The national intelligencer and Washington advertiser. (Washington City [D.C.]), 1806-03-03 00:00:00

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER, AND WASHINGTON ADVERTISER.
VOL. VI. WASHINGTON CITY, PRINTED BY SAMUEL HARRISON SMITH, PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE. No. DCCCXLII. FIVE DOLLARS PER ANNUM. MONDAY, MARCH 3, 1806. PAID IN ADVANCE.
IN SENATE OF THE U. STATES
FEBRUARY 20, 1806.
Mr. Adams, from the committee to whom was referred, the bill, to prevent the abuse of the privileges and immunities enjoyed by foreign ministers within the United States; reported the same with the following
AMENDMENT.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That whenever the President of the U. States, shall, under the authority of the laws of nations and of this act, send any foreign ambassador, minister, or other person as aforesaid, so offending, home to his sovereign, he shall issue his warrant to any officer, civil or military, under the authority of the U. States, commanding him to provide for the departure of the said ambassador, minister, or other person as aforesaid, so offending: taking due precautions to avoid all improper or unnecessary violence in executing said warrant. And all officers, civil and military, under the authority of the U. States, are required to be obedient to such warrant.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
REPORT.
The committee on public lands, to whom was referred a resolution of the 20th of January last, directing an enquiry into the expediency of providing by law for the legal adjudication of claims to land, set up by persons in virtue of purchases, or transfers from purchasers of the United States, previous to the emanation of grants under their authority,
REPORT:
That between original purchasers they have had but one instance of conflicting claims, nor do they believe it is probable that any others have, or will occur. Neither have they heard of more than one dispute between those claiming lands by virtue of transfers from purchasers under the U. S. but controversies of this description are not of a nature to exclude the probability that others may exist, of which, however, the committee have not been informed. No doubt they will become more frequent in future, in proportion as the number of persons, holding under purchases made of the U. S. become greater.
The committee, therefore, would deem the evil of sufficient importance to justify them in recommending some provision being made by law for granting relief against its operation, if such provision does not already exist. If parties to those controversies cannot before the emanation of grants, resort to courts of justice, and obtain from them an adjustment of their disputes, it must be ascribed either to the want of jurisdiction, to the want of a rule of decision, or to a want of a mode of proceeding, applicable to the nature of the rights which are contested.
Of controversies arising under the laws of the U. S. or between citizens of different states, the courts of the U. S. have ample jurisdiction as it is in the power of congress to give them. Of controversies between citizens of the same state, and not arising under the laws of the U. S. the decision must be left to the state tribunals. There can never be a want of rules of decision, because the laws under which the right is claimed must always furnish the rules by which its validity will be determined, and no others can be substituted in their place.
As to the modes of proceeding in the courts of justice, the committee are impressed with an opinion, that they are not less applicable to controversies arising between parties before, than they are to controversies arising between parties after the emanation of the grants.
They can conceive of no right which will not be made effectual, and no wrong which will not have its remedy according to the mode of proceedings in courts of law and equity.
The committee, therefore, are induced to submit it as their opinion, that it would not be expedient to make any new or additional provision, by law, for the adjudication of claims, such as are stated in the resolution referred to them.
RESOLUTIONS
OF THE CITIZENS OF NORFOLK AND PORTSMOUTH, IN THE STATE OF VIRGINIA.
February 21, 1806. Read, and referred to the consideration of the whole House, on the state of the union.
At a meeting of the citizens of Norfolk and Portsmouth, assembled in consequence of the crisis to which the differences between this country and Great Britain have advanced, LUKE WHEELER, Esq. was called to the chair, and ARTHUR LEE appointed Secretary.
Resolved, unanimously, That a committee be appointed to draft resolutions, expressive of the sentiments of our citizens in relation to Great Britain, and that this committee consist of William Wirt, Littleton W. Tazewell, Robert B. Taylor, Moses Myers, William Pen-
nock, Theodoric Armistead, and John Granberry, who, after a short retirement, reported the following resolutions, which were read and unanimously agreed to.
1. Resolved, as the opinion of this meeting, That the law of nations, founded on the eternal principles of equal and reciprocal justice, and on the consent of nations, cannot be abrogated or altered at the mere will and pleasure of any one nation.
2. Resolved, as the opinion of this meeting, That Great Britain, in the selection and adoption of her maritime regulations, appears to make but a single enquiry; and that is, whether those regulations be conducive to her own interest: totally regardless whether they encroach, or not, on the rights of other nations, equally sovereign and independent with herself.
3. Resolved, as the opinion of this meeting, That the interest of Great Britain, and the law of nations, are not convertible terms; and that a measure, although highly expedient for her, although calculated to produce the effect of a general blockade on the nation with which she is at war, although tending to constrain to her own ports the commerce of neutrals, and to give her a monopoly of the commerce of the world, may nevertheless be a direct and palpable breach of national law, and an invasion of the rights, the independence, and sovereignty of other nations.
4. Resolved, as the opinion of this meeting, That of this description is that principle, generated in the British cabinet, which imposes a new restraint on the commerce of neutrals, which closes against them the ports of a belligerent, although such ports be avowedly free from blockade, although the neutral vessels contain no article of contraband, and although the nation, to which such ports belong, open them and invite the commerce of neutrals.
5. Resolved, That Great Britain, by impressing our citizens into her service, and compelling them to fight her battles, and to contribute to the capture and plunder of their own countrymen; by her various abuses of the laws of blockade; by the new principle which she hath prescribed as a part of the law of nations, and by which she effectually blockades the whole of every nation with which she is at war; by all these restraints and oppressions imposed and practised by her on the liberty of our citizens, the freedom of our commerce, and the sovereignty of our nation, hath given evidences of a hostile temper towards the United States, so strong, that, in the opinion of this meeting, it is expedient for our government to adopt such measures as, to their wisdom, may seem best calculated to assert and maintain our rights, and to redress the injuries we have sustained.
6. Resolved, That we have an unshaken confidence in the wisdom and firmness of our national councils; and that we will, with our lives and fortunes, support whatever measures they may take to maintain the honor and independence of our nation inviolate.
7. Resolved, That the chairman be instructed to transmit the said resolutions to Thomas Newton, Esq. our representative in Congress, to be by him laid before that body.
LUKE WHEELER, Chairman. Test, ARTHUR LEE, Sec'y. Norfolk, 12th Feb. 1806.
NOTICE.
THE SUBSCRIBER HAS OPENED A VENDUE STORE, On the Pennsylvania avenue, in one of the frame buildings west of Mr. Herford's brewery, where he is now ready to receive goods, to the disposition of which every attention will be paid by him.
JOHN STEPHEN, Auctioneer. Washington City, Feb. 23-3t N. B. Commission business done with punctuality and dispatch. J. S. Auct.
Will be sold at Public Sale on Tuesday the 4th day of March, the SLOOP FRIENDS, now lying at the Hamburg wharf, she is well calculated to carry wood, and will be sold without reserve, precisely at 3 o'clock P. M.
JOHN STEPHEN, Auctioneer. Feb. 23-2t
I WILL RENT OR SELL,
THE property where I now live, if it is not rented or sold at private sale, before the first Monday in May next, it will then be sold at public sale, two lots in square 23, fronting on Water street, 78 feet 3 inches and running back 131 x 2 feet, which are inclosed in a handsome paled in garden—the buildings are a convenient frame DWELLING HOUSE, Smoke House and Ice House. On the fourth side of Water street, is a wharf sufficiently large to hold 200 cords of wood at once, this part of the property runs to the Hamburg channel, and the situation equal to any in the city for a Lumber, coal, or wood yard. The terms will be made easy to the purchaser, and a sufficient title given, by
JOHN STEPHEN. Feb. 23-3t
MEMORIAL OF THE MERCHANTS OF BOSTON.
To the PRESIDENT of the U. STATES, and the Senate and House of Representatives of the U. States of America, in Congress assembled.
The subscribers, a committee of the merchants of the town of Boston, duly empowered for the purpose, respectfully ask leave to address government on a subject highly interesting to the commerce and prosperity of the U. S., and involving in its results a great pecuniary property, acquired as they believe, by honest exertions in the prosecution of an open, fair, and authorised trade.
While your memorialists have witnessed, with mingled feelings of indignation towards the perpetrators, and of commiseration for their unfortunate countrymen, the insults and barbarities which the commerce of these states has sustained from the cruisers of France and Spain, it is their object in the present memorial, to confine their observations to the more alarming, because more numerous, and extensive detentions, and condemnations of American vessels by Great Britain, and to advert to the principles recently avowed, and adopted by her courts, relative to neutral trade in articles of colonial produce—Principles which, if admitted, or practised upon in all the latitude which may fairly be inferred to be intended, would be destructive of the navigation, and radically impair the most lucrative commerce of our country.
The law of nations, like all other laws not formed by express compact, must, to give it an obligatory force, be founded on the rule of right, and be construed to exist only from open declaration, or from a tacit acquiescence under its operation by the parties interested in it.
It is a law which can never be considered as absolutely permanent, for being established by common consent for the general good, it can only be supported so long as it produces the effect intended, and so various are the changes in the political world, from the relative situation of states at different epochs, & from the growth of new empires, that it may very possibly happen, that what promoted the public welfare at one time, and therefore became part of the law of nations, might, at another period, tend only to the aggrandisement of an individual nation, at the expense and to the depression and injury of many other nations.—In such case it is but reasonable to expect, that old principles, even if they had been once expressly admitted, would become absolute, or be newly modified and made to conform to a state of nations, widely different from that in which they originated—at any rate your memorialists presume it can never be justly contended, that principles of maritime law have been admitted by a nation during whose existence they had never been avowed nor acted upon, merely because such nation did not anticipate and combat pretensions which it never imagined would be seriously advocated—Principles that had been virtually abandoned subsequently to their first avowals, even during an intermediate and inveterate war, and during the prosecution of a trade which is now interdicted and alleged to be illegal, but which trade was at that time sanctioned by the promulgated decisions of her courts, and by an official communication from one of the highest organs of the very government which is now attempting to destroy it, and with its suppression to annihilate, or greatly diminish, the commerce of neutral nations.
