Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty Land Warrant Application File S. 16843, Edward Hancox, Conn.
Page 1

(8-1776)
Service
Conn.
Hancox, Edward
Number
S.16843
carded
contents
Page 2

Connecticut No. 28.162
28162
Edward Hancox
Stonington for the State of Connecticut who was a private in the company commanded by Captain Palmer of the Regt. commanded by Col. Ledyard in the [illegible] .[illegible] line for 2 years


In scribed on the Roll of Connecticut at the rate of 80 dollars _ cents per annum to commence on the 4th day of March, 1831

Certificate of Pension issued the 26th day of Mar. 1834 and
Hon N. Barber

Arrears to the 4th of Mar. 1834 240.00
Semi0anl. allowance ending 4th Sept 1834 40.00
$280.00

{Revolutionary Claim, Act June 7, 1832}
Recorded by R. Burdine Clerk,
Book E2 Vol.  Page 17
Page 3

Declaration in order to obtain the benefit of the Act of Congress passed June 7 1832
State of Connecticut
County of New London Js.

Probate District of Stonington
On this 25th day of February AD. 1833 personally appeared, in open Court before the Dist Judge of the County Probate for the
District of Stonington in the County of New London and State of Connecticut aforesaid, now sitting, Edward Hancox a resident of the Town of Stonington in the County and State aforesaid, aged Eighty seven years and upwards, who being first duly sworn, according to Law, doth on
his oath, make the following declaration in order to obtain the benefit of the act of Congress passed June 7. 1832
That he entered the service of the United States
under the following named officers, and served as here in Stated
That in the year 1775, he resided at Stonington aforesaid at the place called now Stonington Borough. that he belonged to the Militia. That in the month of August, about the last, thereof
the British armed Ship Rose, fired upon Stonington, that he fought in the defence of place at a time, that a company
was immediately raised, by voluntary enlistment, that he enlisted as a private for seven months, unless some discharged, in the company then
commanded by Capt Oliver Smith. that he immediately commenced service at Stonington, in sd Company, & was constantly employed in building the Fort and Battery at sd. place & in in standing guard.  That on or about the 1st April 1776 he was verbally discharged, having served seven months. That no other company, served at sd. Stonington, at sd time. That the above service commenced on the 1st Sept 1775.
That in the year 1776 at Stonington aforesaid
he voluntarily enlisted as a private for Nine months service to commence on the 1st April 1776 & to continue through the year in the  Matron company commanded by Major Oliver Smith, Lieut Nathan Palmer & that he served in sd Company commanded as aforesaid till about the 1st June following, when sd. Smith was promoted to be a Lieutenant Colonel of Militia & Nathan Palmer was appointed Captain. John Belcher 1st Lieut. Clement
Page 4

Miner 2d Lieut & Moses Palmer Ensign & sd company was attached to the Regiment commanded by Col Erastus Wolcott
that is Regiment was employed in erecting fortification & keeping guard at New London, Groton & S Stonington.  that sd Palmers Company, was employed almost the whole time
at sd. Stonington. that he served in sd. company till the 1st of January 1777, being nine months service and was discharged by Capt Palmer.
That in the year 1777 he under still at sd Stonington. and enlisted in the same company
for a like period of nine months as a private to commence on the 1st day of April 1777 and continue till 1st January 1778. that a Company was still commanded by sd. Nathan
Palmer, 1st Lieut Belcher, Ensign Moses Palmer, and were a part of the command or Regiment of Colonel Wm Ledyard who commanded the Garrisons of New London, Fort [illegible]
and vicinity. That he served the full term of his engagement of 9 months at said Stonington at fatigue duty building, altering and repairing the Fort and Batteries & keeping guard, except when called away by alarms &c. & was
discharged by Capt Palmer. or Lieut Acors Sheffield verbally, but rec'd. no written discharge-- on the 1st January 1778.
That in the year 1778 he still continued to
reside in said Stonington, and again voluntarily enlisted for nine months as a private and served from the 1st April 1778, in the Matross or artillery Company  commanded by Lieutenant Acors Sheffield in the Regiment of Colo Wm Ledyard, of Cont State Troops till 1st January 1779. that sd Declarant with G Sheffield{s Company
served at S. Stonington, keeping Guard and other duties as soldier unless called away to places in the vicinity on alarms, caused by the Landing or attempts of landing of the enemy - that during this period, there were drafted Militia men also serving a part of the time at sd. Stonington
that he served nine months as aforesaid, and was discharged by Lieut Sheffield.
That he well
Page 5

