Arguing about arguing   Part 9
Channel: Ray Feodoroff
Date: 2021-07-16

Arguing about Arguing is a series of videos that outlines trends in case based notation literature, over the last 20 or more years, that seem to be overturning the position that Goal Oriented Requirements Engineering notations, such as i* and Goal Requirements Language (GRL) could not be used as assurance reasoning - during the Act of Design.

00:00 Intro
01:29 Revision
02:06 Let's GO!
05:22 I can't get me no, nullification without making or breaking propostions
07:29 Bazzingah!

Part 9 kicks off where Part 8 left off.  Part 8 left us, again, with the feeling that there may be more to comprehension and therefore confidence in a case, than "patching" notations.

In the middle, Part 9 may be a bit busy.   Going back to the idea of Hazard Oriented reasoning, which should be familiar to case based reasoners, we tease out ideas for graphically painting those defeasible characteristics semantically.   Really, sorry, returning to the point that Goal Oriented Requirements Engineering notations have semantics that entails themes from defeasible reasoning.

We're on the last stretch.   There is a Part 10 and then an Epilogue.


As always, the basis of this position of mine is at:

https://www.researchgate.net/project/Agent-Oriented-Assurance-Cases

Leveraging:

http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/istar/

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.150/en

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.151/en

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325923106

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313729854

Credits:
1920's music, especially, by Kevin Macleod

https://www.zapsplat.com
https://www.freesound.org 
https://orangefreesounds.com
https://freemusicarchive.org
https://www.fesliyanstudios.com
https://www.soundboard.com

Audio to mp3 using https://cloudconvert.com/
https://online-audio-converter.com/

Video generated using https://www.doodly.com