조선(朝鮮) 중기(中期) 안명노(安命老)의 팔진도(八陣圖) 분석(分析) - 『연기신편(演機新編)』을 중심으로-

The military training system in the early Joseon Dynasty was Oh-yu-jin-bup, but the king Sunjo, who saw the Nam-byoung’s involvement in the battle of the Castle Pyong-yang of the Im-jin-wae-lan, Im-jin War), replaced them with the tactics of the Ki-hyo-shin-seo written by Chuck Gye-gwang to train their soilders. However, the Joseon Army, trained by the Chuck Gye-gwang’s system, did not prevent the invasion of the Chung''s army during the Byeong-ja-ho-lan(Byeong-ja-War), causing controversy over the training system.One of them, An-Myeong-ro(1620-?), Thought that there was a serious problem with the training system of the Joseon army. He pointed out the problem of the Chuck Gye-gwang’s tactics with his book “Yeon-ki-shin-pyeon,” and insisted on training with the Oh-yu-jin-bup method in the early Joseon Dynasty. However, his proposal was not adopted due to the indifference of the Byeongjo, the Ministry of National Defense) and the opposition of the political parties. He was exiled to province and died on April 24, 1680.This is a thesis that studied battle formation, especially Paljindo, among the Yeon-ki-shin-pyeon written by An-Myeong-ro. This article clarifies the error of Pung-hu’s “Ak-gi-gyeong” claimed by Ahn Myeong-ro, and considers whether the previous criticism of Pal-jin-do was properly made. In addition, this article analyzes the Je-gal-lyang’s Pal-jin-do drawn by Ahn Myeong-ro and studied its meaning and effectiveness as follows.First, it was confirmed that the error of Pung-hu’s Ak-gi-gyeong claimed by An-Myeong-ro, has been controversy from the past, does not exist. the “Ak-gi-gyeong”, which is passed down to modern times, is the Pal-jin-do tactic left by the dead Je-gal-lyang. It contains a poem that praises Ak-gi-gyeong by Seo-jin''s master General Ma-lyung, who conquered Seo-lyang. From his achievements in his excellent Pal-jin tactics, it is hard to see any errors in the “Ak-gi-gyeong” he praised. According to my research, 384 letters of “Ak-gi-gyeong” contain sentences that have been interpreted in posterity. However, as it is an essential sentence for understanding, it could not be regarded as an error as An-Myeong-ro claimed.Second, An-Myeong-ro''s criticism of the Pal-jin-do, drawn by previous tacticians, was analyzed to be valid. It is natural that An-Myeong-ro, who studied this field thoroughly, pointed out that the Pal-jin-do presented by non-professionals, such as Lee-jeon and Jang-yeop, have already been proved to be false by the Jo-bon-hak or Wang-myeong-hak of the Ming Dynasty.Third, it was confirmed that Je-gal-lyang’s Pal-jin-do, which he drew, was not drawn as a curiosity or a hobby, but strictly adhered to the contents of Ak-gi-gyeong, deploying troops and commanders, and schematizing change and flexibility to realize the theory that “Everywhere becomes the head, and everywhere becomes the tail, so wherever the enemy meets becomes the front.”In addition, looking at the middle volume which summarizes the books of the previous wars, and lower volume containing Cheon-mun, Tae-eul, Ki-mun-dun-gab, etc., it was found that he had all the knowledge that a war researcher should possess. In particular, looking at the lower volume, it was found that his tactic was not merely a schematic, but was written with the principles of Yeok-hak(易學), Eum-yang-o-haeng, Ki-mun-dun -gab. Indeed, An-Myeong-ro was a man with military talent.In particular, if you read Yeon-ki-shin-pyeon, you can see that he wrote with all his heart with concern for national defense and national security.However, there are some part to complement. Ahn Myeong-ro''s “Yeon-ki-shin-pyeon” can be said to be a great masterpiece, but he focused too much on defenses and did not mention how to switch to an attack. This seems to be the limit he had as a civil minister.The victory or defeat of a war is determined by its strong attack power. The defense, no matter how good it is, can’t destroy the enemy but only stops the attack, and the enemy that has not been exterminated can re-attack us at any time. Therefore, since it was An-myeong-ro who devoted himself to the perfect reproduction of Pal-jin-do, I think it would have been a better tactic if he had added here Chuck Gye-gwang‘s Won-An-Jin to change the attack strategy.Even if “Ak-gi-gyeong” or Pal-jin-do is an old method of the past, research and development of it would be quite helpful for national defense.