Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: amber.ebow@enron.com
To: karen.lambert@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, r..brackett@enron.com, cynthia.clark@enron.com, counterparty.enron@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com, tom.moran@enron.com, claudia.clark@enron.com, s..bradford@enron.com, lisa.lees@enron.com, juana.fayett@enron.com, jana.morse@enron.com, trang.le@enron.com, paul.maley@enron.com, karen.o'day@enron.com, tanya.rohauer@enron.com, kelly.lombardi@enron.com, brian.lindsay@enron.com, center.eol@enron.com, d..hare@enron.com, amy.heffernan@enron.com, molly.lafuze@enron.com, danny.clark@enron.com, stephanie.panus@enron.com, teresa.mandola@enron.com, tandra.coleman@enron.com, lesli.campbell@enron.com, .taylor@enron.com, kara.lauer@enron.com, kimberly.banner@enron.com, jennifer.mcquade@enron.com, fraisy.george@enron.com, wendi.lebrocq@enron.com, michael.guillory@enron.com, aparna.rajaram@enron.com, maribel.monterrey@enron.com, maria.lebeau@enron.com, albert.escamilla@enron.com, ken.curry@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-18 14:46:14+00:00
Subject: RE: EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-15-01

Good Morning,

Any GCP Adjustments will be highlighted in blue.  Please feel free to give me a call, if you have any questions.

 

Amber N Ebow x5-8331
Global Counterparty_Enron Net Works


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi  
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 6:02 PM
To:	Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Morse, Jana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-15-01


Please see attached.

 << File: EOL 10-15-01.xls >> 
Regards,

Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835
From: jdrmedia1@lists.em5000.com
To: jreitme@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 18:30:53+00:00
Subject: re: your free $10

Dan,

Win Cash Based On Your Skill!  
It's Like Gambling Without The Risk! 
Try It NOW With $10 of OUR MONEY!

http://www.worldwinner.com/cgi/welcome/21eyy?&style=rookie

- If you've wished you could make money playing your favorite games, like Solitaire, FreeCell, Mahjong and Chess...
- If you've screamed at Regis, "I know the answer!  I know the answer! Give me the money!"...
- If you've dreamed of a night in Vegas where you know which machine is going to pay off before you play your quarter.

http://www.worldwinner.com/cgi/welcome/21eyy?&style=rookie

WorldWinner is for you!  Come visit the only site on the Net where everyone plays for cash and winners are paid based on their skill at popular games.  We're so sure you'll love it, we'll give you up to $10 FREE to play now.

Players just like you are taking home over $45,000 EVERY DAY.  There's no risk because we're inviting you to PLAY WITH OUR MONEY!

http://www.worldwinner.com/cgi/welcome/21eyy?&style=rookie

Good Luck!



--------------------------------


-- 

To unsubscribe go to 
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=jdrmedia1&email=jreitme@enron.com 
or to 
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=jdrmedia1 
and enter your email address (jreitme@enron.com)
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu
Cc: kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu, jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
Date: 2000-09-07 17:22:00+00:00
Subject: Re: E220 Case #1

would seem useful if we all contribute in some manner, but i'm open to 
suggestions.  perhaps we could divvy up the questions.




Dylan Windham <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu> on 09/07/2000 04:50:31 PM
To: dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu, kupiecki@haas.berkeley.edu, 
jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
cc:  
Subject: E220 Case #1



Hello,

I have started to look at the case assignment for Monday.  Since, I will be
out of town the following week I will volunteer to write this one up.  I
don't know how he want to divvy up the work (by Questions or everyone does
it all), but let me know.  I have already made a spreadsheet with the
combined cash flow statement that I will send to you tomorrow.  Let me know
how we want to handle this.

--Dylan


Ofc. Dylan H. Windham
Threat Management/Domestic Violence Unit
University of California Police - Berkeley
Room 1 Sproul Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 642-1606
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: nancy.sellers@robertmondavi.com, jeff_dasovich@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-10 21:11:54+00:00
Subject: RE: TYTYTYTYTY

You have just used your quota of exclamation points for the remainder of this year and for all of 2002.  It was very fun.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nancy Sellers [mailto:Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:08 PM
To: 'Jeff Dasovich'
Subject: TYTYTYTYTY


Thank you so much for a wonderful night on Friday.  You were far too
generous in paying for dinner since the wine and corkage were our share and
there wasn't much of that!  It was so fun and I think Prentice really had a
good time too.  Lots  of love and kisses!



Nancy
(707) 251-4870 (phone)
(707) 265-5446 (fax)
"Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
From: darron.giron@enron.com
To: susan.trevino@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-19 09:12:00+00:00
Subject: New Books

Susan,

Attached is the completed book request form.  I just want to clarify a few 
things.  The first three books are for Tagg.  The last two are for Sitara.  I 
will need a region set up in CPR to hold the physical deals.  Do you do 
this?  Or can you point me in the right direction.  I really need this 
completed by the end of the week.  Let me know if there is something else I 
need to do.  Thanks for your help.

