Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: chris.dorland@enron.com
To: mike.cowan@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-07 13:52:20+00:00
Subject: RE:

The range on my next day power was 110 to 260.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:33 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: 

I'm losing a bit this month too.  Fucking cash to futures too tight!!!  Need the weather to break.

Call me tonight and I'll tell you about my Realtor.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris  
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

Want to hear about a bad day. Down $2 million USD today. Temps came in 10 degress hotter than we thought in the Northeast this week and blew up!

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike  
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: 

Sounds good man.  We should maybe talk on the weekend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris  
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 8:18 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:	

I think a mid sept tee time will work. I want to try to be there for the off site with the west guys. Tell John Z I'll call him this afternoon.

Chris
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-08 16:09:00+00:00
Subject: Re: PEP Feedback

It looks fine.  Mark



	Michelle Cash
	Sent by: Twanda Sweet
	11/08/2000 02:58 PM
		 
		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: PEP Feedback

Below is an email to be sent to all attorneys/paralegals within ENA Legal.  
Please review and provide me with any comments.

Thanks.


Many of you have received requests for feedback through the Performance 
Evaluation Program ("PEP") system.  This feedback is used by the Performance 
Review Committee in conducting its evaluations and also is used in preparing 
the written performance reviews.

Please take the time to complete the forms and provide candid, accurate 
feedback when it is requested.

The deadline for completing evaluation forms is November 17th.
From: paul.kaufman@enron.com
To: j..kean@enron.com, m..landwehr@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-07 20:54:34+00:00
Subject: FW: Information Requested



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kaufman, Paul  
Sent:	Friday, September 07, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	'mspear@missc.state.wy.us'; 'staylo2@state.wy.us'
Subject:	Information Requested

Attached please find the issue papers we discussed in our meeting in Cheyenne.  We apologize for the delay in getting this material to you.  A number of our folks were tied up in the California mess (only one week left for their session!!).  

 

We have also taken the liberty of drafting a suggested agenda for a FERC meeting.  The agenda includes the issues we discussed in our meeting--with the exception of our discussion of the next FERC commissioner.  

 

As always, please feel free to contact Sue Landwehr, me or Steve Kean with any questions or concerns.  We look forward to continuing our dialogue on these important issues.  

Thanks!
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: rae.meadows@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-01 16:25:00+00:00
Subject: Final Docs.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 04:24 PM -----

	Gerald Nemec
	06/01/2001 04:22 PM
		 
		 To: arlanz@mexis.com
		 cc: Barry Tycholiz/Enron@EnronXGate, Stephanie Miller/Enron@EnronXGate
		 Subject: Final Docs.

Attached are the final documents which includes

1.  Agency and Management Agreement - Clean and Redlined copy which shows the 
changes per my discussion with Jay Goleb at Baker & Botts
2.  Gas Confirm for June 1 thru June 4, 2001
3.  Gas Confirm for June 5 thru June 30, 2001
4.  Gas Conform for July 1 thru October 31, 2001
5.  GTC which applies to all three confirms
6.  Agency Notice Letter - Mexicana to send to its Permian suppliers for 
notice of Enron's agency.

Please print out and execute documents 1 thru 5 and fax to Barry Tycholiz.  
We will follow up with duplicate originals for execution.  Thanks for all 
your cooperation.
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: brenda.whitehead@enron.com
Date: 1999-08-16 11:07:00+00:00
Subject: EEI Standardized Contract - Revised Draft

Please print
---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 08/16/99 11:06 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  "Caroline Goodson" <CGOODSON@schiffhardin.com>                         
  08/06/99 02:35 PM
	

To: fmd@aep.com, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT, akatz@eei.org, ecomer@eei.org, 
mroger3@entergy.com, wfhenze@jonesday.com, kdleitao@llgm.com, 
dmperlman@powersrc.com, rosteen@powersrc.com, jcrespo@statoilenergy.com
cc: PDONDANV@schiffhardin.com 
Subject: EEI Standardized Contract - Revised Draft



To the Drafting Committee:
Attached for your review are clean and marked copies of the
standardized contract. These documents are in Word Perfect; if you are
unable to open them, please call my secretary Sue Edwards and she can
send you a fax instead. I will be out of the office for the rest of the
day but will be back on Monday if you have any questions. In order to
keep with our mid-August deadline, please call me (312) 258-5659 or fax
me (312) 258-5600 your comments by 5 pm Chicago time on Tuesday, Aug.
10. Also, please let me know if you want to have a conference call
before this goes out to the larger group, as opposed to just reviewing
the draft one last time once I revise it with all your comments. Pleae
let me know if there is any time on Aug. 11 or Aug. 12 when you are NOT
available for a conference call.
Thanks,
Caroline

*****************************************************************************
The preceding message and any attachments may contain
confidential information protected by the attorney-client or other
privilege.  If you believe that it has been sent to you in error,
please reply to the sender that you received the message in
error.  Then delete it.  Thank you.
*****************************************************************************

