#250 Clement Lessage & Federico Ast: Kleros – Crowdsourced Arbitration for Blockchain Applications
Channel: Epicenter Podcast
Date: 2018-08-30

Support the show, consider donating: 
BTC: 1CD83r9EzFinDNWwmRW4ssgCbhsM5bxXwg (https://epicenter.tv/tipbtc)
BCC: 1M4dvWxjL5N9WniNtatKtxW7RcGV73TQTd (http://epicenter.tv/tipbch)
ETH: 0x8cdb49ca5103Ce06717C4daBBFD4857183f50935 (https://epicenter.tv/tipeth)

Dispute resolution is the process by which contracting parties settle disagreements. Whether in the form of litigation, arbitration, or other means of mediation, every contract defines a dispute resolution mechanism and jurisdiction. It is the metaphorical Lady Justice, measuring the strength of each party's arguments, and reaching a decision based on evidence.

Smart contracts are unique in this sense. Unlike traditional contracts, they are rigid and deterministic. Written in computer code, nuances in human language and vagueness of terms do not exist in this realm. There are no judges, no jury, just calculated execution. 

The DOA hack and other similar events have prompted observers of the space to express the need for smart contract dispute resolution. Some have suggested "exit switches" (https://epicenter.tv/episode/142/) that would allow for human intervention when edge cases appear. But could the arbitration process be integrated into the smart contract and on the blockchain?

We're joined by, Federico Ast and Clement Lessage, respectively CEO and CTO of Kleros. This dispute resolution layer provides contracting parties with a fast and secure process for arbitration. The system is broken up into courts and sub-courts, each specializing in specific matters like e-commerce, insurance, and transport. In the event of a dispute, parties submit their case to Kleros, where a crowd of expert jurors analyses the evidence. When all votes are cast, the decision is enforced by the smart contract, which may unlock funds, or provide parties with additional time to fulfill the terms of the agreement. Clever incentive mechanisms reward jurors who vote with the crowd, making Kleros resistant to bribe attacks and collusion between jurors.

Topics discussed in this episode:
- Federico and Clement's respective backgrounds, including a crowd arbitration project called Jury.
- The vision behind Kleros and the problem it addresses
- The case for crowd-sourced jurors as a means to find the best judgment
- The game theory and incentive mechanisms embedded in Kleros
- Kleros' hierarchical system of courts and sub-courts
- How jury selection works and who administers courts
- The system's built-in governance mechanism and its purpose
- The Kleros token, Pinkaion coin, and it's utility in the system
- “Doge on Trial,” a clever experiment to find authentic doges
- The current status of the project and roadmap

Links mentioned in this episode: 
- Kleros Website: https://kleros.io
- Kleros White Papper: https://kleros.io/assets/whitepaper.pdf
- Doges on Trial: https://dogesontrial.dog
- Why Decentralization Matters by Chris Dixon: https://medium.com/@cdixon/why-decentralization-matters-5e3f79f7638e

Sponsors: 


This episode is also available on :
- Epicenter.tv: https://epicenter.tv/250
- YouTube: http://youtu.be/efzSmpac2pw
- Souncloud: http://soundcloud.com/epicenterbitcoin/eb-250

Watch or listen, Epicenter is available wherever you get your podcasts.

Epicenter is hosted by Brian Fabian Crain, Sébastien Couture & Meher Roy.