어휘주의에 기초한 ‘X하다’의 형태·통사적 구성 연구

This thesis has examined the morphologic·syntactic configuration of the Korean term, ‘ha-da’, using the HPSG(head-driven phrase structure grammar) method, which is the latest theory of lexicalism grammar. The HPSG is an constraint-based grammar and is practiced based on grammatical information for each lexical entry. Lexical entries correspond directly to a word in sentences. The word then has grammatical information that combines grammatical information for stem with grammatical information for inflectional affix, and unlike languages such as English where inflectional forms are limited to a few forms, there are various inflectional forms in the Korean language. In addition, each inflectional affix that forms such inflectional form appears to have a variety of syntactic information. Therefore, ‘morphological unit’ was established as a model suitable for grammatical information technology of the Korean inflectional affix.Prior to looking into the term ‘ha-da’, a survey of lexicalism grammar was carried out, which was applied in two principles: head feature principle(HFP) and subcategorization principle. The HFP is the principle of sharing the head information between the phrase and the head daughter that forms the phrase, while the subcategorization principle is the principle of integrating the argument specified in the subcategorization information of the head with the corresponding argument. In addition, the ‘integrated rule of morphology’ was established to separately explain the integration principle of stems and inflectional affixes in accordance with the linguistic characteristics of the Korean language. The application of the lexicalism grammar was examined, in general, to the Korean term through these principles.Based on this theoretical foundation, the morphological configuration of ‘ha-da’ was examined, and the single word ‘ha-da’ could be categorized into the following four types: the independent verb ‘ha-da’, the independent adjective ‘ha-da’, the dependent verb ‘ha-da’, and the dependent adjective ‘ha-da’. The compound word ‘X-ha-da’ was also categorized into four types, including the independent verb ‘X-ha-da’, the independent adjective ‘X-ha-da’, the dependent verb ‘X-ha-da’, and the dependent adjective ‘X-ha-da’.The syntactic configuration of the phrase formed by ‘ha-da’ as the head was then examined, where the independent verb ‘ha-da’ was used as a transitive verb and a ditransitive verb. However, the transitive verb ‘ha-da’ and the ditransitive verb ‘ha-da’ were different in meaning even though they seemed to have same characteristics in terms of the morphologic·syntactic configuration, so they were divided into a heavy verb ‘ha-da’ and a light verb ’ha-da’. As well, there was a case where the light verb ‘ha-da’ was used with a dative noun, in which case the additional complement was taken to separate them. Moreover, while the independent adjective ‘ha-da’ was a predicate with one complement, it exhibited a characteristic that only allowed the ‘auxiliary particle/semantic marker’ to the complement.The independent verb ‘X-ha-da’ was used as a transitive verb and an intransitive verb, and the complement, in case it was used as a transitive verb, was described as an ‘optional complement’. ‘X-ha-da’, which was used as a dative verb, was separated into the different kind of ‘X-ha-da’ from the above-mentioned ‘X-ha-da’. On the other hand, the independent adjective ‘X-ha-da’ was used only as an intransitive verb.The dependent verb ‘ha-da’ took NP or S as a complement, and it was usually combined with adverbial dependent nouns, such as ‘chuk’(척), when it took NP as a complement. If the subject existed in the phrase where the antecedent term served as a head, S was taken as a complement; however, if the subject did not exist in the phrase where the antecedent term served as a head, VP/AP was taken.The dependent adjective ‘ha-da’ took NP or S as a complement, but in case NP was taken, it was combined with the adverbial dependent nouns, such as ‘did’(듯). Moreover, S is taken as a complement in case the antecedent term was the adjective, such as the phrase ‘ki-nin-ha-da’(기는 하다).Finally, the dependent verb ‘X-ha-da’ took VP as a complement and the dependent adjective ‘X-ha-da’ took AP, typically with negative terms such as ‘an-ta’(않다).