Can "an implicitly-defined move constructor" be NOT trivial?
Channel: Peter Schneider
Date: 20/08/2023

Can "an implicitly-defined move constructor" be NOT trivial?
I hope you found a solution that worked for you :)
 The Content (except music & images) is licensed under (https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/licensing)CC BY-SA  
Thanks to all those great people for their contributions!

 (stackoverflow.com/users/22196023/rango)Rango 
 (stackoverflow.com/users/7976805/yksisarvinen)Yksisarvinen 
 A special thanks goes out to the (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76931166/can-an-implicitly-defined-move-constructor-be-not-trivial)Stackexchange community 
 
 I wish you all a wonderful day! Stay safe :)
 
  language-lawyer c++