SS#10 - Scientists NOT meeting a minimum transparency level: Self-defeating and unethical?
Channel: Saving Democracy dot ca
Date: 2020-10-22

I go over why, as a scientist, NOT meeting a minimum transparency level is (1) self-defeating and (2) unethical, a position resulting from boiling down key issues covered in the following previous videos:
► SS#8 (Why are profs encouraging ETHICAL junior researchers to leave academia? https://youtu.be/2mitDwUDhbI) &
► SS#9 (Prominent transparency advocate AGAINST minimum transparency due to competing interests? https://youtu.be/WIndYC7LHNE )

Link to "black-box science" 3d article VISUAL DIAGRAM: https://etiennelebel.com/documents/ss/ss10/3d-min-T-diagram.png

Other links/resources I cite:
Netherlands' Research Integrity Code of Conduct (as example code of conduct that explicitly mentions (minimum) transparency as a core ethical principle, p. 13)
https://assets.tue.nl/fileadmin/content/universiteit/Over_de_universiteit/integriteit/Netherlands%20Code%20of%20Conduct%20for%20Research%20Integrity%202018.pdf 
Article (Making ethical duty of research transparency explicit): https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-016-0587-5
Article (“Just post it”; How mandatory public data would help detection of fraud): https://curatescience.org/app/article/397
Nosek disclosures re: his implicit bias speaking fees (July 2019): https://twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/1146050796527792128 

====GENERAL SAVING SCIENCE SHOW INFO====
Dr. Etienne LeBel bio: 
LeBel is a psychologist & independent meta-scientist who has contributed to raising transparency & replication standards in academia for more than 10 years.  He has published over 30 peer-reviewed scientific articles in internationally renowned journals, including the prestigious journal Science.  He is founder & lead of Curate Science, a nonprofit global initiative to verify, ensure, and track the transparency and credibility of research (see etiennelebel.com and CurateScience.org for more details).  I'm motivated by (1) the ethical duty of intellectuals to report on matters of public concern & (2) the fact that properly functioning science is the best way to finding better treatments for cruel medical conditions like suicide, cancer, and Alzheimer’s, which have touched my family personally, and continue to afflict millions of people worldwide every year.

https://etiennelebel.com
https://twitter.com/eplebel
https://CurateScience.org
Media inquiries curatescience@gmail.com

Guiding diagram that visually depicts the environment in which professors/academic researchers typically operate: https://etiennelebel.com/documents/ss/broken-ecosystem-diagram-SS-logo-v2.png

Collection of peer-reviewed evidence of global & systemic problems w/ the TRANSPARENCY & REPRODUCIBILITY/REPLICABILITY of academic research: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT74Ok8whWCKcyxIyherYfyoRnhtAuV_nYJBFOZHlns/edit# (also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis).

To be an impartial whistle blower, I'm required to be independent & self-funded. If you find value in our videos & support the cause of saving science, please support the show by making a one-time donation: https://www.paypal.me/etiennelebel
Or Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/etiennelebel

The Saving Science Show aims to:
► 1. Raise public awareness of academia's deeply broken academic system,
► 2. To raise  (& enforce) transparency standards at universities & government funding agencies, &
► 3. Change laws to ensure public access to publicly-funded research for the benefit of all.

#openScience #reproducibilityCrisis #replicationCrisis