Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: rbaird@velaw.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Cc: nora.dobin@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-28 17:27:00+00:00
Subject: CFTC Rules

The language that puzzles me is on page 24 of the New Regulatory Framework
release.  It is discussing the Chicago Board of Trade's suggestion that the
exclusion for unilateral transaction execution facilities, such as
EnronOnline, be deleted.  The release says:

"However, under the proposed exclusion there can be but one counterparty to
all market participants.  That is quite different from using one or more
specialists in a multilateral trading setting.  In that structure, the bids
and offers of non-specialists are permitted to interact with each other."

I can understand the point with respect to "or more" specialists, but I
don't understand how you can distinguish EnronOnline from a market with a
single specialist who is a counterparty to all trades.  I also don't
understand the point about bids and offers interacting with each other.
This may be because I don't understand how specialists go about their
business.  But the question is, I suppose, does EnronOnline have to take
steps to make sure that bids and offers are isolated from one another so
they don't "interact?"  Maybe, in fact, that's the way EnronOnline works,
but this is pretty confusing to me.  I suppose this language may cause more
trouble for DealBench than EnronOnline, since DealBench deal rooms may have
all sorts of interactions among bidders.

I'd appreciate your thoughts.

Robert S. Baird
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
One American Center
600 Congress
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512)495-8451
When calling from Houston (713)758-2414
Fax: (512)236-3210
Email: rbaird@velaw.com
Home telephone (512)347-8066
Car phone: (512)627-8065
Home fax: (512)347-8065
Pager: 1-888-487-2651

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: teece@haas.berkeley.edu
Date: 2001-01-24 13:10:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Final Version-Manifesto

I don't envy your position.  At some point, the document must be finished and 
folks need to determine whether they'll sign or not.  I greatly admire Rich 
Gilbert, but his comments (re: regulatory intervention is a good thing, and 
now this one) will surely create considerably controversy and could greatly 
upset the apple cart altogether.

Best of luck,
Jeff

Talked to Tyson.  She's really working it, which is great, and I continue to 
focus my efforts there.  My company is squarely behind her efforts.  Thanks 
again for organizing the meeting last weekend.



	"Richard J. Gilbert" <gilbert@econ.Berkeley.EDU>
	01/24/2001 01:03 PM
		 
		 To: David Teece <teece@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 cc: <tyson@haas.berkeley.edu>, <tom_campbell@law.stanford.edu>, 
<shmuel@euler.berkeley.edu>, <willrichm@aol.com>, <george_barker@lecg.com>, 
<cdanner@wilkandassociates.com>, <scott_harvey@lecg.com>, 
<jscadding@wilkandassociates.com>, <spiller@haas.berkeley.edu>, 
<mwilk@wilkandassociates.com>, <phillip_mcleod@lecg.com>, 
<berk@haas.berkeley.edu>, <john_chandley@lecg.com>, <jdasovic@enron.com>, 
<lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu>, <william_hogan@harvard.edu>, 
<rmichaels@fullerton.edu>, <richard.rumelt@anderson.ucla.edu>, 
<rschmidt@lecg.com>, <pverleger@compuserve.com>, <joseph.mullinix@ucop.edu>, 
<steven@stoft.com>, <peter.gosselin@latimes.com>
		 Subject: Re: Final Version-Manifesto


One more thing:

No one talked about bailing out consumers when retail prices were above
spot prices (by about $40/MWh by my calculation) in the 2+ years
following deregulation.  Surely, if we bail out
the utilities by raising prices now, consumers should be credited for the
above-market prices that they paid in the past.

Rich

------------------------
Richard J. Gilbert
Professor of Economics
549 Evans Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA  94120-3880
tel  (510) 642-1507
fax  (510) 339-6493
From: vikas.dwivedi@enron.com
To: jason.wolfe@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-14 09:55:00+00:00
Subject: Rockies Trade

Jason,

Carole told me to forward this to you.  I'm at 3-0389.  Give me a call when 
you get a chance.  

Thanks, Vikas
---------------------- Forwarded by Vikas Dwivedi/NA/Enron on 12/14/2000 
09:55 AM ---------------------------


Vikas Dwivedi
12/14/2000 09:18 AM
To: Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Rockies Trade

Carole,

On the Rockies trade from Oct 04, Tudor only got TPT confirms.  They need OSP 
and BVI confirms as well.  Come by when you get a chance or I'll try and stop 
by.

Thanks, Vikas
From: dana.davis@enron.com
To: brian.schwertner@enron.com, rosalyn.lum@enron.com, lisa.best@enron.com, lisa.king@enron.com, kristi.fredericks@enron.com, laynie.east@enron.com, susan.rance@enron.com, stacy.hardy@enron.com, brian.dawson@enron.com, dana.davis@enron.com, tammy.barta@enron.com, rufino.doroteo@enron.com, brad.carey@enron.com, stephen.wolfe@enron.com, lisa.kang@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-01 14:46:00+00:00
Subject: December 2000 Journal Entries

FYI:
The managers also have Co.0919 12/31/00 journal voucher packet too.
From: dawn.doucet@enron.com
To: sally.beck@enron.com
Cc: kim.melodick@enron.com, janice.christianson@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-28 18:02:00+00:00
Subject: Merit/Bonus - Canada

Sally, here is a summary re Peggy Hedstrom.  Once you've communicated her 
numbers, you can forward her this or email Janice Christianson and Janice 
will get a copy to Peggy.


