Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: mark.schroeder@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Cc: elizabeth.linnell@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-10 17:19:00+00:00
Subject: Hotel California ISO

Thought you might like to see this, if it had not made the rounds in 
California/USA.  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 10/04/2001 
17:21 ---------------------------


Paul Hennemeyer
10/04/2001 17:17
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Hotel California ISO

An entertaining note on your last day. 
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Hennemeyer/LON/ECT on 10/04/2001 
12:17 ---------------------------


atownsend1@worldbank.org on 10/04/2001 11:07:45
To: Paul Hennemeyer <Paul_Hennemeyer@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: Hotel California ISO



---------------------- Forwarded by Alan F. Townsend/Person/World Bank on
04/10/2001 11:07 AM ---------------------------

From: Apurva Sanghi on 04/09/2001 02:57 PM
Extn: 88974           PSAPF


To:   Alan F. Townsend, Jordan Z. Schwartz, Ian Alexander, Clive G. Harris
cc:
bcc:

Subject:  Hotel California ISO

This is funny...

----- Forwarded by Apurva Sanghi/Person/World Bank on 04/09/2001 02:55 PM 
-----

?? On a? dark Western highway
?? No wind in my  hair
?? No rain for the hydro
?? No NOX in the?  air
?? Up ahead in the distance
?? I saw a?  flickering sight
?? The load grew heavy and the lights grew?  dim
?? No relief in the night
?? So we? stood in  the darkness
?? Down at the Taco Bell
?? And I was  thinking to myself
?? This? could be Heaven or this could be  Hell
?? We lit up a candle
?? No power in the  Bay
?? There were? voices down the corridor
?? I  thought I heard them say* ?

?? Welcome to the ISO  California
?? Such a lovely place
?? Such a  lovely? place
?? Such a lovely face
?? Powering  up? for the ISO California
?? What a nice  surprise
?? What a nice surprise
?? Bring your?  alibis* ?

?? Its mind is policy? twisted
??  Can't stop consumption trends
?? Got a lot of NIMBY  boys
?? Cisco calls? friends
?? How we sweat in  the courthouse
?? Sweet summer sweat
?? Without the  AC
?? We try to forget
?? So I called up the?  Gov'nor
?? Please energize this line
?? He?  said
?? We haven't built a new plant here since  1969
?? Last thing I remember
?? We were? running  for the door
?? We had to find the passage back to? the place  we were before
?? Relax said Judge Damrell
??  California's programmed to receive
?? Go belly up any time you  like
?? But? your power can never leave

Well it had to  happen..........
From: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
To: jennifer.burns@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-27 10:56:00+00:00
Subject: NE Heating Oil Reserve

print
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/2000 
11:02 AM ---------------------------


Sarah Mulholland
12/22/2000 06:05 AM
To: Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike 
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Caroline Abramo/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mario de la 
Ossa/NA/Enron@ENRON, Phil Clifford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill White/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Bill F Briggs/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L 
Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: NE Heating Oil Reserve

Sorry, behind a little on the news I am sure.  In case you haven't heard, and 
to see solid figures:
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: finley.biggerstaff@enron.com
Cc: rick.johnson@enron.com, kathy.neal@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-05 16:41:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Project Canary Labor and Employment Request

Finley,

Can we schedule a conference call with the HR folks at Celgar?

Thanks.

Michelle
From: dan.masters@enron.com
To: jaime.sanabria@enron.com
Cc: dkeller@edisonmission.com, rick.sierra@enron.com, pherrington@edisonmission.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com, todd.peterson@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-13 14:16:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Lng Invoice

Jaime-
I am just going by the contract which shows two banking days after receipt of 
invoice.  There is no way to get a payment out today, as it takes a day or 
two to work invoices through our system.  How about if I pay it the way the 
contract stipulates and if there is a difference to be settled, we can net it 
against our next fuel management payment?
Dan




Jaime Sanabria@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/13/2001 03:11 PM
To: Dan Masters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: dkeller@edisonmission.com, Rick 
Sierra/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, pherrington@edisonmission.com, 
Paul Y'Barbo/NA/Enron@Enron 
Subject: Re: Lng Invoice  


	


Dan:

The price was reduced to accomodate a transfer of funds two days after 
completion of discharge. The final discharge was completed on March 11th, 
therefore we were expecting to see the money today. Therefore, if payment is 
not until Thursday we should be increasing the price. 




Dan Masters@ECT
03/13/2001 02:36 PM
To: Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Lng Invoice  

Jaime-
I got it and passed it on to accounting.  You should see payment on Thursday.
Dan



Jaime Sanabria@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/13/2001 02:10 PM
To: Dan Masters@ect
cc:  
Subject: Lng Invoice


	


Final Invoice attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
03/13/2001 03:17 PM ---------------------------


Jose Cruz
03/13/2001 02:24 PM
To: Jaime Sanabria/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Lng Invoice

Por favor digame si hay que hacerle alg?n otro cambio.
From: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-08 16:16:00+00:00
Subject: 3/8 Checkout

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.



