The national intelligencer and Washington advertiser. (Washington City [D.C.]), 1804-08-20 00:00:00

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER, AND WASHINGTON ADVERTISER.
Vol. IV.
WASHINGTON CITY, PRINTED BY SAMUEL HARRISON SMITH, PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.
No. DCIII.
FIVE DOLLS. PER ANN.
MONDAY, AUGUST 20th, 1804.
PAID IN ADVANCE.
County of Washington, In the District of Columbia, to wit: WHEREAS Washington Boyd, collector of the county tax, for the county of Washington...
Table with multiple columns listing land lots, owners, and acreages. Columns include lot numbers, owner names (e.g., Aaron Ritenover, Matthias Ritenover, John Randall), and square foot measurements.
parts thereof as will be sufficient to pay the tax and cost thereon, will be sold to the highest bidders as the law directs. By order of the Board, JOHN MOUNTZ, Cl. Co. County of Washington, August 20.—writ.
CONGRESS.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
DEBATE on Georgia Claims.
Continued.
SATURDAY, March 10.
The House took into consideration the resolutions offered by Mr. Randolph on the Georgia Claims. M. JACKSON moved to postpone them to the 1st Monday of December. Mr. Stanford enquired whether the motion of postponement was not susceptible of a division, so as to apply to each resolution separately. Mr. J. RANDOLPH hoped the question would be so taken. Mr. RODNEY expressed the same wish, and that the Yeas and Nays might be taken on each division of the question. He was opposed to a postponement. He should not, he observed, have risen at this late period, but for the warm opposition the resolutions had received from various quarters, and but for his desire to avail himself of the opportunity to state his reasons for giving them a firm support. Mr. Rodney was interrupted by an enquiry whether his remarks were in order, before the Chair had decided on the divisibility of the motion to postpone. Mr. J. Randolph remarked that whenever a question was susceptible of division, it might be divided as a matter of right. Mr. VARNUM asked if a motion were made to postpone certain resolutions or a bill, whether it would be divided so as to apply to a part only of the bill or the resolutions. Mr. JACKSON. The motion is to postpone the resolutions generally; a major proposition must include the minor, and cannot be susceptible of division. If a member were to move a postponement of one of the resolutions, a motion to postpone the whole would supersede it. Mssrs Elliot and Eustis were of opinion that the motion did not admit of division. The Speaker said it had been the practice of the House to commit a particular question. He considered the motion divisible. The question having been stated on the postponement of the first resolution to the first Monday of December, Mr. RODNEY rose. I was about said he, when interrupted by an enquiry relating to a point of order, taking advantage of the opportunity afforded, to give my reasons, in support of the resolutions under consideration. I had observed that they experienced such a variety of objections, and from such a variety of quarters, that, notwithstanding it was my intention to have given them a silent vote, and to have relied on the able manner in which they had been supported by my worthy friend from Virginia, I felt it my duty to remain no longer silent. My friend from Massachusetts has endeavoured to interest the feelings of the House by awakening their compassion to the claims of those who have innocently suffered. I will only remark, in reply to such addresses to our feelings, that justice has the first right to be heard. Be just before you are generous is a maxim counteracted by time, and humanity, though an acknowledged virtue, is of an inferior order; it may be the second virtue which a legislative body ought to possess; but justice is the first. In the course of this discussion where reason failed resort has been had to other means; and a too liberal disposition to personal recrimination has been indulged. I am pleased, however, to hear the gentleman from Massachusetts declare that the warmth displayed on this occasion ought not to affect the personal feelings of individual members; and I am happy that this sentiment pervades every part of the House. I shall, therefore, pass by the talies of the imagination which we have heard, as we do the flights of our pigeons who leave their owners animo revertendi, and return to the subject. I shall pass by the fable of the lion, with
NOTICE is hereby given, that unless the county charges aforesaid be paid to the said collector, before the first Monday in November next the said lands and lots of ground or such

another fable relating to that noble animal, and to a reptile, who having found under him a shelter from danger, attempted to sting him.
It is objected to these resolutions that they are abstract propositions. By abstract principles I understand axioms unapplied. But when they are applied to facts they cease to be considered in the abstract. In Geometry there are certain elementary principles which are the basis of all reasoning on any proposition in that department of science. So in law there are principles in the abstract while they remain unapplied, and which bear in every case where facts admit of their application. So in politics certain principles are held sacred, either in the view of right, or in relation to the constitution of a state. But when these principles are applied to a given state of things they cease to be abstract. In the declaration of Independence there are several abstract principles; such as "that all men are free," &c. But applied to a certain state of things, they are no longer abstract. I apprehend, therefore, that my worthy friend from Pennsylvania will, on more mature reflection, perceive that the principles contained in the resolutions, bearing on facts, cease to be abstract; on facts which it is necessary for us to decide; and against examining the consequences of which no reason can be urged.
But says another gentleman, we have no jurisdiction in this case; we have nothing to do with the act of Georgia of 1795; we have no authority over it. I confess myself really surprised to be assured over and over again that the act of 1795, that gives the House all this trouble, that is the corner stone of the present claims and without which there would not be a shadow of claim, is not to be considered as blended with our proceedings. What! when we are called upon to compromise claims, are we not to go to the cause, to the fountain source, and decide whether they have, or have not a foundation in justice? But the act of 1795 out of the way, and would we ever have heard of this compromise? Remove it, and would we have a single claimant before us soliciting a compromise? I consider the act of Georgia as involving the all-important point; as intimately and indissolubly blended with the question before us. That question is whether we will consent to give five millions to effect a compromise of claims; directly emanating from the act 1795; and then, as an incidental question, we are obliged to look at the act of 1795. If the House have authority over the main question, ex vi termini they have authority over every question incidental to it; and common sense teaches us that it is absolutely necessary to determine on the validity of the act of 1795 in order to decide the justice or policy of compromising claims arising out of it.
But says the gentleman from Massachusetts, the United States are pledged to compensate these claimants by the articles of agreement made with Georgia and by the act of Congress passed at a late session. And he wishes us to drop the curtain over this scene of iniquity. I should be as glad as that gentleman to do it, but I wish to know who raised it, and whether the first act in this dark drama is not the act of 1795, and whether this did not in the first instance, raise the curtain. I wish to examine the validity of this act. Is there any thing in the articles of cession that contravenes its validity? My worthy friend from Virginia has frequently called the attention of the House to that instrument. I will again invite it. By the 3d article it is
"Provided, That all the lands ceded by this agreement to the United States, shall, after satisfying the above-mentioned payment of one million two hundred and fifty thousand dollars to the state of Georgia, and the grants recognized by the preceding condition be considered as a common fund for the use and benefit of the United States, Georgia included, and shall be faithfully disposed of for that purpose, and for no other use or purpose whatever. Provided, however, that the United States, for the period and until the end of one year after the assent of Georgia to the boundary established by this agreement shall have been declared, may, in such manner as not to interfere with the above-mentioned payment to the state of Georgia, nor with the grants hereinbefore recognized, dispose of or appropriate a portion of the said land, not exceeding five millions of acres, or the proceeds of the said five millions of acres, or of any part thereof, for the purpose of satisfying, quieting or compensating for any claims other than those hereinbefore recognized, which may be made to the said lands, or to any part thereof. It being fully understood, that if an act of Congress making such disposition or appropriation shall not be passed into a law within the abovementioned period of one year, the United States shall not be at liberty thereafter to cede any part of the said lands on account of claims which may be laid to the same, other than those recognized by the preceding condition, nor to compensate for the same; and in case of any such cession or compensa-
tion, the present cession of Georgia to the right of soil over the lands thus ceded or compensated for, shall be considered as null and void, and the lands thus ceded or compensated for, shall revert to the state of Georgia."
