Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: debra.davidson@enron.com
To: portland.desk@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-23 06:50:00+00:00
Subject: Planned Power Outage at 3WTC on Sunday, February 26

The World Trade Center Facilities Superintendent has informed us that PGE 
Underground has a main transformer with a bad network protector and is off 
line.  Power needs to be off to replace this network protector.  While this 
situation is inconvenient, it is an excellent opportuity to put our power 
backup systems to a test under optimimal circumstances, e.g., on a Sunday.  
Listed below is information about the outage.  Please review since it may 
require some action on your part.

PGE must turn off its main power supply to the building from 6 - 7 a.m. and 
then again from 3 - 4 p.m.
The building has a backup generator that will kick in five minutes after the 
main power supply shuts off.
Enron has a UPS that will provide us with five minutes worth of power.
If everything goes well, there should be no impact.
If there are problems with the backup generator or UPS, we could experience a 
power outage.
We should not experience a loss of phone service even in the unlikely event 
of a power outage.
It would be prudent to take precautions if you have any systems that may be 
impacted by a power outage.  You may want to log off your computer and turn 
it off on Friday before you leave the office.

Someone from our local IT group will be here on Sunday in case any problems 
arise.  Please contact Dave Steiner if you have any questions or concerns.
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: drew.fossum@enron.com
Date: 2000-02-25 14:10:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

Recently we approved a "based on utilization" rate in another contract -- the 
rationale was that our minimum reservation charge is zero -- so on those days 
they don't use the point, the amount allocated to reservation component 
(using our discretion to allocate between reservation and commodity) is $0 
and it's still within our minimum so it is not a negotiated rate.  Does that 
make sense to you?


   
	
	
	From:  Drew Fossum                           02/25/2000 01:47 PM
	

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

OK?  Is the per unit rate for the Cal Border deliveries kosher on a firm 
contract?  DF 
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 02/25/2000 
01:46 PM ---------------------------


Christine Stokes
02/25/2000 10:03 AM
To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen 
Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan 
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lorraine Lindberg
cc: Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST


Please review the attached non-standard discount letter for Duke Energy 
Trading & Marketing.  The one year contract for 10,000 Dth/d provides for 
primary EOT-EOT transportation.  Duke is allowed to transport to 
SoCal/Needles at an incremental rate based upon actual utilization.  Duke has 
retained ROFR rights and rights to capacity release revenues above the 
discounted rate.

Please indicated approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY.   If any questions arise 
please contact me at x35702.
From: ed.mcmichael@enron.com
To: robin.barbe@enron.com, michael.bridges@enron.com, heather.choate@enron.com, ruth.concannon@enron.com, troy.denetsosie@enron.com, louis.dicarlo@enron.com, chris.figueroa@enron.com, maria.garza@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com, paul.gregory@enron.com, l..kelly@enron.com, fred.lagrasta@enron.com, w..muench@enron.com, phil.polsky@enron.com, daniel.quezada@enron.com, m..scott@enron.com, melissa.solis@enron.com, yuan.tian@enron.com, victoria.versen@enron.com, grant.zimmerman@enron.com
Date: 2002-04-30 16:07:30+00:00
Subject: FW: Wholesale/Retail Revised Talking Point Slides

Here is a copy of a presentation that is being presented to the creditor's this week in NY.  I thought you would like to see it.  If you have questions, please ask.  However, unless it is urgent, I would prefer to discuss at our team meeting.
Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quaintance Jr., Alan  
Sent:	Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:20 AM
To:	Beffer, Michele; Leff, Dan; Blachman, Jeremy; Stubblefield, Wade; Smida, Ed; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Holzer, Eric; Kitagawa, Kyle; Pearce, Barry; Apollo, Beth; Funkhouser, Shanna; Mills, Scott; Leuschen, Sam; Couch, Greg; McMichael Jr., Ed; Lamb, Marnie; Smith, Jeff E.; Castleman, Kent; Long, Lindsay; Ueckert, Allen W.; LaBaume, Wanda; Johnson, Eric; Nelson, Kimberley; Pearce, Barry; Semple, Robert; 'bsemple@zolfocooper.com'
Cc:	Patrick, Michael K.; Quaintance Jr., Alan
Subject:	RE: Wholesale/Retail Revised Talking Point Slides


All:

Attached are the Final Wholesale Presentation and the Final Wholesale Presentation Talking Points.

  


Thanks,

Alan Quaintance
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: gary.lamphier@enron.com
Cc: aimee.lannou@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-21 13:21:00+00:00
Subject: Central Power & Light

Gary, 

Do you have any record of this?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 
01:20 PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   03/20/2001 01:38 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Juliann Kemp/ENRON@enronXgate, Rebecca Griffin/NA/Enron@Enron 
Subject: Central Power & Light

Daren - was there a deal for 5.000 at CP&L on Feb. 21?  CP&L shows 5.000, but 
I have looked in MOPS and there is not a deal.  Can you verify whether or not 
there was a deal for that day?  Thanks.

Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 01:39 
PM ---------------------------


Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:18 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Central Power & Light

Aimee,

I received a call from CP&L about the February 2001 production invoice.  They 
are showing 5,000 mmbtu on February 21 for HPL.  We are not showing anything 
for HPL on that day.  Could you verify if this is correct?

Thanks for your help.

