DEBATE: Should licenses be designed to advance general social goals?
Channel: FOSDEM
Date: 13/07/2020

by John Sullivan, Molly de Blanc, James Vasile, Josh Simmons and Dashiell Renaud

At: FOSDEM 2020
https://video.fosdem.org/2020/UA2.220/debate_socal_goal_licenses.webm

We have seen several licenses proposed as "open source" that
carry some obligation or restriction related to ethics or
other social goals. Is this a good direction for FOSS license drafting?
Affirmative position: FOSS licenses should advance social goals


❮ol❯
❮li❯First Affirmative Constructive (1AC) = 7 minutes
a. Cross-examination of First Affirmative by Second Negative = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯First Negative Constructive (1NC)  = 7 minutes
a. Cross-examination of First Negative by First Affirmative = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯Second Affirmative Constructive (2AC)  = 7 minutes
a. Cross-examination of Second Affirmative by First Negative = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯Second Negative Constructive (2NC)  = 7 minutes
a. Cross-examination of Second Negative by Second Affirmative = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯First Negative Rebuttal (1NR)  = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯First Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR)  = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯Second Negative Rebuttal (2NR)  = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮li❯Second Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR)  = 3 minutes❮/li❯
❮/ol❯


Room: UA2.220 (Guillissen)
Scheduled start: 2020-02-01 14:00:00