PREBON
Mike Swerzbin
I am missing the following deals per Prebon:
Enron sells BP Energy 25 mw of Cal'02 Palo Verde at $136.00





AMEREX
Sean Crandall:
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to Transcanada 3/12-3/31 Mid-C at $273.00

Mark Fischer
deal 541226
Prebon does not recognize.
From: christopher.calger@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-03 22:55:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Silence.............

I am trying to close the bid/offer spread.  One thought on your plan below: If Ben and I own the ABB's at 29MM-30MM, we will try to sell them at 31-35.  That will create noise in the market for Canada's deals which will get re-priced down.   Likewise, if Ben and I own them, we can not be prevented from offering them below Canada's deals.  

Solution:   Transfer the turbines 9/1/01 at a price that we agree to today.  

?

Chris Calger
503-464-3735

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kitchen, Louise  
Sent:	Monday, July 02, 2001 9:16 AM
To:	Milnthorp, Rob
Cc:	Calger, Christopher F.; Jacoby, Ben
Subject:	Silence.............

Hello, 

As I didn't hear anything last week on whether we had made progress on the transfer/sale of the ABB turbines (I know Ben was out too ) I thought I would put my thoughts in writing.  I am assuming that we are all on board with the fact that transferring these assets to the Turbine Book is the most efficient mechanism for dealing with the turbines going forward - please let me know if anyone thinks otherwise (excluding arguments about transfer pricing).

Transfer ABB turbines to the Turbine Book (under the management of Jacoby and Calger), capital charges to be picked up by the Turbine Book as of 7/01/01.   The Turbine Book is responsible for the turbines going forward.

Should a sale occur (negotiated by ECC) to any of the customers outlined in the documents, ECC has the right to buy back the assets at any time at the transfer price plus capital charge incurred during the period when the turbines were owned by the Turbine Book.  The call option expires 9/01/01 and can only be exercised for a sale to the counterparties in the document attached with the addition of Calpine for the purposes of a sale combined with the site (the call option for a Calpine sale is valid until 12/01/01).  If  ECC does not wish to pursue the sale to the counterparties in the document attached, then Jacoby can pursue these negotiations and if a sale is completed this year with these counterparties, the Turbine Book will receive a brokerage fee ($1 million) and ECC will pick up capital costs between 7/01/01 and the completion of the sale. 

Please agree to a transfer price for these turbines, if a price cannot be agreed between you, please let me have your arguments substantiating your transfer price and I will arbitrate on the number on Friday.  Let me know if anyone disagrees with moving forward in this way.

Regards

Louise

 << File: Sale Status June  25 01.doc >>
From: brant.reves@enron.com
To: frank.sayre@enron.com, susan.bailey@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-06 09:38:00+00:00
Subject: Glencore Commodities Ltd.

Hello,

Here is a spreadsheet from the confirmations group of all financial trades 
between ENA and this entity that have ever been entered into.

Let me know what you think.

brant
From: liz.taylor@enron.com
To: yvette.pinero@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-11 12:55:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Cuiaba review- Tuesday, April 17th

How long is the meeting scheduled to last?

Liz




Yvette Pinero@ENRON
04/11/2001 10:39 AM
To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca McDonald/Enron@EnronXGate, James 
A Hughes/Enron@EnronXGate, Laine.A.Powell@enron.com, John 
Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Jose Bestard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
Felipe Ospina/NA/Enron@ENRON, Christiaan 
Huizer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rafael Rangel/NA/Enron@Enron, 
RGGDEE@AOL.com, Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron, Eddy 
Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron, Celina Ozorio/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter N 
Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Erwin Landivar/SA/Enron@Enron, 
Fabio Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, John Guidry/NA/Enron@Enron, Felipe 
Jens/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle Blaine/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe 
Kishkill/SA/Enron@Enron, Orlando Gonzalez/SA/Enron@Enron, John J 
Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey Sherrick/Enron@EnronXGate, Greg 
Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Loretta Brelsford/Enron@EnronXGate, Connie Blackwood/Enron@EnronXGate, 
Clarissa Sauer/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Veronica 
Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Isabel Romero/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
Marianne M Arake/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Truss/Enron@EnronXGate, Mina 
Miyakawa/SA/Enron@Enron, Edineth R Santos/SA/Enron@Enron, Rejane 
Pansiera/SA/Enron@Enron, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly 
Hillis/Enron@EnronXGate, Vivianna Bolen/Enron@EnronXGate 
Subject: Cuiaba review- Tuesday, April 17th

A Cuiaba project status review with Rebecca McDonnald  will take place on 
Tuesday, April 17th @ 10:00 am CDT in conference room 3AC21C2.  If unable to 
attend in person, the dial-in numbers are as follows:

Domestic: 888-232-0370
International: 805-240-9483 
Participant code: 939159
Host (Pete's) code: 625402

Any questions, let me know.  Thanks.
From: mark.palmer@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, rebecca.mcdonald@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-14 12:05:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Thanks

Some very nice, and very appropriate thoughts about John Ambler.  Wade 
continues to speak the truth.

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 06/14/2001 12:02 PM -----

	Wade Cline@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/14/2001 11:51 AM
		 
		 To: mark.palmer@enron.com
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Thanks

Mark,

I wanted to pass on to you what I've said to John Ambler -- he is doing a 
great job for us (and all of Enron) in some very trying times that the Dabhol 
project is facing. These tough times will undoubtedly remain for some time, 
and I really appreciate the support we receive from your team led by John.

