The national intelligencer and Washington advertiser. (Washington City [D.C.]), 1805-04-03 00:00:00

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCER,
WASHINGTON ADVERTISER.
VOL. V.
WASHINGTON CITY, PRINTED BY SAMUEL HARRISON SMITH, PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE.
NO. DCC.
FIVE DOLLARS PER ANNUM.
WEDNESDAY APRIL 3rd, 1805.
PAID IN ADVANCE.
RAGS.
THE highest price CASH, given for clean RAGS, by EDGAR PATTERSON, George town, and SAMUEL STETTENIUS, near the Centre market, Washington.
March 8—tdf.
FOR SALE OR RENT.
THE Tavern for some years past occupied BY JONATHAN D. STELLE, It is situated on the Capitol Hill, and well calculated for a large and extensive business, the situation is well known. Possession can be had after the 15th of April next—for terms apply to DANIEL CARROLL, of Duddington, Washington, March 21—tdf.
A SALE,
ON Monday the 15th day of April next, a 12 o'clock if fair, if not the next fair day. The subscriber living on the premises, will offer at public sale to the highest bidder, a valuable
TRACT OF LAND.
Containing 275 acres, lying in Charles county State of Maryland, within half a mile of Nanjemoy Creek—about one half of the tract is cleared and under a good fence, the other half well wooded. It abounds in never failing springs of water. The soil is well adapted to tobacco, corn and wheat. The improvements are a large comfortable dwelling house, with other necessary buildings. The neighborhood consists of a general society of people, and the situation is pleasant and healthy. There are two mills for the grinding of grain, near to the said land; one within 1/4 and the other within 3/4 of a mile, with many other conveniences and advantages which it is considered unnecessary to mention in an advertisement, as those inclined to purchase may be more satisfactorily informed by viewing the land, &c.
The terms will be made known on the day of sale, or at any time previous thereto by application to JOSEPH ELGIN.
March 27—tdf.
VENDUE.
TO BE SOLD on the 15th day of April next at STELLE'S HOTEL, Capitol Hill—a variety of Household Furniture, consisting of Beds and Furniture, with a large collection of other furniture, belonging to the Hotel, too numerous to mention—All sums under 100 dollars cash, and above, nine months credit, the purchaser giving approved notes with endorsers, on the Bank of this place, or George Town, no article to be removed till settled for. Sale to commence at 10 o'clock.
Washington, March 22—tdf.
PROPOSALS
For carrying mails of the United States on the following post roads will be received at the General Post Office until the 20th day of April next.
1 From Washington city to Halifax old c. h. once a week, estimated at 240 miles in three days.
Leave Washington every Saturday at 6 a. m. and arrive at Halifax old c. h. on Monday by 8 p. m. Leave Halifax old c. h. every Tuesday at 4 a. m. and arrive at Washington on Thursday by 6 p. m.
2 From Halifax old c. h. Va. to Pickenville c. h. once a week, estimated at 276 miles, in 3 1/2 days. Leave Halifax old c. h. every Tuesday at 4 a. m. and arrive at Pickenville the next Friday by 10 a. m. Leave Pickenville every Friday at 2 p. m. and arrive at Halifax old town on Monday by 8 p. m.
3 From Pickenville to Coweta, Indian town on Chattahoochee river, estimated at 280 miles, in 3 1/2 days.
Leave Pickenville every Friday at 4 p. m. and arrive at Coweta the next Monday by 6 p. m. Leave Coweta every Tuesday at 4 a. m. and arrive at Pickenville the next Friday by 10 a. m.
4 From Coweta on Chattahoochee to Fort Stoddert once a week, estimated at 246 miles, in 3 1/2 days.
Leave Coweta every every Tuesday at 4 a. m. and arrive at Fort Stoddert the next Friday by 10 a. m. Leave Fort Stoddert every Friday at 2 p. m. and arrive at Coweta the next Monday by 8 p. m.
5 From Fort Stoddert to New Orleans once a week, estimated at 211 miles, in 3 days.
Leave Fort Stoddert every Friday at 2 p. m. and arrive at New Orleans the next Monday by 2 p. m. Leave New Orleans every Tuesday at 10 a. m. and arrive at Fort Stoddert the next Friday by 10 a. m.
NOTE.
The contracts are to be in operation on the first day of May next and are to continue in force until the 1st day of July 1806, on the usual penalties for failures and delays and other conditions.
GIBSON GRANGER, Postmaster-General.
General Post-office, March 18, 1805—1A205
The subscribers has just laid in, and have for sale, at their Warehouse on the New Jersey avenue, near Barry's wharf—a quantity of Superfine FLOUR for family use, Corn, Corn meal, Choop corn, Oats, Shorts, Bran, Salt, &c. &c. All of which they will sell on reasonable terms for cash.
PETER MILLER, EBENEZER ELIASON.
Washington, March 15—3t&6w
IMPEACHMENT OF JUDGE CHASE.
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1805.
[Continued.]
WILLIAM MARSHAL Sworn.
Mr. Harper. Inform the court how soon you saw Judge Chase after his arrival at Richmond, what passed between you, &c.
Mr. Marshall. Judge Chase arrived in Richmond, but whether on the 21st or 22nd of May, I do not recollect; but my impression is that it was Tuesday. I waited on him, as was usual with me, and gave him information respecting the state of the docket. The associate judge did not attend on the 22nd, when the court was opened and the grand jury received their charge. They went to their room, and did not return till Saturday the 24th of May when they returned a presentment against James T. Callender, which I have. [The original presentment was produced by the witness, read, and delivered to the Secretary.]
As soon as I had read the presentment, at the request of the attorney of the district the jury were taken back to their chamber, and progress was made in preparing the indictment. There was some conversation between Judge Chase and Mr. Nelson, which lasted for a few minutes. Judge Chase enquired what was the proper process on the presentment. The answer which the district attorney made was that he supposed a capias was the proper process. I recollect that Judge Chase said something of a bench warrant, which was a process unknown to us. Judge Chase asked me to draw the warrant. I said I could not. He then said he would endeavor to draw it. Afterwards Judge Chase desired the district attorney to draw out the form of a capias—the judge said he would draw one himself, and that I might draw out another; and he said he would take the most approved of the three. I recollect mine was drawn first; but whether before Judge Chase and Mr. Nelson had finished theirs, I do not recollect. On looking over mine, he said he was better satisfied with mine than his own; and he requested me to sign, seal, and deliver it to the marshal.
[Mr. Marshall here produced and read the original capias.]
On Saturday the 24th of May, in the afternoon, the grand jury brought in the indictment. I have taken these circumstances from a copy of the minutes of my office, which if the court will to see. I can produce as I have them with me. Judge Chase alone formed the court from the 22nd to the 29th of May inclusive. On the 27th of May the Marshal brought Callender into court; Judge Chase being at that time the only member of the court. A chair was handed to him, and he remained in court while the court proceeded with the docket in the usual way, until near evening, when Judge Chase observed that as the traveler was in court, he might perhaps have some application to make. I do not recollect whether the council afterwards employed for the defense of Callender were then in court; but if they were they made no observations. But Mr. Meriwether Jones, with whom Callender resided, said that Callender was not then prepared to make any application; but that perhaps tomorrow he would move a continuance. Then Judge Chase applied to Callender, and asked if he could give bail. Mr. Jones replied that he could give bail in a moderate sum. Judge Chase asked Callender what were his circumstances; that in fixing the sum, he would be governed by that circumstance. Callender said they were nearly equal. The judge repeated the question; and then Callender said he was indebted about two hundred dollars, and there were was about as much due to him which he expected to receive; and therefore he did not consider himself worth anything. Judge Chase then asked if he could give bail, himself in two hundred dollars, and another in a like sum. The reply made by Mr. Callender, or Mr. Jones was that he could find bail to that amount; and he accordingly gave bail. On the 28th May an application was made by Mr. Hay—this was the first instance in which Mr. Callender took any steps for his defense. Mr. Hay stated that he was not well acquainted with the practice in such cases; that he had an affidavit of a general nature, stating the impossibility of going into the trial, with any prospect of success, without the attendance of a number of witnesses who lived at a great distance. Mr. Hay also enquired whether a general affidavit was sufficient, or whether a special affidavit, stating the names of the witnesses and the facts they were expected to prove, would be required. Judge Chase said that the strict practice of the law required a special affidavit; but they might take till tomorrow to prepare a special affidavit, submitting it to their discretion to manage the cause as they thought proper. I beg pardon for being a little too hasty in my narrative. When Mr. Hay offered his motion for a continuance, the court said that before they could hear the motion it was necessary that the traveler should plead to the indictment. For if he pleaded guilty, there would be no necessity for such an application. Mr. Hay assured the court that the traveler would not plead guilty. Mr. Callender was arraigned and pleaded not guilty—and then the conversation, which I have stated took place. The reply of Judge Chase was, after a general affidavit made, it must be relied on, but you may withdraw the general, and file a special affidavit. Nothing further passed on the 28th. On the 29th in the morning, Mr. Hay produced a special affidavit; I have the original here. It is
stated therein that there were a number of witnesses; one from New Hampshire; one from Massachusetts; some from Pennsylvania, and some from South Carolina, absent; who were material witnesses for his defence; that there were also sundry documents necessary to be procured; and an essay written by Mr. Adams on cannon and feudal law, which the traveler supposed it important to have for his defence. Mr. Hay on these grounds moved for a continuance to the next term, in a pretty long speech. Judge Chase observed that every person before he made a publication, if he meant to justify it, ought to know the names of his witnesses, and if he meant to justify it by documents, they ought to have been within his reach. It was not to be presumed, indeed, that he could calculate upon being able to procure his witnesses in a few days. That in this case it was alleged that one witness resided in New Hampshire, which was a great way off. He said that the ordinary sittings of the court would be too short for him to obtain witnesses from so great a distance. He said that the prisoner should have time, and he should have a fair trial; but he could not allow him to the next term. He said he might have two weeks—but that might be too short a time—you may have three weeks, a month, nay six weeks. We cannot sit so long, because we are obliged to hold a court in the district of Delaware; but I will adjourn this court, go to Delaware, and will return in six weeks. In the course of the observations offered by Mr. Hay to the court, as well as I recollect, he said if the documents and witnesses were here, he did not think, he would be prepared during that term to investigate all the facts and the law arising on them; but he would be prepared against the next term, if the court would indulge him with a continuance. After Judge Chase had made this offer of a postponement, I do not distinctly remember that Mr. Hay or Mr. Nicholas made any reply. After a short interval Judge Chase said as they did not seem disposed to take the time I have offered, the trial shall come on within the time the testimony of the witnesses residing in Virginia, deemed material, can be procured. He asked the marshal what was the distance of the residence of Mr. Giles and Gen. Mason; and at what time they could conveniently come to Richmond; and whether his deputy marshals could go for them. The reply of the marshal was that his deputies were prepared to execute any orders of the court. Judge Chase then directed me to make out the subpoena as far Monday the 2d of June; and I issued subpoenas for Messrs. Giles, Mason, and Taylor,—but col. Taylor's name does not appear in the affidavit. The deputy marshals were directed to apply all possible expedition in serving the subpoenas; they were all returned executed on Monday the 2d of June, endorsed with the hour of the day on which they were executed.
