Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991) , was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws, which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals from publishing books about their crime for profit.
 Simon & Schuster challenged the law's application to profits from Nicholas Pileggi's book "", which was written with paid assistance from former mobster Henry Hill.
 The court struck down the Son of Sam law in New York on the ground that the law was violative of the First Amendment, which protects free speech.
 Nevertheless, similar laws in other states remain unchallenged.
 The opinion of the court was written by Sandra Day O'Connor.
DrugWarRant is a website created by activist Peter Guither that specifically advocate the termination of War on Drugs in United States.
 It has a Bulletin Board System, a blog, and other functions, including a comprehensive guide to the Supreme Court case "Gonzales v. Raich", a case dealing with medical marijuana and states' rights.
Rickert v. Pub.
 Disclosure Comm'n (2007) was a Washington State Supreme Court case dealing with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and the regulation of political speech.
 The case invalidated a Washington law that allowed for sanctions for statements made about a candidate for political office, if those statements were found by the State's Public Disclosure Commission to be false and to have been made with actual malice.
 The Court's decision was divided 5-4.
Harvey v. Horan, 278 F. 3d 370 (4th Cir.
 2002) is a federal court case dealing with felons' rights of access to DNA testing.
 The Eastern Virginia District Court originally found that felons were entitled access to DNA testing on potentially exculpatory evidence, but this finding was later overturned by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.
 Nevertheless, the case paved the way for the Innocence Protection Act, which ensures that convicted offenders can try to prove their innocence by requesting DNA testing on evidence in government's possession that was used in their case.
Larry A. Silverstein (born May 30, 1931) is an American businessman.
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1968) was an important United States Supreme Court case dealing with the freedom of choice plans created to avoid compliance with the Court's mandate in "Brown II".
 The Court held that New Kent County's freedom of choice plan did not constitute adequate compliance with the school board's responsibility to determine a system of admission to public schools on a non-racial basis.
 The Supreme Court mandated that the school board must formulate new plans and steps towards realistically converting to a desegregated system.
United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973), is the latest Supreme Court case dealing with the entrapment defense.
 The court split 5-4 and maintained the subjective theory that had first been adopted in "Sorrells v. United states", 287 U.S. 435 (1932).
 Although an undercover federal agent had helped procure a key ingredient for an illegal methamphetamine manufacturing operation, and assisted in the process, the Court followed its earlier rulings on the subject and found that the defendant had a predisposition to make and sell illegal drugs whether he worked with the government or not.
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996) , is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with sexual orientation and state laws.
 It was the first Supreme Court case to address gay rights since "Bowers v. Hardwick" (1986), when the Court had held that laws criminalizing sodomy were constitutional.
American Appraisal is a company which employs roughly 300 people in 60 locations around the world.
 Publicly notable projects conducted by American Appraisal include, for example, a "fresh start" valuation of MCI's assets after its chapter 11 bankruptcy filing or the retrospective valuation of the World Trade Center for Larry Silverstein's court case.
Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983), was a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with issues involving the Fourth Amendment.
 Specifically, the case establishes a firm line in cases where police conduct search and seizure without a warrant.
 The court ruled that, while it is legal for authorities to target and approach a person based on their behavior, absent more, they cannot detain or search such individual without a warrant.

Question: Who is an American businessman and had a court case dealing with what Center?
Answer: World Trade Center