From: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To: mark_guinney@watsonwyatt.com
Date: 2001-01-24 15:35:00+00:00
Subject: Re: Re[2]:RE: e234

The way we handled it last time was 1) have a quick chat about it, 2) split 
up the pieces, 3) once written, pass around the pieces to see if anyone has 
any strong feelings about what folks had pulled together, and then, for each 
case, 4) designate one person as the "assembler" of the pieces.  (We 
designated who would be responsible for which cases at the beginning of the 
semester.)  And yes, all by email (save for, say, the preliminary chat).  It 
worked well.  But I'm flexible, if folks want to try another angle.

Best,
Jeff



	"Mark Guinney" <Mark_Guinney@watsonwyatt.com>
	01/24/2001 12:19 PM
		 
		 To: "Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>
		 cc: "dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu" <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>, 
"dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu" <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>, 
"JCJA@chevron.com" <JCJA@chevron.com>, "jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu" 
<jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu>
		 Subject: Re[2]:RE: e234

Jeff,

How would you suggest it would work writing it jointly via an internet
discussion group?

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax


____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    Re:RE: e234
Author: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Date:       01/24/2001 3:52 PM

Haven't received anything.  Sounds like we all agree that it would be a
good idea to do it.  I'll write the prof an email and ask him to email us
the file.  My preference (in order to actually learn something--i'm sort of
thick) is to work on these jointly rather than have one person do it each
week, but i'm willing to discuss.  others have views on how we ought to
write 'em up?

Best,
Jeff




                    "Mark Guinney"

                    <Mark_Guinney@watson        To:     "Dylan Windham"

                    wyatt.com>                  
<dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>,
                                                "JCJA@chevron.com" 
<JCJA@chevron
.com>,
                    01/24/2001 09:06 AM         "dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu"

                                                <dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu>,

                                                "jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu"

                                                <jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu>

                                                cc:

                                                Subject:     Re:RE: e234






I, too, read the case and was prepared to write a memo except for the
crucial
fact that I have no idea what the prof. is looking for.  I haven't seen the
suggested questions which I assume will point us in the right direction.

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax


____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    RE: e234
Author: dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu (Dylan Windham)
Date:       01/24/2001 12:28 PM

I took a look at the case last night.  It is very short and appears to be
somewhat straight forward.  We may want to work on this one as insurance.

Has anyone received the files with the suggested questions and spreadsheets
yet?

Dylan



At 09:15 AM 1/24/2001 -0800, Jackson, James (JCJA) wrote:
>It sounded like if we do this one it will be best 5 out of 6.  It could
take
>the pressure off of us if we do this one.  I would vote we go for it.  We
>can talk about it tonight.
>Jimmy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dylan Windham [SMTP:dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu]
> > Sent: January 23, 2001 2:58 PM
> > To:   dasovich@haas.berkeley.edu; jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu;
> > guinney@haas.berkeley.edu
> > Subject:      e234
> >
> >
> > Okay gang,
> >
> > Given what was just sent out by Diane from the Professor, do we want to
do
> >
> > this first case (it is now optional)?  It appears that he will then
break
> > the groups up and assign the remaining 5 cases to us.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Dylan
> >