Thanks....
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: richard.weeks@enron.com
Cc: sylvia.sauseda@enron.com, legal.2@enron.com
Date: 1999-06-02 15:35:00+00:00
Subject: Modem Order

I currently have a 28800 modem but would like to get the fastest (within 
reason) modem we have available for a Compaq LTE 5280.  Please let me know if 
this is the kind of thing I can get by Friday since I leave for London Friday 
afternoon and would like to take the computer (complete with modem) with me.  
If the new modem is not available in that time frame, I at least need a new 
pigtail for the existing card since the old one is broken.

Thanks and please charge 413/1157.

Mark Taylor
x37459
From: b..sanders@enron.com
To: jrnelson@llgm.com
Cc: twanda.sweet@enron.com
Date: 2001-09-27 18:37:56+00:00
Subject: RE: cALL


I have asked Twanda to set up a short call.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Robert Nelson" <JRNELSON@LLGM.COM>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Robert+20Nelson+22+20+3CJRNELSON+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:	cALL

Are we going to have a call to discuss (1) our position vis-a-vis SCE, (2) funding of the PX bankruptcy and (3) the Weg settlement proposal?  Bob

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me by return mail, e-mail or at (insert your telephone number).  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
J. Robert Nelson
725 Soth Figueroa St, Los Angeles, Ca. 90017-5436


==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
From: robert.cotten@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-24 11:58:00+00:00
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Daren,

FYI.

Bob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 11:56 
AM ---------------------------


Vance L Taylor
10/24/2000 11:51 AM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Bob,

Here's a November preliminary updated file.





vlt
x3-6353
---------------------- Forwarded by Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 
11:50 AM ---------------------------


Vance L Taylor
10/23/2000 04:42 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa 
Hesse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: November Prelim Wellhead Production - Estimate

Bob,

Please see the attached file estimating wellhead production for the month of 
November.  Please be advised that this is a preliminary estimate as to this 
date, we have received no noms for November and there may be revisions from 
the traders.  I will update you with any revisions as they occur.

Thanks,

vlt
x3-6353
From: amy.clemons@enron.com
To: thresa.allen@enron.com, casey.evans@enron.com, stacey.white@enron.com, rajib.saha@enron.com, chris.stokley@enron.com, murray.oneil@enron.com, leslie.reeves@enron.com, fran.chang@enron.com, samantha.law@enron.com, heather.dunton@enron.com, melissa.ratnala@enron.com
Cc: mark.confer@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-26 11:24:00+00:00
Subject: May 2001 Desk Analysis Report

Again, let me know if there are any questions.



Thank you
Amy
ext 39741
From: enron.announcements@enron.com
To: enw-employees@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-31 01:46:00+00:00
Subject: Organizational Announcement

We are pleased to announce the following promotions within Enron Net Works.  
These promotions will be effective February 1, 2001.   We would like to thank 
these individuals for their past contributions and recognize their 
instrumental roles in the growth and success of the organization.  Please 
join us in congratulating the following employees, and wishing them continued 
success with Enron.        

To Managing Director
Sally Beck
      
To Vice President  To Senior Specialist    
David Forster  Luis Aybar    
David Samuels  Matthew Burleigh    
Jay Webb  Heather Busby    
  Stephen(Steve) Harrington    
To Senior Director  Wei Hu
Scott Mills  Aneela Charania
Kevin Sweeney  Diane Ellstrom
  David Rae
To Director  Shifali Sharma
Michael(Mike) Croucher  Gang(George) Ji
Rahil Jafry  Jorge Mancero
Savita Puthigai  Kirti Patel    
Ganapathy Ramesh  Virendra Patel    
Drew Ries  Raleigh(Trey) Rhodes    
Stuart Reed  Mark Symms    
Thresa Allen  Carlos Uribe    
Jeffrey Gossett  Ye Wang    
Kim Theriot  Amelia Alland    
Stacey White  Cynthia Balfour-Flanagan
  Stacey Brewer
To Manager  Marlene Hilliard
Nilay Basu  Dawn Kenne
Frank Coles  Errol McLaughin    
Mark Davidson  Kevin Meredith
Daniel(Dan) Dietrich  Meredith Mitchell
Colin Tonks  Thien-Huong Ngo
Danielle Marcinkowski  Brian Palmer
Kari Oquinn  Mark Schrab    
Tai Nguyen  Stephanie Sever
Cornelio Pua  Christopher Spears
Amy Spoede  Tara Sweitzer
Gerald(Jake) Staffel  Sabrae Zajac
Vernell Vallejo      
Jing Fang(Jennifer) Zhou  To Specialist    
Christopher Abel  Robert Henry    
David Baumbach  Benjamin(Ben) Jordan    
Rebecca Ford  Nikolay Kraltchev    
Ngiam(Jeremy) Wong  Grace Warren
Matthew Brown  Kenneth(Kenny) Lim    
Clara Carrington  Victoria Sorkina
Richard Cross  Patrick Marchand    
John Swinney  Sumit Shah    
Maya Beyhum  Kori Loibl    
Patricia Sullivan  Bruce Mills    
Patricia Spence  Mathew Motsinger
Dimitri Taylor  Bernice Rodriquez
Darron Giron  Brandi Wachtendorf
Kristen Hanson  Patryk Wlodarski
Larry Hunter  
William Kasemervisz  To Staff    
Kam Keiser  Norma Yeverino
Monica Lande  Geralynn Gosnell
David Maxwell  Judith Walters
Melissa Ratnala  Richard Miley
  Joan Winfrey
Technical Consultant  Guy Freshwater
Xiaozhuo(Sean) Yang  Brent Storey
Show-Yien(Show) Lee  Stuart Thom
Nai-Chung(Jesse) Wang  Jonathan White
Jin Yu  
  To Executive Assistant
Associate To Manager  Peggy McCurley
Jason Althaus  Tammie Schoppe
Cheryl Ingstad  
Ross Mesquita  To Administrative  Coordinator    
Leonardo Pacheco  Heather Choate    
      
To Administrative Assistant I  To Senior Clerk
Ali De Hoyos  Matthew Davies  
  Demonica Lipscomb    
To Senior Assistant  Mark Pilkington
Barbara Lewis  Daniela De Lisi
Sarah Knott  Tresea Parker    
Thais Hensch  Angela Barnett
 Laura Vargas
From: imelda.frayre@enron.com
To: tana.jones@enron.com, leslie.hansen@enron.com, claudia.clark@enron.com, lisa.lees@enron.com, karen.o'day@enron.com
Cc: justin.boyd@enron.com, enron.group@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-04 16:32:00+00:00
Subject: Re: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College

Still waiting to hear from you guys on this before I send it out.  

Tana/Leslie: I need to get an official approval from Legal

Houston PCG: I need to know if Houston Credit/Legal will be reviewing for US 
products.  Please let me know.

Imelda
---------------------- Forwarded by Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT on 04/12/2000 16:32 
---------------------------
From: Imelda Frayre on 01/12/2000 09:04
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia 
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul 
Maley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Alan 
Jamieson/EU/Enron@Enron 

Subject: Re: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College

Hi Everyone

I apologize for all the e-mails going back and forth but hopefully we can put 
this one to rest soon.  London Credit have approved this CP for financial 
metals and I need to confirm if they are approved from a legal perspective as 
well.  I spoke to Justin Boyd (London legal) and he asked that I clear this 
with Houston Legal before setting them up.  

In addition, I want to see if Houston Credit/Legal will be reviewing this 
counterparty for US products as well.  Please let me know as soon as you can.

Thank You

Imelda Frayre
---------------------- Forwarded by Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT on 01/12/2000 09:00 
---------------------------


Alan Jamieson@ENRON
30/11/2000 17:55
To: Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: ECT London Credit, Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT 

Subject: Re: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College  

Approved for financial metal products only with collateral - MGS Code IVY


To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit, Enron Europe Global 
CounterParty
cc: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT, EOL Marketing 
Europe@ECT, Lindsay F Edmonds/EU/Enron@Enron, Hamish M Scutt/EU/Enron@Enron, 
Diana Higgins/LON/ECT@ECT, Alan Jamieson/EU/Enron@Enron, Britta 
Dinnendahl/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex Heath/LON/ECT@ECT, Robert Brewis/LON/ECT@ECT, 
Chris Shapland/LON/ECT@ECT 

Subject: New Counterparty - President & Fellows of Harvard College

Hi

We've received a PA registration form from President & Fellows of Harvard 
College  for EnronOnline.  I've entered the customer details in the customer 
database (s:/access database).  Please review and confirm via return e-mail 
once approval is completed.  Attached is the PA registration form for your 
review.   

Regards

Imelda Frayre

---------------------- Forwarded by Imelda Frayre/LON/ECT on 21/11/2000 07:53 
---------------------------


London Fax System
20/11/2000 22:07
To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: New fax received (Likely sender: 713 646 8511).


You have received a new fax from 713 646 8511

The image contains 3 page(s).
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: mark.knippa@enron.com
Cc: david.foti@enron.com, steve.harris@enron.com, michel.nelson@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, mary.miller@enron.com, susan.scott@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-31 17:54:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Gallup - Conversion Agreement Pricing

Mark, I understand we need to act very quickly once we have turned you loose 
to price the swap.  I think this is a Harris and Nelson call, so lets talk 
tomorrow.  I'll look at the contracts again to verify our risks in locking in 
before we are 100% sure we are going ahead with the project.  DF




Mark Knippa@ECT
01/31/2000 04:27 PM
To: David Foti/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Drew 
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Gallup - Conversion Agreement Pricing



Just wanted to communicate that I contacted Drew earlier today to suggest that
we check the pricing and execute the Conversion Agreement for Gallup.   As you
guys know, the recent price valuation for deliveries associated with Gallup 
have been 
well below the earlier market quotes.  

