In-situ nano-reprecipitation enables superior cryogenic mechanical properties in a 3D printable medium-entropy alloy

Domain: physics
Published: 2025-12-12
Editorial outcome: minor_revision

Abstract
Precipitates or second-phase particles effectively strengthen metallic materials. Their use in additive manufacturing (AM), however, is constrained by the narrow thermal window of laser processing, which restricts control over precipitate characteristics. Here, we overcome this problem by creating a novel cryogenically strong and ductile alloy by a size-dependent composite powder feedstock design consisting of CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy core powders and decorated TiC shell nanoparticles. We show that these compound particles can be completely dissolved into the alloy during the first laser pulse of AM and then reprecipitate in situ upon subsequent cyclic reheating. Consequently, we introduce a high number density of nanosized TiC precipitates, coherent with the matrix. Their strong resistance to dislocation glide increases tensile strength by ~312 MPa and promotes dislocation accumulation without inducing severe stress heterogeneity or premature cracking, yielding a high strength-ductility product at 87 K. Our in-situ nano-reprecipitation strategy is achieved by laser-induced melting of pre-assembled nanoparticles and their kinetically favorable reprecipitation, which is applicable to other AM alloy systems to enhance their cryogenic mechanical properties.

Introduction
Metal-based additive manufacturing, or three-dimensional (3D) printing, is recognized as a disruptive metal processing technology with numerous unique advantages. One notable benefit is the capability to fabricate complex component geometries with minimum material waste, offering a sustainable solution particularly for certain industry sectors (e.g., aerospace and energy) that require to use massive resource-intensive metallic materials1,2. In comparison to their cast and thermo-mechanically processed counterparts, additively manufactured (AM) materials often possess a higher strength3–6, due to the rapid cooling-induced high dislocation density3–5 and grain substructures6. However, the increased strength, along with unavoidable manufacturing defects and chemical segregations in AM materials, impairs their ductility and damage-tolerance especially at harsh environments like cryogenic temperatures7–9. For instance, the recently developed face-centered cubic (FCC) CoCrNi medium-entropy alloy (MEA), one of the toughest alloys in its cast and thermo-mechanically treated state at cryogenic temperatures10,11, was reported to experience premature failure at the temperature range of 77–143 K when the alloy is produced by additive manufacturing7,8. This shortcoming of AM materials strongly limits their deployment in safety-critical cryogenic infrastructures that are needed for sustainable energy supply and transportation.

In comparison to conventional manufacturing routes that can afford the flexibility of multi-step thermomechanical processing to fine-tune alloys’ microstructures for enhanced strength-ductility synergy, AM parts have less freedom of post-processing (such as heat treatment), due to the potential risk for the degradation of their dimensional accuracy12,13 and the formation of heat-induced cracks14. In-situ microstructure tuning, which exploits phase transformations during the process of additive manufacturing is thus desired15,16. However, the often unmanageable temperature profile and narrow time window inherent in laser additive manufacturing pose significant challenges in controlling microstructure characteristics (e.g., phase fraction, size, distribution, and interface coherence)1,17. This is particularly true for AM materials that utilize pre-assembled metallic or ceramic particles to introduce second phases within the microstructure for strengthening18–20. The strengthening, resulting from the blocking effect of second phases on dislocation motion, typically increases with the strength and stiffness of the second phase used21. However, strong and stiff particles generally possess much higher melting points than the matrix materials in which they are embedded due to their strong covalent or ionic bonds22,23. This means that high-strength second-phase particles are difficult to be dissolved in matrix during laser melting, which further impedes their metallurgical control. Instead, they often form unpredictably distributed incoherent particles already during solidification24, which readily results in damage nucleation upon mechanical loading and thus a risk of embrittlement at cryogenic temperatures25,26. Fundamental challenges thus arise pertaining to how to utilize and control high-strength particles in AM materials to improve both strength and ductility at cryogenic temperatures.

Here, we provide an additive manufacturing solution to reconcile the above-mentioned conflict, namely, (i) bringing finely dispersed stiff particles with high melting points into a metallic alloy and (ii) devising a process that allows for their full metallurgical and process control. We find that through a size-dependent composite powder feedstock design (Fig. 1a), hard TiC nanoparticles (melting temperature ~3413 K27) coated on CoCrNi MEA powder particles (which serve in their uncoated state as the base matrix alloy) can be completely dissolved in the alloy during the first laser energy pulse. The subsequent laser pulses and the associated cyclic reheating enable their preferential reprecipitation in a highly dispersed, nanosized, and coherent manner. The high resistance to dislocation motion caused by these precipitates gives rise to a high tensile strength at the cryogenic temperature as well as a highly intensive dislocation interaction and accumulation that is crucial for strain hardening. We further observe that these coherent nanoprecipitates also effectively suppress the low-temperature induced intergranular cracking observed in the reference AM CoCrNi alloy devoid of such nanoprecipitates, due to the mitigated grain boundary-dislocation interactions and the resulting more homogenous stress and strain patterns. The key for such cryogenic mechanical performance lies in the size-dependent composite feedstock induced nano-reprecipitation, a process that is controllable and applicable for other FCC alloys. Our work hence widens the processing toolbox that so far lacked effective means for additively manufactured alloys to withstand harsh cryogenic environments.

Results
Microstructural characteristics
The equiatomic CoCrNi metal powders (diameter 15~53 μm) coated with nanosized (average diameter ~190 nm, Supplementary Fig. 2) TiC particles (Fig. 1b) have good printability that enables successful fabrication of components with complex geometries (see the printed turbine blade as an example, Fig. 1h). The sample consolidated by laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) shows a high density of >99.8%, with only few manufacturing defects (small gas pores) as shown by the micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) results (the inset in Fig. 1h). The microstructure of the as-printed nano-TiC-decorated CoCrNi alloy (referred to as nTiC-CoCrNi) has an FCC matrix, with a tortuous grain morphology (average grain size ~22.7 μm, Fig. 2a). Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analysis in Fig. 2b reveals the presence of solidification cellular substructures within each grain. The average diameter of the cellular structure is ~529 ± 116 nm. Along the cellular boundaries, pronounced Cr and Ti segregation is observed in Fig. 2c. The concentration of Cr and Ti at cellular and grain boundaries was measured to be ~36 at.% and 3.3 at.%, respectively, which is around ~3 at.% and ~1.5 at.% higher than its concentration value within grain interior (Supplementary Fig. 3). Such segregation derives from solute partitioning between liquid and solid phases in the interdendritic regions during solidification28.

