Unravelling heterogeneities in magnetic fabric record of the strain: a combined AMS and ApARM data analysis applied to intraplate shear zones.

&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Deciphering the stress and strain distribution across plate boundary shear zones is critical to understanding the physical processes involved in the nucleation of megathrust faults and its behaviour. Plate boundaries at shallow depth represent complex and highly deformed zones showing structures from both distributed and localized deformation.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;As magnetic minerals are sensitive to stress regime, the investigation of the magnetic fabric has proven to be an effective tool in studying faulting processes at intraplate shear zones.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) provides insights into the preferred orientation of mineral grains and the qualitative relationships between petrofabrics and deformation intensity.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;We present an approach of combined Contoured Diagram and Cluster Analysis to isolate the contribution of coexisting petrofabrics to the total AMS and evaluating the significance of magnetic fabric clusters.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Our results reveal distinct subfabrics with reasonably straightforward correlations with structural data. Specific AMS pattern may be associated to the intensity of the reworking related to tectonic shearing and the structural position within the shear zone (i.e., the proximity to the main thrust faults).&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Close to the main thrust the magnetic fabric is dominantly oblate with magnetic foliation consistent to the S-C fabric and/or m&amp;amp;#233;lange foliation and the magnetic lineation parallel to the shear sense.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Away from the thrust faults the degree of anisotropy as well as the ellipsoids oblateness gradually diminishes. Thus, the presence of subfabrics related to previous tectonic events or less intense deformation (i.e. intersection lineation fabric) became dominant. The discrimination of subfabrics also allowed to unravel the presence of minor thrust plane and qualitatively evaluate the heterogeneous registration of strain (i.e. distributed versus localized deformation).&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;An abrupt change in magnetic ellipsoid shape and parameters is also observed below the basal d&amp;amp;#233;collements showing purely sedimentary magnetic fabric or previous deformation history with minor to absent evidences of shearing in the hanging wall.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Then, the integration with anisotropy of magnetic remanence experiments in different coercivity windows (ApARM) allow to separate the contribution of different ferromagnetic subpopulation of grains, constraining the significance of the different magnetic pattern/clusters detected through the AMS analysis.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;In conclusion, our results show the potential of a combination of density diagrams and cluster analysis validated by ApARM experiments in distinguishing the superposition of deformation events, unravelling strain partitioning/concentration and thus to better understand the geodynamic evolution of subduction-accretion complexes.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;