Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: 1800flowers.191910071@s2u2.com
To: lcampbel@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-14 18:05:00+00:00
Subject: Send Sweetest Day gifts from the heart to every sweetheart!


.name {  FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none}  .letter {  FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none} .linked {  FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #0000cc; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: underline} .text {  FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none} .letterbold {  FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none} .exclusive {  FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 9pt; COLOR: #ff0000; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; TEXT-DECORATION: none} .header {  font-family:arial,helvetica; font-size:12px; font-weight:bold; color:ffffff;} A:visited {text-decoration: underline; FONT-WEIGHT: bold;} A:hover {text-decoration:underline; color:cc0099;} .line {color:ffffff;} .disclaimer{ font-family:arial,helvetica; font-size:10px; color:000000} .letter03 {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; font-style: italic; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #000000; text-decoration: none} .footer {  font-family: Arial; font-size: 9pt; font-style: normal; line-height: normal; font-weight: normal; color: #FFFFFF; text-decoration: none} 	
 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  	
    [IMAGE]    Mille  de Fleur Arrangement    Dear Larry,    Sweetest Day is a day to celebrate all those who make you  smile, lift your spirits, or are always ready to lend an  ear when you want to chat. This year, Sweetest Day is Saturday,  October 20, and it's the perfect time to send someone a  gift just because they are such a delight to be around.  Visit our Sweetest  Day Collection  to find treats for all the sweethearts  you know, and give them two things they are sure to hold  close to their heart - a gift and a smile!  Visit 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 to see  our complete selection of gifts for every occasion.  From your friends at 1-800-FLOWERS.COM
 Call 1-800-FLOWERS
 (1-800-356-9377), Click (www.1800flowers.com)  or Come in!  AOL Keyword: 1800flowers  Offer valid through 10/31/01.  This email was sent to LCAMPBEL@ENRON.COM   	
      [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]    Rose  inCherub Planter  Brown  Bearwith Chocolate Roses  Shari's  Berries?StrawberriesGift Box- 1Dozen  Marquis
by Waterford BudVase with Red Roses  	
  	
	
  Electronic  Greetings  | Gift  Certificates  | Member  Benefits  | Gift  Finder     Remove  Me  | Contact  Us  | Security  & Privacy  | Disclaimer*  | Store  Locator
From: tconvery@wharton.upenn.edu
To: vkamins@enron.com
Cc: kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu
Date: 2000-11-22 10:39:00+00:00
Subject: December 6th Meeting

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

This is to confirm the December 6th Meeting here at our Center.

The location for the meeting is Room # 3212 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall and 
the time will run from 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM.

Please let us know if you need anything further.

We look forward to seeing you then.

Regards,

Theresa Convery


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Theresa Convery
Administrative Assistant
Risk and Decision Processes Center
The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
(215) 898-5688/Fax: (215) 573-2130
tconvery@wharton.upenn.edu
From: timothy.ray@enron.com
To: colleen.sullivan@enron.com
Cc: chris.germany@enron.com, john.henderson@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-02 10:48:00+00:00
Subject: CES Supply Management Agreement

New Power Company is current working on the acquisition of CES' mass market 
customers.  In light of the acquisition, there are issues that surround our 
relationship with ENA as we step into the supply management agreement.  Below 
are the observations  that I have.  I would like to get you feedback on 
these.  If necessary, let's get together to discuss the ramifications.

1) We are purchasing customers within only twelve markets.  As such, we will 
only interpret the language of the agreement related to "existing markets" as 
applying to only those twelve markets.  For other markets that we conduct 
business in, we would choose to make a decision on supplier and load 
management even if it is an LDC identified as an existing market under the 
agreement.  In essence, we see the supply management agreement being 
bi-furcated since CES is selling C&I to another marketer.

2) My interpretation is that New Power Company will only be on the hook for 
capacity and storage charges as they apply to mass markets.  This would 
include capacity and/or storage allocations received on CVA, CMD, AGL.  In 
addition, it would include the FSS and SST purchased on COH.  It would also 
include the following transportation agreements: 61822, 61825, 61838, 61990, 
64939, 65418, 62164.  There are some capacity agreements on TCO for 
CPA(65041, 65042) and BGE(65108) that were purchased by CES for both C&I and 
mass markets.  It is our contention that we will only be on the hook for the 
demand charges related to the capacity covering mass market purchase 
commitments identified in the schedules of the purchase agreement .  All 
un-utilized capacity would to stay with CES and/or buyer of the C&I 
agreements.

3) We need to discuss the application of the contract to additional capacity 
that New Power procures applicable to the periods prior to Apr. 1, 2001.  I 
want to keep this capacity separate and under our control.  I will need your 
viewpoint on this.  If ENA feels strongly that we must place the capacity 
under the supply management agreement, then I would want to discuss our 
ability to market any excess capacity in open market.  Bottom-line, I want to 
avoid gas costs being inflated due to my inability to receive value for 
un-utilized capacity. 

4) I would like to get your viewpoint on the right of first refusal clause.  
My view would be that its applicable would be made to transactions of similar 
nature and service level. (supply management)  To the degree that New Power 
chose after the primary term to manage its supply, all supply only 
transactions would not be subject to this clause.    

