Virginia Argus — Richmond, Va., 1810-07-24 00:00:00, page 3

and then in the event oF no change
jb* taking place in the conduct of the bcl
W ligerents towards the United Sratcs,
Dto endeaver to assert their rights a
gainst both powers j but that if either
thould relax in their aggressions, they
said they would vote for taking part
with that one against the other which
should continue its aggressions.
Mr Gallatin remarked to me, that the
resolutions which were proposed by the
• committee of Foreign Relations in their
report to the House rf Representatives,
and which lmd already passed in ibe
comm ttee of the whole House, and wou'd
perhaps soon Dass into a law, seemed to
him to remove two very important grounds,
cf difference with Great Britain, viz. the
ron.importation a£t, as applicable to her
atone, and the President** proclamation,
whereby the ships of Great Britain were
excluded from the ports of the U. States,
while those of Fiance were permitted to
enter, but now, by the non.in’ercourse
law bo h powers were placed on the same
footing; he did net pretend to say that
this measure had been taken fiom any
motives of concession to Great Bri'ain ;
but as in fa£l those consequences follow,
ed, be conceived they might be consider*
cd as removing the two great obstacles
to a conciliation. Thiy he wished migh
• be the case, as he intimated to me that
such step* were about to be taken by
Congtess upon another very important
subject of the differences between the two
countries, as might have a farther effcfl
'in leading to a favorable adjustment of
them. He informed me, that a law was
about to be proposed to Congress, and
-which he b-lieted would pass, to in erdi£l
oil American vessels, fiom receiving on
boatd any foreign seamen, under heavy
penalties or forfeitures, and that already
the ships of war of he United Slates had
net n oraerva noi to receive any, ana to
f-m disc beige 'uch as were at that time on
v . kqp<d. This subject is also alluded to by
) Mil Giles, the Senator, in his speech, who
i% £igh in the confidence of the govern.
_ rj»#nt,and it is said, is to be Mr Madison’s
fiecvetary of State. Mr Gallatin also said*
that lie knew that it was intended by the
United States to abandon the attempt
?o cariy on a trade wi.h the colonies of
belligerents in time of war which was not
allowed in time of peace, and to trust to
the being pet milted by the French to car.
ty nn such trade in peace so as to entitle
them to a continuance of it in lime of
V 8%
In this manner he obseved all the points
c.f differences between Great Britain and
the U. ited States might be smoothed
away (was'his expression) and that the
United States would be willing to put the
. — intercourse with Great Britain upon a per*
. leSk foo ing of reciprocity, and would ei.
thep consent to the arrangement that the
shtfss of both nations should pay the
same duties reciprocally, or place each o*
rr her •simply upon the footing of the most
favored nation.
I have no doubt that these cornmunt
rations were made with a sincere desire
that they might produce theefTe£l of can.
filiation, because it is well known that
Mr Gallatin has long thought that the res.
tri6\ive and jealotls system of the non.im*
.portaiion Isms, extra duties, and .other
inodes of cherKing a free trade with G.
Britain have been erroneous and highly
injurious to the interests of America ; he
informed me, distinctly, that he had al*
•ways entertained that opinion, and that he
uniforicly er.dtavoied to persuade he
place i he conduit of .Great
ranee towards the U» States
before-he public He seem*
himself af the moment he was
x ape'akuflTupon that subjefik, and 1 could
rot get him <o express himself more dis
titiiliy. but I could clearly collect from his
•manner, and from some slight insinuate
W'lin mess lie uiw f KdlUkill IlflU
«c\ed with partiality towards France. For
log such a bias towards France » and re
marked that Mr Madison was known to
be an admirer .of the British constitution,
•to be generally well d'&poscd towards the
jnetion, and to be entirely free from an;
•enmity to its general prosperity* He ap
pealed to me, whether I had not observed
that lie frequently spoke with approbate
on,its energy and spirit, and tbst he was
r thoroughly well versed in lit history, lite
rature and arts.
These observe'ions he made at that
time for the purpose of contrasting the
. .*moment* of Mr Madison with those of
the Fiesident, as he kn< w hat 1 must have
. observed that Mr Jefferron never spoke
with approbation of any thing that was
Biitish and always lookup French topics
lo his conversation, and always praised
the people and country of France, and
revsr lost any opportunity of shewing his
•d.alike to G* Bulain.
cion*? of my interview wi h Mr
G i . in; said in a familiar way, ** You
•ee, sir, we ecu id se.tle a treaty in my
private room in two hours, which mi^ht
perhapj be found lo be as lasting as it it
was bound up in all the formalities of a
regular system—and might be found as
reciprocally useful as a treaty consisting
‘ of twenty-four articles, in which the m.
l_ i. tficite points <4 intercourse might be in
Vain attempted tu be reconciled to the op.
positg, and perhaps, jealous views oi
Merest ol the respective coun ries."
