Norfolk gazette and publick ledger — Norfolk [Va.], 1810-04-23 00:00:00, page 3

it of the subjects
,.J!. wamtsbai
in? pot In a train of adjostmentOn endeavour to Ob
tain frcmitheAtjmrican gwi^dnViibraefn&r'e pre
cise and authewSck expw« of tj^r victorjTa
•his subject, to be transmitted here Ibrcowsldeyaf
If possible, at the time wSh theft- answers upon
subject* ofUinse other despatches.
It will not, however, be desirable th it these an
swers should be dA^ed for this purjtse.
Bat yon are autnwised to ashore the American go
wemment of the readjuess which wc shall be pre
pared to enter into tne amicable discussion i f the
commercial relations of the two countries, on the ba
sis of the latter of the two principles proposed by Mr.
Gallatin, whenever these obstacles, which stood in
the way of the renewal of their intercourse, shall
have been happily removed. \ *
In this case, as in respect to the subject of my ci
ther despatches, you will see that the sincerity of
the good disposition professed by the persons compo
sing the new administratiou, is the point the most
important in the view of the Biitish government.
If such a disposition really exists all difficulties
Will (as Mr. Gallatin has expressed himself) be ea
sily smoothed away.
If unfortunately this hope should he disappointed,
Great Britain hus only to continue the s\ stem of
self-defence and retaliation iip.ui her enemies, to
■which she has been compelled to have recourse with
the consciousness of haring eaiterlv seized the first
opportunity that appeared to be offered to her, of ob
taining through an amicable arrangement with A
snerica, the object for which the system was esta
blished. I am, Stc.
(Signed) GEORGE CANNING.
JJn. 12.—Despair!) from the hon. David F.rskirie to
Ml*. Secretary Canning, dated Washington, April
SO, 180‘J
Sir—As die instructions contained in your des
patclves, Nos, i and 2, directed me to regulate my
conduct in making p-opositfons on the .part if his
majesty tothi“ government, according to the general
disposirion lvl.ich might be shewn bv them to come
to a Complete and cordial understanding with Great
Britain—I accordingly used all my efforts to disco
ver whether the professions of such * disposition
■which had been so, often repeated to mo unofficial',.
and hteiy in the most form a) ins mien, were sincere.
The result of further communication p* isuaded me,
that the sentiments of this gorernm-ot had been tru
ly represented to me. and I was confirmed it: that o
pinion by the favourable reception of the reparation
tendered by his majesty for the affair of 'he Chesa
perke ; the details of which 1 have given in my pre
ceding number.
With this conviction upon my mind, I examined,
with the greatest attention, the tenor of your insti ac
tions, contained in your despatch No. 1, and parti
cularly the three conditions upon which his m .jesty
was willing to v. ithdraw the orders in council of Ja
nuary and November, 180r, as respects the United
tita'es.
The first of them I considered would he of course
e>lfcial)y recognized by the American government,
the 14th section 0f the Act of Congress, usual
ly termed the Non-Intercourse Act, provided for
-such a contingent proposition.
The secondr.oncition named (tv von. I knew would
Be acquiesced in ; not only from the declaration
which had been made to me by most of the members
of this government, but from the universal opi
nion of the members of weight and influence of
both houses of congress, that the principles and
object sought to bo established by that rule were e
fpiitable, and would ever be insisted upon by Great
Britain.
I foresaw, however, that a difficulty must arise in
obtaining a formal recognition on that point without
any reference to the other comment ial arrangements,
which would form the basis of a regular treaty.
The third condition, it was obvious, coifld not be
objected to, because an American owner of * vessel
captured by a British cruizer, on account of its des
tination to France, nr to any other country with
which intercourse was prohibited by the laws of the
United States, could not complain to this govern
ment of such seizure, as the only answer would be,
that the enterprize being illegal', he had no claim to
redress.
Upon my submitting the three Conditions to the
consideration of the secretary of state, ho made the
answer to the first which I had anticipated, namely,
that the president would of course assent to it, and
in pursuance of the power rested in him by the con
gress, would issue a proclamation f„r that purpose.
t» trke effect on the same day that the orders in
council should cease to operate as respects the Uut
tedStatca.