 - marked.agm.wpd
 - Clean.agm.wpd
From: creditcards@teamfreeze.com
To: d..thomas@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-31 17:11:37+00:00
Subject: Discover
 Gold: 0% Intro APR*!

charset="iso-8859-1" 
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  You've been selected for a special No-Annual-Fee  Discover
 Gold Card with all of these prisynergy6leges: [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]   	

*This online application is subject to the terms and conditions. See the Important Information Section 
of the application regarding APR, fees and other important information.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The e-mail address you are signed up with is: paul.d.thomas@enron.com
To unsubscribe please click here :
http://regman.freeze.com/mailing/remove.asp?email=paul.d.thomas@enron.com 
This email is not sent unsolicited. This is a Freeze
Network mailing! You are receiving this email as a 
subscriber to a Freeze Network service. This message
is sent to subscribers ONLY.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
(FRZ4009139)
From: tracy.geaccone@enron.com
To: kwatson@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 18:52:15+00:00
Subject: Fw: Transpecos


--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy <Tracy.Geaccone@ENRON.com>
To: 'kim.watson@enron.com' <kim.watson@enron.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 27 12:49:46 2001
Subject: Transpecos

Is there a meeting with Kevin Howard today on this? I would like to attend if so.

Thanks
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-28 18:12:00+00:00
Subject: EFCU QuickTeller Phone Service Unavailable This Sunday

Due to communication equipment upgrades by Enron, QuickTeller, Enron Federal 
Credit Union's Automated Phone Account Service, will be unavailable Sunday, 
October 1st, from 7 a.m. to 12 p.m.  If you need access to your credit union 
accounts, QuickLink PC Banking is available through our web site at 
www.efcu.enron.com.  If you are not yet set up for QuickLink access, please 
send us an e-mail and we will be glad to get you set up.

We apologize for any inconvenience.  Thank you!
From: members@realmoney.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-14 03:09:00+00:00
Subject: One Great Investment

ONE FINAL CHANCE TO SAVE!!

Dear Mark Taylor:

You know by now that we at RealMoney.com know a lot about investing.  Well,
here's an offer we think is a definite "buy".


Just click on:

http://www.thestreet.com/z/Sub_Center/subcenter.jhtml.


THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE TO SAVE $40 OFF A YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION!!!!!

Take our reliable advice and save on the two things we all need more of:
time and money. Invest in a one-year subscription to TheStreet.com! For
only $199.95, you'll save nearly $40 off our monthly rate, and get 12
months of all the real-time news and commentary you need to make sound
investment decisions.


Username:  mtaylo1
Password:  official109

Get 24-hour, up-to-date news for only $199.95 a year, less than 60 cents a
day! Sounds like a good investment to me.  Or, if you prefer, sign up
for a monthly subscription at just $19.95 a month.  Either way, we hope
we've convinced you to subscribe!



Sincerely,

Dave Kansas
Editor-in-Chief

P.S. You may also call Customer Service at 1-800-562-9571 to subscribe.
Hours of operation are ET 8 a.m. to 11 p.m., Monday - Friday, and 12 p.m.
to 6 p.m., Saturday and Sunday.







TheStreet.com
Ignore Us At Your Own Risk
www.thestreet.com
From: raetta.zadow@enron.com
To: lynn.blair@enron.com, rick.dietz@enron.com, jodie.floyd@enron.com
Cc: raetta.zadow@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-15 19:38:27+00:00
Subject: FW: Daily Measurement

The attached is a result of a phone call that I made to Rita to find out where we may have talked about daily measurement in the tariff just in case we need to explain this further to the Measurement Group.

Thanks,

Raetta

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bianchi, Rita  
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:11 AM
To:	Zadow, Raetta
Subject:	Daily Measurement


I looked at the tariff and talked to Mary Darveaux.  NNG must have true daily measured volumes, as opposed to a monthly measurement divided by days in the month, for several business reasons.

References to daily volumes and calculations are sprinkled throughout the tariff.
1.  For example, under the TF & TFX Rate Schedules, the tariff states that the MDQ (maximum daily quantity) is the firm service that NNG is obligated to provide on a daily basis.  We can't provide a daily service if we do not have daily measurements.
2.  Curtailment provisions in the tariff require DAILY measurement.
3.  DDVCs require accurate DAILY measurement.  DDVCs are a part of NNG's revenue.  Even if NNG were to bill on scheduled volumes at the beginning of the month, true-up to actuals would be required.  DDVCs would not disappear, they would simply move from the commodity billing to imbalance billing after measurement close.  Order 637 may change some aspects of DDVCs but it will not eliminate them or change the daily nature of the abuses DDVCs are designed to discourage.

