Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: james.steffes@enron.com
To: scott.stoness@enron.com
Cc: harry.kingerski@enron.com, don.black@enron.com, jbennett@gmssr.com, tamara.johnson@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, james.lewis@enron.com, leslie.lawner@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-13 13:20:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

Scott, etal --

My final concern.  

Is anyone at EES concerned with this outcome --  
(1) Accept EES' tiering but use 60% of current usage as baseline, 
(2) all above 60% is DJ Index, and 
(3) demand below 60% is paid at $500/Mwh (or the ISO price)?  

This is an adaption of our proposal.  Would this be painful?  

My big fear is that somehow the CPUC uses our filing against us.  We need to 
make sure that these discussions don't get away from us to allow that outcome.

Jim





Scott Stoness@EES
04/13/2001 12:00 PM
To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES, James D 
Steffes/NA/Enron@ENRON, jbennett@gmssr.com@ENRON, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, 
Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie 
Lawner/HOU/EES@EES, Leslie Lawner/HOU/EES@EES
cc:  

Subject: Meeting 8AM Central Monday

We have agreed on a strategy, subject to Whaley/Delaney approval, to:
Scott Stoness submit testimony today advocating 2 part real time pricing in CA
Read other parties testimony this weekend from the perspective "Has somebody 
filed testimony close enough to Stoness testimony, that we can cross examine 
and brief to a favorable outcome?"
Meet on Monday at 8AM to decide whether to rescind Stoness's testimony.

The following dial in number and code corresponds to the Monday 8AM Central 
Time meeting.
1 800 713 8600
68266 is PIN
Scott Stoness is host

Action Items:
All on To list above read and have opinion on 2 and 3 above
All on To list above meet on Monday at 8AM.  Meet in Stoness office if 
possible.
Harry and Jeane polish Stoness testimony and wait to the last minute before 
submitting it
Jeane ensure all on this To list get a copy of testimony, emailed as soon as 
she gets it.

Scott Stoness
From: rehman.sharif@enron.com
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-06 13:24:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Redployment

Vince,
I highly appreciate your consideration.
Best regards,
Rehman




Vince J Kaminski@ECT
03/06/2001 11:41 AM
To: Rehman Sharif/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Re: Redployment  

Rehman,

Thanks for you message.
My group hires almost exclusively people with background in quantitative 
disciplines
(math, physics) or computer programming.

I shall send your resume to some other units in the company that are looking
for people with good skills and experience.

Vince





Rehman Sharif@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/27/2001 11:17 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Redployment

Vince,
I am a redeployment candidate out of CALME region and in the process of 
exploring opportunities within Enron. I have very extensive background in 
financial analysis and economic structuring. I am interested learning more 
about your group to find out if my skills and abilities could serve the 
present and future needs of your group. Attached is my resume for your 
review, any guidance you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Rehman Sharif
From: ehillegeist@hotmail.com
To: lisa.gillette@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-18 14:02:26+00:00
Subject: RE:


bonjour- don't know if y'all got my message last night or not- sue i only
heard the first part of your message then it got cut off....am supposed to
go to NB today while the tile men are htere, but prob back late tonight or
early tomorrow morn.  maybe could meet up tomorrow night depending on
whether or not am doing dinner w/ gogo et al....cannot typewell w/ my damn
arm in this brace, so will try to call you later on the road.  chat soon-
e

>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
From: d..steffes@enron.com
To: donna.fulton@enron.com, robert.neustaedter@enron.com
Date: 2001-08-09 23:46:08+00:00
Subject: RE: Storage Monetization

Yes.



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fulton, Donna  
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:23 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject:	Storage Monetization

I spoke with Mary Kay Miller when she was in town to give her an update of where we were on the storage project.  I told her we had gotten the LeBoeuf law firm and Brown, Williams involved to help.  I told her that both firms suggested that once pipelines were sufficiently interested in the storage monetization products, they should set up meetings at FERC and with their own respective pipeline customers in order to explain specific storage monetization proposals.

She was glad for the update and was comfortable with the suggested meetings as long as Enron did not attend the meetings at FERC or with the pipeline's customers.  This seems what LeBouef and Brown, Williams had in mind, since the pipelines are responsible for the regulatory needs of the storage project.  Enron is merely offering background research in order to get the pipelines interested in the storage monetization and to give the pipelines ideas on how to put the project in the best regulatory framework at FERC.

I would like to send this note to Paul Bieniawski if you agree with my comments.

--Donna
From: sara.shackleton@enron.com
To: robert.bruce@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-16 19:13:00+00:00

----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000 07:13 PM -----

	Treasa Kirby
	11/16/2000 05:13 AM
		 
		 To: Stephen Jacobson/EU/Enron@Enron, Matthew Landy/OSL/ECT@ECT, Kim S 
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/LON/ECT@ECT, 
Chris Glaas/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Von Bock Und Polach/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: 

Please find attached draft confirmations for the Corp Prepay.