With regard to the second, he said, althongh he
was persuaded that no difficulty would arise in the
adjustment «>f that point, conformably to views of his
majesty’s government, whi n the various articles of
* commercial treaty should be bryaght under discos,
■ekm, yet It was impossible for i(m> American govern,
meut to give an offi iaf recogroifon of that principle
as.s previous step, because there was tut romm-.r, e
of any kind, at present, permitted by the law* of the
United States,to be carried on with Fi ance or her
dependencies.; and that the question therefore must
necesssrny utiiong icanoincr suite ei tilings, o' re
main to be .vjjiistfd by treaty.
The third condition, Mr. Smith observed, appep.T*
Wd to hi(n to renane «o rrcoi.&nition, since it »v*s e
vident that dte interference cf the government of
the United State* cohid never be re. ognized by nrryf
of its citizens for retires* far n injury sustained in”
consequence of a direct breach i f tire lows n ;k!
that in thf evcnyif any such appeal being msile the
s>nly answer fiwi would he, tiwi the government
whu|d bnipediateiv order the bonds of i he petitioner
to hgpitt Into execution against him for n violation
of the lavra.
He stated, however, that the rirctfrntf ince of ’be
fwernment of-the United Stites stipulating that (i.
i-itairi should he allotted to execute thoir. iawsv.oi.ld
be degrading, and attended with bo advantages to
the latter. , j I ■» "
Oqjjr those rlrburhstinces, it became my ilnty to
cottfl||ps whether' the *;k'it of yhnr instructions
syonld heaccom{>h-*lj«'Vby my obtaining an •• fin ial re*
oognilioh op the part of this goyerrmu lit of the first
condition, and mu understanding respecting the two
otHtts. in conformity with the news of his majesty’s
■Jhnrxftirecnt, though cot given in * fnatel manner
ffWr reaaoils hefcre detadedv) or wn-thWtt was in*
Stuipbentrty cmUj> forbear from making any propnsi*
tldh, as-l fcould not obtain a compliance with the ex
act letter tif your instruction*.
Variwia ^nsidxjat^us t>f .grpat weight urged me
to endenttjnr to bying about so adjustment of the
iiWiyriiirtfaJietv/eehj^ie tigo poumrtes, open the
points entrusted to.discretion, an-far »* it was
possible, without departing, from, the orders 1 had
received.
The strongest inducement was deri ved from the
communications- which I had lately received from
Hr. Smith, of the- dissatisfaction of the french mi*
■later here with the non intereourae act. the particu
lars of which I Uaseeiven in mv He. 17, also from
•he Jeneral aefW* of the relation* of * tftie' country
'-With ^reat Britain- and- France, as <let>*iiyd m mv
Hti*. |r and W, and in some previous dispatches*
l"he circumstance of w congress heme.about to’,
use it blc very shortly, was am t»:er ixejrtn for wish-.
^tohfWf«hrt»jSftW«*rta*W«6efcded,ah^
..!■
As this gove'ftittnmtfljrought tint a.. „
irt jjie time for the renewal of tfc* intercom** «».
twetn Great-Btttain and the United States »ouW de
prive such ah arrangement of many of its mutual at!
vantages, and as fully agreed in that opinion, a day
Certain (the 10th of June next) wa» accordingly fix
ed upon.
'1 he note* •fthitfh passed between the secretary of
state’ and myself, and which I have now the honour
to inclose (marked A, B, C,D) will explain thecotirsc
pursued in She arrangement that was concluded.
Should his majesty's government consider that 1
have exceeded the limits of my instructions in thceVi.
gagement I have made on his majesty's belial*, I am
aware that no advantages which might be derived
from it to Great-Britain could justify my conduct.
I therefore rest my vindication npoh the reasons
detailed in the foregoing part of this despatch. for
•el.eving that I have adhered to the spirit, and, as
far a:; 1 could, to tiie letter of my orders : but I pl .ee
mv chief reli ince on the well known liberality of
his majesty in appreciating the conduct of his ser
vants.
I will only beg leave to remark, that the agree
ment has been com loded in the persuasion that an
amicable understanding would be settled by ih^ spe
cial mission, and with a view to promote so desirable
f'ujeci.
iouU! unexpected difficulties occur in forming n
treaty, or should his majesty’s envoy extraordinary
find reasons to doubt the friendly disposition of the
L nited States, it will then rest with hts majesty to
take such incisures as may be deemed proper, ac
cording to tiie actual state of thing- .