[Here Mr. Marshall offered the originals with the endorsements of the time of service.]
On Monday the 2d day of June, col. Taylor appeared in court. The other witnesses were called, but they did not appear. A postponement was asked by one of the gentlemen for two hours, who stated that it had rained on Sunday preceding, which might have impeded travelling, and it was granted. Some time in the course of the day Judge Chase offered that he might have till to-morrow, which was accepted.
On Tuesday morning soon after the opening of the court, the motion for a continuance was renewed, founded on the affidavit of Callender, which gave rise to the first motion. Judge Griffin was then in court, having arrived on the 30th of May, and continued during the remainder of the term. It was argued much at length, and received the same decision as on the 29th. The marshal was then ordered to call the petit jury; twelve jurors appeared; there were some objections, which I do not precisely recollect, to the panel of the jury; and a motion made to quash the array; an argument was made, and some authorities quoted. Judge Chase said they were not to be relied on, and he struck for Coke upon Littleton. I brought from the library in the capitol; Judge Chase looked into it, and said the array should not be quashed; but I do not know the principle on which he decided. When the jury had all answered, the gentlemen proposed to propound a question to the jurors as they came to the book. I do not recollect what the question was; but Judge Chase said he would propound the proper question himself. The question which Judge Chase
said it was proper to propound was, Have you formed and delivered an opinion (for he said it was necessary to have delivered as well as formed it) on the indictment. The answer of the first juror was that he had never seen or heard the indictment, and could not say he had formed an opinion respecting it. Eight or nine of the jurors were asked the same question, and gave a like answer. The gentlemen, who defended the traveler then said it was unnecessary to ask the other jurors that question; the rest were sworn and the trial proceeded. The conference took was pretty lengthy, and I cannot state all the circumstances that took place. I recollect that the testimony of colonel Taylor was refused, but I do not recollect the particular circumstances attending it.
Mr. Harper. Did any thing pass between you and Judge Chase, respecting the jury summoned to try Callender?
Mr. Nicholson made some objection to this question. Mr. Harper replied in support of it. The objection was then withdrawn by the managers; but further objection being made by a member of the court, The President desired the question to be reduced to writing.
When the Senate decided that it should be put—Yeas 32—Nays 2.
Mr. Marshall. Mr. Giles was on a jury in the circuit court on, I think, the 27th of May, the day Callender was brought into court by the Marshal. When Mr. Giles's name was called, Judge Chase asked me whether that was the celebrated Mr. Giles, member of Congress. I said that it was. He said that he had never seen him before. Nothing more passed at that time. In the evening I was at Judge Chase's lodgings. He asked me whether I supposed Mr. Giles would remain in Richmond until the trial of Callender. I said it was uncertain, that it was not customary for Mr. Giles to remain any length of time when he came to town. Judge Chase said he wished he would remain, and serve in Callender's case; nay he wished that Callender might be tried by a jury of his own politics. He said that if his situation as a Judge would permit him to drop a hint to the marshal with respect to the jury, he would intimate his wish that Callender should be thus tried; but in his situation it would be improper for him to interfere with the duty of the marshal.
Mr. Harper. Inform the court at what time, if any, you were at Judge Chase's chambers, when a certain Mr. John Heath was there, what passed, and what did not pass.
Mr. Marshall. Judge Chase was, as he informed me, a total stranger at Richmond, and had never been there until he held the court in 1800. He asked me if I would call upon him from time to time. When I knew he was at home, I used to go in an evening, and spend an hour or two with him at his lodgings. I also generally went in the morning, about an hour before the meeting of the court. I recollect about 10 o'clock, going to Mr. Chase's lodgings. I went, I think, but of this I am not positive, with Mr. Randolph. I found Mr. Heath in Judge Chase's chamber, or in the passage. Mr. Heath was, I think, in the act of leaving the room, he had his hat in his hand, and I met him either in his way out of the room, or in the passage.
President. Can you state the day of the month?
Mr. Marshall. I cannot, but I think it was the day before Judge Griffin arrived. I recollect very well, on that day Mr. D. Randolph and myself walked up to the court room. I was surprised at seeing Mr. Heath at Judge Chase's, and asked Mr. Randolph what could have brought him there.
Mr. Harper. Was Mr. Heath in the act of going out when you entered.
Mr. Marshall. Yes, Sir, he was on the floor, he has taken his leave, as I supposed, of Judge Chase, and was either out of the room, or in the act of coming out of it. I do not recollect positively where Mr. Randolph went with me. I recollect going with Mr. Randolph to court, and that it was the usual practice of Mr. Randolph and myself to go to Judge Chase's chambers in the morning and attend him to court. I do not certainly recollect whether that morning we went together to the Judge's chambers, but I am positive we left the chamber together. The court met generally at 11 o'clock. I had something particular to do that morning, and it was from 10 to half past 10 when I went to the Judge's chambers—it may have been about 10—the time I saw
Mr. Heath must have been about 10 o'clock.
Mr. Harper. Did any conversation take place between the Judge and Mr. Heath while you were there?
Mr. Marshall. I believe I met Mr. Heath outside of the door. There was not a word of conversation at any rate.
Mr. Harper. Did any incident take place respecting a paper handed from Mr. Randolph to Mr. Chase?
Mr. Marshall. There did not.
Mr. Harper. Did you hear any thing about creatures called Democrats.
Mr. Marshall. I never heard any thing pass between them. I never heard the Judge say any thing about the jury, except what occurred, either at the Judge's lodgings or at court, which I took to be instructions to summon 24 jurors above twenty five years of age; and free-holders, that there should be enough to supply the juries required at that court.
Mr. Harper. Did he direct them to be summoned from the county or the town.
Mr. Marshall. I have stated all that I remember relative to the summoning of the jury.
Mr. Harper. Did he say any thing of the description of persons, relative to parties.
Mr. Marshall. I do not recollect that he had a word.
Mr. Harper. Did you make it a practice to go with the Judge to court every day from his lodgings?
Mr. Marshall. I walked every day with him, I made it an uniform practice. The Judge's lodgings were on my way to court, not more than twenty yards out of my way.
Mr. Key. When the subpoenas were returned on the 2d of June, and neither Mr. Giles nor Gen. Mason appeared, was there an application made to the court to allow a further time for their appearance?
Mr. Marshall. There were some observations made, but I do not recollect whether I attended to them at the time or not; but I think Judge Chase offered to issue an attachment for them, and left it to the pleasure of the traveler to say whether he would have compulsory process issued.
Mr. Key. Do you recollect, Sir, whether that was applied for by the counsel, or whether it was a voluntary offer on the part of the court?
Mr. Marshall. I understood that it was a voluntary offer on the part of the court.
Mr. Harper. Did Judge Chase confer with Judge Griffin upon the motion for a continuance, and upon the rejection of Col. Taylor's testimony?
Mr. Marshall. I sat very near them, and I frequently heard them in conversation in a sort of whisper.
Mr. Harper. Did you ever hear any part of the conversation between them?