From the decree of the Lords of Appeal in the case of the Essex—Orne—from the judgment of Sir Wm. Scott, in several other cases since that decree in direct contravention of his former decisions—from the multiplied arrestations and detentions of American vessels, of which every arrival furnishes a more extended list, there is great cause to apprehend, that the British government mean to set up as a principle, that she has a right to interdict all commerce by neutrals to the ports of her enemies, which ports had not been opened previously to the commencement of hostilities—that if she permits a trade with them in any degree, she has a right to prescribe the limits of it—to investigate the intention of the parties prosecuting it, and if such intention be not the actual disposition of the property in the neutral country, to consider the merchandise even after the importation into such country, after having been landed therein, warehoused, and the duties paid on it, as only in the state of a continued and direct voyage from the colony to the mother country, or vice versa, and therefore illegal, and liable to condemnation.
Speculating upon the apparent avowal of these principles, the vice admiralty judges of Great Britain, the officers of her ships of war and cruisers, seem to consider them as the signal for harassing and arresting neutral commerce, and vigilantly acting in conformity with these impressions. We find, that scarcely an American vessel can pass the Bahamas, the straights of Gibraltar, or the English channel, without being seized, in some cases condemned, and in others released, without damages, or with the conviction, that the demand for
compensation, would be attended with greater expense than would be defrayed by a successful pursuit of it.
In some instances, your memorialists find new vessels, on their first passage from the U. S. to Europe, arrested, carried out of their course, and injuriously detained, under the vexatious pretence of a continuity of voyage from the country or colony of a belligerent.
In another instance they have witnessed a vessel captured and condemned under the most frivolous pretext, when in the prosecution of an acknowledged and permitted trade, under circumstances which banished every shadow of doubt as to the real destination of the vessel, the identity of the owners, or the actual intention of the parties.
Your memorialists allude to the case of the Indus, Myrick—which vessel was owned by gentlemen of this town, not engaged in commission business—possessing very abundant capital to undertake large and distant enterprises, and the fairness of whose intentions or conduct, has never been questioned or suspected.
The Indus proceeded from Boston to Batavia, there purchased a cargo, and with the return therewith to Boston, was dismasted, and after suffering severely from the elements, obliged to put into the Mauritius: on her arrival there, the ship was found too much injured to prosecute the voyage, was condemned as not sea-worthy, and sold. The captain, not being able satisfactorily to dispose at the Isle of France of that part of the cargo, which remained after defraying the expenses, purchased another vessel, gave her the same name, put on board the residue of his original cargo, and completed his loading with freight belonging to citizens of this town. With this remnant, saved from his misfortunes, he proceeded on the voyage, and had nearly reached the mouth of our harbor, when his vessel was captured by a British cruiser, and carried into Halifax, and there by the vice admiralty court condemned, because among the papers was found a memorandum, reminding the captain after his arrival within the harbor of Boston, to insert in the manifest to be delivered at the custom house, that the ship was bound "for Boston and Embden"—a provision merely intended to operate in case of the restoration of peace before the return of the vessel, and which, as the laws of the U. S. were, when she departed from Boston, was needful to enable her to proceed to Europe without unloading the cargo, or the payment of duties; and which provision, the captain must have been well convinced, was rendered wholly nugatory with the second ship because when he left the U. S. he knew, that if any part of the cargo were entered, the whole must be landed; and having taken freight which he was obliged to deliver here, there no longer remained an election respecting the termination of the voyage, and that it must of necessity be concluded at Boston.
The precautionary memorandum, to insert in the manifest after the arrival of the vessel in our harbor, the words "Boston and Embden," was practised at the time for the same purpose by many of our most correct and intelligent merchants, and is no evidence of an intention to avail of the permission which it gave to proceed to Europe. In the case of the Indus, the owners have disavowed, most formally, under the existing political state of Europe, any intention of continuing the voyage; and this asseveration is corroborated by the strongest collateral evidence it is possible to adduce—the same orders have been given in previous enterprises, in none of which had the permission been availed of—but in every case in which they were interested, the cargoes had been actually landed and sold in the U. S. notwithstanding a similar declaration in the manifest.
In another case, your memorialists learn, that a vessel (the Aurora, Hall,) belonging to Portsmouth, N. H. after having carried out a cargo of innocent merchandise, the property of the natives and merchants of this town, to the neutral port of Leghorn, ordered from thence with specie to Calcutta, and from thence to return with a cargo to this place, has been arrested in the progress of the voyage, carried to Gibraltar, and may probably be condemned, because her outward cargo consisted of colonial produce, and because the captain was permitted by his orders to stop at the Isle of France on his voyage to Calcutta, and to avail himself of the state of the markets there, should they be favorable to procure a return cargo for Boston; thus embarrassing a trade which, whether prosecuted to one place or the other, has by all parties been considered as open, and extending the tant of a cargo of colonial produce, further than by most nations are attached to a loading of articles wholly contraband of war, for it is admitted by them, even in that case, that the offence is deposited with the cargo, and ceases on its delivery.
Your memorialists will not proceed to fatigue the attention of government, by either cases, which they presume, so soon as regular documents can be obtained, will be transmitted in precise statements to the department of state.
These few instances they have thought it needful to notice, in order to demonstrate, that unless the present disposition of the British admiralty courts, and navy officers, can be counteracted and removed, a widely dispersed and unprotected commerce, extending to every region of the globe, will only serve to invite depredation, to bankrupt ourselves, and enrich others, until such commerce be swept from the face of the ocean, and leave nothing in its stead, but sentiments of hostility and acts of contention.
Without entering into elaborate discussions, your memorialists request permission to make a few remarks on what they conceive to be the principles assumed by Great Britain.
1st. It is contended by G. Britain, that she has the right to interdict entirely a trade by neutrals to the ports of her enemies, such ports not having been open to them in time of peace, & that having the right to interdict this trade altogether, she has, a fortiori, the right to modify it as she pleases—and of consequence, if an enemy nation should remain in a state of war for half a century, any alteration of her colonial system, which, very probably the progress of events might have produced in time of peace, shall not be permitted to her, even should there have taken place during that time, a total and acknowledged revolution of her government, and an abolition of all her ancient systems.
2ndly. That having allowed a direct trade between the colonies of her enemies, and neutral countries, she has a right to say, that such trade shall cease and determine in the neutral state—to that to prevent its further progress, she has the right to examine in all cases, to whom property found on the ocean belongs—to trace the evidences of a continuity of trade—to investigate the latent intentions of neutral merchants—to discriminate between importers and exporters—and then to accord to one part of a community, what she denies to another part.
A tacit submission to pretensions thus lofty and comprehensive, but which your memorialists trust are most of them untenable, would, they conceive, be an abandonment of rights openly recognized, and a dereliction of the most important commercial interests of our country.
Reason and the most powerful considerations of equity, enjoin it as a duty on the U. S. to oppose these pretensions; for, circumstanced as these states are, possessing an immensely extended and fertile territory, producing mostly the necessities of life, which, with the merchandise obtained from abroad by the industry and enterprise of her citizens, she is obliged to barter, or furnish in payment for importations of foreign produce or manufactures—it behoves her, strenuously to contend for the right of an open commerce in innocent articles between other nations that are willing to accord it and herself; for if the right be not both claimed and admitted, scarcely any of the European powers can in future be engaged in warfare, without making the U. S. States, in opposition both to her efforts and wishes, either a victim or a party in the contest; for it is well known that the European power is carried on by occasional permission, and by particular relaxations of the prohibitory system; and if the British contend, that the port of Batavia shall not be opened to neutrals in time of war, because it has ordinarily been closed against them in periods of peace—that the temporary permission to trade there, was extorted merely by the pressure of the maritime superiority of G. Britain, and that to relieve this pressure, by the purchase of Javanese produce, was counteracting the effect of her arms, and giving aid to her enemies in the war—it might with equal force, by parity of reasoning, be contended by France, or any other nation at war with G. Britain, that the limited permission given to the U. S. to trade at Jamaica in articles of the first necessity, was evidently granted with reluctance, and was extorted by the power of their arms on the continent of Europe; that to oppose and counterbalance these, G. Britain was necessitated to victual and man immense fleets, and to organise and support numerous armies—that to provision these fleets, and provide for these armies, consumed all the produce of her country, that not having any articles of subsistence to spare, she must therefore either abandon her colonies to famine, or reduce or distress her armaments by diverting from them, part of the supplies destined to their support—and that for the citizens of the U. S. to step in, and avail of even a six weeks permission to supply her colonies, and thus prevent their falling an easy prey into the arms of France from the pressure of their own necessities, and actually giving aid, and comfort, and existence to the enemy of France, was in effect making a common cause with her, and of course rendered the vessels of the U. S. when captured in the prosecution of such trade, lawful prizes to the cruisers of France.
Thus your memorialists conceive the pretensions afford constant sources of

collision, continually tending to involve those states in the issue of European wars, and would oblige the government on the occurrence of such wars, speedily to unite with one or other of the parties, in order that the commerce of the country might lawfully avail itself of some degree of security, from the protection which its own force, and that of its allies could afford.
To this state of things your memorialists believe it can neither be the interest nor wish of the British government to reduce our country.
The right of internal commercial regulation in articles of an innocuous nature, is one of the essential and inherent rights of every independent sovereignty—and with the exception of a trade to blockaded ports, or in articles contraband of war, every government has a right to sell the surplus articles of its manufactures and produce to neutral merchants, who on their part, so long as they confine themselves to a fair and honorable course of dealing—purchasing exclusively for their own account; and refusing to cover the property of a belligerent, are entitled to the protection of their own, and the respect of other governments—for the most tenacious advocates for the rights of belligerents admit, that during war, neutrals have a right to enjoy in the utmost latitude, the trade to which they had been accustomed in time of peace. Now if a belligerent has the right to blockade an extended sea coast, and exclude neutrals from perhaps fifty different ports, (as was the case with the French ports in the channel during the last war) how can the neutral enjoy his usual peace trade in its greatest latitude, unless this deprivation is balanced by another trade which is opened to him during the war?
As to the inquisitorial right of search into the ownership of neutral property set up by G. B. and the doctrine appended to it, that a neutral importer shall not again export his goods, but that they shall be first alienated and passed into the possession of others, your memorialists believe them to be unsound in principle, offensive in practice, and nugatory in effect—for the importation of merchandise into a neutral country, landing it, payment of duties on it, and exposing it for sale, as fully domesticates such merchandise, and makes it as much a part of the marketable stock of the country, as the corn which is raised in the fields, or the beef that is fattened on its mountains; and thenceforward, it becomes as much the right of one citizen as another, to export or appropriate it as he chooses, & the attempt by another government subsequently to discriminate, and to deprive a neutral merchant of the right to purchase a cargo for exportation, because possibly he owned a fiftieth part of it on importation, can only excite irritation—invite collusion—lead to fictitious sales, and eventually would diminish in a very small, if any degree, shipments of foreign produce.
