Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: vanessa.griffin@enron.com
To: sean.keenan@enron.com
Cc: ken.curry@enron.com, julia.murray@enron.com, cheryl.lindeman@enron.com, deb.korkmas@enron.com, dan.lyons@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, carol.clair@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-29 15:24:00+00:00
Subject: ENA - - Mitsui & Co. (USA) Inc. GTC's

Pursuant to our discussion, please find enclosed separate ENA-Mitsui Steel 
GTC's for physical steel.

I have made the requested changes in the following provisions:

Clause 1.3
Clause 3.1
Clause 3.2
Clause 4.1
Clause 8

I am also enclosing a redlined version for ease of comparison.  Mark Taylor 
or Carol St. Clair should be consulted to make any changes to the financial 
GTC's.
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: pat.clynes@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-28 11:19:00+00:00
Subject: Industrials

When will the buybacks and swings be set up for July?  I am a little 
concerned with the long weekend coming up.  I believe that we agreed that 
these would be set up by the 3rd work day, which would be Friday the 7th.  
(Six days of flow.)  I definitely don't think that we should any later.  It 
would be great if this could be handled sooner, miimizing our economic impact.

Additionally, we need to get the Industrial spreadsheet up and running 
again.  This report is very beneficial to Gas Control, industrial traders and 
schedulers on call.

Let me know what you think.

D
From: reagan.rorschach@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com, ozzie.pagan@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com, lloyd.will@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 12:41:00+00:00
Subject: FW: [Fwd: EPMI LOI]

I received this from Marvin this morning.  We need to discuss how/if we 
incorporate them into the LOI.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Marvin L. Carraway" <mcarraway@watervalley.net>@ENRON 
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Marvin+20L+2E+20Carraway+22+20+3Cmcarraway+40watervalley
+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 8:19 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: [Fwd: EPMI LOI]

Reagan,please reveiw this list of comments again. The latest draft only
addresses item no. 5. MLC

Return-Path: AMalmsjo@rwbeck.com
Received: from [192.152.12.2] (HELO orlmail.rwbeck.net) by watervalley.net 
(Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b8) with ESMTP id S.0000328507 for 
<mcarraway@watervalley.net>; Tue, 06 Mar 2001 10:40:36 -0600
Received: by orlmail.rwbeck.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id 
<1675AAYC>; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:38:30 -0500
Message-ID: <3F1E9D0FB6E5D1118D8A00104B64CF87CDD36C@orlmail.rwbeck.net>
From: "Malmsjo, Al" <AMalmsjo@rwbeck.com>
To: "Marvin Carraway (E-mail)" <cpuadmin@telepak.net>,  "Marvin Carraway 
(E-mail 2)" <mcarraway@watervalley.net>
Cc: "Painter, Donna" <DPainter@rwbeck.com>
Subject: EPMI LOI
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:38:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0A65B.DF6A8A30"
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000


Here are the  comments that I said I would send.  Feel free to call if you 
have any  questions. - - Al
 
Al Malmsjo 
R. W.  Beck 
(407) 648-3521 - Office 
(407) 421-5402 - Cell 
 
 - Comments on EPMI Proposal.doc
From: cwcass@duke-energy.com
To: dfarmer@enron.com, briley@enron.com, cwcass@duke-energy.com, wespeckels@duke-energy.com, dcspencer@duke-energy.com
Cc: dfbane@duke-energy.com, mrcherry@duke-energy.com
Date: 2000-02-22 09:18:00+00:00
Subject: HPL Nomination for 02/23/2000

Sent on behalf of Bruce McMills:


For 2/23, the nom into Eastrans is 42,000 MMBtu, which is 39,179  Mcf @ 1072
btu.
Please increase nom into PG & E to 35,000 MMBtu.  7,000 will come from
Fuels Cotton Valley, and sale of 500 MMBtu//d remains in place.

If there are any problems please contact Bruce McMills at 817-255-5020 or Chad
Cass at 713-627-6202.

Thanks
From: carol.clair@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Cc: clement.abrams@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-22 13:04:00+00:00
Subject: BNP Paribas Guaranty

Tana:
Here is the Enron Guaranty that we have reached agreement on and Clem has 
approved.  Please have it signed and sent to our contact at BNP Paribas.  
Thanks.



Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
From: jarrod.cyprow@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 15:08:13+00:00
Subject: RE: Clorox

What time and day works for you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 9:06 AM
To:	Cyprow, Jarrod
Subject:	RE: Clorox

bad day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cyprow, Jarrod  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:51 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Clorox


Can you get together today to discuss Clorox and the meeting you had with credit last week?

I have a meeting today at 11:00 but other than that I am wide open, so just let me know what works for you.

Thanks,

Jarrod Cyprow
Enron Forest Products
1400 Smith
Houston, TX 77002
(713) 853-5700
jcyprow@enron.com
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: jeffrey.hodge@enron.com
Cc: ben.jacoby@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-23 08:05:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ENRON Blue Dog Max 2 X 7 EA GTG

Jeff,  

It looks like Ben has made some good progress with GE re:  Blue Dog 
turbines.   This really helps.

As you can see,  I now have email access.  

