8/16 Replacement Retards, Rom 9-11 vs. Eph 2
Channel: Brain Outy
Date: 23/12/2012

Replacement theology is the basis for preterism, largely using Romans 9.  Last five videos in this series show how and why both are so retarded.  Much more can be said, but I'm trying to keep it simple, here.  So this simple video and the next three, focus on Romans 9-11 versus Ephesians 2. Last in series shows how Book of Hebrews, blows Replacement Theology outta da water.

I did a huge writeup on the difference between the Old and New Covenants which will take you a month to read, in http://www.brainout.net/LordvSatan2.htm#CovG .  Took me years to compile and distill, so it isn't simple.  But it does work with what you know, and you'll have to mull it all over, if you're even supposed to read it.

A shorter, pithier version of the difference in OUR Bridal contract, is here:  http://www.brainout.net/LvS4aContinued.htm#Bridal .

If you're a glutton for punishment like I was, you'll need to read all of LordvSatan2.htm and LordvSatan3.htm to completely understand all the legalities in the change of covenant, particularly from the standpoint of the Trial.  Took me about seven years to write it up (2000-2007).  It needs revision for updated info on Bible meter -- and for sense -- but is still largely correct.

The Ephesians 2:10 Greek geek stuff is extensively covered in http://www.brainout.net/LvS4b.htm#FitBride .  That whole page demonstrates the difference between OT and NT provisions, as well.  Part IV is on the TRIAL IMPACT of Bride down here, and is summarized in my SatStrat playlist.  In short, I've spent from 2000 until now documenting the role of Church and why Rapture, so there is a lot of material.  On the other hand, you have to be deaf dumb and blind to miss the fact that a) Church does NOT replace Israel, but the DEMONS, and b) to think that God would abandon His Promise to CHRIST as King of the Jews.  But, that's precisely what replacement theology and its anti-semitic kant, does.  Ooops.