Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: susan.scott@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-02 14:03:00+00:00
Subject: Gallup answers

Here is the quick & dirty.

None of the Gallup contracts contain a shipper out if the facilities are not 
placed in service by a certain date.  The respective obligations of the 
parties do not commence until the facilities are "tested and placed in 
service."  We notified our shippers by telephone yesterday that the 
facilities were in service.  The compressor has since been taken down because 
of excessive vibration and an unusual whining noise of undetermined origin.  
EE&CC does not know how long it will take to correct the problems; they do 
not have enough information yet to even give an estimate.  Based on our 
experience with Hubbard, it could take months to correct the problem.  Today, 
we've been able to deliver all nominated gas simply because noms did not 
exceed our existing capacity.  Nominations are expected to exceed existing 
capacity this week, in which case we will have to allocate.

Given the uncertainty involved, from a PR standpoint I believe it would be 
best to tell the customers that because of unforeseen circumstances we are 
not in service after all, that we apologize for the mistake and will do our 
best to provide service on a daily or interruptible basis.    When the 
compressor is actually tested and really in service, we'll let them know.  
The downside:  we get no reservation charge at all.  (estimated loss:  
$25,000/month)
The upside:  in the long run we probably save face with our customers.

From a short-term economic standpoint, the better choice appears to be not to 
revoke our "in-service" announcement.  When summer weather kicks in, we'll 
probably have to allocate every day.  On our EBB we will have to give some 
reason for the allocation (or if we don't, shippers will demand an 
explanation anyway).  Shippers' rights to a reservation refund will be 
triggered.  
The downside:  shippers will never trust us again.  Also, we could be subject 
to fraud or related causes of action for representing the compressor was "in 
service" when we knew it was not.  
The upside:  on the off chance no one files a lawsuit and wins, we might at 
least get to keep some of the reservation charges owed us, to the extent 
deliveries don't fall below 75% of nominated quantities for a period of 
longer than 75 days in months other than July and August this summer.  (In 
July and August, we don't get any reservation charge for amounts not 
delivered).  We just need to keep in mind that normally the pipeline runs 
full in the summer months, and Gallup capacity was sold with that assumption 
in mind.

Haven't had time to do a formal write-up; if you want me to turn this into a 
memo for wider distribution, let me know.  For now, I think it's important to 
get a decision on one of the above options.  The longer we wait to get 
information to our shippers, the bigger our customer relations problem will 
be.
From: amr.ibrahim@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com
Cc: james.steffes@enron.com, lisa.yoho@enron.com, alberto.levy@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-18 16:33:00+00:00
Subject: RAC Meeting for May 18th, 2001

Rick:
Four new projects have been added to the list of the hot deals for May 18, 
2001.  They--and their suggested action items--are as follows:

 Project  Originator  Description        
 GFU   Maria Foster  10 Year physical gas purchase ($11m) - Norway

 Suggested Action Item:  Communicate findings to Europe (Paul Hennemeyer - 
Philip Davies) and compile GA comments for RAC, if any.
   
EES:
 Ownes Corning  Maureen Palmer Structure Credit (TBD)
 Suggested Action Item:  None. 

EWS:
Leaf River   George McCormick Acquisition of SBSK pulp mill 
Jupiter    Mike Beyer  Sale of Equity ($24.4)
 Suggest Action Item:  Communicate findings to J. Steffes, and Lisa Yoho and 
compile GA comments for RAC, if any.


                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                                              
                                                      Please let me know if 
you have any question or suggestion.

Brgrds

AI
3-3037
From: matt.allsup@enron.com
To: kurt.anderson@enron.com
Cc: bo.thisted@enron.com, hollis.kimbrough@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com
Date: 2002-05-20 08:41:00+00:00
Subject: Desert Sky Curtailment April 2002

Kurt,
I have attached the April Log with some corrections to the curtailments.  The 
lines I shaded blue are typing errors that I fixed.  These will account for 
the negative hours and the turbines with no data. 

 The turbines that are showing hours but no production must be a result of a 
SCADA data acquisition problem.  These entries I shaded in red.  I started 
looking through the list in the April Log but I could not find any errors on 
our side, so you may have to base the lost production on what a particular 
turbines' neighbor produced or lost.  

Call me if you have any questions.

Matt
--------------------- Forwarded by Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron on 05/20/2002 10:21 
AM ---------------------------


Bo Thisted
05/20/2002 06:01 AM
To: Matt Allsup/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Desert Sky Curtailment April 2002

Matt,
Please take a look at this as soon as possible this morning. It appears that 
you may have some entries where the operator used the 12 hour clock instead 
of th 24 hour clock. There are many rows where a turbine is curtailed but the 
way the time is recorded makes it come out with zero production. Call me if 
you need help.

