Reflective Style and Speech Production During Academic Task Solving In University Students

The aim of the article is to examine the relationship between students’ reflective information processing style and speech production during academic tasks solving. The study applies Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire (Felder &amp; Solomon, 2001) to examine four pairs of learning styles, notably active –reflective, sensing – intuitive, visual – verbal and sequential - global. The study applies functional analysis suggested by Naydonov (2008). The students were asked to solve the academic tasks aligned with their knowledge of the academic module. The study applies analysis of fourteen categories according to the following two criteria, notably considering the content/meaning of students’ responses and type of solution. The findings indicate that students with a high level of reflective and verbal style less frequently apply category text (34.55±12.39), comparatively with students with a low level of reflective та verbal style (65.94±4.13). Students with a high level of reflective and verbal style more frequently apply category tools (6.61±1.96) and less frequently category intentions (1.69±1.78) comparatively with students with a low level of reflective and verbal style (1.06±.78 and 2.30±.71, respectively). Category models are more frequent in students with a medium level of reflective style (3.61±.99), comparatively with students with a high (2.05±2.76) and a low (2.69±1.01) level. Therefore, speech production in categories of models and tools evaluates the best solutions in the academic setting, providing an efficient academic task solving.&#x0D; References&#x0D; &#x0D; Боса, В. П. Мовленнєва компетентність майбутніх учителів іноземних мов: методологія проблеми. Восточный Европейский научный журнал: международный польский научный журнал. 2017, 11 (27), Ч. 3, 8-13.&#x0D; Залевская А. А. «Рефлексия» и «языковое сознание»: вопросы терминологии. Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия «Филология». 2015, 4, 29–36.&#x0D; Карпов А. В. Психология рефлексивных механизмов деятельности. М. : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2004.&#x0D; Кулик О. Поняття рефлексії, її сутність та роль у методиці навчання української мови. Українська мова і література в школі. 2014, 3, 2–7.&#x0D; Найдьонов М. І. Формування системи рефлексивного управління в організаціях. К.: Міленіум, 2008.&#x0D; Рубинштейн С. Л. Бытие и сознание. Человек и мир. СПб.: Питер, 2003.&#x0D; Савченко О. В. Рефлексивна компетентність особистості. Херсон : ПП Вишемирський В. С., 2016.&#x0D; Савченко О. В. Стиль розв’язання проблемно-конфліктної ситуації як аспект аналізу життєвого шляху особистості. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Серія : Психологія. 2015, Т. 20, 2 (36), Ч. 1, 142–152.&#x0D; Семенов И. Н., Степанов С. Ю. Рефлексия в организации творческого мышления и саморазвития личности. Вопросы психологии. 1983, № 2, 35–42.&#x0D; Старовойтенко Е. Б. Культурная психология личности. М.: Академический проспект : Гаудемус, 2007.&#x0D; Холодная М. А. Когнитивные стили. О природе индивидуального ума. СПб.: Питер, 2004.&#x0D; Шаров А. С. Онтология психологических механизмов рефлексии. Вестник Омского государственного педагогического университета : электрон. науч. журнал. 2006. Режим доступа : http://sfrik.omskreg.ru/res/.&#x0D; Щедровицкий Г. П. Процессы и структуры в мышлении: курс лекций. Из архива Г. П. Щедровицкого. М.: «Путь», 2003, Т. 6.&#x0D; Felder R.M. &amp; Solomon B.A. Index of learning styles questionnaire. North Carolina State University, 2001. Retrieved from http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/ public/ILSdir/ILS-a.html.&#x0D; Kagan J. Reflection-impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1965, 77, 17–24.&#x0D; Vygranka Т. The Features of Formation of Speech Competence of Future Philologists in the Educational Process of Institution of Higher Education. International Academy Journal Web of Scholar. 2019, 5(35), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/31052019/6502.&#x0D; &#x0D; References (translated and transliterated)&#x0D; &#x0D; Bosa, V. P. (2017). Movlennieva kompetentnist maybutnikh uchyteliv inozemnykh mov: metodolohiya problemy. Vostochnyj Evropejskij nauchnyj zhurnal: mezhdunarodnyj polskij nauchnyj zhurnal, 11 (27), P. 3, 8-13.&#x0D; Zalevskaya, A. A. (2015). «Refleksiya» i «yazykovoe soznanie»: voprosy terminologii ["Reflection" and "linguistic consciousness": questions of terminology]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Filologiya», 4, 29–36.&#x0D; Karpov, A. V. (2004). Psihologiya Refleksivnyh Mehanizmov Deyatelnosti [Psychology of reflective mechanisms of activity]. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN».&#x0D; Kulyk, O. (2014). Poniattia refleksiyi, yii sutnist ta rol u metodytsi navchannia ukrayinskoyi movy [The concept of reflection, its essence and role in the methodology of teaching the Ukrainian language]. Ukrayinska mova i literatura v shkoli, 3, 2–7.&#x0D; Naydonov, M. І. (2008). Formuvannia Systemy Refleksyvnoho Upravlіnnia v Orhanіzatsіyakh [Formation of Reflexive Management System in Organizations]. Kyiv: Mіlenіum.&#x0D; Rubinshtejn, S. L. (2003) Bytie i Soznanie. Chelovek i Mir [Genesis and Consciousness. Man and the World.]. St. Peterburg: Piter.&#x0D; Savchenko, O. V. (2016). Refleksyvna Kompetentnist Osobystosti [Personality`s Reflective Competence]. Kherson: Vyshemyrskyi.&#x0D; Savchenko, O. V. (2015) Styl rozvyazannia problemno-konfliktnoyi sytuatsiyi yak aspekt analizu zhyttievoho shliakhu osobystosti [Style of resolving a problem-conflict situation as an aspect of person's life experience analysis]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriya: Psykholohiya, T. 20, 2 (36), P. 1, 142–152.&#x0D; Semenov I. N. &amp; Stepanov S. Yu.(1983) Refleksiya v organizatsii tvorcheskogo myishleniya i samorazvitiya lichnosti [Reflection in the organization of creative thinking and personal self-development]. Voprosyi psihologii, 2, 35–42.&#x0D; Starovoitenko, E. B. (2007). Kulturnaya Psihologiya Lichnosti [Cultural Psychology of the Person]. Moscow: Akademicheskij prospekt: Gaudemus, 2007.&#x0D; Holodnaya, M. A. (2004). Kognitivnye Stili. O Prirode Individualnogo Uma [Cognitive Styles. About the Nature of the Individual Mind]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.&#x0D; Sharov A. S. (2006) Ontologiya psihologicheskih mehanizmov refleksii [Ontology of psychological mechanisms of reflection]. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta : elektron. nauch. zhurnal. Retrieved from http://sfrik.omskreg.ru/res/.&#x0D; Schedrovitskiy G. P. (2003) Protsessyi i strukturyi v myishlenii: kurs lektsiy [Processes and structures in thinking: a course of lectures.]. Iz arhiva G. P. Schedrovitskogo. Moscow: «Put», T. 6.&#x0D; Felder, R.M. &amp; Solomon, B.A. (2001). Index of learning styles questionnaire. North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://www2.ncsu.edu/ unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/ ILS-a.html.&#x0D; Kagan, J. (1965). Reflection-impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,77, 17–24.&#x0D; Vygranka, Т. (2019) The Features of Formation of Speech Competence of Future Philologists in the Educational Process of Institution of Higher Education. International Academy Journal Web of Scholar, 5(35), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/31052019/6502.&#x0D;