remembers. That all three last engagements of nine months each, to wit in 1776 - 1777 and 1778. commenced on the 1st day of April in every year-- & continued through the year. That he has no documentary evidence of his
said services or any part thereof. That he knows of no person who can testify to his alleged service or any part thereof, whose testimony he can procure excepts Lieut. Timothy West, Lieut Amos Gallup & Saml Palmer whose testimony will accompany his declaration.
He herein replies to the Interogatories prescribed
by the War Department & propounded by the Court. That he was born in Stonington aforesaid in the year one Thousand Seven Hundred & forty five Nov 16th. That his age is recorded in the Stonington Records. That he lived in
Stonington, when called into service, has lived there ever since the Revolutionary War, and now lives in sd Stonington. That he volunteered in all engagements to serve, that he never was a substitute.  That in reply to the 5th Interrogatory, he states that he has before answered as
far as his recollection will permit - That he never recd. a written discharge, but was always honorably discharged.
That he is known to Eliher Chesebro -
a Clergyman of sd Town, and Gurdon Trumbull Esq who can testify as to his character for veracity and their belief in his services as a soldier of the Revolution.
He hereby relinquishes every claim to a
pension or annuity except the present, and declares that his name is not on the pension roll of the agency of any State.
Edward Hancox

Sworn to and subscribed
the day and year aforesaid
Before the Court aforesaid
Asa Fish Judge
Page 6

I Samuel Palmer of Stonington in the County
of New London & State of Connecticut aged seventy four years, being duly sworn according to law do on my oath certify declare and say 
that I am well acquainted with Mr Edward Hancox of sd. Stonington, who subscribed the above as foregoing Declaration in my presence. That in the year 1775. The British Ship Rose, Capt Wallace came into the Harbor of Stonington and fired on the village. That immediately thereafter a volunteer Company of State Troop was raised under command of Capt Oliver Smith
that I voluntarily enlisted in sd. Company for 7 months & served in sd Company at Stonington from about the 1st day of September 1775 to the 1st day of April 1776. & sd. Company was employed in keeping guard at Stonington and Building a Fort and a Battery. That I well know
the sd Edward Hancox was a private in sd. company & served, the whole time I served in sd. seven months engagement. That I know
he is the identical person who performed said
service, & that I believe him to be Eighty seven
years old,
Stonington February 25, 1833.
Samuel Palmer

Sworn & Subscribed the day
and year aforesaid Before
the Court aforesaid
Asa Fish Judge

I Nathaniel Hall Junr formerly of Stonington in New London County and State of Connecticut, but now resident in Hopkinton in the County of Washington and State of Rhode Island, aged Seventy years and upward, being
Page 7

duly sworn according to law, do on my oath certify declare and say that I am well acquainted with Mr Edward Hancox of sd Stonington, who subscribed the preceding declaration and have been acquainted with him ever since.  I was a child, that in the year 1775, when I was about twelve years old, and lived at sd Stonington the
British Ship Rose the last day of August in sd. year attacked sd. Stonington, that immediately there was raised a Company of soldiers, commanded by Capt Oliver Smith. That sd.
Company served at sd Stonington from about
the first September 1775 till the 1st April 1776-
That by direction of my father Nathaniel Hale
I served as Drummer for said Company from September till the last of December 1775. That I well know Mr Edward Hancox was a soldier in sd. Capt Smiths company & served in the same, all the time I was in sd. company & that I left sd Hancox in sd. Company, on the 1 Jany
1776, when I was put in Capt James Eldridges Company in Col S. H. Parsons Regiment of Connecticut Troop & served as Drummer in a Company one year.
That I believe sd Edward Hancox to be Eighty
seven years old, as he had a wife and family at
the time of his sd. Service. I know him to be the
identical person who performed sd. service
Stonington April 24, 1833.
Nathl Hale Junr

Sworn to and subscribed the day
and year aforesaid, before the Court
of Probate for the District of Stonington