^0 ove taken the liberty of detailing to
you the substance of this unofficial con
servation with Mr Gallatin, in order toe*,
plain to yju the giounds upon which I
hire farmed my opinion that the mem
bers of llte present government wh> it •
expeCted will belong also 10 the next, would
be desirous of settling the differences o
the U States with Great Britain to ena.
ble them to extrica'e the country 8c hem*
selves from the difficulties in which they
are involved! for it is now, I believe, d -
tsrmined that Mr Gallatin will accept hir
present office under Mr Madison, which
wa« at one time doomed. The character
of Mr Gallatin must be well known to you,
S" beheld in the greatest icspcCt in th s
untty for\ his unrivalled talen'a as a fi_
pkfcetknd ftp a statesman* There canno
I think be ^my reasonable doubt entertain,
ed that he ia heartily opposed to French
aggraf'dixrmcnt, and to the usurpations of
B>noparte. He was an enthusiast in fa*
vor of the French .revolution, in the early
period of it, but has long since abondoned
the favorable opinions he had entertained
respecting it, and has viewed the pro. |
giess of France towards universal domini.
on with jealousy and regret*
How tar the good will of this govern,
ment and country towards Great Britain
may be worth, in the estimation of h>a
Majesty's government, the sacrifice of
.he orders in council snd of the impressi*
on which they might be cxpcClcd to make
on France, it would be presumptuous in
me to ven uie to calculate, bat I am tho.
rouftoly persuaded that ajt that price it
migbkbe obtained*
ijjhfre endeavored, by the most atriCt
‘and diligenf enquiries into the views ur.d
strength^Tthe federal party to ascertain
to whtff extent they would be willing and
able to resist the measures of (he pa-ty
in power, and how far they could carry
the opinions of this country along with
them in their attempts to remove he em
bargo, without recurring to hostilities a.
gainst both G. B. and France.
Upon a mat uie consideration of this
subjeCl 1 am persuaded that great as the
desire is which generally prevails for the
removal of the embargo, that the federal,
ists would not venture to recommend that
withdrawn, without proposing
ires of greater energy as a
me have indeed turned at
of at once declaring war a.
1 j but few, however, ot those
_ cn most clamorous against
the emb^fgq, have yet offered their opinu
ons as to what course ought to be puisu.
ed, although all have declared against the
submission to the restridions upon their
neutral r ghts.
When the small number of those who
have pom'ed out ihe propriety of going to
war with France, alone, is considered, e.
veu of the federal party, I cannot believe
that such a measure would succeed.
All the leaders of the democratic party
in Congress and out of it, declare that
they only propose the continuance of the
embargo for a short time, and that if the
voice of the people at large is for more
adive resistance, that they shall be willing
and ready to put fotththe strength of the
Country fqr that purpose.—The.e declaia.
tima’Mrepto be found in the speeches,
softie ^Kitted copies of which 1 have sent
herewijJgj you will find, however, that in
some of them a great stress is still laid
upon the effed* <o be expeded from the
embargo in coercing the belligerents, par
ticularly Giea- Britain, to relax in her
restridions, from the distress and inccn.
venience which is likely to be produced
by ihe want of ihe produce of this court.
t?y. x
This reliance upon such consequences
from the Embargo is greatly indeed at*
most entirely diminished in the opinions
of most people, and I conceive that the
only reason why the ruling party wish it
to be continued arises from a hope that
time might afford^ them an opportunity
of belter judging qf the probable is ue ot
events in Europe, particularly of the suc
cess or failure qf Iktyparte^n Spain.
It rtiay bh doubteaVheiher the privati
fens ft incdhvenicncius^produced by the
%mo«-go in mis count*, w,|| not compel
tHe Congrcyto takn^sosne hostile mta
sure*, irrUidcr to a pieuxt for its re.
movai of so trifling a nature, however, as
io leave it to the beII gerents to overlook
them, if they please, and to save the rul
ing parly from the necessity of going in*
to war measures of great expense and dan
ger not only to their own popularity and
power, but perhaps, even to the safety of
the union. I propose io have the honor
■at offering some remarks upon this sub
ject in the next number of my dispatch
es*
With the highest retpedl,
i have the honor to be,
*r,
\ r'ur most obedient
humble servant*
D M. KRSKINE.*
For the National Intelligencer.
