The New Hampshire gazette — Portsmouth [N.H.], 1810-06-26 00:00:00, page 2

bk bagging. R o
Bk . Spirituens and Malt Ligusrs. g
\ The duty on licenter &ills amoun.
. ted in 1801 ta 373,000, and e acs
' 2 count of omiflioas might be eflimated
' it 450,000 doliars. ~As the duty ac
: ' nally paid on spirits 'diftilled in those
b 8 ills, did not on an average exceed ‘
- M e cents per gallon, the quantity of -
A rits distilled during that year from
ipi. in and fruit (exclusively of the
‘Ffa ¢ gin distilleries in cities) must
larg »amounted to about §,ooo§ooo gt
hawe “ps and may at present, the m;fi
galle ¢ [ jring having increased at le#fin
afaéh i s ane ratio as the population, be
the o | ted at twelve miilions of gal
valimag . S To this ‘mnft be added a.
“lons. ' eemillions of gallons of gin
mﬁﬂ : s ‘,'\"di&i“'liédi in cities ; .making
_andrun - gateof 15 millions of gallops.
e o sportations. of foreign {pirits
. Thein thelefs very considerable,
e never | ‘nouniéd dm'%g the years
gaving ay . . . Bog,102,750:000 gatlons -
tand 1. . yikoigg e nettannod) re
SRR tathe Xay 6t male ‘*qﬁgfm :
ployed, and to the amount of 130,000
_dollars annually manufactored. In
: Vermont the manufa&@ure fupolies the
‘confumptrion. It is Rated by the hat
ters of Philadelphia that 92,000 hats™
'5 dollars ‘each, are ancuaily.
‘20,000 country hacs, worth three dol
jﬁwﬂ each, are anoually {old in the city.
“In various quartersthe scarcity of wool
is complained of, as preventing the
making of a fufficient quantity of
coarse hats. From all the informa
tion whick has been received, it is be
lieved, that the value “of all the hats
annually made in the United States
is near ten millions of dollars,~~See K. ]
y S <ot e e
Paper and Printing.
Some foreign paper is fill imported ;
but the greater part of the consump
tion 'is of American maoufa&lure ;
and it is believed that if fufficient at.
tention was every where paid to tbe‘{
preservation 6f rags, a quantity equal
to the demand would be made in the '
Uuited States. ' Paper mills are erec
ted in every part of the Union. There
are twenty-one in the states of New-
Hampthire, Vermont, Rhode-Iflind
and Delaware alone, and tenin only
five counties in the {tates of New York
and Maryland. Eleven of those mills
employ a capital of two hundred
thousand dollars, and 182 warkmen, .
and make annually 150,000 dollars
worth of paper. _ - a
Printing is carried on to'an extent
commen{drate with the demand. Ex
clusively of the numerous new{papers
which alone forma considerable item
iy value, ail the books for which
shere is an adequate -number of -
_purchafers, are priated in the United
States. * ‘But {uificient data have not
been obtained to for fimate of
“wnnual aggregate paper
made, & of the pr bind
ing executed in € than
what may be infe . po
pulation. = The ma ang
ing paper, ard of rds are
alfy) extensive ; and] wof printing
types, of which there "are two eftab
lilhments, the principal at Philadel.
phia, and another at Baitimore, was
fully adequate to the-demand, but has
lately been affeted by the want of re
gulus of antimony. | ’
Manufaltures of Hemp. ‘
The annual importation of foreign
hemp amounted to 6,200 tons. But
the interruption -of commerce
has greatly promoted the culti
vation of that article in Maffachuferts,
New. York, Kentucky and several
other places ; and it is believed that a
fufficient quantity will in a thort time
be produced in the United States. ¥
The manufadnre of ropes, cables
aud cordage of every description, may 1
‘be considered as equal to the demand, l
the exportations ot American manu
fadures for 1806 and 18c%, having
excceded the average of 6,500 quin. i
tals, and the importations from for
eign ports having fallen thort of 4,200
ditto. . i
Exclusively of the rope walks in
all the seaports there are fifteen in
Kentacky alone, which consume a.