DG    3-9573
From: scott.neal@enron.com
To: jonathan.mckay@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-28 20:10:13+00:00
Subject: FW:  URGENT - REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ACTION - UBS Orientation tomorrow
 @The Houstonian



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Clyatt, Julie   On Behalf Of Oxley, David
Sent:	Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:43 PM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.; Ames, Chuck; Anastas, Sherry; Anderson, John; Bass, Eric; Baumbach, David; Baxter, Bryce; Black, Don; Brawner, Sandra F.; Bruce, Michelle; Buckley, Karen; Campos, Anthony; Cashin, Janine; Castillo, Michael; Clause, Kristen; Clyatt, Julie; Curless, Amanda; Davies, Neil; Dhont, Margaret; Ermis, Frank; Ewing, Linda J.; Fitzpatrick, Amy; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Griffith, John; Grigsby, Mike; Heu, Mog; Holst, Keith; Hungerford, James; Huntley, Kelley; Jacobs, Charles; Jarrett,  Anthony; Jones, Brad; Keavey, Peter F.; Keiser, Kam; Lenhart, Matthew; Lewis, Andrew H.; Loibl, Kori; Love, Phillip M.; Maggi, Mike; Mahmassani, Souad; Martin, Thomas A.; May, Larry; Mckay, Brad; Mckay, Jonathan; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Genaro; Mills, Bruce; Neal, Scott; Oquinn, Kari; O'Rourke, Ryan; Oxley, David; Palmer, B. Scott; Perich, Stephen; Reitmeyer, Jay; Ring, Andrea; Romero, Araceli; Ruscitti, Kevin; Schwieger, Jim; Scott, Susan M.; Severson, Russ; Shively, Hunter S.; Slone, Jeanie; Smith, Mathew; Sprowls, Cathy; Storey, Geoff; TAYLOR, Joseph; Tholt, Jane M.; Townsend, Judy; Underwood, Thomas; Valdes, John; Vargas, Laura; Videtto, Melissa; Weldon, V. Charles; Williams, Jason (Trading); Winfree, O'Neal D.; Wolfe, Jason; Worthing, Ashley; Zipper, Andy
Subject:	 URGENT - REQUIRES IMMEDIATE ACTION - UBS Orientation tomorrow @The Houstonian

Date: Thursday, January 24, 2002

Location: The Houstonian Hotel

Orientation will be split into two sessions and divided by alpha-order. Sessions will run 10am-1pm and 2pm-5pm.

We encourage all of you to attend your designated session as valuable information will be presented, and you will have the opportunity to get answers to your questions.

You will need to bring your Enron ID card or drivers license.

You can speed things up tomorrow by filing in the attached forms - alternatively you can complete them there tomorrow

10am Session   Letters A- K

2pm Session Letters L-Z


Registration will be outside of the Juniper Room.

Bus Transportation

Buses will depart from the Java Plaza area on the ground floor of the north building at:

First session 				Second session
8:45am-9am				12:45pm-1pm
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: aucoind@epenergy.com
Date: 2000-10-06 10:38:00+00:00
Subject: Re: tw interconnect agreement

Darin, that is fine.  Revised agreement attached.







"Aucoin, Darin" <AucoinD@EPEnergy.com> on 10/06/2000 08:43:21 AM
To: "'Susan Scott'" <susan.scott@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: tw interconnect agreement


Susan,

I would like to request 1 final change to the interconnect agreement before
execution.  It is a simple change to better clarify the intent of paragraph
3.4

This is how I would like to see it read,

3.4 For a period of two (2) years from the date of the Facilities are
completed and placed in-service, EPFS shall be obligated to
 deliver an average of  12,500 MMBtu/d to TW at the Interconnect
Point.  At the completion of the second year from the date
 the facilities are completed and placed in service, If EPFS has not
met the 9.1 Bcf volume  commitment, EPFS will refund
 $100,000 to TW within thirty (30) days.  At any time during the two
(2) year period should EPFS's cumulative delivery to TW
 at the Inteconnect Point meet or exceed the 9.1 Bcf commitment, EPFS
is relieved  of its volumetric and monetary obligation
 to TW as described in this paragragh 3.4.  .......  rest as
originally writen...


Please let me know what you think.

Darin



******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from El Paso
Energy Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************
From: philippe.giguere@enron.com
To: mark.fisher@enron.com
Date: 2002-04-23 16:27:00+00:00
Subject: Data analysis needed

Mark:

Could you please analyze the data the transfer server in in the directory 
Phillip_G/For_MarkFisher.  You have done the same type of analysis before and 
I have added an example of the output you provided before in the spreadsheet.

All I need is the mean value for the nacelle wind speed, free-stream wind 
speed, and ratio of these two wind speeds for 0.5 m/s bins.

It would be great to get this by 11am tomorrow.

Thanks for your help,

Philippe
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: carlos.sole@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 13:36:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC
 Agreemen t

You lost me.  We talked to Jake about it, and the two issues were GE consent 
and accounting treatment.  At least that's how I remember it.