Rebecca
From: outlook.team@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-27 23:02:00+00:00
Subject: Ava-Vacation

CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Ava-Vacation

Date:		2/14/2001
Time:		5:00 PM - 6:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:
From: .hall@enron.com
To: susan.amador@enron.com, john.anderson@enron.com, victor.bulbes@enron.com, fran.chang@enron.com, jill.chatterton@enron.com, sean.crandall@enron.com, diane.cutsforth@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, heather.dunton@enron.com, michael.etringer@enron.com, scotty.gilbert@enron.com, mollie.gustafson@enron.com, .hall@enron.com, tim.heizenrader@enron.com, bala.kandaswamy@enron.com, chris.lackey@enron.com, eugene.lee@enron.com, chris.mallory@enron.com, michael.mcdonald@enron.com, jim.meyer@enron.com, michael.mier@enron.com, kourtney.nelson@enron.com, john.oh@enron.com, phillip.platter@enron.com, john.postlethwaite@enron.com, jeff.richter@enron.com, donald.robinson@enron.com, holden.salisbury@enron.com, diana.scholtes@enron.com, cara.semperger@enron.com, donna.sheidun@enron.com, jeff.shields@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, david.steiner@enron.com, chris.stokley@enron.com, steve.swain@enron.com, mike.swerzbin@enron.com, jake.thomas@enron.com, stephen.thome@enron.com, elizabeth.vanhouten@enron.com, theresa.villeggiante@enron.com, laura.wente@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com, andrea.woodland@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-01 19:09:49+00:00
Subject: What does AG mean?

As in UBS AG:
AG means the same thing as "incorporated" or "inc."

From a German dictionary:
AG [a  ge ]
(pl. -, -s) (f) (abbr) (= Aktiengesellschaft) plc (Brit);corp. (US);inc. (US).


For those interested in more German:
(incorporated company: Comm: Brit, US) Handelsgesellschaft f;
(limited liability company: Comm) Gesellschaft f mit beschr?nkter Haftung;
(Comm) private/public ~, Privatunternehmen nt/staatliches Unternehmen;

If anyone can actually pronounce these words, stop by.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>
From: jason.sokolov@enron.com
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 10:21:00+00:00
Subject: List of teams and projects

Vince,
here is the list of teams and projects.
There are still a couple of people who have not found their teams yet.
I will try to put them in one of the existing teams.

Jason

Team1: Project Metalgesselschaft (MG)

Lynn Nazareth
Javier Lamas
Shauywn Smith
Carlos Wheelock

Team2: Energy Related Futures Contracts

John Ganguzza
Neeraj Hingorani
Grant Johnson
Duane Maue
Rishad Patel
Eric Van Stone
Paulo Yoshiura

Team3: Standard Option Contracts

Yue Guo
Fang Li
Nan Li
Tracy Pan
Wei Wu
Jeff Planck

Team 4: Standard Options Contract

Felix Feng Lu
Ning Zhang
Rakhi Israni
Sanjay Wankhade
Winni So
Orlando Taylor

Team 5: Power Pool Analysis

Elena Chilkina
Rob Gaudette
Joe Helms
Ken Jett
Todd Litton
Marc Westmoreland
From: fredinvt@juno.com
To: smu-betas@egroups.com
Date: 2000-11-12 19:06:00+00:00
Subject: [smu-betas] more party pics

Beta Brothers,
?
More reunion  pictures ("Elvis and Margaret's Party") have been posted at 
EWooglin.com(aka:  Egroups.com).? The link below should take you directly to 
the proper  page:
?
http://www.egroups.com/files/smu-betas/Pictures/
just enter your e-mail address and pass word and you're there.? (If  you 
forget your e-mail address, click at the appropriate spot and they will  
e-mail it to you again.)
?
Check out the pictures at your convenience.? While you're there, click  My 
Profile in the yellow band near the top of the page.?  In the next screen 
click Edit Profile, then enter your current  address, phone number, etc.? 
When you are done, be sure to click  Save Changes at the bottom of the page.
?
Another interesting area of our site is the Links page(see  the table of 
contents on the left hand side of the page).? There you'll  find some of our 
brothers' business web sites.? Just another?way to  become reacquainted with 
your Beta brothers.? Feel free to suggest  additional web sites. 
?
Enjoy the pictures (more to follow) and don't forget to enter your address  
and phone number.
?
-kai-
E.Wooglin
?

Fred Haulenbeek
1195 Baldwin Road
Hinesburg,  Vermont???? 05461
802 482-4043????  802 482-6319


eGroups Sponsor

[IMAGE]

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
smu-betas-unsubscribe@egroups.com
From: joe.hillings@enron.com
To: terence.thorn@enron.com
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, lora.sullivan@enron.com, david.merrill@enron.com, jose.bestard@enron.com, rob.bradley@enron.com, peter.styles@enron.com, scott.bolton@enron.com, hap.boyd@enron.com, mac.mcclelland@enron.com, carolyn.green@enron.com, john.ambler@enron.com, aleck.dadson@enron.com, chris.long@enron.com
Date: 1999-12-15 15:54:00+00:00
Subject: Enron Government Relations-WTO Working Group Objectives and Goals

Terry: I am pleased that you will serve and appreciate your question asking 
for objectives and goals.  The goal is to get information defining what each 
Enron group wants in energy services liberalization. Second is to have them 
define by country the impediments to our businesses that we want addressed in 
a WTO energy services negotiation and third, what groups or companies in 
various regions of the globe can we enlist to lobby their government in 
support of an energy services agenda.

Ideally I would like to have input by January 15, 2000. Perhaps we can all 
meet in Houston about that time to exchange written information, discuss it 
and plan a strategy for 2000.