The above-mentioned microstructure features of the nTiC-CoCrNi sample (matrix phase, grain size, cellular substructure and solute segregation) are similar to those in the reference AM CoCrNi sample that has been fabricated using pure CoCrNi powders alone, i.e. without any nanoparticle coated powders (microstructure shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). The main difference is the presence of a high number density (~4.9 × 1020 m-3) of Ti-rich nanoprecipitates (average diameter of ~36 nm), which are found to form at cellular boundaries in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample, as indicated from the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) results in Fig. 2c. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis reveal an FCC structure of the nanoprecipitates (Fig. 2d), with their room-temperature lattice parameter (0.43 nm) matching well to that of TiC (0.43 nm29). The interplane spacing of their (200) planes (0.215 nm) is very close to that of parallel (111) planes of the FCC matrix (0.217 nm, Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 5), suggesting a low lattice mismatch (0.75%) and thus a coherent nature between the nanoprecipitates and matrix.

Different from using nano-particles on powder feedstock to influence solidification behavior, the starting point of our work is to introduce better precipitation strengthening effect to fabricate AM materials with superior cryogenic mechanical properties. To study the underlying formation mechanisms of these TiC nanoprecipitates, we characterize the microstructure of single-layer and ten-layer nTiC-CoCrNi samples after a single-track L-PBF process. We find that the pre-assembled nanosized TiC particles had been completely dissolved after first-layer laser melting (Fig. 1f), whereas TiC reprecipitation occurs during the further L-PBF process (Fig. 1f). The temperature history simulation for a specific location in the first layer reveals that the intrinsic cyclic heating induced by laser melting at the third layer is higher than the TiC precipitation temperature (936 K, as calculated by thermodynamics simulations, Supplementary Fig. 6). Ti segregation at the cellular boundaries promotes the formation of Ti-rich precipitates. The absence of large-sized remaining TiC particles present in the matrix confirms that reprecipitation behavior should be occurred in the solid state induced by intrinsic cyclic heating. Another item to proof TiC reprecipitation comes from atom probe tomography (APT) results (Fig. 2f), which show the presence of not only Ti and C, but also substantial Cr and Ni (up to 20 at.% for each element) within the nanoprecipitate. The latter two elements are not expected to heavily concentrate in TiC precipitates in equilibrium (Supplementary Fig. 6). We attribute this phenomenon to the insufficient element partitioning between the matrix and TiC precipitates as a response to the fast cyclic heating cycles at temperatures above ~936 K (Fig. 1d).

It should be noted that due to the high melting point of TiC particles (~3413 K27), their initial size before L-PBF need to be carefully controlled to ensure a complete dissolution during the short manufacturing process. To demonstrate this point, we also compare the microstructure between our nTiC-CoCrNi sample and another AM CoCrNi-based alloy that is fabricated based on CoCrNi powders mixed with larger (micron-sized) TiC particles (average diameter ~10 μm, Supplementary Fig. 7). For the latter sample (referred to as μTiC-CoCrNi), we observe that the pre-assembled TiC particles are indeed not completely dissolved upon rapid laser melting and cooling due to the large particle size. The DICTRA simulation discovers that the size threshold for the complete dissolution of TiC particles during the first laser pulse is ~3.2 μm (Fig. 2h). Instead, the undissolved TiC remains distinctly incoherent to the matrix (Fig. 2i), thus lacking lattice compliance, which might promote damage initiation. The characteristics of TiC play a pivotal role in the mechanical performance of the investigated alloys at cryogenic temperatures, which will be discussed as follows.

Mechanical properties
The in-situ formation of a high number density of coherent TiC nanoprecipitates results in an exceptional strength (yield strength ~1.2 GPa, ultimate tensile strength ~1.7 GPa) and ductility (fracture strain ~36.7 ± 1.6%) of our new nTiC-CoCrNi alloy at the cryogenic temperature (87 K), as displayed in Fig. 3a. Figure 3b shows that at the same yield strength level, the product of tensile strength and ductility of our alloy has surpassed that of all other AM metallic materials (by at least 54%) that have been reported to date. A combination of high strength and high ductility means that the material has great energy dissipation capability without fracturing30. To elucidate the governing mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of the coherent TiC nanoprecipitates in this size-controlled powder assembly process, we compare the nTiC-CoCrNi alloy with two reference materials, namely, the AM CoCrNi alloy devoid of any precipitates and the μTiC-CoCrNi sample containing unmelted incoherent micron-sized TiC particles. We observe that the presence of TiC particles, regardless of their size and coherence, results in an improvement of yield strength at the cryogenic temperature, more specifically, by ~225 MPa for the nTiC-CoCrNi sample and ~270 MPa for the μTiC-CoCrNi sample (detailed strengthening mechanisms shown in Supplementary Note 2). The most intriguing phenomenon is that the ductility of our nTiC-CoCrNi sample is simultaneously enhanced by 30.1% in comparison to the reference AM CoCrNi sample (Fig. 3a). This enhancement of inelastic formability is attributed to its higher and more persistent strain-hardening capability that shifts strain localization (i.e., necking, Fig. 3d) to larger total deformations and to the suppression of damage initiation that is often induced by incoherent coarse second phases. The latter feature in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample is in sharp contrast to both the AM CoCrNi and the μTiC-CoCrNi samples which experience premature failure at the test temperature due to low-temperature induced early damage formation and thus a certain degree of ductility loss (Fig. 3c). The absence of ductility loss along with the exceptional strength-ductility combination achieved in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample also ensures a markedly high fracture toughness (JIc = 267.3 ± 5.3 MPa·m0.5, Supplementary Fig. 9), significantly outperforming that of the AM CoCrNi (JIc = 169.3 ± 9.0 MPa·m0.5) and μTiC-CoCrNi (JIc = 123.9 ± 10.5 MPa·m0.5) samples at the same cryogenic temperature (87 K) and with the same orientation (i.e., the notch plane of the compact-tension (C(T)) specimens and the crack propagation direction were both perpendicular to the building direction). These comparisons thus underscore the efficacy of our microstructural strategy in reconciling strength, ductility and toughness, a formidable challenge within the realm of metal additive manufacturing, specifically tailored for cryogenic applications.

