Analyse This.
Channel: Marcus Anderson
Date: 2014-02-17

What's it like to be arrested late at night in your own home as a 20 year old in 1979, based on the slander of your first ever 17 year old girlfriend dumping you by projecting her own mental illness onto you, resulting in psychiatric treatment criminally commenced on you by a GP you've never met before while two police officers hold you down? 

How about when, without any instruction, advice or even a diagnosis, you simply leave the open ward as a "voluntary" patient only to be promptly apprehended without due process for "absconding" and punished by being made an "involuntary" patient, put into a locked forensic ward for the criminally insane, and targeted with stolen kitchen knives by those criminally convicted patients because they can tell there is absolutely nothing wrong with you, all in violation of the Mental Health Act ? 

Analyse This, and find out.

Procuring a person for psychiatric treatment who does not have a mental illness was a crime even before 1979, attracting 10 years in prison, but there is no justice for me I'm afraid. In WA, the Police have only 12 months after the fact to prosecute a crime. How the hell does that work? 

In fact it took me 10 years just to escape the insane Western Australia mental health system, and another 30 years to discover 'what just went down?'. The twisted medical practitioners who did this to me almost got away with murder. Almost, because in 1987, after my 6th aborted suicide attempt, something happened. Mensa confirmed my genius IQ, and everything changed. I could no longer remain in denial. Nor could anyone else. I am twice exceptional, and have the special needs of a both gifted person and the uncompensated victim of a serious crime because of that gift. Just like William Sidis, (www.sidis.net) WA psychiatrists were trying to cure me of my genius.

But if psychiatry in Australia is criminally insane, then there is no appeal to justice either. Justice in Australia is demonstrably a hopeless, heartless, farce because there is no commitment to enforcement of human rights. This is especially the case when it comes to criminal psychiatric malpractice committed against young people - the easy target cohort of choice - by predatory psychiatrists and psychiatric nurses with nothing better to do than punish anyone in their custody who asserts their human rights. 

Australia was the first and for several years the only country of 79 signatories to the 2006 UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to hypocritically declare its intention to deny every Australian, whether requiring treatment or not, their International Human Right to refuse any medical treatment and, in particular, for mental health issues. 

Australia now leads the world in psychiatric abuse of human rights. The only legal protection against psychiatric abuse is the human right to refuse it, and an abuse of human rights to ignore that refusal. This right to refuse medical treatment (at least in non-emergency situations) was confirmed by US Supreme Court dragged kicking and screaming to admit in the 1979 case RIESE v. ST MARY HOSPITAL that nobody can be forced to take antipsychotic drugs against their will. 

Despite this, Australia has enshrined systemic psychiatric abuse into laws enabling discrimination against, and the stigmatisation of, mental illness through forcible medical treatment without consent or legal process.  (See https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html). 

In my 1979 case, the hospital did not even bother with a diagnosis. Realising that the GP had already unlawfully administered antipsychotics, medical officer Ann Troupe and psychiatrist William Hatton overdosed me with unnecessary and extremely dangerous antipsychotic drugs to cover up the "mistake" by deliberately inducing a factitious psychosis.

Dont believe me?  

In a January 2020 case I took to the State Administrative Tribunal I obtained a written statement from the North Metropolitan Health Service admitting that they did not have on their file the legally required document (Form 3) needed to be completed before psychiatric treatment could be lawfully administered in 1979. This alone is enough evidence to bring a criminal conviction under S336 of "Procuring apprehension or detention of persons not suffering from mental illness or impairment".

And if you think anything has changed sine 1979, you're so very, very wrong again. 

In 2022 I received the documents of another individual evidencing a clear criminal procurement for psychiatric treatment in 2011 (under S336) sufficient to put the criminal psychiatrists and medical officers responsible in gaol, yet the many complaints made by this individual have been white-anted and shafted by disbelief, delay tactics, cronyism, perverting the course of justice, and a determination to falsely attribute factitious/fictitious/induced victim trauma as "the" actual mental illness.

Watch this space.