Datasets:

RuyuanWan

/

Politeness_Disagreement

like 0

Hello, I noticed you recently did a lot of work on the ''<url>'' page. I was wondering if you know of the origin of the word "Nassarius" - its etymology/ what is it named after?

I have just noticed that today a Wikipedia administrator added a POV tag in the u201cPsychohistoryu201d article, which you have contributed to edit. Perhaps someone should do a little work to balance the article and remove the tag?

So far so good? Drop me an email sometime, ok?

Hello again. Could you move this to <url>, please?

Ok with you if I play white? I suck so I should go first....and, if you don't agree I will crush you like a mag.... whoa power rush..... Anyway ok with you?

I saw your comment on Jimbo's talk page about plagiarism and copyleft. Would you have time to have a look at <url> and <url> (where most of the discussion has taken place)?

The flag "visible=yes" means a comment on the page is made visible, not that the page is visible in search engines. Why did you remove flag?

As for restoring the image, no I will not. Did you consider that you are asking me to put up an image for which I know the "fair use" claim to be bogus, and that this is illegal?

Hey, I found <url> and at around 1:10, I think I can see the Backstreet Boys holding platinum discs (or double platinum, I'm not sure) for Backstreet's Back and Millennium. Can you please verify and is it possible to use this as a source for adding South African certifications?

So you're interested in both Amiga computers and BDSM! Are you an atheist too?

Wikipedia is not the place for new information. How would we know if it was true or not if someone credible hasn't verified it?

<url>. Or is it just me?

This is what you wrote: "In the book 'Inventing Elliot' written by Graham Gardener, the book, 1948 is mentioned numerous times." What book, 1948??

I started, but gave up. And why link the word 'mother'?

It seems you have been investigating this administrator and have brought up several incidents in your evidence based on that. If possible, could you please link to the feedback that Dreadstar has received as an administrator during/after each of those incidents (and if there was no feedback to any of those incidents, could you please let me know in reply to this)?

You make it very hard to believe that you're acting in good faith when you rewrite the <url> article to remove all references to "liberal," but keep the phrase "conservative Independence Institute." I see POV-pushing when that happens. If you're so concerned about adjectives, why not edit the articles about AEI or Heritage or Americans for Tax Reform?

I have, and they have not responded in one week. How long should I give it?

Thanks for your reply. So just to clarify then, you are happy with the number of references, but you just need me to convert each of them into ref/footnote format, and then the article is GA-ready, is that correct?

Huh? Who the hell are you?

I noticed that you are the major contributor to the articles. Mind if I nominate <url> at <url>?

Happy belated birthday to you too! How have you been?

Please stop mentioning my name in relation to FW. <url> How many times do I have to ask?

Without making a comment on the underlying coverage of the site being down, your edit comment <url> indicates a <url> violation. Under what logic do you propose that you have authority to set policy over the article?

Thank you. Do you have any tips on the Kathy Dunderdale article to improve it?

Hi. The original link (http://www.lgso.org.uk/index.htm) gives a 404 error, but the amended URL (http://www.lgso.org.uk/) works for me, so why do you say it's still dead?

Sure. I have to warn you, though, the file size advantage has pretty much been lost since SVG font rendering went the way of the dinosaurs :) Do you make a point of having the border, or can I leave it out?

OK then. What's your problem with putting this in the lead : "is one of the <url> counties of the <url> and " ?

Hello. Can you help me create a map of Isabela which reflects the 3D map?

Hi, I wsa just noticing that in <url>, players such as Tommy Walsh and Paul O'Connor have appeared under 'T' and 'P' respectively, rather than 'W' and 'O'. How should that be fixed?

Im sorry to see that you withdrew. Maybe next time?

Hi Cmadler, I've written a new ALT hook at the <person> that I think addresses your concerns. Could you sign off on the nomination?

The image is only used on ONE page - the site of the film. What is the problem here, and how does it violate wikipedia policy?

Thanks for blocking this user -- he promptly erased the warnings on his talk page (I put them back). I guess a block doesn't automatically block the talk page, huh?

