Ep. 63 - The Limits of the Non-Aggression Principle | Interview Breakdown
Channel: Steve Patterson
Date: 2017-06-25

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/patterson-in-pursuit-philosophy/id1106619794?mt=2
Stitcher: http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/patterson-in-pursuit-philosophy-politics-religion

Ep. 50 - Argumentation Ethics | Stephan Kinsella:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M22mq4vA4Ew

Free Praxis module: http://steve-patterson.com/praxis

Are there exceptions to the so-called "non-aggression principle," which says that it is never justified to initiate force against a peaceful person?

In some circumstances, could it be justified to use physical force on somebody that doesn't consent? What qualifies as "consent" in the first place?

This is part 1 of my breakdown of Episode 50. In the future, I'll release a second breakdown of our conversation about argumentation ethics.

Check out more at: http://www.steve-patterson.com

If you think this content is worth $1, please check out my Patreon page to support the creation of more videos like this:

https://www.patreon.com/stevepatterson

Or you can enter Amazon through: http://goo.gl/ftfFLg

Or, you can support with Bitcoin Cash: qp35pt4qlgskgg05zjuuy84udnnhw4ma7vrn05qjfz