Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. , No. , March 

Access to Land in Sundanese Community: A Case Study ofUpland Peasant Households in Kemang Village,
West Java, Indonesia

Siti Sugiah Machfud MJ<C>:HN6=ῌ and M>OJCD Kosukeῌῌ

Abstract
This paper reports on a case study that explores women’s access to land, especially among
peasant households with a bilateral kinship system in a Sundanese community in an
upland village of West Java. Based on values of equity in gender, locally called sanak, theparents treat their sons and daughters equally as children and tend to allocate their land
based on the customary law. This law supports gender equality in land ownership, whichfalls into three categories applicable both for paddy field (sawah) and dry land (pasir). The
three categories of land ownership are (a) land solely owned by the husband, (b) land solely
owned by the wife, and (c) land with joint ownership (locally called gono-gini). Of the total ha of the land belonging to households studied, about ῎ is in gono-gini, while thepercentage owned solely by the husband is ῎ and solely by the wife is  ῎.
Of thehouseholds owning land, about  ῎ of them obtained the land either
through inheritance, grant or by purchasing after their marriage. The facts show that theowners of the household’s land are predominantly women, reaching  ῎ compared to only῎ owned by men. The gender equality in land ownership is also evident in theinheritance system that passes through both male and female lines. Based on  cases(households), the total land obtained from the mother is   ha (  ῎), while thatobtained from the father is  ha (῎) and that from both parents is   ha (  ῎).
Both women and men, including widows/widowers, have control over their land, not only
over their inherited/granted/purchased land, but also over to other land that is usedin sharecropping, rented and mortgaged. This phenomenon has been recognized by
the community and by the external authority at the village level as documented in the
Letter C.
Keywords: Sundanese community, sanak values, equality land ownership, gono-gini.

I

Introduction

Since the publication of Ester Boserup’s book on Women’s Role in Economic Developmentin  , ) there has been a growing recognition of the role of women in the agriculturalῌ

Department of Communication and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology,
Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia
e-mail: sugiahmugniesyah῏yahoo.comῌῌῑῒῐΐῌ Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University
e-mail: mizuno῏cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp
῍ Ester Boserup [  : ] investigated the role of women in three categories of farming; i. e.,male farming, female farming and mixed farming. The first is farming with low female ῌ519ῒΐῌ῍ῌῐ῏ ῐῐ῎ ῐ ῑsector.

Despite high awareness among the scholars, there has been too little effort

devoted to reveal the condition of women’s access to and their control over land,
especially in Indonesia.
Different scholars have conducted a considerable number of studies on women’s rolein the agricultural and rural development of Indonesia at different times. Among those,
Sajogyo [῍῕῔῏] and Hastuti et al. [῎ῌῌῌ] deserve special mention due to their potential froman academic perspective. The emphasis of these studies has lain more on the dynamics
of women’s role in agricultural production, focusing on time allocation without explaining the women’s access to land and their control over it.
Studies on the land systems of Indonesia, especially of Java, have a long history. A
number of scholars studied in depth the landholding or land ownership patterns in thecommunity and at the village level in order to understand rural economics as well associal structure in Java villages.

Based on the survey conducted by the colonial

government throughout Java during ῍῔ῒ῔ῌῒ῕, Kano [῍῕ΐΐ: ῏ ] reported that the heritable
individual possession of land was found in Java. In West Java and Preanger especially,such right is called milik, and it was found for sawah and also for lahan kering. During the

῍῕῔ῌs, a number of researchers conducted studies on issues relating to land in Java
villages. Among them van der Kroef, Hüsken, White and Wiradi are noteworthy. Whilevan der Kroef [῍῕῔ῐ] was primarily concerned with landholding patterns and social
structures in Java villages, Hüsken and White [῍῕῔῕] focused on social differentiation,
food production and agrarian control in Java. Meanwhile, the study by White and Wiradi[῍῕῔῕] dealt with issues relating to agrarian transformation, especially the changes infarming technology, land tenure, land market, and the distribution of operated sawahholdings and labor used in the three provinces in Java from ῍῕ΐ῍ to ῍῕῔῍. Excepting van
der Kroef, the researchers noted the impact brought by the changes of technology in thefield of absorption of female labor in rice transplanting, harvesting and post harvesting
work [Hüsken and White ῍῕῔῕: ῎ῑῐ; White and Wiradi ῍῕῔῕: ῎ΐ῏].
Curiously enough, no attention was given to the gender aspects of land ownership,
except by Kano, who briefly described opportunities for the widow and daughter on land
among farmer households [Kano ῍῕ΐΐ: ῍῎, ῍ῑ]. Such results were only natural, because of
the fact that researches were conducted mainly by using the household data as the unitof analysis, as found in Hüsken and White [῍῕῔῕: ῎ῑῒῌ῎ῑΐ] and White and Wiradi [῍῕῔῕:῎ῒ῔]. Further, these results occur because many researchers treat the household as asingle entity in relation to production; and assume that all household resources including
land must be owned and controlled by the husband.

ῌ520

participation associated with extensive plough cultivation; the second is characterized byshifting cultivation with high female participation combined with low technology; and thethird is characterized by sharing of farm work between women and men associated withintensive cultivation in irrigated land, land scarcity and small farm size.

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD Kῌ : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

In contrast, by referring to an Indonesian anthropologist, Koentjaraningrat [῎῕῔῎],῏) it
can be seen that land ownership and its distribution among household members are infact influenced by the kinship. Unfortunately, most of the studies conducted on landownership did not at all mention the influence of the kinship system on land distribution
among household members, irrespective of men and women. Kinship is an entry point tothe study of social institutions, including land ownership, since it examines the statuses
and roles of the individuals who make up a community.
There is some evidence that kinship system influences land allocation among household members. Simbolon [῎῕῕῔] ῐ) conducted a study on peasant women and their accessto land in a patrilineal kinship system in the Batak Toba, North Sumatra, while
Quisumbing and Otsuka [῏῍῍῎] ῑ) studied matrilineal kinship. In terms of bilateral kinship,especially in West Java, there are two groups of scholars having different opinions on
women’s access to land and their control over it in the Sundanese community.
The first group is those scholars who found that women and men in the Sundanesecommunity of West Java have equal access to land [Soepomo ῎῕῔῏; Hardjono ῎῕῔ΐ].
According to Soepomo [῎῕῔῏: ῎ ], the people of West Java generally acknowledge and take
into account the kinship through both father’s as well as mother’s lines, and men(husbands) and women (wives) have equal rights in their marriage, in terms of individual
rights and property rights. Equal individual rights means that men (husbands) andwomen (wives) have their own control over their children. In the case of divorce, either
husband or wife has the right to take care of the children. Soepomo’s finding was
supported by Hardjono who studied land ownership pattern in an irrigated village ofWest Java. Hardjono [῎῕῔ΐ: ῒ῏] adds that in terms of land ownership, a distinction wasmade between the land that husband and wife inherited from their respective parents
and the land purchased during the marriage. However, neither of them mentioned thevalues that cause the Sundanese women to have access to land.
῏ῌ There are four types of kinship: patrilineal, matrilineal, bilineal and bilateral principles ofdescent. In the patrilineal descent, the male line gets the inheritance and for the matrilineal
descent, the female line gets the inheritance. In the bilineal descent, the male line gets a
certain number of rights, while the female gets the other rights. Meanwhile in the bilateraldescent, the inheritance system passes through the male as well as the female lines[Koentjaraningrat ῎῕῔῎: ῎῏῕ῌ῎ῐ῍].
ῐῌ She reports that despite the control and limitations over the rights to use and alienate land
imposed by the adat (customs), in reality there are various ways for men and women to get
the right of access to land. The embeddedness of gender, kinship and economic status in
the end determines how one is aided and at the same time constrained in strategizing
access rights to land [Simbolon ῎῕῕῔: ῎ῐῐ].
ῑῌ Their study in South Sumatra found that the adoption of agro forestry and the individualization of land rights resulted in a change in the traditional inheritance system. The inheritance system is evolving from a strictly matrilineal system to a more egalitarian system inwhich sons and daughters inherit the type of land that is more appropriate for their own
intensive work [Quisumbing and Otsuka ῏῍῍῎: ῔ῑ].
521ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῏῏῏ ῏ ῒEkadjati [῍῔῔ῐ: ῎ῌ῎], a historian, states that the inheritance system of the Sundaneseis based on the concept of “lalaki nanggung, awewe nyuhun” (the man is carrying
something on his shouldersῌbecause of heavinessῌand woman is carrying somethingon her headῌbecause of lightness). This caused a son to inherit twice as much as adaughter. Nevertheless, his statement was not supported by the empirical data. It seems
that his opinion is based on a perception presuming that as the majority of the Sundaneseis Muslim, the inheritance system practiced among their households would be strongly
influenced by the Islamic Law of Inheritance ῐ ) and the Hadiz.ῑ)Soepomo’s study was mainly based on court cases or cases recorded by the village
officials who spread out around West Java during the colonial era.

