Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: messenger@smartreminders.com
To: dutch.quigley@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-20 20:11:24+00:00
Subject: USA Today/ESPN Top 25 College Football Poll


[IMAGE]	
[IMAGE]	
 PLEASE  VISIT OUR SPONSORS: 	
3'x5' Outdoor Flag $9.95. SAVE $25.00! When you buy a flag,we will donate 10% of total Flag Sales to the American Red Cross designated to the relief efforts in New York. CLICK HERE.    	


  Dear Dutch Quigley,   USA Today/ESPN Top 25 College Football Coaches' Poll    1. Miami Fla      (33)  (9-0) 2. Nebraska       (25) (11-0)                 3. Florida         (1)  (9-1)                     4. Oklahoma            (10-1)                  5. Texas                (9-1)                          6. Tennessee            (8-1)                      7. Oregon               (9-1)                  8. BYU             (1) (11-0)                     9. Maryland            (10-1)                       10. Illinois             (9-1)                         11. Michigan             (8-2)                          12. Washington           (8-2)                       13. Stanford             (7-2)                          14. Colorado             (8-2)                          15. Virginia Tech        (8-2)                     16. Washington St        (9-2)                   17. Louisville          (10-1)                  18. South Carolina       (8-3)                    19. Georgia Tech         (7-3)                      20. Marshall             (9-1)                          21. Syracuse             (8-3)                         22. Fresno St            (9-2)                      23. Georgia              (6-3)                        24. Auburn               (7-3)                     25. Arkansas             (7-3)   	


  ---COOL  NEW REMINDERS---Great Quotes of the DayTravel DigestPet Tips ---FAVORITE  REMINDERS---Entertainment NewsChildren's Product RecallsU.S. Market Indicies  Sign up to receive an insightful and inspiring quote of the day. CLICK HERE.   	


To  unsubscribe from this Reminder topic, click  here.  
To unsubscribe  from SmartReminders altogether, click  here.  
[IMAGE]
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: rosalee.fleming@enron.com, kenneth.lay@enron.com
Cc: karen.denne@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-27 14:31:00+00:00

Rosie -- I'm not sure if this went through ... I couldn't find it in my "sent 
file".

Karen -- attached are the documents I mentioned to you a minute ago.
From: furie-lesser@rocketmail.com
To: jeffrey.a.shankman@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-07 05:45:00+00:00
Subject: Re: phone call

Hey Jeff,

Sorry it took me so long to write.  I haven't actually
used my e-mail in about 2 months, but I'm trying to
turn over a new leaf.

Freak show, huh?  What's been going on?

Happy Belated Birthday.  Again, I'm so sorry I didn't
call you on the day.  I'm quite scattered now with
being a Mom and working 3 days a week.

Maddie is doing great.  She's 8 and 1/2 months now,
crawling up a storm, pulling herself up, drinking from
a straw, waving goodbye, and even dancing.  She's
still a pain in the ass at night however, waking up
2-4 times.  UUUGH!

I'd love to talk to you.  Here's my info AGAIN!
Nicole Lesser
37 Grant Street
W. Newton, MA 02465
617-243-0225

Love you, Nicole



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
From: bonnie.white@enron.com
To: richard.sanders@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 14:00:00+00:00

Here is a proposed modification of the indemnification language based on our 
telephone conversation earlier today:

5. Indemnification. Company represents that it is a successor corporation to 
Enron Milford, Inc. and that the Certificate of Incorporation of Enron 
Milford, Inc. on file in the Division of Corporations Files of the Secretary 
of State, State of Delaware, applies to Company.  Company further represents 
that it will act in good faith in investigating and making a determination 
with respect to any claim for indemnification made by Consultant pursuant to 
the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation should an indemnifiable 
event arise.

Let me know what you think.  Thanks.

Bonnie J. White
Enron Litigation Unit
1400 Smith St., Suite 4824
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-7244
Fax: (713) 853-6576
From: leslie.lawner@enron.com
To: barry.tycholiz@enron.com, stephanie.miller@enron.com, m..tholt@enron.com, k..allen@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-13 18:37:29+00:00
Subject: FW: protests PG&E open season

PD is proposed decision. FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	JBennett <JBennett@GMSSR.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-JBennett+20+3CJBennett+40GMSSR+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 11:47 AM
To:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	RE: protests PG&E open season

Leslie -- The Commission was due to vote on PG&E's application for an open
season at yesterday's meeting. There were at least two PDs pending on it
(there may have been a third).  The PD by ALJ Brown denied the application.
The PD by Cmmr. Bilas allowed it to go forward, subject to conditions.  The
item ended up being held until the Commission's next regularly scheduled
meeting (August 2nd).

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawner, Leslie [mailto:Leslie.Lawner@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 9:26 AM
To: jbennett@GMSSR.com
Subject: protests PG&E open season


I was asked to find out whether the CPUC acted on protests filed to the
PG&E open season at its meeting yesterday.  Do you know anything about
this?

Thanks!
From: jdent@mmcable.com
To: smu-betas@yahoogroups.com
Date: 2001-09-07 19:09:33+00:00
Subject: [smu-betas] Hey Woodrow

Drow:

Congratulations on Joe. At least one of your kids likes you.

How is the BBQ joint coming? Have you finished The Undefeated. If so, would
you mind applying your literary mind to a book review for Amazon.com? Feel
free to tell everyone just how great I used to be, still am, and how I led
the Betas in receiving yards, touchdowns and sheer leadership ability for
three straight seasons. Well, if you don't feel like doing that, just tell
'em how great the book is.