1 . the me n time no injury c^n be derived, I con
ceive, from >liHt conditional agreement, i have the
honour to he, &c.
(Signed) JD. M. ERSKINE.
Dr*- "nh from Aft-, Srcr-tary Cannihg, let the
nouovrabte Fault! Ernkme, dated foreign Ot
j\ e, May 27, It,09.
Sin—Pour despatches. Nos. 19 and 20, of the 19th
and C9ih i f 'ipril, have been received here this day,
and Said before the king.
I hare los. t.o time-in receiving hts majesty's com
nv-nds, on the manner in which you have executed
the instructions conveyed to you mi my despatches bv
Mr. Oakley. ’
flt is murhtohe' regretted, that fir the execution
o, instruct.->n\; u;xu, points cf so much delicacy and
import an; t, vou should havfe thought yourself autho
rised >' depart so widely not only from their letter,
uiii *roni tUcir spirit.
V'lth respect to the instruction* relating to tire
Chesapeake, which from the subject of my despatch,
No. I, 1 have to remsth, 1st. the total omission by
t' u ot a preliminai y of the most material import
ance. 2dly. a departure from the terms of vonr in
structions m the manner of conducting the negotiati
on ; andbtilyi the admission by »<«. and so far us
appears, wi houtremonstranre or observation of a
note containing expressions offensive to hi* majesty's
dignity, so h as no minister of his majesty ought to
have submitted to receive, and to transmit to bis go
vernment. °
1st. It is distinctly steted by ftie as the condition of
his majesty “ no longer insisting upon the recal of
the proclamation of July, 1807, as a preliminary to
the • djuslmeht fifth* difference arising (r. tr. the af
fair ot the Chgaape ,ke,” « that the shins of war of
l i ante shall, in point of fact, have been excluded
from the ports of the United States, and such ships
that description as were in tl10£e ports, shall have
been warned to depart."
Of this-condition you appear to have taken no no
tice whatever. The non-intercourse bill operated
only to the prospective exclusion ; but as to the warn
ing to be given to any ships of war of France (if any
such there were) in the ports of the United Sta.es, it
no where appears that even a Question was put by
you on this subject, much less that you received any
satisfactory assurance upon it.
idly. Rut if this preliminary cohditinfi had been
fulfilled, your instructions proceeded to state, that
even then, “ it would still be necessary that either
the proclamation should he withdrawn or its operati
on formally declared to be at an end," “though it
would be sufficient that such withdrawal or declara
ti .n shoold be rccoided in tho same instrument, or
at the same time with the terths of reparation.”
So far fop this indispensable condition having been
obtained by you, tyr. Smith in, the wnswe, by him to
your note, studiously avoids any thing like a recogiu
tion of the principle on which atone the demand of
the f*rcai <>f the procInnijUioh was to tie wav
etl; neither is the proclamation itself withdrawn
nor its operation declared to be at an end.
J he obvious consequence of this omission is, t<iat
sf the non intercourse act, which is a temporary act
were to be sufficed to expire, the proclamation might
revive, and the inequality between the two beliiaCr
cn* ihumjv rcsioreu.
It was obviously your dutv, before y6u committed
bin majesty’.*) name by a written offer of reparation,
to ascertain in what manner that offer be received,
and answered t and if you found that the express
condition either grf the withdrawing the proehtmati'
ot>, or net larnig its operation to be at an end, Wotild
not be complied with, fo abstain from proceeding
one single Step in the negotiation Until yoo had re*
hefred home for further instructions,
I hat part of your instructions which directed that
tt.1s arrangement, if not made the subject of consi
deration, should be settled by the exchange of mini
sterial notes dated on the samt day, and reciprocal
ly delivered at the same time, was expressly rnfead
ed to guard against the possibility of your committing
yourself! v a written proposal, in the uncertainty ot
what might be the nature of the answer to be return
ed to X.
His majesty will not suppose it that Mr<Srttnh’i hi
fended answer , can have been commuuicated to you
previously, and have obtained your approbation.
