Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: russell.diamond@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-21 11:53:00+00:00
Subject: RE: San Diego Gas & Electric Co. ("CP")

Sara, in this situation we make a point to make the trader aware of this 
situation and if it persists we raise the issue to management.  The trader is 
Keith Holst on the West Desk, and I have not spoken to him.  I was waiting to 
hear back from you.

Thanks for your help.

Russell.



 -----Original Message-----
From:  Shackleton, Sara  
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:21 AM
To: Diamond, Russell
Subject: San Diego Gas & Electric Co. ("CP")

Russell:

I received your voice mail about the one (1) year financial trade done 
between ENA and CP.  The three-month limitation on trades is only an internal 
ENA control which was imposed by credit some years ago.  Please refer to 
Lotus Notes for a more comprehensive explanation.

The Master Agreement has been executed.  However, CP was unable to render a 
legal opinion vouching for "blanket" enforceability of the trades due to 
conflicting PUC orders which are still in effect today.

What is credit's position when your internal policy is violated?  Who was the 
trader?  Have you spoken with the trader?



Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
From: chris.greaney@enron.com
To: kathy.sturr@enron.com, jean.adams@enron.com, robert.benningfield@enron.com, larry.berger@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, kenneth.cessac@enron.com, mary.darveaux@enron.com, sherry.forbish@enron.com, stephen.herber@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, steve.january@enron.com, randy.janzen@enron.com, rick.kile@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, penny.mccarran@enron.com, janet.mcdaniel@enron.com, angela.mendez@enron.com, darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, debra.scurlock@enron.com, gary.spraggins@enron.com, g..stage@enron.com, harry.woodson@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-08 20:03:33+00:00
Subject: RE: Report for Jan 5th & 6th

I did talk to Gas Measurement and they are only showing 4 hours of flow on the 5th, I'm not sure about the 6th . Verlene is checking with the measurement techs. and they'll probably  have to poll the stations again to get the volumes into the system correctly.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sturr, Kathy  
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:38 PM
To:	Adams, Jean; Benningfield, Robert; Berger, Larry; Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Cessac, Kenneth; Darveaux, Mary; Forbish, Sherry; Greaney, Chris; Herber, Stephen; Hibbard, Scott; January, Steve; Janzen, Randy; Kile, Rick; Kowalke, Terry; McCarran, Penny; McDaniel, Janet; Mendez, Angela; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Scurlock, Debra; Spraggins, Gary; Stage, Michael G.; Sturr, Kathy; Woodson, Harry
Subject:	Report for Jan 5th & 6th

There looks like there are some measurment problems.  Therefore this report has not been done for these days.  Checking with measurement regarding the variances between scheduled and actuals

Kathy
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: kathleen.clark@enron.com, barton.clark@enron.com, bob.carter@enron.com, stuart.zisman@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com, david.bargainer@enron.com, brian.barto@enron.com, cheryl.costa@enron.com, peggy.banczak@enron.com, karen.jones@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com, alan.larsen@enron.com, davidlu@nepco.com
Cc: sheila.tweed@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-24 14:15:00+00:00
Subject: WestLB

To all,

As you know, Enron is refinancing the equipment we bought through WestLB.  
I've been asked to compile a list of all the equipment purchased through 
WestLB, and the change orders related to same.  All I know about is the LM 
deal with GE (with 1 executed change order, approximately 4 or 5 pending) and 
the ABB transformer deal (with one CO pending).  Please let me know if you 
are aware of any others.

Thanks,

Kay
From: m..presto@enron.com
To: john.llodra@enron.com
Cc: dana.davis@enron.com, david.duran@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-06 23:33:13+00:00
Subject: RE: Discuss CT-Long Island Transmission play

We would prefer physical rights that we can take day-ahead and/or real-time (5 minutes ahead, if possible).   Rather than an obligation (like FTR's), we prefer an option (spread on pricing that can only be positive when exercised).
 
I would want to condition the transaction on having one RTO in the NE with LMP pricing in effect for the entirie NE market on or before 1/1/2003.   Assuming we get over those hurdles, this would likely be viewed as a capital project internally (fixed cost structure), therefore, we need to earn a minimum of 25% expected return (after credit).
 
Obviously, there is a huge unknown on the CT vs. Long Island forward curve with the changing market conditions.   This makes pricing this deal extremely difficult, particulary with the returns we would need to show.
 
Call me with any additional questions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Llodra, John 
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:40 AM
To: Davis, Mark Dana; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: Discuss CT-Long Island Transmission play


Dana/Kevin
 
I would like to chat with both of you regarding what specific interests the desk would have in securing transmission rights between CT and Long Island.
 
As you may recall, NU is proposing to build this line on a merchant basis, and are seeking proposals on 8/17/01 (one week from this coming Friday).
 
My thinking is we may want to bid for some capacity on this line outright (how many MW? what term?), and potentially consider some more innovative structures such as:
 

Bring some debt or mezzanine funding to the table to help get the project financed, and get some options to take capacity on the line in return (what type of optionality -- desired term, preference for physical rights or financial settlements based on LMPs, etc -- would we find most valuable?) 
Provide hedging products such as a CT-LI spread collar to enhance NU's ability to finance the project -- e.g., sell them a put option on the CT-LI bi-directional spread to insure some minimum cash flow on the line, in return for them selling us a call on the spread.

I am beginning to work with structuring to pull some values together, but I wanted to get your input on how to proceed.  Can we plan to speak sometime today/tomorrow?  Please let me know what times work for the two of you.  Thanks

John
From: heather.choate@enron.com
To: randall.gay@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-20 17:01:00+00:00
Subject: FYI - Your jackets are ordered

Randy,
   
  The creme jacket has been ordered with the 'E' Logo and  'West Gas 
Logistics' in tan (matching the color of the inside jacket).  
   It will arrive the week of December 11th.  

  I ordered (2) Medium, (14) Large, (1) XLarge, (2) XXLarge @  $155.75. + 
$4.00 (XXL) = $2963.25. 
  Kerri was unsure if they charged tax or if it was included.  She will not 
know the shipping until 
  after the jackets arrive and she receives the invoice.  

   Also, for future reference, I am including the 'guest list' :   )  Heather

   Jackie Adam - M
   Jan Sutherland - M
   Stacey Brewer - L
   Ted Evans - L
   Suzanne Christiansen - L
   Shelly Mendel - L
   Patti Sullivan - L
   Matt Smith - L
   Bob Superty - L
   Brandee Jackson - L
   Heather Choate - L
   Alex Saldana - L
   Kim Olinger - L
   Randy Gay - L
   Phillip Allen - L
   Tori Kuykendall - L
    Hillary Mack - XL
    Bob Hall - XXL
    Mike Grigsby - XXL
From: james.prentice@enron.com
To: stanley.horton@enron.com
Cc: kerry.roper@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-17 15:38:00+00:00
Subject: February 2000 EMC Financial Results

Stan, please see the attached from Kerry.  We have been close to shut down 
economics but believe it still makes sense to run.  Please let me know if you 
want to disscuss this further.
                                                                              
           JSP
---------------------- Forwarded by James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron on 03/17/2000 
01:30 PM ---------------------------


Kerry Roper
03/17/2000 02:25 PM
To: James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: February 2000 EMC Financial Results

For the month of February, the Enron Methanol Company Income Statement 
reflects a negative gross margin.  As you pointed out, this raises a question 
as to whether we should have been running the plant during the month. 
Hopefully, this brief explanation will clarify the reasons we continued to 
run.

As stated above, the gross margin was slightly negative; however, this 
includes the cost of oxygen. Most of the oxygen expense (approx. $300,000) is 
a fixed cost because of our take or pay agreement with Praxair.  As a result, 
when we evaluate whether or not to run, we look only at variable costs (which 
do not include $300,000 of oxygen). If we ignore this take or pay oxygen 
cost, then the gross margin is approx. $200,000 positive. This is roughly 
equal to our variable O&M costs which means that were at "break even" for 
variable margin and expenses. Given the high possibility of freezing 
temperatures in February and an analysis that indicated that we could break 
even for all variable costs, the decision was made to run the plant to 
protect against freeze damage. 

A simple schedule is attached to illustrate the break even analysis.
From: no.address@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-20 02:44:58+00:00
Subject: Thanksgiving Holiday


As we approach the Thanksgiving Holiday, I want to take this opportunity to wish you and yours a safe and happy Holiday.  
With the recent events in our nation, giving thanks this year has taken on a whole new meaning.  This Thanksgiving we honor the brave, enduring heroes who gave their lives as well as those who are abroad fighting for freedom. We can be thankful for our great nation and for the world coming together. 
I recognize that here at Enron we are working through some challenging times and that everyone in the organization is working hard.  Thank you for your continued dedication.
Please take some time over the Holiday to enjoy your family and friends.   
Happy Thanksgiving.
Stan
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: tony.pryor@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-05 22:29:00+00:00
Subject: Re: PG&E - - Status

Great--please send me the current draft on Thur. AM for me to take a look 
at.  Gracias!  DF 



07/01/2000 05:30 PM
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
07/01/2000 05:30 PM
07/01/2000 05:30 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: PG&E - - Status  

Drew, I just sent the revised draft to Lou for his comments. Hope you're 
better................Tony



Drew Fossum
07/01/2000 04:02 PM
To: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: PG&E - - Status  

Thanks Tony--we'll discuss on Wed or Thur.  DF


06/30/2000 05:28 PM
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
Tony Pryor
06/30/2000 05:28 PM
06/30/2000 05:28 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: PG&E - - Status

Drew, I am incorporating the comments of Maria, Susan and Jeff into the draft 
of the discussion of alternatives. I'm about half-way done, but ran out of 
time. I'll finish this weekend and provide to Lou for his comments before 
forwarding to you.
From: patrick.hanse@enron.com
To: kayne.coulter@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-29 13:54:00+00:00
Subject: Another Vac. request

I would like to request MARCH 15-16th  (Thur. & Fri.) OFF.
Please let me know if this if this is a problem - I'm coordinating plans w/ 
another family.
From: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
To: kim.hickok@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-06 18:31:00+00:00
Subject: Please approve and forward........