This doctrine is probably more injurious in its operation to the U. S. than to any other country. Second to no nation on earth in enterprise, her citizens are yet inferior to those of many other countries in capital—hence arises the necessity of numerous associations in the prosecution of distant enterprises and to exclude all the original associates from the rights of any subsequent trade in articles derived from adventures in which they had been concerned to perhaps a very small amount, and which adventures, after their arrival in the U. S. are as much terminated, so far as respects the continuity of association, as if the property had been sunk in the ocean, and thus to throw advantages into the laps of their neighbors, from the participation of which they are interdicted, is manifestly arbitrary and unjust.
Your memorialists would with reluctance believe that the sacred tribunals of justice have been subservient to motives of political expediency, more especially in a nation whose judicial proceedings have frequently deserved and commanded the respect of all civilized countries—yet they know not, easily, how to reconcile on any other ground, the contradictory proceedings of the British admiralty courts during the last and present war.
In February, 1800, there came on for final adjudication before the high court of admiralty, in Great Britain, the case of the Polly, Laskey.—This was a vessel bound from Marblehead to Bilboa, captured and carried into England, because she had on board 249 boxes of Havanna sugars, and 80 hds. Caracacas cocoa, the produce of Spanish colonies—and was brought to trial principally under the pretence that, as she was carrying those articles to a port of Spain, the trade was in effect a direct one between the colony and the mother country, and therefore illegal, and subjecting the property to condemnation.
The Polly was owned by a merchant of Marblehead, who in his attestation declared, that he had been in habits of trading both with old Spain and with the Havanna. In evidence on the trial it appeared, that the Polly on a previous voyage had been to Bilboa, that she took from thence bills of exchange on the Havanna, that with these bills, she in part paid for the identical sugars which were found on board of her, at the time of capture; that for the residue of the purchase, bills were drawn from the Havanna on the house in Bilboa, who did the business of the vessel on her former voyage; and by the certificate of the collector of the customs at Marblehead it appeared, that the sugar had been imported from the Havanna on board the Polly in June, and exported by her to Bilboa in August; the intermediate time being employed in repairing the vessel, and preparing her for the voyage. It also appeared by the deposition of the
mate, that the captain had destroyed some of his papers.
A case more pertinent to the question at issue, or more strongly marked, could scarcely be imagined by the strongest powers of invention.
For the captors, there appeared in the King's advocate (undoubtedly one of the ablest jurists in the nation) and Mr. Arnold. In delivering its judgment, the court asked, whether it were contended, that an American could not purchase articles of this nature, and import them bona fide to America on his account, and afterwards export them; it was answered no. The court then stated—that an American has undoubtedly a right to import the produce of the Spanish colonies for his own use, and after it is imported bona fide into his own country, he would be at liberty to carry them on to the general commerce of Europe. The vessel and cargo were restored to the neutral claimants.
In 1801, in consequence of a decree of the vice admiralty court at Nassau, condemning the cargo of an American vessel going from the U. S. to a port in the Spanish colonies, with a cargo consisting of articles the growth of old Spain; our highly respectable and able minister at the court of London, immediately addressed lord Hawkesbury, his majesty's secretary for foreign affairs, and represented in a respectful, but a firm and dignified manner against this infringement, and violation of rights of neutrals. The remonstrance met that prompt attention from the British government which its merits demanded. The subject was referred to the consideration of the advocate general, who reported—That the sentence of the vice admiralty court at Nassau was founded in error—that it was now (1801) distinctly understood, and had been repeatedly so decided by the high court of appeals, that the produce of the colonies of the enemy, may be imported by a neutral into his own country, and may be re-exported from thence even to the mother country of such colony; and in like manner, the produce and manufactures of the mother country, may in this circuitous route legally find their way to the colonies—that a direct trade had not been recognised as legal, & the decision of what was, or was not, a direct trade, was a question of some difficulty, but that the high court of admiralty had expressly decided, and the advocate general saw no reason to expect the court of appeal would vary the rule, that landing the goods, and paying the duties in the neutral country breaks the continuity of the voyage, and is such an importation as legalises the trade, although the goods be reshipped in the same vessel, and on account of the same neutral proprietors, and forwarded for sale to the mother country.
The report of the advocate general was accepted by the British government, immediately transmitted by lord Hawkesbury to Mr. King; and his majesty's express command communicated by the duke of Portland, the principal secretary of state, to the lords commissioners of the admiralty, with the information that it was his majesty's pleasure, that the doctrine laid down in the advocate general's report, should be immediately made known to the several judges of the vice admiralty courts, setting forth to them what he held to be law upon the subject, by the superior tribunals, for their future guidance and direction.
Thus are obtained so recently, as within five years, the deliberate opinions on the subject under discussion, of the most eminent English civilians, and of the high court of admiralty, corroborated (if one of the first law officers of the crown may be credited,) by the repeated decisions of the court of appeals which by its late, and contradictory decree, in the case of the Essex, Orne, has caused so disastrous an arrestation and condemnation of American property.
Judgments thus perspicuously stated and enforced, by the highest authority, it was fair to consider as intended for a beacon, to direct to the channel, thro' which neutral commerce might be prosecuted with security. It is hoped the event will not prove they were a mere ignis fatuus to ensnare the innocent and unsuspecting.
At any rate whether the doctrine were sound or not, or whether it injured Great Britain or not—it cannot become the integrity and magnanimity of a great and powerful nation, at once, and without notice, to reverse her rule of conduct towards other states, and to prey upon the unprotected property of a friendly power, the extension of whose commerce, had been invited by the formal avowal of her intentions, and prosecuted under a reliance on her good faith, and from the confidence reposed, that her courts—uniform in their principles—would never be influenced by the time serving politics of the moment.
But whatever may have been the motives of the proceedings on the part of G. B. the effect is notorious. From her recent conduct great losses have been sustained, our commerce has been checked and embarrassed, and large quantities of produce are now remaining locked up in this country, which were purchased for foreign markets, because our merchants cannot send it abroad, without taking risks on themselves, which prudence would not justify, or without paying such rates for insurance as the trade of the country cannot afford.
Thus circumstanced, the merchants of Boston have thought it their duty respectfully to make known their complaints to the government. Believing the citizens of the U. S. desirous of cultivating relations of amity with the whole
* Lobs. Reps. † Duke of Portland's letter to Mr. King.
human race, and particularly connected as they are with G. B. by habits of constant intercourse and by mutual wants, they cannot but hope that like dispositions are entertained by the British nation towards this country, and if measures were speedily taken for the amicable discussion by negotiation of our complaints, (that a sense of her own interest, and a respect for the rights of others, would induce her to depart from her present measures, and to conduct towards us with justice and liberality.
Under this persuasion, and without meaning in the smallest degree to derogate from the talents and attention of the American minister at the court of London, the subscribers with deference and humility, beg leave to suggest, whether, when so important national interests are at stake, a special mission would not carry with it great influence, and be very instrumental in the accomplishment of our reasonable wishes.
In all events fully relying, that the subject of our differences with G. B. will receive the due consideration of government, and that such measures will in consequence be promptly adopted, as will tend to disembarrass our commerce—assert our rights—and support the dignity of the U. S.
Your memorialists have the honor to remain, in behalf of their constituents and themselves,
Most respectfully, James Lloyd, junior, John Coffin Jones, David Greene, George Cabot, Arnold Welles, Thomas H. Perkins, David Sears, ATTEST, Isaac Winslow, junior, sec'y.
BRITISH AMERICA.
SAINT JOHNS, Jan. 20.
Admiralty Case. —On Wednesday last, came on in the court of Vice-Admiralty, at the city hall, the hearing of the cause of the sloop Falmouth, for some time past depending in that court; the testimony in the cause was very voluminous, and the arguments of the counsel on both sides very long and interesting; and the court was attended by a large and respectable audience.
This sloop was a foreign sloop belonging to citizens of the U. S. States, and seized in the month of Oct. last, by the Union cutter, under the direction of George Leonard, esq. superintendant of trade and fisheries in North America and a preventive officer in the service of his majesty's customs in this province, having taken her cargo of plaster of Paris on board from a British vessel, off Saug Cove, in the island of Campo Bello, in the county of Charlotte, in this province, contrary to the provision of the navigation act and other British laws of trade. The sloop and cargo were claimed by Ebenezer Lock, the master, upon the ground that the waters in which these vessels were lying at the time the said cargo was so laden were either wholly within and belonged to the U. S. States, or were neutral, free or common to the vessels of both nations, for the purpose of trade and navigation. Wednesday and Friday were occupied in the hearing of the cause, and on Saturday his worship William Botsford, esq. judge of the court pronounced his decree, by which the sloop and her cargo are condemned and forfeited, upon the ground that the place in question where the cargo was laden on board, was on the British side of a line drawn through the waters between Campo-bello and Dudley islands, the latter of which is in possession of citizens of the U. S. States. The claim was dismissed but without cost, as it appeared in evidence that such a trade had been practised for some years past, with the knowledge and consent of the custom-house officers of both governments; and there appeared to be no intention of fraud on the part of the claimants.
Philadelphia, Feb. 27.
EXTRACT.
VICE ADMIRALTY COURT OF ANTIGUA.
Edward Byram, Judge.
The schooner Washington, belonging to Mr. Soulic of New Orleans, taken on her voyage from Bordeaux to New Orleans, and sent into Antigua.
Opinion of the Judge.
That Mr. Soulic's right and property in the vessel and cargo as an American citizen, resting altogether upon his residence at New Orleans from the date of the cession of Louisiana by the government of France to the United States of America, it remains to be determined whether a native subject of France, who, when Louisiana belonged to Spain, was a subject of that kingdom, and when it was ceded to France, became again a French subject, and in both characters trading to and from the countries of the enemy of Great Britain, shall be at once by the event of the sale of Louisiana to America, considered as an American citizen, and entitled to the rights of neutrality. That is too much for this court to say, and is a question only to be decided by a superior tribunal. Considering therefore, the vessel and cargo as the property of French subjects, &c. do order, adjudge and decree, and it is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed, as the definitive sentence of this honorable court that the said schooner Washington and her cargo or lading (except such part as belongs to the Master and—which is hereby ordered to be restored) be and the same is hereby condemned as good and lawful prize to his Majesty's ships Hippomenes, whereof Edward Wolcombe, Esq. is commander, and L'Heroux, whereof George Youngusband, Esq. is commander, and to be delivered to their agent or agents, accordingly be divided, &c.
