OKTA - Climate Change 2023
C0. Introduction

C0.1(C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization.
Okta is the leading independent identity provider. Okta’s Workforce Identity and Customer Identity Clouds are powered by the category-defining Okta Identity Platform thatenables organizations to securely connect the right people to the right technologies at the right time. With more than 7,000 pre-built integrations to applications andinfrastructure providers, Okta provides simple and secure access to people and organizations everywhere, giving them the confidence to reach their full potential. Okta istrusted by 18,050+ customers to secure their digital interactions with employees and customers and to accelerate innovation.

C0.2(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data and indicate whether you will be providing emissions data for past reporting
years.
Reporting year
Start dateFebruary 1 2022
End date
January 31 2023
Indicate if you are providing emissions data for past reporting years
Yes
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 1 emissions data for
3 years
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 2 emissions data for
3 years
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 3 emissions data for
3 years

C0.3(C0.3) Select the countries/areas in which you operate.
Argentina
Australia
Belgium
CanadaCzechia
FranceGermany
IrelandJapan
MexicoNetherlands
Philippines
PolandPortugal
Puerto Rico
Republic of Korea
Singapore
Spain
SwedenSwitzerland
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America
Uruguay

C0.4(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
USD

CDP

Page 1 of 76

C0.5(C0.5) Select the option that describes the reporting boundary for which climate-related impacts on your business are being reported. Note that this option shouldalign with your chosen approach for consolidating your GHG inventory.
Operational control

C0.8(C0.8) Does your organization have an ISIN code or another unique identifier (e.g., Ticker, CUSIP, etc.)?
Indicate whether you are able to provide a unique identifier for your organization

Provide your unique identifier

Yes, a Ticker symbol

OKTA

Yes, a CUSIP number

679295 105

C1. GovernanceC1.1(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-related issues within your organization?
Yes

C1.1a
(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) (do not include any names) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position ofindividual orcommittee

Responsibilities for climate-related issues

Board-levelcommittee

Our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) efforts are overseen by our executive leadership team and reviewed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of
Directors as per the Committee Charter which is publicly available and states under “Committee Activities” - “ESG Matters - Periodically review the Company’s environmental, social andgovernance (“ESG”) programs and public disclosure.”

C1.1b(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Frequency with which climate-related
issues are a scheduled agenda item

Governance mechanisms into whichclimate-related issues are integrated

Scope of board- Please explainlevel oversight

Scheduled – some meetings

Reviewing and guiding strategy<Not Applicable> Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews our environmental, social andOverseeing the setting of corporate targets
governance programs and public disclosures, at least annually and more frequently as needed.
Monitoring progress towards corporate
targets

C1.1d(C1.1d) Does your organization have at least one board member with competence on climate-related issues?
Board member(s)Criteria used to assesshave competence on competence of board
climate-related
member(s) on climateissues
related issues
Row No, and we do not1plan to address thiswithin the next two
years<Not Applicable>

Primary reason for no
Explain why your organization does not have at least one board member with competence on climate-related issues
board-level competence and any plans to address board-level competence in the future
on climate-related
issuesImportant but not an
immediate priority

Our plan to address Board-level competency is in the near term to educate our current Board. For example, in September
2021, Okta with external experts, Anthesis, offered an “E in ESG” training for our Board NomGov Committee focused on
climate. Since FY22, we generally have provided quarterly ESG updates to the Board NomGov committee.
In the medium term, we may explore adding further competency to our Board.

C1.2(C1.2) Provide the highest management-level position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.

CDP

Page 2 of 76

Position or committee
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
CEO reporting line
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Quarterly
Please explain
The corporate responsibility/ESG Executive Committee consists of three members - the CFO, the Chief People Officer (CPO), and the General Counsel. The corporate
responsibility/ESG Executive Committee generally meets quarterly, and reviews and approves strategic decisions related to ESG and climate related risks andopportunities, as needed.
Position or committee
Other C-Suite Officer, please specify (Chief People and Places Officer)
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
CEO reporting line
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Quarterly
Please explain
The corporate responsibility/ESG Executive Committee consists of three members - the CFO, the Chief People Officer (CPO), and the General Counsel. The corporate
responsibility/ESG Executive Committee generally meets quarterly, and reviews and approves strategic decisions related to ESG and climate related risks andopportunities, as needed.
Position or committee
General Counsel
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
CEO reporting line
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Quarterly
Please explain
The corporate responsibility/ESG Executive Committee consists of three members - the CFO, the Chief People Officer (CPO), and the General Counsel. The corporate
responsibility/ESG Executive Committee generally meets quarterly, and reviews and approves strategic decisions related to ESG and climate related risks andopportunities, as needed.
Position or committee
Corporate responsibility committee
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Developing a climate transition plan
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Setting climate-related corporate targets
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Managing value chain engagement on climate-related issues
Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
Other, please specify (ESG Executive Committee)
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Quarterly

CDP

Page 3 of 76

Please explain
Okta has an ESG Committee of Directors and VPs across the business, a Sustainability/Climate Working Group with subject-matter experts, and full-time ESG and
Sustainability Sr. Director, full-time ESG & Climate Lead, full-time ESG Program Manager, and full-time Workplace Sustainability Manager. We added an ESG Program
Manager in FY23, this CDP reporting period. The ESG Committee, which reports to the ESG Executive Committee, meets bi-weekly to develop and implement Okta’s ESG
and climate strategy.
The Sustainability/Climate Working Group has ~25 members including Managers, Directors, and VPs who are subject matter experts on ESG topics; and/or business
functions like financial forecasting, employee incentives; and/or stakeholder engagement like employee communications and investor relations. The Working Group meetsquarterly, and sub-groups meet more frequently as needed, to make decisions and strategic recommendations to the ESG Committee. The Working Group has establishedsub-groups to lead work-streams like renewable electricity, business travel, and supplier engagement. The sub-groups meet quarterly and more frequently as needed.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the company reviews our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) programs and
ESG-related public disclosure, and is updated at least annually on ESG-related strategy. The company’s SEC disclosures include information on the company’s ESG
program.

C1.3(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets?
Provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues
Row 1

Comment

Yes

C1.3a(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues (do not include the names of individuals).
Entitled to incentive
Environment/Sustainability manager
Type of incentive
Monetary reward
Incentive(s)Promotion
Salary increase
Performance indicator(s)Progress towards a climate-related target
Achievement of a climate-related target
Implementation of an emissions reduction initiative
Increased share of low-carbon energy in total energy consumption
Increased engagement with suppliers on climate-related issues
Increased engagement with customers on climate-related issues
Incentive plan(s) this incentive is linked to
Short-Term Incentive Plan
Further details of incentive(s)The Sustainability team sets annual goals and their performance is measured against achievement of those goals. One of our goals is to annually achieve our climate targetof 100% renewable electricity. Employees including the senior director of ESG & sustainability may receive a salary merit increase or promotion based on their performance.
Explain how this incentive contributes to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Annual performance is evaluated against progress on our climate targets including achieving our public climate commitment to 100% renewable electricity.
We strive to achieve targets laid out in our climate strategy and implementation plan that include both near- term and long-term milestones.

C2. Risks and opportunities

C2.1(C2.1) Does your organization have a process for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities?
Yes

C2.1a
(C2.1a) How does your organization define short-, medium- and long-term time horizons?

CDP

From (years)

To (years)

Short-term

1

2

Medium-term

35Long-term

5

Comment

Anything beyond 5 years, Okta considers long term

Page 4 of 76

C2.1b
(C2.1b) How does your organization define substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
We have an enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process which considers impact on our business in financial terms as well as in terms of business disruption and/or
brand related impacts. In FY23, our Sustainability team worked with the Okta risk management team, to incorporate climate into Okta’s risk assessment process. Okta
determines substantive financial or strategic impact by evaluating and prioritizing potential climate-related risks against the following impact categories: financial impact,
potential for business disruption, operational, compliance, customer impact, strategic impact, and/or damage to reputation. Okta defines substantive financial or strategic
impact in accordance with GAAP and US accounting standards as a cost or revenue impact in the millions of dollars. Through our ERM process, the impact of risks arequantified across these impact categories, and rated from low, medium, high to critical impact. Risks are also assessed by their likelihood of occurrence and respective time
horizon (or velocity).

