Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: jglass@northelginteleport.com
To: smu-betas@yahoogroups.com
Date: 2001-08-17 19:08:04+00:00
Subject: Re: [smu-betas] FW: A friend thinks you should read this!

Chuck - are you aware that Jeff Skilling resigned as CEO from Enron this week
citing "strictly personal reasons" ? It was in the business section of the
Tulsa World (our newspaper). The former chairman of Enron has had to step back
in & assure the market that it was not due to financial problems in the company
- strictly a personal decision by Skilling, which "the Board regrets".
Jim.

Chuck Paul wrote:

> Beta Bro's:  enclosed below is a link to the article I e-mailed about today
> concerning Jeff (Rocky) Skilling.  This is definitely easier than finding
> and/or buying a copy and thanks to John Miller to sending me the link.
>
> -kai-
>
> Chuck
> ________________________________________
> Chuck Paul
> A Closer Look
> Professional Mystery Shopping Company
> 770-446-0590
> Email: Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
> http://www.a-closer-look.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miller, John [mailto:miller@advlaser.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: 'chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com'
> Subject: RE: A friend thinks you should read this!
>
> No.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Paul [mailto:chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:30 PM
> To: miller@advlaser.com
> Subject: RE: A friend thinks you should read this!
>
> John,  I have the original copy of this article at home.  Did you send it
> out to the smu-beta egroup?
>
> Chuck
>
> ________________________________________
> Chuck Paul
> A Closer Look
> Professional Mystery Shopping Company
> 770-446-0590
> Email: Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
> http://www.a-closer-look.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: miller@advlaser.com [mailto:miller@advlaser.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 2:20 PM
> To: chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com
> Subject: A friend thinks you should read this!
>
> A friend (miller@advlaser.com) has sent you a link to a web page!
>
> Here is the article with J.S.
>
> Brought to you by www.business2.com.
>
> Please click on the link below to view the article!
>
> http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0,1640,16686,FF.html
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: steve.schneider@enron.com, jim.schwieger@enron.com, brad.blevins@enron.com
Cc: ann.white@enron.com
Date: 1999-12-15 10:12:00+00:00
Subject: MidCon Interconnect Agreements

Attached are drafts of the MidCon Interconnect Agreement for Deer Park and 
Greens Bayou.  The agreements are written with the following key points.

1.  HPL will install both meter facility to mutally agreeable specifications.
2.  HPL will own and operate the Greens Bayou Point.
3.  MidCon will own and operate the Deer Park Point.
4.  All costs to install both interconnects will be shared 50/50 by the 
Parties under a true up mechanism based on actual costs.
5.  Pressure committments by both Parties for 5 years, with failure to meet 
such committments resulting in reimbursement by the failing Party of all 
costs borne by the non-failing Party for that interconnect only at which the 
pressure committment is not met.
6.  Each Party has a right to use at all times 50% of the then available 
capacity at each interconnect, unless a Party fails to meet its pressure 
committment.

Please review.
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: dale.rasmussen@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 17:49:00+00:00
Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr
	oject

Don't be too grateful.  I think Jake wants you to weigh in no matter what.  
He obviously values your opinion.

My personal opinion is you put the comments in front of Lee, and if he 
doesn't like them, the answer to Delta is no, we have no leverage to get your 
changes.

Kay




Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/16/2001 05:39 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr 
oject  

It would be great if you could.  I'm trying to get an EPC contract signed 
right now.

Thanks.



Kay Mann@ENRON
03/16/2001 03:46 PM
To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr 
oject  

Jake is ready to tell Lee who the purchaser is and get permission to "tell 
all".  I think that's a good way to go.

I have to confess that I didn't look at their comments to the turbine 
contract.  I will be glad to do it if you want.  Jake said that Bill Williams 
had some discussions with Delta, and he thought maybe some of their comments 
were no longer germane.  Bill has received their comments, but I don't know 
his reaction.

Kay



Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/16/2001 05:10 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: RE: GE LM-6000 purchase contract for Las Vegas Cogeneration II pr 
oject  

Jake is trying to chase me down to see if some proposed changes Delta wants 
to negotiate with GE look to be in the realm of reason.  Have you seen the 
comments?

Second:  In redacting the liability caps, etc. did you have a discussion with 
Lee Johnson about GE sensitivities?  Delta is expressing a need to see what 
the caps are.

Your thoughts?
From: terry.kowalke@enron.com
To: william.aldinger@enron.com, dannis.bellard@enron.com, marion.collins@enron.com, jacob.conklin@enron.com, galen.coon@enron.com, tim.cooper@enron.com, james.cramer@enron.com, jack.howard@enron.com, lynda.laferla@enron.com, hilda.lindley@enron.com, mary.phillips@enron.com, cynthia.rivers@enron.com, patrick.barry@enron.com, jean.blair@enron.com, randy.bryan@enron.com, nancy.callans@enron.com, james.carr@enron.com, karen.clapper@enron.com, renee.perry@enron.com, diana.porter@enron.com, shirley.walden@enron.com, kathy.washington@enron.com, jerry.wilkens@enron.com, robert.benningfield@enron.com, sherry.forbish@enron.com, chris.greaney@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, joe.linhart@enron.com, janet.mcdaniel@enron.com, debra.scurlock@enron.com, kathy.sturr@enron.com, cara.vaughan@enron.com, harry.woodson@enron.com, laura.giambrone@enron.com, bert.hernandez@enron.com, christine.mcevoy@enron.com, beverly.miller@enron.com, l.miller@enron.com, tracy.minter@enron.com, amy.mulligan@enron.com, linda.ward@enron.com
Cc: lynn.blair@enron.com, sheila.nacey@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 13:10:12+00:00
Subject: Scheduled Quantities Report