In tlie proposal for restoring the men taken from
on board the Chesapeake, it whs dm Intended that
the condition of bis majesty's right to reclaim them
in a regular way from tlie American government,
if either Aaftrrgiborn subjects of Us majesty, or de
sertcrsfrom his majesty’s service, should have been
■ nitted. I dwell however the less on this point, as
his majesty’s right, hi this respect, is founded on
publick law, and does not rt-q’uire to be fortified by
the recognition of any other government. 3
But I cannot forbear observing with regret that the
bounty of his nisjesty, in the intended provision for
the relations of the men iHIed on lioard the Chess,
peake, is not only stated by you without» similar re
striction, Iwtri brought forward at oore as a part of
the reparationoriginally offered; and thus convert
ed by yen from an act of spontaneop* generosity, iQ.
to one of the positive obligation.
&Uy. In addition tb the substancdlttf Mr. Smith's
note, which I hate already menfhmed. rt remain* for
me to notice the expfesaiwm so foil of dlsrMpeCt to
bis majesty, with which that note concludes. And f
mtosignify to y«jn tfoe displeaaure which bin: m».
to*? ft#, thpt.any minister -* *■-7 - * ® -
bw thi_
of hi* sovereign,
is 4k Via WjtfcftfUe' of the his
ith'ex« triple, niu the fees per*
ed tli»t it would
best.ciMiipdit with what it (tail
TwWfBriUhnltfc
majesiy to hi* own honour. I
“ R. SMITH.*
Congi ess of the United. States.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Monthly, star it i 6.
R eduction o f t i i e. a km v a $ 0 n a v y.
Tn* bause again resolve^ ilsrif into » commutes
the whole, Mr. liasset in the chair,, an the lull
h»r laying additional duties*
[loihis committee had alto beet* ref< rred th,
lotlowmg resolution ''< Resolved, Th*l tie mili
Uty and naval rstaMjyhijienis of the United States
odjpjt to be reduced.1
Mr. Taylor moved that the bill for imposing «,l
diiriin.il duties l-.e on the table tor the purpose ol
taking tip this resolution.
This motion was supported by Messrs. Marion,
Dm a and ] roup, on the ground that it. was nrn
PtT ° -‘Sr.'iuiu w:.4l to*\ expenditure ol the year
"°<lW b,‘ proviei. it u-4 made. lt, ,nm it ;
*’"* wrt oppose! by torS!,fs. Love, W. Alston,
i IniHgQipery and Suuijuud »»q die ground that t/n*
additional duty would he proper whether the army
and navy were reduced or nut.
1 h- moti"" “> the bill on the table was cat
r ed—49 to-toi.
Mr. Ancon moved to amend the resolution so as
to die;hand the wholf army.
1 ins motion to amend was negatived, two or
three gentlemen only voting in the affirmative.
1 lie partial reduction ol the army was advocated
hy .Messrs. Macon, Liana, Smihe, Johnson, TaH
inadge, n.yloi, M‘Kee and Hoot, and opposed hy
.Mess^. Nelson, Rhea of fen. Holland, Boyd, ami
On motion of Mr. Root, the resolution was i
mended so as to read as follows :
Resolved, lhat the military establishment of the
United Slate* ought tote reduced } and that the
navul cslabiishiuent ought to he reduced.'
Mr. Root then called for a division of the questi
on. ’
And the question being taken an so much as re
lates to the tin lit a y establishment, was carried,
Ayes 77—present about 1U0 members.
And ihc question was then taken on the remain
itqt part relative to the naval establishment, and car
fivd, Ayes 68.
1 lie question on the whole resolution was then
taken and rallied.
i he ronim'itiee rose airf reported progress otf the
duly bill, obtained leave to sit agaiu on it, aod re
ported their agreemenlto the resolution.
1 he house agreed now to consider the report of
the roriiuiiiiee, but, before lukiuga question «Ai it
amounted.
Tuesday, April \ f.
Mr. Smilie saui. that in reviewing the business
before the house, hr thought it was impossible to
adjourn on the 23d inslant as they had agreed to
do. lie Ibereiore inosea lo rescind that Vote.
^ I he house agreed to consider the motion, </0 to
Mr. Ely opposed the motion ns premature, and
rnegular, ina-innrh as it appeared to him to be proa
p< r t.ial [lie proposition to rende should Com* liom
the house which had laSl agreed lo the reSoKflion,
as it was to lie supposed that boose would lully have
investigated it. The Senate, besides, Mr. £. ga,d,.