Bo
---------------------- Forwarded by Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron on 05/20/2002 08:14 
AM ---------------------------


Kurt Anderson
05/17/2002 02:36 PM
To: Bo Thisted/EWC/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Desert Sky Curtailment April 2002

Please call me, thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron on 05/17/2002 
02:49 PM ---------------------------


Mark Fisher
05/17/2002 01:26 PM
To: Kurt Anderson/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Desert Sky Curtailment April 2002

Kurt,

I'm attaching the generated spreadsheet. There are a few problems. Scanning 
through it it appears the site personnel entered some times backwards so 
there were a few negative durations with 0 kWh predicted productions. I also 
do not know what is causing the other 0 kWh productions (it might be low 
wind, or there might be some other problem).

There was a 90.9% data recovery. The predicted production for the month was 
45929604 kWh, the production lost due to curtailment was 21780739 kWh which 
after 97% availability and 2% line loss becomes 20704770 kWh.

Due to the many curtailments at the site this program takes a lot of time 
(today it ran for 2 hours). 

Mark
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: kimberly.brown@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-28 19:26:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Passwords For the move

ID cgerman 
Pword clg03mar


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Kimberly Brown                           03/28/2000 02:12 PM
	

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F 
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea 
Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris 
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate 
Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen 
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bhavna 
Pandya/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Passwords For the move

Please forward me your passwords for the upcoming move.  I will be coming in 
over the weekend to test your workstations.

Thank you
From: jeff.forbis@enron.com
To: richard.zdunkewicz@enron.com
Cc: james.bouillion@enron.com, paul.clayton@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, james.harris@enron.com, richard.jones@enron.com, cheryl.brashier@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-03 10:32:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Risk Profile and Liability Mitigation Product

Cheryl - 

Please include me in follow up meeting.

Thanks,

Jeff


   
	Enron Energy Services
	
	From:  Richard L Zdunkewicz                           05/03/2001 09:56 AM
	

To: James L Bouillion/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Clayton/Enron@EnronXGate, Vince 
J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: James Harris/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Forbis/HOU/EES@EES, Richard B 
Jones/HOU/EES@EES, Cheryl Brashier/HOU/EES@EES 
Subject: Risk Profile and Liability Mitigation Product

Please find attached a Scope of Services document and a list of projects 
which have been implemented with current EES customers.  The Scope of 
Services document is designed to show the types of projects, operations and 
maintenance, and facilities management services that EESO typically offers to 
its customers based on their industry segment.  The projects and services 
offered are very similar across segments and customers, but their level of 
deployment varies significantly from segment to segment.  

Certain segments were grouped together because the EESO offering would 
feature similar assets and services.
SIC Codes were given for each segment to represent the types of customers 
that comprise each segment. 
The list of projects represents general categories from which more specific 
projects will be tailored to fit the clients needs.  This project list 
represents assets that have been approved by the DSM Desk and was queried 
from PCCS.
The Operations and Maintenance services can be applied to any energy-related 
assets and was compiled from term sheets and IAM.  Generally those activities 
have been limited to a few industrial outsourcing deals including Springs, 
Polaroid and recently Eli Lilly.
Facilities Management is usually outsourced via IPT or through the adoption 
of existing vendor contracts and can involve repair and maintenance for all 
assets.   Generally this type of activity has been focused on the retail/real 
estate segment.





Cheryl, pls set up a meeting with Harris, Clayton, Bouillion, Jones and 
Kaminski to discuss this and an action plan to develop a liability mitigation 
product.  I will re-present the original product concept at the meeting.  
Would like to see the meeting take place late next week.

Thanks.

Richard
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, c..williams@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, andrew.wu@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, jeremy.blachman@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-10 17:08:16+00:00
Subject: FW: DIRECT ACCESS SUSPENSION LETTER


FYI.  Utility recent submissions to PUC regarding DASR process under 09.20.01 DA suspension.

Best,
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:41 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail); Sue Mara (E-mail)
Subject: FW: DIRECT ACCESS SUSPENSION LETTER




-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer.Tsao@sce.com [mailto:Jennifer.Tsao@sce.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:24 AM
To: pxo2@pge.com; PSzymanski@sempra.com; 'Dian M. Grueneich'; JBennett
Subject: DIRECT ACCESS SUSPENSION LETTER


Below is a copy of the letter that SCE sent to the Energy Division last
Thursday.

Peter/Paul -- Can you forward me a copy of what PG&E and SDG&E sent as
well?  Thanks.


Jennifer M. Tsao
Senior Attorney
Southern California Edison
G.O. 1, Room 345
phone:  626-302-6819
fax:  626-302-2050
----- Forwarded by Jennifer Tsao/SCE/EIX on 10/09/01 11:01 AM -----
 

                    Jeanne Smith

                                         To:     Jennifer Tsao/SCE/EIX@SCE

                    10/09/01             cc:

                    10:21 AM             Subject:     DIRECT ACCESS
SUSPENSION LETTER     
 

 



                                                                 
 (Embedded                                                       
 image moved   (Embedded image moved to file: pic22208.pcx)      
 to file:                                                        
 pic09399.pcx)  FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY                            
                                                                 
                                                                 




(See attached file: 10-4-01 DA Suspension Ltr (E-mail).doc)



Jeanne Smith
Southern California Edison
San Francisco Office
(415) 929-5514 / PAX 2-6714
Fax: (415) 673-1116
From: evelyn.metoyer@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-03 12:12:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Deal 483771.01

O.K. you can change the date.