All Reps, please check with all our customers and make sure that they can retrieve and print the scheduled quantities report. Also make sure they are correct. Please have one team member, let me know the status of this by days end. Thank you. 
Terry Kowalke
From: lavorato@enron.com
To: jonch@magic.pmh.on.ca
Date: 2001-04-10 15:40:54+00:00
Subject: RE:

My Picks (Lav)

Elias nj
Jagr pitt
Lemieux pitt
Kovalev pitt
Yashin ott
turgeon st. louis
tkachuk st. louis
pronger st. louis
sakic  col
forsberg col
yzerman det
modano dall


brodeur nj


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	JONCH@magic.pmh.on.ca@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-JONCH+40magic+2Epmh+2Eon+2Eca+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	 


Gentlemen,

After consult with Red Skelton, pool entry deadline is now
Wed April 11 at 4 pm.  Games don't start til Wed pm.  E-mail your
12 players PLUS 1 goalie to me.  Will try Vulcan mind meld
tonight to try and reach Mac.

Chris
From: w..white@enron.com
To: min.zheng@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-03 21:56:16+00:00
Subject: RE: Thank you

Min,

I am so happy that you were moved to the Netco list.  Thank you for all your hard work and the efforts you have put forth to learn our needs and react quickly to them. I look forward to working with you in the future.

Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zheng, Min  
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:56 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	Thank you

Dear Stacey,

Steve just told me I am in Netco list now. 

Thank you so much for all your helps. 

Min Zheng
From: ken@kdscommunications.com
To: janel.guerrero@enron.com, jdasovic@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-12 15:08:00+00:00
Subject: IEPA call

Re: Today's IEPA Call
?
The early discussion was about the Chronicle article?on  Sunday -- which said 
that demand was not much greater than last year, which  California met -- and 
the methodology used.? IEPA/McNally has send the MRW  info to KFBK 
(Sacramento's leading news station), which picked up on the story,  and is 
preparing a response for the Chron.? It may be in the form of a  short op-ed 
or a letter to the editor.? 
?
The line on the FERC refund order is that what it does is  eliminate some 
uncertainty about the rules producers operate under.? There  was a strong 
message that the producers have been playing by the rules --  somewhat 
uncertain though they were -- and will continue playing by the  rules.? The 
positive is that FERC has now offered a methodology that will  eliminate 
short-term uncertainty.
?
IEPA has issued a floor alert to oppose AB 39x.? The  alert has been issued 
in conjunction with the California Chamber of Commerce,  Western States 
Petroleum Assn. and others.
?
There is a target date of the end of next week for completion  and possibly 
printing of the packet they are developing.? There may be a  new round of 
editorial board meetings and it sounds as if there will be an  effort to meet 
with the Senate Republican Caucus to follow on a similar meeting  recently 
held with Assembly Republicans.? 
?
Greg and Stephanie (whose name and affiliation I did not get  but I'm sure 
you can tell me) have been named co-chairs of the group.?  They'll coordinate 
the calls and items such as staff.? Budget issues will  go to the whole group.
?
Those were the main points.? If there was a summary  prepared by IEPA or 
McNally and it comes to me by e-mail, I'll pass it  along.
From: hunter.shively@enron.com
To: airam.arteaga@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-14 17:13:00+00:00
Subject: BABY SHOWER

Please put this on my calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 
05:13 PM ---------------------------


"Kelli Stevens, Margie Straight & Cora Pendergrass null" 
<cora.pendergrass@enron.com>@excitecorp.com> on 02/14/2001 04:13:26 PM
Sent by: Blue Mountain Invite <invite.support@excitecorp.com>
To: <hunter.s.shively@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: BABY SHOWER


Blue Mountain Invite

You are invited to BABY SHOWER on March 22, 2001. 

Click here to pick up and respond to your Invite: 

http://invite.bluemountain.com/view/WQS-S8X8-Z9BB 

Hope to see you there! 

Blue Mountain Invite: The fun, easy way to plan your events!  
Organize your own party at http://invite.bluemountain.com/ 

click here!
Click Here!


NEED HELP?

If your Invite link above appears to be inactive, copy and paste this text 
into your browser's location bar and hit Enter: 

http://invite.bluemountain.com/view/WQS-S8X8-Z9BB 

You'll be taken to your personal Invite web page for BABY SHOWER. 