Brother Dent



----- Original Message -----
From: woody berry <boethia@hotmail.com>
To: <smu-betas@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [smu-betas] Thank you for being great friends.


> Brothers,
>     He'll never get over that even though I don't deny providing Hutch
with
> some of his best eroticism during his college days when we roomed
together,
> the fact remains Dent was then, as now, short, dumpy, sloth-footed with
> hands like skillets whilst I was tall, lithe, svelte, speedy, with great
> moves and hands like pillows.  It was a no brainer for Hutch to decide who
> to throw to.  It was made even easier when Hutch considered the other
> lineman, Fu-Fu puss, who performed his best imitation of one of Jerry's
kids
> everytime Hutch even thought about throwing one in his direction.
>
>
> Yours in -kai-,
> Drow
>
> PS. Brother Dent, the book signing was again, a really neat affair.  Sorry
I
> couldn't stay longer.  And Brother Hester.....do you remember the legacy
of
> the Beta D---?  It seems it is alive and well.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
>
> At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay
connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's
incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it
up right where they left off years ago.
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/Vk9qlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

At Homecoming 2000, the BETA TENT had the biggest crowd by far.  Stay connected and consider a future homecoming BETA reunion.  It's incredible...forget the 20 years in between...everyone just seems to pick it up right where they left off years ago.



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: andrew.thomas@enron.com
Date: 1999-08-05 16:51:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Long Sentences

Thanks for the update - I can't say I'm too sorry about any delay since I 
haven't had a spare moment to look at them yet anyway.  This project moves so 
fast and there's so much to do it's scary!
From: mark.mcconnell@enron.com
To: greek.rice@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-22 15:58:28+00:00
Subject: RE: Questar Southern Trail West Leg due diligence meeting


This is an asset purchase (a mothballed oil pipeline for conversion to nat gas).  Robert Guthrie did not attend.


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rice, Greek  
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 7:02 AM
To:	McConnell, Mark
Subject:	RE: Questar Southern Trail West Leg due diligence meeting

Guthrie:  are you planning on attending?  Is this the asset purchase?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McConnell, Mark  
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 4:41 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Brassfield, Morris; Huber, Lee; Chandler, Bob; Centilli, James; Ratner, Michael; Guthrie, Robert; Rice, Greek; Hawkins, Don
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Alters, Dennis; Rapp, Bill; Hayslett, Rod; Sandt, Jim; Saunders, James
Subject:	Questar Southern Trail West Leg due diligence meeting



We are planning on meeting on Monday, October 22nd from 10:00 to 11:00 to discuss the Southern Trails Pipeline West Leg data room.  We will meet in EN 1336.  During this meeting, we will discuss:

General description of the project

What data needs to be requested to be included in the data room

Assignments in the data room

Timing of visiting the data room

Please contact me if you are unable to attend or need to send a substitute representative.

Thanks,

Mark


Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com
From: karen.denne@enron.com
To: kenneth.lay@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, mark.frevert@enron.com, jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com, raymond.bowen@enron.com, mark.koenig@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com, rex.rogers@enron.com, .palmer@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, tim.despain@enron.com, stanley.horton@enron.com, s..muller@enron.com
Cc: j..kean@enron.com, vance.meyer@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 23:20:45+00:00
Subject: FW: draft release

Attached is the most recent press release, as of last night.  We held off circulating because we anticipated an updated draft but have not yet received one so wanted you to have an opportunity to review what we have.  Please let me or Mark Palmer know if you have any comments.

Thank you.
Karen
x39757
From: andrea.yowman@enron.com
To: cindy.olson@enron.com, dan.leff@enron.com, fernley.dyson@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com, rod.hayslett@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com
Cc: wes.colwell@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-27 02:22:00+00:00
Subject: VP Commercial Support PRC Sub-Committee

MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF WES COLWELL:

You have been selected to participate on the VP Commercial Support PRC 
Sub-Committee to cross calibrate and rate the Commercial Support Vice 
Presidents.  This PRC will be held on July 20, 2001 in EB 49C1.  You will be 
responsible for representing Vice Presidents in your functional area and/or 
business unit.  The attached file details specifically, the employees we are 
requesting that you represent. 

Two weeks prior to the meeting, you will receive the following information to 
facilitate your preparation. 

1. Employee Profile
2. Consolidated Feedback
3. List of Accomplishments
4. Functional vs Business Unit Ranking Differences

You should discuss the performance of these Vice Presidents with their 
manager and resolve any issues based on feedback received prior to attending 
this meeting.  The results of this committee will be reviewed and approved by 
the VP PRC Committee on July 23, 2001.

If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to contact me at 
ext. 37249.

Wes Colwell
From: mark.guzman@enron.com
To: katie.trullinger@wfsg.com
Date: 2000-11-06 09:56:00+00:00
Subject: RE:

I wouldn't stick around for someone that thinks U of O football is more 
important than getting married.  So, we should hang out sometime soon or 
something.  Boy do I have a ton of shit to tell you about.
From: sarah.novosel@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com, christi.nicolay@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-09 18:39:00+00:00
Subject: Discussion with Scott Miller

I spoke with Scott Miller yesterday about several issues, so of course 
California came up.  Scott expressed frustration with the California 
situation and indicated that he thinks California will never be able to move 
away from its current problems without a comprehensive solution, led by an 
entity like the Administration.  Scott said he thinks all the parties need to 
come to the table and reach some sort of agreement to net out the differences 
between what suppliers are owed and what California thinks it is owed in 
refunds.  Once that is accomplished, the parties would then agree to enter 
into 1-3 year supply contracts at agreed-upon prices for the bulk of 
California's power needs.