---------------------- Forwarded by Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron on 01/03/2001 
12:07 PM ---------------------------
Stephanie Piwetz @ ECT   01/03/2001 12:11 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Re: Deal 483771.01


---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT on 01/03/2001 
12:08 PM ---------------------------
   Kate Symes                01/03/2001 11:44 AM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Deal 483771.01  

I'm sorry my reply is so delayed - I was gone for the New Year holiday. This 
deal should have been entered on 12/19. It looks like it's still in there as 
12/20; but I wanted to check with you before changing it. Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate


Stephanie Piwetz   12/22/2000 10:40 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Deal 483771.01

Kate-

Mike Swerzbin deal 
483771.01  we have trade date in system as 12/20/00
prebon sends confirm over with trade date 12/19/00.   
they cannot check into it again til Monday, there brokers are gone. 
maybe we can check on our sidein the meantime.
thanks Stephanie
From: matt.smith@enron.com
To: chris.hyde@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-15 16:58:00+00:00
Subject: new meters

Ok Chris.  this is it.  Three tabs each with NEW meters to add to the 
database with unique identifiers.  The third tab has four points that need 
IHS numbers assigned.  These four should be assigned to the Questar 
pipeline.  Thanks.

Mat
From: mike.grigsby@enron.com
To: craig.breslau@enron.com
Cc: kimberly.olinger@enron.com, kim.ward@enron.com, patti.sullivan@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-03 18:16:00+00:00
Subject: CA endusers

Craig,

Did you ever follow up with Kim Ward and the desk on the contract language 
for the deal or deals you did with CA endusers?  We need to make certian that 
the customers are signed to the correct contract for balancing, etc.  Please 
get with me to discuss.

Mike Grigsby
From: karen.denne@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-14 16:20:00+00:00
Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO
 ORDER CONSUMER

fyi... transcript of Gov. Davis' remarks in San Diego today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000 
04:19 PM ---------------------------


"sandra" <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 11/14/2000 04:02:48 PM
Please respond to "Sandra Yamane" <SYamane@marathon-com.com>
To: <karen.denne@enron.com>, Windows@marathon-com.com, 
Windows@marathon-com.com
cc:  

Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO 
ORDER CONSUMER




 - GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO ORDER 
CONSUMER REFUNDS AND PRICE CAPS.htm
From: jane.wilson@enron.com
Cc: mark.metts@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-28 12:15:00+00:00
Subject: Confidential issues

As requested, I investigated potential government approvals or potential 
political interventions if India assets/investments are sold.  My 
understanding from the India CFO (in response to my query about approvals 
necessary for any sell-down like we are working on for Dabhol) is that it 
depends to whom we sell.  If we sell to an Indian company, then the Reserve 
Bank of India (RBI) must approve taking dollars out of India.  If a sale is 
made outside India, no Indian approvals are necessary.  There are, however, 
many other approvals that would need to be obtained -- specifically from 
lenders and counterparties pursuant to project documents.  I have not 
analyzed these financial-related approvals.
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-15 14:43:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001041515.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL



---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  10.00 / Final:   9.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: leslie.hansen@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-15 10:25:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ECSC - Market Energy Price language

Thanks for your help yesterday.  Sorry about the quick turnaround.




	Leslie Hansen
	12/14/2000 12:28 PM
		 
		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: ECSC - Market Energy Price language

Gerald:

Attached please find my proposed revisions to the Transaction Agreement for 
the ECS/EES transaction to address the Market Energy Price calculation.  
Sorry it took me a little longer than I anticipated.

Give me a call if you have any questions.

Leslie
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: sylvia.sauseda@enron.com
Date: 1999-05-26 11:38:00+00:00
Subject: Lateral Files for EB 38, IP99 413 0005 0446

Per our conversation...thanks for your help!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/26/99 11:38 AM 
---------------------------


Robin Pressler
05/25/99 04:46 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dolores Sustaita/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ortiz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat 
Scarborough/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Lateral Files for EB 38, IP99 413 0005 0446

Tana,

I have received the quote for the new files for your area.  The 5-drawer 
files are $682 each and the 2-drawers are $362 each for a total of $5,948 
(includes tax).  If you want me to proceed with the order, please send me an 
authorizing email.  Also, I still need to know how you would like the 
cabinets to be keyed: all alike, split by banks (by groups) or individually, 
or a combination of the last two options.  I can submit this purchase order 
now without this information, but will need that shortly.

I will be out of May 26-28, so if you have any questions, please contact Pat 
Scarborough (x35368).

Robin
From: cheryl.nelson@enron.com
To: eric.tipp@enron.com
Cc: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-14 09:22:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Legal Agreement Status from Aneela

We will have an update by tomorrow morning.  Off hand, I will have the 
following agreements signed/executed by the end of the day or early tomorrow: 
Raymond James, Robertson Stephens, & J.P. Morgan Electronic Agreement.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3880D
(713) 345-4693



	Eric Tipp
	03/14/2001 08:12 AM
		 
		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Legal Agreement Status from Aneela

Sara,

Here's the updated status report as of the 5th.  



