Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: dana.davis@enron.com
To: hope.vargas@enron.com, pam.becton@enron.com, marnie.lamb@enron.com, michael.galvan@enron.com, nicole.mendez@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-31 09:43:00+00:00
Subject: E-Schedules

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 09:42 AM 
---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Dana Davis                           01/31/2001 09:37 AM
	

To: Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosalyn Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa 
Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristi 
Fredericks/NA/Enron@ENRON, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan 
Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian K 
Dawson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Rufino Doroteo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephen 
Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: E-Schedules

Who has the E-schedules for co. 1n2 and 272?  Marnie is looking for them and 
the aren't in the file cabinet.  Call me and I'll take them to her.

Thanks.

Dana
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: brian.hoskins@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-25 13:15:00+00:00
Subject: Re:

what are you trying to show me? 

this just sends me to the ap website




Brian Hoskins
08/25/2000 11:34 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 

http://wire.ap.org/?FRONTID=MCOLBASKETBALL
From: kevinscott@onlinemailbox.net
To: skean@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-20 12:02:00+00:00
Subject: Public Policy Contacts for California

Jeff and  Steve
?
As you requested, I have  prepared a list of my preferred public policy 
contacts?for  California.? It is composed of professionals from an array of 
public,  private and non-profit backgrounds.? I have worked in some capacity  
with?each of these people?and most I know quite well.?  
?
Please call me for further  background.
?
Kevin
213-926-2626
?
Attachment
 - Kevin Scott -  Preferred Contacts - 6-20-01.doc
From: gascontrol@aglresources.com
To: dscott4@enron.com, lcampbel@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-18 17:28:00+00:00
Subject: Alert Posted 5:20 PM November 18, 2000: IBSS DWQ-MDWQ

Alert Posted 5:20 PM November 18, 2000: IBSS DWQ-MDWQ
Marketers should be able to count on their IBSS Nominations up to their MDWQ 
during this cold spell.
From: shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
To: ordonez@shasta.phys.us.edu
Cc: stinson.gibner@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-27 10:54:00+00:00
Subject: Preliminary Interviews with the Research Group

Good morning Professor Ordonez:

Vince would like to bring Ernesto and Carlos in for a preliminary interview.
Vince and Stinson are available on Tuesday, December 5 or Wednesday,
December 6.  

Should I contact them personally, or will you arrange the interviews?

I will need to know the times they are available on these days and I will also
need copies of their resumes.

If you need any information, please call me at 713/853-5290.

Regards,

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Research Group



---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 
10:48 AM ---------------------------


Vince J Kaminski
11/27/2000 10:47 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Greetings

Shirley,

Please, invite them for a preliminary interview,
Stinson, Zimin, Paulo and myself.

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/27/2000 
10:46 AM ---------------------------


carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/27/2000 10:15:51 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: Greetings


Dear Vince,

I am sorry for the dely in answering. These are their phone numbers:

Ernesto Hernandez:  (713) 532-0573
Carlos Gorrichategui: (713) 668-0408.

The best way to get a hold of them at this point would be through
me. I would pass along the information and then they can contact you.

Cheers,

Carlos



At 12:50 PM 11/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Carlos,
>
>I need their phone numbers.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 11:45:45 AM
>
>To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Greetings
>
>
>Vince,
>
>I gave you both their academic reports from here and Mexico and Panama.
>This
>information I believe also contain some personal info. Would you need more?
>One of them was a bit nervous about the formality of turning in an actual
>resume...
>
>Please let me know whether the academic info is not enough.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>At 10:41 AM 11/21/00 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>Carlos,
>>
>>Please, forward their resumes to us and we shall set up an interview for
>>them.
>>
>>Vince
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>carlos ordonez <ordonez@shasta.phys.uh.edu> on 11/21/2000 09:30:08 AM
>>
>>To:   Stinson.Gibner@enron.com
>>cc:   vkamins@enron.com
>>Subject:  Re: Greetings
>>
>>
>>Dear Vincent and Stinson,
>>
>>Both my students would love to come visit you guys for an informal
>>visit in the near future. Please let me know well ahead of time
>>when they can come. If possible, see to it that their parking expenses
>>be paid when they do come.
>>
>>
>>I'll be in touch with you all over the next months about this and
>>a possible postdoctoral/trainee agreement (World Lab.).
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, greg.wolfe@enron.com, holden.salisbury@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pchoi2@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-03 12:38:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 3/3/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001030313.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 13 / Preferred:  77.21 / Final:  77.03)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/3/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
From: janette.elbertson@enron.com
To: elizabeth.sager@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, jeffrey.hodge@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-13 17:22:00+00:00
Subject: Invitation List for ISDA Energy Conference in Houston on March 6

Elizabeth and Mark:  Mark Haedicke said you two would be able to pull 
together a list of lawyers' names and addresses (lawyers who deal with energy 
derivatives) to be provided to Liz O'Sullivan to be invited to the referenced 
conference.

