Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: andy@apbenergy.com
To: newweather@apbenergy.com, weathernews@apbenergy.com
Date: 2001-10-19 13:51:04+00:00
Subject: FRIDAY WEATHER HEADLINES


Weather Headlines
Friday October 19 , 2001
***  Zonal flow keeps the short term quiet. Major jet stream amplification
expected in the medium range with arctic outbreak possible.***
     A weak cold front is crossing the Midwest today, but with very little
change in sensible weather. The only significant storminess over the next
several days would be a heavy rain threat over the Southern half of Florida
and a moderate rain threat in the Pacific NW. When I last wrote on Monday,
I discussed the potential for a trough to form in the Western U.S. It
clearly has not happened though I mentioned that a zonal flow would also
accomplish the forecasted warm up. This milder air should stay in place
into the middle of next week. The Western Atlantic ridge has also
strengthened in recent days which should force Gulf and East coast
temperatures to go above normal by early next week after a couple of more
coolish days. There are no named storms in the tropics at this time. A
couple of flare-ups in the Caribbean bear watching, but likely would not
develop until Monday at the earliest, if then.
Weather patterns in the 6-10 day range should become much more interesting
and bullish. All of the models forecast a strong dip of the polar jet to
occur into the Plains late next week. There are some discrepancies in the
intensity and how fast it moves East. However, given some very strong winds
in the Pacific and some very cold air now over the Arctic, I expect this to
be significant. Persistence also should pay off in this forecast. These
troughs have not had any problem digging into the Eastern U.S. since Labor
Day while troughs into the West have been non-existence. This could be
giving us clues on how the winter will go. The good news is that will aid
in verifying my winter outlook, the bad news is it could result in a long
season in the East. Specifics can wait until next week as the event gets
closer. A couple of highlights though would likely be accumulating snows in
the Northern U.S. and double digit below normal temperatures invading the
Plains and spreading East. As is usually the case, a strong trough in the
East results in significant ridging(with warmer, drier air) in the Western
U.S.
For the period October 19 through October 23, expect the following
temperature trends:
Average 1 to 3 degrees below normal: Gulf Coast, Ohio Valley, Northeast,
Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, Northern Rockies, Pacific NW...
Average 1 to 3-degrees above normal: Plains, Mississippi Valley,
California,  Central Rockies...
Average 4 to 6-degrees above normal: Desert SW, Intermountain West,
Southern Rockies...
Unspecified areas will average close to normal...
From: glen.hass@enron.com
To: drew.fossum@enron.com, bret.fritch@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, robert.kilmer@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, danny.mccarty@enron.com, kay.miller@enron.com, keith.petersen@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com
Cc: lorna.brennan@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-14 13:57:59+00:00
Subject: CA Capacity Report

Attached is an updated Interstate Pipeline Capacity to California Report with changes and additions highlighted.
From: david.delainey@enron.com
To: anne.koehler@enron.com, barbara.gray@enron.com, brian.redmond@enron.com, timothy.detmering@enron.com, wes.colwell@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-31 11:45:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Project Triple Lutz--Hart Scott -Rodino Act Filing--Your
 Responses Needed

Guys, I do not have any material that Brian, Tim or Wes would not  have in 
their files.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001 
11:24 AM ---------------------------
From: Barbara N Gray on 01/30/2001 06:41 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL 
Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T 
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas 
A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Project Triple Lutz--Hart Scott -Rodino  Act Filing--Your 
Responses Needed




		

Each of you were intended recipients of the below-attached memo and  E-Mail 
from Anne Koehler.  To date your responses have not been received.   Please 
respond via E-Mail to Ann Ballard in our Enron Corp. Legal Department.  Ann 
will be making our HSR filing tomorrow and needs to have these E-Mail 
responses in order to insure that all of the  data described in the 
below-attatched memo has been included in the HSR filing and to complete the 
corporation's files which serve to evidence that appropriate efforts were 
made to conduct a thorough search for responsive data.  If you have questions 
please call either Ann Ballard, Anne Koehler or me.

Sincerely
BNG



		
		 




From: Anne C Koehler@ENRON on 01/25/2001 04:37 PM
Sent by: Carolyn George@ENRON
To: Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy J Detmering/HOU/ECT@ECT, David W 
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick Wade/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jill T 
Zivley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhett Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes 
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Brazaitis/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Ann Ballard/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  
Subject: Project Triple Lutz

Attached please find a memorandum describing Enron's obligation to provide 
copies of certain information in connection with the Hart Scott Rodino filing 
required in connection with sale of HPL to AEP.  Please review the memorandum 
and respond as requested by the memo no later than Tuesday, January 30, 2001. 
Thank you for your assistance with this matter. 





Anne C. Koehler
Sr. Counsel, ENA
EB 3839
713-853-3448
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: michael.olsen@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-20 21:53:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Deal 338634 Meter 985077

done.





Michael Olsen@ENRON
03/20/2001 10:48 AM
To:	Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	 
Subject:	Deal 338634 Meter 985077

The above deal was in the system for 7/1/00 to 12/31/00.  We have had continued flow on the following dates...