bout oneygthoufand tons of hemip a
year ; and fix new works weie in;
a (ate-of preparativn for the present
YJear. i ,
Tae manufaQures of fzil du-k for
‘#herly eftablithed in Rhode Island, in
Cownedticut, and at Salem, have been
abandoned or suspended, partly on
accoant of the high price of hemp,
and partly for,waat of capital. Some
is still made; and the species of can
vas commouﬁﬁﬁl}ed cotton bagging,
4s now manuiattured in various places
on an extensive fcule, -~ An-efßabiifh
ment at Phildelphia, employ§iibht
looms, and can mak: annualigs
yards of duck or 45,000 y; %
ton bagging. Tlere ar@ SliEfen
manufaiories i 1 Kentucky, 4nd twq
in Welt Tenoeflfee. The five at or
near Lexington, meking annually
252:000 yards of duck and couon
“mount only to 185,000 galkis. . =
~ And -the annual éxportations of
‘American beer and cider to 187,000
gallons. e P e
. But the amount a&ualiy made can
not be corre®ly stated. It has been
‘faid that the breweries of Phildelphia
consumed annually 150,000 bushels of
malt ;. and exclusively of the numer
cus establishments on a smaller scale,
dispersed throughout the country, ex
tensive breweries are known to exiltin
New-York and Baltimore.
From those data the aggregate val
ue of spirituous and malt livors an
nvally made in the U. States, cannot
be eltimated atlefs that ten millions
of dollars. \ .
Iron and manafaciures of Iron.' = -
The information received respec
ting that important branch is very
imperf=&. It is however well known
that iron ore abounds, and that nu.
merious furnaces and forges are erec
ed throughout the Unpited States.
They supply a fufficient quantity of
hoilow ware, and of castings of every
description ; but about 4.500 tons of
bar iron are annually ‘imported from
Russia, and probably an equal qu:n
tity from Sweden and England to
gether. A vague elitmate states the
amount of bar iron amnually used in
the Uaited States, at fifty thousand
tons, which would leave ahout forty
t;},;mfand for that of American man
viacture. " Although a great propor
tion of the ore found in Vermont;
Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
be of a superior quality, and some of
the iron manufactured th=te equal to
any imported, it is to be regretted
that from the great demand and from
want of proper attention in the man
uf:&ure, much inferior American
1100 isibro’t to market. . On that 4c.
count, the Want of the ordinary {upply
of Ruflian iton has been felt in some
of the {liting and rolling mills. But
whild a redu®ion of the duty on
Ruflian iron is asked from fevezal
quarters, it is generaily stated that a
high ‘or prohibitory duty on Eng
lith- bar, flit rolled and sheet iron
- would be benehicial ; that which is usu
ally imported on account of its cheap
ness, being made with pit coal, and of
a very inferior quality. > »
‘The ananal importations of sheet,
flit and hoop iron amount to five
hundred and sixty five tons ; and the
quantity rolled and {lit in the Uniced
States is estimated at seven thousand
tons. Ia the state of Maflichufetts
alone, zre found thirteen roiling and
flitting mills, in which about 3.5c0
tons of .bar iron, principally from
Ruflia, are annually relled or flit. A
portion is used for sheet iron and nail
rods for wrought nails; but two thirds
of the whole quantity of bar iron flat
tenéd by machinery in the Upited
States, is used in the manufaéture of
cut natls, which has now extended
throughout the whole country, and
being altogether an American inven
tion, substituting machinery to manu
“al labor, deserves particular notice.
The details on that {ubje& will be
found in the communications (L)
-and (M ;) and it will be fufficient
here to tate, that the annual produs
of that branch alone,may be efßimated.
at twelve hundred thousand dollars,
and that, exclyvely of the saving of
fuel,the expense of manufaéuring cut
nails is not one third part of that of
forging wroaght nails. About two
hundred and eight tons are already
anuilly exported, but the United
States continue to import annually
more than fifteen hundred tons of
wiought nails and {pikes. An increase
of dury on those, and a drawback on
the exportation of the cut nails, is
- generally asked for. ; 4
A considerable quantity cf blistered
and some refined fleel, are made in A.
merica ; but the foreign importations.
exceeded 11,000 ¢wt a year.
