Debate: Sean v Denton on 'Is Christianity Pagan: The Trinity'
Channel: DENTON'S TALES OF THE VIKING AGE
Date: 2020-11-02

Some points I would like to clarify, which I think got a bit lost in the overall chat. (No spoilers) One: The finding of bricks in Egypt does not in any way invalidate the conclusions of archaeologists in Israel, they found nothing, nor is there even any proof of who was responsible for the bricks in the first place, Hebrews or Egyptians. The bricks are irrelevant. Two:  While the terminology and composition of the Hindu and Celtic Irish trinities might differ, the CONCEPT, which is what we are talking about, the concept of something that is one yet three is exactly the same, as the Christian trinity and existed long before Christ. Three: St Paul, while explaining the new faith, never once in his writings mentions the most important doctrine of that faith,, the one thing that the Church later insisted someone MUST believe in in order to be a Christian, yet he ignores it. To say he had other things to talk about is completely illogical,  that was the most important thing he could have said and yet he never mentions it, which clearly shows it did not exist in his day. (The word 'Trinity' did not exist in the 1st century to be sure, but he never uses any terminology to describe three, everything he says refers to two.) I hope that adds some clarity to what I was saying. I must thank Sean for a very intelligent, educational and friendly debate, which never got out of hand as debates so often do.