RiteeshGrandhi/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
    \begin{tabular}{lccccccccc|c}
        \toprule
        & stable & stable & valid & unique & valency & atom  & bond & bond & bond & time \\
        & mol $\%_\uparrow$ & atom$\%_\uparrow$ & $\%_\uparrow$ & $\%_\uparrow$ & ${W_{1}}_\downarrow$ & $\mathrm{TV}_{\downarrow}$ & $\mathrm{TV}_{\downarrow}$ & len ${W_{1}}_\downarrow$ & ang ${W_{1}}_\downarrow$ & s/mol.$\downarrow$ \\
        \midrule
        \emph{data}       & 98.7 & 99.8 & 98.9  & 99.9 & .001 & .003 & .000 & .000 & .120 & -\\
        \midrule                    
        EDM        & 97.9 & 99.8 & 99.0  & 98.5 & .011 & .021 & .002 & .001 & .440 & 0.54 \\
        GeoLDM     & 97.5 & 99.9 & 100. & 98.0 & .005 & .017 & .003 & .007 & .435 & 0.65 \\
        VoxMol     & 89.3 & 99.2 & 98.7 & 92.1 & .023 & .029 & .009 & .003 & 1.96 & 0.83\\       
        \midrule        
        $FuncMol_{dec}$ & 88.6 & 99.2 & 100. & 81.1 & .022 & .066 & .032 & .006 & 1.21 & 0.55\\
        
        $FuncMol$ & \makecell{{89.2}\\\tiny{($\pm$.4)}} & \makecell{{99.0}\\\tiny{($\pm$.07)}} & \makecell{{100.}\\\tiny{($\pm$0)}} & \makecell{{92.8}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.3)}} & \makecell{{.021}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.001)}} & \makecell{{.012}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.001)}} & \makecell{{.006}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.003)}} & \makecell{{.005}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.009)}} & \makecell{{1.56}\\\tiny{($\pm$0.06)}} & 0.55\\
        \bottomrule  
    \end{tabular}}    
\end{adjustbox}
\caption{Table 1: QM9 results w.r.t. test set for 10000 samples per model. $\uparrow$/$\downarrow$ indicate that higher/lower numbers are better. The row \textit{data} are randomly sampled molecules from the validation set. We report 1-sigma error bars over 3 sampling runs.}
\end{table}