The national intelligencer and Washington advertiser. (Washington City [D.C.]), 1806-03-12 00:00:00

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER, AND WASHINGTON ADVERTISER.
VOL. VI.
WASHINGTON CITY, PRINTED BY SAMUEL HARRISON SMITH, PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.
No. DCCCXLVI.
FIVE DOLLARS PER ANNUM.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 1806.
PAID IN ADVANCE.
CONGRESS.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5.
DEBATE.
On Mr. Gregg's resolution.
[CONTINUED.]
Mr. J. CLAY. I had entertained a hope that the call of my colleague would have been delayed for a few days longer, as the documents we have received from the Treasury Department have been but two days on our table, at least in a printed form, and as they are calculated to throw much light on the subject before us. In the few remarks which I am about to offer, I shall not follow my colleague through the detail he has made of the injuries and insults of G. Britain. We all of us well know that the national flag has been grossly outraged and the national honor violated by her. But I do not conceive that the best mode of obtaining redress for these wrongs is to do that which will be more injurious to ourselves than to her. My objections to this resolution are two fold. The first is that, if carried into effect, it places greater means of injuring us in the hands of our enemy than she already possesses; and the second, that we shall not be able to maintain in the course it points out for any length of time.
By the resolution before us we are prohibited from importing from G. Britain, any articles, however necessary or convenient they may be; while at the same time we are permitted to carry any articles to her market. The effect will be that while our productions are accumulating in the hands of the British manufacturers and merchants they will have no means of paying for them. And of consequence debts due from British merchants to American citizens. Even at the present day I have great doubts whether there are not greater sums due by the merchants, of G. Britain to the citizens of the U. S. than there are recoverable debts due by American citizens to them. If so, what will become of the second expedient proposed to be resorted to by my colleague, that of sequestration? The balance of injury, instead of being in our favor, will be against us. If my colleague had looked over the report of the secretary of the Treasury, and had attended to the amount of American property afloat, he would have seen that there is not less than one hundred millions of dollars worth of American property at the mercy of the cruisers of Britain. I believe that the naked vessels, independent of the products they carry, amount in value to more than thirty millions of dollars. It will be seen that the commerce of the U. S. in exports and imports amount to 150 millions, of which it is fair to calculate that one third is constantly exposed on the ocean. Of this amount about forty millions is carried on between the U. S. and the power with whom it is proposed to cut off intercourse. With this fact staring us in the face, would it be politic to expose so much property to the retaliation of the British ministry. When the gentleman spoke of the amount of British depredations, he ought to have stated the amount of those recently committed. I believe I am not very wrong in stating the whole amount of American property detained by British cruisers as not exceeding six millions of dollars. On balancing, therefore, their interests, ought the U. S. to resort to measures of hostility, to measures which, in the opinion of every man, will justify retaliation.
Besides, I would with my colleague to show us how we are to be supplied with articles heretofore derived from G. Britain. All articles of iron manufacture, hard ware, of cotton, and coarse woollens, we are obliged to import from that Island. From her East India dominions we likewise import a great variety of useful articles; while from her West India islands we import a great portion of one article, spirits, which pays one sixth of our whole amount of duties—the amount which we get from her colonies will be found to be two and a half millions of dollars. From the same document it appears that the whole of this article imported from the British dominions is consumed in the U. S. But it is said that we may find a substitute for it. I acknowledge it. We may find this substitute in the products of our domestic distilleries which pay no duties. Are we prepared to sacrifice so large a part of our revenue as is derived from the importation? For it will be observed that other kinds of spirits are in a great measure exported from the U. S. while all that we import from British settlements is consumed in this country. If the importation of British manufactures is prohibited I do not know whence we are to be furnished with the articles we stand in need of. It is true, France has some rising manufactures, and that she takes off about a fourth part of the cotton exported from the U. S. But are we, by this measure, to cut off the market of the agricultural-
list for this article to the extent of 90,000 bales at present annually exported to G. Britain?
But the great and material injury to the U. S. will be from the destruction of revenue occasioned by this measure. The present revenue may be estimated at 12,000,000 of dollars, of which 5,400,000 dollars is paid on importations from G. B. and her dependencies. We have an annual appropriation of 8,000,000 for the payment of the principal and interest of the public debt. We have been engaged in extinguishing this debt for near twenty years, and have so far succeeded.
It is a probable calculation that if we remain at peace, and do not cut off the right hand of our revenue, the debt will be extinguished by the year 1816. To me this is an object as desirable as it can be to my colleague. I do not, therefore, wish to deprive the government of this large share of revenue derived from duties on merchandise imported from G. Britain.
As to the effects of this measure on G. B. I might acknowledge, if it could be permanent, that it might raise a clamor among her merchants & manufacturers, which might induce the minister of that nation to relax in the course now pursued. But I will appeal to any gentlemen conversant with the state of the country from the year 1792 to this time, to say whether there is any probability of our being able to endure a non-importation of British goods for any length of time; for more than about six or eight months. We have neither stock enough on hand; nor manufactures or manufacturers of our own to enable us to do so. It is true that our manufactures are advancing surely, though slowly, and I may state in corroboration of this fact, what may not generally be known, that in the city of Philadelphia, manufactures are now carried on to a greater extent than they were forty years ago in the town of Birmingham. But can we from this source, or from foreign markets supply the great demand of our citizens? No. There are some articles which we may obtain elsewhere—Let us then prohibit the importation of these from Britain. Let us carry such a system as this into effect. One which as it will do us little injury, is likely to be permanent, and will therefore have a permanent influence on G. Britain.
My colleague has alluded to the measures taken in the year 1793. But he will recollect that the orders, issued by the British government, at that period went much farther than the principle now set up. Besides in 1793 the spirit of this country was very different from that which now prevails. The revolution of France had, at that time, rekindled the enthusiasm of our own revolution; and I believe I shall not be incorrect in saying a majority of our citizens were in favor of drawing the sword in favor of France. I ask, if that is the case now? If a majority of the people of America are ready to take part with the emperor Napoleon. And notwithstanding the measures then taken, in 1794 we concluded a treaty which sacrificed every thing we had contended for, and for which I believe my colleague voted, at least for appropriations to carry it into operation. If this was the issue of violent measures, I am not now for taking them. I am not for taking measures, which my colleague says will strike at the vitals of Britain, but which, he says at the same time, will not be a cause of war. I am, on the contrary, in favor of such measures as we are able to carry into effect, and which may be adopted without permanent injury to ourselves.
Mr. CROWNINSHIELD. The gentleman from Pennsylvania, who has last spoken, regrets that this subject has been taken up so soon, but I regret it has not been taken up at an earlier period. Although, after I found certain information called for, I moved for other documents, calculated to shed further light on the subject, yet I then said, and I am still convinced that this information, could not influence my decision on the subject under consideration. The documents called for are, however, now before us. And it appears that the balance of trade between the U. S. and Great Britain is from eleven to twelve millions against us. This difference we are obliged to make up by remittances in cash or bills from other countries; when if we did not purchase of her more than we sell to her, we should not owe this annual balance, and the amount would surely be returned to the U. S. very probably in cash, as a balance in our favor from other European nations. The trade, therefore, with Great Britain, so far as relates to the balance, is disadvantageous to us. The gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Clay) thinks this resolution will materially injure us, while it will inflict little injury on G. Britain. But there can be no doubt that the measure it contemplates will injure Great Britain vastly more than it will injure us. Great Britain has, without any cause whatever, condemned our vessels engaged in the carriage of colonial productions, the bona fide property of American citizens. The gentleman has acknowledged that these captures may amount to six millions of dollars. I do not know the amount, but if the adju-
dications continue, I believe it will soon exceed that sum. But if the amount did not exceed one million we are bound in duty to protect our merchants. The gentleman, in his remarks, goes on the calculation that Great Britain will go to war with us if we adopt this resolution. But I have no such idea. If, however, I held that opinion, I should not on that account withhold my approbation from it. Because I believe if a war should take place, the U. S. will have a great advantage over Great Britain. We should be able, in that event, to fit out a great number of privateers, and we should make two captures to their one. If a war should take place, which I do not hesitate to say I should greatly deprecate, we should take twice as much of their property, as they would take of ours. But we are not, by the adoption of this resolution, about to enter into war with Great Britain. No such thing is in the contemplation of any gentleman. We are merely about to prohibit the importation of British goods, in consequence of her having seized our vessels engaged in carrying on a lawful commerce, and in consequence of her seizure of American citizens protected by the American flag.
With regard to the measure contemplated by the resolution, I hope that G. Britain will not permit it to go into operation; that she will, on the contrary, on mature reflection, give us back the property she has wrongfully taken from us, and liberate our seamen from the captivity in which she detains them.
With regard to the observation of the gentleman relative to our inability to supply ourselves with the goods we get from her settlements in the East Indies, I think it proper to observe that they may be obtained from other colonies in that quarter; and as to spirits, there can be no doubt of our getting a sufficient quantity of spirits, notwithstanding the adoption of this resolution. But suppose we could not obtain a sufficient quantity of rum, or manufactured articles for our ordinary supply, and the revenue should be thereby affected for a time. We ought not to be governed by this consideration. But I believe the industry and enterprise of our merchants would soon obtain from other markets, a sufficient supply of every article, woollen goods, perhaps, excepted.
In November 1793, Great Britain adopted a similar principle with regard to the colonial trade, except that the orders issued at that time went further than the present principle. In consequence of these orders four or five hundred of our vessels were seized. Every one knows the conduct of the American government at that time. A treaty was finally made in which Great Britain promised to pay for the aggressions committed by her vessels on neutral rights. But nearly ten years elapsed before our merchants received compensation for their losses. The principle slept till 1801. Great Britain did not find it convenient to call it again into existence before that time. It then appears by a correspondence between Mr. King, then our minister at the court of Great Britain and Lord Hawkesbury, that she attempted to renew it at that time. Mr. King, however, remonstrated; and he finally received a note from Lord Hawkesbury, who had referred the subject to the attorney general of Great Britain, admitting that the seizure, under this principle, was not warrantable. The opinion is this: that the neutral has a right to carry on a commerce with the enemies colonies. That the continuity of the voyage is broken when the return cargo is landed in the neutral country, & has paid duties there, and that the goods can afterwards be safely transported to any belligerent country in Europe, in the same bottom on which they were originally imported or on any other neutral bottom whatever. This appears to have settled the question, and numerous decisions in England both before and since that time have confirmed the principle as a correct one. But notwithstanding all this, to our astonishment, the same adjudications have been renewed, and the same principle considered as abandoned last war, is now revived. In the early part of the last summer we find it once more brought into existence, and the following case was made use of, as a fit pretext, to warrant the new captures which were intended should be made under this extraordinary decision of the court of appeals.