Deformation behavior
We next unravel the underlying strengthening and ductilization mechanisms associated with the coherent TiC nanoprecipitates. For this purpose, we deform the sample at different strain levels and probe the substructures by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and TEM. Typically, in other FCC materials (e.g. other multicomponent alloys31,32, Fe-based alloys33,34, and Ni-based superalloys35), coherent precipitates (e.g., L12-typed carbides) with similar size (~50 nm) are often sheared by dislocations (Supplementary Table 2). However, herein our nTiC-CoCrNi sample, we observe that dislocations bypass TiC nanoprecipitates and form dislocation loops, as demonstrated in the 4% strained sample in Fig. 4a-d and Supplementary Fig. 11, suggesting the prevalence of the Orowan mechanism rather than dislocation shearing. This phenomenon results from the large mismatch in the shear modulus between the stiff nanoprecipitate (182 GPa36) and the matrix (93 GPa11), which gives rise to a markedly high particle shearing stress (estimated to be as high as 1.3 GPa, Supplementary Note 1). Therefore, dislocations are completely blocked by the high number density of non-shearable TiC precipitates, which contributes to a significant strengthening effect (calculated to be 256 MPa on the basis of the Orowan strengthening mechanism, Supplementary Note 2). Further, the blocking, trapping and the resulting patterning of dislocations by the precipitates and the surrounding Orowan dislocation loops with the same sign promote the gradually evolving storage and formation of new dislocations. This is a critical precondition for the high strain hardening observed in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample (Fig. 3d). The new dislocations can either be nucleated from original dislocation sources (e.g. Frank-Read sources and grain boundaries) or directly emitted from the TiC-matrix interfaces due to the high stress concentrations therein (as exhibited in Fig. 4d). As a result, an increased dislocation multiplication rate (by a factor of ~1.6 in comparison to the TiC-free AM CoCrNi counterpart material, as shown from Fig. 4l) and the resulting stronger dislocation interactions are achieved in the nTiC-CoCrNi material. We believe that this is the major reason for the observed rise in the strain hardening rate found for this alloy at a strain of ~4% (marked by an arrow in Fig. 3d). At a higher strain level of ~18% (Fig. 4e-h) and beyond (Fig. 4i-k), deformation nano-twins start to form in the nTiC-CoCrNi alloy, subdividing its cellular substructure (Fig. 4f and g) and limiting the average dislocation mean free path (Fig. 4j) through the progressive introduction of new interfaces. The rapid dislocation generation leveraged by the TiC nanoprecipitates, along with the effects of deformation twinning on dislocation multiplication and motion, accelerate both statistically stored dislocations and geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) during deformation of this material (Fig. 4k and l). In particular, we find that in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample the back-stress hardening, induced by dislocation pile-ups at grain and twin boundaries as well as by GNDs formed due to elastic and plastic incompatibility between TiC and the matrix, is much higher than that of the AM CoCrNi reference sample (Supplementary Fig. 12). Therefore, it can be concluded that the presence of non-shearable TiC precipitates and their interactions with dislocations contribute to both isotropic and kinematic hardening, which jointly increase the strain-hardening ability of the material. It is worthwhile to note that in the latter material, a high interface density of deformation twins (DTs) is also formed, even at a smaller strain of ~4% (Supplementary Fig. 13). This finding strongly suggests that the high and permanently maintained strain hardening rate observed in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample is closely linked to the presence of TiC nanoprecipitates and their non-shearable nature and less to the twins.

Fracture mechanism
Unlike traditionally cast and thermomechanically treated FCC materials, the reference AM CoCrNi sample suffers from a certain degree of ductility loss at the testing temperature of 87 K, which causes premature failure as shown in Fig. 3d. Characterization of the fracture surface of this sample, from both, a side view (EBSD data in Fig. 5a and b) and front view (SEM fractography in Fig. 5c), reveal that such failure mainly stems from the intergranular cracking along grain boundaries (GBs). We ascribe this low-temperature induced cracking event to the following two factors. Firstly, the segregation of Cr at GBs reduces the cohesive energy of GBs, i.e., the interface is weakened37,38. This is due to the increased GB energy (Supplementary Fig. 14) induced by the atomic size difference as well as the changes in the local electronic structure39. Secondly, the blocking effect of GBs on dislocations and deformation twins results in a high stress concentration at the GBs40. The latter point is supported by a more detailed observation of the microstructure near the fracture surface (Fig. 5d), which shows indeed the formation of microcracks at the twin-GB intersections.

In contrast to the AM CoCrNi sample, we find that the grain boundary cracking and intergranular fracture are completely suppressed in the nTiC-CoCrNi material (Fig. 5e–g), even in regions very close to the fracture surface (which experience the highest level of plastic deformation prior to fracture). Instead, the fracture of this sample at the cryogenic temperature is driven by a ductile mode of microvoid nucleation, growth and coalescence (Fig. 5e and f). Given that the presence of TiC nanoprecipitates only marginally influences the grain boundary chemistry and thus the intrinsic cohesion, the suppression of intergranular cracks of the nTiC-CoCrNi alloy can be assumed to come from the mitigated interaction between lattice defects (dislocations and twins) and GBs. On one hand, the high number density of the TiC nanoprecipitates essentially increases the dislocation bow-out stress41, thereby enhancing the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) for the generation of stacking fault loops and thus for the growth of deformation twins based on the double-cross-slip mechanism for twinning (see more detailed CRSS calculations in Supplementary Note 4)42–44. The increased stacking fault energy due to the increased concentration of C and Ti in solid solution also suppresses the formation of deformation twinning in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 16). On the other hand, the impenetrable TiC nanoprecipitates frequently block the growth of deformation twins (Fig. 5h and i) as well as the motion of dislocations, thus homogenizing defect distribution. This reduces the likelihood that these defects can accumulate excessively at GBs45.

It should be noted that the characteristics of the TiC-associated hetero-interfaces and the particle size are crucial for embrittlement under cryogenic conditions. Particularly when these particles become incoherent to the matrix, e.g., in the μTiC-CoCrNi sample, the resulting increased interfacial energy is likely to induce brittle cracking along the TiC-matrix interfaces, as shown in Fig. 5j–l. This explains the premature failure and the reduced ductility (~23.1%) observed in the μTiC-CoCrNi sample (Fig. 3a). This comparison further highlights the significance of introducing strong (non-shearable), nanosized and coherent precipitates for navigating the interplay between defect blocking (lending strength) and damage tolerance (lending ductility and fracture toughness) in the field of AM alloys at cryogenic temperatures.