Wade






Wade Cline on 06/14/2001 10:04:53 PM
To: John Ambler/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Thanks

John,

In the midst of all the e-mails we exchange -- I think I've sent a few more 
tonight with my comments on various releases -- I want to take a moment and 
say that I really appreciate the job you do for us. It's easy to focus so 
much on the problems I face in balancing the India issues with the Houston 
issues and forget that you are doing the exact same thing except with a 
higher level of interaction with both senior management and the external 
world than I. Plus you are in close enough proximity to those folks that they 
can do physical harm to you. I always have the benefit of having at least 20 
hours advance notice so I can hide.

Keep up the good work, and hang in there. Please let me know if I can do 
anything to help you continue to provide the great support you deliver to us. 
As we go forward, especially in this time of increased international press 
and shareholder scrutiny, I'll try and be as responsive as possible.

Regards,
Wade
From: feedback@intcx.com
To: iceuserslist@list.intcx.com
Cc: sales@intcx.com, icehelpdesk@intcx.com
Date: 2001-10-25 19:00:34+00:00
Subject: Reminder About Hourly Power


Hourly Power Launched on ICE Tomorrow!!

As a reminder, IntercontinentalExchange will be launching Hourly Power tomorrow for all hubs currently traded in the West as well as PJM in the East.  All commissions for Hourly transactions will be waived for one month.  Effective December 1, traders will pay a flat fee of $4.00 per side for each trade.  Please call your ICE representative with any questions.

24-hour Help Desk  770-738-2101
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-22 11:41:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001042212.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL



---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: CRLP
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: -100.00 / Final: -99.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TRADING_SC: EPPS
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1



---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred:  64.64 / Final:  64.59)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
From: anne.moisan@internationalsos.com
To: peveryone@internationalsos.com
Date: 2001-10-19 16:27:30+00:00
Subject: Houston office

Greetings from Houston!

The phone lines are down again.

If you need us please contact us at

John - 281 361 0482

Julie - 713 668 4248

Anne 281 450 5269

Thank you
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: sshackl@msn.com
Date: 2000-02-15 08:48:00+00:00
Subject: Revised E-Mail Address List

---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000 
08:47 AM ---------------------------


SSher5DUN@aol.com on 02/14/2000 08:26:15 PM
To: abarnett@mapus.com, gary@bmicmortgage.com, joaniem5770@yahoo.com, 
Rahkneebee@aol.com, sshackl@enron.com, labdsc@womans.com, msher@dlalaw.com, 
"allison_b_sher"@uhc.com, schneil@ibm.net, Aimee1132@aol.com, 
ACSURFR@aol.com, Kiteaze@aol.com, lbarnett@cyberenet.net
cc:  
Subject: Revised E-Mail Address List


Sher family:

Steve & Anita:  ssher5dun@aol.com
Marc:  msher@dlalaw.com
Allison:  "allison_b_sher"@uhc.com

Schiller family:

Gary:  gary@bmicmortgage.com
Joan:  joaniem5770@yahoo.com
Neil & Robin:  schneil@ibm.net
Amy:  aimee1132@aol.com

Barnett family:

Arnold & Ellen:  abarnett@mapus.com
Alan & Nancy: acsurfr@aol.com and kiteaze@aol.com
Lara: lbarnett@cyberenet.net
Ronnie:  rahkneebee@aol.com

Shackleton family:

Sara:  sshackl@enron.com

Cavalier family:

Steve & Debbi:  labdsc@womans.com
From: naveed.ahmed@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-18 15:03:00+00:00
Subject: NNG capacity

Mark,

Further to our brief meeting of this afternoon, I am attaching a sample of  
long description for capacity product. As you would note we have suggested to 
move the second paragraph into GTC. You may wish to discuss with Tony about 
this.

Regards
Naveed
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
To: b..sanders@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-02 15:58:36+00:00
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Andy Jan. Cell Phone

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Andrew  . Edison
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Andy Jan. Cell Phone
Report Total: $75.00
Amount Due Employee: $75.00


To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: doug.rotenberg@enron.com
Cc: rick.buy@enron.com, lavorato@enron.com, david.haug@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-22 16:23:00+00:00

Doug:
To confirm the pricing of the LNG dela::

I can show a $3.01 bid for the Nymex portion of 160,000 mmbtu/day for the 
time period Jan 2003-Dec 2014.  The bid on Henry Hub basis for same time 
period is -$.0025 resulting in fix price of $3.0075; the bid on Sonat basis 
is -$.0175 translating into a bid of $2.9925.

Notional volume = 70,128 contracts.
PV volume = 37,658 contracts.
Exposure per $.01 move = $3,760,000

John
From: jim.willis@enron.com
To: jim.willis@enron.com, ruth.concannon@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, loftus.fitzwater@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-29 19:12:46+00:00
Subject: Boston Gas Deal

Ruth, Chris, & Fitz,

Frank Vickers has asked me to set up a meeting for us to discuss the Boston Gas situation - how we can restructure (upstream and/or downstream) the deal, what positions are struggling on the North American side, what is our current position, etc.   Ruth and Chris, the above-mentioned time is just a suggestion - Loftus and I are fairly flexible for the remainder of today and/or tomorrow - except 10:00 am and 2:00 pm tomorrow).  Please let me know if another time will work better for either of you.  Basically, we need you to please lay out for us some of the history behind the deal, address some of the issues mentioned previously, and help brainstorm how Loftus and I can go forward from this point.