Regards

Treasa
---------------------- Forwarded by Treasa Kirby/LON/ECT on 16/11/2000 11:12 
---------------------------


akeros@tdsec.co.uk on 16/11/2000 10:36:29
To: tkirby@enron.com
cc: francg2@tdsec.co.uk, fulles2@tdsec.co.uk 

Subject: 




(See attached file: Enron.doc)(See attached file: Enron2.doc)(See attached 
file:
Mscg.doc)

Treasa

Please find attached Draft Confirmations showing indicative terms.

Please note that trade size, pricing and maturity are still subject to 
internal
approve and the issue concerning our ability to successful net credit 
protection
with this transaction still has to be resolved before we will be in a position
to trade.

Please let me know if you have further questions.

I'll speak to you later today

Regards Shane
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and the information it contains may be confidential and is for the
intended addressee(s) only. If you have received it in error, please do not
disclose the contents to anyone. Notify the sender immediately and delete the
transmission from your files. If you are not the intended addressee, any 
review,
distribution, copying or use of this information is strictly prohibited and 
may
be unlawful.  We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this
communication, expression of views or recommendations, save and except for the
benefit of the intended addressee(s) and subject to the terms of any other
documentation with the intended addressee(s).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 - Enron.doc
 - Enron2.doc
 - Mscg.doc
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: margaret.allen@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-14 21:13:43+00:00
Subject: RE:

okay skilling

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Allen, Margaret  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	RE: 

whatever. i'll call when i'm walking out and i'm sure i'll wait 45 minutes. asshole.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Arnold, John  
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Allen, Margaret
Subject:	

...since I waited half an hour for you last time
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: cbrashear@velaw.com
Date: 2000-10-26 09:50:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Weekend

That would be great.  We can leave his "stuff" by the front door.  I know he 
will have things he wants to bring to show you.

Michael asked me for advice yesterday.  ("Mom, I have a problem...").  He now 
has 2 girlfriends, Ashley plus a new one, Marilyn.  He was torn.  He decided 
to stick with Ashley. Oh, the problems of a 6 year old!!

Michael is very excited about the weekend.  He just doesn't think it will be 
long enough!!

Thanks for everything,

Kay




"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 10/26/2000 09:45:55 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: RE: Weekend

   No problem as far as I am concerned.  I can just pick up the
antibiotics and anything Michael has forgotten on the way back after I pick
him up.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:42 AM
To: Brashear, Charlotte
Subject: Re: Weekend



Hi Charlotte,

I'm glad you wrote, as I was going to write you.

Michael has strep (as do I), so he and I are home today.  He is on two
antibiotics which he takes twice a day.  I'm trying to figure out how to
get these to you, since these have to be refrigerated.  Obviously, if
Michael  isn't doing great I won't go.  Currently, he feels fine, and only
feels bad when he has fever. He woke up with fever again this am, but the
fever should go away after 24 hours on the antibiotics.  Just let me know
if you aren't comfortable with  the situation.  I can always leave on
Saturday, or not at all.

Michael's doctor is Rey Calderon 713 520 9550.  His wife (and assistant) is
Delores, and they are wonderful about returning calls, etc.

We will be staying at the Hyatt Hill Country Resort, 210 647 1234. Saturday
night I will be staying in Round Rock (going to Paige's homecoming in
Georgetown), but Neil will still be at the Hyatt.

Michael says hi, by the way.  He is watching me type this.

Kay





"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 10/26/2000 07:15:59 AM

To:   "Mann Kay (E-mail)" <kmann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Weekend

           Don't forget to let me know where you will be staying in San
Antonio.  Also, what is Michael's doctor's last name.  I know it's Reynaldo
something.

           Thanks.  Have a great time and don't worry about Michael.
From: shannon.mcpearson@enron.com
To: errol.mclaughlin@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-05 16:04:23+00:00
Subject: NG Deferred

Please save the revised file attached for the NG Gas Deferred book DPR. The changes did not affect P&L. The changes are highlighted in yellow on Roll 1.

 

Shannon McPearson
Enron North America
713-853-5944
Shannon.McPearson@enron.com
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: colleen.sullivan@enron.com
Date: 2000-04-27 13:01:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Transportation Reimbursement Meeting

I did get the email.  I was looking right at it and couldn't see it I guess.


   
	
	
	From:  Thomas Engel                           04/26/2000 10:21 AM
	

To: Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda H Fletcher/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Adrial Boals/Corp/Enron@Enron, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Transportation Reimbursement Meeting


I believe Irena talked to everyone - just to confirm - we changed the meeting 
date/time -

Moved to Friday - April 28 a 11 am - EB2132.


