Wikisocion talk:Links
From Wikisocion
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
I don't think that armleg socionics forum will work, because it has 80+ forums.
Machintruc
12:37, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
is there a proper way to indicate that a forum is dead/dying (socionics.com and socionix)
Bionicgoat
13:03, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
Yes. Use the "minus" sign and write that it seems to be dying. (
Admin
13:07, 21 June 2007 (CDT))
I went with "Forum has very little activity recently"... that sounds nicer :)
Bionicgoat
13:15, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
Is socionics.com dead/dying? I never registered there.
Expat
21:20, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
it was the last time I was there... very little/no activity over a two week absence. Socionix is for all purposes dead, we only really trade one liners there now (and even that's pretty much died out)
Bionicgoat
01:32, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
Speaking of the identity of the Admin of armleg socionics forum -- that is Hugo.
Expat
15:33, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Where did he get his information for the forums? Is it generally accessible in English or his own writings/translations? (
Admin
15:55, 23 June 2007 (CDT))
I'd imagine that it's his own writting along with bad machine translations of Russian sites(he was always asking me to translate stuff for him) I haven't looked at it though (and didn't even know it was Hugo's until Expat said something)
Bionicgoat
17:04, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
I just checked it out and it looks as if he's using bad babelfish translations
Bionicgoat
17:49, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, probably of Lytov's paper where he lists all those small groups.
Expat
17:50, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
On his indentity -- he registered with yet another username to PM some people to get them to go to the forum (not me though, obviously), and I've been told.
Expat
18:01, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
just a question of aestetics
which do you guys think looks better?
very active forum on personality type theories but
low emphasis on socionics
or
very active forum on personality type theories but
low emphasis on socionics
personally I think the second one with them on two different lines flows better... does anyone have an objection to changing it?
Bionicgoat
17:18, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
lol OK I guess that's my answer :)
Bionicgoat
17:26, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
added indents to the comments for a better look
Bionicgoat
17:29, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Rick's sites
I assume he was being modest when he wrote the links list. I went ahead and gave socionics.us and his blog a well deserved
for content ;)
Bionicgoat
18:21, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
the16types
If enough people have similar complaints about the16types forum, we can summarize them with a
sign and a comment or two. For example, we could write, "personal insults are not uncommon" or "some users complain of interpersonal intrigue and insults" or something like that. (
Admin
05:57, 4 July 2007 (CDT))
ha, that might even attract some people to the forum!
Expat
06:30, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
the rough part is how do we determine this. To me it just looks like one pissed ex-members opinion. Honestly I don't see where the 16t forum is worse than any other internet forum in this respect, which to me would have to be the case for it to get a special negative mention.
Bionicgoat
20:14, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
That's fine. I'm not necessarily advocating a negative comment, but if 'enough' people have similar complaints (here we would want to look at the opinion of people who don't participate there), we could summarize them here. (
Admin
00:54, 6 July 2007 (CDT))
cool... I guess this is this the part where we say "speak up people!"
Bionicgoat
01:44, 6 July 2007 (CDT)
"Because of the free nature of the forum, the intertype relations are easy to follow."
Haha, very funny.
Thehotelambush
00:13, 22 July 2007 (BST)
Retrieved from "
http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Wikisocion_talk:Links&oldid=7426
"
Views
Project page
Discussion
View source
History
Personal tools
127.0.0.1
Talk for this IP address
Log in / create account
Navigation
Wikisocion home
Community
Events calendar
Recent changes
Random page
Help
Search
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
This page was last modified on 4 March 2010, at 01:30.
This page has been accessed 2,650 times.
Content is available under
the GNU FDL
.
Privacy policy
About Wikisocion
Disclaimers