C2.2(C2.2) Describe your process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Upstream
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Annually
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-term
Description of process
Okta created an enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process in FY20. Okta’s ERM steps include (1) identification of a comprehensive set of risks relevant to Okta (2)surveying company leadership (directors and above) in order to determine current mitigation activities (3) internal discussion with executive management to prioritize risks
as top, important and emerging, (4) development of mitigation strategies for agreed upon top risks, (5) establishment of cross-functional project teams to implement
mitigation strategies, and (6) performance of advisory consulting projects or operational audits to validate mitigation effectiveness. Top risks are reviewed at least quarterly
by the Disclosure Committee and the Board’s Audit Committee. The scope of our ERM is both our direct operations, downstream and upstream activities and the time frame
is short term (0-2yr) and medium term (3-5yr).
For climate, since FY22, Okta has intentionally included climate risk as part of the annual ERM process (instead of just as part of the business continuity risk aspect of theprocess). Therefore, we consider our climate risk assessment process to be integrated into a multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process. In FY22, Okta
partnered with Anthesis to estimate the impact of emerging regulation and reputational risks. These risks were submitted into Okta’s annual ERM process. Okta’s
Sustainability team also submitted climate risks into the FY23 ERM process.
In recognition of climate related risks and opportunities, Okta responded by hiring our first Director of ESG and Sustainability in FY21. Additionally, in FY22, Okta hired two
full-time employees dedicated to sustainability. In FY23, we hired a full-time ESG Program Manager.

C2.2a

CDP

Page 5 of 76

(C2.2a) Which risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Relevance Please explain&
inclusion
Current
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Current regulatory risks, including those related to climate regulation, are included in our annual enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process and were identified as a risk. For
example, proposed draft SEC regulations for climate disclosure poses potential regulatory, reputational and financial risk to Okta if we are not compliant.

Emerging
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

We did an initial climate-focused risk analysis in FY22 and updated it in FY23. We focused on transitional risks including: (1) new regulation for carbon fee and/or decarbonization andassociated costs, (2) reputational risk, and (3) business continuity risk of a natural disaster impacting our office, remote workforce, or data centers.
For emerging regulation, for example, we used the risk/scenario that there would be mandatory carbon fee or decarbonization. In response we forecasted our emissions until 2040. We
further estimated the growth of our annual emissions and the cost per ton to reduce emissions to estimate the annual investment we would need to make to reduce our emissions.

Technology Relevant,alwaysincluded

As a part of our enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process, our initial climate-focused risk analysis identified technology risks and opportunities relevant to Okta as a technology
company. This included the importance of technological investments to reduce energy consumption and improve energy efficiency (save energy, save money). For example, Okta
committed to setting science-based targets for absolute emissions reductions in October 2021, which were validated by SBTi in 2022. To meet these public commitments, we need toinvest annually in emissions reductions, in technology solutions to reduce emissions such as energy efficiency, electrification, renewable energy, etc.

Legal

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

As a part of our enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process, our initial climate-focused risk analysis identified climate regulation as a potential risk, in line with Okta’s risk of legal andregulatory compliance. For example, the enforcement of climate disclosure regulation could result in financial or legal consequences if we do not adhere to the regulation or if we do nothave data collection and internal controls to ensure data integrity.

MarketRelevant,
alwaysincluded

For market risk, we identified the risk of our customers contractually requiring their suppliers, like Okta, to meet their expectations for climate commitments and demonstrate progress. For
example, one customer has already contractually required their suppliers, including Okta, to have climate commitments. The impact is currently low, but there could be risk if further
customers contractually require and/or won’t work with Okta if we do not meet their expectations.

Reputation Relevant,alwaysincluded

For reputational risk, we identified for both our customers and investors expectations on climate, i.e. the potential negative reputational impact if we did not meet their expectation. For
customers, we were able to identify the percentage of our top customers who have committed to set science-based targets (SBTs) for absolute emissions reductions, and who submit
themselves annually to the CDP. For our top 25 investors, we identified the number who have made climate stewardship investment commitments (e.g. CDP signatory, TCFD signatory,
and/or part of Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative) and what percentage of Okta’s market capitalization are from those investors.
We also looked at our vendors/value chain, as the majority of our emissions are from scope 3. To achieve our public commitment to reduce our GHG emissions, we will have to partner with
our vendors to help them set and achieve emissions reductions targets.

AcutephysicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

For acute physical risk, we identified the increasing occurrence of natural disasters due to climate change, which is connected to Okta top risks of business continuity and resilience.
Natural disasters have increased in frequency and severity, and climate scientists have warned this will continue to accelerate. We are already seeing this happening - extreme heat andwildfires in the American west; extreme storms in many parts of the US and globally. This could disrupt Okta’s workforce, data centers, and/or surrounding public infrastructure.

Chronic
physicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

For chronic physical risk, we identified the increasing impact of rising temperatures due to climate change, which is connected to Okta risks of business continuity and resilience. For
example, chronic extreme heat and wildfires in the American west could disrupt Okta’s workforce and our cloud service provider’s data centers.

C2.3(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
No

C2.3b
(C2.3b) Why do you not consider your organization to be exposed to climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on
your business?
PrimaryreasonPlease explain

Row Evaluation Okta created an enterprise wide risk management (ERM) process in Okta’s FY20. Okta has committed to annually evaluating the impact of climate risks on our business. Okta’s ERM steps
1
in process include (1) identification of comprehensive set of risks relevant to Okta (2) surveying company leadership (directors and above) in order to determine current mitigation activities (3) internal
discussion with executive management to prioritize risks as top, important and emerging, (4) development of mitigation strategies for agreed upon top risks, (5) establishment of cross-functional
project teams to implement mitigation strategies, and (6) performance of advisory consulting projects or operational audits to validate mitigation effectiveness. Top risks are reviewed at least
quarterly by the Disclosure Committee and the Board’s Audit Committee. To inform our risk process and have more robust data, we expanded our GHG emissions inventory to include all of scope
3.
The Sustainability team worked with the enterprise wide risk management team in FY23 to incorporate climate risk into that process. We are continuing to evaluate the impact on our business.
As part of our business continuity planning, we have disaster recovery plans that use multiple AWS locations in order to prevent service disruption. Okta has a global infrastructure based on cells,
our infrastructure runs on AWS which has data center locations in major global regions. AWS infrastructure regions contain multiple availability zones. Each availability zone contains data centerswhich are physically and logically isolated. So just in AWS infrastructure alone, there is already a great deal of redundancy in power, internet connection, storage, etc.
Beyond Okta’s proprietary cell architecture, we’ve built extreme redundancy into each layer of the technology stack. Even if a SaaS, PaaS or IaaS offering used by Okta goes down, Okta remains
available for its customers because of the way that we designed our infrastructure. This strategy also extends to redundant monitoring and alerting across all layers of our service. This approachenables Okta to remain on and functional even when entire AWS availability zones or systems have gone offline.
Our brand is built upon Trust, and our customers count on us to uphold that promise. Okta runs on AWS however infrastructure services experience failures so we have built in lots of redundancy
and features over the last 10 years to improve uptime and optimize reliability.