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT on 04/26/2000 10:13 
AM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           04/25/2000 09:55 AM
	

To: Carrie Hollomon/HOU/ECT@ect, Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas Engel/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Transportation Reimbursement Meeting

Please plan to attend one more meeting on Thursday, April 27 at 11:00 am in 
EB2132 regarding changes to Sitara and Unify to accomodate transportation 
reimbursements systematically rather than spreadsheet based.  Please advise 
if you cannot attend.
From: lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com
To: daphneco64@bigplanet.com, daphneco64@yahoo.com, jason.bass2@compaq.com, eric.bass@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-11 21:32:00+00:00
Subject: Fw: Voter Competency Test

Be sure and take the test.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Peggy Dan Maynard" <peggy@airmail.net>
To: "Larry W. Bass" <lwbthemarine@bigplanet.com>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 4:52 PM
Subject: Fw: Voter Competency Test


> Hope you are doing okay. I have many skin cancers because I had xray
> treatments when a teen ager. We did miss you in  Austin.  By the way...
hope
> you pass the test!!  love YOU
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark_Maynard@Dell.com <Mark_Maynard@Dell.com>
> To: peggy@airmail.net <peggy@airmail.net>
> Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 11:35 AM
> Subject: FW: Voter Competency Test
>
>
> >This is a website that has a joke test.  You should be able to go to it
by
> >clicking the address below:
> >
> >> http://fly.hiwaay.net/~mtspeer/index.html
>
From: fildesd@phibro.com
To: fildes@enron.com, fildesd@phibro.com, jromeril@seminolecanada.com, 'joslyn@enron.com, pjoslyn@enmax.com, jborle@atb.com
Cc: barry.tycholiz@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-26 18:15:49+00:00
Subject: RE: how about a bid?


I gave you the wrong lot number... type in 1032 instead to get the Great
One.
I think 1031 is Haakan Loob.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fildes, David 
> Sent:	26 November 2001 18:00
> To:	'Jim Romeril'; 'Joslyn, Paul'; 'JBorle@atb.com'
> Cc:	'barry.tycholiz@enron.com'
> Subject:	how about a bid?
> 
> 
> 
> Boys,  
> I am bored today and have proof to show you... 
> Go to this website and type in 1031 in the sale number field..
> It's a beauty and would be a fine addition to any collector's gallery.
> I would consider a joint venture with you for investment purposes on this
> find of a lifetime.
> Personally, I think it looks a little like a late 70's drummer but it is
> the Great One nonetheless. 
> It is a fine specimen of the era ' Short on the sides, but keep the length
> in the back'
> 
> http://www.auktionsverket.se/starte.htm
> 
> 
> PS- the price is about 25,000 swedish kroners which i think is about $5000
> Canadian
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: mike.maggi@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-20 21:38:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Guggenheim Museum

Do you have interest in having a semi formal party at the guggenheim for our 
ny counterparties?  was thinking it might be a good pr move.
---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 09:35 
PM ---------------------------
From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 03/19/2001 05:23 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Guggenheim Museum  

There will be a corporate lounge for you to congregate in.  Does that sound 
good?  No problem on the thrity tickets.  I will hold them for you.  Let me 
know if you don't think yo uwill be needing all of them. I can also get you 
the formal invitations to send out if you would like.




	John Arnold@ECT
	03/19/2001 11:22 AM
		
		 To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Guggenheim Museum

On Friday, will there be a private reception or area for us or will our 
customers get lost in the crowd?
Probably thinking 30 invites for Friday.  Is that ok?


From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 03/16/2001 10:23 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Guggenheim Museum

Hey Buster,

Hope you had a great time in Cabo! I'm so jealous.  I need a vacation 
desperately!  

I'm trying to get a commitment on numbers from the different groups for the 
Guggenheim events.  Will you look over this document and tell me which ones 
you would like to attend and how many people you would like to bring to each? 
Of course, I need it ASAP -- what's new, right?!!

Thanks honey! Margaret
From: rainslie@isda.org
To: mark.e.haedicke@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com
Cc: dmoorehead@pattonboggs.com, pmartinez@isda.org
Date: 2001-03-21 19:30:00+00:00
Subject: ISDA Tax Committee - comment letter on proposed IRS hedging regul
	ations:  Weather Derivatives and Energy Derivatives

Mark and Mark:

This is a request for assistance from the TaxCommittee, which is preparing a
comment letter on the January 2001 proposed IRS regulations concening
hedging transactions.

Most of the comment letter addresses whether the Proposed Regulations
implement Congressional intent in replacing risk reduction with risk
management as the standard for hedging transaction status.  The Proposed
Regulations provide that unless explicity permitted, "a hedging transaction
does not include a transaction entered into to manage risks other than
interest rate or price changes, or currency fluctuations,..."  The Preamble
to the Proposed Regulations indicate that the Service wishes to receive
comments on additional risks that should be covered. Here is an excerpt from
the draft comment letter "

The Preamble to the Proposed Regulations indicates that a
weather derivative used by an energy producer to hedge against the risk of
decreases in the volume of sales resulting from variations in weather
patterns will not qualify as a hedge transaction until the Service exercises
its regulatory authority.  The Service should do so now.