In contrast,

Hardjono’s study used households and the holding as the base of her analysis. Although
she mentioned women’s access to land among peasant households, there are no further
elaborations on gender in land ownership as she did not present sex-disaggregated dataat the household level. Moreover, there is a lack of information, especially in terms offormal recognition toward individual land ownership in respect to gender at the village
level. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct a study on the values that have offered the
Sundanese men and women an opportunity to have an equal access to land, on the
dynamics of their relation to land ownership at the household level, as well as on theevidence on formal recognition of individual land ownership in respect to gender.
Such findings are very important not only to gain a better understanding of women’s
access to land among peasant households in bilateral kinship, but also to support theavailability of sex-disaggregated data on land ownership. Such data may help the policy
makers ῒ ) to value women and men equally as the owners of agricultural resources, which
in turn would be important for implementing the Presidential Instruction Number ῔ of῎ῌῌῌ (Inpres No ῔ Tahun ῎ῌῌῌ) regarding Gender Mainstreaming in Development.ΐ) Thisῐῌ “There is a share for men and a share for women from what is left by parents and thosenearest related, whether the property be small or largeῌa legal share” [the Holy Quran,An-Nisaa: ῒ ]; and “Allah commands you as regard your children’s (inheritance): to the male,a portion equal to that of two females. . . . (These fixed shares) are ordained by Allah. And
Allah is Ever All-Knower, All-Wise” [The Holy Quran, An-Nisaa: ῍῍] in Al-Hilali and Khan
[῍῔῔ῒ: ῍ῌΐ].
ῑῌ Prophet of Muhammad stated: You are all leaders and each of you will be asked to accountfor your leadership. A man is a leader for his household and will be asked to account for
his leadership. A woman is a leader in her husband’s house and she will be asked toaccount for her leadership [Zaini ῍῔῔῏: ΐΐ].
ῒῌ As most of the agricultural production systems in rural area are run by the households,
most of the policy makers of the Ministry of Agriculture in Indonesia tend to use household approach in implementing their programs, and most of the programs for rural womenare conducted by using Women in Development (WID) approach, excepting some projects
that are funded by international agencies where gender perspectives are used.
ΐῌ President instructed all Ministries, Local Government and non department institutions toinclude gender equity and equality dimensions in all policies, programs, or activities ofdevelopment programs, including agricultural development [Anonymous ῎ῌῌ῍].
522

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD Kῌ : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

study is also important as a preliminary study for further research on gender andagrarian transformation, as Hart et al. [῎῕῔῕: ῎῍] states that a principal challenge of future
research in agrarian transformation is to link the analysis of changing relations between
genders and generations with the emerging process of differentiation.
By using a gender perspective, the objectives of the study are to clarify the existenceof values internalized by peasant household members in land allocation among the
Sundanese community with bilateral kinship system, and to explain their influence on
the practice of land rights with regard to landowner category. Along with these, theorigin of land rights recognition, especially by the household, community, and external
authority at the village level, will be discussed.

II Research Methodology
Conceptual Framework
Many scholars and institutions are working on gender perspective. Gender refers to thesocial, economic and cultural roles and relations between women and men, including
their different responsibilities in a given culture or location and in different populationgroups.

As a social construct, gender can change over time and vary according togeographic location and social context [ILO ῏῍῍῍: ῑΐ; Wood ῏῍῍῎: ῏῏; FAO ῏῍῍ῐ: ῒ ].
According to Moser [῎῕῕ῐ: ῐ ] the focus on gender rather than women makes it critical tolook not only at the category “women,” but at women in relation to men, and at the way
in which relations between these categories are socially constructed.
There are two concepts that are central to analyzing gender in land ownership:
access to and control over the land.

Haggis et al. [῏῍῍῍: ῎῔] defined “access” as theopportunity to make use of resources, but without the authority of taking decisions on
how to use them. While the word “control” was defined as the complete authority tomake decisions on the use of resources. According to Agarwal [῎῕῕ῑ: ῎῕], “the concept ofaccess to land can be through not only rights of ownership and use but also informal
concessions granted by individuals to kin or friends.” She stated that rights are defined
as claims that are legally and socially recognized and enforceable by an external
authority, be it a village level institution or some higher-level judicial or executive bodyof the State. Further, she defined control over the land as the ability to decide how theland is used, whether it can be leased out, mortgaged, bequeathed, and sold and so on.
She also emphasized that when speaking of the importance of women having “independent rights in land,” it should be an effective right, which means “having a right not justin law but also in practice.”
By referring to the concept of bilateral kinship and the above discussion, this study
attempts to show that in the bilateral kinship system, the land inheritance system is523ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῐῐ῏ ῐ ῒbased on the customary law which is strongly influenced by gender equity ῒ ) values andthis, in turn, leads to gender equality῍ῌ) in terms of land allocation and control at thehousehold level. Based on this hypothesis, this study will try to find information on thevalues regarding gender equity which are internalized among peasant households; and toelaborate further how these values are reflected in the nature and the dynamic ofcustomary law which directs the land rights and the system of land inheritance that havebeen practiced by the members of the peasant household.
With regard to Agarwal’s concepts stated above, this study needs to find data on landownership of households in terms of size of land and categorize the owners of the landwith respect to gender. In order to understand the origin of land that belongs to thehousehold members of the cases under survey, data on two generations are needed. Thisis also helpful for identifying the mechanisms of land distribution at the household level.
Data on land ownership are also important for mapping out the land distribution patternat the community level with respect to gender. Realizing that the peasant households areheterogeneous in land size, access and control, this paper attempts to give an explanationof women’s access to and control over land by looking at the stratification of householdin terms of land ownership.
Furthermore, given the heterogeneous pattern of households and the nature ofinterrelationships among them, this study is also concerned with the data on the
dynamics of land tenure among the peasant households, data on other factors in thevillage that shed light on rights to land in the form of usufruct, such as leasing/renting;sharecropping and mortgaging in respect to gender. Empirical data partly supports therights in land in the community level. Further, with a view to examining the legal
aspects of recognition of women’s rights in land at the community or village level, othertypes of data or historical corpuses available in the village office, especially the “LetterC”῍῍) document, are used.
Methodology of Field ResearchThis study used several research methodologies to collect the primary and secondaryῒῌ Gender equity means fairness of treatment for women and men, according to their respective needs. This may include equal treatment or treatment that is different but which isconsidered equivalent in terms of rights, benefits, obligations and opportunities [ILO ῎ῌῌῌ:ῐῑ].
῍ῌῌ Gender equality entails the concept that all human beings, both men and women, are free
to develop their personal abilities and make choices without the limitations set by stereotypes, rigid gender roles and prejudices. The different behaviours, aspirations and needs ofwomen and men are considered, valued and favored equally [ILO ῎ῌῌῌ: ῐῑ].
῍῍ῌ Letter C (Buku Letter C) is a book that deals with the judgment on land classification andsize of holdings made by the village officials for determining the classification for imposing
Regional Development Levy (Iuran Pembangunan Daerah) for each landowner [Kano ῍ῒῑῐ:῎῏ῒῌ῎ῐῌ].
524

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD Kῌ : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

data. The primary data collected by the full enumeration survey will be used along withdetailed interviews of the upland peasant households in two adjacent hamlets of Kemang
Village i. e., Beber and Cikupa. These two hamlets have been selected because they
represent the general conditions of the village with regard to social, economic andagro-ecological factors. The full enumerated survey of the household was conducted in
September and October ῎῔῔ΐ, while the collection of documents and extensive interviews
were taken in April ῏῍῍῏, especially to complete the qualitative data. Based on the fullenumerated survey result, the number of households selected for studying the landownership is ῎ῑῐ.

