Random selection no relation sortition
Selection
Quasi-random selection or sortition is often used to ensure that a representative spectrum of the population is included. Elections by contrast overrepresent variously advantaged citizens. Random selection is recommended on the grounds of equality, cost efficiency, and representativeness. Selection is only quasi-random, due to the additional variables of self-selection and deliberate over-representation of specific groups. When people are not required to participate, those who opt out may share characteristics that render the resulting group less than representative. To prevent this, quotas can be established to restore the balance. Quota systems can be implemented in different ways; a straightforward "naive" implementation of quotas can result in a system that mistakenly "over-reacts" to individuals at the intersection of multiple overrepresented sets and over-excludes them from selection. Regardless of the desired recruitment algorithm, recruitment can sometimes be sabotaged by faulty implementation. Random selection in governance has historic significance and the earliest known instances include the Athenian democracy and various European communities.Common interest
Electoral reform, redistricting, campaign finance law, and the regulation of political speech are often claimed to be unsuitable for  management by self-interested politicians. Assemblies have repeatedly been deployed to replace such political judgments. Fearon and separately Nino support the idea that deliberative democratic models tend to generate conditions of impartiality, rationality and knowledge, increasing the likelihood that the decisions reached are morally correct.
Several experts assert that selection by sortition prevents disproportionate influence by "special interests". Term limits further reduce the opportunities for special interests to influence assemblies.
no relation