I will attach the questionaire that Bob Fisher of the Hills group prepared 
from the Rachel Thompson paper that was distributed to Energy Services 
Coalition members in November and asked that they complete it by the middle 
part of December which is today. So far we have had very little response.  
The WTO is to meet in Geneva this week to decide a schedule to consider 
"services" starting this year. Despite the fact that Seattle did not launch a 
formal round of negotiations, the Uruguay Round concluded seven years ago 
mandated that the WTO begin negotiations on agrucultural and services 
liberalization in 2000. The next formal meeting of the WTO is January 25 in 
Geneva.

Joe
From: rob.gay@enron.com
To: richard.quek@enron.com
Cc: peter.anderson@enron.com, joseph.galan@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-20 12:20:00+00:00
Subject: Re: IFC Precedents

In non-default situations the Lenders allow the banks to have rights and 
typically substantial input on waivers modifications etc.  As you can imagine 
the IFC would not want the liability of being responsible to B banks if they 
changed the deal without their consent and the B banks would e uncomfortable 
turning over that right to a third party.  They would lose control of the 
credit process.






Richard Quek@ECT
02/18/2001 11:50 PM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: IFC Precedents  

Rob,

Thanks for the feedback. Does the IFC veto cover all waivers, consents, 
approvals, etc (except for those that require unanimous approval like changes 
to pricing, tenor, security, etc, of course)?

On the prepayment penalties (other than the customary break-funding costs), 
what have you seen, in terms of the levels imposed?

Regards,
Richard



Rob G Gay@ENRON
02/15/2001 03:48 AM
To: Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Richard Quek/SIN/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: IFC Precedents  

There are prepayment penalties associated with IFC loans.  As to the lender 
Veto, the Veto should only apply to the banks covered by their umbrella and 
should not be applicable to the relationship to other MLA's or uncovered 
lenders.  For instance if OPIC is lending $50MM, FMO $10MM, and the B banks 
$40MM, the voting rights should be 50% for OPIC and 50% FMO (since FMO is the 
lender of record for the B banks).  Unanimous consent items would then 
require both OPIC and FMO to consent.



Peter N Anderson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/14/2001 10:45 AM
To: Rob G Gay/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: IFC Precedents

Rob-

I told Richard that I had no experience with IFC.  Suggested that you may 
have.

Regards
---------------------- Forwarded by Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
02/14/2001 10:44 AM ---------------------------


Richard Quek@ECT
02/14/2001 10:34 AM
To: Peter N Anderson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: IFC Precedents

Peter,

As you might know, we are in the midst of discussions with a group of lenders 
on the Bulacan project in the Philippines. The lender of record if the FMO 
(Netherlands Development Finance Corporation) and the structure is modelled 
on the IFC "A" and "B" loan structure. As the "A" loan lender, FMO is saying 
that they want veto rights over all decisions that are to be taken by the 
lenders. Do you know if the IFC has such veto rights in their facilities - 
will greatly appreciate your feedback on this asap. In addition, does the IFC 
impose prepayment penalties?

Regards,
Richard
From: chuck.paul@a-closer-look.com
To: jskilli@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-09 14:44:00+00:00
Subject: Homecoming

Jeff,  I hear you may be coming in for Homecoming?  I hope you have been
getting all those crazy pictures that have been out there on the net!  Catch
me up,

Chuck

PS  I am on the Committee for next years MS Walk here in Atlanta.  Our group
ranked # 8 in the state for last year's contributions!!


________________________________________
   Chuck Paul
   A Closer Look
   Professional Mystery Shopping Company
   770-446-0590
   Email:  Chuck.Paul@A-Closer-Look.com
   http://www.a-closer-look.com
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-30 06:41:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/30/01; HourAhead hour: 7;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001043007.txt
Error: Invalid variant type conversion

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_5001
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM



---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 7 / Preferred:   6.40 / Final:   6.30)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: SCE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/30/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
From: samantha@mainecoast12.com
To: jwillia@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-12 12:36:19+00:00
Subject: Enter Now for your opportunity Giveaway Vacation!


Are you ready to treat you and your family to a well deserved vacation? Register NOW for a Giveaway vacation to one of over 30 different destinations including Orlando, St. Thomas, LasVegas, and Hawaii just to name a few!
Click here for free registration! http://www.mainecoast12.com 
If you wish o be removed, simply send an email with "REMOVE"in the
subject matter To remove@mainecoast12.com
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: mark.whitt@enron.com
Cc: dan.bump@enron.com, barbara.gray@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-02 11:18:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FW: Production Report

I would call Kent and ask about this.  I would also remind him about our 
request for the pressure data in the September 14 letter and their 
obligations to keep pressures at the average pressure for the 3 year period 
prior to the effect date of the agreement.  

Mark,  We also need you to keep notes, with dates and times, of all your 
discussions and communications with Wildhorse.  Dan, Has been preparing his 
notes and you may want to just add onto his notes.  

Dan,  I also need to get a copy of your notes when you get a chance.





	Mark Whitt@ENRON
	Sent by: Mark Whitt@ENRON
	10/02/2000 10:34 AM
		 
		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: FW: Production Report

Did you see this Gerald.  They have taken out one of our compressors.  Should 
I call Kent Harris?

Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark Whitt/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 09:33 AM -----

	Dan J Bump
	Sent by: Dan J Bump
	10/02/2000 08:11 AM
		 
		 To: Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: FW: Production Report

Shark see attached notes (on the excel spreadsheet) re: compression removal 
at San Arroyo....its ugly.