~ The manufa@ures of iron conßft
ptincipal of agricultural implements,
and of all the usual work ' performed:
by common black{miths. . To thefs
may be added anch:rs, shovels, and
{pades, axes, {cythes, and other edged
voots; saws, bits, and firrups, and a
gréat wariety of the coarser articles of
ironmongery ; but cutlery and all
the finer {pecies of hardware and. of
steel work, are almoflk altogether im
ported from Great Britain, Bails,
thells, and cannon of small callibre
are calt in several places ; and three
founderies for calting . solid, those of
the largeß callibre, together with the
_proper machinery for boring and fin
_ifhing them, are eftablithed in Cecil
_county, Maryland ; near the city of
Wathington, and at Richmond, in
Virginia 3 each of the two last may
cast 300 pieces of artillery a year, and
_a great aumber of iron -an.-av?fs‘?cm'-
‘non are made 'a:t-'fgfnjd near the feat of
.government. Those of Philadelphia &
‘near Hudson river, are now employ.
_ed. " 1t may be here'added, that there
‘arefeveral iron founderies for calling
~every species of work wanted for ma
(SHEPYGAOTTUR UeatE SERIDAR. e
made o of Pluiiphin,
twenty thousand more are made &f
‘feveral faftoties, of which the mogt
_perfe@ is {2ld to be gﬁi;éﬁa?a!Nem
Haven, and which. With the exceprion
of that erested at Richmond hy the
Rate of erg%‘ate all private eltab-.
lithments. Thele may if wanted, be
~immediately enlarged, and do not in
clude a ‘number of gun smiths em
- ploved ia mﬂuﬂ'g rifles, .é'nd several
- other {pecies, of arms—Swords and
-pistols are also manunfa&ured in fever
ral-plages,: o &
i ?\hhwgm not pra&icable to
make a corre@® flatement. of the value
of all the irdp and manufattures of
iron, annually .made in the United
States, it 1s Bgﬁ:%ﬁ to be from twelwe
to fifteen millions of dollars.. The an.
nual imfpom%ﬁns‘ from all foreign
countries, including bar iron, and
every description of . manufatares of
iron or feelyare elimated at near
four millions of dollars.
: K iinadiimid _
Copper and Bras;.
. Rich copper mwines are found in
New Jersey, in Virginia, and near lake
Superior ; but they are not now
wrought. The priacipal manufac
tures of that material, are those of
fßillsand othc‘rﬁeﬂ’els 3 but the cop.
per'in (heets and bolts is almost un.
verfally imported ; the oaly manu
fa&are for thatebje@,which is at Bof
ton,not r:ec,eivigg guﬂi sient encomracg.
meat, although a capital of 25,000
doliars bas beea vefled in a rolling
mill and other apparatus. The true
reason is, that thole- artieles are im
ported free of duty 3 and the owners
seem to be principally employed in
‘calting bells and other articles.
' Zanc has been lately discovered in
Pennfylvinia, and there are a few
manufa@ureds of metal buttons, and
~various brass wares, -
[ T 2 by continued ‘
From the Virginia drpus.
WE desire the pablic to mark, with
particular attention, the condu& of
the federal prints at the present mo
ment. They are vehement in their
exclamations against France, wi.ilf,
at the fame ‘time tley are totally si
lent in relation to Great Britain. We
da nnt blame them for their reproba
tion of the condu& of the emperor of
the French ; but we reproach them
for being: silent in relation to the out
rages of Lngland, which they pretend
not to fee, whilt they bellow like
bulls sgainft those of France.. dtisa
terrible thing with a federal gazette
if the French poverament imprisons
an American citizen, hut it is quitte a
nother affair i the Eaglith government
imprisons a thousand ; -and Bonapar
te, with the fame prints, is a miscre
ant if he seizes our property by gpen
force, whillt king-George is an :‘.s;;el
.though he should caule julk as large
an amount of . American property to
be condemned in bis courts of Admi
ralty. - The federal news papers could
perceive nothing in the murder of
Pierce, in the dtrack on the Ch.fepeak,
nor in the impertnence of Mr. Jack
son to raise their ire; but, in the note
of Mr. Champagny how furious and.
boiling is their rag'e“! Surely, this u
niform blindness and silence with re
gard to the injuries we have fultaitred
from Great Britaigy and this extreme
sensibility to sthe provocations of
France, is fuficient to convince any
man of reft:&ion and candor, that the
federal- prefles in the United States,
with some few exceptions, are devot
ed to the cause of Great Britain. 3o
glating is the fa&, that in some cases.