Jeff: Mark Haedicke said you would be able to pull together a list of 
companies (companies dealing with energy derivatives) and their addresses to 
be provided to Liz O'Sullivan to be invited to the referenced conference.

Liz O'Sullivan is with ISDA in New York.  Her telephone number is:  (212) 
332-2559.

Thanks.


Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com
From: exchange.administrator@enron.com
To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 07:00:17+00:00
Subject: WARNING:  Your mailbox is approaching the size limit

This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 97384 KB.

Mailbox size limits:

	When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox: 

  Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today), 
  Select Properties and click the Folder Size button. 
  This method can be used on individual folders as well. 

To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.  

You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed. 

To turn Journaling off, 
 click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items. 

See client Help for more information.
From: janine.migden@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com, steve.montovano@enron.com, tom.hoatson@enron.com, jeff.brown@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, kerry.stroup@enron.com, dave.mangskau@enron.com, edward.baughman@enron.com
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-22 15:49:00+00:00
Subject: PJM West

I spoke with Craig Glazer, the new director for PJM regarding their concept 
for PJM West, which includes the following:

- Single market, rules, and tariffs for all companies
- No seams
- Reliability criteria of existing control areas in ECAR etc, 
- PJM West could use PJM market  
- A power exchange such as APX could be established as a competitive option 
for day ahead transactions.
- Designed to be flexible
- Native Load exception is eliminated
- LMP
- Transcos could be a part of it

We talked at length about LMP and I suggested the hybrid as an option for a 
variety of reasons.  He does not believe the hybrid method will work because 
a study demonstrated that using past information to develop commercially 
significant flowgates does not work since the paths will change, resulting in 
insufficient coverage of costs which would have to be socialized.  He further 
stated that there is insufficient data in the midwest to identify the 
constraints and we would have to rely on info provided by companies like AEP.

Given our current efforts to develop a single RTO, I think we should meet 
with the PJM folks and talk to them about our issues and see if we can come 
to some agreements.  Craig thinks it is logical that FE might join PJM West.  
I asked him if they were open to alternatives to LMP and he said he didn't 
know.
From: j..kean@enron.com
To: allan.sommer@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-15 00:07:04+00:00
Subject: RE: Merger Transition Teams

Thanks for the message.  I don't know of anything moving forward as yet.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sommer, Allan  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:26 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Cc:	Olson, Cindy
Subject:	Merger Transition Teams

Steve,

While Enron's management teams are reviewing actions plans for the upcoming six to nine months, I understand that functional transition teams will be assembled to address the planned merger.  I would like to register my strong interest in assisting any transition team where my skills could add value. Prior to developing and supporting corporate as well as enterprise systems at Enron my career has spanned across General Electric Capital Services and ABB on a global basis. Much of this experience has included system integration and change management.  

Let me know if you have any questions to the above.  Otherwise, I wanted to let you know of my interest and desire in working towards a successful transition for Enron.

Regards,

Allan Sommer
Enron ISC
713-345-5291
From: lisa.lees@enron.com
To: tom.moran@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, karen.lambert@enron.com
Cc: melba.lozano@enron.com, robert.cass@enron.com, kevin.meredith@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 10:54:00+00:00
Subject: Options on EOL - Time to tell the world

Heads up.  Please read the new financial option product type attached below.  
We'll need profiles, so I'll be in touch with each of you.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 12/13/2000 09:44 AM 
---------------------------


Dale Neuner
12/13/2000 10:45 AM
To: Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B 
Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Options on EOL - Time to tell the world

Option Manager is right around the corner, with a targeted release dat of the 
20th. Here's the Product Legal description, which has already been approved 
by Mark Taylor.

Dale
From: blachman@enron.com
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-22 15:23:12+00:00
Subject: Home Depot and more

I just wanted to pass you a note on these guys, since we had you call Bob Nardelli a couple of months ago to see what we could get going. Home Depot issued and RFQ and we responded with a non-conforming bid. We have, however, been chosen to exclusively negotiate with them (beat out Reliant and TXU) for their energy spend west of the Mississippi. We are focusing on a spend of about $50mm a year. We are also looking to help them with some of their problems in California, They entered into a number of 1-2 year deals with third party providers that were brokered for them by SRI and as they expire, they don't want to go back to the utilities.

Just wanted to let you know that we are making progress, and at the right time I may ask you to make another call to Nardelli.



New Subjects;

- I also have hooked up with Liz Flynn at Chase. She is an executive vice president and reports directly to Shapiro. She will look to me as the senior Enron contact for our deal and is aware and supportive of the corrective actions we are taking as well as the need for some restructuring. 

- As you know, we have recently closed 3 deals with Sam Zell's Equity Office Properties. We did 5 year deals for their Chicago, NY and Boston based properties. We are in the midst of looking at other regions as well as negotiating a term sheet for an off-balance sheet partnership that would perform DSM and look at Distributed Generation opportunities at their properties. I think it would be great to have you call Sam and say how great it is that we were able to begin doing business together. I will send sheri a note with his number and some deal details if that is acceptible to you.