Asa Fish Judge
Page 8

I Amos Gallup of Covington in the County of New London and State of Connecticut, aged Seventy eight years a Pensioner of the United States, under the act of Congress of the of June 1832 being sworn according to law do on my oath certify declare and say, that I am well
acquainted with Mr Edward Hancox of Stonington who subscribed the foregoing Declaration. That in the year 1776 I enlisted as a private soldier in the Company of Connecticut troops, commanded by Maj Oliver Smith command [illegible] Nathan Palmer, 1st Lieut. Belcher, S. Lunt Clement Miner, ensign for Nine months service. That I joined sd. Comp
any at Stonington about the 1st March 1776, and served in sd Company at Stonington, employed in erecting the forts and standing Guard- till July 1776 in the mean time Maj. Smith was appointed at Lt. Col. Lt. Palmer was appointed
or promoted to be Capt of a Company-- In July. One half of the Company was order to N London, with which I went & there served, and sd. company or force was annexed to a Regiment commanded by Col.  Erastus Wolcott ,Ely
Major. That about 1st August Leut. Col. Oliver
Smith, went to the westward, with the militia regt. to toward New York. that I continued at New London serving in a Company till 1st December I was their marched to Stonington aforesaid and was discharged. That I well remember that sd Edward Hancox, was a member of sd. Company & served at Stonington, before sd. part of a Company was ordered
to New London, and was in service in sd Company at sd. Stonington, at the time of my discharge in Dec 1776-
That I well remember the term of my enlistment was nine months. That I was paid for Nine month. being the first period of my service during the revolutionary war. That I am intimately acquainted with sd Hancox and believe
him to be Eighty seven years old or upwards.
Amos Gallup

Sworn and subscribed this [illegible] th day of January AD 1834
Before the Court
Asa Fish Judge
Page 9


We Elihu Chesebro' a Clergyman, residing in the Town of Stonington in the County of New London & State of Connecticut and Gurdon Trumball residing in said Stonington hereof
by certify, that we are well acquainted with Mr
Edward Hancox who has subscribed and sworn to the above or foregoing declaration, that we believe him to be upwards of Eighty seven years of age, that he is reputed and believed, in the neighborhood where he resides to have been a soldier of the Revolution and that
we concur in that opinion. and we further certify
that we are fully of the opinion, that the belief is
general among his acquaintance, & that no doubts of his services, to the extent claimed by him, ever existed.
Elihu Chesebrough
Gordon Trumball 

Sworn & subscribed this 29 day of January AD 1834 before the Court of Probate for the District of Stonington aforesaid -
Asa Fish Judge

And the said Court do hereby declare their opinion after the investigation of the matter, and after putting the interrogatories prescribed by the War Department, that the above named applicant, Edward Hancox, was a revolutionary soldier and served as he states. And the Court further certifies that it appears to sd.
Court that Elihu Chesebro' who has signed the preceding certificate is a clergyman
resident in Stonington & that Gurdon Trumbull who has also signed the same is a resident
in said Stonington, and is a credible person, and that their statement is entitled to credit.
And the Court further certifies, that it appears to them that Samuel Palmer, who has
Signed a certificate annexed, is a resident of sd. Stonington, That Nathaniel Hale
and who has also signed a preceeding certificate is a resident of Hopkinton in the State of Rhode Island, and that Amos Gallup Esq who has also signed a certificate foregoing is a residents of sd Stonington, and that sd. Saml Palmer Nathl.
Hale Junr and Amos Gallup, are credible persons and that then statements are entitled to credit. And further that John Swan, who
has also signed & certificate hereunto annexed is a resident of North Stonington aforesaid, is a credible person, and that his statement is entitled to credit
Febry 4, 1834,
Asa Fish Judge
Page 10

I Nathan Daboll Clerk of the Court of Probate for the District of Stonington Ct. do hereby certify that the foregoing contains the original proceedings of the said court in the matter of the application of Edward Hancox for a pension.  In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal of office this 4th day of February 1834.
Nathan Daboll Clerk

Edward Hancox 29755
Page 11

Rev. and 1812
Wars Section.