I know you will need to review the contract.  We have some time to discuss 
these issues, but would like to have feedback from you no later than next 
Friday, if at all possible.  I can be reached at ext 39475.  Thanks for your 
help.
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: dhunter@s-k-w.com
Date: 2001-10-11 20:51:17+00:00
Subject: RE: CESG Annual Retreat

What's the date again?

-----Original Message-----
From: Delaney Hunter [mailto:dhunter@s-k-w.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 2:25 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)
Subject: CESG Annual Retreat


Jeff-
Hey there! Will you please moderate a panel for me at the CESG Annual
Retreat? Below are the details. Just let me know.

Thanks,
Delaney

V.	Natural Gas Market Development. California has proceeded over the last
several years from 	a nuclear/hydro/QF price based generation cost base to
one dominated by natural gas costs - 	what's ahead for gas?
Proposals for new or enhanced interstate and intrastate pipelines, LNG
development, storage facilities as well as future price outlooks, etc.

Moderator: 	Jeff Dasovich - Enron

Panelists:	Keith McCrea - California Manufacturers & Technology Association
		Clark Smith - El Paso Corporation
Bill Wood - California Energy Commission
		Randy Wu - The Utility Reform Network
			Representative - Sempra
From: jr..legal@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-25 19:51:35+00:00
Subject: FBI Investigation


During the course of their investigation, Special Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation will be taking documents they believe may be important for their investigation from employees' offices.  The FBI has agreed to return copies of such documents. 

In addition, should you have an immediate need for a document requested by the FBI, please make a copy of the specific document and give the original to the FBI. Thank you for your cooperation.
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: rkbooth@attglobal.net
Date: 2000-11-01 17:51:00+00:00
Subject: Resource Contingency Program - Hermiston/Chehalis Power Projects

I've been working with Laura Wente to locate these documents for a couple 
days, and I think I've found what you need. If you could call or e-mail with 
your fax number, I'll send what I have over to you and expedite the process. 
If you'd like to peruse the EIS documents online, go to 
www.tis.eh.doe.gov/nepa/ and click the heading DOE NEPA Analyses.

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. My phone number is 
503.464.3748.

Kate
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: gacox@mail.gsi-net.com
Date: 2001-10-03 15:34:11+00:00
Subject: RE: Pure Drive Feedback

what makes you think that


Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grant Cox <gacox@mail.gsi-net.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Grant+20Cox+20+3Cgacox+40mail+2Egsi-net+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:51 AM
To:	Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	Pure Drive Feedback

I think your Pure Drive plays alot like a Yonex.


>Subject: Pure Drive Feedback
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 01 10:12:26 -0700
>From: Tennis Warehouse Feedback <feedback@tennis-warehouse.com>
>To: "Grant Cox" <gacox@gsi-net.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>
>Grant,
>
>Greetings from Tennis Warehouse!
>
>We're following up on the Babolat Pure Drive racquet you purchased
>recently. Any comments on this model would be very helpful to others
>considering it. If you choose to reply, we'll include your thoughts on
>our web site.  Feel free to write as much or little as you'd like, in any
>form you'd like. Your honesty is appreciated. To give you an idea of what
>we're looking for, here are some sample questions: Which racquet were you
>previously using and how does the Pure Drive compare? What were you
>looking for in a racquet and has it satisfied your needs? What aspects of
>your game has this racquet made a difference in (positive or negative)?
>Is there anything someone considering buying this racquet should be aware
>of? Playing level, string used and tension?
>
>We appreciate your time and any comments you can provide. Thanks again
>for choosing Tennis Warehouse!
>
>Kind Regards,
>Dan Jenkins
>Website Editor/Tennis Warehouse
>Toll Free 1-800-883-6647
>Direct (805) 781-6464
>E-mail: feedback@tennis-warehouse.com
>www.tennis-warehouse.com
>


---------------------------------------------------------------
 Grant A. Cox                          ph: (713) 522-6300
 Groundwater Services, Inc.           fax: (713) 522-8010
 2211 Norfolk, Suite 1000          e-mail: gacox@gsi-net.com
 Houston, TX 77098
---------------------------------------------------------------
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: scott.healy@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-10 10:48:00+00:00
Subject: FW: FuelCell / Enron

I wasn't sure from your email if you wanted to review it now, or wait until 
Jackie and I sort through some things.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/10/2000 10:47 
AM ---------------------------


"Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino" <jscheib@rc.com> on 11/10/2000 08:54:15 AM
To: "Jerry Leitman (E-mail)" <jleitman@fce.com>, "Ross M. Levine (E-mail)" 
<rlevine@fce.com>, "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Sellay, William" <WSELLAY@RC.com> 

Subject: FW: FuelCell / Enron


Our server is back up - sorry for the delay in your receipt of these
comments which were initially sent out last night.  A message from our
system administrator indicates that Kay already received the message below
but Ross and Jerry did not.  Just to be safe I am resending to all of you.