Thanks,
Jeremy
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: clayton.vernon@enron.com
Cc: vasant.shanbhogue@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-07 15:24:00+00:00
Subject: Re: seminar on beyond ols

Clayton,

We can offer the seminar / discussion session on Monday, December 18,
at 3:30. Please, let me know if this would work.


Vince





	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	12/07/2000 01:55 PM
	
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: seminar on beyond ols

Vince-

George is fully enthusiastic for a seminar by Research on these ideas and 
resource tools. Any afternoon is fine to him- we can probably push the time 
up to 3:00 or so so everyone who needs to cheat to get away from work early 
to go shopping can.

Clayton
From: darron.giron@enron.com
To: smmayers@earthlink.net
Date: 2001-02-16 12:11:00+00:00
Subject: March

How goes it?  I wanted to check in with you and make sure we are still on for 
March.  I also need to let you know we will have an extra person besides the 
four of us.  He is the kid of some people who are driving up and is flying 
with us.  I hope this is OK.  He can acutally babysit so maybe we can go out 
one night.  Let me know.  Also,  I just hired a KU kid just out of undergrad 
school.  He's pretty bummed out about Baylor.  Talk to you soon.

DG
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: gary.hickerson@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-27 08:45:00+00:00
Subject: Today's IDEA

Gary,

Any interest?

Vince


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000 
08:46 AM ---------------------------


"Vadim Pokhlebkin" <vpokhleb@ideaus.com> on 03/22/2000 08:51:06 AM
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com> 
Subject: Today's IDEA


Good morning Vince,

Attached are today's issues of our daily morning faxes:
1. FMT, Financial Markets Today - good for FX and partly for fixed income
departments,
2. Fixed Income Today - good for bonds people only.

Do you mind if contact your colleagues directly to get their feedback?  That
will save you from spending time on forwarding this info to them.

Please let me know whom I may contact.

Best regards,
Vadim Pokhlebkin
Account Manager
vpokhlebkin@ideaglobal.com
tel. + 1 212 571 4332
fax  + 1 212 571 4334

IDEAglobal.com
140 Broadway, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10005, USA

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
IDEAglobal.com. This email, its content and any files transmitted with it
are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged
and/or confidential. Access by any other party is unauthorized without the
express written permission of the sender. If you have received this email in
error you may not copy or use the contents, attachments or information in
any way. Please destroy it and contact the sender via the IDEAglobal.com
switchboard in one of the following three offices: New York +1 212 571 4332;
London +44 171 430 2888; Singapore +65 332 0700

 - FMT0322A.pdf
 - FIT0322a.pdf
From: j..kean@enron.com
To: john.ambler@enron.com, w..brown@enron.com, ann.brown@enron.com, rosie.castillo@enron.com, greg.caudell@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, tim.despain@enron.com, rodney.faldyn@enron.com, sue.ford@enron.com, clint.freeland@enron.com, jackie.gentle@enron.com, leslie.hiltabrand@enron.com, c..koehler@enron.com, mark.koenig@enron.com, david.leboe@enron.com, amin.maredia@enron.com, gay.mayeux@enron.com, jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com, vance.meyer@enron.com, julia.murray@enron.com, cindy.olson@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com, .palmer@enron.com, meredith.philipp@enron.com, pat.radford@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, .schuler@enron.com, marion.sczykutowicz@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com, eric.thode@enron.com, elizabeth.tilney@enron.com
Cc: nicki.daw@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com, rosalee.fleming@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, kenneth.lay@enron.com, rex.rogers@enron.com, liz.taylor@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-21 00:14:52+00:00
Subject: Message Points 11/20/01

Please see attached.
From: jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com
To: stanley.horton@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-17 23:21:46+00:00
Subject: RE: NEPCO

I believe it may be a challenge in the near term to get any meaningful credit support.  But I really don't much about the business.  Will the sureties just support the construction company  by itself?  Ray, can you have someone look into this.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Horton, Stanley 
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 3:40 PM 
To: McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond 
Cc: 
Subject: NEPCO



I need some guidance regarding NEPCO.   We will try to determine if there is any sale value, however, in the meantime all the projects we are bidding require Enron credit support and guaranties of performance.  Without the credit support/guaranties of performance NEPCO is essentially in a wind down status which would be very costly.  From a cash and valuation standpoint business as usual is the best approach.  Just need some guidance from you.  Sorry to bother you with this but I am already getting inquiries.  FPL called today since we are bidding on two of their merchant plants.  They will probably want to talk with one of you regarding our position.
From: janel.guerrero@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.landwehr@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, daniel.allegretti@enron.com, howard.fromer@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-29 12:16:00+00:00
Subject: Leadership Agenda

;
From: laurel.adams@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-19 18:09:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd

Sara,

Per Jean, 

We may have a good argument for saying there is a material ommission from the 
confirmation, because there was not a defined reference obligation.   
However, that option involves going to court and is not really all that 
desirable.  Basically, the whole confirm is so vague, that there's almost no 
way to tell what Paul traded.  Madhur also called Lou Jaffe at DB to feel him 
out on the trade.  Initially Lou was referring to the April 2002 issue of 
APP, but then when he started reviewing the confirmation  and realized that a 
reference entity was not specified, he started saying that DB had bought 
protection on any APP issue.  I get the feeling that Madhur feels like DB 
will ultimately work with us on what they deliver to us, since everyone 
initially agreed that the trade was on the 4/02 issue, it just wasn't 
documented that way.  Of course, the more vague the confirm, the better for 
DB in this case.   (Perhaps if we had had a deal ticket, we wouldhave known 
what to look for.!)   At any rate, Madhur is monitoring the trade with Jeff 
for Paul (who is in Vegas), and he is keeping us in the loop.  You may want 
to call Madhur direct, just to get his impressions of the conversation with 
Jean.
From: linda.trevino@enron.com
To: steven.harris@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com, mark.mcconnell@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com
Cc: rick.dietz@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-08 19:28:59+00:00
Subject: TW Contract/Capacity Release System Implementation

The long awaited Transwestern web based Contract and Capacity Release system will go live Sunday March 10, 2002.  The implementation team will be on site from Saturday evening thru Sunday evening to assure the system is performing properly. Should you receive any calls from customers related to the new system please direct the calls to one of the following individuals:

Elizabeth Brown - 36928
Dennis Lee - 31715
Linda Trevino - 35413
Rick Dietz - 35691

Thanks to all of you who provided assistance to the team the past few months.  Your imput and  cooperation was greatly appreciated.  

A couple of reminders:

	Houston Customer Training - Thursday March 14th & Friday March 15th 
	Marketing Dept Training - Monday March 18th & Thursday March 21st

Call if you have further questions.

Thanks

Linda
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: 2000-09-15 16:59:00+00:00
Subject: Re: vol model

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 
05:05 PM ---------------------------


Tanya Tamarchenko
09/01/2000 01:05 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: vol model  




From: Pavel Zadorozhny on 08/31/2000 06:45 PM
To: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Tamarchenko/HOU/ECT@ECT, Naveen 
Andrews/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: vol model

It's been a while since I put this together. Some assumptions, such as those 
about the current VAR methodology may not be correct. But my ideas and the 
math involved are hopefully reasonable. Let me know if you have any questions.

Pavel, x34778
From: harold_tamayo@merck.com
To: lavorato@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-02 11:17:00+00:00
Subject: mi:2 & car

John,

Happy New Year!!  I wish you and your family the best and as Dina puts
it...BUY LOW, SELL HIGH (lol).

I have a great deal of songs to send you.  Just look at the lists (you can
open it with Wordpad) and let me know wich ones you like or if you prefer I
will send them all to you.  Also, I wont be able to send them via e-mail
(too big in memory size).  Therefore, check to see if your IT group have an
IOmega Zip Drive (100 MB) so that I can mail the songs to you.

I have attached the copy of the mi2 theme song and a catalog of the
Corvette.

 <<list.m3u>>  <<list1.m3u>>  <<list2.m3u>>
Song:

 <<Limp Bizkit - Mission Impossible Theme (Instrumental).mp3>>


Brochure:

 <<Corvette brochure.pdf>>

Saludos,
HDT


 - list.m3u
 - list1.m3u
 - list2.m3u
 - Limp Bizkit - Mission Impossible Theme (Instrumental).mp3
 - Corvette brochure.pdf
From: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To: shannon.groenewold@enron.com, matt.smith@enron.com, m..tholt@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com, l..gay@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 18:27:55+00:00
Subject: RE:

Has Phil found the supply for Mexicana?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Groenewold, Shannon  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:16 PM
To:	Grigsby, Mike; Smith, Matt; Tholt, Jane M.; Sullivan, Patti; Gay, Randall L.
Subject:	

I have stranded all the transport to the border out of Keystone for the month of December.

The transport volumes that have been taken out are as follows:

	22,836 - Keystone  -->  Socal Ehrenburg

	11,418 - Keystone  -->  Socal Ehrenburg (this is the mexican de cobra deal).  Previously Mexican de Cobra was buying the gas from Texaco.  Starting in 					December, Mexican will have to find another supply for this gas.  They will no longer buy from Texaco.  Phil Polsky is talking with 					Mexican, and a deal will be entered into Sitara, once Mexican has found a supply.  So as of now, the 11,828 supply coming into Keystone 				for this deal is not in the system.

	3975 - Keystone  -->  Socal Topock
From: virginia.thompson@enron.com
To: cara.semperger@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-01 23:00:00+00:00
Subject: RE: DMS - 7550 - February Bill

Thanks, Cara.  One more question....Does this go on NW or SW's books?

