The Rhode-Island Republican — Newport, R.I., 1810-01-17 00:00:00, page 2

jovernment of the United States.—And we
are even disposed to believe, that the judg
nent of the British nation will admit the cor- |
'ectness of this conclusion. Be that, howev
ot ‘?'it may, our first duty is to maintain the
lignity and iodependence of the American
Nation, whose honour and happiness we must
e¥er regard as paramount considerations,—
How [.r that dignity and independence would
Lave been prostiated Uy the edmission of the
proposed MuTAnLyy and coMMuTARLE Brii-
ISH PraxcirLes of fransit dury, or ungualificd
cafiture and condemnation of our vessels—and
iy the right, contended for ot the part of the
ritish government, of l'ccl:cfurﬂng the detain
cd wariners, gaptured in the Chesapeake, al
rer the'thsulting farce of such a restoration-of
them ghould hiwe been performed, it cannot
e necessary to explain to the least informed
o the most prejudiced mind.
Moweyer mugh eirht years near observa
lon of the cal;‘g\htcs incident to war, may
Xeite our deprecalion of that alternative
%&ﬂ;;}m do most sificerely hope it will not, on
€ present occasion be readeved necessury)
e are not sgtisfied that war is the woist evil,
which ay Lefela navion. » =0 4 2
- The admirible unalysis of the negociation,
iven in the letter from the Sceretary of
nm,q!b Mb. Pinkney-precludes the necessity
K 4 simgle additienal remark on our part. . |
We fr%#et that our limits do not admit us to
tisert thie whole of that letter in this day’s
AN ' "
;',7 ") f‘:‘om thie Novfolk Herald, [ Federal.)
-+ We haye included ' this dzy’s paper, the
Dodamebts which' accompanied the Presi
deot’s. Message. Mulignance, with its en
yenoned f~u;a|g, has ulveady began to assuil
the Cliardeter of our government j—insinua
tions, as Ludse &9 blasting upon ‘jtw.,_pl‘ouml
gators, Bave been slily. colntenanc d ; the old
ory of 4 FRbuen INVLURNOR,! rears its hith
vrto dropping head ; ag‘ ¢ eharacter of the
Prosident which was- glmost immaculate in
Y o IR 8 4 ynwvd_. Ty ?
tie eves of certain politicians - a few months
mincwmmhowgmiwﬁp srdenl, fiot of those
wio ure attached to their country, but the
M,‘cim}prus‘_,o’t ¢ 2ALTH ; men who know
no other principle ian ln}orcu. - Buty lm{r-,
piiy fur s, those revilers of every thing vic
tious and good ;—=those sowers of discord
wud reapers of distress are defeated in (heir,,
eipectations. The Documents presented to”
the publick, exhibit on the ong side, hunesly;
ﬁrinm:sg :.ad-hgebt}(y of argumeunt, on the
other decgit; subterfagé, and bullyism.~lt is
ueidless o say to whom these citferent ap
pellations attach. =~ ¢ Lo |
Picgering ‘hus saicy ¢« that Great, Britain
has done us no assential injuty ;" this we
'now to be incorrect, nor ure we certain that
thie Sentiment way not cxtracted by British ‘
gold, But this much we know that Britain
begins to do us some “ essential good ;” be-“‘i
cause her cupidity and bad faich ; her em- -
powerting ber Ministep (o insult, and reiterate }
iosuleno the American people, must naturs.
ally beget hatred or disgist towards that goy
erntent. Thervefore, we are correct when
we say that Copenhagen Jackson has done us
gome * cssentiul good.” e has opened the
«yves of the blind ; the dim see more clearly;
and the wilfully blind have such a tot;{lcm of
proof lghm upon them, that resistdnce is
ih vaignd the ervours of their ways are seen
by all, “T'hus producing a reinforcement to
the original phalanx, “which must secure
them quict possession of the field, while the
haggard band of disorganizers are forced to
re treat in deßpair '
| L o
o s I -
DEFALCATIONS !—By an official re
partyto Congress, it appears, -that CHRIS-*
TOPHER GORE stdds answerable ‘to ghe
Uni[ea m;uoq" Com issioner. at "J* n
t;mk"“%‘ Otli “apticla-of the Dritish trélie
or the sum of 53201 dollars, angd -the SN
" Cliristofitier G e ahd othgls,” us nffents for .
paying cougiggent expences o the boafd. of
comissiofl#hs It London, uddar-the’ 6th ars,
ticle; sahvm sworibl for 30'943 dolrsmm
niingn s whaje fixrr-un Tnousae.
g" w’ﬂ" BLAND SIXTY-lEVE DOLLA .g
which Styn hadgheen standing sgaccounted oy
:' L ""‘ Q"T.‘M'i 4 -\\."".-." C’.‘f\a .