Amongst the papers lately laid before
the British parliament respecting Airier
’can affairs, i| a dispatch from Mr Era,
kme t(/Mr Calming, dated 4th December
1808, Milch principally relates io a con.
venation beJWeeu Mr Erskme and myself.
This molt place a* my house and without
frny previous appointment i But as Mi
Erakine had during the preceding week
conversed wiih Mr Madison nn the same
topic is and the result had been commu.
nics * to me the day before by Mr Ma
dison, 1 was prepared for the subject t am
every sentiment I uttered was in perfeCl
unison with those of the President and n
the Secretary of State. What was mean
by colonial trade has already been ex
I plained by Mr Erakine * but as his owi
shsre m th.**e conversations with severs
I members of the administration isy in hi
-1:spatchesj •Hope.her omitted.; and ih*
coodi'iqs expeflcd by the United S-ntes!
irom Great Britain are not distin&ty ex
plained, it is Drop* to state hhieflv ihe
general grounds which were considered
•ere as fo"nung a proper basis for an ad.
1 istment ol differences, if a conciliator!
disposition was found to exist on the part
of the British government.
1. Reparation f?r the attack on the I
Clpeskpeake. The Presidents j.r cl >ma
ttoq pnerging in the proposed non.ioter.
couTsela,by which the public ships of
both Great Britain and France would b~
excluded fiomthe ports of the U. Sta’es,
the o>tensible obstacle to making the re.
paration, acknowledged to be due, w s re
moved.
2. Orders of Council. To be repealed
simply on the ground of the non-imer.
course a£l applying, in that even-, exciu.
sively to France, so long as her decrees
violating the neutral rights of the U. fc.
continued in force.
2.* Impressment of seamen. To be en
tirely abandoned, America agreeing to ex.
elude form her navigation seamen not citi
zens of the U. States, on the principle
contained in the instructions of the 30*. h
May,. 1807, to Messrs, Monroesnd Pirk
Hey* wtah, on account of the rupture of
the rihjg&tailona, were.not, hi that respe£t
acted wpon.
4. Colonial trade. ! The right to the
dtrefltrade, vis that carried directly from
he colonies to the belligerents in Kuropej
to be waved by the U. States; Provided
that the trade be'ween the Uni ed S ates
and the colonics, and that in colonial ar
ticles between the United States and o.
ther countries was formally recognised,
according to the principles contained in
the same instruct ons.
5. Commercial relations. The parti
al non importation aft of the U. States, I
and the convoy and other extra duties of
Great Britain to be repealed ; and general
ly every source ct collision arising from
that speeies of commercial warfare to
'cease by a mutual repeal of all disciimi
naung duties, in conformity w.d. ,i..
stru&ions 10 Messrs Monroe and Pinkney
before mentioned The two nations to
j P,ace other, in every other respett,
on the footing of the most, favouraed na.
ition.
| On this last point, my observations were
.generally and equally applying to both
| countries. The system of restrictions
j which those of Great Britain had forced
[the United States to adopt being equ«liy
| injurious to both. And Mr. Erskine is
!mistaken in supposing that I would have
preferred, &t first, measures of a more dc.
cided nature to the Embargo.
Mr* Erskine appears, so far as can be
inferred front the correspondence now pub
lished, to have supposed that in order to
induce his government, and to take into
consideration* those propositions, and to a
dopt a conduct consistent.«*th jq«t princi
ples and with the great and permament
interests of Great Britain, it was absolute
ly necessary to dissipate the prejudices
they had imbibed i And his efforts seem
accordingly to haye been principally used
m trying to convince them of the sincere
disposition of the members of the Ameri
can administration to adjust the differen
ces between the two countries. Knowing
the earnestness of his endeavours in pro
moting that object, the difficulties he had
to encounter in his attempts to induce the
British ministry to take a comprehensive
and correct view of the subject, and the
sanguine temper which he discovered
throughout the whole transaction. 1 feel
no disposition to cavil at the general col
oring of the language ascribed either to o_
ther members of tha administration or to
niyseli. But there is pari of the despatch
io which i cannot for a moment acqui
esce.