In the latter part of the late war which was terminated by the treaty of Amiens, an American vessel was carried into the island of New-Providence, and adjudicated. An appeal was carried to Great Britain, where the condemnation was affirmed on the ground that she was carrying on a trade during war which was not allowed in a time of peace. Under this decision the cruisers of Great Britain have seized a great number of other vessels. I know this case particularly. The vessel, I have referred to, was the Essex, Capt. Orne. There was a direct importation of her cargo into Salem, in Massachusetts, after remaining there stored three or four weeks, the duties having been paid, it was shipped for the Havanna. On her passage to the Havanna, she was seized, and adjudicated in New-
Providence. There was an appeal, and after remaining nearly four years undecided, the judgment is at last confirmed in England, and the capture of American vessels commences. Can we put up with such decisions? Can we agree to them? If this principle be allowed, I desire to know whether the whole carrying trade of the U. S. will not eventually be sacrificed. By the carrying trade I mean the direct trade to and from the colonies, as well as to Europe. If we acquiesce in their capturing a part, Great Britain will extend her captures still further, and make a sweep of our whole trade. For my part I am not willing to make this sacrifice; if it were no more than a million I could not agree to it.
As to the impressment of our seamen, that too is a subject of most serious complaint. We have called for a document on this point, which unfortunately is not yet on our tables. It is so extensive, and the information drawn from such various sources, that the Secretary of State has not yet been able to present it. We have, however, understood, that the number of our impressed seamen amounts to above 3,000. During the last war G. Britain impressed upwards of 2,000 of our seamen, of which she restored 1,200, proved to be American, and 800 remained in her possession at the peace. In the short period of two years she has impressed 3,000 seamen. I believe that we are bound, by all peaceable means, to obtain the liberation of these men. Lately, one of our frigates was shipwrecked off Tripoli, and 300 men taken captives. We immediately passed a new appropriation bill, and sent out several additional frigates. The affair has terminated honorably to our country, and our seamen are released. Will we not now do as much for 3,000 seamen, as we then did for 300, which are but a tenth part? After the course we are now taking, should Britain persist in her captures and in her oppressive treatment of our seamen, and refuse to give them up, I would not hesitate to meet her in war. But, as I observed before, I do not believe G. Britain will go to war. Our trade is too valuable to her. She knows too that in such an event she will lose her Eastern provinces. The states of Vermont and Massachusetts will ask no other assistance than their own militia to take Canada and Nova Scotia. Some of her West India islands will likewise fall. She knows also other things. Her subjects own sixteen millions of the old public debt of the U. S. eight millions of the Louisiana stock; and three or four millions of Bank stock; and have private debts to the amount of ten or twelve millions, amounting in the whole to nearly forty millions of dollars. Will G. Britain, by going to war, risk her provinces, and this large amount of property? I think she will not put so much at hazard. I believe she will take no other steps than are usual with regard to neutral trade. As I said before, the risk of a contrary course will be too great. Her minister is now trying a system, the continuance in which will depend on us. He means to see how much we can bear. By this step we shall put an end to it. If, before it goes into effect, we give him time to reflect, he will, rather than experience the injury that menaces his country, pay for the property that has been condemned, and release our seamen. Under these circumstances, and viewing the resolution as a pacific measure, I hope it will be adopted unanimously.
(To be Continued.)
IN SENATE OF THE U. STATES.
MARCH 6.
Mr. SMITH of Maryland, from the committee appointed to consider the resolution of 12th February on the subject, reported the following bill, which was read and passed to a second reading.
A BILL
For the encouragement of the shipping and navigation of the U. States.
BE it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the U. S. of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the day of next, no goods, wares or merchandise shall be imported in any foreign ship or vessel into the U. S. or the territories thereof, other than goods, wares and merchandise of the growth, produce or manufacture of the nation to which such foreign ship or vessel shall belong, upon the penalty of the forfeiture of all such goods, wares and merchandise as shall be imported, in any foreign ship or vessel, contrary to the true intent and meaning hereof, as also of the ship or vessel in which they shall be imported, and of all her tackle, furniture and apparel, to be disposed of conformably to the ninety-first section of the act to regulate the collection of duties on imports and tonnage, passed the second day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety nine. Provided always, That this prohibition shall not extend to the ships or vessels of any foreign nation, which admits into its ports the importation, in ships or
vessels of the U. S. of goods, wares and merchandise, not being the growth, produce or manufacture of the U. S.: And provided also, That any forfeiture which may be incurred by virtue of this act, may be mitigated or remitted in the manner prescribed by the act to provide for mitigating or remitting the forfeitures, penalties and disabilities accruing in certain cases therein mentioned, passed third March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety seven, and made perpetual by an act passed eleventh February, one thousand eight hundred.
MARCH 6.
Mr. Worthington submitted the following resolution for consideration.
RESOLVED, That in order better to provide for the defence of the territory of Orleans, a tract of land, not exceeding in any case acres, to be located out of a tract of land not exceeding two millions of acres, to be surveyed between the Achafulaga, the Red river, and a meridian line passing by the fort at Nachitoches; shall be given free of all expenses, other than those of surveying expenses and office fees, to every citizen of the U. S. above twenty one years of age, and not at present residing either in said territory or in the Mississippi territory, who shall before the day of next, become an actual settler on such tract, and shall actually improve, and continue to cultivate and reside on the same years thereafter; on condition, that such actual settler and his sons above the age of eighteen years, at any time or times during the said period of years be liable to be called into service for the defence of the said territories of Orleans and Mississippi, and under obligation during the said period, to continue in such service for any length of time which may be necessary.
Navy Department, March 4, 1806.
SIR,
In obedience to the resolution of the House of Representatives of the 5th ult. requiring the secretary of the navy to inform the House "of the nature and extent of the services rendered to the captive crew of the frigate Philadelphia, by the Danish consul, at Tripoli," I herewith enclose a copy of a letter from captain Bainbridge to me, which affords all the information in my possession upon the subject.
Respectfully submitted
R. SMITH.
The hon. the Speaker of the House of Representatives of the U. States.
COPY.
New-York, Feb. 12, 1806.
SIR,
In compliance with your letter of the 6th inst. which this day came to hand, I hasten to detail the services rendered to the crew of the U. S. late frigate Philadelphia, while in captivity at Tripoli, by Nicholas C. Nissen, esq. his Danish majesty's consul residing there.
In consequence of the mode of imprisonment it was impossible for the officers to procure the necessary articles of subsistence, they were therefore necessitated to receive their daily provision, &c. through another channel. Mr. Nissen generously offered his services to obtain our necessary supplies, which he did, in the most faithful manner, for 19 months and 3 days, the period of our captivity, and at times when the funds placed at my command, in Tripoli, were expended, he continued our daily supply, by his own means, until ours were renewed by the commodore of the Mediterranean squadron, or George Davis, esq. charge of affairs at Tunis, to whom we are gratefully indebted.
Had it not been for the friendly aid of consul Nissen we should not have received our subsistence in so regular a manner as we did, and should have been exposed, at a great expence, to the impositions of the lowest class of our enemy. His attentions were not confined solely to the officers, but were equally extended to the seamen and soldiers.
Consul Nissen was the first christian we saw after landing on the shore of Africa, and he met us the very evening of our misfortune, with the philanthropy of a man of feeling, and immediately administered to our wants by sending provision and bedding from his house, and ameliorated, as much as possible, our truly unpleasant situation.
I cannot, in justice to his attention, omit mentioning a circumstance which shows the lively interest he took in our situation, and the hazard he ran to serve us. When commodore Preble attacked Tripoli, Mr. Nissen's house was as much exposed as any in the town, and himself in danger from the bombardment. I solicited him frequently to leave his dangerous situation, and retire to the gardens where the consuls were: he requested me not to importune him more to leave the town, for he preferred running the risk of the shot and shells from our squadron, and attending to our wants and subsistence, to resorting to the gardens. In thus pursuing the dictates of a feeling mind he was very near losing his life by a shot from

The Constitution. Had he not acted in this friendly manner towards us it is very probable we should have been several days without provision, as the enemy were occupied and exasperated. I have, Sir, detailed to you generally the services rendered to the officers and crew of the Philadelphia, at Tripoli, by Nicholas C. Nissen, esq. but it is impossible for me to convey a just sense of them. Nothing but a perfect acquaintance with our situation, and the aid we received, can truly estimate the services rendered.
I have the honor to be, Sir, With the greatest respect, Your most obedient servant, (Signed,) WM. BAINERIDGE. Hon. ROBT. SMITH, Secretary Navy.
REPORT.
The committee of commerce and manufactures, to whom was referred the petition of the merchants of Newburyport in the state of Massachusetts, submit their
REPORT.
The petitioners state the great inconvenience in navigating their vessels, by reason of the rocks and shoals, to which they are exposed in the river Merrimack, notwithstanding buoys have been placed on several of the most dangerous of them, and supported at the expence of the U. S. The rapidity of the current, and numerous accidents arising from vessels and bodies of ice running against them, having worn away the chains by which they were fastened, the petitioners felt themselves justified in building two piers as a substitute for the buoys. The piers were erected in the summer of 1804, at the expence of one thousand three hundred and eighty-five dollars and sixty cents, which sum was raised by subscription among themselves. They now ask for a reimbursement of the money expended in erecting the piers. They did not make application to government to defray this expence in the first instance, as it was doubted by many persons whether the piers could be so constructed as to withstand the force of the ice, which runs in the Merrimack with great rapidity, but they were willing to make the experiment at their own hazard, and are now fully satisfied that they will answer the purpose contemplated; for, since they were erected, very large and heavy bodies of ice have passed down the river, without doing them any injury.