January 29, 1927

C. E. Hancock
245 Arguello Blvd
San Francisco, Calif.

Sir:
I have to advise you from the papers in
the Revolutionary War pension claim S. 16843,
it appears that Edward Hancox was born November 16, 1745 at Stonington, New London County, Connecticut
.
While residing at said Stonington he served
as a private in the Connecticut Troops, as follows
August 30, 1775, the British ship " Rose" fired
on Stonington, and he enlisted and served seven months under Major Oliver Smith.
He enlisted April 1, 1776 and served under Lieutenant Nathan Palmer and Major Smith, until about August, when Lieutenant Palmer was promoted to captain, and Major Smith to Lieutenant-Colonel, and he served
in Captain Nathan Palmer's Company, Colonel Erastus Wolcott's Regiment to the last of December 1776.
He enlisted April 1, 1777 and served nine months
Page 12

in Captain Nathan Palmer's Company. See Conn. Book Page 614
He enlisted April 1, 1778 and served nine months
under Lieutenant Acors Sheffield, Colonel William Ledyard's Regiment.
He was allowed pension on his application executed February 25, 1833, while a resident of Stonington, Connecticut.
It is stated that he had a wife and family at
the time of his service in 1775, but no names are
mentioned, and there is no further data on file as
to family.
Respectfully,
WINFIELD SCOTT
Commissioner.
Page 13

Edward Hancox

[illegible]

2 years
$80

N. Barber
HK
Page 14


State of Connecticut
New London County
JS. Stonington
On this 29th day of January A.D. 1834 personally
appeared the identical Edward Hancox, named in the preceding declaration, and after being duly sworn according to Law, doth on his oath, make the following Statement in order to amend, the said Declaration. That at the time of making sd. declaration, he omitted to state that the description of service in which he was engaged, as alleged in his Declaration was Matross or artillery.  That in the statement of the rank of officers, he would not be understood to speak
positively, except those of the company, under whom he served. That in the enlistment of seven
months in 1775. as alleged, he enlisted for seven
months, unless sooner discharged, that he served from the 1st September to the 1st April 1776 and was paid for seven months, that he is unable to procure the testimony of Timothy West. The declarant does not know, whether, at the time of his enlistment under Major Smith 1st Sept 1775, that the sd. Smith, was authorized
at the time, but knows, that the service was recognized by the Legislature of Council of safety, on or about the 14th September of that year as appears by the certificate of Hon Elisha Phelps, Comptrotter of the pub
Page 15

public accounts of this state, hereto annexed
Edward Hancox

Sworn in open court before the Court of Probate for the District of Stonington, the day and year aforesaid.
Asa Fish Judge
Page 16

Sir
I have enclose to you  from
the evidence in support
of Edwd Hancox
Samuel Palmers claim to a pension
I must beg of you to examine it's contents all again in [illegible] the certificate of
E. Phelps by Comptrollery of Co. I do hope you may come to a more favorable  conclusion ]than  [illegible] have heretofore done  [illegible]  [illegible] 
With an early answer
Yours
 [illegible]  [illegible]  [illegible] 

J. L. Edwards Esq
Commissioner of Pensions
March 15, 1834
Page 17

Dear Sir
Mystic Bridge
March 12, 1834

Herewith addressed to your care, and
the Statements of Edward Hancock & Samuel Palmer to amend or explain. Their respective declarations now on file in the Pension Office at Washington.
It would serve, that owing to the press of business probably the commissioner came to
a conclusion, that by Mr Phelp's certificate
the service of the Stonington Compy as authorised by Council of Safety & Genl. Assembly. Terminated in Dec 1775, when it appears, that it was continued, under the command of Oliver Smith, through a great part of 1776.
No doubt on a reexamination by J. L. Edward of their cases - they will have justice done them.
Ever Yours
Asa Fish
If you have time you will please provide the papers
Hon Noyes Barber
Washington ⎬
Page 18

16843
INVLAID

File No. 16843
Edward Hancox
Pri Rev War
Act: June 7th '39
Index: Vol 1 Page 165
[Arrangement of 1870]

1927 Jan 29 Hist to C. E. Hancock awy
Page 19

CALFORNIA PINE BOX DISTRIBUTORS
W. J. WALKER PRESIDENT
J. DANAHER, JR.
AST VICE PRESIDENT
SUITE 1019-1025 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
PHONE GARFIELD 2885
C. R. WISDOM 2ND VICE PRESIDENT & GENERAL MANAGER
H. W. TEMPLEMAN
SECRETARY E TREASURER
REPLYING PLEASE REFER TO
OUR INITIAL AND NUMBER
CEH:AE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Nov. 26, 1926.