Also, I told Ken to (remember to) add you as his primary contact.

D


---------------------- Forwarded by Dan J Bump/NA/Enron on 10/02/2000 08:08 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  "Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net>                           10/02/2000 
07:55 AM
	

Please respond to <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
To: "Dan Bump \(E-mail\)" <Dan.J.Bump@enron.com>, "Scott Josey \(E-mail\)" 
<scott.josey@enron.com>, "Gerald R. Nemec \(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
cc: "Arvel Martin \(E-mail\)" <amartin@enron.com> 
Subject: FW: Production Report


Gentlemen,

Please see the attached production report - note the comment under
"DOWNTIME" at the end of the report.  It indicates Wildhorse pulled out a
compressor last week at the San Arroyo Plant and our pressures have
increased.   We are trying to get more information and will pass it along
when we get it.

Ken Krisa


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 7:21 AM
To: Ken
Subject: FW: Production Report




-----Original Message-----
From: Dreineke@aol.com [mailto:Dreineke@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 1:48 AM
To: jjosborne@apex2000.net
Cc: Arvel.Martin@enron.com
Subject: Production Report


Attached is the production report.
We are still having high line pressures.
I will call you after I speak with Wildhorse this morning.
Dan

 - SASEP30-2000.xls
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-24 16:07:00+00:00
Subject: Re: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student

Rajnish,

We shall invite you for  an interview in Houston.

Vince






Rajnish Kamat <kamat@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 10/23/2000 07:55:31 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: UC-Berkeley Graduate Student


Dr. Vincent Kaminski
Managing Director and Head of Research
Enron Corp.

Dear Dr. Kaminski,
It was a pleasure talking with you and attending your talk today.
I am a graduate student in Industrial Engg. and Operations
Research working with Prof. Shmuel Oren
on topics in financial instrument pricing and design of
contracts in deregulated electricity markets. I am also
doing research in auction models and computable equilibrium
models with applications in electricity market design.

I am planning to graduate with a Ph.D. in May 2001 and would
appreciate hearing about any opportunities in your group at Enron.
I am attaching at copy of my resume (file: cvrkamat.doc) for your perusal.

Thanking you,
Sincerely,

Rajnish Kamat
Graduate Student
IEOR, UC-Berkeley

4135, Etcheverry Hall
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94710

 - CVRKAMAT.DOC
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: kenneth.chow@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-25 10:47:00+00:00
Subject: Confidentiality Agreements

Ken, here are the confidentiality agreements that should be signed prior to 
our providing information to our vendors.  Each agreement should be printed 
as duplicate originals on TW letterhead, and signed by an officer of TW.  I 
understand that Mike Nelson is out due to a death in the family; Steve Harris 
is out this week also.  Perhaps Julia White would be willing to sign in order 
to expedite things.

If you have any questions or need further assistance with any aspect of these 
agreements please do not hesitate to call (x30596) or come by.
From: barshk@gtlaw.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com, steven.krimsky@enron.com
Cc: reetzr@gtlaw.com, savagep@gtlaw.com
Date: 2001-11-26 20:46:16+00:00
Subject: Order of Consolidation

      I hope that you had a wonderful Thanksgiving ! 
      FYI-- Judge Stampelos issued an Order consolidating the pending
Pompano Beach and Deerfield Beach air permit challenges into a single
proceeding, which is scheduled to be heard on Tuesday, January 29th, 2002,
through February 1st, 2002.   Under the Order, the pre-hearing stipulation
is required to be filed by January 24th.   I will be sending a copy of the
Order by facsimile.   
       Please keep me apprised of the status of the settlement negotiations
as they progress.   I will send you a copy of the proposed permit language
for the Pompano Beach proceeding upon receipt from Martha Nebelsiek of DEP.

       If you have any questions or comments on the foregoing, please
contact me.  
         --Kerri           


_______________________________________________________________ 
The information contained in this transmission may contain 
privileged and confidential information.  It is intended only 
for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the 
intended recipient,  you are hereby notified that any review, 
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email 
and destroy all copies of the original message. 

To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an 
email to postmaster@gtlaw.com.
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.houston@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-08 21:59:00+00:00
Subject: Juvenile Diabetes Foundation Fundraising

It is my sincere honor to once again lead the Enron team in this year's 
Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) walk scheduled to take place on Sunday, 
November 5, 2000, at the Sam Houston Race Park.  I continue to serve on the 
board of JDF representing Enron and will be Enron's corporate executive for 
this year's fundraising efforts.

As many of you may already know, I am an insulin dependent diabetic myself.  
Even though I know how difficult this disease can be to manage with the 
multiple finger pricks for blood samples and several shots each day, I cannot 
imagine how difficult it is for a small child with this disease.  Taking 
insulin does not cure the disease nor prevent the development of 
complications; insulin is simply their life support system and without it 
they would die.

Enron continues to be a major corporate sponsor for JDF again this year.  JDF 
is a very efficient organization in which approximately 84% of all money 
raised goes directly to research.  Enron's goal this year is to raise 
$225,000 and we need your help.  Enron has been the number 1 walk team for 5 
years in a row and we are not ready to give up first place!  We need team 
leaders, walkers and volunteers to help us reach our goal.  The theme for the 
walk this year is "Knock Out Diabetes" and we would like to have you join us 
for this great event.  The Walk is truly a blast and we had about 500 Enron 
people participate last year and everyone enjoyed it.

