Rules of the Superior Courts (Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments) 2017
Statutory Instruments
Source: Statutory Instruments

num: 1
paragraphs: (1) These Rules, which may be cited as the Rules of the Superior Courts (Jurisdiction, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments) 2017, shall come into operation on the 1st day of November 2017.
(2) These Rules shall be construed together with the Rules of the Superior Courts.
(3) The Rules of the Superior Courts as amended by these Rules may be cited as the Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 to 2017.
num: 2
paragraphs: The Rules of the Superior Courts are amended:
(i) by the substitution for sub-rules (4), (5) and (6) of rule 23 of Order 42A of the following sub-rules:
“(4) The following applications to the Court concerning a judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) shall be made:
(a) where no proceedings concerning the judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) have already been commenced before the Court, by originating notice of motion to the Court entitled “In the matter of Regulation No. 1215/2012” and grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party, or
(b) where proceedings concerning the same judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) have already been commenced before the Court, by motion on notice in those proceedings, grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party:
(i) an application pursuant to Article 45 of Regulation No. 1215/2012 for refusal of recognition;
(ii) an application pursuant to Article 46 of Regulation No. 1215/2012 for refusal of enforcement; or
(iii) an application on the grounds set out in Article 38 of Regulation No. 1215/2012 to suspend proceedings before the Court.
(5) An application to the Court for a decision under Article 36.2 of Regulation No. 1215/2012 that there are no grounds for refusal of recognition of a judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) may be made:
(a) where no proceedings concerning the judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) have already been commenced before the Court, by originating motion ex parte to the Court entitled “In the matter of Regulation No. 1215/2012” and grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party; or
(b) where proceedings concerning the same judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) have already been commenced before the Court, by motion ex parte in those proceedings, grounded upon an affidavit sworn by or on behalf of the moving party,
provided that the Court may, upon the hearing of any such application ex parte, if it considers it necessary in the interests of justice, direct that the application be made on notice to the judgment debtor concerned or, as the case may be, on notice to the opposing party in the proceedings mentioned in paragraph (b).
(6) Save where the Court, being satisfied as to the urgency of the application, otherwise permits, copies of any originating notice of motion or notice of motion and affidavit referred to in sub-rule (4) (and any exhibits to that affidavit) shall be served by the moving party (a) not later than seven days before the date fixed for the hearing of the originating notice of motion or notice of motion, on the opposing party or person by or against whom enforcement is sought and (b) on such other person or persons as the Court may direct.
(7) A party or (in the case of an authentic instrument) person who can demonstrate his or her entitlement to the benefit of a judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement referred to in sub-rule (2) shall be at liberty to apply to the proper officer in the Central Office to cause particulars of the judgment, authentic instrument or court settlement to be entered in the books kept for the purpose set out in Order 41, rule 6 in the like manner as is provided for in Order 41, rule 6 in relation to domestic judgments. For the avoidance of doubt, such a person shall not be obliged to apply to the proper officer for this purpose.”