Data policies, laws, and regulations: Creating a trust environment

No AccessJun 2021Data policies, laws, and regulations: Creating a trust environmentAuthors/Editors: World BankWorld BankSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1600-0_ch6AboutView ChaptersFull TextPDF (0.4 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract: Finds that trust in data transactions is sustained by a robust legal and regulatory framework encompassing both safeguards, which prevent the misuse of data, and enablers, which facilitate access to and reuse of data. Safeguards must differentiate between personal data, requiring a rights-based approach with individual protection, and nonpersonal data, allowing a balancing of interests in data reuse. In particular, cybersecurity must address cybercrime and offer personal data protection. Enablers for data sharing are typically more developed for public intent data, where public policy and law mandating data access and sharing are more readily established, than for private intent data, where governmental influence is limited. While no one size fits all for a legal and regulatory framework, the urgency of taking action will depend on how far a country’s legal and regulatory framework has evolved to be internally coherent and aligned with the country’s policy orientation, data culture, and social contract on data. ReferencesAnderson, Thea and Elizabeth M Renieris. 2020. “Data Protection and Digital Infrastructure before, during, and after a Pandemic.” Omidyar Network, Redwood City, CA. https://omidyar.com/data-protection-and-digital-infrastructure-before-during-and-after-a-pandemic/. Google ScholarAustin, Lisa M and David Lie. 2019. “Safe Sharing Sites.” NYU Law Review 94 (4): 591–623. https://www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-94-number-4/safe-sharing-sites/. Google ScholarBen-Avie, Jochai and Udbhav Tiwari. 2019. “India’s New Data Protection Bill: Strong on Companies, Step Backward on Government Surveillance.” Open Policy and Advocacy (blog), December 10, 2019. https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2019/12/10/indias-new-data-protection-bill-strong-on-companies-weak-on-gov. Google ScholarBorgogno, Oscar and Giuseppe Colangelo. 2019. “Data Sharing and Interoperability: Fostering Innovation and Competition through APIs.” Computer Law and Security Review 35 (5): 105314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.008. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCavoukian, Ann. 2010. “Privacy by Design: The Definitive Workshop; A Foreword by Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D.” Identity in the Information Society 3 (2): 247–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12394-010-0062-y. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCavoukian, Ann. 2011. “PbD, Privacy by Design, the 7 Foundational Principles: Implementation and Mapping of Fair Information Practices.” Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Toronto. Google ScholarChen, Rong. 2021. “Mapping Data Governance Legal Frameworks around the World: Findings from the Global Data Regulation Diagnostic.” Policy Research Working Paper 9615, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/581331617817680243/Mapping-Data-Governance-Legal-Frameworks-Around-the-World-Findings-from-the-Global-Data-Regulation-Diagnostic. Google ScholarCision. 2020. “Helsinki and Amsterdam First Cities in the World to Launch Open AI Register.” Cision News, September 28, 2020. Cision, Chicago. https://news.cision.com/fi/city-of-helsinki/r/helsinki-and-amsterdam-first-cities-in-the-world-to-launch-open-ai-register,c3204076. Google ScholarCity of Amsterdam. 2020. “What Is the Algorithm Register?” City of Amsterdam Algorithm Register Beta. https://algoritmeregister.amsterdam.nl/en/ai-register/. Google ScholarCity of Helsinki. 2020. “What Is an Artificial Intelligence Register?” City of Helsinki Artificial Intelligence Register. https://ai.hel.fi/. Google ScholarCOE (Council of Europe). 2018. “Convention 108+: Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data.” COE, Strasbourg. https://rm.coe.int/convention-108-convention-for-the-protection-of-individuals-with-regar/16808b36f1. Google ScholarConfessore, Nicholas. 2018. “Cambridge Analytica and Facebook: The Scandal and the Fallout So Far.” New York Times, April 4, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-scandal-fallout.html. Google ScholarCongress of the Philippines. 2012. “Republic Act No. 10173: An Act Protecting Individual Personal Information in Information and Communications Systems in the Government and the Private Sector, Creating for This Purpose a National Privacy Commission, and for Other Purposes.” August 12, 2012, Lawphil Project, Arellano Law Foundation, Manila. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2012/ra_10173_2012.html. Google ScholarCouncil of Ministers, Jordan. 2019. “Jordan Open Government Data License.” Issue version 1.0, Open Government Data Platform. https://portal.jordan.gov.jo/OGD-License_en.pdf. Google ScholarCouncil of the European Union. 