War per definition is separate to mankind's nature, and unnaturally an artificial creation
Channel: Patrick Edgar Regini
Date: 22/10/2018

Human beings can be hostile, belligerent, aggressive, invasive, and pigheadedly preponderant ... completely insufferable. And yet, no one is obligated to put up with us or combat such shortcoming aspects of our personas unless by the wicked whim of the resentful desire to remove such obstacles before our ego.
... War, is not so much sourced in human nature ... as many demonstrate or even say to believe, as it is in the invention of the weapon which kills, itself. Which in turn plants a wanting desire to acquire the same after the necessity to correspond has been caused in the assaulted.
When in heated argument our opposer surprises the unsuspecting with a weapon of murder, something unprecedented in human psychological calculations occurs. A blow of sorts to the natural flow and fabric in the really of our social relations mentality and perspectives of one another. A disruptive assault onto the cocoon of nearly the totality of our evolution which has solely consisted of that which was proportioned by the efforts in the physicality of our own hands arms and legs.
At that moment intense inner negotiations with our own reactive impulses occur. We first naturally want to step on and crush that sight and the person holding it like we would a poisonous insect that which can calmly and coldly kill life with the squeeze of a trigger, something that arises in us naturally in a great altruistic spirit of self preservation and some fear. Yet we immediately realize its lightening dispensation of death immobilizes us from doing so. So we must accept the force of that gun being aimed at us. Hence that "look" on people's faces when they are surprised by a weapon being pointed at them.
What this means is that we are then forced to socially falsely befriend or accept a subjugating power. ... And so the world continues on as we have been designing it.
I could continue to expand on this which does continue on very interestingly, but what I'm getting at, and the point I'm making for you, is that war is unnatural. And it is unnatural because it is derived from a human artifice or engineered invention which ruptures into what otherwise would have been the natural flow our long evolved social psychology, suddenly creating a completely different sociological scenario. Now new psychological dynamics, infested with deceit, suspicion, worry, paranoia, longing, resentful competition and covetousness as accepted falsehoods at a scale that dwindles their once small and deeply buried subconscious origins have been woven expansively into the entire human experience of the world and of life, so expansively absorbed after that initial encounter with the killing weapon, that we have all forgotten where it started.
War is a natural as a car is natural, or as money is, or as laboratories that produce chemical compounds are.
So ... next time you try to "humanize" war, make sure you catch yourself, and don't continue along side your country to proliferate and worship its material gifts to your country in the world. Rather see it for what it is, a problem we have created, and thus just as easily one we can get rid of it.