Don Moorehead (who has an active tax practice as well as the active "Hill"
practice we know so well) is the drafter and makes strong arguments for
extending hedge transaction treatment to weather derivatives.  To help with
the argument, we would like to attach as an exhibit specific examples of
types of weather derivatives that could be incorporated in the final
regulations.

A similar concern exists with respect to energy supply derivatives.  Quoting
again from the draft letter:

Under the Proposed Regulations, if a business that is an intensive
user of energy (e.g., an aluminum producer) enters  into a transaction
to manage the risk of increased energy prices, that transaction apparently
can qualify as a hedge  transaction.  If, however, the transaction is
intended to manage the risk of an energy supply interruption, it apparently
will not qualify as a hedge transaction...

The energy supply derivative, like the weather derivative, alters
the taxpayer's exposure to risks that are inherent in its core economic
activities and there is no discernable policy rationale for delay in
extending hedge transaction treatment to energy supply derivatives,
particularly in light of the exclusivity provisions of the Proposed
Regulations.


To help with the argument, we would like to attach as an exhibit specific
examples of types of energy price and supply derivatives that could be
incorporated in the final regulations.

We look to you for help in this lists of products. Could you please point us
to someone at Enron who could supply such lists and promote more "risk
management" tax treatment for weather/energy derivatives?

Thanks in advance and regards, Ruth
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: d..steffes@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-16 20:21:12+00:00

Tribolet sez he doesn't know anything about the Lay/Edison call, but he said Wanda mentioned something about it.  You may want to check in with her.  I'm still waiting to hear from Calger.

Best,
Jeff
From: michael.garberding@enron.com
To: jeffrey.hodge@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 11:42:00+00:00
Subject: Prepay

Jeff,

I spoke with Bill B in credit this morning - currently, his main concern with 
Stoneville is the collateral issue.  We had assumed that Stoneville will have 
no credit line and all potential mark-to-market changes would be taken care 
of through rehypothecation (just like Chase).  However, we need to address 
the credit risk of Stoneville between when the margin call occurs and when 
the rehypothecation occurs.  He was also concerned where these 
rehypothecation procedures would be documented.  Let me know, but as I 
understand it, the Chase agreement should be a good format for this master 
agreement.  Thanks.

Michael
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: mike.smith@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com
Cc: vicki.sharp@enron.com, kelly.higgason@enron.com, michelle.maynard@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-27 17:05:44+00:00
Subject: RE: Extensions of CA Deals

For what it's worth, I concur with Mike.  Option 3 is the most prudent, and preferable, path.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Mike  
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:50 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; mday@gmssr.com; Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sharp, Vicki; Higgason, Kelly; Maynard, Michelle
Subject:	Extensions of CA Deals

CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION

I'd like to get some thoughts on this issue and hopefully build a consensus pretty quickly.

We are in the process of extending the term of some of our existing CA deals that we executed on the Master in June.  Understanding that "new" deals struck after 9/20 are, and extensions of existing deals may be, at risk, it seems to me we have three basic options in order to effect this extension, and I want to make sure we evaluate and choose the one that minimizes the risk that the extension is invalidated.  Note that DASR's have been submitted for the subject accounts under the original Transactions.  

The 3 choices I see are:

1.  .Amend and Restate the existing Transaction Confirmation to add the extension and new price for the extension.  In this case, the extension would be wrapped up on one document that is signed after 9/20 but effective in June.
2.  Simply amend the existing Transaction to add extended term and price.  This would be a separate document.
3.  Execute a whole new Transaction for the extended term, which would be effective when signed but the services and price under which would not start until after the expiration of the existing Transaction.  The existing Transaction would stay in tact as written.

It seems to me that choice number 3 is the safest overall.  The amended and restated route has appeal because the whole transaction is dated back to June.  However, if a regulator were to peel it back, the conclusion could be that the deal was struck after Sept 20 and therefore the whole transaction was invalid, including the original structure.  I think that choice 2, though creating a separate document for the extension, could fall into the same trap.  In that sense, choice 3 seems safest because arguably the original transaction is not at risk.  If the extension is invalidated, that determination would likely not claw back to the original deal.

The commercial teams want to close these extensions in Q3 so they are moving fast.  Please let me know your thoughts asap.  If we need to have a quick call, I can set something up.  Thanks.  MDS
From: suzanne.adams@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-07 09:35:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Westinghouse - Gleason

Done.  Are you dry?



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 09:29 AM
		 
		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason

please calendar.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2001 09:29 
AM ---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 08:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason

I received a letter from Westinghouse in response to our threat to draw on 
the letter of credit.  A copy is being delivered to you today.  I have spoken 
to Patty Clark (Asst. General Counsel for Allegheny) about what we are doing 
and she didn,t seem overly concerned but asked to be kept in the loop.  I 
told her that Enron was very sensitive about the potential impact that our 
threats against Westinghouse might have on Allegheny,s contractual 
relationship with them.  Personally, I don,t think that we should draw on the 
letter of credit (even though I believe that we are entirely in the right on 
this one) because it might somehow hurt Allegheny.  I don,t, however, want to 
take the heat off of Westinghouse so I have not said anything.