1/4/01 to 1/8/01
1/29/01
2/7/01 to 2/28/01

The total flow has been 2804.

Can this deal be extended to cover the January and February flow?
From: barry.pearce@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-15 17:29:27+00:00
Subject: FW: Preliminary Information Request List  [WatchDog checked]

FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thapar, Raj 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Albrecht, Kristin; Wilson, Shona; Pearce, Barry; Racicot, Paul;
Miller, Don (Asset Mktg); McMichael Jr., Ed; Tweed, Sheila
Subject: FW: Preliminary Information Request List [WatchDog checked]



FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Cindy.Ma@ey.com [mailto:Cindy.Ma@ey.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Albrecht, Kristin; Thapar, Raj
Cc: wfoster@milbank.com; ken.white@eycf.com; alan.holtz@eycf.com;
lawrence.prybylski@ey.com; scott.underberg@ey.com; James.Rees@ey.com;
Daniel.Somers@ey.com
Subject: Preliminary Information Request List [WatchDog checked]




Raj and Kristin:

Sorry for the delay in sending you the list.   Traveling between New York
and Houston sometimes takes away valuable working hours.   As discussed in
the meeting, the attached list is very preliminary and is an on-going
working document.  Forms A, B and C are provided to you to illustrate the
type of information we would like to capture upon detailed analysis of the
trading positions and the associated market values.  At this juncture,
please do not complete any of these forms until we have further
discussions.



Regards,
Cindy


Cindy Ma
Corporate Finance
Ernst & Young LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
PH: 212 773 2638
FAX: 212 773 8008
EY Comm: 9362463

(See attached file: Info Request_Jan 11_02.xls)



______________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it
from your computer.  Thank you.  Ernst & Young LLP
From: shona.wilson@enron.com
To: bob.hall@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, jeffrey.gossett@enron.com, peggy.hedstrom@enron.com, stacey.white@enron.com, scott.mills@enron.com, david.maxwell@enron.com, martha.stevens@enron.com, scott.earnest@enron.com, sheila.glover@enron.com, laurel.bolt@enron.com, d.hall@enron.com, brent.price@enron.com, brenda.herod@enron.com, barry.pearce@enron.com, kristin.albrecht@enron.com, meredith.eggleston@enron.com, neil.hong@enron.com, mike.jordan@enron.com, james.new@enron.com, andrew.cornfield@enron.com
Cc: kelly.tisman@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-07 17:21:00+00:00
Subject: building a database for exception reporting

Currently, I am receiving exception reporting from many of your groups in 
EXCEL.  We have started to build a database to replace the EXCEL reporting.  
In order to make the reporting easy on you we would like to build the 
database around your current systems.  In order to do this, you and people in 
your groups will be receiving calls from Kelly Tisman, who is responsible for 
building the database.  Please make some time to show her your systems and 
needs as far as the reporting is concerned.

Attached is the list of people she is planning to contact.  If it needs 
updated, please let Kelly know.

Thanks

Shona
From: sally.beck@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com, brian.redmond@enron.com
Cc: bob.hall@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, anne.koehler@enron.com, anne.koehler@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-30 15:34:00+00:00
Subject: HPL Sale - Energy Operations Task List

I talked with Anne Koehler in Legal today to determine her understanding of 
what is required from Energy Operations prior to the effective sale of HPL.  
Anne believes that she may have been the one to introduce the term "protocol" 
into these discussions.  To clarify, according to Anne, the "protocol" is not 
anticipated to be a formal legal document.  Instead, Anne envisions simply 
e:mails or memos between Enron and AEP with regard to any sharing of 
information, agreements on processes to be followed in the transition, etc.  
Operational details to be decided between Enron and AEP have been handled 
exactly in that manner to date, with e:mails being sent from Bob Ball (Enron) 
to Steve Jackson (AEP).  

Only critical changes to the Purchase and Sale Agreement will be formally 
documented.  Bob Hall identified the treatment of cash accounts in the 
original Purchase and Sale Agreement as incorrect relative to cash flows for 
gas to be delivered in the month of May.  He has worked with Enron's treasury 
group to establish the correct procedures and has worked with Sandi Braband 
in Legal to document this change to the Purchase and Sale Agreement as an 
Amendment to that agreement.   As of today, Legal has completed revisions to 
that amendment and Anne Koehler is sending it to Mary Perkins in Enron's 
Treasury group for her review.  Upon Mary's review, Anne will forward the 
amendment to AEP for their review before final signatures.  

We devised this week a new format for incorporating the AEP-HPL transition 
issues on which my team has been focused and have provided that to both of 
you.  This new format incorporates the various memos and e:mails which have 
to date captured the status of transition issues.  Items that only require 
actions by Enron will be our "to do" list.  Each item has a due date and we 
will update you weekly on progress.  Those items that fall under the AEP list 
or which appear in both the Enron and AEP list will be the items to which we 
will evidence communication to AEP and/or their agreement via the e:mails or 
memos as suggested by Ann Koehler.  I believe that this should satisfy your 
requests earlier this week for written "protocol".   We will also update you 
weekly on the status of those e:mails and/or memos between ourselves and 
AEP.  

