(* iris/algebra/list.v *)
From stdpp Require Export list
From iris.algebra Require Export ofe
From iris.algebra Require Import big_op
From iris.prelude Require Import options

Local Instancelist_dist : Dist (list A) := λ n, Forall2 (dist n).

Lemma list_dist_Forall2n l k : l ≡{n}≡ k ↔ Forall2 (dist n) l k.
Proof. done. Qed.

Lemma list_dist_lookupn l1 l2 : l1 ≡{n}≡ l2 ↔ ∀ i, l1 !! i ≡{n}≡ l2 !! i.
Proof. setoid_rewrite option_dist_Forall2. apply Forall2_lookup. Qed.

Global Instancecons_ne : NonExpansive2 (@cons A) := _.

Global Instanceapp_ne : NonExpansive2 (@app A) := _.

Global Instancelength_ne n : Proper (dist n ==> (=)) (@length A) := _.

Global Instancetail_ne : NonExpansive (@tail A) := _.

Global Instancetake_ne n : NonExpansive (@take A n) := _.

Global Instancedrop_ne n : NonExpansive (@drop A n) := _.

Global Instancehead_ne : NonExpansive (head (A:=A)).
Proof. destruct 1; by constructor. Qed.

Global Instancelist_lookup_ne i : NonExpansive (lookup (M:=list A) i).
Proof. intros ????. by apply option_dist_Forall2, Forall2_lookup. Qed.

Global Instancelist_lookup_total_ne `{!Inhabited A} i :
  NonExpansive (lookup_total (M:=list A) i).
Proof. intros ???. rewrite !list_lookup_total_alt. by intros ->. Qed.

Global Instancelist_alter_ne n :
  Proper ((dist n ==> dist n) ==> (=) ==> dist n ==> dist n) (alter (M:=list A)) := _.

Global Instancelist_insert_ne i : NonExpansive2 (insert (M:=list A) i) := _.

Global Instancelist_inserts_ne i : NonExpansive2 (@list_inserts A i) := _.

Global Instancelist_delete_ne i : NonExpansive (delete (M:=list A) i) := _.

Global Instanceoption_list_ne : NonExpansive (@option_list A).
Proof. intros ????; by apply Forall2_option_list, option_dist_Forall2. Qed.

Global Instancelist_filter_ne n P `{∀ x, Decision (P x)} :
  Proper (dist n ==> iff) P →
  Proper (dist n ==> dist n) (filter (B:=list A) P) := _.

Global Instancereplicate_ne n : NonExpansive (@replicate A n) := _.

Global Instancereverse_ne : NonExpansive (@reverse A) := _.

Global Instancelast_ne : NonExpansive (@last A).
Proof. intros ????; by apply option_dist_Forall2, Forall2_last. Qed.

Global Instanceresize_ne n : NonExpansive2 (@resize A n) := _.

Global Instancecons_dist_inj n :
  Inj2 (dist n) (dist n) (dist n) (@cons A).
Proof. by inversion_clear 1. Qed.

Lemma nil_dist_eqn l : l ≡{n}≡ [] ↔ l = [].
Proof. split; by inversion 1. Qed.

Lemma cons_dist_eqn l k y :
  l ≡{n}≡ y :: k → ∃ x l', x ≡{n}≡ y ∧ l' ≡{n}≡ k ∧ l = x :: l'.
Proof. apply Forall2_cons_inv_r. Qed.

Lemma app_dist_eqn l k1 k2 :
  l ≡{n}≡ k1 ++ k2 ↔ ∃ k1' k2', l = k1' ++ k2' ∧ k1' ≡{n}≡ k1 ∧ k2' ≡{n}≡ k2.
Proof. rewrite list_dist_Forall2 Forall2_app_inv_r. naive_solver. Qed.

Lemma list_singleton_dist_eqn l x :
  l ≡{n}≡ [x] ↔ ∃ x', l = [x'] ∧ x' ≡{n}≡ x.
Proof.
  split; [|by intros (?&->&->)].
  intros (?&?&?&->%Forall2_nil_inv_r&->)%list_dist_Forall2%Forall2_cons_inv_r.
  eauto.
Qed.

Definition list_ofe_mixin: OfeMixin (list A).
Proof.
  split.
  - intros l k. rewrite list_equiv_Forall2 -Forall2_forall.
    split; induction 1; constructor; intros; try apply equiv_dist; auto.
  - apply _.
  - rewrite /dist /list_dist. eauto using Forall2_impl, dist_le.
Qed.
Canonical Structure listO := Ofe (list A) list_ofe_mixin.

Fixpoint list_compl_go`{!Cofe A} (c0 : list A) (c : chain listO) : listO :=
  match c0 with
  | [] => []
  | x :: c0 => compl (chain_map (default x ∘ head) c) ::
               list_compl_go c0 (chain_map tail c)
  end.