I approve. Please process immediately.

Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 
06:32 PM ---------------------------

Jennifer Burns

12/06/2000 04:41 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Please approve and forward........

Jeff:  Please approve and  forward to Kim Hickok.  I was unable to enter in 
my time for the Dec. 15th pay period do to being out on Monday, this e-mail 
will be sent on to payroll so that a manual check can be processed.  Thanks!

Nov. 16 - 1 hr. overtime
Nov. 17 - 2 hrs. regular, 6 hrs. vacation
Nov. 20 - 8 hrs. vacation
Nov. 21 - 2.5 hrs. overtime
Nov. 22 - 8 hrs. vacation
Nov. 27 - 2 hrs. overtime
Nov. 28 - 1 hr. overtime
Nov. 30 - 1 hr. overtime
From: karen.denne@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-18 02:30:40+00:00
Subject: RE: Info on VICA conference

Oooh, I hope they videotape this!  Sue -- you're going to be amazing!!  Jeff's just jealous that Freeman's keeping his date with you and he canceled on Jeff.  Freeman's scared of a rematch after your last VICA appearance, so they've brought in Horowitz.  Who's Fred Pickerel? 


-----Original Message-----
From:	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wed 10/17/2001 6:11 PM
To:	Mara, Susan; Denne, Karen
Cc:	
Subject:	RE: Info on VICA conference

I think Sue should come down with something (I know I would).  Horowitz? Eegads. He will be relentless...

Looks like this group likes a good food fight.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan 
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:10 PM
To: Denne, Karen; Dasovich, Jeff; Kaufman, Johnathan
Subject: FW: Info on VICA conference


Karen,
I can't believe you got me in to this! David Horowitz!

-----Original Message-----
From: Sandra Yamane [mailto:SYamane@marathon-com.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:06 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: Info on VICA conference


Hi Sue:

The Valley Industry and Commerce Assn (VICA) is holding its 13th annual
Business Forecast Conference on Friday, Oct. 26th at the Warner Center
Marriott, located at:

21850 Oxnard Street
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Phone: 1-818-887-4800

Your panel will begin at 10:00 a.m. and will be moderated by Paul Dandridge,
Anchor/Journalist for KCBS News.  Other panelists include: David Freeman,
David Horowitz, and Dr. Fred Pickel.

If you have questions about the conference, call Bonny Herman, president of
VICA or Scott Schmidt, VICA director of legislative affairs at 818/817-0545.

Call me if you have any other questions.  I may be reached at 323/655-4660.
Looking forward to seeing you Friday.

Sandra


-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan [mailto:Susan.J.Mara@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:34 PM
To: syamane@marathon-com.com
Subject: Info on VICA conference


I know I'm speaking on the 26th -- but I have no information on where or
when. Could you please tell me who to contact at VICA?


Sue Mara
(415) 782-7802


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you. 
**********************************************************************
From: marnie.lamb@enron.com
To: dana.davis@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-08 14:28:54+00:00
Subject: Performance Review - Dana Davis

When: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB 2303

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
From: douglass@arterhadden.com
To: barbara_klemstine@apsc.com, bob_anderson@apses.com, dcazalet@apx.com, billr@calpine.com, jackp@calpine.com, glwaas@calpx.com, ken_czarnecki@calpx.com, cabaker@duke-energy.com, gavaughn@duke-energy.com, rjhickok@duke-energy.com, gtbl@dynegy.com, kewh@dynegy.com, jdasovic@enron.com, susan_j_mara@enron.com, curt.hatton@gen.pge.com, foothill@lmi.net, camiessn@newwestenergy.com, jcgardin@newwestenergy.com, rsnichol@newwestenergy.com, rllamkin@seiworldwide.com, cfi1@tca-us.com, roger.pelote@williams.com
Date: 2000-11-15 18:45:00+00:00
Subject: FPC v. Texaco

Attached is a copy of the 1974 Supremem Court case, Federal Power  Commission 
v. Texaco, which we discussed briefly at yesterday's board  meeting.
?
Dan
 - FPC v. Texaco.doc
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: slafontaine@globalp.com
Date: 2001-03-15 08:08:00+00:00
Subject: Re: utilites?

