Portland gazette, and Maine advertiser — Portland, Me., 1810-02-19 00:00:00, page 1

INj. 45, of Vol. XII.'] MONDAY, FEBRUAR Y 19, 1810. \_JVhole N>. 6'7.
- - - - _ I_ __._____.____
f MR. DANA’S SPEECH,
\ On Giles’* Heftrtution for approbating the
Sa e conduit of the Executive—CuxtuueJ.
..
The correfpnndence gves us interefting in
forma.ion applicable IO the prefenr ful'jelt.
[ Under the adminiftration of the tint president
of the United States, the inquiry was made by
il the fec*v:ary of flare officially—whether the
acct edited Britifh mini liar plenipotmtiarr was
\ authorised to conclude arrangement* refpec
t, g c nme'ce, or 10 negotiate lurh arrange*
|| tncirs ? a hether he wa-» itifirueled to ex*
E plait c;te iatentin * of the B'itilh government
| A: to to® execution of an article of the deini*
| live treaty of peace ?
Ir doe* not f*em to have been imagined at
I that time that the irqury could be thought
[ it, vary in any refpell whatever from me hon
: ourable principles **f diplomatick intercourfe*.
f; Theanfwer is to be fouud in the letter to the
i fecretary of flare from the Bitifti minifter
plenipotentiary bearingda'e at Philadelphia,
■ the SO of November, 179l,thenexr day after
[ the official inquiry was made. Permit me
[ now, fir, to lla e luch pans of this letter as
appear the molt applicaDle to the calc be
I fore us
“ With refpeift to the non-execution of
[ the ?!h article of the definitive treaty of peace
[ between his Britannick m j.dlt and the U.
? Sr a e» of America which y<-u have reca'led to
jj tny attention it is (carcelv lu'ctlTary for me to
I xemaik to you, fir, fat the king my mailer
[ was induced to fufpend the execution of that
[ article on hi» part, in confequeace ot the non ■
[ compliance cn the part ot the United tates
I wih the engagement* contained in the 4;h
I 5th and 6th article* of the lame treaty.
| Thefc two nSjeols are therefore lo material y
[ conceded w'.h each other as n.>t to admit of
: fepararion, either in the mode of diicufiing
|. tt.em or in any (ubfequent arrangeirieu'» which
Fmay relult from that di buffi on.
u In itanng to you, lir, this mdifpen fable
consideration, I muff at the lame time allure
you. that in the confidence of expe L ciug a
Similar difpofition in the government jf the
U. State*, it i* In* ruajefty’s defire to remove
every ground and occasion of mbuiiderSlau
diog winch may arile between the two coun
trie* ; and iu conformity to that difpofitioa
in his mrjeSly I can add that I am infiru&ed to
enter into the difcuUrn of all Such measures
a* may be dten'.ed the moft practicable and
reaiouahle for giving effect to thofc flipula
lions of the definitive treaty, the execution of
which ha* hitherto been delayed as well by
the government of this country a* by that of
C.ea: Eriain.
u In anlwer to your queftioo on the fubjec'l
of i e commerce of G-eat Britain aud the U*
cited States, I can, alio inform you fir, that
the king is fit.ee> ely difpofcd to promute aud
facilitate the commercial intercourfe between
the two countries, and that I am authorized
to communicate to this government hi* majef
ty’» reach nets to enter into a negotia ion for
ehabltlhtng that intercourfe upon principle* cf
reciprocal benefit
-“ .vud 1 truft. I may be permitted to
add, that it would be the higheft obje<5k of
my ambition to be the humble inftrumetit of
contributing in any manner to Six upon a
permaneut bafts the future fyllern of harmony
and good understanding bet tv ecu the two couti
tries.”
Such i* the Jangu ge cf the British minifier
plenipotentiary, Mr Hammond He doe*
not leem to have iuf':e&ed any fcmblance of
iobecu, uni in the official inquiry ; for he re
turned an official anfwer, Such as I have ju!t
mentioned on the !u! j-Cts of the coriel| W;i
det.ee. and in tiie fame letter mentioned hi*
leufein obliging exprelfious of perfou .1 te
gard. The next letter which in (he pubiith
td correlpoudence uow before me i» alfo
from Mr. H- nnumd. The letter is fo ill rt,
and in point of pnuciple it na* io near re a
tiontotne prefent Subject, that the whole will
uow be Slated a* it appear* iu ihe primed col
lection.