It must be evident from the plain reading of this article that Georgia did not contemplate, on her part to pay, or with the United States to pay the claimants. She ties the United States down to a certain time; and if afterwards she undertakes to appropriate one acre to their satisfaction, the whole reverts to Georgia. Is there any specific recognition of claims in the instrument? Is there any covenant to pay the claimants under the act of 1795? We find nothing in the letter of the articles of cession to warrant it; and we must conclude that there is no promise made by the United States to compensate the claimants under that act. But say gentlemen, this is to be found in the act of the last session. I think that act establishes no such thing; and that those claims are not recognized, or intended to be recognized by it; for it explicitly declares in the 8th section, "That so much of the five millions of acres reserved for that purpose by the articles of agreement above mentioned, as may be necessary to satisfy the claims not confirmed by that agreement, which are embraced by the two first sections of this act, or which may be derived from British grants for lands which have not been re-granted by the Spanish government, be, and the same is hereby appropriated for that purpose and so much of the residue of the said five millions of acres or of the net proceeds thereof as may be necessary for that purpose, shall be and is hereby appropriated for the purpose of satisfying, quieting, and compensating, for such other claims to the lands of the United States south of the state of Tennessee, not recognized in the abovementioned articles of agreement, and which are derived from any act or pretended act of the state of Georgia, which Congress may hereafter think fit to provide for, provided however, that no other claims shall be embraced by this appropriation, but that the evidence of which shall have, on or before the first day of January next, been exhibited by the claimants to the Secretary of State, and recorded in books to be kept in his office for that purpose, at the expense of the party exhibiting the same, who shall pay to the person employed by the secretary of state for recording the same, at the rate of twelve and an half cents for every hundred words contained in each document thus recorded; nor shall any grant, deed, conveyance or other written evidence of any claim to the said lands, derived or pretended to be derived from the state of Georgia, and not recognized by the above mentioned articles of agreement, ever after be admitted or considered as evidence in any of the courts of the United States, unless it shall have been exhibited, and recorded, in the manner and within the time above-mentioned."
From this view I think it must be obvious to every person who has considered the articles of cession and the act of Congress, that neither in the one or the other are these claims recognized as valid. They are both very far from containing any covenant to compensate or compromise them. I know that truth is only to be sought by a slow and painful process: while error is very compendious and easy. We can with great ease hop and skip over truth, and perch upon assertion, and call it truth. But where shall we find in the articles of cession or the act of Congress any obligation to render compensation for these claims? We can find nothing—No such idea is inculcated: while we may find abundant proof to satisfy us that this assumption is without foundation, and cannot be supported.
Having letted, as I conceive, these preliminary points, I will call the attention of the House to the great point on which their decision must turn. Either the act of 1795 or of 1796 is in force. If that of 1795 is in force the claimants have a legal title to unascertained millions. If that act is not binding, they have no claim at all. If that act is of no authority there is an end of their title. The tree is cut up by the roots, and all its branches fall. They have either then a title to fifty millions, or they have no title at all. Their case cannot be compared to a common saying, which declares half a loaf better than no bread.
Now let us compare these facts and reasonings with the resolutions. When I rose I intended to have taken them up in order, but as I have been diverted by the course of the argument, I shall pursue the track I have taken. One of the resolutions states "that a subsequent legislature of an individual state has an undoubted right to repeal any act of a preceding legislature, provided such repeal be not forbidden by the constitution of such state, or of the United States."
This is, I think, a plain and clear axiom. Both legislatures flow from the same source and are armed with equal powers. What one legislature can do, another may undo, if the interest of the
public prescribes it. I know an ingenious distinction is taken as to the power of a legislative body between municipal acts and those constituting contracts. The distinction holds to a certain degree as to expediency, but not as to power. When a legislative body forms a contract it is a solemn thing, and it ought not to be touched except when the private evil arising from its being annulled should rather be endured than the public calamity arising from its continuance. But still the position of the resolution is perfectly tenable. What one legislature has done another may undo; what one has enacted, a subsequent one may repeal.
Let us examine whether there is any thing in the rescinding act of Georgia at variance with the constitution of that state or of the United States. The whole course of the business shews the previous act to have been a violation of the constitution of Georgia. The constitution of the United States declares that no state "shall pass any ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts." That no contract has been impaired is evident from attending to the sense of the word. I know of no contract formed, either in a legal or equitable sense. Did the constitution of Georgia authorize her representatives to rob the people of their property? Or did it authorize them only to dispose of it for their welfare? If they had a right to dispose of it in a wrongful manner it knocks up the argument at once. If they were vested with a right to rob and plunder their constituents, I give up the point. But until this is shown I shall remain of opinion that they only had the right of disposing of it for the general good. I am not about to travel through the fruitful wilderness of iniquity disclosed in the progress of this affair. But gentlemen say we have no evidence of corruption. What do they want more than we possess? The whole business has been referred to a set of commissioners, whose comprehensive powers embraced an investigation of every claim. They have fully examined the claims under the act of 1795; and they have reported that "A comparison of the schedule annexed to the articles, and which is declared to be a part of the agreement, with the yeas and nays on the passage of the act, authorizing the sale (E) shows that all the members, both in the senate and house, who voted in favor of the law were with one single exception (Robert Watkins, whose name does not appear) interested in and parties to the purchase."
"The articles of agreement, and list of associates of the Tennessee company, which have been voluntarily furnished by one of the trustees, shows that a number of members of the legislature were also interested in that company."
This stubborn fact appears on the face of a report made by persons duly authorized to investigate the whole transaction. The fact is indisputable, and ought to satisfy the most reluctant and unwilling mind of the enormity of the corruption attending this business. It is fully satisfactory to my mind. But it is said that this statement is founded on ex parte depositions, and that no opportunity has been allowed to cross examine the witnesses. But where were they taken? In Georgia; in probably, the same House that witnessed the scene of disgrace; by a tribunal competent to take them and to enquire into facts. But say gentlemen, admitting the facts to be true, the subsequent rescinding act of Georgia was unjustifiable and is invalid; and notwithstanding a majority of those who framed it were corrupted, it is a binding law. I do not know, as I have before stated, any case strictly analogous to this. But I consider it as an universal principle that fraud vitiates every contract; and that consequently if this contract was entered into fraudulently it was null from the moment of its formation. If a legislature should authorize a man to make a fraudulent conveyance, and he should make it, will gentlemen say it would be valid. They will not. But say gentlemen, there are parties who are innocent. I lament as much as any one, that persons of this description are likely to suffer. But a grant void at the period of its formation, cannot be valid at any subsequent stage. Void in its creation, no validity can accrue to acts under it. But gentlemen ask, if we have ever heard of a case in which two parties are equally guilty, of one taking advantage of the other. The general principle of the law is that where both parties are equally guilty of a fraud, the one in possession is in the best condition. A usurer cannot plead his usurious bond, and get into possession of the property pledged for its payment. So if a contract be made to dispose of land for a corrupt purpose, the party in possession may shew the fraud and keep the land and money. Why is this principle established? In order to prevent the parties from practising fraud; which is most effectually done by declaring that neither of the parties practising a fraud shall receive a helping hand from the law.
The opinion that the rescinding act is not obligatory is as novel as unfounded. Has it not been declared obligatory by the legislature and convention of
Georgia? Have not the commissioners likewise declared it valid, in saying "that under all the circumstances which may affect the case, as they have come within their knowledge, the title of the claimants (under the act of 1796) cannot be supported." Has not congress authorized the commissioners to purchase the territory? In what situation then is the House placed provided the act of 1795 is valid? Are they not a set of land-jobbers? Have they not purchased land from Georgia which she had no right to sell? Are they not, at this moment, in proposing to give a part only of the lands conveyed by the act of 1795, declaring that act void, as much so as if they gave none? I cannot conceive in what point of view the subject can be placed without coming to the conclusion that the act of 1795 is void. And the proceedings of the House shews their perfect unanimity on this point; otherwise some gentlemen would be in favor of giving the whole fifty millions.