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Scheib, Jacqueline Pennino
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:14 PM
> To: 'kay.mann@enron.com'; Jerry Leitman (E-mail); Ross M. Levine
> (E-mail)
> Cc: Sellay, William
> Subject: FuelCell / Enron
>
> As discussed, attached is a clean and blacklined version of the FuelCell /
> Enron Agreement reflecting the parties' agreements over the past two days.
> The marked up comments list will follow shortly by PDF file.  Please note
> that some of the members of my client's team will be seeing this at the
> same time as you and therefore may have additional comments.
>
>    <<FuelCell Enron (CLEAN) Purchase Agreement.doc>>  <<FuelCell Enron
> (RED) Purchase Agreement.rtf>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Jacqueline Pennino Scheib, Esq.
> Robinson & Cole LLP
> 280 Trumbull Street
> Hartford, CT  06103
> (p) 860-275-8285
> (f) 860-275-8299
> jscheib@rc.com
>

 - FuelCell Enron (CLEAN) Purchase Agreement.doc
 - FuelCell Enron (RED) Purchase Agreement.rtf
From: perfmgmt@enron.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-26 01:38:00+00:00
Subject: Reviewer Approval

Please note that your employees have suggested the following people to 
complete a feedback form on their behalf.  You will need to access the 
Performance Management System (PEP) to either approve or decline these 
suggested reviewers.  Once you have approved the suggested reviewers they 
will be notified and can begin completing the feedback form.

Your list of employees that have suggested reviewers are listed below:



Date suggested: May 24, 2000
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name: CRENSHAW, SHIRLEY J


Date suggested: May 19, 2000
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name: KOLLAROS, ALEXIOS


Date suggested: May 22, 2000
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name: KRISHNARAO, PINNAMANENI V


Date suggested: May 22, 2000
Feedback Due Date: Jun 16, 2000

Employee Name: SHANBHOGUE, VASANT
From: cantekin.dincerler@enron.com
To: grant.masson@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-27 11:23:00+00:00

Grant,

Would you take a look at the following correlation matrix? Does it make sense?

PS: This is an updated correlation matrix with gold and silver correlations. 
I used Bloomberg's generic closest month gold and silver contract prices for 
the correlation analysis.
From: harry.arora@enron.com
To: harrysarora@yahoo.com
Date: 2001-12-26 17:38:41+00:00
Subject: FW: test mail



-----Original Message-----
From: Kaur, Gurdeep (Gurdeep)** CTR ** [mailto:gkaur1@lucent.com]
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 11:14 AM
To: 'harora@enron.com'
Subject: test mail



Hi Harpreet,

testing email id. pls acknowledge receipt.

Thanks
Gurdeep Kaur 
Global Messaging Services (Lucent)
*            gkaur1@lucent.com
Phone	(732)949-6106
From: mark.haedicke@enron.com
To: michelle.cash@enron.com
Cc: mark.holsworth@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-11 15:00:00+00:00

How would we do this efficiently in EWS?  Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 02:58 PM -----

	Mark Holsworth/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/10/2001 11:21 AM
		 
		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew Fossum/ENRON@enronXgate, Kristina 
Mordaunt/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc: 
		 Subject: 

  Pete Van De Gohm of EES has again raised the topic of inventorying our 
trade secret protection which has been discussed from time to time.  I have 
visited with Jim Derrick about having a legal/business committee representing 
your major groups.  It would function in a similar manner as our Y2K 
committee did.  We would have Fulbright & Jaworski give our people general 
instructions, our business people would canvass our companies to determine 
what we considered proprietary trade secrets and if we were not protecting 
our proprietary information appropriately, we could address that issue.  
Fulbright could also be used on an ad hoc basis.   Costs would be shared 
proportionately between the major groups except special fees attributable to 
a specific operating group.
 
  I believe we need this inventory.  If we try to enforce our non-competition 
agreements and we can't prove that we kept such information on a need to know 
basis and properly secured, we could lose the law suit.  

  Jim asked that I contact each of you regarding this to see if you were in 
agreement with the proposed plan.  Please respond as soon as possible if you 
agree so we can get the project off the ground.
From: mary.cook@enron.com
To: derek.davies@enron.com, greg.johnston@enron.com, chris.gaffney@enron.com, mark.powell@enron.com, cheryl.nelson@enron.com
Cc: tracy.ngo@enron.com, russell.diamond@enron.com, wendy.conwell@enron.com, edward.sacks@enron.com, susan.bailey@enron.com, samantha.boyd@enron.com, stephanie.panus@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, peter.keohane@enron.com, randy.otto@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-11 10:13:00+00:00
Subject: Canada Work Report

See attached.


Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
From: stanley.horton@enron.com
To: caron.horton@trinity.edu
Date: 2000-12-11 08:13:00+00:00
Subject: Re: morning 12/11

Glad you finally made it!  Good luck on your Legal exam today.  Get some rest 
and start studying for Wednesday and Thursday exams.  The finish is close at 
hand.

Enjoyed taking you last night.  I like the time alone with you.  Saturday, I 
have a haircut at 2:30 so we can start shopping at 3 or go early and be done 
by noon.  Let me know and send me your Mother's list!

Dad
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: mark.knippa@enron.com
Date: 1999-08-05 16:53:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Gallup - Continental Divide's contract proposal

Any chance they could email electronic version of this Agreement?






Mark Knippa
08/05/99 10:17 AM
To: Gerald Nemec
cc:  
Subject: Gallup - Continental Divide's contract proposal


Gerald,

I am sending up a copy of the proposed contract structure from Continental 
Divide
who is the local power utility associated with the Transwestern Gallup 
station.

Overall the commercial terms seem to be in line with all the discussions that 
have
been referenced, although there are some issues we want to make vary clear or
more apparent.