Thanks very much for your help,

Jim Willis
ENA - East Gas Origination
(713) 853-7912
jim.willis@enron.com
From: kimberly.hillis@enron.com
To: rick.buy@enron.com, ted.murphy@enron.com, vladimir.gorny@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-27 11:19:00+00:00
Subject: Alberta PPA

Please see the attached Alberta PPA presenation.  Please make review and if 
you have any modifications, please get with John as soon as possible.

Kim Hillis
x30681
From: outlook.team@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-27 23:02:00+00:00
Subject: Mike Bryant-out of office

CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Mike Bryant-out of office

Date:		1/17/2001
Time:		5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:
From: britt.davis@enron.com
To: david.best@clyde.co.uk, matthias.lee@enron.com
Cc: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, harry.collins@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, james.studdert@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-02 18:25:00+00:00
Subject: In re M/V PACIFIC VIRGO

 You have ECT's authority (per John Nowlan and Alan Aronowitz) to notify 
Mitsubishi that ECT declines to pay its claim for freight and demurrage due 
to the cargo contamination that occurred aboard the ship and that ECT wishes 
to go forward with appointment of arbitrators for London arbitration.  I ask 
that David draft the appropriate document and then confer with Matt as to who 
should send this document to Mitsubishi.  No one over here needs to see it 
before you send it out.  You may wish to send a copy to Cliff Bennett as 
well.  Please send me a copy of this document by e-mail or telefax  once you 
have sent it out.

 Many thanks.

       Britt
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: jeff.blumenthal@enron.com, peggy.banczak@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-06 18:09:00+00:00
Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2000 06:08 
PM ---------------------------


jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com on 06/06/2000 06:08:59 PM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc: Brian.D.Barto@enron.com, tim.lederach@ps.ge.com, 
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, karl.siverling@ps.ge.com 

Subject: RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

Kay,
See the proposed wording, below.  This is the only contract text issue I am
aware of.
Other than the items mentioned in my e-mail of June 1st/2nd (on the
consolidation agreement) and finalization of the "letter agreement" (you got
my fax), we are there.
Implied in the above, is that at this point I think the split agreement
approach would get us to closure faster.
Regards,
Jeff Smith

-----Original Message-----
From:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance) 
Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:12 PM
To:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps)
Subject:   RE: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)

I have no problem with their proposed addition as it applies to the onshore
contract.  However, I would recommend modifying it as follows:

      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.  Seller agrees to
provide Purchaser with an original tax receipt, in Seller's name, indicating
remittance by the Purchaser of the amounts withheld.  Failure to provide
this receipt within a reasonable period of time will result in the amount
withheld becoming payable to the Seller.
Regards

Tim Lederach
GEPS Taxes


      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Smith, Jeffrey E (PS, CommOps) 
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:43 PM
      To:   Lederach, Timothy P (PS, Finance)
      Subject:   FW: language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)
      Importance:   High

      Tim,
      Enron wants to add this to the end of Clause 5.2.2.
Attached is the latest version of the On-Shore Contract for reference.
      Please let me know your opinion.
      We can talk to Enron about this if appropriate.
      Thanks,
      Jeff Smith
          << File: VITRO5-on-r1b.wpd >>   

      -----Original Message-----
      From:   Brian D Barto [mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]
<mailto:[mailto:Brian.D.Barto@enron.com]>
      Sent:   Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:23 PM
      To:   jeffreye.smith@ps.ge.com
      Subject:   language for Withholding (Section 5.2.2)




      If Purchaser is obligated to make any payment to Seller that
is subject to any withholding tax, then Purchaser shall remit the
appropriate withholding tax to the proper governmental authorities, and
Purchaser shall then remit the net amount of the payment (i.e., the gross
payment minus the applicable withholding tax) to Seller.
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: trogg522@aol.com
Date: 2001-03-06 14:32:00+00:00
Subject: TMR earnings

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001 02:32 
PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Jim Homco                           03/06/2001 02:23 PM
	

To: Jay Knoblauh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: TMR earnings

TMR earnings report tomorrow...

I've been watching this sector -  ie small cap oil&gas.
Most companies have risen prior to earnings, but then have a pretty good 
sell-off
after announcing record earnings.

Examples: 
 CHK earnings report on 2/20 stock price=$10.80, by 2/24 stock price = $9.10.
 GW earnings report on 2/12 price = $6.70, by 3/1 price $5.05.
 OEI earnings 1/25 price $18.05, then 1/30 $16.75 but today $19.00
 DNR earnings 2/23 price + $11.00 by 3/1 $9.70
 CRK earnings 2/14 price = $13.80 by 2/20 $10.20
 
So...buy the rumor, sell the fact ????
I still want to hold TMR long term, but maybe take a little profit tomorrow 
?????????
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-08 07:58:00+00:00
Subject: LMP

What should i tell john?
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/08/2001 07:58 AM -----

	janderson <janderson@elcon.org>
	01/05/2001 10:02 AM
		 
		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc: 
		 Subject: LMP

Steve,

I haven't talked with you lately.  Hope that all is well.