But we are told it is politic to satisfy the claimants, because they may be troublesome; they may bring ejectments and prevent the disposal of the public lands. Let us see if there is no remedy against this evil, and whether it is not pointed out by the act of the last session. Provision is therein made for registering and recording claims on the United States under the acts of Georgia. This provision goes to a great extent; it declares that unless the claimants observe certain forms they shall be debarred from giving evidence of their validity in any of the courts of the United States. If then Congress have power to declare the claims subject to certain forms, can they not say that no claim, title papers, or deeds under the act of 1795 shall be adduced in the courts of the United States, as well as to say that they shall only be adduced under certain prescribed forms?
Upon the whole, it appears to me most evident, on referring to the acts of Georgia, the articles of cession, and the laws of Congress, that the claims under the acts of Georgia have no validity. If, therefore, we give any thing, it must be from compassion, and not from the obligations of justice. Let the House, ere they do this, reflect whether there are not objects in the country equally worthy of their compassion. Let them visit the strewed of the war-worn soldier who bled in the defence of our rights; the comfortless hut of the widow who lost her husband in battle. With but little search, we shall find a mountain of claims that overhangs the justice of the country. If after this view, we shall consider any unfortunate victims of injustice in this transaction entitled to compassion, I will agree to go as far as any man in affording them relief. But were we as rich as Cæsar, I would first administer relief to the Belisarius of our country. Let us be just to these before we are generous to other descriptions of claimants.
In discussing the subject in this manner I have attested my entire correspondence with the sentiments of my friend from Virginia (Mr. Randolph) who has ably advocated these resolutions. I believe that he has irrefragably substantiated the principles and facts they contain. I believe he has placed them on a solid basis, and has erected a pyramid of argument in their support which nothing can shake, and which terminates in a point that must lead to the rejection of the bill. I express this opinion with due deference to the ideas of gentlemen on the other side of the question; only observing, a language used on another occasion, that those who are disposed to censure me for my warmth will give me credit for my sincerity. Thinking as I do, I could not repress it. It was the first lesson of my youth to go where duty led; hitherto I have pursued that course. I have found it the road to conquest; and shall teach it to my children. Had I not, on this occasion, trodden this path, I should have considered myself unworthy of the confidence of those who have sent me here.
(To be continued.)
FROM THE LONDON STAR.
ST. DOMINGO.
The following particulars of the failure of a negotiation which has been carrying on between our government and Dessalines, the governor of St. Domingo, has been received.
The British Agent was dispatched from Jamaica on the 2d January, on board the Tartar frigate, with proposals for a treaty, which had for their basis the original agreement between Gen. Maitland and Toussaint, with a few modifications and extensions favourable to the commerce of St. Domingo. The Tartar touched at first at Jeremie, a port on the south side of St. Domingo; but as Dessalines was at Port-au-Prince, she failed to that town, and entered the harbour on the 15th. The British agent had the following day an interview with the governor-general, when numerous objections were made by him to the treaty, and amendments and additions were suggested, to which it was impossible to accede, so very extravagant were his demands. Dessalines
wished to stipulate for universal commerce, and for freedom of navigation round the island to any distance from the coast his vessels might proceed. He also insisted on being supplied by us with arms, ammunition, and what was most extraordinary, with negroes.—From terms so excessive as these, no hopes could be entertained of any thing like a satisfactory issue of the negotiation, and during five days more, while the British agent and his colleagues remained at Port-au-Prince, only another interview took place. Dessalines seized the opportunity of recapitulating a number of old grievances complained of by Toussaint, and tending to shew his doubts of our sincerity. He laid vast stress on the confidence reposed in him by the people of Hayti, and of the dignity and independence of his government, which obliged him to reject the terms we proposed, and to which he could not think of acceding, since the island was open to the commerce of the whole world, France excepted. To a proposition that he should put us in possession of the port of the Mole during the war only, he answered, that it was altogether impossible, that he had given orders to destroy all the fortifications on the land side of the town, which had been carried into effect at Port-au-Prince, and was to be done through the whole of St. Domingo. Our agent returned to Kingston with the proposals of Dessalines in writing, after a solemn promise that an agent should be sent from Gov. Nugent, at Jamaica, with all possible despatch.
The promise was punctually executed, for the British agents did not remain quite a week at Kingston, when he embarked in the Fame frigate for St. Domingo, with Governor Nugent's ultimatum. With the exception of some trifling modifications, it differed little from our first proposals. The governor thought it, however, expedient to send presents to Dessalines and his principal officers, to the value of several hundred pounds, chiefly composed of bars, gold lace, epaulets and sabres. On the 10th February our agents were landed at Jeremie, but as Dessalines was at Aux Cayes, no interview took place until his arrival, which was the 25th. Instead of relaxing in the demands he had before made, he renewed all his objections, and even insisted as a preliminary, that we should furnish him with one million pounds of powder, equal to five hundred tons, with fifty thousand muskets and ammunition, fifty thousand sabres for infantry, five thousand sabres for cavalry, and fifty barrels of fints. So extraordinary a proposal was a convincing proof that he had no intention of treating with us; but it was considered the wisest course to assure Dessalines his demand should be laid before the governor of Jamaica. The agents returned to Kingston, and we understand, that in consequence of Gov. Nugent's despatches, all idea of a treaty with the republic of Hayti was entirely relinquished.
It is added to this account, that the great mass of his officers and army are equally perfidious and brutal; and it is confidently maintained by those best acquainted with his character, that no treaty made with him, or any of them, can be kept sacred. Such a measure would inevitably expose the lives and properties of our merchants to the caprice of those ferocious banditti, who, if left to themselves, must fall a prey to each other. They have now an army of nearly 20,000 men on foot, without any material resources for its support. The troops are miserably clothed, receive no pay, and would be shortly without the means of existence, as cultivation is neglected throughout the island, were we to declare the ports in a state of blockade. The actual ration allowed to each black soldier consists of a herring, and half a pound of bad bread. The whole population of St. Domingo is not now 150,000 souls, and of that number not more than 25,000 are effective males. This population, diminishing as it is, would decrease still more rapidly, were they deprived of all external succours. With a people so disproportioned to the standing army, it may be easily conceived to what a miserable state the plantations are reduced. The few which are still worked are cultivated by women, children, and old men; and all the sugar works and distilleries, except in a few instances, have been totally destroyed. A quantity of Tafia, sufficient for the consumption of the military only, is not made in the whole island, and not a single pound of sugar is to be obtained. It would seem from the sentiments expressed by Dessalines during his conferences with our agents, that he intends to make coffee and cotton the chief commodities of the island.
As the blacks naturally look to another attempt on the part of France to recover the island; their present system is to destroy all the fortifications round the towns, unless they protect the entrance of the harbours. Dessalines does not affect any mystery with respect to the plan of operations he has determined to pursue should the French effect a landing. Persons of every description are immediately upon the approach of the enemy, to retire with all their pro-

perty to the strong holds and fastnesses in the interior, having previously burnt the towns.
We learn with pleasure that no fears can arise with respect to any danger to our possessions in the West Indies, should the new government of St. Domingo prove hostile to us. The blacks are destitute of vessels capable either of annoying our trade, or of transporting troops, and we decidedly question the policy of any commercial treaty with them, which would not only expose the lives and property of our merchants, but involve us in a connection that might interfere in our future arrangements with France, and hold up an example to our own colonies ultimately productive of the most dangerous consequences.
COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
LONDON, May 26.