From casual expressions imperfectly un
derstood, and incorrectly stated, and fro.n
what he calls *« my manner and slignt in
sinuation*,'* Mr, Erskine infers that I
thought that the President (Mr. Jeffereon)
had acted with partiality towards France.
ana mat i naa attempted to contrast Mr.
Madison's sentiments in that respect with
those of the President.
That Mr. Erskme’s object was to «se
the change ot Presidency as an argument
to induce the British ministry to alter
their measures towards America; and
that the opinions thus ascribed to me,
were his own, is sufficiently obvious from
the whole tenor of bis despatch. But the
mfgfencOsBs it relates to me is totally er
roftt ou*^ tad Mr. Erskine must have
f*V assent to the existence of
!,UrV«.ofPrtii!Uy in Mr. Jefferson to
low at (SrF j^nice for aa acquiescence in the
truth of tnem.
1 might with troth have spoken of Mr.
Madison, not as feeling any particular ad.
miration for the British constitution and
institutions, but as having neither bias or
enmity towards France or England. But
I never could or did contrast his
sentiments in that respect, or ascrii>e 10
him opinions on the subject of oar foreign
relations at variance with those of Mr.
Irff-rson.
I knew those surmises respecting Mr.
Jefferson to be altogether des itute ot fuun.
dation. To have in the most indirect
manner, suggested or countenanced a be
lief in them would have been direct false,
hood* So far from having, even by my
silence, acquiesced in Insinuations of that
nature; when Mr. Erskine, once, and
onbe only dropt a hint to that effect inti.
iAnting a supposed hostility to England,
fhd ilcUvthe President had not placed her
epnduckin a-fair light before the public,
f jmme&Utd/repelled the charge, and,
atAongstmthef observations, reminded turn
that the onl^ time when the British gov
ernment Imr, by the proposed equalization
of duties, made an approach ot a liberal
and conciliatory nature towards America,
it was Immediately me: by the President
who hail expressly recommended the sub.
■ jrct to Coegress in his message ; ami that
‘ the plan had been defeated by the clamor
I ot that par;y in America, which was con.
> stdered the beet disposed towards Great
Br'tnin; That, on that occasion, a change
took place in tmr manner is very probebU I
—hut Mr. Eriki'ie ha* ascribed it to a 1
source very cliff, rent from that which «*c.
casi^aed it, I had very lately bvvn ae-.|.
ployed W repelling the dinrge—a
cR3geY,hich 1 rever could hear witnout
Eight yenrs of the tnon inf
mate n ercctir*e, during which not nn act,
nor hardly a thought tesp<rct:ng the for.
eign relations of America was concealed
mahle me confidently to say, that Mr.
Jefferson i,rvcr had in that respect any
other object in view but the protection of
the rights of the United States again-t
every lore gn aggression or injury Irom
whatever nation It proceeded, and has in
ev‘3V jns'ance, observed towards all the
be,|.'V\nts the most strict justice and the
mdst^ctypul 'us impartiality. His char,
aefer stands not in ueedoi this dec aratto*
tt is due to myself. '
The groundless accusations of foreign
biaa and influence have betn generated
solely by the virulence of party spirit • and
they w ere adopted abroad as an apology
or pretence for unprovoked aggressions.
A just sense cf the injuries received, and
ih* rrvpst temperate sffui ts to obtain re*
dress constitute wh t\,h,ts been culled pax.,
tialiijt. And it seems to have l>e» n for.
gotten.t .at, from tfje time when Mr. JcL
terson became Presid nt‘till the month ot
August, 1807, no actual aggression un the
neutral r ghts of America hud been com.
mit’ed by France ; whilst,duringthe same
period the nominal blockades of enemies'
perts by England and the annual actual
blockades, as they may he called, of our
own * the renew.!, contrary to express and
mutual explications, of he dt predations
on the indirec colonial trade, llte-cQt'td'Ucd
imp^e,aments of our seamen and the atta k.
* £<h' sapeake had actually t;*koo
. Vrin6 dial period, the laws, the
ex^|^ve%ct8, rhe negotiations of the A.
inerichn government could have been di
rected to that government alone
t»om whom injuries had been received.
But from the time when the rights o! ute
United S ales were invaded by both tins
belligerents, every public measure has e.
'■■“iimwo train ^ me i xe enorts,
founded on the tame basis, have uniformly
though without success, been made to o>
tain redress from both i And the corres
pondence now punlisbed furnishes at least
irrefragable proofs of the e&rnes: desire
ot Mr*^4etferson’s administration to ad
just \Mc differences with Great Britain and
of tfipir disposition to remove, for that
purpose,Whatever might serve a? the sha
dow of a pretence for a denial of justice on
her part.
