1. Introduction

1. Introduction

Ensure that the calculation of Regional Safety Index does become atask of the local government.
Make sure that the competence of the evaluator does not influence thejudgment of the local government’s safety capability.
The perfunctory safety-related projects, such as those that do notreduce the number of deaths and incidents, should not affect thelevel of Regional Safety Index.

1. Introduction

2. Regional Safety Index Announcement in 20162nd Official Release in 2016

2. Regional Safety Index Announcement in 2016

Upgrading

Downgrading

Num. of L.G.

Num. of L.G.
decreasedHazard Indicator

Ratio

Num. of L.G.

Num. of L.G.
increasedHazard Indicator

Ratio

Fire

64

6398%

665888%

Traffic Accident

48

4798%

45

4498%

Crime

43

4195%

39

3385%

Safety Accident

52

3058%

48

48100%

Suicide

57

5698%

60

5795%

Infectious Disaese

52

4587%

53

4585%

Natural Disaster

57

57

100%

70

3651%

Average

53

4891%

54

4685%

Sectors

2. Regional Safety Index Announcement in 2016

Sectors

Hazard Indicators

2014

2015

Variation(Ratio)

Num of Deaths

322249↓73 (22.7%)

Num. of Fires

41,62443,915↑2,291 (5.5%)

Traffic Accident

Num. of Deaths

4,489

4,380

↓109 (2.4%)

Crime

Num. of the FifthViolent Crimes

578,334

560,813↓17,521 (3.0%)

Safety Accident

Num of Deaths

148,943

158,123↑9,180 (6.2%)

SuicideNum of Deaths

13,836

13,513↓323 (2.3%)

Infectious Disaese

Num of Deaths

2,765

2,798

↑33 (1.2%)

Natural Disaster

Result of ‘Safety Indexfor Community Safety’

0.739

0.651

↑0.088 (11.9%)Fire3. Evaluation Process

Statistics related to SafetyDep. & AgencyStatistics

1

National Police Agency

Crime related, Car accident related

2

Ministry of Employment andLabor

Industrial accident related

3

Ministry of Education

Education related

4

National Health InsuranceService

Num of Healthcare Provider, etc.

5

Ministry of Land, Infrastructureand Transport

Land & Road Traffic related

6

Korea MeteorologicalAdministration

Special Weather Report

7

Road Traffic Athority

Traffic Accident, Death, etc.

8

Ministry of Health and Welfare

Basic received people and healthprotection related

9

Korea Forest Service

Landslide and forest fire related

10

Ministry of Interior and Safety

Fire-related, Natural disasterrelated

11

Ministry of Foodand Drug Safety Food safety and Poising related

12

Statistics Korea

Cause of death & businessstatistics, etc.

13

Korean Education DevelopmentInstituteNum of Students

14

Korea Land&Housing Coperation Rate of Urbanization, ResidentRegistration, etc.

16

Ministry of Environment

Environment related

17

Local Government

Statistics by Local Government

3. Evaluation Process

Meaning of Hazard, Vulnerability, and Mitigation IndicesNum. of deaths and incidents by Sectors

Becomes the human andmaterial factors causingharmPrevent and counteract theoccurrence of harm in advance3. Evaluation Process

Key Indicators

3. Evaluation Process

Sectors and Model

Safety Index = 100 - (Hazard Ind. +여기에 수식을 입력하십시오.

- Mitigation Ind. )3. Evaluation Process

Natural Disaster Sector

3. Evaluation Process

Items and Detailed Indices of Safety Index for Community Safety

Indicators

Category

Frequency of Natural Disaster During Decade

RiskEnvironment(13)Scale of DamageRisk Factor

Social Risk Factor

from NaturalGeological Risk Factor

DisasterCommon Indicators

RiskManagementCapability(16)River DisasterRisk Factor

Inundation Disasterfrom Natural

Slope & Soil Erosion Disaster

Disaster

Seaside DisasterEtc.

Prevention Performance(18)3. Evaluation Process

Way to Calculate Safety Index

4. Utilization of Regional Safety Index

Regional Safety Diagnosis System

Operated to help local governments to strengthen their safety capabilities subjectively

4. Utilization of Regional Safety Index

Regional Safety Diagnosis System

4. Utilization of Regional Safety Index

Local Government Consulting

Support the local government consulting by to strengthen regional safety capabilities

5. Effects of Regional Safety Index Subjective Efforts and Improvement-50-250500

1000

Jeju-doGyeongsangnam…
Gyeongsangbuk…
Jeollanam-doJeollabuk-doChuncheongnam…
Chungcheongbu…
Gangwon-doGyeonggi-do0

5. Effects of Regional Safety Index TF Composition and Operation17 cities and provinces have composed and run TF to understand and improve

Safety Index (Consultative groups in response to Regional Safety Index)

Safety-RelatedDepartment