PLUNKETT,
v. COBBETT.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is Solicitor General in Ireland, against Mr. Cobbett for an alleged libel published in the Weekly Political Register, of the 10th of December last. The damages were laid to the amount of 10,000l. The libellous passages were contained in a letter, signed "Cambricus," and were as follows:—
"If Dr. Adlington had required that Lord Kenyon should direct a Cambridge Earl in all his councils, the integrity of his Lordship would have shrunk from such an undertaking, particularly if a condition had been added to it, that a couple of lawyers, without political habits, political information, or honorable connexions, were to be joined as assessors, and to be the only assessors; on the contrary, his pride and integrity would have both joined in preventing such men from being introduced into the Cabinet. If any one man could be found, of whom a young but unhappy victim of the justly offended laws of his country, had, in the moment of his conviction and sentence, uttered the following apostrophe:—'That Viper, whom my father nourished! He it was from whose principles and doctrines which now by their effects drag me to my grave; and he it is who is now brought forward as my prosecutor, and who, by an unheard of exercise of prerogative, has wantonly lashed with a speech to evidence the dying son of his former friend, when that dying son had produced no evidence, had made no defence; but, on the contrary, had acknowledged the charge, and submitted to his fate; Lord Kenyon would have turned with horror from such a scene, in which, although guilt was to be punished, in the whole drama justice was confounded, humanity outraged, and loyalty insulted.'—Again, "that Lord Kenyon would have shrunk from recommending to his Majesty's Councils a man who had insisted upon the sovereignty of the people as a FIRST principle."
Mr. Erskine, in a speech of great learning and eloquence, addressed the Jury.—He expressed his veneration for the rights of free discussion, and the liberty of the press; they were the birth rights of Englishmen, he said, and should never be departed from. At the same time, it was never intended that those sacred principles should be confounded, and the first elements of British liberty be made a shield to protect the unprincipled libeller. The law, as regarded libels, was clear and explicit, and it was laid down "that if a man writes or publishes that which injures or brings into contempt his neighbour, or shall endeavor to shew that an individual is unfit for the office he holds, whereby that individual may be displaced and injured, such man shall be deemed a libeller."—To that my Lord Holt, whose attachment to the liberty of the press could not be doubted had added, "that injurious words spoken of a public character were more prejudicial than if uttered against an individual in a private station."—The inquiry then would be, whether the defendant wrote or published the words, and what was his meaning when he wrote them? That the libel was of a malignant, injurious and destructive nature, there could be no doubt, and when it was considered that it was written immediately after the murder of Lord Kilmarden, it must be perceived that it struck not only at the honor of Mr. Plunkett, but in its consequences might expose his person to similar outrage. The learned Counsel then alluded to the trial of Mr. Robert Emmett, whose fate he said every one must lament, however his conduct might be condemned. He had filled his mind with a fatal enthusiasm, that Ireland could only be happy in a separation from England; and, to falsely possess himself of its truth, that after his condemnation he entered into an eulogium upon the rebellion, and defended its necessity and continuance: yet, after this mistaken and ill-judged exultation, [said Mr. Erskine] he declared
that such was the mildness, moderation and wisdom of Lord Hardwick's administration, that he was obliged to pull on the catastrophe, and bring out his associates undisciplined, left his extended and deep laid rebellion should cease, from the causes that urged it being daily removed, and gradually dissolving away. Mr. Erskine further complimented Lord Hardwick's government, who, he said, appeared to be perfectly convinced of the necessity of governing that brave people with a light and delicate hand, and seemed to have adopted the principle of the great Earl of Chatham, who speaking of America, said—
"Be to her virtues ever kind; Be to her faults a little blind; Let all her ways be unconfined; Glap not a padlock on her mind."
The learned counsel returned to the subject of Mr. Emmett's trial, and observed, that so far from Mr. Plunkett having lashed the unfortunate man in his speech to the evidence, that he had wholly employed his address in reading a useful lesson to the misguided part of his Majesty's subjects:—assuring those who expected happiness from French assistance and French principles, that they would be miserably abused; that the leading feature of the French government was ambition, and every thing that was the reverse of Washington, and contrary to all they anticipated.—At that moment, said Mr. Erskine, the applying the axe to the neck of Mr. Emmett was nothing: the public example every thing. The defendant, he said, had not merely thrown out the ambiguas voces ; but day after day had been writing and sending forth his libels among the community. It was no defence to say, that Mr. Cobbett was an admirer of his king and constitution, if he was constantly libelling the ministers of that king, and transgressing the laws of that constitution. It was nothing for him to say, "I respect my religion and my God," if he broke the ten commandments daily. The Saviour of man said, "by their fruits shall ye know them," and the court would judge of Mr. Cobbett by his works. He next entered upon an explanation of the libels, and urged, that it was impossible their allusion should be misrepresented, or their libellous intention mistaken; concluding this branch of his argument by saying, that the defendant might be a man with a strong and vigorous mind, and that the talents of such a man could not be controuled; yet he should take care, in the exercise of that mind and talent, not to slander another's reputation by the wicked efforts of his superior genius. The more esteemed the man for learning, the more his productions were admired. The powerful mind, whether it gave vent to its acquirements upon the canvas as a painter; in the tented field as a general; in the Senate House as an orator; or upon paper as a writer, the effect was the same. The man who reads, said Mr. Erskine, falls into the track and opinions of him who writes, and the more powerful the writer, the more powerful the influence. In proportion, then, to the defendant's talent, the extent of injury was to be considered and the compensation measured.—He next commented on that part of the libel which described his Majesty as having struck out of his list of Privy Counsellors an illustrious nobleman, for having toasted the sovereignty of the people at a "drunken club," and further urging the impropriety of "introducing into his Majesty's Council, a man, (meaning Mr. Plunkett) who, the writer inferred, had insisted, in a grave assembly of legislators, that the sovereignty of the people was a first principle in the state." The learned counsel, in touching this part of the subject, ludicrously described Mr. Cobbett as a grape and canister-shot libeller, wounding and injuring characters in all directions. Mr. Erskine concluded a speech of two hours in length, by observing, that the question the Jury had to consider, was, whether the libel was written or published by the defendant, and if so, whether it was written for the purpose, and with the intention ascribed to it; and if they were of that opinion, they were bound to give a verdict of damages commensurate with the injury, and such as would furnish a wholesome lesson to the defendant for his future conduct in life.
Evidence was then produced, that Mr. Cobbett was the sole proprietor of the Political Register. Several witnesses were then called in order to explain the innuendoes; these witnesses were Mr. Wickham, Mr. Barnett, and Mr. Foster, Speaker of the late Irish House of Commons. These gentlemen, on being shown the libels, agreed in thinking the innuendoes applied to Mr. Plunkett.
Mr. Adam then rose and addressed the Court and Jury for the defendant. He began by stating, that there were several particulars in the speech of his learned friend, of which it was his duty to complain. His learned friend had made very free allusions to the proceedings which had taken place on the former day, and it appeared, his principal efforts were directed so as to keep that day fresh in the
minds of the jury. The anxiety which he (Mr. A.) felt on that occasion, he trusted, would not injure him in the esteem of the jury, or hurt in the most remote degree the cause of his client. He knew that justice would be done, not as Mr. Erskine said, he knew the persons of the jury, but because he gloried in, and well knew the character of an English jury. His learned friend had endeavoured to inflame their minds, by advertising to the state of Ireland; but that was not the question, and did not bear at all on the present action. The question was, whether they would try this action with free and unfettered minds, divested of those prejudices which had been brought into view. Mr. Erskine had held Mr. Cobbett very high as a public character, and had introduced the evidence of the other day, in order to enhance the damages; he trusted the jury would not attend to any such considerations. Mr. Cobbett was a man of perseverance, he lived an upright life, was the father of a numerous family, and the husband of an amiable wife. He gained his living, not by ribaldry in his writings, they were characterized by an honest zeal in favor of the aristocratical institutions of the country. He had been the assessor of the rights of his country in America, but he had not realised the means of paying damages to the enormous amount now demanded. If a verdict to that amount should be given against him, he would be doomed to an eternal jail; and it was contrary to law, that a man subjected to damages, should be made to endure a corporal punishment. After a great many arguments on the construction of the libels, the learned counsel concluded by entreating the jury to be lenient in their verdict.