Scott has been floating this idea with his colleagues (unnamed) who countered 
with "Would Ken Lay agree to something like that?"  I told him that I agree 
there needs to be a comprehensive solution to California but I did not know 
what Enron would agree to.  I asked him if he has heard anything about the 
Vice President's task force and whether the report will propose something 
like this.  Scott indicated that he and his group have had no contact with 
the task force and he has no information as to what will be in the report.  
This workout plan is just Scott's idea for now.

Scott said he thinks the current scenario is unworkable, that there is not a 
lot of internal support for Hebert's approach, and that things will get 
worse.  For example, Scott said that although generators are the only 
suppliers subject to cost justification at present, if the problems continue, 
marketers will be subject to the same cost justification in the future.

I thought you all would be interested in this conversation.  I told Scott 
that since Joe has changed jobs, that he should feel free to call me with 
questions or to talk about things like this, and he also told me to call him 
whenever we need him.  Although Scott is not expecting a response from us on 
his California idea, if we do have some sort of response, we may want to 
convey it to him just to show our interest in working  with him and his group 
and that we have a similar interest in resolving the problems in California.
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: george.grant@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-21 11:57:00+00:00
Subject: CILCO STORAGE

George, 

Are you looking into these variances?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000 
11:56 AM ---------------------------
KENNY J 
SOIGNET        
03/21/2000 08:58 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT, George 
Grant/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: CILCO STORAGE

The Cilco volumes are different than the confirmed volumes to Cilco.  Please 
review the attached the spreadsheets from Lisa Kinsey, the central desk 
scheduler responsible for the Cilco account.  The biggest variance is in 
January 2000.  Cilco withdrew 200,000 mmbtu's more than we booked @ bammel.  
Please let me know the best way to correct the problem.  I suspect the 
variance is showing up as a transport imbalance.  Also, the nomination for 
the current month is 7,327 mmbtu instead of 7,000 mmbtu per day.  7,000 is 
the volume delivered to Cilco after transport fuel.
 
---------------------


Lisa Kinsey
03/21/2000 08:12 AM
To: Kenny J Soignet/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: CILCO STORAGE

Kenny,
Attached is the worksheet that I have been using to verify Cilco's storage 
balance with Vonda Seckler from Cilco.  Let me know if you need anything 
else.  



Lisa Kinsey
ext 37628
From: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
To: christine.stokes@enron.com
Cc: lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com, sharris1@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-02 16:40:00+00:00
Subject: IOS Posting for 14,000 Capacity for 2001

Christine, pls draft the IOS language for posting the 14,000/day capacity to 
Topock for the period April thru Oct 2001.  I would like the IOS on our Web 
page for Friday 8/4.  The IOS should include  Alt delivery rights to Needles 
and Citizens/Griffith when that point becomes active late next summer (when 
the power plant comes on line).  TW reserves the right to reject all bids (I 
think with the exception of max rate bids).  Please check with the Team and 
Susan Scott with any questions.

Bids will be taken between 10:00am - 2pm CST on Thurs. 8/10.

Please see Lorraine on any questions when drafting the posting or procedures 
(all documents are on the shared drive).

We will need to call shippers and possibly draft a message to be posted in 
Gas Daily for Monday 8/7.
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: paul.simons@enron.com, jonathan.marsh@linklaters.com
Cc: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-26 11:36:00+00:00
Subject: FSA Letter

Paul:

Here is the FSA letter with my comments inserted in red.  I have tried to 
make it a bit stronger by deleting references to our positions being merely 
"arguable."  The language I deleted in the first part of 3.4 I thought was 
unnecessary and just point out doors that may remain open for the SFA.  The 
language added in 3.5 was an attempt to show how much EEFT does vs. 
EnronOnline.

Is there a reason we are referring to Net Works rather than EnronOnline LLC?  
It is also a Delaware limited liability company.  Are we afraid it may have a 

I also wonder if the discussion of EPOL's involvement in 2.2 and 4.2 is 
really needed since the ETA is entered into on EEFT's behalf.  If this has 
not yet been raised by the SFA, it doesn't seem necessary to flag it for 
them.  My position would be that EEFT is a party to that agreement whenever 
it is necessary in connection with an investment.

Mark
From: theresa.zucha@enron.com
To: .taylor@enron.com
Cc: s..theriot@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-26 20:33:50+00:00
Subject: Consent and Amendment Agreement

 



Theresa Zucha on behalf of
Stacy Dickson Granmayeh
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St., EB3884
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  713/345-4582
Fax:  713/646-3490
From: rick.buy@enron.com
To: gordon.mckillop@enron.com
Cc: greg.whalley@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-22 12:05:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Raptor Position Reports for 11/20/00

Can you please add Greg Whalley to the distribution on this report, which by 
the way is quite bebficial to us. Tx Rick Buy
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: mmiller3@austin.rr.com
Date: 2000-09-20 13:18:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Hey!

I will check with my bro, to see if he is interested and let you know.  Get 
some sleep.   Talk at ya later.