From these households, ῏῍ sample households were selected forin-depth interview. The questionnaires include demographical aspects, the pattern ofland ownership, the size of paddy field and dry land owned, the location of land, the way
the land was obtained, the kind of usufruct, and others. The in-depth interviews wereconducted particularly to collect information on values, inheritance and kinship systems.
To show the dynamics of land ownership pattern at the community level based on
landholding, the peasant households were differentiated into the following four strata,
determined based on focused group discussion.

Stratum

Size of Landholding

Stratum A (upper stratum)
Stratum B (medium stratum)
Stratum C (lower stratum)
Stratum D (lowest stratum)

More than ῎῕ῐ ha῍῕ῒ haῌ῎῕ῐ ha῍῕῎ ha but less than ῍῕ῒ ha
Landless households

The secondary data that are used in this study include the data on monographs of
Kemang Village and the “Letter C” document. Since the data of the “Letter C” in ῎῔῔ΐ arenot available, the data on ῎῔ῒῑ have been used instead, particularly for obtaining figureson the recognition of women’s and men’s rights to land.

III Research Site: General Condition
Kemang Village is one of the villages of the Sub-district of Bojong Picung, Cianjur
District, which is located in the southern part of West Java. The village is situatedbetween Sukaratu Village to the north, Cililin Subdistrict (Bandung District) to the south,
Sukarame village to the west and Cihea Village to the east. Administratively, the village
is divided into three dusun (sub-villages); and like other upland Sundanese villages, each
dusun consists of a number of hamlets (kampung), which are scattered over the whole
village territory and linked by foot tracks. There are ῏῏ hamlets which are unevenly
distributed into the three sub-villages (dusun): ῒ hamlets in Dusun I, ῐ hamlets in Dusun
II, and ῎῍ hamlets in Dusun III (see Map ῎ ).
525῔῕῎῏῎ῒῑ ῐ  ΐ

Map ῌ Location of Research Site and of Kemang Village, Cianjur District
Source: Location map is modified from the Map of Indonesia and Java in Hüsken and White[ : ].
Note: Map of Kemang Village is drawn by E. Kusumah, an extension agent of PMDHT (Integrated
Forest Village Community Development Program), Kemang Village ( ).

Kemang Village represents the upland area, which is surrounded by the National
Forest Land (Perhutani’s Land). Of the total village area, which is around  ha, ῍(around   ha) is Perhutani’s Land, consisting of  ha as conservation forest and  ha as production forest. As an upland village, there are two types of agricultural landthat are important to peasant households in the village: paddy field or sawah, and the dry
land or pasir (these local names are used in this paper).
The land that belongs to the Kemang people is around   ha, consisting ofsawah (῍) and ha of ha of pasir (῍) [Anonymous  ]. The pasir owned by the

Kemang people is distributed throughout the hamlets in Kemang Village; while thesawah owned by the Kemang people is located not only in the village but also in the
low-land areas surrounding Kemang such as Bojong Picung and Cibarengkok.
Similar to the upland villages in West Java, there is no communal land such as tanahbengkok) in this village. However, there is about  ha of village land called tanahtitisara, which is all in the form of pasir.

Besides being allocated for building theelementary school in Baranangsiang hamlet and the village cooperative, the village landis also allocated for the cemetery.

Interestingly, about eight landless householdsῌ

including two widowsῌalso use parts of this land for non-permanent houses.)The population of the village was  people, with males slightly outnumbering
females, i. e.  ῍, and the number of the households was [ibid.].

The major

occupations include farmers of sawah and pasir, agricultural wage laborers, traders,artisans, and transportation workers. About out of  are reported as landowners,

ῌ Tanah bengkok is sawah assigned to village officials for their private use [Kano  : ]ῌ There is an agreement between the village organization and the villagers who occupied thetanah titisara. The households could occupy the tanah titisara as long as the land has notbeen used for cemetery.
526

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD Kῌ : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

while the rest is landless [ibid.]. The Kemangs are all Muslims.
Of the ῎ῒῑ enumerated households, males headed ῔ῑ῕ῑῌ of the households whereasῐ῕ῑῌ of the households were headed by females. The low number of female headedhouseholds occurred due to the fact that among the Sundanese Muslim community, thestatus of the head of household (kepala keluarga or kk) is determined de jure. By the typeof family, about ΐ῍ῌ of the enumerated households are the nuclear type of family, madeup of parent(s) with or without children, and the rest (῏῍ῌ) are the extended type offamily, which consists of husband and wife with either married or unmarried adultchildren or grandchildren. Polygamy was found in two cases among the enumerated
households (about ῎ῌ).
The ῎ῒῑ households studied there were ῒῐῐ household members. By marriage status,
almost ῑ῍ῌ were married (couple), ῐῒῌ had not married yet, and the rest were widows or
widowers. Most of the couples consisted of people who were born in different hamlets ofthe same village, but some of the younger people were married to a wife/husband froma different sub-district and/or district in West Java. Therefore, the marriage system ishamlet exogamy. Of the ΐ῍ couples, about ῔῏ῌ choose their wife/husband by their own
decision, and the rest had the choice made by their parents. The residential system of
new couples is to live with either the husband’s or wife’s family or alternatively to havethe opportunity to choose to live far from both families. This depends on the availabilityof land that can be used for building the couple’s house and/or the job of the husband. Of
the total interviewed couples, about ῑ῍ῌ live in the wife’s land, ῐῒῌ in the husband’s
land; while the rest is in a new location (as the husband works in another village or in an
urban area). The average age of first marriage among those who are currently married
was about ῏῎ years for men and ῎ῒ῕ῐ years for women, while for widows and widowers,
the average age of first marriage was about ῎ῑ years for the women and about ῎ΐ῕ΐ years
for the men. With regard to marriage frequency, generally, the male household members
who had married had been married ῎῕ῒ times, with the equivalent figure for women beingslightly lower, about ῎῕ῐ times.

