RiteeshGrandhi/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
Conclusion
Meta-analyses of exercise interventions for mild cognitive impairment generally exhibit quality levels ranging from “very low” to “low.” Key deficiencies are noted in the registration of preliminary design plans, transparency in the rationale for including specific study types, and the assessment of bias risks that significantly affect the outcomes—most studies fail to meet the requisite standards in these areas. Additionally, the widespread lack of reporting on funding sources could lead to undeclared biases and conflicts of interest, potentially compromising the interpretation and credibility of the findings. Overall, the existing research lacks methodological rigor, and the quality of reporting is notably poor.
Figure 1: PRISMA flow diagram chart for systematic review.

  Download full-size image
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17773/fig-1
Basic characteristics of the literature included in the study.
The quality of AMSTAR2 items for included literatures.