Competitional Linguistic Tracking: Listening to a book read while reading AI chat with human.
Channel: Benjamin B
Date: 24/04/2020

The Technological System's Bluff - Jacques Ellul youtube.com/watch?v=MmuJG5e-Om4

https://elusid.space/2020/04/18/new-game-data-mine-the-a-i/
https://elusid.space/2020/04/19/oppenheimer-herbert-ellul-hoffman/

#AuthenticSovereignty #AuthenticLiberty #EndTheDrugWar #freethelusid #ExpandRightToTry #BodilyAutonomy #CognitiveLiberty #JustHousing #Benji2020

Graham Hancock calls DMT "jungle vision" in comparison to television. Tibetans call it "vajra vision"

"The new earth settlement is the classical notion that if you cause no harm to others, you are protected by the social contract that ensures your liberty to be as smart or dumb as you wish in how you consume. That is what makes Western culture great, and many non-Western cultures get that idea, not because it is unique to Western culture, but because — just like how ayahuasca introduces any human to the nature and history of human consciousness — the protection of life, liberty and property for those who do not harm others is the best way to minimally organize collectives of humans, both for the community and the individual."
https://www.facebook.com/cactispine/posts/10104436343459138

As autonomous beings living in multiplicity, there must be commonly agreed to respect for and responsibility to that multiplicity and our roles as individuals within it; most essentially, not to harm one another, and by extension from that, the agreement to protect one another from harm if we are not causing harm to others — as the most critical and foundationally fundamental agreement. If we don't have that, then we are working on something distracted from or in denial of that which must be most primarily established as our most basic and minimal responsibility as autonomous human agents.

Like: eat, sleep, shelter yourself, and strive to establish and protect that just and proper liberty... or succumb to games distracting people from that. It really has gotten that clear in my thinking and approach now.

I hope I have not over-simplified things unfairly or over-complicated the simple in the aim to clarify its importance.

Bodily autonomy. It is not the government's body. It is not your body. It is not your option. To think otherwise is a very sad and dangerous issue probably resulting in the equally problematic thinking that you can help anything politically without ending the drug war, since honestly, you have to address the root of the issue: Bodily autonomy. If one does not have a right to one's own body, we do not have an establishment of free and civil society.

Yes, impermanence and the community follow-through of eliminating wastefulness in the allowance of people's actions to unfold as they want them to requires solidarity and initiative in the agreement of non-aggression: to the protection from harm justly extended to those who cause no harm to others, but not in the protection of individuals from themselves and their autonomous actions non-harmful to others that individuals are responsible for to themselves and in the consequences of actions in society to oneself and others. That is the establishment of the common understanding to feel and speak to most primarily.