I understand that the two of you have a regular weekly meeting for an update 
on the HPL sale.  To provide clarity for these update meetings, may I suggest 
that we incorporate one of the following two approaches: 

 1)  Brian and I hold a regular meeting just prior to your update meeting so 
that Brian has a full   understanding of operational transition items and 
their status, or 

 2) I attend the first part of your update meeting in order to provide a 
firsthand update to the two of you.  

Please let me know which one of these works best for you so that we can 
incorporate that into our schedules for next week.
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: nick.hiemstra@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-22 10:43:00+00:00
Subject: Re: GAME TONIGHT @ 9:45

it says that on the schedule, we will find out tonight




Nick Hiemstra
05/22/2000 10:41 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: GAME TONIGHT @ 9:45  

yep; by the way, I have written in my calendar something about a flag 
football tourney on May 29, is that right?  


   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Eric Bass                           05/22/2000 09:04 AM
	

To: Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, 
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan 
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D 
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth 
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amir Ahanchian/Enron 
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:  
Subject: GAME TONIGHT @ 9:45



 Let me know whether or not you will be there.  Please try to make it by 9:15.
From: rrga-l@list.rtowest.org
To: rrga-l@list.rtowest.org
Date: 2001-05-18 06:29:00+00:00

I got your message 4 times!


Roy Lewis Eiguren
Givens Pursley LLP
P. O. Box 2720
Boise, ID  83701
ph: (208) 388-1313
fax: (208) 388-1300
rle@givenspursley.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This e-mail may contain confidential information 
that is protected by the attorney-client privilege.  If you are not the named 
recipient of this communication, you are instructed not to deliver, 
distribute, copy or disclose its contents or take any action in reliance on 
information it contains.

>>> Bill Eastlake <Beastla@PUC.STATE.ID.US> 05/16/01 11:06AM >>>
FYI---I got this same message three different times.
From: billy.lemmons@enron.com
To: jeff.skilling@enron.com, a..shankman@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, mark.courtney@enron.com, kevin.garland@enron.com
Cc: c..bland@enron.com, traci.warner@enron.com
Date: 2001-07-17 02:44:46+00:00
Subject: Thank You......

I want to thank each of you for joining us at the Analyst Orientation Happy Hour this evening.  Showing your interest in the Program, in such a personal way, is one of the most valuable contributions you can make to our efforts.
 
Thank you,
Billy
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: 2000-01-25 14:26:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Meeting (fwd)

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2000 
02:26 PM ---------------------------


bradley romine <bradley@Stanford.EDU> on 01/20/2000 02:16:24 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Meeting (fwd)





--
Bradley Romine
EES/OR Stanford University
bradley@leland.stanford.edu

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:09:05 -0800 (PST)
From: bradley romine <bradley@Stanford.EDU>
To: Nick Bambos <bambos@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Meeting

Professor Bambos,
 3pm on Wed. is fine with them. So I'll see you then in your office
in terman.

Brad

On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Nick Bambos wrote:

> Brad,
>
> Yes, I would be happy to meet with them.
> How about 3pm on Wed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> bradley romine wrote:
> >
> > Hello Professor Bambos,
> >         I was talking to some friends I have at Enron about pricing
> > options for bandwidth trading and other optimization algorithms for
> > broadband networks. Anyway they are interested in talking to you about
> > your research. They will be in town next week tuesday and wednesday and
> > would appreciate getting a chance to talk to you. Are you available?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >         Brad
> >
> >  --
> > Bradley Romine
> > EES/OR Stanford University
> > bradley@leland.stanford.edu
>

--
Bradley Romine
EES/OR Stanford University
bradley@leland.stanford.edu
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: s..ward@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-11 22:26:30+00:00
Subject: RE:

are you going to tell me or do i have to guess
-----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S.  
Sent:	Monday, June 11, 2001 4:02 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	

I've decided what the charge should be for housing refugees during power outages and other tragic phenomena as a result of the Flood of a Lifetime.
From: tom.may@enron.com
To: gautam.gupta@enron.com, narsimha.misra@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-12 12:44:00+00:00
Subject: Materials for MC Working Group Meeting 12/13/00

One of you folks should try and listen in on this.


---------------------- Forwarded by Tom May/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 12:40 PM 
---------------------------


Daniel Allegretti
12/12/2000 07:48 AM
To: NEPOOL Power Trading Group
cc:  

Subject: Materials for MC Working Group Meeting 12/13/00


---------------------- Forwarded by Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron on 12/12/2000 
07:44 AM ---------------------------


"Dumond, Susan" <sdumond@iso-ne.com> on 12/08/2000 11:03:13 AM
To: NEPOOL Market Committee <mc@iso-ne.com>
cc: "Bourcier, Don" <dbourcie@iso-ne.com>, "Ethier, Robert" 
<rethier@iso-ne.com> 

Subject: Materials for MC Working Group Meeting 12/13/00


Markets Committee Members:  A meeting of the Working Group of the Markets
Committee has been scheduled for Wednesday, December 13, 2000 from 9:00 a.m.
to 3:00 p.m. at the Holiday Inn in Holyoke, MA.  The meeting's agenda
consists of two items, both of which involve MR 17: (1) Transmission
Congestion Compensation and (2) Structural Screen for OP-4 (bid cap) type of
conditions.

