UQx DENIAL101x 1.3.3.1 Psychological Barriers to Concern about Climate Change
Channel: UQx Denial101x Making Sense of Climate Science Denial
Date: 28/04/2015

Why is it difficult for people to care about and act on climate change? We call these psychological barriers "dragons of inaction."


About Denial101x:

Climate change is real, so why the controversy and debate? Learn to make sense of the science and to respond to climate change denial in Denial101x, a MOOC from UQx and edX. Denial101x isn’t just a climate MOOC; it’s a MOOC about how people think about climate change.

Comments on our channel are turned off. To discuss our videos, enrol at http://edx.org/understanding-climate-denial and join us in the edX discussion forum.


References for this video:

Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290. http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/66/4/290/

Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., ... & Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1-12. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/29735/2/Gifford_Scannell_Uzzell.pdf

Pahl, S., Harris, P. R., Todd, H. A., & Rutter, D. R. (2005). Comparative optimism for environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 1-11. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494405000022

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(4): 665-683.

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3), 445-459. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378007000209

Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2154-2189. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.334.650&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1(9), 462-466. http://www.geog.psu.edu/sites/default/files/Ding_%282011%29_Perceptions_of_Scientific_Consensus.pdf 

McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Xiao, C. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119(2), 511-518. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9

Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 399-404. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v3/n4/full/nclimate1720.html

van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?. Climatic Change, 126(1-2), 255-262. http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/slinden/files/consensus1.pdf

Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 48-71. http://eab.sagepub.com/content/38/1/48.short