The national intelligencer and Washington advertiser. — Washington City [D.C.], 1804-01-30 00:00:00, page 3

of the fudges H..r rhioric rV'rpl
out fpecifyingatiy fuppofed mifcon
It ni iks tli--m a* public objects of fiX
picipn throughout the whole of their ju
dicial lite, and without naming any
thing, invites private enemies to accufe
them of everything.
To fnpport fuch a refolution, com
mon fame lias Ween mentioned in the
eourfe of debate, p.s a fufficient ground
of proceeding ; and this idea is fnppofed
to he authoiifed by Xnglifh precedent.
Whatever may have been done former
ly and in a period of rudenefs or vie
lfaoce, the more improved fyftern erf
modern jurisprudence fhould difcard
frch a doctrine if »t ever prevailed.—
"But even that doctrine if admitted,
would not jullify you in adopting the
prefent refolution. You cannot thence l
infer the propriety of proceeding againft
a peif.m who is not accuied of any
thing punifhsble Will it be pretend
ed, tbat the common fame, which is
tn be a ground of proceeding, does not
refer tr. any offence or to aoj tranl.tcU
cm? 'C'lTimMi lame, if admitted Lr
proof, muft be Smpofcl to apply to fome
Si'rjeftof comploiti*-. On the principle
ev-n of this very queft ioft able doitrinri,
t, fta of fome cha-ge is rcquifite.
What then, in tie prefent cafe, is the
accufation, which c**<uld he fupportedby
Simmon hme? If there be any Such
l?t it he ft 'tec 1 !
The gentlemen who advocate the re
fedution In it 4 prefent form, tail in their
eftorrs to S-pp.rt it, nctivithftinding
all the aid which ! h-y have fought from
« the loading things and crutches of
|H*fCC tents, * (to uf* th _ language of
tV gentleman from Virginia) On gene
ral P'iiT-ii.leson theh'O'id batisof uni
v.*rfal ii-*ht, the r< fdutiun is condemn
ed ; and no precedent is add no-d which
•a« juftify it. Ido not with to fiiicld
any public effver?, whether judges or
Other*, who may merit impsjchuiest ;
hut I with 'he Houfe when acting M
public acrufers, to prbCfed in fuch a
Tnarn-r si not to do injury to at)}
tidual, Jiftice is due to the individual
as w.ll as to the public—No public
duty cm require thi> houfe to adopt a |
ref.iut'on of general reproach, yet fin- ]
ting no otdolic ofFence. And it but ii: j
acr ird* with She p'rtviclplei of jtilticv. t <
fubj.et th- judicial efficers of the union,
to all the ioco'i venielice, vexttion antl
expence of being obliged to vindicate
thrmfetves agjinfl fecret accufations,
which it mny be more difficult to difco
iiv-' than to overthrow.
V v will obfarve, fir, tbat Ido not
enter into any particular txaoiination
iF>f the r.ilV referred to by th* gentleman >
from Pennsylvania, Mr. Smilie, whe
ther there was a controvert/ as to pre
rogative and privilege b;tweeti the Court J
and the bar, in which the pride of pro*,
feffional rank aopeared in opposition to
judicial authority. Whether the judge
very properly refuf-d to yield to the
Ciun.t-1, or whether the cour commit
ted a: <-rror in pronouncing the law,
thefe *ire topics which 1 think it needleSs
to examine i*a cotitidering the
now on tjie tahl-. For the refolution ■
itfe.lf fta,tes nothing, and there is no cafe
before us for examina.ion.
On io grave 9 fnhjer'i »$ the prefent,
"when we are called upon to aid in the
adminiftration of juftice, it was t<-> be
defired that the advocates of the refolu
tion fhould fo far regard their own ex
hcrtst'mns as to retrain from attempting
to enkindle the animofity of party. The
gentleman from Penntylvania, Mr.