I realize Cheryl has been working on some of this.  I would appreciate it if 
your group could update the list as far as status is concerned and send the 
file back to me.

Thanks,
Aneela
From: dave.perrino@enron.com
To: jose.bestard@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, charles.yeung@enron.com, steve.walton@enron.com, l..nicolay@enron.com, .andy@enron.com
Cc: richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-20 18:30:21+00:00
Subject: RE: NERC Meeting Notes - Nov14-16

Joes,

Thanks for the note.  My only comment would be in relation to the resource adequacy discussion - watch this one, I believe that NERC is trying to promote a nation-wide ICAP.

Kind Regards,

Dave

Happy Thanksgiving!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bestard, Jose  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:19 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Walton, Steve; Nicolay, Christi L.; Perrino, Dave; Andy Rodriquez (E-mail)
Cc:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	NERC Meeting Notes - Nov14-16


See Attachment

	 << File: JB- Notes NERC Nov 2001 Meetings.doc >>
From: karen.buckley@enron.com
To: m..forney@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-24 15:07:55+00:00
Subject: RE: Ruben Lorenzo

Thanks John.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Forney, John M.  
Sent:	Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:56 AM
To:	Buckley, Karen
Subject:	Ruben Lorenzo



I have spoken with Ruben this morning.    He is currently working in Structuring for Sempra,  focusing on the Ercot retail market.    Additionally,  he has worked for the California PX.    This and his educational background would have me recommend scheduling an interview with this applicant.


JFORNEY
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com, kevin.presto@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-10 16:40:00+00:00
Subject: EPMI response to FERC investigation--East

Attached are EPMI's responses to the FERC investigation of the bulk power 
markets in the East..  The "summprob" docs highlight examples of 
discriminatory practices and other problems with the OATT rules for trading 
and interconnection activities.  FERC staff asked for similar responses from 
10 power marketers and plans to use the information in the aggregate in in 
its report to the Commission, due Nov. 1.
From: kevin.presto@enron.com
To: john.lavorato@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-03 14:50:00+00:00
Subject: Prudency C

Now that the accrual book is fresh on your mind, I would like to propose the 
following for Schedule C prudency:

1)  Monetize $20 million of the 2001 accrual gas position to be utilized for 
the following Schedule C prudency accounts:

$10 million against the JEA (Northern Florida) short position (170,000 MWh's 
on-peak).   We have mid-marketers attempting to buy energy for 01 and 02 in 
FL, however, the market is extremely tight with no competitive offers.   The 
JEA position is covered with FPL non-firm power, therefore, we are exposed to 
on-peak price volatility due to FPL economic curtailment during load 
management periods.
$3 million against the VEPCO market-based call option with a look back audit 
on pricing.  This deal is an absolute pain in the ass because we are forced 
to quote a price to VEPCO that is representative of an actual transaction at 
reasonable prices with a rationale counterparty in the SE market.  They can 
call on the MW daily, weekly, or monthly.   We can lose as much as $2-3 
million/yr on this BS position due to the logistical issues and look back 
audit rights that VEPCO has.
$2 million against the MJMUC (inside Associated Electric Coop) 40 MW 7x24 
short position in a transmission constrained market area with absolutely no 
liquidity.  We have this position marked against the Entergy curves, however, 
physical delivery is a major issue which creates curtailment (and LD$) 
uncertainty.
$5 million against the OPPD 110 MW daily shaped call (with hourly 
flexibility) that is nearly impossible to hedge cleanly.   OPPD is in 
Southern MAPP (Nebraska) and delivery risks are significant.  The total deal 
is in our books at negative $25 million (10/2/00 curves) and we potentially 
have an additional $5 million of exposure due to illiquid nature of MAPP, 
scalar risk, and physical delivery risk.

We have several other customer deals that have hair, however, they are 
generally more manageable from a physical delivery standpoint.   Each of the 
deals above are in illiquid markets with delivery problems and scheduling 
flexibility for the counterparty that is incosistent with the current power 
trading market.   For these generic reasons and the specific issues outlined 
above, I am recommending Schedule C prudency for the amounts indicated 
above.  
From my standpoint, it is prudent and appropriate to use $20 million from gas 
accrual gains to finance these prudency positions.

Let me know your thoughts.  Thanks.
From: martin.cuilla@enron.com
To: richard.tomaski@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-17 19:14:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Intra-day call service at PGL

yep i agree

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tomaski, Richard  
Sent:	Monday, September 17, 2001 2:13 PM
To:	Cuilla, Martin
Subject:	Intra-day call service at PGL


Martin,

I wanted to verify with you the transactions done to date.  Let me know if you agree

9/8	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/9	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/10	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/13	50,000		$0.10		$5,000

Total to date			           $20,000
From: darron.giron@enron.com
To: russell.diamond@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-22 09:24:00+00:00
Subject: West Books

Russell,

These are all of our book names:

GD-NEW
GD-NEWJR
FT-WEST
FT-NORTHWEST
MGMT-WEST
WEST-NW
WEST-SW
WEST-PERM
WEST-SJ

For Basis, add  -BAS to the end of the book name.  For Gas Daily, add  -GDL 
to the end of the book name.  Call me if you have any questions.