VA
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara  
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 6:42 AM
To:	Thompson, Virginia
Cc:	Runswick, Stacy; Salisbury, Holden; Wilson, Susie
Subject:	Re: DMS - 7550 - February Bill

I believe the preschedule loss charge is valid for 2/9/01, as I see no loss schedule represented on the scheduling sheet.

c





 
Virginia Thompson
04/30/2001 05:53 PM
To:	Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:	 
Subject:	DMS - 7550 - February Bill

Dear Cara and Bill,

Do you recognize these charges as valid  (Cara for 2-9 and Bill for 2-14)?  

Virginia

---------------------- Forwarded by Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:59 PM ---------------------------
   


 	  From:  Amy Clemons @ ENRON                           04/17/2001 05:56 AM	
		



To:	Virginia Thompson/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:	 

Subject:	DMS - 7550 - February Bill

I need to get this settled.  This is the detail Lynn sent me.  Have you or Cara spoken to her about this charge they have invoiced us for?

Let me know
Thank you
Amy
---------------------- Forwarded by Amy Clemons/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 07:53 AM ---------------------------

 
"LYNN RICHARDSON" <LERICHRD@wapa.gov> on 04/13/2001 11:55:51 AM
To:	<amy.clemons@enron.com>
cc:	 

Subject:	February Bill


Hi Amy!

I tried to return your call from yesterday this morning, but only got your voice mail.

The February bill for $341.90 was for two days:  February 9th and 14th.  February 9th (Tag No. 16259) was priced for 1 MW @ $207.99.  February 14th was a real-time transaction with no tag for less than a MW priced at $133.91.  I checked our records and saw no energy return for losses to WACM from Enron at any time during February.

Please call if you have further questions.

Lynn Richardson
Public Utilities Specialist
RMR
(970) 461-7440









<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
From: stanley.horton@enron.com
To: john.garrison@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-30 08:24:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Weekly update

Thanks for the report.  Just what I need.


From: John L Garrison@AZURIX on 04/27/2001 04:58 PM
Sent by: Jeanette Nickell@AZURIX
To: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Weekly update




John L. Garrison
President and Chief Executive Officer
Azurix Corp.
713-646-6421 Office
713-646-9577 Fax
jgarris2@azurix.com
From: christopher.calger@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-21 22:07:00+00:00
Subject: LM6000 Swap

Louise,

A couple of weeks ago we bought an option on four more LM6000's for a Jan02 delivery.  The intent was to sell our 4 July01 machines and recognize approximately $5MM for this "time swap".  We believe that we are in a position to execute this swap (Delta Power is at the table), but during the past two weeks we have received very strong tolling bids (Merrill Lynch, Duke, Constellation) for the LV project that imply a $20MM value to the project but require a commercial operation date of Sep02.  COD of Sep02 requires early turbine delivery.  We are therefore leaning towards canceling the turbine sale/repurchase in order to go for the bigger prize.  It will require finalizing development, EPC contract, tolling agreement, finance plan and internal approvals by May 1.  I am recommending that we go for it.  If we are not able to pull it off, I am confident that the high bids for these machines will still be there.  

Chris
From: arif.joshi@smginc.com
To: dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu, fiske@haas.berkeley.edu, gfong@haas.berkeley.edu, hudacko@haas.berkeley.edu, dkumar@haas.berkeley.edu, kwon@haas.berkeley.edu, langridg@haas.berkeley.edu, jpatel@haas.berkeley.edu, sklarin@haas.berkeley.edu, yarak@haas.berkeley.edu
Date: 2001-01-10 23:38:00+00:00
Subject: Atlantic 5 Analyst Report

Attached is the updated Atlantic 5 Analyst Report. We will also have
available a printed copy for each of you on Friday morning. Thank you for
your patience. I look forward to seeing you this weekend.

Sincerely,
Arif Joshi


 <<Analyst Report-Atlantic 5.doc>>

 - Analyst Report-Atlantic 5.doc
From: kayne.coulter@enron.com
To: john.kinser@enron.com, rudy.acevedo@enron.com, juan.hernandez@enron.com, miguel.garcia@enron.com, joe.stepenovitch@enron.com, joe.errigo@enron.com, doug.miller@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, keller.mayeaux@enron.com, chad.starnes@enron.com, dean.laurent@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, christopher.watts@enron.com, steve.olinde@enron.com, larry.jester@enron.com, juan.padron@enron.com, benjamin.rogers@enron.com, narsimha.misra@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, mauricio.trejo@enron.com, dustin.collins@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-27 16:06:00+00:00
Subject: Incorrectly booked deals

---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 04:05 
PM ---------------------------


Rhonda L Denton
04/27/2001 04:02 PM
To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudy 
Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Incorrectly booked deals

THESE DEALS STILL HAVE NOT BEEN CORRECTED!!!!!!!!



