Mechanical-electrical analogies | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: wikipedia tts
Date: 2019-06-28

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical%E2%80%93electrical_analogies


00:03:54 1 Applications
00:05:56 2 Forming an analogy
00:10:29 2.1 Power conjugate variables
00:12:01 2.2 Hamiltonian variables
00:15:20 3 Classes of analogy
00:17:16 3.1 Impedance analogies
00:19:28 3.2 Mobility analogies
00:20:23 3.3 Through and across analogies
00:22:05 3.4 Other energy domains
00:23:50 4 Transducers
00:26:23 5 History
00:30:03 6 See also



Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts
Speaking Rate: 0.8644583342731496
Voice name: en-GB-Wavenet-B


"I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think."
- Socrates


SUMMARY
=======
Mechanical–electrical analogies are the representation of mechanical systems as electrical networks.  At first, such analogies were used in reverse to help explain electrical phenomena in familiar mechanical terms.  James Clerk Maxwell introduced analogies of this sort in the 19th century.  However, as electrical network analysis matured it was found that certain mechanical problems could more easily be solved through an electrical analogy.  Theoretical developments in the electrical domain that were particularly useful were the representation of an electrical network as an abstract topological diagram (the circuit diagram) using the lumped element model and the ability of network analysis to synthesise a network to meet a prescribed frequency function.
This approach is especially useful in the design of mechanical filters—these use mechanical devices to implement an electrical function.  However, the technique can be used to solve purely mechanical problems, and can also be extended into other, unrelated, energy domains.  Nowadays, analysis by analogy is a standard design tool wherever more than one energy domain is involved.  It has the major advantage that the entire system can be represented in a unified, coherent way.  Electrical analogies are particularly used by transducer designers, by their nature they cross energy domains, and in control systems, whose sensors and actuators will typically be domain-crossing transducers.  A given system being represented by an electrical analogy may conceivably have no electrical parts at all.  For this reason domain-neutral terminology is preferred when developing network diagrams for control systems.
Mechanical–electrical analogies are developed by finding relationships between variables in one domain that have a mathematical form identical to variables in the other domain.  There is no one, unique way of doing this; numerous analogies are theoretically possible, but there are two analogies that are widely used: the impedance analogy and the mobility analogy.  The impedance analogy makes force and voltage analogous while the mobility analogy makes force and current analogous.  By itself, that is not enough to fully define the analogy, a second variable must be chosen.  A common choice is to make pairs of power conjugate variables analogous.  These are variables which when multiplied together have units of power.  In the impedance analogy, for instance, this results in force and velocity being analogous to voltage and current respectively.
Variations of these analogies are used for rotating mechanical systems, such as in electric motors.  In the impedance analogy, instead of force, torque is made analogous to voltage.  It is perfectly possible that both versions of the analogy are needed in, say, a system that includes rotating and reciprocating parts, in which case a force-torque analogy is required within the mechanical domain and a force-torque-voltage analogy to the electrical domain.  Another variation is required for acoustical systems; here pressure and voltage are made analogous (impedance analogy).  In the impedance analogy, the ratio of the power conjugate variables is always a quantity analogous to electrical impedance.  For instance force/velocity is mechanical impedance.  The mobility analogy does not preserve this analogy between i ...