If you have problems or questions, please contact Blue Mountain Customer 
Support using this URL: 

http://www.bluemountain.com/techsupport
From: ramona.rodriguez@enron.com
To: mike.carson@enron.com
Cc: doug.sewell@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-01 16:29:21+00:00
Subject: Please attached confirmation



             
02/01/02    NON-CHECK FINANCIAL DATA FOR REF. #    30203245606
ACCOUNT: 40781075      ENRON CORP-ECT CASH SVC
            AMOUNT      POST DATE  VALUE DATE   CODE      BATCH/TRACK       DUP
        290,500.00       02/01/02    02/01/02    479     650000000571         1
TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION
SAME DAY DR TRANSFER
         GID:LCT20321215500
         FED20020201B1Q8024C002843
         REF:      S053022000156165
         ORDER:    ENA CASH SERVICES
         CR BK ID: 021000021
         CR BK:    JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FORMERLY CHASE
          MANHATTAN BANK,N.A NEW YORK, NY 10004
         BENEF:    323009980 ENTERGY KOCH TRADING, LP
          20 E GREENWAY PLZ HOUSTON, TX US 77046
         USER REF:S053022000156165
         DETAILS:WT0201 ENTERGY S053022000156165
         INSTRUCT DATE:02/01/02 ADVICE TYPE:MAIL

ENTER  (1) YESTERDAY    (2) TODAY        (3) SEARCH       (4) SERIAL
       (5) REFERENCE    (6) HISTORICAL   (7) TRANS FLOAT  (8) BACK VALUE
       (9) LAST VIE
From: colleen.sullivan@enron.com
To: phillip.allen@enron.com, theresa.branney@enron.com, sandra.brawner@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, dick.jenkins@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, thomas.martin@enron.com, greg.mcclendon@enron.com, scott.neal@enron.com, kimberly.olinger@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, brad.mckay@enron.com, hunter.shively@enron.com, fletcher.sturm@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com, elsa.villarreal@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com, keith.holst@enron.com, kate.fraser@enron.com, andrew.lewis@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-05 12:22:00+00:00
Subject: Regulatory Filing Summary

Attached are two documents containing the regulatory summaries for this 
period.  The first is the same document you are used to seeing--a summary of 
all types of filings made by the pipelines to FERC.  The second is a special 
document that contains only the Order 637 compliance filings that have been 
made.  As I'm sure most of you are aware, each pipeline must make a filing 
indicating how it intends to comply with the new Order 637 regulations.  For 
your convenience I have included in the second attachment an explanation of 
the new Order 637 requirements, followed by the compliance filings that I 
have received to date.   I will update this document as new filings are 
received.  If you have any questions, I may be reached at x35514.
From: dan.leff@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-16 08:16:00+00:00
Subject: UC/CSU Procedural Next Steps

Greg - 

Clarification and follow up to our discussion.

Let me know if you'd like to discuss further.


Thank you - Dan


---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Leff/HOU/EES on 05/16/2001 08:03 AM 
---------------------------
From: Robert C Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/16/2001 07:58 AM
To: Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES 
Subject: UC/CSU Procedural Next Steps

As you know, UC/CSU sued us for breach of contract in March.  At the same 
time they moved for a preliminary injunction to restore them to direct access 
during the pendency of the case.  The district court granted their motion and 
issued the preliminary injunction.  We appealed the granting of a preliminary 
injunction in these circumstances, and, in addition, asked the Court of 
Appeals to stay the effect of the district court's order until our appeal 
could be heard.

The Court of Appeals granted our request for a stay.  Because of the 
similarity beween the legal tests for granting a stay and for granting of 
preliminary injunction, to grant the stay the Court of Appeals necessarily 
had to find, at least preliminarily, that the district court likely erred in 
granting the preliminary injunction.  This is why we think we will win our 
appeal, especially if it is heard by the same panel.  (Whether or not it is 
heard by the same panel depends on the clerk of the Court of Appeals and the 
schedules of the judges.)

We filed our brief in support of our appeal on May 14.  UC/CSU's and the AG's 
answering briefs must be filed by June 11.  Our reply brief is due 14 days 
after their briefs are filed.  The appeal is then referred to a 3-judge 
panel.  Oral argument is usually allowed.

If we win the appeal, UC/CSU campuses in PG&E and SCE territory remain on 
utililty service until a final decision is made in the case.   If we lose the 
appeal, we have to take them back until a final decision in made in the 
case.  The appeal relates only to the preliminary injunction.  The breach of 
contract action remains to be tried at the district court level.  

The contract expires March 31, 2002.  In the ordinary course a final decision 
in the case would not be made by then.  The judge, however, could expedite 
the proceedings so that a decision could be made earlier.  UC/CSU could also 
move for summary judgment, arguing that that facts are not in dispute and 
that the judge should rule without a trial.  In either event, it would seem 
unlikely that a final decision even on a expedited basis could be handed down 
before late fall/winter.

Please call me with any questions.  Thanks.
From: meiling.chen@enron.com
To: kim.kouri@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-07 09:49:00+00:00
Subject: Re: migration request

I have replace the old basis differential with Michelle's new numbers and 
migrated the program to
production.  So TW Deal Analysis is using the new basis differential now.

Mei-Ling 


---------------------- Forwarded by Meiling Chen/ET&S/Enron on 11/07/2000 
09:41 AM ---------------------------


ETS DBA
11/07/2000 08:09 AM
Sent by: Margaret Waters
To: Gary Kenagy/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mei-Ling Chen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: migration request  

Done.



