RCaz/eu-funding-proposals-sft huggingface dataset:
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Write the concept and methodology overview for 'Foundry engineer's workbench for computer simulation of the rigging and casting of components' under Fourth Framework.

assistant: **Concept**

The scientific & technical objectives of this research proposal concern the creation and application of a novel foundry engineer designers workbench to handle geometry reception, CAD data repair, upgrade, transformation and export; to simplify the creation and addition of runners, risers, chills, local insulation and exothermics; to set up and manage the analysis of the casting using a selection from a library of casting simulation modules; to provide the required post processing and analysis. The graphical users interface will be tailored to the needs of the foundry engineer. Attention will be given to the need to greatly simplify the regeneration of 3D models, from 2D three orthographic view data, that are necessary for good simulation. Research is required to enable the seamless integration of existing analysis modules into an easy to use framework for the production and manufacture of alloy castings and will require investigation of the automation and degree of operator interactivity necessary to achieve the above objectives. An essential part of the project will be the analysis of selected industrial problem castings, the definition of improved processes and the testing of the proposed solutions by SME proposer made castings under controlled conditions and the analysis of the results. Problems of ease of use by a foundry engineer will be addressed and how the model output could be linked into existing costing and scheduling models will also be addressed.
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Explain the overall concept, methodology and approach for the project 'John Innes Centre International Student Bursaries for Early Stage Training' (JICIBSET).

assistant: **Concept**

There will be three related training programmes (total 396 months, with training starting October 2004).(1) 3-Year PhD Programme (6 Fellowships, 216 months);(2) 4-Year PhD Programme (6 Fellowships, 144 months from EU, with an equivalent 2-year contribution from a second sponsor). The 4-year PhD programme involves three research rotations in the first year, followed by a 3-year research project as above;(3) Short-term Fellowships (3 Fellowships of 12 months duration, total 36 months). Short-Term Fellows will undertake one to three short research projects similar to those in the 4-Year PhD programme. They will be registered for an appropriate MSc degree. Taught courses and a wide range of seminar programmes will provide opportunities for a broad-based scientific and technical training. All students will attend a 10-day course on complementary professional skills. Some research training will involve links with industry. The John Inns Centre is affiliated to the University of East Anglia, Norwich, where all Fellows will be registered for research degrees. Each Fellow will be guided by an individual research supervisor, and advised by a supervisory committee that meets regularly to discuss research progress, plans and further training and career objectives. A Graduate Studies Committee monitors the effectiveness of all postgraduate training at the Centre. The main research objectives are: - to discover basic biological processes in plants and micro organisms; to develop and apply the platform technologies that underpin modem molecular biology, and to create plants and bacteria of enhanced value. This provides an excellent training environment and a springboard for careers in academic or industrial research.
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Describe the novelty, innovation potential and advance beyond the state of the art for 'From face-to-face to face-to-screen: Social animals interacting in a digital world' (SODI).

assistant: **Innovation**

Over millions of years, human survival has crucially depended on rapport building, seeking others’ social support, and sharing resources in groups. This social context has created constant evolutionary pressure to develop specific biological systems geared to interacting face-to-face with physically present others. For just a few years, we have been living in a rapidly developing digital world where interactions across society (education, friendship, health care) shift to face-to-screen interaction – strongly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. How does this core change affect our social interactions? In SODI, I will contrast face-to-face with face-to-screen “live” interactions of many individuals, taking a multi-method, biopsychological approach. According to my theoretical working model, face-to-screen interactions fail to entirely engage specific, socially relevant hormonal systems (oxytocin, μ-opioids, testosterone), which evolved to process context-dependent stimuli from face-to-face contact (mutual eye gaze, physical contact, social odour). Consequently, hormone-mediated beneficial social effects should be attenuated, while adding social stimuli should ameliorate this difference. To test my model’s assumptions, I will tackle three objectives. How do face-to-screen interactions differ from face-to-face ones? Can we “socially enrich” face-to-screen interactions by adding previously lacking social stimuli? Does experimentally modulating hormone levels in the brain affect differences between face-to-face and face-to-screen interactions? In a radically innovative approach, my research combines experimental-psychological interaction paradigms, neurophysiological and subjective measures, and hormone administration to understand the merits and flaws of interacting in a
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Compose the 'State of the Art and Innovation' section for a Horizon 2020 proposal on 'How nature affects cooperation in common pool resource systems'.