Rumor on the street is that ENRON may completely reverse its position on
LMP and come our is support of the concept.  If so, this is very
significant.  It could affect the ability of various organizations to work
closely together.

Is there any truth to this rumor?

John Anderson, ELCON
From: james.steffes@enron.com
To: bhansen@lhom.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, hgovenar@govadv.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-20 13:56:00+00:00
Subject: ABX60 - Hertzberg Certification Language

My comments on the fax --

Sec 1 is horrific in that it tells new generation that they must offer their 
energy to the DWR at "just and reasonable cost base price".   First, this 
sends the wrong signal to developers.  Second, I have no idea what a J&R cost 
based "price" is?  Who determines this?  Finally, Sec 2 would require that 
all generation in the state has to provide a maintenance schedule to the PUC 
- why?  What happens if an unplanned outage occurs?

This is a bad device that does nothing to 'increase supply or decrease 
demand'.

Jim
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: stephanie.panus@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-15 10:51:00+00:00
Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Stephanie:  Please see me about a "draft ISDA municipal format".  Let's talk 
as soon as you have a minute and prioritize.  Thanks.  Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2001 10:46 AM -----

	Stewart Rosman
	02/09/2001 12:02 PM
		 
		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's

Sara -

Jeff Fuller is interested in pursuing ISDA's with a number of his other 
customers after a successful experience with Merced Irrigation District.  He 
would like a generic ISDA to start with and hopes to negotiate four ISDA's in 
the near future.  The purpose of the ISDA will be to hedge their price risk 
once they get a piece of slice (this is a BPA plan to allocate slices of 
their system to customers).  Feel free to call me if you have any questions 
at 503-464-3810.


Stewart
---------------------- Forwarded by Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001 
10:45 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  Jeff Fuller <JFuller@prmllp.com>                           02/09/2001 
08:06 AM
	

To: "'Stewart Rosman'" <Stewart.Rosman@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: ISDA/Financial Trades for Washington State PUD's and Muni's


Stewart,

PRM has 4 utility clients (Benton PUD, Franklin PUD, Grays Harbor PUD and
City of Richland) that will be purchasing BPA's Slice product beginning
October 1, 2001.  I want to get the process started to get ISDA's in place
between Enron and these utilities.  We are currently in the beginning stages
of discussing financial trades with their legal counsel.  Fortunately for
Enron, I think we can have one attorney represent all 4 of PRM's clients.
(FYI, that attorney will be Doug Rosenberg at Preston Gates & Ellis in
Seattle.)

To get started, I'd like Enron to forward to me copies of the ISDA agreement
that you would propose as the starting point for discussions.  I also ask
that you send me a list/examples of any other documentation Enron will
require (e.g., legal opinion, board resolution, etc.).  Please send just one
set of documentation at this point.  I want to get the basic legal review
process underway before you prepare four different sets of documents.  I'd
also like to request that when we get to the point of having Enron's
attorney walk through the ISDA with our attorney, that Enron use Sara
Shackleton.  Sara was great to work with when we went through this for
Merced, and I think she'd be extremely helpful once again as we venture into
new territory with these 4 utilities.

Thanks for your help.

Jeff
From: phillip.allen@enron.com
To: mike.grigsby@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-03 12:33:00+00:00
Subject: Western Strategy Summaries

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 
12:30 PM ---------------------------


Tim Heizenrader
03/03/2000 07:25 AM
To: James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Western Strategy Summaries

Slides from yesterday's meeting are attached:
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: suzanne.adams@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-29 08:15:00+00:00
Subject: St. Lucie County

print job,  please.

How was your weekend?  I had a good one.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/29/2001 08:14 
AM ---------------------------


"Boehler, Chris" <chrisboehler@akllp.com> on 05/25/2001 02:22:49 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>, <ann.elizabeth.white@enron.com>, <gkrause@enron.com>
cc: <laymand@gtlaw.com>, "Inoff, Darren" <darreninoff@akllp.com> 

Subject: St. Lucie County

Attached for your review please find one (1) clean copy of the latest
drafts of the property owners association documents for Midway Grove,
and one (1) copy of same which have been marked to show the revisions to
the previous draft.

Please call me with any questions or comments you may have.