Kay


From: Carlos Sole on 03/16/2001 01:21 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Re: ENA/Hanover Compressor Company: Letter Agreement and LLC 
Agreemen t  

I thought that we had this conversation yesterday on the reason for the 
structure?
From: darron.giron@enron.com
To: patrick.ryder@enron.com, phillip.love@enron.com, bruce.mills@enron.com, victor.guggenheim@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-12 10:06:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FW: Prison Bitch Name Generator

---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 04/12/2001 
10:04 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Darron C Giron                           04/11/2001 04:00 PM
	

To: "Brent Wallace" <bwallace@zahrsecurities.com> @ ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Re: FW: Prison Bitch Name Generator  

Nipple Nibbler

DG



"Brent Wallace" <bwallace@zahrsecurities.com> on 04/11/2001 02:52:49 PM
To: "James Conlee \(E-mail\)" <jconlee@tradecast.com>, 
<brollman@protrader.com>, <darron.c.giron@enron.com>
cc: <joe@gallup.com>, <fallen@zahrsecurities.com>, <chris@savatech.com> 
Subject: FW: Prison Bitch Name Generator




What's yo name, biznitch?

 http://members.iglou.com/lyons/bitchGen.html
 <<Oz Prison Bitch Name Generator.url>>

 - Oz Prison Bitch Name Generator.url
From: joe.linhart@enron.com
To: jean.adams@enron.com, robert.benningfield@enron.com, larry.berger@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com, john.buchanan@enron.com, kenneth.cessac@enron.com, mary.darveaux@enron.com, sherry.forbish@enron.com, chris.greaney@enron.com, stephen.herber@enron.com, scott.hibbard@enron.com, steve.january@enron.com, randy.janzen@enron.com, rick.kile@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com, joe.linhart@enron.com, penny.mccarran@enron.com, janet.mcdaniel@enron.com, angela.mendez@enron.com, darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, debra.scurlock@enron.com, gary.spraggins@enron.com, g..stage@enron.com, kathy.sturr@enron.com, harry.woodson@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-19 15:57:36+00:00
Subject: Oneok recap Nov.17th




                      Oneok recap for November 2001




                                           


                        Joe.................3-0518
From: register@wesc.org
To: lblair@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 22:16:10+00:00
Subject: FBI: Bin Laden may target Gas Industry

WASHINGTON, Nov. 26 - "The oil and gas industry is on high alert after a Federal Bureau of Investigation warning that Osama bin Laden may have ordered retaliatory strikes against North American natural gas facilities in event of his capture or death", news sources said Monday.

The FBI alerted the American Petroleum Institute, who works directly with Energy Department on security, to issue a warning to oil and gas companies.

"We have received uncorroborated information that Osama bin Laden may have approved plans to attack natural gas supplies in the United States," said the memo, adding that the information was "from a source of undetermined reliability."

The FBI warning continued that "such an attack would allegedly take place in the event that either bin Laden or Taliban leader Mullah Omar are either captured or killed."

Representatives from the world's leading energy companies, policy makers and industry experts will gather January 24, 2002 in Washington DC at the World Energy Security and Commerce forum (http://www.wesc.org) to discuss the new realities facing executives responsible for securing energy assets, transporting them to market and balancing changing political climates.













 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, click here: http://209.143.71.90/er/MailingList/UnSubscribe.jsp?MailingListID=53

































































































































































































































































































------------------------------
Powered by www.EventRebels.com
From: kam.keiser@enron.com
To: andrew.champion@enron.com, susan.trevino@enron.com, shona.wilson@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-07 21:42:10+00:00
Subject: risktrac access

Andrew,

The following are the people that will be setting up new books for Netco.  The e-requests have been submitted.

Kam Keiser
O'neal Winfree
Phillip Love
Scott B. Palmer
John Valdes
Errol McLaughlin



Thanks

Kam
From: steven.south@enron.com
To: patti.sullivan@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-17 11:03:00+00:00
Subject: opal gas day 10

---------------------- Forwarded by Steven P South/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 
12:01 PM ---------------------------


cwduke@duke-energy.com on 10/09/2000 12:31:44 PM
To: steven.p.south@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: opal gas day 10


Of the 45,000 we sold 22,000 was not able to get scheduled by the timely
nom.  With problems at Kemmerer, this volume is vulnerable to cuts.  Any
more thought on how this problem can be resolved?
From: larry.campbell@enron.com
To: joe.hartsoe@enron.com, william.kendrick@enron.com, arnold.eisenstein@enron.com, john.shafer@enron.com, donna.martens@enron.com, ruth.jensen@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-10 20:36:00+00:00
Subject: Redrock Permit Issue, Requested Information

Joe, presented below is the first memo I sent out concering the air permit 
issue:

[Yesterday evening I phoned both the state of Arizona ( agency for stations 1 
and 2) and Region 9 EPA ( agency for stations 3 and 4) concerning the status 
of when the air permits would be issued by both agencies for the Redrock 
expansion.  I was surprised to find out that both agencies stated a 2-4 month 
delay prior to issuance.  They cited back log of other permits, public 
comment periods, and workload as being the main reasons.  I am particularily 
disappointed because there were pre meetings with both agencies identifying 
what was to be included in each application package, and even after the 
applications were submitted in March of this year, each agency came back and 
asked for different information that from what was discussed at each meeting.