C2.4(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.4a

CDP

Page 6 of 76

(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Upstream
Opportunity type
Energy source
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Other, please specify (Supply-Chain Decarbonization)
Primary potential financial impact
Reduced indirect (operating) costs
Company-specific description
It is well documented that achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees will require governments around the world to implement
regulations that place a ‘price on carbon’ thereby making fossil fuels and high carbon activities more expensive, and low and zero emissions fuels and technologies morefinancially attractive. Okta is a US headquartered company that is growing rapidly around the world, including in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. We also source
products and services from many countries globally. We therefore have broad exposure to potential future carbon pricing policies.
As a software technology company, over 90% of our emissions arise upstream of our operations, our value chain, including from the generation of electricity to run our
digital supply chain, the manufacturing and transportation of goods we purchase as well as employee travel. It is reasonable to expect that our upstream business partners,
whether cloud service providers, manufacturers of goods or airlines will seek to pass the costs they incur from carbon pricing policies to their customers such as Okta.
Additionally, as a publicly listed company selling services to enterprise customers, we face increasing expectations from stakeholders including investors and customers totake responsibility for the emissions arising throughout our value chain. By engaging with our suppliers to promote emissions reductions upstream of our operations, wehave an opportunity to both reduce the costs incurred by Okta to mitigate our value chain emissions as well as limiting our exposure to future increases in costs due tocarbon pricing of fossil fuel use and other carbon intensive activities upstream of our operations.
Time horizon
Long-term
Likelihood
More likely than not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
25000000
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
45000000
Explanation of financial impact figure
The approximate cost range provided is based on modeling Okta completed to estimate emissions footprint mitigation costs. Taking into account business as usual
emissions projections, $25 million is the estimated mitigation cost for FY26 and $45 million is the estimated mitigation cost for FY30 assuming the action Okta would take is
to purchase energy attribute certificates, sustainable aviation fuel and/or other instruments to mitigate our emissions in line with a 1.5 degree pathway. These costs could
be avoided or reduced through active engagement with our business partners to promote emissions reductions in our value chain.
Cost to realize opportunity
85000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Situation: Our strategy to realize this opportunity is to partner with our Procurement team to develop a strategy for vendor engagement on climate and emissions reductions,& to work collaboratively with other companies. Task: We developed a plan & roadmap to implement our strategy & presented it to the full Procurement team.
Action: In order to minimize the financial impact of a future carbon tax we are actively engaging with vendors to promote emissions reductions in our own value chain.
During FY23, we collaborated with the Business Council for Climate Change (BC3) & other partners. Okta continues to co-chair the BC3 supply chain group. As part of this,we co-created & co-funded a letter to vendors to request they set their own emissions reductions targets, & two guides on how to set & achieve emissions reduction targets.
Our goals were to collaborate to develop a consistent request to vendors & to develop a simple resource/guide that summarizes the steps to set targets, and existing
resources on how to set targets and provides links to some of those resources for ourselves to use in our target-setting to have it all in one place to make it as easy as
possible to set targets & then be able to focus on achieving those targets, & to avoid duplication of work. In FY23 we also partnered with external consultants to provide
more direct resources to vendors in support of their emissions reduction. We expanded our software subscription to include a Supply Chain Module which helps Okta track& engage with vendors through sustainability questionnaires and resources, & offers vendors a free (funded by Okta) GHG inventory. We continued to work collaboratively
by partnering with the BC3 group to co-lead the BC3 supplier engagement group. In FY23 BC3 kicked off work on a Supply Chain Guidebook that outlines how to develop
an internal strategy for achieving a corporate supply chain engagement target.
The cost to realize this opportunity/of response in this reporting period is estimated around $85,000, which is comprised of membership fee to BC3, supplier engagement
software module, & funding vendors to have a GHG inventory &/or access to consulting support. Additionally, Okta’s ESG & Sustainability team spent significant time on
vendor engagement in FY23.
Result: As a result of this strategy, we have resources and guides that we are sharing with vendors with steps to conduct GHG inventories & set science based targets andto reduce emissions and achieve targets.
Comment

C3. Business Strategy
CDP

Page 7 of 76

C3.1(C3.1) Does your organization’s strategy include a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world?
Row 1
Climate transition planNo, our strategy has been influenced by climate-related risks and opportunities, but we do not plan to develop a climate transition plan within two years
Publicly available climate transition plan
<Not Applicable>
Mechanism by which feedback is collected from shareholders on your climate transition plan
<Not Applicable>
Description of feedback mechanism<Not Applicable>
Frequency of feedback collection<Not Applicable>
Attach any relevant documents which detail your climate transition plan (optional)<Not Applicable>
Explain why your organization does not have a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world and any plans to develop one in the future
We do have a climate transition/action plan; however, we do not have a (1) climate scenario analysis, beyond our climate risk analysis as part of our enterprise risk
management, nor (2) a net zero target, beyond our science-based targets (SBTs) for absolute emissions reductions, which is the primary step toward achieving a net zerotarget.
Our climate action plan includes important elements, such as: (1) renewable electricity procurement, (2) validated science-based targets, (3) climate risk as part of ourenterprise risk management process, (4) governance, (5) financial planning and forecasting emissions, (6) value chain engagement, (7) an annual GHG emissions inventory
for scopes 1, 2 & 3 that is third party assured/verified. In FY23 we expanded both our Form 10-K filing and our energy and climate webpage to include details on our climate
program and climate action plan.
Our climate action plan includes our overall climate strategy to reduce energy consumption, electrify, purchase renewable energy, and engage vendors on their climate
progress. We set and are already achieving our goal of 100% renewable electricity for our global offices and remote workforce annually, and in FY23 expanded ourrenewable electricity program to include third party cloud services. We are requesting our vendors to set their own SBTs.
Additionally, we have validated science based targets (SBTs). We collaborated with a 3rd party consultant to develop resources to support our vendors to set their own
SBTs.
Explain why climate-related risks and opportunities have not influenced your strategy<Not Applicable>

C3.2(C3.2) Does your organization use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its strategy?
Use of climate-related scenario analysis toinform strategy
Row No, but we anticipate using qualitative and/or
1
quantitative analysis in the next two years

Primary reason why your organization does not use climaterelated scenario analysis to inform its strategy

Explain why your organization does not use climate-related scenario analysis
to inform its strategy and any plans to use it in the future

Important but not an immediate priority

In this reporting period (FY23), we focused on continuing to integrate climate risk into
our enterprise risk management process.
In the next two years we are conducting climate scenario analysis.

C3.3

CDP

Page 8 of 76

(C3.3) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your strategy.
Have climate-related
Description of influencerisks and opportunities
influenced yourstrategy in this area?
Products
andservices

Yes

As part of our business continuity planning, we have disaster recovery plans that use multiple AWS regions in order to prevent service disruption. Okta has a global
infrastructure based on cells, our infrastructure runs on AWS which has data center locations in major global regions. AWS infrastructure regions contain multiple availability
zones. Each availability zone contains data centers which are physically and logically isolated. So just in AWS infrastructure alone, there is already a great deal ofredundancy in power, internet connection, storage, etc.
Beyond Okta’s proprietary cell architecture, we’ve built enhanced reliability into each layer of the technology stack. Even if a SaaS, PaaS or IaaS offering used by Okta goes
down (e.g. during a climate disaster), Okta remains available for its customers because of the way that we designed our infrastructure. This strategy also extends to reliable
monitoring and alerting across all layers of our service. This approach enables Okta to remain on and functional even when entire AWS availability zones or systems havegone offline, such as in the event of a natural disaster.
Our brand is built upon Trust, and our customers count on us to uphold that promise. Okta runs on AWS however infrastructure services experience failures so wearchitected for reliability and built features over the last 10 years to improve uptime and optimize availability.

Supplychain
and/or
value
chain

Yes

As per our GHG emissions inventory, indirect emissions from scope 3/value chain is a significant part of our overall footprint. Our vendor engagement strategy is therefore
influenced as we aim to partner with our suppliers to reduce GHG emissions in our value chain.
In this reporting period (FY23), we achieved 100% renewable electricity for our third party cloud service providers (in category scope 3 purchased goods and services); set
validated science-based targets (SBTs) including a vendor engagement target; refined our vendor engagement strategy on climate with our Procurement team; analyzed ourvendor list including identifying which vendors already have GHG inventories and/or SBTs; wrote Okta specific communications to our vendors; and developed our plan toroll-out asking our vendors to set SBTs.
We work collaboratively, continuing to partner with the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) and to co-lead the BC3 supplier engagement group. This BC3 group in
FY23 drafted a Supply Chain Guidebook to support companies to set and achieve supply chain targets to work collaboratively to decarbonize supply chains.
Okta also identified and onboarded additional partners, such as a vendor with a supply chain module with whom we started to customize a portal for our vendors withresources, access to a free GHG inventory, etc, and a vendor who can provide custom consulting support for our vendors.
We also started to share and receive feedback on the two guides we developed with BC3 in FY22: “how to conduct a GHG inventory and set emissions reductions targets”
guide and “how to reduce emissions”.
Significant decision taken:
In FY23, we expanded our 100% renewable electricity commitment to include our third party cloud service providers.

Investment Yes
in R&DWe have launched enhanced disaster recovery in the US. The architecture allows us to improve fail over time from 60 minutes down to 5 minutes. We are planning for future
expansion to other regions.

Operations Yes

As a technology company, with a growing operational footprint, we see both risks and opportunities related to our use of electricity (the largest contributor to our scope 1 and
2 footprint). If we do not manage the emissions associated with our footprint, we may see increased costs as carbon pricing policies are introduced and by taking a proactive
stance to mitigate the impacts of our electricity use we have opportunities to improve our reputation with stakeholders such as our employees and customers. These risks
and opportunities influence our operational strategy.
In FY22, we expanded the scope of our GHG emissions inventory to include remote workforce (WFH) energy consumption.

C3.4(C3.4) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your financial planning.
Financialplanning
elements thathave been
influenced
Row Direct costs
1

Description of influence

In this reporting period, we invested financial resources to hire an additional ESG full-time employee; towards LEED Silver and WELL Silver certifications for our new direct lease officebuild; to achieve our 100% renewable electricity for our offices, remote workforce, and third party cloud service providers electricity consumption; to conduct and assure our annual GHG
emissions inventory; and to purchase Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF), for example. The resources needed were factored into our financial planning process for the reporting year and are
relevant over the short, medium and long term horizons.

