Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.worldwide@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-29 18:08:00+00:00
Subject: eThink About It: October 2, 2000

It's another big week for eSpeak, with two thought-provoking events.
Join us Wednesday, October 4 at 10:00 am Houston time for Harry Arora, vice 
president of eCommerce.  Harry will be answering your questions about 
DealBench.
Thursday, October 5 at 10:00 am Houston time, Beth Tilney, managing director 
of marketing and communication, will be on hand to discuss Enron's new 
employee satisfaction survey:  The Pulse.
We hope you'll be able to participate in both events, but if you can't, be 
sure to pre-submit your questions on the eSpeak site.


Incubate your intelligence.  How?  First, recognize you have competitive 
intelligence.  Second, go to the Edge and post competitive intelligence. It's 
that easy.  We'll look for you on the Edge.


Stop by eMeet today and see the latest posting in the Office of the Chairman 
category.  And, remember, this is a discussion forum.  Feel free to add your 
thoughts to what the Office of the Chairman has to say.
From: john.anderson@enron.com
To: bill.williams@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-26 04:40:33+00:00
Subject: RE: REVISED REAL TIME SCHEDULE FOR FEBRUARY

Per Geir's request.....

Traded 1/29 day shift for 2/1 night shift.  See schedule for details.

JohnAnderson

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams III, Bill  
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:13 PM
To:	Anderson, John; Dean, Craig; Guzman, Mark; Meyers, Albert; Mier, Michael; Slinger, Ryan; Solberg, Geir; Williams III, Bill
Subject:	FW: REVISED REAL TIME SCHEDULE FOR FEBRUARY

Please be sure to send me an email regarding changes, and write them on the schedule.
B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Albert  
Sent:	Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:10 PM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	REVISED REAL TIME SCHEDULE FOR FEBRUARY

YOU WILL FIND A NEW SCHEDULE POSTED WITH CHANGES AS THEY RELATE TO OUR GROUP.

IF YOU HAVE ANY CONFLICTS THEN PLEASE TRADE WITH SOMEONE ELSE.

BERT
From: conferences@mail.energycentral.com
To: khyatt@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-15 23:13:57+00:00
Subject: Energy Central Conference Watch - 2/15/02

___________________________________________________________________________

ENERGY CENTRAL CONFERENCE WATCH
  Covering Trade Shows, Conferences and Seminars for the Power Industry
WEEK ENDING February 15, 2002
___________________________________________________________________________
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  Online Registration Available! 
  Look for the events labeled "Online Registration Available!". 
  TO REGISTER INSTANTLY. "Special Offer!" means a special
  discounted price for Energy Central Members!

  Links are provided under selected events.
  ---------------------------------------------------------- 

  This update is a FREE supplement to the Energy Central
  Daily Electric Power News Service. It is delivered each
  Friday and includes New Listings, Upcoming Events, and
  Featured Listings.
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  To receive this service in HTML format, go to 
  http://www.energycentral.com/sections/services/
  ----------------------------------------------------------
  You MAY redistribute this message to others (via e-mail, print, 
  Intranet or other methods), as long as the entire message is kept 
  intact.

  For more information on the Daily Energy Central Electric Power 
  News Service, send a message to newstrial@energycentral.com or type 
  an 'x' in the brackets below and send this message back to
  conferences@mail.energycentral.com.

  Energy Central maintains a comprehensive database of upcoming 
  conferences, seminars and trade shows related to the electric power
  industry. You can access this database at 
  http://www.energycentral.com/sections/events

  You may request more information on any listing in this message 
  simply by typing an 'x' between the brackets next to the listing and
  sending the message back to conferences@mail.energycentral.com. 
  For more information on requesting information, or un-subscribing
  to the Energy Central News Service, see the end of this message.

  [ ] 17-105: Request information on Energy Central Daily News Service

___________________________________________________________________________

  CONFERENCE ANNOUCEMENTS
___________________________________________________________________________
From: cheryl.dudley@enron.com
To: lauri.allen@enron.com, debbie.brackett@enron.com, clem.cernosek@enron.com, robert.cotten@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, melissa.graves@enron.com, elizabeth.hernandez@enron.com, nathan.hlavaty@enron.com, michael.morris@enron.com, donald.reinhardt@enron.com, jefferson.sorenson@enron.com, elsa.villarreal@enron.com, robert.walker@enron.com, irene.flynn@enron.com, shawna.flynn@enron.com, kimberlee.bennick@enron.com, julie.meyers@enron.com, carey.metz@enron.com, bob.bowen@enron.com, lisa.hesse@enron.com, carlos.rodriguez@enron.com, carolyn.gilley@enron.com, gary.lamphier@enron.com, mary.smith@enron.com, joan.quick@enron.com, o'neal.winfree@enron.com, brant.reves@enron.com, russell.diamond@enron.com, george.weissman@enron.com, jim.little@enron.com, vance.taylor@enron.com, susan.smith@enron.com, amelia.alland@enron.com, chris.riegler@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-23 15:23:00+00:00
Subject: 04/01 Assignment, Termination, Expiration Report - Houston Pipe
 Line