1) ECS is agreeing to a 3 yr term "to buy power from Continental Divide" 
assuming
     the merger is completed and power is available to ECS through the No. 21 
tariff.

2) They have provided none of the information concerning a split demand 
charge 
      that totals $12.21/kw.  Discussions reflect that $8.86/kw is avoidable 
and tied to
      their monthly coincidental peak load and the remaining $3.35/kw is a 
base type
      demand.  This is the basis of the rebate mechanism for TW.  Note this 
is also
      a Tri-State portion and part of the tariff 21.

3) ECS is aware of more favourable contract structures that Tri-State has 
negotiated
     and wants to maintain the ability to utilize a more favourable 
tariff/contract structure 
     or to negotiate specifics with Continental Divide post the Tri-State 
merger.   We 
     would still be buying from Continental Divide supporting their 3 yr term.

I am trying to get some written specifics from Continental Divide / Tri-State 
relative
to the demand avoidance since they are currently using this structure today.  
I'll let
you know.

Otherwise I wanted to get the document to you for your review.

Thanks
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: phillip.love@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-30 16:28:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Tuberville

damn, are you going to take that?




Chad Landry
01/30/2001 03:40 PM
To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan 
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Tuberville  

Get off Blanchard's nuts.  Tuberville would leave in a heartbeat.  Hell, 
Auburn is not even Alabama's Flagship University.  Wow, 2nd tier in your own 
state.  I am sure Tuberville never thinks about that fact.

CKL



Phillip M Love
01/30/2001 03:02 PM
To: Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan 
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: Tuberville  

Chad, do you even know what is coming out of your mouth?  When did you become 
such a football expert?  I recall Blanchard and the boys having to teach you 
about the game.
From: antonio.paez@bradfordcompany.com
To: john.griffith@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-28 12:26:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Hi!!!!!

Hi boy, How are you?

I thing Mexico are better than USA.

Let me call you

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Griffith@enron.com [mailto:John.Griffith@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 12:16 PM
To: Antonio Paez
Subject: Re: Hi!!!!!



---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 02/28/2001
11:13 AM ---------------------------


John Griffith
02/28/2001 11:15 AM

To:   "Antonio Paez" <paez1000@hotmail.com>
cc:

Subject:  Re: Hi!!!!!  (Document link: John Griffith)

Tony,

Whats up?  Hey I think that Mexico is playing US tomorrow in Ohio for the
World Cup qualifying.  Is Mexico any good?  Should we wager on the match?
Hope things are going well with you.  Talk to you soon.

My work number is (713) 853-6247 if you want to call me anytime.  I got a
promotion.  I am now trading Natural Gas Options.  We trade them over the
internet also.  We have a website (Enron Online) that we make markets on
many different commodities and we just started making option markets in
natural gas a couple of months ago.  I am helping with this.

Tell your family hi and have a great day.

John
From: stephanie.piwetz@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-27 16:59:00+00:00
Subject: Deal 318870.01, inquiry

Kate, checking on deal  318870.01, it is an EOL deal and looks like it has 
been changed.  Once an EOL trade is transacted we are not suppose to change 
the deal.  Please let me know why the ch took place.  

Thanks
Stephanie
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: ellen.wallumrod@enron.com
Cc: kim.ward@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-13 06:42:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Ellen,
 I have generated the attached for Kim Ward.  I will let you know if the 
counterparty elects to sign.




	Ellen Wallumrod@ENRON
	04/03/2001 11:16 AM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company


Dan,

As the confirmation will have so much special language and conditions and it 
is a long-term trade,  I would prefer if someone in Legal wrote it up.
Would that be OK Dan ?

Regards,
Ellen




Dan J Hyvl@ECT
04/03/2001 10:02 AM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company  

Kim,
 We currently have a Master with Eastern New Mexico Natural Gas Association, 
Inc. (Contract No. 96009607) therefor, the Confirm Desk can do the confirm 
once it is put in the system.  
 
Ellen,
 Do you agree?



	Kim Ward
	04/03/2001 09:40 AM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Dan, 

Thanks for looking at this for me.  I did remove the phrase you mention in 
number 1 below.  As for a volume cap, I don't think that one is necessary in 
this case.  Their TW contract limits them to 1000 MMBtu/day.  Any prices that 
are fixed will not include TW transport charges.

Thanks again,

Kim

ps, once their board approves this term sheet, we will need to do a 
confirmation.  Will this be generated by you or when the deal is entered into 
the system?



Dan J Hyvl
04/02/2001 08:55 AM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company  

Kim,
 I have reviewed your term sheet and have the following questions.  
1.  Under Term, you have included the phrase "with annual redetermination" 
however I find no redetermination language in the Price  section.  I would 
suggest that the phrase be deleted.
2.  Under Quantity, you indicate there expected volumes, however, we need to 
put some cap on the maximum, With a 5 year term, we should offer some maximum 
such as 200% of the expected volumes.  Any thoughts relating to a cap?
3.  Under Price you indicate that the price could be changed to a Fixed 
Price, I assume that you do not intend to include the Transwestern 
transportation charges as a part of the Fixed Price.  Is this correct?  and 
if so, does the Fixed Price language need to be qualified?  
 Otherwise, the term sheet appears okay.  
      Dan



	Kim Ward
	03/29/2001 03:52 PM
		 
		 To: Dan Hyvl
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Eastern New Mexico Gas Company

Dan,

Attached is a term sheet that has been sent to Eastern New Mexico gas company 
to extend a four year deal that ends on April 30, 2001.  Could you look into 
the confirmation for this transaction?  They will be going to the board for 
approval at the end of next week so you have some time.  Sorry to bombard 
you!!  This one should be easy.

