Prompt: Generate a Bail Application involving the following key legal details: - CASE: Crime No. 370 of 2020 - DISTRICT: Not available - BAIL APPLICATION: Not available --- Output: IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT F JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH : LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2020 Mohammad Iqbal aged about 40 years son of Shri Abdul kamal resident of in front of civil court, subhash nagar Kunda Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. ....Accused- Applicant (In Jail since 20.04.2020) Versus State of U.P. ......Opposite Party Crime No. :370 of 2020 Under Section : 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station :Kunda District :Pratapgarh Bail No. 1655 of 2021 rejected by Additional Session Judge, Room No. 5, Special session judge( Gangster) Pratapgarh on 15.09.2021 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 439 Cr.P.C. For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble may kindly be pleased to enlarge the applicant on bail, in connection with Case Crime No. 370 of 2020 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh during the pendency of his trial, in the interest of justice. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) Advocate Date: 23.09.2021 Counsel for the Applicant IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2020 Crime No. :370 of 2020 Under Section : 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station :Kunda District :Pratapgarh Bail No. 1655 of 2021 rejected by Additional Special Session judge (Gangster) Pratapgarh on 15.09.2021 Mohhamad Iqbal ....Applicant (In Jail since 20.04.2020) Versus State of U.P. ....Opposite Party AFFIDAVIT (In support of first bail application) I, Anand Kumar Smt. Khurshida Bano aged 35 years wife of Iqbal Ahmad resident of resident of in front of civil Court, Subhash Nagar, kunda District – Pratapgarh, Religion – Muslim, Qualification – Literate, Occupation – Housewife, the deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under :- That the deponent is wife of the applicant and 1. doing pairvi of applicant in the above noted case duly authorized by him and as such he is fully conversant with the facts of the case deposed in the instant affidavit. That the photo of the deponent is being pasted on 2. the first page of this affidavit and photocopy of ID proof of the deponent is being annexed with this affidavit. That this is first bail of the applicant filed 3. before this Hon’ble Court and no other bail application on same cause of action is filed or pending in any court of law. That on 02.09.2020 at about 11.41 Hours, the 4. informant Shri Devendra pratap Singh, In-Charge Station House Officer, Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh lodged a first information report against 2 persons including the applicant at Case Crime No. 370 of 2020 under section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to ‘Gangster Act’) in Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. The certified and typed copy of the first information report dated 02.09.2020 is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 1 to this affidavit. That brief fact of the alleged prosecution story 5. is that the applicant along with his companions are the active member of the a gang, who is committing the offences in organized manner regularly as they are habitual, for their economic benefit and due to their terror no one can dare to speak against them. That prior to lodging the aforesaid case crime 6. against the applicant, the gang chart has been approved by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh on 28.08.2020. The photo and typed copy of the gang chart is being annexed herewith as Annexure No. 2 to this affidavit. That for proper adjudication of the case it is 7. submitted that the applicant is totally innocent and does not commit any offence as alleged in the first information report by the informant. That the informant in order to showing his good 8. and hard work, falsely implicate the applicant in several case crimes, which are pending before him and thereafter finally lodged the said first information report dated 02.09.2020 under Section 2/3 of Gangster Act mentioning the Two cases mentioned below:- Case Crime No. 112 of 2020 under Sections 8.i. 307,504,506 IPC and 4/5 of explosive act , at Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. In which the applicant has granted bail by this Hon'ble High Court on 19.11.2020. Case Crime No. 365 of 2019 under 8.ii. Sections 3/25 of Arms act , at Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, in which the applicant has granted bail by the Additional Chif judicial magistrate on 31.10.2019. That it is relevant to mention here that apart 9. from above cases, the applicant has been also falsely implicated in below mentioned case crimes, which are as under: Case Crime No. 817 of 2014 under Sections, a. 396, 302, 201, 412, 34 of IPC, related to Police Station – Munshiganj, District – Amethi, in which the applicant has been enlarged on bail by this Hon'ble High Court. Case Crime No. 193 of 2014 under Sections, b. 