the conductors of federal priats do
-not think it worth while to conceal
it ; but proclaim alogd that we ought
to unite with ‘the Bsitith againf the
French. ' - . :
The republican prints, it is notori
ous, purfu¢ a line of ccnduc entirely
different ; they put France and Eng
land’ one the fame ground, and ex
.prefs their indignation alike at the
“wrongs which we egperieace from the
“one or from the other. |
" To take the present occasion foran
example : Where'.is ;the- republican
print that julliies the condu& of
France ! There may pe a solitary in
dividual ‘or two, who may believe
that fubmiflion to. the outrages of
Great Britain affords a plausible pre
‘text for the seizure of our veflels by
the emperor of the French : but take
the mass of the lepublicans, and you
will find that they confider it a molt
execrablea&. - - o kol
1t is true, the republicans did not
“think it their duty to clamor against
‘the French government, whilftthe lat
ter confined itfelf to the seizure of
‘Britith goods in _profituted Ameri
can bottoms, with forged papers ;—
“because it is no proof ‘of a patriotic
spirit 40 raise an outcry in behalf of
- commercial (windling “of any kind,.
and, least of all, in bebalf ofa fyfiem
" of swindling which wett to degrade.
“money at the expence of ‘ the citizens
of the United States, into the pockets
of the British' merchants. But the.
inflant it was known that Bonaparte
"had seized bone flf Adcrican prop-
RS Rl NOS RS R e S gt L T S e e
The republicans, hnwever, have al
ways bhad their cyer open 1o ench as;
well asito British policy. < The embar
ga is appealed to for the truth of this
assertion ; for gad let the fc'd%
answer-the quefinn ) %ow'Cou/d A erks
620 property have deen seized in the ports
of France if it had not * bees permitted
Yo go hitheréo ? Providence has placad
betwern France and America ¢ a fof
{e deep and wide,” (as Mr. Randolph
exprefess it) 4vhich the republicans,
by the embargo, were desirous of ap.
‘propriating toits ratural vfe, to wit :
4 barrier againll European aggression.
But the federalifts and Mr. Randolph
with them, rendered nugatory’ the
means which the Creator of the Uli
verfe put at our disposal for protec
tion ; the federalilts and Mr. Ran
dolph continually excited & rebellious
temper in the minds of ignorant men,
clamored of the embargo, aud, loos
ening the canvass of cur ships, gave
our property to the corsairs of the
ocead and the brigands of the land.
France could not ‘crofs the Actlantic,
come into our ports, and there frize 1
our veflels ; so the federalifts and
their new leader sent our property to “
the ports of Continental Europe,
wherie the French Emperor could
seize them. ‘This was not what Mr.
‘Randolph and the federalifts withed,
- but it was what the administration &
the -cpublican pariy in ‘general fore.-
saw, and what they firoggled to pre.
vent. : 7 A
Almef every body mult recolfed
.those famous Ipeeches of the federal.
- members of Congress which exhebired
so much wifeacie wisdom on’the)ivfub
je&t of commerce.. There were Tim
othy Pickering, agd Mr. Hilthoufe,
and Philip B. Key, and Mr. Quincy,
and even Jabez Upham, who enume.
rated ports withofit number where
they said the Americans could trade : ;
there were St. Sebaftians, Leghorn,’
Trielte, the ports of '¢nmark, and
twenty ocher places. These however
_are the very marts where our prop.
erty has been confilcated. Could it 1
{the question is repeated) have been
cocfiicated if it had been detained in
~our ports 2 Would it not have been.
- detained in our ports if the embargo
bad not been repealed ? Federalifis?
these questions ought to Rrike you |
dumb t » |
- Having fairly juftifisd the republi. |
can party,*we fthall conclude this arti
cle by remarking, that it is ufelels to -
‘maintain an altercation about awho
has dine us the greatefl drjury, -or avko
began firfl 2 Vince, if wrongs from
one nation will at all excuse wrongs
from auother ; if because one power
has insulted us, another is privileged
to insult s too, thea the more we are
‘wionged and abused, the less we are
authorifed to feck: redress ; the less
ought we ro be Qtimulated to require
{atisfaction. = The true way is to con
fider our affairs with England as they
. relate tn Eng;land, and not asthey
relate to France ; and to confiderour
‘Freénch relations astheyregard France
-and not as they regard Great Britain.