assistant: **Innovation**

The constraints and dynamics set by nature have a deep and significant impact on economic fundamentals and the ability to successfully manage renewable resources. This can be taken into account to formulate effective policies. However, the causal pathway from the natural to the social environment and its feedback for sustainable resource use is often overlooked, not the least because preferences and incentives are traditionally viewed as being stable and fixed. Yet, it is high time to take this new perspective: Social-ecological systems around the globe are under mounting stress and common pool resources are vital, in particular in developing countries. This project aims to establish how nature shapes preferences and incentives of economic agents and how this in turn affects common-pool resource management. To this end, I investigate three mechanisms: (A) how tipping points and thresholds in the natural system may encourage cooperation; (B) how the volatility of resource abundance influences risk preferences and how this in turn affects community-based management; and (C) how leadership, which is closely linked to risk preferences, interacts with the natural environment to foster cooperation that overcomes common-pool dilemmas. NATCOOP's bold agenda pushes the frontier of economics and sustainability science.  Not only the investigation of the feedbacks between nature and cooperation from a new angle, also the scale and scope of the project -- combining cases from different socio-economic and ecological setting at three continents with theoretical and statistical work -- will generate new knowledge and be highly rewarding. Though challenging, I am confident that my background in economics and ecology puts me in an ideal position to achieve this important task. My ultima
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Write the 'Expected Impact' section for the project 'EUROPEAN GROUP FOR ANALYSIS OF CORIUM RECOVERY CONCEPTS' (EUROCORE), addressing dissemination and exploitation.

assistant: **Impact**

The role of the EUROCORE concerted action is to obtain a much clearer view of the state of the art of European actual reactor corium recovery concepts and to better identify research and development needs, taking into account current technical knowledge and reactor situations. A prioritisation of R&D actions coming from the synthesis of real users needs should hopefully result from this action, which involves public and private, research organisations, but also utilities and nuclear reactors vendors. In order to be successful, it will be paid a great attention to the fact that debates are based on technical objectivity and a strong consensus finally emerges, because a weak consensus makes no sense for handling suvh an important problem.The project has been concluded in july 2002 with a four months late delay by the approval and the delivery of the final report. This report has been completed five months after the last meeting in Chamrousse (end of January 2002) as a lot of discussions and e-mails have been necessary to get the final consensus and to achieve the final report and distribute it to all participants and the Commission.. Let us recall that the first meeting has been hosted by KTH/RIT (Prof. Sehgal) in Stockholm on May 25, 26th 2000 and it has dealt with the analysis of in vessel corium recovery concepts. The second one has been hosted by AEA-T (Dr Brian Turland) in London on Nov.6,7th, 2000, it has been devoted to corium quenching in the reactor cavity and to corium concrete interaction with water addition. The third technical and mid term meeting took place in Lanzarote (Spain, March,13, 14th, 2001) and it has been devoted as initially planned to approval of the first two consensus reports and to the Ex-Vessel Core-Catcher, spreading concept and the evaluati
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Draft the 'Objectives and Scope' section of a Fifth Framework proposal for the project 'Eco-efficient design and control of environmentally-friendly chemical reactors and processes.'.

assistant: **Objectives**

Most of European chemical industry faces major challenges in the problem of improving efficiency and productivity, and at the same time minimizing environmental and ecological effects. At the technological level at which the industry operates today, very sophisticated modeling tools and experiments are needed for improving the eco- efficiency, and at the same time maintaining or improving the productivity and efficiency of the processes. These design and optimization tools must be based, as far as possible, on a first-principles approach. that is, on a sound theoretical foundation. The doctoral training at the training site focuses directly on the heart of these problems: detailed CFD-based modeling of chemical reactors, as the heart of the processes, combined with development of new methods for design and optimization of process and handling of environmental effects like CO_2-emissions. The ECOCHEM Marie Curie Training Site in Trondheim welcomes researchers from EU countries who will address the challenges of design, optimization and control of environmentally friendly and efficient industrial processes for a stay of 6-12 months. Particularly industrial researchers or industry relevant research is welcome, and we also especially encourage women to apply. Research is carried out in many subject areas, especially gas absorption, gas cleaning operations, thermodynamics, drying, membrane technology, computer aided modeling, Process control, reactor technology, single and multiphase flow modeling, petro chemistry, polymer chemistry, surface- and colloid chemistry, reaction kinetics and catalysis. However, in all cases the primary goal is to increase eco- efficiency while still maintaining or improving the raw material utilization in the processes so that waste product and C
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Compose the 'State of the Art and Innovation' section for a Horizon 2020 proposal on 'Set in Stone - A retrospective impact assessment of human and environmental resource usage in Late Bronze Age Mycenaean Monumental Architecture, Greece'.

assistant: **Innovation**

Greek Mycenaean monumental architecture has been well-studied. However, the extent to which large-scale building programmes contributed to the socioeconomic and political changes and crises that took place in Late Bronze Age Greece (c.1600-1100/1070 BC) has not been studied. The project aims to investigate human and natural resources which interacted in the Argive Plain and Attica. There, elites mobilized these resources to implement their monumental building programmes. It seeks to reveal how and why these constructions were accomplished, and what impact such large-scale prolonged building programmes had on the population over time. Methodologically, practical building processes and inherent social practices are captured via the chaîne opératoire approach. Economic data are assessed via architectural energetics, an econometric modelling procedure translating buildings into cost-estimates including time-units of labour invested. These two approaches are triangulated with critically reviewed data sets revealing the changing broader demographic situation of the region. The latter data are extracted from published settlement and land use surveys, as well as archaeobotanical, geomorphological, climatic and mortuary studies from the Argolid. Published historical archives and the Linear B tablets provide further comparative data on regional pre-industrial land use and human activities. Together all these data will provide numerical estimates of people involved in region-wide large-scale building projects. The social consequence is that these people could not simultaneously produce primary commodities (e.g. food). The project will finally illustrate whether the estimated active population of the region could sustain such long-term building and supply of other resources, or whe
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Write the 'Expected Impact' section for the project 'Unravelling  the secrets of Cu-based catalysts for C-H activation' (CUBE), addressing dissemination and exploitation.

