From: janine.migden@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, ginger.dernehl@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-20 13:57:00+00:00
Subject: Fwd: NCLC Energy: Electronic Signature; Federal Preemption

This law appears to supercede state laws and allows for electronic 
signatures.  Perhaps this should be circulated to everyone in Rick's group.
Janine
---------------------- Forwarded by Janine Migden/DUB/EES on 06/20/2000 12:53 
PM ---------------------------


DRinebolt@aol.com on 06/20/2000 12:13:15 PM
To: Janine_Migden@enron.com (Janine Migden), Lbell33@aol.com, 
bentine@cwslaw.com (Bentine,John W.), blaskjo@vssp.com (Blasko,Joseph C.), 
Christine_E._Lippold@cng.com (Christine E Lippold), lippold-c@bigfoot.com 
(Christine Lippold), dryan@mwncmh.com (Debbie Ryan), ghummel@mwncmh.com 
(Gretchen Hummel), michelleg@ohioretailmerchants.com (Griffiths,Michelle), 
smhoward@vssp.com (Howard,Steve), Ellis@daytonlegalaid.org (Jacobs,Ellis), 
jcea@mwncmh.com (Jean Cea), jonespl@stargate.net (Jones,Phil), 
Philip_L_Jones@cng.com (Jones,Phil), Jonespl@stargate.net (Phil Jones), 
murraykm@mwncmh.com (Kevin Murray), kwile@mwncmh.com (Kim Wile), 
Becky_L_Merola@enron.com (Becky L Merola), Jmisaros@aol.com, 
mhpetricoff@vssp.com (Petricoff,M. Howard), ben@ohiogrocers.org 
(Piscitelli,Ben), Thomas_S_Reichelderfer@enron.com (Thomas S Reichelderfer), 
preising@rwbeck.com (Reising,Paul), DRinebolt@aol.com, drubin@clevegrowth.com 
(Rubin,David), srandazzo@mwncmh.com (Sam Randazzo), jsmall@cwslaw.com 
(Small,Jeffrey L.), larrys@ohioretailmerchants.com (Stelzer,Jr.,Lawrence J.), 
taftsh@vssp.com (Taft,Sheldon A. ), kwalsh@newenergy.com (Walsh,Ken (E-mail), 
Lara_Leibman@enron.com (Lara Leibman), pmikuls@wpsenergy.com (Phil Mikulsky), 
beverlyejones@mindspring.com (Bev Jones), LColes@rwbeck.com (Coles,Lynn), 
Clevelandutil@hotmail.com (Ivan Henderson))
cc:  
Subject: Fwd: NCLC Energy: Electronic Signature; Federal Preemption


This should be of particular interests to the marketers.

Dave Rinebolt
OPAE

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <owner-energy@lists.nclc.org>
Received: from  rly-ye01.mx.aol.com (rly-ye01.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.198]) 
by air-ye04.mx.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:12:42 -0400
Received: from  cyways.com (66.64p27.118.239.140.in-addr.arpa 
[140.239.118.66]) by rly-ye01.mx.aol.com (v74.17) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 
2000 10:12:27 -0400
Received: from localhost (bin@localhost) by cyways.com (8.9.3/8.7.2) with 
SMTP id KAA26870; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:11:18 -0400
Received: by pikachu.cyways.com (bulk_mailer v1.12); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 
10:11:07 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cyways.com (8.9.3/8.7.2) id KAA26861 
for energy-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:11:07 -0400
Message-ID: <394F7B4A.13B50408@ctel.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:10:18 -0400
From: "Barbara R. Alexander" <barbalex@ctel.net>
Organization: Consumer Affairs Consultant
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: NCLC Energy List <energy@lists.nclc.org>, consumer_list@nrri.ohio-st
Subject: NCLC Energy: Electronic Signature; Federal Preemption
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-energy@lists.nclc.org
Reply-To: energy@lists.nclc.org
X-Archive: http://lists.nclc.org

Both the NCLC Energy List and NARUC Consumer Affairs folks will be
interested in S. 761 which was enacted by Congress and is awaiting
President's signature.  This legislation creates an "electronic
signature" law and preempts any state law to the contrary.  There is an
exception for a number of written signature requirements and
notification of information in writing, including an exemption for
"cancellation or termination of utlity services (including water, heat
and power)" [Section 103(b)(3)]  Please note the absence of specific
reference to telephone service, but the term "utility service" may
suffice.

My preliminary reading suggests that this statute would preempt a state
law or regulation that requires a customer to enroll with a competitive
supplier with a "wet signature."

This legislation does not require a customer to agree to provide a
signature electronically, but does prevent a state from prohibiting a
commercial entity from seeking an electronic signature as a valid and
legal signature.

Barbara Alexander
Consumer Affairs Consultant