Criticism of Greenpeace | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: wikipedia tts
Date: 03/06/2019

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Greenpeace


00:00:28 1 Prominent critics
00:02:30 2 Criticisms
00:02:39 2.1 Internal party structure
00:03:21 2.2 Shell oil storage buoy
00:04:58 2.3 Anti-DDT campaign
00:05:51 2.4 Greener Electronics campaign
00:10:59 2.5 Greenland indigenous complaints
00:12:28 2.6 Neo-luddism
00:13:16 2.7 Opposition to golden rice
00:13:55 2.8 Mismanagement of funds
00:14:53 2.9 Damage to Nazca Lines
00:16:35 2.10 Greenpeace and Indian government controversy



Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts
Speaking Rate: 0.9599022396369437
Voice name: en-US-Wavenet-E


"I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think."
- Socrates


SUMMARY
=======
Throughout its history, the policies and objectives of the non-governmental environmental protection and conservation organization Greenpeace have been criticized by a number of groups, including national governments, members of industry, former Greenpeace members, scientists, political groups, and other environmentalists. The organization's methods, such as the use of direct action, have also led to controversy and legal action.