C3.5(C3.5) In your organization’s financial accounting, do you identify spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climate transition?

Row
1

Identification of spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climatetransition

Indicate the level at which you identify the alignment of your spending/revenue with a sustainable financetaxonomy

Please select<Not Applicable>

C4. Targets and performance

C4.1(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was active in the reporting year?
Absolute target

CDP

Page 9 of 76

C4.1a(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Target reference number
Abs 1
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, and this target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
Target ambition
1.5°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s)Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Base year
2020
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)0
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)1351
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 10 of 76

Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)1351
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1
100
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2
100
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)<Not Applicable>
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
100
Target year
2030
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
67

CDP

Page 11 of 76

Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
445.83
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)323
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)323
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
113.569826662395
Target status in reporting year
Underway
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
Okta’s scope 1 & 2 target covers 100% of Okta’s scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
Okta plans to achieve this target by (1) reducing energy consumption (2) electrifying (3) purchasing renewable electricity and (4) engaging our vendors.
Read more on our Energy and Climate webpage
https://www.okta.com/responsibility/supporting-our-communities/
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>
Target reference number
Abs 2
Is this a science-based target?

CDP

Page 12 of 76

Yes, and this target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
Target ambition
1.5°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s)Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Base year
2020
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
10513
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
2858
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
13371
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)
13371
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 13 of 76

Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)100
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)100
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)
30
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
100
Target year
2030
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
42
Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
7755.18
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 14 of 76

Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
21235
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
2417
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
23652
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)
23652
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]-183.072107011977
Target status in reporting year
Underway
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
Okta’s business travel & employee commute target covered business travel Scope 3.6 and employee commuting transportation within Scope 3.7.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
Okta plans to achieve this target by reducing travel, traveling more sustainably, and covering air travel emissions with sustainable aviation fuel.
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>

C4.2(C4.2) Did you have any other climate-related targets that were active in the reporting year?
Target(s) to increase low-carbon energy consumption or production
Other climate-related target(s)

C4.2a

CDP

Page 15 of 76

(C4.2a) Provide details of your target(s) to increase low-carbon energy consumption or production.
Target reference number
Low 1
Year target was set
2021
Target coverage
Company-wide
Target type: energy carrier
Electricity
Target type: activity
Consumption
Target type: energy source
Renewable energy source(s) only
Base year
2020
Consumption or production of selected energy carrier in base year (MWh)0% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in base year
0
Target year2022
% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in target year100
% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in reporting year100
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
100
Target status in reporting year
Achieved
Is this target part of an emissions target?
No, it's not part of an overarching initiative
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
No, it’s not part of an overarching initiative
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
FY21 - Global direct lease offices supported by 100% renewable electricity
FY22 - 100% global direct lease, shared workspaces, subleased offices, and remote workforce electricity
FY23 - 100% global direct leased offices, shared workplaces, subleased offices, remote workforce electricity, and third party cloud services.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
<Not Applicable>
List the actions which contributed most to achieving this target
Okta has reached 100 percent renewable electricity for its global offices, remote workforce, and third party cloud service providers in FY23. This critical milestone wasreached by purchasing renewable energy certificates (RECs) equivalent to 100 percent of its global office, remote workforce, and third party cloud service providers’’
electricity consumption, and a commitment to energy efficiency with both LEED Silver and WELL Silver certified Okta direct leased offices. The majority of the RECs Oktapurchased were from the PosiGen Louisiana Project and the California Bright Schools solar program, which helps to realize the most cost-effective energy-saving
opportunities, supports renewable energy education and the installation of solar on schools across the state.
In FY22 (April 2021), Okta committed to annually procuring renewable electricity to match the electricity use of our global direct lease offices. In FY22 (September 2021), we
achieved this for our global direct lease offices, our remote workforce, subleased offices, and service offices’. In FY23 Okta expanded this renewable electricity commitment
to include the electricity consumption of our third party cloud service providers.

C4.2b

CDP

Page 16 of 76

(C4.2b) Provide details of any other climate-related targets, including methane reduction targets.
Target reference number
Oth 1
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Target type: absolute or intensity
Absolute
Target type: category & Metric (target numerator if reporting an intensity target)
Engagement with suppliers

Percentage of suppliers (by procurement spend) with a science-based target

Target denominator (intensity targets only)<Not Applicable>
Base year
2020
Figure or percentage in base year
6
Target year
2026
Figure or percentage in target year
65
Figure or percentage in reporting year13
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
11.864406779661
Target status in reporting year
Underway
Is this target part of an emissions target?
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
Science Based Targets initiative – approved supplier engagement target
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
The coverage is purchased goods and services, and capital goods, which are the majority of our emissions.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
Our plan to achieve these target includes:(1) collect data about vendors and their current climate actions, (2) develop and fund access to resources for vendors to conduct
GHG inventory and set SBTs (3) email vendors to ask that they set SBTs and to share resources (4) follow-up with vendors (5) partner with strategic vendors to reduce
emissions.
In this reporting period (FY23), we refined our supplier/vendor engagement strategy on climate with our Procurement team; analyzed our vendor list including identifying
which vendors already have GHG inventories and/or SBTs; wrote Okta specific communications to our vendors; and developed our plan to roll-out asking our vendors to set
SBTs.
We work collaboratively, continuing to partner with the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) and to co-lead the BC3 supplier engagement group. This BC3 group
drafted a Supply Chain Guidebook to support companies to set and achieve supply chain targets to work collaboratively to decarbonize supply chains.
Okta also identified and onboarded additional partners, such as a vendor with a supply chain module with whom we started to customize a portal for our vendors withresources, access to a free GHG inventory, etc, and a vendor who can provide custom consulting support for our vendors.
List the actions which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>

C4.3(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year? Note that this can include those in the planning and/or
implementation phases.
Yes

C4.3a

CDP

Page 17 of 76

(C4.3a) Identify the total number of initiatives at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings.
Number of initiatives

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e (only for rows marked *)

2

3236

Under investigation
To be implemented*
Implementation commenced*
Implemented*
Not to be implemented

C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Initiative category & Initiative typeLow-carbon energy generation

Solar PV

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)4256
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 2 (market-based)
Scope 3 category 7: Employee commuting
Scope 3 category 8: Upstream leased assets
Scope 3 category 13: Downstream leased assets
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
0Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
350000
Payback period
No payback
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
1-2 years
Comment
For the reporting period, we matched 100% of our electricity consumption for our global offices, remote workforce, and third party cloud service providers with energy
attribute certificates (EACs) or called Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) in the US.

C4.3c(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?
MethodComment

Dedicated budget We have annual budgets in our Okta for Good, ESG & Sustainability, and Workplace Sustainability programs to reduce consumption and emissions, such as achieving LEED and/or similar
for energy
green building certifications for new direct leased offices, purchasing renewable electricity, purchasing sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), and developing resources for employees and vendors toefficiency
reduce their emissions. Okta has committed that all new direct leased offices will be at least LEED Silver and WELL Silver certified and supported by 100% renewable electricity.
Dedicated budget For example, Okta invested in renewable electricity. For this reporting period, we purchased renewable electricity certificates (RECs) or energy attribute certificates (EACs) to match 100% of ourfor otherelectricity consumption for our global direct lease offices, our remote workforce, subleased offices, service offices, and third party cloud service providers.
emissions
reduction activities In FY23, Okta began its work towards achieving its business travel emissions science based target. These actions included joining the Sustainable Aviation Buyers Alliance (SABA) andpurchasing a small amount of sustainable aviation fuel. Okta also launched an employee resource called the Sustainable Travel Guidebook which provides tips and tricks on how to choose
more sustainable travel options.
Employeeengagement

For example, Okta has provided resources to support employees to reduce emissions, such as our Dynamic Work Sustainability Guide published in the previous reporting period (FY22) which isavailable here: https://www.okta.com/sites/default/files/2021-12/Dynamic-Work-Sustainability-Guide.pdf.
In this reporting period (FY23), Okta launched our new, internal employee resource called the Sustainable Travel Guidebook, and also hosted annual Earth Week activities.
Okta also has an employee intranet sustainability page and a sustainability slack channel where employees access and share resources. Okta also shares sustainability updates at employee
All Hands meetings.