DG    3-9573
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Date: 2001-04-23 12:55:00+00:00
Subject: RE: How's your back???

Why don't you get a hamster or something like that.   You know my woman has a 
cat - he likes sleeping on my firm, rockhard stomach when I watch TV.





"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:41:55 PM
To: "'Chris.Germany@enron.com'" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: RE: How's your back???


I planted 50 plus flowers this weekend in my flower boxes. They look so
pretty. I hope I don't kill them. I'm going to find me some kittens in the
next few weeks. I'm lonely without Miss Muffy. Cindy Vachuska is coming to
visit me in two weekends. I'm taking May 4th off.. we are going to do some
museums, day to the eastern shore, and baltimore's inner harbor.

Bidweek is such a joy!!! We are suppose to be back online with y'all... so
they say.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Germany@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 1:31 PM
To: joni.veselack@neg.pge.com
Subject: Re: How's your back???



How sweet.  Its doing ok.  A better question is "how's the lovelife?".
That's doing ok too - although I wish I could find the perfect woman.  Mine
is wanting to take some trips - Maine, New York, EUROPE!!!!!

What's up with you girl?




"Veselack, Joni" <joni.veselack@neg.pge.com> on 04/23/2001 12:13:11 PM

To:   "'Chris Germany'" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  How's your back???


See.... I'm being nice and not asking any other questions.

Hope you're doing okay.


PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: o'neal.winfree@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-13 17:31:00+00:00
Subject: Flag Football Schedule

---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/13/2000 05:31 PM 
---------------------------


Brian Hoskins
09/07/2000 01:04 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, bthoskins@hotmail.com, Luis.Mena@enron.com, 
Amir_Ahanchian@enron.net, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy 
Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth 
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lenine 
Jeganathan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Flag Football Schedule

Heat,

I have good news and bad news.  The bad news is that Danny Campbell, our 
esteemed Enron Flag Football President, left the company and forgot to
tell us that our first game was...last night.  So we forfeited our first 
game.  The good news is that it was against the Raiders, and we probably 
wouldn't
have won anyway.  

Here is the schedule.  Enron's Team 3 is probably not going to play, so this 
means that we'll have some open dates unless they decide to reschedule.
Take note that we're playing in the City League again this fall, but the 
location has changed.  We're going to play at Jaycee Park.  Directions are
below.  Sorry about the confusion this week, but I'll see you on the field 
next Wednesday night.

Brian


All games are on Wednesday nights at Jaycee Park ballfield
9/6 8:30pm vs. Raiders
9/13 7:30pm vs. Jay Ballers
9/20 8:30pm vs. Organized Confusion
9/27 7:30pm vs. Dawgs (Enron)
10/4 6:30pm vs. Team 3 (Enron)
10/11 6:30pm vs. Raiders
10/18 6:30pm vs. Jay Ballers
10/25 7:30pm vs. Organized Confusion
11/1 8:30pm vs. Dawgs (Enron)
11/8 8:30pm vs. Team 3 (Enron)

Directions to Jaycee Park ballfield (NW)
1300 Seamist @ Grovewood
Go out the West Loop N (610) to W. 18th Street.
Exit W. 18th Steet, go right
Take right on Seamis, follow to the park
From: tim.belden@enron.com
To: john.lavorato@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com, amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-06 14:34:55+00:00
Subject: Contract Update

Done
Swerzbin
Crandall
Badeer

Almost Done
Belden
Richter
Heizenrader

Not Sure
Wolfe

Decline
Motley

Mike signed on Friday which is great news.  Richter, Heizenrader, and I are all waiting on language that gets us comfortable with the California litigation risk.  In case you were wondering, we are not talking to one another about this language.  Each person is working independently on this.  We have been waiting on Michele Cash for a week now on proposed language (and for me, a copy of Enron's corporate bylaws explaining officer indemnification).  I will keep you posted.
From: no.address@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-23 03:28:00+00:00
Subject: To: All Domestic Employees who Participate in the Enron Corp
 Savings Plan

October 26 is fast approaching!  

Mark your calendar-- 
	as the Enron Corp. Savings Plan moves to a new administrator!

As a Savings Plan Participant, Friday, October 26 at 3:00pm CST will be your last day to:

?    Transfer Investment Fund Balances and make Contribution Allocation Changes
?	Change your Contribution Rate for the November 15th payroll deductions
?	Enroll if you were hired before October 1

TWO important reminders: 

?    Vanguard Lifestrategy investment options  are being replaced with Fidelity Freedom funds and;  
?	Your funds will remain invested in the funds chosen as of 3:00pm CST until 8:00 am November 20.  

At 8:00 am CST, November 20 the Savings Plan system re-opens with great new features.  