Attached is a file containing two exhibits that provide congestion
information that, hopefully, will aid in the group's discussion on the first
item.  With respect to the second item, we will forward to you any materials
we receive.  If you can not make the meeting in person we have arranged for
a conference call.  The dial-in number is as follows:

Telephone Number:  (212) 293-3100
Passcode:  7837367

Thank you.

Don.

Also, attached is the directions to the ISO which show where the Holyoke
Holiday Inn is located.  As you get off 91 North you will see it on your
left just past the gas station at the corner of Whiting Farms Road and Lower
Holyoke Road.  To your right is Holyoke Mall.  If you should have any
questions, please give Susan Dumond a call at (413) 535-4097.

 <<directions.doc>>  <<Exhib for MC re Congestion Compensation.xls>>

 - directions.doc
 - Exhib for MC re Congestion Compensation.xls
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: kerri.thompson@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-01 11:09:00+00:00
Subject: Re: tfs checkout

Bob finally entered these. Here are the deal numbers and details:

471546
Enron buys El Paso
25 MW
141.00
Palo Verde
On Peak

471547
Enron sells EES
25 MW
141.05
Palo Verde
On Peak

Thanks,
Kate





Kerri Thompson@ENRON
12/01/2000 08:47 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Re: tfs checkout  

can you check with bob again, because i got confirms on the deals.  the 
broker told me yesterday he forgot to tell bob.




   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 06:05 PM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: tfs checkout  

Bob does not recognize these deals, and tried to check with the broker. He'll 
talk to TFS in the morning to verify these and I'll let you know ASAP.

Thanks,
Kate



Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/30/2000 02:32 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: tfs checkout

missing 2 deals for bob:

buy el paso
cal 01
141.00
25 mw
pv
on peak

sell ees
cal 01
141.05
25 mw
pv
on peak


thanks
From: christi.nicolay@enron.com
To: corry.bentley@enron.com, don.baughman@enron.com, kayne.coulter@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-01 04:43:00+00:00
Subject: RTO_SS Parallel Test Sessions

FYI.  Also, are you all on this SPP email list?  If so, I can get off it.  
Let me know.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 
04:33 AM ---------------------------


"Gibson, Barbara" <bgibson@SPP.ORG>@spplist.spp.org on 04/30/2001 10:38:48 AM
Please respond to "Gibson, Barbara" <bgibson@SPP.ORG>
Sent by: bounce-operations-1560@spplist.spp.org
To: "Operations Information" <operations@spplist.spp.org>
cc: "Taylor, John" <JTaylor@SPP.ORG>, "Perry, Kevin" <KPerry@SPP.ORG>, 
"Kirby, Josh" <jkirby@SPP.ORG>, "Friddle, Jarrett" <jfriddle@SPP.ORG>, 
"'sppteam@oatiinc.com'" <sppteam@oatiinc.com> 

Subject: RTO_SS Parallel Test Sessions


The SPP members completed the first of several scheduled parallel test
sessions of the new electronic scheduling system, RTO_SS.  This first
session was held on Friday, April 27 from 9am CDT to 1pm CDT.  There
were a total of 9 SPP Control Areas that participated during this
session.  Those Control Areas included; WR, KCPL, CSWS, WPEK, GRDA, MPS,
SPS, SPA, and CLEC.  Many thanks to all those companies that
participated!  We are hoping for a higher turnout at the next session.
If you do not plan to participate during these parallel test sessions,
please contact Barbara Gibson so arrangements can be made for your
schedule approvals.

These parallel test sessions are excellent opportunities for training
and practice on the new system with live data being imported into
RTO_SS.  During the times that parallel testing is NOT in session, users
can test additional functionality by creating their own sample tags and
taking the various actions on those associated schedules, i.e.
approving, denying, adjusting, canceling, etc.  The system is available
to users 24 hours per day.

There will be 3 more parallel test sessions this week and finally 3
sessions the following week. The sessions this week are scheduled for:

Tuesday, May 1 - 9am CDT - 1pm CDT
Wednesday, May 2 - 9am CDT - 1pm CDT
Friday, May 4 - 12pm CDT - 4pm CDT

Please refer to the attached document for more details regarding logins,
test information, etc.

We still do not have many sources and sinks set up for the different
Generation Providers and Load Serving Entities that wish to have direct
approval rights on the schedules.  If you are a GP or LSE and need to
get this data set up, please call Barbara Gibson or Shari Brown at SPP.