Best regards,

Chris Boehler
 <<covs-c.doc>>  <<covs-r.doc>>  <<dec-c.doc>>  <<dec-r.doc>>  
<<laws-c.doc>>  <<laws-r.doc>>
From: sberman@hewm.com
To: bmspeckman@aol.com, nwrto@pplmt.com, frank_afranji@pgn.com, mpa@aelaw.com, ambarnes@bpa.gov, slbaskerville@bpa.gov, sberman@hewn.com, dbrookhyser@nevp.com, doug_brawley@pngc.com, jbuchal@mbllp.com, pjburger@bpa.gov, kcarlson@do.usbr.gov, elchristensen@snopud.com, jchristian@lawsonlundell.com, rcloward@avistacorp.com, kconger@nrgxs.com, gdahlke@painehamblen.com, dunwei@ibm.net, adavis@state.mt.us, sdleonard@earthlink.net, mjdewolf@bpa.gov, michaelearly@earthlink.net, cub@teleport.com, pfeldberg@lawsonlundell.com, ericf@prestongates.com, don.furman@pacificorp.com, paula.green@ci.seattle.wa.us, tgrim@chbh.com, mhain@enron.com, whannaford@nwppc.org, kharri@puget.com, dhowell@puc.state.id.us, steve.huhman@southernenergy.com, gfh@bpa.gov, sjarsky@pn.usbr.gov, paul.kaufman@enron.com, tkent@pn.usbr.gov, snkripalani@stoel.com, srlarson@bpa.gov, betty@wapa.gov, lunda@bentonpud.org, mpmanion@mtpower.com, pdmichie@bpa.gov, sbmillar@bpa.gov, jpm@aelaw.com, terrym@millcreeklaw.com, pmurphy@mbllp.com, lnichols@bpa.gov, douglas_nichols@pgn.com, will.patton@ci.seattle.wa.us, jim_piro@pgn.com, shellyr@teleport.com, rfroberts@bpa.gov, rkrodewald@bpa.gov, mschaff@worldnet.att.net, george.schreck@pacificorp.com, kyle@ppcpdx.org, aleka_scott@pngc.com, jgselby@bpa.gov, tshuba@sheagardner.com, llskidmore@bpa.gov, rbstrong@painehamblen.com, jill_sughrue@pgn.com, jthompson@idahopower.com, rvermeers@avistacorp.com, swadding@europa.com, steve@nwenergy.org, cwestadt@sppc.com, kewh@dynegy.com, ckwinter@desgt.com, lwolv@worldaccessnet.com, mwood@stoel.com, cindy.wright@ci.seattle.wa.us, mthomas@mtpower.com, sawatson@bpa.gov, cfi1@tca-us.com, jboucher@kemaconsulting.com, dhackett@kemaconsulting.com, kristiwallis@sprintmail.com, ekrogh@sev.net
Date: 2000-06-23 16:08:00+00:00
Subject: my email address

A typo has invaded my email address in the Legal Work Group mailings going
around, so I am missing emails.  My correct email address is
"sberman@hewm.com"  Thanks.

> Stan Berman
> Attorney
>
> HellerEhrman
> phone: 206.389.4276
> fax: 206.447.0849
> email: sberman@hewm.com
> mail: 701 Fifth Ave., Suite 6100, Seattle, WA 98104
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
> confidential, and protected from disclosure.   If you are not the intended
> recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
> prohibited.  If you think that you have received this e-mail message in
> error, please e-mail the sender at "sberman@hewm.com".  Thank you.
Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: brent.hendry@enron.com
Cc: mark.taylor@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-07 10:52:00+00:00
Subject: Re: weather confirm

I thought this was what we were already doing.  Sara, Mark, wasn't that your 
understanding?



	Brent Hendry@ENRON
	08/07/2000 10:45 AM
		
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

When the Master does not have the weather modification to the Trade Option 
Exemption representation then I think we should include it in the confirm. Is 
this feasible?





	Tana Jones@ECT
	08/07/2000 10:25 AM
		 
		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent 
Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm

Tanya forwarded the attached confirm on to me.  Are we supposed to have that 
weather rep also in confirmations when we trade under a master?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:24 AM -----

	Tanya Rohauer
	08/07/2000 10:21 AM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: weather confirm


---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:17 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Diane Anderson @ ENRON                           08/07/2000 10:09 AM
	

To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: weather confirm
From: a..shankman@enron.com
To: darrenwolfe@earthlink.net
Date: 2001-11-19 17:46:35+00:00
Subject: RE: Darren Wolfe's Resume

Hi Darren,

I am sorry it has taken me so long to reconnect with you, but as you know, it has been very difficult these days at Enron.  It would be best if we could schedule a phone call some time during the first half of December.  At that time, I should have some time to help you.  Hang in there.

Best,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Darren Wolfe" <darrenwolfe@earthlink.net>@ENRON  
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject:	RE: Darren Wolfe's Resume


Dear Jeffrey,
Lisa thought that you could answer some of my questions dealing with power and gas trading. I have traded equities for the last three years and I worked at a small investment commercial real-estate firm before I traded. I am trying to position myself at an energy company that produces, trades, and sells. I understand that I need to learn the industry from the bottom-up. I am looking at positions of Risk Analyst and Merchant Energy Trader. Do you have any suggestions for me.
 
Sincerely,
Darren Wolfe
 
   
 
--- Darren Wolfe
--- darrenwolfe@earthlink.net << File: mailto:darrenwolfe@earthlink.net >> 
--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
 

 - drw resume2.doc << File: drw resume2.doc >>
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: steve.hotte@enron.com
Cc: shelley.corman@enron.com, danny.mccarty@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, julia.white@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-18 14:03:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Advertising.