SIS AR Wy in infiatiguing O
‘«’y‘ﬂ‘“ Sothe dhilbaz "\h#"."..;» -ve .
2SN L “ o ™y N AR
Ay RS PR, W o * -
ot Goy el \V" Fof defuleal r.‘y%,
ST !‘\FT" v:k‘i»";‘# &:h"‘ =y el i
. 2 :k I*_ “ . {\*@:. ':‘
M e caliaE ﬁL P %‘ﬁ*‘w} e (8
Jelpo NIRRT . 4 ¥ Ay TN AR i
| '»‘3."s‘ ' M‘%._s’ﬂ} R hf
R e B O L-‘ L 9‘
mu(“‘.h ‘ L .o n’ com=
nent. N ¥ ' [Boston Chron:cle,]
SEE QPR S
.~ SRR BRI o
et RO tAeYERs L ork | v .
i SO >
Vs R . S SR . ;
LPs VN e WARCR are "d i!’ "
S "-M‘*“f’”i"" by ek %"
N G wg RRN e
AR '&aﬁ ee T sl PR Lg i v g
I'\’&%W'; ﬁ*ﬁ%ﬂ states, the 10l- -
k 4 "\,Mnfr-wy,; o el
. - N 5 ! " 71 g “.' S
YR 'l*m“ ‘ ) E
~and kaisehood. We will mare
. o s Y @ : 34
- & Boston Repertory=ltis no small salise
faction z:mquphm following ¥x- -
§ 1-*"«..» ehe am / < :
Fpigies Witk v only 3ae I have |
Briti
Many.who affect blindness to the imputed
insult, treat the subject as if the imputatation
went to the whole correspondence on the part
of Jackson-—as if the allegation had been that
every letter teemed with insult—as if every
sentence was big with insolence ; and to im-~ l
agine that if they® ¢ould sélect an innocent
passage ov two, and demonatrate the inno
cence, they had vindicated Jackzon, and ob
tained a triumph over our government. All
the defenders of Juckson, however, are not so. |
preposterous ; but not one of them either in |
«ebate or print, has met the question faivly— |
not one has taken up the offensive passages, |
and by fuir analysis and deduction attempted
to demonstrate their innocence of the mean
ing imputed to them. Criticks, as they pro
fess 1o be, and as some of them undoubtedly
are, they ought to be able to develope the real
meaning of ?ﬁcksou in these passages, and by
shewing what it was, have shewn what it was
not. - But instead of this coursc, instead of -
| analysis, and criticism; and rcasoning, they '
| pour out abuse, and invective, and recrimina.
lion, and all the eflusions of desparationina’
~desparate ‘cause. Certain presses in our)
great cities, have more. Jitewney. distin-
Mﬂh:&m&“ﬂih’ ne. Butéven in
| &pngriu the question is not met bysthe op-
Pposition gentlemen directly. It is adroitly
evaded in one way:.or another. Ms. Dana
waves it and mns" upon the oversight in -
%ﬁef iithy in not demanding Erskine’s pow-.
‘er.. Mr. Gold ‘dodges the question, and es
| capes | w 'e;u'rjbu:*s\;btcrfcgc. _“And what is
_; ‘tt;%li ¥ h’qhu the charge pests on implis
_cation mn aqnon ca~
Yimmc i' minals
jurisprudence. " Pray, Mr. Gold; must ‘t 3
insinuation be implied ? Did yolf'etieMß:enp
of its beinglexpressed? Are igsults by ins ““.5
uation to betolerated ? & “‘:‘m:s f"“\‘?'
sults for being in that forg#h¥ Jackson is NS
demned ah"e“zay by the juggment of the -
ident, and the question @is whether you will
condémn the j"dkﬁ’ approve the sentence.
If Jackson was guilty*§ff.the charge, the sen
tence was justs gpd fou do not deny his
guil t onlyfPleatiihis privilege, for com
< %;i“@ Dyrmdiguation.