Furthermore - 
1.  That's the way the gas transportation industry operates.  It may not be a GISB standard, but it is a fact of life.  
2.  Most contracts executed through EOL are for 1-2 days of service at a time.  Gas flowing at a point could vary significantly during the month and a point may be used by different parties at different times.  We can't just assume that the same amount flowed every day for everyone.
3.  Overrun charges are based on gas flows above the contract MDQ (Maximum DAILY Quantity) each day of the month.  Using an artificial, average daily measurement would mask overrun volumes (and reduce NNG revenue, since Overrun pays a higher rate than firm commodity).  A shipper could avoid paying overrun if it flowed below MDQ on some days and above on others.
4.  We have several contracts with volumetric provisions which cannot be accurately billed without DAILY measurements.  An example would be Utilicorp and all of its Taconite contracts.
5.  NNG is looking at moving to daily dollar-valued OBAs.  If NNG can't tell what is flowing on a daily basis, customers can game the system by pushing extra gas into the pipe on days when the price is lower and withdrawing it on other days when the price is slightly higher.  Gas prices can fluctuate considerably during the month.  Multiplied times a bcf of gas, even a fraction of a cent change adds up to real money.
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: raislerk@sullcrom.com, gilbergd@sullcrom.com
Date: 2000-01-17 10:31:00+00:00
Subject: West Power Customer Web SIte

Would you guys please take a look at this and let me know what sorts of 
restrictions you would suggest we try and put on these guys and what sorts of 
legal disclaimers/notices should be on the site?

Thanks,

Mark
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2000 10:29 
AM ---------------------------

Michael Etringer

01/14/2000 05:00 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: West Power Customer Web SIte

Mark,

As discussed, here is the URL for the proposed web site:   
http://ecthou-lndev1.nt.ect.enron.com/westpowernet.nsf/
It is still on an internal server which I hope you will have access to.  Let 
me know if it doesn't work.  

The User ID is: "user1"  and the Password is:  "test"  .

I also ran through several of the web sites from which we gather our 
information and did not run across the occurance of any copyright statements.

In terms of timing, we hope to release the site by the end of January to a 
limited customer listing.

Regards,
Mike Etringer
503-464-3836
From: kimberly.watson@enron.com
To: lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, mark.mcconnell@enron.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com, bill.rapp@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com
Cc: steven.harris@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-13 00:33:07+00:00
Subject: OBA Meeting with Joe Hartsoe

All,

Joe is able to meet with us at 10:00 Thursday, December 13 in EB1336 to discuss the OBA language as it relates to our ability to enforce dollar value, cash out and other provisions in the OBA with other intra and interstate pipelines.

Please plan to attend.

Thanks, Kim.
From: kathleen.carnahan@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-29 08:40:00+00:00
Subject: RE: FW: Revised form of Memorandum of Option

That would be wonderful!  I was looking at those online this weekend.  I used 
play pens all of the time for my children.

Thanks very much.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay  
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Carnahan, Kathleen
Subject: RE: FW: Revised form of Memorandum of Option

I have a pretty cool portable play pen you can have if you want.
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: lynn.aven@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-26 14:03:58+00:00
Subject: RE: Tunnel of Fundge?

Lunch sounds great!   Any time is good for me.  Just holler. Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Aven, Lynn  
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Tunnel of Fundge?

Sara:

Would you like to have lunch today?  If you are not available today we can set something up in the next week or two?

Lynn
From: vincent.strohmeyer@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Cc: john.cobb@enron.com, jerry.peters@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-08 19:01:04+00:00
Subject: FW: Price Curves

Sally,

In March of 1999, ETS companies, Northern Natural Gas (NNG) and Transwestern Pipeline Company (TW), signed Confidentiality Agreements with Enron Capital and Trade (ECT) for pricing information.  You were the signatory for ECT at that time.  These price curves are used by the pipelines for risk management purposes.  Currently, we are implementing a new risk system and would like the ability to use this system across all of ETS' pipes.  However, the Confidentiality Agreements do not permit us to share this information with any other companies.  I would appreciate any assistance you could provide in identifying the new person at ENA/EWS that would handle these duties currently.

Thanks

Vince Strohmeyer
713.853.6701
From: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To: tirwin@alleghenyenergy.com
Date: 2000-10-23 08:29:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ENRON -- Due Diligence

The water analysis that I sent you is for Gleason.  Over the weekend we put 
the other water analysis studies for the other plants on DealBench.  Please 
let me know if you have any other questions.  Thanks!
Ben
From: rod.hayslett@enron.com
Cc: rod.hayslett@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-17 10:24:00+00:00
Subject: Appointment Delegated - GPG B2B and Aspect Issues and Integrated
 Supplier initiative

LOCATION is EB46C1

Purpose is for persons with overall responsibility for B2B and Aspect to
1  hear from George and Morris on issues with B2B and Aspect  and help sketch 
out a path forward and timeframe to resolve the issues - 60 minutes
2  hear from Morris Brassfield on the Integrated Supplier initiative and help 
sketch out a path forward and time frame to implement - 30 minutes
From: sylvia.thomas@enron.com
To: sylvia.thomas@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-26 18:59:39+00:00
Subject: FILENET SYSTEM OUTAGE

The Envision System will be down beginning Friday, October 26th at 5:00pm and will remain unavailable for use until Sunday, October 28th, 2001 at 8:00 am 
This is being done to comply with the scheduled building power outage performed by TrizecHahn Office Properties. 
The Three Allen Center Building, where the Envision equipment is located, has scheduled their annual building electrical shutdown on October 27, 2001. 
The shutdown is required to perform preventive maintenance on the main switchgear and any necessary repairs to electrical panels, bus ducts, equipment, etc. 
Access to the building will not be allowed during this power outage.