Thanks,

Kim
From: samuel.schott@enron.com
To: camille.gerard@enron.com, mary.gosnell@enron.com, adnan.patel@enron.com, tanya.rohauer@enron.com, paul.radous@enron.com, tom.moran@enron.com, bradley.diebner@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, karen.lambert@enron.com, stacey.richardson@enron.com, frank.davis@enron.com, noel.petterson@enron.com, walter.guidroz@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-08 10:03:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ClickPaper approvals, 12-7-00 _ GCP Response

GCP adjustments are highlighted in red.

 

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_ENA)






Walter Guidroz@ENRON
12/07/2000 09:00 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel 
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley 
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Noel 
Petterson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:  
Subject: ClickPaper approvals, 12-7-00

Attached are ClickPaper approvals for December 7, 2000.
From: pete.davis@enron.com
To: pete.davis@enron.com
Cc: bert.meyers@enron.com, bill.williams.iii@enron.com, craig.dean@enron.com, dporter3@enron.com, eric.linder@enron.com, geir.solberg@enron.com, jbryson@enron.com, leaf.harasin@enron.com, monika.causholli@enron.com, mark.guzman@enron.com, pete.davis@enron.com, ryan.slinger@enron.com, steven.merris@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-23 03:42:00+00:00
Subject: Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  <CODESITE>

Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final 
Schedules\2001042304.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   4.68 / Final:   4.65)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
From: krzysztof.forycki@enron.com
To: ed.cattigan@enron.com, jarek.astramowicz@enron.com, adam.overfield@enron.com, anne.edgley@enron.com, lloyd.wantschek@enron.com, james.derrick@enron.com
Cc: jacek.glowacki@enron.com, sophie.martin@enron.com, christian.hackett@enron.com, carys.willott@enron.com, brian.muscroft@enron.com, e..parrish@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 09:18:22+00:00
Subject: RE: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance

I agree with Ed proposal to accept the settlement.

Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: Cattigan, Ed 
Sent: 26 November 2001 15:30
To: Astramowicz, Jarek; Overfield, Adam; Forycki, Krzysztof; Edgley,
Anne; Wantschek, Lloyd; Derrick Jr., James
Cc: Glowacki, Jacek; Martin, Sophie; Hackett, Christian; Willott, Carys;
Muscroft, Brian; Parrish, Paul E.
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance


Good Afternoon

Attached are 2 documents in relation to final Settlement of the outstanding Delay in Start up (relating to the replacement of the previously damaged rotor) claim. One is a detailed history of the claim and the other a final acceptance notice proposed by the brokers.

I have been negotiating the outstanding portion of the claim now for nearly 9 months and believe that due to the circumstance surrounding the late delivery of the rotor and the advice of external council this settlement is acceptable to ENS. Will you please advise wether you agree with accepting this sum as full and final settlement.
 
In way of context this settlement is $750k of a possible $901k an 83% success on a claim we had been advised would not have been worth taking to arbitration if the insurers had become difficult.

regards

Ed  

Sophie. Could you please confirm that you are happy with the wording of the acceptance notice. 
NOTE I would really like to complete this by Wednesday this week as this is my last week.


-----Original Message-----
From: BODIMEADE, Alfred [mailto:ABodimeade@heathlambert.com]
Sent: 26 November 2001 10:34
To: 'Ed Cattigan'
Subject: FW: ENS - Draft Form of Acceptance


Ed
Let me know a.s.a.p. if you have any problem.
I think the figures are correct.
Alf
From: specialoffers@iexpect.com
To: h..lewis@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-29 21:32:06+00:00
Subject: Earn your degree fast


  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  We can help you get it!  The House of Education, the leading online education portal, lets you shop  and compare certificate and degree programs at over 40 schools. Prepare  for a successful future. Find out more about our programs in:	


 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    Food preparation and food service will be the fastest-growing occupations  through 2006 (according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics).  Learn from top international chefs.   	 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    Shop and compare programs in Advertising, Graphic Design, Publishing, Internet, Retail, Fashion, Print and many other industries. Constantly challenge your creative thinking.   	
 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    Get your degree in as little as 18 months. Study network/systems administration, computer technical support, e-commerce and more.   	 [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    Earn 50% more income than without an education (according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics). Earn your degree in as little as 15 months.   	


You are  receiving this Special Offer as a valued iExpect.com member. If you do not wish  to receive any 
Special Offers from us in the future, please click here   to unsubscribe.[IMAGE]
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: kerri.thompson@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-04 14:07:00+00:00
Subject: Re: natsource checkout

price changed to 420.00





Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/04/2001 02:02 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: natsource checkout

570324
broker has 420.00
From: nicole.palczer@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-22 09:52:00+00:00
Subject: Congratulations

Sally,  

I just wanted to send a quick congratulatory note on your promotion to 
Managing Director.  And a bit belated, a thank you for serving again as my 
PRC representative.  I was pleased with my outcome at year-end, and once 
again, was one of the few Analysts or Associates who was always kept informed 
about the process.  I appreciate your time and energy in representing me.