 Given the short term market reaction to the colder weather, we may be able 
establish
prices similar to the earlier market quote.   Based on the response from Dave 
and Drew
I have requested the pricing and hope to have that information by mid-day 
tomorrow.
From: tco_commercial_services@nisource.com
To: john.hodge@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 14:30:26+00:00
Subject: Columbia Reduction for Enron N A

Company: 000236     Arng: 37147-02131     Eff Date: 2001-10-30

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                    10,711                10,711
Working                      10,711                10,711
Capacity Allocation           9,158  CCR            9,158
Confirmed                     9,158                 9,158
From: chris.gaskill@enron.com
To: larry.may@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-02 12:43:00+00:00
Subject: FW: The Price Anderson Act - Nuclear Power

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Burk, Bart  
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Gaskill, Chris
Subject: The Price Anderson Act - Nuclear Power

I called the Nuclear Information and Resource Service in D.C. and spoke to a 
representative. He mentioned that the Price Anderson Act has brought about 
opposition in the past, but has typically breezed through the renewal 
process. The NIRS website seemed to more anti-nuclear power focused, so it 
was interesting that he did not see the Act as having any trouble in its 
renewal.

My perspective is that nuclear power accounted for about 20% of all power 
generation last year, and would cause rolling black-outs if ceased. Politics 
and recent surveys of the positive turn in public opinion suggests that it 
would be highly unlikely for nuclear power to be phased out. Nuclear plants 
nearing the end of their initial useful life period - around 30 years - have 
already begun an extension process. Five reactors have been licensed for 
another 20 years of operation. The WSJ article stated that within the next 15 
years, 40% of the 103 licensed U.S. reactors are likely to request similar 
extensions.

Independents are buying-up the plants from utilities and taking advantage of 
high power prices and low nuclear fuel costs. The new technologies mentioned 
in the article suggest that an overrun of construction permits may be filed 
in the near future. Smaller megawatt units operate at lower temperatures, and 
are thus less susceptible to catastrophic failure if their cooling systems 
are crippled. Investment costs are modest, construction times are faster, 
power could be supplied in a shorter period of time, and the NRC has improved 
the time for the approval process. Companies could re-coup their costs and 
make decent profits within a short period, even if there were fears of 
negative opposition down the road.

A negative outcome for the Price Anderson Act renewal could slow plans to 
build new nuclear plants, but it is likely that existing plants will continue 
to operate. At a minimum, base load nuclear power generation should be flat 
over the next couple of years.


Bart R. Burk, Jr.
Enron Corporation
Gas Fundamentals Research
Phone: (713) 345-3635
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: nene77057@yahoo.com
Date: 2001-01-11 10:42:00+00:00
Subject: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

Neil left to go hunting this am, Paige leaves for school tomorrow, leaving 
me, Michael and our new puppy (mid life crisis dog) to our own devices.  I'm 
taking the day off tomorrow, and Monday is an Enron holiday, so I'm looking 
forward to some Kay time, working in the yard (weather permitting), watching 
Oprah, etc.  






ANDREA DOWLEN <nene77057@yahoo.com> on 01/11/2001 09:08:36 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Re: HAPPY BIRTHDAY!

Boys............whatcha gonna do?
They love that stuff.........
Missy, our friend Susie, and I went to the usual Elvis
impersonator thing at Chuy's on Richmond Monday night.
Walked into a full force cat fight on the way in...one
girl screaming Lesbian at the top of her lungs, and
dropping the "C" bomb all over the girl she was
beating up. Waiters had to get them out of the place
and into the parking lot.  Very exciting. 
Dinner with family and Dad's widowed friend Claude,
and his daughter Lisa who we have known forever.  Good
folks.
Any plans for you?
  
--- Kay.Mann@enron.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  Did you have a good one?  Michael was all
> "cracked up" over the
> card you sent!!
> 
> Kay
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ANDREA DOWLEN <nene77057@yahoo.com> on 01/11/2001
> 08:28:27 AM
> 
> To:   Kay.Mann@enron.com
> cc:
> 
> Subject:  HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
> 
> KAY - HAPPY BIRTHDAY!
> I HOPE YOU HAVE A GREAT DAY AND RECEIVE A LOT OF
> GOODIES??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> LOVE,
> ANDREA
> 
> =====
> Andrea Dowlen
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
Andrea Dowlen

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
From: .ward@enron.com
To: bberneking@summitenergy.com
Date: 2001-11-20 16:14:45+00:00
Subject: confirmation

Brent,

Attached is the confirmation for serving Smurfit's plants in southern California for December 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kim Ward
Manager, West Gas Origination
From: kate.symes@enron.com
To: greg.wolfe@enron.com, christian.yoder@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-20 08:09:00+00:00
Subject: Confirms - Hinson Power deals

Would you let me know if confirmation letters have already been sent out for 
these deals? If not, is there any way to get them out before the holiday?

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 12/20/2000 08:04 AM 
---------------------------


Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
12/20/2000 07:30 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Hinson Power Company, Inc.

Hi Kate,
Deals #478168, 478944, 478945, 478946 are to be confirmed by either Greg 
Wolfe or Christian Yoder.  We need to get the final copy of these confirm 
letters so we can scan them into the system for our files.  Also, if the 
finalized confirm has been sent to the counterparty we need to change the 
status in the system.  These deals are still showing up on our "New" report 
every morning and I need to do something with them.
Thanks for your help!
Kim
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: spower@houstonballet.org
Date: 2000-07-15 13:39:00+00:00

Hello:
A recent posting on the Enron bulletin board indicated that you are looking 
for academic tutors.  I may be available to help at nights in math.  Can you 
please respond with details about the program, how old the kids are, the 
commitment required, etc.
Thanks,
John Arnold
From: robin.rodrigue@enron.com
To: bilal.bajwa@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-14 14:35:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Books!

