The Great American Union National Anthem
Channel: Andrew Lehti
Date: 2021-12-16

The anthem is not covered by copyright or has any protection because Russia says it belongs to the people. Which is honestly very ethical. But that does not make up for the oppression of their people, and opposition of women, and homosexuals. No, the USA isn't any better but the open development that we demand will most likely switch the sides of the government and people. If you remove the American theme but retain the American, the meaning of anything quickly changes. This video was designed to demonstrate that when the two-party system is eliminated, it is possible to feel as though we are all one people. There should be no party system. There should be no one- or multi-party system. This compels us to vote indiscriminately. If you're going to vote for someone, you should hear them speak and examine their record. Have they battled for their beliefs? Have they voted in favor of companies receiving an unethical amount of money? Your tax funds are intended to assist you and your neighbors, not corporations. Why should multinational corporations be bailed out when they manufacture in other countries? Why would you buy products from a company like Apple, which we recently learned made a secret 275 billion dollar deal with China and continues to use child labor with Foxconn, despite Foxconn's use of child labor being in the news every few months? We all desire the same things, but in unique ways. We all want freedom, we all want our neighbors to be safe, we all want our families and children to be safe, and we all want an uncorrupt government. Therefore, why don't we establish an Omnicracy? It is basically a reform of the current government based on how legislation is passed with publicly democratically elected administration. There are no municipal or county governments, only regional so that city laws within regions are the same. The amount of top heavy administration we have is horribly inefficient. The state would receive most taxes and federal would dictate how some of that is to be spent. This would be a Federal government in which the people control the executive government. Members of Congress would have to sell their ideas to the American people, not to one another. Cryptocurrency technology has the ability to be structured and hardened in order to create the ideal voting system. One that is impenetrable. The code must be available in an open source format. If you wish to vote, you must register at the DMV, which requires two workers to authorize accounts and a rolling agent would check each person to rid the system of discrepancies. Those people would be mirror checked by an unknown within the agency to prevent corruption, and each avenue would be switched on every check. The votes must be open to the public. If you are opposed to this concept, then whoever sold it to you was openly defrauding you. Nobody cares how you vote. If you're concerned about how your vote is perceived to the public, then you know you are voting for the unethical option. Allowing people to conceal the count enables whomever is conducting the election to cheat. How can you believe the results if there is no public or third-party verification of votes?