South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court considered the limitations the Constitution places on the authority of the United States Congress when it uses its authority to influence the individual states in areas of authority normally reserved to the states.
 It upheld the constitutionality of a federal statute that withheld federal funds from states whose legal drinking age did not conform to federal policy.
State v. Whitmarsh was a South Dakota Supreme Court case decided on November 18, 1910, which asked whether or not fellatio, or oral sex, should be classified as sodomy.
 The contemporary federal common law definition of sodomy did not include fellatio.
 The court ruled that fellatio was an "abominable and disgusting" crime against nature and outlawed it between any two persons, regardless of marital status, sexual orientation or age.
 The case set a precedent for other states' laws and remained in effect in South Dakota for the next 66 years, until all sodomy laws, including the "crime against nature" statute, were abolished by the South Dakota Legislature in 1976.
South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Congress specifically abrogated treaty rights with the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe as to hunting and fishing rights on reservation lands that were acquired for a reservoir.
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment is a 2007 non-fiction book by journalist Anthony Lewis about freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of thought, and the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
 The book starts by quoting the First Amendment, which prohibits the U.S. Congress from creating legislation which limits free speech or freedom of the press.
 Lewis traces the evolution of civil liberties in the U.S. through key historical events.
 He provides an overview of important free speech case law, including U.S. Supreme Court opinions in "Schenck v. United States" (1919), "Whitney v. California" (1927), "United States v. Schwimmer" (1929), "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" (1964), and "New York Times Co. v. United States" (1971).
Mundt was born in Humboldt, South Dakota.
 He was the son of Ferdinand John Mundt (1875-1947) and Rose (Schneider) Mundt (1874-1965).
 Both of his parents were the descendants of German immigrants.
 Mundt attended public schools in Humboldt, Pierre, and Madison, graduating from Madison High School in 1919.
 In high school, he excelled in oratory and debate, which became lifetime passions.
 After receiving a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College in Minnesota in 1923 with a major in economics, he became teacher and principal at Bryant High School in Bryant, South Dakota.
 As a first-year teacher he taught speech, psychology, sociology, and government, coached the debate, oratory, and extemporaneous speech teams, and began a school newspaper.
 After his first year, he was promoted to superintendent of Bryant schools, a position he held until 1927.
 As superintendent, he continued to coach debate and oratory.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942) , is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court articulated the fighting words doctrine, a limitation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech.
The DakotaDome is a 10,000-seat multi-purpose stadium on N. Dakota Street in Vermillion, South Dakota.
 Opened in 1979 for a cost of $8.2 million, it is home to the University of South Dakota Coyotes for numerous athletic events, including football, men's and women's swimming and diving, and track.
 The DakotaDome was also the home site for the NAIA school Briar Cliff University football team until 2017 located 25 miles to the southeast in Sioux City, Iowa.
 The DakotaDome hosts other events throughout the year, including the South Dakota high school football championships each November.
 In 2014 a proposal for a new basketball arena went through and construction began just south of the Dome.
 The new arena, the Sanford Coyote Sports Center, which seats 6,000, first opened for the 2016 women's volleyball season (NCAA women's volleyball is a fall sport, preceding the college basketball season).
South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prosecutors may use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test as evidence of guilt, and the introduction of this evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination.
South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976) , elaborated on the "community caretaking" doctrine.
 Under the Fourth Amendment, "unreasonable" searches and seizures are forbidden.
 In addition to their law enforcement duties, the police must engage in what the Court has termed a community caretaking role, including such duties as removing obstructions from roadways in order to ensure the free flow of traffic.
 When the police act in this role, they may inventory cars they have seized without "unreasonably" searching those cars.
USS "South Dakota" (BB-57) was a battleship in the United States Navy, in active service from 1942 until 1947.
 The lead ship of her class, "South Dakota" was the third ship of the US Navy to be named in honor of the 40th state.
 The four ships of the class are considered to be the most efficient battleships designed under the limitations of the Washington Naval Treaty.
 During World War II, the battleship first served a tour in the Pacific theater, where it fought in two battles in 1942 that earned the ship and its crew a Navy Unit Commendation before returning to New York in December 1942 for an overhaul and battle repairs.
 In May 1943, "South" "Dakota" joined British Home Fleet patrols in the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans before sailing again to the Pacific in August 1943.
 There, "South Dakota" participated in combat operations preparatory to the invasion of Japan until returning to the United States in October 1945.

Question: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire and South Dakota v. Dole, which was more about freedom of speech?
Answer: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire