RiteeshGrandhi/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
\toprule
    \multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{\textsc{GPT-NeoX (20B)}}} &  \multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{\textsc{Bigscience-Bloom (176B)}}} \\
    \cmidrule(lr){2-4}\cmidrule(lr){5-7}
    \textbf{\makecell[c]{Style\\Directions}} & \textbf{Appropriateness} & \textbf{Style Strength} & \textbf{Semantic Correct.} & \textbf{Appropriateness} & \textbf{Style Strength} & \textbf{Semantic Correct.}\\
   \cmidrule(lr){1-1}\cmidrule(lr){2-4}\cmidrule(lr){5-7}
    $H_1 \rightarrow B$ & 0.98 (0.06) & 0.88 (0.26) & 0.80 & 0.96 (0.15) & 0.82 (0.33) & 0.78\\
    $H_1 \rightarrow H_2$ & 0.97 (0.06) & 0.69 (0.31) & 0.87 & 0.96 (0.08) & 0.81 (0.23) & 0.76\\
    $B \rightarrow H_1$ & 1 (0.02) & 0.86 (0.12) & 0.95 & 0.98 (0.08) & 0.75 (0.27) & 0.87\\
    $B \rightarrow H_2$ & 0.97 (0.05) & 0.90 (0.08) & 0.99 & 0.97 (0.14) & 0.91 (0.08) & 0.89\\
    \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{adjustbox}
\caption{Table 6: Inter-annotator agreement scores for the three human evaluation tasks. Standard deviations over all data points are shown in brackets for the style strength and appropriateness evaluation tasks. The detailed procedure for calculating the agreement scores can be found in Appendix 2.}
\end{table}