M Philadelphia, Pee Ctb *791.
Mr. Htmtnonl, Minijler Pirmpvtent i t* 9 ij
(jrect lit it am, to dll'. 'J'jje’ji”», - ai/<iury 1J
State.
“ sit»,— As I am extremely folic:tous to a*
«my mifappr ebenfnm of my letter of ‘he
3>th ult - I have now the honour of hating to
you iu explanation of that part of it to winch
you have adverted in yours of yellerday, that
although (as I formerly mentioned iu my firft
touverfations with you after my arrival in
this country) I am not as yet empowered to
any definitive arrangement with ief
pe*fi to the commercial iuiercourfe between
fhe two countries, I ftill meant it to i>e un*
derftood, that I am fully authorized to enter
*•<* a megocMtkm for that purpofe, and into the
difculfton of luch principle* as m^y appear
l est cal. u ated to promote that objcdl on a
hafij of itciptoca! advantage.
lam further authoiized to receive any pro
pou:iuus which ihi* government may Le piea*
led to make to me upou this fubject
I have the honor to be, wi h every lenti
mem of refpedf and elteem, fir, your molt o
bedieut and moft humble fervant.
GLO. HAMMOND”
la this letter the diftinclion is marked be
tween e »ci*jii it uM art uhotment and eaten** into
6 o Q
•eg tittiom for that purpole. According to his
uwufucmeut, although fully author.zed to
*mer into negotiation, the miuifter wa. not
empowered to conciu ie au arrangement ret
pedling the commerca! intercourfe between
'he two countries J\> 10 the idea cf conclu
ding any definitive commercial arraugemeut,
t'erefore, there could be no further queitiun
LucertUc exilting circumliances—The miuif
ter plenipoteutiarv had uot the competent
powers ; and nothing ought to be doue ; and
**f Coutlc, under the adminiftration of the
®rlf B* cadent of the United .Mates nothing
"*>dcuv. But the Briiilli minifter plei»«i»o
ten'Miy undoubtedly believed hi tided fullf
iu idler i&.O a utgoaacua ; iuch
was hi* ftatement as diftindtly made in an offi
cial letter to the Secretary of 6 ate.—What
was the confequence ? I he fecretai y of Hate
addrefTed a letter the neit week to the Britifh \
mintfter plenipotentiary The letter was fhort ;
but very intelligible Gentlemen aie requef- j
ted to attend to the whole.
“ Phila delphia, Dec 13,1791.
“ Mr. JcfetsOm, Secretary of ltote to Air. Ham
mottd, A'unuter Plenipotentiary of G-eat Britain.
14 Sir, I have laid before the Prtfident of
the United States the lexers of Nov. 20th and
, Dec. 6th with which you honored me : and in
| confequence ihcreof, and particu'arly of that
part of your letter of December 6‘h, where
I you fay that you are fully authorised to enter
into a negociation for the purpofe of arrarg .
; ing the commercial intercourle between the
, two countries. I have the honor to inform
; you that 1 am ready to receive a cwmmunica
I lion of your full powers for that purpofe at
any time you fhall think proper, and to pro
ceed immediately to their object. I have &c.
44 TH: JEFFERbON.”
Such was the principle and fuel* the style
. of diplomatick propriety under the adminis
tration of Prefidt-nt Washington. The Britiik
minj'.ter plenipotentiary returned an aufwer
| the following day. 1 will read every part of
i it as 1 find it, that geutlemeu may judge on a
, fair view of the whoie.
“ Pbtlaklpbia, Dec 14, 1791.
u Air. Hammond Alinitlcr Plenipotentiary cf Great
Btciain, to Air. f<-Jftrfon, Secretary of State.
i “ Sir,
“ In anfwer to your letter of yesterday, I
car. only repeat what I have before lUud in
my frit converfations with you after my arri
val a:.d fufrequently in my letter of the 6th
of this moot h; viz that I have no ipeciat com
m.ihon empowering me to ^mluJe'cay definitive
arrangement upon ihelubjtdi of the commer
ce I lutcrci urle between Great Bi itain and the j
United bta es- But that 1 conceive roylelf
fu' y competent to enter into a negotiation with
j ihi* government for that j'urpole, in the dil- '
cullion cf the principle* winch may ferve as
the bafis and conltiru*e the (bpufations of any
: fuch definitive arrangement.
