Quzzzz/enron-emails huggingface dataset:
From: carries@tradefairgroup.com
To: kevin.hyatt@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-29 22:45:28+00:00
Subject: RE: NGI committee speaker

FYI - I talked with David Johnson regarding that article from the New
England Power Plant Journal. He said he could not find it and he thinks he
already threw it away.  I will let you know if he locates any other
interesting articles and this time, I won't let him throw it away!

Also, I spoke with David Sweet, Independent Petroleum Association of
America.  He is interested in chairing that session, but is awaiting budget
concerns.  I'll forward the email to you that he sent me.  

We are going to call him at 9:00 a.m tomorrow.  Do you want to be included
on the call?

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Hyatt@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Carrie Shapiro (E-mail)
Subject: NGI committee speaker
Importance: High


Carrie--
	Mike Nelson, Vice Pres of Pipeline Integrity for Enron, has
agreed to speak at NGI Session A on Pipeline Infrastructure Security.
Mike can be contacted via the following:

Mr. Michel Nelson
Enron Transportation Services
PO Box 1188
Suite 3AC3101
Houston, TX  77251-1188

713-345-5241
michel.nelson@enron.com

Please send him a conf invite at your earliest convenience.  

thanks
kh


**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you. 
**********************************************************************
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: stinson.gibner@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-02 15:13:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel

Stinson,

Let's talk about it. It seems like an open personality clash developing 
for the first time in the history of the group.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 
03:12 PM ---------------------------


Zimin Lu
05/02/2001 01:41 PM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel  


Our convention is whoever finalizes the model should write the 
documentation.  It does not make sense
to write one when changes are anticipated.  You have been working on this 
almost a year, it never 
strikes you that we need a documentation ? 

I created Exotica.xll, does that also give you an excuse not working on 
Exotica documentation ?   

Zimin 





Paulo Issler
05/02/2001 11:52 AM
To: Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Pavel Zadorozhny/Enron@EnronXGate 
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel  

I am surprised that we do not have the documentation ready.
I can make that for you. It is not there because you did not put that 
together by the time it was created and all the changes I have made did not 
required changes on the functionality.
Paulo Issler
 



Zimin Lu
05/02/2001 11:29 AM
To: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pavel Zadorozhny/Enron@EnronXGate 
Subject: Re: Asian Option for Pavel  



Tai Woo,

Here are the c-codes for the CrudeAPO.  'Sig' is the spot
volatility meaning the price volatility within the delivery period. 
You should consult  with Pavel for the definition of this "extra" 
parameters.   We 
would like to see the Position Monitor once you get it running.
We might have some additional suggestions.




Paulo,

Why don't we have a documentation on CrudeAPO you worked on ?
I can not find it in Exotica help file.   Please supply that to Tai, thanks.



--------------------------------------








From: Tai Woo/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/02/2001 09:55 AM
To: Paulo Issler/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kara Maloney/ENRON@enronXgate, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Asian Option for Pavel

This morning, Zimin told me that Pavel is using a special model in evaluating 
his Asian option portfolio. 
He asked me to talk to you in order to access to the code so that I can see 
the difference made to the model.

As I cannot find the doc. describing this model, please tell me what that new 
input parameter 'Sig' is.

Thanks,
From: sherri.sera@enron.com
To: vince.kaminski@enron.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, richard.causey@enron.com
Date: 2000-09-20 12:49:00+00:00
Subject: Re: University of Texas conference on energy finance, February 2001

Vince, I am checking the date on Jeff's calendar (I'm assuming the date is 
February 22?).  I am holding that date whole week for a trip abroad, but I 
think we have some flexibility on that and am checking it out.  I'll be back 
in touch as soon as I've resolved that.  SRS




Vince J Kaminski@ECT
09/20/2000 11:41 AM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: University of Texas conference on energy finance, February 2001

Jeff,

Our friends at the University of Texas are planning a conference on energy
economics and finance in February of next year. They would like very much to 
have 
you as a keynote speaker. 

Given our good, long-term  relationship with UT,  I would recommend
that you speak at this conference. I talked to Prof. Ehud Ronn
a few times about the program and  I think that this will be 
an excellent forum to present Enron's accomplishments and
agenda for the future.

I am sure that Rick Causey will join me in making the same recommendation.

Vince
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: nmann@erac.com
Date: 2000-10-12 16:44:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Choc

I'm glad she sounds so good.  Maybe she can be a back up for next Thursday.

Kay




"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/12/2000 02:45:08 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:  

Subject: Choc

Just got off the phone and she wants to pick Michael up from school on
Friday the 27th. I told her we would be home around noon on Sunday and she
said that was find but they might be out and about! She sounded great! She
is busy on the 21st so I thought I would try grandma again. I plan on
stopping by this evening to work on the pager issue.
From: daren.farmer@enron.com
To: tom.acton@enron.com
Date: 2000-03-02 10:58:00+00:00
Subject: Re: WELLS

That's fine.  Go ahead and change the deal if you need to.