Bilal,

These books are no longer used.

Robin






Bilal Bajwa
11/14/2000 02:30 PM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Books!

Robin,
Whose books are these GD-MARKET-BAS, GD-MARKET-GDL, AND GD-MARKET-PRC ???
Bilal
From: robert.bruce@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Cc: tana.jones@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-15 17:42:00+00:00
Subject: NICOR

Mark, Tana asked me to send you an e-mail re-summarizing the d/b/a issue.

According to Illinois counsel, there is no quirk in Illinois law that 
mitigates against being able to enforce a contract with a party who signs the 
contract under a registered d/b/a name.   Since we have a copy of the 
company's d/b/a filing certified by the Illinois Secretary of State, we 
should already have everything we need.   In an abundance of caution, we 
could ask the counterparty's corporate secretary to certify that "[actual 
corporate name]" and "[d/b/a name]" are one and the same entity.  But I 
personally think even doing that is overkill -- the Illinois Secretary of 
State is already basically telling us that in the certificate we already have 
in the file.

Feel free to call w/ any comments or questions.




Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com
From: lester.rawson@enron.com
To: portland.shift@enron.com
Cc: greg.wolfe@enron.com, paul.choi@enron.com, stanley.cocke@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-01 11:11:00+00:00
Subject: Willamette BOM Sale

Real Time Traders,

The Services Desk has sold 10 Mw of Willamette Ind. energy, Balance of the 
Month, to Avista/WWP, On Peak,  beginning 12/4 through 12/30. The energy is 
unit contingent power  at the WWP system. I have placed copies of the tags 
and oasis requests in the Services Books. 

I have purchased PacifiCorp Firm transmission to move from the Willamette 
Busbar to the BPA system interconnect. Then Snohomish network transmission to 
move from PacifiCorp's system to Avista's system.

I have requested that Willamette give Enron a phone number to allow us to 
communicate Real Time with their generation staff. I will pass this along 
when it's received. 

Although the schedule is unit contingent I would like to make a reasonable 
effort to keep the schedule whole when Willamette has unit problems. If we 
can show that this energy is a reasonably reliable energy source it will open 
up future opportunities. If there are curtailments call Pac Transmission at 
503-251-5230, Snohomish Transmission at 425-304-1620 and WWP at 509-495-8534 
and inform them of the cut and whatever resupply source that maybe used. 

Feel free to call me at home (503-579-1615) or on my Cell (503-807-2826) if 
there are ever any questions.

Les Rawson
From: bhitschel@tesoropetroleum.com
To: michelle.lokay@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com
Date: 2001-12-21 16:25:36+00:00
Subject: FW: Computers

Happy Holidays!

Bonnie Hitschel
210-283-2456

> Subject: Computers
> 
> Dear Tech Support, 
> 
> Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a 
> slowdown in the performance of flower and jewelry applications that had 
> operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0. In addition, Husband 1.0 
> uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.9,and
> installed 
> undesirable programs such as NFL 5.0 and NBA 3.0. 
> 
> Conversation 8.0 no longer runs and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes 
> the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to 
> no avail. What can I do? 
> 
> Desperate 
> 
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Dear Desperate, 
> 
> First, keep in mind that Boyfriend 5.0 is an entertainment package, 
> while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Install Tears 6.2 and enter the 
> command <C:\ I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME>. 
> 
> Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications Guilty 3.0 and 
> Flowers 7.0. But remember, overuse can cause Husband 1.0 to default to 
> Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0, or Beer 6.1. Beer 6.1 is a very bad 
> program that will create Snoring Loudly.WAV files. 
> 
> DO NOT install Mother-in law 1.0 or reinstall another Boyfriend 
> program. These are not supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0. 
> 
> In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have a 
> limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might
> consider 
> buying additional software to improve performance. I personally recommend 
> Hot Food 3.0 and Lingerie 6.9. 
> 
> Good luck. 
>
From: tim.despain@enron.com
To: kenneth.lay@enron.com, greg.whalley@enron.com, andrew.fastow@enron.com, mark.koenig@enron.com, j..kean@enron.com, .palmer@enron.com, paula.rieker@enron.com, ben.glisan@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-16 19:32:15+00:00
Subject: Moody's Basis for Placing Enron Securities on "Review for
 Downgrade"

In order to ensure that our communications with the investment community are consistent, Stephen Moore of Moody's and I have agreed to publicly state the following as it pertains to the Moody's rating action taken today:

Full Review To Occur - The action is intended to be the catalyst for a full review of our business operations to occur in the coming months.  The company's appropriate rating will be determined during this time frame;

Primary Areas of Concern - Moody's will be focusing on the following items during the review:

Potential Future Equity Write downs:
Dhabol
California
Broadband Fiber Network
Wessex/Azurix

Slow Progress in Asset Sales - we have been discussing sales for the past 18 months with limited closings

Material Working Capital/Margin Expansion - has resulting in negative cash flow from operations

The Equity Adjustment - Moody's was unaware of the potential of an equity adjustment of this magnitude

Please let me know if you would like to discuss any of the points in detail.