Gary Kenagy
11/06/2000 09:17 AM
To: ETS DBA/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mei-Ling Chen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 
Subject: migration request

Please process the request below. Let both of us know if there are any issues.

Gary


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Kenagy/OTS/Enron on 11/06/2000 09:18 
AM ---------------------------


Meiling Chen
11/03/2000 05:21 PM
To: Gary Kenagy/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kim Kouri/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron 

Subject: migration request  


DBA,
Please migrate up_TWDA_deal_analysis in etstest/twprod01 to dbo, and to 
etsmo/twprod01, mojo/twprod01.
Grant execute to developers, TWDP in etstest
Grant execute to TWDP in etsmo and etsmojo

Gary,
Per user request, we need to replace basis differential for TW Deal Analysis 
forward pricing that was hard coded
in the program with the latest numbers as stated in the e-mail from Michelle 
Lokay.  We are working on
accessing the information from revenue management table as soon as the data 
is available in the database. 
This change does not impact any other applications.
Please approve it and forward this request to ets dba.

Thanks,
Mei-Ling





Kim Kouri
11/03/2000 07:08 AM
To: Mei-Ling Chen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Updated Average Basis Differential for Pipeline System

FYI, did you have this already?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Kouri/ET&S/Enron on 11/03/2000 07:07 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Michelle Lokay                           11/02/2000 04:28 PM
	

To: Mei-Ling Chen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kim Kouri/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Updated Average Basis Differential for Pipeline System
From: mjones7@txu.com
To: cstone1@txu.com, ggreen2@txu.com, daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, davila1@txu.com, liz.bellamy@enron.com, rskerik1@txu.com, kponton@duke-energy.com
Date: 2001-02-08 10:39:00+00:00
Subject: 2/07/01 GAS FLOW

We show the nom for Teco Tap to be 30.000  and the Actual for Teco Tap is 
21.814

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on 
02/08/2001
10:52 AM ---------------------------


kponton@duke-energy.com on 02/08/2001 09:06:50 AM

To:   David Avila/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Melissa
      Jones/Texas Utilities@TU
cc:
Subject:  2/07/01 GAS FLOW



NOM = 17,500 (6:00 PM STARTED 60,000 RATE & SHUT OFF AT 1:00 AM)

ACTUAL FLOW = 21,076 MCF     21,814 MMBtu's
From: mike.purcell@enron.com
To: holden.salisbury@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-12 20:01:50+00:00
Subject: RE: Pac(t)

The numbers now reflect a variance of :

Pac 	89,656.64
E	88,560.12

dif	1096.52

This small  differnce I can divide among the desks.


MP




 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Salisbury, Holden  
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 10:25 AM
To:	Purcell, Mike
Subject:	RE: Pac(t) 

I have updated the deal numbers 727040 and 737214 to how I think it should be valued.  When it comes down to it the differential will probably not be that large.  Let me know what the difference is now.

Thanks,
Holden

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Purcell, Mike  
Sent:	Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:42 PM
To:	Salisbury, Holden
Subject:	Pac(t) 

Holden

I need to true this transmiision up, any word on those two resevations?  



Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297
From: steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 1997-08-29 08:00:00+00:00
Subject: Department meeting conference call.  800-283-1805, in Rick's name.


Page Montovano
Diane -- pay for part of an admin
Ken Rice
Steve Shackman -- MayaMora Weber 609 279 4094
Cal trip Leave meessage for Eliz and Karen
39504 Sheila Galloway
Ralph Cavanagh (415) 777 -0220
Mike Day 415 781 0701
Meg Nollen
From: shona.wilson@enron.com
To: kate.agnew@enron.com
Cc: donna.lowry@enron.com, richard.lauer@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com, ted.murphy@enron.com, john.sorrells@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-15 14:08:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Mariner Doorstep Report

Dear Kate,

We are now ranking the findings - red or yellow.  Since these need to be done 
immediately, I suggest that they are red findings.

Regards






Kate Agnew
08/15/2000 01:59 PM
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard 
Lauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted 
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sorrells/AA/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Mariner Doorstep Report

Attached is the Mariner Doorstep Report.  Jim Brown indicated that the action 
dates for the three findings should be immediately, we decided that October 1 
was a realistic deadline for implementation.  Please let us know any comments 
or questions.  

Thank You
Kate
From: phillip.love@enron.com
To: kam.keiser@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-28 16:00:00+00:00
Subject: 0900 OA as of October GL; September Liquidation Detail

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 
03:58 PM ---------------------------


Jim Little
11/14/2000 10:25 AM
To: Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy De La Torre/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary 
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gregory A Mausser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John 
Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba A Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Delma Salazar/NA/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Lee/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey C 
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M 
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, James 
Hungerford/NA/Enron@ENRON, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 0900 OA as of October GL; September Liquidation Detail
From: david.poston@enron.com
To: bill.williams@enron.com, chris.mallory@enron.com, phillip.platter@enron.com, serena.bishop@enron.com, scotty.gilbert@enron.com
Cc: steve.nat@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, matt.burleigh@enron.com, susan.amador@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-12 23:20:23+00:00
Subject: FSP Ready Again for Production

Good Afternoon FSP users,

We have just finished a comprehensive FSP rebuild & testing phase for the next release of FSP.  The rebuild should address all the issues raised in the previous go-live as well as some additional capabilities for robustness.  Please note that we have already executed several hundred different test case scenarios & performed some stress testing using data before the Enron collapse.

