R Kelly Appeal TV--Episode 2-- Sentencing Reset
Channel: 1SuccessMindset
Date: 2021-10-31

Subject:  Thank you for visiting R-Kelly Appeal TV. Where we remain current on the conversation regarding where the Appeal of Award winner Robert Sylvester Kelly is headed. Is there room to set him free or possibly give him more time? I’m your host Shine Wisdom and I welcome you to episode #2. I was simply amazed by the new subscribers and those who responded on our first pilot video. I thank the viewer from China for showing your love and sharing your business details of what you do. Please subscribe so you will get the premiere that will take place right here on this channel every Sunday 6 pm EST. So, let’s jump right into the conversation today. 
So my research sent me to review these three important factors
1) What positions do the Defense have to win or re consider charges on R-Kelly’s behalf regarding Appeal? 
2) Should R-Kelly lose his Grammy Awards? 
3) Should recanting a story be held in contempt of court and nothing stated after that be inadmissible?
So, I asked these questions to many community members and the statistics are as follows. 
1) We have found that the sentencing has been postponed from April, 2022 to August 2022. Some feel that Robert S. Kelly Aka R-Kelly will be set free before the holiday. Meaning through December 31, 2021. Taking stories from alleged victims who waited so long to report these crimes against them can cause one to believe that the stories may have changed in some way for the benefit of the group of individuals that actually spoke against Kelly during his time of judgement. For example; two people see an accident; the first person can see the event totally different. Based on emotional states of the event. Causing both to have separate accounts. These situations minimize the event in the mind state to recall events exactly as they appeared. Making the reliability of the facts lessened by 2% each day that time lapses. According to the Bureau of Justice and Statistics. On the other hand, scientists have now identified the likely biological basis for this hormone released during emotional arousal “primes” nerve cells to remember events by increasing their chemical sensitivity at sites where nerve wires to form new memories circuits. What are your views about allowing the docuseries and personal accounts to be the “be all” to the jury’s verdict? And how do you feel about the short length of time the jury deliberated on a man’s life? Do you feel that it was enough time to find guilt on all charges? 
Let’s discuss the underage tapes found alleged to be R-Kelly. One individual questioned me and asked; how many times have you been in a crowded place and see a man that looks like this person; or that person. Then you find yourself in a mistaken identity situation. Could this be the case? Another conversation stated if R-Kelly videotaped everything, wouldn’t other underage videos be popping up like popcorn? Just like all the women who has accused Robert for all the heinous acts that has come out all at once. Yet, no one had the strength to come out when it happened. Not the year after; or decade after that; or two decades after that? Can this really be considered grounds for an appeal? For me, I look at R-Kelly’s music maturing from the 90’s- today. I believe he was leaving the old and coming into his manhood and growing like others couldn’t imagine with his gifts and talents in the world as Kells knew it. Just my thoughts. 
2) About the Earned Awards. When a person has been approved for the physical works performed; such as a hyseman trophy, granted ability through earned opportunity. How can an earned award be taken from a person who has performed the acts that made him/ her successful in the eye of the act itself. Example; You just received an A in social studies and years later you do something immoral, unethical. Is that grounds to take away that A you’ve achieved?  Please leave your comments in the comment box.  How many of you feel that R-Kelly worked in the studio tirelessly to the point that he would be up for days. To have this moral issue be the essence of removing all his success from his achievements. I remember him being GIVEN those awards on BET, Vibe Magazine; VEVO, Morning shows etc. Achievements to me reflect what has been involved in the climb. Can anyone take away an achievement award for someone who climbed Mount Everest? Just a thought. I would like to also state that the moral fabric of a person should be considered when going up the mountain. It is possible that, yes, the moral fabric may be tainted from demons of another’s past. Thank you for listening to this podcast and join me next week.