Envision/EnCompass Support Team
Document Mgmt and Process Automation
713/853-1511 Opt 1
From: kay.chapman@enron.com
To: david.delainey@enron.com, philippe.bibi@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com, michael.brown@enron.com, rick.buy@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com, david.cox@enron.com, janet.dietrich@enron.com, w.duran@enron.com, jim.fallon@enron.com, ben.glisan@enron.com, joe.gold@enron.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com, james.hughes@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, michael.kopper@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com, dan.leff@enron.com, jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com, rob.milnthorp@enron.com, matthew.scrimshaw@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, marty.sunde@enron.com
Cc: kenneth.lay@enron.com, cliff.baxter@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com, ken.rice@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, kevin.hannon@enron.com, andrew.fastow@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, lou.pai@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com, drew.lynch@enron.com, robert.jones@enron.com, mary.joyce@enron.com, marla.barnard@enron.com, kalen.pieper@enron.com, gary.smith@enron.com, cindy.skinner@enron.com, andrea.yowman@enron.com, cindy.olson@enron.com, gina.corteselli@enron.com, elspeth.inglis@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-24 13:26:00+00:00
Subject: Peer Group Mapping

On May 10, 2001, a memo was sent out regarding "Peer Group Mapping".  This 
mapping is intended to illustrate from a functional view point where each 
activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

Please refer to the attached original memo, if you have not responded to 
David Oxley and have any comments 
please respond to him by May 25, 2001.

Dave Delainey



Following my note last week please find attached the consolidated peer group 
mapping for all business units. This mapping is intended to illustrate from a 
functional view point where each activity was placed at Year End 2000 VP PRC.

We were considering moving to a 3 Peer Group Structure however it as agreed 
at the last PRC Committee Meeting  to stay with the current structure since 
the data had been cleaned and everyone felt generally comfortable where most 
activities had been placed with the exception of just  2 or 3. It was agreed 
that we should concentrate on resolving these rather than undertaking an 
organization wide remapping excercise to consolidate to 3 Peer Groups. All 
functions/activities within the business units should now be reflected on the 
acttached. 

The actions points from this excercise are:

1 to review and agree the attached mapping 

2    consider and comment on highlighted groups that we have discussed in 
previous PRC meetings and ask for your comments or objections to moving them  
as indicated on the attachment.

3 invite your comments or questions on any other function that you consider 
questionable or requiring further explanation.

      Please return your comments to David Oxley by Friday May 25.

      To have this discussion now will save lengthy discussions in the final 
VP/MD PRC Meetings.  Definitions of the peer groups are also attached for 
your ease of
      reference.
From: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
To: oscar.cedeno@enron.com, dan.masters@enron.com, rick.sierra@enron.com
Cc: arthur.ransome@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-08 00:14:00+00:00
Subject: Eco Fuel Consumption

Oscar,

Per our conversation, the following are the fuel management team's assumptions of fuel requirements for Eco at 100% of capacity:

LNG   91,260 MMBtu/day at 507 MW    Heat Rate = 7500 BTU/kwh

LPG   1905 Metric Tons at 507 MW     Heat Rate = 7461 BTU/kwh    (Note: 522 gallons/MT   ,   91,300 Btu/gallon)

No.2   619,000 gallons/day at 465 MW   Heat Rate = 7313 BTU/kwh    (Note: 131,850 Btu/gallon)


Heat rates at less than 100% of capacity will be different from those at 100%. Check with Rick or Arthur regarding performance curves.

Call me if you have any additional questions.


Regards,

Paul
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: dana.bryant@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-20 18:28:57+00:00
Subject: RE: another question

Not a problem if the employee does not date it.  The issue of signature by the company that the agreement is not fully executed until it is signed by company.  MHC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bryant, Dana  
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 11:38 AM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	another question

Michelle,
I have run across a few agreements where the employee has signed the agreement but not dated it.  Is this something that could potentially be a problem?
I think that, for our (exec comp) purposes, the agreement is not actually in effect until it is signed by the person "offering" the terms.  Is this true?
Thank you

Dana
From: david.delainey@enron.com
To: barry.tycholiz@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-29 13:54:00+00:00
Subject: Pebble Beach Update

Guys, I'm not the sharing type  - book me in the Forest Room.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 
01:53 PM ---------------------------
From: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/29/2001 09:59 AM
To: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry 
Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Pebble Beach Update

These are the dates that we are going to graceland.  I suggest we arrive on 
Thursday evening and come back Sunday afternoon.  I'll now hand over the 
arrangements to Tycholiz Travel Co.