If you have any trouble with RTO_SS please contact someone listed below:

Barbara Gibson, 501-664-0146 x245, bgibson@spp.org
Shari Brown, 501-664-0146 x23, sbrown@spp.org
Josh Kirby, 501-664-0146 x306, jkirby@spp.org

Regards,

Barbara Gibson
Supervisor, Applications Development
Southwest Power Pool
501-664-0146 x245
bgibson@spp.org




 - RTOSS_User_Testing.doc
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: cdade@bracepatt.com
Date: 2000-08-04 14:51:00+00:00
Subject: Draft Release

----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 02:50 PM -----

	Randy Petersen
	08/04/2000 02:39 PM
		 
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Draft Release

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy Petersen/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000 
02:38 PM ---------------------------


"Dawn Simmons" <dsimmons@canfibre.com> on 08/04/2000 01:41:52 PM
To: <randy.petersen@enron.com>
cc:  
Subject: Draft Release



?
 - 0804 News ReleaseDraft.doc
From: philip.polsky@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-01 11:27:00+00:00
Subject: SoCalGas WACOG

Jeff,

Stephanie Miller gave me your name as the person who might be able to help me 
track down the SoCal Gas WACOG calculation methodology.  I'm looking at the 
Core Procurement Service schedule, and it indicates that the WACOG 
calculation is set forth in "D.98-07-068".  I am assume that this is a 
decision number from the California PUC.  

I need to get a copy of the decision and/or whatever information is relevant 
to the calculation.  Let me know if you can help.

Thanks,

Phil Polsky
Associate, West Gas Origination
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: katrina.burton@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-27 14:43:00+00:00
Subject: SMethodist Presentation

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/27/2001 02:43 PM -----

	Ursula Brenner
	03/23/2001 04:03 PM
		 
		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: SMethodist Presentation

Steve,

Jeff is talking at SMU Management Briefing Series on March 27th.  The 
organizers wanted him to talk about his background and career at Enron and 
about where the industry is heading.  The presentation covers this last 
piece.  The audience will be local business people and some SMU students and 
professors (350-400 people)

Jeff already reviewed this presentation.  Please, let me know if you have any 
questions or suggestions.

Thanks,

Ursula Brenner
ENRON CORP.
+1(713)345-3787

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information 
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are 
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. 
---------------------- Forwarded by Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron on 03/23/2001 
04:00 PM ---------------------------


Katrina Burton
03/23/2001 03:43 PM
Sent by: Katrina Burton
To: Ursula Brenner/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: SMethodist Presentation
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: sgoodel@columbiaenergygroup.com
Date: 2000-01-12 09:46:00+00:00
Subject: 1999 GRI Surcharges

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:46 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           10/08/99 03:02 PM
	

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: 1999 GRI Surcharges

Responding to your e-mail:

(sure glad I saved the original message -- I've been asked for the 
information several times)
---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 10/08/99 
03:00 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           09/21/99 01:46 PM
	

To: Greg Couch/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Erin Norris/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: 1999 GRI Surcharges

Per your phone message................


---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT on 09/21/99 
01:45 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	

	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Rebecca W Cantrell                           11/12/98 02:43 PM
	

To: Michael J Legler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie A Gomez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris 
Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara G Dillard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa Branney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul T 
Lucci/DEN/ECT@ECT, Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven 
P South/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank Ermis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cary M 
Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert M -Houston- Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ray 
Hamman/DUB/EES@EES, Deborah D Merril/DUB/EES@EES
cc:  
Subject: 1999 GRI Surcharges

Just a reminder that the GRI surcharges will go down for all member pipelines 
a bit effective 1/1/99, per the Settlement approved by FERC last April.  Here 
are the rates through 2004:

Rates (cents per Dth)	
	1999	
		2000	
			2001	
				2001	
					2003	
						2004
Commodity	0.75	0.72	0.7	0.5	0.4	0.0
High Demand*	23.0	20.0	9.0	6.0	5.0	0.0
Low Demand*	14.2	12.3	5.5	3.7	3.1	0.0
Small Customer	1.8	1.6	1.1	0.8	0.6	0.0
  						
*refers to high load factor or low load factor customers.
From: b..sanders@enron.com
To: c..koehler@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-05 19:54:39+00:00
Subject: RE: Legal opinion

no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Koehler, Anne C.  
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	Legal opinion

In connection with ENA legal opinions (to be signed by Mark H) required for two swap transaction closings later this week, please advise by return e-mail whether or not, to your knowledge, except as disclosed in Enron Corp.'s SEC reports, there is any action, suit or proceeding pending or threatened against ENA before any court or arbitrator or any governmental body agency or  official that could either (1) materially and adversely affect the business consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations of ENA and its subsidiaries, or (2) impair ENA's ability to perform its obligations in connection with the swaps. 

Thanks
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: herman.manis@enron.com
Cc: carlos.sole@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-05 15:58:00+00:00
Subject: BPUB LOI

re: Coal fired plant we discussed with Mitch and John.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/05/2001 03:58 
PM ---------------------------


John Moore
04/04/2001 10:27 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: BPUB LOI

Kay,

I fiddled a little with the BPUB LOI.  You can see the redlined changes in 
the attached document.  Kathleen FEDEX'ed two CA orginals to BPUB yesterday 
evening and the plan is for them to sign the CA today, I will then email a 
clean LOI to BPUB and to their outside counsel, Davidson, in 
San Antonio.