Smilie. Seems to have thought himfelf
at liberty to purfue a different couife.—
But conSidering the nature ol the quefti
ou, on which our votes are to be given,
I hope to be excufed, if I deem it not
proper, in this debate, to reply to him,
on the various topics of party difcuffiou,
which he, has chofen to mention, al
thourrh the t»fk might be eify indeed to
repel his charges agatrft the former ad
miniflr .tion.—A fingle obferva'.ii n, !
however, rmy be proper, on a law to
which he has dhided in the language
cf cenfnre. 'i .*:rs was at leaft one
prominent festure which m'ght r< coir
meH;l it to the friends of tiuth. It ex
prefdy declared, that the truth might be
given in evidence.
Mr. DEN SIS faid that in the
courfeof the remarks which he had the
honor of making yefterday, he had de
clared himfdi' in favor of the propofed
invetiigatior, provided it were made on
proper principles. A.nd in order the?
more clearly to iiluitratc his ideas and
evince his Sincerity, he'hid read in his'
place, a refolution embracing all tbe f.iets
whh.h were fuggefted Xo the Houie as
the foundation of this proceeding. He
had then faid he would not pledge him- |
i<lf to i fifer a rcfolutiou fuch as be tlien '
read, but'would -rote for it if offered by j
others. As the gentleman from Vir» J
jriiiir!, (Mil Randolph) lr..d not accept-j
ed his overture?, and in the couife of
his observations had done him the honor
*f noticing Some of his ideas exprefiVd
in yefterday's d..bi:e ; hoe: rofe principal
ly torthepurpofcof off ring an,amend
ment, a;id partly t'oi the .;u pofe cd' re
plying to one or two of the gentleman's
remarks. fT*- was not a little' furp
at the animate \n which ih.u i
gentleman had Rddreffed the 'Houfe in ;
the cburfe of th'a morning-, nor did any '
thing appear to have fallen
gentleman in th; courier of the di
I fioH)
Ito produce fo much cxc t
had ma'nifefted. But as h
c!dm to Set up his own feelin
own conduct H the ftar.dard hy v
the feelings or actions of others were j
to be guided and as th- gentleman had i
applied his obtervatious without impli- |
eating motives, he had not at all inter- ,
runted tho equanimity of his d.feofi j
tion. He hod' exercifeda right which!
j he fhould always be difpofed to acuondj
j to that gentleman and every other mem- j
i b?r—the right of placing the obfeova- j
| toons of his mponents in thetfloft Iwdi- j
eruinoint of view of which they were j
fufceptible—ln this right he Would alfo :
indulge himfelf, whenever tbe fubject
required it.
The gentleman from Virginia, in re- j
plying to tome, of Ms obf*rvarlnn«r, had
faid that he had conceived the charge {
exhibited WHS of a very feriottS nature, j
Hat did not appear to corrprthertd vi' l '
what refpect he conftdered it fo, and :
he wifhed to explain in whet
rr he contiderei it as fuch. He
Confidered it as ferioiv. tn-Smich vs it
w?.s calcul it-'d to excite fufpicion and j
nfperfe the officTal crujduA of the gen-!
