Code Review: Is this a correct way to write a convenience constructor? (2 Solutions!!)
Channel: Roel Van de Paar
Date: 23/04/2022

Code Review: Is this a correct way to write a convenience constructor?

Helpful?  Please support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/roelvandepaar

With thanks & praise to God, and with thanks to the many people who have made this project possible! | Content (except music & images) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing | Music: https://www.bensound.com/licensing | Images: https://stocksnap.io/license & others | With thanks to user phi (codereview.stackexchange.com/users/10570), user David Ronnqvist (codereview.stackexchange.com/users/28924), user Adam Sharp (codereview.stackexchange.com/users/26789), and the Stack Exchange Network (codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/28545). Trademarks are property of their respective owners. Disclaimer: All information is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. You are responsible for your own actions. Please contact me if anything is amiss at Roel D.OT VandePaar A.T gmail.com