We had a call with Westinghouse yesterday to discuss the facts surrounding 
our claim and have a follow up call scheduled for Wednesday (6/13) at 3:00 
pm.  You are welcome to participate if you would like.  To date, lawyers from 
either side have not participated in discussions as they have been primarily 
fact-finding in nature.  I am happy to give you an update as to what has 
happened and what I expect to occur on Wednesday at your convenience.

Take care,

Stuart
From: lynn.blair@enron.com
To: g..stage@enron.com, terry.kowalke@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-01 18:42:48+00:00
Subject: FW: OneOk Letter

	FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sellers, Emily  
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 1:42 PM
To:	Darveaux, Mary; Fossum, Drew; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Miller, Mary Kay; Cessac, Kenneth; Lowry, Phil; 'gharvey@gibbs-bruns.com'; Rice, Randy
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Dornan, Dari; Ringblom, Kathy; Nelson, Mike; Hawkins, Don; Thomas Bower (Haynesville); Kyle, Ted; January, Steven
Subject:	RE: OneOk Letter

For those of you that e-mailed me that you are available at 2:00 p.m. CST today, you can meet Drew in conference room EB47C2. 
For those of you outside of Houston please call into the number below: Please route to others we may have missed.

All participants dial:         1-800-711-8000
Access Code:                  21423#

Thanks

Emily Sellers
Enron Transportation Services Legal 
1400 Smith Street, EB4771
Houston, Tx 77001
emily.sellers@enron.com
(713) 853-7172
(713) 646-2738

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Darveaux, Mary  
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Miller, Mary Kay; Cessac, Kenneth; Lowry, Phil; 'gharvey@gibbs-bruns.com'; Rice, Randy
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Dornan, Dari; Ringblom, Kathy; Sellers, Emily; Nelson, Mike
Subject:	RE: OneOk Letter

	FYI   Dave Neubauer and Mary Kay are not available this afternoon.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fossum, Drew  
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 11:17 AM
To:	Neubauer, Dave; Davis, Britt; Miller, Mary Kay; Cessac, Kenneth; Lowry, Phil; 'gharvey@gibbs-bruns.com'; Rice, Randy
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Darveaux, Mary; Dornan, Dari; Ringblom, Kathy; Sellers, Emily; Nelson, Mike
Subject:	OneOk Letter

I'd like to get the above group together to discuss our response to ONeOk's letter calling for a special test. The agreement requires us to "cooperate" with OneOk when a special test is called, and there are a number of issues we will need to cooperate on, including what to do for measurement while the meter is removed, which outfit to use to test the  meter, and what the standards for testing the meter should be.  Emily--pls get a meeting set up for today if possible.  All-I suspect I've inadvertently left some key people off this distribution, so please route as necessary.  DF
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: jeffrey.shankman@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-01 10:23:00+00:00
Subject: Re:

Jeff, 

Christ, Mark and myself are planning to visit Tom Piazze in October. I talked 
to Christy about Wharton
and she will be calling Tom to set it up.

Vince



   
	
	
	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           09/01/2000 09:25 AM
	

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON 
Subject: 

Hi Vince,

I just got off the phone with donna piazze at Wharton, (I don't know if there 
is a relationship with Tom at Wharton), and we were discussing there Tiger 
Teams.  It is a required research program, 2nd semester for MBAs, and Wharton 
would love to have Enron participate.  I told her there is probably some real 
life reasearch project we could have the students do.  She did  also mention 
that it is one of the best recruiting tools under development at wharton..  I 
gave her your number.

Her number is 215 573 8394.  Please call her when you get a chance within the 
week.

Mark, can we get christy involved?  Thanks everyone.

Jeff
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: linda.guinn@enron.com
Date: 1999-12-19 10:11:00+00:00
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

Have you requested my upgrade?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/19/99 
10:09 AM ---------------------------


Felix Buitron
12/15/99 08:45 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Felix Buitron/HOU/ECT on 12/15/99 08:45 
AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  General Announcement @ ENRON                           12/06/99 06:20 
PM
	

Sent by: General Announcement@ENRON
To: All Enron North America And Corp
cc:  
Subject: IT Purchasing Process

In an effort to continuously improve the service we provide to our customers 
we have created one central mail ID for all IT Purchase Requests.  This new 
ID is Enron IT Purchasing.  Please send all future IT Purchasing requests to 
this ID as opposed to sending your requests to one individual in the 
purchasing group.  If you do not use this ID your purchase request may be 
delayed.  Also, please remember that all Technology purchases should go 
through the IT Purchasing department if you intend to use them for business 
purposes.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Regards,
Bob Hillier
Application Systems
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: reagan.rorschach@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-05 08:37:00+00:00
Subject: RE: MDEA

Well, don't get too excited until you read it.  There's lots of stuff I just 
had to put place holders on, but we'll get it all filled in.