I have a call into the state of Arizona ( construction is to begin at Station 
2 and they have jurisdiction for this station) to see if we can initiate  
some construction activities  such as laying pipe and building foundations 
prior to receiving the permit.  I have been given these types of approvals 
from other agencies in the past, but these types of approvals are extremely 
narrow and restrictive.   If this flys I am sure that they will require us to 
make sure the turbine is not brought on site until the permit has been 
issued.  I know this will require written approval from the agency, but this 
may allow us to proceed on schedule and avoid any delays.  Ill keep you 
apprised of this issue.]

I spoke with the ADEQ after our conference call and they directed me to 
another group (compliance) in the air permit section.  They strongly 
suggested that I contact the compliance group before contacting Nancy Wrona, 
Director of the ADEQ.  I left a message with the supervisor of the ADEQ 
compliance section, Kathy McConnell (?) 602-207-2328, but have not heard back 
from her.  Either Bill Kendrick or I will  be touching base with her again, 
tomorrow.

Arnold has given me the following list of construction items he would like to 
have the ADEQ grant us permission/waiver to do in leau of receiving the air 
permits:

 all earthwork
 trench construction and piping tie ins
 all foundation and building construction
 installation of ancillary equipment

This list is probably too aggressive and falls out of what the agency may 
allow us to do.

The EPA contact for the Sta. 3 and 4 air permits: permit engineer  Roger 
Cohn      (415) 744-1238
      Supervisor  Geraldo Rios    (415) 744-1259

The ADEQ contact for Sta. 1 and 2 air permit permit engineer  Shudeish 
Mahadev (?)   (602) 207-2323
      Director   Nancy Wrona
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: sharen.cason@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-17 13:41:00+00:00
Subject: Re: #499147

You're right - bankruptcy is a likely move for PG&E. But this deal was 
entered in place of an existing position we had with PG&E in the California 
Power Exchange, and it's been approved by our legal and credit departments.

Let me know if you have further questions.

Thanks,
Kate


   
	
	
	From:  Sharen Cason                           01/17/2001 01:12 PM
	

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: #499147

This deal is with PG&E.  I thought they were going into bankruptcy.  Can you 
check and see if this is a wrong co name or what.

Thanks!
From: gramlr@pjm.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Cc: doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu
Date: 2000-08-15 16:44:00+00:00
Subject: GSPP forum

Jeff,
Annette Doornbos called from the school and we talked over the forum a little.
As for cost her initial thought was in the range of $10,000 for an early 
evening
forum including dinner for speakers afterwards, with these costs mostly being 
in
the form of paying for the school's events person to organize and advertise.  
An
all day event would be higher.

Let's try to set up a conference call this week or early next week so the 
three
of us plus Heather Cameron and possibly the Dean can agree on a general plan.
Agenda items are:

1) Structure of the forum:  all day or afternoon/evening.

We should all think about whether an all day event would have a big enough
audience because its a bigger commitment.  We could probably do it either way
but we need to decide how much effort and investment we're ready for. Since 
this
is sort of a test drive/demonstration project, we might want to shoot for one
panel with 4-5 speakers representing opposing viewpoints plus a moderator.  I
think that type of forum might maximize attendance and press attention.  
While I
tend to think the issues are so complex that its hard to address them in such 
a
short time, they have presidential debates in this time frame that are 
certainly
much more broad yet useful.  It could be like a congressional hearing, yet
controlled by policy questions rather than politics.  We might think about
asking the Dean moderate to raise the profile and the objectivity, and he's a
strong presence who can keep people in line.

2) Sponsorship

Jeff, if Enron supports this, are there certain companies or groups it not 
want
to jointly sponsor an event with?  Its in the school's interest to have a
variety of funders so as to appear more objective.

3)  Description for discussions with press

We need to put together a one-pager or so on the potential speakers and 
issues,
to assist Annette in seeking input from the press.  She may contact a GSPP 
alum
who owns (?) runs (?) the Sacramento Bee and other newspapers plus the UC 
public
affairs office.

4)  Initial speaker list (the "shoot high" list).

Please respond and we'll try to set something up.
Rob


Rob Gramlich
PJM Market Monitoring Unit
(610) 666-4291
gramlr@pjm.com
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: all.houston@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-07 06:21:00+00:00
Subject: An Opportunity to Change Your Electricity Provider

Electricity Deregulation is coming to Texas!
What a great way to start off the New Year ) to be able to choose your 
electricity provider, which could mean potential savings for you and your 
family on your electric bill.  As you know, Enron has been a leader in 
lobbying for deregulation and a consumer,s right to choose energy providers.

For the first time in our state,s history, 5 percent of Texas households will 
have this golden opportunity.  The NewPower Company (NewPower), which is 
approximately 45 percent owned by Enron, was recently formed to provide 
energy and energy-related services to residential customers in deregulating 
energy markets across America, including Texas.  For a limited time, 
Houston-based employees will be eligible to participate in NewPower,s pilot 
program offering their deregulated electric service.