John Lavorato





Below is the availability of alternate rooms at the Inn at Spanish Bay for 
March 8-11, 2001:

Forest View Room @$425/night - some double queen size currently available.
Scenic View Room @ $475/night - no double accommodations available and single 
rooms are sold out.
Ocean View Room @$525/night - some double queen size currently available.

If you would like to pay by credit card, I will need the type of card, 
number, name & expiration date on the card.  Along with the credit card 
information, I will need to know the names of the other 3 people attending.

I have reserved golf for Friday, March 9th at 7:20 a.m. at Links at Spanish 
Bay and Saturday, March 10th at 12:00 p.m. at Pebble Beach Golf Links.

Room availability is tight so we should move on this as soon as possible.  
Please let me know how you would like to proceed with this event.
THANKS!
From: body.shop@enron.com
To: chris.hendrix@enron.com, ray.bennett@enron.com, otis.wathington@enron.com, george.nguyen@enron.com, rick.bachmeier@enron.com, jefferson.sorenson@enron.com, robert.wingenter@enron.com, martin.o'leary@enron.com, christopher.ducker@enron.com, kenneth.lay@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-12 16:33:00+00:00
Subject: Priority Locker Selection-Men's

In anticipation of re-opening, you have an opportunity to pre-select your new 
locker location.  All active Body Shop members who had a permanent locker at 
the time of the September 1st construction close have been given first 
consideration when selecting their new locker location before December 29th.  
 Priority will be given to member's original locker location (i.e. a member 
who requests their original locker area will be given priority for that 
space).  After this date lockers will be distributed to members on the 
waiting list and to member's with permanent lockers who request a different 
space from their original locker area.   For your convenience, a Body Shop 
enrolment and locker request table will be in the lobby from December 18th 
through January 5th between the hours of 11am - 1:30pm. 



Follow these simple steps to secure your locker location:
Open and review the attached Men's Locker Design template.
Select your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choice location preference.
Complete the Locker Selection Request Form.  
Complete and Sign the Locker Payroll Deduction Form.
Return all completed forms before December 29th to the Body Shop at EB1355, 
drop off at our offices on EB1372 or at the Body Shop Table in the lobby from 
December 18th through January 5th between the hours of 11am - 1:30pm.

You will receive an e-mail notifying you of your new locker location and 
locker combination prior to re-opening.  If you have any questions, please 
contact the Body Shop Front Desk at  x35547.
From: nick.politis@enron.com
To: richard.ring@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-28 15:41:29+00:00
Subject: RE: Unforced capacity credits

Thanks for that, I have a couple of other time periods for this same customer.  They are naturally long and I think I could work something out if you guys are natural buyers.  The other 2 periods are: Jun-Dec02 (starting one month later than your last quote)
The other period is the PJM planning year Jun02-May03.  The amount could be higher if that works for you guys.  Let me know if you want to do more than 100 MW and I will see what I can do.  Nick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard  
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Politis, Nick
Subject:	RE: Unforced capacity credits

Nick,

EESI would be bid at $48.00/MWD for 100MW's.

Thanks,

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Politis, Nick  
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:26 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Unforced capacity credits

This is a different counter-party that is looking to sell 50-100 MW from May-Dec02.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard  
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:25 AM
To:	Politis, Nick
Subject:	RE: Unforced capacity credits

Nick,

We already provided a bid ror Cal02 PJM UCAP.  Do you have another prospect for May-Dec02?  If so, what is the additonal quantity that you are talking about?



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Politis, Nick  
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 9:11 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	RE: Unforced capacity credits

I will try and get a response from my customer today, also is there interest downstairs for UCAP in PJM from May-Dec02?  Nick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ring, Richard  
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:20 AM
To:	Politis, Nick
Cc:	Misra, Narsimha
Subject:	RE: Unforced capacity credits

Nick,

I spoke to Narshima about this deal.  EESI would be bid at $46.00/MWD for Unforced Capacity Credits for Cal02.  Are you asking if we would have a bid for the energy as well?  If so, I would need to know the specific location for this generator (i.e. what point does this energy enter the PJM system).

Regards,

Richard

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Politis, Nick  
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:40 AM
To:	Ring, Richard
Subject:	Unforced capacity credits

Richard,

Did Narsimha have a bid for 20 MW of Unforced Capacity Credits in PJM for Cal02?  My customer would like to sell this as well as energy.  I need to show him a price this morning.  Nick
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: katie99@tamu.edu
Date: 2000-04-26 14:32:00+00:00
Subject: Survive?

Hi Katie,  How are you doing?  Did you survive all your projects and 
presentations?  Haven't heard from you in a while and just wanted to see if 
you made it through.  Hope everything is going OK.  