Attached is the April 2001 Assignment, Termination & Expiration Report for 
Houston Pipe Line's contracts.  (FYI - It contains all of the entries made by 
our group since the report was last done on 3/8/01, regardless of the 
effective date.)  If you do not need to receive this report or if you know of 
someone else that should receive it, please let me know by e-mail or phone 
(x-36982) so that I can either remove your name from or add their name to the 
distribution list.
From: pma-marketplace@mgfairfax.rr.com
Date: 2001-04-22 18:15:00+00:00
Subject: State of Deregulation Report: Texas

? 
State of Deregulation Report: 
TEXAS 

A comprehensive Report Detailing the Status and Recent Developments in the 
Texas Power Marketplace,?
both Wholesale and Retail 

"If you are involved in the Texas Power Markets, or considering becoming 
involved, this report will save you untold hours... and dollars!!" 

To view the brochure, please download www.pmaconference.com/Texasreport.pdf 


In-Depth Regulatory Analysis 

The PUCT decisions made now will have enormous impact on the Texas 
competitive energy market. Given the established rules, Texas has the 
potential to be a vigorous retail market with many opportunities for the 
energy companies that know the risks and benefits of the marketplace. Our 
State of Deregulation:Texas report will guide you through the newly emerging 
Texas energy marketplace terrain. 

Skipping Stone's State of Deregulation:Texas report on the evolving Texas 
retail markets provides an insightful and detailed analysis of the potential 
opportunities and problems on doing business in the retail electric markets 
in Texas. Insight on the latest orders issued and how they will effect the 
Texas energy market, as well as the market statistics that will impact your 
business are also included in the report. 

Additional topics in the State of Deregulation:Texas report:


Legislative history
Potential Revenues and Number of Customers
Who the Players Are
ERCOT
General Market Design
Code of Conduct Rules
Consumer Protection Rules
Capacity Auction Rules



Texas Market Statistics
Stranded Cost Issues
Pilot Program
California vs Texas
Generation Mix and Its Importance to Successful Competition
Issues to Track
Potential Problems
Conclusion for Possible Opportunities


?? 


Experts Make the Difference 

The State of Deregulation: Texas report has been compiled and written by 
experts in deregulation who have operated retail marketing companies and have 
actively participated in the process of restructuring the retail markets.? 

Based on years of experience, they know what factors are important in making 
the critical decisions you face every day and have compiled that information 
in this report.


Order your copy of the? 
State of Deregulation: Texas ?
report today!? 

The first part of the report, which will include the background and current 
status, will be available May 1st and the supplement, including the May 26th 
decisions from the PUCT, will be available June 15th. 

The cost of this report is $2,000.? 

For additional information or order, download the brochure at: 

www.pmaconference.com/Texasreport.pdf 

?

?
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-16 04:41:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/16/01; HourAhead hour: 5;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001041605.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 5 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/16/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
From: brent.price@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-11 18:22:00+00:00
Subject: MG US visits

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent A Price/HOU/ECT on 11/07/2000 18:21 
---------------------------


Richard Sage
11/07/2000 18:01
To: Shona Wilson/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT 
Subject: MG US visits

Shona, Brent,

Some preliminary reading for you!
Apologies for some duplication amongst these.
Andy Cornfield visited Chicago.
Naomi Connell, Andy Cornfield, Lloyd Fleming, and Eric Gadd visited New York.
From: samuel.schott@enron.com
To: carol.north@enron.com, karen.lambert@enron.com, kelly.lombardi@enron.com, bernice.rodriguez@enron.com, adnan.patel@enron.com, bill.hare@enron.com, steve.venturatos@enron.com, camille.gerard@enron.com, bill.hare@enron.com, tanya.rohauer@enron.com, paul.radous@enron.com, tom.moran@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, frank.davis@enron.com, ken.curry@enron.com, nicole.hunter@enron.com, aparna.rajaram@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-05 18:28:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Click Paper aprovals 3-2-01 _ GCP Response

GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

 

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)



From: Carol North/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/02/2001 03:58 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel 
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan 
Patel/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve 
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G 
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya 
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom 
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Aparna 
Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:  
Subject: Click Paper aprovals

Please see attached.
From: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com
To: controllers.dl-ets@enron.com, laura.giambrone@enron.com, bert.hernandez@enron.com, christine.mcevoy@enron.com, beverly.miller@enron.com, tracy.minter@enron.com, amy.mulligan@enron.com, linda.ward@enron.com
Cc: david.roensch@enron.com, rich.jolly@enron.com, donna.scott@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-23 15:17:28+00:00
Subject: Citizens contract for Griffith operation

Citizens is going to sign the agency and operating agreement today.  TW will be taking over the operations
and monitoring the Griffith plant on Citizens behalf.  We will be monitoring the alarms at the plant and you have
a call out sheet for Citizens personnel.  We also will be responsible for the operations at the plant.  Currently
in Scada we have Griffith Power Plant El Paso and Griffith Power Plant TW.  Please get familiar with the points
and how set points will need to be sent.  To change El Paso, the set point will be at 1.  TW will be at 2.
When you send flow set points of 140,000 that will automatically convert to pressure control.  Set points less than
140,000 will stay on flow control.  We will have to experiment with set points when we have orders on TW and 
El Paso.  Currently we have orders just off of TW.