agree with contango story .   cash to futures pretty bullish but a picture 
where agressive inj now are bearish later.  so curve should flatten.  also 
back of curve (cal2,3) under a lot of pressure now.  customers will be buying 
all the way down and will get fucked just like last year.  contango has been 
under considerable pressure even with the front falling...any rally should 
result in those snapping in to 4.  good scalp in my opinion.
definitely seeing your side on the $5 level.  surprised we havent gotten more 
demand back as we sit at these lower levels.  
off to cabo today for a long weekend.  kind of exhausted at work right now so 
a much needed break.




slafontaine@globalp.com on 03/15/2001 07:50:59 AM
To: John.Arnold@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: utilites?



i wud think apr shud also start to find support from contangos, storage 
players,
ie pretty attractive contangos given the bullsih mkt sentiment, and spec a
little short will eventually roll. i bullspd a little little at 5.5 just for a
scalp. if cash converges which it shud as we fall in px then shud see sprds 
find
support at the 5-6 ct level/month? ?
    other than that-im still bearish-5 bucks not sustainable longer term and
nothing yet telling me otherwise. economy and oil curve also not going to help
ngas. buying 4.00 summer puts
  thanks for comments on utilites-i'll bet they buy all the way down but i 
think
theyll have so much gas coming at em if we stay at these levels the mkt will
ultiamtely force em to back down.
  in ny yest and today-saw the red hot chili peppers last nite , was awsome,
small place about 1000 fans,maybe for a charity. also here for some of those
covert operations we talked about a while back. wkup.
From: leonardo.pacheco@enron.com
To: taffy.milligan@enron.com
Cc: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-04-26 08:20:00+00:00
Subject: Bandwidth GTC for Mark Taylor's Review

Taffy,

As per our conversation yesterday, attached please find the GTC Document that 
we need to fax to Mark Taylor in Argentina. 
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you very much for your help!

Sincerely,

Leonardo Pacheco
ext. 39938
From: jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-01 23:55:18+00:00
Subject: RE: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works

Yes...they have all been completed.  Pls get with someone in Causey's world to get the details.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Beck, Sally 
Sent: Mon 12/31/2001 3:37 PM 
To: McMahon, Jeffrey 
Cc: Piper, Greg 
Subject: 2002 Budget for Enron Net Works



ENW submitted our preliminary revised budget two weeks ago.  In our meeting in the Board Room, we did acknowledge that the ENW budget is very dependent upon the business plans of the business units that we support.  Since our budget meeting was the first that you conducted, we agreed that the ENW revised 2002 budget would need to be reviewed again once the business plans and associated budgets for other Enron business units were completed.  Has that process been completed such that we can now re-evaluate the 2002 budget for ENW?  

I will follow up with you or someone on your staff on January 2 so that we can complete this budget process.  

I hope that you and your family enjoyed the holidays.  --Sally
From: glen.hass@enron.com
To: lindy.donoho@enron.com, bill.rapp@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, robert.kilmer@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-20 18:27:58+00:00
Subject: RE: SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding

I agree.  The draft with Lindy's changes still makes our point.  gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Donoho, Lindy  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:43 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke, Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject:	RE: SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding 

I'm a little nervous actually commenting that we have Shipper imbalances.  Here are my comments.

 << File: SoCalCPUCAdviceLetter11-20-01.doc >> 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke, Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject:	SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding 

Attached is a draft of the letter that we propose to send to the CPUC regarding the AL2837 proceeding in which SoCal Gas is proposing changes to its "windowing" criteria. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. We need to file this tomorrow, so please communicate any comments to me by the close of business today, if possible. Thanks.


 << File: 11-21-01 Transwester Advice Comments 2837-A - DRAFTl1.doc >>
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: stephanie.sever@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-30 13:42:00+00:00
Subject: Hunt Petroleum

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/30/2000 01:42 
PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/30/2000 01:12 PM
	

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Truong/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pam B Boxx/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Hunt Petroleum

Chris,
I am turning the Hunt Petroleum deals for the East desk over to Tricia 
Truong.  When you find out who we are suppose to pay for the deals below, you 
can let her know.

Tricia,
Pam will get with you about the Koch piece.

Megan
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 03/30/2000 
01:00 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Megan Parker                           03/24/2000 11:42 AM
	

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Hunt Petroleum

I am told that you are the one to ask about CES deals.  I have some CES deals 
for Hunt Petroleum that Hunt says they should not be paid for.  The details 
are below.  I am trying to find out who to pay.

Megan
---------------------- Forwarded by Megan Parker/Corp/Enron on 03/24/2000 
11:38 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Megan Parker                           03/24/2000 10:16 AM
	

To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Hunt Petroleum

There are three deals entered under Hunter Petroleum which Hunt says should 
not be paid to them.  Deal 136863 they say should be paid to Aviare Energy.  
Deal 136835 and deal 136845 they say should be paid to Hassie Hunt.  Can you 
tell me who we are suppose to pay for these meters?  Their payment is due on 
Monday, so whatever you can tell me today would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Megan
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com, carlos.sole@enron.com, ann.white@enron.com, karen.jones@enron.com, jeffrey.hodge@enron.com, steve.hooser@enron.com, barbara.gray@enron.com, sheila.tweed@enron.com, sscott3@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com, bill.clydesdale@enron.com, steve.hall@enron.com
Cc: mitch.robinson@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-22 18:27:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FW: FERC clarifies credits for upgrades

Legal folks -- please let me know of any other legal people who should be 
added to interconnection issue emails.