# ml * • .. • -
* i is opinion or my competency is found
ed upon my iuitruciions tnaimuch as they are
to retina e my perfona! couiiud. ana upon
the cor.vnflion tha* the Utter of credence from
hit nu-rjefty mveded me wi.« a general
ttnt’jty character, which I had the honor of
presenting to the Pretident of the United States
and Ids ronfeipaeot recognition of me iu that
character, are authorities decided'y adequate
to the commencement of a preliminary nego
tiation
I have the honour to he,
With feutiments uf great rcfpect,
Sir,
Your moft obedient and
Humble fervast,
GEO: HAMMOND.’*
The courfe of correfpondence had cow
(hewn, tiiat the Britifli minifter plenipoten
tiary believed hunfelf fully autlioiieed to adl
as negotiator, becaufe he had presented his let
ter of credence to the Pielident of the United
Stares and been received accordingly, and be
caute too he had inftrudtions to regulate his
perfonat conduct, but which he did uot think
proper to communicate, and which he does
not appear to have been at liberty *e commu
nicate to the American government.
If the letter of credence could be regarded
as authorizing *he negociaiion, it had already
been preleu ed to the prehdeut of the United
ctaies. 1 hat tins did not conftitute the com
petent authority, therefore, mull have been
decided by tiie prehde it, beyond controverly,
a* the date of the letter which invited the
1 Lritilh nun -icr plenipotentiary to conunu
nica.e his lull power.
i! i» now »o i'e i(collected,(na.t in hi* letter
j of the SCth of November ihe mimlter had
j mentioned his being intbudted to enter into
! d IculM-i.* with relpeft ro a tides ot a defiui
• live ire-!■ v, which bid been conc'uded, but
i •
i no. fully executed. According to lmowude
J cilion, he wanted competent authority to con
j elude a definitive commercial arrangement l;e
tweru the two countries anti according to the
d’.Ci of n * r 11 1 < (ident of the United
Mi i niiou ’tvd y he wan ed the competent
au'horiry *o negociate Inch arrangement.
Ai^' i ,u ;ior.» eip. tiie i by the miniiter in his
letter, of the (»ih aud I4ih December could
not be fu proved to revet ft* adecifion deiiber
a'.e’y orm'd y ]*r<fid*nt Wailtington ; and a
| c n'toverli.it corrcfpandruca relative to fuch
opinions might be worfe than ufelel*. Of
; courie.it woo'd accord with expedience a* well
i as diplomatic decorum to abftaiu from remark
j ing on thofe letters in fours correfpotideace.
But to dbcus t).e refreclive claims and com
, 1
I plaints might conin'- u;e toadifliidt knowl
edge of the affairs, and undoubtedly liie mimf
ter might eutcrintofurh difeuffinns No dif
cuffrona however multiplied, could constitute
j a stipulation *ot any ihiug to he done on the
‘ part of the government of either country. Ac
! cordiogly, it is worthy of obfet vation, that ifee
letter of the 14th of Dec. from the Briiilli
miniiter plenipotentiary is not mentioned in
■ the letter of the ncxi day from the Secretary
of Sta'e, who acknowledges the nnnifter’s let
ter of the 30th of November without feeming
to recollect any thing of the intervening cor
I refpondence. I will now Hate the introdu&o
j ry part of this letter from the Secretary of
i Slate.
“ Pbilad Ifhia, Dec. 15, !79l
“ Air. JrJprrf»”t FtC'ttury uf Slate, t* Air. Hum
rurnd, Alintfler tletipMntury <f G> eut-lirtiav*.
i “ fi'r,
1 am to acknowledge the honor of your let
; ter of Nov. 30th, and to exprefs »he fatisfac
| turn with which we learn, that y< u are inUruc
; ted to difeuf* w ith us the meafure* which rea
fon and practicability may d.dlare for giving
effect to the ftipu'ation* of cur tieaty yet re
: mainiug to be executed.1 I can allure you, on
the part of the United Sta e? of every difpofi
tion to Itffen difficulties by passing over what
ever is of fmalter concern and infilling on thole
ir.auer* only which either juiffee i© individuals
t I
or publick policy render ind fpenfable : and
in order to limplify our dilculiions by dehumg
precife y their ol jesSts, I have the honour to
propofe, that we lliall begin by fpecifying on
each side the particular a&s which each con
fiders to have been done by tne other in con
travention of the treaty. I Hudl fet the ex
ample ”
Such authorities we have before us in the
political hiftory of our own country.