JMoore
From: outlook-migration-team@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-22 04:35:40+00:00
Subject: Analyst Mtg - EB3321 (I did not confirm you)

Leslie Rich, VP &
 Doris Kelly Waltkins, SVP, Portfolio Mgrs w/
Evergreen Investment Mgmt Co.
 (Laura Valencia x36785)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Outlook-Migration-Team </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EXCHMIGTEAM>
X-To: 
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \GWHALLE (Non-Privileged)\Calendar
X-Origin: WHALLEY-G
X-FileName: GWHALLE (Non-Privileged).pst

6/19 - Per LT and Laura Valencia  - GW attending meeting, Larua getting lunch 
served
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: stephanie.piwetz@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-20 14:25:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Trade date for deal 475585.01

Thanks for keeping me up to date. Out of curiosity, do you know why El Paso 
changed the trade date in the first place?

Kate


Stephanie Piwetz   12/20/2000 01:45 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Trade date for deal 475585.01

Kate, 
just fyi, El Paso struck thru our 12/6/00 trade date and placed 12/5/00.  I 
spoke to Chi, of El Paso and he said the 12/6/00 was okay.  I just made a 
note on the confirm and sending it to the fileroom to be executed.
Thanks
Stephanie
From: breakingnews@cnn.com
To: textbreakingnews@cnnimail4.cnn.com
Date: 2001-06-07 22:54:02+00:00
Subject: CNN Breaking News

BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

-- Attorney: McVeigh not likely to appeal to Supreme Court. Details soon.

For complete coverage of this story visit:
http://www.CNN.com

========================================================
To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE to any CNN E-MAIL service visit:
http://www.CNN.com/EMAIL

(c) 2001 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company



CNN Interactive email id:29051185402131698
From: kam.keiser@enron.com
To: r..brackett@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-16 14:16:34+00:00
Subject: Nov 30th post-id's

Debbie,

Have you had any luck getting the Nov. 30th post id's? I did my best job trying to get them for Houston, Chicago and Calgary but with over 400 post-id's I guarantee that we missed some.

Let me know if you still think it's possible, I would like to get back to Zhiyong today.

Thanks again for your help,

Kam
x3-5781
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: frank.sayre@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-08 11:09:00+00:00
Subject: ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC

Frank:  FYI.  Let's tell her that we can execute the :

(1)  letter
(2)  the separate ISDA amendment
(3) our understanding (together with Vastar's) of the "old" guaranty.

I have a doctor's appointment at noon but I'll be back afterwards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 11:05 AM -----

	"Russell, Nicole" <nicole.russell@mirant.com>
	03/08/2001 10:08 AM
		 
		 To: "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc: "Satterly, Kenneth" <ken.satterly@mirant.com>
		 Subject: ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC


 <<ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC>>

Sara,

I have a couple quick comments on the letter you sent this morning.  In
general, we need to make clear that we are replacing the credit support
provider under the ISDA.  Otherwise, I am concerned that we could face a
possible default under the ISDA once the VRI parental guaranty is
terminated. Otherwise, the letter looks very agreeable to me.  I am
anticipating we can get this executed today so please keep in touch with me
in regards to any further changes you would like to make.

Many thanks for all your help.

Best regards,

Nicole Russell

 - ENRON MIRANT SOCO ISDA AMENDMENT LTR MIR LCMTS.DOC
From: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
To: crescida.mccue@humble.k12.tx.us
Date: 2002-03-22 17:29:09+00:00
Subject: RE: test message

It was nice meeting you too!  Please feel free to email or call anytime with questions or concerns regarding Austin.  I was impressed by the Study Skills program explained last night.  If this class was made a 6th grade requirement, I think it would go a long way in better preparing the kids for when they get to your class.

Best Regards,
Kevin Hyatt


-----Original Message-----
From: Crescida McCue [mailto:Crescida.McCue@humble.k12.tx.us]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: test message


Mr. Hyatt:
I'm just making sure I have your name in my address book correctly. It was certainly nice to meet you in person last night, and I hope things continue to look up for Austin.
I look forward to reading his research paper, as you obviously had him working extra hard on it over Spring Break. Thanks for your involvement and support.
Have a great weekend! Crescida McCue
From: jeff.duff@enron.com
To: hollis.kimbrough@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-11 07:35:00+00:00
Subject: FYI - Lightining Storm 08 - 09 Mar 02

Noticed that your not on this email.  I've been receiving summaries like this 
for the last month. 

JD
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron on 03/11/2002 07:44 
AM ---------------------------


Alden Zeitz
03/11/2002 05:46 AM
To: Mark Perryman/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Barry Riffe/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jane 
Gibbs/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Gayle Moore/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jerry 
Holt/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Pitt/EWC/Enron@Enron, Mark V 
Walker/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Duff/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Marion 
Horna/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Storm 08 - 09 Mar 02

Everyone,

This is the initial report for the violent storm we experienced this weekend.

Jane, it is starting already!!! LIGHTNING DAMAGE!!!!




Any comments or questions are welcome.

Al
From: steven.ehrig@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-06 13:28:00+00:00
Subject: NYMEX Limits Testing

Tana,


I was hoping that you could answer a question for me. 

I have a copy of a NYMEX approval letter dated June 5, 2000 plus the 
interoffice memorandum
detailing the increase of Henry Hub Natural Gas positions from 17,000 to 
20,000.  They state that
this is in regards to the July ONLY contract.