What we need now is help from you to continue to identify enhancements and/or bugs with FSP so that we can go-live with FSP once the new company starts trading.  Susan Amador will be available to help in any testing.  You should probably also coordinate with her when you are about to start testing so that our continuing testing doesn't interfere with your testing.  PWRTESTN & PWRTESTP should be all setup for your use.

Here are some of the bug fixes & enhancements we have rolled-out with this latest release:
1.  Bid Curve - Ability to bid on zero volumes (for import, export, and wheels)
2.  Rebuild of all FSP application utilizing Direct Oracle Access components for faster database access & higher reliability.
3.  Bug Fixes on database commits to eliminate database "deadlocks".
4.  New aggregation scout to "stream-line" the template writing process & improve template writing performance.
5.  SQL tuned "Hour Ahead" template writing.  Confirmed performance of 1min 30 seconds on heavy transaction volume days.
6.  And many other small previously unidentified bugs.

We are very excited about this newest release and are looking forward to your feedback over the next couple of days.  Susan will probably be your best contact but please feel free to contact me at anytime.

Thanks,  David Poston
# 713-345-7834
From: lysa.akin@enron.com
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, susan.mara@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, mday@gmssr.com, gfergus@brobeck.com
Cc: joseph.alamo@enron.com, jan.king@enron.com, mary.hain@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-06 11:20:00+00:00
Subject: Ron's Outline of Comments to November 1 Order

Please advise your availability ASAP for a call on Wednesday, Nov. 8th at 
8:30am Pacific / 10:30am Central / 11:30am Eastern
---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 11/06/2000 11:15 AM 
---------------------------


Mary Hain
11/06/2000 10:41 AM
To: dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan B 
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christi Nicolay, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, carrrn@bracepatt.com, 
Richard Sanders, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides, Neil 
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, 
Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novasel@sarah 
novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Ron's Outline of Comments to November 1 Order

Attached find Ron's outline of comments on the FERC's November 1 order in the 
Section 206 proceeding.  They are primarily legal arguments.   

Concerning his comments about the congestion management redesign - I'm not 
sure that we want to oppose LMP.  I think instead we want to ensure that 
there are not a large number of nodes.

Alan will be writing the technical comments on the $150 caps, not Seabron.  
Sue called me this morning and said IEP will not be contesting the $150 price 
cap.  This is too bad because we had hoped they would carry the ball on 
arguing why $150 is not sufficient to incent peaking generation.  Sue is 
working on IEP to try to get them to reconsider.

I think we also need to make sure we make all of the arguments that relate to 
the CPUC's subpoena.  I have asked Lysa Akin to set up a conference call 
about this ASAP with Richard, Dan, Gary Fergus, Me, Mike Day, Sue, and Jim.  
Please tell Lysa if I haven't listed you and you wish to be on this call.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:27 AM 
---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>                           
11/03/2000 02:58 PM
	

To: <mary.hain@enron.com>, <smara@enron.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com> 
Subject: Comments to November 1 Order


I have enclosed my thoughts on which issues to address in our comments.

 - 0133539.01
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: clement.abrams@enron.com
Cc: twanda.sweet@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-12 11:09:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Audit Letters

My asst, Twanda Sweet, will get them for you.



	Clement Abrams@ENRON
	01/11/2001 05:22 PM
		 
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Audit Letters


	


Richard,

With respect to the above, I am still trying to track down the addresses for 
the following firms that have been identified as requiring the audit 
letters.  Could you please confirm the addresses so that the letters can be 
sent out as soon as possible.

  Issue      Outside Counsel  Contact
(1) Bernard Glatzer; alleged violation of trade secrets  Schlinder Cohen  
Steve Schlinder 

(2) PCA Bankruptcy Claim     Weil, Gotshal   Melanie Gray

Thanks,

Clement
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, greg.wolfe@enron.com, holden.salisbury@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pchoi2@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-05 02:38:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 3/5/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 3/5/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No 
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001030503.txt
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: cameron@perfect.com
Date: 2001-10-15 20:11:06+00:00
Subject: RE:

John Wayne at his spookiest.  4 stars.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:39 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: 


Yes.  As I have said before, I can take mom and dad only in small doses.
They fight too much for me.

We went home and watched The Searchers.  I had never seen it.  It was
great!!


Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Cameron Sellers
Subject:	RE: 

Yeah.  Ask me how happy I am to be back at work, with a midterm in
finance tomorrow nite. Sigh...

Tried to call you guys yesterday to see if you wanted to stop by your
folks to have abalone, but only got your voicemail.  I'm sure you were
glad just to get home and relax.



-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Sellers [mailto:cameron@perfect.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 1:31 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff
Subject: RE: 


I thought the whole weekend was a total blast.  It was great having both
of
you there!!  I think every one had a very good time. There is no
possible
way that we could have done anything more in one weekend.  Pumpkin
carving,
abalone, piano roles, bluegrass, good meals, monopoly, scrabble and then
the
most incredible weather I have ever had up there!!


Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	cameron@perfect.com
Subject:	

It was really fun.  Thanks so much for inviting us.  It was great to get
to play together.  I'll get Scott a check for our share of the goodies.
Thanks again.

Best,
Jeff


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you. 
**********************************************************************
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, mbaldwin@igservice.com, steven.harris@enron.com
Date: 2000-02-09 16:47:00+00:00
Subject: TW comments on CAC proposal

Here's what I propose to send to the parties on the 14th.  Take a look, and 
think about whether it would be wise to do more selling in the first 
paragraph.  I propose that we get on the agenda for the March 1 meeting so 
that we have some time to approach individual parties first.  

With your permission, I will forward this to Mr. Dasovich also.
From: scenicvu@neosoft.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com, scriner@trionegordon.com
Date: 2000-04-25 17:29:00+00:00
Subject: FW: Dallas Meeting Reminder

Our annual meeting will be held this Friday, April 28th at 2:00 pm at Crow
Holdings, 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700. We will not meet on Saturday!

Directions to Crow Holdings from Love Field are as follows:
Leaving Love Field take the front exit to Mockingbird. Travel West (right)
on Mockingbird. Go approximately one mile and take the TX 354 Loop SOUTH
ramp. Merge onto Harry Hines Boulevard. Go approximately three miles and
turn left onto Moody Street. Moody Street becomes N. Pearl Street. Turn
right onto McKinney. The building is located at 2100 McKinney between Pearl
and Olive.

If you have not yet confirmed your attendance with the Scenic Texas office,
please call or e-mail by 5:00 Wednesday April 26th. Thank you!

Anita
From: suhernan@llgm.com
To: judy.hernandez@enron.com, irenepepe@hotmail.com, smanzanales@jw.com, aguevara@llgm.com, bmonte@llgm.com, clbrown@llgm.com, jvega@llgm.com, vfarrell@llgm.com, maria.soliz@ppfa.org, bburrell@tmh.tmc.edu
Date: 2000-12-08 17:57:00+00:00
Subject: Li'l Johnny

> A first grade teacher was having trouble with one of her students.   The
> teacher asked, "Johnny what is your problem?"
> Johnny answered, "I'm too smart for the first grade. My sister is
> the  third grade and I'm smarter than she is!  I think I should be in
> the
> third  grade too!"     The teacher had had enough. She took Johnny to the
> principal's
> While Johnny waited in the outer office, the teacher explained to the
> principal what the situation was.  The principal told the teacher he would
> give the boy a test and if he failed to answer any of  his questions  he
> was   to  go back to the first grade and behave. The teacher agreed.
> Johnny was brought in and the conditions are explained to him and  He
> agrees  to take the test:
> Principal: "What is 3 x 3?"
> Johnny: "9"
> Principal: "What is 6 x 6?"
> Johnny. "36"
>
> And so it went with every question the principal thought a third grader
> should know.      The principal looks at the teacher and tells her, "I
> think Johnny can  go  to  the third grade."
> The teacher says to the principal, "Let me ask him some questions?"
> The principal and Johnny both agree.
> The principal's eyes open really wide and before he could stop the
> answer,
> The teacher asks, "What does a cow have four of that I have only two
> Johnny, after a moment, "Legs.
> Teacher: "What is in your pants that you have but I do not have?"
> The principal's eyes open really wide and before he could stop the answer,
> Johnny replied, "Pockets."
> Teacher: "What does a dog do that a man steps into
> Johnny: "Pants"
>
> Teacher: "What starts with an 'F' and ends in 'K' that means a lot of
> excitement?"
> Johnny: "Fire truck."
> The principal breathed a sigh of relief and told the teacher, "Put Johnny
> in   the fifth grade, I missed the last four questions myself."
>
>
>
From: phil.clifford@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-10 10:42:00+00:00
Subject: nymex

thought you would find this article and quote interesting.

phil


``What's the difference between AT&T and NYMEX? Xerox?'' he asked. ``All 
these businesses are sunset industries.''

former nymex chairman


http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20001110/wr/markets_dc_1.html
From: gfergus@brobeck.com
To: apickens@gibbs-bruns.com, breasoner@gibbs-bruns.com, rconner@brobeck.com, djn@pkns.com, jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com, dcastro@pkns.com, msmith1@enron.com, mmolland@brobeck.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, robert.c.williams@enron.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com
Date: 2001-01-18 17:36:00+00:00
Subject: CCSF  City Attorney's Office  People v. Dynegy

FYI.
Will provide conformed copy once we receive it.
Thanks.
Gary


 http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/cityattorney/sfenergy.htm
 <<CCSF  City Attorney's Office  People v. Dynegy.url>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, 
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to 
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com



 - CCSF  City Attorney's Office  People v. Dynegy.url
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: david.portz@enron.com
Date: 1999-12-09 15:08:00+00:00
Subject: Distibution of EEI draft

Into product should be distributed to Andy and Patricia Young.  Emails in 
this email
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 12/09/99 03:07 
PM ---------------------------


"Andy Katz" <AKatz@eei.org> on 12/08/99 04:16:29 PM
To: HEMU@dynegy.com, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, rosteen@powersrc.com, 
pdondanville@schiffhardin.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: Draft Agenda for 12/15/99 EEI/NEMA Contract Group Meeting



I've been hiding in the weeds.  Hisss.  I agree w/ Patty and Liz that product 
definition should be the primary focus of the meeting.  It would seem most of 
the transmission related issues PECO (or Dynegy) have could be addressed in 
the context of the force majeure definition and how specific product 
definitions tighten or loosen FM excuses for non-performance.

