RiteeshGrandhi/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{cc|cl|cl|clc}
\toprule
& 
& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Pointpillars} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Centerpoint} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Transfusion} \\
Aug. & Metrics                    & \small{LiDAR}       & \small{$\uparrow$BEVFusion}         & \small{LiDAR}       & \small{$\uparrow$BEVFusion}        & \small{LiDAR}   & \small{$\uparrow$BEVFusion}    & \small{LC}    \\ \midrule
&{mAP}                            & 12.7        & 34.3 (+21.6)       & 31.3        & 40.2 (+8.9)       & 34.6    & 40.8 (+6.2)   & 38.1  \\
&NDS                           & 36.6        & 49.1 (+12.5)       & 50.7        & 54.3 (+3.6)       & 53.6    & 56.0 (+2.4)   & 55.4  \\                  \midrule
\checkmark &{mAP}   & -           & 41.6 (+28.9)       & -           & 54.0 (+22.7)      & -       & 50.3 (+15.7)  & 37.2  \\ 
\checkmark &NDS                     & -           & 51.9 (+15.3)       & -           & 61.6 (+10.9)      & -       & 57.6 (+4.0)   & 51.1  \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{adjustbox}
\caption{Table 4: \textbf{Results on robustness setting of object failure cases. }
{Here, we report the results of baseline and our method that trained on the \nus{} dataset with and without the proposed robustness augmentation (Aug.). All settings are the same as in \tabref{tab:range}. }}
\end{table}