However, the ECT generated report for Limits (the report Moscoso's group 
creates) dated June 19, 2000 
doesn't show this increase under the "Delivery Month Limit Amount" column for 
July NG contracts.
In turn,  the red flag, "approaching limit", pops up on the 21st.  This is 
b/c  the limit is still at 17,000 instead
of 20,000; the red flag probably wouldn't have popped up if the limit had 
been raised.  

Tell me your thoughts.

Thank you so much for all of your help.
If you have any questions please give me a call, x31684.

Sincerely, 

Jack Ehrig
From: teb.lokey@enron.com
To: jeanette.doll@enron.com
Cc: bill.rapp@enron.com, robert.kilmer@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-08 19:15:07+00:00
Subject: RE: TW rate sheets

I think we need to update tariff sheets explaining the contract has terminated.  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Doll, Jeanette  
Sent:	Friday, March 08, 2002 11:13 AM
To:	Lokey, Teb
Subject:	TW rate sheets

Teb,

In talking with Michelle Brown about billing the Conoco contract, she was wondering if we needed to changed the tariff rate sheets for the Current Firm Customers.  I believe I copied you on the Conoco contract e:mail on the TCR II surcharges.  I was thinking (before talking with Michelle) that we really did not have to change those tariff sheets (5B.02 and 5B.03); however, I am not so sure anymore.  The CFC rates on 5B.02 do not apply to Conoco anymore.  So do we need to take them off?  There is a note on 5B.02 that says the surcharges on 5B.03 (TCR II) are applicable to the CFCs listed on 5B.02.

So my question:  Do we just leave the tariff sheets alone, since Conoco's contracts under the Global and Mini- Settlements have terminated, or do we need to update this sheets?

I do not think this is urgent, but I wanted to ask.

Jeanette
From: mbx_iscinfra@enron.com
To: tammy.marcontell@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com, kerry.roper@enron.com, s..galvan@enron.com, tahnee.stall@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-16 12:38:20+00:00
Subject: \\spr1inf1\sapfiles\ifout\04000\20020116-DENWC.XLS

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS E-MAIL--THIS ACCOUNT IS NOT MONITORED

AP User:

Attached is/are the payment proposal(s) for your business unit.  Please review and forward to your approver(s)/CAO.


Thank you.
SAP AP Team
 - 20020116-DENWC.XLS
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: barbara.gray@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-27 18:42:00+00:00
Subject: Re: MEXICO.....PLANS FOR GETTING ADDITIONAL LEGAL RESOURCES -
 URGENT

The  person I had in mind was Fransisco Pinto-Lite.  He is unwinding from his 
old obligations.  I will work on an update.   Mark



	Barbara N Gray
	11/27/2000 04:54 PM
		 
		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: MEXICO.....PLANS FOR GETTING ADDITIONAL LEGAL RESOURCES - URGENT

Mark, I am concerned that although assistance has been previously (prior to 
the latest reorg) represented to Peggy as forthcoming, it has not yet 
arrived.  We left our QLMeeting without a definite plan.....as I recall, 
because we thought there might be an individual with one of the "disbanding 
units" available "in the near future.  I am concerned  (based on some very 
tenuous third hand information) that Peggy may already be looking 
elsewhere...........I have told her that finding help for the Mexico work was 
on the very top of our agenda.....I would like to be able to inform her of 
what exactly we are doing to handle this situation................can you let 
me know what the status is of the individual referred to above.

Many thanks

BNG
From: andrew.kelemen@enron.com
To: omar.al-farisi@csfb.com, james.bartlett@csfb.com
Cc: don.miller@enron.com, jinsung.myung@enron.com, benjamin.rogers@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-24 08:47:00+00:00
Subject: Recent Elvis and Priscilla draft

---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT on 08/24/2000 
08:47 AM ---------------------------


Gray Calvert
08/23/2000 07:45 PM
To: Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jonalan Page/PDX/ECT@ECT 
Subject: CIM Revisions

Andy,

Here is the most recent copy for your review.  The biographies and historical 
performance and historicals have been requested and we will insert as soon as 
we receive.  

Gray
From: gerry.medeles@enron.com
To: michele.winckowski@enron.com, michael.bodnar@enron.com, lynn.blair@enron.com
Cc: reyna.cabrera@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-14 20:30:58+00:00
Subject: RE: SBA Contracts

I am not sure I understand the question.  Do you mean at anytime we call on SBA volumes, we never/should not allocate the location?  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winckowski, Michele  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:32 PM
To:	Bodnar, Michael; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Cabrera, Reyna; Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	RE: SBA Contracts

	I guess the question is - have we ever actually reviewed when we call on the SBA volumes and what the system conditions have been during those periods.  We want to verify that we are not allocating a point when we have SBA gas flowing.  Theatrically, we argue that we would not call on SBAs if the gas was not needed to meet system requirements.  We' want to verify that the theory and the actual match up.  I hope this makes sense.  Thanks MW

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bodnar, Michael  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:15 PM
To:	Winckowski, Michele; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Cabrera, Reyna; Medeles, Gerry
Subject:	RE: SBA Contracts