Should you need assistance during the transition period, call ext. 3-7979 and press Option 6.  This option will be available from 8:00am CST October 29 until 5:00pm CST November 19.

Enron Benefits... keeping pace with your lifestyle.
From: e..haedicke@enron.com
To: vicki.sharp@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-24 15:11:21+00:00
Subject: RE: Monday Morning Meetings - Policy Committee and Office of the
 General Counsel

Just do the best you can.  We will probably end up moving it to a different day.  Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sharp, Vicki  
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 7:57 PM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	Re: Monday Morning Meetings - Policy Committee and Office of the General Counsel

It will be hard for me to make these meetings on time, since Dave's meeting often ends after 10 and he/Janet often do followup meetings right after.   If others have a similar problem, I would like to suggest reconsidering the afternoon or  Tuesday am slot. 


From:	Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate@enronXgate on 08/23/2001 11:59 AM
Sent by:	Janette Elbertson/ENRON@enronXgate
To:	Alan Aronowitz/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Evans/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Julia Murray/ENRON@enronXgate, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron, Lance Schuler-Legal/ENRON@enronXgate, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Taylor/ENRON@enronXgate, Sami Arap/SA/Enron@Enron, Justin Boyd/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Mary Browning/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Deborah Culver/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara N Gray/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey T Hodge/Enron@EnronXGate, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Peter Keohane/ENRON@enronXgate, Michelle Maynard/HOU/EES@EES, Travis McCullough/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Sager/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard B Sanders/Enron@enronXgate, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Sheila Tweed/ENRON@enronXgate, Marcus Vonbock Und Polach/Enron@EUEnronXGate
cc:	Nita Garcia/ENRON@enronXgate, Tracy Foy/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Wendi Hoelscher/ENRON@enronXgate, Carolyn George/ENRON@enronXgate, Mina Miyakawa/SA/Enron@Enron, Sandy Haldeman/ENRON@enronXgate, Kathy Dodgen/HOU/EES@EES, Holly Keiser/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicola Beales/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Pauline Wilson/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Leslie Hiltabrand/HOU/EES@EES, Keegan Farrell/ENRON@enronXgate, Joanne Rozycki/ENRON@enronXgate, Cathy Deleonardis/HOU/EES@EES, Sharon Crawford/ENRON@enronXgate, Theresa Zucha/ENRON@enronXgate, Margaret Doucette/ENRON@enronXgate, Alice Wright/ENRON@enronXgate, Twanda Sweet/ENRON@enronXgate, Patricia O'Neal/HOU/EES@EES, Sarah Edwards/Enron@EUEnronXGate 
Subject:	Monday Morning Meetings - Policy Committee and Office of the General Counsel 


	It has become necessary to change the starting time for our Monday morning staff meetings (Policy Committee and Office of the General Counsel) from 11:00 am CDT to 10:00 am CDT.  Also due to the time change, we will need to return to meeting in EB38C2.  

	The next Policy Committee meeting will be on Monday, August 27.

	Monday, September 3, is the Labor Day holiday; therefore, the next Office of the General Counsel meeting will be on Tuesday, September 4.

	The call in numbers have not changed.  

	Thank you.
From: a..shankman@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com
Cc: rick.buy@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-23 17:19:47+00:00

With the U.S. dollar weaking over the last month vs. most major currencies, and forecasts for it to continue to do so, (which is clearly helpful to Enron while we try to sell international assets), I was wondering if we should think about selling some long dated (6 month-to 1 year depending on when we think we could actually sell something) OTC F/X or Euro calls.  (Or sell calls and buy puts with the proceeds.

Any thoughts?

Jeff
From: don.baughman@enron.com
To: richard.hrabal@enron.com, kayne.coulter@enron.com, john.kinser@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, rudy.acevedo@enron.com, gerald.gilbert@enron.com, cyril.price@enron.com, jay.wills@enron.com, wayne.herndon@enron.com, larry.jester@enron.com, jeff.king@enron.com, juan.hernandez@enron.com, joe.errigo@enron.com, lawrence.clayton@enron.com, dean.laurent@enron.com, keller.mayeaux@enron.com, doug.miller@enron.com, chad.starnes@enron.com, joe.stepenovitch@enron.com, greg.trefz@enron.com, lisa.burnett@enron.com, jason.choate@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, mstewart@pdq.net, reidstav@houston.rr.com, travieso74@hotmail.com, andrea.p.williams@us.pwcglobal.com, seanpat@flash.net, ktracey111@aol.com, twomarshalls@hotmail.com, shannontyer@email.msn.com
Date: 2000-12-11 11:35:00+00:00
Subject: FW: new airforce one

 - air+force+one[1].jpg
From: don.miller@enron.com
To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-30 15:17:00+00:00
Subject: Updates to Caledonia and Brownsville Schedules

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 03:16 PM 
---------------------------


"Rippy, Roger" <rogerrippy@akllp.com> on 11/30/2000 10:48:17 AM
To: <chris.booth@enron.com>, <gus.eghneim@enron.com>
cc: <stuart.zisman@enron.com>, <don.miller@enron.com> 
Subject: Updates to Caledonia and Brownsville Schedules


Chris and Gus,

I have open items remaining in connection with updating the attached
schedules.