I wasn't sure whether you were actually reading anything because facts seem to bounce off of you like bullets off of Superman. And you accuse ''me'' of fantasies?

The Hitchin-related hoax claims by <url> seem to have led to a rather precipitate response, considering that he has only been an editor for a few days. Is there something going on here that isn't obvious?

One to go. Shouldn't "now welcome" be "not welcome"?

Hi, I just couldn't understand <url> ! Could you explain,please ?

What "fact" that was recently prooved is referred to? And since when is pi the ratio of circumference to radius, rather than circumference to diameter?

I hope Ed's doesn't look like mine. Wait--what is this navbar we're talking about?

During your RFA you stated that you would be helping deal with the Scibaby situation after Raul stopped doing it. Do you feel that you've done what you said you were going to do?

Yes, that was really necessary. What's wrong with establishing uniformity in CASH articles?

"''Images with iconic status or historical importance: As subjects of commentary.''". Listen, it's just trivial to look up, could you take the care of actually reading these policies before arguing over them?

So, is the template too much? Should I add it to all articles contained within the template?

Thanks for the infomative reply -- I wasn't really questioning your putting the image in the infobox; appearance-wise I don't think it makes much difference. It is better, though, I think, to have the thumbnail indicator -- Is it possible to have that inside the infobox?

Blocked, templated. Next?

I'm in Japan timezone - and at work now - and most IRC is totally blocked through work proxies. Can we do a weekend?

I noticed your "Original Research" notation for the section on weights and measures in the article in Liberia. Could you explain in more detail your concern and how it might be remedied?

You lived next to her? What did you do wrong?

I received a message from the bot you run telling me that one of two duplicate files I uploaded is due for speedy deletion. If possible, could it be made that Bath_badge.png is the one that is deleted, rather than Bath_rugby_badge.png please?

Sorry for the late reply, but I usually check new additions from the bottom of the page, not the top. What is your disappointment regarding?

Hello - some of your writing is a bit hard to understand. Is English your first language, out of curiousity?

Regarding <url>, <url>, <url>, <url>, <url> and <url>, may I redirect them? Should I leave the merge tag on the talk page?

Hi! What would you like help with in particular?

I notice you are still contributing to Wikipedia, but have not responded to my argument. Do you now agree with the argument I suggested?

You also say that I am participating in a high-tech lynching. Isn't that what you did when you put SamuraiClinton on RFA?

But ATT is a re-statement of NOR and V. We don't need a re-statement of them and then call it RS. What would be the point?

Hi there, you entered info in the bio of <url>, saying he is related to <url>. Do you have any more info on the specific relationship, and also how they were related to <url> ?

I will find religious advocacy statements. You don't understand, or disagree, that medical issues are over emphasized in the circumcision article?

Hello??? Are you just pretending I don't exist?

I have to protest that I find it rather meaningless to present arguments on the talk page for edits which are then blankly reverted by the likes of User:Historicar without explanation or discussion. Any suggestions for a more formal process or other remedies?

The file clearly states this is an image from a poster. Since when does this require any additional explanation?

Sounds good to me. Shall we have a straw poll on it?

Thanks. Any idea how I log into this account?

PS do you really think that attrition is a degeneration? Surely it's the norm?

Thank you for removing the "Speedy Deletion" from my post. I realise that I still need to do more work on the post itself, but are the sources that I am using acceptable?

Let me know when's convenient and I'll put the kettle on. Tea or coffee?

I don't think I'll have the time to keep the flies off it all week but I'll have a go (I might get around to incorporating Caitlin Moran's detailed reviews too). Could you not semi it as well?

I've had enough of this. What would you think about filing a RfC?

Do you live in the US? How excited are people about the album?

Re your e-mail, there is info there which is not on my talk page. May I add it to my talk page, or would you prefer it stayed off?

I've steadily become more interested in getting this article up to FA, but I'm having trouble finding sources that actually analyze ''contemporary R&B'' instead of the entire <url> genre. Do you have any advice or would you be interested in working on it together?