On May 16, FERC clarified its policy regarding credits for network upgrades 
associated with the interconnection of a generating facility -- all network 
upgrade costs (the cost of all facilities from the point where the generator 
connects to the grid), including those necessary to remedy short-circuit and 
stability problems, should be credited back to the customer that funded the 
upgrades once the delivery service begins.

Once a customer signs up for transmission, then the transmission provider is 
limited to charging the higher of the expansion cost or an embedded cost rate.

Generally, Enron has not procured transmission at the time of interconnection 
and therefore, may be required to pay the network upgrades at the time of 
interconnection; however, the order clarifies that a credit should be 
available to the interconnecting customer or a third party that contracts for 
transmission away from the generator.

Kinder Morgan v. Consumers Energy  (Docket No. ER01-1587-000)
From: vkaminski@aol.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-29 21:11:00+00:00
Subject: Fwd: Polaris 360 bags

Return-Path: <bargainpool@jps.net>
Received: from  rly-yd01.mx.aol.com (rly-yd01.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.1]) by 
air-yd01.mail.aol.com (v77.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:30:00 -0500
Received: from  smtp.rcsis.com (smtp.rcsis.com [208.45.228.18]) by 
rly-yd01.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:29:41 -0500
Received: from ValuedCustomer (062.dsl9225.rcsis.com [63.92.25.62]) by 
smtp.rcsis.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA21202 for <VKaminski@aol.com>; 
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:27:44 -0800
Message-ID: <011201c08a2b$75567100$3e195c3f@rcsis.com>
From: "Bargain Pool Supplies" <bargainpool@jps.net>
To: <VKaminski@aol.com>
References: <6a.ad13305.27a5f2a8@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Polaris 360 bags
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:41:22 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010F_01C089E8.67119F40"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200




Thanks for contacting BargainPoolSupplies.com
?
The all purpose Polaris 360 bags are $19.50
?
Please place your order on-line or e-mail us with your name and phone  number
to place your order and we
will call you.? Or you can call our  toll free line at: (877) 296-0980.
?
Thanks for your interest.
Mark
?
www.bargainpoolsupplies.com
sales@bargainpoolsupplies.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From:  VKaminski@aol.com 
To: sales@bargainpoolsupplies.com 
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 2:09  PM
Subject: Polaris 360 bags

Looking for Polaris 360  bags. Residential cutomer. 

Vince Kaminski
From: cara.semperger@enron.com
To: christian.yoder@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-06 19:32:00+00:00
Subject: RE: <<GIVE YOUR COMPLIANCE FORMS TO ME BY THE 8TH>>

lol

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yoder, Christian  
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:00 AM
To:	Semperger, Cara
Subject:	RE: <<GIVE YOUR COMPLIANCE FORMS TO ME BY THE 8TH>>

Hey, make sure you don't migrate your old last name over to UBS.  You are coming up out of Egypt and need your Freeland name.   

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara  
Sent:	Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:33 AM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	<<GIVE YOUR COMPLIANCE FORMS TO ME BY THE 8TH>>
Importance:	High

**For New UBS employees***

I am going to send all of our File Migration compliance forms in one batch, so give them to me when you have signed the Document Migration Certificate. I will be sending this the evening of the 8th.

If you don't know who I am or what this is about, ask Dave Steiner or any of the Admins.

Thanks,

Cara Freeland
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: kevin.moore@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-11 17:22:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Wall Street Journal

Kevin,

OK.

Vince




Kevin G Moore
05/10/2000 12:53 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Wall Street Journal

Hello,
Elena Chilkina is requesting a Wall Street Journal,
may I subscribe for her.

Please inform .......
From: darron.giron@enron.com
To: kristi.giron@cfisd.net
Date: 2000-09-07 13:41:00+00:00
Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 
01:41 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  B Scott Palmer                           09/07/2000 12:30 PM
	

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game


---------------------- Forwarded by B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 
12:29 PM ---------------------------


Phillip M Love
08/02/2000 12:10 PM
To: B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 08/02/2000 
12:06 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Cecilia Olvera                           01/17/2000 01:17 PM
	

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game


---------------------- Forwarded by Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000 
01:16 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Jennifer Nguyen @ ENRON                           01/17/2000 01:09 PM
	

To: Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game


---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron on 01/17/2000 
01:09 PM ---------------------------


Larry Lenning <larry@apbenergy.com> on 12/21/99 02:18:13 PM
To: Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: FW: UNO!!! the game



I could not find the good email.  Sorry.  Can I send you that type of email
or will you get in trouble? What are you doing for Christmas? Staying in
Houston?

