C0nc0rdance vs. the Discovery Institute
Channel: C0nc0rdance
Date: 01/10/2010

As promised, this is the Q&A session I had with the Discovery Institute at the recent SMU sponsored event, "4 Nails in Darwin's Coffin".  For best results, I recommend using the interactive transcript.

The full high resolution video of the entire event is available at http://www.mediafire.com/?cp2b4lcqzya63 for download.  You are free to do with this video, and the other videos of the event, as you wish.  Note that some of the downloadable files were too large, and are available as file-spanning .rar archive files.

I apologize for the wordy, too-fast slides that I included.  There was a lot of information that needed to be presented to understand why their technical arguments fail on a basic level.  You may find that you need to pause the video, or watch it multiple times to get the full effect.

The articles I cited/used:
1.  My favorite, it refutes Doug Axe's 2004 JMB paper very clearly (free full text):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2459213/pdf/rsif20080085.pdf

2.  I borrowed very heavily from Arthur Hunt's analysis of Doug Axe's work on Panda's Thumb:
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/01/92-second-st-fa.html

3.  Doug Axe's 2004 JMB paper that he bases most of his argument on:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15321723

I recorded the Q&A session with my Android phone in my pocket.  Audio quality is a bit low, and you'll hear the creak of people's chairs as they got up to leave.  Everyone was a bit tired of listening to these clowns.

A viewer brought these sites to my attention, and I want to make it clear that the SMU Biology faculty generally oppose Intelligent Design:

SMU Biology Professors Speak Out Against Intelligent Design
http://www.smudailycampus.com/opinion/smu-professors-speak-out-against-darwin-presentation-1.1649982
Dr. John G Wise's analysis of ID Creationism
http://faculty.smu.edu/jwise/big_problems_with_intelligent_design.htm