C4.5(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods and/or services as low-carbon products?
No

CDP

Page 18 of 76

C5. Emissions methodology

C5.1(C5.1) Is this your first year of reporting emissions data to CDP?
No

C5.1a
(C5.1a) Has your organization undergone any structural changes in the reporting year, or are any previous structural changes being accounted for in thisdisclosure of emissions data?
Row 1
Has there been a structural change?
No
Name of organization(s) acquired, divested from, or merged with<Not Applicable>
Details of structural change(s), including completion dates<Not Applicable>

C5.1b
(C5.1b) Has your emissions accounting methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition changed in the reporting year?

Row
1

Change(s) in methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year
definition?

Details of methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition change(s)Yes, a change in methodology

Okta has updated our methodology to more accurately account for employee reimbursements and corporate credit card
purchases.

C5.1c(C5.1c) Have your organization’s base year emissions and past years’ emissions been recalculated as a result of any changes or errors reported in C5.1a and/or
C5.1b?
Base year
Scope(s)Base year emissions recalculation policy, including significance thresholdrecalculation recalculated
Row Yes1

Scope 3The inventory will be adjusted in response to the aggregate impact of any structural or methodology changes, if the resulting adjustment would equate to morethan 5% of base year emissions. Adjustments below this threshold are considered insignificant and will be decided case by case.

Past years’
recalculation
Yes

C5.2
(C5.2) Provide your base year and base year emissions.
Scope 1
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
No scope 1 sources.
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)1309
Comment
Scope 2 includes purchased electricity, heating and cooling.

CDP

Page 19 of 76

Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)1352
Comment
Scope 2 includes purchased electricity, heating and cooling.
Scope 3 category 1: Purchased goods and services
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
27568
Comment
Scope 3 category 2: Capital goods
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)6289
Comment
Scope 3 category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
115
Comment
Scope 3 category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 5: Waste generated in operations
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
320
Comment
Scope 3 category 6: Business travel
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
10695
Comment

CDP

Page 20 of 76

Scope 3 category 7: Employee commuting
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
3348
Comment
Scope 3 category 8: Upstream leased assets
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)24
Comment
Scope 3 category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 10: Processing of sold products
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 11: Use of sold products
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 12: End of life treatment of sold products
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 13: Downstream leased assets
Base year start
February 1 2019
Base year end
January 31 2020
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
186
Comment
Scope 3 category 14: Franchises
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

CDP

Page 21 of 76

Scope 3 category 15: Investments
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3: Other (upstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3: Other (downstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C5.3(C5.3) Select the name of the standard, protocol, or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate emissions.
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard

C6. Emissions data

C6.1

CDP

Page 22 of 76

(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0Start dateFebruary 1 2022
End date
January 31 2023
Comment
Past year 1
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0Start dateFebruary 1 2021
End date
January 31 2022
Comment
Past year 2
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0Start dateFebruary 1 2020
End date
January 31 2021
Comment
Past year 3
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0Start dateFebruary 1 2019
End date
January 31 2020
Comment

C6.2(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
Row 1​Scope 2, location-based​
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Scope 2, market-based
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Comment

C6.3

CDP

Page 23 of 76

(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Scope 2, location-based
1776
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
324
Start dateFebruary 1 2022
End date
January 31 2023
Comment
Past year 1
Scope 2, location-based
1513
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
298
Start dateFebruary 1 2021
End date
January 31 2022
Comment
Past year 2
Scope 2, location-based
1461
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
732
Start dateFebruary 1 2020
End date
January 31 2021
Comment
Past year 3
Scope 2, location-based1309
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
1352
Start dateFebruary 1 2019
End date
January 31 2020
Comment

C6.4(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions that are within your selectedreporting boundary which are not included in your disclosure?
No

C6.5(C6.5) Account for your organization’s gross global Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.

CDP

Page 24 of 76

Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
48300
Emissions calculation methodology
Supplier-specific method
Average data method
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
5.47
Please explain
For most purchased goods and services estimates, we calculate emissions using the EPA Environmentally Extended Economic Input Output (EEIO) emissions factors
applied to annual supplier and procurement spend data. Spend is aggregated by each accounting category to get total spend. Each accounting category is mapped to themost accurate EEIO category. Spend with select vendors are mapped to those vendors’ unique revenue intensity estimates when complete and reported to the Carbon
Disclosure Project (CDP). Total spend is multiplied by the EPA EF for that category or for that vendor to calculate CO2e emissions. To prevent double counting, supplierspend data that is accounted for under alternative scopes are removed from this analysis (e.g. electricity from facilities). For cloud computing emissions, we use either
cloud usage data or spend data to estimate electricity consumed and calculate electricity emissions by applying regional EFs. We also use spend data to estimate theindirect emissions associated with the cloud vendor. For some physical goods where we have SKU data, BOMs are used to separate the SKU mass into individualcommodities, which are multiplied by the total SKUs purchased to obtain the total mass per commodity per SKU. Mass is aggregated by each commodity to get total mass
per commodity, and each commodity is mapped to the most accurate Emissions Factor(s). We multiply total mass by the Emissions Factor(s) for that commodity to
calculate CO2e emissions.
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)2413
Emissions calculation methodology
Supplier-specific method
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
3.04
Please explain
We calculate emissions using the EPA Environmentally Extended Economic Input Output (EEIO) emissions factors applied to annual supplier & procurement spend data.
Spend is aggregated by each accounting category to get total spend. Each accounting category is mapped to the most accurate EEIO category. Spend with select vendors
is mapped to those vendors’ unique revenue intensity estimates when they have submitted complete reports to complete and reported to the Carbon Disclosure Project(CDP). Total spend is multiplied by the Emissions Factor for that category or for that vendor to calculate CO2e emissions. To prevent double counting, supplier spend datathat is accounted for under alternative scopes are removed from this analysis.
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)244
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Fuel-based method
Site-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
We estimate fuel and energy related activities emissions for two categories:
1) Transmission and Distribution - We estimate electricity lost to transmission and distribution. We apply regional grid loss rates from eGRID and Ecoinvent to estimate
electricity lost in transmission and distribution, and apply the correct electricity emissions factor to estimate emissions.
2) Natural Gas Leakage - We use fugitive emissions data from chapter 4.2 of the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas inventories. A
tier 1 approach was taken to evaluate fugitive emissions from exploration, production, processing, and transmission & storage of natural gas. Tier 1 was chosen as specificsupply chain data was unavailable, and fugitive natural gas emissions are typically not significant for Watershed customers.

CDP

Page 25 of 76

Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta is a cloud software provider and does not have physical products or transportation & distribution systems.
Waste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)40
Emissions calculation methodology
Waste-type-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
We estimate waste emissions by evaluating the number of employees working from each office location - this is assumed to match the number of employees that are
actively commuting each day (see Scope 3.7). We use the CalRecycle benchmarks as an estimate for waste produced per employee per day. We multiply waste produced
for each month by emissions factors for landfill and recycling. No waste estimate is included for work from home employees. We use emissions factors from DEFRA for
landfill, composting, and recycling.
Business travel
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
21235
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Spend-based method
Fuel-based method
Distance-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
4.18
Please explain
We estimate three emissions inputs for business travel. (1) Flights - We calculate the distance traveled by looking at flight routes and calculating the distance between
airports. We calculate total emissions using Emissions Factors from DEFRA, grouped by category of flight (e.g. long haul, medium haul, short haul). When origin,destination, and mileage data is not available, we use spend on flights applied to the relevant EEIO emissions factor. (2) Hotels - We calculate the number of nights stayed
at a hotel using the check-in and check-out dates, and apply an emissions factor based on estimated electricity and natural consumption for an upscale hotel. When thisdata is not available, we use spend on hotels applied to the relevant EEIO emissions factor. (3) For all other types of business travel (e.g. Uber, Trains), we calculate
emissions using the EPA Environmentally Extended Economic Input Output (EEIO) emissions factors applied to annual spend data. Spend is aggregated by each travel
category to get total spend. Each accounting category is mapped to the most accurate EEIO category.
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)2418
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Distance-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
We estimate emissions in two categories.
(1) Commute. We estimate the number of employees commuting in each location by aggregating employees by location. We exclude any remote employees, and exclude
any months where employees were working from home due to COVID-19. We use data published by governments to estimate average commute mix and distance for eachlocation, and apply that to the total number of commuting employees in each location to determine miles traveled by car, public transit, walking and biking (Example
sources: US Census Bureau for US states, Euro State for select EU cities). We multiply miles by the emissions factor for that commute-method category.
(2) Remote work. We estimate that the square footage occupied by a home office is 150 square feet. We use the Department of Energy’s Building Performance Databaseto find benchmarks for electricity consumption per square foot of residential space and natural gas per square foot of residential space. We then multiply energy usage by
the corresponding region's electricity and natural gas emissions factors. Since the DoE's data set does not assume homes are being used non-stop during working hours,
we adjust these estimates up to correct for this.