2019. “Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters.” Interinstitutional File 2018/0108(COD), Council of the European Union, Brussels. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10206-2019-INIT/en/pdf. Google ScholarDastin, Jeffrey. 2018. “Amazon Scraps Secret AI Recruiting Tool That Showed Bias against Women.” Reuters, October 10, 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G. Google ScholarData.NSW. 2020. “NSW Government Information Classification, Labelling, and Handling Guidelines.” Data.NSW, Data Analytics Center, Customer, Delivery, and Transformation, Department of Customer Service, Government of New South Wales, Sydney. https://www.digital.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/NSW%20Info%20Classification%20Labelling%20and%20Handling%20Guidelines%202020%20V2.1_1.pdf. Google ScholarDCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport, United Kingdom). 2019. “Digital Charter.” Policy Paper, DCMS, London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-charter/digital-charter. Google ScholarDeighton-Smith, Rex, Angelo Erbacci, and Céline Kauffmann. 2016. “Promoting Inclusive Growth through Better Regulation: The Role of Regulatory Impact Assessment.” OECD Regulatory Policy Working Paper 3, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm3tqwqp1vj-en. Google Scholarde Montjoye, Yves-Alexandre, César A Hidalgo, Michel Verleysen, and Vincent D Blondel. 2013. “Unique in the Crowd: The Privacy Bounds of Human Mobility.” Scientific Reports 3 (1): article 1376. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01376. CrossrefGoogle ScholarDLA Piper. 2020. Data Protection Laws of the World. London: DLA Piper. https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/index.html?t=about&c=AO. Google ScholarDodds, Leigh. 2016. “How to Write a Good Open Data Policy.” Guides. Open Data Institute, London. Google ScholarDong, Marissa Xiao. 2020. “China: The Civil Code Strengthens Civil Law Protection around Privacy and Personal Information.” Conventus Law, June 12, 2020. http://www.conventuslaw.com/report/china-the-civil-code-strengthens-civil-law/. Google ScholarDwork, Cynthia. 2006. “Differential Privacy.” In Automata, Languages and Programming: 33rd International Colloquium, ICALP 2006, Venice, Italy, July 10–14, 2006, Proceedings, Part II, edited by Bugliesi, Michele, Bart Preneel, Vladimiro Sassone, and Ingo Wegener, 1–12. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, Vol. 4052. Berlin: Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F11787006_1. CrossrefGoogle ScholarEC (European Commission). 2014. “Guidelines on the Implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union Judgment on ‘Google Spain and INC v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González’ C-131/12.” Document WP225, Directorate C (Fundamental Rights and Union Citizenship), Directorate General Justice, EC, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=667236. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2015. “A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe.” Document COM(2015) 192 final, EC, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=EN. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2016. “EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020: Accelerating the Digital Transformation of Government.” Document COM(2016) 179 final, EC, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0179. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2017. “Article 29 Data Protec-tion Working Party: Guidelines on the Right to Data Portability.” Document WP242 rev.01, Directorate C (Fundamental Rights and Rule of Law), Directorate General Justice and Consumers, EC, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=611233. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2018a. “Article 29 Working Party: Guidelines on Consent under Regulation 2016/679.” Document WP259 rev.01, Directorate C (Fundamental Rights and Union Citizenship), Directorate General Justice, EC, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=51030. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2018b. “Guidance on Private Sector Data Sharing.” Text. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future—European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/guidance-private-sector-data-sharing. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2018c. Study to Support the Review of Directive 2003/98/EC on the Re-Use of Public Sec-tor Information: Final Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/373622. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2020a. “European Legislation on Open Data and the Re-Use of Public Sector Information.” Shaping Europe’s Digital Future: Policy. Data Policy and Innovation (Unit G.1), EC, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/european-legislation-reuse-public-sector-information. Google ScholarEC (European Commission). 2020b. “A European Strategy for Data.” Communication COM(2020) 66 final, Brussels, EC. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-european-strategy-data-19feb2020_en.pdf. Google ScholarECHR (European Court of Human Rights). 