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/23/2001 08:09 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           03/22/2001 07:44 PM
	

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: john.schroeder@ps.ge.com @ ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron)

Subject: Re: ENRON Blue Dog Max 2 X 7 EA GTG  

John:

Thanks for the e-mail. I also got your voice-mail. We will of course wrap up 
all outstanding items on change orders quickly. Also, rest assured, we intend 
to give you ample notice of project location, etc. for the units after we're 
sure we have a deal for a joint project with the customer. 

As I mentioned in our call, please let me know if you will be able to improve 
the delivery date on the air filter for unit 1 as we have been advised that 
it is presently scheduled for a June 15 delivery date.

Thanks much for looking into this, and for the e-mail below.

Regards,

Ben



john.schroeder@ps.ge.com on 03/22/2001 12:14:26 PM
To: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, gilbert.bosworth@ps.ge.com
cc:  
Subject: ENRON Blue Dog Max 2 X 7 EA GTG


Dear Ben,
I have asked Gib Bosworth of GE Power Sys in Arizona to call you about the
availability of the 2 units we call Blue Dog.  He has a customer who is
interested in the units because of their timing.  I have advised him you are
also closely working with others for these turbines.

Ben Jacoby  713 853 - 6173    Gib Bosworth 480-888-1545

Best Regards
John H Schroeder, Jr.
GE Power Systems Account Mgr.
2707 North Loop West, 9th Floor
Houston, Texas 77008
(713) 803-0525 
Fax - 0567
From: dan.bump@enron.com
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-13 14:52:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Crescendo

Looks good, G.

Thus far, compensation from Crescendo for ENA's activities have not been 
discussed (nor expected) from my little world.

Thanks.  [I hope you get everyone's comments in order to allow you to send 
the document asap...]

D
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: ellen.wallumrod@enron.com
Cc: gary.lamphier@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-13 15:30:00+00:00
Subject: Formosa, Marathon, and Valero confirmations

I have this date forwarded these three confirmation agreements to Gary 
Lamphier for his further handling with his counterparties.  I will let you 
know if they get executed.
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 1999-06-23 13:52:00+00:00
Subject: Trading Web Site

sorry about that - misdirected to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on 
06/23/99 01:51 PM ---------------------------
To: Mark EI.London Taylor@Enron
cc:  
Subject: Trading Web Site

I hope ours looks better than this:

http://www.unioncal.com/
From: jerry.graves@enron.com
To: david.roensch@enron.com, ben.asante@enron.com, dennis.alters@enron.com
Cc: jeff.whippo@enron.com, darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, ron.matthews@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-25 15:25:49+00:00
Subject: RE: San Juan Lateral Eff.



Tiny, you are correct. At this time I have nothing in the outage report for this. Ben, if something comes up, please let me know, so we can make plans for it.  

Jerry Graves

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roensch, David  
Sent:	Friday, January 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To:	Asante, Ben
Cc:	Whippo, Jeff; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Matthews, Ron; Graves, Jerry; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	San Juan Lateral Eff.

Ben, need to know how the San Juan Lateral eff. is holding up so that we can better estimate when O&M budgets may be impacted this year from pigging type activities.  I know you took a good look at this segment prior to moving into tariff last year and now as we approach the non tariff months this year we need you to take another look to insure no potential problems exist.  

Jerry, please correct me if I am wrong, but at this time no planned outage has been posted for this activity YTD.
From: stephanie.sever@enron.com
To: walter.guidroz@enron.com
Cc: tom.moran@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, lisa.lees@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-06 15:58:00+00:00
Subject: RE: MidAmerican Energy Company

Walter,

This counterparty is one of the early approvals.  There are probably quite a 
few more that  have this type of access and will need to be cleaned up as 
they are found.  Please process through Profile manager.

Thanks,
Stephanie


From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 03:41 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate 
Subject: RE: MidAmerican Energy Company

I agree.  This is another instance of a case where products seem to have been 
opened/not correctly updated/changed.  I think it's safe to assume that they 
shouldn't be trading Dutch power...

Also, they appear to be open for a slew of other European products for which 
they shouldn't be open.  Thanks for the catch.

WG

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana  
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter
Subject: MidAmerican Energy Company

Is there any reason why this counterparty has transact on NL power?  I cannot 
believe they have a power marketing license there?
From: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Cc: mbaldwin@igservice.com, susan.scott@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-09 13:26:00+00:00
Subject: Conference call

Jeff,
It depends on Mark's schedule and whether Susan and I will be out of staff 
meeting by 2:30 p.m.  We'll try it.  

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Cc: mbaldwin@igservice.com; Scott, Susan
Subject: Re: FERC ruling on Kern expansion

My apologies.  Just been "ordered" to be on a 1 PM (PDT) call.  Possible to 
do our call at 2:30 Houston time.  Sorry about that.

Best,
Jeff




	Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate 04/09/2001 10:34 AM 	   To: Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron  cc: Susan Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, 
mbaldwin@igservice.com@SMTP@enronXgate  Subject: FERC ruling on Kern expansion


I think we said we'd call you at 3:00 p.m. CDT.   See 'ya then.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff  
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Fawcett, Jeffery
Subject: Re: FERC ruling on Kern expansion

Hmm. Interesting.  Thanks for the info.  Do we know who got to Breathitt?  
Forgive me, but what time did we pick to talk today?  And will you call me?