	"Mark Miller" <mmiller3@austin.rr.com>
	09/20/2000 11:06 AM
		 
		 To: "Gerald Nemec" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Hey!


Well 35 of 40 spots are confirmed for the party!

I was up all night on it and now working.....yikes!

Does your brother want to come? Or someone else you know?

Sat Oct 21 7-11 pm

It would be great if he did, I have the perfect role!

I'll need his mailing address and e-mail......

Thanks, Later buddy

Mark
From: eugenio.perez@enron.com
To: shona.wilson@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-31 10:15:00+00:00
Subject: Operational Risk

I have taken to heart your request that we try to mitigate operational risk.  
Perhaps I have found another way to serve Energy Operations.

Arthur Andersen and Risk are sponsoring a conference on operational risk 
(www.risk-conferences.com/oprisk2001).  The conference is composed of two 
streams, one of which focuses on quantification and mathematical modeling 
(neural networks, Bayesian models, and other statistical approaches).  The 
quantitative approach to operational risk is akin to how VaR formalized and 
quantified market risk.  It is also similar to the curve fitter that I wrote 
(which uses mathematics to quantify how "good" or "bad" the back end of a 
curve looks given the front end).  

The conference is next Thursday and Friday (8-9) in New York (I just got the 
notice today, so I am sorry for the short notice).

Would you like me to attend?

Regards,



Eugenio
From: alma.carrillo@enron.com
To: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, richard.hanagriff@enron.com, elizabeth.brown@enron.com, donna.scott@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-13 17:47:54+00:00
Subject: TW Letterhead


I am looking for TW letterhead on-line (word document).  Do you have a copy?
If so, please forward a copy.
Alma
36503
From: chartman@nbsrealtors.com
To: eholm@aracnet.com, mark_irwin@beavton.k12.or.us, mark.guzman@enron.com, brendanf@gfsloans.com, chrisc@gfsloans.com, boydjas@hotmail.com, creightonca@hotmail.com, seanpatrick@iname.com, brent_tanner@mindspring.com, kss@rdigroup.com, joev@ripcity.com, billc@rosequarter.com, penn_eric@salkeiz.k12.or.us, seastape@teleport.com, sharkb8@teleport.com, msalove@tqs.com, mccarthp_1@yahoo.com, postke755@yahoo.com, reubenschug@yahoo.com
Date: 2001-01-25 15:51:00+00:00
Subject: Softball (already?)

Greetings
Yes, it is that time of year again.  Time to start thinking about another 
championship season.  This is going to be real preliminary, what I need to 
know is who is interested in playing, then we can get into the gory details.  
Here though is a basic schedule - Register in mid-February.  Season starts in 
May and we will play 5 games in 5 weeks.  Then there is a two week break to 
make up games.  2nd half starts in July and again 5 games in 5 weeks.  The 
cost is going to be around $50-70 depending on things.  Games will be once a 
week starting anytime between 6:30 and 9:30 or something like that.  So, let 
me know if you want to play or not.
Chris
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: keith.petersen@enron.com
Cc: michele.winckowski@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-01 12:33:00+00:00
Subject: certificate questions

Keith, last week you and I discussed briefly Facilities Planning's proposal 
to change the service factor on the Gallup compressor in order to increase 
capacity.  I believe you had concluded that a certificate application would 
be necessary.  Now Arnold Eisenstein is asking me (thru our commercial 
people) whether we would still have to make a filing if our certificated 
capacity could be increased without any physical modification to the 
compressor -- in other words, through a pressure commitment.  My initial 
impression is yes, we would have to make a filing.  Am I out of my mind?  
Does this make sense?  Please advise.
From: rob.gay@enron.com
To: mtnsport@ris.net
Date: 2001-02-05 09:30:00+00:00
Subject: Re: 1959 Topps Willie Mays EBAY # 1104856652

Thank you for the refund.  I am still hopeful you will be able to find the 
card.  Its a fine piece of history.

Regards,

Rob




Colorado Mountain Sports <mtnsport@ris.net> on 02/02/2001 05:44:04 PM
To: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Re: 1959 Topps Willie Mays EBAY # 1104856652


We have a trace running on the package which could take a long time with the 
Post Office. We sent you back a refund yesterday. If we can locate your item 
or another one that is similar we will be sure to let you know.
CMS

Hi, we have been missing each other on the phone.? Were you able to trace
the package?

My home Email is RGGDEE@AOL.com
From: exchangeinfo@nymex.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-18 14:07:00+00:00
Subject: (01-172) Members' Forum on Brent Crude Oil Futures

Notice No. 01-172
May 18, 2001

TO:
All NYMEX and COMEX Division Members

RE:
Members' Forum on Brent Crude Oil Futures


All NYMEX and COMEX Division members are invited to an informational meeting 
regarding the planned Brent crude oil futures contract on Wednesday, May 23, 
at 3:30 PM, on the NYMEX Division trading floor.

This informational forum should not be confused with the special meeting of 
stockholders of NYMEX Holdings, Inc., to elect equity holder directors and 
fill two other vacant positions at 4:00 PM on the 10th floor.

The board and executive committee encourage all members to attend the 
briefing on Brent futures.