2010. “European Convention on Human Rights.” ECHR and Council of Europe, Strasbourg. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf. Google ScholarECHR (European Court of Human Rights). 2020. Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to Respect for Private and Family Life, Home and Correspondence, rev. ed. Strasbourg: ECHR. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_8_eng.pdf. Google ScholarEDPB (European Data Protection Board). 2018. “Guidelines 2/2018 on Derogations of Article 49 under Regulation 2016/679.” Guidelines. EDPB, Brussels. https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_guidelines_2_2018_derogations_en.pdf. Google ScholarEDPS (European Data Protection Supervisor). 2014. “Mauritius Declaration on the Internet of Things.” 36th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Balaclava, Mauritius, October 14, 2014. https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/14-10-14_mauritius_declaration_en.pdf. Google ScholarEDRi (European Digital Rights). 2015. “A Truly Digital Single Market?” June, EDRi, Brussels. https://edri.org/files/DSM_Analysis_EDRi_20150617.pdf. Google ScholarENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity). 2014. “Privacy and Data Protection by Design: From Policy to Engineering.” ENISA, Heraklion, Greece. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2824/38623. Google ScholarENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity). 2019. “Pseudonymisation Techniques and Best Practices: Recommendations on Shaping Technology According to Data Protection and Privacy Provisions.” ENISA, Heraklion, Greece. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/pseudonymisation-techniques-and-best-practices. Google ScholarEtalab. 2020a. “Algorithmes de Nantes Métropole.” data.gouv.fr, October 7, 2020, Etalab, Paris. https://www.data.gouv.fr/en/datasets/algorithmes-de-nantes-metropole/. Google ScholarEtalab. 2020b. “Les algorithmes publics: enjeux et obligations” [Public sector algorithms: challenges and obligations]. guides.etalab.gouv.fr, Etalab, Paris. https://guides.etalab.gouv.fr/algorithmes/guide/#_1-a-quoi-servent-les-algorithmes-publics. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2014. “Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions in the Internal Market and Repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.” Official Journal of the European Union L 257/73 (August 8). https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/eidas_regulation.pdf. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2015. “Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on Payment Services in the Internal Market, Amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and Repealing Directive 2007/64/EC.” Official Journal of the European Union L 337/35 (December 23). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015L2366&from=EN. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2016. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Official Journal of the European Union L 119/1 (May 4). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018a. “Art. 6 GDPR: Lawfulness of Processing.” GDPR.Eu, November 14, 2018. Proton Technologies, Calgary, Canada. https://gdpr.eu/article-6-how-to-process-personal-data-legally/. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018b. “Recital 26: Not Applicable to Anonymous Data.” GDPR.Eu, November 14, 2018. Proton Technologies, Calgary, Canada. https://gdpr.eu/recital-26-not-applicable-to-anonymous-data/. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018c. “Recital 43: Freely Given Consent.” GDPR.Eu, November 14, 2018. Proton Technologies, Calgary, Canada. https://gdpr.eu/recital-43-freely-given-consent/. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018d. “Recital 68: Right of Data Portability.” GDPR.Eu, November 14, 2018. Proton Technologies, Calgary, Canada. https://gdpr.eu/recital-68-right-of-data-portability/. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018e. “Regulation (EU) 2018/1807 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 on a Framework for the Free Flow of Non-personal Data in the European Union.” Official Journal of the European Union L 303, 61 (November 10): 78–68. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2018:303:FULL&from=EN. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2018f. “What Is GDPR, the EU’s New Data Protection Law?” GDPR.Eu, May 25, 2018. Proton Technologies, Calgary, Canada. https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2019a. “Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services.” Official Journal of the European Union L 136/1 (May 22). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L0770&from=EN. Google ScholarEU (European Union). 2019b. “Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on Open Data and the Re-Use of Public Sector Information.” Official Journal of the European Union L 172/56 (June 26). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1024&from=EN. Google ScholarFang, Sammy, Carolyn Bigg, and John Zhang. 