Best,
Jeff
From: tk.lohman@enron.com
To: michelle.lokay@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-01 16:55:29+00:00
Subject: FW: Confirmations



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lohman, TK  
Sent:	Friday, March 01, 2002 8:56 AM
To:	Strohmeyer, Vincent; Moseley, Debbie; Moore, Jan; Hanagriff, Richard; Mulligan, Amy; Schoolcraft, Darrell
Cc:	Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Confirmations
From: j..kean@enron.com
To: tom.briggs@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-25 13:00:03+00:00
Subject: RE: WTO Energy Services Coalition Lives!  (Sort of)

Thanks for the update.  Your approach makes sense to me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Briggs, Tom  
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 6:01 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard; Kean, Steven J.; Robertson, Linda
Subject:	WTO Energy Services Coalition Lives!  (Sort of)

As you may know, Enron has ceased all funding of the efforst made by the Energy Services Coalition an entity that it was instrumental in establishing.  However, Linda recognised that we could not completely abandon our involvement with the ESC and the USTR effort to negotiate an energy services section of GATS.  Otherwise, Enron would risk damaging its reputation within USTR and among the other members of the coalition.  In fact, carol Ballassa of USTR spoke with me privately about her concern (and, alledegedly, Zoellick's concern) that Enron would abandon the effort. Therefore, Linda set me on the task to "rationalize" our ESC involvement.

Upon further scrutiny of the ESC effort, it became apparent that the GATS effort on energy services had absolutely nothing to do with deregulation or liberalisation of the energy sector.  In fact, mention of open access - particularly gas pipelines - caused some of the ESC members to break out into a cold sweat.  Unfortunately, few, if any, of the energy services that could be provided by Enron can be offered in a monopoly market.  Therefore, there was little for Enron to gain in these negotiations unless the deregulation was adressed as a prerequisite to opening trade in energy services.

I met privately with the USTR negotiating team and made the case that deregulation had to part of the negotiating agenda.  Otherwise, I told her that there would be little to gain for Enron and we would not be an active participant as a result.

We met today with USTR and other members of the coalition and in fact, deregulation was on the USTR negotiating agenda.  GE and Enron supported the way in which USTR would raise the issue in negotiations, but other members of the ESC (from the oil and gas sector) objected strenuosly to pipeline access provisions.  As it stands, the ESC will split or fold on this provision.  If the USTR agrees to water down its negotiating provision, they know that Enron will likely leave the ESC.  If the provision remains, then the USTR effort may actually prove beneficial to Enron in the long run. Regardless of the outcome, Enron's time and expenditure on this effort will be minimal to non-existant.

If you have any questions, please call.
From: don.baughman@enron.com
To: jae.black@enron.com
Cc: kim.melodick@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-19 19:40:00+00:00
Subject: EPMI Real-time Traders and Schedulers working during the
 Thanksgiving Holiday

TJ,
Please advise Carmen and other relevant staff of the following Real-time Traders and Schedulers working during the Thanksgiving Holiday for payroll purposes:

Thursday and Friday (2 days Holiday Pay)
Alex McElreath
Maricio Trejo
Jason Berlin
Brant Reves

Thursday or Friday (1 day Holiday Pay)
Jason Choate 
Gretchen Lotz
Larry F. Campbell
Ashish Mahajan
Andrew Greer
Jay Blaine
David Maskell
George Phillips
John Kinser
SUENG-TAEK Oh


Thank you for your help on this matter.

Best Regards,

Don Baughman
713-853-0392
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: tanya.rohauer@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-14 15:45:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Calpine Power Services/Calpine Energy Services

Nope, it's a merger.



	Tanya Rohauer
	11/14/2000 03:35 PM
		
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Edward 
Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Calpine Power Services/Calpine Energy Services

I think we were under the impression that this was a name change.


From: Tana Jones on 11/14/2000 03:12 PM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Calpine Power Services/Calpine Energy Services

This Counterparty is on the 11/9/00 EOL List.  We have received documentation 
that reflects that Calpine Power Services Company, an entity where we have an 
ISDA Master in place, has merged with and into Calpine Energy Services, L.P., 
an entity where we don't have an ISDA in place with.   Is Credit OK with this 
merger?
From: mark.schroeder@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-08 17:23:00+00:00
Subject: Re: regulatory support

Have also today spoken to Anthony Duenner, finally.  I am afraid the message 
for David is that we should be thinking about his exit.  I cannot see much 
mileage in putting him in front of Cliff.  Do you agree that we should be 
discussing exit package?   thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 08/12/2000 
17:25 ---------------------------


Rebecca McDonald@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/12/2000 16:16
To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J 
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron@ECT 

Subject: Re: regulatory support  

Mark,

Thanks for your note.  It's a common misconception that we will be mostly 
working on asset disposition.  Our focus will be on the efficient operation 
of the assets, cleaning up problems, finishing projects etc.  The sales 
efforts will be conducted through Cliff Baxter's group with support from us.  
So, I don't believe that  I will need the type of effort that you believe 
David can provide and I have no other need for him at this juncture.  Cliff 
may feel that he has the need for David.  By the way, my experience with 
David when he worked for APAChi was that he had not learned much about the 
business and therefore was not terribly helpful to us as we were 
restructuring the group or when we were in a build mode in Thailand.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Regards,
Rebecca



Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/08/2000 08:35 AM
To: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A 
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron 

Subject: regulatory support

With your new organisation, I expect that you will have issues that will 
require support from my team, covering everything outside the Americas (Rick 
Shapiro providing support in the Americas).  Any thoughts either of you have 
regarding what your requirements might be would be helpful.  My understanding 
is that a fair bit of your effort will be focussed on asset disposition.  If 
that is correct, I want to run one idea by you.  We still have David Merrill 
posted as an expat in Singapore.  He is not working out as support for EBS 
(totally new field to him).  What are your thoughts on David returning to the 
energy arena, and focussing on flying around, as appropriate, to meet with 
various governments, working to secure necessary approvals, as/when/if 
needed?  Seems to fit his skill sets, based on prior government experience 
that he has.  