---------------------- Forwarded by Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001 
04:01 PM ---------------------------


Rhonda L Denton
04/25/2001 03:11 PM
To: Miguel L Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mauricio Trejo/Enron@EnronXGate, Rudy 
Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Incorrectly booked deals

Please change the following deals to the correct counterparty
NRG Power Marketing Inc.  Please do not pick NRG Energy Inc.   This CP is for 
swaps only.  Power Marketing is for physical power.   Please Please Please 
select the correct CP.


589885
591068
591123
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-27 10:26:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Wikieup/Big Sandy Project

Here is the email I got from George.  I suspect he is just being high 
maintenance, but I never miss the opportunity to suck up to a potential 
customer, so hope you think my response is appropriate.  Thanks.  
DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/27/2000 
10:25 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Drew Fossum                           03/27/2000 10:24 AM
	

To: "George Briden" <gbriden.snakehill@worldnet.att.net>
cc:  

Subject: Re: Wikieup/Big Sandy Project  

I'll bring this up with Mr. Fawcett today and you will hear back from either 
him or I or both shortly!  Glad to be of help.  DF



"George Briden" <gbriden.snakehill@worldnet.att.net> on 03/27/2000 08:57:04 AM
To: "Drew Fossum" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: Wikieup/Big Sandy Project



Drew;
Thanks for sending me off to read the order in CP99-522, etc.? I've  gotten a 
good feel for the relevant TW issues. 
Based on our preliminary information, TW looks attractive as the supply  
source for the Wikieup project.? 
?
FYI: I've discussed the project a couple of times with Jeff Fawcett, and he  
promised a first cut estimate? of facilities costs on this (as well as  
another) project, and suggested that it would be done by early March. 
Currently,  however, he seems to be among the missing (not returning phone 
calls,  etc.)? Maybe you could call over there and help me get his 
attention??  I'd sure like to make some progress on this deal.
?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
GB
 - George Briden.vcf
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: amy.clemons@enron.com
Cc: cara.semperger@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com, greg.wolfe@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-06 22:37:53+00:00
Subject: RE: Kathy from EPE's answer

Amy -

That's the best news I've heard all day! Looks like we're getting this checkout process down to a science. As far as the new scheduling fee, I'm being told that we're still negotiating a way to enter this into Enpower. I'll let you know once I've talked with Cara and Greg to determine whether or not it will be a price adjustment per MW on each deal or a lump sum annuity each month. In the meantime, just let me know when you have more information on the buy-resale prices - I think I have an answer for you.

Thanks,
Kate 
503-464-3939
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clemons, Amy  
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Symes, Kate
Subject:	FW: Kathy from EPE's answer
Importance:	High

Kate - Kathy has asked me about this annuity: 

 "you will be billing us an annuity for $43,708.25 for the month of
July for a scheduling fee of 25 cents per MWH associated with our
preschedules that Portland puts together for us.  This will continue from
now on.   Could you lump this monthly amount in with our total mwh purchase
amount on the invoice?"

Where will I see this?  I need it to be entered into EnPower in order to bill them  - also, will this be captured in the model?

Let me know - that is the only question I have for July - Except: the BR in the model is different fromt he BR prices in EnPower.  I am trying to figuire where they are off.  Once I do, that will be the only change (besides this annuity) that I will need you to make -THE RECONCILIATION THIS MONTH WAS GREAT!!!!!!  Thanks so much for your attention! - Amy


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara  
Sent:	Wednesday, August 01, 2001 3:17 PM
To:	Wolfe, Greg
Cc:	Clemons, Amy; Gang, Lisa
Subject:	Kathy from EPE's answer

Kathy had a meeting with Rodger and the accounting people at EPE, and they want to just show everything on the sheet and not do any billing changes in the individual deals.  I explained your point and validated that I thought it would help them later with the PUC stuff.  She told me that she is talking to our settlements person in Houston (Amy Clemons) and wants to show it as just part of the overall invoice number each month instead of breaking it out.  She said that would accomplish the same thing.

Pete is out of the office until Monday, but they are going to get his final blessing on this before the final OK is given on procedure.

Let me know if there is anything further I need to do on this.

C
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: dana@gablegroup.com
Date: 2000-09-28 15:49:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Prelim. Proposal for ARM

Thanks.  Best of luck.  Don't hesitate to call if there's anything you need.  
Look forward to getting down to S.D. soon.  Maybe we can talk Jessie into 
having a drink. 

Best,
Jeff
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-26 21:40:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No 
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001042622.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM
From: scott.neal@enron.com
To: andrew.lewis@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-23 12:41:00+00:00

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001 12:41 PM 
---------------------------


"scott neal" <sneal12@mindspring.com> on 04/20/2001 08:37:28 PM
To: <Scott.Neal@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: 



The Dow  topped out in February of 1966 at 995. By September of that year the 
Dow had  tumbled to 744. The Dow then rallied to a high of 943 in September 
of '67. By  March of '68 the Dow had fallen to 825, only to climb to a highly 
speculative  peak of 985 in December of '68. The Dow then sank to 631 in 
December of '70.  