2020. “New Chinese Civil Code Introduces Greater Protection of Privacy Rights and Personal Information.” Insights, June 9, 2020, DLA Piper, London. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/uk/insights/publications/2020/06/new-chinese-civil-code-introduces-greater-protection-of-privacy-rights-and-personal-information/. Google ScholarFederal Register of Legislation, Australia. 2019. “Competition and Consumer Act 2010, No. 51, 1974.” Compilation 121. Sydney: Office of Parliamentary Counsel. http://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2019C00317/Html/Volume_1. Google ScholarFinch, Kelsey and Omer Tene. 2018. “Smart Cities: Privacy, Transparency, and Community.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, edited by Selinger, Evan, Jules Polonetsky, and Omer Tene, 125–48. Cambridge Law Handbooks Series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316831960.007. CrossrefGoogle ScholarFisher, Angelina and Thomas Streinz. 2021. “Confronting Data Inequality.” WDR 2021 background paper, World Bank, Washington, DC. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3825724. Google ScholarFTC (Federal Trade Commission, United States). 2018. Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C § 1681, rev. ed. Washington, DC: FTC. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/statutes/fair-credit-reporting-act/545a_fair-credit-reporting-act-0918.pdf. Google ScholarGellman, Barton. 2013. “Edward Snowden, after Months of NSA Revelations, Says His Mission’s Accomplished.” Washington Post, December 23, 2013. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/edward-snowden-after-months-of-nsa-revelations-says-his-missions-accomplished/2013/12/23/49fc36de-6c1c-11e3-a523-fe73f0ff6b8d_story.html. Google ScholarGelman, Robert B 1998. Protecting Yourself Online: The Definitive Resource on Safety, Freedom, and Privacy in Cyberspace. With Stanton McCandlish and Members of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. New York: HarperCollins. Google ScholarGPO (Government Publishing Office, United States). 2018. Communications Act of 1934, as Amended. United States Code, 2018 ed. Title 47: Telecommunications. Washington, DC: GPO. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2018-title47/USCODE-2018-title47-chap5-subchapI-sec151. Google ScholarGreenleaf, Graham and Bertil Cottier. 2020. “2020 Ends a Decade of 62 New Data Privacy Laws.” Privacy Laws and Business International Report 163: 24–26. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3572611. Google ScholarHasselbalch, Gry and Pernille Tranberg. 2016. “Personal Data Stores Want to Give Individuals Power over Their Data.” Dataethics (blog), September 27, 2016. https://dataethics.eu/personal-data-stores-will-give-individual-power-their-data/. Google ScholarHenley, Jon and Robert Booth. 2020. “Welfare Surveillance System Violates Human Rights, Dutch Court Rules.” Guardian, February 5, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/feb/05/welfare-surveillance-system-violates-human-rights-dutch-court-rules. Google ScholarHill, Kashmir. 2020. “Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm.” New York Times, August 3, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/technology/facial-recognition-arrest.html. Google ScholarHLCM (High-Level Committee on Management, United Nations). 2018. “Personal Data Protection and Privacy Principles.” HLCM, Chief Executives Board for Coordination, United Nations, Geneva. https://unsceb.org/personal-data-protection-and-privacy-principles. Google ScholarHoofnagle, Chris Jay, Woodrow Hartzog, and Daniel J Solove. 2019. “The FTC Can Rise to the Privacy Challenge, but Not without Help from Congress.” Brookings TechTank (blog), August 8, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2019/08/08/the-ftc-can-rise-to-the-privacy-challenge-but-not-without-help-from-congress/. Google ScholarHuyer, Esther and Gianfranco Cecconi. 2020. “Business-to-Government Data Sharing.” Analytical Report 12, European Data Portal, European Commission, Luxembourg. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/analytical_report_12_business_government_data_sharing.pdf. Google ScholarICO (Information Commissioner’s Office). 2018. Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Wilmslow, UK: ICO. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr-1-1.pdf. Google ScholarICO (Information Commissioner’s Office). 2019. “The Use of Live Facial Recognition Technology by Law Enforcement in Public Places.” Information Commissioner’s Opinion, 2019/01, October 31, 2019. https://ico.org.uk/media/about-the-ico/documents/2616184/live-frt-law-enforcement-opinion-20191031.pdf. Google ScholarISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2018. “ISO/PC 317: Consumer Protection: Privacy by Design for Consumer Goods and Services.” Taking Part: Technical Committee, ISO, Geneva. https://www.iso.org/committee/6935430.html. Google ScholarISO (International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2016. “ISO/IEC 27011:2016(en): Information Technology, Security Techniques, Code of Practice for Information Security Controls Based on ISO/IEC 27002 for Telecommunications Organizations.” Online Browsing Platform, ISO, Geneva, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:27011:ed-2:v1:en. Google ScholarISO (International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2017. “ISO/IEC 19941:2017, Information Technology, Cloud Computing, Interoperability, and Portability.” Online Browsing Platform, ISO, Geneva. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:19941:ed-1:v1:en. Google ScholarITU (International Telecommunication Union). 2014. “Using Regulatory Impact Analysis to Improve Decision Making in the ICT Sector.” ITU, Geneva. Google ScholarKirkpatrick, Robert. 2014. “A Big Data Revolution for Sustainable Development.” In The Global Compact International Yearbook 2014, edited by United Nations Global Compact Office, 33–35. New York: United Nations; Münster, Germany: macondo publishing. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKosseff, Jeff. 2019. The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. CrossrefGoogle ScholarKrämer, Jan, Pierre Senellart, and Alexandre de Streel. 2020. “Making Data Portability More Effective for the Digital Economy: Economic Implications and Regulatory Challenges.” Center on Regulation in Europe, Brussels. https://cerre.eu/publications/report-making-data-portability-more-effective-digital-economy/. Google ScholarLégifrance. 2016. “Loi no 2016-1321 du 7 octobre 2016 pour une République numérique.” Journal officiel de la République française, October 8, 2016, Légifrance, Direction de l’information légale et administrative, Paris. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/file/SJ9w29KN2wvvWjcmiPwHr3B0La5rYk6ys5dm_FwTPZs=/JOE_TEXTE. Google ScholarLessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarLOC (Library of Congress, United States). 1998. “H. R. 2281 Digital Millennium Copyright Act: 105th Congress (1997–1998).” Congress.gov, October 28, 1998, LOC, Washington, DC. https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/2281. Google ScholarLOC (Library of Congress, United States). 2018. “H. R. 4943, CLOUD Act: 115th Congress (2017–2018).” Congress.gov, February 6, 2018, LOC, Washington, DC. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4943. Google ScholarLubarsky, Boris. 2017. “Re-Identification of ‘Anonymized’ Data.” Georgetown Law Technology Review (April): 202–13. https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/re-identification-of-anonymized-data/GLTR-04-2017/. Google ScholarLum, Kristian. 2016. “Predictive Policing Reinforces Police Bias.” HRDAG: Human Rights Data Analysis Group, October 10. http://hrdag.org/2016/10/10/predictive-policing-reinforces-police-bias/. Google ScholarMeitY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology). 2020. “Report by the Committee of Experts on Non-Personal Data Governance Framework.” 111972/2020/CL & ES. MeitY, New Delhi. https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/28/2020/08/mygov_159453381955063671.pdf. Google ScholarMETI (Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, Japan). 2018. “METI Formulates ‘Contract Guidance on Utilization of AI and Data.’” News release, June 15, 2018. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/0615_002.html. Google ScholarMETI (Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, Japan). 2020. “Unfair Competition Prevention Act.” Policy Index. Intellectual Property Policy Office, METI, Tokyo. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/policy/economy/chizai/chiteki/index.html. Google ScholarMITCI (Ministry of Technology, Communication, and Innovation, Mauritius). 2017. “National Open Data Policy.” MITCI, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius. https://mitci.govmu.org/Documents/Strategies/Mauritius%20Open%20Data%20Policy%20May%202017.pdf. Google ScholarMoICT (Ministry of Information and Communication Technology, Jordan). 2017. “Open Government Data Policy.” MoICT, Amman, Jordan. https://modee.gov.jo/ebv4.0/root_storage/en/eb_list_page/open_government_data_policy_2017.pdf. Google ScholarNational Archives, United Kingdom. 2017. “Digital Economy Act 2017.” legislation.gov.uk, National Archives, London. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2017/30/contents/enacted. Google ScholarNational Archives, United Kingdom. 2019. “Guidance on the Implementation of the Re-use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2015: For Public Sector Bodies.” Version 1.1, National Archives, London. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/psi-implementation-guidance-public-sector-bodies.pdf. Google ScholarNational Assembly, Togo. 2020. “Loi Relative a l’Identification Biometrique des Personnes Physiques au Togo” [Law on the biometric measurement of natural persons in Togo]. National Assembly, Open Session, September 3. http://www.assemblee-nationale.tg/images/biometrie%20loi%20AN.pdf. Google ScholarNilsson, Patricia. 