tlemen h qiieftfon ; but did not mean to j
infin«ate,but on the contrary repelled the ,
ielea of ite, being feripUS as regarded its
fufSciency, if true, a» a foundation of
impeachment —Iv order to the- that
the conduct of the judges had not been
fo highly cei-Su'-ablc even as the ftate
ment of the. gentlemanfrom Pciin'.ylva
nia, (jtfr.iSmiiie) or his colleague and
th gentleman frow Virginia, Seemed
to fitppofe, hebegg •* leave to ftate his
ideal as to the rectitude of their
Here be mig ;t ufe the obfervarion of the
gentl-man from Virginia, applied to
one of his own remark-, and fay, that
gentlemm had with no great dexterity
C mfounded two principles as dift nt trom
eoch other as the nothern from the fou
Charn Pol.-. He feemed to atiimilate the
cafe in which the court have arbitrarily
withdrawn the qm.ftion ©f law entirely
from the jury—-to the conduit of the
. in this cafe which only went to re
dried the connS.l from arguing before
the jury, a cafe already fettled in the
minds of the rourt, hy a train of judicial
deterrninati.;n3 in ftrnilar cafes, and in
which they left both law and fait to the
determination of the jury: directing
them a* to the bw upon the fubject.—
He wrs warranted in his omnion» be
caufe the gentleman from Virginia, in
Nluftrating fome ot his pofitioni, bad
cited the cafe of Libel as decided by
Lord Mansfield—3rd Mr. Fox's ctls
brated declaratory bill, which grew out
of that decifion. What analogy has
tha* cafeti the cafe in qneftion ? Lord
Mansßeld decided that in the cafe of a
libel, alt the jury lad to do was to find
the fact of public -tion or not, and that
whether when nublifhed it were criminal
or pot, they had no right to determine;
and thus withdrew tlie flueftion of law
altogether from their aecifton. This
Was juilly regarded as a grofs violation
of that principle of the criminal law of
j that country, which mv -fts the jury
with the right to decide as well pa the
law as the V*ct. This principle 1 fu'ly
acknowledge, and if the court in the
c.vfe of Fries, bad deprived the. jury of
that right and withdrawn the queftiou
of law from them, there might be fome
foundation for this refolution. But ac
cordinjr to the ftatement of the gentle
man from Pennfytvania, the queftioo of
j law and f?ct were both fubmi ted to the
juiy, with the instructions of the court
on the legal que'dion. He hid always
I bren taught to believe that the court
were the proper «rgsn through which
the law was to be communicated to the
jury, though lie did not deny but the ju
, ry had the right which they fhould cau
i tioufly exercife,butwhich they would al
i wr.ys exereite, when they difcover an
■ inclination in the court to opprefs the
! citizen oi exculpate the guilty, to reject
; the direction of the court and decide
for themfelves.
But tiie complaint is that the court
denied to the. counfel. the privilege nf
i arguing the law beX/re the jury. Mr.
1 Dennis faid he believed the c Ort
f. fTed a power of this nature, to be re
- gulated by a found difcrruon. If the
. court Ih mid believe that a queftion had
j been put at rcit by a long train of judi
i eitcal decifion, Such as was the csfe in
this induce, they not only have the
light, but it becomes their duty to pre
j vent a ufelefs confumption of time, aud I
jto pohibit the counfel from agistingi
! the qnellion. Indeed it is indelicate in
I counfel toimprefs on the ju-y an opint
j on'of law contrary to the known opini
on of th; court ; nor is there any court
who will net take on themfelves the
right of checking counfel, in an attempt i
to miflead the jury on a queftion of hw.
j Such was the practice of the. cou-ts in '
Maryland, and in that county ir m
j which we deiive ail our nutiens of jurif
i prudsnee.
Bui though he did not conceive ther
was any ground fur impeachment in the
ftatement of the gentleman trom P
fvlvania- y-t he knew th it this ttifcuf
I Ron would produce a vague, and unde
rlie, which h-.-. brdieved the
-• in quefti m ought to have an op.
portunity of repelling. He thereto c
moved the following amefidmentby waj
of preamble to I ..ion.
WHEREAS inform aticn has bee
to the houfe hy Ohe of its rhein-1
:, in a certain profecuttod
n the pat of the United Stl
it -o certain John F. ies, pending it*, i
iicuit court of the Unit-d : : '
in th. ftate of Pennfylvania j r>
Chad one of the affociate juftic<*s ot tl c |
fuprtnfe court of die United Stati
I R"' chard Piers drftr'tt judge lor the j
diftrictof Peniil", ivii.i.i, by w'. m
faid circuit.cnu.t was then ho! ic;, did
inform the counfel for the prifoner th«t
as the court formed their opinfojn ,
upon the p d-.it of law and would di
the jury thereupon, tire counfel for the
prifoner mti'l confine their argument be
fore the jury to tha quoft-kjo of f&et only j
I *--A*id whereas it it' repreiVnted that
in oonlVqaence of Smh determination of
I the court, the Counfel Jid refufe to ?d- (
dreij th** j:r-y On th* qn fti m id f«ctj ;
and the faid John Fti. » was I '■•und guil. j
i ty of treafon and fenteiic cerurt <
to the nnniihmevit io liich ca.l
'< laws of the. United Stutes pi " iV
and was pardoned hy the Pnidileot of !
