NASA and chemtrails
Channel: H. Doug Matsuoka
Date: 2014-06-15

This video is comprised of excerpts of a presentation by NASA scientist Riley Duren gave on February 14, 2013. 

For some, the very existence of chemtrails is a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory that has large forces of government, giant corporations, and other such dark (often secret) forces, acting in collusion to control the weather and even to control countries and their populations. 

Does this video prove chemtrails exist? Not necessarily, but it shows that NASA (and many others) know how to make them and know that they can be "weaponized" for global control and giant profit. 

The entire NASA broadcast is still available at NASA's Ustream channel:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/29293171

In the presentation, Duren gives the hypothetical cost of a global chemtrail effort at $10 billion a year. That's a steep price even for Monsanto though, with a total capitalized value of around $20 billion.

But how about a really gigantic corporation like BASF? They're the biggest GMO/pesticide/chemical corporation on Earth with a capitalized value of around $87 billion, and revenue last year of around $100 billion. 

But wait. In an article cited by Duren, the RRN Team of the World Economic Forum states, "Recent studies suggest that a small fleet of aircraft could inject a million tonnes of sulphur compounds into the stratosphere -- enough to offset roughly half of the global warming experienced to date -- for US$ 1 billion-US$ 2 billion annually."

That's an order of magnitude less than Duren's estimate, and that much more doable. 

So, up in the sky. Is that a contrail or a chemtrail? Well, it certainly could be a chemtrail, couldn't it? But if it were, we the people would be informed about it, right? Our government wouldn't let harmful chemicals be injected into our skies without telling us, right? We'd have to have informed consent to allow chemicals to be sprayed into the atmosphere, right? Especially if those chemicals might have unpredictable effects on our health, the weather, or that might unfairly profit huge corporations at our expense, right? They would have to disclose what chemicals they are spraying and observe some kind of buffer zone, right? Right?

H. Doug Matsuoka

Recorded Ustream of Riley Duren's complete NASA presentation on geoengineering:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/29293171

Publication cited by Duren: World Economic Forum 2013 X Factors list:
http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2013/section-five/x-factors/#view/img-3

Article mentioned by Duren (Guardian 7/17/2012 US geoengineers to spray sun-reflecting chemicals from balloon): http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/jul/17/us-geoengineers-spray-sun-balloon

World Economic Forum: Are we at risk from rogue geoengineering? 
http://forumblog.org/2013/01/are-we-at-risk-from-rogue-geoengineering/

Monsanto purchase of Climate Corp: http://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceupbin/2013/10/02/monsanto-buys-climate-corp-for-930-million/

Documentary: What in the world are they spraying?:
http://youtu.be/jf0khstYDLA

Documentary: Why in the world are they spraying?:
http://youtu.be/mEfJO0-cTis

DougNote post using this video:
http://www.dougnote.com/2014/06/up-in-sky-is-that-contrail-or-chemtrail.html