A second person who could also fill this role, though he is looking at other 
opportunities within Enron and may not be available, is Mike Dahlke.  
Thoughts on this person for this role?

thansk   mcs
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-29 22:40:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No 
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001042923.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4C
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
From: outlook.team@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-27 23:02:00+00:00
Subject: Manual Scheduling  EB4194

CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Manual Scheduling  EB4194

Date:		8/14/2000
Time:		3:00 PM - 4:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: samantha.boyd@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-06 17:51:00+00:00
Subject: Request Closed: Access Request (MNES-4L2JK4)

Samantha,

When you get in let's take a look and see if you can get into the Master Swap 
Agreement Database.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 05:50 PM -----

	Michael Neves
	06/06/2000 05:28 PM
		 
		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Request Closed: Access Request (MNES-4L2JK4)

FYI --
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Neves/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2000 05:19 
PM ---------------------------


Information Risk Management on 06/06/2000 05:26:51 PM
To: Michael Neves/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Request Closed:  Access Request (MNES-4L2JK4)


The following resource request has been closed. A summary of the request 
appears below. To see your original request, please click on the Request Link 
icon.

Request Number:	MNES-4L2JK4
Requested For:	Tana Jones/HOU/ECT
Request Link:	


	Requested Resource(s)			
	Name	Cost	Status	Implementation Comments
	Application/Database			
	Unlisted Lotus Notes Applicti...		Completed	Added Samantha Boyd to the ECT Legal - Swap - 
Users group. Please allow approx. 1 hour for the change to replicate to all 
of the Address Books.
From: knipe3@msn.com
To: mccomb.keith@enron.com, constantine.brian@enron.com, wollam.erik@enron.com, mccomb.chris@enron.com, joe.parks@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-12 13:21:37+00:00
Subject: Re: Possible new lease member

Wait a minute, lets think about this.  We already have one attorney on the lease, can we handle another??     We're gonna need a bigger ranch!
 

----- Original Message -----
From: Keith McComb
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:16 AM
To: 'Brian Constantine'; 'Erik Wollam'; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member
 
If he buys the first keg, he's in!

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:12 AM
To: Erik Wollam; knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com;
Joe.Parks@enron.com; kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com
Subject: RE: Possible new lease member


Think this a great idea...he is just the ideal person to have on the lease
and as standup and nice of a guy you would ever want to know. I'd give him a
bid right away!!!

BC

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:04 AM
To: knipe3@msn.com; cmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Joe.Parks@enron.com;
kmccomb@austin-mccomb.com; Brian Constantine
Subject: Possible new lease member

Deer All:

I have a person that might fit what we are looking for in the 8th spot or to

fill a gap left by Joe (who is currently unable to provide a firm response).

B.J. Johnson. Played football with Chad and I at Jesuit. Was a year a head
of us. Met Zander at UH in College and hung with he and Brian while they
were rooming together. Went to lawschool a few years after me. Is out and
doing well with at a well known plaintiff's lawfirm.
Nice guy. He mentioned a year or so ago to call him if we ever had a spot.
His dad used to take him hunting and BJ wants to return the favor. Looking
for a place he could take his dad once or twice a year, just to get out
there not to shoot deer. He has two small girls, is busier than I am and
would go no more than the rest of the Houston boys.

He is a good guy. Don't know much about his deer hunting experience, but I
don't care about that.

Chad and Brian give him the stamp of approval. My thought is we could
proceed as set with Chris and I splitting the 8th spot, but if Joe winds up
taking a job out of state (which is a possibility) we would be left with two

spots to fill and less time to do it. I think it might be best to offer this

spot to BJ and fill up all 8 spots, then if we lose Joe, Chris and I can be
the fall back plan.

Thoughts and comments from the McComb guys please.


Erik.


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-17 01:43:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 2;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001041702.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
From: louis.soldano@enron.com
To: michael.moran@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, bill.cordes@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, tim.aron@enron.com, johnny.mcgee@enron.com, laruzow@concentric.net, lslade@modrall.com, wes@modrall.com, jw1000mac@yahoo.com
Date: 2000-03-17 16:25:00+00:00
Subject: Recent Discussion of Offer - Navajo Nation

Mr. Zaman called Larry yesterday to discuss the most recent offer.  

Larry had the opportunity to discuss with Mr. Zaman the sense of urgency on 
TW's part and the desire to meet with the decision making body - the NNERTF.  
Apparently Mr. Zaman was of the impression that TW would not be pressed to 
take legal action until the ROW expired.