I think we can represent that discussions w/ FERC staff will take place 
during January.  Our meeting coordinator is talking w/ Mariott about roll out 
meetings in Houston during the first week of March and in NYC late 
April/early May.  Let me know if you have any scheduling conflicts during 
those timeframes and I'll circulate some proposed dates w/ the product 
definitions.  Also, let me know if you are not interested in participating in 
one of or both roll-outs.

I will gladly circulate product definitions, but will be out of town after 
the 10th.  Could you CC: Patricia Young at EEI 202/508-5757 pyoung@eei.org 
with any definitions you want circulated.

Another topic I would suggest discussing briefly  if time is available is the 
results of the contract survey.  We have received many responses. Tabulation 
of the results should be done by our meeting.

Andrew S. Katz, Senior Attorney
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004
Voice:  202-508-5616
Fax:     202-508-5673
e-mail:  akatz@eei.org

>>> <HEMU@dynegy.com> 12/07/99 07:40PM >>>
Please take a look at this and give me your thoughts.  One area that I believe
needs more work in particular is the item referring to FERC policies; I think
this is PECO's issue, but I'm not sure what FERC policies they are concerned
about.

I would like to attach the current definitions of the products to the agenda.
Do we have a definition of the "Into __" product that has been updated since 
the
November 9 conference call?  Is there a new defintion of the "Firm (LD-System
Reliability)" product?

What about trying to tackle bookouts if we have the time?  Is there any
conceivable way we will have the time?

Thanks,

Harlan

(See attached file: EEI-NEMA AGENDA.DOC)
From: susan.mara@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-31 21:07:10+00:00
Subject: RE: Halloween

Nice touch.  You're still a mensch.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dernehl, Ginger   On Behalf Of Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:03 AM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Allegretti, Daniel; Allen, Joe; Alvarez, Ramon; Ausenhus, Kara; Barnes, Lynnette; Bellas, Kirsten; Binns, Darran; Bolton, Scott; Boston, Roy; Buerger, Rubena; Burns, Stephen; Canovas, Guillermo; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Comnes, Alan; Connor, Joe; Cooney, Carolyn; Dasovich, Jeff; Decker, Larry; Dernehl, Ginger; Dressler, Jean; Floris, Vinio; Frank, Robert; Fromer, Howard; Fulton, Donna; Gottfredson, Bryan; Guerrero, Janel; Hamilton, Allison; Hardy Jr, John; Hartfield, Rita; Hawkins, Bernadette; Hemstock, Robert; Hetrick, Nancy; Hoatson, Tom; Hueter, Barbara A.; Hunter, Bevin; Huson, Margaret; Ibrahim, Amr; Kaufman, Paul; Kean, Steven J.; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Kishigami, Kikumi; Knight, Laurie; Landwehr, Susan M.; Lassere, Donald; Lawner, Leslie; Lawrence, Linda L.; Leibman, Lara; Leonardo, Sam; Levy, Alberto; Lindberg, Susan; Linnell, Elizabeth; Long, Chris; Mara, Susan; Maurer, Luiz; McVicker, Maureen; Migden, Janine; Miller, Terri; Montovano, Steve; Moore, Bill; Nersesian, Carin; Neustaedter, Robert; Nicolay, Christi L.; Nord, Sue; Noske, Linda J.; Novosel, Sarah; O'connell, Earlene; Ogenyi, Gloria; Palmer, Germain; Perez, Carmen; Perez, Gus; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Pharms, Melinda; Reyna, Margo; Rishe, Frank; Rizzo, Helen; Roan, Michael; Robertson, Linda; Robinson, Marchris; Rodriquez, Andy; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Shelk, John; Shortridge, Pat; Staines, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Stephens, Sharonda; Stransky, Joan; Stroup, Kerry; Stubbings, Randy; Sullivan, Kathleen; Sullivan, Lora; Thome, Jennifer; Tiberi, Fino; Twiggs, Thane; Walton, Steve; Warner, Geriann; Yeung, Charles; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	Halloween
Importance:	High



              I'd encourage everyone in the group to leave early today, if you so desire,  in order to more fully enjoy celebrating Halloween with families and friends. Thanks also  for your continued support and dedication during these difficult times - It is noticed and much appreciated.  Enjoy Halloween!
From: gisb1@aol.com
To: jrtemplton@aol.com, wpboswel@mwbb.com, shorton@enron.com, hdroberts@marathonoil.com
Date: 2000-06-02 12:24:00+00:00
Subject: GISB -- Correspondence from ConEd

Dear Jim, Stan, Hugh & Bill,

Attached please find correspondence from Mary Jane McCartney regarding
ConEd's perspective on expanding GISB's standards setting activities.  I
spoke to her this morning, and she has shared this correspondence with the
LDC Board members and felt that it was appropriate to share it with you also.
 She noted that she did not intend it as comments for posting on our web
site.  Please let me know if you have trouble downloading the correspondence
-- it is in Word format.