Newburyport is a place of considerable trade, and their navigation has already increased to upwards of twenty-eight thousand tons. There can be no doubt of the utility of piers in all great rivers, especially where they are placed as marks to avoid dangerous shoals, or to afford protection to vessels within them, as in the case of the piers in the river Delaware, for which an appropriation of 30,000 dollars, was made by an act of the 5th of April, 1802. At Newburyport they were much wanted; but it does not appear that the petitioners were warranted in substituting piers for the buoys, which had been placed there and supported by the government of the U. S. If they had applied to Congress in the first instance, it is reasonable to suppose an appropriation would have passed, either for repairing the buoys, or building permanent piers, but having omitted to make this application prior to erecting the piers, the committee are of the opinion that the U. S. ought not to pay the expence. The money has not been expended under the direction of any agent appointed on behalf of the U. S. and although it has certainly been applied to a useful object, yet the committee conceive it would be an imprudent departure from established usage, to assume the payment of a debt contracted as this has been. The committee therefore submit the following resolution:
Resolved, That the petitioners have leave to withdraw their petition, and the documents accompanying the same.
REPORT.
Of the committee on public lands, to whom were referred on the 29th of January last, the petitions of the mayors, aldermen and assistants of the city of Natchez; of the board of trustees of Jefferson college, in the Mississippi territory, and of William Dunbar, in the said territory.
REPORT.
The above petitions relate to the conflicting claims of the corporation of the city of Natchez, of the trustees of Jefferson college, and of Wm. Dunbar, to a certain piece or parcel of land lying within the limits of the city aforesaid, between the buildings thereof and the bluff of the Mississippi river; and also to the conflicting claims of the aforesaid corporation and trustees to two town lots, occupying a central situation in the city aforesaid.
For three successive sessions this subject has been before Congress, the history of which is as follows:
In the 12th section of the act, entitled "An act regulating the grants of land & providing for the disposal of the lands of the U. S. of the state of Tennessee," a reservation is made of "such town lots, not exceeding two, in the town of Natchez, and of such an out lot adjoining the same, not exceeding thirty acres, as may be the property of the U. S. to be located by the government of the Mississippi territory, for the use of Jefferson college."
After this reservation was known to the corporation of Natchez, they, apprehending that the lands and lots be-mentioned, which had been in the possession and use of the town, and to which they conceived it entitled in justice, might be located for the use of the college, petitioned Congress to confirm
their claim to the said land and lots, and to grant them such other vacant lands as might be found within the limits of the city.
The committee, to whom this petition was referred, made a report favorable to so much of it, as relates to the land in front of the town, and the two town lots claimed by the corporation. A short time after, a petition was received from Wm. Dunbar, claiming the land in front of the town, as already described. This petition and that of the corporation were then referred to a new committee, who, just as they were about to report in favor of the latter, received information that the two town lots had been located by the governor, and the land in front of the town by the secretary of the territory, for the use of the college. Upon the receipt of this information the committee recommended a resolution (which was afterwards agreed to) for suspending all further proceedings relative to this subject, until the end of the last session of Congress.
Early in the last session a memorial was received from the trustees of the college, claiming the land and lots in question, as the property of that institution. About the same time, another memorial was received from Wm. Dunbar, in support of his claim to the land in front of the town, and requesting that the consideration of all petitions relative thereto might be postponed, and that time might be allowed him to prepare further representations on the subject.
The select committee, to whom all these conflicting claims were referred, like the preceding committees on the same subject, reported in favor of the claim of the corporation. But the report was not acted upon by the House during the session.
By an official act of gov. Williams, bearing date the 18th of November last, the locations in favor of the college have been withdrawn; and the question, of consequence, is again placed on fair, equitable ground, and rendered susceptible of such legislative decision as may be dictated by justice and expediency.
The principles of the question should next be considered.
The claim of Wm. Dunbar to the land in front of the town, is founded, as appears by documents, upon a grant from the Spanish governor, Gayoso, subsequent to the treaty of limits and navigation with Spain, in consideration of services rendered by this memorialist to the Spanish government. The claim of the corporation to the land just mentioned, is founded, as appears by several depositions, upon a previous reservation made by the same governor, when the town was laid off, for the preservation of health and other useful purposes. The foundation of the claim of the trustees has been already stated.
In comparing the respective merits of these claims, your committee have no difficulty in forming an opinion. On the ground of equity they conceive, that as the people of the town of Natchez settled and made improvements there, under an impression that the reservation of this land, made by the competent authority, would be continued for their common convenience; & as it was continued as long as that authority existed, they ought not to be deprived of the benefits of that reservation, either by the government which had ceased, or that which succeeded.
On the ground of expediency, your committee observe a very obvious and important difference between the claim of the corporation and the claims of the two other parties. It is apparent that the latter are asserted, from a consideration of the pecuniary value of the land in question, whilst the former is defended with a view of averting those evils, which are considered as inevitable, should either of the other claims be finally established. Your committee are assured that no part of this land was ever contemplated as a site for the college. The object of the trustees, therefore, as well as of the individual claimant, must be, if successful, to make the most advantageous disposition of the land by laying it out into lots for the erection of buildings, without entering into the physical reasonings of which the subject seems to be peculiarly susceptible. In support of the claim of the corporation, your committee would suggest as their opinion, that it ought to be left to those who are immediately interested, to devise and use such means as to them may appear necessary, for the preservation of health. It is with a view to this great end that the people of Natchez wish to ventilate the town by keeping the reserved space on the bluff of the river unoccupied with buildings. To say nothing of other local objects of minor consideration, to which this reservation seems necessary, your committee conceive that the one above mentioned is of sufficient importance to authorise the experiment, whether it be considered in relation to the town of Natchez alone, or to other towns that may be hereafter established.
It seems by a letter of the 19th of November last, from the governor of the territory, who is president of the board of trustees, and who also is authorised to locate the out lot for the college, that a more advantageous location of other land may be made for that institution. Your committee, therefore, can see no well founded reason why the right of the U. S. to the land in question, should not be vested in the corporation of the city.
On the two town lots, or on one of them which had been located for the use of the college, stands an old building, which under the Spanish government, was appropriated to the use of the clergy, but is at present used for the threefold purpose of holding the mayor's court, the meetings of the common coun-
cil, and the performing divine service. Except these two town lots, there are no others within the knowledge of your committee, claimed by the town on which buildings may be erected for the above mentioned, or any other public purposes. From this consideration, & from the additional one, of the great expense which the inhabitants of the town of Natchez have to sustain from its peculiar circumstances, your committee should not hesitate to recommend a grant of those lots to the corporation, did they know that the grant of town lots to the college could be satisfied by another location. But possessing no certain knowledge on this part of the subject, they abstain from recommending any legislative measure relative thereto, presuming that such a salutary exercise of discretion may be expected from the governor of the territory, as may be best calculated to do justice, and to obviate as far as practicable every cause of local contention.
With respect to granting to the corporation all the lands that may be found vacant within the limits of the city, your committee conceive that it would be proper to ascertain what lands are vacant, before any decision is had on this part of the prayer of their petition.
From the foregoing facts and considerations, your committee are induced to recommend the following resolution:
Resolved, That the right of the U. S. to the land lying between the front street of the city of Natchez and the Mississippi river ought to be vested in the corporation of said city, so as not to interfere with the legal claims of any individuals, if any there be, nor with the lands annexed to the old fort adjacent thereto: Provided, That the said land be neither cultivated, nor occupied with buildings, but be planted with trees, and preserved as a common for the use, comfort and health of the inhabitants of the city aforesaid.
REPORT.
The Committee, to whom was referred the petition and memorial of the president and directors of the Chesapeake and Delaware canal company, respectfully
REPORT:
That it appears a company has been incorporated by the respective states of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware, for the purpose of forming a navigable canal over the isthmus, which separates the bays of Chesapeake and Delaware: that in pursuance of the several acts of incorporation, passed by the said states, respectively, a large number of subscriptions were made by divers citizens of the United States, and a board of president and directors were duly elected for carrying the project into effect.
That the said president and directors, in pursuance of their appointment, have procured skillful engineers, to explore and survey the ground across the aforesaid isthmus, and have fixed on a route or position for the canal, calculated, as they conceive, in every respect, to secure the great and important purpose of an uninterrupted navigation, and have made considerable progress in the work. They find, however, that to accomplish it, a greater portion of fortitude and perseverance, and more ample resources will be necessary, than the individuals who are embarked in it, can be supposed to possess. The importance of the undertaking and the immense national advantages which may ultimately result from it, they hope will be sufficient inducements, to prevail on congress to grant them such assistance as will enable them to complete the business agreeably to their original plan.
The committee cannot hesitate a moment in deciding on the importance and extensive utility of connecting the waters of the Chesapeake and Delaware, by a navigable canal. To adopt a phrase familiarized by use, they consider the project as an opening wedge for an extensive inland navigation, which would at all times be of an immense advantage to the commercial, as well as to the agricultural and manufacturing part of the community. But in the event of a war, its advantages would be incalculable. The reasoning of the petitioners is conclusive on this point. If arguments are necessary, their petition furnishes an ample supply to prove, that no system of internal improvement which has yet been proposed in this country, holds out the prospect of such important national advantages, as will naturally result from a successful termination of their undertaking.
Did the finances of the country admit of it, the committee would feel a perfect freedom in recommending to the House, the propriety, in their opinion, of extending to the petitioners such aid as the difficulty and importance of their enterprise, would be thought to justify. But it is a question, whether, at this moment, the state of the treasury would admit of any pecuniary assistance being granted. The amount of the public debt, yet to be extinguished, the embarrassed state of our commerce, and the critical situation of the country in relation to foreign governments, might perhaps be considered as insurmountable objections against applying any public money to internal improvements, at this particular time. Under an impression arising from these circumstances, the committee recommend the following resolution:
Resolved, That it would not be expedient, at this time, to grant any pecuniary assistance to the president and directors of the Chesapeake and Delaware canal company.
COURT OF VICE ADMIRALTY.
Nov. 12. 1806.
Before his honor Henry Moreton Dyer, esq. sole Judge & commissary. SAMPSON, Phippen, master.
[CONCLUDED.]
This petition and its rejection have been much commented upon, and it has been intimated that the correctness of that refusal may be questioned together with the whole case, before a higher tribunal. The document itself and the proceeding upon it, being entered on the minutes of the court, the wish of the claimants will for that purpose, be fully attained. What opinion may be formed upon it in that more enlightened court, it would be presumptuous in me to conjecture. I will only say for the party himself, valet quantum valens potest. As to the court, whose duty it is to apply its decisions in the first instance, I trust it will at least have the effect of shewing that the humble individual who presides here, does not sleep upon his post, and would not hastily permit so fatal a departure from the regular forms of proceeding.
