Astrology and science | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: wikipedia tts
Date: 2019-03-27

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology_and_science


00:01:56 1 Introduction
00:03:06 2 Historical relationship with astronomy
00:06:14 3 Philosophy of science
00:06:35 3.1 Falsifiability
00:08:03 3.2 "No puzzles to solve"
00:09:44 3.3 Progress, practice and consistency
00:12:19 3.4 Irrationality
00:14:55 3.5 Quinean dichotomy
00:15:19 4 Tests of astrology
00:16:09 4.1 Carlson's experiment
00:17:49 4.2 Dean and Kelly
00:18:49 4.3 Other tests
00:20:11 4.4 Mars effect
00:22:10 5 Theoretic obstacles
00:22:51 5.1 Lack of consistency
00:24:46 5.2 Lack of physical basis
00:26:38 5.3 Lack of predictive power
00:27:52 5.4 Lack of mechanism
00:32:35 6 Psychology
00:35:32 7 Sociology
00:40:09 8 See also



Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts
Speaking Rate: 0.8365679411415455
Voice name: en-US-Wavenet-C


"I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think."
- Socrates


SUMMARY
=======
Astrology consists of a number of belief systems that hold that there is a relationship between astronomical phenomena and events or descriptions of personality in the human world. Astrology has been rejected by the scientific community as having no explanatory power for describing the universe. Scientific testing has found no evidence  to support the premises or purported effects outlined in astrological traditions.Where astrology has made falsifiable predictions, it has been falsified. The most famous test was headed by Shawn Carlson and included a committee of scientists and a committee of astrologers. It led to the conclusion that natal astrology performed no better than chance. Astrologer and psychologist Michel Gauquelin claimed to have found statistical support for "the Mars effect" in the birth dates of athletes, but it could not be replicated in further studies.  The organisers of later studies claimed that Gauquelin had tried to influence their inclusion criteria for the study by suggesting specific individuals be removed. It has also been suggested, by Geoffrey Dean, that the reporting of birth times by parents (before the 1950s) may have caused the apparent effect.
Astrology has not demonstrated its effectiveness in controlled studies and has no scientific validity, and is thus regarded as pseudoscience. There is no proposed mechanism of action by which the positions and motions of stars and planets could affect people and events on Earth in the way astrologers say they do that does not contradict well-understood, basic aspects of biology and physics.