We note here that our method of introducing TiC nanoprecipitates is significantly different from that achieved by pre-alloying and associated precipitation during cyclic reheating, in terms of the dissolution and subsequent precipitating kinetics and the resulting types of precipitates. In order to study the difference in more detail, we prepared pre-alloyed powders which were additionally microalloyed with nearly the same amount of C and Ti as in our nTiC-CoCrNi sample (Supplementary Table 3). After the L-PBF process of this sample (referred to as CoCrNi(TiC)), in addition to TiC nanoprecipitates, we also observe a usually unavoidable formation of Cr-rich M23C6 precipitates at GBs (Supplementary Fig. 17), which induce severe intergranular cracking during cryogenic deformation, thus deteriorating ductility to only ~27.2% (Supplementary Fig. 18). These findings suggest that during the L-PBF process of the nTiC-CoCrNi sample, the reprecipitation of TiC is highly preferential over other types of precipitates. We attribute this phenomenon to the heterogeneously distributed Ti and C solutes, or more specifically local modulation of Ti and C clusters, likely developed after the instantaneous laser melting of TiC and the subsequent rapid solidification. This preferential reprecipitation process further implies that our nanoparticle strategy is not limited to specific alloy systems. In addition to the CoCrNi alloy that has been selected here as a model matrix material for demonstrating our approach, we show that TiC nanoparticles with similar characteristics can also be introduced in other additively manufactured FCC materials, including austenitic stainless steels and Fe60Co15Cr15Ni10 (in at.%) MEA, using the same processing method to enhance their cryogenic strength-ductility combination (Supplementary Figs. 19 and 20).

To conclude, we presented here a novel additive manufacturing pathway that effectively enhanced the cryogenic strength and ductility of AM FCC alloys through in-situ formation of hard and stiff second-phase particles, which are typically challenging to metallurgically control during additive manufacturing processes due to their high melting points. We showed that through the laser-induced melting of size-controlled pre-assembled TiC particles and their kinetically favorable reprecipitation during additive manufacturing, an unprecedented high number-density (~4.9 × 1020 m-3) of coherent, nanosized TiC precipitates (~36 nm) can be introduced within the microstructure of a CoCrNi alloy. The fine-tuning of these precipitates by this approach and their interactions with microstructural defects (e.g., dislocations and twins) upon mechanical loading triggered an exceptionally high product of strength and ductility of 60.8 GPa% at near liquid-nitrogen temperature, surpassing all other AM alloys at the same yield strength level (~1 GPa) documented to date. Unlike other in-situ microstructure tuning approaches that explored alloy-specific phase transformations during laser-induced cyclic reheating15,16, we demonstrated that our method of introducing well-controlled nanoparticles can generally be extended to other FCC materials (like austenitic stainless steels) for better cryogenic mechanical performance. Our work thus provides a general pathway to advance the use of AM alloys in extreme cryogenic environments.

Methods
Alloy fabrication
In this investigation, pre-alloyed equiatomic powders of CrCoNi medium-entropy alloy (MEA), with a particle size distribution ranging from 15 to 53 μm, were employed. In the case of nTiC-CoCrNi powders, TiC nanoparticles with a mean size of ~190 nm, were blended with CoCrNi powders to produce composite powders through the utilization of a planetary ball mill apparatus (Fritsch GmbH, Germany). In order to avoid the formation of coarse primary TiC precipitates, the fraction of TiC nanoparticles is experimentally optimized to 1.5 wt.%. The ball milling process was carried out under the following parameters: a ball-to-powder weight ratio of 2:1, a main disc rotation speed of 200 rpm, and a milling duration of 4 hours. In order to investigate the influence of the size of assembled TiC particles, larger TiC particles with an average size of 10 μm (1.5 wt.%) were used to prepare the μTiC-CoCrNi powders, with the same blending procedure as that for nTiC-CoCrNi. Pre-alloyed CoCrNi(TiC) powders (nominal composition Co34.2Cr30.2Ni34.1Ti1.2C0.3, in wt.%) with the same amount of C and Ti as that in nTiC-CoCrNi were produced by vacuum induction melting, followed by vacuum inert gas atomization and powder sieving, which yields a similar particle size as that of CrCoNi powders.

Additive manufacturing using the above four types of powders was conducted using an HBD-200 L-PBF system (Hanbang United 3D Tech Co., Ltd, China). Prior to L-PBF fabrication, alloy powders were sieved and then dried at 373 K in a vacuum chamber. Following extensive optimization of process parameters using an energy density approach46, the laser power, laser scanning speed, layer thickness, and hatching space were set as 175 W, 900 mm/s, 30 μm, and 70 μm, respectively. A scanning strategy involving a 67° rotation between adjacent layers was implemented to mitigate anisotropy in the transverse direction as well as to alleviate residual stresses in the as-printed materials, shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. The dimension of as-printed block specimens was 40 mm × 12 mm × 40 mm. All the AM samples exhibit a high density exceeding 99.5%. In order to investigate the effects of L-PBF processing parameters on reprecipitation behavior of TiC, a power from 125 W to 200 W and scanning rate from 600 mm/s to 1500 mm/s were selected, which yielded different volume energy density (VED) ranging from 40 J/mm3 to 158 J/mm3, the microstructure and density shown in Supplementary Fig. 21 and Supplementary Table 4. In addition to block specimens, in order to reveal the nano-reprecipitation mechanism, single-track thin walls (a length of 10 mm) with a layer and ten layers on a 316L substrate were prepared with the same L-PBF processing parameters with the block specimens. The measured chemical composition of the as-printed samples is listed in Supplementary Table 3.

