Paradoxes of set theory | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: wikipedia tts
Date: 2018-12-25

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_set_theory


00:00:17 1 Basics
00:00:26 1.1 Cardinal numbers
00:01:43 1.2 Ordinal numbers
00:02:16 1.3 Power sets
00:03:39 2 Paradoxes of the infinite set
00:04:14 2.1 Paradoxes of enumeration
00:05:08 2.2 iJe le vois, mais je ne crois pas/i
00:06:10 2.3 Paradoxes of well-ordering
00:07:12 3 Paradoxes of the Supertask
00:08:16 3.1 The diary of Tristram Shandy
00:09:07 3.2 The Ross-Littlewood paradox
00:09:38 4 Paradoxes of proof and definability
00:10:54 4.1 Early paradoxes: the set of all sets
00:11:56 4.2 Paradoxes by change of language
00:13:07 4.2.1 König's paradox
00:13:55 4.2.2 Richard's paradox
00:14:05 4.3 Paradox of Löwenheim and Skolem
00:15:22 5 See also
00:16:35 6 Notes
00:17:26 7 References



Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts



"There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance."
- Socrates



SUMMARY
=======
This article contains a discussion of paradoxes of set theory. As with most mathematical paradoxes, they generally reveal surprising and counter-intuitive mathematical results, rather than actual logical contradictions within modern axiomatic set theory.