Mr. Delaunay's deposition has been justified by the argument of his counsel, on the ground that he answered to what he himself thought was necessary, and that he was not bound to reply to every question which he did not deem material. But it is the law I conceive, and not the individual, which is to prescribe what information is or is not necessary. He who undertakes to satisfy the enquiries of justice, must do so entirely and unfeignedly, if he would avoid the palpable suspicion of interested suppression; still less can I comprehend how he, who has sworn to depose all that he knows, can feel himself justified in withholding a part. Any further observation however, must be unnecessary upon an argument which is so wholly rebutted by every rational and received rule of evidence.
Again, it has been urged that Mr. Delaunay is a man unacquainted with judicial proceedings, and that some irregularities on his part in matters of this sort may be overlooked. Setting aside all that his oath required, passing over the solemn warning of the officer who administered that oath, and supposing that a defect of form is the utmost fault which can be imputed to him, I must at least observe that he is a man of the most methodical irregularity I ever knew: because it so happens, that he withholds his information precisely upon those points which were most material. He is ready enough to speak of the voyage from Philadelphia to Havanna; but as to any thing which happened prior to the last departure from Philadelphia, which was the important point to be ascertained, he refused to depose. Where a conscientious witness has erred upon matter of form, the court would never be disposed to press a mere omission of irregularity against him; but it must be perfectly obvious how little this gentleman has entitled himself to such excuse.
What then, upon the whole, is the effect of Mr. Delaunay's testimony? I have no hesitation in pronouncing, that it is completely confirmatory of the history made out by the testimony of the two preceding witnesses, and with this serious addition—that the penalties of the transaction were well known to the parties concerned in it, and that this gentleman was from beginning to end employed by them to avoid those penalties, by means of fraud and concealment, to his own as well as their advantage.
It has been argued for Mr. Delaunay, that if he had answered those interrogatories fully, he could not have stated any thing to the prejudice of the claim. When we reflect upon what we have heard from the other witnesses, and upon what even Mr. Delaunay himself has admitted upon those interrogatories which he did please to answer, I should not claim much credit for penetration, if I were to form a conjecture as to what his answers would have amounted to, if they had been explicit;—but I forbear to enter upon an enquiry which is, in no degree, imposed upon the court. This gentleman by his improper conduct, compels me to presume every thing against him, and has deprived himself of the benefit of those lenient constructions, (even if any lenity of construction could be strained to serve him) which it is the practice and the pleasure of the court to apply to persons of ingenious conduct. I must rather observe as to him, what was eloquently said upon another occasion, that "a pertinacious refusal to submit to fair enquiry must infall all the penalties of convicted guilt."
Having drawn this result from the examinations, the documentary evidence becomes of less moment. In a case of this nature, it could scarcely be expected but that some color of fairness should be given to the formal documents. And yet even among those there is nothing contradictory to the oral testimony.
As to the ship, there are the formal papers in proof the property of Mr. Mann; but they are of a most recent date, being in fact no older than the present voyage from Philadelphia. This circumstance combined with the testimony, as to the commencement of the transaction, the change of name, and of captain and crew, the landing, and re-shipment, leads to no other conclusion than that this change of property was effected for some colorable purpose; and it is equally evident that this purpose was to suppress the former history of the vessel, and to stamp her with new credentials for the present occasion.
As to the cargo, there are bills of lading and invoices in proof of the property of Messrs. Foussat and Mann, & Mr. Delaunay—but the articles themselves which they enumerate, bespeak
French produce or manufacture, as we have before learned was the fact from some of the witnesses. That the articles in Mr. Delaunay's invoice came from France, is further evident from the calculation of prices in francs, which is an ideal denomination of money familiar in French mercantile computation. This is not indeed the case with Mr. Foussat's invoice—but in that many articles are of a similar nature, and the marks almost indiscriminately the same with Mr. Delaunay's. The articles too, of both invoices are wholly included in the certificate for obtaining the drawback, a paper which, it was justly observed, bespeaks a mere entry at Philadelphia for exportation. I cannot but conclude, from all these circumstances, that the whole of these articles came from France, and in this vessel.
A question has been made how far the misconduct of Mr. Delaunay, even if penal as to himself, could affect the property of other persons committed to his charge. I cannot but agree with the captor's advocate in holding this gentleman to be no ordinary supercargo—but one in whom the most unbounded confidence and power have been placed. His employers must therefore be bound by that very general rule of admiralty law, which holds the principal to be affected by the acts of his agents. There are cases indeed, of wilful and unauthorised conduct in the agent, where that rule may seem to be harsh; but no such argument arises in the present case—where the whole plot appears to have been projected by, and known to the employers themselves, as well as their deputed agents.
I beg to be understood as applying these observations, more especially to Messrs. Foussat and Mann, who are the owners of the ship, and the former, together with Mr. Delaunay, the principal proprietor of the cargo.
There are, however, three smaller shipments claimed on behalf of Mr. Dabadie, Mr. Daval and Messrs. Warner and Sons—to which considerations of a different nature may be applicable.
The chief article in the shipments of both Dabadie and Daval, are ribbons and satins—articles which are most probably of French produce and manufacture, but that circumstance alone is not enough to affect them. It is not improbable but that they had been previously imported bona fide , into America. Certain it is that they were not included in the certificate of drawback; so that there is no evidence prima facie of their having been entered for exportation. There is no evidence that they were brought from France in this ship, and it appears by the depositions that articles were on board, besides those which were brought from Marseilles.
If these articles were of that description, and these persons had no connection with Mr. Delaunay previous to the voyage from Philadelphia, I should hold it rather too severe an application of the rule of responsibility by a principal for the acts of his agent, to call them participes criminis with Mr. Delaunay in respect of his concerns throughout the whole of this transaction. On the other hand, considering the general conduct of Mr. Delaunay, I think it would be too much to decree immediate restitution of property committed to his charge as to which any possibility of doubt can exist. But I shall allow these gentlemen an opportunity of shewing, if they can, by further proof, that they have not been implicated in any of the improper and illegal conduct, which I have found it necessary to condemn upon, in respect to the ship and general cargo.
The only remaining shipment is that of Messrs. John Warner and Sons, which stands entirely free of all objection. The sole article in their invoice, is lard, amounting in value to about 3000 dollars. This is an article which bespeaks itself to be of American origin. It is consigned to a merchant at Havanna, having nothing to do with the other parties to this transaction, and the shipper himself is equally free from any such connection. This shipment, therefore, becomes a very fit subject for immediate restitution. But the ship, together with the property of Mr. Delaunay and his employers, I feel that it is my duty at once to condemn.
IRON WORKS ON POTOMAC.
The Subscriber has for Sale or Rent, a good seat for a Furnace upon the North Branch of Potomac in Hampshire county, with plenty of ore already investigated at considerable expence and found to be good, a constant and sufficient stream with upwards of 30 feet fall, and the wood of more than 900 acres of well timbered land; enough of which is arrable to form a complete establishment. Connected with this may also be rented the forge built by Mr. John Potts at the Great Falls of Potomac, now the property of the subscriber. It is conceived that these two seats are particularly worthy of the notice of iron Masters of capital; as they are fully adequate to the supply of iron, in its various forms, to an extensive country, having great demand for that article, both above and below the Blue ridge. The Hampshire property is free from every encumbrance, and the payment of a very few thousand dollars due to the proprietor of the fee simple at the Great Falls (my lease of which is for upwards of 900 years at a low rent) for rents in arrear prior to my purchase, will render this property clear; and afford a complete establishment for all the various manufactures of iron, as well as for mills, with a convenient farm, &c. &c.
I have seats equally eligible (if not superior) for furnaces and forges, upon the river Shenandoah in this county, with ore, wood, and water, all convenient and abundant: which may be rented for a long term of years, with rich farming land attached thereto.
FERDINANDO FAIRFAX. Charles town, Jefferson Co. Virg. November 26—wtf

WAR DEPARTMENT, February 22, 1806.
Gentlemen,
Your letter of the 24th of December last, enclosing the copy of a patriotic and spirited resolution, entered into by yourselves and the company under your command, having been submitted to the consideration of the President of the U. S. I have the honor of enclosing to you a copy of his letter to the secretary of war on the subject.
I am, very respectfully,
Gentlemen,
Your most obedient serv't.
H. DEARBORN.
T. SHALLUS, capt. 1st U. S. Inf. co. J. STRATTEN, lieut. 1st brig. 1st div. J. HUFTY, lieut. Penn. militia. Washington, Feb. 21.
Sir,
In expectation that further information would give us a more distinct view of the course which our foreign affairs are likely to take, I have kept unanswered the letter of capt. Shallus and others, covering resolutions of the First Light Infantry company of the first brigade of the first division of Pennsylvania militia, offering their service to their country, if necessary, and asking the honor of being first called to its defence, and in that event, of being placed on the same footing with the regular troops of the U. S. I think it improper longer to withhold the expressions of my sense of this very generous and patriotic offer. It confirms me in the belief I have ever entertained, that should this country be compelled to resort to war for justice, it will distinguish itself in that line, by the same enterprise and activity, which have distinguished it in the pursuits of peace. In our present uncertainty, however, I can but ask the favor of you to return, on behalf of our country, my thanks to capt. Shallus and his officers, and the testimony which I willingly bear that they have deserved well of their country.
Accept my salutations, and Assurances of great esteem And respect, (Signed) THOS. JEFFERSON. THE SECRETARY OF WAR.
Chillicothe, Feb. 20.
We understand the governor has received an express from Mad river, from Maj. Moore, Capt. Moore & Capt. M'Pherson, along with some depots taken on oath, which state that the Shawney Indians are preparing for war; that the war belts are passing amongst them; that their tomahawks are painted and feathered; that they are embodied at Stoney creek, and at White river, and are now in council at Greenville, where it is feared they will strike a war post in their council, this being the determined signal for war; that a small settlement on Stoney creek, consisting of about eight families, from their fears had armed for defence, but had fled, into Mad river settlement.
It appears from this express that the Shawneys are preparing for war, but it does not appear that it is intended against the white people: It may be intended against the Indian tribes over the Mississippi.
Proper measures will, we have no doubt, be taken to ascertain their intention, and such prudent means used as will quiet the fears of our defenceless citizens, if the alarm should be groundless, and preparations used to ward off any attempt to disturb our quiet, should this weak and restless tribe of Indians be urged by any foreign emissaries, to involve themselves in what will ultimately prove their entire ruin.
