Recognition of same-sex unions in Namibia

Recognition of same-sex unions in Namibia
Same-sex unions are currently not performed in Namibia. The Supreme Court ruled 4–1 on 16 May 2023 that same-sex marriages concluded outside of Namibia should be recognised for the purpose of residency rights. A bill seeking to overturn the ruling is currently pending in the Parliament of Namibia.
Historical recognition of same-sex relationships
Christianity was only introduced to Namibia in the late 19th century. It is believed that same-sex unions were tolerated in pre-colonial and pre-Christian Namibia. In the 1920s, German anthropologist Kurt Falk reported same-sex marriage ceremonies among the Ovambo, Nama, Herero and Himba peoples. Among the Herero, erotic friendships, known in Otjiherero as , between two people regardless of sex were also common, and typically included anal intercourse. The Nama people recognised a similar "mutual pact of friendship" which involved same-sex sexual relations.
Legal history
Background
The Marriage Act (Act 25 of 1961), enacted by the Parliament of South Africa when Namibia was still South West Africa, does not explicitly prohibit the recognition of same-sex marriages; neither does it explicitly define marriage. However, the law has been interpreted not to recognise same-sex unions. When Namibia became independent in 1990, it retained all South African laws unless explicitly repealed or modified by an Act of Parliament. In addition, the Constitution of Namibia does not explicitly permit same-sex marriages and states in Article 14(2):
Article 14(1) states that men and women of marriageable age may enter into marriage irrespective of their race, colour, religion, ethnicity, creed, social or economic status, or nationality. Furthermore, men and women are entitled to the same rights and obligations, whether during the marriage or at its dissociation. Article 14(3) places the family as the "natural and fundamental unit of society", entitled to special protection by the State.
Anal intercourse among men remains illegal in Namibia as per the Criminal Procedure Act (Act 51 of 1977). Although nobody has ever been convicted, this "crime" is occasionally reported to the police, resulting in arrests and fingerprinting, and instilling fear in the LGBT community.
Political positions
John Walters, the Ombudsman of Namibia, expressed his support for same-sex marriage in August 2016. SWAPO, the ruling party since independence, is opposed to same-sex marriage. Since Yvonne Dausab became the Minister of Justice in 2020, the SWAPO-led government has softened its position, suggesting that the cabinet discuss scrapping the sodomy law. Of the other parties represented in the Parliament of Namibia, the Christian Democratic Voice (CDV) and the Namibian Economic Freedom Fighters (NEFF) are staunchly opposed to same-sex marriage. The Popular Democratic Movement (PDM) is ambivalent on the issue.
Court cases
Chairperson of the Immigration Selection Board v Frank and Another
In the late 1990s, Elizabeth Khaxas and her German partner Erna Elizabeth Frank sued to have their lesbian relationship recognised in Namibia. Namibian law grants residency and citizenship to foreign nationals who marry Namibian citizens. However, as the couple's same-sex relationship was not recognised by law, Frank could not obtain permanent residency or citizenship. She applied for a permanent residence permit with the Immigration Selection Board twice, in 1996 and 1997. The Board rejected the application both times. The High Court ruled in favor of the couple in 1998, directing the Board to issue a residence permit to Frank. The Board appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. In Chairperson of the Immigration Selection Board v Frank and Another on 5 March 2001, the Supreme Court held that:
While the court ruled that Frank should be granted a permanent residence permit, which she received a year later, it did not rule in favour of recognising same-sex relationships by law.
Digashu v GRN & Seiler-Lilles v GRN
In December 2017, Johann Potgieter and his South African husband Matsobane Daniel Digashu filed a lawsuit in the High Court, Digashu v Government of the Republic of Namibia, to have their marriage recognised in Namibia. The couple had married in South Africa in 2015, but Digashu was not recognised as Potgieter's spouse by the Namibian Government, causing several legal and bureaucratic problems as he could not receive permanent residency or citizenship, as is granted to married opposite-sex partners. In January 2018, officials granted the couple's application to allow Digashu and their son to enter Namibia, as the High Court continued to review their case. Another case, Seiler-Lilles v Government of the Republic of Namibia, was filed in 2018 by Anette Seiler-Liles and her German wife Anita Seiler-Lilles, together since 1988. The couple argued that their 2017 German marriage should be recognized in Namibia.