ALBERT GALLATIN.
Washington, 21st April, 1810.
Sr. Louis. (Louisiana,) June 24.
A gentleman just arrived here from
above the river Platt, on the Missou
ri, reports that the Paune, Panckns,
Maha, Otto, Missouri, Sinex, Osage,
& many other nations are at present in
open war with each other; Rogers the
Shasvenie chief, has received informa
tion a few days ago of the murder of
three of his people who were out hunt
ing on the Gasconade, by the Osages
—•if this information proves true there
is tio doubt of a very formidable ex
pedition consisting of Mississippi and
Wabash Indians being set on foot this
summer against the offending party.
The remains of Joseph Kemball
(late a lieutenant in the U. S. army)
was found in the middle of the big
prairie in the Illinois territory ; it is
supposed he had been dead five days,
the magistrates call d a jury, who with
out hesitation found a verdict, suicide
t was cut from ear to ear,
dyed with blood which
to belong to him lavincr o
pen near his body, his friends are here
by advertised, that his coat and pocket
book are found, with papers that may
lie of service ; other things are also
left here, but not of a large amount,
alt of which can be had by applying to
tbe foreman of the inquest.
Wm. M'DONALD.
Ilarrsonville, Jane 9t'u.
York, (Penn.) July 14.''
We learn from every quarter as far
as our enquiries have extended, that
the crops in this country, paiticularlv
of wheat and other small grain, are ex
tensive and uncommonly exuberant.
Should flour, the great staple of this
st »te, experience no declension i"n price
the firmer will reap greater advanta
ges from this source of wealth the pre
sent than lor many past years.
Gun Powder,
Warranted Gf a Superior quality in Keg>
and Cdiiiiiiteri,
Salt-Petrc, t
English Refined, in Casks am] Kcg^ Fot
s*le by D. J. blfRR.
—WANTED—
A quantity of Willow wood for which i
I liberal price will be paid. A nrgro Ia<
will be taken a prentice to the Co'pei’
tr«d«. t f.
i HE OWNER of a hhd Tobacco Jayim
m Deane's Ware House and n»p«.r n
[in tbe name of ioicph Jeonm^s a* brlut
described it requested 10 come forward 1
i claim the same, othorwse it will hcAtol
agreeable tu Law in that case ma<!tJ an
provided. F
Deane’s No. 672 126$ 163 1100
MMH U (JALLOIN.
Inspectors Deane's Waichousg.
July 28: h, 1810.
At a Court held for Prince Edward
count*, June the 19 it 1810,
Jolm Witt* and r«om.ts T. Sco't T
Executors of William VV»t:,«iecM. a
Cerapl *i [ J
Against &
Jesse H-mlet, nml Betsey his wife, J
Ute BeUry Clarke,' end Suihiwmu
heirs oi John Clnrke,tlec*ti. r‘ y"
MAton (i. Ilarpsr, Miu’.un G. j r*3
WWk«, »n i I,ucy G, Ins wifi-, lute I ^
Lucy G. Harper, Joel B. H-rper j 2
and Elizabeth E, Harper, heirs of ! •’
JHtnes Harper, dec’d. Deli’s. I
TH» defend nu Mastnn G. Hafper.
Mastnn G. Clarke bud Lucy G. hm
W‘fe, late Lucy G. Harper Joel B. H»r«^-v 1
per and Eluaoeth B H trp-r, not havijfC
entered their appearance and given 'JT*- 1
rity acdordng to an set o; the GeJfcr«|/
A»sem>;y_, and the rules of this C /
it appearing to the satisfaction of the iucr:
tnat they are not inhabitants ol tnis
oil the motion of the complainants, by ih^
counsel. It is ordered, that the said iVfem
djiiits Maston G llarjier, Xus'on G
Clarke, and Lucy’ G his wife, late Lucy
G. Harper, Joel B. Harper, &nJ BUzauetfi.
I . V'VT5r’ do aPPe;tr k«re ,cn rS.e hr-«c
day Octooer court next, and answer the
I cojfcptainants bill, and. that o c >py oj this
orde^be forthwith inserted in, 30me cne
of the public News-Papers printed tn the
city of Richmond tr two m:jii433 suc.cc*.
sively, and also postfd at the from ilJut of
(Ue Court House of this county,
A Copy Tes:e,
B. J. WORSHAM, d. c#
At a Court continued and h-id tui huu.e
Edward cuuuty, June 19tn, 1810.