Mr. Marshall. I did not hear anything distinctly, but when Mr. Bateset was sworn, after having stated the situation in which he stood, Judge Chase asked him whether he had formed an opinion who was the author of the Prospect Before Us; he replied that he had not formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether he had formed an opinion of the author, but he had formed an opinion of the book, and had said that the author ought to be punished. Judge Chase then turned to Judge Griffin, and said that the question propounded by the counsel would prevent the formation of a jury with respect to a notorious murder, by declaring that it ought to be punished, as every man in the country where it had been committed might have declared that the perpetration ought to be punished. In that case there would not be in the whole county a competent jury. Judge Chase then asked him whether

A STATISTICAL TABLE FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
   Yrs. POPULATION. Averaged price lards. Militia. Navy United States. Seamen. IMPORTS. EXPORTS. Tons, merchant vessels on which duties were collected Averaged labor per day. Averaged wheat per bushel.   Free Persons. Slaves increase near 2 1-2 per cent. per annum. Total population, including Loui- siana in the year 1804. Total increas d in each year. Persons to each square mile. Cultivated per acre. In their natural state. Emigrants, besides 4500 Slaves imported. Merchandise including emigrant's stock, furniture, &c. Domestic produce. Total Exports.     1774 1 986 000 500 000 2 486 000 — 2 20 850 000 2 50 421 300 — 15 000 3000 7 000 000 6 100 000 6 100 000 198 000 30 60   1784 2 650 000 600 000 3 250 000 — 3 21 500 000 2 25 541 666 — 18 000 5000 11 000 000 9 000 000 10 150 000 250 000 50 65   1790 3 232 303 697 697 3 930 000 — 3 30 000 000 2 10 654 000 — 25 000 3500 17 500 000 14 200 000 16 000 000 486 890 50 75   1791 3 333 761 714 139 4 047 900 117 900 4 31 000 000 3 20 677 650 — 28 000 4000 19 000 000 14 600 000 18 399 202 502 698 60 75   1792 3 438 237 731 000 4 169 337 121 337 4 32 000 000 3 50 694 889 — 30 000 5000 22 000 000 15 060 500 21 005 563 567 698 65 80   1793 3 446 417 748 000 4 294 417 125 180 4 33 500 000 4 50 715 736 — 33 000 3600 26 000 000 15 420 000 26 011 788 627 670 70 95   1794 3 537 189 766 060 4 423 249 128 632 4 34 000 000 4 50 737 208 — 39 000 3500 34 000 000 16 200 100 33 043 725 628 617 100 100   1795 3 771 946 784 000 4 555 946 132 697 4 34 550 000 4 60 759 324 — 45 000 3900 48 000 000 18 064 050 46 855 556 747 964 100 120   1796 3 850 424 802 500 4 652 624 136 678 4 35 100 000 4 75 782 104 — 51 500 4500 68 000 000 20 024 021 67 064 097 831 902 100 100   1797 4 012 902 820 500 4 833 402 140 776 4 35 600 000 5 50 805 567 3 124 60 200 3500 52 000 000 24 052 671 51 294 710 876 912 90 150   1798 4 940 404 838 000 5 044 404 145 002 4 36 100 000 5 25 829 734 13 350 62 300 3800 63 000 000 27 991 413 61 327 411 895 329 85 190   1799 5 273 756 854 000 5 127 756 149 352 5 38 300 000 5 50 854 626 42 950 63 500 4000 79 000 000 33 142 187 78 665 522 920 000 10 200   1800 4 404 798 876 790 5 281 588 153 832 5 36 800 000 5 50 878 000 42 970 64 000 3800 71 800 000 31 840 903 70 971 780 972 492 90 200   1801 4 544 800 878 300 5 440 100 158 512 5 37 400 000 5 60 914 001 20 600 65 000 4000 88 900 000 46 377 792 93 029 515 947 576 80 175   1802 4 682 313 921 000 5 603 313 163 213 5 38 000 000 5 70 940 000 20 600 63 000 4500 73 000 000 36 182 173 71 957 144 1 003 002 75 130   1803 5 727 412 944 000 5 771 412 168 090 5 38 500 000 5 85 972 000 18 556 63 500 3900 56 000 000 42 205 961 55 800 033 1 077 323 75 125   1805 5 600 100 999 000 6 000 000 228 583 6 38 950 000 6 50 1 050 000 20 560 64 000 5000 80 000 000 41 477 479 77 699 074 1 077 323 75 155  
Officer. I do not recollect any case in which they held a consultation, but that of the rejection of the testimony of Col. Taylor, and the direction that Mr. Bissett should be sworn on the jury. He was confused as to the testimony of Col. Taylor, but I did not hear him declare his intent aloud, but I took it for granted, as it was not denied.
Mr. Harper. With respect to the motion for a continuance, do you know whether the decision was made after a consultation with Judge Griffin?
Mr. Marshall. I do not recollect that anything was said on the part of Judge Griffin; but I understood that it was assented to, as it was delivered as the opinion of the court.
Mr. Harper. Was there any expression on the part of Judge Griffin disapproving of what was delivered by Judge Chase as the opinion of the court?
Mr. Marshall. None, sir.
Mr. Nicholson. At the time of the trial of Callender, was it not the custom of the judges to choose their circuits?
Mr. Marshall. I believe it was, sir. Mr. Nicholson. At that time, the Virginia district was within Judge Chase's circuit, and do you recollect that he said he would not continue the court till the next term?
Mr. Marshall. I recollect that Judge Chase said he would not continue it till the next term.
Mr. Nicholson. Who presided at the next term?
Mr. Marshall. Judge Paterson.
Mr. Randolph. You have said that on the morning when you found Mr. Heath about retiring from Judge Chase's chamber, you did not recollect whether the marshal accompanied you there or not?
Mr. Marshall. I do not recollect whether he did or not, but the probability, as resting on my mind, is that he did.
Mr. Randolph. Did he accompany you in the lodgings of Judge Chase to the court?
Mr. Marshall. Yes, I am certain of that, because I had the conversation with him which I have mentioned.
Mr. Randolph. You mentioned a conversation you had with Judge Chase on the subject of the political characters serving on the jury; that he wished that Mr. Giles, and other gentlemen of the same political character might serve on the trial of Callender; did you mention that conversation to the marshal?
Mr. Marshall. I do not remember to have conversed with him on that subject.
Mr. Randolph. Were you acquainted with the gentlemen who served as petit jurors on Callender's trial?
Mr. Marshall. Yes, sir.
Mr. Randolph. Is there any one of them that comes under the description of being of the same political character with Mr. Giles?
Mr. Marshall. I believe not, sir. At the time of the trial, I was not fully acquainted with the political characters of the gentlemen that served on the jury; but since I have learned, as I then learned, that none of them were of the same politics with Mr. Giles.
Mr. Randolph. If I understood you right, sir, you stated that a capias was ordered to be issued before the grand jury returned the indictment—a true bill.
Mr. Marshall. Yes, for the arrest of Callender before the indictment was found.
Mr. Randolph. The indictment was found on the 10th of May, was it not?
Mr. Marshall. The presentment was made on the morning of that day. The co-jurors, other than usual, and I remember that the jury wished to be discharged, but they were not, and it was
five or six o'clock before they brought in the bill of indictment.
Mr. Nicholson. Do you recollect whether the attorney of the district had commenced drawing the indictment before the presentment was made?
Mr. Marshall. I remember that the district attorney was drawing up the indictment before the presentment was made; he had made however very little progress in it at that time, it was furnished afterwards as soon as convenient, and transmitted to the grand jury.
Mr. Randolph. During the course of that trial, pray, sir, tell the court where the interruptions of the counsel for the traverser more frequent than you have been in the habit of witnessing?
Mr. Marshall. I have rarely seen a trial where the interruptions were so frequent.
Mr. Randolph. Do you remember a single instance?
Mr. Marshall. I think in a trial where Judge Iredell presided there were interruptions which were as frequent, if not more frequent than took place in the course of this trial.
Mr. Randolph. Do you recollect anything disrespectful on the part of the counsel towards the court on the trial of Callender?
Mr. Marshall. One of the counsel, Mr. Hays, appeared to be under a great deal of irritation during a great part of the trial.
Mr. Randolph. Did you perceive any cause for this?
Mr. Marshall. The court were very positive that the jury should not be addressed by the traverser's counsel on the constitutionality of the sedition law, and whenever that point was touched by the counsel, there was as much decision shown by the court as I ever witnessed.
Mr. Randolph. Was there much mirth among the by-standers?
Mr. Marshall. There was a good deal. I cannot say what gave rise to it, but it was kept up during the course of the trial. The court was extremely facetious during that part of the trial which I particularly attended to, but I was not very attentive to the trial till that morning.
Mr. Martin. What was the cause of the interruptions?
Mr. Marshall. It was the counsel persisting in addressing the jury on the constitutionality of the sedition law after the court had declared what was their opinion of the law on that point.
Mr. Randolph. Do you recollect any particular expressions used by the court on this subject?
Mr. Marshall. I heard Judge Chase say that the counsel for the traverser were mistaken in their exposition of the law, and they kept pressing their mistakes upon the court; he said so once, if not oftener.
Mr. Harper. You say, sir, that there was no gentleman on the petit jury of the same political opinion with Mr. Callender or Mr. Giles. Do you mean on the jury that tried Callender, or on the panel?
Mr. Marshall. On the jury that tried Callender.
Mr. Harper. Were there any on the panel?
Mr. Marshall. There were colonel Harvie, Mr. Radford, and Mr. Mark Vandervall. Mr. Harvie was called very early; and Mr. Mark Vandervall; but it appeared to me that there was a great unwillingness on the part of those gentlemen to be on the jury to try this cause, and several applications were made to have them excused.
Mr. Harper. How did it happen that none of those gentlemen served?
Mr. Marshall. Mr. Harvie suggested that he was sheriff of Henrico county, and that the county court was sitting at the time; that his presence
was required, and on that ground the court excused him from serving on the jury. The other two gentlemen did not attend at all.