In June 2019, Judge President Petrus Damaseb directed that a full bench of three judges should be designated to hear all pending cases. In September 2019, the couples agreed to consolidate their lawsuits. Judges Hannelie Prinsloo, Orben Sibeya and Esi Schimming-Chase heard oral arguments in the combined court case on 20 May 2021. The couples asked the court to recognise their marriages performed outside of Namibia. Senior counsel Raymond Heathcote, representing the plaintiffs, argued that the case would not legalise same-sex marriage in Namibia but sought to recognise marriages performed elsewhere. He argued that the Constitution gives men and women the right to marry without limitation due to their social status, and that discrimination based on sexual orientation is discrimination on the basis of sex and social status, two grounds on which the Constitution forbids all discrimination. A judgment was issued on 20 January 2022. The judges agreed in principle with the plaintiffs, but ruled that they were bound by the 2001 case of Chairperson of the Immigration Selection Board v Frank and Another and as a result could not rule in favour of same-sex marriage. The judges encouraged the couples to appeal to the Supreme Court to have its previous ruling overturned. Judge Prinsloo said, "Only the Supreme Court can correct itself", adding that "it [is] high time the constitution reflect[s] social reality". The couples said they were "disappointed" with the decision but would now consider an appeal to the Supreme Court. Lawyer Carli Schlickerling, representing the plaintiffs, said, "The court said to us this morning, 'look, we want to help you, we believe that you should be succeeding on the constitutional issues'. It seems that the court is setting out to the Supreme Court why we should succeed on appeal."
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on 3 March 2023. On 16 May 2023, it ruled 4–1 that, due to constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity, the government must recognise same-sex marriages concluded outside of Namibia for residency purposes equally to heterosexual marriages. It also commented on its 2001 decision, stating that its previous remarks on same-sex relationships were "peripheral and subsidiary remarks not necessary for that decision and thus [...] not binding".
Aftermath and reaction
The ruling was welcomed by the plaintiff couples. Digashu said he was "overwhelmed", "The litigation journey was a lonely one, initially. But we made some beautiful friends and connections along the way, from litigation and support by the Southern Africa Litigation Centre who saved us a great deal, to the Civil Society Organisations here in Namibia with whom we found such great sense of community." Siegliende Wether, the president of the Khorixas Constituency Residents Association, also welcomed the ruling, "We all are God's creation, and nobody should be lesser than another. Namibia has to live up to a just and equal society as the Constitution emphasises." However, the ruling was fiercely opposed by religious groups and politicians. The Council of Churches in Namibia released a statement calling on legislators to ban same-sex marriage, describing it as "contrary to Namibian culture".
In July 2023, the National Council passed legislation seeking to overturn the court ruling. The bill would define marriage as the "union between persons of the opposite sex" and define a spouse as "one half of a legal union between a genetically born man and genetically born woman". Further, it would make celebrating, witnessing, promoting or propagating a same-sex marriage a criminal offence punishable with up to six years' imprisonment and fines of up to N$100,000 ($5,500), which opponents of the bill described as a "clear violation of freedom of speech". It is unclear how the bill would legally overturn the court ruling, as the Supreme Court has ruled that the constitutional principle of equality guarantees recognition of same-sex marriages performed abroad, and the bill is not a constitutional amendment and therefore cannot actually overturn the court's judgment. If enacted and a challenge filed, it is likely to be held unconstitutional and struck down. MP McHenry Venaani said, "I have not seen bills written deliberately (to) contradict judgments. I am not sure it would pass the test of constitutionality."