Since writing the above, we learn that a second express has arrived from Mad river, with dispatches for the governor, and that Gen. Kenton, Maj. Moore, Capt. M'Pherson and a Mr. M'Ilvain, went to the Indian council but could not get admittance; they had, however, a conversation with about eighteen Indians who met them at some distance from the council house. The Indians received a few strings of white wampum; professed friendship for the white people, but at parting manifested hostile views, by giving their left hands, &c. The above gentlemen are fearful of consequences; but nothing appears certain as to the views or object of the Indians.
We are informed the governor has sent a message or speech to the chiefs, with a large line belt of white wampum, and has given such instructions as will, it is hoped, in a few days bring news that will restore the public quiet. We are also told to believe, that orders have been issued to Brig. Gen. Whiteman, of Green county, how to prepare and act, if necessity should require it.
Baltimore, March 7.
The following particulars of the engagement between the French and English off St. Domingo, mentioned in the American of yesterday, are all that have presented themselves. They were taken down as they occurred during the action by an eye witness from the top of one of the houses in that city, and are copied from the Gazette of last evening.
"St. Domingo, Feb. 6, 1806.
"At 6, A. M. the look-out ship of the French squadron was seen firing at seven guns, and an English squadron of seven sail of the line, two frigates, one brig and a schooner in chase of her. At half past 7 A. M. the French squadron of five ships of the line and two frigates got under way, and ran to leeward with the sloop of war that was on the look-out: at 30 minutes past 10, the headmost ship of the English, (supposed a 74) ran ahead of the French squadron and brought them to action: In 20 minutes after a British ship of the line fell into action; in 10 minutes after 3 ships
of the line came into action, and in 75 minutes after the commencement, the action was general—2 French ships ran on shore and two more were dismasted. The action lasted 2 hours and 20 minutes: By this time they were so far off that I was unable to see what ships were taken.
"February 7, several officers and seamen returned from the admiral's ship the Imperial, that was on shore, and said that her three decks were battered away; the admiral, and 750 men killed and wounded—the Diomed was also on shore dismasted, in sight of St. Domingo; the other three ships of the line were now ascertained to be taken, but not certain of the fate of the sloop of war or frigates. At 12, meridian, 3 heavy ships passed the city, steering to the westward, but showed no colors.
"February 8, at 9 A. M. one of the dismasted ships hove in sight, with a brig and frigate playing about her. At 2 P. M. 4 frigates, 2 ships of the line and a brig passed along the coast reconnoitering about the two ships that were on shore: while the heavy ships kept a straight course, the frigates seemed to keep ranging in with the shore, and had St. George's ensign flying; one of the heavy ships were blue at the mizen. Night came on and no farther observations could be made. The French admiral was slightly wounded; the captain-general had both his legs shot off, and the first and second lieutenants on board the admiral were killed. Officers and seamen were returned to town in a shocking condition. The Jupiter and La Brave were both dismasted by the board in the first of the action. The admiral's mast went by the board as she was running on shore. She was silenced nearly an half hour prior to going ashore."
From the above mentioned, which were taken down as the incidents which they relate occurred, and from the details we have been able to collect from other sources, it appears, that on the French squadron passing by St. Thomas's some persons of that island hired a large row boat, and with 20 or more hands plied away to windward up to Tortola, where an armed vessel was lying, which was dispatched with the utmost expedition to admiral Cochrane, at Barbadoes, who collected all the ships which the urgency of the case would permit, and with the force above stated, scoured down to leeward till he overtook the French squadron at anchor off the city of St. Domingo; where he captured the Jupiter, 74, La Brave, 80, and L'Alexandre, 74, and burnt the fine new ship L'Imperial, of 134 guns, and Diomed, 74, after they had been run ashore by their own officers. The action was an obstinate and bloody one; but the precise loss of men, on either side, is unknown.
The destruction of this fleet, if their officers was accurately stated by the officers who escaped from the ships which were run ashore, is one of the most fortunate events that ever occurred for the insurance offices of America—it was no less than a complete execution of the arrete of Ferrand, except, possibly, the sanguinary part; but it was, at all events, to take or destroy every American vessel in the harbors or on the coast of Hayti.
We learn that the French squadron engaged in the late action off St. Domingo, sailed from Brest in company with another squadron of 7 sail of the line & 1 frigate, under the command of prince Jerome Bonaparte, and parted from them off the Western Isles—their destination unknown; but from their steering a S. W. course, it was conjectured that they were bound for the Cape of Good Hope.
CITY LOTS FOR SALE.
THE undermentioned Lots of ground are offered for sale, either separately or by squares, on liberal terms either for cash or on credit—they are all free from mortgage or incumbrance, and are subject to no litigation or contest, as the titles are derived by immediate conveyances from the chancellor of Maryland and the commissioners of Washington, to Messrs. Henry Pratt, Thomas Willing Francis, John Miller, junr. John Athley & Jacob Daker, trustees of the Aggregate Fund.
Square No. 54 Lot no 9—sq 72 Lots no 2 4 8 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lot no 1—sq 85 Lots no 20 21 22—sq 103 Lots no 7 8—sq 145 Lots no 1 2 7 8—sq 146 Lots no 1 2 3—sq 147 Lot no 4—sq 163 Lots no 5 6 7 12 13 14—sq 258 Lots no 6 7 10 11 12 13 14—sq 293 Lots no 1 2 3 7 8 11 12 13 18—sq 349 Lots no 1 2 8—sq 376 Lots no 10 16 17 18—sq 407 Lots no 3 4 7 8 9 17 18—sq 487 Lots no 5 6 7 10—sq 488 Lots 8 9 12—sq 489 Lots 5 6 9 sq 491 Lots 10 11 12 16 19 20 24—sq 493 Lots no 7 8—sq 494 Lots no 8 9 10—sq 531 Lots 3 4 8 11 12 13 14—sq 533 Lots no 13 15 16 17—sq 584 Lots no 1 2 3 4 22 23 24—sq 588 whole square Half of 590 whole square—sq 635 Lots no 1 2 3 5 6 9 10—sq 638 Lots no 1 2 3—sq 633 Lot no 1—sq 640 Lots no 1 2 3 4 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18—sq 641 whole square—sq 642 Lots no 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 19—Half of 643 Lot no 2—outh of 643 Lots no 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 28—sq 644 Lots no 1 5 7 west of 645 whole square—sq 878 Lots no 16 17 18 19 20—sq 973 Lots no 4 5 6 7 8 20 21—sq 995 Lots no 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18—south of 1019 Lots no 1 2 4—sq 1020 Lots no 1 2 3 4 5 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38—sq 1021 Lot no 1—sq 1022 Lot no 2—sq 1023 Lots no 4 5 7 8 9 10—sq 1024 Lots no 1 2 3 7—sq 1043 Lots no 9 10 12—sq 1046 Lots no 2 14 15—sq 1047 Lots no 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20—sq 1048 Lots no 7 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23.
Persons disposed to purchase are desired to apply to the subscriber at Mrs. Frofis near the capitol.
JAMES GREENLEAF, Agent and attorney to the trustees of the Aggregate Fund.
Feb. 24—w6t
WASHINGTON CITY.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12.
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES are still almost exclusively occupied with the discussion of Mr. Gregg's resolution relative to a non-importation of goods from Great Britain. ON MONDAY, Mr. Clark, Mr. Eppes, Mr. Nicholson, and Mr. Macon, spoke against the resolution.
ON TUESDAY, Mr. Macon having concluded his remarks, was followed by Mr. G. W. Campbell and Mr. Jackson. Messrs. Eppes and G. W. Campbell declared themselves in favor of strong and decided measures, though against Mr. Gregg's motion—Mr. Jackson had not finished his remarks when the House adjourned, and had not declared himself definitely in favor of the resolution, or of any other particular measure, though he avowed that he was impressed with the necessity of vigorous measures.
Messrs. Clark, Nicholson and Macon did not avow the particular measures they were in favor of pursuing.
The SENATE on Monday took into consideration the resolution which has, for some time, been on their table, prohibiting the importation into the U. S. of certain articles from G. Britain. This measure was supported by General S. Smith and Mr. Bayard.
The bill, introduced, by Mr. Adams, relative to foreign ministers, has been disagreed to, under the impression that full powers are to be found in the laws of nations to meet the cases contemplated by the bill.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
MONDAY, MARCH 10.
The committee of Claims made an unfavorable report on the petition of the representative of Baron Beaumarchais, which was referred to a committee of the whole House on Thursday.
TUESDAY, MARCH 11.
Mr. Gregg, from the committee on public lands, reported on the petitions of sundry inhabitants of the Indiana and Mississippi territories, praying for the right of pre-emption to the lands on which they are settled. The report was unfavorable to the petitioners.
Mr. Gregg from the same committee, reported on the petition of sundry settlers in Washington county, in the Mississippi territory. The report was in favor of granting school lands, and opposed to exonerating claimants from the expense of having their surveys executed.
The following Indian songs, with the observations thereon, are taken from the Aurora. For the translations we are indebted to the leisure moments of DR. MITCHELL.
INDIAN TRIBES.
The Osages who have been lately at Washington, are represented as possessing a more enlarged intellect and a greater share of that acute sensibility which cherishes reflection, improves by observation, enlarges the reasoning faculty and assimilates to matters of taste and elegance, than our more northern and western tribes. We have had presented to us copies of two poetical articles, which we are informed are translations as close as the dissimilarity of two languages, and the structure of English metre will admit—we give them as we received them:
SONG,
OF THE OSAGE INDIANS.
On making their visit to Washington, the seat of the national government, in Dec. 1805.
SUBJECT—Their journey to Washington to have an interview with Mr. Jefferson, President of the U. S. and their satisfaction on meeting their great father.
My comrades brave, and friends of note!
You hither come from lands remote, To see your grand exalted Sire And his sagacious words admire.
"The master of your life and breath"
Averted accidents and death, That you might such a sight behold, In spite of hunger, foes and cold.
Ye Red Men! since ye here have been,
Your Great White Father ye have seen,
Who cheered his children with his voice
And made their beating hearts rejoice.
Thou chief Osage! fear not to come And leave awhile thy sylvan home— The path we passed is clear and free, And wide and smoother grows for thee.
Whene'er to march thou feelst inclined, We'll form a length'ning file behind, And dauntless from our forests run To hear the talks of JEFFERSON.