Antigua, Dec. 5, 1805.
delivered to their agent or agents, accordingly be divided, &c.
Antigua, Dec. 5, 1805.
Charleston, Feb. 17.
Capt. Cook left Marseilles on the 21st December. A report of the battle between the French and Austro-Russian armies had just reached that place—it was styled the "baille of the three Emperors," and the French were reported to have enjoyed the advantage.—It was stated that 80,000 English and Russian troops had been landed in Naples.—Capt. C. was boarded in the Mediterranean by an English squadron, who informed, that the American frigate Essex, in entering the Bay of Algeziras, had been fired upon by the Spanish batteries. Markets were dull at Marseilles, for colonial produce, in consequence of an expectation of peace.
Courier.
Cincinnati, Feb. 10.
On Thursday last, arrived at this town the brig Perseverance, capt. Wilson, burthen 160 tons, from Marietta, bound to New-York. She was built at Marietta, at the expence of Benjamin Ives Gilman, Esq. The construction and workmanship of this vessel do much credit both to the mechanic and proprietor.
[Communicated for insertion in the National Intelligencer.]
DOCTOR EBENEZER BROOKS.
Was the only son of a very respectable and pious citizen of Philadelphia. He was weakly from his infancy and wanted the use of his right arm. He received a very liberal education principally under the care of the Reverend Francis Allison, with whom he afterwards studied divinity. Shortly after he was licensed, he came to the western parts of Virginia, where he lived several years, and preached with great reputation. Some of the Presbyterian clergymen with whom he associated treating him harshly on account of the liberality of his theological opinions, he became disgusted with their church, resigned his sacerdotal office, and commenced the study of physic of which he had been always extremely fond. About this time he met with a few hints on stenography by Dr. Byrom and embraced the idea of reducing it to a complete system in which it is believed he succeeded. A short time after commencing the practice of physic he removed to Kentucky where he lived twelve or fifteen years. He then made Cumberland his residence for two or three years, and returned to Virginia for the purpose of completing his system of stenography and having it published. He was advised by his friends to visit Philadelphia and make application for the appointment of stenographer to Congress. His journey he undertook with some hopes of success, knowing the perfection to which he had reduced his system. But in this he met with his common lot, disappointment. Having there but few, if any, friends, and being poor, it is probable his outward appearance did not make a sufficient impression upon the members to make them judge suitably of his merits. And he was no courtier—no adulatory sycophant. He again returned to Washington county in Virginia, and practised physic, his favorite pursuit, until his death in 1799.
When Paine's "Age of Reason" made its appearance, and before bishop Watson published his reply, at the suggestion of some of his friends the doctor wrote an answer to that work, and afterwards revised it when he saw the second part of the "Age of Reason." This work has been ranked by those who have read it in manuscript among the ablest productions in defence of christianity. Having spent considerable time in composing it, he thought himself entitled to some compensation from the public. Subscriptions were opened and a number of subscribers obtained. The manuscript was prepared for publication and sent to Philadelphia. At the same time the patronage of the then President of the United States, Mr. Adams, and the Secretary of state, Mr. Pickering were expected, they having expressed their approbation of the work. But here their patronage was to cease. As Thomas Paine had dedicated his work to the citizens of the U. S. States, the doctor dedicated his in a most impressive manner to citizens of France. Mr. Pickering in a letter to the doctor on the subject of the publication, intimated that it would be agreeable to change the dedication. This he would not consent to, and the friendly offices of the President and Secretary were never after heard of. Nothing was done for a short time concerning it; the doctor departed this life, since which it cannot be had. His executor a Mr. Montgomery, to whom he left his small estate, not having it in his power to make enquiry concerning the manuscript and attend to its publication, authorised Mr. Augustus Woodward, then of Washington, Virginia, since of the city of Washington, to take into his possession those of the doctor's papers which could then be had, among which were some of his manuscripts on stenography, to endeavor to procure the answer to Paine and to have it, together with his system of stenography, if it could be properly deciphered, laid before the public. Five years have now elapsed and neither of them have appeared, which induces a belief that the answer to Paine cannot be found. It certainly would afford the friends of Dr. Brooks peculiar satisfaction to see it published, that the design of the author might be complied with, and that his name might assume its just rank in the literary world. This last to be sure would have been with the author a small
consideration; but is a debt the living owe to the dead.
Beside the works which have been mentioned he wrote several other small tracts on the practice of physic and other subjects, none of which have yet appeared in print, and most of them it is feared are lost. He was enthusiastic in the promotion of education, and often spoke in the highest strains of eulogy of the members of the Virginia Assembly who passed the law in 1796, for establishing public schools. He delivered before the court of Washington in March, 1797, an elegant address in favor of the law and advising them to carry it into execution. Although they did not comply with his advice, he received their thanks, and a copy of his address was requested for publication, but what became of it I cannot say.
Notwithstanding his great talents and acquirements, he was often in extreme poverty. Although very industrious in his profession, he scarcely made as much by it as procured his medicine. This proceeded entirely from his benevolence. He sought for the distressed, and relieved them without remuneration. His disposition may be said in some measure to have shortened his life. He visited some of his patients at a considerable distance in March 1799. The weather was extremely cold and he had just recovered from a dangerous attack of sickness brought on him by a fall from his horse. He was taken violently with the dropsy, a complaint of which he had felt symptoms before and died in a few weeks.
I went to see him a few days before his death. After being considerably affected at our meeting he composed himself and conversed with his usual pleasantness and wit, possessing naturally a very sprightly imagination. One of his old and intimate acquaintances was with me, with whom he always enjoyed himself greatly in conversation. He told us he must certainly die in a very short time, and amused himself much in talking about the employments in the other world, and those of his friends whom he should meet there. In all these conversations he betrayed not the smallest anxiety of mind. He died in about the fortieth year of his age, a firm believer in christianity, and what few can say, without an enemy.
"Virtue, the strength and beauty of the soul, Is the best gift of Heaven: a happiness That even above the smiles and frowns of fate Exalts great nature's favorites: a wealth That ne'er incumbens, nor to baser hands Can be transferr'd; it is the only good Man justly boasts of, or can call his own."
MR. SMITH, I request you to republish in the National Intelligencer, two, libels which have been published against me in Relf's Philadelphia Gazette and Daily Advertiser, of Tuesday last, the 25th inst. as follows:
From Relf's Gazette.
"In copying the following article, we indulge with the Balance a fellow feeling of contempt and indignation at the low meanness and despicable evasion of a man who disgraces an office of high trust and responsibility.—Ever since the Congress of the U. S. removed to the city of Washington, we have forwarded this gazette to the office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives at Washington. Up to the time of Mr. Beckley's accession to that office, the subscription was punctually and honorably paid. From that time to the present, notwithstanding repeated applications, the House of Representatives of the United States remains in our debt! But perhaps we ought not to say the House of Representatives.—We have no doubt but Mr. Beckley has charged the House with the amount and put it into his own purse. We are the more convinced of this, by observing that two of his clerks, Messrs. Lambert and King, have during the present session, presented petitions to the House, complaining of his having withheld from them certain balances of their salaries. Certainly it is the duty of the Speaker of the House to see to these malversations; and if he cannot correct the monstrous evil, the honor, the credit, and the dignity of the whole representative body may be compromised by an officer of abandoned and unprincipled conduct."
"From the BALANCE."
"BLACK LIST—COMMENCED."
"As in publishing this list, we intend to shew that we have no partiality or respect for persons, we commence with the name of
JOHN BECKLEY, Esq.
Clerk of the House of Representatives of the United States.
By whose order we have sent the Balance to members of Congress at three different sessions, and have, in vain, attempted to get pay for them. As this gentleman is furnished with money by the government, to procure papers for members of Congress, by withholding it from us, he retains it in his own pocket."
So far as respects the first of these libels, it will be sufficient to remark that had any thing short of the malignant design to assassinate my character been the object of Mr. Relf, he would have stated the facts:—First, that his accounts for papers furnished to members at every session of Congress since my accession to office, have been regularly paid, as soon as presented, as will be seen by the receipts filed in the Treasury Office;—and secondly, that

for his paper, sent to the clerk's office, no subscription or order for it was ever given or made by me, and that on this ground I refused to pay for it at every application made to me, although, like his fellow of infamous memory, Peter Porcupine, he continues to send the paper even now , with a manifest view to justify his malicious slanders. Whether I have been guilty of charging the House for this paper , and putting the amount into my own purse, and the consequent crime of forging a receipt therefor, (since it is well known that for every charge against the House I am required to present a receipt at the Treasury) Mr. Reif will be enabled to establish in a court of law; as likewise his equally unfounded charge, that I have withheld salary from two of my clerks, Messrs. Lambert and King, and for which I have their receipts in full to the times, respectively, at which they became due.
In respect to the second of these libels, by the editor of the Balance,—I answer,—that about twelve months ago I received an insolent, blackguard letter from this man, by the mail, demanding payment of his account, but enclosing neither an account nor a receipt. This letter I never noticed, and as no person has, in his behalf, ever presented an account to me receipted, or who was authorized to give a receipt, without which payment of it would not be admitted at the Treasury, I can no otherwise account for his not having received payment to this time. A copy of my circular letter, sent to him, and hereto subjoined, will show that he was fully advised in what mode to demand payment. As I never received this man's money, I could not, consequently, retain it in my own pocket, as he baselessly asserts: And indeed what blackness of heart must not that man possess, who could possibly conceive and suggest that for the paltry sum of nine dollars , which his claim does not exceed, I have been guilty of a palpable fraud?
JOHN BECKLEY, Clerk to the House of Representatives of the United States. 28th February, 1806.
[CIRCULAR.] Clerk's Office of the House of Representatives of the United States.
