Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Nicolaes Maes
(Dordrecht 1634 – 1693 Amsterdam)ca. 1649–53
oil on canvas
133 x 110.8 cm
NM-100© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 2 of 11

How to cite
Van Tuinen, Ilona. “Woman with Three Children and a Goat” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 3rd ed. Edited
by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. and Lara Yeager-Crasselt. New York, 2020–23. https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/(archived December 2023).
A PDF of every version of this entry is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by apermanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs.

Nicolaes Maes painted this enigmatic and evocative image of a young woman caring

Comparative Figures

for two girls and an infant boy seated on a goat at the very beginning of his career.
Whether Maes conceived this work as a group portrait, a portrait historié, or based his
scene on a literary source has been debated over the years. The traditional title of thispainting, dating back to the early nineteenth century, is Spanish Gypsy,[1] a title basedon the assumption that Maes was inspired by Jacob Cats’s Het Spaens
heydinnetje. Cats published his story in Trou-ringh (Dordrecht, 1637), and his
narrative was later turned into a play by Mattheus Tengnagel (Amsterdam,
1643).[2] In his story, Cats describes how a two-year-old noble girl is kidnapped by an
old gypsy woman for her expensive clothing and jewelry and is forced to grow up as a
singing gypsy. At age 15, while surrounded by fellow gypsy girls making rose
wreaths, a nobleman falls in love with her and rescues her. Although several elementsof this story—a gypsy woman, a baby, and girls with roses—are present in thepainting, other compositional elements—the gender of the baby, the young age of thewoman, and the goat—do not correspond with the story’s plot, and it is unlikely thatFig 1. Nicolaes Maes, Abraham
Dismissing Hagar and Ishmael, 1653,
oil on canvas, 87.6 x 69.9 cm, New
York, The Metropolitan Museum ofArt, inv. no.
1971.73, www.metmuseum.org

this traditional title accounts for the unusual character of this painting. Moreover, thepuffs around the woman’s broad, relatively flat hat are not found in costumes worn by
gypsies, and she does not wear a chord around her neck, as gypsies normally do.[3]It is probable that the painting is an allegorical family portrait.[4] Although thewoman’s hat is somewhat fanciful, and akin to those seen in history paintings fromthe Rembrandt school,[5] her simple red dress, plain white chemise and brown apron
indicate that she is most likely a wet nurse or maid.[6] Maes emphasized theinteraction between the maid and the boy through their compositional prominence
and their contrasting yellow and bright red clothing. With a slight tilt of her head, she© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 3 of 11

tenderly leans over the baby boy in her care, his gender indicated by the red coralnecklaces draped over his shoulder. She helps him to sit upright on the back of a goatby supporting his back with her left hand and holding onto the animal’s backside withthe other. This motif relates to a tradition in seventeenth-century children’s
portraiture where young boys are shown astride bridled goats, symbolic of the need tocurb lust and to ensure a good upbringing.[7] Here, the maid takes on a guiding role in
the rearing and education of the future patriarch of this family. The boy, elegantly
clad in a yellow dress, embroidered shoes, and a feathered beret over a tight hat—a socalled biggin—has a sweet and docile expression, as though aware that he is under her
protection. His coral necklaces, moreover, were thought to provide protection against
illness.[8]In the foreground sits the boy’s older sister, who wears an expensive goldembroidered chemise under a brown dress. She carries a tubular case for crochet
needles on a chain at her waist, a tambourine in her lap, and roses in her

Fig 2. Nicolaes Maes, Christ Blessing
the Children, ca. 1653, oil on canvas,
206 x 154 cm, London, National
Gallery, inv. no. NG757, © National
Gallery, London / Art Resource, NY

hands.[9] Another sister, wearing a brown dress and a red necklace, is seen in profile atthe far right against the backdrop of a rose bush. The two girls, painted in brown anddark red hues and wearing almost identical dresses, gaze to the right, outside thepicture plane. Perhaps they once looked toward a pendant painting depicting theirparents.[10]When the painting first appeared on the market in 1796, it was attributed toRembrandt on the basis of a false Rembrandt signature.[11] This attribution persisted
until Alfred von Wurzbach gave it to Nicolaes Maes in 1910.[12] Most subsequentscholars, such as Cornelis Hofstede de Groot, Wilhelm von Bode, Wilhelm
Valentiner, Werner Sumowski, and Leon Krempel, accepted this attribution andgenerally dated the painting to ca. 1653, the year in which Maes left Rembrandt’s
studio and settled in Dordrecht as an independent master.[13] They connected thepainting to several works from Maes’s oeuvre from the early 1650s, particularly his
Abraham Dismissing Hagar and Ishmael, 1653, his earliest dated painting (fig 1), in
which Hagar’s features are similar to those of the maid. They also stressed therelationship of the Leiden Collection painting to Christ Blessing the Children, which