----------
From:  Tod Vaught
Sent:  Monday, December 20, 1999 3:51 PM
To:  Goddard Hampton; James Mueller; Kyle Galloway; Larry Lenning; Paul
Lutz; Preston Higgins; Tony Tong; Will Vaughn
Subject:  FW: UNO!!! the game



----------
From:  Erin Massey
Sent:  Friday, December 17, 1999 3:54 PM
To:  Tod Vaught
Subject:  FW: UNO!!! the game

Enjoy...








 - Uno.exe
From: stephen.schwarzbach@enron.com
To: faith.killen@enron.com, tracy.geaccone@enron.com, stephen.wood@enron.com, stephen.evans@enron.com, hazel.cook@enron.com, niamh.o'regan@enron.com, michael.lyons@enron.com, e..smith@enron.com, sherri.kathol@enron.com, darin.talley@enron.com, s..galvan@enron.com, kerry.roper@enron.com, erin.copeland@enron.com, hope.vargas@enron.com, jill.erwin@enron.com, patricia.shannon@enron.com, howard.selzer@enron.com, agatha.tran@enron.com, .nelson@enron.com, dana.lee@enron.com, terry.west@enron.com, gregory.adams@enron.com, robert.wilcott@enron.com, michelle.leblanc@enron.com, kirk.smith@enron.com
Cc: e..lindsey@enron.com, bob.butts@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-29 15:40:34+00:00
Subject: 2002 Plan Dates & Information

Attached is the revised calendar for the completion of the 2002 Plan.  As you will note, the dates have been moved up approximately 2 weeks in most cases.  This is a result of the recent management changes and executive availability.

A couple of notes on the dates:

-Please note that dates for assessments apply to ALL BUSINESS UNITS who will be senders of costs.
-The October 18th due date for the Presentation Pages: I will provide more information at a later date on this.
-The dates highlighted in yellow are not 2002 Plan related, but merely a reminder of other significant items that will be occurring in this time frame.

Also included in the file FYI is the PROPOSED schedule for the Plan/Executive Business Reviews with the Office of the Chairman.  These are still subject to change.  Rick Causey's office (Sharron Westbrook) is coordinating the schedules of the applicable attendees.  I will let you know when these are final.

Additionally, the Plan will be submitted to Corporate in the traditional format, Excel files.  We will be sending the templates out on (or by) September 20, as reflected in the revised calendar.  However, our strategy is still to enter 2002 with the full plan ( I/S, B/S, Cash Flow) loaded into Adaytum and to utilize Adaytum going forward from that point.  Therefore, we will be enhancing the Excel files to include the level of detail that will be loaded into Adaytum, so there will be additional lines and/or supplemental schedules added to the files.

One more thing - please communicate all of this information to the appropriate individuals in your business unit/group.

If you have any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,
Steve
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.houston@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-22 20:12:00+00:00
Subject: Topping-Out Ceremony Today

You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park 
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.  

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be 
handed out to all participants.  


In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday 
and 
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm
From: robert.kilmer@enron.com
To: glen.hass@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Cc: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 20:36:36+00:00
Subject: RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its
 Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of
 November

Yes we would like to participate

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hass, Glen  
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	FW: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

I would recommend that we participate.  In addition to myself we may want Steve V and/or Teb to also attend as they explain their FERC filing for making the backbone system jurisdictional.  Let me know if you concur and then I'll advise Jeff.  Thanks--gh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
From: ddoyle@nyiso.com
To: ddoyle@nyiso.com
Date: 2001-10-01 13:36:35+00:00
Subject: Virtual Transaction - Oct. 16

Dear Participant:

Please be advised that I am in receipt of your registration for the Virtual
Transaction training session scheduled for October 16, 2001, in Albany, New
York.  I will be sending to you within the next couple of days, by U.S.
Mail, documentation confirming your registration and your original invoice.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me or refer to our website for location and hotel information -
http://www.nyiso.com/services/training/cinfo/index.html.

Thank you for your interest in our training course.

Debbie Doyle
Conference Planner
518-356-6274
ddoyle@nyiso.com
From: russ.severson@enron.com
To: robert.superty@enron.com, george.smith@enron.com, edward.terry@enron.com, victor.lamadrid@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, randall.gay@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com, anita.patton@enron.com, briant.baker@enron.com, kevin.heal@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-02 17:21:00+00:00
Subject: September Deal Inactivation in Sitara

Currently,  prior month deals are inactivated in Sitara for portfolio 
purposes on the 10th of the month.  
  For system efficiencies we would like to inactivate September deals this 
weekend if possible.   This will have no affect on volume feedback.
  A system enhancement is being worked on so that we would not have to try to 
inactivate earlier than normal for next month.