I don't see any immediate problem.  As long as the advertising didn't 
interfere with the effectiveness and efficiency of Hot Tap as a tool for 
satisfying our posting and notice obligations, FERC shouldn't care.  The 
revenue would be nonjurisdictional and would be treated as such in Northern's 
or TW's next rate case.  As to the "type of advertising," I can't think of a 
legal or regulatory reason we need to be picky, but we may want to exclude 
certain types of services that seem to rely heavily on internet advertising 
if you know what I mean.  DF




Steve Hotte
10/18/2000 01:06 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Danny McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Julia 
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Advertising.

Shelly/Drew,

We  get quite a bit of customer activity on our Hot Tap internet site.  Do 
you think there would be any legal or regulatory restriction on us offering 
advertising on that site.  We can be selective on the type of advertising, 
but would obviously want to choose a vendor that would benefit from exposure 
to the Hot Tap audience. 

The revenue from such an idea varies.  If it passes the legal and regulatory 
test I will look into potential customers and firm up some figures.

Thanks,
Steve
From: dcramer@as-coa.org
To: tmcnamara@as-coa.org
Date: 2000-10-25 09:39:00+00:00
Subject: CHANGE OF AMERICAS SOCIETY BOARD MEETING DATE. IMPORTANT NOTICE
 FROM TED McNAMARA

                             IMPORTANT NOTICE

TO:       Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:     Ted McNamara
SUBJECT:  Change of December 5, 2000 Americas Society Board Meeting Date.

Our chairman, Bill Rhodes, will be traveling in China on December 5, the
scheduled date of our annual board meeting.  He would like to explore the
possibility of moving the meeting to Monday, December 11, from 9:00 a.m. -
10:30 a.m.  Should you be unable to attend on December 11, there is the
possibility that we could schedule the meeting for Friday, December 8, from
9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m.  Please let us know by return email as soon as
possible, if you could make a Monday meeting.  If not, would December 8
work for you?

Thank you for a quick reply.  I will get back to you this week, if you can
all respond quickly.
From: caroline.abramo@enron.com
To: john.griffith@enron.com
Cc: mike.maggi@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-29 22:25:46+00:00
Subject: harvard term vol trades- will explain

  



basically a swaption on vol for nov03-mar04 that expites on feb 25, 2003.
they also did the following:

 
i asked why they did swaption AND short call and put spreads.. this was their response..


 

sorry for the slow confirms today....



--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <IMCEANOTES-+22CAROLINE+20ABRAMO+2C+20ENRON+20CORP+22+20+3CCABRAMO+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
To: Abramo, Caroline </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cabramo>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:22:43 GMT
Subject: 

the trade we have done in NG (based on the old gold trade) was
as follows:

i buy winter 03/04 forward implied volatility at x% (fixed rate)

we agree on x% today and on 02/25/03 you deliver to me the ATMF
straddle on X3-H4 priced at x%.  I can hit your bid for the
straddle (at your bid vol) or take delivery.

x% is a function of the swaption vol (02/25/03 expiry on the X3-
H4 swap) and the X3-H4 term vol.  variances are additive, so:

(contd)




--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <IMCEANOTES-+22CAROLINE+20ABRAMO+2C+20ENRON+20CORP+22+20+3CCABRAMO+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
To: Abramo, Caroline </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cabramo>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:22:58 GMT
Subject: 

t2= time in yrs to "term" expiry
t1= time in yrs to swaption expiry
t12= time in yrs from swaption exp to term exp (=t2-t1)

s2= annualized term vol
s1= annualized swaption vol
s12= annualized forward-forward vol

t2 * s22 = t1 * s12 + t12 * s122??flip terms around and solve for s122 and that's your forward
vol.




--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <IMCEANOTES-+22CAROLINE+20ABRAMO+2C+20ENRON+20CORP+22+20+3CCABRAMO+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
To: Abramo, Caroline </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cabramo>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:44:01 GMT
Subject: 

we did the trade now for the winter 2 years hence. numbers
looked more compelling.  we also put on some short positions in
callspreads and putspreads which we did when winter 03 was at
$4.  that was the biggest winner so far.
Reply:
SHORT CALL AND PUT SPREADS FOR WINTER03-04 OR CLOSER IN TERM?
Reply:
out there in 03/04.  low delta, but they were low risk too.
total luck with the timing.  we did it last thursday before the
first rumors of an aga revision came out...




--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <IMCEANOTES-+22CAROLINE+20ABRAMO+2C+20ENRON+20CORP+22+20+3CCABRAMO+40bloomberg+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com>
To: Abramo, Caroline </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cabramo>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 4:43:22 GMT
Subject: 

well, long vol via the FRA trade, and short delta via the cs/ps
 (we bot putspreads, sold callspreads).  the cs/ps were done
due to the correlation of vol and price.  we figured taht if
price went down, our fra vol would end up low, so we bot
putspreads.  on the flipside, if gas traded $6, it's safe to
say our fra vol would be a lot higher, and we wouldn't mind
paying out under the 5/6 callsrpead.
From: lana.moore@nesanet.org
To: eva.pollard@nesanet.org
Cc: staff@nesanet.org
Date: 2001-10-23 15:04:52+00:00
Subject: NESA NYC Mixer - November 8

Please make plans to attend NESA's Membership Mixer in New York City -
rescheduled from October 10 - 11, 2001.  Details are included in the
attachment below - if you have problems with the attachment please contact
NESA Headquarters and we will be happy to fax or mail the information to
your attention.

