Ex-parte hearing in open court
Channel: JUDICIAL JIU-JITSU
Date: 2020-09-14

Watch how Joesph Hong and Melanie Morgan tricked Judge Kishner at the 4/23/19 hearing into believing their false claims: 
1. that she didn't intend to grant me leave to intervene at the 12/20/16 hearing which is the same as not granting it; 
2. that she didn't deny SCA's motion to dismiss me as an individual at the 4/27/17 hearing because David Ochoa never wrote or entered the order, 
3. that the attorneys should have removed me from the caption in the two stipulations and orders she signed on 3/7/19 and 3/12/19 and so, regardless of there being no order, I am removed and my filings stricken from the record as rogue anyway; 
4. that it didn't matter that she never signed an order removing me as a party until 6/24/19, three weeks after I was excluded from having my claims adjudicated from trial; 
5. that it was not an abuse of discretion to make decisions that are fatally prejudicial to me based on representations of opposing counsel without me or my attorney being present because it is not an ex-parte communication if it is held in open court;
 6. that it was not an abuse of discretion to proceed with an ex-parte meeting with Joseph Hong and Melanie Morgan on 4/23/19 at an unnoticed hearing of "Nona Tobin's Opposition to Nationstar's motion for summary judgment against Jimijack and counter motion for summary judgment"; 
7. that it doesn't matter that Joseph Hong served notices on 4/15/19 and 4/22/19 that the 4/23/19 hearing of Nationstar's motion for summary judgment set by a 3/22/19 Clerk's Notice of hearing was continued by Judge Kishner's own 4/12/19 order to 5/7/19 
8. that it was ok to proceed and take action against me in my absence because she kept the matter on the agenda so the opposing parties present could explain to her what was really going on in this case; 
9. that it was not an abuse of discretion to sanction me without my attorney or I present because  my counsel of record hadn’t filed a motion for leave to withdraw in advance of my for filing Pro Se documents;
10. that having an ex-parte discussion to clear up the judge’s confusion about my standing with Joseph Hong and Melanie Morgan; 
11. that it was not an abuse of discretion to have the Clerk email department 16 to make sure Melanie Morgan attended the unnoticed, continued, 4/23/19 hearing of Nona Tobin’s opposition to NSM’s MSJ vs Jimijack while not seeming to care that the person who was going to be attacked had been served notice not to show up;
13. that there is no problem with the bench orders against Nona Tobin bee merely reported to Tobin and her counsel as a fait accompli but never entered as orders ever while the Register of Actions to this day shows that Nona Tobin’s OPPC, including her MSJ against Jimijack was heard at the 4/23/19 hearing
12. that because Melanie had filed a "Response", not an opposition, to Nona Tobin's OPPC, claiming that Nona Tobin didn't have any claims against Nationstar, everything Melanie said about Nationstar's standing, and Nona Tobin's lack thereof, justified striking all Nona Tobin’s motions and notices in my absence without any opportunity to be heard, without any appeal and without ever again being allowed to speak on my own behalf.