Commissioner of Pensions,
Bureau of Pensions,
Washington, D. C.

Dear Sir:
AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES ACCIDENTS, CAR SHORTAGE OR OTHER CAUSES OF DELAY BEYOND OUR CONTROL
PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE UNLESS PROMPTLY ACCEPTED
WEARE NOT RESPONSISLE FOR BRANDS PLACED WITH US BYOUR PATRONS.
Will you please give me the data covering
the services ( and any other information you may have) of " Edward Hancox " in the Revolutionary War, as noted in " Senate Documents, Pension Rolls, 1st Session, 23rd Congress,
1835 ".
Very truly yours,
C. E Hancock
C. E. HANCOCK,
245 Arguello Blvd.
San Francisco, Calif.
Page 20

Edward Hancox

Return to Hon N. Barber 
House of Rep.
Page 21

I John Swan of North Stonington in the County of New London and State of Connecticut, aged Seventy three years, being duly cautioned and and sworn according to Law do on my oath certify declare and say that I am well acquainted with Mr Edward Hancox of Stonington in the County aforesaid and have been well acquainted with him the said Edward Hancox, for more than fifty six years. That on the 1st day of June 1778 at Stonington at a place then called Long Point. I took the place as a substitute for Oliver Breed, now decd and served as a private in the Matross Company, stationed at sd. Stonington and commanded by Lieutenant Acors Sheffield, four months. That I were constantly employed in Garrison duty at the forts in Standing
guard in repairing and working on the Forts and Battines at Stonington (Long Point), and other military duties, under Lieutenant Sheffield
till the 1st October 1778, the term of my engagement having expired when I was honorably discharged by Lieut Sheffield - That I well remember and know that sd. Edward Hancox was a member of sd. Sheffield's Company, and served in the same, the whole time I was then engaged-- and that when I was discharged as aforesaid the sd. Hanson continued, that sd. Hancox lived at sd. Stonington at sd. time of service in 1778. where he has ever since lived, and that he still resides there. That I understood and believed at the
time that the sd. Edward Hancox, had been in the service as a soldier, the two years preceding 1778 at Stonington. I believe him now to be Eighty eight years old-
North Stonington June 30 AD 1834
John Swan

New London County Js.
North Stonington January 30 1834
Personally appeared John Swan signer of the above affidavit whose testimoney as a witness is intitled to credit and made solemn oath to the truth of the facts therein contained
Before me Latham Hull Justice of the Peace
Page 22

I, Noyes Barber, a Representative in Congress from the State of Connecticut hereby certify that Latham Hull Esquire, before whon the preceeding affidavit of John Swan was taken is Justice of the Peace in and for the county of New London in the state aforesaid, and that the signatures purporting to be his is in his own proper handwriting.
Washington 15th Feby. 1834
Noyes Barber [illegible]
Page 23

State of Connecticut
New London County ⎬ Js. Probate District of Stonington,

On this 10th day of March AD 1834 personally appeared before the County Probate for the District aforesaid now sitting Edward Hancox a resident of Stonington in sd. County, aged 89 years who being duly sworn according to
Law doth on his oath make the following statement, to amend or explain his Declaration for Pension, now on file in the Pension office of the United States at Washington.
That he has heard read to him the objections contained in the Letter of Hon J L Edwards Commissioner of Pensions dated 24 Feby to Hon N Barber to the admission of his claims for service, alleged in his said Declaration to have been by him performed in May Smith's Compy from Sept 1775 to April 1776-
That he respectfully begs leave to submit
the following facts and brief observations, to the Department to be considered.
That he resided in Stonington, and in the village or Long Point, at the commencement of the Revolutionary War and has resided there ever since. that although now in the 90th
year of his age, he well remembers the circumstances of the attack on sd. place of his residence, by the ship Rose Captain Wallace 30th of August 1775. That he fully believes he cannot be mistaken as to the duration of the period of his first term of service, & that it was not less
than seven months, and that there was no intermission of his duty performed as a soldier in sd Maj Smiths compy at Stonington till 1st April (or after, 1776. That said Major O Smith was at that time a Major of Militia and resided in sd Stonington, and immediately on or after
the attack by Ship Rose, organized and enlisted a company for the Defence of the sd. place, of which company, Declarant enlisted as a private. That Maj Smith, then applied to the Council of Safety. to authorise and recognize the sd.
enlistment & that it appears by Hon Elisha Phelp's certificate to have been done by sd. Council on the 14 September 1775
That he believes. That the fol
Page 24

following particulars contained in Mr Phelp's certificate attached to his the Declarant's declaration escaped the observation of the Commissioner of Pensions
Viz