If you are interested in volunteering to be a walker or a team leader, or if 
you would like to make a pledge, you may call any of the steering committee 
members listed below.  If you are interested in being a team leader, please 
contact one of the following people immediately so that you may be included 
in the first important and informative training session taking place this 
week.

Thank you very much for your support.

Mike McConnell

Steering Committee Members:

Blanca Bollom X66091
Rachel Feldt  X57629
Deb Gebhardt X39606
Cathy Phillips X36898
John Walt  X35379
Debbie Yates X35305
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: mark.koenig@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-27 21:15:00+00:00
Subject: Invitation for you from Rice University : The National Forum on
 Corporate Finance

Mark,

I left you a message regarding The National Forum on Corporate Finance
at  Rice.

They would be delighted if you could serve as a panel  member
at this conference.

Here are the coordinates of the professor at Rice who
is in charge. I would appreciate if you could call him
and let him know if you can attend.

Thanks.

Vince


Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385
From: casey.evans@enron.com
To: stacey.white@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-07 17:06:00+00:00
Subject: training update!

Stacey,

I've taken Derivatives II and I'm signed up for VAR in Mar '01.  I am also 
going to sign up for the Power Marketing class that Mitzi just attended!

Gracias senorita!!
From: sarita.garza@enron.com
To: stephen.allen@enron.com, randy.armstrong@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com, cutty.cunningham@enron.com, andrew.gieser@enron.com, ruth.jensen@enron.com, david.johnson@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, jim.lynch@enron.com, dan.maschka@enron.com, leo.nichols@enron.com, kyle.purvis@enron.com, mike.riedel@enron.com, ted.ryther@enron.com, larry.urban@enron.com
Cc: john.shafer@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-07 12:16:00+00:00
Subject: John Shafer's Monday Staff Meeting / Conf. Calls

As a reminder, to participate in John's Monday staff meetings.

Monday staff meetings are held at 1:30pm CT in John's office 3AC-3119.

To participate by phone, please dial 1-800-991-9019, Pass Code 6000796#.

Present at the meetings are the management team members:

 Steve Allen
 Bill Kendrick
 Dave Johnson
 Cutty Cunningham

as well as others when necessary.

If you have any questions or if I left anyone off, please let me know. 

Thank you, 
Sarita Garza
Asst. to John Shafer
713-646-7035
From: bwoertz@caiso.com
To: 20participants@caiso.com
Date: 2001-03-07 18:40:00+00:00
Subject: CAISO Notice - Draft Market Stabilization Plan

  ISO Market Participants:
  Attached is the ISO's draft market stabilization plan.  This
document will be the basis of our conference call on Friday, March 9th at
10:00.
   <<Market Stabilization Draft 010307.doc>>
  Byron B. Woertz, Jr.
  Director, Client Relations
  (916) 608-7066

 - Market Stabilization Draft 010307.doc
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: joseph.alamo@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-14 12:37:00+00:00
Subject: Re: San Francisco Examiner: "California told it must solve energy
 problems to hold on to high-tech industry"

Actually, please keep doing this, but send them only to Miyung Buster and ask 
that they be included in the group of articles sent out to everyone twice a 
day.  Miyung's in charge of compiling and distributing such articles on a 
twice-a-day basis.  Thanks a bunch.
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-26 02:58:00+00:00
Subject: Schedule Crawler: HourAhead Failure <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  HourAhead schedule download failed. 
Manual intervention required.
From: phillip.allen@enron.com
To: stagecoachmama@hotmail.com
Date: 2001-02-15 13:30:00+00:00

Lucy,

Here is the 2/2 rentroll.  The total does not equal the bank deposit.  Your 
earlier response answered the questions for #3,11,15,20a, and 35.

But the deposit was $495 more than the rentroll adds up to.  If the answer to 
this question lies in apartment 1,13, and 14, can you update this file and 
send it back.

Now I am going to work on a rentroll for this Friday.  I will probably send 
you some questions about the 2/9 rentroll.  Let's get this stuff clean today.

Phillip
From: john.suarez@enron.com
To: mike.carson@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, corry.bentley@enron.com, evelyn.aucoin@enron.com, jason.choate@enron.com, chip.schneider@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, gwendolyn.williams@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-09 13:57:10+00:00
Subject: RE: Lets get this ball rolling....

Price sheet for delivery date 1/10/02.

 
Gwendolyn, please give me a call (x35267) with the FED ref #.

John 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Carson, Mike  
Sent:	Tuesday, January 08, 2002 7:44 AM
To:	Sewell, Doug; Bentley, Corry; Aucoin, Evelyn; Choate, Jason; Schneider, Chip; Hanse, Patrick; Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); Suarez, John; Williams, Gwendolyn
Subject:	Lets get this ball rolling....

John Suarez will be doing this deal tomorrow (1/9/02).  His extension is 3-5267.

 << File: KOCH01082002.xls >>
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: stacey.richardson@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-13 18:03:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Revised Pooling Point GTC

Not anytime soon, but within the next couple of weeks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richardson, Stacey  
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	RE: Revised Pooling Point GTC

Thanks.  Do you anticipate any more changes to this version?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald  
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 11:51 AM
To:	Wallumrod, Ellen; Richardson, Stacey
Cc:	Thorne, Judy
Subject:	Revised Pooling Point GTC

Please use the attached GTC is place of the previously forwarded for all deals going forward.