Be Among the First to Participate:
Enrollment with NewPower begins March 12.  Also, watch for a special Enron 
Employees Exclusive offer on your desk March 12.  If you would like more 
information about NewPower, visit the company's web site at www.newpower.com

Disclaimers:
Any contract for goods or services that is entered into by an Enron employee 
with respect to the NewPower program shall be solely between NewPower and 
such employee.  Enron assumes no obligation on behalf of NewPower and makes 
no representations, warranties, or guaranties with respect to NewPower, or 
any goods or services offered or provided by NewPower.
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: faizs@texaco.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-24 09:51:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Houston visit

Soussan,

Nice to hear from you. Dinner on Wednesday, Jan 31 would be great.
Please, let me know where you are going to stay.

Vince





"Faiz, Soussan" <faizs@texaco.com> on 01/22/2001 04:29:08 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: vkaminski@aol.com 
Subject: RE: Houston visit


Hello Vince, Happy 2001 and hope all is well.

I'll be in Houston the week of 1/29.  It will be great to have our belated
dinner preferably on Wed. 1/31.  Pls let me know whether you're available on
Wed. or, if not, another day that week.

Best,
Soussan
914 253 4187
From: project.team@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-21 19:48:00+00:00
Subject: - Inventory Collected from CN=Darron C Giron/OU=HOU/O=ECT -

As you are aware, your business unit has been selected to participate in 
Project GEM (Global Enron Migration) for the rollout of Windows 2000.  In 
preparation for this rollout, it is imperative that we gather information 
about your workstation and the applications you use.  To begin this data 
collection, we have automated the process.  In fact, your system has just 
been inventoried.   Once this information is received, we will be working 
with your local department coordinator to consolidate this information to 
ensure this transition is as smooth as possible.

The GEM team would like to thank you for your participation.  If you have any 
questions, please contact Patrick Marchand, 5-5636.
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: heather.kroll@enron.com, jeffery.ader@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-07 11:03:00+00:00
Subject: NJNG LOI/MOU/LOU/HOA

Here's a first stab at the LOI.  I just guessed on the attachment.  

I have a couple of questions:

Any thought as to how we get/split money (other than the obvious up side for 
us)?

Do we want to work toward a "Project Development Agreement" which will set 
forth the basis for how we develop projects on a project-by-project basis? Or 
do you envision a different next step?  

Talk to you soon,

Kay
From: hunter.shively@enron.com
To: airam.arteaga@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-27 08:45:00+00:00
Subject: Gas Trading Vision mtg.

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 
08:45 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Cindy Cicchetti                           09/26/2000 12:38 PM
	

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Allan Severude/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jayant 
Krishnaswamy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Long/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Gas Trading Vision mtg.

This meeting has been moved to 4:00 on Wed. in room 2601.  I have sent a 
confirmation to each of you via Lotus Notes.  Sorry for all of the changes 
but there was a scheduling problem with a couple of people for the original 
time slot.
From: shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
To: sherri.sera@enron.com
Date: 2000-04-11 15:52:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Proposed Darden Interview Schedule - April 18

Sherri:

2:00PM on the 18th of April is fine for Vince Kaminski.

His "bio" is attached.  If you need anything else, please let me know.



Shirley







   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           04/11/2000 03:42 PM
	

To: Bert Frazier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jewel Meeks/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley 
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Proposed Darden Interview Schedule - April 18

Ladies, I'm trying to finalize this schedule prior to my vacation 4/13-14.  
Please confirm that the time proposed below will work for your executive.  
Additionally, would you please e-mail me a bio for your executive; the 
professors have requested it.

Thanks for your help.  SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2000 
03:37 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Sherri Sera                           03/31/2000 05:15 PM
	

To: Gene Humphrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J 
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bert Frazier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Jewel Meeks/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Mercedes Estrada/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley 
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Proposed Darden Interview Schedule - April 18

Below is proposed schedule for the Darden case video-taped interviews; an 
hour has been scheduled for each of you (except Vince, for whom 1-1/2 hours 
has been requested), however, you may be finished in less time.  The location 
is yet to be determined, but will most likely take place in a vacant office 
of 50M.  

Please let me know of any conflicts with this proposed schedule.  I'll send 
along additional information as it becomes available.  Thank you and have a 
nice weekend.  SRS

8:00a  Gene Humphrey

9:00a  Lou Pai

10:00a  Ken Rice

11:00a  Andy Fastow

12:00p  Break

2:00p  Vince Kaminski

3:30p  Jeff Skilling
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: jennifer.fraser@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-13 16:08:32+00:00
Subject: RE: crude buying

i've been selling.  was long 500 and selling out.  everybody will  be expecting the crude draws.  they dont matter.  think this is tremendously bearish all energy demand.  supply shocks are the only question, but I dont think US will end up fighting a war against the middle east.  Who cares if we nuke afghanistan?  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fraser, Jennifer  
Sent:	Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:04 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	crude buying

nice move--stats will be very very bullish---especially padd I and II--expect big draws.
jf
From: mreddy@epsa.org
To: acomnes@enron.com, bernadette.hawkins@enron.com, carin.nersesian@enron.com, christi.l.nicolay@enron.com, donna.fulton@enron.com, janelle.scheuer@enron.com, jhartso@enron.com, john.shelk@enron.com, jsteffe@enron.com, linda.j.noske@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, ray.alvarez@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, sscott3@enron.com, susan.j.mara@enron.com, tom.hoatson@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-29 17:38:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Draft Letter to FERC Commissioners Regarding AllianceRTO
	Stakeholder Process and Interconnection Agreement

