Federal Republic of Germany accused of crimes against humanity
Channel: Pater Rolf Lingen
Date: 2012-08-02

Press release: Appeal to the International Criminal Court and to the Office of the United Nations
Pater Rolf Hermann Lingen, Dorsten, August 2nd, 2012
The so-called "Federal Republic of Germany" (FRG), i.e. every single responsible FRG representative personally, is accused of crimes against humanity according to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, namely Article 6 (b), Article 6 (c) and Article 7 (h). On August 2nd, 2012, an according complaint has been submitted both to the International Criminal Court (ICC), Office of the Prosecutor, Den Haag, and to the Office of the United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Geneva. This press release is likewise the text of the complaint. The Roman-Catholic priest Father Rolf Hermann Lingen (the complainant), Germany, must expect a life imprisonment solely for confessing the Catholic faith. Already sentenced earlier because of the same "crime", he now shall be sentenced again, this time once and for all, because of his obstinacy. The final court hearing shall take place on Septembre 27th, 2012. The complainant is a so-called "sedevacantist". Sedevacantism is the position that the Holy See is vacant since 1958, i.e. since the death of Pope Pius XII. The group of the so-called "Second Vatican Council" (V2) is *NOT* the Catholic Church, but an anticatholic sect. Many English websites offer information on this issue, e.g. "dailycatholic.org" or "novusordowatch.org". In 1997, the complainant founded a German site (later address "kirchenlehre.com" - "doctrine of the church") for which he has already published more than a thousand texts. In short: The V2-sect does not have the four marks / specific adjectives of the Church, i.e. one, holy, catholic and apostolic. The Church infallibly condemned some teachings as heresies, of which some are mentioned in a "collection" ("Syllabus") by Pope Pius IX. And even Joseph Ratzinger himself (nowadays sometimes called "Pope Benedict XVI.") openly declared that the V2-text "Gaudium et Spes" is a "counter-Syllabus". Regarding all the blasphemies and heresies of the V2-sect with "inter-religious meetings", "ecumenical worship services" etc., nobody seriously thinks that the V2-sect is the Church. The complainant spreads this information confessing that he - contrary to the V2-"priests" - is a Roman-Catholic priest. The FRG ignores reality completely and falsely accuses the complainant of "abuse of titles". Some aspects: 1. The FRG completely violates the principle "No punishment without a penal law" ("nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali"). There is no law at all that prohibits being Catholic, i.e. sedevacantist, resp. that dictates to approve a false pope as a true pope. And even if such a law existed, it would be illegal and void in itself, cf. Pietro Rainalducci. 2. The FRG completely violates the freedom of conscience. The FRG forces the citizens to approve the false ideology that the V2-sect is the Catholic Church. 3. The FRG completely violates the freedom of the true religion. The FRG absurdly declares that everyone who rejects the blasphemous V2-heresies is a heretic (contradictio in adiecto). And as the Church is "Catholic", i.e. "for all", every actual and potential Catholic is victim of justice of the FRG. 4. The FRG completely violates the right of a fair trial. In general, The FRG a) never proves anything of its - notoriously false! - accusations against the complainant and b) ignores all the proofs, arguments etc. submitted by the complainant. 5. The complainant has even openly declared that he will instantly revoke his sedevacantist conviction as soon as there is a proof that the V2-sect is indeed the Catholic Church. But the FRG nevertheless does not give any arguments that the V2-sect is the Catholic church. Instead, it argues that only the Church has to give any arguments. However, in the first place, the FRG insists that the V2-sect is the Catholic church. Thus, the FRG presupposes the exact thing that must first be proven! To stress this fact again: In all these decades since 1958 the V2-sect could only "argue" that Germany itself claims that the V2-sect is the Catholic church. The FRG solely points to the V2-sect, while the V2-sect solely points to the FRG. As a matter of fact: There is no argument at all but only a circular reasoning. 6. Contrary to the FRG, the complainant has sufficient knowledge of both Catholic theology and V2-ideolgy. The complainant was a V2-"priest candidate" and made his V2-"diploma" with the rating "very good". Not until at the end of his V2-studies, he became "sedevacantist" and therefore refused being "ordained" in the V2-sect. Instead, in 1996, he was ordained by a sedevacantist bishop: Georg Schmitz, a former member of the "Society of St. Piux X" (SSPX) of Marcel Lefebvre.