Gerald
From: customersatisfaction@etrade.com
To: joe.stepenovitch@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-22 12:43:00+00:00
Subject: E*Trade Account Services Feedback Survey

Dear E*Trade customer,

Thank you for opening your account with us recently.  To help us improve your 
service experience, we ask that you take a moment to give us your valuable 
input via this survey.  Your responses will be kept completely confidential 
and will be seen only by the department related to your customer service 
experience.

To complete the survey, simply click on the Web address below.

We appreciate your prompt response to our survey.

http://www.customercast.com/etrd0001a/survey.cgi?marker=aYVUZhJvPf79fZDvG%2ecB
NL5qpO2@Igqahmd&contactdate=Apr%205%202001&contacttimestamp=

Many thanks for your time and thoughtful feedback!

Tatia Ammerman
Quality Management
E*Trade
From: anita.luong@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com, beth.apollo@enron.com
Cc: kenneth.thibodeaux@enron.com, chris.abel@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-05 09:38:00+00:00
Subject: Schedule C

Attached is the preliminary Schedule C as of March 30, 2001.   A new Schedule 
C will follow as the information is updated.

Thanks
Anita 
36753
From: mark.schroeder@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-10 18:39:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Appreciate your help

fyi.   mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 10/07/2000 
18:41 ---------------------------


Sanjay Bhatnagar@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/07/2000 18:09
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT 

Subject: Re: Appreciate your help  

Jane: Ditto on the views Wade expressed. On the MSEB front, I would like to 
ensure that you are personally making sure that the MSEB review petition 
final form goes in with ur full consent. Enlist Kohli or Gurunath's help in 
this.


   
	enron india
	
	From:  Wade Cline                           07/08/2000 04:58 AM
	

To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT 
Subject: Appreciate your help

Jane,

I know your schedule is very busy, as is mine. This means we don't get to 
talk much and catch up. I just want you to know that we really appreciate 
your help on the many fronts you are fighting, including MSEB/MERC, Metgas, 
LNG shipping policy, Electricity Act 2000, Derivatives trading, etc. It is a 
great comfort to know that we have someone dedicated to this function who 
brings so much personal history and knowledge as well as access to the larger 
Enron regulatory family.

I get very positive feedback from all who interact with you, both internally 
and externally. Keep up the good work.

Wade
From: outlook.team@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-27 23:02:00+00:00
Subject: Call Log Recap/ Conf:  EB4102 D. Scott, J. Buchanan, S. Nacey
 Ava/35842

CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Call Log Recap/ Conf:  EB4102 D. Scott, J. Buchanan, S. Nacey Ava/35842

Date:		3/30/2001
Time:		3:30 PM - 4:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:
From: ricardo.charvel@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-08 14:53:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Secretary Martens to meet with Ken Lay

FYI
----- Forwarded by Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron on 02/08/2001 02:44 PM -----

	Max Yzaguirre
	02/07/2001 09:27 AM
		
		 To: Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Secretary Martens to meet with Ken Lay

Ricardo:

Please call me ASAP to discuss this meeting.  I am very concerned that our 
regulatory strategy is getting separated from our commercial objectives.  For 
a meeting of this type, I think it would be far more beneficial for Ken to 
talk about specific commercial objectives than just having a general 
discussion (which, as you know, wouldn't be what Martens would be seeking).  
What is the agenda?  Is there a briefing book for Ken?  If so, what does it 
say about our projects and project initiatives?

Max





	Ricardo Charvel
	02/06/2001 08:54 AM
		 
		 To: myzagui@ect.enron.com, Jaime Alatorre/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Secretary Martens to meet with Ken Lay

Max, Jaime,
I have been coordinating a possible visit of Secretary Martens to Ken Lay in 
Houston.  The initial agreement was that the Secretary would meet with Mr. 
lay on Mionday Feb. 12 at 9:00 a.m.   Nevertheless since Martens has to see 
President Fox on the 12th, he is requesting to see Mr. Lay on Sunday Feb. 
11th in the afternoon.

Secretary Marten's is interested in having this meeting before Feb. 16th 
which is when Presidents Bush and Fox are meeting in Guanajuato.  

President Fox has been making statements with respect to having a common 
energy policy with North America and about electricity and gas infrastructure 
interconnections ( Max, he almost said from The Yukon to Yucatan) and Martens 
wants to listen to Mr. Lay's opinion and build some good will there.

I will let you know if the meeting is confirmed and when it will take place.

Best,

Ricardo
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: ena.employees@enron.com, ees_employees@enron.com, gas.operations@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-30 18:50:00+00:00
Subject: SAP Expense Report Form

With the implementation of SAP, the employee expense report form has been 
modified to reflect the new coding system.  The procedures for its use are 
unchanged, but there are some cosmetic differences.  One item to note: the 
form no longer requires entry of your Social Security Number; instead use 
your new personnel number assigned through Human Resources (see 
http://hrweb.enron.com).  For electronically submitted expense reports, enter 
the same number on the receipt envelope.