Sir, I enclose you a list of the names of such members of the House of Representatives of the United States, as have elected, pursuant to a resolution of the House, to be furnished with your Gazette, during the present session. You will be pleased to forward to each of the said members as many of your newspapers accordingly, as shall not exceed the price of a daily paper, & transmit your account at the close of the session, agreeable to the accustomed charge to other subscribers, calculating at the rate of 365 days in the year for the exact number of days which the session may continue; when, to whatever person may be authorized by you to receive payment, and grant a receipt therefor, the amount shall be immediately discharged. I am, sir, Your obedient servant,
WASHINGTON CITY.
MONDAY, MARCH 3.
OUR readers must have noticed, for some time past, strong animadversions in several of the public prints, on the conduct of General Armstrong, our Minister in France, in the case of the New-Jersey; which has likewise produced a remonstrance to the President from the Insurance Company of New-York. Of the communication of this remonstrance, Dr. Mitchell, of the Senate of the U. S. was some time since made the organ. An answer was made through him at an early day, by the President, expressive of confidence in the integrity of our Minister, and intimating that as soon as information had been received of the opinion ascribed to him, a letter disapproving it had been written to him, the reply to which, it was expected, would comprize the necessary explanations. The President added that having no doubt of the right of insurers to stand in the place of the insured, that right would be asserted and maintained on every proper occasion.
An explanatory letter having been since received from General Armstrong, and communicated to Dr. Mitchell, is now published, with the view of elucidating a subject which has excited so much sensation among mercantile men.
Extract of a letter from Gen. Armstrong, Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States at Paris, to the Secretary of State, dated Paris, November 26, 1805.
"I had the honor, within the last week, of receiving your letter of the 25th of August, expressing the solicitude of the parties interested in the ship New-Jersey and cargo, "least their claim should be rejected on the idea, that the rights of the insured did not pass to the insurers;" and communicating also the opinion of the President, that "American underwriters who had paid the loss to the original owners, citizens of the United States, were entitled to the benefits of the treaty of 1805."
In my next dispatches I shall furnish you with documents from which you will see, that the difficulties in this case, have in no stage of it, arisen from the causes to which they have been ascribed; that its admission by the American board was long suspended under col. Mercer's objections, that "no evidence
had been produced of the insolvency of the captors," that its rejection, by the council general of liquidation proceeded from the belief, that "the ship and cargo were partially, or altogether, British property; and from certain other causes"—and that when this belief concerning the national character of the property was done away by the production of certain policies of insurance, which had been effected in different parts of the U. States, (but which till then had been carefully kept out of sight) the claim so far from being opposed on the principle that "the rights of the insured did not vest in the insurers," or indeed on any other principle, was on my suggestion sent back to the council, relieved from the first and apparently the principal objection, and left the subject only to the "other causes" mentioned in the rejecting article of the 28th of Frumaire. These "other causes" are fully exhibited in the report of the Director of the 4th division, dated on the 15th Germinal, and may be digested into the following heads.
1st. That the judgment of the 17th Prairial, year 6, pronouncing the confiscation of the New-Jersey and cargo, is still subsisting, inasmuch as it has not been annulled by the decree of the council of prizes, which directs only, the restitution of the sum deposited by the owner with Gen. Hedouville.
2d. That the claimants having neglected to prosecute their appeal within six years after the capture, were precluded, by the laws of France, from a right of appealing.
3d. That the New-Jersey not having a rôle d'équipage, as provided by the treaty of 1778, was excluded from the provisions of the 4th article of the treaty of 1800.
4th. That the captain and agent of the privateer not having been heard in their defence, nor even summoned to appear before the tribunal, the decree of the council of prizes was illegal.
5th. That no evidence having been produced of the abandonment of the ship and cargo to the underwriters, and the agents having even denied the right of either government to question them with regard to an abandonment of the property, and having besides acknowledged that the original owners, or a part of them, had acquired the New Jersey by a new title; by yielding to the underwriters, "un droit convenable de reprise dans le dépôt" it may be fairly inferred, that the loss never was paid by the insurers, and that the receipts (which by the way do not correspond in number with the policies) are merely fictitious, and,
6th. That were it in proof that the owners had abandoned, and that the underwriters had paid, still the claim of the latter could not be admitted, inasmuch as it could not now be liquidated under the rules prescribed by the treaty—the American commission having no longer an existence.
You will readily perceive that in all this there is not a single syllable pointed at the rights of insurers, "who have paid the loss of the original owners." It only remains for me, therefore, to show, that in no other act either of the Council or of Mr. Marbois and myself, was the broad principle which has given so much alarm to our underwriting citizens, or even the qualified one to be found in the President's opinion, adapted or applied to the case of the New-Jersey—The report of which I have already given you the substance, not having been agreed to by all the members of the council, and the liquidator general not choosing to decide the difference, transmitted the case a second time to the treasury, with a wish that Mr. Marbois and myself might determine it—We complied with this wish—we did determine it, and admitted it for its full proportion of the marginal fund. It is true that Mr. Marbois and I differed somewhat concerning this proportion. He would have given 333,000 francs, whereas I thought that 300,000 were quite as many as fell to its share; and that you will think as I did, I have no doubt, when I inform you, that there are claims amounting to more than three millions, as sound in point of principle, less objectionable in point of form, and better recommended by the pecuniary circumstances of the claimants, for which I have not yet got a single sous."
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
FRIDAY, FEB. 28. On motion of Mr. Dawson the House resolved itself into a committee of the whole on the state of the union.
The resolutions of a select committee relative to the fortification of ports and harbors were read.
The first resolution appropriates one hundred and fifty thousand dollars to this purpose.
Mr. Dawson advocated the adoption of this resolution. Mr. Clinton thought the proposed sum insufficient for the purposes contemplated, and particularly as it applied to protecting the harbor of New-York. He thought the posture of our affairs demanded vigorous and liberal measures.
Mr. Smilie moved a postponement of the further consideration of the report. He was of opinion that if the U. S. submitted to the insults and injuries heaped upon them, there was no necessity for incurring the proposed expense. But should the government manifest a becoming spirit of resistance, he would be willing to resort to any measures of defence called for by our situation. He, for this reason, thought it expedient, in the first instance, to decide the course of measures intended to be pursued.
Mr. Cook spoke against the motion of postponement—which was likewise opposed by
Mr. Dawson, who expressed great surprise at the course pursued by gentlemen on this subject. Whenever it had been called up it had been followed by a motion to defer it, notwithstanding the critical state of our affairs. He was of opinion that the subject ought immediately to be acted upon, and that the interest and dignity of the nation were not to be protected by mere declamation.
The question of postponement was then taken and lost.
Mr. Cook moved to insert 300,000 dollars in the room of 150,000 dollars.
Mr. Early moved to strike out 150,000 dollars.
Mr. Bidwell opposed this last motion. He was willing to make this limited appropriation, as the present object was the repair of existing fortifications. Did the question turn upon making new fortifications, it would require a very different consideration.
The motion to strike out 150,000 dollars was lost.
Mr. Mason then spoke against the resolution. He believed that it went to introduce a system of defence which the nation could not bear. He said the report embraced three modes of defence; by ships of the line, by gun boats, and by land batteries. To the seventy fours he was decidedly opposed; with regard to gun boats he cared very little about them; and he was opposed to the proposed appropriation for fortifications on land.
Mr. Dawson advocated the resolution.
Mr. Cook spoke in favor of the resolution; and made a speech of considerable length, in favor of appropriating a larger sum than that contained in the resolution, and in favor of energetic measures and a naval establishment.
Mr. Early opposed the resolution.
Mr. Dawson replied.
Mr. Varnum spoke in favor of it.
Mr. Clinton moved that the committee should rise, to allow further time for examining the subject.
Mr. Elmer opposed, and Mr. Mason supported this motion, which was carried.
Mr. Dawson gave notice that he would again call up the subject on Thursday next.
The resolution, reported by a select committee, to prohibit the importation of slaves into the territories of the U. S. was agreed to, and a committee appointed to bring in a bill.
SENATE UNITED STATES.
February 26, 1806.
Mr. MITCHELL, from the committee appointed on the subject, submitted to the consideration of the Senate, a report on those parts of the memorials from the merchants of New-York, and the chamber of commerce in New Haven, which relate to providing a further naval armament for the public defence.
In addition to the strong reasons urged in those two memorials, the committee refer to the President's message of the 3d day of December last, informing Congress that considerable provision had been made under former authorities, of materials for constructing ships of war, that these were on hand, and subject to the will of the legislature; and to two communications from the secretary of the navy, dated December 16th, and 21st, 1805, giving information that large supplies of timber, cannon, copper, and other valuable materials for that object, had been already bought and paid for.
Calculating the moderate appropriation which will be required to augment to a very respectable degree the naval force of the nation; contemplating the insults and depredations, committed by foreigners near our coasts, and at the very mouths of our most frequented harbors; and estimating the protection and security to the territory of the nation, and to the persons and property of its citizens, by an enlargement of the means of maritime defence, the committee recommend an adoption of the following resolution, to wit:
That it is expedient to make provision by law, for the appropriation of any balance which may remain unexpended of the Mediterranean fund, to the purpose of building ships of the line, under the direction of the President of the United States, agreeably to the provisions of the act of February 25th, 1799.
Treasury of Massachusetts.
According to the official statement, made on the 1st January, 1806, there was due from the commonwealth, 1,042,367 dollars—and there was due to, or in possession of the commonwealth 2,031,366 dollars. The state has, besides, a large quantity of valuable lands.
Boston Feb.
OPERATIONS OF THE VIRGINIA MANUFACTORY OF ARMS.
It appears from a very accurate and detailed statement furnished by the superintendent of that institution—that in the year ending with the 30th of November, 1805, the following articles have been manufactured, and at the prices annexed to each.
   Dols. Cts. Mills.     2135 muskets with bayonets, 10 91 2 each   211 pistols for cavalry carrying a musket cartridge, 7 52 2   628 swords for do. 5 29 2   18 iron scabbards, 2 45 1   352 set tips for leather do. 81 9   58 rifles, 16 70 5   Besides various parts of arms, in a  
state of forwardness, but not yet completed.
Thus it will be seen that a musket of superior quality, costs only 10 dollars, 91 cents, and 2 mills. Those procured before the establishment of the armory, cost on an average 13 dollars and 50 cents, and were of very inferior quality.
Number of Militia in the Commonwealth of Virginia, taken from the annual return for the year 1805.
