Debunking Immoral Statist Non-Debunking Debunker Common Law
Channel: Freedom Unchained
Date: 2021-06-08

Debunking Immoral Statist Non-Debunking Debunker Common Law

Follow Me on the other platforms!
https://twitter.com/GarrettJGrubbs
https://www.facebook.com/GarrettJGrubbs
https://mewe.com/i/garrettgrubbs1
https://mewe.com/join/freedomunchainedcommunity
https://rumble.com/register/GarrettJGrubbs/
https://odysee.com/@FreedomUnchained
https://flote.app/user/GarrettJGrubbs
Contact Me! foundationfreedom@protonmail.com
Join Me on UHive with this Link and Earn Tokens and 25% discount within the story
https://www.uhive.com/invite?c=JAW4AT
UHive- Freedom Unchained

Rights Cannot Be Taken Away - Only Given Under Consent
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2020/10/17/rights-can-not-be-taken-away-only-given-under-consent/

I do not know the original author of this but I feel it necessary to repeat it.

We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS or UNITED STATES CITIZENS, et al.

STATUTES ARE NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE THEY MUST HAVE YOUR CONSENT. 

We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT, EVER. 

We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e.  We are Living Souls. 

We are NOT a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece of paper, or bond paper, being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or dead entity.

A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! – Flournoy v. First National Bank of Shreveport, 197 LA 1057-3 So. 2d 244,248.

A “CODE” in NOT a law! – In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point of fact in law.

A concurrent or “joint resolution of the legislature is NOT “law”. Knowing v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292,179 N.E. 705,707, Ward v. State, 176 OKL,368,56 P. 2d 136,137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110.P.2d 162,165

U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “The common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”.  Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.

U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – “All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws.  All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process…” – Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F. 2d,1344, 1348 (1985).

U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – 1796 – “There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature.  He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent”. Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. This decision has never been overturned:

“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789.  There have only been Administrators. – FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178″.

“The Supreme court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful commands {Statutory Rules, Regulations and Codes- Ordinances and Restrictions} on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…{deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion, and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts}”. – United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 178,76, S.Ct. 281,L.Ed. 185 (1956).

“The Common Law is the real law, Supreme Law of the land.  The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. (Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261),  They are the law of government for internal regulations, not the law of man, in his separate but equel station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.

” A concurrent or “joint resolution” of legislature in not “Law”, (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707: Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136,137: State ex rel. Todd v Flynn, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,165).  All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws, “All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of law..” (Rodriques v, Ray donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344,1348 (1985):…lacking due process of law, in that they are “void for ambiguity” in their failure to specify the statutes applicability to “natural persons”, otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their constitution by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional corporate entities or “persons”, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, and property of the government, but not the “Natural Person” or American  citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism”.  

A “Statute is not a Law”, (Flournoy v, First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197, La. 1067, 3 So.2d 144,148).

A “code” or Statute is not Law”,( Flournoy v. first Nat. Bank of Shreveport 197, La 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248).

A “Code is not a Law”, ( In Re Self v. Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law)”.