S QY ‘q.": will bg found by the opposi
tion membels yét to apgak, time will disclose:
Leavinig them™at this*work, we ‘will retugn
from this digression, ahd take up the corres
pondence as t¢ggthe point in question,
Mpv. .S‘mi!h',f our Secretary, n hingf—
terof the 9thof Octghér Ghescatsp e
e (o Exeotte theay TEO LRI Otk
B -’;-*‘.v MM“ 'sv'v,"”}"' ‘.-:‘. &Ll %.A P £
hig Miptstery Mo, Bskines for gpt &avinges
it e i o 4 !-;E) f"":t-.‘a W iy
DOso ViR RO for ' THETN I Oh o oE Tt .
v - - ] ;.5 g Y Lo B ~‘ ‘- 7(“_:,, 5 ﬂ.@t: : ““’3
AR ~ . s W g i&i',.f
,* L o § SRPERE e e e “ A
. v W"‘-w 7y AR b e "fﬁé"" ..( 5:, ;7. o ‘
B ,%‘_';,f.» by ~ Eai D e v (TR "
. o SRS T T D BTRR . L e
Fra ety o N TRV R SEPR I L ST o 7 g
" i :-",\ o ‘ ,‘,.a- _. e WO IR o t%f
,' e I G ’*' ?:f"',‘.u'w - ) \?@:h“‘
I O oo
i, '~‘lu»~¢s€"33w.~s»; o ARSI e,
L:“‘.‘ < 6N o '#;,;'("“, . »} gy »y R )
SR « , [EETRL Y ttru “’mm
Akl &, 0" ,:;fém,f‘" ougi I‘%,
2 P R ‘ Go s » (IsSavow: tlt‘ L
b e R s e I'l""!ﬁ. ﬂl! d
‘ on, ETNEO M‘lﬂl‘tﬁ*
! ollowed. To telt our government thay
the et paigy te fm‘yiohl)‘p,of the.
t‘\qu B LRI B o W
i ‘4 " 23 2 -""“"'_“N{ #;,"N“( d‘ﬁh}:‘ }‘\.' ‘ h‘,:
B Tt Vb o G, s D
| " . . ‘ * ,1.«:.‘-,- ‘.‘*:"i" 1 '"‘v:k'-‘j'vﬁf“'""f»; £Y !l‘ :
‘ A RES W o Lo ..u}x& ".:b'—,‘w 4 e S
whd doube. X I e T |
AR e o o A el
Nt ’q‘ L'y “i‘ . p J ey “.l
18 ",l"‘(".’ r .: in O b “" " a
IR e e e
o ’ ‘ i ‘v’wf«‘ F TG ’fr..»‘-‘vf‘ o
I»)‘.‘4?’?\?‘ ?»:{.?:‘ > R .“‘3 ‘tf..mi‘ ""M't
LB il et o ’t L N, e
e R R o,
Worahehs § " g P . ke L 8 o,
,X’y‘ P th'“"ww ?‘“A?
13 o -‘.l-‘:;; T T “k{l,
. 4 ‘ *’ i M . . - ~"?‘
SR AR, e ]
« Americans ! if this correspondence and
the insuliing dismission of the British minigter
do lot open your eyves to the real views of
your government, then would not one raiseq
from the.dead convince you.” Park.
,% We have reatd, (says Df. Park) the con
clusion of the correspondence with Mr. Jack
gon, which is now made publick. 'We confess
then we are strifck with astonisment at the
result. We cannot diseover the least shadow
of radeness or insult ox uis pART, through
the whole—not even the slightest violation of
respect. '
since 1 finished the perasal of the Documicats.
—~Messrc. Jackson and Relfy are welcome 10
the honour of helding an- opperite vy, an’
they may if they please abandon their co
umns to the pens of the Democrats.”
Coleman.,
Reflections on the Proceedings of our Go
vernment with Jackson, the British
' . . 2 !
- Mimister.
Political
For the RerußLican.,
['Coguinued.:r
iscellany.