D




Tom Acton@ENRON
03/02/2000 10:22 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: WELLS

 Dallas at meter 986789 would like to decrease from 12079 to 12000. Let me 
know  " D "
From: no.address@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-19 13:12:09+00:00
Subject: Enron In Action 11.19.01


	
Enron in Action can be accessed through the new Community Relations web site at http://cr.enron.com/eia.html .  In this week's issue you will find out information regarding:

Enron Happenings 
Sponsor a Child - Win a Ticket to Cirqie du Solei

Enron Volunteer Opportunities
Saint Nicholas Needs Your Help!
Nutcracker Volunteer Opportunity
Camp Noah - Daycamp for Children Recovering from Disaster
Thanksgiving Volunteer Opportunity

Enron Wellness
Holiday Fashion Show & Luncheon
Weight Watchers

In addition, Enron in Action is available through a channel on my.home.enron.com.  To add this channel to your set-up click on the channels link at the top of the screen and under announcements check the Enron in Action box.  

If you wish to add an announcement to Enron in Action, please fill out the attached form below and submit it to mailto:eia@enron.com no later than 12 PM Thursday each week.
From: nancy.corbet@enron.com
Date: 2000-12-13 15:45:00+00:00
Subject: VENEZUELA CONSULTING AGREEMENTS

I was on 38 this a.m. so dropped by your office but you were at a meeting. 
James Mcmillan called me this morning as Ned and I provide legal services on 
the Venezuela LNG project . FYI -  I am working on the commercial documents 
and Ned is working on the construction contract. James called me this morning 
to inquire who the right attorney is that he should be dealing with on 
consulting agreements related to the construction fo the project. ( It does 
get confusing as Ned is handling a consulting agreement for another fellow 
and we have each done consulting agreements for this group in the past - many 
international . )  James advised that you had been in a meeting with him a 
few weeks ago and he understood that you would be assisting and he was 
looking for confirmation of who to contact.  One particular agreement is with 
an individual named Voker Eyerman  who has been working with Enron on a 
contract basis   for 5 years. This individual is due to start work on this 
matter January 8th and James is concerned that this matter be taken care of 
before the holidays. This one seems pretty straight forward and I would be 
happy to do it this week but wanted to run this by you first. 

Let's talk about this at your convenience  today/tomorrow. I told James that 
I would have the time to attend to Voker's contract this week if you were 
unable to do so and that I would discuss this contract and the others with 
you. He is sending me Voker's existing agreement . Look forward to meeting 
you. Nancy 6,7790
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: suzanne.adams@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-10 11:11:00+00:00
Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

I love Vincent's and it is close, so I say we go for it.


From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 11:07 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?  

So, should I make reservations?  Is there somewhere else you'd rather go?  
I'm starving!



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:54 AM
		
		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

I haven't talked to anyone.  I've got 10 docs going out this am, but I'm 
almost finished.


From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?  

Sheila can't go today because of work.  Carlos called, is he still going?  
It's your birthday lunch, what do you want to do.



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:42 AM
		
		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sounds good, but if today isn't a good day, it is not a problem.


From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:  

Subject: How about Vincent's for lunch?
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: gtownsend@manorisd.net
Date: 2001-07-12 21:55:00+00:00
Subject: Whazzup!!

Hey Dude,  How is it going?  Was thinking about maybe making a road trip next weekend the big A.  What do you have going on?  Might just be myself though.  Barbara and I had a parting of the ways.  Relationships seems to give me the panics after a couple of months.  Right now I am working on recharging the girlfriend pipeline.
From: michael.etringer@enron.com
To: mark.taylor@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-21 15:13:00+00:00
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte

IT informed me that they should be able to provide "outside" access to the 
Customer website by Tuesday.  As such I will hold of sending you any hard 
copies of the webpages.  I will let you know when the site is open.

Thanks,
Mike


To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte  

Yes, I think they could develop some initial thoughts with that kind of 
description.



Michael Etringer

01/19/2000 04:40 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte  

It sounds like it may be a little while before the IT group gets the final 
approval to move the web site to the outside.  In the mean time, is it worth 
while to send Sullivan&Cromwell print outs of the pages?  Right now there is 
not really much info on the site.  We can identify third party links, the 
type of information we will be providing as well as sources for our data.  
Will this be of use?

Mike




To: Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: West Power Customer Web SIte  

I have been able to access this but our outside legal counsel (Sullivan & 
Cromwell in NY) can't.  Any way for them to get access so they can advise us 
on this?  They are also the guys who will help with a training session on 
various legal issues and company policies in trading.



Michael Etringer

01/14/2000 05:00 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: West Power Customer Web SIte

Mark,

As discussed, here is the URL for the proposed web site:   
http://ecthou-lndev1.nt.ect.enron.com/westpowernet.nsf/
It is still on an internal server which I hope you will have access to.  Let 
me know if it doesn't work.  

The User ID is: "user1"  and the Password is:  "test"  .

I also ran through several of the web sites from which we gather our 
information and did not run across the occurance of any copyright statements.

In terms of timing, we hope to release the site by the end of January to a 
limited customer listing.

Regards,
Mike Etringer
503-464-3836
From: oscar.dalton@enron.com
To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
Date: 2000-04-17 12:13:00+00:00
Subject: CIPCO

Here are the responses to my CIPCO questions

1.  Henwood Energy is a third party evaluation consultant.  They will review 
the RFP responses

2.  Burns & McDonald has assisted in site selection/review and will 
participate in evaluation of any self-builds that CIPCO does.