Yes, you are correct. The changes in the business requirements for the scheduling priority of SBA contracts will not impact NNG's primary firm shippers. What do you need to verify and support this fact?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winckowski, Michele  
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 2:53 PM
To:	Blair, Lynn; Bodnar, Michael
Subject:	SBA Contracts


	Contract	Shippers			Contract Date

	107018		Tenaska Marketing Ventures	Nov 1 2000
	107019		Texaco Gas Marketing		Nov 1 2000
	107021		OGE Energy Resources		Nov 1 2000
	107989		Tenaska Marketing		Jun 1 2001
	108021		Arkla Energy Marketing Co.	Jul 1 2001
	108284		Tensaka Marketing Ventures	Nov 1 2001
	108290		Texaco Gas Marketing		Nov 1 2001
	108281		El Paso Merchant Energy	Nov 1 2001
	108282		UtiliCorp United, Inc.		Nov 1 2001
	108283		Engage Energy American	Nov 1 2001

	These are the SBA contracts that were provided during the due diligence.  I'd like to be able to verify and support that the changes in the business requirements for the scheduling priority for these SBA contracts do not result in an impact to NNG's primary firm shippers.  Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks MW
From: enron_update@concureworkplace.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 16:29:11+00:00
Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - HK102501

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Harry J. Kingerski Mr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: HK102501
Report Total: $880.95
Amount Due Employee: $880.95


To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com
From: jeffery.fawcett@enron.com
To: susan.scott@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 08:32:00+00:00
Subject: Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 12/13/2000 
08:32 AM ---------------------------


MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com> on 12/12/2000 04:51:57 PM
To: "'Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com'" <Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: RE: Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision


If we widely distribute the letter, we will add your printed name in a
signature block as we did with other parties. Thanks, Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:04 PM
To: MBD
Subject: Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision



Thanks for getting back to me.  Yes, I thought it was well done.  I don't
think we'd have any trouble signing on to it.  Just let us know how you
want to proceed.






MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com> on 12/12/2000 11:19:27 AM

To:   "'Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com'" <Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  RE: Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision


Yes it did, but we can redo a new version for circulation.  We will be
trying to get press coverage for the letter.  Let me know if you are ok,
Jeff D. thought you would be. Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com [mailto:Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 8:27 AM
To: MBD
Subject: Re: Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision



Mike,
I apologize, but I was out of the office yesterday.  Did the letter go out
already?







MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com> on 12/11/2000 01:46:04 PM

To:   Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Letter to CPUC re GIR proposed Decision


Jeff:

Here is the letter we are sending to the CPUC.  Please let me know if TW is
on. I need to send it by 2 pm our time.  Thanks, Mike Day

 <<CSA Letter SCG.doc>>

(See attached file: CSA Letter SCG.doc)
From: clint.dean@enron.com
To: erinwill@yahoo.com
Date: 2001-05-23 16:18:00+00:00
Subject: Re: e-mail address

Wow, I almost forgot.  Thank you.  I will contact her soon.  




Erin Williams <erinwill@yahoo.com> on 05/23/2001 03:18:00 PM
To: clint.dean@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: e-mail address

Clint,
I am so sorry that it has taken me so long to e-mail you.  I hope you didn't 
think that I forgot.
I spoke to Amy and she would love to meet you.  Her e-mail address is 
amy_ross@baxter.com.  
Hope you have a good Memorial Day weekend,
Erin
 

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions $2 Million Sweepstakes - Got something to sell?
From: joey.taylor@enron.com
To: errol.mclaughlin@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-13 17:31:58+00:00
Subject: FW: expiration dates



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lim, Francis S.  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:33 AM
To:	Taylor, Joey; Rostant, Justin
Subject:	RE: expiration dates

 
I believe that we currently do not have futures expirations for both HU and HO.
Attached is the excel where we have futures expiration dates for.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Joey  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:46 AM
To:	Lim, Francis S.
Subject:	FW: expiration dates

Do you have the futures expiration dates also?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rostant, Justin  
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Taylor, Joey
Subject:	RE: expiration dates

can i get the futures contract expiration as well for both HU an HO?

thanks
Justin Rostant
Enron Financial Trading Desk.
Phone: 713-853-6460
Mobile: 832-264-6333
Fax: 713-646-3239

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Taylor, Joey  
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Rostant, Justin
Subject:	FW: expiration dates



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lim, Francis S.  
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:28 PM
To:	Taylor, Joey
Subject:	expiration dates

 << File: x.xls >>
From: mike.carson@enron.com
To: paul.broderick@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-08 09:28:00+00:00
Subject: Baby Party/Shower

---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Carson/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000 
10:08 AM ---------------------------


Mike Carson
08/04/2000 10:22 AM
To: goodmand@kochind.com, meridetk@kochind.com, Trpape@aol.com, 
tpape@satake-usa.com
cc:  

Subject: Baby Party/Shower



Some friends of my wife and I are throwing a little bash on the evening of 
September 9th for my upcoming baby BOY.   I would like to invite you all to 
attend.  I believe there will be a margarita machine....

If you want to come,, please reply by sending me your address.  You will then 
recieve an invitation by mail.

Hope to see you there,,

Mike