   Infantry, 76,573   Cavalry, 3,438   Artillery, 1,365   Total 81,370  
New-York, Feb. 27.
West Indies—By the brig Farmer, from St. Thomas, we have received further advices of the different fleets in the West Indies. Capt. Whitney informs, that on the 1st of February, a French fleet of 10 sail of the line and 10 frigates moored off the city of St. Domingo. On the 10th Feb. adm'l Duckworth, with 7 sail of the line and 2 frigates passed St. Thomas, bound toeward. And on the day following 2 English men of war were seen steering the same course. In addition to the above intelligence, capt. Parker from St. Kitts, informs, that the English fleet of 7 sail of the line and 2 frigates, left St. Kitts on the 31st Jan. Next day 2 English frigates passed there to join the fleet; and in the afternoon 5 heavy ships were discovered in the offing, apparently French, and bound in the same direction.
No decisive stroke, then, has been made by the French in that quarter; though it appears from various sources, that they have had the advantage.
Capt. Vinall, of the schr. Washington, from Liverpool (arrived at Boston) who sailed from thence the 25th Dec. informs, that various reports respecting the military occurrences on the continent, were in circulation a few days previous to his sailing; but the last was that Bonaparte's grand army had been defeated. Capt. V. brought from Liverpool, London papers to the 22d of Dec. but gave them to the captain of a French man of war.
Subscribers in arrears are respectfully requested immediately to transmit their dues. They will otherwise impose upon the Editor the disagreeable necessity of discontinuing their papers at this interesting period.
PORTER CELLAR.
THE Subscriber takes the liberty of informing his friends and the public, that he has opened a PORTER CELLAR at the NAVY YARD, where he has on hand and will be constantly supplied with the best Philadelphia porter.
JOHN DOBBIN. March 3—3t
N. E. The business will be conducted as usual in F street. J. D.
This is to give notice that if the heirs of a certain STEPHEN REYNOLDS, who died on his way from the western country in the month of August 1803, and supposed to have been a native of the state of New Hampshire or one of the Eastern states will apply to JOHN RICE administrator living in the town of Cumberland, Alleghany county, state of Maryland, will hear of something to their advantage. By order of Alleghany county orphans court. March 3—ep2m
FOR SALE.
About Two Thousand acres of LAND On the east side of the Eastern Branch, and adjoining it, commencing about 4 miles from the Capitol, and 2 from the New Bridge, and including a sufficiency of wood; 300 or 400 acres of meadow ground, a great part of which may be watered; a good country mill, and a commodious brick dwelling house, with all necessary out houses, in good repair. This land will be divided to suit purchasers, though it would be more agreeable to sell the whole together; and there is no more valuable estate than the whole, to be bought in the neighborhood of Washington, nor one capable of being made to yield a better annual income. Apply to BENJ. LOWNDES at Bladensburg, or to BEN. STODDERT. George Town, March 3—4w
PUBLIC SALE.
IN pursuance of the decree of the High Court of Chancery of the state of Maryland will be sold at public sale to the highest bidder at JOSEPH SAMMERS's tavern, George Town, on the 11th day of April next, at 11 o'clock A. M. all the right, title, and interest of the late Thomas Clark of George Town, deceased to the following property, to wit:
Lot No. 13, in Peter, Betty, Threlkeld, & Deakins's addition to George Town with the improvements thereon consisting of a commodious BRICK DWELLING HOUSE, Coach and Smoke House, and other useful outhouses—
Lots No. 173, 174, and 175 in Thomas Reall of George's first addition to George Town, and any other lots in said addition to which said Clark was entitled.
Also, a piece or parcel of land containing about fifty acres lying about a mile and a half from George Town and adjoining the land on which Mr. Key lives. The purchaser or purchasers to give bond with approved security for the purchase money with interest thereon from the day of sale, payable in fifteen months from said last mentioned day.
All persons having claims against said Thomas Clark, deceased, are requested to exhibit the same to the register of the court of Chancery aforesaid with the vouchers to support the same within three months from the said day of sale.
JAMES S. MORSELL, Trustee. March 3—3w
A HOUSE & LOT FOR SALE.
Will be offered at Public Sale on Tuesday the 25th of March next at Mr. King's tavern near the premises, on a credit of 90 days, a two story ERICK HOUSE, with two rooms and a passage on each floor, a cellar and dry well therein. This house is situated on Lot No. 10 in square 728, on H Street. Negotiable notes with approved indorsers payable at the Bank of Columbia, or Washington Branch Bank, will be required of the purchaser and when paid a good title will be made by SAMUEL TYLER, Executor of Samuel Tyler, deceased. March 3—w3t
BY virtue of a Deed of Trust from the Rev. George Ralph, to Samuel Tyler, deceased, and Mary Potinger will be sold at Public Sale for cash, on Tuesday the first day of April next, at Mr. Chaplier's tavern, Charlotte Hall Academy in St. Mary's county, a tract or parcel of land, called HULSTON, situate, lying, and being in the vicinity of said Academy in St. Mary's county aforesaid, containing about 130 acres, more or less, consisting of three valuable men: a woman and two likely boys. MARY POTINGER, Survivor of Samuel Tyler. Prince George's county, March 3—w3t
RUNAWAY NEGRO.
Was committed to the jail of Washington county, in Maryland, on the 6th inst. as a runaway, negro SALLY, about 20 years old, stout and likely, and a pleasant countenance; she says she got away from her master, who was taking her and several other slaves to the westward or southward, who had purchased her with others from a certain John Smith of Stafford county in the state of Virginia, but does not know (or will not tell) her master's name, has on a striped cotton jacket or short gown, and Joara spinning petticoat, and appears to be far gone in pregnancy. Her owner is desired to release her, or she will be sold for jail and other fees, agreeably to law. N. ROMESBER, Sheriff Washington county. Hager's Town, March 3—w3t
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
WHEREAS by the first article of the terms and conditions declared by the President of the United States on the 17th day of October, 1795, for requesting the materials and manner of paving and improvements on the lots in the city of Washington, it is provided "that the outer and party walls of all houses in the said city shall be built of brick or stone" and by the third article of the same terms and conditions it is declared "that the wall of no house shall be higher than forty feet to the roof in any part of the city, nor shall any be lower than thirty five feet on any of the avenues." And whereas the above recited articles are found to impede the settlement in the city, of mechanics and others whose circumstances did not admit of erecting houses authorized by the said regulations, for which cause the operation of the said articles has been suspended by several acts of the President of the United States, from the fifth day of June in the year 1796 to the fifth day of January last, and beneficial effects arising from such suspensions having been experienced it is deemed proper to revive the same with the exception hereafter mentioned.
WHEREFORE I THOMAS JEFFERSON, President of the United States, Do declare that the first and third articles above recited shall be, and the same are hereby suspended until the first day of January in the year one thousand eight hundred and seven, and that all houses which shall be erected in the said city of Washington previous to the said first day of January in the year one thousand eight hundred and seven conformable in other respects to the regulations aforesaid shall be considered as lawfully erected, except that no wooden house covering more than three hundred and twenty square feet, or higher than 12 feet from the floor to the eves shall be erected, nor shall such house be placed within twenty four feet of any brick or stone house. Given under my hand the twenty-fifth day of February 1806
TH: JEFFERSON. Feb 28—2aw8w
Important to Sportsmen.
On the 29th day of April next, will be offered for sale, at the Bowling Green in Caroline county,
THE STUD, of the late Col. JOHN HOOMES, consisting of imported & country bred stallions, Brood Mares and their produce, for several years past—total above one hundred head. This is certainly the most numerous, and probably the best selected stud ever before offered at public auction in this country; as it is well known, that the late owner spared neither money or exertion, in procuring both at home and abroad such stock as appeared most certain to insure him success as a breeder. To gentlemen who may feel a disposition to engage immediately in the sports of the turf, several fine three and four year olds could be highly recommended, for size, blood and figure. Should any of the said horses be farmed out for the approaching spring, the sale of such will be postponed, until the expiration of the season. The other stock will be sold without reserve. The terms of sale will be one half of the purchase money payable in six and the other in twelve months, to be secured by bond, with approved securities, to carry interest from the date if not punctually paid.
A considerable discount will be made for cash. Gentlemen in the neighboring states are hereby assured, that the sale shall positively take place on the day above stated. A catalogue will be exhibited, stating age, blood, &c.
JOHN G. WOODFOLK, JOHN HOOMES, Executors of John Hoomes, deceased. Bowling Green, March 3—1w.

ATTENTION.
A good HOUSE in a central and convenient part of George Town, completely furnished or with the furniture, may be had on reasonable terms (for seven or nine months). For further information, apply to the printer here.
By order of the Orphan's Court of Prince George's county, the subscriber will offer at public vendue on Tuesday the 26th March next at Mill Town near Magruder's Ferry on a credit of 12 months, all the personal estate of Wm. Wilson deceased consisting of his household furniture, &c. the purchase to give bond with good security.
ALEXANDER G. BOORS. Prince George's county } Feb. 26-3t }
Painful it is for me to give the following NOTICE.
But absolute NECESSITY compels me. In September last I gave public notice to all those who owed me money, that my books were closed and no further credit would be given even to my best friends; but contrary to my determination that resolution lasted but a few days and with concern I say it, since that period my book debts have increased nearly
NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS. For a person with my small capital having so much money out, it is impossible for me to support my credit, which that panderingity, which is common with me, has rendered so. I am therefore obliged to leave my town on the 10th day of July next, and retire to some peaceful abode where Honor and honesty reign, and where the Upright and Good Man will have justice done him over the Rogue and Swindler—for such are the laws of this Territory, though the capital of America, (and with flame I say it) there is no distinction made between the Man of Honor, who, though Poor, will pay his debts, and the Rogue and Swindler, who retires to, and resides in this Territory, well knowing it to be an Asylum for Villains—the former will call and pay you when able; the latter will have the audacity to show you Tenfold the amount in cash that he owes you, and bid you defiance to sue him; for, say he, "I have no property"—though at the same time, through some employment or other, he enjoys an income of from 5 to 800 dollars per year—this is a "Liberty" indeed, the cost of our country! but no justice. As my stay in this place will be but short, and as I do not wish to leave it one cent in debt, I earnestly entreat those who stand indebted to me to make immediate payment; by which, they will avoid such a measure being taken, as they are little aware of. For if I cannot have my office, one me, I have this condition, that I have a Refert yet let it, which, if they have any SWANS, or one Swan of HENRY for their characters, they will avoid my putting in force, for a galled horse will wince.