1.  Currently El Paso is set on 140,000 flow which will control on pressure and TW flow set point is at 120,000.
     this is on flow control.  
2.  When we have a flow order from El Paso we may want to set them on flow control and TW on pressure.   We
     will just have to experiment with the best operation. 
3.  Remember the above mentioned is at the plant and not at the TW Mainline I/C.  We are working with Citizens 
     to be able to see El Paso Mainline I/C.(El Paso will be responsible for the Mainline I/C and setpoints.) 

I put a copy of the agreement in everyone's inbox for your review.  
If you have questions we can get with Craig Lipke with Citizens and ask for their help.  Last conversation with him
was we would just have to operate and see which scenario best fits the situation.  In other words they really don't
know which is the best way to operate.

Thanks DS
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: pthompson@akllp.com, ccobb@akllp.com, lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
Cc: cheryl.lipshutz@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, brett.wiggs@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com, rtaylor@akllp.com
Date: 2000-12-07 16:41:00+00:00
Subject: ESA facility agreement - close to execution version

The first facility agreement which needs to be finished is the ESA Facility 
Agreement.  Peter and/or Chris, could you please send/re-send the most recent 
version with a email stating any open issues, copying everyone on this 
email.  We need to get this one ready to sign tomorrow, if at all possible.

My understanding of the commercial deal is that the scope should include 
change order #3, with 75% of the value of change order #3 payable on or 
before Dec. 27, 2000, and 25% of change order #3 being added to the January, 
2000 payment.

Kent/Lee, sorry I didn't mention this in our phone call this afternoon. 
That's what happens when I'm not working from my list.

Thanks,

Kay
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: brett.wiggs@enron.com, john.ayres@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-02 17:16:00+00:00
Subject: GE turbine contract

Hi there, and happy new year.

I have a stack of turbine contracts which were waiting for signature.  I 
believe the override letter needed signing as well.  Should I send the 
unsigned originals somewhere?

Thanks,

Kay
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: tyrell.harrison@enron.com
Cc: mark.whitt@enron.com, barry.tycholiz@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-24 17:31:00+00:00
Subject: Revised Cannon Amendment

Attached is the amendment letter for Cannon with a payment date of Jan. 4, 
2002.  Let me know if you have any questions.
From: mary.poorman@enron.com
To: mary.poorman@enron.com
Cc: robert.cotten@enron.com, daren.farmer@enron.com, vance.taylor@enron.com, pat.clynes@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-30 15:29:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Flow volumes at Oxy Gladewater, Meter 98926

I checked metered daily, and this has been on since the first of October, we 
had a purchase deal in place for the first 10 days, which went to zero from 
the 11th forward.
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: the.mailout@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-04 20:09:00+00:00
Subject: Pulse Survey Memo from the Office of the Chairman

In October of this year, we asked you to participate in the &Pulse8 survey.  
Over 70% of you were willing to take the time to respond.  Thank you!  This 
is our highest response to an all Enron employee survey - ever.  

In exchange for your candid feedback, we want to provide you with an overview 
of the results for our company.

We realize that you and your management have been working hard to build on 
our strengths and improve in areas of concern for us.  The results reflect 
your substantial efforts.

As you can see from the chart below, thanks to the increased focus on these 
issues provided by the Vision & Values Task Force and your efforts to improve 
communications, we have made significant progress.  

Question	1999 % Positive	2000 % Positive
Employees are encouraged to challenge the status quo	42%	47%
Decisions are communicated well	41%	50%
Employees feel free to voice opinions openly	46%	55%
Enron does a good job of acting on suggestions of employees	45%	52%
Communication across departmental lines is good	30%	34%

Congratulations on your fine efforts.  Improvements in communications across 
the company should enable better performance from all of us.  However, as you 
know, our goal is to have 60% positive in most of these areas by 2001.  So 
our work is not over and these will continue to be areas of attention. 
(Complete survey results are attached for your review.)
 
We are also pleased to report that employees across Enron expressed 
satisfaction in the following areas:
 
Employee benefits ) 82% 
Supervisors/managers deal fairly with people ) 76%
Supervisors/managers encourage teamwork ) 73%
People are treated with respect and dignity ) 73%
Information from top management is credible ) 74%
People would recommend Enron as a good place to work ) 72%
The workload is reasonable ) 67%
People are committed to Enron as more than just a place to work ) 65%

All of these areas improved between one and five percentage points since the 
previous survey.  In fact, we improved in almost every area measured by the 
core survey questions.

