Toggle Light / Dark / Auto color theme
Toggle table of contents sidebar
Philosophy
¶
Socionics is itself a kind of philosophical system whose terminology can
be used to describe key differences between schools of thought and to
summarize the key features of many cultural, societal, and political
phenomena. The
information aspects
are
probably the most convenient tool for this kind of analysis.
Socionic logic and philosophy
¶
When knowledge is accumulated and recorded in fields of science and
technology, a logical emphasis develops. This means that information is
expressed primarily through the use of the
element
of
logic
. Within science and technology, however, you will find
fields and sub-fields where either
extraverted logic
or
introverted logic
dominate (and sometimes other aspects as
well):
When
dominates, attention is primarily focused on
accurately describing facts, developing an empirical foundation, and
testing hypotheses.
When
dominates, attention is primarily focused on
structuring information, analyzing methodology, and producing
theoretical explanations.
Whenever a field leans too far in the direction of one of these
approaches, it attracts criticism: too much
- for a lack
of theoretical development and overarching explanations, and too much
- for a lack of empiricism and testable hypotheses. One
approach focuses on the logic of external, factual reality, while the
other focuses on the internal logic of ideas and explanations
themselves.
Within
personality psychology
, the
approach is represented by the “trait” approach to personality, which
measures psychological traits along a continuum and provides little
theoretical understanding. The
approach is represented by
the “type” approach to personality, where individuals are grouped into
discrete categories. This second method can provide a clear theoretical
understanding, but is criticized for lacking an empirical basis and
testable hypotheses.
and
have played off each other in the
development of science. As technical progress allowed more objective
facts to be registered (
), people’s conceptual
understanding (
) gradually accommodated the new facts, and
scientists took the new paradigm to its logical conclusion
(
), anticipating many facts intellectually before they had
been demonstrated physically (
).
Influence of socionic type on philosophers’ views
¶
In philosophy, the difference between
Ti
and
Te
is
mirrored in the analytic-synthetic distinction. It can be seen that
ego
Ti philosophers (such as Christopher
Langan and Rene Descartes)
tend to favor reaching truth through mathematical, abstract means,
whereas
ego
Te philosophers (such as Karl
Popper) concentrate more on establishing useful
protocols and methodologies. Some (such as David Hume)
fall in between the two extremes, showing that the analogy is by no
means complete - at least not on the level of individuals.
The pinnacle of Te philosophy is
pragmatism
, in both its
everyday and philosophical senses, whereas that of Ti philosophy is
logic
(likewise both formal and
informal).