High Radiation Near Rice Field & Incineration Site Outside Evacuation zone Fukushima Japan
Channel: MsMilkytheclown
Date: 17/08/2016

Source video by Birdhairjp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkcTuO...

Check out and sub his channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Birdhairjp

NOTE: TODAY THEY ANNOUNCED THEY WERE CHECKING ALL RICE (FROM A CERTAIN AREA AND FOUND IT TO BE FREE OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION) DO YOU BELIEVE THEM NOW?


Normal background level is up to 0.2 uSv/hr (microSv/hr)
-rumorecurioso

Birdhairjp wrote:
On 25 Aug 2012, I measured radiation at Oguni Community Center, Ryozen Area, Date city of Fukushima prefecture Japan.
I monitored 1.03 micro Sievert per hour in air at chest hight, 15.21 ground level.
(Monitoring post showed 0.864 micro Gy/h in air)
Over-limit radioactive cesium have been detected in rice produced in this aria 2011.
Rice is not planted around this area in 2012.
The monument shown in the video is telling us that the first agricultural cooperative association in Japan was founded on this place in 1898.
The monitorinig place is 50 km from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear power plant.
Measuring instrument is made of Ukraine, ECOTEST MKS-05.
15.21μSv/h 伊達市 霊山地区 小国ふれあいセンター 2012.4.22

46.14μSv/h 福島市ごみ焼却場近くのホコリ 2012.8.25
https://youtu.be/i5WF8w0fxXk?list=ULi5WF8w0fxXk

FAIR USE NOTICE: Any copyrighted (©) material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues; this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
___________________________

How are the activities of those who design and operate nuclear reactors as well as nuclear storage facilities in any way private? How are the operations of companies extracting oil from, say, the Gulf of Mexico or the Tar Sands of Alberta, in any way private? What is private about the assaults on ecology and public health that have been shown to occur regularly and on a massive scale in the industrial transformation of matter into energy? Who is supposed to pay for the clean up when supposedly-private corporations mess up? Who is to be held liable in societies where the for-profit corporations have been legally structured around the concept of limited liability?
Dr. Anthony J. Hall: From Hiroshima to Fukushima, 1945-2011
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/03/28/from-hiroshima-to-fukushima-1945-2011/

Internal vs. External Radiation Exposure Explained (Arnie Gundersen) https://youtu.be/l9l3nPs75lg

Nuclear 101 - Advantages & Disadvantages of Splitting Atoms to Boil Water
http://www.fairewinds.com/content/nuc...
Birdhairjp: 85.03 microSv/h, Fukushima city, mud into a river, June 2012, Whats going in rivers (vs. normal background of up to 0.2 microSv/h) https://youtu.be/lk6YSOK3Uz8

Nightmare Nuclear Waste (german, english subtitles)