Fixpoint list_lbcompl_go`{!Cofe A} (c0 : list A) {n} Hn (c : bchain listO n) : listO :=
  match c0 with
  | [] => []
  | x :: c0 => lbcompl Hn (bchain_map (default x ∘ head) c) ::
               list_lbcompl_go c0 Hn (bchain_map tail c)
  end.

Global ProgramInstance list_cofe `{!Cofe A} : Cofe listO := {
  compl c := list_compl_go (c 0ᵢ) c;
  lbcompl n Hn c := list_lbcompl_go (c _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn)) Hn c
}.
Next Obligation.
  intros ? n c; simpl.
  assert (c 0ᵢ ≡{0ᵢ}≡ c n) as Hc0 by (symmetry; apply chain_cauchy, SIdx.le_0_l).
  revert Hc0. generalize (c 0ᵢ)=> c0. revert c.
  induction c0 as [|x c0 IH]=> c Hc0 /=.
  { by inversion Hc0. }
  apply symmetry, cons_dist_eq in Hc0 as (x' & xs' & Hx & Hc0 & Hcn).
  rewrite Hcn. f_equiv.
  - rewrite conv_compl.
    by rewrite /chain_map //= Hcn.
  - rewrite IH /chain_map /= ?Hcn //.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
  intros ? n Hn c m Hm; simpl.
  assert (c _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn) ≡{0ᵢ}≡ c m Hm) as Hc0
    by (symmetry; apply bchain_cauchy, SIdx.le_0_l).
  revert Hc0. generalize (c _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn))=> c0. revert c.
  induction c0 as [|x c0 IH]=> c Hc0 /=.
  { by inversion Hc0. }
  apply symmetry in Hc0.
  apply cons_dist_eq in Hc0 as (x' & xs' & Hx & Hc0 & Hcn).
  rewrite Hcn. f_equiv.
  - rewrite (conv_lbcompl _ _ Hm). by rewrite /bchain_map //= Hcn.
  - rewrite IH /bchain_map /= ?Hcn //.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
  intros ? n Hn c1 c2 m Hc; simpl.
  specialize (Hc _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn)) as Heq.
  move: Heq. generalize (c1 _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn)) as c0 => c0.
  generalize (c2 _ (SIdx.limit_lt_0 _ Hn)) as d0 => d0 Heq.
  induction Heq as [ | ???? Heq1 Heq2 IH ] in c1, c2, Hc |-*; simpl; f_equiv.
  - apply lbcompl_ne=> γ Hγ. by rewrite /bchain_map //= Hc Heq1.
  - apply IH=> γ Hγ. by
...

Global Instancelist_ofe_discrete : OfeDiscrete A → OfeDiscrete listO.
Proof. induction 2; constructor; try apply (discrete_0 _); auto. Qed.

Global Instancenil_discrete : Discrete (@nil A).
Proof. inversion_clear 1; constructor. Qed.

Global Instancecons_discrete x l : Discrete x → Discrete l → Discrete (x :: l).
Proof. intros ??; inversion_clear 1; constructor; by apply discrete_0. Qed.

Lemma dist_Permutationn l1 l2 l3 :
  l1 ≡{n}≡ l2 → l2 ≡ₚ l3 → ∃ l2', l1 ≡ₚ l2' ∧ l2' ≡{n}≡ l3.
Proof.
  intros Hequiv Hperm. revert l1 Hequiv.
  induction Hperm as [|x l2 l3 _ IH|x y l2|l2 l3 l4 _ IH1 _ IH2]; intros l1.
  - intros ?. by exists l1.
  - intros (x'&l2'&?&(l2''&?&?)%IH&->)%cons_dist_eq.
    exists (x' :: l2''). by repeat constructor.
  - intros (y'&?&?&(x'&l2'&?&?&->)%cons_dist_eq&->)%cons_dist_eq.
    exists (x' :: y' :: l2'). by repeat constructor.
  - intros (l2'&?&(l3'&?&?)%IH2)%IH1. exists l3'. split; [by etrans|done].
Qed.

Global ArgumentslistO {SI} _.

Global Instancelist_fmap_ne {SI : sidx} {A B : ofe} n :
  Proper ((dist n ==> dist n) ==> (≡{n}@{list A}≡) ==> (≡{n}@{list B}≡)) fmap.
Proof. intros f1 f2 Hf l1 l2 Hl; by eapply Forall2_fmap, Forall2_impl; eauto. Qed.

Global Instancelist_omap_ne {SI : sidx} {A B : ofe} n :
  Proper ((dist n ==> dist n) ==> (≡{n}@{list A}≡) ==> (≡{n}@{list B}≡)) omap.
Proof.
  intros f1 f2 Hf. induction 1 as [|x1 x2 l1 l2 Hx Hl]; csimpl; [constructor|].
  destruct (Hf _ _ Hx); [f_equiv|]; auto.
Qed.