Chris, could you please provide me with some information regarding each
schedule.  You will note in the attached schedules that your name is
contained in brackets in the places where I need your input.  Please
confirm whether these contracts exist and, if so, please send Don Miller
and me a copy of the contracts at your earliest possible convenience.

Gus, in a prior e-mail, you had noted that the schedules needed to be
updated on Schedule 4.1(n).  I sent you an e-mail with a request for
further explanation and a summary of the required update.  Please
respond to that e-mail at your earliest possible convenience.

Thank you in advance.


Roger A. Rippy, Attorney
Andrews & Kurth LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 4200
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: 713.220.4458
Fax: 713.238.7128


 <<BLACKLINE OF BROWNSVILLE SCHEDULES (11-29-00).rtf>>  <<BLACKLINE OF
CALEDONIA SCHEDULES (11-29-00).rtf>>


 - BLACKLINE OF BROWNSVILLE SCHEDULES (11-29-00).rtf
 - BLACKLINE OF CALEDONIA SCHEDULES (11-29-00).rtf
From: al@friedwire.com
To: seung-taek.oh@enron.com, juan.padron@enron.com, eric.saibi@enron.com, kevin.cline@enron.com, thomas.lowell@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 13:30:47+00:00
Subject: ERCOT Daily Data for 10-28-2001

Enjoy!
 - 20011028ERCOT_LOAD.XLS 
 - 20011028ERCOT_FLOW.XLS
From: debra.perlingiere@enron.com
To: ellen.wallumrod@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-21 13:20:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Shanner

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 01:20 PM -----

	John M Singer@ENRON
	12/21/2000 12:52 PM
		
		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Shanner

I don't think so.  I bought the gas based on Index, no fixed price.
John



DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
12/21/2000 10:48 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Shanner


I have sent a Gas Purchase Agreement as requested to Jim Shanner for 
signature.  Are there any transactions which need to be confirmed under the 
new agreement??  

Mr. Shanner is curious as to price etc.  Could you contact him regarding this 
issue and let me know.

Thanks!
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490
From: louise.kitchen@enron.com
To: mark.pickering@enron.com
Cc: greg.piper@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-05 18:32:58+00:00
Subject: RE: IBM

I don't understand whta she is offering

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pickering, Mark  
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Kitchen, Louise
Cc:	Piper, Greg
Subject:	FW: IBM

Hi Louise,

Just got off the phone with Gail. She wants to know if they can help by coming up with a guaranteed offering from IBM that would help any NewCo succeed by providing IT support/direction, saving money, monetizing assets, retaining key staff and lending the IBM name, etc, etc to the deal.

If you're interested you can either call me or call her directly.

Regards

Mark Pickering 
Chief Technology Officer

Enron Net Works, LLC

  _____  


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Piper, Greg  
Sent:	05 December 2001 08:23
To:	Pickering, Mark
Cc:	Leff, Dan; Beck, Sally; Rub, Jenny
Subject:	FW: IBM

Anything here?  I think that at one time prior to filing IBM was looking to buy or monetize or loan against all out hardware so we could get cash but I am not sure where that went.

GP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Leff, Dan  
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:09 AM
To:	Dayao, Anthony; Piper, Greg; Beck, Sally
Cc:	Stubblefield, Wade; Sharp, Vicki
Subject:	IBM

Anthony, Greg, Sally - 

Gail Whipple from IBM called to offer any assistance that they can provide. 

Potential to save money, monetize assets, provide people, provide assistance to employees & people that we don't / may not need, etc.

If we would like IBM to assist, we need to call her @ 914-642-6399.


Thanks - Dan
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: holden.salisbury@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-06 18:34:00+00:00
Subject: Re: schedule crawler

Done





Holden Salisbury
04/04/2001 05:48 PM
To:	Pete Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	David Poston/PDX/ECT@ECT 
Subject:	schedule crawler

Hello,

Could you please remove me from this email list.

Thank You
From: nicholas.o'day@enron.com
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-08 13:56:00+00:00
Subject: USTR bilateral

Mark,

As mentioned in our call on Tuesday, we have discussed with the US Embassy 
(State Dept) what we would like to see covered in the next round of the US 
Japan bilateral talks on deregulation in the energy sector. I attach a brief 
note which confirms in broad terms our preliminary discussions on the topic.

We are encouraging a significantly more cooperative approach by the US to 
Japan, particularly in the wake of the telecom talks earlier this year. As 
mentioned in the attached note, we believe that the Japanese Government 
genuinely wants to implement further reform, but is having difficulty in 
balancing competing policy interests. We are not advocating that the USG tell 
Japan what its environmental policy or energy policy should be. We are 
suggesting more of an advisory role. The concrete outcome would be further 
significant reforms to the electricity and gas sectors, together with a 
timetable for complete deregulation.

