Dr. Thompson~DISCREDITS NRC on MITIGATING SFP DISASTERS!"
Channel: MsMilkytheclown1
Date: 15/06/2014

Dr. Thompson~DISCREDITS NRC on MITIGATING SFP DISASTERS!" http://youtu.be/D34ckRy3vK0
Dr. Gordon Thompson 

Remember that 1/3 of the population lives within 10 miles of a nuclear power plant.
NRC: Briefing on Spent Fuel Pool Safety and Consideration of Expedited Transfer of Spent Fuel to Dry Casks
January 6, 2014
Dr. Gordon Thompson's research reveals THE DANGERS of SFP loss of water and the NRC's lack of dignified studies to confirm the deadly consequences to human life and the collapse of the United States economy! 
DR. GORDON THOMPSON RESEARCH PROFESSOR AT CLARK UNIVERSITY AND THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR THE INSTITUTE OF RESOURCE AND SECURITIES STUDIES AT CAMBRIDGE. 

Dr. Thompson is debating this portion of the discussion:
NRC meeting~MITIGATING A SFP DISASTER, JUST ADD WATER! by jrae50021 http://youtu.be/KoG71pyDbU4
Link to full 3 hours & 25 minute video called NRC video Briefing on Spent Fuel Pool Safety and Consideration of Expedited Transfer of Spent Fuel to Dry Casks dated January 6, 2014 here
http://video.nrc.gov/vPlayer.php?eventID=880&type=JW
Mr. David A. Heacock serves as the President and Chief Nuclear Officer Dominion Nuclear at Dominion Resources, Inc. 
Total Calculated Compensation 2013 =$1,502,560.00

in the meantime, THIS just in: *Breaking* Fukushima- 5.8 Magnitude Quake Violently Shakes Nuclear Plant  http://youtu.be/xDQoO1mLel0

Back to this NRC video:  THIS STUDY DID NOT CONSIDER RISKS OF MOVING FUEL FROM POOL TO DRY CASK STORAGE!  Transfer of spent fuel to dry cask storage.  Dave Heacock (President and CEO of Dominion Nuclear) says Mitigating a Spent Fuel Pool Fire is Easy, Just Add Water ~ Zero probability of Spent Fuel Pool Disaster.  Of course he want's the fuel to stay in the SFP, the Dry Casks Moved during the Earthquake.  See pictures below.
The "industry position" ... "Expedited transfer of spent fuel to dry cask storage would provide only a minor or limited safety benefit." according to the regulatory analysis.
"It makes no sense to remove spent fuel from these sites at this time". 
SFP Earthquake experience supports the industry's position.
What A JOKE!  Read the slide at 4:25 into the video.
He goes on to say Fukushima Daiichi "lost very little inventory, although there was a lot of concern over it, it really did not lose inventory.".  That's NRC speak for they Did lose inventory!  Of course, fucker, because spent fuel pool in reactor unit 4 exploded and caught fire, you idiot.  These guys make me ILL.    
North Anna DID NOT HAVE "NO DAMAGE" TO IT AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE!  Look at the attached photos! http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/?p=3259  

Officials Admit North Anna Fuel Bunker Damaged By Quake As Feds Launch Reactor Core Damage Inspection
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2011/09/officials-admit-north-anna-fuel-bunker-damaged-by-quake-as-feds-launch-reactor-core-damage-inspection-1041349.html

A canister with spent nuclear fuel at the nuclear plant was seen to have moved a few inches because of the recent earthquake near Mineral, Va. http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2011/09/08/us/NUCLEAR-2.html

After weathering the East Coast's recent quake, the North Anna nuclear plant finds itself in a situation that no American reactor has ever faced before. The shock was bigger than anything its designers thought it would ever experience. Dominion employees inspected an area that they had scraped off to explore the depth of a small crack. http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2011/09/07/us/NUCLEAR.html

Pictures are worth a thousand words.  Now take your stupid slide presentation and shove it down your throat.  Have a nice day.

The North Anna, Virgina, #1 and #2 nuclear power generation stations operated by Dominion Virginia Power are seen March 24, 2011, at Lake Anna, Virginia, in this aerial photo. The Lake Anna Reactor is ranked 7th most at-risk for earthquake damage. According to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, North Anna #1 and # 2 face an annual 1 in 22,727 chance of the core being damaged by an earthquake and exposing the public to radiation. The national average for US nuclear plants is a 1 in 74,000 chance. The top five most at-risk plants are all on the east coast: Indian Point, north of New York City; the Pilgrim Plant south of Boston, Limerick outside of Philadelphia, the Sequoyah plants near Chattanooga Tennessee and Beaver Valley near Pittsburgh. These five plants are at a higher statistical risk than those along fault lines in California, for example, because they were not designed for and built in presumed strong quake danger areas. Since they were constructed the US federal government has revised upwards the quake risks where they are. According to Jim Norvelle with Dominion Power, North Anna was designed to withstand a magnitude 5.9 Ã‚Â-- 6.1 earthquake.