We provide the evidence that corroborates Fiona's victimization by Steve, Red's, & Cheshire.
Channel: Negative Exponents
Date: 17/06/2022

#stevemcrae #newsnowhouston #cheshire 

 Chapters Added to easily locate the evidence that we added
After realizing last night just how many people were unaware of certain past events regarding #stevemcrae and the complete fabrication of the SA allegation that effected her ability to act as a victims advocate. 
      I used an interview she gave on A.Z.'s channel but included the applicable clips that verify her testimony regarding the harassment and defamation she endured. Below is a playlist with all applicable source material and content creators I gathered these clips from. 
      Special thanks to Tea Spiracy and Nate the Lawyer for the interview and intro. Those are linked below. You will also find a playlist called The Honorable Worden which contains all the original source material and entire backstory for anyone who wants to research further 

Tea Spiracy= https://youtu.be/cOR8mg3-iBQ?t=10422
Nate the Lawyer- https://youtu.be/R5xvGQUsWh4
The Honorable Worden playlist- https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpeCH3z2LreMeVcGI_hSgz2vsXrxZ4PT2


https://www.youtube.com/c/NegativeExponents-170/featured?sub_confirmation=1
https://twitter.com/negexponent
https://ko-fi.com/negativeexponents

00:00- Intro
01:02- Beginning of Interview
02:40- Chesh and Steve accuse Fiona of SA Red's Rhetoric
06:10- Cheshire explains her layered argument on The Shills
07:15- Steve stating he believes Earl David Worden because he's an honorable guy
10:29- Red admits that Fiona Did Not SA him.
15:50- Picture of Red and Fiona that shows the truth.
18:10- Keon joins the interview




The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content.  Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 106 AND 106A, THE FAIR USE OF A COPYRIGHTED WORK, INCLUDING SUCH USE BY REPRODUCTION IN COPIES OR PHONORECORDS OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS SPECIFIED BY THAT SECTION, FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS CRITICISM, COMMENT, NEWS REPORTING, TEACHING (INCLUDING MULTIPLE COPIES FOR CLASSROOM USE), SCHOLARSHIP, OR RESEARCH, IS NOT AN INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT.”
THIS VIDEO AND OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL IN GENERAL MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN COPYRIGHTED WORKS THAT WERE NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED TO BE USED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S), BUT WHICH WE BELIEVE IN GOOD FAITH ARE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL LAW AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE FOR ONE OR MORE OF THE REASONS NOTED ABOVE.