; the United State-.
Refolved, That a committee be Jto- J
I yvoint "d t- ijivef):ig*>te the truth <•'
, allegations aid t-> report a i
j ment of facts in the aforefaid,
j their opinio'i thereupon, whethei
Slid Sinmel Chafe and Richard P
or eit-her ot them have So condu
themfelves on the trial af - st » ■
render nec.eiY.iry the inte,' i the j
conlVitutionftl powers of this h<
This •mendment einb thee
fiets ftated by the gentleman '
Pennsylvania, points out a fp>
charge as the Snioda'ion r,( the proceed
ing, and yet, Whe* attached to the
foiution, guv committee
power of general enquiry.
We are told fiat the fa£ts have been
ftated by a member on the floor, and
there is no reafon for (fating them in
the refolution. Will the ftatement of
the geitleonan from Pennfvlvania ap
pear on your journals!, and how will it
hereafter he known tin: any tact was
ftated as the foundation en vhich to c
rett a committee writ gedera! hiquifi
t.irial o~".vers ? Pofterity will only fee
the refidution, and to them it will be a
precedent which will jaftify the crea
tion of a committee of euejuiry into the
official conduct 'f "any officer, with >ur
the allegotton of n fingle fa£t, whenever
a member nry chuff to he o c opinion
that a vexations :ind expenfive proceed
ing fhall be inftittmd. It was there
fore thit lie wifhed to refill the wrinci
ple and for that purpofe muved the
amendment.
Mr. HUGER Said he hod before
ftated, and he nor* repeated, that he
w*s not ave.rfi* to an inveftigation ; but
he did not coufider himS*U bound to vote
for a refolution So gener-d aril vao-ne.
It the amendm-Et of the gentlemaw From
Msfyland were adnpted he fiiould vote
for tic refolution.
Mr. NICHOLSON moved to amend
tbe nmeridment hy ft,king out the v-hole
ofitafterthe wsrd <4 wh*>eas," and by
infert.i.og, •« members ot this JF-nfe,
hay ftated in their p'.*t-*es that thry have
he> r d certain acts of official mifcoTiduct,
tlledged againft Samuel Chafe, one of
the affociate juftices of the Supreme
Court of the United States, and Richard
Peters, judge of tfe* diftridt court of the
diftrict of P"iit-.lylvania.
Mr. Hugerh»'l ni objection-to the
infer tion of the laft amendment, but he '
had to linking out the firft, he there
fore called for the Yeas and Nays upon j
linking out.
The que ft ion was tnk-*n by Yeas I'd
N .ys upon ftriking out and carried— j
Yea- 79—Nays 41.
The queftion was therj r.iken on infert- !
ing tlie amendment of Me. Nicholfon, I
and carried—.Yeas 71.
Th<j queftion wis thmnut upon agree- ,
ing to the amendment thus amend-d.
Mr. PURVIANCE faid he ed-dd |
not vote tor it, becaufe it did not ftate
the fact. It declared that members of
the Hufe had ftated that they Iml
heard of official acts of raiff.ofiducj tf :
beith the judges, when but ;*ne act had
been charged ag-inft jufbge Prters,
Mu. j. Randolph obferved tint
he per e.ved no reafon for th» pream- :
b!e. He hoped, therefore, it would not j
be agreed to. G-neral enquiry was his
<<hject : «nd as going to limit it, he was
againft the preamble.