CDP

Page 26 of 76

Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)28
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
We estimate emissions from upstream leased assets in two ways:(1) For leased assets where we have spend data, we calculate emissions using the EPA Environmentally Extended Economic Input Output (EEIO) emissions factors applied
to annual spend data. We exclude categories that are accounted for separately (i.e. buildings)(2) For some leased assets such as shared co-working spaces, we have sq-ft estimates and then generate activity based EFs for electricity and NG and calculate
emissions based on assumed activity
Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta is a cloud software provider and does not have physical products or transportation & distribution systems.
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta is a cloud software provider and does not have physical products or transportation & distribution systems.
Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta is a cloud software provider and does not have physical products or transportation & distribution systems.
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta is a cloud software provider and does not have physical products or transportation & distribution systems.

CDP

Page 27 of 76

Downstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)55
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Downstream leased assets are reported based on the market-based approach for scope 2 reporting. Electricity, natural gas, and fugitive consumption is gathered or
estimated using Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) data, and emissions are then calculated using EPA emission factors. Electricity consumption
is covered by RECs.

Franchises
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Okta does not have any franchises.
Investments
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
As per GHG protocol Scope 3 definition, the investments category is designed primarily for private financial institutions, and public financial institutions (e.g., multilateraldevelopment banks, export credit agencies). Okta is not in the financial services business and has no significant investments and hence this category is not relevant.
Other (upstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Other (downstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain

C6.5a(C6.5a) Disclose or restate your Scope 3 emissions data for previous years.

CDP

Page 28 of 76

Past year 1
Start dateFebruary 1 2021
End date
January 31 2022
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)
42819
Scope 3: Capital goods (metric tons CO2e)
9200
Scope 3: Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)113
Scope 3: Upstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Waste generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)17
Scope 3: Business travel (metric tons CO2e)
6620
Scope 3: Employee commuting (metric tons CO2e)
1941
Scope 3: Upstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)5
Scope 3: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Use of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: End of life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)73
Scope 3: Franchises (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Investments (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

CDP

Page 29 of 76

Past year 2
Start dateFebruary 1 2020
End date
January 31 2021
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)
24457
Scope 3: Capital goods (metric tons CO2e)
8423
Scope 3: Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)
123
Scope 3: Upstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Waste generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)48
Scope 3: Business travel (metric tons CO2e)
1266
Scope 3: Employee commuting (metric tons CO2e)1945
Scope 3: Upstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)37
Scope 3: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Use of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: End of life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)186
Scope 3: Franchises (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Investments (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

CDP

Page 30 of 76

Past year 3
Start dateFebruary 1 2019
End date
January 31 2020
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)27568
Scope 3: Capital goods (metric tons CO2e)6289
Scope 3: Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)
115
Scope 3: Upstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Waste generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)
320
Scope 3: Business travel (metric tons CO2e)
10695
Scope 3: Employee commuting (metric tons CO2e)
3340
Scope 3: Upstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)24
Scope 3: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Use of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: End of life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)186
Scope 3: Franchises (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Investments (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C6.7(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic carbon relevant to your organization?
No

C6.10

CDP

Page 31 of 76

(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit currency total revenue and provide any
additional intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Intensity figure
2e-7
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, metric tons CO2e)324
Metric denominator
unit total revenue
Metric denominator: Unit total
1858000000
Scope 2 figure used
Market-based% change from previous year
24
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason(s) for change
Other emissions reduction activities
Please explain
The 24% decrease in emissions intensity compared to last year is due to right sizing our real estate footprint as well as an increase in revenue.

C7. Emissions breakdowns

C7.1(C7.1) Does your organization break down its Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type?
No

C7.2(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Canada0

United States of America

0

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

0Australia

0

Argentina

0

C7.3(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By activity

C7.3c(C7.3c) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

None

0

C7.5

CDP

Page 32 of 76

(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)Australia

131

4.8

Canada128

125

United States of America

1438

178

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

41

11

Argentina

14

2.5

France

4.8

2.9

Japan

19

0

C7.6
(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By activity

C7.6c(C7.6c) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Purchased electricity

1452

0

Purchased heating (natural gas)

195

195

Purchased cooling (refrigerant leakage)

123

123

Energy Use (other)

5.1

5.1

C7.7
(C7.7) Is your organization able to break down your emissions data for any of the subsidiaries included in your CDP response?
No

C7.9(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Increased

C7.9a(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined), and for each of them specify how your emissions compare
to the previous year.

Change in renewableenergy consumption

Direction ofchange inemissions

Emissionsvalue(percentage)

Please explain calculation

237

Decreased

79.5

In FY23, we purchased renewable energy equivalent to 1,452 tCO₂e. In 2022, we purchased renewable energy equivalent
to 1,215 tCO₂e.
In FY22, our total Scope 1 and 2 emissions were approximately 298 tCO₂e. With an increase in renewable energy
consumption equivalent to 237 tCO₂e, we calculate our reduction to be 79.53% = (1,452 - 1,215) / 298.

8.48

Our market based GHG emissions increased 25.3 tCO2 from FY22 to FY23.

Other emissions
reduction activities<Not Applicable>

Divestment<Not Applicable>

Acquisitions<Not Applicable>

Mergers<Not Applicable>

Change in output<Not Applicable>

Change inmethodology<Not Applicable>

Change in boundary<Not Applicable>

Change in physicaloperating conditions<Not Applicable>

Unidentified
Other

CDP

Change in emissions(metric tons CO2e)25.3

Increased<Not Applicable>

Page 33 of 76

C7.9b
(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-based Scope 2 emissions figure or a market-based Scope 2
emissions figure?
Market-based

C8. Energy

C8.1(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

C8.2(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Indicate whether your organization undertook this energy-related activity in the reporting year
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired steamNo

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling

No

Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling

No

C8.2a
(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
Heating value

MWh from renewable sources MWh from non-renewable sources

Total (renewable and non-renewable) MWh

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)

HHV (higher heating value) 0

20.53

20.53

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity<Not Applicable>

5360.505360.5

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

<Not Applicable>

01079.511079.51

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Total energy consumption<Not Applicable>

5360.51100.04

6460.54

C8.2b
(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this fuel application
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity

No

Consumption of fuel for the generation of heat

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of steamNo

Consumption of fuel for the generation of coolingNo

Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation

No

C8.2c
(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.

CDP

Page 34 of 76

Sustainable biomass
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment
Other biomass
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1.87
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment
Other renewable fuels (e.g. renewable hydrogen)Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment
Coal
Heating value
Please selectTotal fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment

CDP

Page 35 of 76

Oil
Heating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
18.66
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment
Gas
Heating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1079.51
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment
Other non-renewable fuels (e.g. non-renewable hydrogen)Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment

CDP

Page 36 of 76

Total fuelHeating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1100.04
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Comment

C8.2e

CDP

Page 37 of 76

(C8.2e) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a zero or near-zero emission factor in the market-based
Scope 2 figure reported in C6.3.
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
United States of America
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)5460
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2009
Comment
Purchased from the CA Bright Schools Program.
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
United States of America
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)14131
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2018
Comment
Purchased from PosiGen of Louisiana

C8.2g(C8.2g) Provide a breakdown by country/area of your non-fuel energy consumption in the reporting year.
Country/area
Argentina
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)42.27
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)6.76
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/area
CDP

Page 38 of 76

Australia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)172.76
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/area
CanadaConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)125.09Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)662.12
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/area
FranceConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)37.62
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)5.73
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/area
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)154.68Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)23.07
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/areaJapan
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)39.89
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
CDP

Page 39 of 76

Country/area
United States of America
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)4788.19
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)381.83
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>

C9. Additional metrics

C9.1(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.

C10. Verification

C10.1(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Verification/assurance status
Scope 1

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 3

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

C10.1a(C10.1a) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 1 emissions, and attach the relevant statements.
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
FY23_Okta_GHG_Verification_Letter.pdf
Page/ section reference
p1 & 2
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1b

CDP

Page 40 of 76

(C10.1b) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 2 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 2 approach
Scope 2 location-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
FY23_Okta_GHG_Verification_Letter.pdf
Page/ section reference
p1 & 2
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
Scope 2 approach
Scope 2 market-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
FY23_Okta_GHG_Verification_Letter.pdf
Page/ section reference
p1 & 2
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1c(C10.1c) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 3 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 3 category
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services
Scope 3: Capital goods
Scope 3: Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Scope 3: Waste generated in operations
Scope 3: Business travel
Scope 3: Employee commuting
Scope 3: Upstream leased assets
Scope 3: Downstream leased assets
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
FY23_Okta_GHG_Verification_Letter.pdf
Page/section reference
p1 & 2
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

CDP

Page 41 of 76

C10.2(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related information reported in your CDP disclosure other than the emissions figures reported in C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
Yes

C10.2a(C10.2a) Which data points within your CDP disclosure have been verified, and which verification standards were used?
Disclosure module
verification relates toData verified

Verification
standard

Please explain

C4. Targets andperformance

Emissions reduction activities

ISO14064-3

Okta’s verification includes: total energy consumption, total purchased electricity consumption, total renewable electricity consumption,
percentage renewable electricity consumption, and all relevant emissions categories.

