Cross-lingual Alignment vs Joint Training: A Comparative Study and A Simple Unified Framework
Learning multilingual representations of text has proven a successful method for many cross-lingual transfer learning tasks.There are two main paradigms for learning such representations: alignment, which maps different independently trained monolingual representations into a shared space, and joint training, which directly learns unified multilingual representations using monolingual and cross-lingual objectives jointly.In this paper, we first conduct direct comparisons of representations learned using both of these methods across diverse cross-lingual tasks.Our empirical results reveal a set of pros and cons for both methods, and show that the relative performance of alignment versus joint training is task-dependent.Stemming from this analysis, we propose a simple and novel framework that combines these two previously mutually-exclusive approaches.Extensive experiments on various tasks demonstrate that our proposed framework alleviates limitations of both approaches, and outperforms existing methods on the MUSE bilingual lexicon induction benchmark.We further show that our proposed framework can generalize to contextualized representations and achieves state-of-the-art results on the CoNLL cross-lingual NER benchmark.
We conduct a comparative study of cross-lingual alignment vs joint training methods and unify these two previously exclusive paradigms in a new framework. This paper compares approaches to bilingual lexicon induction and shows which method performs better on lexicon, induction, and NER and MT tasks.