Mr. Zaman was encouraged by the TW approach of an incentive but offered no 
insights on the acceptability of the offer.  He did promised to review it 
with the task force in the near future and indicated that Johnny could expect 
a response in the near future regarding the letter and the request for a 
meeting.
From: d..winfree@enron.com
To: a..martin@enron.com, j..farmer@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-19 18:19:07+00:00
Subject: FW: Customer list

This one includes more financial counterparties non-eol

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winfree, O'Neal D.  
Sent:	Wednesday, December  19, 2001 11:13 AM
To:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	Customer list

Tom,

Attached are EOL customers between July 1, 2001 and Nov. 30, 2001, broken out by Physical and Financial...  The only physical customers I remember non EOL are Imperial Sugar and Texas Energy... I'm also checking this list against other non-EOL deals Eric or Joe might have done, but for now take a look at this... O
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: nick.mooney@enron.com
Cc: michael.corbally@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 1999-08-23 10:43:00+00:00
Subject: Form of Online Weather GTC

Per our conversation, I am attaching a sample form of online weather GTC.  As 
we discussed, I am trying to complete the information for "Datasource" and 
under "Floating Amount" for Reporting Service and Reporting Agency for the 
U.K.  Thanks for your help!
From: tom.briggs@enron.com
To: rosalee.fleming@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, cynthia.sandherr@enron.com, chris.long@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-25 09:08:00+00:00
Subject: Fwd: Gramm Proposed Changes

----- Forwarded by Tom Briggs/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 08:06 AM -----

	RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
	10/25/2000 08:01 AM
		 
		 To: tom.briggs@enron.com
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Fwd: Gramm Proposed Changes


Please find attached Part 1 of  <<Gramm changes 1.pdf>> the proposed changes
from Gramm staff to the House passed version of the CEA bill.



----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Gramm changes 1.pdf
From: robert.johnston@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com, gary.hickerson@enron.com
Cc: markus.fiala@enron.com, bryan.seyfried@enron.com, jeff.kinneman@enron.com, michelle.cisneros@enron.com, michael.bradley@enron.com, jaime.gualy@enron.com, danielle.romain@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-22 12:33:00+00:00
Subject: Calfornia 5/22

PLEASE TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL

A source had a meeting today with California state treasurer Phil Angelides.  
Here are the main points from their conversation

1. Anglelides Certain that SoCal Will Go Bankrupt

Corroborating our line over the past four months, Anglelides stated with 
confidence that SoCal would go bankrupt and that "he was surprised they 
hadn't already."  He noted that the only reason they haven't yet is that 
"they were too stupid to ring-fence the parent" and that "their two biggest 
equity holders were screaming not to do it."

He added that the Davis/SoCal MOU is dead and that all the "Plan B's" are 
"speculative" at best.  He also thought that SoCal was being "naive if they 
thought they would get a better deal from the legislature than from the 
bankruptcy court."

2. Bond Issuance- $12B Not Enough

Angelides conceded that a $12B bond issue would not be enough to buy power 
for the summer and that the true costs would probably be $18-24B.   The only 
reason they didn't issue more is that Angelides felt that "$12B was all the 
market could handle."  The current game plan for bonds assumes an average 
peak price for power of $400/MWh, which Angelides said explains the 
difference between his estimates and the higher estimates from State 
Comptroller's Kathleen Connell's office.

3. New Generator Construction

Anglelides was explicit that the California Public Power Authority 
(authorized by the legislature last week) will "build plants and not stop 
until we [California] has a 10-15% capacity cushion above expected demand.  
Angelides expects the state to be "5-10% short on power all summer."
From: rishad@rice.edu
To: vince.j.kaminski@enron.com, jason.sokolov@enron.com
Cc: hingoran@rice.edu, maue@rice.edu, vanstone@rice.edu, ganguzza@rice.edu, gjohnson@rice.edu, yoshiura@rice.edu, rishad@rice.edu
Date: 2001-04-30 20:41:00+00:00
Subject: Energy Futures Contracts Project

Please respond to Hi Vince and Jason:

Please find attached a copy of our project. Thank you for an enjoyable and
informative class.

Sincerely,

Rishad Patel
Neeraj Hingorani
Duane Maue
Eric Van Stone
John Ganguzza
Grant Johnson
Paulo Yoshiura


 - EnergyFuturesProject.doc
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.houston@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-26 23:41:00+00:00
Subject: "Freaky Friday" with Mind's Eye Madness

"If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn,t thinking.8  - George S. 
Patton, Jr.
 
Keeping with our Mind,s Eye Madness week, be sure to check out the Enron Mind,
s Eye Motorcade 
on Friday, April 27th from 11:30am to 1:00pm at the Big E Cafe.  This art car 
convoy will spend the day visiting 
Enron-designated stops in the community to promote innovation and 
creativity.  Mirroring Enron,s innovation, 
these artists think about the way things could be and are not limited by the 
way things are.

Featuring:
Lunch by Escalantes Mexican Grille - choice of beef, chicken or veggie 
fajitas with trimmings, dessert and a drink for $5.  
Live salsa music will be provided by Tropicrew, featuring Enron,s own Ms. 
Alex Villarreal as the lead singer.  
Non-profit organizations represented will include the March of Dimes, SEARCH 
and the Lupus Foundation of America.  
Get lunch free if you're dressed "freaky"!
  
