Power of Contempt Makes Family Court Void
Channel: PrivacyFight
Date: 2023-11-21

If you were a victim of divorce or family court, it is very likely that none of what happened to you is legal.  I explain some of this here but see my video membership that explains how you can fight back and prevent yourself from being victimized by this unfair system at www.privacyfight.io
see also
www.aceofcoins.com

The Intersection of Family Law and Personal Agency: A Discourse by John Jay

Executive Summary:

John Jay presents a provocative discourse on family law, personal finance, and the sanctity of private family agreements. He begins by discussing the potential for passive income to alleviate financial burdens such as mortgage payments. He suggests that one can create or invest in revenue streams, like websites, that could cover recurring expenses. Jay swiftly transitions into a critique of the family court system, arguing that it oversteps its bounds by intruding into the private agreements and decisions made within families.

Jay asserts that the family should be the final arbiter of its affairs, especially concerning divorce, child custody, and the distribution of financial responsibilities. He challenges the court's authority to override existing familial arrangements, emphasizing that such interventions disregard the intimate, private agreements between spouses. He questions the court's jurisdiction, especially in the absence of abuse or neglect, which he believes should be the purview of criminal courts instead.

He further critiques the family court's approach to imposing contractual terms on families, requiring judicial approval of agreements, or setting terms unilaterally. Jay underscores that the courts lack accountability and the intimate knowledge required to make decisions that align with a family's unique circumstances.

Delving into the legal definitions, Jay speaks to the concept of marriage as an existing private membership association (PMA), which inherently has its terms and should not be subject to court revision. He suggests that the marriage license and residency establish jurisdiction, but do not grant the court the right to interfere in the private association that a marriage represents.

Jay concludes by advising that families maintain records of their financial allocations and agreements not for public disclosure, but for their own reference. He proposes the idea of a family as a trust, with the husband and father acting as the fiduciary, responsible for the management of the family's assets and well-being. This perspective challenges the conventional legal approach to marital property and spousal roles. Jay's dialogue offers an alternative viewpoint on the interplay between personal agency, legal frameworks, and the autonomy of the family unit.