Click on the URL below to view the three pages of survey results.
http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/pulseresults.ppt
From: enronsportsbook@yahoo.com
To: j.beyer@enron.com, block.doug@enron.com, b..childress@enron.com, daniel.falcone@enron.com, mark.friedman@enron.com, richard.hanagriff@enron.com, omar.hasan@enron.com, steve.jacobellis@enron.com, gary.justice@enron.com, nat.kreamer@enron.com, aaron.martinsen@enron.com, george.mcclellan@enron.com, kevin.mcgowan@enron.com, tom.mcquade@enron.com, f..moran@enron.com, ted.noble@enron.com, o'malley.justin@enron.com, scott.pack@enron.com, chad.pennix@enron.com, salil.pradhan@enron.com, mark.schroeder@enron.com, e.taylor@enron.com, jay.vandenberg@enron.com, derek.wilson@enron.com, trevor.woods@enron.com, jay.yu@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-07 19:53:39+00:00

Week 2 Results.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
From: rvujtech@carrfut.com
To: rvujtech@carrfut.com
Date: 2002-01-11 14:44:32+00:00
Subject: energy letter 1/11

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures


The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.




Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-11-02.pdf
From: limor.nissan@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-07 15:02:00+00:00
Subject: Enron Canada isda with Transalta

Hi Tana,

The executed ISDA list says that we,ve got one b/t Enron Canada and 
Transalta.  Can I get a copy of the docs faxed to me asap??

Thanks a lot,

Limor

Enron Global Markets
520 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5283
Fax: 212.715.5608
E-Mail: Limor.Nissan@Enron.com
From: ami.chokshi@enron.com
To: mjones7@txu.com, timpowell@txu.com
Cc: cstone1@txu.com, daren.farmer@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-31 11:28:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Enron / HPL Actuals for July 28 - 30, 2000

Tim:

For Day 28, we show a total of 77.5 at the Tap broken down as follows:
  9a through 1p = 0
  2p through 4a = 120.0
  5a = 60.0
  6a through 8a = 0

Please advise.

Regards,
Ami
 
 






"Melissa Jones" <mjones7@txu.com> on 07/31/2000 10:24:09 AM
To: "Charlie Stone" <cstone1@txu.com>, "Gary Green" <ggreen2@txu.com>, 
timpowell@txu.com, daren.j.farmer@enron.com, gary.a.hanks@enron.com, 
carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com, earl.tisdale@enron.com, ami.chokshi@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Enron / HPL Actuals for July 28 - 30, 2000





July 28, 2000

     Teco Tap       10.000 / Enron ; 61.250 / HPL IFERC ; 8.750 / HPL Gas 
Daily

     LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron

July 29, 2000

     Teco Tap       10.000 / Enron ; 100.000 / HPL Gas Daily

     LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron

July 30, 2000

     Teco Tap       10.000 / Enron ; 110.000 / HPL Gas Daily

     LS HPL LSK IC       30.000 / Enron
From: don.black@enron.com
To: john.lavorato@enron.com
Cc: wes.colwell@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 22:58:51+00:00
Subject: FW: <$4.5> mill P&L for tmr's DPR

We will recognize a $4.5mm hit on Wednesday as we roll through adjustments from actualizations from as far back as the year 2000.  If you want a detailed download let me know.  This comes out of our $55mm UA4, but the UA4 seems to grow at the same pace that we clear things up.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hwang, Monica  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:48 PM
To:	Black, Don; Vanderhorst, Barry; Shireman, Kristann; Des Champs, Joseph
Cc:	Michels, David; Mills, Scott
Subject:	<$4.5> mill P&L for tmr's DPR
Importance:	High

We'll be reporting <$4.5> mill for tmr's DPR for Acctg flash-to-actual mainly due to reconciliation of UAF volumes at Reliant, NSR, and SW Gas.  Here's the b/o:

Central <$1,475,491>
East	<$723,130>
Texas	<$54,115>
West	<$2,076,322>
Desk-Level	<$175,111>

Thanks,
Monica Hwang
x3-5070
EB South- 620
From: kimberly.hundl@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-16 15:29:00+00:00
Subject: El Paso Electric Company Deal # 460852

Hi Kate!
I just want to make sure that this is the correct counterparty name.  Usually 
we trade with El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.  Is this name entered correctly?
Kim
From: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
To: sonia.guerra@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-29 20:52:59+00:00
Subject: FW:  LNG Team List



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'Barbo, Paul  
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 3:52 PM
To:	Guevara, Mauricio
Cc:	Hardeman, Kathleen D.
Subject:	 LNG Team List


Mauricio,

Please change my Home number to 713 812-7158 and my FAX number to the number given in the note below.

Thanks,

Paul
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Y'Barbo, Paul  
Sent:	Wednesday, May 16, 2001 3:38 PM
To:	Guevara, Mauricio
Subject:	LNG Team List

Mauricio,

Please change my FAX number to 713 646-6560.

Thanks,

Paul
From: david.oxley@enron.com
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Cc: mary.joyce@enron.com, jeffrey.mcmahon@enron.com, jeanie.slone@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, john.lavorato@enron.com, kriste.sullivan@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-07 14:49:57+00:00
Subject: Severance for ENA lay-off's

Michelle,

As discussed we are planning 200 lay-off's in ENA effective Dec 15. Can you confirm that the $4500 payment is applicable to them, on account of WARN, accrued vacation, etc., If it does presumably we will pay within 7 days of Dec 15.

I am getting a lot of questions and at this stage and simply send we will "confirm it's applicability in next few days".

David
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: ludkam@aol.com
Date: 2000-01-10 12:37:00+00:00
Subject: Re: czeki

To whom?