We look forward to welcoming you to New York!


>  <<NE Notice 2001.doc>>

 - NE Notice 2001.doc
From: gregory.carraway@enron.com
To: errol.mclaughlin@enron.com
Cc: rebecca.ford@enron.com, kim.theriot@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-16 08:50:00+00:00
Subject: Gas Daily deals in dispute

The following deals are being disputed by Reliant Energy Services. TAGG is 
showing these deals as Gas Daily, but the counterparty states that they 
should be changed to Nymex trades. They also stated that they were told by 
Mike Maggi that the deals would be changed to Nymex deals:
From: amanda.rybarski@enron.com
To: mike.maggi@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-19 20:54:28+00:00
Subject: RE:

I think so

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:48 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE: 

thats not true

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

yes you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:41 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE: 

me

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:34 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

not lately

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE: 

yes i am

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:31 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

you are no fun at all!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:30 PM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE: 

i cant because i need eol to beep when it trades

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda  
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:29 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	

If you don't like the noise, mute your computer.
From: shannon.mcpearson@enron.com
To: errol.mclaughlin@enron.com, cheryl.dawes@enron.com, chance.rabon@enron.com, george.huan@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-24 20:48:00+00:00
Subject: 0301 PMA's

Attached you will find the outstanding PMA's, as of March 2001 accounting. You will see adjustments requested by financial settlements. They have finally provided us with reconciliation's for the contract periods of Dec00 through Feb01. Financial settlements thought that reconciling current months and working backwards would be best. So, you should continue to see PMA's, from financial settlements, for previous months as they become available to us. Please let me know if you have any questions.
 
Thanks!
Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com
From: kingram@lockeliddell.com
To: mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
Cc: sbrownell@lockeliddell.com, bswanstrom@lockeliddell.com
Date: 2000-09-20 10:50:00+00:00
Subject: FROM BILL SWANSTROM--Project White Knight

-----Original Message-----
From: Ingram, Kay
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:30 AM
To: 'sheila.tweed@enron.com'
Cc: Brownell, Stephen; Swanstrom, Bill
Subject: FROM BILL SWANSTROM--Project White Knight



As a follow-up to my earlier e-mail regarding Steve Brownell's experience
regarding municipalization strategies as a way to facilitate Enron's efforts
to be the energy manager for communities, I have attached a proposal
pursuant to which you can potentially use tax-exempt financing to
restructure power contracts.  Let me know if you or anyone else over there
are interested in talking about this further.  I think it's an interesting
idea.







Kay Ingram
Assistant to H. William Swanstrom
Locke Liddell & Sapp
(713) 226-1317
kingram@lockeliddell.com





 - 1
From: soblander@carrfut.com
To: soblander@carrfut.com
Date: 2001-05-04 11:15:00+00:00
Subject: Global Economic & Markets Strategy

(See attached file: gems.pdf)







Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com
 - gems.pdf
From: kenneth.thibodeaux@enron.com
To: chris.abel@enron.com, frank.hayden@enron.com, gregg.penman@enron.com, robin.rodrigue@enron.com, s..shively@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 16:43:41+00:00
Subject: 11-26 Enovate DPR

  
 
 11-26 Enovate.xls
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: mary.poorman@enron.com, megan.parker@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-28 13:45:00+00:00
Subject: Duke

On Feb 7, we sold 10,000 to Duke Energy Field Services at Waha.  However, I 
entered the deal (#603484) under Duke Energy Marketing (Can you believe I 
made a mistake?).  To correct this, I created a new ticket (#700132) under 
DEFS.  

Mary - Please repath these deals and let Megan know when you're done.

Sorry for the extra work.

D
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-17 13:06:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Commission for Bloomberg

Tom and Mark are not spot traders, they're cash traders. This is what I was 
referring to yesterday - that Real Time is now being charged $15 for trades - 
but cash and term traders should still be charged the traditional $.005. Why 
is Bloomberg recognizing these trades as Real Time?

Kate




Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/17/2001 12:33 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Commission for Bloomberg

 
Hi Kate, per our discussion on yesterday about the $15.00 flat fee on Tom's 
and Mark's deals, here is Bloomberg's response.  Please pass this info to all 
of our traders.  Please let me know what the response is from them.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 
02:34 PM ---------------------------


"PAUL CALLAHAN, BLOOMBERG/ NEW YORK" <PCALLAHAN2@bloomberg.net> on 04/17/2001 
02:28:57 PM
To: Evelyn.Metoyer@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Commission


Evelyn, as of April 16, 2001 our charge for Spot trades is a flat fee of
$15/trade.
From: susan.mara@enron.com
To: phyllis.anzalone@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, roger.yang@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-14 14:25:00+00:00
Subject: Restructuring Today, Tuesday November 14, 2000

----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/14/2000 12:20 PM -----

	US Publishing <daily@restructuringtoday.com>
	11/14/2000 09:10 AM
	Please respond to daily
		 
		 To: "RT Reader" <daily@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Tuesday November 14, 2000


(see attached file:  rt001114.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001114.pdf