W19 the body most likely to be possessed ot laris or
evidence winch would render it proper tu protract
the session. r
Mr. S<inlie Said he whuld fnovd that the resold
tom should lie on the tepid hot that he had under
*l° ”! lhe ,u*''s 01 l|iesenate required tiiree days tor
lb- passage of Such a resolution ; apd, if not passed
to day, it might not be ly tune lor' the sen ate to act
on 11 he lore the day fixed h»r adjournment.
.Mr. Livermore was ol opinion that the resolution
should originate with the senate, unh «s something
vas plTered Rom the executive « h.rh shoul i icudei
it necessary to protract the seustoir, he was against
Hie resolution.
Mr. Ghirfson rtioCed to antend the resolmton, by
a iding then. 10 a resolution to aoaourn on the ui ..r
•U.J,
Mf. Pitkin sa?d if the question tfnj taken ntf#*
l.e should vote against tt. ft ti.e President bad re
retvad information to make in necessary liir run
s' ess to continue longer together, he touted be
would give it. II such information! w«g in his pos
session, ft wa4 ins dtlly to communicate it to
the house.- f he President kirtw that congress had
determined to adjourn on the fcJd. If lie wished
tiiehi to continue .iopg.r, Mr. P. aaid he trusted that
he wmrfd giee them that mloru.ation. 'lit! that
intiiroimiafi whs received, he tould not agree to re
scind the vote fur adjoui ament.
Mr. Newton said his torus accorded nearly with
those ol the gentlnnah last up. Not bring prepar
ed now to acton the resolution, be moved that it
lie on the table.
Mr. Fisk hoped (he resolution would not fie on
the table, nor he amended as proposed,- and cited
the *d*MM«s important concerns now depending be
fore congress «rs so many arguments in favour ol the
■nation, particolarly ths renewal Of the charter of
the Bank oi the United States. If this subject was
not acted.riT, the President might be compelled on
account' of it to cohvt-ae congress iff an antra ses
sion. . i, ,
M r. Qai bey opposed (be resofetlofc ff tmtpti».
were_ now to orotracybe session, m what aiuiation
wauld th*y plage ihe^meft bant, wbo had r.rlrulateo
yihh certainty oh the adjournment of rndgrew oti
lh* W* rpbdeqtfcatly. the -expirattim Mi 5 ti*
non-mtcrcoutsedawaal that time t Was the -tmutt
rohrgthes
_ lu suspsyscr 1# (be rieeo't
i"’f
till fcc the imntedtaie repeal «|
the!.
~ bd- (tumttaaoausly past
sd. ‘
Messrs, fJrtM »hn opposed the reso
lution, and Mr. Mat im supported H*
»**.**„■-(.
SetoMr.n« fVP Tini SltltU ailfcaat.V
ing.reUwi>£2dNus*a*lbe*wsre
.Wenii e,^ M »r»«j
*>». Masai
'-’r-iv
*>***#* T*tmmge, 'Jaytor,. Th™
V«n Hfirnr V*f, H
VVi>f«t in. V\ i,i*aian, WttaiMa.1
N VVS - MmV».*X
Cfopu.n, Cm*k, Ojt.fraaforrf,
nrf, Wu«nW$ JotiH, S.
ornery, N. ft. Moure, Mum lord, S’M
'fiolsutt, J. K rtef, ol Ten.,;™
Summons, G.- Smithy Southard, 'tamer
Winn—3 f. £• ' *
't he fcU.mirfs arr the Yea# and i
m-ijifs tom* .v,
\ KAS--&W..W. .fiHintu Bachti. fcfcfc. tri-.iL,
; "ll, Br«fkFnri<tg^ liltlter,
■ a, Cimrttpion, Ciny Cou. Cochran, f-trarrn
*W feSS*5**5"
t.a -dX vn. CiuW, II^tp, lhh»t, ,
, -v’ K' ks'in* Johnson, Kennedy; lift ,
* i Bf M Kee, Mnut^orrifryf Mi*y
fi>W*' MoSeley, Pur toy P.rkfat,; pj,
ter, j^ndnlpf., Re:,, ,.f P,,,. Richard*, 1
siu^ bkeriev, Si.. Ii, Smhe, O. SmMM+muu
bdiiuivi Simla. Stanford, Swowpay Wbnadae
lor, Up!.an., Van KeusStLirr, Weakliy, Wbeaion—<
N A Y9—lU<**r#.- ArtifctntHi, Bird, Bi«sm
Cnrwell Calhc*, Cfc.pt,*. cUfeS ftl*
JiuHlej, Fisk, a.nneti, Oaritaef,- ffoven,
it't; L'ver‘“’-’re’ Vt£ Ri’K.in,
N. H.Mmre, ulwmtrrfi, Nelson, Nnljol»H(»,i,Pi>M
tfr, QiMfty, Rl,«, of fttt. ftonne. Rooff%^
Summons, Southard,* Stephenson, Tjs’ttrt T
son, Tracy, Ttfrtorf, Vstn -Whtuhib
I;
**”* "'ilsrfri, Wtnit, Wnb^m-X’v *
I he question on the Whole rrtpitfui* «ur.