 << File: PoolGTC1.DOC >>
From: mday@gmssr.com
To: kmccrea@sablaw.com, kmills@cfbf.com, karpjos@sf.whitecase.com, gworster@txuenergy.com, sscott3@enron.com, askaff@chrm.com, 6266273191@messaging.sprintpcs.com
Date: 2000-12-10 10:30:00+00:00
Subject: Proposed Letter to Commissioners re GIR Proposed Decision

Enclosed is a revised draft letter which a large group of CSA signatories
intend to send to the commission on Monday, in addition to any individual
comments the parties may file to the PD.  I am sending this draft to you as
I understand that some of you may not have seen the last version which was
distributed on Friday.  Our understanding now is the SoCalGas is likely to
sign the letter with a slight moderating of the tone of the final paragraphs
which describe our years of wandering in the wilderness.  ORA is for the
moment not going to sign.  The remainder of the key CSA parties will sign.
We are asking for everyone to get approval to me by phone or email
authorizing us to sign on their behalf and providing details of how you want
the name on the signature block to look by noon on Monday.  Please call me
if you have any problems with that or wish to discuss the letter.  Thank you
very much for your prompt attention to this.

Mike Day

 <<X19029.DOC>>

 - X19029.DOC
From: mark.knippa@enron.com
To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-22 22:51:11+00:00
Subject: My Info



	Hey Kevin,
	Here is my resume......somewhat updated.  I would like to have an
	opportunity to meet and provide a more detail discussion about my
	background and accomplishments that may be a really good fit for
	what ET&S is working towards.  

	Overall I've been with Enron since September of 1989.  My resume
	doesn't go back that far, but I started with Enron Gas Pipeline Operating
	Company (EGPOC) working with Transwestern and then Northern Natural.
	
	I'd like to see Enron grow and develop the asset part of our business
	and I truly believe that I can help accomplish that.  I have a strong history
	of getting things accomplished and I'm a firm believer in the win-win 
	business perspective. I also know how to work through the Enron
	organization to help get pricing, information, etc..

	I would like to establish an interview/meeting as soon as possible in
	order to be able to fully evaluate the opportunity.
	
	I would also appreciate that we keep this correspondence between
	us and the appropriate people within ET&S.

	Thanks,
	mk
From: m..scott@enron.com
To: lisa.a.thielemann@chase.com
Date: 2001-07-13 20:42:33+00:00
Subject: How are you?

Hey Lis,

How's married life treating you these days?  I hope things are good with your job, home, etc.  

I was actually writing you to try and get Bonnie's email address.  My friend Monique and I are going to Seattle next week for a long weekend and I was hoping to get some tips from her as well as possibly get together for lunch or dinner.

Hope to see you soon and please say, "Hi!" to everyone for me next weekend at the lake house.  I'm so sad I'll be missing it, but I'd already booked my flight by the time Clay sent the email.

Love,
Sue
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: william.crooks@enron.com, will.smith@enron.com
Cc: david.poston@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-16 00:15:46+00:00
Subject: New Enpower Issue

I have one more thing to add to the list of Enpower requests:

Deals done under the EPMI Short Term West Hourly desk do not need to be confirmed. The Real Time traders know they need to check "No" in the Confirmation box in Deal Entry; however, it's one detail amidst many that sometimes gets overlooked. It occurred to me that we could avoid the problem of Real Time deals getting unnecessarily confirmed - and unnecessarily confusing counterparties - if we could make "No confirmation" an automatic default for all deals entered under the Short Term West Hourly book. 

I can't think of any other groups which would be adversely impacted by this change, but let's discuss that during the next Enpower meeting. Please let me know what we can do to get this implemented.

Thanks for your help,
Kate
From: alan.comnes@enron.com
To: alan.comnes@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, jennifer.thome@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, dave.perrino@enron.com, ban.sharma@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, b.palmer@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, christopher.calger@enron.com, gray.calvert@enron.com, michael.etringer@enron.com, mark.fillinger@enron.com, jonalan.page@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-13 11:23:00+00:00
Subject: RE: DWR Stranded Cost Update

I am resending the same file as before (although to a larger group) and  need 
to make a correction regarding one assumption.  I am told the analysis does 
not yet include the gas indexed contracts.  We're working on getting them  
included and when they are, the overmarket value will likely increase.
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Comnes, Alan  
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Thome, Jennifer; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James; Mara, 
Susan; Perrino, Dave; Sharma, Ban; Belden, Tim; Alvarez, Ray
Subject: DWR Stranded Cost Update

Using information pulled together by Jennifer and BAN, I requested West 
Tradings Risk/Structuring Group do a more careful analysis of the 
above-market costs associated with the DWR contracts.  Attached is their 
analysis.

In this analysis we examined only the executed contracts and NOT the 
agreements-in principle.  (Only executed contracts were released by the state 
in the last few weeks.) Also, gas-indexed contracts were examined on their 
nongas costs only.  Since gas costs are a pass through on some contracts, we 
excluded them as a conservatism; i.e., we did not ascribe costs to the gas 
portion of the contracts since they will float with market costs over time.  
These contracts were marked to market using current, applicable curves.  
Finally we discounted at the LIBOR rate, which is around 4%/year.

The stranded cost under these assumptions  is approximately $10 billion.  The 
spreadsheet shows the overmarket costs by contract.  Note: a negative 
"mark-to-market" equals a positive stranded cost.

As before, this analysis is based upon Enron's confidential forward curves.  
Approval from Tim Belden is needed before this analysis can be released.