Ludkam@aol.com on 01/10/2000 11:40:44 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, VKaminski@aol.com
cc:  
Subject: czeki



#1243  $266.00   #1244  24.00       L.
From: carol.clair@enron.com
To: rjr@houston.rr.com
Date: 2000-05-30 11:44:00+00:00
Subject: Credit Issue

Rob:
Our credit person is okay incorporating the Specified Transaction concept 
without a threshold.    Please call me at your convenience to discuss the 
remaining open issues.  Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
From: stanley.cocke@enron.com
To: shift.dl-portland@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-25 21:17:05+00:00
Subject: Sierra Power Corporation

Group,

This evening, Wednesday, 7/25, for HE23-24, Sierra Power has 7mw available to sell.  Please sell for the best price you can get.  They have to run, so they are not price sensitive (but don't rape them).  Since they are only 7mw, if you take a $10 spread that would be fine.  They are in SP15, we are their SC, and their unit ID is VESTAL_6_WDFIRE.

Any questions please give me a call.

Thanks,
Stan
From: master.amar@hoegh.no
To: qalhat.control@enron.com, 00968447774.fax@hoegh.no
Cc: 00968708221.fax@hoegh.no, 00968708221.fax@hoegh.no, masters@enron.com, dan@enron.com, dan.masters@enron.com, tony.galt@enron.com, tony.galt@enron.com, wayne.perry@enron.com, wayne.perry@enron.com, jim.fernie@enron.com, jim.fernie@enron.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com, barbo@enron.com, lhgas@hoegh.no
Date: 2001-05-03 10:53:00+00:00
Subject: ETA Notice.

Dear Sir's.

Confirm ETA Qalhat 13th. May 0900 local time.
Also confirm that pipes on port side, main deck has been rebuild and
there should now be free access for the shore gangway.

Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no.+874 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no.+874 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.+584 330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.+584 430853910 (24hrs.watch)
From: mark.schroeder@enron.com
To: jane.wilson@enron.com
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-17 19:25:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ENRON COMMENTS ON VI DRAFT

good stuff.   mcs




Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
18/07/2000 03:48
To: K Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
shruti.bhatia@ciionline.org
cc: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Neil 
McGregor/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay 
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Wade 
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Akshay 
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr 
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sisir K 
Podder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ashok 
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 

Subject: Re: ENRON COMMENTS ON VI DRAFT

Attached are Enron's comments on Draft VI of the Electricity Bill 2000.  We 
note new and disturbing provisions in this draft that provide for 
interference of regulators in the business of Supply Companies and the 
unacceptable interference of the Central Government and State Legislatures in 
the freedom of transmission and supply enabling the diversion of supply to 
deficient regions.  Finally, there is a provision to cap supply prices in the 
event of extraordinary circumstances that is discussed.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
07/17/2000 09:44 PM ---------------------------


K Seethayya
07/17/2000 01:22 AM
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: shruti.bhatia@iionline.org 

Subject: Re: ENRON COMMENTS ON VI DRAFT  

Jane: Ms Shruti is looking for Enron's comments on 6th draft. She wants put 
our comments in the final submission from CII today evening. You may like to 
make available electronic version of the latest comments on 6th version.

Seethayya



"Shruti Bhatia" <shruti.bhatia@ciionline.org> on 07/17/2000 11:35:43 AM
Please respond to shruti.bhatia@iionline.org
To: K.Seethayya@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: ENRON COMMENTS ON VI DRAFT


Dear Mr Seethayya,

This is in continuation to our telecon on the above subject. I am
writing to request if it is possible to get enron comments on the 6th
draft by this afternoon. Please treat this as urgent.

regards

shruti bhatia
CII
********************************************
Please contact Ms Shruti Bhatia
Executive Officer - Energy Dept.
Confederation of Indian Industry
Gate No.31, North Block
Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium
Lodi Road
New Delhi 110 003

Tel : 4367901, 4366225 / 73 / 76 / 81 / 82
Fax : 4367484, 4366271/ 6311
Email : Kindly send me email now at shruti.bhatia@ciionline.org
From: samuel.schott@enron.com
To: day@enron.com, claudia.clark@enron.com
Cc: tana.jones@enron.com, bernice.rodriguez@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 23:39:00+00:00
Subject: CP/ID 93394, International Paper Corporation

Hi Karen,

I'm in agreement with Tana's message below. I understand that the Trader / 
Requester
applied to EOL as International Paper Corporation, however, after further 
investigation, 
DnB supports that the location of this company is actually a Branch location 
of International Paper Company, CP/ID 1836 - - already an EOL counterparty.

Please confirm and advise.

Please contact Bernice Rodriguez if an inactivation of this Branch record is 
in order.



Bernice, if an inactivation occurs, would you adjust the spreadsheet above on 
the O: drive
and resend it to our EOL distribution as an EOL 03-07-01 Amendment.

Thanks !!

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 03/16/2001 11:10 
PM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 03/15/2001 06:23 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: International Paper Corporation

The above counterparty on the 3/7/01 list is ID#93394.  We had a counterparty 
on the pre-approval list that was called International Paper Company and was 
ID#1836.  Was that one in error?  Are they the same, different?  What's the 
scoop?