GEORGE FITT. N. B. A person authorized by me will call on them in a few days, when it is hoped they will be prepared to settle their respective balances. To avoid the necessity of a refusal, I request no one will ask for credit, except those to whom I stand indebted. G.P. George Town, Ter. of Col } Feb. 2-2wtf }
Twenty Dollars Reward. WILL be given for apprehending and securing in jail, negro WALLACE—he ran off in the month of November last, & has since been seen in Washington city, where I suppose he is still lurking, as he is acquainted with Mr. Thos. Washington's Negroes of that place. He is about 5 feet 8 or 9 inches high, not exceeding 23 years of age, very likely, well made, bright mulatto, with black eyes, and flutters when abruptly spoken to. He carried a good suit of clothes with him, having at sometimes acted in the capacity of, officer. If he is delivered to me at my residence, in King George County, Virginia, I will give 20 DOLLARS, besides what the law allows. TOWNSEND DADE. Allison, 26-5t.
This is to give notice that the Subscriber hath obtained from the Orphan's Court of Prince George's county in Maryland letters of administration on the personal estate of George Eaton late of said county, deceased. All persons having claims against the said deceased are hereby warned to exhibit the same with the vouchers thereof, to the subscriber at or before the 11th day of August next, or they may otherwise by law be excluded from all benefit of the said estate. Given under my hand this 11th day of February 1806. BASIL HATTON, Adm'r. Prince George's county near Pileatway, Feb. 24-7t
FOR SALE ON BOARD THE SCHOONER SALLY, From Providence Rhode Island, Laying at Capt. SMALLWOODS wharf near the Navy Yard. New England Rum in barrels, Cider do. Molasses in hogsheads, Potatoes in barrels or bulk, Cheese of a superior quality, Malt and prime beet in barrels, and Stone lime. Feb. 23-3t
On a liberal credit. THE subscriber will dispose of at private sale, his estate called Chichester, lying on the eastern branch, immediately opposite the city of Washington. This tract of land containing 697 acres is laid off in lots from 33 to 144 acres for the convenience of purchasers. Parts of the estate and the terms of sale are in the hands of Colonel Hanson at the navy yard, and Charles Wayman of George Town. The lots will be shown by Mr. Wedden, living on the premises, near the Eastern Branch bridge. ANTHONY ADDISON. Barnesby, 12th June 1805-1t
CHARLES H. VARDEN, MERCHANT TAYLOR, NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NEAR THE CAPITOL. Respectfully informs the gentlemen of the District of Columbia that in addition to his former stock he has received by late arrivals at Philadelphia from London a choice assortment of superior cloths, single and double milled cassimeres, Fennecs p'tent cord, woolverteen and wadecord, fancy and black silk molekins, all of superior quality and newest fashion, plain and stripe black velvets, constitution cord, knap coatings, plushing flannels, &c. &c. with a variety of other articles in his line, and he pledges himself, to those gentlemen who shall favor him with their orders to complete them in the newest style of fashion. N. B. Ladies habits, regimentals, navy uniforms, made in the most fashionable manner. Washington, Dec. 18-1f
THE IMPROVED STRAW CUTTER. May be seen in operation at the subscriber's house between the Six Buildings and the Potomac river; he forms the wheel of this machine so as to cause the knife to cut off the straw at an angle of 22 1/2 degrees which makes it cut much easier than at right angles, or square across—also a model of the improved Press. Either of the machines can be had of Oliver Evans in Philadelphia or the subscriber, city of Washington. EVAN EVANS. February 12-ep4w
20 DOLLARS REWARD. RANAWAY from the subscriber about the latter part of December last a negro man named LEWIS about 4 or five and thirty years of age. He is very black, about 5 feet four inches high and rather slender made, when interrogated he has a considerable impediment in his speech and discovers much confusion. He had on when he went off a short coat of bear skin cloth very much worn, and a pair of long breeches, of white plants—he was seen the first of January in the county of Fauquier enquiring the way to the city of Washington where if he gets he will probably attempt to pass as a free man, though being very ignorant it is likely his tale will not be a plausible one. The above reward will be given for securing him in any jail so that I get him again and all reasonable charges paid if brought to me. JOHN WILLIS. Orange county Feb. 7-1m
Twenty Dollars Reward. AARON, a mulatto man about 43 years old, left the city of Washington early in October, and was seen on the road leading from Alexandria to Leesburg in company with a black woman, who I am informed is the property of some person in the vicinity of this place. He is about 5 feet 10 inches high, has frizz hair, very bald, in one of his eyes (I think it is the left) near his nose, there is an indented scar occasioned by a firelock he received, which fractured the bone in that place, and whenever he has it in his power never fails to drink to excess. It is probable that he has gone to Jefferson or Berkeley county Virginia, where he formerly resided, and from thence will endeavor to go to K. Murchy. The above reward will be paid to any person who will have him committed to jail, and give information thereof to the subscriber in George Town, District of Columbia. EDWARD GANTT. Nov. 11-1f
Twenty Dollars Reward. WILL be given for apprehending negro FANNY a very low and tolerable lusty woman about 38 years of age, but from appearance older, very black and much marked with the small pox which occasioned a small defect in one of her eyes, has lost one of her foreteeth, she is very artful and cunning, having procured a free pass, and passes by the name of Charity Shorter; she was formerly the property of John Chittens of this county, and was run away for near eight years, was apprehended and sold to me in 1803 and was hired by me to a certain Thomas King of Prince George's county, from whom she absconded in Oct. 1804 and has been lurking. I do suppose near where she was hired or gone to Calvert county where I have understood her husband has gone. The above reward will be given to any person who will lodge her in jail so that I get her again, or deliver her to Mr. Samuel Speake city of Washington, or to the subscriber living in Charles county Maryland, near Port Tobacco. P. S. I forewarn any person from harboring or employing said woman, at their peril. MARY SIMMS. Nov. 27-1f
FOR SALE, A Handsome two story BRICK HOUSE, 22 feet front by 34 feet back, with a kitchen stable and carriage house, its situation for a public or private dwelling is superior to any house near the Navy Yard, it commands a perfect view of the Yard and shipping and is now rented for 300 dollars per annum. I will also sell a valuable unimproved Lot near the premises in sq. 83x— young negroes will be taken in part payment. For terms apply to the subscriber, living near the Navy Yard, or to Mr. Samuel M'Intire. MICHAEL VOSS. Washington, Feb. 14-wtf
WANTED BOARDING & LODGING, In a private Family for Two Gentlemen. Slight at this office. Feb. 28-1f
City of Washington, Sept. 9, 1805. Several persons under the impression that the public lots in this city, are to be disposed of in future by public sales only, having made enquiries when the next sale will probably take place, we are requested to state that those lots may at any time be purchased at private sale of the Superintendent of the City. Sept. 9-1f
The Subscriber offers to lease for a number of years 200 acres of first rate land situated in the 4th, 5th, 6th, 10th, & 11th ranges on each side of Mad river and between the great and little Miami rivers—Jacob Broadwell, esq. resident in the vicinity of Cincinnati is authorized by the subscriber to lease the whole or any part of the above lands. Industrious families, who first commence their improvements on the premises shall have cattle and other stock on shares if required. The above is in a healthy part of the country, surrounded with mills and a populous settlement. The soil is rich and productive, is well watered, shaded with some of the most valuable sort of timber, and pleasantly situated. Town lots will be given to well recommended mechanics who commence their settlement in one year from this date. Mr. Broadwell is authorized to dispose of ten plantations between the two Miami's well improved, with a large distillery and a set of new mills, equal to any in the western country. They stand on the Little Miami river 3 miles from the Ohio. The grist mill is calculated for five pair of stones, among them is a pair of burrs. Mr. Broadwell will show the premises and make known the terms of lease and an indisputable title will be given on payment of the purchase money. JOHN SMITH of Ohio. Washington city, Feb. 14-2w
20 DOLLARS Reward.
RANAWAY from the subscriber on the 22d inst. a negro man about 50 years old 5 feet 8 or 9 inches high, his clothes uncertain, except a blue cloth jacket and trousers. It is believed he rode off a young Grey mare, and as he was raised in St. Mary's county, and has lived in the city of Washington he will endeavor to go to one of those places. He was purchased of Mr. Enoch Millard in George town about 9 years ago I will give the above reward to any person who will have him secured in any jail so that I get him again. One of his hands has been lately hurt and is yet perhaps a little swelled. DAVID LYNN. Cumberland, Allegany county, Md. February 12-3w
WANTED,
A WOMAN that understands plain cooking and house work; likewise a GIRL of about 14 years of age to take care of children—none need apply but those who can bring unexceptionable recommendations. Enquire at the house and on the well end of the Six Buildings and at this office. Nov. 27-1f
ELIAS B. CALDWELL, ATTORNEY AT LAW, HAS removed his Office, to the house lately occupied by Mr. LAW, on Capital Hill. Washington, July 26-1f
STELLE'S HOTEL & CITY TAVERN.
THE Subscriber takes this method of thanking his friends and the public for their favors whilst on the Capitol Square and begs leave to acquaint them that he has taken the Spacious Hotel lately erected by Mr. Carroll, near the Capitol. The hotel being above one hundred feet in front, and containing fifty rooms enables the subscriber to offer every accommodation to members of Congress and travellers which can be expected in a public house. PONTIUS D. STELLE. Washington City, March 25-1f N. B.—P. D. S. will rent the house lately occupied by him on the adjoining square
A BARGAIN.