Nicole
From: no.address@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-24 05:44:38+00:00
Subject: eSource Presents Briefings with Senior Industry Analysts - Energy
 and Telecom/Broadband



A Dialogue with Frost & Sullivan's Senior Industry Analyst, Energy Markets 
 &
 Industry Analyst and Program Lead, Telecom and Bandwidth Services
Thursday, November 1st 
eSource is pleased to host our first Analyst Summit  to share insights into the Energy and Telecom/Bandwidth Markets   

Please join

Patti Harper-Slaboszewicz, Senior Industry Analyst, Energy Markets
&
    Rod Woodward,  Industry Analyst, Telecom Services &  Program Lead, Wholesale Services
He has authored a report on U.S. Bandwidth Services (Trading/Brokering/Online Exchanges) 
Download report for free at http://esource.enron.com/hot_topics.asp


at      3:30 - 5:30 PM     EB 5C2   
	Each presentation will last 35 minutes with 20 minutes Q&A 	
Agenda - Energy   3:30-4:30
?	Frost & Sullivan capabilities - 10 minutes 
?	Energy speaker: New Region Challenges for Retail Electric Providers - 25 minutes
	Development of transactional capability
	Acquiring customers
	Quick survey of offers online in ERCOT region
	Rate offerings will be limited by current meter capabilities
	ERCOT Retail Providers
	Forecasting load
?	Questions & Answers - 20 minutes 

	Agenda - Telecom/Broadband   4:30-5:30
?	Frost & Sullivan capabilities - 10 minutes
?	Telecom/Broadband speaker: Industry Insights - 25 minutes
Role of "Utilicom"/Energy providers in telecom
Overall wholesale market perspective 
Overview of data services market 
Insight and update on bandwidth trading services
?	Questions & Answers 20 minutes 


Please RSVP to Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
From: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com
To: controllers.dl-ets@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-05 15:40:31+00:00
Subject: FW: southpoint



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Peter Melera <pmelera@calpine.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Peter+20Melera+20+3Cpmelera+40calpine+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:34 AM
To:	'dschool@enron.com'; West Real Time Group
Subject:	southpoint

 - Southpoint Gas Model.xls
From: greg.trefz@enron.com
To: doug.gilbert-smith@enron.com, steve.wang@enron.com, larry.jester@enron.com, greg.trefz@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-16 16:43:11+00:00
Subject: Exxon Pricing

When: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 4:30 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 3143b

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
From: miguel.maltes@enron.com
To: mariella.mahan@enron.com, greg.curran@enron.com, paul.y'barbo@enron.com, javier.jaramillo@enron.com, lynnette.lopez-silva@enron.com, jay.wong@enron.com, tony.torres@enron.com, mauricio.ortiz@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-17 16:20:23+00:00
Subject: Weekly Report

Attached you will find the weekly report for week ending of March 16, 2001.

 

Saludos
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Date: 2000-10-10 15:27:00+00:00

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 
03:33 PM ---------------------------


Pinnamaneni Krishnarao
10/09/2000 10:53 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject:
From: brenna.neves@enron.com
To: eve.puckett@enron.com, judy.hernandez@enron.com, leslie.smith@enron.com, regina.blackshear@enron.com, sharon.peace@enron.com, lois.ford@enron.com, diane.salcido@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 19:12:00+00:00
Subject: Gas Deals with Enterprise Products Operating L.P. as Counterparty

Hi,  until Joe tells me otherwise, he needs to see all deals done with the 
Counterparty 'Enterprise Products Operating L.P.' if the counterparty 
signature has a stamp above it that says "By Enterprise Products GP, LLC, 
General Partner".  I will send around a copy tomorrow so that you can see an 
example of what I am talking about. 

I still do not have the list typed up from our meeting, but I will get the 
information to you as soon as I can!!

Thanks,
Brenna
From: markskilling@hotmail.com
To: tskilling@tribune.com, tomskilljr@aol.com, jeff.skilling@enron.com, mmmmisha@ix.netcom.com, mlangermann@2onesource.com, ermak@gte.net
Date: 1999-08-17 03:12:00+00:00
Subject: Re: earthquake---are you all right?

Just got on line.  Surprised it was possible.  Electricity out, so probably
only us with battery powered lap tops clogging things up.

Everything ok here, so far.  Got a pretty good shake.  Was out in the
streets for a couple of hours, with everyone else.  My neighborhood up on
solid rock, so things looked mostly ok.  Lots of old and bad construction
here; stones in the street.  One upper floor (abandoned) apartment half a
block from here collapsed and much debris in the stereets.  No apparent
injuries, however, in my neighborhood.  Unfortunately, other areas not so
lucky.  Saw 6.7 estimate for Izmit, the center, here (one place I passed had
a genertor and had a tv out for everyone to see).  Passed women praying, men
reading Koran, most just huddled in groups talking. Strange being in the
middle of it all with limited ability to communicate.  Know a few folks in
neighborhood and we had a few basic chats, though its amazing how much I
learned even from them.  Already knew the Turkish word for earthquake, which
is depram (revolution is devrim) and came in handy.

A few seagulls just went by and I think a neighbor down stairs up and about;
mistook that comotion for an aftershock.  A little rattled myself; much like
after SF quake.  I think memory of that still deep seeded in my
subconscious.