Thanks for your help!
From: people@venturewire.com
To: jdasovic@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-06 11:19:00+00:00
Subject: VentureWire People, Wednesday,  June 6, 2001

VentureWire PeopleA:link {text-decoration:none; color: black;} A:visited 
{text-decoration:none; color: black;} A:hover {text-decoration:none; 
color:#006699;}
From: lisa.gang@enron.com
To: serena.bishop@merant.com
Date: 2002-05-20 15:07:17+00:00
Subject: RE:

I'm great except for you know who...god we fight every day...it is so funny...what's going on with you?  you don't want to come back here do you?  i wish you would have stayed...apparently, they hired another consultant, remember Susie..she is going to work part time...we are not busy here at all..we terminated NEVP and SPP so i'm usually done by 11:00...talk with Murray...hows everything else going?  i miss you...i'm thinking about going to law school...crazy, huh but i figure this is my only opportunity to go back to school..i hope all's well...hang in there...its tough times but things always happens for a reason...let me know whats up...
 
[Gang, Lisa] 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Serena Bishop [mailto:Serena.Bishop@merant.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Gang, Lisa
Subject: 



Lisa - How the heck are you??  Need a scheduler?? Serena 

Serena Bishop 
Financial Analyst 
Merant 
503.617.2815
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: stella.morris@enron.com
Cc: anita.luong@enron.com, megan.parker@enron.com, robert.lloyd@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-03 14:54:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Meter 9643 for 1/2000

Cactus Swift is now ERAC:  #169760 for Jan, #138094 for Feb
HPLR Liq:  138544

D


   
	
	
	From:  Stella L Morris                           03/03/2000 02:31 PM
	

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E 
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Meter 9643 for 1/2000

Daren, can these deals be extended or are there new deals to replace the ones 
indicated below?

Thanks, Stella
---------------------- Forwarded by Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT on 03/03/2000 
02:27 PM ---------------------------


	Anita Luong
	03/03/2000 01:35 PM
	
To: Stella L Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Megan Parker/Corp/Enron@ENRON 
Subject: Meter 9643 for 1/2000

Stella,
This is Fred's meter but I helping him out.   Can you please extend 2 deals 
at meter 9643.

114096  HPL Resources Liquids Division ( for 1/2000 only)
93210  Cactus Swift (for 1/2000 and 2/2000)

Let me know if you have questions.

Thanks
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: edward.gottlob@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-20 07:58:00+00:00
Subject: 5 x 24 transactions

FYI.  There might be some back office issues with this.  
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2000 07:57 AM 
---------------------------


Dale Neuner on 03/16/2000 04:25:45 PM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 5 x 24 transactions

My peice of this, the language component, is easy to do. The trouble comes in 
with logistics. We need to check with the Sitara Group to see if this is 
feasible. In the OTC world it's a lay-up because you can enter the different 
legs into the system and skip the weekends. The issue re: doing this on EOL 
is the ability of the system NOT TO NOMINATE on certain dates.

Scott Mills is out on vacation until Monday and he's the man I have to see. I 
will follow up with him next week.

Dale
3-9746
From: karen.denne@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com, mark.palmer@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-21 16:55:00+00:00
Subject: Phil Angelides Remarks

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 05/21/2001 
04:54 PM ---------------------------


Sandra Yamane <SYamane@marathon-com.com> on 05/21/2001 12:40:05 PM
To: "'karen.denne@enron.com'" <karen.denne@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: Phil Angelides Remarks


Phil Angelides addressed Town Hall Los Angeles last week about the energy
crisis.  Angelides was the first speaker in Town Hall's energy series.
Upcoming speakers include John Bryson, Steve Letbetter, Loretta Lynch, and
Ken Lay.

Angelides made the following comments regarding the energy crisis:

1.  A sharp downturn in California will send the national economy into a
slide
2.  California deregulation is a virus that will kill deregulation
nationally.
3.  The power shortage is a problem of our own making.
4.  Californians must conserve power in record-setting levels.
5.  The Governor and Legislator must level with citizens about the energy
crisis
6.  Utility rates must penalize consumption
7.  Californians must unite to reign in generators
8.  The Federal government should impose wholesale price caps
9.  If FERC will not fulfill its obligation to set fair and reasonable
prices, or the price of electricity
     increases 50% more, Californians must fend for themselves, possibly
through the formation of a
     buyers cartel with Oregon and Wash. or by seizing power plants.
From: dave.perrino@enron.com
To: diana.scholtes@enron.com, cara.semperger@enron.com
Cc: alan.comnes@enron.com, andy.rodriquez@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-26 20:56:25+00:00
Subject: FW: Clarification Letter

Diana/Cara,

Attached is a letter from Mark Hackey, which I assume you have already read.  Do you have any issues related to this document that I need to address with anyone on the WSCC OC or WMIC?