3.  CIPCO has a preference to purchase from the market or from plants that 
Enron would develop.  They are not big on wanting to build their own plant or 
JV.

4.  CIPCO has identified a key site in Iowa that has direct access to their 
own system as well as the Mid-Am system.  They would make that site available 
to us if we needed it.  They will not reveal the site unless we get into 
negotiations.

5.  CIPCO will consider terms longer than 5 years.  They would consider a 
15-20 year term if there was a capital project involved.

6.  CIPCO does have their own transmission system as well as point/point 
transmission agreements on Mid-Am and Alliant.  The point to point agreement 
are from plants where CIPCO owns a partial share to CIPCO's system.

7.  CIPCO appeared to not value the LM-6000 technology to any higher degree 
than other machines.

8.  CIPCO was not sure of how things would be financed.

9.  If CIPCO decided to self build, they would certainly be interested in 
working with Enron on the gas deal.
From: stacey.neuweiler@enron.com
To: daren.farmer@enron.com
Date: 2000-05-19 13:03:00+00:00

Here's my performance evaluation choices:

Gary Hanks - pipeline operations 
Morgan Sharifi - desk to desk business
Greg Steagall - transportation/invoicing
Julie Meyers - contract admin
Charlotte Hawkins - HPLC ops

Please let me know if you think I should list anyone else.  Thanks.
From: kaminski@enron.com
To: anne.labbe@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-08 16:58:49+00:00
Subject: RE: HR Research Projects

Anne,

Thanks. These are excellent ideas and my group needs these
initiatives.

Vince


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Labbe, Anne  
Sent:	Friday, June 08, 2001 9:30 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Kohli, Sandeep; Krishnarao, Pinnamaneni; Lu, Zimin; Raymond, Maureen; Roberts, Mike A.; Sezgen, Osman; Shanbhogue, Vasant; Tamarchenko, Tanya
Subject:	HR Research Projects

I just wanted to let you know that I am going to start working on a couple of projects for your group as a result of yesterday's meeting.

1)	Establish a Toastmasters "club" at Enron in order to give the members of your team, as well as other employees, the opportunity to be proactive in developing their leadership and presentation skills.
?	Yesterday I learned that we do have Toastmasters here at Enron that meets on Thursday at lunch.  I am scheduling a meeting with the lead and will report back to you as to whether another club that would meet at a different day/ time (perhaps in the evening) would be successful, and how we can more effectively market this program. 

2)	Continue to work with our organizational development and training team to develop a specialized program that will address the following needs:  ESL, effective communication, presentation skills, and selling/ networking skills.  Currently we are sponsoring an ESL class a group in Networks group, but I would like to try and take that concept further so that your specific needs can be adequately addressed.  

If you think that there are any other areas that I can focus on, please do not hesitate to let me know.  

Thanks,
Anne
From: .taylor@enron.com
To: .taylor@enron.com
Date: 2001-11-28 00:58:10+00:00
Subject: Synchronization Log:

18:57:58 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Taylor, Mark E (Legal)'
18:57:58 Synchronizing Hierarchy
18:57:59 Synchronizing Favorites
18:57:59 Synchronizing Folder 'Inbox'
18:58:04 	   7 item(s) added to offline folder
18:58:04 	   6 item(s) deleted in offline folder
18:58:04 	   1 view(s)/form(s) updated in offline folder
18:58:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Outbox'
18:58:04 Synchronizing Folder 'Sent Items'
18:58:05 	   4 item(s) added to offline folder
18:58:05 Synchronizing Folder 'Calendar'
18:58:09 	   2 item(s) added to offline folder
18:58:09 	   2 item(s) updated in offline folder
18:58:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Contacts'
18:58:09 	   1 item(s) updated in offline folder
18:58:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Drafts'
18:58:09 	   1 item(s) added to offline folder
18:58:09 Synchronizing Folder 'Tasks'
18:58:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Journal'
18:58:10 Synchronizing Folder 'Notes'
18:58:10 Synchronizing Views
18:58:10 Synchronizing Forms
18:58:10 Done
From: hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com
To: kevin.ruscitti@enron.com, chris.germany@enron.com
Cc: hherzog@columbiaenergygroup.com, molly.johnson@enron.com, cdalpho@columbiaenergygroup.com, dscott1@columbiaenergygroup.com, knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com, djones1@columbiaenergygroup.com, kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com, hboyd@columbiaenergygroup.com, cfrankl2@enron.com, joan.veselack@enron.com, vversen@enron.com, cindy.vachuska@enron.com, cora_pendergrass@enron.com, mmitche2@enron.com, scott.goodell@enron.com, steve.gillespie@enron.com, cgarcia@enron.com, despey@enron.com, joann.collins@enron.com, dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com
Date: 2000-05-26 10:03:00+00:00
Subject: CES Daily May '00 Requirements for 5/26/00 and after

The attached file contains our daily volume requirements for  5/26 and  the
following day(s) as listed .    There are three  worksheets labelled as
follows:

