• "Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur"  •
Channel: Doug Meet
Date: 2021-11-11

• On a shield paleways of thirteen pieces argent and gules, a chief azure, an eagle rising and standing on the middle of the shield holding in his dexter talon an olive branch consisting of thirteen leaves and berries and in his sinister talon thirteen arrows, all proper. In an arc below the device the motto, "Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur." On an annulet surrounding this device the words "Department of Justice" and three mullets, all contained within a corded edge. 
--President altered the Department seal April 27, 1934, on recommendation of the Attorney General, by ordering the blazon for the seal:

When the device is rendered in colors the background of the seal to be buff, the shield, eagle, olive branch, and arrows as described above, with the motto and annulet in blue and the name of the Department, mullets, edges of annulet and corded edge in gold...suggested to Attorney-General Black by a passage in Lord Coke's Institutes, Part 3, folio 79, which reads thus:

    And I well remember, when the Lord Treasurer Burleigh told Queen Elizabeth, Madam, here is your Attorney-General (I being sent for ) qui pro domina regina sequitur, she said she would have the records altered; for it should be attornatus generalis [i.e., (your) attorney general;"] qui pro dominal veritate sequitur.

Department of Justice account on YouTube. 
Links
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheJusticeDepartment

A CLAIM THAT DEFENDANTS INTERFERED WITH PLAINTIFF’S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS UNDER THE FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTION;
 void ab initio violations of Consumer Fraud Act (cfa)  ET SEQ, UNCONSCIONABLE COMMERCIAL PRACTICE AND DECEPTION, and false report, and  unconscionable misrepresentation, deception, fraud,  knowing, concealment, suppression, and omission of  material intent others rely upon . . . such  declared an unlawful practice.
            CFA claim: 
“(1) unlawful conduct by defendant; (2) an ascertainable loss by plaintiff; and (3) a causal relationship between the unlawful conduct and the ascertainable loss.”
     with subsequent performance such person deceived or damaged thereby  . . .
            “An `unlawful practice’ contravening  CFA arise
(1) an affirmative act;
(2) a knowing omission;
or
(3) a violation of an administrative regulation.”
 Courts should construe liberally in favor of consumer, accordingly “the capacity to mislead is prime ingredient of fraud,”
directed state of mind, and motive relevant remedy or not distinguished from "legal" remedies (available to claimant) by  discretion of court grant common law jurisdiction.
        Rescission in relation to contract available (pled with specificity, failure to do so result in dismissal").
       engaged in "knowing concealment, suppression, and omission of material facts," and  false representation, which FMOLHS OLOL LSU rely.
        Void ab initio, because it was entered in violation of state law.
        No notice provided in violation of state law, civil CONSPIRACY.
        plaintiff alleges defendant not compliant with obligation under these, as they obtained fraudulent and/or illegal or void of healthcare consumer's previous status in fulfillment of government Medicaid and ACA plans formerly accepted by this provider from  this Healthcare System

    § 460.168 Reinstatement  in  other  Medi-care and Medicaid programs.
    To facilitate a participant’s rein-
    statement  in  other  Medicare  and  Medicaid programs after disenrollment, thePACE  organization  must  do  the  fol-
    lowing:
    (a) Make appropriate referrals and
    ensure medical records are made avail-
    able to new providers in a timely man-
    ner.
    (b) Work with CMS and the State ad-
    ministering agency to reinstate the
    participant in other Medicare and Med-
    icaid  programs  for  which  the  partici-
    pant is eligible.
    § 460.170 Reinstatement in PACE.
    (a)  A  previously  disenrolled  partici-
    pant may be reinstated in a PACE pro-
    gram.
    § 460.172 Documentation of disenrollment.
    A  PACE  organization  must  meet  the  
    following requirements:
    (a) Have a procedure in place to docu-
    ment the reasons for all voluntary and
    involuntary disenrollment. 
Resulting in shortening my lifespan by no less than 10%, of my remaining years, quality of life already lowered through violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), giving rise to RICO conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).