On confidering the rcfolution from the fen
ate, the fubjetfk does not appear to be placed
on the proper bafts. 1 am agaiuil the rtfolu
tion.
Communication*.
TZty cponitor.No. XX.
“ Come •with vie and see rny zealfur the Lord.”
THE conduct ol Jehu, the son of Nini
shi, may furnish a subject for profitable
speculation. He was a highly distinguish
(1 instillment in the hand ol the Lord. But
he could not Dear such elevation. As it is
written of him, “ he took no heed to walk
in the law of the Lord God of Israel with
all Ids heart, for he departed not from the
sins of Jeroboam, the soil of N^-bat, who
made Israel to sin.’* And yet he appeal a
to have been a very high professor, in that
he w as not content to walk rigidly in the
observance of the ceremonial law, but he
called aloud in the streets to Jehcnadab,
saying, “ Come with me, and see my zeai
for the Lord. ’ To the honor of christiani*
ly he it spoken, that its precepts point to
the heart. To he a Christian, a man must
be, and not merely stem to be. Hence the
hollow-hearted professor is the more easily
discovered. In vain does a man say that
he feels the power of religion—in vaiil does
he, like the pharisee, make long prayers—
in vain does he tith mint, amuse, and cum
min, if lie neglects the weightier matters
of the law. If the Christian temper be not
cultivated, and if he do nut show, by a cor
respondent conduct, that the peace of God
rules in his heart, notwithstanding his high
professions, and although his zeal should e
qual that of Jehu, yet it *s but as the “ soun
ding brass and tinkling cymbal.” The
world abounds with such professor*. Their
own orthodox creed, or their supposed at
tainments in religious experience, supply
the place of vital piety. Every one who
does not reach tl.cir standard is cast out w.
made an anathema. Being wedded to a
It vv darling woida, they will allow no one
O * {
to be a believer who cannot pronounce the
same- But these things are lor out admo
nition- Notwithstanding the conduct of
hypocritical professors, ever since the days
of Jehu, would seem to dissuade from any
profession of godliness whatever, yet the
voice of inspiialien is still crying, “ who is
, on the Lord’s side ?” l'ne most eilectual
way of discountenancing evil is lobe zeal
ously active in that which is right. There
fore, while the Jehu’s ol the age arc shout
ing aloud “ Come and see my zeal,” let
the lowly Christian cultivate those pure doc- 1
trinal feelings which subdue native corrup
tion, retine '.he temper, and lift the soul
! above the world.
RELIGIOUS REFLECTIONS.
THAT the religious institutions should
be sue: edly observed ; that the scriptures
should be studied, and regarded as the
rule of our practice, is certainly right and
proper. “ YVe have heard with our ears,
uni our fathers have told us” what inex
pressible advantages have resulted from a
pu us course of life And I may add fur
ther, “ we ourselves have seen that the
righteous man is more excellent than his
neighbor.** Religion is a rational, o|>cra*
live principle, extending its influence to ev
ery individual action, and is necessarily con
nected with good works. Though a m .n
say, “ I am religious,” and does not evince
tlie mnh of his assertion by a scries of good
actions, “ he is a liar, and the truth is not
m hint.** Morality is not religion, but re
ligion cannot exist without morality. The
one is essential to the being of the other.
A man may put on a solemn countenance ;
may make great pretensions ; may constant
ly attend meetings day and night; yet if
he conduct not honestly, if he do not exer
cise charily—if he is given to slandering &.
calumniating a brother for no other cause
than that of differing from him in senti
ment, he is destitute of the spirit of relig
ion. RELlGIObUS.