'Total Reqs':  Contains the volumes that CES is requesting from Enron at each
of the delivery points and dates indicated in the columns labelled "NOM".   
The
Enron schedulers will want to check this sheet to see how much gas is needed 
at
a specific point.   The AGL volumes are not timely and should be ignored until
further notice.    CES schedulers note:  the attached file is archived on
P:\Energy Ops\Enron\May_00\Daily\ *.xls, so you don't have to save a duplicate
copy elsewhere on the network.
'Daily Change' :  shows the change (increase +/decrease -) in the daily volume
needed from Enron at the designated citygate delivery point relative to the
supply volumes arranged previously with Enron prior to the current date.  For
the current gas day, the change is an intra-day change and is calculated using
the previous day's volume request for the current day (e.g., If the current 
gas
day is 3/28, then the change is computed with respect to the 3/27 request for
3/28.  Note that this procedure assumes that the prior day supply change was 
in
fact effectuated).  For tomorrow's gas day and any subsequent ones shown, the
change is computed as the latest Dth Nomination requirement less the
First-of-the-month supply volume plus or minus any adjustments made since the
first-of-the-month to the FOM supply for the (future) days shown.  (e.g., If
today is 3/28, then the change for 3/29, 3/30, etc. is computed with respect 
to
the first-of-the-month volumes for those days adjusted for any additional
purchases or sell-backs since the first-of-the-month thru 3/27.)   This sheet
should be useful in determining prices for daily changes in gas volumes that 
we
take or turn back.   The column labelled "ENA Daily Swing +/- vs FOM volume'
shows the absolute magnitude of the daily swings allowed by ENA at
pre-specified prices.  Prices for Swing volumes exceeding these magnitudes or
for swings at delivery points without pre-specified pricing must be 
negotiated.
'Comments':   Contains comments on selected items on various days.




Hans Herzog
ph: 703 561 6331
fax: 703 561 7317

 - 05-26-00 daily volsAM.xls
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: aduncan@kilstock.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com
Date: 2000-08-30 10:47:00+00:00
Subject: Skelton option

I'm looking at the Skelton option (Hart County, GA), and can't figure out 
when it was executed. (must confess I didn't read EVERY word) Can anyone help 
me with this?

Thanks,

Kay
From: no.address@enron.com
Date: 2001-10-09 03:39:13+00:00
Subject: Please Register to Attend the Enron Management Conference

As you know, the Enron Management Conference will be held Wednesday through Friday, November 14-16, 2001, at the Westin La Cantera Resort in San Antonio, Texas.  

This has been an eventful and challenging year for Enron.  Now,  more than ever,  it is fitting to bring Enron's leaders together.  After all, it is up to our management team to lead our company through these challenging times.  Together, we will define Enron's character and determine Enron's destiny.

We have a great program planned for this year's conference.  I'm delighted that General Norman Schwarzkopf will join us as a keynote speaker on leadership.  I'm equally pleased to welcome back Gary Hamel, who will help us process the past year and prepare for future success.  As I've said before, we are a company that continues to look to the future, and there are many exciting things in store for us.

I look forward to seeing you at this very important meeting.

Regards,
Ken Lay 

NOTE:   This year,  registration for the Management Conference will be conducted electronically.  Below is a link to the online registration website along with instructions for navigating the site.  Everyone must register by Friday, November 2. 

http://www.mplanners.com/enron

When you access the Management Conference online registration website, enter your eMail Address and Password (password: enron) in the specified boxes.  The first time you access the site, you will be prompted to enter your First Name and Last Name.  Once completed, click Submit. 

On the next page, click Sign Up Now to register.  You will be prompted to enter your basic information and make selections for your hotel room, travel and preferred activity.  In the scroll box to the right, you can review and print the conference agenda, a list of activities, as well as travel arrangements and other general information.  

After you have entered the necessary information, you can Review Your Registration or simply Log Out.  Your registration information will be automatically submitted.  

Once registered, you can reaccess the site at any time to review or change previous elections.  When reentering the site, you only need to enter your eMail Address and Password.

If you experience any problems accessing the site, please contact Marge Nadasky at 713-853-6631.
From: jeff.duff@enron.com
To: david.miller@enron.com, patricia.hunter@enron.com
Cc: hollis.kimbrough@enron.com, jeff.marecic@enron.com, mark.fisher@enron.com, mark.walker@enron.com
Date: 2002-05-24 08:27:00+00:00
Subject: DB Table Additions

To support the data storage of ZMET data here is a proposal for what the 
table structure should be.  In addition, after discussing the status messages 
it is important to differentiate between those which effect availability and 
those that do not.  The FAULTS table includes a flag field INCLUDE which 
serves this purpose for STAR. 

A improvement to this table would be to add a counter description field 
var(4) which would hold one of the following descriptions; SOT, LOT, DT, WOT, 
MT, RT, and EST.  This will allow us do differentiate status messages by 
which counter they are associated with.

Since the intent is to mirror the SQL Server and the STAR db we need to make 
these changes to both.  I'd like to get the SQL server changes ASAP so I can 
develop some additional reports.