Mr. ELUOT Said thn, had the ;
am-ndm-nt of the gentleman from Ma- !
rvland prevail*d, he might have r*,.on
cil.d it to his mind to vo'e for ehe refo
lution thus amended. But as it Rood, j
|je could not.
Mr. NICHOLSON remarked that
i when he. offered the amendment, the iv
! correet'trf, Suggefted by the gentle-man
I from North-Garolina had not occurred
ito him. To obviate this incorrerrtneis
!he would move ti/amend the amend*
: ment by faying M a ce.rtiun act of Hi.
,eh .1 P-t is."
Mr. Speaker faid this amendment was
no' i i
Mr. NICHOLSON faid, under fuch
cireu i.fl w.c-s he muff vote againft the
wh-Ie amendment,
take 7 *) the a*
lme.it as amended was loft without
the refolution for appointing
f enquiry was curieU—..
hi B.—-Nays 4U—-us follow ;
i
—Metrt, Ai«o«, jilawr.
j lexauder, Bird,
•yle, Brown, H yan,
! Hut:r, G>fey, J. Ciay, Cbpion, Gi
Com, Dick Sin, Eacle, ]■" i
mes, I.uttis, Fineitey, Fo •
GilleipVi Gray, Gregg. Hant|a > iT{*<f
' brou< Holland, Hh-lmes, I ck
fon, Jarses, K-r.necy, flight, Li!-, L - '
I cas, uyon, M'C'ord, Meriwether R.
.c, Morrow, New, New
lfoi|, O.iil, p-dnv-r.
, terlon, J'ht-io.:. J. Rand..l,.ii,jnn. T.
J. Rea.,(eij Pcniify)
libera, of ( I'tiKi- IY< } Rich a i
S-CiinKii*, Sai oner,
! 1-iio.i- Virginia)
I Scan) Thomas,
; Thomid .*n, A* »an
( Gortl • ■ i>um, Vet
! plani ■!', M. Willi
I aui3, Wi ■-, and YVvo.hs.—-
I 81.
| N - "ten,
J- * v, Coittrnurii,
Drnvi, :':
-, V. Won, 'iiMiuo, G..
IdyHaftUvrs, Hough,
ant, J. L wi'-', inn . V. I
in, L ;wiidc-s, N. Mitchel', !
Mott, ?.-iie.;, Pm-vi i,h,-.
licit, J. Simh,(of New,
.i, Sttphenfjoni, Tagg"ai:,
' Tennay, fhatcii«-r, Fibbitii V;n llenf
\ fela»r, W*dfwoith, and I.'. Williams,
j 41.
WASHINGTON CUV
MONDAY. Januauy 30.
/ On FRIDAY lali, tn- acquisition of
LOUISIANA waa celebrated in this
ci yby a numerous < -Ambled at
Stelk's Hotvl, on ( . A moft
fuperb dinner Was gi number ot
the MEMBERS OF CO >, to
X\x< P-.'Siieiuof tlie United the
Vice Prelident, the heads ot depart
ments and the cthet officers ot govern
ment. The Prelident was ■ fcorted Iron*
his own houfe to tbe place of entertain
ment by members of both houfes, the
B-igaoier General and the Colonel of
the Wafliington militia, and the officers
of fjovemwent generally. Hs ap
proach was announced hy a difchiv.ge of
artillery from the Hill, anil he was re
ceived at the by the Prcfide-nt £*
Vice-Pielidents of die day, and wed
coined by a full band of rnufic playing
• Jeffe, ton's march. The company, c.uti
liitiug of about one hundred, let down
to dinner at 5 o'clock ; G-n. S. Smith
presided, and Mr. Nicholson and
Geneial Varnum actedas Vice Preti
deoti. On no occafion have tb
fame number of countenances x'n
bi ed mor • rea l fa:is.act on, as n« «
ever" offered i ifelf upon which
mutu-il congratulation covl.i be more
ti':c->-e, or mutual good will more ge
net ally felt. An affemblnge Si numer
•us, to celebrate an event, at once So
glorious and fo happy, may not oieur
again for ee-Rtuiies to come. The re
duction of a petty fortrefa width hus
c ft the lives of thoufands ; the con
queft of a town, in whi<*.h the widow,
the orphan, and the helplefs virgin have
had ample caufe to heap Curies on the
heads of the conquerors, have te»o often
furnifhed occafion for j.y and feftivity.