Alan Comnes


 << File: Stranded Cost Analysis Structuring Confidential.xls >>
From: debra.perlingiere@enron.com
To: nony.flores@enron.com, janette.elbertson@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-05 11:46:00+00:00
Subject: Lunch/ other

1.   I am going to the Gadgets, Gizmos, thing on Wed.  can you join me?

2.   Are you interested in the Classical Encounters for Singles Sat.?(see 
Enron in Action)


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490
From: larry.may@enron.com
To: robert.stalford@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-18 15:24:00+00:00
Subject: A Two States Model For Power

---------------------- Forwarded by Larry May/Corp/Enron on 04/18/2001 03:19 
PM ---------------------------
From: Frank Hayden/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/18/2001 03:00 PM
To: Bjorn Hagelmann/ENRON@enronXgate, David Port/ENRON@enronXgate, Vladimir 
Gorny/ENRON@enronXgate, Rudi Zipter/ENRON@enronXgate, Cassandra 
Schultz/ENRON@enronXgate, Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, 
Michael Pitt/EU/Enron@Enron, Mark Thomas/WSX/AZURIX@Exchange, Bharat 
Khanna/ENRON@enronXgate, LaCrecia Davenport/ENRON@enronXgate, Paulo 
Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry 
Arora/ENRON@enronXgate, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, John 
Griffith/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sunil 
Dalal/ENRON@enronXgate, Naveen Andrews/ENRON@enronXgate, 
Michael_schilmoeller@pgn.com@SMTP@enronXgate
cc: lloyd.bloom@elpaso.com@SMTP@enronXgate 

Subject: A Two States Model For Power

One of my GARP connections at El Paso has put forth a white paper for 
discussion. He is hoping it will be adopted across the industry.  He will be 
presenting it June 5th, at the next GARP meeting in Houston, to be hosted by 
El Paso at El Paso.  He is collecting feedback before the upcoming meeting.  
Please review, and comment to either myself of Lloyd at the address below.  


Thanks,
Frank


His email address is:
Lloyd.Bloom@ElPaso.com
From: rajesh.chettiar@enron.com
To: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-16 15:45:00+00:00
Subject: Hoegh Galleon Check list

---------------------- Forwarded by Rajesh Chettiar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
02/16/2001 03:53 PM ---------------------------

Delivery Failure Report
Your document:	Hoegh Galleon Check list
was not delivered to:	Paul Y'Barbo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
because:	User Paul Y'Barbo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT (Paul 
Y'Barbo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@enron.com) not listed in public Name & Address Book

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by 
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.  
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure 
report
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was 
successfully delivered to all other recipients.


EDC_NMAIL01/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, EDC_NMAIL01/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

________________________


To: Wayne Perry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Todd 
Peterson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tony 
Galt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul 
Y'Barbo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan Masters@ect, Dustin 
Collins@ECT
cc: 
From: Rajesh Chettiar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Date: 02/16/2001 03:45:18 PM
Subject: Hoegh Galleon Check list

Based on the comments received, I have compiled check-lists for the Houston 
office and for vessel delivery.

regards

Rajesh
From: alma.carrillo@enron.com
To: rod.hayslett@enron.com, jack.boatman@enron.com, hasan.kedwaii@enron.com, adrian.chua@enron.com, david.duff@enron.com, tina.dunnaway@enron.com, stephen.nimmo@enron.com, steven.swanson@enron.com, sue.vanavech@enron.com, joe.hoang@enron.com, jill.herrmann@enron.com, larry.hill@enron.com, margaret.waters@enron.com, don.stacy@enron.com, richard.zhang@enron.com, terry.lehn@enron.com, lori.saffer@enron.com, scott.abshire@enron.com, larry.steward@enron.com, robert.hayes@enron.com, eyituoyo.ekperigin@enron.com, jean.adams@enron.com, william.aldinger@enron.com, donald.angeletti@enron.com, nancy.bastida@enron.com, bill.bell@enron.com, dannis.bellard@enron.com, ramona.betancourt@enron.com, jean.blair@enron.com, michael.bodnar@enron.com, elizabeth.brown@enron.com, sharon.brown@enron.com, marian.bryant@enron.com, rory.calhoun@enron.com, nancy.callans@enron.com, james.carr@enron.com, steven.chambers@enron.com, karen.clapper@enron.com, steve.coash@enron.com, jeffrey.cochran@enron.com, marion.collins@enron.com, galen.coon@enron.com, james.cramer@enron.com, helen.cummings@enron.com, jodi.dobrinski@enron.com, deborah.dunten@enron.com, dale.eldridge@enron.com, jodie.floyd@enron.com, sherry.forbish@enron.com, laura.giambrone@enron.com, jerry.graves@enron.com, chris.greaney@enron.com, richard.hanagriff@enron.com, crandal.hardy@enron.com, steven.hearn@enron.com, thomas.hebert@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, randy.janzen@enron.com, alice.johnson@enron.com, maggie.matheson@enron.com, janet.mcdaniel@enron.com, beverly.miller@enron.com, christopher.miller@enron.com, tracy.minter@enron.com, bart.monden@enron.com, robert.munson@enron.com, renee.perry@enron.com, diana.porter@enron.com, dale.ratliff@enron.com, byron.reid@enron.com, cynthia.rivers@enron.com, debra.scurlock@enron.com, gerald.skertich@enron.com, ron.spain@enron.com, gary.spraggins@enron.com, james.studebaker@enron.com, kathy.sturr@enron.com, toby.summers@enron.com, david.velen@enron.com, michael.wagoner@enron.com, shirley.walden@enron.com, linda.ward@enron.com, kathy.washington@enron.com, edward.welsh@enron.com, harry.woodson@enron.com, raetta.zadow@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, a..ayres@enron.com, ricki.winters@enron.com, gary.riojas@enron.com, a.ramirez@enron.com, cuong.nguyen@enron.com, patrick.barry@enron.com, larry.davis@enron.com, gaynel.henley@enron.com, bert.hernandez@enron.com, jack.howard@enron.com, jeff.moore@enron.com, josue.vasquez@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 15:39:24+00:00
Subject: TEAM CELEBRATION