Mr. Harper. When you said that the confusion on this trial took place, from the counsel's pressing their opinion on the jury, do I understand you as saying that it was after they (the counsel) had been over-ruled by the court?
Mr. Marshall. I so understood it, I did not perceive any other cause.
Mr. Harper. What took place on the motion for a continuance. The affidavit it filed, stated, that the traverser could not produce his witnesses; did it state that he could prove a justification as to all the charges in the indictment?
Mr. Marshall. No, sir, not that I remember, but the affidavit is here on file. It was stated by Judge Chase, that there were 19 charges in the indictment, and that it was necessary for the traverser, in order to procure his acquittal, to prove the truth of the matter in the whole; it was not sufficient to prove a dozen or more of them to be true, if he could not prove them all. It was not sufficient to prove a part instead of the whole, of any one charge; for example, suppose a man should charge me with being a great scoundrel, a rogue, and a very ugly fellow, and he should prove that I was a very ugly fellow, would that go to acquit him for having called me a scoundrel or a rogue? Can a part proven in this way be said to be a justification?
Mr. Harper. Was this remark made by Judge Chase in good humour?
Mr. Marshall. I thought him in a remarkable good humour.
Mr. Harper. You say Judge Chase was positive. Was he harsh towards the counsel of the traverser?
Mr. Marshall. I did not think so. I remember that he said, his country had made him a Judge, and he would be the Judge on the business of that day, and whatever was transacted should be under the direction of the court. He said also that he was a trial and feeble man, and that it was possible he was in an error, in respect to the opinion which he entertained of the law. If the gentlemen who differed from his opinions would form a bill of exceptions, he would be the first man to show them a writ of error to go into the supreme court of the United States, a superior tribunal, and have there his opinions tested.
Mr. Harper. Did the counsel for the traverser state a case on the offer of the Judge?
Mr. Marshall. Those were the observations of the court, but I do not recollect that the counsel said anything in reply.
Mr. Randolph. You mentioned that no person of Mr. Giles's politics was on the jury; did I understand you, when speaking of Mr. John Harvie as being of those politics, as meaning Mr. Harvie of Belvidere?
Mr. Marshall. Yes Sir.
Mr. Randolph. What do you conceive to have been his politics at that time?
Mr. Marshall. I thought, from his opinion on the sedition law, which I had understood was, that it was unconstitutional, he might have been of the same politics as Mr. Giles.
Mr. Randolph. What was your opinion of Mr. Radford?
Mr. Marshall. I understood his politics to have been of the same kind.
Mr. Randolph. Did you ever hear that Mr. Mark Vandervall had denied that he was summoned on the jury for the trial of Callender?
Mr. Marshall. I have understood that he denied ever having been summoned.
Mr. Randolph. Did Mr. Harvie an-
swer to his name when called on the jury list?
Mr. Marshall. Yes Sir, and he was excused as being high sheriff of the county of Henrico.
Mr. Randolph. Did Mr. Radford answer to his name?
Mr. Marshall. I believe not Sir. Mr. Vandervall I am certain did not.
Mr. Randolph. Were you well acquainted at the time with Mr. Radford and Mr. Harvie?
Mr. Marshall. I was with Mr. Harvie, and tolerably well with Mr. Radford.
Mr. Randolph. Were you well acquainted with Mr. Mark Vandervall?
Mr. Marshall. Not very intimately.
Mr. Randolph. Do you know, or believe, that at the election for members of the House of Representatives in the spring of the year 1799, whether Mr. Vandervall did vote for your brother, the present chief justice?
Mr. Marshall. I believe he did not vote at all, but if he had voted, I believe it would have been for him.
Mr. Harper. Colonel Tinsley appears upon this panel, I would ask you if his political opinions were at that time the same as they are now?
Mr. Marshall. I do not know what were his political sentiments at the time—but I remember that he had been hostile to the adoption of the federal constitution.
Mr. Martin. The panel of the petit jury is never returned, if I understood you right, by the marshal, until the jury appears in court, and the clerk of the court knows nothing of it? Did you learn anything of the panel that had been summoned by the marshal on the morning you were with him at Judge Chase's lodgings?
Mr. Marshall. I did not.
The President. Did you know whether Mr. D. Randolph had or had not made out his panel?
Mr. Marshall. I knew nothing of it.
Mr. Wright. When was it that the conversation took place at Judge Chase's lodgings, when you met Mr. Heath there?
Mr. Marshall. I do not recollect the precise day, but I think it was the 27th or 28th of May.
DAVID M. RANDOLPH sworn.
Mr. Harper. Were you marshal of the United States for the district of Virginia in 1800.
A. I was, Sir.
Mr. Harper. Did you attend the circuit court held in May of that year, as marshal?
A. I did, Sir.
Mr. Harper. Did you summon the panel of the jury that served on the trial of Callender.
A. I did.
Mr. Harper. Had you any conversation with Judge Chase on the forming that panel.
A. I had no conversation with him on that subject. There was a conversation offered to me by Judge Chase.
Mr. Harper. What was it.
A. The Judge recommended to me that I should get persons generally from the country—represented that they should be twenty five years of age, of fair characters, untainted by party prejudices.
Mr. Harper. What were his reasons for taking them from the country.
A. I do not know—I replied that the mode of summoning jurors was looser in Virginia than in other states—of course I did not, with his instructions.
Mr. Harper. If at that period you had been disposed to form a jury of the political opinion of those then in power, would you have taken them from the town or country.
A. I knew very little of the political sentiments of the citizens. There were, however, in town a great majority of those whose politics were called federal.
Mr. Harper. Was that the case in the country?
A. I cannot say. I never meddled with politics in any way except in private conversation. Not attending at public meetings, I had but little acquaintance with the politics of individuals.

   Years. REVENUE. EXPENDITURE. MONEY. STOCKS, PASSING AS MONEY, PART HELD IN EUROPE. DEDUCT FROM THE DEBT. LANDS SOLD TO DISCHARGE THE U. S. DEBT. NATIONAL FUNDS.   Impost on merchandise and tonnage. Total annual receipts. Civil list and contingencies. Total Expenditure. Metallic medium. Bank notes in circulation. Number banks. Banking capital. Nominal public debt. Active sinking fund, & reimbursements. Custom house bonds & cash in the treasury. No. acres sold to pay the public debt, at 3 to 6 dollars the acre. NATIONAL FUNDS.     1774 Dollars. Dollars. Dollars. Dollars. Dollars. Dollars. Dollars. Highest war debt. Dollars. NOTE. Appropriated by law to the discharge of present and future Public debts.   84 — — — — 4 000 000 — — 200 000 000 Bonds are un- dervalued per estimate. Stocks drawing interest purchased by the   90 — — — — 10 000 000 2 000 000 3 2 130 000 Funded. Commissioners of the Sinking Funds   91 — — 946 841 — 9 000 000 2 500 000 4 2 550 000 72 237 301 with specie by law of the United States   92 3 443 073 8 771 600 400 458 8 962 920 18 000 000 11 500 000 16 17 150 000 77 124 300 of August 1790, with the surplus duties   93 4 235 306 6 450 195 436 853 6 479 977 20 000 000 11 000 000 17 18 000 000 78 402 945 2 019 184 6 000 000 by law of May 1792, with proceeds of   94 4 801 065 9 439 855 443 031 9 041 593 21 500 000 11 600 000 17 18 000 000 79 424 668 2 265 022 8 000 000 the public lands, &c. Dolls. 7,024,450   95 5 588 461 9 515 758 417 362 10 151 240 19 000 000 11 000 000 23 19 000 000 84 930 433 3 254 235 10 000 000 4,500 lots in the city of   96 6 367 987 8 740 329 507 747 8 367 776 16 500 000 10 500 000 26 21 200 000 83 404 139 3 600 341 11 000 000 Washington, 1,500,000   97 7 549 649 8 758 780 540 408 8 625 877 16 000 000 10 000 000 25 19 200 000 81 324 139 4 549 627 12 000 000 235 millions of acres of land,   98 7 106 061 8 179 170 564 408 8 583 618 14 000 000 9 000 000 25 19 200 000 11 244 139 5 233 174 12 000 000 limited by law at not less   99 6 610 449 12 549 381 568 199 11 004 965 17 000 000 10 000 000 26 21 200 000 88 456 038 9 052 232 12 000 000 than two dollars per acre,   1800 9 080 932 12 413 978 805 051 11 952 834 17 500 000 10 500 000 28 21 350 000 89 443 437 9 274 607 12 000 000 to net in time, Dolls. 470,000,000   01 10 750 773 12 945 455 692 821 12 273 376 17 000 000 11 000 000 31 22 400 000 88 745 704 10 876 686 13 500 000 Half of the United States   02 12 438 235 14 995 793 596 981 13 270 457 16 500 000 10 000 000 32 22 600 000 87 421 521 12 013 777 14 500 000 Louisiana lands at the   03 10 479 417 11 064 097 526 748 11 258 983 16 000 000 11 000 000 36 26 040 000 98 196 118 14 413 000 15 500 000 same limit may net for   04 — — — — 17 500 000 14 000 000 59 39 500 000 — 16 500 500 16 500 500 poserty. 600,000,000  
standing with Col. Vandervall, I think in conversation with him. I called him across the street, and asked him how they succeeded. At this time I saw my other deputy. They told me they wanted but one or two jurors. I told them they must make haste. About this time I saw Mr. B. after entering town on horseback. I told him that he had been crossed as a grand juror for non-attendance—that he must serve as a petit juror, which would give him an opportunity of offering his apology. I took out my watch, and told him that I allowed him five minutes. We arrived at the capitol, and my deputies there gave me their memorandums, from which and my own I made up the list of the jury. Two gentlemen, Mr. Lewis and Mr. Blakely, offered something like excuses. I looked at Mr. Blakely and said there was only one excuse that I would admit, to wit: his being under 25 years of age. He said he was under that age, and I dismissed him. Mr. Lewis said he might make the same excuse. I said I doubted it, but I let him off. As I went into the passage, I met Mr. Samuel Myers, who also desired to be let off. I told him I could not and would not. He said I would excuse him for a reason which he could assign. He whispered, and said that he was prejudiced against Callender. I permitted him to go, but begged him to keep that reason to himself. Another juror summoned was very warm and importunate to be excused. I told him there was only one ground on which I would excuse him. He asked me what it was? I answered, that if it applied to him, he already knew it. I begged him to go to the court, and he would learn what it was. He did so. Col. H. H. H. stopped me in the passage in a hasty manner, and with great warmth and friendliness urged me to let him off. He said he was the sheriff of Henrico county. I said I knew it, but that I also knew that his duties were generally performed by deputies. I did not let him off. He applied to the court, and was excused.
