Invisible versus Visible 'Truth' Proofing
Channel: Brain Outy
Date: 06/09/2013

Audio only.  It outlines the issue of material reality being inconclusive, the fact that really all of us are dependent on faith in something invisible, whether it be math (for the sciences), or.. 'God'.  Math being invisible yet absent matter or energy, yet governing all material reality, begs the question of immateriality governing or causing materiality.  So since you exist, then is there a counterpart Ultiimate Person aka 'god' by some definition?  'Yes' is certainly a logical answer.  But by itself, also inconclusive.

Fine: but how do you test for the existence of an Immaterial, 'God'?  You certainly can't use materiality, since by itself a) it can not prove the actual existence of an Immaterial Person, and b) whatever materiality there is, can be explained in multiple ways.

So then you need a combined testing mechanism, which starts with the immaterial, and if that immateriality is real, then you can TEST the immaterial 'explanation' of that thing (or Person) with respect to the material, for cohesion.  This is what a scientist does, especially in math, physics, cosmology:  he forms immaterial ideas and connections called hypotheses or theories, then tests materiality for any kind of demonstration of those hypotheses or theories.

So you can do the same thing for the God question, but frankly that's not even enough.  For if God exists immaterially and you do also, then why wouldn't this God communicate to you?  And how do you distinguish between communication you think you received, versus possible error or even hallucination on your part?  Ergo this audio.