FOR THE GAZETTE.
jethro7....^^ H;
THE next thing we are to consider as be
longing to the character of good rulers, is,
that they he “ men of truth.” It would seem
hardly proper to make this a subject of par
ticular remark, were there not too much
reason to fear, that, however essential, it
fails of deserved attention. Government,
in its very nature, and therefore under e\e
r> form, requires that respect he paid to
loose who sustain its several offices liut,
shall we transfer Hie honour due to authon
ity to mere place, instead of confining it, as
we ought to do in a gruat measure, to the
persons by whom »t is fdkdl Without -
4.
particular regard to the character of candi
dates for public trust, we shall be reduced
to one of these difficulties we must ei
ther violate the rule enjoined both by rea
son and scripture, of giving “honour to!
whom honour i* due,’* or respect those j
whose conduct is rather deserving of con
tt mpt; or else do homage to a shadow, the
abstract idea of station. 1 hese inconveni
ences, however, may be avoided, by select
ing lor public patronage, such men as will
throw lustre upon the rank to which they
are raised, instead of seeking their impor
tance merely in their elevation.
The tepio..ch attached to falsehood is so
apparent, that we need be ouly reminded of
the fact. So deep is the stigma which the
opinions and customs of men have fixed u|>
on it, that no charge is met or retaliated |
with so much indignation as that of a He, i
Such being the case, what shall we think of
those, who would thrust themselves into]
the most conspicuous situations, when, by
their contempt of truth, they have already
disgraced the middle and obscure walks of
life. A large portion of the absurdity be
longing to them, it is evident, must tall to
the share of citizens at large, should they
give their suffrages te men, so undeserving
of the public favour.
But there is a mere important reflection
to urge under this topic. There is great,
danger that a disposition adverse to truth ‘
will not be confined within any model ate (
bounds. Thy man who indulges it, has long
since overcome the dread of deception and
fraud in common affairs ;—by assigning him ;
a post of honour, you will soon find him ca-1
p^ble of contending with the solemnity of an .
oatn. rle Hi ay mueeu ue uiiaiuus \u avuiu
the charge and punishment of peijury ; yet,
it must be recollected, that there me many
waj s, in which an oalh may be violated,
with little room for detection, though much
for mischief. Where now is the ground of
your confidence ? You have seen the re
straint dissolved, which civilized and chi is- •
ti.vn society has, for ages, imposed upon the
good and the bad—upon the man of truth,'
and upon him who “ maketli a lie.” But,
you will endeavour to lenaedy the evil,1
which you had not been cautious enough to
prevent ; and, by withdrawing your sup.
port, seek to make some compensation for
your past imprudence. Tins indeed is far
bi tter than persevering in error ; yet your
prescription will not reach that poison j
which has already circulated through ti e
public veins, and afforded nourishment to
those seeds of dissolution which every poli
tical, as well as natural body, encloses with
in itself. ' RLCLUSE.
. !!■■■ • »• 11 mmrnmm n ■ n —
C^i0cdtancou0 flection*.
C? MARK THIS. j
The following paper is entitled,
from the importance of its contents
to a furious pciufal and the molt pro
found pondering. We fhall only add
that it comes from a perfon whole
pen has never deceived us.
'^Ba!t. Bed- Rtf kb.
TO THE PEOPLE.
Suppofe in the firlt place, Mr. Onis
the Ambaffador from Spain to the
United States, fully authorized to
offer our government eight millions
of dollars in lieu cf the Ioffes w hich j
our merchants have fuftained by cap
tures.
I
Suppofe, in the next place, Mr. O- i
nis empowered to fettle the difputed
limits of Louifiania to our fatisfadfion.
And gdly—Suppofe the Prefident,
Mr. Madifon, though well allured
that Mr. Onis pofleffes thefe powers,:
and is ready to enter into the nrcefla
ry ftipulations, yet perfifling in his .
determination not to receive him in '
any character, under which the fa:d
offers could be carried into effect.
Should thefe fuppofiuons prove
realities, how in the name of our
country lhall we account for the con
duct of our Prefident on this occu-|
fion ? Mr. Onis is the rcprefentative
wt a nation legitimately ftruggling for;
liberty and independence, againlt an;
invader, whofe claim confiiis in his •
legions and cannon. Can the refuf
ing to receive this minifler be juffifi
ed on the ground of ufage cr policy ?
It can be juitified on neither ground
Why then has he been lefufed ? it is
poflible I may hereafter aflign the
true reafon.
Ponder, I befeech ycu, my fellow
citizens, upon thefe things, and dis
cover if you can, a clue to the mvitc
rious conduct of our Prefident. And
now learn for a certainty whai I have
Hated hypothetically, tbu: Mr. MuJ
1
ison knows Mr. Gnis has patent paw.
ers to fettle with our government the dif
puted Loufian* limits, and to secure to
our merchants eight millions of dollarsf
as an indemnification for the capture of
their property. VERITAS.