Mr. Harper. Were there any other gentlemen who applied to be excused? A. Yes, Sir, Mr. Radford. He was in court at the time I commenced making out the list. He urged as an objection to serving that he differed in politics from myself. This I considered evasive, and I told him I should call him. When called he did not answer. I believe he went immediately home. Mr. Harper. Did you go in person to execute the process against Callender?
A. I did. Mr. Harper. Did you meet any person at Petersburg, with whom you had a conversation respecting the arrest of Callender? A. The first person I had any conversation with was Mr. George H. H.
Mr. Harper. Did any thing pass in that conversation tending to dissuade you from searching for Callender? A. I had fruitlessly gone in pursuit of Callender some distance from Petersburg, on my return about sunset, at a tavern nearly opposite the residence of Mr. H. H. H., he came up, and entered into conversation with me with regard to Callender. I said I had been on a wild goose chase, and had found myself fooled; but that I was determined to find whether he was not in town. Mr. H. H. H. appeared to interest himself very much, in dissuading me from the pursuit. He said that Callender would not be taken, and that it was in vain to pursue him. I replied, that I would do my duty, and, if possible, apprehend him. I asked him if he knew where Callender was. He said he knew not where he was, and if he did, he would not tell me. He invited me to take a bed at his house;—
which I declined, as I was going to spend the evening down town.
Mr. Harper. Did Mr. H. H. H. assign any reasons why Callender ought not to be arrested?
A. I cannot state the language he used. He urged a great many things. Among others, he observed that as Callender could not be defended this term, he would be found guilty and imprisoned, and said that if he was not then arrested, he might in the fall surrender himself.
Mr. Harper. You understood Mr. H. H. H. to say, that if Callender was not arrested till the next term, he would surrender himself?
A. He so intimated to me. These were not his very words, but that was my understanding of them.
Mr. Harper. You say you completed the panel after the court met on Monday.
A. I did. Mr. Harper. And that you never submitted it to Judge Chase, or spoke to him about it?
A. I did not at any time or place whatever.
Mr. Harper. And that you had no conversation with the Judge about forming it, except that you have mentioned?
A. None other, and that was at his lodgings in a familiar conversation.
Mr. Randolph. I understand you to have said you did not summon Marks Vandervall yourself?
A. I said so—but he was summoned by my order.
Mr. Randolph. Were you present when the order was executed?
A. I was on the opposite side of the street, and saw my deputy Motley in conversation with him. He crossed the street, and said that Col. Vandervall expressed a reluctance to serving. I told him it lay with him to release him, and if he departed from the general rule, he must answer for it.
Mr. Randolph. Do you know whether Mr. Vandervall has denied that he was ever summoned?
A. I do not, except seeing it so stated in the public papers.
Mr. Randolph. Have you ever at any time had any conversation with Judge Chase on the subject of the grand jury?
A. Not—that I recollect.
Mr. Randolph. Was the William Radford, who was summoned and expressed his unwillingness to serve on the jury, the same who keeps the Eagle tavern?
A. The same. Mr. Randolph. Did he keep the Eagle tavern at that time?
A. I believe not.
Mr. Randolph. Did he say his politics differed from yours?
A. I do not know that he used those words—but such was my impression at the time of his meaning.
Mr. Randolph. Did you understand his opinions to be of that political character?
A. I cannot say positively. I have some indistinct recollection that he was classified among that description of men.
Mr. Nicholson. What party? A. The democratic party, as they are called.
Mr. Randolph. Did I understand you to say you were not positive to which party he belonged?
A. I was not positive at that time.
Mr. Campbell. I wish you to state when you showed the panel of the grand jury to the Judge?
A. On the first day of the court after it was formed?
Mr. Campbell. Had he never seen it before?
A. Never, Sir—I had never seen it before myself. The practice is for the returns to be handed in by the deputies,
and a list formed and given to the clerk, who hands it to the court.
Mr. Campbell. Have you any recollection of seeing Mr. Heath at the Judge's lodgings, and who?
A. I have no recollection of seeing him at the Judge's chambers at any time, or of seeing him in Richmond during that session of the court, until it was called to my mind by Mr. Marshall's testimony.
Mr. Nicholson. Then you recollect by presumption that he was there—Did you see him?
A. I rather think I saw him—but I have no recollection of seeing him in Judge Chase's chamber, or with Judge Chase alone.
Mr. Randolph. Did Judge Chase lodge at Grouchy's?—Is it not a tavern?
A. It is a boarding house, and no wife distinguished from a tavern. I had never been in the house before Judge Chase's arrival.
Mr. Randolph. Did you ever receive any instructions, verbal or by letter, from Judge Chase in relation to the grand jury?
A. Never. (To be continued.)
WASHINGTON CITY.
FRIDAY, APRIL 3.
The federal, as well as republican, statements received from New Hampshire concur in declaring JOHN LANGDON to be elected Governor, in the room of Mr. Gilman, and it is probable that on enumerating all the votes, Mr. Langdon will appear to be elected by a great majority. It cannot, under these circumstances, be considered premature, to congratulate the people not only of that state, but of the whole United States, on this event; which is one of the best evidences of the increasing triumphs of republican principles. We need not inform our readers that Mr. Langdon is one of the most distinguished republicans of the Eastern States. They cannot have forgotten the firmness, which he manifested in the Senate of the United States, in times of uncommon peril and alarm, and which evinced a perfect consistency with the revolutionary principles, for the maintenance of which he staked his all. Of seventeen states there are now fourteen over whose affairs republican legislatures, and thirteen over which republican governors preside. If we look back a few years, and contrast the present with the then posture of affairs, we shall be lost in astonishment at the magnitude and rapidity of the change. In the year 1800, there were only seven states, in which the government was republican; and there are now fourteen. Can we, under these circumstances, so far as regards characteristic political principles, be said to be a divided people?
Mr. Cathcart, late Consul of the United States, to the Barbary Powers, has arrived, with his family, in this city.
Agreeably to the request contained in the following note, we have re-inserted Mr. Blodget's Statistical table. Such Editors, as may have inserted the first publication, are requested to publish the corrected statement.
NOTE.
Sir,
Owing to the dampness of the sheet, part of the corrections made on the proof of the Statistical table, which Mr. Smith was so obliging as to publish in his last were accidentally obliterated; hence a few errors remained in the pub-
lication, these are corrected in an errata sent Mr. Smith, and may be amended in the way most convenient to prevent an immediate repetition of the errors in publications usually following the annual Statistical Table for the United States for the United States.
S. BLODGET.
FOR SALE.
Eight hundred acres of Land.
IN Fauquier county state of Virginia, known by the name of Oakland Farm, situate about 22 miles from Fredericksburg, and the same from Dumfries.
About three hundred acres of this land are under a fine growth of oak and hickory timber. The cleared land is inclosed and well adapted to the culture of corn, wheat and tobacco, it is finely watered by a number of never failing springs, dispersed in such a manner in four separate inclosures, as to afford water for stock in great plenty. On the premises are a small mill and distillery, a strong frame dwelling house 44 feet, by 20, finished in a plain and elegant stile, a stone spring house completely finished, leaning and framing, sufficient for a kitchen and smoke house.
Any person inclining to purchase will be shown the land by Mr. Levan Oliver who lives near the place—the terms may be known by an application to Mr. John Love of said county and the title confirmed by the subscriber living in the city of Washington, district of Columbia
THOMAS THORPE.
April 3.—tf
Bank of Columbia.
THE Board of Directors having this day declared a dividend for the half year ending the 20th inst. at the rate of Eight per cent. per annum. The same will be paid to the Stockholders or their representatives, on or after Wednesday the 20th inst.
WILLIAM WHANN, Cashier.
March 18.—6w
PUBLIC NOTICE.
Pursuant to a resolution of the House of Representatives of the United States of the 28th of February last, I am ready to receive separate proposals until the first day of May next, for the supply of such articles of Stationery as may be necessary for the service of the said House, at and during the next session of Congress, and also like proposals, for the execution of all the Printing business of the said House, during the same session. The several species of Stationary and Printing wanted, are subjoined to this advertisement, and the proposals must be accompanied with the names and residence of sufficient securities for performance.