. Butwtiat muft have been the fentations ;
of thofe who were n«ow afTenbled, when j
, they refl-&ed, that without exciting the .
[ anguifh of one. heart, they had extend
ed the bleflings of liberty to an hundred I
i tooul'and beings who were added to -.he ■
j population of their country ; and by
I means unStained with the blood of a tin*
; gle victim, they bad acqu'ued at nolt a i
j new world, and had laid the foundation
' for the hapuinef. of millions yet unborn! i
After dinner the following tosfts
i were drank, eac*s accompanied by a dif
charge of artillery, and the intervals
filled up with appropriate mufic, from
tiie Italian band.
1. The people of the United States.
2. The Conftitution otthe Umoi.
S. Our hrothefs of Louifiana.
4. The notions in amity with the U
nit-d S-ate?.
5. The Union of the Strte?.
6. The State governments.
7. The lights of neutral powers.
i 8. Peace when peace is honorable,
war. rather than difgraee.
9. Ar*s and Sciences.
10. Agriculture, coinmefce and manu
j families.
11. Th* river V.ffiiliop'—— i high
road of commerce betwee ■ citizens of
the tame country, not a barrier between
rival nations.
12. The militia of the United States.
1 3. The army &iid navy at the Unit
ed St.:t S.
14. Tiie Am-rican f'mrr, nroter
■ tion t.-i them in their youth, and tup? ot
I for them its old e.ge.
15. The memory cf Wafli
! ingt. ti and the other departed heroes
v-jho fmght ! r our ihrjepehdetice
16. Tlie memory of Frs-kh . Hsn.
I the deceafid
17. Livingft**»n and Munrce, our mi
pi ft rs v.-ho negeciated tlie treaty of
' CeiUon.
f'o'itniee •>.
the'Pr. fidcnt ot the Ufnhrd Stltet*
The Vice-PiefideHt.
Grtverttor CiUieJorne, General Wil
b, and that part of the at my and
militia which riefc.ended the MifTiftippl
with tliem to take ponefßon of the eew
ly acquired territory of Louifiana.
By the Sf j Reprt*
I lovereigi s ci the
be American Fair.
tranflated from the
oneof the' company, and a
• dapted to the occafion, wti> futtg by fz*
| vend voices accompanied withitiftruineii*
tal niulie.
i vi i ii a**i*. i> -*■*
PAX BKT.J.O
Alvtlge-.ty Jove, thy Sunpliaot* he»f,
j lndnigfnt grant our ard<nt pmyer ;
May I'm ding Peace, with oliv? wand,
i I.rtrii? feitter •Itffinifs o'er the Land,
I And !»iv,- to gntefiil Ma i tiie po.#wr
| Ol wifely ufiag every hour.
When her fii'ten wing,
Qrscct (poet, the Mule, lii.tr ;
coiN tile fto* rig .Ail,
Ui'Y:c- facferi Vigil keep*
I tha couch where Virtue fleops
Put where the thwnderlng Ond of Wat
' Spreads havoc round ia blood 'hun'd car,
I Religion le-eho the gjoeyny fhade
.Ircuping Juliet I: Wlgl bar head,
; An! Virtue loies all her chsirets
AhiiJ the hcrrid d-.n of Anna.
To JctT-rfon. belov'd of IleAv'n,'
May Koiden Peace be ever given,
And when Death at laft lhall corns,
7o lay l.iin io the filent
May weeping A ngets gather nc-r.