Regards:
Tim DeSpain
x31770
From: chris.germany@enron.com
To: dick.jenkins@enron.com, dan.junek@enron.com, scott.hendrickson@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com, steve.gillespie@enron.com, victoria.versen@enron.com, sean.boyle@enron.com, brad.mckay@enron.com, judy.townsend@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-23 13:50:00+00:00
Subject: CNG Rate change

CNG has new commodity rates effective 11/1/2000

New  Old
$.0973  $.0462

Fuel remains unchanged at 2.28%.
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: gregg.penman@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-22 10:55:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Peoples Letter Agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 10:55 
AM ---------------------------


"William J. Harmon" <wjharmon@JonesDay.com> on 11/22/2000 09:43:30 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: Re: Peoples Letter Agreement



Looks great to me.  I'm glad to know (as a NS customer) that my gas won't
be cut off this COLD November.

Bill Harmon
wjharmon@jonesday.com
312-269-4160
Fax: 312-782-8585



                    Kay.Mann@enron.c
                    om                   To:     wjharmon@jonesday.com
                                         cc:
                                         Subject:     Peoples Letter Agreement
                    11/22/00 08:35
                    AM






Any problem with this?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:35
AM ---------------------------

From: Gregg Penman on 11/21/2000 05:00 PM

To:   Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:   Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject:  Peoples Letter Agreement

Kay - Here is my attempt to turn the term sheet into something executable.
I have accepted all of William Harmon's changes except for the second
paragraph under amended terms.  William used the wording "The payment late
payment amount is calculated...".  I changed it to "The payment interest on
overdue amounts is calculated..." to be consistent with the reference in
the above paragraph.  I don't think this changes any substance, but I defer
to you.  I think that is all I changed.  I also added a quick intro. and a
paragraph on future payments to reiterate this is only for October
purchases.  Neither may be necessary, let me know.  I am not sure your
availability tomorrow, but I would love to hear from you ASAP in the
morning to get this in front of Peoples for signature.  Russell Diamond is
coordinating the internal Enron approvals with Global Finance, Credit and
RAC.

Thanks again for your help on your vacation day.

Gregg

(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)


(See attached file: Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc)



==========
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information.  It
is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are
not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
replying to this message and then delete it from your system.  Use,
dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
==========


 - Payment Delay Term Sheet.doc
From: gavin.dillingham@enron.com
To: filuntz@aol.com, liz@luntz.com, nicholas.o'day@enron.com, mike.dahlke@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-01 08:57:00+00:00
Subject: California Issues Intranet Site

FYI. All articles that I have sent out regarding the California Power Issue 
and national electric deregulation issues are available on the home.enron.com 
website or at this link 
http://nahou-lnapp01.corp.enron.com/Public_Affairs/CalDereg.nsf/MainHome?OpenF
rameSet . There are also other electric deregulation news articles and some 
statements from EPSA on this site that I have not sent out. Please feel free 
to check out the site. Currently, we have had close to 2,000 hits on the 
site. A new section has been added to the website called Enron Talking Points 
and Speeches. This site has not been populated, but as soon as there are 
internal documents/speeches/talking points that are available for public 
viewing I will place them on the site. 

Thanks,

Gavin
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: matthew.lenhart@enron.com, bryan.hull@enron.com, luis.mena@enron.com, hector.campos@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-20 15:29:00+00:00
Subject: Happy Hour

If you are all still in town - Matt and I were thinking of going to Happy 
Hour tomorrow after work.  Let me know if you are in.
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: michael.barnas@ps.ge.com
Date: 2001-01-10 13:56:00+00:00
Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 01:55 
PM ---------------------------


Kay Mann
01/10/2001 01:51 PM
To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com, mike.barnas@ps.ge.com
cc:  

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Viola!
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/10/2001 01:50 
PM ---------------------------


Kay Mann
01/03/2001 11:18 AM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
cc:  

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark  

Lee,

The best way to go about it would be to send the invoice to Jody, but copy 
the Enron project folks you have been dealing with.  

Are we ready to sign the Fountain Valley contract?  I would think that we 
could sign the change order at the same time, and payment terms can be 
whatever the Enron project team has bought in to.  The banks won't care.

Have you seen sig pages for ESA yet?  

Kay





lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com on 01/03/2001 09:00:30 AM
To: Kay.Mann@enron.com
cc:  

Subject: RE: invoice information/TurboPark

Kay,

Please confirm that this will be the invoicing address for the 6 units bound
for Fountain Valley Project and 4 units pegged to LV Cogen Expansion.  Also,
we've still got a change order needed for Fountain Valley for the 6 Power
System Stabilizers and 2 Exhaust Stacks.  LV is also saying they will need 4
Power System Stabilizers, but haven't confirmed their order.