Mechanical testing
Dog-bone-like tensile specimens, with a gauge length of 10 mm and a width of 2.6 mm were machined along different planes from the as-printed samples. Quasi-static uniaxial tensile tests with a nominal engineering strain rate of 1 × 10-3 s-1 were performed inside an environment chamber at the room (298 K) and cryogenic temperature (87 K). The strain was measured by a mechanical extensometer with a gauge length of 10 mm (epsilon LHT). At least five tensile specimens for each condition were tested to ensure the repeatability. Interrupted tensile tests at different engineering strains (4%, 18% and 28%) of the nTiC-CoCrNi and AM CoCrNi samples were conducted with the aim to study the deformation behavior. Compact-tension (C(T)) specimens for the measurement of fracture toughness were machined from the as-printed blocks. According to the ASTM standard E182047, C(T) specimens with a width (W) of 25 mm, a thickness (B) of 9 mm and a notch length of ~13 mm were prepared by electrical discharge machining (EDM). Fatigue pre-cracking was introduced at the ambient temperature at a stress intensity range (ΔK) of ~15 MPa·m0.5, a frequency of 10 Hz and a load ratio of 0.1. Optical microscopy was used to examine the length of the fatigue crack from both sides of the specimens, to ensure the linearity of the crack front. The final length of the fatigue crack was around 14.5 mm, well above the minimum length (~1.3 mm) regulated by ASTM E182047. More details of fracture toughness testing and the associated calculation can be found in Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Fig. 9. At least three fracture toughness specimens were tested to ensure the repeatability.

Microstructural characterization
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation was conducted using a ZEISS Gemini 2 instrument equipped with SE, ECCI, and EBSD detectors. The acquired EBSD data were analyzed using the TSL OIM software package. To study the interface relationship between TiC nanoprecipitates and the matrix, TEM characterization was performed by an aberration-corrected transmission electron microscope (FEI Titan G2 60–300) under 300 kV. The dislocation patterning in non-deformed and deformed samples was studied using a FEI Talos F200X TEM operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The elemental distribution was detected using EDX. Thin foils for TEM observations were prepared by either focused ion beam (FIB), using a Zeiss-Cross Beam XB1540 FIB-SEM instrument or electro-polished (electrolyte of 20 vol.% perchloric acid and 80 vol.% acetic acid, at 258 K and 50 mA). The weak-beam TEM dark-field imaging was conducted to accurately determine the dislocation patterns at different strains using a diffraction vector of g=111. The number density of TiC nanoprecipitates per unit area was measured based on the TEM-based EDX mapping, and it was then converted to the value per unit volume considering the FIB sample thickness using the relation established in ref. 48. FFT images obtained from the TEM images were calculated using the Gatan Digital Micrograph 3.5 software.

APT measurement was conducted using an instrument of local electrode atom probe LEAP 5000XR (Cameca Instrument Inc.). Experiments were operated in the high-voltage laser pulsing mode with a laser pulse energy of 45 pJ and a base temperature of 60 K. A detection rate of 5 ions detected for 1000 pulses and a laser pulse repetition rate 200 kHz were used for data collection. Needle-shaped APT specimens were fabricated using a FEI Helios NanoLab 600 dual beam SEM/FIB with Ga source. The data analysis and reconstruction were performed using the commercial software package AP Suite 6.1. The characterization of the distribution of manufacturing defects was carried out through μ-CT technique using a GE phoenix Nanotom device operated at 140 kV, 100 μA, and 1500 ms detector timing. The radiographic images, obtained at a spatial resolution of 0.8 μm, were reconstructed using the VG Studio Max 2.2 software. Neutron diffraction experiments were conducted at the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) using a Multi-Physics Instrument equipped with a 360° rotation stage. The neutron source was operated at a power of 120 kW, and data collection was performed using the time-of-flight method, with a total scanning time of 1 hour. The specimens were rotated at a rate of 6°/min perpendicular to the incident neutron beam direction to mitigate the impact of textures. The evolution of dislocation density in AM CoCrNi and nTiC-CoCrNi samples under various interrupted strains (0%, 2%, 6%, 12%, 18%, and 25%) was determined using the modified Williamson-Hall (MWH)49 and Warren-Averbach (MWA)50 methods, utilizing neutron diffraction profiles as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 22. The exact Bragg position and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) were determined by Rietveld refinement performed using the GSAS-II software. Additional details regarding the calculation methodology can be found in Supplementary Note 6.

Thermodynamic and thermal-history simulations
A 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was created to simulate the transient processes of melting and solidification of the powder particles51. The governing equations, boundary conditions, and source terms, etc. related to CFD simulations were provided in Supplementary Note 7. The powder layer was generated by modeling a rake being pushed over a powder bed using the discrete element method (DEM). The distribution information of powder bed particles obtained during powder laying was imported into the CFD model, and the thermal history of the printing process was solved using discrete metal powder particles as objects. After each layer of powder bed was melted and solidified, the morphological features (including the fusion zone and un-melted powders) were saved in STL file format and imported into the DEM model as the substrate for the new layer. It was assumed that the first printed layer could be sufficiently cooled to room temperature before the laser power input for the second layer52. The powders were then spread to form a new layer of powder bed, and repeat the above process to complete the simulation of multi-layer powder bed printing. The process parameters used for the simulation were consistent with those of the L-PBF experiment. Due to the absence of some physical parameters of CoCrNi powders, the 316L powders were selected as the base powders to perform the thermal-history simulation.

The equilibrium phase fractions as a function of temperature were calculated using the Thermo-Calc software 2024a together with the TCHEA4 thermodynamic database for high entropy alloys. Particle dissolution simulations were performed using the DICTRA module of the Thermo-Calc software in conjunction with the TCHEA7 thermodynamic database and the MOBHEA3 mobility database for high-entropy alloys53. More details about DICTRA simulations were described in Supplementary Note 8.