IV The Values of Sanak and Its Relation to theCustomary Law of Inheritance System
As already mentioned earlier, Ekadjati pointed out the values of lalaki nanggung-awewenyuhun. This concept implies gender inequity, with values of treating men and women
differently in any aspect of household life. On the contrary, we found that the values thatgovern life among the peasant households in Kemang are based on the gender equity.
The values concerning children among the Kemang households are called sanak, which
gives sons and daughters the same status as children (anak). Having these values, theparents treat the children equitably with regard to property including land that is bought527ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῍῍῏ ῍ ῒduring their marriage as well as to the property/land that was owned by them at the timeof their marriage.
Although the Kemang people are all Muslims, customs related to land allocation in
the household deviated from the scriptural text (the Holy Quran) rules. The inheritancesystem that has been implemented by most of the Kemang people is bilateral, where theland is allocated through the nucleus household based on equality of division among all
children.
In general, the ownership right of land in Kemang is such that the owner, mother
and/or father, can dispose of her/his land to her/his/their children according to personalor joint will. However, this should be done prior to the death and this is called hibah(grant). In the case where the mother or the father dies before allocation of the land,
usually the land would be allocated by the surviving spouse. In a case where both thefather and mother die before their children reach adulthood, the eldest daughter/son
distributes the land among the siblings based on the customary inheritance system. In
the case when they have to allocate land according to Islamic law of inheritance, theytend to allocate land in two stages. At first, by implementing the Islamic law or what
they call Faroid, the son gets twice as much as the daughter. In the second stage, thebrother shares a half of his inherited land by dividing it into two parts and giving a partto his sisters. The first stage is conducted to express his obedience to the Islamic law ofinheritance, and the second stage is to express his respect and solidarity to his sister/s.
The brother tends to share the land equally with his sister, as he is aware that in reality
his sister also needs land for her livelihood. Therefore, there is a distinction between theland that a husband and wife inherit from their respective parents and the land purchased during the marriage, which is called as tepung kaya or gono-gini.
There is fairness between wife and husband regarding the land, and marriage does
not bring ownership rights to the land of the spouse, so in all situations a woman/man
retains her/his rights to her/his own land, as pointed out by Hardjono [ῌῐ῏῎: ῎῏]. As
far the couple has children, the couple’s siblings (aunt and/or uncle) have no rights toinherit the land. Interestingly, in the case that the couple does not have any children, theland is equally allocated to their siblings. In the case that all the couple’s siblings diedearlier, the husband’s and wife’s land is equally allocated to the sons and daughters of thesibling.ῌ῍) According to some informants, until recently there has been no evidence of
conflict among the couple’s siblings (aunts and uncles) or between nieces and/or nephews
regarding the practice of customary law on land inheritance systems. This may be dueῌ῍ῌ There is a case of Mrs. HT who married twice but did not have any children. Before her
death, she made a testament to her niece and nephew to allocate her land as follows: to sell
the one hectare of her pasir and part of the money should be spent to ask the Islamic leader
who has already gone on a Hajj pilgrimage to conduct a Hajj pilgrimage on her behalf; andthe rest was for her death ritual ceremonial activity; while her sawah should be allocatedequally among her niece and nephew.
528

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

to the fact that Kemang people generally respect the testaments (called amanat) made by
their late parents or aunts/uncles, so as to ensure the parent or uncle/aunt rests in piece.

V

The Distribution of Land

The Total Land Owned by the Peasant Households
As already mentioned above there are two types of agricultural lands that are considered
important by the Kemang people i. e., sawah and pasir. Fig.  shows the total land thatbelonged to the Beber and Cikupa residents.
As seen in Fig. , the total land owned by households of the two hamlets was  ha,consisting of  ha or ῌ sawah and  ha or   ῌ of pasir. For pasir, all the landthat belonged to the hamlets’ people was located inside the village, and was around ῌof the total pasir in the village. The sawah was around  ῌ of the total sawah in thevillage. By location, the percentage of sawah located inside the village was higher thanthe percentage located outside the village. It was  ha, representing   ῌ of the total
sawah that belonged to the village. The remaining land was located in Bojong Picung
and Cibarengkok area, amounting to  ha or around ῌ of the total sawah in thevillage.
In regard to the fact that the peasant households are heterogeneous, this study also
looked at the “clue” of differentiation in terms of land ownership by analyzing the land
distribution pattern according to stratification. Of the   enumerated households, there
were  households (ῌ) of Stratum A,  households (ῌ) of Stratum B,households ( ῌ) of Stratum C and about  households ( ῌ) which were landless.
Table  provides some information of land distribution among the peasant households
according to stratification.

Fig. ῌ

The Total Land Owned by Households of the Two Hamlets by Type of Land in (in ha and ῌ)
Source: Fieldwork, .
529῔῕῎῏῎ῒῑTable ῌῐ ΐ

The Total Land Owned by Peasant Households in the Two Hamlets in  by Type ofLand and Stratification
Unit: ha (῍)

Stratification

Sawah

Pasir

Total

Stratum A (nῌ )
Stratum B (nῌ )
Stratum C (nῌ ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) () () () (  )  ( )

Total (nῌ ) ( )  (  ) ()Source: Fieldwork, .

As it is seen in Table , ῍ of the total land belonged to Stratum A households.
Looking at the type of land, Stratum A households owned  ha or almost ῍ of thetotal sawah and also 
controlled

ha or  ῍ of the total pasir. In terms of sawah, Stratum A

times the amount of land controlled by Stratum B and  times the amountcontrolled by Stratum C. For pasir, Stratum A controlled double the amount owned by
Stratum B and C. Besides the landowners, the identity of the Stratum A is described bysome combination of the following: banana traders or the owners of wood and rice
milling micro enterprises and hajis, and elementary school teachers. Some of them were
either traders in banana leaves and fruits, or owners of rice hullers, trucks, vans and small
shops. This is a tendency of what White and Wiradi stated as strategy of accumulation,in which surpluses derived from one income activity are used for gaining access to (andhigher income in) the other [White and Wiradi : ].
The Average Size of Land among Peasant Households
This section aims at describing the average size of land of the household according tostratum. Of the  households studied, the average holding of the sawah, pasir and thetotal land was only  ha,  ha and  ha respectively. In other words, theaverage size of pasir was almost  times higher than the average size of sawah.
However, if only land-owning households are considered ( households), as shownin Table , the figure rises to  ha for sawah,   ha for the pasir and the total land isaround  ha. The largest size of land owned by households is  ha for sawah and ha for pasir.
Of the households that owned the land, counting both sawah and pasir, the averageland size of Stratum A households was around 

ha, that is around  times and times higher than Stratum B and Stratum C. However, there is a patron client relationship between the upper stratum households with those of the lower stratum. Since thepasir is located in remote areas and the households of the upper stratum cultivated their
pasir with banana leaves, the households of the lower stratum and landless households
get the opportunity to work as laborers harvesting and transporting banana leaves. The
remoter the pasir is located, the higher the share that obtained by the laborers. If thepasir is located close to the human settlement, the share is : ; but for pasir farther way
530

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community
Table ῌAverage Land Size Owned by Households in the Two Hamlets in  by Type of Landand Stratification
Unit: ha (῍)

Stratification

Sawah

Pasir

Total

Stratum A (nῌ )
Stratum B (nῌ )
Stratum C (nῌ )  ( )  ( )  ( )  ( )  ( )  ( )  ()  ()()

Total (nῌ )  ( )  (  )  ()Source: Fieldwork,  .

from settlements the share is : , and for the farthest pasir, the share is : . Lower
stratum households and the landless also have an opportunity to harvest and processliqueur of the palm trees that grow naturally in the pasir that belongs to upper stratum
households [Mugniesyah, Mizuno and Iwamoto : ].

VI Gender and the Practice of Land Rights at the Household Level
In the following parts of this paper, an attempt will be made to provide evidence on how
the customary law is applied in practice, especially with regard to landowner categories
at the household level, and to the origin of the land.
Landowner Category at the Household Level
Based on the inheritance system described above, there are three categories of landownership at the household level: the land solely owned by the husband, the land solely
owned by the wife, and the land owned under joint ownership, locally called tepung kaya/
gono-gini. Fig.  shows the total land owned by peasants’ households by category of
landowner.
In general, of the   ha total land of the enumerated households,   ha ( ῍)
was in gono-gini, while land owned by wife solely was   ha ( ῍) and land owned by
the husband solely was   ha ( ῍). This means that there is opportunity for many
households to expand their land after their marriage, although the size of land is verysmall. By the type of land, there is a slight difference between sawah and pasir. In termsof sawah, the figures for land owned solely by the wife are higher than those for land
owned solely by the husband: ha ( ῍) of women’s solely-owned land and ha( ῍) of husband’s solely-owned land. The pasir shows the contrary picture: the wife’s
solely-owned land was   ha ( ῍) and the husband’s solely-owned land was ha( ῍).
Of the total land owned by the households ( households), about  households
owned their land through inheritance or grant, and the rest were those that owned landthrough purchasing after their marriage (gono-gini). Looking at the owner of the land, it531

ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῐῐ῏ ῐ ῒFig. ῌ

Total Land (ha) Owned by Households in the Two Hamlets by Type of Land
and Owner Category in ῍῔῔ΐ
Source: Fieldwork, ῍῔῔ΐ.

is found that wives owned the largest part of the household’s land. Of the households
that owned land, ῐ῏ῌ of them were households where the land is solely-owned by thewife, owning pasir, sawah or both. Meanwhile households where the land was solelyowned by the husband were only ῏ΐῌ, and the remaining was gono-gini land. In otherhouseholds, the sawah belongs to the wives and pasir belongs to husbands (ῒῌ). Only ῐῌof the households owned both types of land inherited from or granted by their parents.
As shown in Fig. ῏, generally the average land size of wife’s land was slightly lower
than that of the husband. However, the figure differed slightly according to the type ofland. Regarding sawah, the average land size of wife category was ῑῌ m῎ larger than thatof husband’s; while for pasir the husband’s land was ῒ῍ῌ m῎ larger than that of the wife’s.
Further, it is interesting to compare these categories for both types of land among
the strata, as can be seen in Table ῏.
As shown in this table, the higher the stratum, the higher the average land size in thethree categories for both types of land. Among the Stratum A and C households, in termsof sawah, the average land size owned by the wife was slightly higher than that of thehusband.
This situation occurs due to the fact that some women with half a hectare of land
were married to men with little or no land. Interestingly, some of the Kemang women
prefer to marry a man who is capable of managing her land. This is different from thefindings of Hardjono who studied in Sukahaji, Bandung and reported the tendency for“land to marry land,” with it being as almost unusual for a man or woman with half a532

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

Fig. ῌThe Average Land Size Owned By Households in the Two Hamlets in  by Type ofLand and Owner Category (in ha)
Source: Fieldwork, .

Table ῌThe Average Size of Land Owned by Peasant Households in the Two Hamlets by Typeof Land, Landowner and Stratification in Unit: ha
Sawah

Pasir

Stratification
Stratum A (nῌ )
Stratum B (nῌ )
Stratum C (nῌ )

Husband

Wife

Gono-gini

Husband

Wife

Gono-gini









 











 



Source: Fieldwork, .

hectare of land to marry a person with no assets in the form of an anticipated warisan(inheritance) of land [Hardjono : ]. Among Stratum B households, the average landsize that was owned by husband and wife was almost the same both for the sawah andpasir. Furthermore, we find a different land ownership pattern among the strata as seenin Table .
Among the Stratum A households, the land ownership pattern for sawah and pasir issimilar. There were four dominant categories: (a) HusbandῌWifeῌGono-gini, (b) Husbandῌ
Gono-gini, (c) WifeῌGono-gini and (d) Gono-gini only.

Among the Stratum B and C

households, the percentage of women category was slightly dominant, especially for thesawah. The percentage was  ῍ among Stratum B and  ῍ among Stratum C. But
for pasir there was a difference between the two strata. Among Stratum B households,
the percentage of gono-gini land was dominant ( ῍), then the pattern of WifeῌGono-giniand Husband, each ῍, followed by wife (῍). In other words, among Stratum A, mostof the households were those that can expand or accumulate the land that derived fromthe couple, or from each member of the couple. In contrast, among Stratum B and C533῔῕῎῏῎ῒῑTable ῌῐ ΐLand Ownership Pattern: Among Peasant Household in the Two Hamlets by Type ofLand and Stratum in 
Unit: ῍Land Ownership
Pattern

Sawah
Stratum A Stratum B

Pasir
Stratum C Stratum A Stratum B

HῌWῌGG
HῌW
HῌGG
WῌGG
W solely
H solely
GG solely
None


























Total





Stratum C






































Source: Fieldwork, .
Note: HῌHusband, WῌWife, GGῌGono-ginihouseholds, sawah that is derived from the wife was dominant, while the pasir thatderived from wife and husband was also dominant. It seems that the figures mentioned
above reflect that in general the equality in access to land among women and men in
Kemang village has been implemented.
Origin of the Land and Its Dynamics
Table  presents some information on the origin of land, which is based on in-depth
interviews of  selected families.

The data show that husband and wife obtained

inherited and granted land from their parents through their mother and father as well asfrom both of them.
As shown in Table , of the total land,  ha (῍) land was obtained from themother. This amount was not so different compared to that obtained from the father(   ha or  ῍); while land obtained from both parents was  ha or ῍ of thetotal land. Furthermore, based on the obtaining process, the majority of the husband’sland and wife’s land is obtained by the way of the inheritance system, which is applicablefor both sawah and pasir.
It is interesting to note that in the case when one of the couple dies earlier, thesurvivor should allocate the father’s/mother’s land directly to their children as soon as
possible, especially when the son/daughter is adult. If the son/daughter is still young,her/his brother/sister kept the land and gave the land after they he or she became adultor married.
The data analysis for the total inherited and granted land shows that there wasconsiderably more land owned by wives through inheritance and grant in regard to
sawah and pasir. As may be seen in Table , the total sawah owned by wives was about ha, while that owned by husbands was only  ha. For pasir the amount of wife’s
534

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community
Table ῌThe Total Land Owned by Households in the Two Hamlets by Owner and Origin ofLand in 
Unit: haSawah

Origin of Land

Pasir

Inheritance

Grant

Inheritance

Grant

Total

H

W

H

W

H

W

H

W

MotherFatherMother and Father


 


 







 
 
 






 










 

 

Total

 









 



 



Source: Based on our field research in April   (nῌ  households).
Note: HῌHusband, WῌWife

Table ῍

The Average Land Size among Households in the Two Hamlets by Owner and Originof Land in 
Unit: haSawah

Origin of Land

MotherFatherMother and Father
Total

Pasir

Inheritance

Grant

Inheritance

Grant

H

W

H

W

H

W

H

W

 




 


 
 


 

 





 
 


 
 


 

 

 

 

 

 





 



Source: Based on our field research in April   (nῌ  households).
Note: HῌHusband, WῌWife

and husband’s land was  ha and  ha respectively. In other words, almost ῍ ofsawah and ῍ of pasir was inherited land owned by the wife.
In terms of the average land size, the figure is similar to the total land as mentioned
above (see Table  ). Women (wives) inherited larger sawah and pasir than men (husbands) by   ha and   ha respectively. Women (wives) supported their households
by making access to land in case of almost all the strata. In Stratum A, there is a case ofa polygamous household. In this case, it is found that the husband who has   ha ofsawah and  ha of pasir married to his first wife who has  ha of sawah and  haof pasir, and then to the second wife who has  ha of sawah and  ha of pasir.
According to his two wives, their husband’s land is not enough to support their household expenditure. In another case, we found two cases of women, one from Stratum B andone from Stratum C, who married twice, and neither the first husband nor the second
husband had any land.
Since land is considered very important for the household economy, it is common for
the woman (wife) and husband to prefer to keep inherited land as their own possession.
There is an exception to this practice in that they sell land when they find scope to buy
another piece of better quality of land. Everybody, irrespective of gender, prefers to sell535ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῐῐ῏ ῐ ῒthe land with gono-gini status if they have it.
A number of cases among the respondents showed that they usually sell their own
land after discovering the possibility of buying another piece of land, either sawah and or
pasir. It was also found that the woman as well as the man has the right to buy land
individually. Of the ῎ῌ cases, ῌ῕ῒΐ ha of sawah were bought by the wife ( ῏ households)and ῍῕῍ΐ ha were jointly bought by husband and wife or gono-gini ( ῔ households). In
terms of pasir, around ῎῕῎῏ ha ( ῏ households) and ῔῕ῑῐ ha ( ΐ households) were bought bywife and gono-gini respectively.
The women of Kemang keep control over the land which is inherited from theirmothers or fathers. In the case of a woman of Stratum A of the polygamous family, thesecond wife stated that she sold pasir three times at different stages. First, she sold thepasir inherited from her mother to buy sawah, which was more productive i. e., ῏ῌῌῌ ofharvesting intensity. Next, she sold a part of another piece of pasir when she decided togo for a Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca. Curiously enough, she even asked her husband tofollow her with the money she received by selling the landed property. She also decided
to adopt three childrenῌone foster daughter and two foster sonsῌwhom she later ongave rights to cultivate a part of her sawah as well as pasir based on the sharecropping
system. Third, she decided to sell a part of her sawah that was bought by the money
earned from selling the pasir to support her youngest daughter for studying at theuniversity.