Lord Ellenborough briefly addressed the jury, who retired for a few minutes, and returned with a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.—Damages 500l.
WASHINGTON CITY.
MONDAY, August 20, 1804.
We learn that Mr. Cooper, and Mr. Priestley of Northumberland in Pennsylvania, are engaged in writing the biography of Dr. Priestley. Among the papers left by the Doctor is an account of his own life for a number of years, as well as we recollect, about seventeen. This is likely to be a precious literary relic. From the unassisted modesty which invariably characterized the doctor, and from the ingenuousness of his mind and his ardent love of truth, we may expect a faithful record of his thoughts. Among the most agreeable legacies of this nature left by eminent literary characters, our readers will recollect the interesting narratives of Franklin, Hume and Gibbon. The plain and unadorned statements they have made, have given us a more correct insight into their characters, and have more successfully contributed to shield their fame from unjust aspersion, than all the eulogiums pronounced by their admirers. We may be permitted to indulge the hope that the artist's narratives of a Priestley, who united to the consciousness of talent felt by a great mind the simplicity inspired by true genius, will form the best monument to the purity of his motives, and to the beneficence of a spirit actively occupied through a long life in the service of his fellow men.
On the 10th inst the general election was held in North Carolina.
Messrs. Macon and Stansard appear, from the North Carolina papers, to have been re-elected without opposition.
The same papers state the re-election of Mr. Alston as beyond doubt from the votes already ascertained—and that Thomas Blount will likewise be elected.
The executive of Virginia (in the recess of the Legislature) have appointed William B. Giles and Andrew Moore, Senators in the Congress of the United States, the former to supply the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Abraham Venable, and the latter to supply the vacancy occasioned by Wilson C. Nicholas.
The Circuit court of the district of Columbia, for the county of Washington adjourned on Thursday last until the third Monday in September next, when the remainder of the criminal and equity business is expected to be done. At this term the following gentlemen were admitted and sworn attorneys and counsellors of the court.
Charles Evans, Thomas Holland Wilkinson, James Hercules Kearney, & Samuel Smith Hamilton, Esquires.
The Grand Jury of L'equil for the city and county of New York, now in session, have found a bill of indictment against the Vice President of the United States for sending a challenge to Gen. Hamilton, inviting him to be killed in a duel: and against William P. Van Ness and Nathaniel Pennycuick, for acting as seconds. Should this indictment be confirmed by the competent authority, the parties will be disannulled for the term of 20 years, pursuant to a law passed by the legislature of this state at the last session. N. Y. paper.
Charleston, August 3.
Died, at his house in this city, on Sunday last, John Neuville, Esq. commissioner of the Continental Loan office of this state. He was seized on the 27th June last, with some semblance of palsy. By importunity he consented to the physician's aid; on the 29th doctor Ramsay was called; but he soon rejected medicine, and it was with difficulty he could be prevailed on to take nourishment. Fever ensued, and the case became arduous; for no preparation of bark could be administered, and his advanced age, embittered complaints and helpless state, precluded the thought of tormenting him with blisters—Having by an unfortunate fall, broke one of his hip bones in August, 1801, a distressing wound was the consequence of being able to lay upon only one side. His speech failed the three last day—all human affluities to save a valuable life were unavailing, and he expired without a groan and scarcely a sigh—He raised and educated a large family—His love of freedom and the rights of mankind, made him a zealous and active advocate in our revolutionary struggles. Being of the privy council and a member of the existing committees, the success of our cause animated and engrossed his mind. He embarked his fortune, which was very considerable and lost it all. A grievous imprisonment, exile and sufferings, he shared with his brave companions, and with them the issue of the contest and restoration to his native home gladdened his virtuous poverty.
Unfortunate and unthought of, he received from General Washington the Commission of Loans; his fellow citizens well knew with what integrity he conducted himself in office, as well as in his private walk of life. On the day he was arrested by the messenger of death, he conversed a little with Brigadier General Washington on official business; and until that period, notwithstanding lameness prevented his walking, or being moved but in a chair with rollers, he attended to his duty. He had an excellent constitution, preserved by temperance, was 45 years without taking a dose of physic, and rarely seen on a sick bed. His age was 76 years and 9 months. The late Presidential election greatly agitated his mind, as he was fearful if the general voice of the people did not prevail, his country would have been involved in the calamities of civil contention; but the happy result restored the calm and wonted equipoise. He died contented.
NEW-YORK, August 14.
Capt. Ely, who arrived here last evening from Amsterdam, informs, that Admiral Verheul, commander of the united Batavian and French flotilla, sailed from Flushing about the beginning of June with a squadron of about 60 gun boats, some brigs and schooners for Ostend—that on his way, he fell in with a division of British ships, late under command of Sir Sidney Smith; and after a severe engagement beat them off and got safe into Ostend with the loss of only three boats, after which Admiral V. returned to Flushing, where he received 2 swords mounted with gold and many handsome compliments for his bravery. The Emperor promoted him to the rank of Vice-Admiral, &c. The British lost a cutter, and one of their frigates two of her masts.
Captain Ely further informs, that the Dutch would not suffer any American vessels to enter New Dieppe; but it was supposed this prohibition would soon be removed.
We have received Dutch papers to the 23d Inst., but they are barren of news. One of which, however mentions, that Talleyrand was appointed Arch-Chancellor of France.
PARIS, June 7.
Copy of a letter from gen Moreau to the Grand Judge, Minister of Justice, enclosing his letter to the First Consul.
"Citizen Minister, I send you herewith annexed, a letter for the First Consul. I beg you, when you transmit it to him, to engage him to read it with the greatest attention. I make no doubt but he will appreciate the situation in which I am placed, and hasten to pronounce on my fate.
"I beg you, citizen minister, to accept the assurance of the most distinguished consideration, with which I am, (Signed) "The General, MOREAU."
The Grand Judge's Reply.
This evening at 11 o'clock, citizen gen. Moreau, I laid your letter of this day before the First Consul. His heart was affected in a lively manner by the rigorous measures which the fate of the state have prescribed him.
"At your first interrogatory, when the conspiracy and your being implicated therein, were not denounced to the first authorities and to all France, he had charged me, if you had thrown a wish to that effect to bring you before him that very moment, that you might have contributed to draw the state out of the danger in which it still continued.
"Before I let justice take its course, I would by a second interrogatory, assure myself if there were no possibility to separate your name from this odious affair. You have not given me any opportunity to do so.
"Now that the juridical proceedings are begun, the law requires, that no paper, whether for or against you, should be withdrawn from the judges, and the government has ordered me to annex your letter to the proceedings.
(Signed) "REGNIER."
NOTICE.
The Commissioners for building a Wharf in this city agreeable to a late law of the corporation shall want for the execution of that work, about 10 or 1200 feet of wharf logs, and about 140 perches of stone, to be delivered in the Tyber on the spot fixed on for the wharf—Proposals for furnishing the above materials, as also for the filing in of said wharf and for the workmanship of the frame and walls thereof will be received by either of the subscribers between this and Monday evening next, when they will meet on the business at Mr. L. Morris's.
The subscribers for the promotion of the above work are requested to pay the amount of their respective subscriptions to either of the subscribers to this notification (who are authorized to receive it) as soon as possible.