assistant: **Impact**

The Holy Grail of selective C-H activation has been vigorously pursued for more than 70 years in all areas of catalysis - homogeneous, heterogeneous and biological - yet with scarce cross-fertilization. CUBE will bridge this gap, by synergistically disclosing the secrets of Cu-containing biological and synthetic catalysts and translating the acquired knowledge into rationally designed new catalysts with unprecedented activity, selectivity and turn-over numbers.CUBE will capitalize on the recent discovery of abundant and experimentally accessible natural enzymes (LPMOs) that activate resilient C-H bonds using a mono-Cu catalytic center, thus providing a biological analogue to synthetic Cu-zeolites. CUBE will also harness the potential of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which offer unprecedented (“enzyme-like”) flexibility in catalyst development. C-H activating Cu-containing Zr-MOFs have just been described. CUBE will generate trans-disciplinary insights into Cu-based catalysts to progress beyond the state of the art in C-H activation. To this aim, we will elucidate the key mechanistic features of oxidant activation by O2, as well as N2O and H2O2, and then C-H activation. Emerging design principles from these studies will evolve new catalysts, including engineered enzymes, enzyme-polymer hybrid materials, and MOFs. To enable these efforts, we will develop novel methodologies at the interface of spectroscopy and computational chemistry. The project brings together leading players in complementary fields: design, synthesis and testing of catalysts (UiO), enzymology and protein engineering (NMBU), spectroscopic investigations of heterogeneous catalysts (UoT) and spectroscopic/computational studies of homogeneous and biological catalysts (MPI). Through a work-plan conceived
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Write the 'Expected Impact' section for the project 'Cloning and characterisation of spindle-c, a gene required for polarisation of the anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral axes in drosophila' (1994-1998), addressing dissemination and exploitation.

assistant: **Impact**

Research objectives and content The formation of the anterior-posterior and dorsoventral axes in Drosophila depends on three crucial symmetry-breaking events during oogenesis, all of which involve the localisation of specific mRNAs. 1) One of the two pro-oocytes is determined to become the oocyte 2) The position of the oocyte determines posterior 3) The position of the oocyte nucleus and gurken mRNA determines dorsal. Mutants in the five spindle genes disrupt all three of these processes, with spindle-C mutants producing the strongest phenotypes. I aim to clone and characterise the spindle-C gene to determine what role it plays in these events. This research should increase our understanding of the molecular events that underlie the origin of polarity in Drosophila and the mechanisms of mRNA localisation. Training content (objective, benefit and expected impact) I have chosen to work in the Wellcome/CRC Institute as it is one of the leading Institutes in the field of Developmental Biology in Europe, and is very well-equipped for the research I wish to perfom. I will be affiliated with the Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, and will participate in its PhD. program. This grant will enable me to study for my PhD. in a highly stimulating and intellectual environment with the best facilities available. I will obtain a solid training in both Drosophila genetics and molecular biology, a combination one cannot find in Ireland. Links with industry / industrial relevance (22)
system: You are an expert grant writer specializing in European Union research funding proposals. You write compelling, well-structured proposal sections that demonstrate excellence, impact, and implementation quality, using precise EU terminology and following best practices for Horizon Europe, Horizon 2020, and earlier framework programmes.

user: Write clear, measurable objectives and define the scope for the project 'The Future of ILL 2030' (FILL2030) under Horizon 2020.

assistant: **Objectives**

FILL2030 will adapt the business model for the ILL to fit the changing landscape of neutron research. The business model will secure full operational capacity of ILL to meet the demand from its users, until at least 2030. Neutron scattering in Europe is in a major transition period. The technique, developed by experts, has reached a level of maturity that fits the wide use by a broad, non-expert user community. Cutting edge experiments which demonstrate scientific excellence are performed in parallel to the most efficient, high throughput approach which will ensure the broadest, highest impact. This evolution in the user model is concurrent with the emergence of the big data driven, multi-disciplinary research approach. This demands the simplest, most open access to analytical facilities, as far as possible. At the same time, capacity in Europe for neutron scattering is being reduced with the closure of two major national facilities. ESS will start operation in the mid-2020’s providing new capability, but initially limited capacity. Already today ESS constitutes a major strain on the European neutron scattering budget. It is crucial in this case for ILL to service the future users of ESS till 2030.In FILL2030 adapting the business model is done through developing new service packages for academia and industry, adapting the funding model, developing tools to identify emerging user groups and to show case the socio-economic impact of the research done at ILL. FILL2030 will also provide ILL the means to test the new business model in piloting the new access modes for new users.As one of the oldest, large scale research infrastructures in Europe, with a funding model distributed across many stakeholders and a diverse user community, the ILL is an ideal test bed for adapting