Santa Clauss pig no relation analytic philosophy
The use–mention distinction is a foundational concept of analytic philosophy, according to which it is necessary to make a distinction between using a word (or phrase) and mentioning it. Many philosophical works have been "vitiated by a failure to distinguish use and mention". The distinction can sometimes be pedantic, especially in simple cases where it is obvious.The distinction between use and mention can be illustrated with the word cheese:
Use: Cheese is derived from milk.
Mention: "Cheese" is derived from (the Anglian variant of) the Old English word ċēse (pronounced [ˈt͡ʃeː.ze]).The first sentence is a statement about the substance called "cheese": it uses the word "cheese" to refer to that substance. The second is a statement about the word "cheese" as a signifier: it mentions the word without using it to refer to anything other than itself. Note the quotation marks.Properly with a concrete and real referent: "That is my pig" (assuming it exists). (personal supposition)
Properly with a concrete but unreal referent: "Santa Claus's pig is very big." (also personal supposition)
Properly with a generic referent: "Any pig breathes air." (simple supposition)
Improperly by way of metaphor: "Your grandfather is a pig". (improper supposition)
As a pure term: "'Pig' has only three letters". (material supposition)The last sentence contains a mention example.
The use–mention distinction is especially important in analytic philosophy. Failure to properly distinguish use from mention can produce false, misleading, or meaningless statements or category errors. For example, the following sentences correctly distinguish between use and mention:
no relation