Prompt: Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: - CASE: Crime No. 69 of 2021 - DISTRICT: Pratapgarh - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available --- Output: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH : LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2023 Manish Singh aged about 35 years son of Hari Narayan Singh resident of Village – Muraini Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh .....Accused/Applicant (In jail since 26.05.2020) Versus State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Civil Secretariat, Government of U.P., Lucknow ......Opposite Party Crime No. :69 of 2021 Under Section : 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station :Sangramgarh District :Pratapgarh Bail rejected by Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge(Gangster) Room no- 2, Pratapgarh on 10.01.2023 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.P.C. For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble may kindly be pleased to enlarge the applicant on bail, in connection with Case Crime No. 69 of 2021 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (in Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh during the pendency of his trial, in the interest of justice. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) Advocate Date: 16.01.2023 Counsel for the Applicant IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2023 Crime No. :69 of 2021 Under Section : 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station : Sangramgarh District :Pratapgarh Bail rejected by Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge(Gangster) Room no- 2, Pratapgarh on 10.01.2023 Manish Singh .....Applicant (In jail since 26.05.2020) Versus State of U.P. ....Opposite Party AFFIDAVIT (In support of first bail application) I, Hari Narayan Singh aged about 62 years son of Shri Sangam Singh resident of Village – Muraini, Dhangarh, Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, Religion – Hindu, Occupation – Agriculture, Qualification – Literate, do hereby solemnly affirm and states on oath as under, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under :- That the deponent is the father/pairokar of the 1. applicant and duly authorized by the applicant to doing pairavi and file the aforesaid application before this Hon'ble Court and as such he is fully conversant with the facts of the case and deposed as under: That the photo of the deponent is being pasted on 2. the first page of this affidavit and photocopy of ID proof of the deponent is being annexed with this affidavit. That this is first bail of the applicant filed 3. before this Hon’ble Court and no other bail application on same cause of action is filed or pending in any court of law. That on 09.04.2021 at about 20.25 Hours, the 4. informant Shri Ashutosh Kumar Tripathi, In charge Inspector, Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh lodged a first information report against 06 persons including the applicant at Case Crime No. 69 of 2021 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to ‘Gangster Act’) in Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh. The photo and typed copy of the first information report dated 09.04.2021 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 1 to this affidavit. That brief fact of the alleged prosecution story 5. is that the applicant along with his companions is the active member of the a gang, who is committing the offences in organized manner regularly as they are habitual, for their economic benefit and due to their terror no one can dare to speak against them. That prior to lodging the aforesaid case crime 6. against the applicant, the gang chart has been approved by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh on 03.04.2021. The photo and typed copy of the gang chart is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 2 to this affidavit. That the Gang chart prepared on the basis of case 7. crime no. 79 of 2020 under sections- 302,307, 308, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 147 of I.P.C., at Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh, in which applicant granted bail on 22.12.2022 by this Hon’ble court. (Crl.misc.case.no. 13283(B) of 2022) Manish Singh versus State of U.P. is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 3 to this affidavit. That for proper adjudication of the case it is 8. submitted that the applicant is totally innocent and does not commit any offence as alleged in the first information report by the informant. That the informant in order to showing his good 9. and hard work, falsely implicate the applicant in some case crimes, which are pending before him and thereafter finally lodged the said first information report dated 09.04.2021 under Section 2/3 of Gangster Act:- Case Crime No. 27 of 2009 under sections 9.i. 323+ of I.P.C. and 3(i)x S.c.S.t Act, at Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh, in which order passed by juvenile justice board Pratapgarh dated 14.12.2021 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 4 to this affidavit. That the case crime no. 139 of 2009 9.ii. under section 110-g Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh, proceeding is lapse of time. That the case crime no. 290 of 2009 9.iii. under