Please respond today if you are attending the Team Celebration this Thursday, November 29th at 4pm in the Double Tree.
Alma
36503
From: m..melman@enron.com
To: sara.shackleton@enron.com, tanya.rohauer@enron.com, s..theriot@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-15 16:42:52+00:00
Subject: FW: Revised Documentation


Attached is the close to final documentation evidencing the 2 trades we've just made with Bear Stearns International. We anticipate signing these either later today or tomorrow.






-----Original Message-----
From: Froom, Ilene (Exchange) [mailto:ifroom@bear.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 5:25 PM
To: Melman, Gil M.
Cc: Cooke, Peter Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange); Guinchard, Claude
(Exchange)
Subject: RE: Revised Documentation


Gil:

Please see the revised documentation.

Thank you.

Ilene



 <<Enron VWAPtion 101201.pdf>>  <<Enron Forward 101201.pdf>> 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Froom, Ilene (Exchange) 
> Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 11:09 AM
> To:	'gil_melman@enron.net'
> Cc:	Cooke, Peter Confidential Memo-Counsel (Exchange); Guinchard, Claude
> (Exchange)
> Subject:	Revised Documentation
> 
> Gil:
> 
> Attached are the revised documents.  There are two versions of each, a
> redlined copy and a clean copy.  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ilene Froom
> 
> 
>  << File: Enron Forward Clean.pdf >>  << File: NY14468 Enron North America
> Corp.mark-up.pdf >>  << File: NY14468 Enron VWAPtion.mark-up.pdf >>  <<
> File: Enron VWAPtion Clean.pdf >>
From: lora.sullivan@enron.com
To: steven.kean@enron.com, mark.schroeder@enron.com, scott.bolton@enron.com, rcfisher@hillsandco.com, sburns@pecc.org
Date: 1999-12-06 09:10:00+00:00
Subject: Aaron letter change

Forwarded at the request of Joe Hillings:

---------------------- Forwarded by Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron on 12/06/99 
10:15 AM ---------------------------


"Linda Schmid" <schmid@uscsi.org> on 12/03/99 12:41:00 PM
To: Undisclosed.Recipients@smtp-gw.vma.verio.net
cc:  (bcc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron)

Subject: Aaron letter change



Dear Transborder Data Flow Working Group:

A significant change has been made to the letter to Aaron.  The following
two paragraphs have been rewritten to achieve recognition of the adequacy of
the existing federal and state legislative framework.  Under the procedures
of the Directive, the Commission will have to make a determination of
adequacy, thus, the rewrite to soften the suggestion of how they make that
affirmative determination.

Article 25 of the EU Directive calls for "adequate," not "equivalent"
protection, and the Financial Services Modernization Act, added to the
existing federal and state legislative framework, establishes a high and
enforceable standard for notice, choice, access, and security of consumer
information. This comprehensive legislative framework achieves equivalency
to the Data Protection Directive in protecting customer information covered
by Title V of the FCRA.

Over the next 18 months, the European Commission should follow the process
of rulemaking and implementation of the Act during the Safe Harbor
transition, in order to make a subsequent determination of adequacy based on
how the Act is interpreted and applied.  In the short-term the Commission
should conclude that the federal and state financial services regulators,
with their new statutory privacy mandate, can serve as the independent
enforcement bodies for those financial services companies that choose to
certify under the Safe Harbor.

Please let me know if you object to this change.  The comments are due
today.

Sincerely,

Linda Schmid
Director Electronic Commerce
Coalition of Service Industries
805 15th Street NW, Suite 1110
Washington D.C. 20005
Telephone: (202) 289-7460
Fax: (202) 775-1726
Email: schmid@uscsi.org

************************************************************************
Visit http://www.WorldServicesCongress.com to view industry resolutions for
the WTO Services 2000 Negotiations.
************************************************************************

 - CSI draft letter to Aaron 11_ 19.doc
From: zimin.lu@enron.com
To: shelley.corman@enron.com, chris.gaskill@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, stinson.gibner@enron.com, clayton.vernon@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-21 11:10:00+00:00
Subject: Template for pricing the right of first refusal

Shelley and Chris,

I have set up a template for pricing ROFRs.  The ROFR is priced as a series 
forward start options.

A forward start option gives the holder the right to exercise the option but 
the strike price
is set at the money in future before the option expiration.  The feature 
mimics the "matching the best bid"
in the ROFR.  The underlying for the option is the "best bid", which should 
be closely related to the
price differential between the two hubs that the pipeline connects. Therefore 
the ROFR is case dependent,
as Vince pointed out.  The volatility can be estimated from the "best bid" 
price history. 

With these inputs we can estimate the value of ROFR.  If you have any 
questions concerning the model
please feel free to call me or Vince.


Zimin Lu