C8. Energy

Energy consumption

ISO14064-3

Okta’s verification includes: total energy consumption, total purchased electricity consumption, total renewable electricity consumption,
percentage renewable electricity consumption, and all relevant emissions categories.

C6. Emissions data

Year on year change inemissions (Scope 1 and 2)

ISO14064-3

Okta’s verification includes: total energy consumption, total purchased electricity consumption, total renewable electricity consumption,
percentage renewable electricity consumption, and all relevant emissions categories.

C11. Carbon pricing

C11.1(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS, Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
No, and we do not anticipate being regulated in the next three years

C11.2(C11.2) Has your organization canceled any project-based carbon credits within the reporting year?
No

C11.3
(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal price on carbon?
No, but we anticipate doing so in the next two years

C12. Engagement

C12.1(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on climate-related issues?
Yes, our suppliers
Yes, our customers/clients

C12.1aCDP

Page 42 of 76

(C12.1a) Provide details of your climate-related supplier engagement strategy.
Type of engagement
Information collection (understanding supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Collect other climate related information at least annually from suppliers% of suppliers by number
2% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
27
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
We are focused on vendor engagement as over 90% of our emissions are from scope 3/supply chain.
We continue to ask vendors about their climate program in our new vendor onboarding form. Although all new vendors are asked to complete this vendor onboarding form,
not all vendors complete the climate questions.
Last reporting period (FY22), we also introduced a sustainability/climate questions template for our RFP process for when Okta evaluates and selects new vendors.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successOur goal is to convey to new suppliers through these climate and GHG emissions questions that we care about their environmental and climate performance. We also aim
to gather information about our suppliers’ emissions and commitments in order to inform our supplier engagement strategy. Measures of success include % of suppliers
responding and % of suppliers who are measuring their GHG emissions, setting targets and/or taking steps to reduce their emissions.
Comment
Type of engagement
Engagement & incentivization (changing supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change% of suppliers by number
1% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
14% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
11
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
Okta engages a number of our suppliers through the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3), a primarily Bay Area group of technology sector peers.
Okta’s Sr. Director of ESG & Sustainability has monthly calls with ESG & Sustainability peers, some of whom are vendors.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
In FY23, we set a validated vendor engagement science-based targets (SBTs); refined our supplier/vendor engagement strategy on climate with our Procurement team;analyzed our vendor list including identifying which vendors already have GHG inventories and/or SBTs; wrote Okta specific communications to our vendors; and developed
our plan to roll-out asking our vendors to set SBTs.
We continued to work collaboratively by partnering with the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) to co-lead the BC3 supplier engagement group. In FY23 the BC3group kicked off work on a Supply Chain Guidebook that outlines how to develop an internal strategy for achieving a corporate supply chain engagement target.
Okta also identified and onboarded additional partners, such as a vendor with a supply chain module with whom we started to customize a portal for our vendors withresources and access to a free GHG inventory, and a vendor who can provide custom consulting support for our vendors.
Comment

C12.1b

CDP

Page 43 of 76

(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Type of engagement & Details of engagement
Please select% of customers by number% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
In FY23, Okta enhanced our energy and climate page to provide a holistic overview of our climate program, public commitments, and strategy. We published blogs on EarthWeek, climate equity, and our SBTs. We continued to engage with customers via the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) joint efforts and peer calls. We also
hosted for the first time ESG & Sustainability sessions at our major customer events: in person at Okta’s Forum22 Conference and online at Okta’s annual Oktane
conference. Our Sr Director of ESG & Sustainability spoke at Salesforce’s Dreamforce Conference 2022.
Okta annually reports to CDP, including the supply chain module for our customers and makes our CDP submission public on our webpage for all of our customers to see.
We publish an annual ESG Fact Sheet, which includes key climate data for customers and investors. We also replied to individual customer surveys sent to Okta.
We shared two targeted climate communications with our largest customers via our Executive Sponsorship Program.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
We are aiming to increase transparency and access to this info for all of our customers via our website. We also respond to customer surveys. Measures of success include
receiving positive feedback from our customers on our public renewable electricity commitment and efforts to reduce GHG emissions.

C12.2(C12.2) Do your suppliers have to meet climate-related requirements as part of your organization’s purchasing process?
No, and we do not plan to introduce climate-related requirements within the next two years

C12.3(C12.3) Does your organization engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate?
Row 1
External engagement activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Yes, our membership of/engagement with trade associations could influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Yes, we fund organizations or individuals whose activities could influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years
Attach commitment or position statement(s)<Not Applicable>
Describe the process(es) your organization has in place to ensure that your external engagement activities are consistent with your climate commitments and/or
climate transition plan
Okta internal business partners sometimes seek Sustainability team's input before joining trade associations. Okta does not directly engage in lobbying policy makers on
climate change.
Okta is a member of the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) . This organization advocates for improved climate and policy.
Okta is also a member of BSA | The Software Alliance. A statement of BSA’s sustainability principles is here.
Primary reason for not engaging in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate<Not Applicable>
Explain why your organization does not engage in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate<Not Applicable>

C12.3b
(C12.3b) Provide details of the trade associations your organization is a member of, or engages with, which are likely to take a position on any policy, law or
regulation that may impact the climate.
Trade association
California Chamber of Commerce
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Unknown
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
No, we did not attempt to influence their position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position<Not Applicable>
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
CDP

Page 44 of 76

No, we have not evaluatedTrade association
Other, please specify (BSA | The Software Alliance)
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Unknown
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
Yes, and they have changed their position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position<Not Applicable>
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, we have not evaluatedTrade association
Other, please specify (Alliance for Digital Innovation)
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Unknown
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
No, we do not know their position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position<Not Applicable>
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, we have not evaluatedTrade association
Other, please specify (Better Identity Coalition)
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Unknown
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
No, we do not know their position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position<Not Applicable>
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, we have not evaluatedTrade association
Other, please specify (Sf:citi)
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Unknown
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
No, we did not attempt to influence their position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position<Not Applicable>
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, we have not evaluatedC12.3c

CDP

Page 45 of 76

(C12.3c) Provide details of the funding you provided to other organizations or individuals in the reporting year whose activities could influence policy, law, or
regulation that may impact the climate.
Type of organization or individual
Other, please specify (Business Council on Climate Change (BC3))
State the organization or individual to which you provided funding
Business Council on Climate Change (BC3)
Funding figure your organization provided to this organization or individual in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
20000
Describe the aim of this funding and how it could influence policy, law or regulation that may impact the climate
Okta is a member of the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3) . This organization advocates for improved climate and renewable energy policy.
Have you evaluated whether this funding is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes, we have evaluated, and it is aligned

C12.4(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places
other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Publication
In voluntary communications
StatusComplete
Attach the document
Okta_Here’s How We’re Playing Our Part to Combat Climate Change.pdf
FY22-Okta-GHG-Emissions.pdf
Okta 2022_ESG_Fact Sheet.pdf
Okta for Good Impact Report _ 2023 (1).pdf
Okta Energy and Climate Webpage (1).pdf
Here’s How Okta Celebrated Earth Week in 2022 _ Okta.pdf
Okta Commits to Climate Action With Approved Science-Based Targets (1).pdf
Page/Section referenceContent elements
Strategy
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Comment
In FY23, Okta enhanced our energy and climate page to provide a holistic overview of our climate program, public commitments, and strategy. We published 3 blogs on
climate: Earth Week, climate equity, and our science-based targets (SBTs). We also published our annual ESG Fact Sheet that includes climate metrics and included
climate metrics and information in our annual Okta for Good Impact Report.
Okta expanded our energy and climate webpage to provide more information about our strategy, program, and governance. Blogs are to share additional information about
what we are doing to be transparent and to support other companies on this journey (the way we look to roadmaps from others to support us).
For our annual fiscal year (FY) GHG emissions figures, we have them third party assured, drafting in a summary to share on our public GHG inventory webpage.
Publication
In mainstream reports
StatusComplete
Attach the document
DEF 14A 2023 Proxy Statement (1).pdf
10-K (Fiscal 2023) filed 3.3.23 (1).pdf
Page/Section reference
Page 15 - Form 10-K
Page 26 - Proxy Statement
Content elements
Strategy
Other metrics
Comment
We expanded the disclosure in our FY23 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement to include details on our climate program and climate action plan.
Okta’s Form 10-K and Proxy Statement share (1) Okta’s commitment to climate action, (2) annually conducting a GHG inventory across all scopes, (3) Okta having set
public commitments to climate targets, (4) our 100% renewable electricity commitment, (5) our commitment to integrating climate into our enterprise-wide risk management
process and (6) incorporating equity into our climate work through purchasing RECs that have a social benefit and into our grantmaking.

