Change Is Good: The Evolution and Future of Breast Imaging

HomeRadiologyVol. 306, No. 3 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorial–Centennial ContentChange Is Good: The Evolution and Future of Breast ImagingLinda Moy Linda Moy Author AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, New York University, 160 E 34th St, New York, NY 10016.Address correspondence to the author (email: [email protected]).Linda Moy Published Online:Feb 7 2023https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230018MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1. Reading junction web site. https://readingjunction.com/measure-intelligence-ability-change/. Published March 6, 2021. Accessed January 24, 2023. Google Scholar2. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196(1):123–134. Link, Google Scholar3. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239(2):341–350. Link, Google Scholar4. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225(1):165–175. Link, Google Scholar5. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211(1):101–110. Link, Google Scholar6. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004;233(3):830–849. Link, Google Scholar7. Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology 1997;202(1):79–86. Link, Google Scholar8. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992;184(3):613–617. Link, Google Scholar9. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47–56. Link, Google Scholar10. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1989;170(3 Pt 1):681–686. Link, Google Scholar11. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;205(2):399–406. Link, Google Scholar12. Clopton MB. The difficulty of diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast. Radiology 1925;4(5):390–394. Link, Google Scholar13. Joe BN, Sickles EA. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present. Radiology 2014;273(2 Suppl):S23–S44. Link, Google Scholar14. Mann RM, Hooley R, Barr RG, Moy L. Novel Approaches to Screening for Breast Cancer. Radiology 2020;297(2):266–285. Link, Google Scholar15. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012;380(9855):1778–1786. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Yen AM, et al. Beneficial Effect of Consecutive Screening Mammography Examinations on Mortality from Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study. Radiology 2021;299(3):541–547. Link, Google Scholar17. Broeders M, Moss S, Nyström L, et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen 2012;19(Suppl 1):14–25. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18. Lee CS, Moy L, Friedewald SM, Sickles EA, Monticciolo DL. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(2):241–245. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19. Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Rueter FG, Suleiman OH. Mammography in the eighties. Radiology 1990;177(2):335–339. Link, Google Scholar20. Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, et al. The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6(12):851–860. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21. McLelland R, Hendrick RE, Zinninger MD, Wilcox PA. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157(3):473–479. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013. Google Scholar23. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2018. Google Scholar24. American Cancer Society (ACS). American Cancer Society Recommendations for Early Breast Cancer Detection in Women Without Breast Symptoms. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancer/moreinformation/breastcancerearlydetection/breast-cancer-early-detection-acs-recs. Accessed April 19, 2018. Google Scholar25. Monticciolo DL, Malak SF, Friedewald SM, et al. Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2021;18(9):1280–1288. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75–89. [Published correction appears in CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(3):185.] Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(3 Pt A):408–414. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Weinstein SP, Slanetz PJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density. J Am Coll Radiol 2021;18(11S):S456–S473. Medline, Google Scholar29. Mann RM, Athanasiou A, Baltzer PAT, et al. Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Eur Radiol 2022;32(6):4036–4045. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30. Hussein H, Abbas E, Keshavarzi S, et al. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.221785. Published online January 31, 2023. Link, Google Scholar31. Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98(19):10869–10874. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar32. Pinker K, Chin J, Melsaether AN, Morris EA, Moy L. Precision Medicine and Radiogenomics in Breast Cancer: New Approaches toward Diagnosis and Treatment. Radiology 2018;287(3):732–747. Link, Google Scholar33. The TAILORx trial in over 10,000 women with early breast cancer reaches 12 years of recurrence and survival outcomes. ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group.https://ecog-acrin.org/press-release-the-tailorx-trial-in-over-10000-women-with-early-breast-cancer-reaches-12-years-of-recurrence-and-survival-outcomes/. Published December 6, 2022. Accessed December 7, 2022. Google Scholar34. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, et al. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiology 2020;295(2):328–338. Link, Google Scholar35. Wanders AJT, Mees W, Bun PAM, et al. Interval Cancer Detection Using a Neural Network and Breast Density in Women with Negative Screening Mammograms. Radiology 2022;303(2):269–275. Link, Google Scholar36. Larsen M, Aglen CF, Lee CI, et al. Artificial Intelligence Evaluation of 122 969 Mammography Examinations from a Population-based Screening Program. Radiology 2022;303(3):502–511. Link, Google Scholar37. Shoshan Y, Bakalo R, Gilboa-Solomon F, et al. Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Radiology 2022;303(1):69–77. Link, Google Scholar38. Romero-Martín S, Elías-Cabot E, Raya-Povedano JL, Gubern-Mérida A, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Álvarez-Benito M. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation. Radiology 2022;302(3):535–542. Link, Google Scholar39. Acciavatti RJ, Lee SH, Reig B, et al. Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.222575. Published online February 7, 2023. Link, Google Scholar40. Brink JA, Hricak H. Radiology 2040. Radiology 2023;306(1):69–72. Link, Google Scholar41. Hughes DJ, Subesinghe M, Taylor B, et al. 18F FDG PET/CT and Novel Molecular Imaging for Directing Immunotherapy in Cancer. Radiology 2022;304(2):246–264. Link, Google Scholar42. Kuhl CK. What the future holds for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer. Radiology 2023. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.223338. Published online February 7, 2023. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived: Jan 03 2023Accepted: Jan 03 2023Published online: Feb 07 2023 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByWhat the Future Holds for the Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Breast CancerChristiane K. Kuhl, 7 February 2023 | Radiology, Vol. 306, No. 3Recommended Articles Molecular Breast Imaging in Breast Cancer Screening and Problem SolvingRadioGraphics2017Volume: 37Issue: 5pp. 1309-1606Semiannual Breast US or MRI Screening in Patients with a Personal History of Breast CancerRadiology2023Volume: 307Issue: 5Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic ResultsRadiology2016Volume: 280Issue: 3pp. 716-722Survival Outcomes for Women with Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in the Era of Supplemental ScreeningRadiology2019Volume: 292Issue: 1pp. 49-50Surveillance Imaging after Primary Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in SituRadiology2023Volume: 307Issue: 1See More RSNA Education Exhibits Letâs Talk about Next-Generation Breast Cancer Screening Programs: How Should We Do? What Should We Use?Digital Posters2020Next Top Model: An Overview of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment ModelsDigital Posters2022Breast Density Included in the Modern Rules of Mammographic ScreeningDigital Posters2019 RSNA Case Collection Invasive ductal carcinoma as developing asymmetryRSNA Case Collection2021Male invasive Ductal Carcinoma RSNA Case Collection2022Primary breast lymphomaRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 306, No. 3 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download