Child Abuse, part 3.2: liberalism, feminism, cowardice and abuse enabling
Channel: spiritanvil
Date: 2012-08-21

Both feminism and liberalism in general can be seen as forms of abuse enabling, though feminism has also been abusive. I am aware of feminists efforts both in the UK and the US to stifle perfectly honourable research which reveals that the perpetrators of domestic abuse are just as frequently women as they are men. I also know that the widely documented tendency to give women lighter sentences (the so-called "sentencing bias") grants protection to female perpetrators of abuse, and note that the family courts have given female perpetrators the opportunity to incarcerate and enslave their male victims through the use of child support. I will be discussing these things thoroughly in later sections.

As for the harm that liberalism causes, I present the following sample:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sandra-dupont/bullying_b_1581828.html
This sort of article is there to remind us that some of the main beneficiaries of liberal bullying advocacy campaigns are the school counseillors themselves, who get comfortable, well-paying jobs that involve asking the bully to play nice with the victim and never having to bear witness to the reigns of terror that the bully often creates in the workplace after graduating.

I apologise for not making a very coherent case on either feminism or liberalism yet. There is much evidence to present and I will dedicate a separate series to antifeminism.

A note about my workplace, which I mention at 00:19:15: the problem with this workplace is that though some of the people I work with behave in a very toxic manner and do present personalities that make it very unlikely for them not to be abusive, they are prevented by circumstances from manifesting the full extent of their character towards me (I have only gotten a few sporadic insults out of the blue so far). As I have not been in contact with anyone whom they have abused, I cannot take any action against them since, there being no abuse, but simply the high potential for it, I have no evidence to present against them. Strange as it sounds to an outsider, I find myself very upset over the fact that I am working for these vile individuals, and would have surely been a lot more happy if I could catch them in the act of behaving abusively towards me or anyone else. What's more, there is not a single law in the UK to put these bastards in prison if I do get evidence; the best I could hope for is tarnishing their reputations.

When I talk about cowardice, I note that the societies that tended to cultivate courage and honour were those of nomadic tribals and frontiersmen. Wherever legal authorities arose to regulate violence, cowards found benefit in these institutions, letting others take the risks of engaging in conflict while nonethless reaping the benefits. Wikipedia's article on honour goes into this a bit.