Kay


From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/05/2001 08:29 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: RE: MDEA

Wow!  This is big.....remarkable effort.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay  
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 8:14 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David
Subject: MDEA

Here's a starting point.  I've tried to bracket stuff with open issues like 
this [ ], but I'm sure there are more questions than [ ]s.  I'm really 
unclear on the financial aspect of the deal.  

 << File: MDEA ESMA (Mann4-3 Draft).doc >> 

Reagan, I didn't stop to put the exhibits you sent in, as I thought it was 
better to get the doc in your hands (and Mr. Fairley's) for a detailed review.

Kay
From: mark.palmer@enron.com
To: mark.koenig@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, karen.denne@enron.com, meredith.philipp@enron.com, eric.thode@enron.com, peggy.mahoney@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, rob.bradley@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-20 13:23:00+00:00
Subject: Lay Release

Ken Lay made a speech this morning concerning the domestic natural gas 
market.  We're putting the speech (actually the slides from which Ken gave 
the speech) on the web, accompanied by this press release.
----- Forwarded by Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron on 09/20/2000 01:17 PM -----

	Cindy Derecskey
	09/20/2000 01:17 PM
		 
		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Lay Release
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: roseann.engeldorf@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-28 14:15:00+00:00
Subject: Override letter

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/28/2001 02:15 
PM ---------------------------
From: Roseann Engeldorf on 12/22/2000 11:32 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: Override letter


----- Forwarded by Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron on 12/22/2000 11:32 AM -----

	Kay Mann
	12/21/2000 12:22 PM
		 
		 To: Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, John R Ayres/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa 
Alfaro/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Novak/SA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, rtaylor@akllp.com
		 Subject: Override letter

Attached is the  form of override letter to be executed at the same time as 
the GE facility agreement.  It addresses accounting issues and lender 
requirements.

I should have a final draft of the GE facility agreement later today.

Kay
From: frazier.king@enron.com
To: ets.center@enron.com
Cc: rod.hayslett@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-01 07:58:00+00:00
Subject: Daily Market Summary: Password Request.

Rod Hayslett is approved to receive the "read only" version of the Daily 
Market Summary.
Please send him a password.

Frazier King




---------------------- Forwarded by Frazier King/FGT/Enron on 11/01/2000 
07:59 AM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

11/01/2000 07:51 AM
To: fking@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: 

I request "Read Only" access to ETS Daily Market Summary Information for all 
companies. I certify that, consistent 
with the policy of Enron Corp, I will not provide the password issued to me 
to anyone else.

The purpose of access is to obtain business information.   I certify that the 
information obtained will be used only for this 
stated purpose and will not otherwise be released either internally or 
externally.
From: judy.e.collazo@ssmb.com
Date: 2000-12-21 15:09:00+00:00
Subject: CALIFORNIA SITUATION CLARITY IMPROVING; MOST LIKELY OUTCOME FAVO
 RABLE FOR ALL

CALIFORNIA  SITUATION CLARITY IMPROVING; MOST LIKELY OUTCOME FAVORABLE FOR
ALL
* While we do not expect a direct rate increase or removal of the rate
freeze for EIX or PCG out of the California Public Utility Commission
meeting today, we are encouraged by the conciliatory tone of recent
comments.
* In our view, acerbic rhetoric has finally given way to pragmatic
reconciliation and it now appears that California utilities are on the path
towards effectively receiving the rate increases they require to remain
solvent.
* We believe this has implications not only for the health of the
affected utilities, but also for the Growth Energy Merchants and Competitive
Generators.
* While the credit risk associated with utilities' power market
purchases have not been solved yet, the credit risk in the California market
has eased somewhat.
* While trading may be choppy as the final California remedy is
hammered out, we recommend the purchase of the Growth Energy names
throughout any near-term weakness possible as a result of the process.
* Decision expected today at 4:00 PM EST.

 <<CA Situation Improving12-21-00.pdf>>


Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s

Raymond C. Niles
Power/Natural Gas Research
Salomon Smith Barney
(212) 816-2807
ray.niles@ssmb.com

s




 - CA Situation Improving12-21-00.pdf
From: m..love@enron.com
To: rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com
Date: 2001-10-26 20:43:14+00:00
Subject: RE:

by the way congrats on the girl.  Is it going to be Mallory?
She is going to be 6.5 feet tall
PL


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com@ENRON   On Behalf Of rachel.bonilla-kragel@accenture.com
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 11:23 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	 