Let me know what you think

JD
From: tana.jones@enron.com
To: harry.collins@enron.com
Date: 2001-05-21 11:39:00+00:00
Subject: ClickPaper Approvals, 05-21-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/21/2001 11:39 AM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/21/2001 11:33 AM
		 
		 To: Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Bernice 
Rodriguez/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Venturatos/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel 
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom 
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L 
Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole 
Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Angela Y 
Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen 
Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Fraisy George/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra 
Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc: 
		 Subject: ClickPaper Approvals, 05-21-01

Please see attached.



Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com
From: michael.guadarrama@enron.com
To: andy.zipper@enron.com
Cc: jay.webb@enron.com
Date: 2001-06-05 19:22:47+00:00
Subject: FW: Global Strategic Sourcing Question

Andy,

This technically possible if we model this as a standard product.  To make it look like a realtime auction is also possible but will require some work.  It's something that would be interesting to have.

Regards,
Michael
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Shelley  
Sent:	Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:20 PM
To:	Alatorre, Carlos
Cc:	Webb, Jay; Guadarrama, Michael; Perlman, Beth
Subject:	

All,

Dale Neuner and Ross Mesquita referred me to you all.  I work with Global Strategic Sourcing and am looking to implement an "online marketplace" idea into Enron Online.  This would involve vendors and suppliers providing bids in a structured format - kind of like a reverse auction E-Bay.  Vendors would be able to see their competitors bids online, but not their names.  Any registered vendor would be able to update their numbers online, "real time".

First, we would like to know if anything like this is being done at Enron.  
Next, is it technologically possible to bring this concept into Enron Online?

Please advise.  We would like to do a test pilot as soon as possible with Crane Rentals.  Please give me a call so we can discuss this possibility,  
5-6528.

Thanks,
Shelley


Shelley Johnson
Business Analyst
Global Strategic Sourcing   
713-345-6528    
333 Clay Street  1116d
Houston, TX  77251
shelley.johnson@enron.com
 http://gss.enron.com/
From: sheri.thomas@enron.com
To: stephanie.segura@enron.com
Cc: sally.beck@enron.com, frank.davis@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-07 10:49:00+00:00
Subject: Clcikpaper cost per trade

As requested, I have come up with a rough estimate of the cost per trade for 
Clickpaper (from a Product Control Group/Call Center prospective only).

The average cost per month for the team (fully loaded - salaries, benefits, 
plus expenses) is $36,000.  The average number of trades per month is 40 - 
therefore, the average cost $900 per trade.

As a comparison, the average cost per EnronOnline trade $3.00.  As you can 
see, it is much lower due to the volume of transactions.  We will recognize 
the same economies of scale when the Clickpaper trades increase.  We do not 
anticipate needing any additional staff this year.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sheri
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: mark.courtney@enron.com
Cc: lance.legal@enron.com, lawrence.lawyer@enron.com
Date: 1999-06-07 15:04:00+00:00
Subject: Agreements to be Assigned to ECC

Mark,  The attached document outlines the relevant documents to be assigned 
to the new LLC and their assignment provisions.  Please note that for the 
City of Farmington Power Supply Agreement (Bloomfield), a deposit will be 
required by the new assignee.  Please review and let me know if you have any 
questions.

Larry and Lance,  The contract packages which contain the referenced 
agreements will be sent today.
From: mark.taylor@enron.com
To: bhutt@ankarcapital.com
Cc: gpier@doubleclick.net
Date: 1999-11-05 19:58:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Cruisin'

Bummer - I had no idea the USVI wasn't considered part of the US - I'm 
assuming when you say "on the way back in" you mean from the USVI to the 
mainland since we could try to arrange things to avoid going back to the BVI 
while you were with us if that made a difference.

I don't have any leads on a possible stand-in, but don't really want one 
either since we've our hearts set on YOU.    Hopefully the lawyer can figure 
out a way to speed things up.  As a last resort, maybe we should check with 
Greg for a replacement since that's who he'll have to bunk with.  You have to 
be reasonably careful about such choices since you will be spending your 
holiday in pretty close contact with them.   It may also be a bit late to 
find transport to that part of the world; any hope of transferring the ticket 
in your name to someone else?





"Bruce Hutt" <bhutt@ankarcapital.com> on 11/05/99 02:50:19 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: "Pier, Greg" <gpier@doubleclick.net> 
Subject: Re: Cruisin'



Mark

I have just spoken with my lawyer.  Basically, USVI does not work.  I could
be easily "carded" on the way back in.  Apparently, it is well tried and
therefore well patrolled way of entry into the US.

We are going to try and get INS to speed the process, but basically I am in
a difficult position.  I no longer have the first job under which the first
application was submitted, so I cannot call and say I need the travel permit
for business reasons, and although my cheques have been cashed (I think) the
travel permit is delayed somewhere.  I have no news at all on the second
application.

Do you know of anyone that you may want to take along instead?  One or two
spots going....whichever is easiest to fill.