Please contact me if this timing would cause you any problems.

Thank you

Russ
x37386
From: mike.maggi@enron.com
To: amanda.huble@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-24 16:22:21+00:00
Subject: RE:

by the way where is my present

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda  
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

I knew you would like that

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	RE: 

that was a good comeback

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda  
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

maybe I like trouble

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:05 AM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:	

you better be careful about drinks I think you might be in trouble
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: peterthompson@akllp.com
Date: 2000-11-13 13:19:00+00:00
Subject: Re: GE Turbine Agreement

Peter,

If I can get the clean version, I'm happy to run a blackline here.  Maybe 
getting out of your system would help!

Thanks,

Kay




"Thompson, Peter J." <peterthompson@akllp.com> on 11/13/2000 01:17:39 PM
To: "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: GE Turbine Agreement

Our IT folks in Houston are still trying to run the blackline.  I was
told it would only be a few more minutes.
From: becky.pitre@enron.com
To: clem.cernosek@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-05 12:00:00+00:00
Subject: Re: System 550 Unmetered Gas

---------------------- Forwarded by Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT on 06/05/2000 11:58 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Patricia Kirkwood @ ENRON                           05/23/2000 10:14 AM
	

To: Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: System 550 Unmetered Gas


---------------------- Forwarded by Patricia Kirkwood/GPGFIN/Enron on 
05/23/2000 10:11 AM ---------------------------


Tommy Hicks
05/15/2000 10:57 AM
To: Patricia Kirkwood/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: System 550 Unmetered Gas

 Use the 802 unmetered number for Edna.
thanks
thicks

---------------------- Forwarded by Tommy Hicks/GCO/Enron on 05/15/2000 10:55 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Patricia Kirkwood                           05/15/2000 10:17 AM
	

To: Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Tom Cathey/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Tommy 
Hicks/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Sam Shaw/GCO/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gary Anderson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Esther 
Garcia/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Cameron/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Clara 
Davis/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: System 550 Unmetered Gas  

Which unmetered station is to be used: 802,812,830,831,860 or 950?



Tommy Hicks
05/15/2000 08:49 AM
To: Cheryl Jones/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Esther Garcia/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, 
Patricia Kirkwood/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Gary Anderson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Pat Flavin/GCO/Enron@ENRON, Tom Cathey/GCO/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: System 550 Unmetered Gas

 On 5/10/00 a pipeline leak was found on system 550.  By the evidence found 
it is believed to have been present for several months. We need to go back to 
at least January '00 for corrections.  Please input this gas loss to the 
system 550 balance. The estimated gas loss for January through April is as 
follows:

 January: 103,058 MCF 105,066 DTH
 February: 97,219 MCF 99,114 DTH
 March:  106,015 MCF 108,082 DTH
 April:  95,214 MCF 97,070 DTH


Gas loss for May will be forwarded as soon as we obtain the pressure readings 
from meter 
986501-10.                                                                    
                                   Attached is the supporting documentation 
used to calculate these volumes:





If you have any questions please call.

thanks
thicks
From: david.delainey@enron.com
To: jeff.donahue@enron.com
Cc: kevin.presto@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-06 09:15:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Idea

Jeff, can you speak briefly with Kevin on this one - intriguing idea if the 
execution was probable.

By the way, what is our plan with Sithe?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 10/06/2000 
09:13 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kevin M Presto                           10/06/2000 08:50 AM
	

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Idea  

Put a bid into SOCO's shareholders for the transmission assets only.  Since 
the market is valuing Genco assets at a much higher multiple, a bid at book 
value for the transco would be very intriguing to the existing shareholder 
base.

Given a high probability of supply shortage in Florida over the next 2-4 
years, the transmission gateway to Florida is extremely valuable, 
particularly if expansions are done off the existing system.

In addition, it would give Enron tremendous regulatory leverage with the 
pending Entergy/FPL (SOCO connects systems), and the entire SE market, 
including TVA.

I know it's a longshot, but we will have to do something radical to bust open 
the SE market into a free functioning commodity market.  The SE is 
essentially untapped from a power trading standpoint right now, and the 
market is nearly 200,000 MW if you include Florida.
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: elizabeth.linnell@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, amr.ibrahim@enron.com, sue.nord@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-13 16:33:26+00:00
Subject: MAINTAIN DEREGULATION INFO CENTRAL ON EES Web Site

Elizabeth -

Let's please meet this week to update this web site.

Jim
From: chris.dorland@enron.com
To: migeorge@deloitte.ca
Date: 2001-09-26 22:12:51+00:00
Subject: RE: Found in Trade Center Wreckage

Looks like bullshit to me. How was the Deer this weekend? What are you doing this weekend? I will probably just be moving all weekend but we should go out next weekend.