Washington, Jan. 7, 1806.
A WAR SONG BY THE OSAGES.
SAY, warriors, why, when war is sung,
And dwells on every native tongue,
Do thoughts of death intrude?
Why weep the common lot of all?
Why think that you yourselves may fall,
Pursuing or pursued.
Doubt not of Tewasatage's care,
To lead you forth and shew you where
The enemy's concealed;
His single arm shall make the attack,
And drive the sly invaders back,
Or stretch them on the field.
Proceeding with embodied force,
No nation can withstand our course
Or check our bold career;
Tho' if they knew my warlike fame,
The terrors of my form or name—
They'd quake—or die with fear.
* The great spirit or supreme being is called by several tribes "The master of breath, or the master of life."
March 10—3t
A CARD.
THE Subscriber being informed that the French Minister and other French agents in this country, have repeatedly asserted that he had no just claim on their government, and that he had been paid in full, for all the supplies furnished to the same, feels it due to his own character to contradict these reports and offers to prove to the satisfaction of all those, who will take the trouble to call upon him, that for supplies furnished in the West Indies, as well as for advances made here, part in cash and part in provisions, to the French frigates he now holds bills drawn by the French agents, and which are unpaid, and protested, for upwards of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars.
He has besides the above, upwards of twenty thousand dollars in bills received from Mr. Pichon, for passages furnished to the French soldiers, which bills also remain unpaid, and the minister of marine offers only 50 per cent of their value in payment.
VICTOR DU PONT DE NEMOURS, 101 Greenwich Street, New York. March 12—6t
FOR SALE.
ALL that tract of land which I purchased from Mrs. Mary Jenkins and on which I now reside lying in St. Mary's county on the Chesapeake bay three miles from St. Inigoes creek, containing 500 acres more or less. The advantages of this land are numerous, 400 acres are in wood abounding in oak, locust and poplar. The bay shore affords an inexhaustible source of excellent manure in the sea weed or sea car as it is commonly called which is at all seasons thrown up in great quantities and is of easy access, lying immediately along side of the fields. No place can be better adapted than this for stock of all kinds. The woods yield abundance of acorns, and it abounds in grounds well calculated for meadows that produce great quantities of grass. The improvements of this place are likewise considerable. There are on it a good brick dwelling house, every necessary out house, a small water mill, and two tenements now under rent, besides all necessary fencing in good repair. Moreover there are many convenient springs of good water that do not fail in the driest seasons—its situation renders it almost superfluous to mention that it lies convenient to the Baltimore, Norfolk and Alexandria markets. This valuable tract of land I will sell for one 4th cash and the remainder in one two and three years. WILFRED MANNING. Great Mill, Jan. 31—3t&wtf
March 12—6t
Pursuant to a decree of the
Chancery Court of Maryland, I will expose to PUBLIC SALE on the twenty fourth day of March next at Montgomery Court House a tract of land in Montgomery county, state of Maryland, containing 519 acres more or less, late part of the estate of Gen. George Washington deceased, and on the 21st day of the same month, I will sell at Port Tobacco in Charles county at public sale 500 acres of land lying in said county & state of Maryland a so part of said estate. Persons desirous of purchasing are requested to examine said lands which will be divided or sold entire as may best suit the purchaser to give bond with approved security for the purchase money and interest payable at the end of 12 months from the day of sale.
BUSS: WASHINGTON. Feb. 28—2wtfMar24
FOR SALE.
The subscriber offers for private sale a valuable plantation adjoining the land known by the name of Non-tuch, about one mile and a half from the Eastern Branch bridge, containing about 280 acres with a sufficiency of wood and meadow ground, about 15 acres now in grass and may be well called as pretty a piece of ground as any in the District of Columbia; the main road leading through part of this tract which will be a suitable stand for a tavern and retail store, together with plenty of wood and hay, which always command a ready cash price, will make this property a desirable object to any person wishing to become a farmer. This land is well watered by several never failing springs. Any person desirous of becoming a purchaser may see the title papers and view the premises by applying to the subscriber living on the land, if the above property is not sold at private sale by the 1st day of April next it will then be sold at public auction on the premises, and at the same time an valuable slaves, mostly young and healthy. Terms of sale will be made known on the day of sale.
JOHN MASTERS. Feb. 21—w3t
OLD COPPER AND BRASS
TWELVE & A HALF CENTS FOR
each pound of the above metals will be
given by the Subscriber on Pennsylvania
avenue near the Centre Market.
MATTHIAS HART.
March 6—w3t
I WILL RENT OR SELL.
THE property where I now live, if it is not rented or sold at private sale before the first Monday in May next, it will then be sold at public sale, two lots in figure 28, fronting on Water street, 73 feet 3 inches and running back 181 x 2 feet, which are inclosed in a handsome paled garden—the buildings are a convenient frame DWELLING HOUSE, Smoke House and Ice House. On the fourth side of Water street, is a wharf sufficiently large to hold 200 cords of wood at once; this part of the property runs to the Hamburg channel, and the situation equal to any in the city for a lumber, coal, or wood yard. The terms will be made easy to the purchaser, and a sufficient title given, by JOHN STEPHEN. Feb. 28—3t
Thirty Dollars Reward,
FOR apprehending and securing in jail negro JACOB, who is a low well made fellow, about 25 years of age, complexion rather black, tho' not deep, has a pleasant countenance, is stout made about the shoulders and breast with small legs, has a flopping in his speech and cannot make a quick reply, when spoken to without flitting his eyes or being in motion, which is very observable, his clothing was blue negro cotton jacket and overalls, ozanburg shirt, and wool hat, though they are subject to change, he was late the property of Richard E. Beall of Fauquier county, Virginia, and eloped about the 6th of Nov. emby last. The constables and others of the city of Washington, George Town, Alexandria, Baltimore, Philadelphia and Norfolk are requested to look out for the said runaway slave, as he above reward will be immediately paid them on the terms specified by JOHN KEDDLE. City of Washington, Dec. 16—2awtf
Fresh Garden Seeds, &c.
THEOPHILUS HOLT respectfully informs his friends and the public that he has received from London per ship Mars to Baltimore, and for sale, a very extensive assortment of fresh Garden Seeds, garden tools, grass seeds, bird seed. Split peas and flour of mustard by the pound.
He also has for sale a variety of bulbous flower roots, fruit trees, flowering shrubs, Lombardy poplars, &c. &c.
The customary allowance made to Gardeners and those who purchase to sell again. Washington City, Dec. 13—2awtf
P. S. An assortment of the garden seeds are for sale at Dr. Ott's George Town.
Painful it is for me to give the following
NOTICE.
But absolute NECESSITY compels me. In September last, I gave public notice to all those who owed indebted to me, that my books were closed and proved; and that no further credit would be given even to my best friends; but contrary to my firm determination, that resolution lasted but a few days, and with concern I say it, since that period my book debts have increased nearly
NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS.
For a person with my small capital having so much money out, it is impossible for me to support my credit, with that pecuniary, which is so much my wish. I am therefore resolved to leave this town on the 10th day of July next, and retire to some peaceful abode where Honor and Honesty reigns, and where the Upright and Good Man will have justice done him over the Rogue and Swindler—for such are the Laws of this Territory though the capital of America, (and with shame I say it) there is no distinction made between the Man of Honor, who, though Poor, will pay his debts, and the Rogue and Swindler, who retires to, and resides in this Territory, well knowing it to be an Asylum for VILLAINY—the former will call and pay you when able; the latter will have the audacity to shew you Ten fold the amount in cash that he owes you, and bid you defiance to sue him; for, says he, "I have no property"—though at the same time, through some employment or other, he enjoys an income of from 5 to 800 DOLLARS per year—this is a "Liberty" indeed, the boast of our country! but no Justice. As my stay in this place will be but short, and as I do not wish to leave it one cent in debt, I earnestly entreat those who stand indebted to me to make immediate payment; by which, they will avoid such a measure being taken, as they are little aware of. For if I cannot have Justice done me, I have this consolation, that I have a Refort yet left, which, if they have any SHAME, or one spark of HONOR for their characters, they will avoid my putting in force, for a galled horse will wince.
GEORGE PITT.
N. B. A person authorized by me will call on them in a few days, when it is hoped they will be prepared to settle their respective balances.
To avoid the necessity of a refusal, I request no one will ask for credit, except those to whom I stand indebted. G. P. George Town, Ter. of Col Feb. 8—2wtf
A HOUSE & LOT FOR SALE.
