Correction to ‘Decoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaning’

Open AccessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Soto David, Sheikh Usman Ayub, Mei Ning and Santana Roberto 2020Correction to 'Decoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaning'R. Soc. Open Sci.7201162http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201162SectionOpen AccessCorrectionsCorrection to 'Decoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaning' David Soto David Soto http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0205-7513 Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Usman Ayub Sheikh Usman Ayub Sheikh http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-4725 Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Ning Mei Ning Mei Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Roberto Santana Roberto Santana Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author David Soto David Soto http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0205-7513 Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed , Usman Ayub Sheikh Usman Ayub Sheikh http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-4725 Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed , Ning Mei Ning Mei Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and Roberto Santana Roberto Santana Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:12 August 2020https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201162This article corrects the followingResearch ArticleDecoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaninghttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192043 David Soto, Usman Ayub Sheikh, Ning Mei and Roberto Santana volume 7issue 5Royal Society Open Science20 May 2020 R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 192043. (Published Online 20 May 2020) (doi:10.1098/rsos.192043) (1) 'Interval of 3.4 s and 6.8 s' was wrongly used in place of 'interval of 3.4 s and 8.6 s'. This has now been corrected. (2) There is an error in the visualization of the informational connectivity results (Figure 5). The order of the ROI labels in the panel of the Figure were incorrect. Both Figure 5 and the Python script used to produce it have been updated. The Results in the main text have also been updated. "There were two substrates that showed the strongest changes in informational connectivity with the rest of the semantic network. First, the fusiform gyrus showed increased informational connectivity with parahippocampal gyrus, middle temporal lobe, inferior parietal lobe, posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, pars opercularis, pars orbitalis, pars triangularis and superior frontal gyrus. A similar effect involved the left inferior temporal lobe, which showed increased connectivity during mental stimulation with fusiform gyrus, middle temporal lobe, inferior parietal lobe, precuneus, pars opercularis, pars triangularis and superior frontal gyrus. Figure 5 also shows that anterior temporal lobe and frontal pole showed no changes in informational connectivity as function of the depth of processing." (3) The finding previously reported that mental simulation changes the level of informational connectivity within the semantic network remains therefore unaltered. However, in the Discussion it is noted that "Remarkably, the fusiform gyrus showed increased informational connectivity with multiple association areas, including default-mode regions and frontoparietal cortex, suggesting that the interplay between domain-specific and domain-general regions at a representational level, underlies mental simulation." Figure 5. The figure shows the mean difference of informational connectivity between deep and shallow conditions. The right panel shows which of the pairs of ROIs were significantly more connected in deep as compared with the shallow condition (FDR corrected for multiple comparisons).Download figureOpen in new tabDownload PowerPoint Comments Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. Previous Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsRelated articlesDecoding and encoding models reveal the role of mental simulation in the brain representation of meaning20 May 2020Royal Society Open Science This IssueAugust 2020Volume 7Issue 8 Article InformationPubMed:32968538Published by:Royal SocietyOnline ISSN:2054-5703History: Published online12/08/2020 License:© 2020 The Authors.Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Citations and impact Subjectsneuroscience psychology