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22George+2C+20Mike+20+28CA+20-+20Calgary+29+22+20+3Cmigeorge+40deloitte+2Eca+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:58 PM
To:	'Ry-Ry'; Dorland, Dan; Dorland, Chris; 'She-rhino!'; Clements, Colin (CA - Calgary); Zureski, Max (CA - Calgary); Saunders, Mark W. (CA - Calgary); Bergfeldt, Troy (CA - Calgary); Green, Jared (CA - Calgary)
Subject:	FW: Found in Trade Center Wreckage


Apparently this was from a camera found in the wreckage of the WTC, 
developed by 
the  FBI for eveidence and released on the net today....the guy 
still has no name and is missing .... 
  
  
 - missing.jpg << File: missing.jpg >>
From: bryant@cheatsheets.net
To: cheatsheets@egroups.com
Date: 2000-11-17 16:39:00+00:00
Subject: [cheatsheets] Breaking News-Marshall Faulk To Start!

Hi Folks,
?
Coach Mike Martz said today RB Marshall Faulk will  likely start Monday 
night's game.? More details as I get them.?  
Just wanted to give you a heads up. 
?
Joe

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com
From: scott.neal@enron.com
To: hunter.shively@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-26 16:31:00+00:00
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:29 PM 
---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Jared Kaiser                           10/26/2000 04:19 PM
	

To: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!


---------------------- Forwarded by Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:19 
PM ---------------------------


Joe A Casas
10/26/2000 04:12 PM
To: Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen@CCMAIL
cc:  
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 04:11 
PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Victor Lamadrid                           10/26/2000 03:40 PM
	

To: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia 
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy 
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alvin 
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward 
Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cynthia 
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E 
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, 
Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Women and motorcycles don't mix!

While we wait for Unify to work.....here's a funny!!!!


 - Evilke~1.mpe
From: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
To: geresj@tdusa.com
Date: 2000-12-18 07:50:00+00:00
Subject: Re: December 17 - 20

6:30 tonight is great.  see you later....any ideas?




geresj@tdusa.com on 12/15/2000 01:31:30 PM
To: Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: December 17 - 20




Re: your voice-mail, let's move the dinner to Monday the 18th at 6:30 p.m. (or
later if that is more convenient).

JRG



12/13/2000 08:34 AM
John Geresi
John Geresi
John Geresi
12/13/2000 08:34 AM
12/13/2000 08:34 AM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20  (Document link not converted)

Jeff -

Let's do dinner on the 17th.   I'd be happy to stop by your house for a quick
drink and tour.  I will assume 6:30 p.m. works unless I hear that this does 
not
work for you. I look forward to seeing you on Sunday.

JRG



Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com on 12/13/2000 08:24:33 AM

To:   John Geresi/CIBG/TDBANK/US@TDBANK-US
cc:
Subject:  Re: December 17 - 20





Yes, Love to have dinner, either the 17th or 18th--you pick.  Let's have a
drink at my house first so I can show you the digs.  Sorry I couldn't make
it...last minute schedule problems...

Jeff




geresj@tdusa.com on 12/12/2000 04:02:50 PM

To:   Jeffrey.A.Shankman@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  December 17 - 20




Jeff -

Jean and the boys will be heading to my parents for X-Mas on 12/17.  I am
in
Houston until the morning of the 21st, and would love to get together for
dinner
sometime during that interval.

Are you scheduled to be in town during that period?  If so give me a call
at
713.653.8207 (day) or at home at 713.522.9381.  I'll also be happy fill you
in
on what happened at the MFAH subcomittee meeting today as well.

JRG
From: rufino.doroteo@enron.com
To: stacy.hardy@enron.com, brian.schwertner@enron.com, susan.rance@enron.com, rosalyn.lum@enron.com, laynie.east@enron.com, lisa.best@enron.com, kristi.fredericks@enron.com, lisa.king@enron.com, tammy.barta@enron.com, lisa.kang@enron.com, dana.davis@enron.com, brian.dawson@enron.com, stephen.wolfe@enron.com, brad.carey@enron.com
Cc: pam.becton@enron.com, marnie.lamb@enron.com, nicole.mendez@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-06 16:39:00+00:00

i have a doctors appointment tomorrow morning and will be in around 9 or 10.  
dana will be here to assist you while i'm gone.

rufino
From: elsa.villarreal@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-26 14:26:00+00:00
Subject: MGI Supply

---------------------- Forwarded by Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT on 12/26/2000 
02:26 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Nicole Vo @ ENRON                           12/08/2000 11:28 AM
	

To: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: MGI Supply
Humble Gas Pipeline
S#446339, 449505, 411836, 472615, 463236, 448454

Elsa,

I was informed to bill anything on HGPL by my supervisor, but when I talk to 
Priscilla Hamic she informed me that HGPL should be billed by offsystem and 
not the Texas desk.  The deals in Sitara that relate to HGPL all state that 
it is Texas desk.

Please let me know who should be billing MGI Supply for HGPL volume.

Thanks for your help.
Nicole Vo