MEMORANDUM

TO: Regulatory Affairs Committee
       Power Marketers Working Group

FROM: Jim Steffes, Regulatory Affairs Committee Chair
            Bob Reilley, Power Marketers Working Group Chair
            Julie Simon, Vice President of Policy
            Erin Perrigo, Manager of Policy

DATE: June 29, 2001

RE: Draft Letter to FERC Commissioners Regarding Alliance
      RTO Stakeholder Process and Interconnection Agreement

Attached is a draft letter addressed to the FERC Commissioners concerning the 
collaborative stakeholder process of the Alliance RTO (ARTO).  As you are 
aware, EPSA sent a letter in April to the ARTO transmission owners outlining 
our concerns with the development of the ARTO stakeholder process.  The ARTO 
subsequently made its compliance filing to FERC in May describing the 
progress of the collaborative stakeholder process.  Many parties filed 
comments outlining the flawed progress and their inability to provide 
meaningful stakeholder input to the ARTO.

Most recently, the ARTO removed all system upgrade transmission crediting 
provisions from the latest draft Interconnection Agreement and 
Interconnection Procedures covered during the June 7-8, 2001 collaborative 
meeting.  We are concerned that such an action will have grave effects on 
generation and is clearly inconsistent with FERC precedent.  We are also 
concerned with the ARTO's commitment to uphold its interests in the Inter-RTO 
Cooperation Agreement ("Cooperation Agreement") to form a common pro forma 
Generator Interconnection Agreement with the MISO.

We intend to send the letter to the FERC Commissioners as well as all parties 
in the active docket.  The letter will be signed by EPSA, but if individual 
generators would also like to sign on, please let us know.  If you have any 
comments, please contact Erin Perrigo at 202-628-8200 or at eperrigo@epsa.org 
by noon EST on Tuesday, July 3rd.

Attachment

 - ARTO IA letter.doc
From: susan.scott@enron.com
To: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-22 11:11:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

This would be analogous to every time you send me an e-mail, I forward it 
directly to Drew and Maria.  How do you tactfully advise your coworkers about 
corporate etiquette?  I wonder.
On a substantive note, I sincerely believe the analysis MKM wants is beyond 
the scope of this letter, and would have no qualms about sending it.  




Jeffery Fawcett
11/22/2000 08:22 AM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

Now do you see why I didn't want to send this to Keith Petersen???  Anytime 
you send anything to Omaha, the MKM cult goes into their Satan worship 
chamber, they sing a few chants, and then sacrifice the good commercial 
effort to the demon regulatory god.  

Jeez, next time I'm gonna just send it out to the customer and ask for 
forgiveness later.



---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 11/22/2000 
08:10 AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           11/22/2000 08:07 AM
	

To: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy  

Jeff,  do you have the information for the rate?  We would have to file a 
certificate and the rate would need to be calculated in accordance with the 
standard COS methodology-  I want to make sure that the rate you are planning 
to quote matches what the rate derivation for the filing would be-  avoid a 
potential issue-  maybe James could send us what he did- thanks  MK



Keith Petersen
11/21/2000 04:56 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

I have not yet reviewed, this is for your information.

Keith

---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000 
04:53 PM ---------------------------


Jeffery Fawcett
11/21/2000 01:17 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin 
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald 
Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James 
Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy

Attached for your review and comment is a broad outline of a rate proposal to 
Caithness for the construction and operation of the 40-mile lateral to the 
Big Sandy project.  This non-binding proposal was requested by Caithness' 
consultant, George Briden, as a starting point for modeling the economics of 
the project's gas supply and a basis for further discussions aimed at 
designing an appropriate deal structure.  For your information, James 
Centilli calculated the transport rate based on the (+/- 30%) $20.33MM cost 
estimate with a ten-year (contract) amortization.  

I plan to put this in the mail by the close of business tomorrow.  If you 
have any suggestions, please let me hear from you by mid-day.   Thanks.
From: stinson.gibner@enron.com
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-20 16:15:00+00:00
Subject: gone Tuesday

Vince,

A reminder that I'm gone on Tuesday to Spearman.

Status of projects:

1.  Compound option for power structuring (Bernie, Edith Cross, Nick ?)
 Alex has finished the model.   Paulo has done some validation so we can 
probably release it.
 This is will be used for an exotic book, so we may have to help with VAR 
interface, etc.

2.  Followed up with Laine Borgman on DG contract.  We still need legal's 
sign off.

3.  Left a message and email about Tom Barkley with Molly Magee and told Tom 
that an offer would be coming by next week.
From: roseann.engeldorf@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-20 11:12:00+00:00
Subject: Electrobolt EPC Contract

Per my voicemail.