We have consciously stopped short of recommending a preferred structure for 
the electricity and gas sectors for a couple of reasons. Not only would it be 
inappropriate for the USG to dictate to the Japanese Government on what to do 
rather than how to do it, but determining the Enron preferred structure for 
Japan is a significant undertaking and something that we are currently 
working through. In this regard, as mentioned on Tuesday we will be looking 
for significant support from your group and clearly will need sign off from 
Europe and Houston. 

The approach we are recommending that the US Government adopts reflects the 
approach we propose adopting in Japan. To assist us in getting our message to 
the right people, we have been taking steps to further develop our 
relationships with cabinet ministers, the MITI Director General and others, 
including members of the following committees who are or will be reviewing 
various aspects of energy policy in Japan:
- the LDP Comprehensive Energy Policy Study Committee (Chair - Mr Amari) 
- the supra partisan New Energy Policy Committee ( Chair - former PM Mr 
Hashimoto)
- the business lead Deregulation Committee (Chair - Orix chairman Miyauchi)
- the MITI sponsored Liberalization of Power Industry and Public Interest 
Committee ( Comprising academics)

I would welcome your comments on the attached note.
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: tom.wilbeck@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-29 19:10:00+00:00
Subject: Re: technical help for interviewing traders

In regards to gas:
what signals do you for in determining your view?
what resources do you use to formulate a price view?
give example of complex transaction you've structured for a customer.
where is storage now relative to history? what is the highest and lowest 
level we've been at in past 5 years?
what are your short, medium, and long term views of gas market?
what major basis changes have occured in the market over the past 5 years? 
What do you expect in the next 5?
how should a storage operator decide whether or not to inject on any given 
day?

In regards to derivatives in order of difficulty
What are delta/gamma/theta?
if you buy a put spread, is your delta positive, negative, or zero?
Is swap price equal to simple average of futures contracts?
If interest rates go up what happens to option prices all else equal?
what is the value of a european $1 call expiring in 12 months if 
corresponding futures are trading $5?
what happens to delta of an option if volatility increase?




From: Tom Wilbeck/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/23/2001 03:35 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K 
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: technical help for interviewing traders

Jeanie Slone was telling me that you were among the best interviewers in the 
trading group.  Because of your expertise in this area, I was wondering if 
you could help me put some technical questions together that you've found to 
be effective in interviewing Gas Traders.

Norma Hasenjager is in our Omaha office needs this information ASAP in order 
to help her screen some candidates.  It would be great if you could respond 
to this with two or three questions that you've used in the past to select 
good Gas Traders.

Thanks for your help.

Tom Wilbeck
EWS Training and Development
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: edie.leschber@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-14 11:06:00+00:00
Subject: Texas EOL DATA

Edie,

Here is the updated EOL data for the Texas Region.  
2000 DATA
2000 EOL Trades = 13,500
2000 EOL Volume = 2.5 TCF


2001 DATA
2001 Plan EOL Trades = 17,500
2001 Plan EOL Trades/Month = 1,460
2001 EOL Volume = 3 TCF

Could you please update the plan numbers for Tom?

Thanks,

Eric
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: eric.gillaspie@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-05 19:27:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Easement encroachment demand letter

looks fine



	Eric Gillaspie
	04/05/2001 07:24 AM
		 
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karl E Atkins/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Easement encroachment demand letter

Richard,

We plan on sending this demand letter (and an identical one to the other 
co-owner) out today.  
Ann Elizabeth wanted me to run it by you before we send it out.  Please let 
me know if you have any questions or comments.



Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886
From: louise.kitchen@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Cc: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-30 16:41:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ahausman@bloomberg.net

Andrew  Hausman
Bloomberg LP.
499 PArk Avenue
New York
NY 10022

Tel (212) 318 2295
Fax (917) 369 4041




Louise Kitchen
30/06/2000 16:39
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: ahausman@bloomberg.net
From: wanda.curry@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-20 09:49:00+00:00
Subject: California Markets Focus Group - Summary Notes

FYI.  This is the handout for the meeting this morning.

Wanda
---------------------- Forwarded by Wanda Curry/HOU/EES on 12/20/2000 09:49 
AM ---------------------------

Wanda Curry
12/19/2000 08:26 PM


To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES, Dan Leff/HOU/EES@EES, Mark S Muller/HOU/EES@EES, 
Harold G Buchanan/HOU/EES@EES, Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Kevin 
Hughes/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
cc:  
Subject: California Markets Focus Group - Summary Notes

I have attached the most recent summary (12-19-00) of the California Markets 
Focus Group meetings.   If you have questions or comments, please call.  
Updates from yesterday are in italics.  

We continue to stress the importance that this information remain 
confidential.   


Thanks,
Wanda
From: hillis@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-28 15:36:13+00:00
Subject: Mtg: Greg Whalley/Louise Kitchen/Wes Colwell - Merlin CLO

This is to confirm the above mentioned meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, March 1 from 1pm - 1:30pm.  The meeting will be held in John Lavorato's office.  

If you have any questions, please call me at  x58113.

Thanks.