WILL be offered at Public Sale on Tuesday the 25th of March next at Mr. King's tavern near the premises, on a credit of 90 days, a two story BRICK HOUSE, with two rooms and a passage on each floor, a cellar and dry well therein. This house is situated on Lot No. 10 in square 728, on East Capitol Street. Negotiable notes with approved indorsers payable at the Bank of Columbia, or Washington Branch Bank, will be required of the purchaser and when paid a good title will be made by SAMUEL TYLER, Executor of Samuel Tyler, deceased. March 3—w3t
FOR SALE,
A second hand COACHER with a handsome pair of pared Harness. This carriage is the property of a Lady who wishes to sell it, and a bargain will be given. Application may be made to Wm. A. Washington, esq. of Rock-Hill, where the carriage may be seen. February 28—wtf

This is to give notice that if the heirs of a certain STEPHEN REYNOLDS, who died on his way from the western country in the month of August 1803, and supposed to have been a native of the state of New Hampshire or one of the Eastern states will apply to JOHN RINK administrator living in the town of Connersville, Alleghany county, state of Maryland, will hear of something to their advantage. By order of Alleghany county orphans court. March 3—42am
On a liberal credit. THE subscriber will dispose of at private sale his estate called Chichester, lying on the eastern branch, immediately opposite the city of Washington. This tract of land containing 697 acres is laid off in lots from 83 to 144 acres for the convenience of purchasers. Parts of the estate and the terms of sale are in the hands of colonel Hanson at the navy yard, and Charles Wayman of George Town. The lots will be flown by Mr. Wedden, living on the premises, near the Eastern Branch bridge. ANTHONY ADDISON. Brewery, 12th June 1807—tf
ELIAS B. CALDWELL, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Has removed his Office, to the house lately occupied by Mr. Law, on Capitol Hill. Washington, July 26—tf
FOR SALE, AT DANIEL RAPINE'S BOOKSTORE CAPITOL HILL, A few copies of HAZARD'S COLLECTION OF STATE PAPERS; and other authentic documents; intended as materials for an history of the U. States of America, in 2 vols. 4to. This valuable work was, for several years past, not to be procured; and as the demand for it lately has considerably increased, great exertions were made to procure the few copies now offered for sale. Gentlemen wishing to possess this work will please to apply soon, as it is believed no more copies can be purchased after these are sold. March 5—
THE IMPROVED STRAW CUTTER, May be seen in operation at the subscriber's house between the Six Buildings and the Potomac river; he found the steel of this machine such as to cause the knife to cut off the straw at an angle of 22 1/2 degrees which makes it cut much easier than at right angles, or square across; also a model of the improved Press. Either of the machines can be had of Oliver Evans in Philadelphia or the subscriber, city of Washington. EVAN EVANS. February 12—ep4v
WANTED, A WOMAN that understands plain cooking and house work; likewise a GIRL of about 14 years of age to take care of children—none need apply but those who can bring unexceptionable recommendations. Enquire at the 2nd house from the west end of the Six Buildings and at this office. Nov. 27—tf
Ten Dollars Reward. STRAYED or STOLEN, about six weeks ago, a dark BAY MARE, 15 hands high, has a star in her forehead, one of her hind feet white to the hoof lock, and one of her fore feet has a white stripe on it, she has a bushy tail, and was heavy with colt. Ten Dollars reward will be given if brought to Mr. Waterson's Capitol Hill, by ADAM POWELL. March 10—3t
FOR SALE, A Valuable Tract of Land, In the state of Kentucky, under an inalienable title, and for which the proprietor will take, if applied for soon, half a dollar per acre, payable one half down, and the other half in 12 months on approved security—Enquire of the printer. Feb. 12—4v
CHARLES H. VARDEN, MERCHANT TAYLOR, NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NEAR THE CAPITOL. Respectfully informs the gentlemen of the District of Columbia that in addition to his former stock he has received by late arrivals at Philadelphia from London a choice assortment of superfine cloths, single and double milled cassimeres, Bennetts patent cord, wolvenet and washable stuff, fancy and black silk mouselkins, all of superior quality and newest fashion, plain and stripe black velvets, constitution cord, knap coatings, flushing flannels, &c. &c. with a variety of other articles in his line, and he pledges himself, to those gentlemen who shall favor him with their orders to complete them in the newest style of fashion. N.B. Ladies habita, regimentals, navy uniforms, made in the most fashionable manner. Washington, Dec. 28—tf
This is to give notice that the subscriber of the county of Washington and District of Columbia hath obtained from the Orphan's Court of Prince George's county, state of Maryland, and from the Orphan's Court of the county of Washington aforesaid, letters of administration on the personal estate of WALTER MACKALL, late of Calvert county deceased—All persons having claims against the said deceased are hereby warned to exhibit the same with the vouchers thereof to the subscriber at or before the 6th day of September next, they may otherwise by law be excluded from all benefit of the said estate. Given under my hand this 24th day of February 1806. JAMES S. MORSELL, adm'r. February 28—22wim
Twenty Dollars Reward, WILL be given for apprehending negro FAME a very low and tolerable lady woman about 38 years of age, but from appearance older, very black and much marked with the small pox which occasioned a small defect in one of her eyes, has lost one of her foreteeth, fee is very surl and cunning, having procured a free pass, and passes by the name of Charity Shorter; she was formerly the property of John Chittens of this county, and was run away for near eight years, was apprehended and sold to me in 1803 and was hired by me to a certain Thomas King of Prince George's county, from whom she absconded in Oct. 1804 and has been lurking, I do suppose near where she was hired or gone to Calvert county where I have understood her husband has gone. The above reward will be given to any person who will lodge her in jail so that I get her again, or deliver her to Mr. Samuel Speake city of Washington, or to the subscriber living in Charles county Maryland, near Port Tobacco. P.S. I forewarn any person from harboring or employing said woman, at their peril. MASSY SIMMS.
Nov. 27—tf CITY OF WASHINGTON, Sept. 9, 1805. Several persons under the impression that the public lots in this city are to be disposed of in future by public sales only, having made enquiries when the next sale will probably take place, we are requested to state that those lots may at any time be purchased at private sale of the Superintendent of the City. Sept. 9—tf
STELLE'S HOTEL & CITY TAVERN. THE Subscriber takes this method of thanking his friends and the public for their favors which on the Capitol Square and begs leave to acquaint them that he has taken the Shalons Hotel lately erected by Mr. Carroll, near the Capitol. The hotel being above one hundred feet in front, and containing fifty rooms enables the subscriber to offer every accommodation to members of Congress and travellers which can be expected in a public house. PONTIUS D. STELLE. Washington City, March 25—tf N.B.—P. D. S. will rent the house lately occupied by him on the adjoining square.
ADVERTISEMENT. THE Public are notified that the partnership of Thomas Hunton of Fauquier and George Britton of Shenandoah was dissolved on the second day of August 1805. March 10—3t In the case of Charles Tomkins an insolvent debtor. SIX months from and after the first day of March next is limited and appointed for the creditors of the said Tomkins to bring in and exhibit their claims to the trustee. Ordered that this notice be published in the Washington Federalist and National Intelligencer once a month, during said term. By order of the hon. Wm. Cranef eq. an assistant judge of the circuit court of the district of Columbia. WM. BRENT, Ck. Feb. 7, 1806.
The subscriber being appointed by the court trustee in the above case, solicits the attention of the creditors to the above order. JOHN MITCHELL. March 10—3t
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. WHEREAS by the first article of the terms and conditions declared by the President of the United States on the 17th day of October, 1791, for regulating the materials and manner of building and improvements on the lots in the city of Washington, it is provided "that the outer and party walls of all houses in the said city shall be built of brick or stone" and by the third article of the same terms and conditions it is declared "that the wall of no house shall be higher than forty feet to the roof in any part of the city, nor shall any be lower than thirty five feet on any of the avenues." And whereas the above recited articles were found to impede the settlement in the city, of mechanics and others whose circumstances did not admit of erecting houses authorised by the said regulations, for which cause the operation of the said articles has been suspended by several acts of the President of the United States, from the fifth day of June in the year 1796 to the first day of January last, and beneficial effects arising from such suspensions having been experienced it is deemed proper to revive the same with the exception hereafter mentioned. WHEREFORE I THOMAS JEFFERSON, President of the United States, Do declare that the first and third articles above recited shall be, and the same are hereby suspended until the first day of January in the year one thousand eight hundred and seven, and that all houses which shall be erected in the said city of Washington previous to the said first day of January in the year one thousand eight hundred and seven conformable in other respects to the regulations aforesaid shall be considered as lawfully erected, except that no wooden house covering more than three hundred and twenty square feet, or higher than twelve feet from the sill to the eave shall be erected, nor shall such house be placed within twenty four feet of any brick or stone house. Given under my hand the twenty-fifth day of February 1806. TH: JEFFERSON. Feb. 28—22w3m
Important to Sportsmen. On the 29th day of April next, will be offered for sale, at the Bowling Green in Caroline county, THE STUD, of the late Col. JOHN H. HOOMES, consisting of imported & country bred Stallions, Brood Mares and their produce, for several years past—total about one hundred head. This is certainly the most numerous, and probably the best selected stud ever before offered at public auction in this country; as it is well known, that the late owner spared neither money or exertion, in procuring both at home and abroad such stock as appeared most certain to insure him success as a breeder. To gentlemen who may feel a disposition to engage immediately in the sports of the turf, several fine three and four year olds could be highly recommended, for size, blood and figure. Should any of the stud horses be farmed out for the approaching spring, the sale of such will be postponed, until the expiration of the season. The terms of sale will be one half of the purchase money payable in six and the other in twelve months, to be secured by bond, with approved securities, to carry interest from the date it is not punctually paid. A considerable discount will be made for cash. Gentlemen in the neighboring states are hereby assured, that the sale shall positively take place on the day above stated. A catalogue will be exhibited, stating age, blood, &c. JOHN G. WOODFOLK, JOHN HOOMES, Executors of John Hoomes, deceased. Bowling Green, March 3—tw.