B
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Taylor <mtaylo1@ect.enron.com>
To: Bruce Hutt <bhutt@ankarcapital.com>
Cc: Pier, Greg <gpier@doubleclick.net>
Date: Friday, November 05, 1999 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Cruisin'


>
>
>Would it work if we picked you up in the USVI?  I know it's possible to fly
into
>St. Thomas either directly from New York or through San Juan and you could
take
>a ferry to St. John (still part o the USVI) where we could pick you up.
It's a
>bit of a hassle since we have to clear the boat into the US and then back
to the
>BVI but I've done it a couple of times before.  The timing might be
difficult
>since we can't possibly get the boat to St. John before the afternoon of
the
>22nd.  If you're nervous about sailing into the BVI, we could stick around
St.
>John for a few days.  You might check the cruising guide & see what it says
>about the US side of things - places to go/anchor, etc.
>
>
>
From: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com
To: david.roensch@enron.com
Date: 2002-03-22 16:29:54+00:00
Subject: FW: TW Weekly Report for March 22, 2002



 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Moore, Jan  
Sent:	Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Betancourt, Ramona ; Blair, Lynn; Buchanan, John; Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Doll, Jeanette; Donoho, Lindy; Geaccone, Tracy; Harris, Steven; Hernandez, Bert; January, Steve; Kowalke, Terry; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; McEvoy, Christine; Miller, Beverly; Minter, Tracy; Moore, Jan; Mulligan, Amy; Nacey, Sheila; Robertson, Audrey; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Ward, Linda; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject:	TW Weekly Report for March 22, 2002


Attached is the TW weekly report for March 22, 2002.


 


Jan Moore
X53858
From: susan.trevino@enron.com
To: debbie.brackett@enron.com, john.powell@enron.com, ron.nolte@enron.com, jason.moore@enron.com, rudi.zipter@enron.com, todd.warwick@enron.com, chris.abel@enron.com, tracey.irvin@enron.com, daniel.falcone@enron.com, manfred.roenz@enron.com, clara.carrington@enron.com, minal.dalia@enron.com, homan.amiry@enron.com, christian.lebroc@enron.com, xochitl.figueroa@enron.com, burton.mcintyre@enron.com, kevin.lee@enron.com, kenneth.d'silva@enron.com, rebecca.ford@enron.com, gregory.carraway@enron.com, bjorn.hagelmann@enron.com, sunil.dalal@enron.com, rahmaan.mwongozi@enron.com, terri.harlan@enron.com, robin.rodrigue@enron.com, bilal.bajwa@enron.com, bradley.samuelson@enron.com, marina.ng@enron.com
Cc: jason.wolfe@enron.com, burton.mcintyre@enron.com, anne.bike@enron.com, darron.giron@enron.com
Date: 2001-01-23 16:09:00+00:00
Subject: Book Request #661

This book request is complete. Please contact either Burton or myself if you 
have any questions.

Thank you,
Susan
x3-1462
From: scott.neal@enron.com
To: dick.jenkins@enron.com, andrea.ring@enron.com, scott.hendrickson@enron.com, brad.mckay@enron.com, sandra.brawner@enron.com
Date: 2000-10-25 12:59:00+00:00
Subject: Candidate Itinerary

Itinerary for each of the Super Saturdays.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 12:57 PM 
---------------------------


Corina Taylor@ENRON
10/25/2000 10:29 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Candidate Itinerary

Information you requested.  I hope this helps....Corina
---------------------- Forwarded by Corina Taylor/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 
10:28 AM ---------------------------


Shelly Jones@ECT
10/20/2000 03:26 PM
To: Dolores Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna 
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Nyegaard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Alison Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Alyse Herasimchuk/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul LeBeau/NA/Enron@Enron, Kristin 
Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Bruce/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth 
Miertschin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geynille Dillingham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jacqueline 
Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lexi Elliott/NA/Enron@Enron, Corina 
Taylor/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Candidate Itinerary


	

Just as an fyi, the attached is the candidate itinerary.  Questions are 
coming in - you can use this for a guide of how the weekend will go for them.

Shelly
From: brett.pate@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-29 11:41:00+00:00
Subject: RE: Fwd Obligation Testing

Kate, no problem at all, I just wanted to give you and Cara a chance to look 
at it too.  Thanks,

Brett

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Symes, Kate  
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Pate, Brett
Subject: Re: Fwd Obligation Testing

Brett -

I'm so sorry for not sending you an e-mail last night! I did test the report 
and it looks just fine - but I had so many things going on right up until I 
left that I forgot to tell YOU that it looked fine. Thanks for the reminder, 
and for your work on the report.

Kate


From: Brett Pate/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 09:10 AM CST
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: Fwd Obligation Testing

Kate, were you able to test the Fwd Obligation Report?  Mr. Luu is ready to 
push it in to production, but we wanted you to look at it and give it your ok 
first.  

Thanks, 

Brett Pate
Enpower QA
From: vince.kaminski@enron.com
To: jlpnymex@aol.com
Cc: vince.kaminski@enron.com, vkaminski@aol.com
Date: 2000-03-16 13:37:00+00:00
Subject: Re: status

Jana,

It would be great to see both of you again. 

What about Friday evening (tomorrow) or sometimes next weekend (March 25 - 
26th)?
I heard many good things about  "American Beauty."