And Lai.rets ftrew around *is Tier,
And waft him, osi the w nv;s of Love,
iO cVcrLtfting Peace above.
Tb« Senate have, for Some days
been engaged on the bill for the go
vernment of Louisiana. After a debate
of confideraole length, it has heen de
— Yeas S3—Nay* 7— to p-ohihic
rtatton into Louifiana of fLves
fr-;n all foreign countries. We fli r ter
ives that this important principle
will be c...nfii-med by the ultim-ite vots
of the tw» Houfes, aid tint Gont*,r.-Sa
will thereby evince an unabating fptrit
to cTt-ert every ' v 'i f -h
which th-.y are invefl .-'." u-. the
national character fron de
gradation, and Save the people they re*»
prefent from the. deepeft evils which fu
turity might otherwise have in lion* fur
them.
TO B y; LEI 1
And entered upon irnmedi*
ately, a two ftory U '*.HX MOIfSB in (rood
repair on I'weli'th Oreet p«ar Pcntifylvania
AvtWue, ( ppofite Morin'a ta*r:m —The
l-oufe is the property o( the WiSairgton
Handing Ce-rti{Mmy, and will he rented low.
Apply WIHuMmS CAKt'iiN rER.
Jm 30—-3*.wtr"
WANTED 'TO HIRE.
7'HR.EB of four young Negro Vfe- ,to go
to Wafhirgt-n county, near
I Hager's Town, who are accufte*neel to a
farm—io per annum Will Ht giv--. and
i the negroes hum .nely treated— Apply to
; Wm. I,EB in Qcerpre ow .
A liSeral price wontd be given fortwo or
: three Negroes of »ot>fl choraeSer frcan ij to
■ »3 cr 3c years oid—apply as above
Jan .30- 6r
District tf Columbia County, of Wash'
ington to wit :
ON th* petition of Crurlea B ft'an an in* i
folvcnt dehtor Confined in the prifoa
of U ..ihineton count : -rrd
, that noricc he given to t';.c creditors oi' tbe
faid Ba'uin, that on >onday the' filth d..r
;of February next, at the court .oe-m in the
! capitoi at e'ev { n o'clock in the forenoon the
1 cath of an infolvent dobt.ir will be *dminiirer
j ed fo the (aid Charles B.iftiin *gr<ieahiy to the
ftitutr in fuch cafe lately mtirjeand provided &
a tru'lee appoiored unlcu iufiicient ca6'c be
fhewn ti> the controry It is further oroered
that this notice be pudifhsd three leve-ral
time» in the Nati«n»l Inteiligencer 3nd the
, Wafhirtgton Fe...err.ill previous to the aid
I (tli Ha' oi J-vbtu.ry '-y ( ,f : er 0 f the hono-
I r-Me Nic o.as F tzhugh one ol the judge*
of the cireit.t eoart f.r ihe Diftricd *f Co
lumbta.
tfaiAH FORREST, Clk.
J*<n 30 —jt
aRD£:N SUDST
D IV!D HEPBURN,
CN \RDiNIR. Ifhrr Grdens fouth of
T the Center Market, receie-ed iron*
liii.adeiphio a feieeft atlorted ot Oiteeu ucd»,
w'llch he now .fiVr. lor fale.
A pra&i .» girdeacr r.> be heard of at
ainive
W..fhington Jan 30— W3t
NO
Ilflh»bit»nti of H ,f!iin.:tpft cirv and
a! 1 rncdareht) t»ed t
th?t the *ffiffm*it hy ordef 11 tioa
cf V. ; „w
cen p p C jo
nal pr l; p rty Ce.ut • re«
ureri < ffiee 11- lay of
March nxi t ' •■ gs
*rs alie i .. n the i' nre
rev Ke
l.raary 1
>r
J*m. Ji— —JtlaW 'iitaai. r.