She said that all their children were enrolled in academic institutions

including the universities in the capital city of West Java (Bandung) using the money
earned from her land. The income of her husband is not enough, since her husband hasnine children from his first wife. But, she recognizes that her husband helps her inmaintaining her land, especially after he retired from being the head of the village.
The second case is a woman of Stratum B who married to a second husband having
no land who works as a civil servant. She manages her own land by herself since herhusband works as a civil servant outside the village. She reports that she also keeps theincome drawn from her inherited land due to the fact that the land under question
belongs to her and also to two of her sons from the first husband. The land belonging to
the woman of Stratum B consists of land that she inherited from her mother (sawah), herfather (pasir), and from her first husband (sawah and pasir).

Another case is theland-owning woman of Stratum C, who obtained a divorce from her husband because in
her opinion her husband was not working hard enough for her land. She decided toremarry a person whom she considered very hardworking. Interestingly, she decided tobuy another piece of land during their marriage, which she called the gono-gini land, as
she thought that her husband contributed largely to the income that derived from her
sawah.

This points out the fact that the land categorized as gono-gini may also be

supported by income originating from the wife’s property.
The gender equality in land ownership also supports the tendency for equality inproductive activities. Based on the data in ῍῔῔ΐ, it is known that women and men in536

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

Kemang Village are involved in rice farming in sawah and huma paddy farming in pasir[Mugniesyah and Mizuno ]. The average working hours required for rice farming insawah are about  hours in the rainy season and  hours in the dry season.
Women (family and hired labor) contributed about almost

῍ in the wet season and῍in the dry season. Similarly, in huma paddy production in pasir, of the total working
hours required for huma paddy production, women contributed around  ῍ out of thetotal hours ( hours in six months period). Interestingly, there is no sex segregationin the rice farming activities in sawah as well as in huma paddy in pasir. Women and men
are engaged in almost rice farming activities in sawah.

The gender stereotype of

preparation of land and spraying work being man’s domain is exclusively among thepeasant households. In contrast to this perception, women and men are involved in
preparing land and spraying work, although the working hours are relatively short. In
huma paddy production in pasir, women and men are also engaged in the “heavy tasks”
such as slashing, burning of tree and cleaning the land. In these activities, womencontributed  ῍ of the total activity, or about

῍ of the men’s contribution. Generally,

women also took part in decision making together with their husbands in almost all
activities in rice farming in sawah as well as in huma paddy production in pasir. Womenare also involved in decision making in the technological domain such as fertilizing,
spraying and milling.

Women in Kemang also contributed significantly to thehousehold’s income. Of the average household incomes in  (about  million rupiahs),
women contributed about  ῍ of the household income from their non-farm productive
activities; and together with the husbands, they contributed about ῍ from agriculturaland brown sugar industry activities.
Gender and Land Tenancy
According to Agarwal [ : ], whether the rights in land can be in the form ofownership or usufruct (that is rights of use) are associated with varying degrees of
freedom e. g., to lease out, mortgage, bequeath or sell. In the case of Kemang Village, thepeople also have access to land in the way of sharecropping (bagi hasil or maro), renting(sewa) and mortgaging (ngakad), ) and even in cultivating the Perhutani’s Land.
As it is shown in Table ,   ha of land was accessed by the residents of Beber andCikupa hamlets, where our survey was conducted.

 ῌ Sharecropping is a form of land tenure under which the landowner allows another person
to cultivate land in return for a ῍ share of the produce. The system of land renting
usually involves a cash payment to the landholders by the tenant in advance before thetenant acquires the right to cultivate it. The system of ngakad is different from rent. In
this system, the landowner borrows some amount of money from other person who lends
him/her money; and in lieu of that, the lender acquires the right to cultivate the land as
his/her own. The period of mortgage (ngakad) depends on the agreement, but usually it
exists until the debt is repaid.
537ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ ῏  ῒTable ῌThe Total and Average Land Size Accessed by Peasant Households in
the Two Hamlets by Type of Agreement
Unit: ha
Sawah

Pasir

Type of Agreement
Total

Average

Total

Average

Sharecropping
Rent
Mortgage
Perhutani’s land cultivators

 
 
 
 

 
 

 


 
 
 


 
 
 

Total

 

 

  

Source: Fieldwork,  .

Of the  households studied, about  households have access to other’s land bysharecropping. Of these sharecroppers, about  households (ῌ) cultivate sawah and 
households (ῌ) cultivate pasir, with the average land size being about   ha for sawahand   ha for pasir. The sharecroppers who cultivated sawah consist of those who
belong to all strata:  households each from Stratum A and Stratum B,  households ofStratum C andhouseholds of Stratum D. Those who cultivated pasir consist of , , and households of Stratum B, C and D respectively. There were only  households that
had sharecropping agreements on both types of lands.
The decision of accepting the sharecropping agreement is decided by the couples, as
they are the main family laborers who cultivate the land. Besides, most of the money
required for cultivating the land is derived from the income of the couples’ land.
However, there were four households that earned the capital necessary for the sharecropping. Such capital originated in money earned by the wives as international migrant
workers. The sharecropping system is usually restricted to land located exclusively inthe village. Households of the lower stratum are not interested in becoming sharecroppers outside the village. It is because the transportation cost from Kemang to the lowland
villages located surrounding the village is too expensive for the poor households. The
landowners who engaged in this sharecropping system consisted of women and men
from all strata, while the cultivators consisted of women and men of the landless andthose who belong to Stratum B and C. The sharecropper may even be the landowner’s
daughter or son who is landless.
As sawah is limited in Kemang Village, the opportunity for the landless households
to rent land was also limited. There were only eight households who rented sawah, andthey belonged to the households that do not have sawah but do have a small amount ofpasir. The average land size that they rented is about   ha. Only two households hadaccess to rent pasir, with the average land size being about   ha. Neither of them had
sawah, but owned pasir that belongs separately to the husband and wife. In terms ofmortgage, there were only three households of Stratum B and C that possessed mortgageof sawah, with the average land size being about   ha. All of the households used the538

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

income generated by the women from non-agricultural activities (migrant worker, small
shop owner and trader) for mortgaging.
Of the  households studied, there were  households (ῌ) of all strata thatcultivated Perhutani’s land as participants in the Social Forestry Program. Of the 
households, there were  households each from Stratum A and B,  households from
Stratum C, andhouseholds from Stratum D. There is a tendency whereby the higher

the stratum, the larger is the average land size of Perhutani’s land cultivated. The
average land size of Stratum A is  ha, while among Stratum B and C households it isaround  ha and   ha respectively; and about   among Stratum D households.
The reason is due to a number of husbands of Stratum A and B who were also appointed
by the National Forest Company (Perhutani) as heads of the forest farmer groups.
Widows and widowers in Kemang Village also had access to land.

Of the households studied, there were  widow/widower households, of which  are widows.
It is interesting to note that even among widower households, besides having access toland inherited from his parents, the widower also had access to sawah and pasir originathouseholds where theing from his wife. Of the total widower households, there werecomposition of landholding of each household is the following: (a) the sawah as well as thepasir that belonged to the widower’s late wives, (b) the rice land that belong to wife andhusband and the gono-gini’s pasir, (c) the pasir that belonged to the husband and access to
Perhutani’s land. The other widowers were landless, but
Perhutani’s land.

of them have access to

The composition of landholding of the widow households is thefollowing: (a) the wife’s sawah and husband’s pasir, (b) wife’s sawah and pasir, (c) wife’s
sawah and access to Perhutani’s land, (d) cultivated only the Perhutani’s land, and (e)access only by mortgaging. The remaining households had no access to any land due toaging.