__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(01-172)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.
From: michelle.lokay@enron.com
To: steven.harris@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com, mark.mcconnell@enron.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com
Cc: audrey.robertson@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-24 15:22:04+00:00
Subject: California Capacity Report for Week of 01/21-01/25


Transwestern's average deliveries to California were 933 MMBtu/d (86%), with San Juan lateral throughput at 864 MMBtu/d.  Total East deliveries averaged 452 MMBtu/d.  

El Paso's average deliveries to California were 1954 MMBtu/d (67%):
- PG&ETop, capacity of 1140 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 502 MMBtu/d (44%)
- SoCalEhr, capacity 1250 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 954 MMBtu/d (76%)
- SoCalTop, capacity 540 MMBtu/d, deliveries of 498 MMBtu/d (92%)

Thursday's posted Gas Daily prices:
	SoCal gas, large pkgs	  2.155 (-.19)
	PG&E, large pkgs	  2.13 (-.15)
	TW San Juan		  2.025 (-.175)   
	TW Permian		  1.985 (-.24)

Enron basis:	n/a
From: christian.yoder@enron.com
To: dale.rasmussen@enron.com, steven.mccarrel@enron.com, kenton.erwin@enron.com, eric.merten@enron.com, e..jones@enron.com, tracy.ngo@enron.com, susan.rance@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, f..calger@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Cc: .hall@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-09 22:19:47+00:00
Subject: HYDA  -3


The Hall-Yoder Daily Assemsment Index for Friday, November 9, 2001:   -3

Monday       +1
Tuesday       -1
Wednesday  -2
Thursday      -5
Friday          -3

It has become clear that we cannot save ourselves, and so, a takeover would seem to be better than bankruptcy.  Through thick fog it seems that Wall Street banks (lenders to Enron) may favor a Dynegy takeover to the alternative,  and  the Moody downgrade fell just short of the junk bond line.  Tim Belden and Chris Calger flying to Houston means Portland's voice may be heard at one of the many tables in the many board rooms, but is offset by the fact that Tracy Ngo was seen in the photocopy room, rushing to get six months of expense reports submitted to Houston for payout.  

And, the crows were seen swarming out over the calm waters of the river, circling above the waters as if expecting to see something below, eventually rising up in a flock to lead the way south ahead of Tim and Chris.
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com
Date: 2001-04-03 16:06:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Domaine

That's so weird.  Prentice left her car door ajar (when she went to go to 
school yesterday morning, it was dead and she had to get a jump).  

I was surprised that the phone was only 300 pesos.  I thought they'd charge 
by the minute, but apparently, it's a flat 10 pesos for local (i.e., 800 
calls), no matter how long one's one.



	Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
	04/03/2001 04:00 PM
		 
		 To: "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: RE: Domaine

I left the car light on - battery totally dead!  Freezing cold in SF - no
coats - landed at 9 pm - home at 12:30 am.  ugh!!!  300 pesos is just the El
Cid part of the bill - I think the rest will be on your card.  Eldon
actually got them to adjust some of that off as well cuz he said your
connection kept going off.   I say "If only life always gave us credits when
our connections went off!"

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine



we got back ok.  (i didn't know tulsa had such a neat airport.)


 

                    Nancy Sellers

                    <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo        To:
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"               
                    ndavi.com>                     <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>

                                                   cc:

                    04/03/2001 03:50 PM            Subject:     RE: Domaine

 

 




you don't want to know

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 1:47 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Domaine



The entire phone bill is 300 pesos???  Yes, please fax to me.  And please
email me rest of expenses when you get a chance so I can write you a check
for everything (plane,phone, golf, etc., etc.)

You guys get back OK?
From: pizzahut@emsiweb.com
To: kward@ect.enron.com
Date: 2001-11-21 05:41:38+00:00
Subject: Pizza Hut


www.pizzahut.com [IMAGE] 			
  			
[IMAGE]	    [IMAGE]   		
	[IMAGE] 		
	[IMAGE]		
	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
From: stephanie.panus@enron.com
To: fortem@coned.com, janelle.scheuer@enron.com
Cc: edward.sacks@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-19 14:17:00+00:00
Subject: Revised confirmation

Michael/Janelle,

Attached for your review is the revised Annex B and B-1 for the new deal.

Stephanie Panus
From: darlene.forsyth@enron.com
To: joseph.deffner@enron.com, tim.despain@enron.com, stephen.douglas@enron.com, mark.evans@enron.com, rodney.faldyn@enron.com, ben.glisan@enron.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com, travis.mccullough@enron.com, kristina.mordaunt@enron.com, rex.rogers@enron.com, james.sandt@enron.com, barry.schnapper@enron.com, lance.schuler-legal@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, ryan.siurek@enron.com, annmarie.tiller@enron.com, rob.walls@enron.com
Cc: jordan.mintz@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-05 11:19:00+00:00
Subject: EGF-Legal Dealflow Distribution

 Attached is the current EGF-Legal Dealflow Distribution and 1Q Close.

 Please let Jordan Mintz know if you have any questions or comments.  Thanks, 
Darlene
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: sheetal.patel@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-07 11:37:00+00:00
Subject: put on collar

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000 11:36 
AM ---------------------------


Zimin Lu
12/07/2000 11:26 AM
To: Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: put on collar



I re-compiled Exotica.xll, so that the xcol function is a put on collar.

De-add in your Exotica. Add this special one. And use xcol for put.

Then delete the Exotica_xcol_putoncollar.xll

We will build in this functionality in near future.


Zimin



Paulo,

Can you add a flag to xcol function so that we can choose a put or call from 
the
spreadsheet ?