JOHN BECKLEY, Clerk to the House of Representatives of the United States.
City of Washington, } 11th March, 1805. }
STATIONARY WANTED.
 Letter paper, hot pressed, vellum, extra large. } per ream.  Do. do. plain, Folio post, wove and plain, Do. medium size for engrossing, Foolscap, } per lb.  Ready made pens, per hundred, and quills per hundred.  Best Dutch red wax, Do. black do. } per lb.  Red wafers, Common black sand, in papers, and Water boxes and pounce boxes, per dozen. } per dozen.  Inks and sands, per pair. } per dozen.  Half pint phials with corks, Low priced folders, Lead pencils, Red tape, in pieces, Ink of the best quality, per gallon. Indian rubber, per bottle. } per dozen.  Parchment in skins, per dozen, cut, dressed, and pounced for use, 28 by 32 inches. Office pen knives, and crafting knives. 
PRINTING WANTED.
 Man work, per sheet, octavo 300 impression of each sheet.  Bills numbered per line, in sheet or half sheet, folio.  Figure work, Rule and figure work, Table work, } in octavo, and in folio, same number of impressions.  Folding and stitching per hundred, for any number of documents exceeding three half sheets, and thence to twenty half sheets, and for all above.  Book binding in boards, } per folio and octavo, calf, } vo volume, marked sheep, } and lettered. 
March 13.—ep3w
Young Ladies Academy.
MRS. O'REILY respectfully informs her friends and the public that she has removed her Academy from Baltimore to Alexandria, where she will receive young Ladies who shall be taught the English and French languages grammatically; writing and arithmetic; history, geography and the use of the globes; music, drawing, and all kinds of work, viz. embroidery in chenilles, gold, silver, silks, &c. compass figures, historical and ornamental, landscape, flowers, fruit, birds, &c. maps wrought in silks, chenilles, gold, &c. print work in figures or landscapes; cloth work in fruit, birds, flowers, &c. needlework and varnishing in vases, pyramids, baskets, tea caddies, ovals, &c. grotto and shell work; artificial flowers, tambour and needlework, cross stitch, tent stitch, tapestry, &c. beaded and pearl work, painting on velvet, gauze, silk, vellum &c. Her terms are 100 dollars per annum for board and tuition. For music 18 dollars per quarter. Drawing 8 dollars per quarter. Washing 8 dollars per quarter. Every young Lady furnished with Mrs. O. R. with bed and bedding will be charged 4 dollars per quarter. March 8.—1m.
Judge WILSON'S Works.
Just Published, and for sale by Rapine, Conrad, & Co. NEAR THE CAPITOL.
THE works of the Hon. James Wilson, L. L. D. late one of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, and professor of Law in the College of Philadelphia, 3 vols. with an elegant portrait of the author.
This valuable work contains the learned author's Lectures on Law and other works connected therewith, of which he takes a most comprehensive view, and ably explains that intricate science. March 10.—22w3w
The supply of these articles must embrace, a possible demand, to the value of 3,500 or 4,000 dollars, for the session.
It is desirable that specimens of paper, quills and parchment should accompany the proposals; and, in every instance, articles of American manufacture, of equal quality with, and not exceeding the price of similar imported articles will be preferred. A security equal to 8000 dollars will be required.
In every instance, the printer supplies the paper as well as the work, duly folded and stitched, and no possible delay is to occur, in the daily execution and delivery of the work; so that in all cases where it is practicable, the document ordered to be printed on any given day, may be ready for delivery, the next morning at the hour to which the House stands adjourned.
No extra allowance will be made for working on Sundays, holidays, or after night; these must be considered by the contractor, in the price per sheet. The contract must embrace a possible amount of work during the session, equal to 10,000 dollars, and the security required will be to the amount of 20,000 dollars.
JOHN BECKLEY.

ADAM KING, & Co. At their wine store in High Street George Town, have in addition to their stock of old wines, laid in a large and general assortment of all kinds of Liquors and Groceries suitable to the present season; where bills of any description, in their line, will constantly be filled up on the shortest notice and their flatter themselves, from the quality of their wines, &c. they will be able to give general satisfaction to all those who may think proper to favor them with a call—where all kind of commission business as usual, will be attended to with the utmost attention. George Town, November 5—tf
TO PRINTERS.
THE subscriber takes Order for Type from the well known Foundry of William Cassin Junn. and Co. London—Specimens and list of London prices to be seen at Mr. Geo. W. Riggs, Georgetown.
CHARLES WIRGMAN, No. 215, Market Street, Baltimore. Jan 16. tf
CHARLES H. VARDEN, MERCHANT TAILOR.
Has received from Philadelphia a handsome assortment of FALL goods, consisting of the best London and French superfine cloths, cashmeres, patent Benner's cord, toiletries, fancy and white Marcellies, black and figured silk, mouselkins, fancy silk, Marcellies, constitution cords, velvets, Genoa cord, silk and satin Florentines, superfine coating, knitted cloths, with a variety of other articles suitable for the winter season. N. B. Ladies habits, regimentals, and navy uniforms made in the first style of fashion. New Jersey avenue near the Capitol, December 10—tf
One Hundred Dollars Reward.
ON Friday evening the 22nd inst. ROBERT W. PEACOCK, confined in the Jail of Washington County of the District of Columbia, upon a conviction of forgery at December Term, 1834, escaped from said Jail. He was before this conviction a practicing Attorney in the City of Washington, and is very well known in Virginia and Maryland, having resided in both. He is a stout man, 5 feet 10 or 11 inches high, about 34 or 35 years of age, looks young of his age, has blue eyes, full face, fair and ruddy complexion, light hair which he wears tied behind. He is also very much inclined to corpulency. Whoever apprehends the said felon, and secures him in any Jail, so that I get him again, shall receive the above reward from DANIEL C. BRENT, Marshal of the District of Columbia. March 25—tf
STELLE'S HOTEL & CITY TAVERN.
THE Subscriber takes this method of thanking his friends and the public for their favors whilst on the Capitol Square and begs leave to acquaint them that having purchased and now occupying the tavern, late Tunnicliff's hotel; which he has commenced enlarging and improving—he respectfully solicits a continuance of the patronage of his friends and the public, assuring them that 'tis his full determination to fit up his present hotel, and so to conduct it, as to merit, he hopes, the preference of the public travelling, as well as those coming to the permanent seat of the Government of our Land of Liberty. FONIUS D. STELLE. Washington City, March 25—tf
THE subscribers have opened a GROCERY STORE in the house near the Capitol, lately occupied by Mr. JAMES D. BARRY—where they have for sale, low, for cash, or in exchange for country produce.
Genuine Cognac brandy, Inferior French do. Old Jamaica Spirits, Madeira, } Wines, by the quarter cask Sherry, } and case, or smaller quantity. Lisbon, } Claret, Brown Sugar, 12 and 24 quality Loaf and Lump, do. Molasses, Fishin Butter, Mould Candles, Sweet Oil, Spices of different kinds, Fig Blue, Starch, Almonds, Anchovies, } In bottles. Capers, } Powder and Shot, Excellent Wine Vinegar, Gin, Whiskey, Hyon, } Teas, fresh, and of superior quality. Imperial, } Young Hyon, } Salt Herrings in Barrels.
PETER HEALY, & Co. Washington October 31—tf
PROPOSALS
For carrying the Mails of the United States, on the following post-roads, will be received at the General post-office, in Washington, until the 10th day of July next, inclusive.