"The records of State show that the
General Assembly at their session in December
1775, Resolved by this Assembly that the Troops now stationed on the sea coast of this Colony by order of the Governor and Council of Safety be and they are hereby continued for the defence thereof" [illegible]  & under date Feby. 23rd 1776 there is of the journal the following entry viz "Major Smith of Stonington present moving that the Stonington Company of 40 for the defence of the harbor, town be
augmented for reasons by him urged and is
considered and on consideration voted and resolved that the company of 40 men now stationed at Stonington [illegible] & be augmented to go men including officers and be continued untill the first of December next "L & c 1776
On the Books of the Pay table Date October 25. 1775 Majr. Oliver Smith Commander of Compy at Long Point the old name for Stonington Village and recognized now by the older inhabitants and so called) Cr by Acc. and for his company from Sept. 20th to Oct 20th 1775 L210.06 [illegible] 
also under date Jany 19, 1776 the pay roll of Maj. Oliver Smith C. at Stonington is charged to the United States from Oct 20th to Decr 1st $ 350.14. 3 ½ under date April 4. 1776 the pay roll of Majr Oliver Smith is charged to the United Colonies from & Jany. 
to 1st. April 1776 - L 709.1.6 under date May 23d 1776 there is charged to Majr. Oliver Smith "To Order on Treasurer on acct Company
at Stonington L 410, And under date Augt. 13 1776 he is also charged with an order to Balance L 322. 16 ½ on the same day he is credited by account rendered for his Co & Fort at Stonington Viz Wages L 589.1.5 [illegible] and Blankets L72.10 &""
Page 25

The foregoing facts contained in the Comptrollers certificate, the Declarant, hopes and believes will satisfactorily show that the said Stonington Company, continued serving, without intermission, from the time of organization in Sept 1775. not only to 1st April 1776 but till Aug 1776 under Major Oliver Smith as
its captain when it was commanded by other officers. In Aug 1776, sd. Smith being then a Lietenant Colonel of Militia, marched with his regiment of Militia to the Westward, and was at White Plains. where Genl Washington army retreated after the capture of New York by the enemy in that year.
The description of troops alleged in
his sd. declaration to have been Matross, may be incorrect. he so alleged because the the duty of
sd. Stonington Company was always to exercise. Cannon or Artillery at the Forts, as also to stand guard and that said company was called at the time it was serving, Artillery or Matross-- and
in the certificate of Mr. Phelps Comptroller (as the declarant understands) attached to the declaration of John Swan is the following
'Under date March 28. 1780 there is upon the Journal of the Council of Safety the following Memorandum viz
"This board reappoint the same officers of the Matross companies at New london and Groton and Stonington as were appointed last year,"
The declarant, who lived at sd Stonington during the whole war believes the description of those
stationed at the Forts for the defence of that place from 1775 to 1780, was not changed. That only on emergencies of expected attack or danger. Militia Companies occasionally served for longer or shorter periods at Stonington.
Confident that he served as he alleged more than two years, he hopes on reexamination of his case to be allowed a pen
Page 26

pension of full pay.
But should it not appear that he has established his claim,his determination is to accept whatever may be found by the commissioner as to duration of time or description of service and  desires that a pension certificate may be forwarded accordingly.
Edward Hancox

Sworn & subscribed the day and year aforesaid before the court.
Asa Fish Judge

I Nathan Daboll, Clerk of the Court of Probate for the District of Stonington Ct. JS.    do hereby certify that the foregoing contains the original proceedings of the said court in the matter of the application of Edward Hancox for a pension in testimony where of I have hereunto set my hand and seal of office this 11th day of March AD 1834
Nathan Daboll Clerk

Edward Hancox

Return to Hon N Barber
Ho of Reps