Peer review rounds
[{"round": 1, "reviewer_comments": {"reviewer_1": "This is a transferred manuscript from [Redacted]. I appreciate the significant effort made by the authors in the response. The corresponding modifications in main text and supplementary information well addressed my concerns and comments. I recommend this for publication.\nThe only issue to me is the Abstract is too long. The authors are encouraged to make a concise Abstract.", "reviewer_2": "The authors have addressed many of the comments made in the previous review and it’s great to see that they seem to have put a lot of work and effort into their response. On the negative side, some changes and explanations they have given are not reflected in the manuscript, and some points need further clarification. The remaining issues are:\n- 2-1: while it is unclear how an already well performing material that is brought to a better performance describes a breakthrough, and where terms such as ‘unexpected non-shearable nature of TiC nanoprecipitates’ come from, the real question here is how these nTiC particles contribute to strain-hardening, as described in the response?!\n- 2-2: great to see that fracture toughness tests in 3 orientations form the microTiC material were done. Results are, however, surprising. Why would the fracture toughness be so much worse than for the nTiC material – and also worse than the AM material?\n- 2-3 & 2-7: why have the authors not added any of their response – which provides important information – to the manuscript?\n- 2-9: great to see that the authors now compare different orientations. Their response to the comment, however, brings to question, what flow stress they have used for the fracture toughness determination – when crack growth parallel to the build direction was it that from tensile tests parallel or perpendicular to BD?!", "reviewer_3": "The authors have used nano-sized TiC particles blended with a CoCrNi HEA coupled with additive manufacturing to enable dissolution and re-precipitation of TiC along the cell boundaries. This is an interesting approach to improve the tensile strength of the material at cryogenic temperatures. In the revised version, the authors have satisfactorily addressed the reviewer feedback and conducted new calculations and experiments, where required. This has helped provide more clarity to the work and make it appealing to a broader audience. The paper is suitable for publication in Nature Communications."}, "author_response": ""}, {"round": 2, "reviewer_comments": {"reviewer_2": "The comments of the second review have been addressed sufficiently."}, "author_response": "Response to Reviewer #1\nOverall comment:\nThis is a transferred manuscript from [Redacted] I appreciate the significant effort\nmade by the authors in the response. The corresponding modifications in main text and\nsupplementary information well addressed my concerns and comments. I recommend\nthis for publication. The only issue to me is the Abstract is too long. The authors are\nencouraged to make a concise Abstract.\nOverall response:\nWe highly appreciate the reviewer’s kind and positive feedback on our revisions.\nWe have followed the reviewer’s suggestion to make abstract more concise.\nResponse to Reviewer #2\n(Modifications in the revised manuscript were highlighted in yellow)\nOverall comment:\nThe authors have addressed many of the comments made in the previous review\nand it’s great to see that they seem to have put a lot of work and effort into their response.\nOn the negative side, some changes and explanations they have given are not reflected\nin the manuscript, and some points need further clarification.\nOverall response:\nWe highly appreciate the reviewer for the kind and pertinent considerations and\ntime invested in this paper, resulting in valuable remarks and suggestions during the\ntwo review processes, which ultimately help us improve the quality of the manuscript.\nWe have now carefully followed and complied with all these comments, and we have\nundertaken extensive additional experiments and analyses, helping to thoroughly revise\nour manuscript along the lines suggested. We hope that the revised version can address\nthe comments raised by the reviewer.\n2-1 Comments/Remarks:\n- 2-1: while it is unclear how an already well performing material that is brought\nto a better performance describes a breakthrough, and where terms such as ‘unexpected\nnon-shearable nature of TiC nanoprecipitates’ come from, the real question here is how\nthese nTiC particles contribute to strain-hardening, as described in the response?\nAuthors’ Reply:\nWe are very grateful for the detailed comments. We first would like to humbly\nclarify that our intention in using the word “unexpected” was not to exaggerate the\nresult, but rather to emphasize its contrast with common expectations from the literature.\nTypically, in other FCC materials (e.g., other multicomponent alloys1,2, Fe-based\nalloys3,4 and Ni-based superalloys5), coherent precipitates like L1 -typed particles or\n2\ncarbides with similar size (~50 nm) are often sheared by dislocations (Supplementary\nTable 2). In our case, however, the ~36 nm TiC precipitates are also coherent with the\nCoCrNi matrix, yet TEM observations clearly suggest that they are bypassed by\ndislocations by means of Orowan looping rather than being sheared (Fig. 4a ). This\n3\nphenomenon results from the large mismatch in the shear modulus between the stiff\nnanoprecipitate (182 GPa6) and the matrix (93 GPa7), which gives rise to a markedly\nhigh particle shearing stress (estimated to be as high as 1.3 GPa, Supplementary Note\n1). Therefore, we believe that the non-shearable nature of coherent TiC nanoprecipitates\nat this relatively small size is unusual compared with the shearable behavior typically\nreported for other coherent precipitates of comparable dimensions, which is why we\ninitially described it as “unexpected”. To avoid any possible misinterpretation, we have\ndeleted the terms, e.g., “unexpected”, throughout the whole manuscript.\nThe above-mentioned dislocation looping mechanism associated with nanosized\nTiC particles is also the key factor for the increased strain hardening rate. Dislocations\nare completely blocked by the high number density of non-shearable TiC precipitates.\nThe blocking, trapping and the resulting patterning of dislocations by the precipitates\nand the surrounding Orowan dislocation loops with the same sign promote the gradually\nevolving storage and formation of new dislocations. This is a critical precondition for\nthe high strain hardening observed in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample (Fig. 3a in the\n2\nmanuscript). The new dislocations can either be nucleated from original dislocation\nsources (e.g. Frank-Read sources and grain boundaries) or directly emitted from the\nTiC-matrix interfaces due to the high stress concentrations therein (as exhibited in Fig.