Michael Krigsman - Oracle OpenWorld 2014 - theCUBE Studio QLogic
Channel: SiliconANGLE theCUBE
Date: 2014-10-01

Michael Krigsman, Asuret,  at Oracle OpenWorld 2014 with Dave Vellante and Stu Miniman

@theCUBE
#*OOW14*
I spent a lot of time this week (unintentionally) tuned into Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff’s extremely enthusiastic – and extremely long – DreamForce keynote address and (intentionally) thinking about the implications of the company’s ‘biggest breakthrough ever’ which is destined to ‘revolutionize the workplace’.  The announcement of Salesforce Chatter – the company’s newly announced Collaboration Cloud platform.

Yet here at SiliconANGLE, at what I consider to be the pre-eminent site for cutting edge thinking on everything ‘2.0’, I was surprised to find – nothing.  Crickets.  No chatter on Chatter.

My fellow Enterprise Irregulars have certainly had plenty to say.  Paul Greenberg, Susan Scrupski, Dion Hinchcliffe, Dennis Moore and others were tweeting from the event, and both Brian Sommer and Michael Krigsman wrote relatively positive posts.  Generally speaking, the thinking of the group from both public posts and private discussions seems to be that Chatter is well-positioned to be both a validation and a driver of mainstream adoption of Enterprise 2.0.

Yet, as Jennifer Leggio pointed out in a recent post, Chatter competitors such as Yammer have been in the market for some time but have seen weak – at best – adoption.  And as Charlie Wood mentioned in a private Irregulars discussion, the idea of applications ‘chatting’ isn’t particularly new either – having been available for image quite some time via RSS and other means, yet has met with lukewarm – at best – adoption.

Personally, I am anxious to see what adoption looks like – whether Chatter is really the validation of Enterprise 2.0 that many are looking for.   As I mentioned in a Focus discussion this week, Salesforce.com has done a nice job packaging up Social capabilities around Enterprise applications (most notably, of course, their own).  Chatter appears to have solved the ‘integration of point solutions’ barrier for enterprise social networking – now it’s just a matter of seeing who actually uses it.

Of course, there remains the barrier of cultural issues surrounding social networking in the enterprise – do companies really want to make it easier for the employees to access these networks – and what is the perceived value (positive or negative) of enterprise social networking?

Since Chatter won’t be in-market until next year, at this point all we have is chatter to decide whether it’s truly a big deal – or not.

So let’s have at it – what does the SiliconANGLE community think?  Do you see your company actually using Chatter? Will it really ‘revolutionize how the enterprise communicates’? Does this announcement ‘validate’ Enterprise 2.0?

Or has Marc Benioff’s hyperbole exceeded the reality of ‘Enterprise 2.0’?

Is Chatter just chatter?  Or is it for real?