Again, this new technology amazes.  Better get off and save my battery.  May
need it.

Thanks for the note.  It was good to see your messages there.  I'll send
this to the rest of the family, but if they call tell them I'm ok and
worried about them worrying about me.

Love,

Mark



>From: <tskilling@tribune.com>
>To: "Mark Skilling" <markskilling@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: earthquake---are you all right?
>Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 21:55:16 -0500
>
>      Mark--
>          Have just received word of the earthquake there.  Reports are
>      preliminary but they are reporting it hit just after 3AM your time
>and
>      that buildings have collapsed and there are deaths--though they
>      haven't said how many.  It's being estimated at 7.1.
>          I've called Mom and Dad---clearly, Mark, we're very concerned.
>      Let us know you're all right.
>          Have been meaning to get to you to say hello. Hvae been following
>      your e-mails.
>          We're told phone lines are out--so haven't any idea when this
>      might get to you. Please let us know you're all right.
>          Thanks Mark.
>
>                                        Love,
>                                       Tom
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
From: r..rogers@enron.com
To: n..anderson@enron.com
Cc: alan.aronowitz@enron.com, sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-20 20:54:39+00:00
Subject: FW: Greenfield - ECTRI Loan Note

Peter,

F/y/i -- ECTRIC filed for bankruptcy protection in the US on 2/11/2002, so we'll need to confirm whether these payments must now be made into the Enron Corp. DIP account.

Kind regards,
Dan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Daniel R.  
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:39 PM
To:	Anderson, Peter N.
Cc:	Aronowitz, Alan; Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	Greenfield - ECTRI Loan Note

Peter,

The details of the promissory note ("Loan Note 2002") from Greenfield to ECTRI in payment of agreed interest rate swap breakage costs in connection with the November 2001 Greenfield equity sale/LAKSHMI vessel financing workout transaction are as follows:

Maker: 			Greenfield Shipping Company Limited
Holder:			Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp.
Guarantor: 		Mitsui OSK Lines, Ltd.
Date of Note: 		November 20, 2001
Principal Amount:	US$12,720,000.00
Interest Rate: 		5% per annum (based on 360 day year)
ECTRI Swap Deal No.:	M148198

Repayment Schedule*:
	1st Payment:	January 31, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	2nd Payment:	February 28, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	3rd Payment:	March 29, 2002 -- US$561,621.52 (includes principal and interest)
	Final Payment:	April 30, 2002 -- remaining balance of principal plus accrued interest.

	* Notwithstanding the foregoing schedule, the Loan Note is repayable in full upon refinancing of the vessel by Greenfield. 

Hope this helps.  Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.  I'm copying Enron lawyers Alan Aronowitz and Sara Shackleton on this note so that they are also aware of the details of this ECTRI receivable and the fact that MOL appear to be arranging payment on behalf of Greenfield to ECTRI (at least for the January and February 2002 instalment obligations).

Kind regards,
Dan Rogers
From: chris.dorland@enron.com
To: mike.cowan@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-07 14:42:53+00:00
Subject: RE:

Not good. Listen to this. At the end of the day dailies traded down to 85 bucks. Check that range 85-275. I need a vacation.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:54 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: 

How is that weak baboon heart of yours????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 7:52 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

The range on my next day power was 110 to 260.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike  
Sent:	Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:33 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: 

I'm losing a bit this month too.  Fucking cash to futures too tight!!!  Need the weather to break.

Call me tonight and I'll tell you about my Realtor.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris  
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:	RE: 

Want to hear about a bad day. Down $2 million USD today. Temps came in 10 degress hotter than we thought in the Northeast this week and blew up!

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cowan, Mike  
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE: 

Sounds good man.  We should maybe talk on the weekend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dorland, Chris  
Sent:	Friday, August 03, 2001 8:18 AM
To:	Cowan, Mike
Subject:	

I think a mid sept tee time will work. I want to try to be there for the off site with the west guys. Tell John Z I'll call him this afternoon.

Chris
From: patti.sullivan@enron.com
To: mike.grigsby@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-15 00:12:07+00:00
Subject: Elizabeth Shim

Mike,

Just a quick rundown of the problems we encountered with Liz in scheduling. As you know, we started her out scheduling El Paso. After about 7 weeks of training and having her do intraday nominations, we put her in the weekend rotation. The first weekend she worked, it became obvious that she still did not understand physical gas flow. Shannon spent the whole weekend on the phone talking her through any changes that needed to be made. She didn't seem to remember anything that she had been trained on daily for the previous 7 weeks. When I spoke to her on the following Monday, she indicated that she just became confused after someone tried to make a change in the nomination. We continued to work very closely with her to make her understand how physical gas flow works on El Paso. I started receiving some complaints from customers who were very much aware that she didn't understand what she was doing. After several more weeks, Shannon was becoming frustrated with the lack of progress, so I told Shannon to write down step by step every piece of the day to day nomination and renom process. That weekend went much more smoothly because Liz had every step and every scenario drawn out for her. I have since had her scheduling SoCal Ehrenberg while the new people are training and that seems to be working out OK. I think the biggest problem with Liz is an inability to think outside the box. but she is willing to work hard. I hope this helps. 