Hi, thanks for your help. There is also this sentence "Asukkaista 84,5% oli ruotsinkielisixe4 ja 15,4% suomenkielisixe4 vuonna 1970 ja kunta oli kaksikielinen." What does it mean, please?

I'm always behind the times. PS- When did you guys decide to ''remove'' the Quebecois nation resolution from that article's introduction?

Hi, I see that you added the etymology section of the <url> article. What does "RatCE" mean?

Thanks for your input. Would you mind voicing your opinion in the GMC's talk page?

Thanks for offer of help on IRC - terminology completely baffling to me (not helped by freenode instructions written as if translated through several languages into final english) - just which channel are admins supposed to log into, and how does one register when it seems by invitation only. Finally what on earth is a cloak ?

Alternatively, maybe the second column could be '''Country of origin''' and Rosen could simply be denoted USA/Poland, while Pillsbury would be USA/USA, without his US State being mentioned - it would be less confusing I think. Any thoughts?

Hi MariAna, there are just a couple of outstanding issues with the article. Could you have a look at them so I can get the GA closed in the next few days?

The PressTV references in Wikipedia's "Turkey-PKK Conflict" article are not the same, but the titles are wrong. If you have time, can you correct the titles?

I think if we did it that way, it would add a lot of possibilities to the page, enabling us to give breakdowns of other wars and major events in separate tables as well, in addition to alternative listings, which I think would be quite useful. Because there are a lot of events with different aspects to them that could be covered in more detail IMO, what do you think?

Thanks Bro, it is better to ask is the stead of jumping out and getting a disgruntled Admin on my back. And why would you continualy :: bludgeon yourself over the head with your keyboard when you have my jokes?

I'd like to try it out at FAC, after Friday. Would you be willing to co-nom?

It's not that, it's just feels ... wrong. An admin especially should be accountable for all his dealings, so why delete the history?

Okay, so yeah, it's possible that that's his intent, but I even if it were, I don't see why the file has less value. Are interviews with BLP subjects not considered valid EL's general?

Except for the one about the Chevrolet Monza bit at the middle which came from the Prototype book, was in fact come from the Brumos website, but the last time I read that was back in February 2001. Also is with the referencing, the page is now a total mess, is there a way that could be sorted out, I would be very thankful if you could help?

Cool, Thanks, do you want to add it to their list? or can I?

Thank you for contacting me, the history has been restored given the link you provided. Would you mind assisting with sourcing of the article so that it complies with <url> policy?

Listen, the reason I put those signs in the code 'break-clear' is because the arrangement of the blocks is ''off-key'', at least when looking through IE or Mozilla. Why are you taking them off?

Oh and you seem to have deleted half of the stuff on <url> ... I presume this was a mistake?

I think I lot of the things on the Methuselah page are very interesting, but perhaps should be transferred to the Biblical Generations article, if they touch on more than just Methuselah. Would you agree?

One more thing. How is the policy of "you're not allowed to block someone for personally attacking you" unworkable?

Re: <url>: if it's eligible for Did You Know, it's by definition not a stub. Cool?

I'm not going to get involved in the content dispute. But I'm pleased to see you finally taking this seriously: its no longer ''all in good fun'', perhaps?

I've nominated a biology-type article, <url>, at <url>. Would you be interested in reviewing it?

Are you saying that you have a close or imtimate relationship with N.I.?

I had an editorial dispute with a user called <url><, but I'm not responding to him anymore as it seems to escalate into heated arguments. If he keeps messaging, would it be ok if I got back in touch with you and you had a word with him?

Well, I fully agree with the three rationales Lumos has given above; and so evidently do about half the Wikipedians who have contributed to the RfC Lumos has cited. If so many think that such links can be useful and appreciated, why does it matter so much to you that they should be eradicated?

Hello, again. Would you care to intervene at <url>?

Thanks for the note about my work on the above line. Would you mind if I copied and pasted your version over to mine to work on?

Thanks for your help on this, it's much appreciated. Should I delete my request for checkuser?