Key Witness Lied on Witness Stand vs Charles Manson
Channel: Dan Russo
Date: 2011-06-06

Vincent Bugliosi was the DA from LA that prosecuted Charlie Manson in the Sharon Tate murder trial.  He was unable to get a Murder 1 conviction because Manson was threatening to kill his key-witness from his prisoncell if she testified against him.  Thus, Bugliosi let the woman perjure herself to say Charles Manson had nothing to do with the Sharon Tate murders.  Meanwhile, Bugliosi, ignoring a Mountain of Evidence, said that there is "no proof" that there was a conspiracy to kill Jack Kennedy.  Either Oswald was in the CIA and competent enough to refuel U2 spy planes in Japan that flew over Red China, as the San Francisco Chronicle reports (among others), or he Had a Double in the CIA who was one of the three ex-Marine sharpshooters who shot Jack Kennedy in Dallas, after being hired by CIA.
It is possible these were FBI men, since CIA gave FBI black bag operations for Domestic Targets.  It is obvious Kennedy was a Domestic Target for someone!  Mark Lane says there were 3 shooters and that Oswald had a double.
If Lane is correct, Bugliosi was wrong about no conspiracy.
If Bugliosi was correct about Oswald being "too incompetent" to be in the CIA, then Oswald had a double in CIA as is shown in the film Executive Action.
When Kennedy signed the Executive Order to pull CIA out of Vietnam and dismantle the CIA, after CIA got him to invade Cuba and failed, the order went out from CIA to kill Jack Kennedy.
This leaves Bugliosi with 2 strikes and no hits.  Not too long ago he testified about Iraq in front of the Judiciary Committee.  Bugliosi ALMOST knows something about Iraq, but he does not know that it was Mossad that gave us the false info that got us into that quagmire, and why.
Almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, Vincent.