\n4a ). As a result, these factors result in an increased dislocation multiplication rate in\n4\nthe nTiC-CoCrNi material (by a factor of ~1.7 in comparison to the TiC-free AM\nCoCrNi counterpart material, as shown from Fig. 4d). In this context, the strengthening\neffect can be rationalized by the Taylor hardening law 8,9, which highlights that the\nincrement of the dislocation density contributes to strain hardening: σ -σ = \nflow YS\nαMGb√ρ, where σ\nflow\nand σ\nYS\nare the flow stress at a given plastic strain and the yield\nstrength, respectively, ρ is the dislocation density, α (dimensionless constant), M\n(Taylor factor) and b (magnitude of the Burgers vector) are regarded as constants that\ndo not vary much during tensile deformation10,11. In addition, we also find that the\nelastic and plastic incompatibility between TiC and the matrix contributes to a higher\nback-stress hardening effect (Supplementary Fig. 12) compared with that of the\nreference, TiC-free AM CoCrNi sample. Therefore, it can be concluded that the\npresence of non-shearable TiC precipitates and their interactions with dislocations\ncontribute to both isotropic and kinematic hardening, which jointly increase the strain-\nhardening ability of the material. The above-mentioned effects of TiC nanoprecipitates\non materials’ strain hardening ability have been thoroughly discussed in the manuscript,\nthe related contents now read: “Further, the blocking, trapping and the resulting\npatterning of dislocations by the precipitates and the surrounding Orowan dislocation\nloops with the same sign promote the gradually evolving storage and formation of new\ndislocations. This is a critical precondition for the high strain hardening observed in the\nnTiC-CoCrNi sample (Fig. 3a ). The new dislocations can either be nucleated from\n2\noriginal dislocation sources (e.g. Frank-Read sources and grain boundaries) or directly\nemitted from the TiC-matrix interfaces due to the high stress concentrations therein (as\nexhibited in Fig. 4a ). As a result, an increased dislocation multiplication rate (by a\n4\nfactor of ~1.7 in comparison to the TiC-free AM CoCrNi counterpart material, as shown\nfrom Fig. 4d) and the resulting stronger dislocation interactions are achieved in the\nnTiC-CoCrNi material.\nIn particular, we find that in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample the back-stress hardening,\ninduced by dislocation pile-ups at grain and twin boundaries as well as by GNDs\nformed due to elastic and plastic incompatibility between TiC and the matrix, is much\nhigher than that of the AM CoCrNi reference sample (Supplementary Fig. 12).\nTherefore, it can be concluded that the presence of non-shearable TiC precipitates and\ntheir interactions with dislocations contribute to both isotropic and kinematic hardening,\nwhich jointly increase the strain-hardening ability of the material.” (Line 256-278, Page\n10-11).\n2-2 Comments/Remarks:\n- 2-2: great to see that fracture toughness tests in 3 orientations form the microTiC\nmaterial were done. Results are, however, surprising. Why would the fracture toughness\nbe so much worse than for the nTiC material – and also worse than the AM material?\nAuthors’ Reply:\nWe are grateful for the insightful comment. Through additional fracture toughness\ntests at cryogenic temperatures, the measured fracture toughness of the μTiC-CoCrNi\nsamples is indeed lower than that of the nTiC-CoCrNi and AM CoCrNi materials. This\nbehavior can be rationalized by considering the crack propagation features and fracture\nsurfaces (as shown in Response Fig. 2-1) of the μTiC-CoCrNi samples. It is important\nto note that the pre-assembled TiC micro-particles are not fully dissolved during rapid\nlaser melting and cooling due to their large size, and the undissolved particles remain\ndistinctly incoherent with the matrix (Figs. 2g-i). Such large sized, incoherent TiC\nmicro-particles can easily initiate microcracks, either at the heterointerfaces or within\nthe carbides, upon deformation at cryogenic temperatures12. These micro-cracks can\neasily merge with the main crack, thereby promoting its propagation and thus reducing\nthe overall toughness of the material. Such micro-cracks formation and merging\nbehavior can be well supported by the cracking analysis and the fracture surfaces, as\ndemonstrated in Response Fig. 2-1.\nAccording to the reviewer's suggestion, in order to further address this comment,\nwe have added revised descriptions in the Supplementary materials (the figure caption\nof Supplementary Fig. 9), the new texts now read: “Secondary electron (SE) images of\ncrack propagation at mid-thickness of μTiC-CoCrNi samples with a selected orientation,\nthe ZY crack plane, displaying that large sized, incoherent TiC micro-particles can\neasily initiate microcracks, either at the heterointerfaces or within the carbides, upon\ndeformation at cryogenic temperatures. These micro-cracks can easily merge with the\nmain crack, thereby promoting its propagation and thus reducing the overall fracture\ntoughness of the material.”\nResponse Fig. 2-1. Secondary electron (SE) images of crack propagation at mid-thickness and the\nfracture surfaces of μTiC-CoCrNi samples in three orientations. Panels (a-d), (e-h), and (i-l)\ncorrespond to the ZY, XZ, and XY crack planes, respectively.\n2-3 Comments/Remarks:\n- 2-3 & 2-7: why have the authors not added any of their response – which provides\nimportant information – to the manuscript?\nAuthors’ Reply:\nWe are grateful to the reviewer for pointing this out. We agree that the additional\nexplanations provided in our initial response contain important information that should\nalso be reflected in the manuscript.\nIn the revised version, we have now incorporated these points accordingly:\n1. The effects of L-PBF processing parameters on reprecipitation behavior of TiC.\n(Comment 2-3 in previous version)\nAccording to the reviewer's suggestion, in order to further address this comment,\nwe have added revised descriptions in the revised manuscript (Line 414-418, Page 17)\nand Supplementary materials (Supplementary Fig. 21 and Table 4), the new texts now\nread: “In order to investigate the effects of L-PBF processing parameters on\nreprecipitation behavior of TiC, a power from 125 W to 200 W and scanning rate from\n600 mm/s to 1500 mm/s were selected, which yielded different volume energy density\n(VED) ranging from 40 J/mm3 to 158 J/mm3, the microstructure and density shown in\nSupplementary Fig. 21 and Table 4.”\nResponse Fig. 2-2. ECCI images for nTiC-CoCrNi samples fabricated by different volume\nenergy density (VED), VED = P/(v·s·d), where P is the laser power, v is the laser scanning speed,\ns is the layer thickness and d is the hatching space. The ECCI results display all samples have\nnanoprecipitates around the cellular boundaries, without the presence of large-sized precipitates.\nThe size and area fraction of precipitates are shown in Supplementary Table 4, which indicates that\nthe processing parameters have no influence on the reprecipitation behavior.\n2. The mesostructure and texture of three as-printed samples. (Comment 2-3 in\nprevious version)\nWe have added it in Supplementary Figs. 3, 4 and 7. Due to an additional rotation\nangle of 67˚ was applied between each two successive layers to eliminate\nmicrostructural anisotropy. As a result, a relatively low texture intensity is obtained for\nthree studied materials, as shown in Response Figs. 2-3~2-5.