Word of the Day
Zeitgeist \TSYT-guyst; ZYT-guyst\, noun:  The spirit of the time; the general 
intellectual & moral state or temper characteristic of any period of time.
From: owner-nyiso_tech_exchange@lists.thebiz.net
To: marketrelations@nyiso.com
Date: 2000-12-01 12:33:00+00:00
Subject: Resolution of Winter 1999-2000 ICAP Market

Please find attached  a document outlining the guidelines and a timeline for
closing out the Winter 1999-2000 Installed Capacity Market.

Any questions regarding this material can be addressed to Timothy Duffy
(518-862-9876) or Art Desell (518-356-6248).

Note that the LSE and Supplier Certification Forms for the Winter 1999-2000
Capability Period will be available on the NYISO web-site by December 8th.


(See attached file: Winter 1999-2000 ICAP Guidelines.pdf)

 - Winter 1999-2000 ICAP Guidelines.pdf
From: hsmiller@email.msn.com
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com, julie.gomez@enron.com, peter.keohane@enron.com, eric.ledaine@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-26 19:29:00+00:00
Subject: Fw: Calpine Docs.

Hope each of you had a Merry Christmas and enjoyed your time off........

Here is response from Joe at Calpine. In addition to his memo, we also need
to verify intra-day nomination procedures with PGT in the event of force
majeure type interruptions at points other than Malin. Since we cannot give
force majeure protection at Alternate Points of Delivery, they need to
understand scheduling flexibility in the event a nomination needs to be
redirected to Malin.

Joe also asked for more information on the "renewal" process on ANG and
NOVA. Peter/Eric: we will need your assistance. Does any information
pertaining to this reside in their tariffs?

Please look at this first thing in the am. We are going for signatures on
Wednesday!

Regards

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Gorberg <joego@calpine.com>
To: <Stephanie.Miller@enron.com>; <hsmiller@msn.com>;
<Julie.A.Gomez@enron.com>; Brad Barnds <BradB@calpine.com>; Janet Dixon
<jdixon@calpine.com>; Gary Eames <geames@calpine.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: Calpine Docs.


> Stephanie, per our conversation our legal group is reviewing the docs.
>
> After making a first pass, I have the following comments:
> 1. Typos/spelling errors in the supply and capacity release docs.
> 2. Calpine would like a copy of the Enron Transporation agreement(s) with
> PGT as it pertains to the supply agreement.
> 3. Capacity Release agreement(CRA) s/b with Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
> (CES) and not Calpine Corporation.
> 4. Article 4 of CRA should allow for Calpine to have the right to take
early
> assignment of capacity if the entire path of NOVA or entire path of ANG or
> entire path of PGT becomes available.
> 5. Article 8 of CRA should allow for assignment using commercially
> reasonable standards.
>
> Joe.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephanie.Miller@enron.com [mailto:Stephanie.Miller@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 2:20 PM
> To: joego@calpine.com; bradb@calpine.com; jdixon@calpine.com
> Cc: Julie.A.Gomez@enron.com
> Subject: Calpine Docs.
>
>
>
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron on
> 12/22/2000 04:10 PM ---------------------------
>
>
> Gerald Nemec@ECT
> 12/22/2000 04:13 PM
>
> To:   Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON
> cc:
>
> Subject:  Calpine Docs.
>
> Attached are the assignment agreement, the Enfolio, and the Confirm.
>
> (See attached file: CalpineAssignRelease1.doc)(See attached file: Calpine
> Confirm1.doc)(See attached file: CALPINE CORPORATION.doc)
>
>
From: bernadette.hawkins@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, joe.allen@enron.com, scott.bolton@enron.com, jeff.brown@enron.com, aleck.dadson@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, kathleen.magruder@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, janine.migden@enron.com, steve.montovano@enron.com, sue.nord@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com
Cc: joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com
Date: 1999-11-05 12:57:00+00:00
Subject: Colorado Springs Meeting

Folks--
 Attached are my objectives and the budget that I submitted to Rick.  Also 
included is Richard Tabors estimate of how much he thought would be spent in 
each of the regions based on work he has done for us the last two years.  The 
regional costs were not included in my origional submission to Rick.  Call if 
you have questions.
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: george.mcclellan@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-26 15:16:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Help for Wayne

George:
We have a new lawyer in Alan's group starting in a few weeks.  I want this 
lawyer to help Wayne.  I think this will take care of the issue.   Thanks.  
Mark
From: gwyn.koepke@enron.com
To: maureen.raymond@enron.com, j.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-16 23:44:44+00:00
Subject: FW: Curve request follow-up



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hudler, Cindy  
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Koepke, Gwyn
Subject:	Curve request follow-up

Gwyn,

As we discussed earlier, there are no firm due dates  set for  asset models mentioned in my curve request. I discussed the timeframe with Andre again and we agreed that our best estimate would be that we should have all models by end of this month.

Thanks again for working with us on a rather "vague deadline"!