The bill passed unanimously in the National Assembly in late September 2023. It now awaits the signature or veto of President Hage Geingob, who stated his opposition to same-sex marriage in July but expressed "caution" about the bill's constitutionality. MP Daniel Kashikola also expressed concern about the bill's implications on customary marriages and intersex people. Equal Namibia, an LGBT advocacy group, said it would file a lawsuit challenging the bill if Geingob were to sign it into law. Omar van Reenen, campaign manager for the organisation, said, "[This bill is] wholly unconstitutional and will fail in court. But it proved that this is a legislature which is hell-bent on violating their oath of office for cheap campaign points."
Grobler v Minister of Home Affairs and Immigration
In 2018, lawyer Anita Grobler from Otjiwarongo and her South African spouse Susan Jacobs, together for over 25 years, filed a lawsuit in the High Court to have their 2009 South African marriage recognized in Namibia and to obtain residency rights for Jacobs. The Minister of Home Affairs and Immigration was named as the principal defendant in the lawsuit. The Immigration Selection Board decided on 25 July 2019 to approve Jacobs' application for a permanent residence permit. She made the required payment of N$18,000 for the permit, but as of October 2019 it had still not been issued to her. The couple agreed to consider a settlement agreement and the withdrawal of their lawsuit once the residence permit was issued.
Lühl v Minister of Home Affairs and Immigration
In October 2021, High Court Judge Thomas Masuku ruled that the son of a same-sex couple, Mexican national Guillermo Delgado and Namibian national Phillip Lühl, born via surrogacy in South Africa, was a Namibian citizen by descent. The Supreme Court overturned the High Court decision in March 2023, holding that the High Court had "gone astray" in granting citizenship to the child; "Since the birth was not registered in accordance with the Citizenship Act, the High Court was not competent to grant relief."
In March 2022, Supreme Court Chief Justice Peter Shivute ordered the Ministry of Home Affairs to re-evaluate the application for residency of Delgado. Despite the narrow scope of the ruling, activist Ndilokelwa Nthetwa welcomed the decision, "The couple themselves, this impacts them and not necessarily for the community, but it is a win in the way that the Supreme Court has recognized that the ministry has abused public policy (trust) to treat this couple and their family in a very inhumane and hostile manner".
Religious performance
In 2015, the General Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church voted by a 64% majority to recognise same-sex marriages, bless the relationships of same-sex couples and allow gay ministers and clergy (who are not required to be celibate). The decision applies to 9 of the 10 synods; with the Namibia Synod being excluded, but it does apply to the Northern Synod, which includes parts of the Caprivi Strip. The decision caused backlash and objections, resulting in it being reversed a year later. A dozen church members subsequently took the denomination to court to restore the 2015 decision. In 2019, the North Gauteng High Court reversed the decision, ruling that while religious organizations have the religious freedom to define marriage the 2016 decision was not made in accordance with the church's own proper process. Individual pastors are free to choose whether to bless same-sex marriages; a freedom of conscience clause allows pastors with objections to opt out of performing same-sex weddings.
The Anglican Church of Southern Africa, which has one diocese in Namibia, does not permit same-sex marriages. Its marriage policies state that "holy matrimony is the lifelong and exclusive union between one man and one woman". In 2016, the synod voted against blessing same-sex unions. The decision split the church, with several dioceses deciding to nonetheless proceed with the blessing of same-sex relationships, notably the Diocese of Saldanha Bay. Archbishop Thabo Makgoba expressed disappointment with the decision not to bless same-sex unions, but added that "all is not lost", expressing hope that the matter would be debated again in the future. Former Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane also expressed his disappointment with the decision. In early 2023, the church once again refused to allow its clergy to bless same-sex unions, but directed the synod to develop "guidelines for providing pastoral ministry to those in same-sex relationships".
In 2017, Bishop Shekutaamba Nambala of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Namibia, one of the largest Christian denominations in Namibia, condemned same-sex marriage and the traditional Aawambo practice of olufuko, which the church considers "pagan" and "against Christianity".
See also
LGBT rights in Namibia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Same-sex union court cases
Notes
References
External links
Digashu and Another v GRN and Others; Seiler-Lilles and Another v GRN and Others (SA 6/2022; SA 7/2022) [2023] NASC 14 (16 May 2023), Supreme Court of Namibia
LGBT in Namibia
Namibian culture
Namibia