IN MAINE
1. FROM Scodias by Dennysville, Machias, Coopers, Columbia, Harpswell, Steuben and Gouldsboro' to Sullivan once a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Scodias every Wednesday at 2 p m arrive at Dennysville by 6 p m. Leave Dennysville at 7 p m and arrive at Sullivan the next Saturday by 6 p m. Returning —Leave Sullivan every Sunday at 6 a m arrive at Dennysville on Wednesday by 6 a m. Leave Dennysville at 7 a m and arrive at Scodias by 10 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Scodias every Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Sullivan on Monday by 10 a m. Leave Sullivan on Monday at 2 p m and arrive at Scodias on Thursday by 6 p m. 2. From Dennysville to Eastport once a week. Leave Dennysville every Wednesday
at 7 a m and arrive at Eastport at 9 a m. Leave Eastport at noon and arrive at Dennysville by 2 p m. 3. From Sullivan by Trenton, Bluehill, Calais, Buckton, Prospect, Belfast and Ducktrap to Camden once a week. November 1 to May 1—Leave Sullivan every Monday at 1 p m and arrive at Camden on Wednesday by 6 p m. Leave Camden every Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Sullivan on Monday by 10 a m. 4. From Buckton by Frankfort, Hampden, Bangor, Eddington and Orrington to Buckton once a week. Leave Buckton every Friday at 8 a m and arrive at Eddington by 4 p m. Leave Eddington every Saturday at 4 a m and arrive at Buckton on Monday by 2 p m. 5. From Camden by Thomaston, Warren, Waldoboro', Nobleboro' and Newcastile to Wiscasset twice a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Wiscasset every Wednesday and Friday at 2 p m and arrive at Camden on Thursday and Saturday by 11 a m. Leave Camden every Tuesday and Thursday at 1 p m and arrive at Wiscasset on Wednesday and Friday by 11 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Camden every Monday and Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Wiscasset by 6 p m. Leave Wiscasset every Thursday and Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Camden by 6 p m. 6. From Wiscasset by New-Milford, Durdan, Gardner, Hallowell, Augusta, Winthrop, Monmouth, Green, Lewistown, New-Gloucester, Gray and Falmouth to Portland once a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Portland every Monday at 6 a m arrive at Hallowell on Tuesday by 3 p m. Leave Hallowell at 4 p m and arrive at Wiscasset on Wednesday by 11 a m. Leave Wiscasset every Wednesday at 2 p m arrive at Hallowell on Thursday by 8 a m. Leave Hallowell at 9 a m and arrive at Portland on Friday by 7 p m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Portland every Tuesday at 6 a m and arrive at Wiscasset on Thursday by 6 p m. Returning —Leave Wiscasset every Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Portland on Monday by 10 a m. 7. From Hallowell by Augusta, Vassalboro', Winthrop, Waterville, Fairfield and Canaan to Norridgewock once a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Hallowell every Thursday at noon and arrive at Norridgewock on Friday by 6 p m. Leave Norridgewock every Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Hallowell on Monday by 7 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Hallowell every Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Norridgewock on Sunday by 6 p m. Leave Norridgewock on Monday by 6 p m and arrive at Hallowell on Tuesday by 6 p m. 8. From Hallowell by Augusta, Mt. Vernon, Unity, Sharon, Farmington, Cusher, Readfield and Augusta to Hallowell once a week. Leave Hallowell every Thursday at noon and arrive at Farmington on Friday by 6 p m. Leave Farmington every Wednesday at 6 a m and arrive at Hallowell on Thursday by 10 a m. 9. From Wiscasset by Bath, Brunswick, North Yarmouth, and Falmouth to Portland three times a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Wiscasset every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 1 p m and arrive at Portland the next days by 11 a m. Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 4 p m and arrive at Wiscasset, the next days by 11 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Wiscasset every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 4 a m and arrive at Portland by 6 p m. Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 4 a m and arrive at Wiscasset, by 6 p m. 10. From Brunswick, by Boudoin and Litchfield, to Hallowell, once a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Brunswick every Friday at 7 a m and arrive at Hallowell by 3 p m. Leave Hallowell at 6 p m and arrive at Brunswick on Saturday by 2 p m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Brunswick every Monday at 6 a m and arrive at Hallowell by 6 p m. Leave Hallowell every Tuesday at 6 a m and arrive at Brunswick by 6 p m. 11. From Portland, by Windham, Bridgetown, Waterville, Paris, Buckfield, Turner, Norway and Poland to Portland, once a week. Leave Portland every Tuesday at 8 a m and arrive at Turner on Thursday by 10 a m. Leave Turner every Saturday at 6 p m and arrive at Portland the next Monday by 4 p m. 12. From Portland, by Saccarap, Gorham, Standish, Flinstown, Hiram and Brownfield to Friburg once a week. Leave Portland every Monday at 6 a m and arrive at Friburg by 10 a m. Returning —Leave Friburg every Tuesday at 2 p m and arrive at Portland on Wednesday by 6 p m. 13. From Portland by Gorham, Buckston, Limerick, Limington, Parsonsfield, Newfield, Shapleigh, Lebanon, Doytys-falls, Sanford, Alfred, and Waterboro' to Portland once a week. Leave Portland every Monday at 11 a m and arrive at Doytys-falls on Wednesday by 6 p m. Leave Doytys-falls on Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Portland the next Monday by 8 a m. 14. From Portland by Scarborough, Biddeford, Kennebunk, Doytys-falls, Berwick and Dover N. H. to Portsmouth three times a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Portland every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 11 1-2 p m and arrive at Portsmouth the next Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday by noon. Returning —Leave Portsmouth every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 12 1-2 p m and arrive at Portland on Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday by 11 1-2 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Portland every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Portsmouth every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 4 p m and arrive at Portland by 6 p m. May 1 to November 1—Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 1 1-2 p m and arrive at Portsmouth the next days by 11 a m. Returning —Leave Portsmouth every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 8 p m and arrive at Portland the next days by 11 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Portsmouth by 6 p m. Leave Portsmouth every Monday, Wednesday and Friday by 6 a m and arrive at Portland by 6 p m. 15. From Portland by Scarborough, Biddeford, Kennebunk, Wells, and York to Portsmouth three times a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 1 1-2 p m and arrive at Portsmouth the next days by 11 a m. Returning —Leave Portsmouth every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 8 p m and arrive at Portland the next days by 11 a m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Portland every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Portsmouth by 6 p m. Leave Portsmouth every Monday, Wednesday and Friday by 6 a m and arrive at Portland by 6 p m. 16. From Wiscasset to Booth-Bay once a week. Leave Booth-Bay every Wednesday at 7 a m and arrive at Wiscasset by 11 a m. Leave Wiscasset 1 p m and arrive at Booth-Bay by 5 p m.
IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.
17. From Portsmouth by Dover, Rochester, Middlesex, Ossipee, Moultonboro', Center Harbor, and Plymouth to Haverhill and Newbury Vt. and from Newbury by Haverhill Plymouth, New Hampton, Meredith, Gilmanstown, Nottingham and Durham to Portsmouth once a week. Leave Portsmouth every Tuesday at 2 p m and arrive at Plymouth on Thursday by 7 p m. Leave Plymouth on Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Haverhill on Friday by 5 p m and at Newbury by 7 p m. Returning —Leave Newbury every Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Plymouth by 6 p m. Leave Plymouth at 7 p m and arrive at Portsmouth on Tuesday by 10 a m. 18. From Fryburg in Maine by Conway, Bartlett, Rosebrooks, and Jefferson to Lancaster once in two weeks. Leave Fryburg every other Tuesday at 1 p m and arrive at Lancaster on Wednesday by 6 p m. Leave Lancaster every other Monday at 6 a m and arrive at Fryburg on Tuesday by 10 a m. 19. From Exeter by Epping, Nottingham, Epsom, Pembroke, Concord, Salisbury, Grafton, Lebanon and Pelham to Hanover once a week. Leave Exeter every Tuesday at 9 a m and arrive at Concord by 10 a m on Wednesday. Leave Concord at 11 a m and arrive at Salisbury by 3 p m. Leave Salisbury at 4 p m and arrive at Hanover on Friday by 8 a m. Returning —Leave Hanover every Friday at 1 p m and arrive at Concord on Saturday by 2 p m. Leave Concord at 3 p m and arrive at Exeter on Monday by 3 p m. 20. From Portsmouth by Exeter, Kingston, Haverhill, Andover, Wilmington, Woburn, Medford and Charlestown, to Boston three times a week. Leave Portsmouth every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 3 a m and arrive at Exeter by 7 1-2 a m. Leave Exeter at 8 a m and arrive at Boston by 7 p m. Returning —Leave Boston every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 3 a m and arrive at Exeter by 3 1-2 p m. Leave Exeter at 4 p m and arrive at Portsmouth by 7 p m. 21. From Exeter by Chester, Londonderry, Merrimack, Antrim, Peterboro', Manchester, Nashua, and Nashua to Boston once a week. Leave Exeter every Tuesday at 8 a m and arrive at Nashua on Wednesday evening, arrive at Keene on Thursday by 3 p m. Leave Keene at 4 p m and arrive at Nashua on Friday by 10 a m. Returning —Leave Nashua every Friday at 2 p m and arrive at Keene on Saturday by 9 a m. Leave Keene at 10 a m and arrive at Exeter the next Monday by 3 p m. 22. From Salisbury by Andover, New Chester and Bridgewater to Plymouth and thence by Holderness, New Hampshire and Sanborntown to Salisbury one week and the reverse the next week. Leave Salisbury every Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Plymouth by 1 p m. Leave Plymouth at 2 p m and arrive at Salisbury on Friday by noon. 23. From Hanover by O'ford, Haverhill, Bath, Littleton, Dalton, Lancaster, Guilford, Lunenburg and Concord to Littleton, thence by Bath, Haverhill and Orford to Hanover once a week. Leave Hanover every Friday at 9 a m and arrive at Haverhill by 6 p m. Leave Haverhill at 5 p m and arrive at Guilford on Sunday noon and return to Hanover the next Tuesday by 6 p m. 24. From Newburyport by Haverhill and Salem to Windham once a week. Leave Windham every Monday at 6 a m and arrive at Newburyport by one p m. Leave Newburyport every Monday at 4 p m and arrive at Windham on Tuesday by noon.
IN VERMONT.
