Revere MA: 525 Beach Street failed to report 21E contamination to Site Plan Review.
Channel: Christopher King
Date: 2012-04-06

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/04/kingcast-says-clifford-pisano-is.html

04 APRIL 2012

KingCast says Clifford Pisano is correct once again, Revere Site Plan Review demands EPA 21-E information.

Okay so the Site Plan Review Application, submitted by the Development team in November, 2011 contains a $25K budget line item for "Environmental Remediation" yet 525 Beach Street Ltd. claims in its EPA Notification that they had no knowledge of the contamination until 16 December, 2011.
Query, how did they arrive at the line item amount then?
Query, did it really take McPhail & Associates until December to notify them 
of the test results on testing that was being done in May, 2011? 
Watch today's movie from City Hall, up by 12a. or thereabouts.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/03/kingcast-watches-as-clifford-pisano.html

Hearing on Wednesday 28 March 2p.

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/03/aclu-watches-as-kingcast-and-reveres.html

http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2012/03/aclu-watches-as-kingcast-and-reveres.html

The New SJC Rule 1:19 is overinclusive, overbroad and not narrowly-tailored to meet any compelling governmental interest such that media not be permitted to run video and to capture still imagery inside a courthouse common area. Perhaps I will retain Elizabeth Ritvo to represent me on this one LOL.

Oh you better believe I brought my A Game today, I knew this guy was going to be a real schmuck.... and he proved me right. I am a good judge of character. He then had the nerve to ask his boss whether I was an attorney and his boss said "Oh yeah he's an attorney...." 


As if that matters. Whatever, I've earned that alphabet soup buddy, you go ahead and get yours if you can, bro but don't you ever mess with me again because I will smoke you every time, are we clear? I don't even know your name and guess what, I don't even care unless I decide to name you in a lawsuit, then I will find out you got that right. Now then, the message I am giving all journalists, J.D., Esq. or not -- is that there is no need to suffer any abuses against the First Amendment. As a former State Attorney I'm not having it. Not yesterday, not today, not ever. Here is some of the back story.


Related: I ran 5+ miles this morning, and that pales in comparison to the run-arounds I keep getting from Mr. Clerk.