Hey.  My friend Chad (i think you remember him) just moved back here from Houston and is currently in job search mode.  He is in the same field as you..and worked for Raymond James in Houston.  He has some pretty good leads here..and some may pan out for more than just him.  Once he has things settled...meaning when he has a job he will be helpful to you.  Once I know more I will let you know. 
"Love, Phillip M." <Phillip.M.Love@enron.com>
10/25/2001 02:18 PM EST
To: Rachel Bonilla-Kragel/Internal/Accenture@Accenture
cc: 
bcc: 
Subject: new job
what is this I hear that you may have a new job for me?  I hope so, we
keep going in the toilet on Wall Street.  My 2,000 options are now all
worthless.
PL
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: richard.shapiro@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, skean@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-09 10:27:00+00:00
Subject: Tomorrow

FYI.  This regards the meeting we set up between ENA and DWR to try to 
resolve the block forward issue with the PX, and the credit issue generally 
with DWR.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:30 AM -----

	Christian Yoder@ECT
	02/08/2001 07:09 PM
		 
		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C 
Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F 
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
pgboylston@stoel.com, jklauber@llgm.com, gfergus@brobeck.com, Jeff 
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Tomorrow

Here is what is going on with CDWR tomorrow as best I can put it together now.

Richard Sanders, Gary Fergus and I, with Elizabeth Sager available by phone, 
are going to meet in Sacramento with the General Counsel of CDWR, two other 
attornies and their outside counsel by phone.  The meeting is scheduled for 
approx. 2:00 p.m. through 5:00 p.m.

We are going to be trying to get CDWR to negotiate and sign the EEI agreement 
we sent to them as part of our RFB package.  We are also going to have our 
block forward positions documented in a Confirmation Letter under the EEI 
agreement and will ask them to negotiate and sign this letter too.  Finally, 
we will give them a document which we will suggest they use to go to the 
banks which are holding the LC's related to the block forward trades, which 
document will facilitate the transfer of the LC's to CDWR's bank.  
 
The following people have been working together on various aspects of these 
negotiations, and may I suggest that the these people try to coordinate their 
efforts tomorrow morning as follows to help us when we get to the negotiation 
table:

Shari Stack is going to prepare the Confirmation Letter showing our block 
forward trades.  Monica Lande will confirm the positions and Steve Hall is 
going to help Shari make sure the Confirm is ready to fax to me in Sacramento 
around noon.  Elizabeth is going to help us get appropriate language in the 
Confirm to address the situation that would arise if the transfer of the 
block forward trades ever falls apart.

John Klauberg, working with Pat Boylston,  is going to provide us with a 
Regulatory Out Clause for our EEI  agreement.  John, please e'mail the clause 
to Pat, Elizabeth and Steve Hall.  Steve, please coordinate any comments on 
the clause and get it ready to fax to me by noon. 

Please communicate to me tomorrow morning through Steve Hall,  503-464-7795, 
or my pager at 800-449-7147.  Thanks. ----cgy
From: katie.trullinger@wfsg.com
To: mark.guzman@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-06 11:33:00+00:00
Subject: RE:

Angela can be so judgmental and jelous so that doesn't surprise me.  Can't
wait to hear the story.  I'll talk to you later...

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com [mailto:Mark.Guzman@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:27 AM
To: Katie.Trullinger@wfsg.com
Subject: RE:



I assume when you say sick you were refering to Angelas friend.  If so,
then no I didn't even touch her.  Angela actuall hates Nicole she says she
is a "fat ho".  I have a very good story to tell you about what happened.
From: stanley.horton@enron.com
To: nasim.khan@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-01 17:49:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Would like to visit with you

Ok.  Contact Cindy Stark to make an appointment.  




Nasim H Khan@TRANSREDES
04/30/2001 12:42 PM
To:	Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:	 

Subject:	Re: Would like to visit with you   

Stan:
I will be completing my tour of duty in Bolivia in September of this year. I am talking to a number of people regarding opportunities for a new assignment back in Houston office. Thought since I will be in Houston, stop by your office for few minutes. 

NK



Stanley Horton@ENRON
04/30/2001 12:35 PM
To:	Nasim H Khan/TRANSREDES@TRANSREDES
cc:	 

Subject:	Re: Would like to visit with you   

What is the subject matter you wish to visit about?



Nasim H Khan@TRANSREDES
04/30/2001 09:24 AM
To:	Stanley Horton@ENRON
cc:	 

Subject:	Would like to visit with you

Stan:

I will be in Houston on May 11th and would like to visit with you in early afternoon if possible. Please let me know what time would work for you.

Regards,

Nasim Khan










<Embedded StdOleLink>
<Embedded StdOleLink>
From: liz.taylor@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com, peggy.mccurley@enron.com, lydia.cannon@enron.com, tammie.schoppe@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-28 12:24:00+00:00
Subject: The Grinch that almost stole Florida!



NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the 
addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified 
that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.  If 
you have received this message in error please notify postmaster@bhp.com.