Patti
From: michelle.cash@enron.com
To: twanda.sweet@enron.com
Date: 2000-06-28 09:05:00+00:00
Subject: Purchase and Sale Agreement

T:  Please print this and attachments.  Thanks.  MHC


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the 
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 09:05 AM -----

	Peter del Vecchio
	06/27/2000 09:31 PM
		 
		 To: Joe Jure/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert J Pratel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Finley 
Biggerstaff/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward 
Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores Lenfest/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian 
Schaffer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rick Johnson@ENRON.com
		 Subject: Purchase and Sale Agreement


----- Forwarded by Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000 09:00 PM -----

	"GEORGE T. LEE" <GTLEE@LLGM.COM>
	06/27/2000 05:29 PM
		 
		 To: <jcromie@connellfoley.com>, <Dbraunstein@dlalaw.com>, 
<jbyrnes@dlalaw.com>, <jmills@dlalaw.com>, <Lfritts@dlalaw.com>, "ANDREW 
DAVIS" <ADAVIS@LLGM.COM>, "BENJAMIN G. CLARK" <BGCLARK@LLGM.COM>, "CATHERINE 
LIN" <CKLIN@LLGM.COM>, "MARLA S. PETRINI" <MPETRINI@LLGM.COM>, 
<Gmahoney@media-general.com>
		 cc: <mmcbride@connellfoley.com>, <Lsimpkins@dlalaw.com>, 
<Mqualiana@dlalaw.com>, <Plang@dlalaw.com>, <JAMES.grace@enron.com>, 
<PETER.del.vecchio@enron.com>, "ANDREW J FAWBUSH" <AFAWBUSH@LLGM.COM>, 
"DOMNICK BOZZETTI" <DBOZZETT@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN G KLAUBERG" 
<JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>, "PETER BAUMGAERTNER" <PBAUMGAE@LLGM.COM>, "PHILIP 
TINGLE" <PTINGLE@LLGM.COM>, "TAMARA BARNES" <TBARNES@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: Purchase and Sale Agreement


  Attached are revised drafts of the Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to 
Garden State Paper Company, Inc., one of which has been marked to show 
changes from the prior draft (6/16/00) distributed to you. Please recognize 
that this draft is being distributed prior to the completion of Enron's due 
diligence review.  In particular, bracketed provisions merit further 
discussion and/or review.  Please contact us with your comments at 
713-287-2004 or 713-287-2066.

Sincerely,


Benjamin G. Clark and George T. Lee

This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential 
and it may be protected by the  attorney/client or other priviliges.  This 
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to 
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intentded 
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by 
return mail, e-mail or at 713-287-2066.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, 
distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  George T. Lee, gtlee@llgm.com.

 - Purchase.DOC
 - Purchas1.DOC
From: rod.hayslett@enron.com
To: tracy.geaccone@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-27 20:36:42+00:00
Subject: Fw: CAPEX

For TW. Can you help me here?

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


-----Original Message-----
From: Taylor, Sarah <Sarah.Taylor@ENRON.com>
To: Hayslett, Rod <Rod.Hayslett@ENRON.com>
CC: Desai, Jayshree <Jayshree.Desai@ENRON.com>
Sent: Tue Nov 27 14:31:21 2001
Subject: CAPEX

Rod,

Would you please forward me the CAPEX numbers when Tracy e-mails them to you?  Jayshree indicated that she needs those numbers and it will be easier to send in soft form.

Also, to confirm the numbers in the information you gave me are 30.86 MM for 2001 (this does not include Red Rock) and $68.4 in 2002 (this includes $47 MM for Red Rock).  I am assuming that on page three of the 2001-2003 projections that really captures 2002-2004 the operations numbers are in 000s not millions as noted above.  If this is true you have 15 billion in operations CAPEX - which I don't believe is true.  Let me know.

Thanks
Sarah
From: tammie.schoppe@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Date: 2002-01-31 22:08:53+00:00
Subject: Oxley cell 713-922-2991



Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office 
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile
From: james.steffes@enron.com
To: paul.kaufman@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, bruno.gaillard@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, hgovenar@acom2.com
Date: 2000-08-17 18:52:00+00:00
Subject: California Legislative Strategy as of 8/17/00

CONFIDENTIAL WORK PRODUCT


The key points for the next 2 weeks are as follows:

1. Sen. Alpert Legislation on Rate Caps
 - 2290 may be "dead"
 - Senator staff recognizes the legislation has "problems"
 - Senator is still looking to move something with another vehicle
 - Enron MESSAGE:  "CPUC is fixing the problem, legislature should do 
nothing; if you decide to do     something, then use Enron's fixes" (which 
simply codify the CPUC's decision)
 -  focus on customers' support for our legislative fix rather than IEP
 - Jeff D. to talk with customers, give them our fix, tell them to sit tight, 
and contact Sandi M. to discuss
 - Sandi M. to talk with Sen. Alpert about our fixes

2. Continue to support Williamson Act fix for Pastoria
 - Committee meeting on 8/18 fo Urgency bill
 - no opposition identified to date (some question about Farm Bureau though)
 - Sandi M. to attend meeting to support bill

Sandi M. will report back on events tomorrow afternoon.

It looks like we can secure both items in a reasonable fashion.  We need to 
stay focused and coordinated.  If anyone has any questions, please let me 
know.

Jim Steffes
713-853-7673