Cindy Hudler
Enron Corporation
Risk Assessment & Control - Underwriting

1400 Smith St.
Houston, Tx 77002-7361

P: 713.853.6944
F: 713.646.3601
E: cindy.hudler@enron.com
From: mike.carson@enron.com
To: mcarson@gtemail.net
Date: 2000-12-04 16:28:00+00:00
Subject: New Cell Phone Number

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 12/04/2000 
04:55 PM ---------------------------


Matt Besch <m_besch@yahoo.com> on 11/30/2000 02:10:37 PM
To: Rebecca Villanueva <VillanuevaR@BRONCOS.NFL.com>, rebecca 
<rebeccam@pocketmail.com>, Steve Servais <steveservais@yahoo.com>, shari 
tellman <sharitellman@yahoo.com>, barry terranova <bterranova@lcclark.com>, 
kevin vanemburgh <kevinvanemburgh@hotmail.com>, Bill Poteet 
<bill_poteet@nmss.com>, chris johnson <chjohnson98@hotmail.com>, David Vogel 
Ksu93 <Ksu93@aol.com>, Kristin Lane <kristin.lane@nytmg.com>, kristin lane 
<kittynyt@aol.com>, James Mairet <james.mairet@kwikset.com>, Jayson and Mary 
<jaymar@ckhnet.com>, Blair Goering <blair.goering@janus.com>, GREG HANSEN 
<captbigpapa@yahoo.com>, Jim Hess <JHess75671@aol.com>, Mike Hoppe 
<mchoppe@worldnet.att.net>, Libby Buttner <libbster007@hotmail.com>, Mike 
Carson <mike.carson@enron.com>, Kevin Conard <conard789@hotmail.com>, cody 
downard <cdownard@vailresorts.com>, Jason BAXENDALE 
<Jason.Baxendale@umb.com>, margaret bek <m_bek@hotmail.com>, "Margaret 
\(student\) Bek" <margaret.bek@pepperdine.edu>, Charlie Besch 
<Charlie.Besch@graphic-tech.com>, Jonathan Besch <jon_besch@yahoo.com>, 
Matthew Bower <mbower@bellatlantic.net>
cc:  

Subject: New Cell Phone Number


hello all...just to let you know, my cell phone number
has changed.

The new number is:
305-923-5687

Take care,

matt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/
From: brbarkovich@earthlink.net
To: dhunter@s-k-w.com
Cc: ann.cohn@sce.com, drothrock@cmta.net, fieldejr@sce.com, isenberg@hmot.com, jdasovic@enron.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com, lys@a-klaw.com, lysherif@yahoo.com, schoongl@sce.com, vjw@cleanpower.org, dominic.dimare@calchamber.com
Date: 2001-07-09 16:12:00+00:00
Subject: Re: REVISED Merged Leg Document

I do not agree with Jeff's changes to Dorothy's language and I am not sure if 
Dorothy does.
In particular, I don't know what is meant by the language in the definition 
of Spot Market
Service which says "and shall include all costs incurred by the electrical 
corporation to
provide retail electric service" which seems to me to go way beyond even 
energy service.  I
am also concerned that there be no way that customers have to pay for A/S 
twice.

Second, I think 30 days is too short a time for a customer on Spot Market 
service to elect
DA or Term Service, since if the UDC is providing Term Service on a best 
efforts basis, that
option might not even be available within 30 days.  Barbara

Delaney Hunter wrote:

> Folks-
> Sorry for the delay --- major computer problems over here. I have used Ann's
> document and added the changes I made as a template. It is in redline and
> the questions are highlighted as well. Please look over it carefully and if
> there is language you are going to provide please do it post haste.
>
> WE WILL NOT HAVE A 2:00 CALL --- I think most folks are just too damn busy.
> So, if there is a question, problem, disagreement, etc on language please
> work it out amongst yourselves and send me new language if applicable.
> Remember this is due to Rick BY 5:00 PM TODAY!!!!!
>
> Call me with questions,
> Delaney
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                       Name: REVISED Merged Leg Language.doc
>    REVISED Merged Leg Language.doc    Type: Microsoft Word Document 
(application/msword)
>                                   Encoding: base64
From: kathy.mcmahon@enron.com
To: gregory.adams@enron.com, cynthia.barrow@enron.com, cliff.baxter@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com, sarah.davis@enron.com, david.delainey@enron.com, janet.dietrich@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com, jeff.donahue@enron.com, andrew.fastow@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, kevin.hannon@enron.com, stan.horton@enron.com, gene.humphrey@enron.com, terrie.james@enron.com, robert.jones@enron.com, mary.joyce@enron.com, elyse.kalmans@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, michael.kopper@enron.com, kenneth.lay@enron.com, sean.long@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, danny.mccarty@enron.com, jordan.mintz@enron.com, jean.mrha@enron.com, lou.pai@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, ken.rice@enron.com, laura.schwartz@enron.com, vasant.shanbhogue@enron.com, jeffrey.shankman@enron.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, gina.taylor@enron.com, mitchell.taylor@enron.com, michael.terraso@enron.com, eric.thode@enron.com, dennis.vegas@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com
Cc: vanessa.bob@enron.com, mary.clark@enron.com, elizabeth.tilney@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-14 10:36:00+00:00
Subject: Invitation

Cindy asked me to forward the attached memo.







Thanks, 
Kathy
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: c..williams@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-26 21:53:10+00:00
Subject: Next Steps

 Bob --

When should we file our complaint at the CPUC?