- Whenever- we \"zmix’i" the two nattong
‘there is nothing but eonfufion and
fquabbiing. = As to time, in points of
“honor or points of intereßt, an insult
or a piracy is an insult or piracy let it
“happen when it will ; nor does one
outrage obliterate or extentate ano.
ABOEy i g
LTt g ~M‘-w-I"orfl_M¢y j§é~.-18'xo_. 1
" The Zumf.‘?@fﬁMohdiy last, contains a_l
letter dated London, April 15, which Rates,
that Col. Burr, after a detention of 11 wecks
~on the French frqn_ti‘eg:_,;_;[o!iyciﬁ@gé;f;g’_tm' to
“enter France, at length f(ucceeded through'
the aid of Mr, ‘Li&h&im,‘hﬁ Freutz%%mffu
here, who obtaif s@zg:“l’fﬂ*!ghﬁ*ﬂ!-‘-ﬁQa:w
~his arrival at Paris, Burris said to have pre.
fented a hemora and projeck so Bonaparte
“on theTubje® of htrgmmcfmn&my to
fiviac ke o e GeMe e L ige
land felt confident. of the fdpport: of the
[Emperor ; that many of B mﬂm
‘encs had left Englana to mget him at Paris,
Ae S il - A
. Vhe Ruffian land forcer are now inthe
Mhale compoled BE PAZANE: M > X
SRR O A I R TT R
demn the English ; they rcfent such
‘condu& on the *Part of France with
‘equal promptness and resolution, and
are as witling to avenge the wrong
done as if it had been dpne by our old
-enemy the Britith. ol e
But aow, (quoth the federal ga
zsttes) the republicans are beginmng
to open their eyes ! Admit th!ﬁ‘g[{;
trne, what does it prove ? Why, that
the republécans are honelt, atleaft,
‘and that thereids a point beyondwiich
they cannot bmw : butthe 8-
eralilts flop at nothing in the cause of
Great Britain ; they jultify her a&ts;
they are blind to her injoftice ; ibey
Aupplicate every human puffion ia her
fayor ; they appeal to the feelings of
avarice, to humanity : at oge mo
ment they represent her as immensely.
wealthy, and capable of enrichicg.us;
at another, as all powerful and pof
{cfling the means of cruthing us ; and’
at a third, as reduced to the 14t ex
tremity, fruggling for existence, and
invoking the forbearance of the Unit
ed Siates whillt she is contending -
gainft the power of an univer{al con-
REEPOE . -
The Defpatches received by thie John Adams.
have been publithed. We have room this
week only for the following -
s+~ IMPORTANT La“i"rEß. W
Ca,by qf a letter frm Geu; Amﬂmgrto W
~ Duke of Cadore, dated Paris Mearch 10, 1810,
Sir—ll. bad. yesterday the honor of re
cdving 2 vcrba! mdfagc from your ~¢t¢4’f’
lency, -stating, that « His Majesty pad de
‘cided that the American property faaw
“the ports of Spain should be fold, but that
the money arising therefrom should remaig =
‘in depot.” i
_ On receiving this information, two ques
tions {uggefted themselves— e
1. Whether this decision was or was
‘mot, extended to fthips as well as to cargoes ?
and’
2d. Whether the money arising from the
sales which might be made ander it, wou'd,
or. would sot, be fuhje@ to the iffuc of the
peading negotiation ¢ - A- oy
The geutleman charged with t':c delivery
of your meflage, not having been inftru&ed
to ‘aniwer these qucltions, it becomes my -
duty to present them to your excellency,
and to requelt 1 solution of them Noc is
it less a duty, on my part, to examine the
ground on which his majcfty has been plea
{ed to take this decision, which 1 under
fiand to be that of reprisal fuggelted for the
- time in the note whichyou did me the
honor to write to me onAhe 14th uitimo. .
