Libya Benghazi Talking Points re: murder of Chris Stevens, Rice, Clinton, Clapper Petraeus, Allen
Channel: Jeffersonian Alliance
Date: 2012-11-21

Benghazi Gate http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/24/100000-libyan-casualties/
Director National Intelligence Clapper.  Who made the decision to alter the truth to suit political appearance? Tail wagging the dog. Was the US Government disinformed by a media eager to oust Gadaffi as a bloodsport, with plenty of loot. The Media and The Military companies are owned by many of the same interests. In the case of the NYT the hawkishness comes from its ties to pro Israeli elements perhaps. The French and British press, all seemed eager to repeat stories that in the rush to intervene were not fact checked. Did the US NSC have the real info:
Talking Points:
http://libertycrier.com/government/ben-swann-petraeus-allen-gaouette-ham-the-benghazi-story-the-media-isnt-telling-you/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_National_Security_Council#Membership http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57552328/sources-office-of-the-dni-cut-al-qaeda-reference-from-benghazi-talking-points-and-cia-fbi-signed-off/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/20/iraq-afghanistan-daqduq-indefinite-detention
All of this over 4 american lives vs. the 10s of thousands allready lost
Who made the decision to ignore the truth
When it 
Destabilized Africa, releasing weapons and displaced armed groups, and greatly strengthened reactionary armed militants, and militarizing what might have been resolved through dialog
Who made the decision to have the press run with many horror studies about the 1969 Revolution Libyan Government led by Mouammar Gadaffi which turned out to be untrue?
- Viagra Rape
- Heavy Weapons Use On Civilians
- Intervene to prevent a non existent massacre, using Gadaffi's own bluster to justify their actions.
- Arm and train reactionary religious militants, the very same people who pointed their weapons on the US Ambassador. Why were US officials attacked by the people they armed? Isn't that actually the most important question. What is the truth? Then who made the decision to commit fraud on the people of the world by confusing and distorting the facts
- Why are 4 major military figures having their careers halted Petraeus, Allen, Ham. Why is Obama purging these people? Petraeus was exhibiting hostility prior to the election. Additionaly Bob Gates resigned and was reportedly opposed to the Libya intervention as it was conducted. The gamble was on putting a wedge between Tunisia And Egypt in the Arab Spring. But what of the general trend of arming Sunni Wahabi Salafist Groups in Libya and Syria, after selling 80 billion dollars in arms to Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Qatar has become the king maker. Every aspect of the peace keeping resolution was turned into a war making resolution. Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton -- both definitely knowingly lied -- Clinton in refusing real dialog -- by demanding he stop killing his own people, and Rice by claiming 10's of thousands of lives were threatened.
- Why did Americans arm Religious Zealots
- Why did Americans maintain lax security -- when the "love" between Wahabi Salafists and the US Govt in Libya and Syria -- clearly could not fix the damage done by in particular the treatment of Palestinians since the 1960s by the US, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, Iraq and drone strikes. 
- What were they thinking, attacks against even the Red Cross occurred in Benghazi, the Islamic Caliphate flag hoisted over the revolutions hq at the courthouse in Benghazi.
- Why did Ansar Al Sharia and cohorts attack the Americans who had armed them. Did they feel that they had gotten what they wanted out of the Americans, and now could give the Americans what they wanted once Gadaffi was out of the way.
- Should we not hold our Government accountable.
- The problems is any peaceful congresspeople will provide cover to the Administration -- which up until now -- have run an aggressive neo-con strategy lauded by some of the most sinister figures from the Bush administration. And the conservatives basically support this permanent warfare security state. But if you have a voice -- demand that the investigation go back to the outbreak -- you can use the argument -- why did we arm Religious Extremists in Libya, known to be sympathetic to the people we are torturing waterboarding and bombing all over the world. We are reluctant to call them Al Qaeda. But the former LIFG leader Abu Yahya Al Libi was assassinated by the US just days before the attack.
Every military intervention seems to start with a lie, The Spanish American War, The Gulf Of Tonkin, The Iraq War, the war on terror, all are designed to benefit certain people at the expense of the vast majority of the citizens, and even more so the citizens of the targeted countries.
http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=55640 http://futurechallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/arab-spring-map.jpg