Prompt: Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: - CASE: Crime No. 145 of 2021 - DISTRICT: Not available - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available --- Output: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail No. Of 2022 Satwik Singh alias Satyaki Singh …..Applicant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party INDEX Sr. Particulars Page No. No Application for anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. 1. Affidavit in support of application 2. Annexure No. 1 3. The photocopy of the order dated 17.06.2021 passed by this Hon'ble High Court Annexure No. 2 4. The photo/typed copy of the FIR dated 18.04.2021 Annexure No. 3 5. The typed copy of the statement of the arrested accused dated 18.04.2021 Annexure No. 4 6. The photocopy of the GST registration certificate of the applicant’s business Annexure No. 5 7. The photocopy of the order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Hon'ble High Court ID proof of the deponent 8. Power 9. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh “Bisen”) Advocate Dated : .07.2022 Counsel for the applicant Mobile No. 9415288732 AoR No. B/P0262 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2022 Satwik Singh alias Satyaki Singh aged about 27 years son of Shri Abhimanyu Singh resident of 124, Gauradand, Police Station – Antu, District – Pratapgarh ....Applicant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh through its Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Government of U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow .....Opposite Party Case Crime No. 145 of 2021 U/s 272 of I.P.C. U/s 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 Police Station – Antu District – Pratapgarh SECOND APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SECTION 438 Cr. P.C. The applicant most respectfully submits as under:- For the facts and reasons mentioned in accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant the bail to the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 145 of 2021 under Sections 272 of I.P.C. and 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 at Police Station – Antu, District – Pratapgarh, in the interest of Justice. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh “Bisen”) Advocate Dated : .07.2022 Counsel for the applicant Case Crime No. 145 of 2021 U/s 272 of I.P.C. U/s 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 Police Station – Antu District – Pratapgarh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail No. Of 2022 Satwik Singh alias Satyaki Singh …..Applicant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party AFFIDAVIT (In support of anticipatory bail application) I, Satwik Singh alias Satyaki Singh aged about 33 years son of Shri Abhimanyu Singh resident of 124, Gauradand, Police Station – Antu, District – Pratapgarh, Religion – Hindu, Occupation – ?Business, Education – Literate, do hereby solemnly affirm and states on oath as under :- That the deponent is the applicant himself in 1. aforesaid application and as such he is fully conversant with the facts of the case, deposed to hereunder. The photo verification slip issued by the Awadh Bar Association, Lucknow of the deponent is affixed on the affidavit and his ID proof is enclosed with the affidavit. That the concerned police is intended to arrest to 2. the applicant with connection to the First Information Report dated 18.04.2021 lodged by the informant against the applicant and 4 other persons as Case Crime No. 145 of 2021 under Sections 272 of I.P.C. and 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 at Police Station – Antu, District – Pratapgarh. That the applicant, further declared that the 3. first information report lodged by the informant namely Shri Sunil Kumar, Sub Inspector, Police Station - Antu, District – Pratapgarh, under Sections 272 of I.P.C. and 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 which is not fallen under Section 438(6) of Cr.P.C.. That this is the second anticipatory bail 4. application before this Hon'ble Court, which is being filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., before this Hon'ble High Court and no any other anticipatory bail is being before this Hon'ble High Court or at Allahabad or before any other High Court in India, pertaining to the same subject matter. Earlier the applicant has filed another anticipatory bail application bearing No. 4976 (ABAIL) of 2021 has been rejected by this Hon'ble High Court on 17.06.2021. The photocopy of the order dated 17.06.2021 passed by this Hon'ble High Court is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 01 to this application. That the first information report dated 18.04.2021 5. has been lodged by the informant against the applicant and 4 other persons as Case Crime No. 145 of 2021 under Sections 272 of I.P.C. and 60, 63 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 at Police Station – Antu, District – Pratapgarh. The photo/typed copy of the FIR dated 18.04.2021 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 02 to this affidavit. That the case of prosecution in a nutshell as that 6. the informant and his team on patrolling of area on 18.04.2021 and that time the informant got information from his informer (eq[kfcj) regarding manufacturing of the adulterated liquor. That the raid has been conducted by the informant 7. alongwith his team on 18.04.2021 at alleged place of occurrence and seized 50 liter chemical and 200 hundred empty bottle and one accused Madan Lal Verma arrested by the concerned police at the time raid. That at time of arrest, Madan Lal Verma has 8. revealed the name of the applicant to the informant, who has named the applicant in the first information report. That the statement of the opposite party No. 2 was 9. recorded on 18.04.2021 by the investigating officer, in which he repeated the averments of the first information