Rose
----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 11:11 AM -----

	"David Gohlke" <DGOHLKE@skadden.com>
	10/19/2000 05:08 PM
		 
		 To: glauco.palhoto@enron.com, jeff.westfahl@enron.com, 
john.g.rigby@enron.com, john.guidry@enron.com, john.novak@enron.com, 
john.r.ayres@enron.com, jose.anson@enron.com, kevin.joyce@enron.com, 
laine.a.powell@enron.com, lisa.alfaro@enron.com, luiz.watanabe@enron.com, 
mary.cilia@enron.com, mary.kimball@enron.com, Mike.Morrison@enron.com, 
patricia.scholz@enron.com, Peter.N.Anderson@enron.com, 
roderick.blackham@enron.com, roseann.engeldorf@enron.com, 
roshena.ham@enron.com, scott.dieball@enron.com, sergio.nomura@enron.com, 
stephen.gray@enron.com
		 cc: "Brian Bradshaw" <BBRADSHA@skadden.com>, "Thomas Weil" 
<TWEIL@skadden.com>
		 Subject: Electrobolt EPC Contract


ESA, EECC and Finance Teams,

Attached for your review is the Electrobolt EPC Contract (our doc # 
39444.04), which incorporates the negotiated provisions of the Electrobolt 
MOU.  To assist you in your review, I have also attached (1) a blackline of 
the Electrobolt EPC marked to show all changes from the RioGen EPC Contract 
distributed October 17, and (2) a blackline of the Electrobolt EPC marked to 
show all revisions to the EECC form EPC contract.

Please note that the comparison document, prepared by DeltaView, shows new 
text in blue double underscore, deleted text in red strikethrough, and moved 
text in green (double underscore at the new location, strikethrough from 
where moved).

Please call if you have questions/comments.

Regards,
Dave Gohlke

David E. Gohlke
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
1600 Smith Street, Suite 4460
Houston, Texas 77002
direct (713) 655-5158
fax - main (713) 655-5181
dgohlke@skadden.com



------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at 
(212) 735-3000 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail 
and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their 
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.

 - 39444_4.doc
 - 39822_1.doc
 - 39820_1.doc
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: richard.causey@enron.com
Cc: sally.beck@enron.com, vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-18 08:58:00+00:00
Subject: Global Risk Management Initiative

Rick,

I read your memo regarding Global Risk Management Initiative.  I am sending 
you the
information regarding a related initiative on which I have been working last 
year and which
is moving now into the implementation stage. It's Enterprise - Wide Risk 
Management
and it's really an effort to measure business risks consistently across the 
company.
I hope my group can be helpful in designing the general approach to this 
problem.

Please, let me know what your thoughts are.


Vince
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: john.moore@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-23 11:39:00+00:00
Subject: Coal stuff

I'm still out of town, but now I have email access.  Did your CA get taken 
care of?

You mentioned that you feel like we can use Tex-Mex as a go-by.  Do you have 
electronic copies of the development agreement?

Thanks,

Kay
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: ed.mcmichael@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-03 16:09:00+00:00
Subject: Re:

I want John to interview with the various desk heads (Scott, Hunter, Phillip, 
Tom).  I think I'm going to tell John not to mention the past.   It's an 
issue that doesn't need to be made public and as long as Lavo and myself are 
okay with it, I don't see the need to get individual approval from everyone.  
Thanks for your help,
John




Ed McMichael
01/03/2001 08:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re:  

Thanks for the inquiry.  I sincerely appreciate you giving me the heads up.  
As much as it pains me to say yes, I think John has proved himself worthy and 
I am willing to let him interview for the job.  As we talked about before, my 
only condition is that you guys make sure you are willing to take him if he 
comes out on top.  If there is any chance that his past will negatively 
influence your decision, I am not willing to let him interview.  He handled 
the last experience with real maturity, but I do not want him to have any 
more reasons to doubt his ability to overcome his past by working hard and 
proving himself here.  He is very valuable to me and ENA.  Please let me 
know.  
Ed  

      



John Arnold
01/02/2001 09:04 PM
To: Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 

Ed:
I am starting options on EOL in about two weeks.  As we discussed earlier, I 
don't have the appropriate manpower to run this in certain circumstances, 
such as when I'm out of the office.  As such, I'd like to bring in John 
Griffith for anohter round of interviews for an options trading role with 
your permission.  
John
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: karen.denne@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, linda.robertson@enron.com, skean@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, mpalmer@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-19 17:21:00+00:00
Subject: Senate Debating Unfairness of Singling Out Private-sector Sellers
 for Investigation

The Republicans are currently on the Senate floor arguing (noisily, 
repeatedly and passionately) that California (and the Senate in particular) 
is being hypocritical and intellectually dishonest in attacking and 
investigating private companies and ignoring munis.

One Senator specifically identified prices charged by LADWP and SMUD and 
compared those prices to Enron's (1/3 to 1/2 less than LADWP and SMUD 
charged).

Best,
Jeff
From: dale.neuner@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com, leslie.hansen@enron.com, bjorn.hagelmann@enron.com, rudi.zipter@enron.com, jeff.blumenthal@enron.com, stephen.douglas@enron.com, timothy.norton@enron.com, tom.moran@enron.com
Cc: david.forster@enron.com, torrey.moorer@enron.com, jennifer.denny@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-19 18:58:00+00:00
Subject: US Power PJM Demand Product Type (Offered by the Weather Desk

This is a follow-up to my e-mail sent earlier. The Product Type has been 
built in test and awaits your approval. Please offer that approval as quickly 
as posible, as John Lavoratto is eager to see this offered on EOL.