PUBLIC SALE. IN pursuance of the decree of the High Court of Chancery of the state of Maryland will be sold at public sale to the highest bidder at JOSEPH SIMMS'S tavern, George Town, on the 11th day of April next, at 11 o'clock A. M. all the right, title, and interest of the late Thomas Clark of George Town, deceased to the following property, to wit: Lot No. 13, in Peter, Betty, Threlkeld, & Deakins's addition to George Town with the improvements thereon consisting of a commodious Brick Dwelling House, Coach and Smoke House and other useful outbuildings— Lots No. 173, 174, and 175 in Thomas Beall of George's first addition to George Town, and any other lots in said addition to which said Clark was entitled. Also, a piece or parcel of land containing about fifty acres lying about a mile and a half from George Town and adjoining the land on which Mr. Key lives. The purchaser or purchasers to give bond with approved security for the purchase money with interest thereon from the day of sale, payable in fifteen months from said last mentioned day. All persons having claims against said Thomas Clark, deceased, are requested to exhibit the same to the register of the court of Chancery aforesaid with the vouchers to support the same within three months from the said day of sale. JAMES S. MORSELL, Trustee. March 3—3w
FOR SALE, About Two Thousand acres of LAND On the east side of the Eastern Branch, and adjoining it, commencing about 4 miles from the Capitol, and 2 from the New Bridge, and including a sufficiency of wood; 300 or 400 acres of meadow ground, a great part of which may be watered; a good country mill, and a commodious brick dwelling house, with all necessary out houses, in good repair. This land will be divided to suit purchasers, though it would be more agreeable to sell the whole together; and there is no more valuable estate than the whole, to be bought in the neighborhood of Washington, nor one capable of being made to yield a better annual income. Apply to BENJ. LOWNDES at Bladensburg, or to BEN. STODDERT. George Town, March 3—2w
A BARGAIN. THE subscriber offers for sale the farm he now occupies, containing near 300 acres with or without the stock thereon. It is distant from the cities of Georgetown and Washington, about five miles, and well known as a healthy situation. There is much fine fruit thereon, and abounds with springs, affording as good water as in the United States, a considerable proportion of the land has been in clover, and from thirty to forty acres it for the the ensuing summer. It is now in a very improving state, being altogether clear of broom fence, and from 40 to 60 acres ploughed and prepared for a spring crop, and from 30 to 40 acres well set with wheat and rye—some part of the land is calculated for tobacco; and plaster of paris answers well with it all. The dwelling house and other improvements may with small repairs, be rendered very comfortable—From its vicinity to two growing cities, many advantages result in supplying the markets. A purchaser may calculate on a good bargain, particularly if an early application be made. Some part of the purchase money will be required in cash or approved negotiable paper: the remainder rendered easy—or negroes received in payment. The subscriber or William Searcy residing on the farm will show it when required, and the terms made known by application to Mr. John Thompson, George Town, or Dr. WM. THORNTON, Washington. Isaac Pollock, Fruit Hill, Some Lands calculated for the culture of cotton, Indian corn and small grain, situated on a navigable river in the healthiest part of the state of Georgia, will also be sold on reasonable terms or exchanged for negroes. I. P. Jan. 29—eptf
For Sale. The subscriber has from 5 to 600 bushels of the first quality of James river coal to sell, which if not sold by private sale, will be offered at public sale, on Saturday the 15th inst. at 11 o'clock A. M. All sums above 20 dollars 90 days, by giving negotiable notes at the banks of Columbia, or in the city. JOHN STEPHEN, Auctioneer. March 5—
AUDITOR'S OFFICE, Chillicothe, State of Ohio January 31st, 1806. Extract from an act levying a state tax for the year 1806. Section 2. Be it further enacted, That all lands shall be rated and classed in the manner following: that is to say, first, second, and third rates; and the rule to be observed is, that when a greater part of any tract shall be superior in quality to second rate land, it shall be denominated first rate; when a greater part of a tract shall be inferior in quality to fifth rate, and superior to third rate, it shall be denominated second rate; and when a greater part of a tract shall be inferior to second rate, it shall be denominated third rate land, taking into view the situation and the quality of the soil. First rate land shall be taxed at the rate of ninety cents, second rate sixty-five cents, and third rate forty cents, each per hundred acres. Sec. 3. Be it further enacted, That in all cases where the owners of any lands have, by themselves or agents, entered their lands in their proper class, with the auditor or clerks of the court of common pleas, agreeably to the laws heretofore in force, such lands shall under this act be placed in the same class for taxation, and all lands which shall not be entered by the owners, or their agents, with the auditor, before he makes out his duplicate, he shall class and charge the same as second rate, and if any owner or proprietor of lands, or their agents, have heretofore, or shall hereafter enter any tract of land in an inferior class to that of its real quality, said land shall (until it is changed into its proper class) be charged, over and above the rate for which it was entered, with double the amount of tax which should have been paid had the same been entered in its proper class; which shall be paid to the collector of the county, township, or district in which such lands may be chargeable, for the use of the state, on the information of any freeholder, making due proof thereof to the auditor or commissioners and be recovered at the same time and in the same way as other taxes are recoverable. Sec. 4. Be it further enacted, That for the collection of taxes of non-residents lands the state shall be and is hereby divided into six collection districts: the first to include the lands purchased by John Cleves Symmes and his associates and the land within the district of Cincinnati land office; the second to include lands in the Virginia military district, the land within the district of Chillicothe land office and the French grants, the third to include the land purchased by the Ohio Company and all grants included within the limits thereof and the land within the district of the Marietta land office; the fourth to include the lands in the United States military district and the renuee lands, and all the lands within the district of Zaneville land office; the fifth to include the lands within the district of the Steubenville land office, and all lands south of the Connecticut reserve; and not included in the other districts; and the sixth to include the lands in the Connecticut reserve. Sec. 5. Be it further enacted, That there shall be appointed, by a joint ballot of both houses of the general assembly and commissioned by the governor, a collector in each district, who shall continue in office one year and until his successor is chosen and qualified, who shall collect all taxes due and owing on non-residents' lands within their respective districts. The collector of the first district shall keep his office at Cincinnati; the collector of the second district shall keep his office at Chillicothe; the collector of the third district shall keep his office at Marietta; the collector of the fourth district shall keep his office at Zaneville; the collector of the fifth district shall keep his office at Steubenville, and the collector of the sixth district shall keep his office at the town of Warren, in the county of Trumbull. And shall each, at the time they receive their duplicates, take & subscribe the following oath or affirmation: viz. "I, A. B. do solemnly swear or affirm, (as the case may be) that I will, according to the best of my abilities, faithfully and impartially perform the duties enjoined on me by law; as collector of the district; and that I will not directly or indirectly purchase any land by me sold for taxes." Notice is hereby given that all taxes within this state are due and payable after the 1st day of August next ensuing, and if not paid by the first Monday of December, the lands will be sold, or so much thereof as will satisfy the amount due with interest. 1st district collector, A. Goforth, Cincinnati. 2d do Virginia army lands, Thomas Scott, Chillicothe. 3d do Wm. Skinner, Marietta. 4th do James Herron, Zaneville. 5th do Charles Maxwell, Steubenville. 6th do James Hilman, Warren. THOMAS GIBSON, Auditor of Accounts for the state of Ohio. Feb. 20—6w.
War Department, March 1, 1806. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN. THAT separate proposals will be received at the office of the Secretary for the Department of War, until 12 o'clock at noon of the first Wednesday in June next, for the supply of all rations that may be required for the use of the United States, from the 1st day of October 1806, until the 30th day of September 1807, both days inclusive, at the following places, viz. First, At Niagara, Detroit, Michilimackinac, Fort Wayne, Chicago, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited within the state of Ohio, and territory of Michigan, and at any place or places within the Indiana territory north of the 41st degree of north latitude. Second, At South-West Point, Tellico, Knoxville, Nashville, and within the Cherokee nation between Tennessee and Georgia, and on the Tennessee river, and on the road between said river and Nashville, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched or recruited within the states of Kentucky and Tennessee. Third, At the garrison near Vincennes on the river Wabash, at Fort Mifflin, New Madrid, Chickasaw Bluffs, Arkansas, Natchez, & Fort Adams, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited in the Mississippi territory, except the county of Washington, and at any place or places in the Indiana territory south of the 41st degree of north latitude and fifty miles east of the Mississippi river. Fourth, At St. Louis, St. Charles, Kaskaskia, Cahokia, and at any place or places,
where troops are or may be stationed, marched or recruited within the territory of Louisiana north of New Madrid, and at any place or places in the Indiana territory within fifty miles east of the Mississippi river, south of the 41st degree of north latitude, Fort Mifflin excepted. Fifth, At New Orleans, Plaquemines, Point Coupee, Opelousa, Natchitoches, Appalakia, Attakapas, Fort St. Louis, Fort St. Stephens, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched or recruited within the territory of Orleans, or in the county of Washington in the Mississippi territory, and at any place or places on the west side of the Mississippi river below Arkansas. Separate proposals will also be received as aforesaid for the supply of all rations, which may be required for the use of the United States, from the 1st day of January 1807, to the 31st day of December of the same year, both days inclusive, within the several states heretofore mentioned, viz. Sixth, At Fort Wilkinson, Cockpit Island, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched or recruited, within the state of Georgia, and on the Indian boundary between Georgia and the Creek nation. Seventh, at Charleston, Rocky Mount, on the head waters of the Santee, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the states of North and South Carolina. Eighth, At Norfolk, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of Virginia. Ninth, At Fort M'Henry, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of Maryland and the district of Columbia. Tenth, At Fort Mifflin, Carlisle, and at any place or places where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of Pennsylvania, east of the Mountains, and within the states of New Jersey, and Delaware. Eleventh, At Pittsburg, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of Pennsylvania, west of the mountains. Twelfth, At Fort Jay, West Point, Albany, Schenectady, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of New York, Niagara and its dependencies excepted. Thirteenth, At Fort Trumbull, Fort Wolfcott, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the states of Connecticut, Rhode Island and Vermont. Fourteenth, At Fort Independence, (Boston harbor) and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited, within the state of Massachusetts, the town of Springfield, and the district of Maine, excepted. Fifteenth, At Portsmouth, Portland, and at any place or places, where troops are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited within the state of New Hampshire and the district of Maine. Sixteenth, Proposals will also be received as aforesaid, for the supply of all rations, which may be required by the United States, for the troops which are or may be stationed, marched, or recruited within the town of Springfield in the state of Massachusetts, and for the armorers and other persons employed in the United States' armory at that place, from the 1st day of January 1807 to the 31st day of December in the same year, both days inclusive. A ration to consist of one pound and one quarter of beef, or three quarters of a pound of pork, eighteen ounces of bread or flour, one gill of rum, whiskey or brandy, and at the rate of two quarts of salt, four quarts of vinegar, four pounds of soap, and one pound and a half of candles, to every hundred rations. The prices of the several component parts of the ration shall be specified; but the U. States reserve the right of making such alterations in the price of the component parts of the ration aforesaid, as shall make the price of each part thereof bear a just proportion to the proposed price of the whole ration. The rations are to be furnished in such quantities, that there shall at all times, during the term of the proposed contract, be sufficient for the consumption of the troops at Michilimackinac, Detroit and Chicago, for six months in advance; and at each of the other posts on the western waters, for at least three months in advance, of good and wholesome provisions, if the same shall be required. It is also to be permitted to all and every of the commandants of fortified places or posts, to call for, at seasons when the same can be transported, or at any time in case of urgency, such supplies of like provisions in advance, as in the discretion of the commandant shall be deemed proper. It is understood that the contractor is to be at the expence and risk of issuing the supplies to the troops, and that all losses sustained by the depredations of an enemy, or by means of the troops of the U. S. shall be paid by the U. S. at the price of the articles captured or destroyed as aforesaid, on the deposition of two or more persons of creditable characters, and the certificate of a commissioned officer, stating the circumstances of the loss, and the amount of the articles for which compensation shall be claimed. The privilege is understood to be reserved to the U. S. of requiring that none of the supplies, which may be furnished under any of the proposed contracts, shall be issued, until the supplies which have been or may be furnished under contracts now in force, have been consumed; and that a supply in advance may be always required at any of the fixed posts on the sea-board, or Indian frontier, not exceeding three months. H. DEARBORN, Secretary of War. March 5—2aw6w.
BANK OF COLUMBIA. NOTICE is hereby given, that in conformity to the charter of this institution, an election for twelve directors will be held at the house of Joseph Simms, in George town, on the 20th inst. WILLIAM WHANN, Cashier. March 7—