Generally the letter seems pretty straight forward, it seems too bad that they hedge, even the Dec 11 implementation date.  Please let me know if there is anything we need to address in this letter,

Thanks,

Dave

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maiser@wscc.com@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Maiser+40wscc+2Ecom+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of "Hackney, Mark W(Z39911)" <Mark.Hackney@aps.com>
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Western Market Interface Committee
Subject:	Clarification Letter

Please read attached letter:

 <<Clarifying Letter.doc>>
Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com
_________________________________________________________________
Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey

 - Clarifying Letter.doc
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: daphneco64@bigplanet.com
Date: 2000-08-31 10:52:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas

25, yes




"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 08/31/2000 10:46:28 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas


How old is she and does she want me to make her reservations?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Bass" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas


>
>
> shanna said it was ok as well
>
>
>
>
> "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 08/31/2000 10:36:02 AM
>
> Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
>
> To:   Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: Merry Christmas
>
>
> o.k. Have a good day. LU-M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Bass" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> To: "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
>
>
> >
> >
> > yeah, i got it.  thank you.
> >
> > I  can go but I was waiting to hear from Shanna to see if she can go
> >
> > I will let you know
> >
> > love,
> > e
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 08/31/2000 08:31:10 AM
> >
> > Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
> >
> > To:   "Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com>, Eric Bass
> <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
> > cc:   "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
> > Subject:  Merry Christmas
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Boys,
> >
> > Your father and I have decided to tell you what  your Christmas present
is
> > early. We will provide to each of you roundtrip  airfare, lodging,
> groceries at
> > the condo, car and lift tickets for our ski  trip. We are not certain
> where we
> > will go but have selected the  dates. We will leave Houston on Sat.,
12/09
> and
> > return Thursday  12/14. Now, what we need to know as soon as possible,
> i.e.,
> > today, so that  we can book the air. If you will accept our Christmas
> present,
> > accompany  us at this time and whether we should book airfare for 4, 5
or
> 6. (I
> > need  to know the ages of the girls.) The airfare costs will be
$300-$500.
> If
> > I book it for 4 or 5, the tickets need to be paid for within 30  days.
> >
> > Merry Christmas. Let us hear from  you.
> >
> > Love, Mom and Dad
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
From: louise.kitchen@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com
Cc: john.lavorato@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 15:12:20+00:00
Subject: RE: Mexico

No support for Mexico.  

Louise

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard  
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 8:22 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.
Cc:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: Mexico 

Can you talk with Jaime and figure out a plan of support for Mexico (if we still need one)? You might also want to check with John and/or Louise.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Jaime  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:40 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Irvin, Steve
Subject:	RE: Mexico 

Thanks Rick,  and let's talk after the holidays about a new game plan...Best regards and happy thanksgiving. 

Jaime Williams. 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Williams, Jaime
Subject:	FW: Mexico 

FYI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hennemeyer, Paul  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:10 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Subject:	Mexico 

Rick

Thanks for your encouraging words during the last few days. I have to say that despite all the difficulties we have had to endure over the past few months, Enron remains the best place I have ever worked.This is due, in no small part, to the great people I share this place with. 

I also owe you an overdue e-mail on the Mexico matter. As I had indicated, I have decided not to take the offer. I have spoken to a number of friends and associates who live in Monterrey and their views are pretty unanimous: Monterrey is a great place to live if one is already settled with a family, but it is altogther different and more difficult for a  single man. Therefore, despite the professional opportunity to work with a great team, I have decided not accept the offer. 

Many thanks for keeping me  in mind, being patient, and moving things along. I will be in touch in the next couple of days. Enjoy your holiday. 

Best regards, 
Paul
From: alan.larsen@enron.com
To: sheila.tweed@enron.com
Cc: kay.mann@enron.com, jeff.slaughter@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-17 17:28:00+00:00
Subject: Override Letters

Sheila--As we discussed, I am attaching revised versions of the ABB and GE 
override letters, clarifying that they dissolve only on assignment to a 
nonaffiliated party.
From: randall.gay@enron.com
To: pooky@pipeline.com
Date: 2000-07-18 11:45:00+00:00
Subject: 2nd for Kathleen, Fwd: Islander

---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 11:38 
AM ---------------------------


ANITAREED@aol.com on 07/18/2000 11:03:23 AM
To: Randall.L.Gay@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: 2nd for Kathleen, Fwd: Islander


This is my response.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <ANITAREED@aol.com>
From: ANITAREED@aol.com
Full-name: ANITAREED
Message-ID: <cc.7782905.26a5b134@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:10:12 EDT
Subject: Re: Islander
To: Mkbass1@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 106

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the update.  Unfortunately, the Civic Club is unable to run the
article in The Islander, because of its political nature.  President Kathleen
Gay reviewed the article, as it was previously written, and advised me last
night that it is against Civic Club policy and bylaws to be involved in
political issues.

If you have questions or comments, please contact Kathleen.

Anita Reed
From: james.derrick@enron.com
To: c..williams@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-29 02:45:52+00:00
Subject: FW: In re F&J Representation

FYR

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Davis, Britt  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:20 AM
To:	Derrick Jr., James
Cc:	Cheek, Charles; Mintz, Jordan; Bushman, Teresa G.; Armogida, Jim; Holsworth, Mark; Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject:	In re F&J Representation
Importance:	High


	This follows up on my voice-mail to you of just a few minutes ago.  I reviewed a voice-mail from Theresa Bushman this morning about the timing on the new Mariner matter that Mariner for which Mariner would like to retain F&J.  She has spoken with Scott Josie, apparently one of our business people, and has been advised that the December 27 closing is critical, due to market conditions.  Theresa also believes that the December 27 date will be aggressive even for F&J, given the late date.  Theresa, please let me know if I have mischaracterized what you said.

