The "social democratic" government brings the new mandatory "military", the National Security Law
Channel: Anarquistas
Date: 19/07/2021

http://elmilicianocnt-aitchiclana.blogspot.com/2021/07/el-gobierno-socialdemocrata-trae-la.html
Sánchez prepares a regulation that will give full powers to the president to decree a state of exception and that will limit individual freedoms for situations that the rulers arbitrarily consider "special", including terrorism. The social democratic government is once again preparing its legislative artillery tending to cut freedoms, to police and judicial abuse. As usual, it has to be a "left" government that does this type of dirty work to defend the interests of power, something that the right does not dare. We have historical examples, such as the main labor reforms that have cut rights to the working class or, closer to the case that concerns us, the Corcuera Law of the 'kick in the door', approved by a 'socialist' government and that authorized the Security Forces and Bodies to enter a home without the endorsement of a judge as long as they had a “well-founded knowledge” that would lead them “to the certainty” that a crime was being committed or had just been committed. When, by decision of a Prime Minister, a state of crisis is declared in Spain, all citizens without exception must comply with the orders and instructions issued by “the authorities”. This regulation, still in preparation under the name of the National Security Law, draws from the constitutional source that regulates the mandatory military service, specifically Article 30 of the Constitution: "Spaniards have the duty and right to defend Spain." This "National Security Law" is justified in the pandemic situation, although the government will take advantage, as all governments have always done, to put in the same bag those who bother them or those who consider "terrorists" a lazy concept with very serious criminal consequences that the same is used to put jihadists who plant bombs in jail as well as some Basque kids who have a bar fight with civilian civil guards (Altasu case). We suppose that, as has already been done at other times in history, the day is not far off when we anarchists will be included in the same bag. To start trembling. This "national security" law will protect the so-called National Security Council, an advisory body of the president made up of ministers, general directors, defense officials and presided over by the King. In addition to the fact that this Law will provide legal protection for the arbitrariness of power against the civilian population, it is also intended to replace all popular initiatives spontaneously generated during crises, mutual support actions not regulated by the State in which the population gave example of solidarity and organization in extreme situations and without state protection. The Law is very broad and will allow the authorities from the temporary requisition of all kinds of goods, to the intervention or provisional occupation of those that are necessary or to the suspension of all kinds of activities. The law excludes the payment of compensation to those who are obliged to make a personal benefit for the State. The danger is that this law does not specify when and in what circumstances it can be applied, so it is assumed that, in addition to health emergency situations such as the one experienced with the covid, it can be applied in other aspects that endanger the status quo of the state network . And the fact is that article 30 is not very specific in this regard either, since its 4th article speaks of "by law, the duties of citizens may be regulated in cases of serious risk, catastrophe or public calamity." Regulations can also oblige associations and organizations to work for the state, not just individuals. The law may also oblige the media to collaborate with the competent authorities in the dissemination of information of a preventive or operational nature. Although in this case there will be no problems, because the harmony between the mass media and the political and economic power has never been in such a good moment. The main criticisms from the system to this draft are that, if approved as it is now, it would configure a scenario in which jurisdictional control is diluted. In addition, its lack of definition is evident, both in the cases that would give rise to the eventual suspension of some rights and in what the personal benefits should be. On the other hand, this law would generate a great legal uncertainty, which would allow the arbitrary action of authorities, judges and police since neither the assumptions that would give rise to the annulment of some rights, such as the right to work, are listed, nor is it done. list of what these personal benefits should be. In short, this law, which gives broad powers to the president, is perfect for generating abuses of authority, much greater than we currently suffer, with the permanent criminalization of social movements and protests...