Joseph H. Morgan and Polly his wife, *s
Compil'd. , 5
Against I ^
Jc-hn Young Jennet Young, James j 2
R»-ad and N.iscjr his wife, Samuel ! >
Yoi g, and James H x, specially r 'Z
appointed Guardian for Willlia.n l £
.Young ard Henry Y< ung, who are j g
infants under the age of twenty cne I k2
ye*r’» •» Delt’s. J *
THE cl fendanrs John Young, James
Read, and Nancy hi> wile, and SamtLr * %
el » ouug not having entered the'r appear- • ■
ance an 1 given security according t/aI
&**wli|he General Assembly and the file/ /
ot thitMfiurt, and It appearing to the /
isf*ct»n of the Court that they are n. nh*- /
habitat of this state, On the motion „?
j the complainants by their counsel, It js 0|.
» deredj that the id defendants Juhn Y une*
James Read and Nancy Ins wife, and 3 imu
el Yitung, do appear here on the first day
ot September Court next and answer tU«
complainants bill, and that a copy of this
order be forthwith inserted in some one ot
the public News-Papers printed in the ci„
ty of Richmond tor two months succeasiyol
ly, anti also posted at the front door of ih«
Court House of this county,
A Copy Teste,
F. WATKINS. Clk.
Thor^ug * br.d Horses fo Sale.
/^N the 25th September next, at my
„ Plantation in the county of Fluvann *,
cat led Upper Bienco, will be offered for
ba.e to the highest oidder, on a credit of
12 months mysto;lc,
Blooded Horses,
consisting of two bullions, one 6 years old /
last sprues add dist.nguished oy h.s succes- /
lul perfcknances on the turf-tbe other 3#
years olfAf higti form ami great beauty—
several^rood Mares, two very elegant
yearling Colts, and two Fillies—all of tiie
most approved crosses and genoiue blood
as will be shewn on the day of Sale by
authentic pedigrees in the possession of ^
xr o JNO. H. COCKiS,
N. B. About 40 head of sheep will al
so be offered for sale at the same time *
J. H. g !
Jrostscnpt
TO L.H.GIR ARDiN’a PROVISO
RY NOTICE.
LH. GirarJin haa the pleasure to inform his
• Patron* and the Parent* and Guardian*, of
>outh in general, that f om the Erit of s«pt.
«**t„ the English branches will be taught at bi*
A^adeny near the Capitol, by Mr P. po »
gentleman roconim tided in the following terms
by .be venerable Dr. John Carroll. Bishop (it
Baltimore.
“ Mi* Power is very respectably connect
ed—hi* manners St address are highly g-n..
tleminly. Besides, possessing the tsleotn
requisite for teaching the branches of esdu. g
cation mentioned in your letter, he has res. /
pectable testimonials of his ability to give/
lessons in the classics, Gre;L and lA\\nl
and the. mathematics. In short, l dr,
thinB^haJvois can find in America a per
son bitter 'fitted for the employment, .n
respacty thjto character ana abilities.”
Very satirn.ctory specimen* of Mr Pow
er’s hand.writing m,.y be seen upon a- .
pbcation to I, H. Girardm. It benig hn.
potsible to sia'e all the necessary deud-. mi
this day’s paper, thoy are reserved for a
subsequent coinmumc\tif>n. -.L H. Oirur.
din will only observe at p.e.\t that his
intention is to devote hinv»el‘ more ytrl r.n
larly than ever to the husincs* of iir^rui:.
tion^that in hi.i school, bo h children *. d
youth will moot with due attention, ,i».t\
impartial justice. The. instructors will b*=
L. H Girardm, John Wood, Francis Pow
er, und Charles J'remon.essThe masters
tor dihWing, painting, and music Will be
chosen by parents'fete, /
\ July 23d, 1010. \
'i'.t creditors of
. »ouc, 13 r«
r . Tavern, in
\ the city o( Kicbn rVtd.i- sday
, the 2Jth in it. *<* A. M. ,h A
C I order to select**- nd runs /
i j fit and proper ptMcn, ^ inr it o .n ,n, 9
J | to take the aunffnistramm oT hi* ai
tuirs. It is hoped the meeting wilt he
43 lull as the nature and amiatien of
the several t Editors, will admit.
Monday, 23d July, IS 10.