 - GORINCH.jpg
From: phillip.love@enron.com
To: yvette.connevey@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-12 16:08:00+00:00
Subject: This Friday - Lunch

I do not see my name anywhere?
PL

---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 
04:05 PM ---------------------------
   
	
	
	From:  Yvette G Connevey @ ENRON                           05/12/2000 04:02 PM
	

To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: This Friday - Lunch


---------------------- Forwarded by Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron on 
05/12/2000 04:00 PM ---------------------------
   
	Enron North America Corp.
	
	From:  Yvette G Connevey                           05/10/2000 11:28 AM
	

To: Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael 
Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jody Crook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: This Friday - Lunch

Please plan to meet in the Lobby at 11:20 to have lunch with Brenda and Steve 
and all of the Risk Team. 

See ya then!
Y
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: james.steffes@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-05 00:02:00+00:00
Subject: Re: High Tech Slides

Good questions for which I don't currently have answers.



	James D Steffes
	10/03/2000 10:17 AM
		
		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: High Tech Slides

Jeff --

Looks fine.  Who is going to take these slides out to our "targets"?  What is 
the gameplan for coordinating calendars?

Jim
From: debra.perlingiere@enron.com
To: cyndie.balfour-flanagan@enron.com, ellen.wallumrod@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-12 10:22:00+00:00
Subject: GISB

In addition to the previous,  pending ENA signature are the following:

Florida Power Corporation 
EnergyUSA-Appalachian Corp.

Ellen,  I understand there is a deal for EnergyUSA pending?  Can these be 
confirmed under this GISB?


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: jennifer.milligan@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-21 16:38:00+00:00
Subject: Re: stock option grant agreement

Jennifer:
I'll be here, 3221F, tomorrow from 7:00 - 8:00 and 8:30-9:00 am.
Thanks
John




Jennifer Milligan
08/21/2000 11:15 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: stock option grant agreement

John,

I am a new generalist on your Human Resources team and  I would like to 
deliver your Stock Option Grant Agreement.   We are required to deliver these 
documents in person, so please email me with your current EB location or call 
me with a convenient delivery time.

Thanks,
Jennifer
X35272
From: marcus.nettelton@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-17 10:48:00+00:00
Subject: AES NewEnergy, Inc

Tana
 
We can find no record that the above entity has filed market based rates with 
FERC as required by the Federal Power Act. Suggest that we notify them that 
we can find no record of any such filing and as a consequence of which will 
need to turn them off from the being able to sell on EOL, however they can 
continue to purchase and once they have made, or can demonstrate to us that 
they have made the requisite filing with FERC, we will open them up for sell 
transactions as well.
 
Regards,
 
Marcus
From: sally.beck@enron.com
To: richard.causey@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-11 23:36:08+00:00
Subject: FW: Operational Risk Management

Per my voice mail, Wanda is still the lead on this initiative.  From our conversation in your office, I had assumed that this would change.  Apparently has not to date.  

Rick Buy and I are scheduled to get together tomorrow for an hour.  My intent had been to review operational risk reports and information with him and to suggest an approach for meeting his objectives.  He has added Wanda, Debbie Brackett, Bill Bradford and David Port to the tomorrow's meeting since our first point of discussion will be a joint project that Rick and I are sponsoring.  Unless he pairs down the group in tomorrow's meeting after our first topic, I doubt that we will be able to discuss follow up on our conversation in your office regarding operational risk.  --Sally  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda  
Sent:	Thursday, October  11, 2001 5:44 PM
To:	Kilchrist, Shawn; Parsons, Andrew; Bharati, Rakesh; Kohli, Sandeep; Walker, Mark A.; 'john.e.sorrells@us.andersen.com'
Cc:	Beck, Sally
Subject:	Operational Risk Management

I want to move forward with scheduling the initial meeting of the Operational Risk Management task force.  How does Tuesday, October 16th and the afternoon of Thursday, October 18th look for everyone?  Please let me know your schedule for both of these dates.  Most of the task force members have been identified, with the exception of those from GRMO and IT.  Sally Beck will identify representatives from these two areas.  I would also expect that other individuals may be consulted from time to time as additional expertise or resources or required.  

I intend to schedule a two-hour block of time for this meeting.  The agenda will include, at a minimum,  the following topics:

	Definition of Operational Risk for  Enron - What's in and What's Out
	Preliminary Goals for Operational Risk Management (to be refined by the group)
	     Develop Common Language
                 Identify Framework for Monitoring Risk
	     Role of this task force  - Strategy
	     Set common objectives for implementation this year and a look forward to 2002
	Current Initiatives
	Communications Plan 
	Open Discussion - Other Ideas from the group 
			  - Suggestions re other groups/individuals to include on the task force
	

I am excited about leading this initiative for Enron.  We have a unique opportunity to define operational risk measurement for Enron, develop reporting guidelines, and provide qualitative assessments of operational risk, all of which will be considered during the risk capital allocation process.   But most importantly, we can identify ways to mitigate Enron's exposure to operational risk.  Please call if you would like to discuss any of the above prior to the meeting.  

Thanks, 
Wanda Curry