Dwyer 6-14-21 Update:  Spence v. Pacquiao Line Has Dropped.  Pacquiao Still Underpriced, May Win.
Channel: Richard Dwyer
Date: 14/06/2021

Floyd v. Manny highlights:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxF3T1JNxss

Spence v. Porter highlights:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKizQI8F7Cw

On Spotify:  https://open.spotify.com/show/09eLFQ3igWVFhwn9JFtocm

On Google and Apple Podcasts:  dwyerboxingnews

https://www.patreon.com/dwyer70905

Finance - Realvision Referral:  https://www.realvision.com/refer?grsf=1ntsrs

Crypto - Uphold referral:  https://uphold.com/signup?referral=ebf484e6d1

BlockFi referral:  https://blockfi.com/credit-card-waitlist/?r=tBBTf

https://www.allbiz.com/business/richard-e-a-dwyer-esq-650-248-8601

Find me on MetMet.Com

Use Crypto?  Get a Crypto web address -- easy for senders to remember:  https://unstoppabledomains.com/r/1cdd619a859946d

For donations via Square:  https://checkout.square.site/pay/d197918ba8804abf8a06ce983705bcd7

Binance.US Referral - https://www.binance.us/?ref=35006261

On Alexa - "Alexa, play Dwyer Boxing and Sports News on Apple Podcast"

Blogs:
http://BettingAngle.US

http://gamblersadvisory.com

Law Firm Site:  http://divorcesiliconvalley.com

Tip Us In BTC, DASH, or Zcash
Tip us with Bitcoin: 1H7wYXUrSfUKxAYmA5MFUFyUsXGY4CEDLC

Tip us with Dash: XwdfmbU5GN3voHiZ9mGnJgsesA5u2eYYwx

On iTunes, vanity code dwyerboxingnews

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use

Fair use
Additionally, the fair use defense to copyright infringement was codified for the first time in section 107 of the 1976 Act. Fair use was not a novel proposition in 1976, however, as federal courts had been using a common law form of the doctrine since the 1840s (an English version of fair use appeared much earlier). The Act codified this common law doctrine with little modification. Under section 107, the fair use of a copyrighted work is not copyright infringement, even if such use technically violates section 106. While fair use explicitly applies to use of copyrighted work for criticism, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research purposes, the defense is not limited to these areas. The Act gives four factors to be considered to determine whether a particular use is a fair use: the purpose and character of the use (commercial or educational, transformative or reproductive); the nature of the copyrighted work (fictional or factual, the degree of creativity); the amount and substantiality of the portion of the original work used; and the effect of the use upon the market (or potential market) for the original work.