Dale
3-9746
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: 2001-03-12 08:15:00+00:00
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001 
08:16 AM ---------------------------


"Btu" <subs@Btu.net> on 03/09/2001 04:44:17 PM
To: "Btu's Weekly Power Report" <>
cc:  
Subject: Btu's Weekly Power Report



Attached is the latest issue of Btu's Weekly Power Report


e-mail: info@Btu.net
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286



 - wp031201.pdf
From: john.viverito@enron.com
To: susan.musch@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
Cc: darren.delage@enron.com, jane.mcbride@enron.com, susan.musch@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-21 19:12:00+00:00
Subject: Trader

Susan/Alan/Sara

As you will note below, Darren, Jane and I met with B&M to discuss the 
potential tax issues related to Darren's activities in Japan.

The going forward strategy will be tax driven, therefore we will need to have 
Susan's input/suggestions.  If we may be of further assistance, please let us 
know.

Cheers,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 09/21/2000 07:02 PM -----

	Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com
	09/21/2000 04:58 AM
		 
		 To: Susan.Musch@enron.com
		 cc: jane.mcbride@enron.com, john.viverito@enron.com, 
Jeremy.Pitts@BAKERNET.com, Edwin.T.Whatley@BAKERNET.com
		 Subject: Trader


Dear Susan

Jane and John asked us to send you the attached notes on a discussion we had
today concerning ENA's financial trader in Tokyo.  You may also wish to refer 
to
Ed's original June 23 advice on the subject.

We look forward to assisting with the structuring of the arrangements in due
course.

Regards

Paul Davis
 <<Memo 00.09.21.doc>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--------
This is an e-mail from Baker & McKenzie - Tokyo Aoyama Law Office (Qualified
Joint Enterprise Offices). The contents of this e-mail may be privileged and
confidential and are intended only for the use of the addressee. No one else 
may
copy, forward, disclose or use all or any of it in any form. If you are not an
intended recipient, please notify us immediately (by reply e-mail) and delete
this e-mail from your system. Thank you



 - Memo 00.09.21.doc
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: kevin.presto@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, sheila.walton@enron.com, vasant.shanbhogue@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-28 08:35:00+00:00
Subject: Clayton Vernon

Kevin,

Vasant and I talked to Clayton about his request for transfer. Clayton 
received a conditional approval contingent
upon completion of the current project he works on. Vasant will formulate 
exact definition of the deliverables
and we will hold  Clayton  to it. If he fails to deliver the request for 
transfer will be rejected. Anything else
would be highly demoralizing to everybody.

Clayton has so far produced exactly zero (no single output was delivered) 
though he was advertising
the projects inside and outside the group as completed. I want you to be 
aware of it, because I have
serious doubts regarding Clayton's integrity.

Vince
From: vgarrity@iso-ne.com
To: d..steffes@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-12 21:06:20+00:00
Subject: Pursuant to the NEPOOL Financial Assurance Policy (Attachment L t	o
 the NEPOOL Tariff), we are hereby notifying you that you are in a Finan
	cial Assurance Default

 - Enron Financial Assur Default 12_11_01.doc
From: lorraine.lindberg@enron.com
To: michelle.lokay@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-08 10:06:00+00:00
Subject: Capacity

Michelle - When you get a minute, let's go over the available capacity sheet 
you keep.  We need to reconcile 11/01 and 12/01 as well as remove the Agave 
70,000 from the available capacity and extend the term of the agreement.  
Thanks.

Lorraine
From: mary.rose@enron.com
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-04-24 08:56:00+00:00
Subject: Last day notification

Shelia Walton, HR, told me that my last day with my department will be June 
30.  Meanwhile I talked last week to EBS, EnronOnline, and EES.  I was most 
interested in the EES talk with Harold Buchanan who needs to know that he has 
the most complete list of potential customers and then information about 
those customers.

Any happenings from your talks?
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: awais.omar@enron.com
Date: 1999-10-21 10:34:00+00:00
Subject: Re: US West Power Market Description VERY Final

Leslie Hansen was out today so Elizabeth forwarded your language to one of 
our power attorneys in the Portland office for review.  I have some minor 
clean up changes from Elizabeth, but except any material changes to come from 
Christian Yoder in our Portland office.  As soon as I receive Christian's 
comments I will add forward them on to you.
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-24 16:20:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FW: Draft LOI

The other deal I did with TECO  had the same inhouse lawyer.  He's just fine.

ckm


From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 04:17 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: FW: Draft LOI

Let's talk about this after you have an opportunity to review...

Regards,

Ben


-----Original Message-----
From: "Douglas Turner" <dcturner@tecoenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent: Thu 5/24/2001 2:40 PM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred
Cc: Michael Carlson; Becky Alex
Subject: Draft LOI

Gentlemen,

At the request of Becky Alex, attached for your review is a draft of a Letter 
of Intent relating to the Midway project located in Central Florida.   Please 
respond with questions or comments to Becky at 813-228-1107.

Cordially,
Doug Turner

 - Enron LOI.v1.522.doc <<Enron LOI.v1.522.doc>>