Best Regards,  Rae

 - Ltr to GISB 5-30 Draft_.doc
From: ami.chokshi@enron.com
To: george.smith@enron.com, edward.terry@enron.com, tricia.bowen@enron.com, victor.lamadrid@enron.com, mark.schrab@enron.com, darren.espey@enron.com, margie.straight@enron.com, charles.muzzy@enron.com, sabra.dinari@enron.com, joe.casas@enron.com, christina.sanchez@enron.com, lisa.kinsey@enron.com, kirk.lenart@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, beverly.beaty@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-21 08:09:00+00:00
Subject: Nom Change on Texas Eastern

---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 06/21/2000 
08:08 AM ---------------------------


"Jan Svajian" <Jan.Svajian@dvn.com> on 06/21/2000 07:45:12 AM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: Nom Change on Texas Eastern


See attached.

 - Enron Nom Change.xls
From: eddie.zhang@enron.com
To: tara.piazze@enron.com, matt.smith@enron.com
Cc: chris.gaskill@enron.com, colin.tonks@enron.com, chris.hyde@enron.com, jennie.pai@enron.com, eddie.zhang@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-06 13:43:43+00:00
Subject: west pl daily morning report

Tara and Matt,


Following is list of error message for west pl 6/05/2001 - 6/06/2001 as of this morning --



Pipeline Name		Msg_Received_DTM		Msg_Desc			Status
----------------------		------------------------------------	--------------------------		-----------------------------------
N/A			N/A				N/A				N/A







Notice --

Jaguar service was trurned off accidentally last night at about 5:00 pm.  It was turned back on this morining at about 7:50 am.  I checked all the job in DB and files in server folder and appear that all the data has been captured.  But we still need to verify cycle 1 and 2 for some of the sites because they may be the same.



Eddie
From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net
To: marketrelations@nyiso.com
Date: 2001-05-18 11:21:00+00:00
Subject: NYISO Scheduling & Pricing Working Group Meeting

Dear Scheduling and Pricing Working Group Members;

A meeting of the Scheduling and Pricing Working group has been scheduled
for Tuesday, May 22, 2001 from 10:00 - 3:00.  This meeting will be held at
the NYS Nurses Association Conference Center, 11 Cornell Road, Latham, NY.
Teleconferencing information is as follows:

     Dial in Number:  334-269-2157
     Participant Code: 650166

Regards,
Monica Ryan-Taber
518-356-6222

(See attached file: nysna.pdf)(See attached file: S&P may 22 agenda.pdf)

 - nysna.pdf
 - S&P may 22 agenda.pdf
From: mark.whitt@enron.com
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Cc: dan.bump@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-31 13:28:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Wildhorse Letter

There are a couple of typos and I would like you to CC me on this, other than 
that I think it looks good.  Think about generalizing the deliveries to any 
dleivery point, although we do want to go to Northwest.  If they cannot get 
into NWP then we will want to make sure we can get our full volume into 
Questar.  It is my understanding that they should be delivering our full 
volume to whatever point can take it. Questar is not priced as high as NWP 
but on $3 gas $.10 is not that big of a deal compared to not flowing the gas.

Mark
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: enw-employees_houston@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-23 13:17:00+00:00
Subject: Lite Bytz RSVP

This week's Lite Bytz presentation will feature the following APPZ speaker:

Hal Elrod
CommodityLogic
Thursday, April 26, 2001

If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to 
litebytz@enron.com by the end of the day Tuesday, April 24, 2001.

*Remember: this is now a Brown Bag Event--so bring your lunch and we will 
provide cookies and drinks.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/revisedhalelrod.ppt
From: brent.hendry@enron.com
To: rlopezv@lvha.com.mx
Cc: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-07 10:05:00+00:00
Subject: CRE Resolution Encouraging the Use of Financially Settled Commodity
 Derivatives Transactions For Natural Gas Prices							  .

Please delete Shari Stack and add me to your mailing list for these types of 
notices.  I am the attorney for Enron North America Corp. (formally Enron 
Capital and Trade Resources Corp.) that will be focusing on derivative 
transactions with Mexican counterparts.  My email address is 
brent.hendry@enron.com.   Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,
Brent Hendry











































RLV/JCC/SMC
H:\jcc10\VARIOS\Futuros Gas\MM Futuros Gas.doc


 - att1.htm
 - header.htm
From: carol.clair@enron.com
To: gaurav.babbar@enron.com, leslie.hansen@enron.com, savitabi@llgm.com, jmcgreev@llgm.com, sbehrend@llgm.com, bill.windle@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Cc: suzanne.adams@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-01 14:04:00+00:00
Subject: Monday's Conference Call

There will be a conference call on Monday June 5th starting at 1:00 (Houston) 
time to discuss comments to the draft insurance policy that we expect to 
receive from ACE tomorrow.  My assistant, Suzanne Adams (713-853-3989) will 
notify the Enron people of the conference room and will notify the LeBeouf 
people of the call-in number.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

Suzanne:
Please reserve a conference room from 1-4 for myself, Gaurav, Leslie, 
Elizabeth and Bill and please set up a conference call in number and e-mail 
that information to Scott, John and Sam.

Thanks.