THE subscriber offers for sale the farm he now occupies, containing near 300 acres with or without the stock thereon. It is distant from the cities of Georgetown and Washington, about five miles, and well known as a healthy situation. There is much fine fruit thereon, and abounds with springs, affording good water as in the United States, a considerable proportion of the land has been in clover, and from thirty to forty acres fit for the scythe the ensuing summer. It is now in a very improving state, being altogether clear of broom ledge, and from 40 to 50 acres ploughed and prepared for a spring crop, and from 30 to 40 acres well set with wheat and rye—some part of the land is calculated for tobacco; and plaster of paris answers well with it all. The dwelling house and other improvements may with small repairs, be rendered very comfortable—From its vicinity to two growing cities, many advantages result in supplying the markets. A purchaser may calculate on a good bargain, particularly if an early application be made. Some part of the purchase money will be required in cash or approved negotiable paper; the remainder rendered easy—or negroes received in payment. The subscriber or William Scary residing on the farm will show it when required, and the terms made known by application to Mr. John Thompson, George Town, or Dr. WM. THORNTON, Washington. Isaac Polock, Fruit Hill. Some Lands calculated for the culture of cotton, Indian corn and small grain, situated on a navigable river in the healthiest part of the state of Georgia, will also be sold on reasonable terms or exchanged for negroes. I. P. Jan. 29-entf
FOR SALE, A Valuable Tract of Land, In the state of Kentucky, under an indisputable title, and for which the proprietor will take, if applied for soon, half a dollar per acre, payable one half down, and the other half in 12 months on approved security—Enquire of the printer. Feb. 17-4w
FOR SALE, A COUPLE OF HORSES, Suitable for a Hack or Family use—Apply at Mrs. WILSON'S at the Six Buildings. Feb. 26-1t
AUDITOR'S OFFICE, Chillicothe, State of Ohio January 31st, 1806.
Extract from an act levying a state tax for the year 1806. Section 2. Be it further enacted, That all lands shall be rated and classed in the manner following: that is to say, first, second, and third rates; and the rule to be observed is, that when a greater part of any tract shall be superior in quality to second rate land, it shall be denominated first rate; when a greater part of a tract shall be inferior in quality to first rate, and superior to third rate, it shall be denominated second rate; and when a greater part of a tract shall be inferior to second rate, it shall be denominated third rate land, taking into view the situation and the quality of the soil. First rate land shall be taxed at the rate of ninety cents, second rate sixty-five cents, and third rate forty cents, each per hundred acres.
Sec. 3. Be it further enacted, That in all cases where the owners of any lands have, by themselves or agents, entered their lands in their proper classes, with the auditor or clerks of the court of common pleas, agreeably to the law heretofore in force, such lands shall under this act be placed in the same class for taxation, and all lands which shall not be entered by the owners, or their agents, with the auditor, before he makes out his duplicate, he shall class and charge the same as second rate, and if any owner or proprietor of lands, or their agent, have heretofore, or shall hereafter enter any tract of land in an inferior class to that of its real quality, said land shall (until it is changed into its proper class) be charged, over and above the rate for which it was entered, with double the amount of tax which should have been paid had the same been entered in its proper class; which shall be paid to the collector of the county, township, or district in which such lands may be chargeable, for the use of the state, on the information of any freeholder, making due proof thereof to the auditor or commissioners and be recovered at the same time and in the same way as other taxes are recoverable.
Sec. 4. Be it further enacted, That for the collection of taxes of non-residents lands the state shall be and is hereby divided into six collection districts: the first to include the lands purchased by John Cleve Symmes and his associates, and the land within the district of Cincinnati land office; the second to include lands in the Virginia military district; the third to include the land within the Ohio Company and all grants included within the limits thereof and the land within the district of the Marietta land office; the fourth to include the lands in the United States military district and the reserve lands, and all the lands within the district of Zaneville land office; the fifth to include the lands within the district of the Steubenville land office, and all lands south of the Connecticut reserve, and not included in the other districts; and the sixth to include the lands in the Connecticut reserve.
Sec. 5. Be it further enacted, That there shall be appointed, by a joint ballot of both houses of the general assembly, and commissioned by the governor, a collector in each district, who shall continue in office one year and until his successor is chosen and qualified, who shall collect all taxes due and owing on non-residents' lands within their respective districts. The collector of the first district shall keep his office at Cincinnati; the collector of the second district shall keep his office at Chillicothe; the collector of the third district shall keep his office at Marietta; the collector of the fourth district shall keep his office at Zaneville; the collector of the fifth district shall keep his office at Steubenville, and the collector of the sixth district shall keep his office at the town of Warren, in the county of Trumbull. And shall each, at the time they receive their duplicates, take & subscribe the following oath or affirmation viz. "I, A. B. do solemnly swear or affirm, (as the case may be) that I will, according to the best of my abilities, faithfully and impartially perform the duties enjoined on me by law; as collector of the district; and that I will not directly or indirectly purchase any land by me sold for taxes." Notice is hereby given that all taxes within this state are due and payable after the 1st day of August next ensuing, and if not paid by the first Monday of December, the lands will be sold, or so much thereof as will satisfy the amount due with interest. 1st district collector, A. Goforth, Cincinnati. 2d do Virginia army lands, Thomas Scott, Chillicothe. 3d do Wm. Skinner, Marietta. 4th do. James Herron, Zaneville. 5th do. Charles Maxwell, Steubenville. 6th do. James Hilman, Warren. THOMAS GIBSON, Auditor of Accounts for the state of Ohio. Feb. 20-6w.
Thirty Dollars Reward,
FOR apprehending and securing in jail negro JACOB, who is a low well made fellow, about 25 years of age, complexion rather black, short deep, has a pleasant countenance, is stout made about the shoulders and breast with small legs, has a stoopage in his speech and cannot make a quick reply, when spoken to without flitting his eyes or being in motion, which is very observable, his clothing was blue negro cotton jacket and overalls, oznaburg shirt, and wool hat, though they are subject to change, he was late the property of Richard B. Beall of Fauquier county, Virginia, and closed about the 6th of November last. The constables and others of the city of Washington, George Town, Alexandria, Baltimore, Philadelphia and Norfolk are requested to look out for the said runaway slave, as he above reward will be immediately paid them on the terms specified by JOHN KREGLIE. City of Washington, Dec. 16-2awtf
FOR SALE,
A COUPLE OF HORSES, Suitable for a Hack or Family use—Apply at Mrs. WILSON'S at the Six Buildings. Feb. 26-1t
Fresh Garden Seeds, &c.
THEOPHILUS HOLT respectfully informs his friends and the public that he has received from London per ship Mars to Baltimore, and for sale, a very extensive assortment of fresh Garden Seeds, garden tools grass seeds, bird seed. Split peas, and flour of mustard by the pound. He also has for sale a variety of bulbous flower roots, fruit trees, flowering shrubs, Lombardy poplars, &c. &c. The customary allowance made to Gardeners and those who purchase to sell again. Washington City, Dec. 13-2awtf P. S. An assortment of the garden seeds are for sale at Dr. Orr's George Town.
On the first day of April next, or (if not fair) on the next fair day at noon, will be offered at
PUBLIC SALE
To the highest bidder, for ready money, that very desirable and well known estate formerly the property of James Wormeley, esq, Called THE ROCKS;
Situated upon the river Shenandoah, in the county of Jefferson, Virginia. It consists of 900 acres of Land (by estimation) more than one third in woods, and has upon it a variety of the most useful improvements with a large scope of river bottom and other distinguished natural advantages. The upland is remarkably adapted to the use of plaster &c very productive. It will be sold either in one body, or in the convenient divisions of—the farm—the mills—the distillery—and the Ferry with a small tavern for the accommodation of travellers; to each of which a suitable quantity of Land will be attached, by a division to be made previous to the sale. This farm of about 760 acres with plenty of wood and water, including 80 acres of the richest river bottom, and the rest of the arable Land of an excellent quality, with a large and commodious dwelling, the necessary out houses, two barns, &c. &c. may be had at a price which deserves the attention of any gentleman who wishes a farm detached from the mill property, &c.
Also at the same time, on the same terms, a handsome little tract of 300 acres within two miles of the Rocks called
THE MEADOW FARM,
About a 300 in wood, with fine meadow ground—arable Land, well adapted to the use of plaster, a good mill seat with a convenient stream, constant springs of water, and comfortable farm houses. Also, a little farm of only 115 acres 3 4ths still undeveloped, adjacent to the Meadow Farm. The object in this sale being to raise as much money as may be necessary to release the only incumbrance that exists on the above property; if the several purchasers produce the sum required, they will respectively be allowed a credit of part of the purchase money, as an inducement to them to buy as largely as they may wish to do; and no money will be required, but in exchange for a clear deed. FERDINANDO FAIRFAX. Charles Town, Dec. 23, 1805-3t-wtf N. B. The sale will take place at the Rocks; and should any of the above land be previously disposed of by private sale, notice will be published in due time.
Valuable Property For Sale.
THE Subscriber offers for sale a number of valuable heights convenient to the city of Washington about 2 1/2 miles from the President's House and near the same distance from the Capitol, and command a handsome view of the city, river Potomac, and Alexandria. Lot No. 1. contains 60 acres; No. 2. contains 43 acres. No. 3. contains 102 acres. No. 4. contains 19 acres; Likewise a lot lying between John Layton and Dr. Worthington, containing from 80 to 100 acres. Those lots will be sold together or apart as may suit purchasers. Terms may be known by applying to James White or Rev. John Breckenridge near the property. Jan 24-wtf
FALL & WINTER GOODS.
JOHN COX HAS this day received a Large addition to his former supply of FALL and WINTER GOODS, which makes his assortment very complete. Most of his goods were bought on such terms as to enable him to offer them by piece or retail Lower than the regular importers can afford to sell at. George town, Oct. 18-NI&UGseptf
This is to give notice that the subscriber of the county of Washington and district of Columbia hath obtained from the Orphan's Court of Prince George's county, state of Maryland, and from the Orphan's Court of the county of Washington aforesaid, letters of administration on the personal estate of WALTER MACKALL, late of Calvert county deceased. All persons having claims against the said deceased are hereby warned to exhibit the same with the vouchers thereof to the subscriber at or before the 6th day of September next, they may otherwise by law be excluded from all benefit of the said estate. Given under my hand this 24th day of February 1806. JAMES S. MORSELL, adm'r. February 28-2awxm
Pursuant to a decree of the Chancery Court of Maryland, I will expose to PUBLIC SALE on the twenty fourth day of March next at Montgomery Court House a tract of land in Montgomery county, state of Maryland, containing 519 acres more or less, late part of the estate of Gen. George Washington deceased, and on the 31st day of the same month, I will sell at Port Tobacco in Charles county at public sale 500 acres of land lying in said county & state of Maryland a part of said estate. Persons desirous of purchasing are requested to examine said lands which will be divided or sold entire as may best suit the purchaser to give bond with approved security for the purchase money and interest payable at the end of 12 months from the day of sale. BUSH: WASHINGTON, Feb. 28-2awtfMar24