	I see two options:

	1.  If you agree with me that we can't sign the letter as is:  I do my best to get an acceptable letter negotiated with Uriel Dutton today.  If I can't, Mariner retains someone else today.   Frankly, I am not optimistic about getting an acceptable letter from F&J, based on where F&J started.

	2.  If you believe that we need to go ahead and get the best deal we can from F&J under the circumstances: I will do my best to get that done by noon or so, and if F&J doesn't budge, we may have to sign the letter as is.

	Caveat:  I don't know if Dutton is in the office this week, so he and I may not be able to communicate quickly.  Also, if we redraft a letter, we will probably not have time to get comments back from all the other interested Enron attorneys.  

	I would also suggest telling Kelly Zelacovitz, Mariner's GC, this morning what our game plan is, and if it is option one, have her go ahead and contact her back-up choices of law firms, start running conflicts checks, etc., and have them be ready to hit the ground running.

	If there is anyone else I need to send this e-mail to, please let me know.

	I am in all day today; please let me know what you want me to do.

	Britt
From: bob.shults@enron.com
To: david.forster@enron.com
Cc: debbie.brackett@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, mary.solmonson@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com
Date: 1999-09-14 10:34:00+00:00
Subject: Counterparty Matrix Update

I talked with Debbie this morning and she gave the following update:

Credit: (profile, headroom, tenor):

List 1 (695 counterparts) completed profiles, headroom and tenor
List 2 (464 counterparts) 300 to be completed profiles, headroom and tenor 
(approx 164 branches, divisions or trash - Debbie to give more details) by Fri
List 3 (51 counterparts)  Next week
List 4 (331 counterparts) Next week

Master Agreements:

List 1 (695 counterparts) by Fri
List 2 (464 counterparts) 300 to be completed by next Fri
List 3 (51 counterparts)  Next week
List 4 (331 counterparts) Next week

Debbie and I will address reject list early next week.  I support sending 
brochures to branches/divisions with process to deal with assuring trading 
only occurs with approved trading entity.

If we can finalize everything by next week we can assure approved profiles 
for startup.  Please contact me if there are any concerns with this schedule.


---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 09/14/99 09:01 AM 
---------------------------


David Forster
09/14/99 01:52 AM
To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Update

Can  someone please update me as to where we stand on:

1) Legal Review
 - Do we have a complete list of master agreements yet for all companies on 
the mailing list?
 - Has legal reviewed the counterparty list and noted any with which they 
think we cannot do business?
 - Has legal adjusted the above to reflect differing state laws? (i.e. has 
not applied a broad brush to all states on account of restrictive laws in 
some)?

2) Credit Review

Can someone fill in the blanks in the attached matrix of credit to-do items 
with the current status and/or ETA of each item?

Profile = Collateral/Non-Collateral/R-O access status identified
Headroom = Credit limit to be used against sigma factors
Tenor = maximum deal length limit
List 1-4 = As per Bob's spreadsheet
List 5 = This is what I am calling the original list of companies which 
credit rejected, but for which they were going to do some additional analysis 
to see if all of them really should have been rejected (the list of 400 
"rejected" companies which credit sent to us).

  Profile  Headroom  Tenor  

List 1  Done  
List 2  
List 3
List 4
List 5

3) Sigma factors

Who is looking after this? When will it be completed for each Product Type?


Thanks,

Dave
From: denis.o'connell@enron.com
To: denis.o'connell@enron.com
Cc: sara.shackleton@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, jeff.kinneman@enron.com, robina.barker-bennett@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-01 18:37:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FSA Synthetic CBO (Mezzanine USD 120m - USD 270m)

Sara - small typo - the Schedule should read "Amended and Restated as of 
March 2, 2001
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: steven.leppard@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, tani.nath@enron.com, shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-10 08:48:00+00:00
Subject: Re:

Steve, 

I assume it's 9:00 a.m.  my time, Monday.
It works for me.

 I haven't responded in time to the 
your message re Thursday. I had a few back
to back meetings in the morning and I read your message quite late
into the day.

Vince





Steven Leppard
11/10/2000 04:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 

Vince, Tani

FYI.

Steve
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven Leppard/LON/ECT on 10/11/2000 
10:27 ---------------------------

	Calendar Entry


Research Meeting w/-Michael, John, Tani, Richard, Joe, Steve & Vince Kaminski 
Brief description:
Date:
Time:

13/11/2000
15:00 - 15:45


Detailed description:


 Invitations

		Phone/Ext	Include
Chairperson:	John Sherriff/LON/ECT	37359	  Yes
Organised by:	Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT		  No

	
Invitations sent to:	Tracie McCormack
Kirsten Nelz
Steven Leppard
	
	
	
	
This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the 
meeting ).