Thanks,

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:06 PM
To: lee.johnson@ss.ps.ge.com
Subject: invoice information/TurboPark


E-Next Generation LLC
Mr. Jody Pierce
1400 Smith, EB 2480
Houston, Tx 77002
From: eric.bass@enron.com
To: o'neal.winfree@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-24 10:26:00+00:00
Subject: Re: EOL stats for Q4 2000

thanks


   
	
	
	From:  O'Neal D Winfree                           01/24/2001 09:56 AM
	

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: EOL stats for Q4 2000

Eric,

Attached are the details behind the stats as listed below regarding 3rd Party 
transactions on EOL:

Tom/Elsa  Physical Financial Total  Greg/Metz Physical  Financial Total      
Grand Total

October 2000  751  0  751    84  879  963  1,714

November 2000 805  4  809    102  1,276  1,378  2,187

December 2000 863  9  872    30  1,050  1,080  1,952


Grand Totals  2,419  13  2,432    216  3,205  3,421  5,853 





O'Neal
From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: cvavrek@deloitte.com
Cc: asama@yahoo.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com, mark_guinney@watsonwyatt.com
Date: 2001-04-26 11:35:00+00:00
Subject: Checking in

Greetings folks:
Just checking in to see how we're doing and if folks got the files that I 
sent last night.  Should we try to meet at 5:30 to do a final run through?  I 
think that we might be the very first presentation (yikes).

Best,
Jeff
From: john.arnold@enron.com
To: mike.maggi@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-27 15:27:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Commercials

---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 09/27/2000 03:26 
PM ---------------------------
From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 01:45 PM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: Commercials  

John, John, John....very impressive analysis!  The first two commercials were 
supposed to be idealistic spots announcing Enron as an innovative company, 
while the next four are proof points to our innovation by showing the 
businesses we have created. 

I know you were elated to get an email from me this morning, thus proving 
that I had not been kidnapped and all those important things I work on would 
continue to be completed.  Oh and that certainly is a pretty design you add 
to your emails.  Very masculine!  

Smile, Margaret

ps, i hope you can read my sarcasm over email -- if you knew me better, you 
would understand it completely since it is rare that i'm in a totally serious 
mood. hope you don't take offense!





	John Arnold@ECT
	09/27/2000 12:29 PM
		
		 To: Margaret Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: Commercials

I really liked the commercials about specifics (i.e.  weather, EOL, 
bandwidth).  The metal man was definitely at a different philosophical level 
than where my brain operates.  Still not quite sure what was going on there.  
Ode was a bit too idealistic.   The campaign in general was very different 
than previous.   But I guess you know that and that's the point.   Again, I 
think the commercials that showed why we are the most innovative were very 
impressive.  Just telling people we are innovative made less of an impact.  

Sorry I ruined your run.  At least you weren't molested by the River Oaks car 
thief.


From: Margaret Allen@ENRON on 09/27/2000 08:24 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Commercials  

So, what did you think?!  Don't lie or stretch the truth either -- you won't 
hurt my feelings, I promise.  

By the way, by the time I arrived home it was completely dark so I went for a 
three mile run this morning.  Not fun, but I'm definitely awake right now!  
BUT, it's all your fault I couldn't go last night....he!he!

Trade well, MSA
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: james.derrick@enron.com, mark.haedicke@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-25 17:28:00+00:00
Subject: Draft Supplement for MDL Panel

As you will note, Robin has made some use of the Lockyer statements.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2001 07:27 AM -----


	"Jeffrey C. Alexander" <Jalexander@Gibbs-Bruns.com> 05/23/2001 06:09 PM 	   To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@Enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@Enron.com>  cc:   Subject: Draft Supplement for MDL Panel	



 <<26FY01!.WPD>>

 - 26FY01!.WPD
From: jfields@argentinc.com
To: lcampbe@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-28 15:42:00+00:00
Subject: FW: RE: Engines and GF Status

Larry,

Here is the agencies opinion on your project at Spraberry.  How do you feel
about testing one of those engines?

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Stewart [SMTP:DSTEWART@tnrcc.state.tx.us]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:59 PM
To: jfields@argentinc.com
Cc: Jim Linville; James Randall
Subject: Fwd: RE: Engines and GF Status

FYI
>>> Jim Linville 08/28/00 02:21PM >>>
IF there is no increase in emissions, this is probably not a modification
and the Grandfathered status would remain.  They would need to demonstrate
that there is no change.  This could require testing before and after the
change.
>>> Duncan Stewart 08/28/00 01:43PM >>>
What say you all?
From: alan.aronowitz@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-20 16:54:00+00:00
Subject: Chart for your review

PLEASE IGNORE THIS ATTACHMENT. I AM RESENDING TO YOU AND DAVID.

Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 07/20/2000 04:53 PM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	07/20/2000 04:51 PM
		 
		 To: gilbergd@sullcrom.com
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Chart for your review

Please see the attached.



Alan
From: christine.stokes@enron.com
To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
Cc: steven.harris@enron.com, jeffery.fawcett@enron.com, lorraine.lindberg@enron.com, michelle.lokay@enron.com, tk.lohman@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-17 12:10:00+00:00
Subject: Customer Meeting

