God's Nature, Love and Saṁsāra
Channel: Consciousness Research Centre
Date: 2021-04-02

This series is classified *Uncategorized | General*

Viewer Leukos sent me a wonderful email, in which he describes the highest truths, in his own words and with his own original reasoning. It's such a gem, I want to share it with everyone. 

Hello Kind Sir,
I was thinking about God, wanted to share it with you. 
"How can god be anything less than itself"? 
Obviously it couldn't. It means there can never be a sub-set to define it. God can't be defined. It's beyond everything, as much as it is that very everything. God must be infinite. Not only that, even numbers are infinite as well, yet the sum of even and odd number is a greater infinite set than the set composed of only even ones. So God must not only be infinite, but must be infinitely infinite, there can never be an infinite greater than it. 

If God is infinitely infinite, it can't reject anything. It loves it wholly, it can't separate from itself - not even by a single quark, forever. 

I now understand better Blake's insight:
"Eternity is in love with the productions of time"

"Productions of time". 
Kāla, time. Kālī, aspect of the Goddess. "Productions of time" - Saṃsāra, her cycling Māyā.

"Eternity is in love with the productions of time", God is in love with Her productions.

But of course, what else could be? Infinity must be One. Its nature cannot be anything else than love, because it's one.

God is birthing itself infinitely through the love relationship between eternity and the productions of time into every form, by an infinite value of permutations.
It's love loving love, by an infinite degree.

Always Saṃsāra is described as painful, as pain. But how could it be anything less than love, than perfection? It's impossible for it to be imperfect, because it's one with God. But if it's perfect then it also must be Good, therefore loving, therefore not painful. 

Why do we perceive it as painful then? 

I see again Blake:
"If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern".

The Avidyā obfuscates perception, masking love in pain. But even here, how could there be any mistake in anything? God would turn imperfect. So Avidyā must also be right. Isn't this the logical root of Faith? 

If Avidyā is right, it's a calculated mistake. God's introducing error in order not to be "error-less". Infinitely infinite must encompass its own negation, yet it transcends it. 

Avidyā can only be relatively bad, Saṃsāra can only be relatively painful - yet following God's strict logic, its logos, they seem to be ultimately revealed as good and loving. 

The Goddess must also be infinitely loving and compassionate. She's Māyā but she's also Līlā. Going sub specie aeternitatis, from eternity's prospective, how could be the weight of the infinite cycling forms be anything heavier than a play? How could there be fear to begin with? Fear of what?

I feel I don't actually really grasp it now, but I might begin to see how from your perspective "the world never existed to begin with".

I hope you had a peaceful day, I'll have a "prayer" for you before going to sleep and after doing mantras. I hope the Goddess will find you good. 

==========
Dharmasār Video Series Index:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EZFqp9G893-LMYSm-ucUt3CylMTbfLV2/view?usp=drivesdk

Four States of Consciousness Diagram: 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13OWr_2V857yq7AjS59yhF4ub2q9k8Kl9/view?usp=sharing

Dharmasār Complete Archive Library:
https://archive.org/details/dharmasar-essence-of-dharma