Thanks.

Zimin
From: bill.iii@enron.com
To: portland.shift@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-29 13:37:00+00:00
Subject: Time Zone Change

Sunday morning we will experience the first time zone change of the year.  
The time change is shown below (note NO HE 3 PST).  This means that we will 
now be on the same time as El Paso.  Cheers.
From: judy.hernandez@enron.com
To: dora_thurmond@uniteddc.com, suhernan@llgm.com
Date: 2000-02-11 16:04:00+00:00
Subject: Powerful!!!!

---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000 
04:01 PM ---------------------------


Judy Hernandez on 02/11/2000 03:59:57 PM
To: Su, HERNAN@LLGM.COM
cc:  
Subject: Powerful!!!!


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000 
03:58 PM ---------------------------


Amber Ebow
02/11/2000 03:27 PM
To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT, jchadwick-joshua@worldnet.att.net, 
angiec81@aol.com, smchadwic@yahoo.com, theresachadwick@hotmail.com, 
bdouglas@sfasu.edu, larry_johnson@dci-ltd.com, 
lee_johnson_@notes.seagate.com, kincadam@aol.com, mlittle@aol.com, 
gmatth@coair.com, pell-shell@aol.com, mjpierson@netzero.com, 
fwells@ascap.com, Kim Washington <washington@camdenprop.com>
cc: kechadwi@TexasChildrensHospital.org, rjackson@admin4.hsc.uth.tmc.edu, 
sjohnson@urbanjustice.org, smorgan@pmigroup.com, carlao@bellsouth.net, 
lyric_mase@hotmail.com, "Bowden, Neinka S" <nbowden@bcm.tmc.edu>, "Angela 
Washington" <a-washington1@ti.com>, Shundea 
Thrower<shundea.thrower@wcom.com>, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina 
Blackshear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shyril L 
Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Albert Escamilla/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Powerful!!!!


---------------------- Forwarded by Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT on 02/11/2000 03:23 PM 
---------------------------


Julissa Marron@ENRON
02/11/2000 03:21 PM
To: Marilyn Rivera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Marron 
<Patrick.Marron@aspentech.com>, Tiffany La Dang 
<tiffany@eubanks-architects.com>, "Linda Stevens" <lstevens@wt.net>, Faye 
Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marvia Jefferson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amber Ebow/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Stacey Barclay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynette 
Malone/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Powerful!!!!


---------------------- Forwarded by Julissa Marron/Corp/Enron on 02/11/2000 
03:19 PM ---------------------------


Subject: Powerful!!!!

 - ATT00032.jpg
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: chris_strickland@compuserve.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, grant.masson@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-31 08:21:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Energy Book

Chris,

No problem. Feel free to mention our names.

Vince




Chris Strickland <chris_strickland@compuserve.com> on 01/28/2000 03:54:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, les <les_clewlow@compuserve.com>, Jules 
<lacima@compuserve.com>
cc:  
Subject: Energy Book



Hi Vince,

I have pulled a list of names together that I would like to send some
samples of our chapters of the book too, in the next couple of days,  in
order to try and get one or two sentence "reviews" for the dust jacket of
the book. I obviously won't say anything about Enron's sponsorship until it
is official sorted out, but is it OK if I indicate that yourself and Grant
are contributing material to the book?

I'm proposing to send 5 or 6 chapters to the following - unless you have
any objections or suggestions?

David Shimko
Ehud Ronn
Helyette Geman
Mark Garman
Dragana Pilipovic
Corwin Joy
Ilia Bouchouev
Alexander Edyleland
Steve Thomas

Hope the writing is going OK, and regards to Grant.

Best regards.

Chris
From: dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com
To: eric.bass@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-16 10:28:00+00:00
Subject: RE:

You're not excited about going, are you?  Are you hitting that site daily
now?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:45 PM
To: shusser@enron.com; dfranklin@hanovermeasurement.com;
Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com; daphneco64@bigplanet.com;
lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com
Subject:


http://www.rsn.com/pages/include/cams/campic.html?rsn_resort=telluride
From: harry.arora@enron.com
To: nmwolf@duke-energy.com
Date: 2001-10-22 16:14:46+00:00
Subject: FW: Your Amazon.com order (#002-4083380-7905653): your approval
 required



-----Original Message-----
From: orders@amazon.com [mailto:orders@amazon.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Arora, Harry
Cc: orders@amazon.com
Subject: Your Amazon.com order (#002-4083380-7905653): your approval
required


Hello from Amazon.com.

We wanted to let you know that we're experiencing a delay
with the following item:
    
  Masami Saionji "The Golden Key to Happiness : Words of Guidance and 
	Wisdom"
    Item delayed 4-6 weeks.

To approve this delay or to cancel this item from your order, please
go to:

  http://www.amazon.com/o/availability-approval/2BWVKRATKZGNWH

If we have not received your approval or cancellation by 11/21/01,
we will still try to obtain and ship this item before that date;
otherwise, we will automatically cancel the item for you on that date.

If clicking the above link doesn't seem to work, you can copy and 
paste the link into your browser's address window, or retype it there.

We apologize for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com, and we hope to see you again!

Sincerely,

Customer Service Department
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com
Earth's Biggest Selection
From: mnewsletter@mtlnh.com
To: dfossum@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-10 11:38:00+00:00
Subject: Surge Protection and Grounding

If you have missed any of the Newsletters on IS Barriers in Div 2, Zener
Barriers, Ground Monitoring Systems, Surge Protection, Process I/O,
Rotational Speed Application, or Intrinsically Safe Pneumatic Valves, please
click your reply button and note same.

