Discussing “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
Channel: Kristi Winters
Date: 04/09/2016

Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science” by Daniel T. Gilbert, Gary King, Stephen Pettigrew, Timothy D. Wilson

A paper from the Open Science Collaboration (Research Articles, 28 August 2015, aac4716) attempting to replicate 100 published studies suggests that the reproducibility of psychological science is surprisingly low. We show that this article contains three statistical errors and provides no support for such a conclusion. Indeed, the data are consistent with the opposite conclusion, namely, that the reproducibility of psychological science is quite high.
http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/gilbert_king_pettigrew_wilson_2016_with_appendix.pdf

Music by Soni Ventorum Wind Quintet is licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 International License.
http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Soni_Ventorum/Franz_Danzi_Wind_Quintet_Opus_67/01_-_Danzi-_Wind_Quintet_Op_67_No_2_In_E_Minor_1_Allego_Vivo
(This album is made available under the EFF OAL License (Open Audio License), which in turn is interchangeable with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.)

My subscribers are awesome - you're awesome too so you should subscribe as well!

Join my monthly seminar by supporting me on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/drkmwinters

My YouTube Facebook page 
Kristi Winters https://www.facebook.com/youtubedrkmwinters/

Follow me on Twitter too! https://twitter.com/KWintie