The form is now available at the SAP website.  To access the form:

 From the Enron home page, go to the SAP intranet site http://sap.enron.com
 Choose one of the following paths:
 Click on Quick Reference Tools on the left menu
  Click drop-down arrow for Accounts Payable Forms
  Click SAP Expense Report Form

  Click on Forms and Procedures Library on the left menu
  Click drop-down arrow for Accounts Payable Forms
  Click SAP Expense Report Form
 Wait for it to load
 Click Enable Macros (or Yes, allow macros)

After you enter the data, save as Excel Workbook (.xls file extension) with a 
new filename.  Do not save as Excel Template (.xlt extension).

You may print the spreadsheet for submission to Accounts Payable, or attach 
it to Notes for electronic submission.  Instructions are available at the 
website, on the same drop down box as the form.

If you have any questions, contact the Center of Expertise (COE) at 713 
345-7427.
From: richard.costigan@asm.ca.gov
Date: 2001-05-09 07:58:00+00:00
Subject: Energy Briefing paper for Wednesday, May 9th

 <<5-09-01.pdf>>
Richard Costigan, III
Chief of Staff
Office of the Assembly Republican Leader
California State Assembly
Phone:(916) 319-2005




 - 5-09-01.pdf
From: matt.motsinger@enron.com
To: a..shankman@enron.com, jennifer.burns@enron.com, david.forster@enron.com
Cc: torrey.moorer@enron.com, adam.johnson@enron.com, deboisblanc.denny@enron.com, sheri.thomas@enron.com, simone.la@enron.com, andy.zipper@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-04 21:27:49+00:00
Subject: Global Products Report for 4-3-01


Do not update links when opening this file.

 

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Matt Motsinger
x35221
EnronOnline
From: rebecca.cantrell@enron.com
To: steve.walton@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, leslie.lawner@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Cc: phillip.allen@enron.com, barry.tycholiz@enron.com, stephanie.miller@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-01 10:21:00+00:00
Subject: Breaking News : Williams Ordered to Pay $8 Million Refund to
 Cal-ISO

From Natural Gas Intelligence:

Breaking News : Williams Ordered to Pay $8 Million Refund to Cal-ISO 
posted 10:05 AM (CST) May 1, 2001 


Williams Energy Marketing & Trading has been ordered by FERC to refund $8 
million to the California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO) and has had a 
"prospective condition" placed on its authority to sell power at market-based 
rates for a year as part of a stipulation and consent agreement.

The agreement, which FERC approved Monday, was in response to a mid-March 
order that directed Williams Energy and AES Southland Inc. to show cause why 
they shouldn't be found in violation of the Federal Power Act (FPA) for 
allegedly engaging in actions that drove up prices in the California bulk 
power market and potentially compromised the reliability of the transmission 
gid. The two companies entered into the agreement with FERC's Market 
Oversight and Enforcement Section to resolve all the issues in the show-cause 
order [IN0I-3-001].

Specifically, the agreement calls for Williams to refund $8 million of the 
$10.85 million in additional revenues it received when two AES generation 
units, designated as reliability must-run (RMR) units, failed to provide 
immediate service to the Cal-ISO in April and May. The ISO was forced to call 
upon other non-RMR units and pay a much higher price (near or at $750/MWh) to 
Williams. Williams is the exclusive marketer for power from the two AES 
plants at issue --- AES Alamitos LLC and AES Huntington Beach LLC in Southern 
California. The Commission also conditioned Williams' market-based authority 
such that it will have to bear the financial cost of replacement power if a 
RMR unit is unavailable at any time over the next year.

Significantly, the agreement does not find that either Williams or AES abused 
their market power in California. It rejected the California Public Utilities 
Commission's request to impose penalties --- over and above refunds --- on 
the companies. Moreover, the agreement does not put an end to the "formal, 
non-public investigation" that FERC ordered in mid-March into violations 
arising out of the conduct of Williams and AES.
From: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-17 17:21:00+00:00
Subject: Fee changes for Bloomberg

Kate I will have to submit a code change to our Enpower guys to reflect the 
$15.00 flat fee change for 1 or 2 days deals.  Currently this can't be coded 
based on the duration of these deals because we currently have a code for 
daily deals(meaning 1 day only) and a code for short term deals ( meaning 
anything 1 day or more but less than 1 month) and a code for long term deals 
(meaning anything more than 1 month).   If the fee was per mw, I could simply 
go and edit the broker table fee but since this is a flat fee, the codes have 
to be adjusted to reflect such.

I have submitted a request and I am waiting on a response.  I will keep you 
updated.


Evelyn
From: h..foster@enron.com
To: .ward@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-07 19:53:52+00:00
Subject: FW: Smurfit-Stone



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Tracy  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:40 AM
To:	Foster, Chris H.
Cc:	Malowney, John; Ward, Kim S (Houston); Williams, Jason R (Credit); Rance, Susan; Sonnonstine, Max
Subject:	FW: Smurfit-Stone

Will advise as to any netting benefits we may get regarding gas/power deals with Smurfit.  For now, the gas team does not want to take on any incremental risk with Smurfit from the physical gas perspective.