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, related to Police Station – Kotwali, District – Sultanpur, in which the applicant has been enlarged on bail by this Hon'ble High Court. Case Crime No. 175 of 2016 under Section c. 110G of Cr.P.C.. related to, Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. The aforesaid case is not comes under the criminal history category. Case Crime No. 215 of 2016 under Sections d. 2/3 U.P. Gunda Act related to Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh. The photocopy of Bail orders is being Annexed herewith as Annexure No.3 to this affidavit. That it is relevant to mention here that the 10. applicant is neither member of alleged gang as alleged in the first information report nor involved any crime as alleged against him in the gang chart by the informant. He further does not committed any offence for his economical and physical benefit due to which the local area people are under the threat as such allegations against the applicant are false and fabricated. That after arresting the applicant in connection 11. with Case Crime No. 112 of 2020 under Sections 307,504,506 and 4/5 of Explosive Substance Act,1908 , at Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, the concerned police falsely implicated the applicant. That it is relevant to mention here that the 12. applicant is a labour and a sole earner of family, as he is in the jail since 20.04.2020 the family is facing trouble for survival That the applicant does not any committed offence 13. for his economical and physical benefit. The applicant is not convicted previously in any case crime. The allegations against the applicant are false and fabricated. That since the applicant has not committed any 14. offence as alleged, hence no offence under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 relating to Police Station – Kunda, District – Pratapgarh, is made against him. That it is relevant to mention here that the 15. applicant is in jail since 20.04.2020 without committing any offense and the applicant is not convicted previously by any competent court of law. That the applicant had moved his bail application 16. bearing number 1655 of 2021 before the Bail rejected by Additional Special Session judge (Gangster) Pratapgarh on 15.09.2021, and same has been rejected on 15.09.2020. The free certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 15.09.2020 is annexed herewith as Annexure No. 4 to this affidavit. That the another accused of the case crime namely 17. Hashim khan is in jail. That the applicant will not misuse the liberty of 18. bail if so granted by this Court. That the applicant has no motive to commit the 19. alleged crime and false motive which given in case, is cooked and fabricated by the concerned police. That there is no chance of the applicant 20. absconding or tempering with the prosecution witnesses. That the applicant is ready to furnish personal 21. bond and sureties to the entire satisfaction before the court, if the bail is granted to him. That in view of the above, it would be expedient 22. and necessary in the interest of justice that the applicant be enlarged on bail during pendency of his trial. Lucknow Date : 23.09.2021 Deponent VERIFICATION I, the deponent, above named do hereby verify that the contents of para 1 to of this affidavit are true to my own knowledge. No part of it is false and nothing material fact has been concealed. So help me God. Lucknow Date : 23.09.2021 Deponent I, identify the deponent, who has I, do hereby declare that the person making this affidavit and alleging herself to be the deponent is known to me from the perusal of papers and I am satisfied that she is the same person. Advocate Solemnly affirmed before me on at a.m./p.m. by the deponent who has been identified by Sri P. K. Singh “Bisen”, Advocate, High Court, Lucknow, Bench, Lucknow. Enrolment No. 2933/2003 resident of “Narsinghpur House”, 25 Preet Vihar Colony, Raiberelly Road, Lucknow. Mobile No. 9415288732 I have satisfied myself by examining the deponent that he understands the contents of this affidavit, which have been read over and explained by me to him. OATH COMMISSIONER Code : 401507(Minor) GROUP : Bail DISTRICT : Raiberelly IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2020 Anuj Yadav ....Applicant (In Jail since 09.02.2020) Versus State of U.P. ....Opposite Party INDEX Sr Particulars Page No No. Index 1. Application for Bail 2. Affidavit in support of bail 3. application Annexure No. 1 4. The photo and typed copy of the first information report dated 02.09.2020 Annexure No. 2 5. The photo and typed copy of the gang chart Annexure No. 3 6. The photocopy of the order dated 19.11.2020 passed by this Hon'ble High Court Annexure No. 4 7. The photocopy of the order dated 05.10.2020 passed by the court concerned Annexure No. 5 8. The photocopy of the order dated 05.10.2020 passed by the court concerned Annexure No. 6 9. The photocopy of the order dated 20.06.2020 passed by court concerned Annexure No. 7 10. The photocopy of the order dated 24.06.2020 passed by court concerned Annexure No. 8 11. The free certified copy of the bail rejection order dated 26.11.2020 ID proof of the deponent 12. Memo 13. E-court fee receipt 14. Lucknow (Pradeep Kumar Singh ‘Bisen’) Advocate Date: 04.12.2020 Counsel for the Applicant Mobile No. 9415288732 AoR No. B/P0262 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLHABAD LUCKNOW BENCH: LUCKNOW Crl. Misc. Case No. (B) Of 2020 Anuj Yadav Versus State of U.P. Annexure No. 24-06-2020 vfHk;qDr vuqt ;kno dh vksj ls ;g izkFkZuk i= vijk/k la[;k 86@20 v0 /kkjk 3@25 , ,DV Fkkuk dksrokyh uxj ls lacaf/kr izdj.k esa tekur izkFkZuk i= fn;k x;k gSA izkFkZuk i= ds ifjis{; esa vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks lquk o izi=ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA vfHk;qDr fnukad 10-02-2020 ls ftyk dkjkxkj esa fu:) gSA vijk/k dh oLrqfLFkfr o ekeys ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vk/kkj tekur i;kZIr gSA vr% vfHk;qDr mijksDr ds }kjk eqcfyc chl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur rFkk leku /kujkf”k dh ih0 ch0 nkf[ky djus ij] mls tekur ij fjgk fd;k tk,A izHkkjh eq[; U;k;f;d eftLVªsV jk;cjsyhA