Timothy Caldwell, David Shoemaker, Peter Lenox, Lewis Morin, John P. Van Ness, August 17—at
At a meeting of a number of citizens convened at the West Market on Saturday the 11th inst. for the purpose of organizing themselves into a Fire Company, pursuant to an act of the City Council passed the 24th ult. Mr. Joseph Stretch was appointed chairman of the meeting and Thomas H. Gillis secretary: whereupon it was
Resolved, That a committee of three be appointed to draft a set of rules and regulations for the government of a Fire Company, and that they report the same at the next meeting.
Resolved, That Joseph Stretch, John Woodside and Thomas H. Gillis be a committee for the above purpose.
Resolved, That the citizens resident west of 16th street west, be requested to attend at the West Market on Saturday the 18th inst. at 6 o'clock P. M. and that they have notice thereof in the National Intelligencer.
Joseph Stretch, Chairman, T. H. Gillis, Secretary.
FIRE COMPANIES.
The citizens of the 1st ward, comprising all that part of the city lying west of 16th street west, are earnestly requested to attend at the West Market, on next Saturday the 18th inst at 6 o'clock P. M. for the purpose of receiving and acting upon the report of the committee appointed at the last meeting "to draft a set of rules and regulations for the government of a Fire Company." The importance and necessity of establishing Fire Companies, it is to be hoped will insure a general and punctual attendance.
T. H. GILLIS, Director of the First Ward.
Washington City, Aug. 17—
MEDITERRANEAN PASSPORTS.
Notice is hereby given, that it has been deemed expedient to change the form of the Mediterranean Passport; issued to vessels of the United States, that from the eighth day of July next those of the new form will be issued as the custom houses to every vessel, for which application may be made on a compliance with the terms prescribed by law and surrendering the former passport of which the may be possessed, if any, in which latter case no fees will be required for the exchange; and that by an arrangement agreed upon by the Barbary powers, with whom we are at peace, either the old or the new form of passport will be sufficient to protect the vessels of the United States, from capture until the 1st of July 1805, after which the old form of passport will be unavailable and the new one alone in use.
Department of State, 23d of May, 1804.
The printers of the laws of the United States are requested to insert the above in their Gazettes twice a week for the space of six months, and the Collectors of the Customs to keep copies of it posted up in their offices. May 30—2aw6m

Doctor MAGRUDER, Has for sale a few hogsheads 4th proof Jamaica spirits, black and lamp oil, spirits of turpentine, window glass, glaziers diamonds, glue, lamp black, white lead, Spanish brown, yellow ochre, chalk, Spanish whiting, Venetian red, red lead, verdigris, drop lake, flake white, patent yellow, rosin and Dutch pink, king's yellow, Turkey umber, gold and silver leaf, painters and sweepers brushes, camel's hair pencils, water colours in boxes, Spanish indigo, fig blue, arnott, red wood, alkauki, madder, logwood, turmeric, salt petre, alum, copperas, sweet oil, pearl barley, timothy and clover seed, tamarinds, castor oil, marble mortars, spring truffles, ginger, cinnamon, cloves, mace, Chings worm destroying lozenges, an assortment of paper hangings, playing cards, copy flips, ink powder, English Latin, Greek and French school books, large family bibles, and his usual complete assortment of drugs and medicine, patent medicine, surgeons instruments, &c. George Town, July 20—tf
Ten Dollars Reward. Ranaway from the subscriber living in Calvert County on the 19th inst. a negro lad named WILL, about 5 feet 2 or 3 inches high of a yellowish complexion a sensible and artful villain; had on and took with him sundry clothes unknown—I expect he will endeavor to get to Annapolis, Baltimore or George Town, at which latter place he has a father living. Any person apprehending said negro so that I get him again shall receive the above reward if out of the county, but if in the county 10 dollars and all reasonable expenses paid by JAMES HELIGHE. August 3—6w
(BY AUTHORITY.) Scheme of a Lottery. To build an ACADEMY in the city of Richmond. Dollars. 1 Prize—1st drawn ticket, having a blank to its number, 20,000 1 do. 10,000 1 do. 5,000 5 do. of 1,000 make 5,000 10 do. — 500 — 5,000 20 do. — 250 — 5,000 100 do. — 50 — 5,000 250 do. — 20 — 5,000 420 do. — 10 — 4,200 1,500 do. — 5 — 7,500 3,000 do. — 1 — 3,000 1st drawn ticket after 1,000 having a blank to its number, 250 1 do. after 2,000 do. 250 1 do. do. 3,000 do. 250 1 do. do. 4,000 do. 250 1 do. do. 5,000 do. 250 1 do. do. 6,000 do. 500 1 do. do. 8,000 do. 500 1 do. do. 10,000 do. 500 1 do. do. 12,000 do. 500 1 do. do. 13,000 do. 500 1 do. do. 14,000 do. 1,000 5,325 prizes, 150,000 9,675 blanks, not two to a prize. 15,000 tickets at 10 dollars each, 150,000 M. B. Prizes subject to a deduction of 15 per cent. This lottery has been authorised by the legislature of Virginia, for the laudable purpose of erecting a seminary of learning in or near the metropolis of this state. With this view, it is contemplated to raise 20,000 dollars, and 2,500 dollars in addition, for defraying the expenses attendant on drawing the lottery. Citizens of the first respectability have been selected as trustees, and they have pledged themselves to use their utmost exertions to carry it into effect. The scheme has the advantage of giving to each adventurer, a chance for some very large prizes, whilst the proportion of prizes to blanks, is so great as to invite the friends of the intended institution to partake in the lottery, with very little risk of their becoming losers. The treasurer of the state is to be appointed to receive the money for the tickets as they are sold, and to pay the amount of the prizes to the fortunate adventurers. It is believed that the above considerations will induce a rapid sale of tickets, and the drawing will commence as soon as a sufficient number shall be sold to authorise it—which it is believed will be on the second Monday in December next. Richmond, March 2—1f
Tickets to be had of Robert Pollard Doct. John Brockenbrough, jun. Wm. Price (Reg.) Samuel Pleasants, jun. and William Prichard.
Travellers Hall. THE subscriber has lately been induced from the rapid increase of his custom to purchase a lot of ground adjoining that on which he lives for the purpose of building a dining room and assembly room, each 54 feet by 22 feet 10 inches with six additional lodging rooms, and intends to finish them before the ensuing winter; which together with his tavern and house will occupy a front of near one hundred feet in the most agreeable part of the town and in the center of business being on the highest part of the public square. He has considerably increased the furniture &c. of his house and stables. His domestics and servants are of the most faithful dispositions and properly qualified for the departments to which they are assigned. He has a constant supply of the best stable forage; imported and country provisions, import d liquors, &c. of the first quality, foreign newspapers, &c. And his ice will most probably last through the hot weather. The distinguished preference which the first characters have already given him, fills him with gratitude. He offers his sincere thanks to all his good friends and begs leave to assure them that neither his time nor his purse shall be spared in attempting to render the Travellers Hall a house of entertainment, for GENTLE GUESTS ONLY, equal to any in America. P. BRADLEY. Lexington, Kentucky, June 12, 1804. A stage runs from the Travellers Hall to the Olympic Springs in the summer, and to Frankfort during the sessions of Assembly. June 29—3m
TO BE SOLD On Tuesday 28th August, at Rhodes's Hotel on a credit of 6 and 12 months by notes negotiable, bearing interest with approved endorser in either the George Town or City banks. A Complete two story BRICK HOUSE, in 14th street west in this city, now in the occupation of the subscriber, containing on the ground floor 2 parlors and kitchen, on the 2nd floor, 3 bed rooms, servant rooms over the kitchen, a good cellar, paved yard, pump with excellent water within 20 feet of the premises—the above premises are in complete repair and fit for the reception of a small genteel family—the house covers 23 feet front and the title from the commissioners. At the same time and place will be sold two bay horses, on credit of six months, one 15 hands 1 inch high, steady in harness, six years old and fine figure; the other 14 hands 3 inches, quiet in harness and rides pleasant, and well, his quality's well known for two years in this city; also a strong chaise with head & harness complete, and one gr. cask of old Madeira wine of the first quality. Sale to commence at 4 o'clock precisely. WM. LOVELL. August 6—1f.
