9/11 conspiracy theories | Wikipedia audio article
Channel: Subhajit Sahu
Date: 2018-12-25

This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories


00:01:45 1 Background
00:04:07 2 History
00:10:48 3 Types
00:12:19 4 Theories
00:12:28 4.1 Foreknowledge
00:12:55 4.1.1 Suspected insider trading
00:18:06 4.1.2 Air defense stand down theory
00:20:49 4.1.3 Israeli agents
00:21:49 4.2 World Trade Center
00:27:23 4.3 The Pentagon
00:31:16 4.4 Flight 93
00:36:19 4.5 Hijackers
00:38:38 4.6 Foreign governments
00:39:38 4.6.1 Israel
00:41:34 4.6.2 Antisemitism in conspiracy theories
00:43:02 4.6.3 Saudi Arabia
00:44:36 4.7 No-planes theory
00:46:17 5 Cover-up allegations
00:46:36 5.1 Cockpit recorders
00:47:50 5.2 Bin Laden tapes
00:50:21 5.3 Hiding of CIA recruitment efforts
00:50:58 6 Motives
00:51:06 6.1 Pax Americana
00:53:06 6.2 Invasions
00:54:05 6.3 New World Order
00:54:30 7 Suggested historical precedents
00:55:39 8 Proponents
00:58:03 8.1 Dissecting the 9/11 Truth movement community
01:01:02 9 Media reaction
01:12:33 10 Criticism
01:19:48 11 In politics
01:24:51 12 Legal cases
01:25:55 13 See also



Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago.

Learning by listening is a great way to:
- increases imagination and understanding
- improves your listening skills
- improves your own spoken accent
- learn while on the move
- reduce eye strain

Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone.

Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio:
https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91
Other Wikipedia audio articles at:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts
Upload your own Wikipedia articles through:
https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts



"There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance."
- Socrates



SUMMARY
=======
There are many conspiracy theories that attribute the planning and execution of the September 11 attacks against the United States to parties other than, or in addition to, al-Qaeda including that there was advance knowledge of the attacks among high-level government officials. Government investigations and independent reviews have rejected these theories. Proponents of these theories assert that there are inconsistencies in the commonly accepted version, or evidence that was either ignored or overlooked.The most prominent conspiracy theory is that the collapse of the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were the result of controlled demolitions rather than structural failure due to impact and fire. Another prominent belief is that the Pentagon was hit by a missile launched by elements from inside the U.S. government or that a commercial airliner was allowed to do so via an effective stand-down of the American military. Possible motives claimed by conspiracy theorists for such actions include justifying the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq (even though the U.S. government concluded Iraq was not involved in the attacks) to advance their geostrategic interests, such as plans to construct a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. Other conspiracy theories revolve around authorities having advance knowledge of the attacks and deliberately ignoring or assisting the attackers.The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the technology magazine Popular Mechanics have investigated and rejected the claims made by 9/11 conspiracy theorists. The 9/11 Commission and most of the civil engineering community accept that the impacts of jet aircraft at high speeds in combination with subsequent fires, not controlled demolition, led to the collapse of the Twin Towers, but some groups disagree with the arguments made by NIST and Popular Mechanics, including Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.