Global Instanceimap_ne {SI : sidx} {A B : ofe} n :
  Proper (pointwise_relation _ ((dist n ==> dist n)) ==> dist n ==> dist n)
         (imap (A:=A) (B:=B)).
Proof.
  intros f1 f2 Hf l1 l2 Hl. revert f1 f2 Hf.
  induction Hl as [|x1 x2 l1 l2 ?? IH]; intros f1 f2 Hf; simpl; [constructor|].
  f_equiv; [by apply Hf|]. apply IH. intros i y1 y2 Hy. by apply Hf.
Qed.

Global Instancelist_bind_ne {SI : sidx} {A B : ofe} n :
  Proper ((dist n ==> dist n) ==> (≡{n}@{list B}≡) ==> (≡{n}@{list A}≡)) mbind.
Proof. intros f1 f2 Hf. induction 1; csimpl; [constructor|f_equiv; auto]. Qed.

Global Instancelist_join_ne {SI : sidx} {A : ofe} n :
  Proper (dist n ==> (≡{n}@{list A}≡)) mjoin.
Proof. induction 1; simpl; [constructor|solve_proper]. Qed.

Global Instancezip_with_ne {SI : sidx} {A B C : ofe} n :
  Proper ((dist n ==> dist n ==> dist n) ==> dist n ==> dist n ==> dist n)
         (zip_with (A:=A) (B:=B) (C:=C)).
Proof.
  intros f1 f2 Hf.
  induction 1; destruct 1; simpl; [constructor..|f_equiv; try apply Hf; auto].
Qed.

Global Instancelist_fmap_dist_inj {SI : sidx} {A B : ofe} (f : A → B) n :
  Inj (≡{n}≡) (≡{n}≡) f → Inj (≡{n}@{list A}≡) (≡{n}@{list B}≡) (fmap f).
Proof. apply list_fmap_inj. Qed.

Lemma big_opL_ne_2{SI : sidx} {M : ofe}
    {o : M → M → M} `{!Monoid o u} {A : ofe} (f g : nat → A → M) l1 l2 n :
  l1 ≡{n}≡ l2 →
  (∀ k y1 y2,
    l1 !! k = Some y1 → l2 !! k = Some y2 → y1 ≡{n}≡ y2 → f k y1 ≡{n}≡ g k y2) →
  ([^o list] k ↦ y ∈ l1, f k y) ≡{n}≡ ([^o list] k ↦ y ∈ l2, g k y).
Proof.
  intros Hl Hf. apply big_opL_gen_proper_2; try (apply _ || done).
  { apply monoid_ne. }
  intros k. assert (l1 !! k ≡{n}≡ l2 !! k) as Hlk by (by f_equiv).
  destruct (l1 !! k) eqn:?, (l2 !! k) eqn:?; inversion Hlk; naive_solver.
Qed.

Lemma list_fmap_ext_ne{SI : sidx} {A} {B : ofe} (f g : A → B) (l : list A) n :
  (∀ x, f x ≡{n}≡ g x) → f <$> l ≡{n}≡ g <$> l.
Proof. intros Hf. by apply Forall2_fmap, Forall_Forall2_diag, Forall_true. Qed.

Definition listO_map{SI : sidx} {A B} (f : A -n> B) : listO A -n> listO B :=
  OfeMor (fmap f : listO A → listO B).

Global InstancelistO_map_ne {SI : sidx} A B : NonExpansive (@listO_map SI A B).
Proof. intros n f g ? l. by apply list_fmap_ext_ne. Qed.

Program DefinitionlistOF {SI : sidx} (F : oFunctor) : oFunctor := {|
  oFunctor_car A _ B _ := listO (oFunctor_car F A B);
  oFunctor_map A1 _ A2 _ B1 _ B2 _ fg := listO_map (oFunctor_map F fg)
|}.
Next Obligation.
  by intros ? F A1 ? A2 ? B1 ? B2 ? n f g Hfg; apply listO_map_ne, oFunctor_map_ne.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
  intros ? F A ? B ? x. rewrite /= -{2}(list_fmap_id x).
  apply list_fmap_equiv_ext=>???. apply oFunctor_map_id.
Qed.
Next Obligation.
  intros ? F A1 ? A2 ? A3 ? B1 ? B2 ? B3 ? f g f' g' x. rewrite /= -list_fmap_compose.
  apply list_fmap_equiv_ext=>???; apply oFunctor_map_compose.
Qed.

Global InstancelistOF_contractive {SI : sidx} F :
  oFunctorContractive F → oFunctorContractive (listOF F).
Proof.
  intros ? A1 ? A2 ? B1 ? B2 ? n f g Hfg;
    by apply listO_map_ne, oFunctor_map_contractive.
Qed.