What Is HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE? HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE Definition & Meaning
Channel: Audiopedia
Date: 2018-10-16

What is HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE, What does HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE mean, AHARD AND SOFT SCIENCE meaning, HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE definition, HARD AND SOFT SCIENCE explanation

Hard science and soft science are colloquial terms used to compare scientific fields on the basis of perceived methodological rigor, exactitude, and objectivity.[1][2][3] Roughly speaking natural sciences (e.g. biology, chemistry, physics) are considered "hard", whereas the social sciences (e.g. economics, psychology, sociology) are usually described as "soft".[3]

Precise definitions vary,[4] but features often cited as characteristic of hard science include producing testable predictions, performing controlled experiments, relying on quantifiable data and mathematical models, a high degree of accuracy and objectivity, higher levels of consensus, faster progression of the field, greater explanatory success, cumulativeness, replicability, and generally applying a purer form of the scientific method.[2][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] A closely related idea (originating in the nineteenth century with Auguste Comte) is that scientific disciplines can be arranged into a hierarchy of hard to soft on the basis of factors such as rigor, "development", and whether they are basic or applied.[4][12]

Some philosophers and sociologists of science have questioned the relationship between these characteristics and perceived hardness or softness. The more "developed" hard sciences do not necessarily have a greater degree of consensus or selectivity in accepting new results.[5] Commonly cited methodological differences are also not a reliable indicator. For example, social sciences such as psychology and economics use mathematical models extensively, but are usually considered soft sciences.[1][2] However, there are some measurable differences between hard and soft sciences. For example, hard sciences make more extensive use of graphs,[4][13] and soft sciences are more prone to a rapid turnover of buzzwords.[14]

The metaphor has been criticised for unduly stigmatizing soft sciences, creating an imbalance in the public perception, funding, and recognition of different fields.[2][3][15]
Source: Wikipedia.org