VII Recognition of Rights to Land
As mentioned earlier, evidence on formal recognition of women’s right to land can besupplied with the help of a document known as “Letter C,” which is available at thevillage office. Table  shows the data of the total land and the average land size in thetwo hamlets as documented based on the Letter C of Kemang Village in  . Based on
the number of the landowners, it can be seen that about  women are documented as
landowners, which is about ῌ of the total landowners in the two hamlets.
Though the total land belonged to women was lower than those of men, there was nodifference with regard to the average land size of the sawah (  ha) between men andwomen. But in terms of the pasir the average land size belonged to women was lower
than of men. Leaving aside the average land size owned by women and men, the data
shown in the table gives an evidence of the formal recognition of women as well as men’s539

῔῕῎῏῎ῒῑ ῐ  ΐTable ῌThe Total and the Average Land Size Owned by the People of
Two Hamlets in   by Type of Land and Sex
Unit: haTotal Land Size

The Average Land Size

Sex
Men
Women
Total

(n῍ )(n῍ )(n῍  )

Sawah

Pasir

Sawah

Pasir



 

 

 



 

 
 
 

Source: Letter C of Kemang Village,  .

right in land. This is also supported by the fact that both land registration and land
taxpayer liabilities are based on the individual. Regarding tax liability, especially for
Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan (PBB), the landowner, whether man or woman, is required to
pay the land tax (PBB) according to the land size and land category as written in the
document called Surat Pemberitahuan Pajak Terutang (SPPT) PBB published by the
Cianjur Tax Service Office, Directorate General of Tax, Ministry of Finance.
At the level of ideology and legal regulations, the bilateral Sundanese customary law
as practiced by Kemang people is ameliorated by the Constitution of , which supports
the principle of gender equality for all citizens. In terms of rights to land, the Basic
Agrarian Law No.  of ) also guarantees the right of women as well as men to own
land.
It is found in group discussions and in-depth interviews that the village officers andalmost all the villagers have detailed knowledge of each other’s land, e. g., about thelocation, the type of land and boundary and even they usually recognize the land by
naming the owner of the land. Since the customary law is enforced and accepted by thevillage community, there is a lack of awareness among the Kemang people on theimportance of the legal documentation of land. In general, most of the land they owned
has still remained in the official document in the name of the current owner’s mother,father, or even in the name of his or her grandmother, grandfather, or other previous
owner.

VIII Conclusions
The studies conducted previously by many researchers on land tenure and tenancy inWest Java were influenced by perceptions on gender role stereotypes which assumed
that women (wives) are family labor and housewives; and men (husbands) are heads ofthe household de jure. In addition, most of them assumed that land ownership among
ῌ The article No.  version  stated that “every Indonesian citizens, man as well as woman,have the same opportunity to obtain the right on land and to obtain the benefit and the
production for himself/herself, and his/her family” [Anonymous :  ].
540

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

Muslim farmers must be influenced by the Islamic inheritance law, where women
inherited only a half of the land that men inherited. Therefore, they emphasize that
husband plays the dominant role in the access to and control over the land. This is notin fact the case, and the practice of land inheritance system has been influenced by thegender values that inform the existing kinship system of the community.
The present study has examined the gender equity values and equality of land
allocation by using evidence on land ownership among peasant households in an uplandvillage in West Java that belongs to a Sundanese community with a bilateral kinshipsystem.

The research methodologies used in this study were census survey of twohamlets in Kemang Village, in-depth interviews, focused group discussion, and examination of the “Letter C” official document on land ownership available at the village office.
In contrast to Ekadjati [: ] who states that the Sundanese inheritance system
is based on the “lalaki nanggung, awewe nyuhun,” which means a son to inherit twice asmuch as daughter, this study provides evidence of sanak values, a set of values withgender equity concerning status of son and daughter relating to the rights of householdproperty. Due to the internalization of sanak values, mothers and fathers in peasanthouseholds treat their daughters and sons equally as anak (children), giving them boththe same rights to their mother’s, father’s and/or both parents’ property, including land.
Despite the fact that Kemang people are Muslim, the values of sanak strongly
influence the peasant households to use the customary law in allocating their landthrough inheritance and grant system. This leads to gender equality on access to andcontrol over the land among the household members. Based on household enumeration,
we find three categories of land ownership pattern for sawah and pasir: husband, wife andjoint ownership, called gono-gini/tepung kaya. Of the  ha total land of  enumerated
households, about ῌ is in the gono-gini category, while the land owned by thehusband is ῌ and the land owned by the wife is ῌ.
In terms of sawah, the average land size in the category of wife,   ha, is slightly
higher than the husband, which is  ha. On the contrary, for pasir, the average landsize is  ha for the wife and  ha for the husband.

Furthermore, of the households that owned land, about  households owned the land through inheritance,
grant and/or gono-gini, while the rest owned land through gono-gini only. Moreover, thelargest part of the household’s land was in wife category ( ῌ), while those with thehousehold’s land belonging to the husband were ῌ. The others consisted of householdswith the wife’s sawah and the husband’s pasir ( ῌ), and only ῌ households that either
the husband or the wife had inherited and granted both the types of land from theirmothers and fathers as well. It means that women had the right to dispose exclusivelyoverῌ land and they have customary legal rights over ῌ of the gono-gini land.

The gender equality in land ownership is also shown in the practice of the inheritance system, which is calculated through the male and female lines. Using the data
gathered by in-depth interviews of  households regarding the origin of the land, it is541ΐ῔῍῎῍ῑῐ῏ ῒfound that the total land that was obtained from the mother is  ha (ῌ), whilefrom the father is   ha ( ῌ) and from both parents is   ha (ῌ). Thesefindings highlight the domination of women in access to and control over the household’s
sawah. Of the total land owned by the  households, a considerable amount of land wasowned by wives through inheritance and grant, for sawah and pasir. The total sawah
under the possession of women was about  ha or almost  ῌ of the total household’s
sawah. In the case of pasir, the women’s position was higher than men too. It was  ha or ῌ of the total household’s pasir.
As the peasants households are heterogeneous, it is found that the higher the stratum
the higher the women and men’s access to and control over the land. The woman,
including women in polygamous households, has her own right to sell and to buy land, toaccumulate her land and/or to support the daughter and son’s high education, and evento make Hajj pilgrimages. As women and men have equal access and control over theland, there is a tendency for them to have equal access and control over the farming
activities, too.
Women as well as men could also control other’s land by sharecropping, renting andmortgaging; they also could use the National Forest Land through the Social Forestry
Program. This was prevalent among widows and widowers, especially among migrant
workers, small shop owners and traders.
The women’s access to and control over the land is also recognized by the community and external authority in the village level as it is found in the documents entitled“Letter C” and Notification Letter of Owing Tax on Land and Building Tax (Surat
Pemberitahuan Pajak Terutang Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan). Meanwhile, at the national
level, women’s and men’s rights to land are also recognized by Basic Agrarian Law No.

 of  as stated in article  version .
It seems from the explanation given above that the hypothesis of this study is
supported by the findings. These findings lead to the need to conceptualize gender
relations and the household in relation to larger processes of agrarian transformation inIndonesia. The findings also have important policy implications. The mainstreaming ofgender should be integrated in all aspects of the agricultural policies, programs andprojects especially under the administration of the Ministry of Agriculture. Further, thenational agricultural census should take into account the sex-disaggregated data on landownership, as the information is very important to evaluate the women’s contribution onpeasant household economies, not only at the micro level, but also at the macro level.