2019. “Police Fear Bias in Use of Artificial Intelligence to Fight Crime.” Financial Times, September 15, 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/5753689c-d63e-11e9-a0bd-ab8ec6435630. Google ScholarNIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2020. “NIST Study Evaluates Effects of Race, Age, Sex on Face Recognition Software.” News, December 19, 2019, updated May 18, 2020, NIST, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD. https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2019/12/nist-study-evaluates-effects-race-age-sex-face-recognition-software. Google ScholarNoble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243/algorithms-of-oppression. CrossrefGoogle ScholarNoveck, Beth Simone. 2017. “Rights-Based and Tech-Driven: Open Data, Freedom of Information, and the Future of Government Transparency.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 19 (1): article 1. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yhrdlj/vol19/iss1/1. Google ScholarOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013. The OECD Privacy Framework. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecd_privacy_framework.pdf. Google ScholarOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019a. Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data: Reconciling Risks and Benefits for Data Re-Use across Societies. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/276aaca8-en. Google ScholarOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019b. “Licensing of IP Rights and Competition Law.” Background Note DAF/COMP(2019)3, Competition Committee, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, OECD, Paris. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2019)3/en/pdf. Google ScholarOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2019c. “Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence.” OECD Legal Instruments, OECD/LEGAL/0449, adopted on May 22, 2019. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449. Google ScholarOneTrust DataGuidance and FPF (Future of Privacy Forum). 2019. “Comparing Privacy Laws: GDPR v. CCPA.” OneTrust, London; FPF, Washington, DC. https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ComparingPrivacyLaws_GDPR_CCPA.pdf. Google ScholarOpen Knowledge Foundation. 2020. “What Is Open Data?” Open Data Handbook: Guide. London: Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/. Google ScholarOVIC (Office of the Victorian Information Commissioner). 2020. “Victorian Protective Data Security Framework, Version 2.0.” OVIC, Melbourne. https://ovic.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Victorian-Protective-Data-Security-Framework-V2.0.pdf. Google ScholarParliament of India. 2019. “The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019.” Bill No. 373 of 2019, Parliament of India, New Delhi. https://dataprotectionindia.in/act/. Google ScholarPC (Productivity Commission, Australia). 2017. Data Availability and Use. Productivity Commission Inquiry Report 82. Canberra: PC. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/data-access/report/data-access.pdf. Google ScholarPCPD (Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong SAR, China). 2012. “Privacy by Design Conference.” PCPD, Hong Kong SAR, China. https://www.pcpd.org.hk/pbdconference/index.html. Google ScholarPMC (Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Australia). 2019. “Best Practice Guide to Applying Data Sharing Principles.” PMC, Canberra. https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/public-data/data-sharing-principles. Google ScholarPotey, Manish M, C A Dhote, and Deepak H Sharma. 2016. “Homomorphic Encryption for Security of Cloud Data.” Procedia Computer Science 79 (January): 175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.023. CrossrefGoogle ScholarRagavan, Srividhya, Brendan Murphy, and Raj Davé. 2016. “FRAND v. Compulsory Licensing: The Lesser of the Two Evils.” Duke Law and Technology Review 14 (1): 83–120. Google ScholarRIA (Information System Authority, Estonia). 2020. “Data Exchange Layer X-Tee.” RIA, Tallinn, Estonia. https://www.ria.ee/en/state-information-system/x-tee.html#:~:text=X%2Dtee%2C%20the%20data%20exchange,data%20based%20on%20an%20agreement. Google ScholarSmith, Jack, IV. 2016. “Crime-Prediction Tool May Be Reinforcing Discriminatory Policing—Business Insider.” Business Insider, October 10, 2016. https://www.businessinsider.com/predictive-policing-discriminatory-police-crime-2016-10?r=UK. Google ScholarStats NZ (Statistics New Zealand). 2019. “Algorithm Charter.” Stats NZ, Wellington, New Zealand. https://data.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Draft-Algorithm-Charter-for-consultation.pdf. Google ScholarSweeney, Latanya. 2000. “Simple Demographics Often Identify People Uniquely.” Data Privacy Working Paper 3, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Google ScholarSweeney, Latanya. 2002. “k-Anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy.” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10 (05): 557–70. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001648. CrossrefGoogle ScholarTaylor, Linnet, Luciano Floridi, and Bart van der Sloot, eds. 2017. Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technologies. Philosophical Studies Series, vol. 126. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. CrossrefGoogle ScholarTBS (Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat). 