By April of '71 the Dow had climbed back to 950, only to fall to 869 in  
February of '72. A big rally then took the Dow (unconfirmed) to a record high 
of  1051 in January of '73, turning everyone bullish. But by December of '73 
the Dow  had collapsed to 788. Think that was bad - by December of '74 the 
Dow had sunk  to a bear market low of 577. At that time, the gurus and 
geniuses of Wall Street  were predicting a 250 Dow and many were talking 
openly about the end of  capitalism. Of course, that was the bottom

And that's  the way the greatest bear market since the Depression worked its 
way down. By  late 1974 investors were dizzy, they were desperate, they were 
wrung-out, they  had left Wall Street, many for  good.
From: bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
To: rich.heidorn@ipgdirect.com, ellen.clardy@ipgdirect.com, suzanna.strangmeier@ipgdirect.com
Date: 2001-01-31 15:57:00+00:00
Subject: TradersNews market commentary attached

For our industry coverage and hourly, daily and  term indexes, log on to 
http://www.tradersnewspower.com
?
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????  
Senior Power Markets Analyst??????  
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell:  832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewspower.com
?
?
 - DlyMrkt 013101.doc
From: richard.shapiro@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-06 11:32:00+00:00
Subject: California story

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 
11:32 AM ---------------------------
MARY 
CLARK        
04/06/2001 11:31 AM

To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: California story

Rick:  The California/dereg story and a sidebar are attached for your 
review.  Please circulate to all on your team who need to review them.  

We need to receive all comments by Monday, April 9.  I am out on Monday, so 
please send comments/approval to Sarah Palmer.

Thanks for the opportunity to do this story.  I think it will be of great 
interest to employees.

Mary
From: christie.patrick@enron.com
To: kenneth.lay@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-20 10:02:00+00:00
Subject: Enron Harvard cases

Friends...

Chris Bartlett at Harvard presented (last week) the 2 most recent Enron cases 
he wrote to the "Harvard Program for Global Leadership".  This is an Exec Ed 
program for CXO's and Senior management from throughout the world. Chris 
called me today to say that the cases received outstanding reviews, and that 
the largely international CXO audience was both knowledgeable about, and very 
'pro-Enron'!

Best!

--Christie.
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: timothy.blanchard@enron.com, matthew.lenhart@enron.com, chad.landry@enron.com, steve.venturatos@enron.com, bryan.hull@enron.com, phillip.love@enron.com, david.baumbach@enron.com, jay.reitmeyer@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-08 12:47:00+00:00
Subject: Tiger recruiting #1

Sorry, but this is funny . . .
http://auburn.nu/board/display.cgi?read=236745
From: louise.kitchen@enron.com
To: zhiyong.wei@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-09 08:18:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

I think we need to get a lot closer together - I expect Geoff (and the 
analyst working for Geoff on this) to be spending a lot more time down on the 
IT floors.  If we integrate at a much earlier stage we might not see any 
divergence from how Geoff sees the end result to what actually appears.

Could you consider how to get your team spending much more time with Geoff - 
I would suggest you have a daily time when you all (developers included) sit 
down around a desk to look at progress.

Let me know what you think?

Louise


From: Zhiyong Wei/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 06:55 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen 
Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/ENRON@enronXgate, Beth 
Perlman/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephen Stock/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:  

Subject: Inception Document for GTV II phase II

Attached please find the Inception Document for Gas Trading Vision II Phase 
II. I would appreciate your comments. I will be circulating the document for 
signatures on Wednesday. Please provide your inputs by then.

Thanks

Zhiyong
From: mjones7@txu.com
To: daren.j.farmer@enron.com, ggreen2@txu.com, cstone1@txu.com, kenenglish@txu.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, davila1@txu.com, liz.bellamy@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-29 11:17:00+00:00
Subject: HPL Nom for January 30, 2001

(See attached file: HPLN0130.xls)

 - HPLN0130.xls
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: harry.kingerski@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, mday@gmssr.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-05 14:49:00+00:00
Subject: Amendment to Sher Bond bill

Please take a look and see if you think it does what we're after.  I'd like 
to share with folks as soon as possible to try to get something in the bill.

Best,
Jeff
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/05/2001 02:45 PM -----

	MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com>
	07/05/2001 02:39 PM
		 
		 To: "'Jeff Dasovich  Enron SF'" <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Amendment to Sher Bond bill


 <<X25946.DOC>>

Here is the very short amendment for the Sher Bond Bill.  Mike Day

 - X25946.DOC
From: peggy.a.kostial@accenture.com
To: andy.zipper@enron.com, dave.samuels@enron.com, michael.bridges@enron.com
Cc: kenny.w.baldwin@accenture.com, paul.j.equale@accenture.com
Date: 2001-03-19 21:35:55+00:00
Subject: EOL Presentation

Andy, Dave, and Mike -

Appreciate the time this morning. I hope you all found it as productive as
we did.

