PATU10 Eph 1:3-14 meters what-if-Rapture based on 1050s
Channel: Brain Outy
Date: 2013-01-13

Here we get into Paul's derivation of his metered and highlighted potential Rapture dates, based on 'mirroring' equidistance: a Bible rhetorical style for God's 'doubling' rule of restitution; here, of TIME. Paul, like Mary Daniel Isaiah and Moses, brackets both 'sides' of the time he writes, with Biblically significant 'mirrors' to show potential scenarios for the Rapture, Trib, Mill.

At issue:  how will the 54 years owed due to Abraham's EARLY maturation, get 'paid'?  And, the extra 3.5 years tacked on to make 50+7.  I thought the 3.5 extra years was rooted in balancing Time relative to Solomon's late Temple dedication; maybe that's still true; but in the 1050 accounting, we've only the same 7-year overage since Noah.  As if God had Solomon WAIT until the 490th anniversary of the Exodus, to dedicate the Temple?  So that WAIT does add the 3.5, relative to the 490, as an extra 'credit' to balance THAT kind of time.  Okay, then why isn't the 1050 off by 3.5 years more.. too?

In any event, Paul balances only to the last seven, adds it to close of the 4200 (end Trib), thus balancing to Jacob and Noah: so the 2100 and 3150 balance, respectively.  The other 3.5 years Paul balances to other events, as you'll see in this video and the next.

Video's temporary p134 of REPARSED is here (unchanged since 9/20):  http://www.brainout.net/Ephesians1REPARSEDp134.pdf .  Its links don't work, but at least you can follow the video better.  Again, the worksheet is here:  http://www.brainout.net/GeneYrs.xls ;  Bible verses used to craft it are here:  http://www.brainout.net/brainoutFAQ.htm#6a .

So the 'scholars' are having brain farts, sorry.  All the dates in Bible are provable IN Bible, don't need no astronomy or guesses based on errors like lunar years, Josephus, Dear Dr. So and So who didn't do his math right, etc.!