_make. Substitution implies a knowledge of
~the thing for which the substitution wus
made, S 0 Mr. Jackson undersiood it, for
he says, ¢ the very act of substitution evident
ly shews that those criginal conditions were
n fact v rf,:; licitly communicated to you,
and by ou 3," urse fald betore the Presi
" R Beg TRI vy - :
dent for "”‘w’ ideration.”” Indeed in this
case it implied more, i amplied that Smith
SR Ak f‘f.ﬂ"»;w'rf@."'_w,' "‘"ﬁquu A : l::"“}" ““l“'?b
RO N‘h ik e pluous apology
‘?»M,.'* n, that th :}Jo have concluded,
“that there was o essen ;,,‘., i_f{crcncc between
the subst ute dnd the conclitions prescri-»
X d.qu the next breath, he telis M.
Smuh thathe difference is so glaring as to
L admit of no elucidation. These are his pre
;p\isb’.;‘_ now.%his conclusions. From
‘these circumstanteShe idfcrs, that Mr. Simith
must Mb;),hqukh; & iffigasonable to com
_plain® of theidisavowal, beequse 4from the
same circumstances he mustihave n it
would take places T Agg- Jhis absense of
G ﬁ;?!" y‘(’fﬁ fmissifn by our ghw
‘ernrhen ‘} the samc circumstgxces gave
His Ma “anundoubted and Myjuestiona-
Wi L & 0 N ol .
& Mg to disavew the arrangcement,
'_k’ AT [0 be continged.
” " 3 : S
. ‘,\..,.} : __..*‘.‘“____
?rﬂ THE RIIWD REPUBLICAN,
REVIEW! *
Gf the Speech of the Hon, Erisua R.PorTER,
in the House of Repiresentatives of the Unit
ed Statesy, on the subject of Mr. Giles's
Resolution, apfiroving the Conduct of the
) Exedutive. @ |
: \ * No. 1. R
“r \ \ R 4
H‘;‘i; be,more ‘grateful to an ‘w ’
mind to/approbatc. Mspupesaiß A S 10\
"es‘.‘ d‘t J u.-~a."‘r'*" ;,L?“u 1 W Lﬂ" pﬁ' L c’
o T » A p J
deforpiaaliicm. B Usßmeae o ol !
R plenenting sl gucellcobiiilid o, -
publick-yipirs, "(ﬁf‘ RARSMIIFOINEG (it AT
o tee Ta bl lok gveat
t '\ ‘ .'J ‘."“; ’f . N W r '«.‘ ﬂj
3+ A " p ERE .
il :’%t“""' , " I il
R R Boch Mo the. National
o Shibfy hi c¢h Itbgh the Nationu
‘ ; c‘ ' "f;ﬂt& t a.cofiplinient paid <o
) ¥ l’f"' : .‘. ‘, (’v‘. X 1 -s'- -
P e A’ a 0 “@ iangl -
"s» J ] ’ ] ; « ‘.‘ A r’
& Statesma ' _# 16 » AN
‘shat theiv hope i now accumpligh
TN URPUDIE K. have begi(cha
“ed 2 How far the publick have begi(charghed
by his“eloquence, or ¢ lightened by « his#un
o prstanging, they will gudge for themselygs.
" Towhiteause are we to ascribe Wis'Sury
o i !* i hi . o bl Allia 1 R 0
prizing elevatio y 1o his virtue & Alas 1 11
"#W; ] 'w 0 his capucity and extead
ore agquirements ! Alas! we have them
‘on record—to his principles ! yesy tp the
Eﬁciﬂubf adulation and sarvility, ingh
ing and abject to those from whmn;\a rives)
SRR, Ly 15 2 A% x v
his powers=cold. and indiffercnt to the intey
est and hs ‘Mof those ovep'whoss he has
‘obtained it Overbearing inthe Sepfte—im
putient o restraint, he %sembl ‘more am
Ippperiou dictator then a Kithtul’dnd Impar
agul gervant of the gpublick. His politicks is
tymaanve<his law obsequim obedience -
- Stiff #h opinion, too often ia” the wrong, by
gint of ‘perseverance, and never yclding tem
pery somie persons, with aview to praise, have
) r“- BS o~ : “ . j h ﬁ
X aicd his character by the name of firm
without reflecting, that firmaness to sub
. ‘ani ensiave our dearest rights, denotes
‘& spirit, of all'others, the most injuricus ‘yl
' fetest ley—yet this gentleman dare profane
| the sucred nawme of liberty. '
, ;A ous of fame, without the resouvrec
of ability ire and merit it, plausidbic
“of N ,M,lqa:n : rerit ity plau
patihg, al yet polite, with ap af
[+ Tt W 8 "- - « » b - »
*:J" '{ ‘oandour and inde e—his
PR, o . |
address in the first appearance may imwa.
