Tuna Kills More People Than Guns No Progress at Fukushima Only Lies (SW)
Channel: A Billion Views
Date: 2018-06-17

My view: if you want a trip, look at the side of tuna sometime. You'd never imagine something with so many warnings and cautions against eating would be viewed as food, let alone sold.

And that was before the radiation... 
_________________________________________________________________

Don't Miss 3/11 The Nuclear Proctoligist https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCw2f... His other channel https://www.youtube.com/user/Beautifu... Thanks to TheTrueRae Smile ZANZABAR RETURNS WITH A SHARKS VIEW on RADIATION https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zuE1...

FDA Refuses to Test Fish for Radioactivity … Government Pretends Radioactive Fish Is Safe. The FDA says it won’t monitor radiation in fish on the West Coast of the U.S.The FDA said North Pacific fish are so unlikely to be contaminated by radioactive material from the crippled nuclear plant in Japan that there’s no reason to test them, state and federal officials said this week. 

Check Me out at Minds https://www.minds.com/Reup I'm on Bitchute https://www.bitchute.com/channel/stro...

DeLancey, the FDA spokeswoman, said “We have not been doing any testing. We’ve been working with NOAA to keep an eye on U.S. waters, to see if there is any cause for alarm, and we do have the capability to begin testing if that does occur.”

Asked to explain what kind of monitoring was taking place in the ocean, DeLancey said, “You would have to talk directly to NOAA … I don’t really want to speak for another agency.” But NOAA fisheries spokeswoman Kate Naughton declined to answer questions and referred a reporter back to DeLancey and the EPA. 

DeLancey said that so far, there’s no reason for concern about Fukushima. The radioactive materials in the water near Fukushima quickly become diluted in the massive volume of the Pacific, she said. Additionally, radioactive fallout that lands on the surface tends to stay there, giving the most unstable ones isotopes like iodine time to decay before reaching fish, she said. 

Of course, radioactive isotopes like cesium 137 are very long-lived, and so won’t necessarily decay before they reach fish. And – in typical Orwellian agency-speak – the FDA is trying to reassure people that eating contaminated fish poses no health risk. Alexander Higgins points out that Japanese fish exceed federal radiation limits by 2400% http://washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/fd...