Is Grounding a Substitute for Surge Suppression Protection?

One of the most common questions regarding Surge Suppression is whether it
is necessary when a grounding system exists. Proper grounding is necessary
for the Instrumentation and Automation systems in use today, but is no
substitute for Surge Suppression equipment in preventing electrical system
damage. Grounding should only be part of the strategy in preventing
equipment damage from electrical surges.

An electrical surge is a burst of voltage that lasts only a matter of
microseconds but which generates very large amounts of current, and this
current must be diverted away from the electrical equipment to be protected.
Some people hold the opinion that if a grounding system is installed, the
electrical system voltage will rise together and lower together and that no
damage to the equipment will occur. While this could be true in theory, the
reality is that very few installations are isolated from other voltages. For
example, the addition of computers with modems or network cards introduces
another ground into the system.

If the two buildings are separated electrically, then the possibility of
damage is minimized, but it is more likely that modems or data lines
interconnect the buildings. A typical scenario might be:

 A lightning strike in the vicinity of one building increases the
 ground potential to 200KV.

 The resistance of the ground decreases this voltage to 15KV
 by the time it gets to the ground circuit of that building.

 As the voltage decreases over the distance to the adjacent
 building, it has lowered to 3KV, with a resulting difference
 of 12KV.

In such a case, the voltage difference between the two buildings generates a
surge current large enough to destroy the communication lines between the
two buildings, and no grounding system can prevent the damage to the
communication ports of the computers. Similarly, any instruments mounted
outdoors can have the same type of voltage difference from the control panel
to which they are connected.

Therefore, while good grounding is essential, it will not neutralize the
potential damage to equipment and processes caused by a surge event.

To discover how you can benefit from an MTL solution in a variety of
applications, visit us at www.mtlnh.com, www.mtl-inst.com, and/or
www.telematic.com. You may call MTL at (800) 835-7075 for the location of
the MTL Representative nearest to you.

To unsubscribe, please use your REPLY button and write "Unsubscribe" in the
subject line.
From: mark.smith@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-07 16:42:00+00:00
Subject: The Mark Report

Here is today's edition.  Enjoy and GO LEAFS.


This information is for the private use of the recipient and may not be 
disclosed to any other entity (including affiliates) without the prior 
written consent of Enron North America.  All of the above prices are 
&indicative8 prices  and are subject to change depending upon changing market 
conditions and liquidity.  The transactions are also subject to negotiation 
of mutually acceptable definitive agreements, satisfactory credit 
arrangements and the approval of the respective management,s of our two 
companies. This term sheet is not intended to create a binding or enforceable 
contract nor is it an offer or a commitment to enter into any transaction.  
All terms are subject to change until  agreement as to a specific transaction 
has been reached.  ENA is not acting as a fiduciary or advisor and you should 
evaluate and understand the terms, conditions, and risks of all transactions 
in making your decisions with respect theret
From: john.goodpasture@enron.com
To: kimberly.watson@enron.com
Cc: dave.neubauer@enron.com, robert.hill@enron.com, eric.gadd@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com, shelley.corman@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-09 17:05:00+00:00
Subject: Altos NA gas model

Kim, I know you have been interested in the development of a long term 
Natural Gas Model for use in the ETS Revenue Management effort.  I agree that 
the ability to model various supply / demand scenarios for North America 
should prove useful in ETS business development efforts, and in particular, 
in predicting the impact of the new, large Alaskan gas supplies on the N.A. 
pipeline grid.

As you know, Vince Kaminski feels that a software product developed by Dale 
Nesbitt (MarketPoint, Inc.) of Los Altos Hills, CA. may be a good choice, and 
one readily available in a relatively short time.  MarketPoint has proposed 
that they work with us in our offices for a week of intensive training and 
testing, so we can make a more informed decision before ordering the 
software.  They have proposed a charge of $12,000, plus expenses, for the 
one-week session, with that cost applied to the first year's subscription 
price (approx. $55-60 M/yr) should we decide to go forward.  The other 
details (timing, ENE resources required, necessary IT interface, etc) still 
need to be worked out, but I believe there is generally a consensus to 
proceed with the test.  

With my recent relocation to the Clean Fuels group, I will no longer be 
responsible for the Alaskan pipeline development.  However, Danny McCarty is 
pulling together a team consisting of people from NNG, NBP and elsewhere in 
ETS to push the project forward.  I believe Eric Gadd will be playing a key 
role as well.  The decision on the long term gas model should appropriately 
be made by the new project team.   

I have attached a draft of the proposed MarketPoint License agreement.  It 
has not yet been fully reviewed by legal (or by Shelley C. for the 
"affiliate" issues).  

Let me know if I can provide any other background or assistance.