on those who scrutinize o deeper than 1
surfice 3 but the gfimar veil withdzawn, tho
RS formD) BN inchpcly S & o
\ Ay e u‘m ﬁp‘«mhm%
R~ ! 3 . & & C"""o
to ns explanation on the ;u;'ufﬂhrmd~
Lt the ey docs not depend on inference ;
.i;.j PENILO - demonstration contained in the
et ' R -
I skl Bbove that Jackson took this offen
sive hd of argument, and attempted to
make it out by a chain of circumsiances.—
Let us see what those “circumstances were,
and particularly what were his inferences
from them, and then let infidelity itsclf doubt,
if it can, of the insult,
tice but two of them, as these two form the
basis ol bis conclusion. The first is, that
the conditions prescribed to Mr. Erskine,
were Communicated to ‘our government,
though the despatch containing them was
not, which latter circumstance, howcver, he
considers as imaking no difference, as we
‘shall presentiy see. The other essential cir
cumsiance is that Mr. Smith himselfl substi
tuted t# arrungement thut was made, for
the one that Mr. Lrskine was authorized to
disavowal would take place. How know
that 7 Becuuse he knew that the circum
stunces were such as must produce that re
suit. Then to shew that ke had a right to
make this inference from this silence on this
subject, he goes on to shew what these cir-
He begins with the circumstances, that
previous to the letter of Mr. Smith, which be
was answering, be had not heard a lisp of
complaint as to the disavowal, on the part of
the American government, that ho trave of
any cause could be found on the records
kepi by N E.rlkmgm none had Leen in
timated. €9en yerbally fohim in his conferen
ces with our “government. Here he pauses
‘o notify Mr. Smith of the inference he de
duces from this cifcumstance, It is,—thav
Mr. Smith must have thouglt it unreasona
ble 1o complain of the disavowal. Why ?
Because Mr. Smith must huve known the
cumstances were. It is not material to no-
vith a deficiency of ﬁﬁgi’ Natur® “"“"*
penses her gifts « random ;'m %f"’""‘ .
trol her power. l\mlﬂﬁag‘ unparden
able, when they seek, abd are sdlicitous fov
difficult employments, to whieh ‘they arc, in
every rcspect, inadequate ;o B e f‘zl'ord!i'
sirous to injure their conntry, ior a Ml
gratification of their own personal vamity.—
Mr. Porrer’s complaisa) ,& MACE 3,"and
insinuation, may be adnrireblygeaic fated o
shine within the cirele ¢ ;um, _.‘,m;“ |
Speech (however circum pecty guarded H
correct in other respects) heha R
the grossest blunders, and the'most Paipay
contradictions. He hus not one OFLES e
site qualifications for a statess 4
hope to prove. : g
Mr. PorreEr commences his SPoe
saying ¢ MHe deemed it of some i fh
cxamine the origin of (his businessy Gigy o
a view of it through its different glages; to
Jinal conclusion.” He then fulminates a ’
lent denunciation against the government
the embargo system, condemning by thga |
sneering tone, that his capacity would affo 'y
him, dectaring 7%hat our commerce was rivi
ed—our revenue at an encd——our cxfiences i 1
creasing, and our (reasury exbausting ; these
ruinous consequences induced the Lxecutive
to change their erro'w‘;.g‘\l; olicy, which even. *
tually led them to conc &i‘}hc provisional
agreement wtih Mr, Erskine. This is thé
introductory part of liis Speech ; towards the
close he observes—=« For my own part Ido
not believe the Ln‘lﬂ 2 l with Uy
at thistime, qlm,ﬁ’/”fgf havg wizhec ﬂ‘%
erlyy Bicasz SRS TN eon our dum
merce ofierates’ nlaer fat oL "’ J \?M
taught her a lesson s T ong Qf‘ Qﬁ
imoton, though I belicve2it 4a be Jaidioy” Srom
the best of motives,"-=A frank confessic ‘i,
deed. Let ug see how M ntimen wr«*" 5
heart, correspond. with his *politieal ‘can-
R R v o AT A
duct.-=lf Jaying the embargs el the
))S ; R I
TER, why condemn i Dt jor aban
doning an injurions policy & Wihy insult the...