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hughes, Evan  
Sent:	Friday, August 24, 2001 11:52 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Bob Williams@ENRON; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	Re: SCE Direct Access Bills

fyi -- this just came across my screen.
---------------------- Forwarded by Evan Hughes/HOU/EES on 08/24/2001 11:51 AM ---------------------------

 
Janet.Covington@sce.com on 08/24/2001 11:44:53 AM
To:	"Diann Huddleson" <dhuddles@enron.com>
cc:	"Evan Hughes" <ehughes2@enron.com>, Diane.Romeyko@sce.com, Matt.Pagano@sce.com 
Subject:	Re: SCE Direct Access Bills



Diann,

Your billing dispute has been reviewed and SCE has determined that all
charges were correctly calculated. New accounts were established as a
result of the change in direct access status and financial relationship and
all amounts are properly due and owing.

Please feel free to contact your Account Manager Matt Pagano should you
require assistance with regard to payment.  These bills are due and payable
and subject to further collection activity which may include Late Payment
Charges and/or reversion to dual billing if they remain unpaid.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this
matter.


Janet L. Covington
Account Manager
ESP/AMS Services Division
SSID Administration Bldg., First Floor
7300 Fenwick Lane
Westminster, CA  92683
Phone: 714-895-0198 (54198)
Fax: 714-895-0347 (54347)
janet.covington@sce.com



                    "Diann
                    Huddleson"           To:     janet.covington@sce.com
                    <dhuddles@enr        cc:     diane.romeyko@csc.com, "Evan Hughes"
                    on.com>              <ehughes2@enron.com>
                                         Subject:     SCE Direct Access Bills
                    08/20/2001
                    03:24 PM






Janet, I think I've cleaned this thoroughly.  Let me know if you find
discrepancies.  Thanks.

(See attached file: SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls)
(See attached file: SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls)

Janet,

With reference to the bills listed on the attached, pursuant to Rule 22 and
Rule
10A we are disputing that any charges are properly due and owing on these
accounts.  Each of these accounts has a credit balance.  We are therefore
withholding payment.

(See attached file: SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls)
(See attached file: SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls)


 - SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls 
 - SCE_DA_Bills_081701.xls 



<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: gemerson@sportsrocket.com
Cc: dave.samuels@enron.com, leslie.hansen@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-03 14:49:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Revisions to NDA

Please fax the signed agreement to 713/646-3490.  If you have any questions 
call me at 713/853-3399.  Thanks.



	"George Emerson" <gemerson@sportsrocket.com>
	08/03/2000 09:07 AM
	Please respond to gemerson
		 
		 To: "'Leslie Hansen'" <Leslie.Hansen@enron.com>
		 cc: "'Dave Samuels'" <Dave.Samuels@enron.com>, "'Tana Jones'" 
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 Subject: RE: Revisions to NDA


Dear Leslie:  The changes are fine by me.  In fact, I like them so much,
I'll now use this as our standard NDA. Do I owe you legal fees ;) ??

Pls send me a fax number and address so I can fwd signed fax copy and then
two fair copies via post.

/g

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leslie Hansen [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 3:00 PM
> To: gemerson@sportsrocket.com
> Cc: Dave Samuels; Tana Jones
> Subject: Revisions to NDA
>
>
>
>
> Dave Samuels asked that I review the Nondisclosure Agreement
> that you forwarded
> to him yesterday.  I have reviewed the NDA and prepared a
> number of revisions to
> the Agreement.  Please give me a call to discuss my revisions
> after you have had
> an opportunity it review.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leslie Hansen
>
> (See attached file: ISPNI NDA.doc)
>
>
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.america@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-15 18:13:00+00:00
Subject: The NEW peoplefinder is here!!

Your participation is required.  We provide the tool - the NEW peoplefinder, 
you provide the data - eHRonline.

Join us in launching the NEW peoplefinder.  View your information in the NEW 
http://peoplefinder.enron.com.  Does your data need updating?  Go to 
http://ehronline.enron.com to update your information today.  Enter changes 
today in eHRonline, view updates tomorrow in peoplefinder!  Do your part to 
make the NEW peoplefinder an accurate and useful communication tool.
From: larry.jester@enron.com
To: jay.wills@enron.com, cyril.price@enron.com, greg.trefz@enron.com, joe.errigo@enron.com, doug.miller@enron.com, dean.laurent@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, lawrence.clayton@enron.com, christopher.watts@enron.com, alton.jackson@enron.com, steve.olinde@enron.com
Cc: kayne.coulter@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-26 16:50:00+00:00
Subject: ERCOT

Mike in the back office reminded me to tell everyone that ISO numbers need to 
be put into the Oasis line in Enpower.  Since he does the losses manually 
after the fact this will help him a lot.  Also, the link to the Ercot 
intranet is attached below.  If you trade Ercot, please add it to your 
favorites.  ISO messages, real time load display info, and a new real-time 
ATC calculator matrix are all there.

You guys are doing a great job backfilling KCPL and moving power across the 
tie when we have the transmission.  Sorry about the P&L and Enpower being 
hairy when we do it.  As you've seen, however, when the spreads are there we 
are printing money.  

Be careful also when putting in deals with regards to what book they go in.  
This morning there was a Cinergy wheel in the Ercot book.  It's easy to mess 
up even for the veterns.  Richard "somehow" had a PJM financial deal in the 
Ercot book this morning that just coincidentally lost over $2000.  I'm not 
sure what comment to make on that one.

Thanks again guys, the Ercot book is up over $160K for the month due in part 
to the job you guys are doing.  If you work the phones hard in Ercot, there 
are always people to get between for solid spreads.  

Late,

LJ