report. That on 18.04.2021, the statement of the arrested 10. accused has also been recorded by the concerned police, in which he has not named anyone as alleged by the opposite party No. 2 in his first information report. The typed copy of the statement of the arrested accused dated 18.04.2021 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 03 to this affidavit. That the real fact of the incident is that the 11. applicant is falsely implicated by the concerned police for showing their good work and also for extraneous reasons. That there is no concerned with the said 12. allegation regarding illegal adulterated liquor as alleged by the informant against the applicant in any manner. That it is further relevant to mention that the 13. wife of the applicant was contesting the election of BDC in Village Panchayat Election held in 2021. That one Deshraj, who was contesting the election 14. of Block Pramukh and met with the applicant and requested to support in his election after winning the election of BDC. The applicant has denied for same hence Deshraj become annoyed. That due to aforesaid reasons for building 15. pressure upon the applicant, Deshraj misused the District Administration/ authorities against the applicant lodged the first information report. That in result of the above, the informant falsely 16. implicates the applicant, in the said crime for ulterior motive, which is baseless and illegal as the applicant is not involved in any criminal activity as alleged against him. That the informant falsely implicates the 17. applicant, in the said crime, due to their own personal/political reasons, behest the Deshraj, which is baseless and illegal due to ulterior motive. That nothing has been recovered with regard to 18. adulterated liquor from the applicant’ possession and place in any manner by the informant. That the applicant has no concerned with the 19. recovered liquor from the alleged place by the informant. That it is relevant to mention here that neither 20. any other evidence against the applicant nor there is hope to found by the investigation officer as nothing has been done by the applicant. That the entire case has been made and based 21. against the applicant only on information of the police informer. That the applicant is doing business of building 22. material in the name of M/s Lakshmi Constructions in his village market. The photocopy of the GST registration certificate of the applicant’s business is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 04 to this affidavit. That the applicant is innocent and belongs 23. respected family and the applicant has not involved in any criminal activity ever. That the applicant has no criminal antecedents 24. except the present case. That the applicant is well settled in the Lucknow 25. and running his successful business and resident since long back in District Lucknow and the applicant has no concerned with the alleged liquor as stated by the informant in first information report. That the applicant is named in first information 26. as his father and brother have also named in first information report by the informant due to ulterior motive. That the first information report has been lodged 27. by the Informant against the applicant on the basis of wrong facts and the applicant believed that the concerned police would be arrest the applicant. That in similar sections this Hon'ble High Court 28. granted anticipatory bail to applicant of the Anticipatory Bail No. 7598 of 2022 (Manoj Prabhakar Vs State of U.P. and another) vide order dated 23.09.2021. The photocopy of the order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Hon'ble High Court is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 05 to this application. That if the applicant will arrested, the applicant 29. will suffer irreparable loss and injury as the applicant has not committed any offence. That till date proceeding under Section 82 & 83 of 30. Cr.P.C. has not initiated against the applicant. That there is no chance of the applicant 31. absconding or tempering with the prosecution witnesses. That the applicant is ready to furnished the 32. security and bond and also undertake that he will be never misused liberty of anticipatory bail. That in view of the above, it would be expedient 33. and necessary in the interest of justice that the applicant be enlarged on anticipatory bail, during pendency of case. Lucknow Date: .07.2022 Deponent VERIFICATION I, the deponent, do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are true to my personal knowledge. No part of its is false and nothing material has been concealed. So, help me “GOD”. Lucknow Date : .07.2022 Deponent I, identify the deponent and do hereby declare that the person making this affidavit and alleging himself to be the deponent is known to me from the perusal of papers and I am satisfied that he is the same person as per identity shown by him. Advocate Solemnly affirmed before me on at A.M./P.M. by the deponent, named above, who has been identified by Sri P. K. Singh “Bisen”, Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrolment No. 2933/2003 resident of “Narsinghpur House”, 25 Preet Vihar Colony, Raibareli Road, Lucknow. I, have satisfied myself by examining the deponent that he understands the contents of this affidavit, which have been read over and explained by me. OATH COMMISSIONER IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH, LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail No. Of 2022 Satwik Singh alias Satyaki Singh …..Applicant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh ....Opposite Party Type copy of the annexure No. 18-04-2021 c;ku vfHk;qDr & vfHk0 enu oekZ iq= clUryky oekZ mez 34 o’kZ fuoklh xzke c.Mk[kqVkj] Fkkuk vUrw tuin izrkix< ls eqdnek mijksDr ds ckcr iwNus ij viuk tqeZ Lohdkj djrs gq, viuk lQkbZ vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls U;k;k0 esa nsuk crk jgk gSA