In Support of Dean Clifford - Unalienable Rights and Natural Law - Trailer
Channel: CanadaNewsLibre
Date: 17/05/2014

UPDATE - June 4, 2014 - The FULL video documentary (47 min)  NOW POSTED !  http://youtu.be/A8_YUIDKObc

All around the world, and throughout history, people have learned to think by themselves. There are people who clearly know the difference between natural law and political law, and the difference between unalienable individual rights and constitutional rights. 

They are famous writers, philosophers, historians, judges; they are also teachers, architects, inventors, house builders, politicians, or simply common people; but, they were also the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. Basically, they are ALL share the same ideas about Life, Liberty, Property and the Pursuit of Happiness. They are the Sovereign Rational Minds. 

However, a majority of people still do not know what fundamental rights are. Knowing our unalienable individual rights is of utmost importance if we want these rights to be protected adequately, while respecting the rights of other individuals.

This documentary is a homemade video montage consisting of pre-existing YouTube video sequences. Hopefully, it will encourage the viewers to do their own research on this important matter. A better understanding of individual rights, we believe will help create a better, more respectful and peaceful world around us.

The video was blocked globally by YouTube as soon as it was posted on May 10th, for copyrights claims - even though I was claiming "Fair Use". There were three claims; one short clip from a movie trailer - to be released  next September - which was already in the public domain. And two educational sequences from Harvard University's on line course called "Justice". Finally there were one copyright claim concerning the music used in one of the video sequences. I have been working on that sequence and have now almost reconstructed it with my own music.

Were we witnessing another example on how a statutory law (copyrights) can be used against the freedom of information and expression?

Anyhow, after removing completely three problematic sequences, I have posted the video montage, again, in its new form. 

CanadaNewsLibre

Website ► http://CanadaNewsLibre.com
Follow us on Twitter ►https://twitter.com/CanadaNewsLibre

Note -  The publishing of the video sequences which compose this video montage does not imply, in any way, shape, or form, the endorsing from their respective original authors. 

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the original video sequences contained in this montage are the sole responsibility of their respective author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of CanadaNewsLibre. CanadaNewsLibre will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements. This video montage may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Non-profit CanadaNewsLibre is operating without any external funding and is making such material available to our viewers under the provisions of  "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material included in this video montage is made available, without profit, to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use", you must request permission from the copyright owner of each video sequence.