We can still look at case-by-case physical power deals with EPMI given the collateral that we're holding.

Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sonnonstine, Max  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 11:34 AM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	Smurfit-Stone

Tracy,
	Talked to Tanya regarding the long deal for SSCC and relayed to her your suggestion for handling gas.  She is ok with managing both gas and power through EPMI as long as legal is on board and all necessary EPMI docs are in place or amended (netting, physical gas), and that we are comfortable with the receivables risk to SSCC.  She actually mentioned that there has been discussions about merging EPMI and ENA into one entity to more properly handle net positions, so she seems to like your idea.  
	With that, I guess I'll pass this deal and legal relationship onto you unless you need or want me to help with any of this.  

Thanks,
Max
From: cshulock@arb.ca.gov
To: e.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-19 18:46:11+00:00
Subject: Re: Certified ZEVs

No I will not have info today.  Getting the numbers is turning out to be more complicated than I thought.

"Taylor, Michael E" wrote:

> Chuck,
>
> Any chance those numbers will be available today?  (The number of ZEV
> credits earned by each manufacturer.)
>
> Sincerely,
> Michael Taylor
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Shulock [mailto:cshulock@arb.ca.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:43 AM
> To: Taylor, Michael E
> Subject: Certified ZEVs
>
> Attached is spreadsheet that shows currently certified ZEVs.  Please
> note that although the Corbin Sparrow is listed, it is not eligible to
> earn ZEV credit because it is not a "passenger car" under California
> law.
>
> I am tracking down the info regarding credits already earned by
> manufacturers.
> --
> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian
> needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For
> a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy
> cost, see our web site at http://www.arb.ca.gov
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************

--
The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian
needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For
a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy
cost, see our web site at http://www.arb.ca.gov
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: frank.bay@enron.com, robert.jones@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-14 09:20:00+00:00
Subject: CIBC World Markets - Daily Teletimes

You guys are making us and our shareholders rich.  I hope you are having fun 
doing it.  Keep up the good work!  DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/14/2000 
09:18 AM ---------------------------


FYI, a daily report put out by CIBC illustrating their view on the emerging 
market...

Daily Teletimes  CIBC World Markets

We had a very informative meeting with Enron,s management yesterday--Jeff 
Skilling, CEO of Enron (ENE - Buy) as well as Ken Rice, CEO of Enron 
Communications and their Software VP, David Berberian and others. Enron has 
built out a substantial fiber network and begun to make substantial moves 
towards developing a bandwidth trading market.  We don,t believe that a lot 
of telecom investors understand how well thought out and agressive Enron 
plans on being in this market.  It appears that Enron is now planning to 
articulate its strategy- specifically at their investor conference on January 
20th in New York.  While details will have to wait until the 20th, Enron is 
essentially aiming to build a gateway tieing in all the major long-distance 
networks, guaranteeing premium quality and pricing in doing so (i.e. a  
&Network of Networks8).  While ENE does plan to use its own network to carry 
traffic, it plans to focus largely on seamlessly integrating capacity bought 
on other carriers networks.  Operationally, this boils down to a very smart 
switching system that gives customers the capabilities and reliability of a 
single network at the front-end while integrating capacity sourced from 
multiple networks on the back end, creating more robust overall transport 
capabilities.  ENE believes that this integration of multiple networks will 
offer greater path diversity, reliability, and efficiency than any 
single-network solution.  We note that Enron,s multi-sourcing approach is 
tailor-made to foster the development of a robust capacity trading market (as 
discussed in our recent bandwidth trading report).  Given Enron,s dominance 
of the electricity and natural gas markets, we believe that there is no 
better positioned company to create and capitalize on such a market in 
bandwidth.   While we await further details, we did leave the meeting with a 
much greater understanding of and confidence in ENE,s overall telecom 
strategy.  We believe that their telecom business could create tens of 
billions of dollars of shareholder value if ENE executes well.  We recommend 
that telecom investors make an effort to attend the Jan. 20 meeting. 

Tim Horan 212-667-5459
From: london.brown@enron.com
To: raymond.bowen@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, mary.perkins@enron.com
Cc: john.sherriff@enron.com, ted.murphy@enron.com, treasa.kirby@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-07 12:01:09+00:00
Subject: Entergy- koch

Guys , I have just been told that pursuant to the terms of our agreement with Entergy - Koch we are obliged to provide them with a letter of credit ( to replace an existing one which expires ) for ?20m today ( by midnight ) or we will be in default - giving them the right to close out . I understand that it is not possible to provide an LC so we will need to cash collateralise them . We will either need to give them $ today or ? tommorrow ( when we will technically be in default , but they seem to be fairly relaxed ) . Can you let me know how you would prefer to manage this ASAP . Louise / Ray , John or I will give you a call when you get in .
Thanks
Michael