In the g4th paragraph utighis note it is said,
that « His Majesty could not have calcula<
‘ted ou the measures taken by the U.'S. who,
baving no grounds of complaint against
France, have comprised her in their acks of
excluting, and finec the month of Miy L
§;!;‘vc-.pmh_ibir¢d the echtry into their porte
“of Treach veflels, by fubje&ting them to con-"
fifcation.” : :
It is true that the U. 8 have, since the
2oth of May lall; forbidden the entry of
French vessels into their harbours—and it is
also true, that the penalty of confifcation at
taches to this saw. . But in what refpe@
does this offend France ? Will the refufe to
us the right of regulating commerce in out
.own ports ? Or will {he deny that the law
in qucition is a regulation merely muaici«
pal ? Me it both as to objedt and
me it more than forbid A- -
m > inte the ports of France
a om coming into those of
‘the this prohibition ? To
avoid fult; to escape that law
lessness, declared to be *“a forced
confequenc the decrees of the British
council.” If then its obje@& be purely de
fenfive, what are its means ! Simply a /e,
previously and generally promulgated, op
erating solely within the territory of tre
U. States, and punishing alike the infraGtors
of it, whether citizens of the {aid States, or
others— And what is this but the txcr;._i(e
of a right, common to all nations,#u
ding at their will forcign commere of
enforcing that execution ? Cap this B®teccme
ed a wrong to France ? Ca%is be regard
ed as a legitimate caule of reprifalon the
part of a power who makes it the firft duty
of nations to defend their sovereignty, and
who cven denationalifes the {hips of those
who will mot fublcriberto the opinfon ?
Bul\it has been said that the v United
States-has nothing to complain of against
France.”
Was the capture and condemnation of a
ship driven ou the shores of France by Qrefs
of weather and the perils of the fra—gos
thing ? Was the seizure and fequéftrations
of many cargoes brought to France in ships
violating no law, and admitted to regulare
entry at the imperial cutom house—no
thing ? Was the violation of our maritime
rights, confeerated as they have been by the
solemn forms of a public treaty—nothing ?
o a word, was it nothing that our ships
were burnt on the high seas, without other
offence than that of belonging jo the U.
- States 3 or other apology, than was to be
found in the enhanced fafety of the perpet
rators ? Surely“if it be the duty of the U,
8. 40 resent the theoretical usurpations of the
Britith orders of November, I¥o7,it can
not be less their duty to complain of the daily
and practical outrages on the part of France !
It is indeed true, that were the people of
the U. § destitute of policy, of hoaor, an;d_ﬂ-,.
of energy, (as has been' insinuated) they .
night have adopted a fyllem of difcriminaa
tion between the two great beligerents ; they .
~might have drawn imaginary lines between
the firlt and second aggrefior 3 ‘they mighe
have rcfented inthe one a condu® to which
they tamely submitted in the other, and in
this way haves patched up 2 compromise
beiween ho nd interest, equally .weak .
and difgracéf. But such was not the
course they ‘purfued, and it is perhaps a
neccffary consequence of the jultice of
-their -measures, that they are at ‘this
day an independent nation ! But I will not
press this part of my subject ; it would be
affrontful to your excellency (knowing as
you do, that there are nét less than one
hundred American thips within his majelty’s
pofleflions, or that of his allies ) to multiply
proofs that the U." States have grounds of
complaint agaialt France., ~ . s
- My attention ia neceflarily called to an
othee-part of the fame paragraph, which -
ammediatcly follows the quotation alrecady
‘made, *** As soon,” fays’ your exeellency,
* s his majelty was informed of this measure
(the non intercouryfe law )it became his duty to
retaliate upon the American vefiels, not only
‘within his own territories, but also within
the covntries under his influcnce. Inthe
ports of Holland, Spain, Italy and Naples, ;
the American veflels have been [eized, bes
cavle the Americans bad seized French veflels v
* Theferemarks divide themselves iuto the
following hcadis T, : 3 5
-t Theright of his Majelty to seize and
confifcate Ametican veflels, within his own
“territories, e et RSB ER (E
- ad. Theright to do fo* within the terti.
‘tori¢s of his-allics; and . $0 W
3. The reason of that ri "}g’t_,su_'z; Because
Americans. bcdﬁi'z‘e'dfrm;bfw}ih. BB ALES
The firlt of these fubje@s vas beenalrcady
examined ; and the second must- dmﬂg i,
like the firlt since: HisMujefly’s rights withe
in thelimits of his ally cannot be greater
. ! N e Qi 1) S adiias Sl R RN T
.than within his own.—ls then it has been
TLe A i
butintended to guird ageinft hat fare of,
‘violence which unhappily prevailed ; tha <
it was "ﬁgﬁﬂ““z‘t 0 the ter
e thass s sALsy Sl pro-)
Coion ¢ wih be ot wnee S
M' %f?&i "?W%*";& i R
TT AR 198 -Tcprilaly ¢ %n%
T€ R sDt S SRR e