the flaw of fair use
Channel: sonic meerkat
Date: 08/09/2016

like with the youtube TOS the conditions are too fucking vague.

1) what constitutes a small portion of the original work?
2) what would you class as parody VS ripping off/criticism VS harassment/education VS not actually teaching?
3) what constitutes as majoritively own work?
4) so a negative review can negatively impact the commercial value of a product so are reviews infringing?

pretty scary to think that at least 90% of content on youtube uses this as their defence and souly rely upon its enforcement.