NGTS, whose main headquarters is located in Dallas, has a one-man office 
located in Colorado Springs, Colorado.  John Rohde purchases gas from 30 
small to medium sized suppliers in the Rocky Mountain area and either acts as 
their agent or moves their purchased gas to markets for NGTS.  Most of this 
gas generally either goes to the Rocky markets or to Northern Natural 
pipeline.  NGTS holds CIG capacity, and I have encouraged John to look at any 
future potential of making deliveries off CIG into TW at Tumbleweed.  John 
also indicated that he thought NGTS does have some equity San Juan gas  which 
currently flows on El Paso to California via capacity release.   I will 
pursue this fact with the proper individual in the Dallas office.
From: jennifer.mendez@enron.com
To: robert.laurel@enron.com, eric.bass@enron.com, sunil.abraham@enron.com, jason.stephens@enron.com, ashley.worthing@enron.com, s..shively@enron.com, gordon.heaney@enron.com, cora.pendergrass@enron.com, d..winfree@enron.com, kathy.link@enron.com, moyez.lallani@enron.com, jason.althaus@enron.com, john.taylor@enron.com, jennifer.rosado@enron.com, d..hogan@enron.com, matthew.lenhart@enron.com, ron.nolte@enron.com, romeo.d'souza@enron.com, l..mims@enron.com, georgeanne.hodges@enron.com, sherry.dawson@enron.com, mike.carson@enron.com, kori.loibl@enron.com, lisa.kinsey@enron.com, jim.sugrue@enron.com, frank.ermis@enron.com, paula.harris@enron.com, scott.shishido@enron.com, ravi.arumbakkam@enron.com, darren.mcnair@enron.com, victoria.sorkina@enron.com, rennu.varghese@enron.com, david.oxley@enron.com, doug.gichana@enron.com, vladimir.gorny@enron.com, claudia.clark@enron.com, ellen.wallumrod@enron.com, habib.ahsan@enron.com, michael.belmont@enron.com, biliana.pehlivanova@enron.com, keith.holst@enron.com
Cc: maryann.roman@enron.com, lee.wright@enron.com
Date: 2002-02-01 17:04:26+00:00
Subject: Body Shop Deductions for UBS Employees

Dear Body Shop Member:

During the UBS/Enron transition your Body Shop membership will continue without interruption.  We are working with UBS and Enron to transition payroll deductions and continue exterior door access to the Body Shop.  

While we are finalizing these changes please continue your Body Shop membership.  

Thank you,
The Body Shop
From: tim.belden@enron.com
To: john.lavorato/corp/enron@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-24 14:57:00+00:00
Subject: lavodeal1

see attached.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 01:59 PM 
---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  Michael M Driscoll                           01/24/2001 11:08 AM
	

To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: lavodeal1
From: mark.hall@enron.com
To: cooper.richey@enron.com
Cc: faheem.qavi@enron.com, dan.dietrich@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-02 22:33:57+00:00
Subject: RE: albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

Here are few question that I think should be asked before the approval of this change be granted:
What is the particulars of the reasoning behind needing the site to be listed as Trusted?
What functionality is missing or broken because it is only listed as a intranet site?
What option in the configuration of Trusted sites facilitates the functionality that is broken or missing?

Please remit answer at your earliest convience.

Mark Hall
Desktop Architecture

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Qavi, Faheem  
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	Hall, Mark
Subject:	FW: albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

Mark,

	Will this suffice or do you need more?  Thanks.

Faheem A. Qavi
Enron Net Works
IT Security & Controls
* Faheem.Qavi@Enron.Com  
(  (713) 345-8338


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Richey, Cooper  
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Qavi, Faheem
Subject:	albertapower.enron.com added to trusted sites list

please add "http://albertapower.enron.com" to the trusted sites list to facilitate power and gas traders' access to web-based decision 	support tools.  

let me know if there are other questions/issues

Cooper Richey
403 974 6946
From: csilva@redsky.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com, cameron@perfect.com, csilva@redsky.com
Date: 2001-05-18 12:53:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Thank You

darling jeffie-poo,

that dinner really was great, but the thanks go mostly to cammy for buying
it all and choosing those great recipes and i helped a bit and i drank a ton
and let's do it again and riddles is fucking hilarious and i had such a
great time and i have such a bad hangover and i like hangin' which you
folks, sheeeit.

xoxox
colleen

let's do it again real soooooooooon.







-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 9:15 AM
To: cameron@perfect.com; Csilva@redsky.com
Subject: Thank You


The dinner was incredibly delicious.  Thank you very much.  I apologize for
being so late--increasingly I have less and less control over my schedule.
Would have much preferred to have spent it with you guys.  And sorry that I
pooped out so early---I'm running on zero sleep and had a 7:30 conference
call this morning.

That said, the dinner was really extraordinary.  You guys outdid yourself.
Made an others tough day very nice.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: katie99@tamu.edu
Date: 2000-03-24 11:28:00+00:00

Hi Katie,  I am feeling good about status of the deals!  Looks like we should 
close next Wednesday.  So as it stands now, I don't think I will have to work 
this weekend.  Of course now that I just said that, it almost positive that 
something will come up.

Hmmm,  Actually work might not be such a bad thing as my alternative is 
helping my roommate pack his stuff up for his move to North Carolina.

Have a great weekend! Talk to you soon.

Gerald
From: shona.wilson@enron.com
To: heidi.hellmann@enron.com, milind.laad@enron.com
Cc: carol.howes@enron.com, sally.beck@enron.com
Date: 2000-07-12 09:44:00+00:00
Subject: India

I appreciate the time you took yesterday getting me up to speed as to your 
business and where you are in the process of establishing risk operations.  I 
hope you found our meeting useful as the checklist is meant to serve as an 
overview of points that need to be addressed before any transactions are 
entered into.

I was wondering if a meeting with Carole, Milind, Heidi, and myself has yet 
been scheduled for Friday. At that time, I think we need to lay out a road 
map of how the checklist items will be addressed and how I can best help you.

Regards

Shona