\nResponse Fig. 2-3. CoCrNi powders and the microstructure of the AM CoCrNi sample. (a)\nScanning electron microscopy (SEM) image showing the morphology of CoCrNi powders. (b) 3D\nview of EBSD IPF maps showing the mesostructure of as-built samples, and (c) pole figures\ncorresponding to the EBSD data. (d) The micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) image showing a\nhigh density of >99.7%. (e) and (f) The cellular structure and GB in the AM CoCrNi sample. (g)\nThe EDX maps corresponding to (e) and (f), displaying the Cr is enriched along the cellular\nboundary and GB. (h) Line element distribution, implying that around 3-4 at.% Cr is enriched along\nthe cellular boundary and GB.\nResponse Fig. 2-4. The as-printed microstructure of the μTiC-CoCrNi sample. (a) 3D view of\nEBSD IPF maps showing the mesostructure of as-built samples, and (b) pole figures corresponding\nto the EBSD data. (c) phase map of the plane perpendicular to the BD, showing the grain size and\nphase composition of the μTiC-CoCrNi sample. (d-g) The cellular structure and EDX maps,\ndisplaying that nano-reprecipitates are distributed around the cellular boundaries. (h) The size\ndistribution of TiC nanoprecipitates in the as-printed μTiC-CoCrNi sample, with an average size of\n28 nm.\nResponse Fig. 2-5. Microstructure and interface segregation behavior of the as-printed nTiC-\nCoCrNi sample. (a) 3D view of EBSD IPF maps showing the mesostructure of as-built samples,\nand (b) pole figures corresponding to the EBSD data. (c) Electron channeling contrast imaging\n(ECCI) and corresponding electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) inverse pole figure (IPF) images\nof GBs, validating the absence of continuous precipitates at GBs. (d) BF-STEM image showing the\nlocation where the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was performed. (e) EDX\nmapping of Co, Cr, Ni, C and Ti close to the GB, probed from the region marked by the yellow\nframe in (d). No Cr-rich phase can be observed at the GB. (f) EDX mapping of Co, Cr, Ni, C and Ti\nof the cellular structure, probed from the region marked by the red frame in (d), showing a similar\nlevel of Cr segregation at the cellular boundaries as that at the GB. EDX line analysis across the GB\nand cellular boundary, corresponding to the lines marked in (e) and (f). The segregation of Cr (of\n~3 at.%) is observed.\n3. The existence of dislocation loop. (Comment 2-7 in previous version)\nTo clarify this point, we selected low-magnification image of Fig. 4a and a typical\n3\nparticle to better demonstrate the existence of dislocation loop, which has been added\ninto the revised manuscript (Line 247-250, Page 10) and supplementary materials\n(Supplementary Fig. 11), shown in Response Fig. 2-6. The new texts now read:\n“However, here in our nTiC-CoCrNi sample, we observe that dislocations bypass TiC\nnanoprecipitates and form dislocation loops, as demonstrated in the 4% strained sample\nin Figs. 4a -a and Supplementary Fig. 11, suggesting the prevalence of the Orowan\n1 3\nmechanism rather than dislocation shearing.”\nResponse Fig. 2-6. Dislocation looping around TiC particles in the nTiC-CoCrNi sample. (a)\nBF-STEM image showing dislocation loops around TiC nanoprecipitates. (b) The enlarged image\nmarked in (a) shows the presence of an obvious dislocation loop.\nThe above points have been added into the revision, we believe these additions\nimprove the clarity and completeness of the manuscript.\n2-4 Comments/Remarks:\n-2-9: great to see that the authors now compare different orientations. Their\nresponse to the comment, however, brings to question, what flow stress they have used\nfor the fracture toughness determination – when crack growth parallel to the build\ndirection was it that from tensile tests parallel or perpendicular to BD?!\nAuthors’ Reply:\nWe are grateful for this important question. As shown in Response Fig. 2-7a, for\nthe fracture toughness determination, we used the flow stress obtained from tensile tests\nperpendicular (0°-1) to the build direction (BD). Although fracture toughness was\nmeasured along three orientations, we initially performed tensile tests only in two\norientations with tensile specimens’ long axes either parallel (90°) or perpendicular (0°-\n1) to the BD, which is a commonly adopted practice in the literature13,14. The tensile\nproperties for the 0°-2 orientation (i.e., fracture toughness specimens with crack growth\nparallel to the BD, Response Fig. 2-7a) were not measured at that stage because\nprevious reports have shown that the flow stress in this orientation is nearly identical to\nthat of the perpendicular (0°-1)-to-BD direction13,14.\nTo further address the reviewer’s concern, we have now re-measured the tensile\nproperties along the 0°-2 orientation in our three samples and confirmed that its flow\nstress is indeed close to that of 0°-1 orientation (Response Figs. 2-7b-d). Therefore, the\nchoice of using the tensile properties with 0°-1 orientation for calculating fracture\ntoughness of samples with two ZY and XZ orientations is both literature-supported and\nexperimentally validated, and it does not affect the conclusions of this work.\nResponse Fig. 2-7. Cryogenic tensile properties of the additively manufactured alloys at 87 K:\n(a) schematic showing the specimen orientations for tensile testing; (b) results for nTiC-CoCrNi,\n(c) μTiC-CoCrNi, and (d) AM CoCrNi, each tested along two orientations defined in panel a.\nReferences:\nNature 608, 310-316.\nnanoprecipitates. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102139.\nsteel. Sci. Rep. 11, 14468.\nMn lightweight steel. Acta Mater. 140, 258-273.\nbased disc superalloys by controling stacking fault energy. Sci. Rep. 7, 8046.\nacoustic properties of transition-metal carbide ceramics: TiC and TaC. J. Mater. Sci. 38, 1107-\n1115.\nat 20 kelvin. Science 378, 978-983.\na microstructure-based strain hardening model. Acta Mater. 55, 2337-2350.\nMater Sci. 48, 171-273.\nto the flow stress of a twinning-induced plasticity steel. Scr. Mater. 112, 28-31.\ndislocations and twins in a twinning-induced plasticity steel. Acta Mater. 88, 170-179.\nand strain fields of 6xxx aluminium alloys: a numerical analysis. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 12,\n255-271.\nand fracture toughness of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 5,\n68-76.\nbehaviour of Ti―6Al―7Nb alloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater. Charact. 62, 488-\n495.\nResponse to Reviewer #3\nOverall comment：\nThe authors have used nano-sized TiC particles blended with a CoCrNi HEA\ncoupled with additive manufacturing to enable dissolution and re-precipitation of TiC\nalong the cell boundaries. This is an interesting approach to improve the tensile strength\nof the material at cryogenic temperatures. In the revised version, the authors have\nsatisfactorily addressed the reviewer feedback and conducted new calculations and\nexperiments, where required. This has helped provide more clarity to the work and\nmake it appealing to a broader audience. The paper is suitable for publication in Nature\nCommunications.\nOverall response：\nWe highly appreciate the reviewer’s kind and positive feedback on our revision."}]

Decision letter