“ If faid Mr. Bibb, of Georgia, all
the States were as ready for war as
Georgia is, I fhould be ready and wil
ling t® encounter it” ! ! Now, broth
er Bobadil, what do you call this ?
1 he puilTant State of Georgia, which
five hundred French hufTars, or
Bririfh light dragoons could fcour, is
perfectly ready for war. While old
MafTachufetts, who can fend forth,
from her hundred hilis, her well arm
ed legions, who can bid defiance to a
ny invading foe, fhuddeis at the
thought of the evils of an unjuft and
unneceflary war. This is an exa£t
picture of human nature. The ftrong
and manly are too proud to boast
they leave the artillery of boaftful
words to the feeble and the timid.
State of Wilkinson's /rmy%
As reported to Ccngrefs by the Secretary
of War.
Privates fit for duty 27<#
Do. SICK! 621
Da. Abfent S99
Do. DEAD ! from May I, 523
Officers on duty 43
Do- SICK ! 17
Do. DEAD ! lb
Do. RESIGNED 51
Do. Abfent 46
It is believed that if General Wilkinfon had
removed t be army agreeably to his orders there
would not have been 300 fick and dead, in
ftead of 1200. Before we place to this awful
account the lives and ill health of fo many of
his fellow beings, l«t us, however,) hear his de
fence) to prepare for which he is allowed tho
time of four months.—*-Frumamt ^ourHalt
“ The Embargo is a peaceful meaf
ure, of juft and impartial tendency, cal
culated to fave our resources, and to
coerce the belligerents by its reftrictive
energies ft—Mr. Jefferlon.
COMMENT.
I have before me a return of exports
from Quebec, by which it appears
that the value of articles exported,
which, before the embargo did not
exceed one million and half of dol
lars, in 1808, amounted to four mil
lions—and in 1809, tofven millions,
which is a larger turn than all JVJaf
fachufetts exported in i8c6, cf arti
cle* of domeftic growth ! ! bo that
the trade of Canada has inertafed
fourfold, and the population of thrte
hundred thoufand fouls carry on as
much foreign trade, as did our pop
ulation of fix hundred thoufand a few
years ltnce. Thus, we fee the ef
fect of our rdlri<ftive energies, on
our enemies—v/e fee too, that the
Non-Jnterccurfe is ft ill better for our
foes than the Embargo—and Macons
bill will confummaie his profperity.
■sac tu
By the law of Net* Humfjbire a perfon can*
not continue a Judge at.er he is feveciy years
of age.—This is undoubtedly on the prefunip
tion tiiat the faculties at that age are general
ly impaired. Mr l.jtxceox, when Govern
or, often executed this la* by dihnutals; and
once with the appearance «•» c-dcul, iug
promptnel\ to till a vacancy j tt as he was
going out of uihce h.ruled ! out this lame
Mr. Lanodon appears iiuhtfeieut to the law,
and to have imbibed neither hint nor IcfT.n
from it, tor he now, at fe<vt(.!f yean if ore, con
feuts to be revr*H a. a lAat iu*.e laC iLe Ot
fizt Of Governor ! /
The rjjtx Junto appear to get
ting in favor wuh the de.n.c t«rs. It
irons that they have lclcctrd two
apoilatcs trom the l'flex phalanx for
Governor and Lieutenant Governor,
i his ia too bad ! \v as it not enough
o
ior that aipuing county to .cad the
Federal bands, (.is the democrats pre
tetui) bur n»uli tney prdoun* to gov
ern the democratic party a ho ?
Our adnuniftra.tog at the dTmiii'.il
of Mi. J rtt xiou, *>1 a. ed the ada.r on a
perianal ground a* regarded that gen
tleman, made no charge again It ins
government as to the nfniuaaon im
puted to him, ai d inv.tcd a new inif
lion. How then has u become more
improper now, than it \v*i four
im mbs tioce, to plav “ G: i. ave tne
King! —it it w*ie *■ God Save Air.
JackJouJ it might clciCiv- comment
—although it is wre turned wc me
tuch Chi 14 - iatii a* G wait everv bocV
/-I * *
sect
«