Prohibitionist Nannies On Parade
Channel: adventures in the free state
Date: 2018-04-17

Well, that was oppressive (but I do it for you, gentle reader). So here we are again with NH's very deliberately hand-picked "Prohibition Justification Commission", AKA, the "Commission to Study the Legalization, Regulation, and Taxation of Marijuana", which has deigned this day, 4/16/2018, to hear from actual -- if not actually all that representative, if polls are any indication at all -- citizens.

The "public comment" portion begins at about 22:00, following a college paper. Excepting your humble chronicler's own svelt testimony, weighing in at about a minute and a quarter, the remaining 10 average a torpor-inducing ~15.5 minutes apiece (granted, they get commodious "help" from the commission). Today's relentless catch-phrase: the ever-popular 'for the children'. Adults must simply accept being treated like children by their betters.

Here is the issue, mentioned by Commission member, Attorney Twomey at 18:45, regarding Sen. Cory Gardner (R-CO) and his proper political intercession, on behalf of his actual constituents no less, against the DoJ's sabre-rattling regarding re-igniting the dying embers of that very "War On People Who Use (Some) Drugs"™.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-gardner-strike-deal-on-legalized-marijuana-ending-standoff-over-justice-nominees/2018/04/13/2ac3b35a-3f3a-11e8-912d-16c9e9b37800_story.html
After that, maybe a freedom-oriented person might want to just skip to Rick Naya, the final speaker, at 2:29:00.

The cognitive dissonance is strong in these crusaders, at least several of whom actually helpfully instruct the commission that the horrifically expensive (in blood, treasure and liberty) drug war DOES NOT WORK -- and yet they're here advocating that NH should CONTINUE THAT UNWINNABLE DRUG WAR. Does that seem right to you -- especially if you're among, according to many polls now, the two-thirds of voters who want it ENDED, maybe even believe it was never authorized in the FIRST place?

One more time. In a free, civil society, the rule of law must be respected. Therefore, in a free, civil society, servant government ought to obey its instituting Constitution. In a free, civil society, unauthorized fiat prohibitions must end. This aggression will not stand, man.

If you want prohibition -- of cannabis, or alcohol, or cigarettes, or harmful calories (watch the video, understand the "health choices" hypocrisy) -- you are FIRST required to get the PEOPLE to pass an authorizing AMENDMENT. A mere legislative statute is flatly insufficient in this Constitutional Republic. Once upon a time, even servant government understood that -- and the People eventually rectified their grievous and costly mistake.

But no amendment is needed in order to repeal an undelegated authority. All THAT requires is an honest, servant government.

Uh-oh...