REMOVAL. THOMAS CARPENTER, TAYLOR, Has removed to the house above Mr. RHODES (LATE LOVELL'S) HOTEL, near the President's Square. In addition to the present stock of goods, an Handsome Assortment is expected immediately. Gentlemen at a distance, by sending a line by post, will be waited upon with all possible expedition. T. C. will pledge himself to execute any order with a taste, expedition and moderation of charge, which shall not be excelled by any. April 16—tf.
Valuable Property for Sale. WE will sell on Tuesday the 28th inst. on the premises at 3 o'clock, those two large lots in George Town, No 74 and 75 with the Stone house thereon, on a credit of 3, 6 and 12 months. The lots will be sold together or separately to accommodate purchasers. Notes with good indorsers payable at the Bank of Columbia will be expected and on the payment of said notes a good title will be made. STEPHEN WEST, RICHARD W. WEST, H. B. WEST, BEN. ODEN. August 10—t28
TO RENT, A THREE STORY BRICK HOUSE in the city of Washington, situate on that beautiful ridge north east of the Seven Buildings, on 1st street, Lot No 3, square 106, at present occupied by Mrs. Scott. Possession may be had the 1st of August next. Under said house is a good dry cellar, on the back of the lot is a stable and near the premises a pump of most excellent water. Enquire of Mrs. Scott, or of the subscriber High Street at Doctor John Beatty's George Town. ABSALOM JOY. June 29—tf
Ten Dollars Reward. STRAYED or stolen from the commons near the Capitol, in the city of Washington on the 24th of last month, (July) a deep SORREL HORSE, about four feet 10 inches high, well made, lately shod all round, a blaze on his forehead, hanging mane and switch tail, trots and canters well, carries his head very low when rode; he is between six and 7 years old. Whoever brings him to the subscriber, living near Mr. Gallatin's in the said city, shall receive the above reward. NATHANIEL GREGORY. Washington city, Capitol hill, August 10—3w
FOR SALE. The following City Lots, ON A LIBERAL TIME, Upon SECURITY, viz. LOTS—3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, in square No. 919.—Lot 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, & 16, in sq. No. 938. Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, & 16, in sq. No. 986. Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 & 19, in square No. 1042. Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 & 13, in square No. 1066. Apply to CHARLES MINIFIE, Washington City, or to RICHARD C. JONES, at Philadelphia. Washington, August 3—1f.
N.B. C. M. hath sundry other lots for sale or ground rent (on easy terms to improvers,) and in eligible situations.
Valuable Land for Sale. The executors of the last will and testament of Anthony Holmead deceased, will sell at private sale about forty acres of Land adjoining the city of Washington on the northern extremity of 20th street west. This land is generally allowed to be one of the handsomest situations near the city, having a beautiful prospect of nearly the whole of the city of Washington, Alexandria and George Town, and any person inclined to purchase this valuable property, will be shown the same, and know the terms by application to the subscriber near the premises. JOHN HOLMEAD.
THEATRE. AS measures have been taken by the Directors of the Theatre to have that building carried on with spirit, so as to be completed by the approaching season, it is earnestly hoped that all persons who have subscribed Cash for that object, and who may not have as yet made payment, will make the payment immediately to some one of the Directors. Those who have subscribed work or materials—that may not have executed the first or furnished the last, will please make early application to Mr. George Hadfield, who will contract for the materials, or for such work as may be required. The Directors have thought proper to give this public notice, that every subscriber may come forward in the manner promised at the time of subscribing. They cannot doubt but that there will exist a generous emulation among all, to tender their promised aid in promoting an object which may conduce materially to the advantage of the city. If however, contrary to their expectations, the Directors should find themselves disappointed by any of those who have agreed to furnish materials or work—in that case they will be constrained to contract with others for such work or materials to be paid in cash—and call upon such subscribers for the amount of their subscriptions in cash, which it is hoped will not be deemed unreasonable or improper. City of Washington, August 4, 1804. CHARLES VARDEN, MERCHANT TAYLOR.
Has received from Philadelphia in addition to his former stock, a handsome assortment of goods, consisting of the best London and Spanish superfine cloths and cashmeres, white and fancy Marcellas, colored and white Janes, India nankeneens, cotton cashmeres, black silk and satin Florentines, with a variety of other articles suitable for the summer season. N. B. Ladies habits, regimentals, and navy uniforms made in the first style of fashion. New Jersey avenue near the Capitol, June 8—tf
LOTTERY No. III. For the encouragement of Literature. SCHEME. 1 Prize of 25,000 dollars. 25 000 1 5,000 5 000 1 2,000 2,000 1 1,000 1,000 18 500 9,000 60 200 12 000 120 100 12,000 200 50 10 000 500 20 10 000 9000 10 90 000 1st drawn no. 1st day 500 1 5th 1 000 1 10th 1,000 1 15th 1,500 1 20th 1,500 1 25th 2,000 1 30th 10,000 1 35th 2 000 1 40th 1,000 1 45th 1,000 1 50th 500 9,913 prizes Dolls. 198,000 23,087 blanks. 33,000 tickets at 6 dollars is 198,000 Less than 2 1-2 blanks to a prize. Subject to a deduction of 15 per cent. The drawing of the above lottery will certainly commence in the city of New York, on the first Tuesday in December next, and will be continued at the rate of 600 tickets each day until completed. The managers having disposed of twenty thousand tickets to a company of contractors in the city of New York, the remainder will be sold for cash only, by the respective managers, until the first Tuesday in October next. This is the third of five lotteries, directed by an act of the Legislature, passed the 3d of April, 1801, entitled an "act for the encouragement of Literature"—and "an act making further provision for improving the navigation between the villages of Troy and Watford, and for other purposes." DAVID GELSTON, THOMAS STORM, DANIEL HALE, PHILIP TEN EYCK, S. SOUTHWICK, Managers. June 6—*
JUST PUBLISHED By Rapine, Conrad & Co. NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NEAR THE CAPITOL.
MAJOR'S Universal History, Ancient and Modern, from the earliest records of time, to the general peace of 1801. Vols. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7—This work will be comprised in 25 volumes, at one DOLLAR each to subscribers in boards. Those who have already favored the publishers with their names are requested to send for their copies, and those who are desirous of possessing this valuable work are informed that the subscription is still open. Also just published and for sale above. The works of WILLIAM SMITH, D. D. late provost of the College and Academy of Philadelphia, vols. 1st and 2nd. This work will be comprised in 4 volumes at 250 cents per volume in boards. R. C. & Co. Have on hand a most valuable collection of new books, received by the late arrivals from Europe, which they will dispose of on the most reasonable terms. June 29—
Valuable Land for Sale. The executors of the last will and testament of Anthony Holmead deceased, will sell at private sale about forty acres of Land adjoining the city of Washington on the northern extremity of 20th street west. This land is generally allowed to be one of the handsomest situations near the city, having a beautiful prospect of nearly the whole of the city of Washington, Alexandria and George Town, and any person inclined to purchase this valuable property, will be shown the same, and know the terms by application to the subscriber near the premises. JOHN HOLMEAD.