section 110-g Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh, proceeding is lapse of time. Case Crime No. 79 of 2020 under 9.iv. sections- 302,307, 308, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 147 of I.P.C., at Police Station – Sangramgarh, District – Pratapgarh, in which applicant granted bail on 22.12.2022 by this Hon’ble court. (Crl.misc.case.no. 13283(B) of 2022) Manish Singh versus State of U.P. That the case crime no. 434 of 2022 under 9.v. section- 506 of I.P.C. Police Station- Kotwali city that the above case till today not to judicial remand of the applicant. N.C.R no. 81 of 2011 under section - 9.vi. 323, 504, 506, 427, of I.P.C. Police Station – Sangramgarh, District- Pratapgarh. That the above case is wrongly mentioned no concern of the applicant. That the accept aforesaid mention case no 10. criminal history. That it is relevant to mention here that the all 11. co-accused of the case crime granted bail by court below. That it is relevant to mention here that the 12. applicant is a poor villager and common man of society. He is neither member of alleged gang as alleged in the first information report nor involve any crime as alleged against him in the gang chart by the informant. He further does not committed any offence for his economical and physical benefit due to which the local area people are under the threat as such allegations against the applicant are false and fabricated. That it is relevant to mention here that the 13. applicant belongs to respected family of society. The applicant is neither member of alleged gang as alleged in the first information report nor involves any crime as alleged against him in the gang chart by the informant. That the applicant does not any committed offence 14. for his economical and physical benefit. The applicant is not convicted previously in any case crime. The allegations against the applicant are false and fabricated. That since the applicant has not committed any 15. offence as alleged, hence no offence under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 relating to Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, is made against him. That it is relevant to mention here that the 16. applicant is in jail since 26.05.2020 without committing any offense. That the applicant had moved his bail application 17. bearing number 10 of 2023 before Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge(Gangster) room no. 2, Pratapgarh and same has been rejected on 10.01.2023. The free certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 10.01.2023 is annexed herewith as Annexure No. 5 to this affidavit. That the applicant will not misuse the liberty of 18. bail if so granted by this Court. That the applicant has no motive to commit the 19. alleged crime and false motive which given in case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned police. That there is no chance of the applicant 20. absconding or tempering with the prosecution witnesses. That the applicant is ready to furnish personal 21. bond and sureties to the entire satisfaction before the court, if the bail is granted to him. That in view of the above, it would be expedient 22. and necessary in the interest of justice that the applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of his trial. Lucknow Date: Deponent VERIFICATION I, the deponent, above named do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are true to my own knowledge. No part of it is false and nothing material fact has been concealed. So help me God. Lucknow Date: Deponent I, identify the deponent, who has I, do hereby declare that the person making this affidavit and alleging herself to be the deponent is known to me from the perusal of papers and I am satisfied that she is the same person. Advocate Solemnly affirmed before me on at a.m. /p.m. by the deponent who has been identified by Sri P. K. Singh “Bisen”, Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrolment No. 2933/2003 resident of “Narsinghpur House”, 25 Preet Vihar Colony, Pratapgarh Road, Lucknow. Mobile No. 9415288732 I have satisfied myself by examining the deponent that he understands the contents of this affidavit, which have been read over and explained by me to him. OATH COMMISSIONER Code: 401507(Minor) GROUP : Bail DISTRICT: Pratapgarh IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2021 Manish Singh ...Accused/Applicant (In jail since 26.05.2020) Versus State of U.P. ....Opposite Party INDEX Sr Particulars Page No No. Index 1. Application for Bail 2. Affidavit in support of bail 3. application Annexure No. 1 4. The certified and typed copy of the first information report dated 09.04.2021 Annexure No. 2 5. The photo and typed copy of the gang chart Annexure No. 3 6. The photocopy of the order passed by the Hon’ble high court Annexure No. 4 7. The photocopy of the order dated 14.12.2021 Annexure No. 5 8. The free certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 10.01.2023 ID proof of the deponent 9. Memo 10. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) Advocate Date: 16.01.2023 Counsel for the Applicant Mobile No. 9415288732 AoR No. B/P0262 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2023 Manish Singh .....Applicant (In jail since 26.05.2020) Versus State of U.P. ....Opposite Party Annexure No.