25. From Littleton N. H. by Littleton Vt. St. Johnsbury, Danville, Warden, Greenfield, Craftsboro', Eden and Johnson to St. Albans, once in two weeks. Leave Littleton N. H. every other Monday at 6 a m and arrive at St. Albans, the next Wednesday by 6 p m. Leave St. Albans every other Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Littleton N. H. on Saturday by 6 p m. 26. From Windham by Woodstock, Royalton, Randolph, Williamstown, Berlin, Montpelier, Middlesex, Waterbury, Bolton, Jericho, and Wiltton to Burlington once a week. Leave Windham every Saturday at 2 p m and arrive at Montpelier on Monday by 3 p m and at Burlington on Tuesday by 1 p m. Returning —Leave Burlington at 3 p m on Tuesday, arrive at Montpelier on Wednesday by 6 p m and arrive at Windham on Friday by noon. 27. From Montpelier by Berlin, Barre, Washington, Corinth, Bradford, Newbury, Ryegate, Barnet and Peacham to Danville once a week. Leave Montpelier every Thursday at noon, arrive at Newbury on Friday by 7 p m. Leave Newbury every Saturday at 5 a m and arrive at Danville by 5 p m. Returning —Leave Danville every Tuesday at 6 a m and arrive at Montpelier on Thursday by 11 a m. 28. From Rutland, by Pittsford, Branden, Leicester, Salisbury, Middlebury, New Haven, Vergennes, Ferrisburg, Charlotte, Shelburne, Burlington, Colchester, Milton, Georgia, St. Albans and Swanton to Highgate once a week. Leave Rutland every Monday at 5 a m and arrive at Burlington on Tuesday by 4 p m and arrive at Highgate on Wednesday by 7 p m. Returning —Leave Highgate every Thursday at 5 a m and arrive at Burlington on Friday by 8 a m and arrive at Rutland on Saturday by 7 p m. 29. From Rutland by Castleton, Fairhaven, Benson, Orwell, Shoreham, Addison, Vergennes, Willsboro', Essex, c. h. Peru and Plattsburg to Champlain once a week. Leave Rutland every Monday at 5 a m and arrive at Fairhaven by 10 a m. Leave Fairhaven at 11 a m and arrive at Champlain on Tuesday by 10 a m. Returning —Leave Champlain every Thursday at 2 p m and arrive at Rutland the next Sunday by 6 p m. 30. From Middlebury by New Haven, Moncton, Hynsbury, Williston, Jericho, Essex, Westford, Fairfax, Fairfield and Sheldon to Huntsburg and thence by Berkshire, Ennaburg, Bakerfield, Cambridge, Underkill, Jericho, Richmond, Huntington, Starksbury & Bristol to Middlebury once a week. Leave Middlebury every Tuesday at 6 a m and arrive at Jericho by 4 p m and at Huntsburg on Friday by 2 p m. Returning —Leave Huntsburg every Friday at 3 p m, and arrive at Middlebury on Monday by 7 p m. 31. From Rutland by Clarendon, Shrewsbury, Saltash and Reading to Windsor once a week. Leave Rutland every Monday at 6 a m and arrive at Windsor by 10 a m. Returning —Leave Windsor every Tuesday at 2 p m and arrive at Rutland on Wednesday by 7 p m. 32. From Rutland by Clarendon, Danby, Dorset, Manchester, Arlington, Shaftsbury, Bennington and Pittsburg to Lansingburg twice a week. Leave Rutland every Monday and Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Bennington on Tuesday and Friday by 8 p m. Leave Bennington Wednesday and Saturday at 5 a m and arrive at Lansingburg by 1 p m. Returning —Leave Lansingburg every Monday and Thursday at 11 a m and arrive at Bennington by 7 p m. Leave Bennington on Tuesday and Friday at 5 a m and arrive at Rutland on Wednesday and Saturday by 6 p m. 33. From Rutland by Cavendish, Chester, Rockingham, Bellows Falls and Westminster to Walpole once a week. Leave Rutland every Wednesday at 2 p m and arrive at Walpole by 6 p m on Thursday. Leave Walpole every Saturday at 6 a m and arrive at Rutland on Sunday by 10 a m. 34. From Bennington, by Marlboro' Wilmington and Woodford, to Brattleboro' once a week. Leave Bennington every Thursday at 9 a m and arrive at Brattleboro' on Friday by 11 a m. Leave Brattleboro' every Friday at 2 p m and arrive at Bennington on Saturday by 4 p m.
IN MASSACHUSETTS.
35. From Salem, by Danvers, Topsfield, Boxford, Haverhill and Chester, to Pembroke N. H. once a week. Leave Salem every Monday at 1 p m and arrive at Pembroke on Tuesday by 6 p m. Leave Pembroke every Saturday at 7 p m and arrive at Salem on Monday by 10 a m. 36. From Boston, by Salem and Manchester, to Gloucester three times a week. Leave Gloucester every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 6 a m and arrive at Boston by 6 p m. Leave Boston every Tuesday, Thursday & Sa-
turday at 6 a m. and arrive at Gloucester by 6 p m. 37. From Salem to Marblehead six times a week. Leave Salem every day (Sunday excepted) at noon and arrive at Marblehead by 1 p m. Leave Marblehead every day at 2 p m and arrive at Salem by 3 p m. 38. From Boston, by Medford, Woburn, Billerica, Chelmsford, Tyngsboro', Dunstable, Amherst, Framingham, Watertown and Claremont, to Windsor, Vt. once a week. Leave Boston every Wednesday at 5 a m, arrive at Billerica by noon and at Amherst by 7 p m. Leave Amherst on Thursday at 5 a m and arrive at Windsor by 6 p m. Returning —Leave Windsor every Monday at 5 a m and arrive at Amherst by 6 p m. Leave Amherst on Tuesday at 5 a m and arrive at Boston by 5 p m. 39. From Billerica, by Patucket bridge, Dracut, Pelham and Windham, to Londonderry once a week. Leave Billerica every Wednesday at 1 p m and arrive at Londonderry on Thursday by 9 a m. Leave Londonderry every Thursday at 10 a m and arrive at Billerica by 7 p m. 40. From Boston, by Concord, Littleton, Groton, Townsend, Ashby, New Ipswich, Jaffrey, Marlboro' and Keene, to Walpole twice a week. Leave Boston every Wednesday and Saturday at 4 a m and arrive at Keene on Thursday and Monday by noon. Leave Keene at 12 1-2 p m and arrive at Walpole by 9 p m. Returning —Leave Walpole every Wednesday and Saturday at 4 a m and arrive at Keene by noon. Leave Keene at 12 1-2 p m and arrive at Boston on Thursday and Monday by 8 p m. 41. From Concord, by Stow, Bolton and Lancaster, to Leominster twice a week. Leave Concord every Wednesday and Saturday at 1 p m and arrive at Leominster by 7 p m. Leave Leominster every Monday and Thursday at 5 a m and arrive at Concord by 11 a m. 42. From Leominster, by Westminster, Templeton, Gerry, Athol, New Salem, Wendell and Montague, to Greenfield once a week. Leave Leominster every Thursday at 5 a m and arrive at Greenfield by 7 p m. Leave Greenfield every Friday at 5 a m and arrive at Leominster by 7 p m. 43. From Worcester, by Boylston and Sterling, to Lancaster once a week. Leave Worcester every Wednesday at 8 a m and arrive at Lancaster by noon. Leave Lancaster every Wednesday at 1 p m and arrive at Worcester by 5 p m. 44. From Worcester, by Holden, Rutland, Barre, Petersham, Athol, Orange, Warwick, Northfield, New Salem, Wendell and Kinross, to Brattleboro' once a week. Leave Worcester every Thursday at 5 a m and arrive at Brattleboro' Friday by 10 a m. Leave Brattleboro' every Friday at 1 p m and arrive at Worcester on Saturday by 7 p m. 45. From Shrewsbury, by Holden, Rutland, Greene, Hardwick, Pelham, Amherst and Hadley, to Northampton once a week. Leave Shrewsbury every Tuesday at 6 a m and arrive at Northampton on Wednesday by 10 a m. Leave Northampton every Wednesday at 1 p m and arrive at Shrewsbury on Thursday by 7 p m. 46. From Brookfield, by Belchertown, Hadley, Northampton, Chesterfield, Worthington, Partridgefield, Dalton, Pittsfield, Hancock and New Lebanon, to Albany twice a week. May 1 to November 1—Leave Brookfield every Monday and Thursday at 9 a m and arrive at Albany on Tuesday and Friday by 7 p m. Leave Albany every Wednesday and Saturday at 9 a m and arrive at Brookfield on Thursday and Monday by 7 p m. November 1 to May 1—Leave Brookfield every Monday and Thursday at 9 a m and arrive at Northampton by 7 p m. Leave Northampton every Tuesday and Friday at 5 a m and arrive at Albany on Wednesday & Saturday by 3 p m. Returning —Leave Albany every Tuesday & Friday at 9 a m and arrive at Pittsfield by 3 p m. Leave Pittsfield every Wednesday & Saturday at 5 a m and arrive at Northampton by 8 p m. Leave Northampton every Thursday & Monday at 4 a m and arrive at Brookfield by 7 p m. 47. From Suffield, by Westfield, Southamptn, Northampton, Hatfield, Whiteley, Deerfield, Greenfield, Broadnstown, Hinddale, Brattleboro', Putney, Westminster, Walpole, Charlestown, Claremont, Cornish, Windsor, Hardwick and Plainfield, to Hanover twice a week. Leave Suffield every Monday and Thursday at 4 a m and arrive at Northampton at 1 p m and arrive at Brattleboro' on Tuesday and Friday by 10 a m. Leave Brattleboro' at 1 p m and arrive at Windsor on Wednesday and Saturday by noon. Leave Windsor at 12 1-2 p m and arrive at Hanover by 8 p m. Returning —Leave Hanover every Monday & Thursday at 6 a m and arrive at Windsor by noon. Leave Windsor at 12 1-2 p m and arrive at Brattleboro' on Tuesday and Friday by 11 a m. Leave Brattleboro' at 1 p m and arrive at Suffield on Wednesday & Saturday by 8 p m. 48. From Springfield, by West Springfield, Russel, Blandford, London, {Concluded in Supplements}