HAT MANUFACTURY. The subscriber informs his customers and the public generally that he has discontinued business in the city of Washington, and has opened shop on Bridge street near the Union Tavern—he solicits the continuance of former customers, and hopes that all others who may chuse to call and purchase his manufacture will be amply suited, if neatness and goodness be requisites. JOEL BROWN. George Town, Feb. 17—tf
Columbian Academy. THE GENTLEMEN who attended the examination of the scholars belonging to the COLUMBIAN ACADEMY, are happy to express their full satisfaction with the attainments of the several classes in branches of science, which had occupied their attention since the last examination. The exhibition this evening drew together a numerous and respectable audience of LADIES and GENTLEMEN, who were highly gratified with the manly efforts of the YOUNG ORATORS. The academy will open again on Monday the 3d of September—A teacher for the French Language will be employed—the price of tuition in the upper school is 26 dollars and 67 cents per year—in the lower school 20 dollars—Those who also study French, 4 dollars a quarter additional. Boarding may be had at from 100 to 150 dollars per year. The strictest attention will be paid to the MORALS and IMPROVEMENT of the youth. Georgetown, August 15. Circuit court for the County, of Washington, District of Columbia, 10th August, 1804.
Three Dollars Reward. STRAYED from the subscriber's Farm, near Rock Creek Church, a small RED and WHITE COW, appears to be about six years old, with a white face and a remarkable short body, the left ear slit, the right branded with two letters not remembered, and a piece of her tail cut off. The above reward will be paid to any person on the delivery of the Cow at said place. S. H. SMITH. August. 11.
To be Sold, At public sale, at Mr. John Barney's Columbian Inn, on the 10th day of September next, at 2 o'clock, P. M. ALL the right, title, interest, and estate of Nicholas February (an insolvent debtor) in, and to fifteen and three quarter acres of land, with a dwelling house thereon, in the vicinity of George-Town, also some household and kitchen furniture.—Terms of sale, the purchaser to give bond with approved security, payable in six months after the day of sale, any person wishing to view the property before the sale, may apply to the subscriber. In the above case, the creditors are requested to exhibit their claims within the time limited, to the subscriber. CHARLES BEATTY, Trustee. George-Town March 7
500 Dollars Reward. WHEREAS on the first day of April last a Negro fellow named STROTHER and his wife named PHILLIS absconded from my plantation near Chester court house South Carolina—and as I have reason to suspect that some white person or persons has been accessory in said negroes elopement, or has feloniously carried them away—I hereby offer the above reward upon conviction of any white person concealing or carrying away said negroes. Forty dollars with all reasonable expenses will be paid for lodging said negroes in any jail and giving notice by letter to me at Chester C. H. South Carolina, so that I may get them, or twenty dollars for each; that is, if they are taken by any person after this date—any jailor or other persons giving notice to me of said negroes, that they are lodged in any jail before this date shall be very handsomely rewarded. STROTHER is 22 or 23 years of age, a little yellow complexioned, 5 feet 9 or 10 inches high, stout made, crooked legged, very large feet, has a four countenance, has large scars on his back occasioned by a severe whipping, by his former overseer in Virginia for rebelling against him. PHILLIS is 20 or 22 years old, of a middle size, trim made, black complexion, has a small lip when she speaks—Said negroes formerly belonged to Mr. Edward Carter, in Prince William county, state of Virginia, where it is supposed (if they have eloped of themselves) they will try to go. Any letters of information will be very thankfully received. JOHN JOHNSTON. Chester C. H. South Carolina, July 11—lawtf
PORT WINE OF A SUPERIOR QUALITY, just received and for sale by the subscriber. Also, Fresh Teas of the WASHINGTON and PLOUGHBOY'S Cargoes, and a few East India and Havana White Sugars. JOHN BANKS, High Street, Geo. Town, D. C. August 10—2wtf
NOTICE. THE Subscriber, being legally and fully authorised, by his assignees, to adjust, and settle finally, all the concerns of his former estate, surrendered under the laws of Pennsylvania, of Maryland, and of the United States, hereby calls on all persons indebted to said estate, to make payment to him; and on all who have claims, to render him their accounts, with notice of what properties still held in pledge for securing payment. JAMES GREENLEAF. Philadelphia, April 13—wtf
NOTICE. The subscriber having been legally authorised, by Messrs. Henry Pratt Thomas Willing Francis, John Miller, John Athley, and Jacob Baker, trustees of a fund created from the joint and separate estates of Robert Morris, John Nicholson and James Greenleaf, and generally denominated, the "Aggregate Fund," hereby calls on all persons, having any claims or pretensions by Mortgage or otherwise, to any of the objects of the said Fund, to make the same known to him, with a view to their adjustment. And all persons disposed to purchase any of the property of the said Fund either for cash, or on terms of short credit, are desired to make early application to JAMES GREENLEAF. Philadelphia April 13—wtf
The property of the AGGREGATE FUND lying in or near the river Potomac, consists of a large number of house lots in the city of Washington. A number of handsome brick houses and a few wooden houses in do. Awharf and store on do. Lands on the Eastern Branch, opposite do. Do. on Hunting Creek near Alexandria. Do. adjoining Fort Cumberland. Do. about 12 miles from do. The subscriber will in person receive applications on any of the objects of his agency, at Mr. Stelles hotel, until the 10th inst. after which until farther notice, he requests that all applications may be made to capt. Thomas Tingey, William Cranch, esq or Mr. Samuel Elliot jun. JAMES GREENLEAF. Washington, June 4—3t wtf
PROPOSAL, For printing by Subscription, Miscellaneous Poems, BY MRS. ALLEN, Consort to the Rev. Mr. Allen of Harford county, Written before her marriage.
CONDITIONS. THE book to be printed with a clear type, and fine paper, in a duodecimo volume and delivered to the subscribers neatly bound price Three quarters of a Dollar, half to be paid on subscribing, and the residue on delivery of the book—which will be put to press as soon as three hundred copies shall be subscribed for. Subscriptions received by Mr. Matthew Carey, Philadelphia—by Messrs. Warner and Hanna, Baltimore, and by the principal booksellers in those cities, also by Mr. Samuel Harrison Smith, Washington city.
Dr. Jacob Hall, of Harford county, of known literary character, to whose inspection these Poems were submitted, in a letter to the author, expresses his opinion of them, as follows: MADAM, I have been honored and gratified with the perusal of your manuscript copy of Poems. In my opinion it is a work of considerable merit, and displays true piety and poetic genius. The pastoral dialogues are commendable for their novelty, simplicity and beauty. The elegies, epistles, and especially the "Man of Misfortune," a Moral Tale, are interesting and pathetic. The Odes and Fugitive Pieces are sprightly and amusing. And the whole composition seems to breathe such a spirit of philanthropy and benevolence as cannot fail to elevate the affections, and to mend the heart. And it is to be regretted, that the author's modesty has hitherto denied the community so refined & elegant an entertainment. Your Friend, &c. J. HALL. Christopher's Camp, March 24.
This day is published By Rapine, Conrad, & Co. CAPITOL HILL, NEW JERSEY AVENUE.
REPORTS of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States in August and December terms, 1801, and February term, 1804: by William Cranch, assistant judge of the circuit court of the district of Columbia. Also just published as above—THE BUILDERS UNIVERSAL PRICE BOOK, containing a correct list of prices to the works of the several artificers concerned in building, in dollars and cents; with observations on erecting found and permanent buildings, by John Evans—price one dollar. July 16—
To be Rented. THE subscriber has two or three small Farms to let from two to three hundred acres in each, in Prince George's county about six miles from the city of Washington and two from Bladensburg; he will let them on a moderate rent, to industrious farmers who will keep them in good repair, and use the Plaster and Clover, for terms apply to the subscriber near Bladensburg. LEONARD M. DEAKINS. August 3—5w
PORT WINE OF A SUPERIOR QUALITY, just received and for sale by the subscriber. Also, Fresh Teas of the WASHINGTON and PLOUGHBOY'S Cargoes, and a few East India and Havana White Sugars. JOHN BANKS, High Street, Geo. Town, D. C. August 10—2wtf