Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty Land Warrant Application File B. L. Wt. 2245-500, Goose Van Scaaiek, New York

SERVICE
NUMBER
New York
★ Van Scaick Goose
{ B.L.W. 2245-500-bol - Issued Sept. 15, 1790, to Mary Van Scaick, executrix
or
Scaick, Goose van
also recorded as
CONTENTS
{ B.L.W. 2146-500 - bol. Issued Sept. 15, 1790, to Mary Van Scaick, executrix
no papers.
Note - Weinman's Historical Register and the New York Archival spell this name Goose Van Scaick

227 Wilbraham Road Springfield. Mass
Sept 10 th 1926
Gentlemen.
Please look among the records in your office for the name of Col. Gosen Van Schaick who served in the War of the Revolution from the State of New York - did not know but that his wife might have a pension - His daughter Elizabeth

who married Sybrant Guacker bush had one & I have the papers. Am trying to get correct records of Coln. Goosen Van Schascks, Birt. Marriage to Maycke Van den Bergh & & death of each. any information will be very gladly received yours sincerely (Mrs) Clara W. Atwater.

8-7-28
Hon. Cannon.
Bureau of Pensions Dear Sir:
Col. Sasse Van Shaick , of 1st & Second N.Y. Line, etc. Rev. War - Have you his Service Record? Particularly ante 1779. He was wounded at Fort Ticonderoga. July 16

or about, 1477, in the Burgundy Campaign. I seek data that will verify the above (See Heilman), and the use of last N.Y. Lines in stopping Burgundy's advance at Albany —
Resy V.E. Bassichy Box 420 New Rochelle N.Y.

Rev. 41812 War Section. AWF
March 28, 1929.
T. E. Cassidy, Box 420, New Rochelle, New York.
Sir:
I advise you that from the records of this bureau it appears that Warrant No. 2245 for five hundred acres of bounty land was allowed on September 15, 1790 to Mary Van Scaick, or Van Schaaick, executrix, on account of services of Colonel Goose Van Scaick , or van Schaaick of the New York Line, War of the Revolution. It does not appear that pension was claimed on account of his services.
There are no further data on file as to this claim, either service, or family, owing to the destruction of papers when the War Office was burned in 1800.
The relationship of the executrix is not stated.
Respectfully,
E. W. MORGAN, Acting Commissioner.

November 10, 1926.
Mrs. Clara W. Atwater, 227 Wilbraham Road, Springfield, Mass.
Madam:
I have to advise you, that from the records of this Bureau, it appears that Warrant 2345, for five hundred acres of bounty land was allowed on September 15, 1790, to Mary Van Scaiek, or Van Schaaiek, executrix, on account of the services of Colonel Goose Van Scaiek, or Van Schaaiek of the New York Line, War of the Revolution. It does not appear that pension was claimed on account of his services.
There are  to no further data on file as to this claim, either service, or family, owing to the destruction of papers when the War Office was burned in 1800.
The relationship of the executrix is not stated.
Respectfully,
WINFIELD SCOTT, Commissioner.
Stated only written to 500 acres took warrants issued same date, I suspect that one as I have always thought it was a correction of some error in first warrant.