Acknowledgements
This study is a part of the Socio-economic Studies on Sustainable Development in Rural Indonesia
which is conducted under the research umbrella of the JSPS-DGHE Core University Program
between the University of Tokyo and Bogor Agricultural University (IPB) on Harmonization
between Development and Environment in Biological Production, especially in the period of  ῌ
542

S. S. M. MJ<C>:HN6= and M>OJCD K : Access to Land in Sundanese Community

. We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Noriaki Iwamoto, the coordinator of the Socio-economic
Studies Group for his generosity and support during our study. We would also like to express our
sincere thanks to Prof. Koji Tanaka, the Director of the Center for lntegrated Area Studies, Kyoto
University and the former Director of the CSEAS, Kyoto University, for extending his unreserved
support in writing this paper. I am also very grateful to the referees and Editorial Board for theirvaluable comments and suggestions. Sincere thanks is due to Dr. Ratanlal Chakraborty, who
assisted in editing the English.

References
Agarwal, B. . A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Al-Hilali, M. T.; and Khan, M. M. . The Noble Al-Quran. English Translation of the Meaning andCommentary. Madinah: King Fahd Complex for Printing the Holy Quran.
Anonymous. . Letter C of Kemang Village. Kemang.
ῌῌῌῌ. . Himpunan Beberapa Undang Undang Pokok dan Peraturan Pemerintah yang Berkaitan
dengan Keagrariaan [Compilation of Basic Laws and Government Regulations Related to Land
Reform]. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Agraria, Departemen Dalam Negeri.
ῌῌῌῌ. . Monografi Desa Kemang, Kecamatan Bojong Picung. Kabupaten Cianjur.
ῌῌῌῌ. . Panduan Pelaksanaan INPRES Nomor 9 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengarusutamaan Genderdalam Pembangunan Nasional [The Guidelines for Implementing the Presidential Instruction No.
 of  on Gender Mainstreaming in National Development]. Jakarta: Kantor Menteri Negara
Pemberdayaan Perempuan.
Boserup, E. . Women’s Role in Economic Development. London: Allen & Unwin.
Ekadjati, E. S.  . Kebudayaan Sunda. Suatu Pendekatan Sejarah [Sundanese Culture. A Historical
Approach]. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
FAO.  . Gender and Sustainable Development in Drylands: An Analysis of Field Experiences.
Gender and Population Division Sustainable Development Department. http://www.fao.org/
DOCREP/  /J  E/J  E .HTM.
Haggis, J.; Lyons, T.; and Schech, S. . The Concept of Gender, Gender Analysis and the Gender
Division of Labor. Training Material on Gender Mainstreaming and Analysis. Conducted by
Ministry of Women Empowerment, Republic of Indonesia, SAGRIC International Pty. Ltd andCentre for Development Studies, Flinders University. Jakarta: AusAid-Indonesia Australia
Specialized Training Project Phase II.
Hardjono, J. . Land, Labour and Livelihood in a West Java Village. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada
University Press.
Hart, G.; Turton, A.; and White, B.; with Fegan, B.; and Ghee, L. T., eds. . Agrarian Transformations: Local Processes and the State in Southeast Asia. California: University of California Press.
Hastuti, E. L.; Hidayat, Deri; and Pranaji, Tri. . Keseimbangan Kontribusi Gender Dalam
Kegiatan Produksi Pertanian. [Gender Contribution Equality in Agricultural Production Activities]. In Proceeding: Perspektif Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan Dalam Era Otonomi Daerah,edited by Rusastra et al. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Departemen
Pertanian dan Kehutanan.
Hüsken, F. . Cycles of Commercialization and Accumulation in a Central Javanese Village. In
Agrarian Transformations: Local Processes and the State in Southeast Asia, edited by G. Hart, A.
Turton, and B. White, with B. Fegan and L. T. Ghee. California: University of California Press.
Hüsken, F.; and White, B. . Java: Social Differentiation, Food Production, and Agrarian Control.
In Agrarian Transformations: Local Processes and the State in Southeast Asia, edited by G. Hart, A.
Turton and B. White, with B. Fegan and L. T. Ghee. California: University of California Press.
ILO. . ABC of Women Workers’ Rights and Gender Equality. Geneva: International Labour Office.
543

ῒΐῌ῍ῌῐ῏ ῐῐ῎ ῐ ῑKano, H. ῍῔ῒῒ. Land Tenure System and the Desa Community in Nineteenth Century Java. IDE Paper No.
ῑ. Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies.
ῌῌῌῌ. ῍῔ΐῐ. Pemilikan Tanah dan Diferensiasi Masyarakat Desa [Land Ownership and Rural
Community Differentiation]. In Dua Abad Penguasaan Tanah. Pola Penguasaan Tanah Pertaniandi Jawa dari Masa ke Masa, edited by S. M. P. Tjondronegoro and G. Wiradi for Yayasan Obor
Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Koentjaraningrat. ῍῔ΐ῍. Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial [Some Principles in Social Anthropology].
Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
Moser, C. O. N. ῍῔῔῏. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice & Training. London: Routledge.
Mugniesyah, S. S. M.; and Mizuno, K. ῎ῌῌ῎. Women’s Access to Land and Local Institutions: Case ofUpland Peasant Households in Kemang Village West Java, Indonesia. Paper presented in theWorkshop of Socio-Economic Studies on Sustainable Development in Rural Indonesia. Group IIIof the JSPS-DGHE Core University Program between the University of Tokyo and Bogor
Agricultural University (IPB).
ῌῌῌῌ. ῎ῌῌ῏. Gender Relations among Upland Farming Households: The Case of Kemang Village
in West Java, Indonesia. In Sustainable Agriculture in Rural Indonesia, edited by Y. Hayashi, S.
Manuwoto and S. Hartono. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Mugniesyah, S. S. M.; Mizuno, K.; and Iwamoto, N. ῍῔῔῔. Agricultural Sustainable Development in
Rural Indonesia: A Gender and Social Change Perspectives: A Case Study in Upland Area inWest Java. Paper presented in the Workshop of Socio-Economic Studies on Sustainable
Development in Rural Indonesia. Group III of the JSPS-DGHE Core University Program between
the University of Tokyo and Bogor Agricultural University (IPB).
Quisumbing, A. R.; and Otsuka, K. ῎ῌῌ῍. Land Inheritance and Schooling in Matrilineal Societies:
Evidence from Sumatra. World Development ῎῔ (῍῎): ῎ῌ῔῏῍῎῍῍ῌ. Pergamon. Elsevier Science Ltd.
Sajogyo, P. ῍῔ΐ῏. Peranan Wanita dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa [The Role of Women in Rural
Community Development]. Jakarta: CV Radjawali.
Simbolon, I. J. ῍῔῔ΐ. Peasant Women and Access to Land. Customary Law, Sate Law and Genderbased Ideology. The Case of Toba-Batak (North Sumatra). PhD Thesis. Wageningen: Ponsen &Looijen b. v.
Soepomo. ῍῔ΐ῎. Hukum Perdata Adat Jawa Barat. Jakarta: Penerbit IKAPI.
Van der Kroef, J. M. ῍῔ΐῐ. Penguasaan Tanah dan Struktur Sosial di Pedesaan Jawa. In Dua Abad
Penguasaan Tanah, edited by S. M. P. Tjondronegoro and G. Wiradi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
White, B.; and Wiradi, G. ῍῔ΐ῔. Agrarian and Nonagrarian Bases of Inequality in Nine Javanese
Villages. In Agrarian Transformations: Local Processes and the State in Southeast Asia, edited by
G. Hart, A. Turton and B. White, with B. Fegan and L. T. Ghee. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Wood, J. T. ῎ῌῌ῍. Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender and Culture. Belmont: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
Zaini, W. ῍῔῔ῐ. The Advancement of Women’s Role. In Islam and Advancement of Women, edited byL. Z. Munir, D. Z. Abdul Munim and Soraya. A Compilation of Papers the Forum for Islam andAdvancement of Women. Jakarta: CV Tunas Pribumi.

544