2020. “Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Canada.ca, July 28, 2020, TBS, Ottawa. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/responsible-use-ai.html. Google ScholarTOOP (The Once-Only Principle Project). 2021. “The Once-Only Principle Project.” Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia. https://www.toop.eu/about. Google ScholarTreasury, Australia. 2020. Inquiry into Future Directions for the Consumer Data Right. Canberra: Treasury. https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-12/cdrinquiry-accessiblefinal.pdf. Google ScholarUbaldi, Barbara. 2013. “Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives.” OECD Working Paper on Public Governance 22, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en. Google ScholarUNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). 1998. “UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996) with Additional Article 5 bis as Adopted in 1998.” UNCITRAL, Vienna. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_commerce. Google ScholarUNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). 2001. “UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures (2001).” UNCITRAL, Vienna. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_signatures. Google ScholarUNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). 2009. Promoting Confidence in Electronic Commerce: Legal Issues on International Use of Electronic Authentication and Signature Methods. Vienna: United Nations. https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/08-55698_Ebook.pdf. Google ScholarUNSDG (United Nations Sustainable Development Group). 2017. “Data Privacy, Ethics, and Protection: Guidance Note on Big Data for Achievement of the 2030 Agenda.” UNSDG, New York. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/UNDG_BigData_final_web.pdf. Google ScholarVickery, Graham. 2012. “Review of Recent Studies on PSI Re-use and Related Market Developments.” Information Economics, Paris. Google ScholarVille de Nantes (City of Nantes, France). 2019. “Charte métropolitaine de la donnée” [Metropolitan data charter]. Nantes Métropole, May 2019, Ville de Nantes, France. https://metropole.nantes.fr/charte-donnee. Google ScholarWaze. 2018. “Waze Celebrates 600 Connected Citizens Program Partners.” Waze, Google, Mountain View, CA. https://medium.com/waze/waze-celebrates-600-connected-citizens-program-partners-36945fbceb66. Google ScholarWEF (World Economic Forum). 2011. “Personal Data: The Emergence of a New Asset Class.” In collaboration with Bain & Company, Inc., WEF, Geneva. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ITTC_PersonalDataNewAsset_Report_2011.pdf. Google ScholarWilkinson, Mark D, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, and Niklas Blomberg, et al. 2016. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship.” Scientific Data 3 (March 15): 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18. CrossrefGoogle ScholarWorld Bank. 2018. “Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance: Worldwide Practices of Regulatory Impact Assessments.” World Bank, Washington, DC. http://docu ments1.worldbank.org/curated/en/905611520284525814/Global-Indicators-of-Regulatory-Governance-World wide-Practices-of-Regulatory-Impact-Assessments.pdf. LinkGoogle ScholarWorld Bank. 2019. ID4D Practitioner’s Guide: Version 1.0. October 2019. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/248371559325561562/id4d-practitioner-s-guide. Google ScholarWorld Bank and United Nations. 2017. Combatting Cyber-crime: Tools and Capacity Building for Emerging Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/355401535144740611/Combatting-Cybercrime-Tools-and-Capacity-Building-for-Emerging-Economies. CrossrefGoogle ScholarWorld Wide Web Foundation. 2017. Open Data Barometer: Global Report, 4th ed. Washington, DC: World Wide Web Foundation. https://opendatabarometer.org/doc/4thEdition/ODB-4thEdition-GlobalReport.pdf. Google ScholarZanfir-Fortuna, Gabriela and Sasha Hondagneu-Messner. 2019. “CPDP 2019 Panel: Understanding the Limits and Benefits of Data Portability.” Future of Privacy Forum, 2019 Computers, Privacy, and Data Protection Conference, Brussels, February 26, 2019. https://fpf.org/2019/02/26/cpdp-2019-panel-understanding-the-limits-and-benefits-of-data-portability/. Google ScholarZhang, Gil and Kate Yin. 2020. “A Look at China’s Draft of Personal Data Protection Law.” Privacy Tracker, International Association of Privacy Professionals, Portsmouth, NH. https://iapp.org/news/a/a-look-at-chinas-draft-of-personal-data-protection-law/. Google Scholar Previous chapterNext chapter FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetails View Published: March 2021ISBN: 978-1-4648-1600-0e-ISBN: 978-1-4648-1601-7 Copyright & Permissions Related TopicsInformation and Communication TechnologiesSocial Development KeywordsTRUSTDATA QUALITYACCESS TO INFORMATIONINFORMATION SECURITYPERSONAL INFORMATIONCYBERSECURITYCYBERCRIMEPUBLIC INFORMATIONCYBERLAWKNOWLEDGE SHARINGSOCIAL CONTRACT PDF DownloadLoading ...