The rest of this coming weekend does not look good.
I am leaving for California (business and a few vacation days in the Napa 
Valley)
on Sunday and I have to finish a few thing before I leave.

I got your fax  re the 10th anniversary party and will attend. My assistant 
should have responded 
by now.

Hope to see you soon.

Vince








Jlpnymex@aol.com on 03/16/2000 12:22:51 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: status


Vince,
How are you?  Did you have a good trip to California?

I just got back in from Atlanta and DC.  Both meetings were very good, and
although I was only in DC for a day, it was beautiful weather and the cherry
blossoms had started to bloom.

I wanted to see if you would like to go see "American Beauty" with us,
sometime soon.  David wants to see it again, before the Oscars.  Let me know
when you have some free time.

Also, did you get my fax re the 10th anniversary party of natural gas futures
trading?  If not, I will re-fax it.

Hope all is well.

Jana
From: samuel.schott@enron.com
To: tom.moran@enron.com, walter.guidroz@enron.com, karen.lambert@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com, brant.reves@enron.com, debbie.brackett@enron.com, david.hardy@enron.com, lesli.campbell@enron.com, cynthia.clark@enron.com, enron.counterparty@enron.com, stephanie.sever@enron.com, tom.moran@enron.com, claudia.clark@enron.com, william.bradford@enron.com, lisa.lees@enron.com, juana.fayett@enron.com, jana.morse@enron.com, trang.le@enron.com, paul.maley@enron.com, sonya.clarke@enron.com, tim.davies@enron.com, karen.o'day@enron.com, tanya.rohauer@enron.com, kelly.lombardi@enron.com, brian.lindsay@enron.com, bernice.rodriguez@enron.com, bill.hare@enron.com
Date: 2001-03-16 16:59:00+00:00
Subject: Re: FW: EOL approvals, 03-16-01 _ GCP Response

Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

 

Best Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)



From: Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/16/2001 04:15 PM
To: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana 
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant 
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David 
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia 
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global 
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom 
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S 
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana 
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, 
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, 
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly 
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron 
Communications, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect
cc:  
Subject: FW: EOL approvals, 03-16-01

Please see attached.
From: mike.mcconnell@enron.com
To: john.sherriff@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-10 13:32:00+00:00
Subject: EGM briefing document

John,
FYI, here is the presentation we discussed today.  This is internal only but 
it can act as a guide if you want to know what we are doing or our approach.  
This is a first draft and I'll send you an updated one when it is finished.
m
From: kerri.thompson@enron.com
To: kate.symes@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-28 14:52:00+00:00
Subject: Re: natsource fees

did you even find out about deals 457489 and 459812?

thanks




   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/22/2000 11:51 AM

To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: natsource fees  

I've checked with Matt Motley and changed 458712 and 458718 to reflect broker 
fees of .0075.

I've left a message for Mike Swerzbin to double-check. He has 457489 entered 
in his log book with no broker fee, but 459812 says nothing either way; so 
I'd like to get ahold of him before I change anything.

Thanks,
Kate



Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/22/2000 09:19 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:  

Subject: natsource fees

458712 .0075
458718  .0075
457489  .0075
459812  .0075

the broker shows the fees on these trades, we have 0.  can you check this out?

thanks
From: harry.kingerski@enron.com
To: rates.group@enron.com
Cc: steven.kean@enron.com, judy.pearson@enron.com
Date: 2000-01-17 17:20:00+00:00
Subject: Rates & Tariffs Working Group

SK - Printed and put in your working group folder.  Also put as "FYI" next 
scheduled meeting.  mm

Follow - up to our first meeting -

We had very good participation.  In the absence of some technical 
difficulties, we would have had 100% participation.  

As our discussion showed, people bring different issues and needs to the 
group.  It seems that this group will function best if we serve as a source 
of information and resources to each other.  Our collective knowledge is 
capable of helping many different individual problems; we just need to figure 
how to get the right information to the people who need it.  Our first task 
should be to sort through this wide ranging topic and start to focus on some 
specific deliverables.

Attached is an updated roster of the team, and a listing of the subgroups and 
some ideas of what the subgroup should consider.  These ideas are not meant 
to restrict but give some additional clarity.  Please note the subgroup 
membership and the designated team leads, and begin your discussions.

Our next meeting will be Friday, February 4, 9:30 am - 11 am Central Standard 
Time.  More details on phone/video conferencing and a full agenda will be 
given later.  At the meeting, each subgroup should share with the larger 
group their thoughts on the directions to be taken by the subgroup.  At that 
time, we can all offer additional comments.



Thank you!
From: rharris@credit2b.com
To: leslie.hansen@enron.com
Cc: craig.chaney@enron.com, tana.jones@enron.com, jeff.kinneman@enron.com
Date: 2000-11-28 17:19:00+00:00
Subject: RE: NDA

great thanks  --  A two way agreement certainly makes sense.

