RiteeshGrandhi/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
Conclusions
Education of DOHaD concepts through an undergraduate programme or a similar intense programme can be easily achieved due to susceptible nature of the participants. Yet, creating available conditions to translate fundamental DOHaD concepts for general public with health care workers, policymakers and researchers is urgently needed for the health of future generations. Knowledge about DOHaD, counselling on DOHaD in practice settings and impact of DOHaD on health have been identified as the three themes that should be considered in translating DOHaD in practice.
Supplemental Information
1. The document “Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and ICC of the DOHaD Awareness Scale.docx” highlights the scale’s strong reliability and validity across health and nutrition sub-factors.

2. The document “Item total statistics.docx” outlines item-total statistics, demonstrating the scale’s strong internal consistency and the contribution of each item to its reliability.

3. The document “Education topics.docx” outlines health and nutrition education topics, including fetal programming, DOHaD components, and the Turkish Dietary Guidelines, along with a Q&A session.

4. The document “Comparison of DOHaD Awareness Scale Scores measured at pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention, and 6 months after intervention.docx” demonstrates the developments in DOHaD awareness following educational interventions.
Figure 1: Comparison of component scores of HEI-2015 measured during pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention and 6 months after intervention.
In HEI-2015, a higher score indicates a higher diet quality. The Friedman test indicated significant differences in the component scores of HEI-2015 between pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention and 6 months after intervention values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

  Download full-size image
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18669/fig-1
Figure 2: Comparison of physical activity duration of participants recorded at pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention and 6 months after intervention.
The Friedman test indicated significant differences in the average physical activity duration (min/day) between pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention and 6 months after intervention values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

  Download full-size image
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18669/fig-2
EFA factor loadings.
Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and ICC of the DOHaD Awareness scale.
Anthropometric measurement of participants before, 6 weeks after and 6 months after intervention.
Comparison of DOHaD Awereness Scale Scores measured at pre-intervention, 6 weeks after intervention and 6 months after intervention.
GEE analysis results: model fit indices and correlation structures.
The effect of time, anthropometric measurements, and HEI-2015 score on DOHaD awareness scale scores.