Court granted Nona Tobin's right to intervene as an individual per NRCP 24(a)(2)
Channel: JUDICIAL JIU-JITSU
Date: 2020-09-20

On 12/20/16 Judge Kishner granted my 11/15/16 Pro Se motion to intervene into the Jimijack vs. Bank of America and Sun City Anthem quiet title case.  Joseph Hong flat out lies about this to the court at a 4/23/19 session in open court that was held ex-parte due to Hong's duplicitous serving notice that the hearing was continued to 5/7/19 so neither I nor my attorney was there to defend me. The 11/15/16 motion to intervene had proposed pleadings attached, all of which identified Nona Tobin, both as an individual and as the trustee of the Gordon B. Hansen Trust that one. Joseph Hong, representing Jimijack was the only opposing counsel present at the hearing and was the only counsel who had filed an opposition to my motion to intervene. Hong's opposition focused solely on his opinion that the case was really just between Nationstar and his clients and he couldn't see how I could assert an NRS 40.010 claim but cited no legal authority to dispute that I met the NRCP 24(a)(2) standards for intervention by right. 
Rule 24. Intervention(a) Intervention of Right. On timely motion, the court must permit anyone to intervene who:(1) is given an unconditional right to intervene by a state or federal statute; or(2) claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the movant’s ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequately represent that interest.