Collaborationism | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: wikipedia tts
Date: 30/11/2018

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
Collaborationism

Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

You can find other Wikipedia audio articles too at:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuKfABj2eGyjH3ntPxp4YeQ

You can upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts



"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."
- Socrates



SUMMARY
=======
Collaborationism is cooperation with the enemy against one's country in wartime.Stanley Hoffmann subdivided collaboration onto

involuntary (reluctant recognition of necessity) and
voluntary (an attempt of exploiting necessity).According to him, collaborationism can be subdivided onto

servile and
ideological,the former is a deliberate service to an enemy, whereas the latter is a deliberate advocacy of co-operation with the foreign force which is seen as a champion of some desirable domestic transformations. In contrast, Bertram Gordon used the terms "collaborator" and "collaborationist" for non-ideological and ideological collaborations, respectively.Poor choices of voluntary collaborators may further undermine the already weak legitimacy of an occupation regime.  John Hickman identifies thirteen reasons why occupied populations might hold collaborators in contempt.
perceived as scapegoats for defeat
perceived as opportunistic
perceived as benefitting from their own poor decisions as leaders before the occupation
perceived as violating the norms of the traditional political order
perceived as having no lasting political loyalties
perceived as guilty of more than collaboration
perceived as cowardly
perceived as deceived by the occupier
perceived as self-deceived
perceived as cheaply bought
perceived as diverting political focus
perceived as representing powerlessness
perceived as escaping their own guilt