Locked in for another 2 days: why I still don't complain when seeing the big (scary) picture
Channel: Harald in China
Date: 2022-10-25

Have to be careful about the wording on YouTube... I hope posting the quotes by Prof. Sachs won't lead to shadowbanning. Below are relevant links to substantiate what I say:

Admission by Victoria Nuland that the US is working in Ukrainian biolabs which have “dangerous” research content https://mronline.org/2022/03/17/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological-research-facilities-worried-russia-may-seize-them/ (original video embedded in the article)

"Prof. Jeffrey Sachs says he is “pretty convinced [COVID-19] came out of US lab biotechnology”. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs is the Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and the President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has also served as the chair of the COVID-19 commission for leading medical journal the Lancet. Through his investigations as the head of the COVID-19 commission, Prof. Sachs has come to the conclusion that there is extremely dangerous biotechnology research being kept from public view, that the United States was supporting much of this research, and that it is very possible that SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19,  originated through dangerous virus research gone awry." https://www.jeffsachs.org/interviewsandmedia/64rtmykxdl56ehbjwy37m5hfahwnm5 There is a video, but it’s impossible to search, I found only this non-English coverage of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtLPrARWmGc with original English speaking by Sachs

Boston university has created a much more deadly version. The artificial virus strain with 80% kill rate was first reported by Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11323677/Outrage-Boston-University-CREATES-Covid-strain-80-kill-rate.html 
The university refutes the allegation, by saying their goal wasn’t gain of function, but rather to find out what causes the deadliness of a virus https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/neidl-researchers-refute-uk-article-about-covid-strain/ 
While their motive is relevant for judging their morals, it is irrelevant in term of result. Apparently also the National Institutes of Health NIH care more about the result than about the intention – they launch a probe into the research: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11336747/NIH-launch-probe-controversial-study-scientists-created-variant-80-kill-rate.html