Peer review decleration

The 3 rd Southeast Asian Conference on Geophysics (SEACG) 2020 All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single blind • Conference submission management system: Conference web submission system • Number of submission Received: 151 manuscripts received • Number of submission sent for review: 110 manuscripts sent for review • Number of submission accepted: 102 manuscript accepted by editor • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (102/151) x 100 = 67.5 % • Average number of reviews per paper: Average 2 reviewers of each paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 45 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: – We did plagiarism check for each paper using licenced Turnitin online software. And we accepted the level of plagiarism each manuscript below 20 %. – The review process was conducted using google form that integrated with conference secretariat email. We sent a review invitation to reviewer by official email of SEACG 2020 and the reviewers conducted review process based on 4 sections: • Technical Criteria • Scientific merit of the manuscript: notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness. • Clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts. • Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing. • Quality Criteria • Originality: Is the work relevant and novel? • Motivation: Does the problem considered have a sound motivation? All papers should clearly demonstrate the scientific interest of the results. • Repetition: Have significant parts of the manuscript already been published? • Length: Is the content of the work of sufficient scientific interest to justify its length? • Presentation Criteria • Title: Is it adequate and appropriate for the content of the article? • Abstract: Does it contain the essential information of the article? Is it complete? Is it suitable for inclusion by itself in an abstracting service? • Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: Are they essential and clear? • Text and mathematics: Are they brief but still clear? If you recommend shortening, please suggest what should be omitted. • Conclusion: Does the paper contain a carefully written conclusion, summarizing what has been learned and why it is interesting and useful? • Decision • Reviewer comment • Suggestion ∘ Ready to publish ∘ Minor correction ∘ Major correction ∘ Reject – All the comments by reviewers were sent to the author to make the correction and revision within 20 days. The editor will check each revised manuscript carefully and make sure the authors have addressed the questions and comments from reviewer. If the manuscript need to do revision for 2 nd circle, the editor would send it back to the authors. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Zulfakriza Geophysical Engineering Dept. Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia zulfakriza@itb.ac.id