Attached is the "scrubbed" version of the deck we reviewed this morning.  A
couple of key points:
     The dates are notional..  We hope to spend some time with you in the
     short term validating them.
     As Kenny mentioned today, we will need to perform a third workstream
     called 'Accenture Socialization and Buy-in' during the initial 6 week
     period.  This is in addition to the 'Market Analysis' workstream and
     'Target 5 Counterparties for Sign-up' workstream that we discussed
     earlier.
     Most of the business case and financial information has been removed
     with the exception of the projected base case revenue stream for
     Enron.   Although we removed this information from this document, we
     wanted to make sure that you know that we consider this to be the
     basis for our analysis to date and that it is available for all future
     discussions and worksessions that we have.

Again, thanks for this morning and we look forward to hearing from you all
soon.

Peggy

(See attached file: EnronOnline Master 010319.ppt)
 - EnronOnline Master 010319.ppt
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: lgc@roce-inc.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-31 14:28:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Real Options E&P course

Larry,

I sent the information to Mark Ruane, 713 853 3569.
He is the best customer at Enron for real options applications.

Vince






Larry Chorn <lgc@roce-inc.com> on 01/25/2000 12:30:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Real Options E&P course



Vince:

As you requested, we mailed you a brochure about our upcoming course
(2/22-4/4) in Houston.

We are now following up with that mailing to identify remaining
attendees for the session.  I wanted to make sure that we did not
overlook anyone at Enron, so I am dropping you this email to see if you
have anyone there in mind as an attendee.

Best regards,

Larry Chorn
972.814.5342
www.realoptions-software.com
From: exchangeinfo@nymex.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-31 11:30:00+00:00
Subject: (01-183) Briefing on Brent Market

Notice No. 01-183
May 31, 2001


TO:
All NYMEX Division Members
All COMEX Division Members
All NYMEX Member Firms
All COMEX Member Firms

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President

RE:
Briefing on Brent Market

There will be an informational seminar on the fundamentals of the Brent crude 
market at 3:30 PM on Thursday, June 7, 2001 in the Seminar Room on the 10th 
floor of the Exchange building.  The purpose of this meeting is to inform 
potential NYMEX Brent traders about the factors that influence price and 
other key issues unique to the Brent market.

There is no cost and attendance is open to all interested parties.



__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=sara.shackleton@enron.com&
refdoc=(01-183)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.
From: nicholas.o'day@enron.com
To: john.sherriff@enron.com
Cc: richard.shapiro@enron.com, joseph.hirl@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-16 17:01:00+00:00
Subject: LDP President election and Basic Energy Law Bill

John, as requested, I attach a note on the impact of the upcoming election 
for LDP party president.

LDP President Election. The bottom line is that the outcome of the election 
is unlikely to adversely impact the pace of energy sector deregulation in 
Japan. There are a couple of reasons:
(a) the LDP is a status quo party  - no single leader is powerful enough to 
radically change the policy direction of the party; and
(b) the LDP represents only one pillar of the policy making triangle, which 
includes the bureaucracy and large industry.

However, the choice of leader will impact market sentiment and the Japanese 
economy as a whole, which in turn will have an indirect impact on the pace of 
reform.



Basic Energy Law Bill. John, you are probably starting to see press on the 
progression of the Basic Energy Law Bill. The Bill recently moved up for 
consideration by the LDP Energy sub- committee, the committee headed by Mr Y 
Kamei. We are still confident that the Bill will not pass beyond Mr Kamei's 
committee. Mr  Y Kamei and METI are opposed to the Bill. In addition, there 
is growing opposition from politicians representing environmental and 
anti-nuclear interests.

In the unlikely event that the Bill does receive the approval of Mr Kamei's 
committee, its passage is likely to be delayed until after the election for 
party president and the upper house elections in July. Further, the Bill is 
currently in summary form and will need to be drafted in full, with due 
consideration given to the impact on existing laws, a process that takes some 
time.

In the meantime, our lobbying efforts continue:
The US Government is fully briefed and stands ready to intervene if the Bill 
progresses further. In addition, the USG voiced their opposition to the Bill 
last week during a visit to Washington by the promoter of the Bill, Mr Kanno 
a member of the LDP and an ex TEPCO VP.
The Nikkei newspaper is likely to run an editorial on the Bill in the next 
week or so, aided by information from Enron.
We are using our position in the "new entrants" group to lobby the Japanese 
Government.
We continue to keep Y Kamei informed on an informal basis.

Transmission Access.
Following on from our discussion last Thursday, Enron Japan will be making an 
application almost immediately with Kyushu Electric for transmission access 
in connection with a transaction Morton Eric is running. The transaction will 
raise several regulatory issues and, if successful, will give us an SSEUB 
"licence" and access to the economic power exchange (Keizai Yuzu).

kind regards