JNG
From: james.mcmillan@enron.com
Cc: emilio.vicens@enron.com, michael.wortham@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-11 13:27:00+00:00
Subject: Professional Services Agreement with Paragon

Michelle,

As most Engineering Contractors are beginning to staff up, it is prudent for 
us to have more than one Professional Services Agreements in place for the 
VLNG Front End Engineering Design effort.  Another Company that I have delt 
with in the past, and which also provided assistance to Enron on the Dabhol 
Power Project, is Paragon Engineering Services, Inc.  As requested for 
Technip USA in my e-mail of 5 Dec, please begin negotiations with Paragon 
Engineering Services for a Professional Services Agreement, to be in place in 
the Feb/March timeframe.  The contact person at Paragon is:

 Richard Durfee
 Project Manager
 Paragon Engineering Services, Inc.
 10777 Clay Road
 Houston, Texas 77041
 Phone: (713) 570-8068
 Fax: (713) 570-8068
 E-mail:  rdurfee@paraengr.com

Thanks and regards
James

---------------------- Forwarded by James McMillan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
12/11/2000 01:22 PM ---------------------------


James McMillan
12/05/2000 09:48 AM
To: Michelle Cash@ECT
cc: 
Subject: Professional Services Agreement

Michelle,

Following up on our meeting last week, we need to get a Professional Services 
Agreement in place with Technip USA Corp.  We do not anticipate a need for 
utilizing their resources until Feb/March at the soonest, but as these 
agreements sometimes take a while to negotiate, I believe it appropriate to 
start this one soon.  The contact person at Technip USA is:

 Gerald W. Alves, P.E.
 Commercial Vice President
 Technip USA Corporation
 1990 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 200
 Phone: 713 548 4263
 Fax: 713 548 4013
 Email:  jalves@Technip.com

As discussed, we need a general type Professional Services Agreement so that 
we can draw upon any of their resources at previously established rates, on 
an as required basis.  

Please let me know how we should proceed with getting this agreement in place,

Regards
James
From: monika.causholli@enron.com
To: he@resourceinfo.com
Date: 2001-10-01 12:46:00+00:00
Subject: RE: NBSK prices

Hello Dequan,
Can you tell me how recent this forecast is?

Thanks,
Monika Causholli
Enson Industrial Markets
(713) 345 1510

-----Original Message-----
From: Dequan He [mailto:he@resourceinfo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:43 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: NBSK prices


Hi Monika,
    Please see the attached file for Northern Bleached Softwood 
Kraft Pulp delivered to Japan.  Let me know if you have any 
questions.
    Best regards,
    Dequan

Dequan He
Economist, Asian Service
Resource Information Systems, Inc.
4 Alfred Circle
Bedford  MA 01730
Tel: (781)271-0030 ext. 34
Fax: (781)271-0337
Email: he@resourceinfo.com
From: gina.corteselli@enron.com
To: cindy.olson@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-23 10:46:00+00:00
Subject: Discussion with Delainey on PRC

Steve/Cindy;

David O. and I met with Dave Delainey yesterday to discuss PRC-- as an 
initial step before we convene the committee (hopefully next week).  Here is 
the gist of that discussion:
? Committee: Add Philippe Bibi to the committee (Delainey was to call 
Skilling on that)
? Peer Groups: He's on board with the Peer Group changes (4 to 3) once 
approved by the Policy Committee
? Ratings and Cluster Descriptors: Agrees in principal with our suggestion to 
use different scales for the 360 rating and the meeting ratings.  He'd like 
the meeting rating scale to be numbers vs. adjective descriptors and would 
like to use a 1- 5 cluster scale vs. the present 6 clusters.  Item for agenda 
for Committee.
? Preferred distribution:  PD should be set by the policy committee.  Item 
for agenda for committee.
? Eligibility for PRC- new hires with less than 6 months tenure will not be 
on the slate for discussion at PRC meetings.  They will, however, get 
feedback via the PEP system.  Bonuses for new hires less than 6 mos. will be 
at the discretion of the BU.  Item for agenda for committee.
? Full disclosure of rating results - Delainey wants to discuss this with the 
Committee for feedback.
? PRC Coverage:  Non-exempt employees to be reviewed in meeting on a 1-3 
scale with no preferred distro applied.
? Employee self eval:  Form to be revised and to include employee 
accomplishments.  We'll provide a link in the emp. self eval  form to permit 
the emp. the option to provide feedback on supervisor.
? Ensure diverse PRC committee representation:   Lists of proposed PRC 
committee members to be sent to Michelle Cash's office for review.  Item for 
Committee agenda.
? Rostering:   Delainey wants to discuss  numerical ranking of employees with 
the Committee.

If you have any additional questions or need additional detail, please don't 
hesitate to contact me at your convenience.  Gina
From: andreas@garpmail.com
To: hansruedi.schuetter@csg.ch
Date: 2000-09-06 12:01:00+00:00
Subject: The GARP 2001 Convention

Dear GARP 2001 Speaker
?
Just a gentle reminder that the information I  requested for your 
presentation at the GARP 2001 Convention,  was due in today. Can I please 
have this information by Friday 8th  September so that I will have adequate 
time to include all the details  in the brochure, which is due to go to press 
very shortly. 

The  information that I require as soon as possible is as follows:
1. confirmation of professional details (including  the speaker's name, job 
title, and organisation)
2. confirmation that the topic title is accurate  and to your liking
3. bullet points for your presentation (up to 5 to  6 bullet points - please 
as technical and detailed as possible)
4. contact details (including telephone numbers,  fax no, colleague/PA, full 
address)
?
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to  contact me, otherwise I 
look forward to receiving the above information by  Friday 8th September.
?
Kind regards
?
Andreas

____________________________
Andreas  Simou
GARP 2001 - Conference Producer
Tel? +44 (0) 20 7626  9301
Fax +44 (0) 20 7626 9900