51 t« 31., and iLwalWTeltef fc, <W ten,»/•«*,,
cmlteosi ti> report. f»y hWt or niherWiie, ” VMm**
1 be hoiWe.aHjl.orned «t 5 aVtcii k. ■ . mWWS
Gazette MarthtfajL.
.. a ARRt^D..
fcrt* Wfmr*, Max well, iff >,« from
S .h, John Tahb, ^
Coffee, Hides, and J^wou.),. C. & K. Whi#^f
rT/' V Kuh“f<’ * Meiyr Miller, *,11, (J ijMiOfjei
nfMajeh tor Plul*A l„hR,.—Left tV srhV^ff*
2*
<*««» ‘of Wilmington; ^ to *«!) ,*
Srh{a Plon'oh'orty, flat!, day a 0©™* fealt!**^
-eh r fcmilv, Beit ham, 40 days 4*. iiaribi,*.
h.mev.k hound tojWeriel«fcori<.^.’i,j»r<<ri»##wgr1|
va, oi artrtfmrti New London bad jof erft%-&
Tbe ship Union, »•&«**,,, fro,*, this jih’ft
l "*'* ««* -*po^ April *6. in tifc 'd$:m
68, 2JJ, opt 5 d vs. •'*. fAjj* Vi
aaj- JOlJ-*- itisi.-fj, niS'.)k|iaes»|-1''' * •
Oil Thursday fl»e 26t
ik r . -e 4'Clock* • '
If file, if not the next frit daV, tMfafe*.
at PuWJck Auction, fV.r the heffett rJf 6
miderwriters, ahd others honcerhed.
i HU
Brig REfctEP,
■- _ ?«»'f ahnut 130 t<.'«kv«r(Inf&lc*#
‘■‘ckle and fumitare at she cantt tfrgn
vessel lays at SoOtligattf & f»ck«oiftt «fji,r
the Sale Will be hwle, sftd ar» iftvMMktw
seen by applying at thcnftret.f ••'•*•
William Peiaiock, V, 'it.*
April 25,
fr^sh Faftiiiy
warranted nf a Vetr superior quality, y “
, . • , MtiOi v ' ; SJ. }<(*?•>
12 boxt* siiporior Eagle^ Hkri ‘ d
and Mefrv Andrew Wayir
for Sale W ' ,
Niettieifft Port
■ Who' offer fcr Rent,
Alt excelleiit Store &,
on Main street, a fe* dobr* easlWorfftlfe
square, with or Without a buck hoMh, t>* i
house; Apply <rt ahnve, ’
April si
. TiiSx for OH A R|’Rttr -
good Ship BRUTlfg,'
•aWl* ( lUl/Hli M*Her,
Burthen 3tr toot, time yfc»»* old, and in pitm* «*- *
d*r* Apply w , ■ "«*•*■'■;
kob,n M»i(l«n4. .
WOOD * Ha:
Hkvt ju»t received a tvrge An<n-tfment
SPRING! GOODS, .
. Among which an-n. ■ \ ■ ,n
7-8 and +-4 ir«h tifMKf^Sgi
5 4 IrivhSKreOni^,- BroWti Lfheas, Long t^h&k
9-8 and 6-4 Cambntk Muifiri*,
do. do. Isconei Fancy andSodt Mtisft** ^
Fine Canib'-ick for Gentlemen
Indi > Mull Mu*Ub *>f toperfoy
Ltnen Cambric* aud Catiibik!
Common and hmC Galllcoe*,
GlftgHngmi
Fancy Vesting*,
Madrnar
Silk and Cotton Umbrella*,
18-4,13-4, and t-M WWW