for unintentional e ""’f'fﬁi"; - they were
mistaken in their views ¥lt is an¢ acknowl |
’ - TN BT R SUTE N T
cdyed fuct, bad theembargo kcountonancs
cd and approbated—hsad it heer *44"’&;3&
forced by the. fw"m‘"' “’:?f 1€ ‘f‘w %ﬂ‘
the legislatul Massachus w News
Hampshire; dy 2n¢ f mect; “:‘:i
condemned by 1;' ::w ”‘:;7;% ~
the exPectation e povernment wouid
have beert condt ma °“’};“f"‘?ff§§%
Succcasges 0“?' PCO al x?’:g‘ w
would bo frée=—our flug re{pested=out neu
ily encouraged—our fiidndsbip ¢ s
Iness AL ECH R ot
hould be the iflol of " polencd
. . : AL 3L eARTR R R
one solitery insta J ' oycrament ia
enforcing her embargo 1a 6y ) /ety %" }f‘ j
it to he laid on frem the béct &M;% &
political profession yi~ «t varieneswith thd
. . ol it S o e Y.
wishes and judgment of bhis h j’*d X “r
not act his preseat avowed s :-‘,"f,Q 19 lest he
offend his adhereats. ﬂ&' not 'stra :*'
erv nerve, has he no”t' ade. oy,
riding day and night to, cieate SUSaEiyEin this ¢
State, to vender, by, '?":_, i
~tation of facts; odious,” the poiiey DX
l eroapent for the embarg ‘;»‘_‘,L t ~'."_i
|(B T abgdark 40} . g'., : 'iﬂ
'@k then IN conte "'4;,“4::‘} '-:;q his ;‘3
and perfidioudzart sé a 8 1t 10 A"
sell and bis fridwgs i 0 Poweßerd embiee the .
- State, and bind it 198 ;,%’;{ ﬁ ' edergcyy,
and c{;entually upon’ Wy B Fhid berty, P :
F:eamﬁiish an Aristotracy; SWi e | ;jf
to preside as chief ? '2, ¢ hd py ok
what inducéd him to be the-DrITREReY =-4
.of having those seditious and. Ik "".“
solves passed by our Staté Assey m“' O
demning the embar 'osystem',‘,w ‘h‘ =
lieved it to be laid on}‘om the best of maitds.”
It is more than a hellish artifice, aullew o-thy
Xie diguity and candour of s progioter. o€
"The publick will give it all theshonaut ft:
merits. ' VT GEING
3 '3 T 4
- ——p (5 S—— RN 'f‘(i
[ ,FOR THE RHODE-ISLAND nzrg')“:{‘”@x. 'g
A i oy
\
—~ - No. Vl. o , W,
f J\A.'icc of Mr, Poticr’s Spoechyint "?&»‘7}‘l A
- [Representatives of the Unitcd "'vfﬁ"".‘" he
' -/Subjrct of Mr, Giles’ R ao/lluoﬂa‘,f":“f in g
o - LSR RO AL
. AS many of our fellow-citizens have not
perused Mr. Potter’s celebrated Sfieéchivc“'
deem it adviseable in making out coriments
Jto quote some of \h} principal puris of it
. Mr. Potter saidy €as he was called upon to
vote upon this rﬂ&lugqﬁ, be feit it his dury
~td give his reasons for sedoing. He decnied
it uf some importance to examine the orir-‘-*
; ol'bﬁ\is business, and to take a view of '
- through its different su:gs Qs fin: fgonchﬂ
} shn.ug\fw)pears,_ soidl he, tHEE after the U
nited States had laid the cmbargo, the execu
;{;e instrdeted our mintster i Londok (o in
form the British nation thet ita#s not. meant
in hostilitysto them, hut a M_.}"*‘-"' cent mo
nicipal gegulation of our dwn. Whatever
they maﬁ:\vc hipught of it at thattime; theyr
soon found thag'lﬁ eat s,-‘.“j‘; e mulerially
changed, and that it was stéiptof all its fino
cencey and held u vh * Nt w \: vers
cive measnie, and such an ope, . %3:“,
ved and vige Q-i*%&‘* dy wvould ‘".*"." bring
18 duty, “ patstie ‘; > ¢ ey,
n Ll o) i S N . T
Jrom matives of*sclpresaevatiun; SR
Rt AST , 1 "ol
- W § ' " A
‘h“ h 7 ) o '3.
amu ey € O €omn-Lin,;
themselves, o i e imputation ¢t