I will be back to you shortly.

robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Leslie.Hansen@enron.com [mailto:Leslie.Hansen@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 5:14 PM
To: rharris@credit2B.com
Cc: Craig.Chaney@enron.com; Tana.Jones@enron.com;
Jeff.Kinneman@enron.com
Subject: NDA


Dear Robert:

Craig Chaney asked me to review the proposed NDA that you forwarded to him
in anticipation of a meeting between Credit 2B and EnronCredit.com early
next week.  The NDA that you forwarded to Craig protects only Credit 2B as
a disclosing party.  After discussing this matter with Craig, I understand
that this relationship might rapidly evolve and require EnronCredit.com to
disclose confidential information to Credit 2B as well.  Accordingly, I
propose that in the interests of efficiency, we negotiate and finalize a
bilateral NDA up front.

I have thus prepared the attached bilateral NDA for your review and
comment.  I have taken Enron's standard form of NDA and incorporated those
provisions of Credit2B's NDA to which I can agree.

I look forward to discussing any comments or concerns that you may have.
Craig would like to finalize this NDA by Friday.

Regards,

Leslie M. Hansen,
Senior Counsel
(713) 853-6121

(See attached file: Credit 2B NDA.doc)
From: steven.kean@enron.com
To: ray.alvarez@enron.com
Date: 2001-04-15 20:02:00+00:00
Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan

Thanks for taking the lead on this.  Note Tim's question about handicapping 
the liklihood of approval.  Prices will move in the West based on these 
odds.  We need to have a better view than anyone else.




Ray Alvarez
04/13/2001 01:19 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J 
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan 
J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON 

Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan  

Tim,  although there's always a "chance" my impression is that the FERC won't 
buy the ban on exports, as this would appear to run afoul of the Commerce 
Clause and certainly goes counter to everything that FERC hopes to accomplish 
with their own Order 888 and 2000 initiatives.  I am less certain about the 
direction FERC will go on pricing, since even the staff has recognized 
stumbling blocks in their own recommendation and offers possible variants.  

The ISO has not submitted revised tariff sheets for approval yet, so it is 
unlikely they would try to implement their own plan in the near term.  If 
they try to do so without FERC approval, possible legal avenues might include 
the filing of a complaint at FERC, asking for fast track processing (this 
"fast" is measured in weeks, not days) and/or seeking injunctive relief in 
court (faster), which can be hard to obtain but not impossible, depending 
entirely on the circumstances.

Will keep you posted if I learn anything new on this.  Ray
    



James D Steffes
04/12/2001 11:21 PM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J 
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan 
J Mara/NA/Enron 

Subject: Re: ISO Market Stabilization Plan  

Ray --

Can you please take the lead in responding to Tim re:  FERC v. state actions?

Sue --

Any info on whether the ISO would do this unilaterally?

Jim



To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Ray 
Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan 
Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: ISO Market Stabilization Plan

The recent plan filed at FERC is horrible.  The two most aggregious parts are 
the cost based standing bids and the ban on exports.  I know that we are 
commenting on this proposal.  I am also looking for intellegence on whether 
the ISO proposal has any chance of getting approved by FERC.  If it is not 
approved by FERC, what can the Californians do?  California has ignored FERC 
before.  If they attempt to unilaterally implement changes what is the 
likelihood that the Feds step in to intervene?  If you hear anything on this 
matter please keep me posted.  The proposed plan will have a huge impact on 
the California market and we need as much advance notice as possible.
From: richard.sanders@enron.com
To: tim.belden@enron.com
Date: 2001-02-21 12:02:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Subpoena Requiring March 5 Response

yes



	Tim Belden
	02/21/2001 08:46 AM
		 
		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Subpoena Requiring March 5 Response

are you on top of this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 02/21/2001 05:47 AM 
---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  "Fuller, Don" <DFuller@caiso.com>@caiso.com>                           
02/20/2001 04:33 PM
	

Sent by: "Happ, Susan" <SHapp@caiso.com>
To: ISO Market Participants 
<IMCEAEX-_O=CAISO_OU=CORPORATE_CN=DISTRIBUTION+20LISTS_CN=ISO+20MARKET+20PARTI
CIPANTS@caiso.com>
cc:  
Subject: Subpoena Requiring March 5 Response


To Market Participants and Scheduling Coordinators:

The ISO received a subpoena requiring a response by March 5, from the
Plaintiff in People of the State of California vs Dynegy Power Marketing,
Inc., et al, a proceeding in the San Francisco Superior Court Civil
Division.  The subpoena is attached.  The ISO intends to seek a protective
order prior to disclosure of information subject to ISO tariff section
20.3.2.  Market participants wishing to take steps to seek protections for
confidential information in accordance with tariff section 20.3.4 should
directly contact Mr. Patrick J. Coughlin, attorney for the Plaintiff, at
415-288-4545 and notify Jeanne Sol, at jsole@caiso.com and Norma Formanek at
<mailto:nformanek@fbm.com> nformanek@fbm.com.
Jeanne M. Sol,
Regulatory Counsel
California ISO
(916) 608-7144
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

The Foregoing e-Mail Communication (Together With Any Attachments Thereto)
Is Intended For The Designated Recipient(s) Only. Its Terms May Be
Confidential And Protected By Attorney/Client Privilege or Other Applicable
Privileges.  Unauthorized Use, Dissemination, Distribution, Or Reproduction
Of This Message Is Strictly Prohibited.





 
 - Deposition Subpoena (2).pdf