C12.5

CDP

Page 46 of 76

(C12.5) Indicate the collaborative frameworks, initiatives and/or commitments related to environmental issues for which you are a signatory/member.
Environmental collaborative Describe your organization’s role within each framework, initiative and/or commitment
framework, initiative and/or
commitment
Row Business Ambition for 1.5C
1We Mean Business

Okta joined the Business Ambition for 1.5C and We Mean Business as part of our commitment to and validation of our science based targets. By joining the Business Ambition
for 1.5C, we demonstrated to our stakeholders our commitment to set emissions reduction targets aligned with a 1.5C future. We fulfilled our commitments under the pledge byachieving validation of our science based targets through SBTi.

C15. Biodiversity

C15.1(C15.1) Is there board-level oversight and/or executive management-level responsibility for biodiversity-related issues within your organization?

Row
1

Board-level oversight and/or executive management-level responsibility for biodiversity-related
issuesDescription of oversight and objectives relating tobiodiversity

Scope of board-level
oversight

No, and we do not plan to have both within the next two years<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C15.2(C15.2) Has your organization made a public commitment and/or endorsed any initiatives related to biodiversity?
Indicate whether your organization made a public commitment or endorsed any initiatives related to biodiversity
Row 1 No, and we do not plan to do so within the next 2 years

Biodiversity-related public commitments

Initiatives endorsed<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C15.3(C15.3) Does your organization assess the impacts and dependencies of its value chain on biodiversity?
Impacts on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
No and we don’t plan to within the next two years
Value chain stage(s) covered<Not Applicable>
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity<Not Applicable>
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)<Not Applicable>
Dependencies on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
No and we don’t plan to within the next two years
Value chain stage(s) covered<Not Applicable>
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity<Not Applicable>
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)<Not Applicable>

C15.4(C15.4) Does your organization have activities located in or near to biodiversity- sensitive areas in the reporting year?
Not assessed

CDP

Page 47 of 76

C15.5(C15.5) What actions has your organization taken in the reporting year to progress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Have you taken any actions in the reporting period to progress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Row 1 No, and we do not plan to undertake any biodiversity-related actions

Type of action taken to progress biodiversity- related commitments<Not Applicable>

C15.6(C15.6) Does your organization use biodiversity indicators to monitor performance across its activities?

Row 1

Does your organization use indicators to monitor biodiversity performance?

Indicators used to monitor biodiversity performance

No

Please select

C15.7(C15.7) Have you published information about your organization’s response to biodiversity-related issues for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP
response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Report typeContent elements

Attach the document and indicate where in the document the relevant biodiversity information is locatedNo publications<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C16. Signoff

C-FI(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional information or context that you feel is relevant to your organization's response. Please note that this field is optional
and is not scored.

C16.1(C16.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.

Row 1

Job title

Corresponding job category

Chief Financial Officer

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

SC. Supply chain module

SC0.0(SC0.0) If you would like to do so, please provide a separate introduction to this module.
Okta is investing in emissions reductions efforts to meet our customers, investors, and employees expectations, and to achieve our climate strategy. For example, Oktaachieved 100% renewable electricity for our office energy consumption in FY22.

SC0.1(SC0.1) What is your company’s annual revenue for the stated reporting period?
Annual Revenue
Row 1

1858000000

SC1.1(SC1.1) Allocate your emissions to your customers listed below according to the goods or services you have sold them in this reporting period.
CDP

Page 48 of 76

Requesting member
Autodesk, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
No scope 1 sources
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Autodesk, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.21
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Purchased heating, purchased cooling
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Autodesk, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)

CDP

Page 49 of 76

Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
49.87
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Purchased Goods & Services, Fuel and Energy Related Activities, Business Travel, & Upstream Leased Assets
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Aveva Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Aveva Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.03

CDP

Page 50 of 76

Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Aveva Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
6.91
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Brown-Forman Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method

CDP

Page 51 of 76

Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Brown-Forman Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.05
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Brown-Forman Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
12.28
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeCDP

Page 52 of 76

Requesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations

CDP

Page 53 of 76

Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
74.43
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.05
Uncertainty (±%)

CDP

Page 54 of 76

Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Empire State Realty Trust, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
11.51
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Experian Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased

CDP

Page 55 of 76

Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Experian Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.27
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Experian Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
63.69
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeCDP

Page 56 of 76

Requesting member
Gartner, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Gartner, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.14
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Gartner, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
CDP

Page 57 of 76

Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
33.76
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
ITV
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
ITV
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.07
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
CDP

Page 58 of 76

VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
ITV
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
16.11
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
KPMG International
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member

CDP

Page 59 of 76

Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
KPMG International
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.5
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
KPMG International
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
117.4
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
CDP

Page 60 of 76

Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
1.01
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
CDP

Page 61 of 76

Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e238.63
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Moody's Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Moody's Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo

CDP

Page 62 of 76

Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Moody's Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Moody's Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
72.89
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency

CDP

Page 63 of 76

Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Nasdaq, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Nasdaq, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.13
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Nasdaq, Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
CDP

Page 64 of 76

Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
31.46
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Sage Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Sage Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.16

CDP

Page 65 of 76

Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Sage Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
37.6
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Salesforce, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method

CDP

Page 66 of 76

Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Salesforce, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Please select
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
1.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Salesforce, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e309.99Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeCDP

Page 67 of 76

Requesting member
ServiceNow Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Please select
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
ServiceNow Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
ServiceNow Inc
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations

CDP

Page 68 of 76

Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
72.89
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Telstra Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Telstra Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.03
Uncertainty (±%)

CDP

Page 69 of 76

Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Telstra Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
7.67
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Transurban Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased

CDP

Page 70 of 76

Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Transurban Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.19
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Transurban Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
45.27
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeCDP

Page 71 of 76

Requesting member
Virgin Money UK PLC
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Virgin Money UK PLC
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.41
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Virgin Money UK PLC
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
CDP

Page 72 of 76

Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
97.45
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Zurich Insurance Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Zurich Insurance Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.37
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
CDP

Page 73 of 76

VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Zurich Insurance Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
86.71
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member

CDP

Page 74 of 76

Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
0.31
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeRequesting member
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Scope of emissions
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 2: Capital goods
Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Category 5: Waste generated in operations
Category 6: Business travel
Category 7: Employee commuting
Category 8: Upstream leased assets
Category 13: Downstream leased assets
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
72.82
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Market value or quantity of goods/services supplied to the requesting member
Unit for market value or quantity of goods/services supplied
Currency
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeCDP

Page 75 of 76

SC1.2(SC1.2) Where published information has been used in completing SC1.1, please provide a reference(s).

SC1.3(SC1.3) What are the challenges in allocating emissions to different customers, and what would help you to overcome these challenges?
Allocation challenges

Please explain what would help you overcome these challenges

Customer base is too large and diverse to accurately track emissions to thecustomer level

As a software company, our operating model is such that we haven’t found a meaningful way to attribute emissions to individual
customers other than by sales.

SC1.4(SC1.4) Do you plan to develop your capabilities to allocate emissions to your customers in the future?
No

SC1.4b
(SC1.4b) Explain why you do not plan to develop capabilities to allocate emissions to your customers.
As a software company, we do not see a meaningful emissions allocation beyond sales at this time.

SC2.1(SC2.1) Please propose any mutually beneficial climate-related projects you could collaborate on with specific CDP Supply Chain members.

SC2.2(SC2.2) Have requests or initiatives by CDP Supply Chain members prompted your organization to take organizational-level emissions reduction initiatives?

SC4.1(SC4.1) Are you providing product level data for your organization’s goods or services?

Submit your response
In which language are you submitting your response?
EnglishPlease confirm how your response should be handled by CDP

Please select your submission options

I understand that my response will be shared with all requesting stakeholders

Response permission

Yes

PublicPlease confirm below
I have read and accept the applicable Terms

CDP

Page 76 of 76