9/3/19 Judge Kishner refused to hear my post-trial motions
Channel: JUDICIAL JIU-JITSU
Date: 2020-09-21

Link to 9/3/19 hearing Recorder's Transcript https://drive.google.com/file/d/1aZBtd3mR9Mg4gJ2ppORzvFKiLxI_NJWJ/view?usp=sharing

The 9/3/19 hearing was dedicated to Judge Kishner's justifying her erroneous belief that she never granted me leave to intervene (at the 12/20/16 hearing) into the quiet title dispute between Jimijack and Nationstar in consolidated cases A-15-720032-C and A-16-730078-C.

Further, because she had come to believe that, she also believed that without her imprimatur on intervention that I had no standing at all in any court and that her jurisdiction extended to preventing me from having any recourse whatsoever. 

Judge Kishner's bench orders and entered orders from 4/23/19 forward were totally prejudicial to me and were based on ZERO consideration of the evidence. I lost a $500,000 house and a claim on $60,000 wrongfully retained by the debt collector without any opportunity to defend myself and without any requirement on the prevailing parties to meet their plaintiffs' burden of proof.

Links to motions Judge Kishner ruled stricken from the record at the 9/3/19 hearing 
Opposing counsels Joseph Hong, David Ochoa, Donna Wittig and Melanie Morgan, and Kaleb Anderson had all misrepresented the facts and the court record to make Judge Kishner believe (quite strongly you'll see) that she had never granted me leave to intervene as an individual. 

7/22/19 motion for a new trial pursuant to 54b (not all claims of all parties were adjudicated) and 59(a)(1)(A)(B)(C)(F)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X5t3N_kWfDwUWiwBYllP6exaHBV-Nqhk/view?usp=sharing

7/29 MDSM to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to NRS 38.310(2)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b_ByEOpEPXMiyYdXGWqM70FSU-CJ0Qd-/view?usp=sharing

8/27/19 Tobin OPPOSITION AND COUNTER-MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE why NRCP 11(b) sancions should not be imposed
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iZyEcLnIrkLrbSwmLlTz4HUTPOyUIFH9/view?usp=sharing

8/27/19 proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and order re Judge Kishner's lack of jurisdiction to provide requested relief to parties non-compliant with NRS 38.310(2)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iZyEcLnIrkLrbSwmLlTz4HUTPOyUIFH9/view?usp=sharing