Fig 3. Adriaan de Lelie, Self-Portrait
with Josephus Augustinus Brentano(1753–1821), 1813, oil on canvas, 285
x 160 cm, Private Collection

Maes probably painted in the same year (fig 2).[14] Sumowski also related the Leiden
Collection painting to a drawing he attributed to Maes depicting Hagar and the Angel
near the Well en Route to Sur from ca. 1652–1653 because of the similarity of the
figure of Hagar in the drawing to that of the maid in the painting.[15]William Robinson, however, questioned the attribution to Maes in his 1996
dissertation on the early works of Nicolaes Maes, in which he placed the painting
within the School of Rembrandt without an attribution to a given artist. He still
maintains that the “differences [between the present painting and the two early© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 4 of 11

paintings by Maes mentioned above] are more compelling than the similarities.”[16] It
is true that, upon closer inspection, the modeling of the hands in the London painting
is more complex and the interplay of light and shadow on the faces in the backgroundof the London painting is more subtle and has a crisp, theatrical effect compared tothe present painting. There are also differences in execution with Abraham Dismissing
Hagar and Ishmael. The maid’s white chemise and the white goat are modeled more
broadly and with more Rembrandtesque impasto than the more smoothly renderedchemise that Hagar wears in the Metropolitan Museum of Art painting.
Nevertheless, the similarities between the Leiden Collection painting and Maes’s
other early works, especially Christ Blessing the Children with its similar subdued
palette and monumentality of figures, are significant. The atmospheric lighting in the
Leiden Collection painting is striking and seems to foreshadow Maes’s moresophisticated use of light and shade in Christ Blessing the Children. It thus seems likelythat the Leiden Collection painting is one of the earliest paintings by Maes, executedin Rembrandt’s workshop between 1649 and 1653, and before he painted Abraham
Dismissing Hagar and Ishmael and Christ Blessing the Children.[17]The provenance of Woman with Three Children and a Goat can be traced back to theeighteenth century. Its first recorded owner was Wouter Valckenier (1705–84),
descendant of an influential Amsterdam patrician family, whose ancestors Pieter
Ranst Valckenier (1661–1704) and Eva Suzanna Pellicorne (1670–1732) are featured
in Michiel van Musscher’s pendant portraits, also in the Leiden Collection(MM-102a/b).[18] By 1813 the work was in the possession of Josephus Augustinus
Brentano (1753–1821), an Amsterdam-based Italian merchant and art collector.
Brentano attached great significance to Maes’s painting, as can be seen in Adriaan deLelie’s 1813 portrait of him with his art collection, in which the work can be seen
hanging prominently on the wall behind him (fig 3). In the two subsequent centuries,
the painting was owned by a string of impressive collectors, including AnthonyNathan de Rothschild (1792–1868) and Alfred Charles de Rothschild (1842–1918);
the distinguished New York banker and art collector J. Pierpont Morgan(1837–1913); and the Dutch entrepreneur and collector Anton C. R. Dreesmann(1923–2000).[19]- Ilona van Tuinen, 2017; revised 2022

© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 5 of 11

Endnotes
1. Sale, Josephus Augustinus Brentano (1753–1821), Amsterdam (De Vries & Brondgeest, Amsterdam, 13
May 1822, no. 282, as by Rembrandt [to De Vries for 3,205 florins]): in the sales catalogue, the figures
are described as “landlieden uit Oud-Kastilië, welke met sluikgoederen reizen” (Castilian gypsies with
their illicit goods). In 1824 the painting was exhibited at the British Institution in London as “Spanish
Gypsy,” which was adopted in the sales catalogue of Christianus Johannes Nieuwenhuys, Christie’s,
London, 10 May 1833, no. 123. When the painting was auctioned during the sale of the Dr. C. R.
Dreesmann Collection, Christie’s, London, 11 April 2002, no. 538, it was still called “Spanish Gypsy.”
2. See Jacob Cats, “Het Spaens heydinnetje,” in Trou-Ringh (Amsterdam, 1937), 308–47. Thanks to David
DeWitt for bringing Het Spaens heydinnetje to my attention. Mattheus Tengnagel, Het leven van
Konstance: Waer af volgt het toneelspel De Spaensche heidin (Amsterdam, 1643).
3. For a description of gypsy dress, see Marieke de Winkel, Fashion and Fancy: Dress and Meaning in
Rembrandt’s Paintings (Amsterdam, 2006), 265–66. The distinctive, disclike hat, also called a bern, wasmade from wickerwork covered by strips of linen and held up by a chin strap. Since gypsies were
thought to come from Egypt, they were often included in Old Testament scenes set there, mostly from
Exodus. There are several examples of Rembrandt’s use of the gypsy hat, including his etching of ca.
1644 (B. 57), just before the period in which Maes studied with him, depicting Mary in gypsy dress on
the way to Egypt. In Maes’s own contemporary Abraham Dismissing Hagar and Ishmael (fig. 1), Hagar
is also depicted with a gypsy hat.
4. For authors suggesting the possibility of a group portrait, see Werner Sumowski, “In Praise of
Rembrandt’s Pupils,” in The Hoogsteder Exhibition of Rembrandt’s Academy, ed. Paul Huys Janssen andWerner Sumowski (Exh. cat. The Hague, Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder) (Zwolle, 1992), 74, and Paul Huys
Janssen, “Nicolaes Maes, Young Woman with Three Children,” in The Hoogsteder Exhibition of
Rembrandt’s Academy, ed. Paul Huys Janssen and Werner Sumowski (Exh. cat. The Hague, Hoogsteder& Hoogsteder) (Zwolle, 1992), 236–39, no. 30, who suggested that the artist was deliberately defying
the traditions of Dutch portraiture by having all four figures looking in different directions. For anotherexample of a maid portrayed with a child, see Frans Hals, Catharina Hooft with Her Nurse, ca. 1620,
Berlin, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.
5. A similar hat with a puffy brim appears early in Rembrandt’s oeuvre in his Sheet of Studies of Four
Heads and a Half-Length Study of a Woman (recto), ca. 1633–35, silverpoint on vellum prepared withpale gray pigment, 13.4 x 8 cm, Museum Boijmans van Beuningen, Rotterdam, Koenigs Collection, inv.
R25, as well as much later in Barent Fabritius, The Adoration of the Shepherds, 1667, London, National
Gallery, inv. 1338. Interestingly, Fabritius based his composition on Rembrandt’s two 1646 depictionsof the subject (Munich, Alte Pinakothek, 1646, inv. 373; London, National Gallery, 1646, inv. NG47),
but added the woman wearing the hat in the foreground himself. Unlike the hats in Rembrandt’s drawing
and Fabritius’s paintings, the hat in the present painting contains an intricately woven pattern at the top.
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 6 of 11

For a less elaborate but very similar dress over a high white vest, like those worn by the girls in thepainting, see Mary’s dress in Gerbrand van den Eeckhout, Rest on the Flight to Egypt, oil on canvas,
1653, 101 x 83.7 cm, Milwaukee Art Museum, Bader Collection.
6. The woman’s status has already been noted by John Smith, A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the
Most Eminent Dutch, Flemish, and French Painters, 9 vols. (London, 1829–42), 7: 74, no. 175, andrepeated in much of the literature. Marieke de Winkel, in an e-mail of June 2013, suggested the same
(copy on file at the Leiden Collection). Many thanks to Marieke de Winkel for sharing her insights on
the clothing in this work.
7. The tradition of depicting children with bridled goats can be traced back to Frans Hals’s Three Children
with a Goat, ca. 1620, oil on canvas, 152 x 107.5 cm, Brussels, Royal Museum of Fine Arts. For a
discussion of the motif of bridled goats and the symbolism of curbing children’s lust, see Jan Baptist
Bedeaux and Rudi Ekkart, eds., Pride and Joy: Children’s Portraits in the Netherlands 1500–1700 (Exh.
cat. Haarlem, Frans Hals Museum; Antwerp, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten) (New York,
2000), 218–20, no. 57 for Jan Albertsz Rotius, Four-Year-Old Boy with Goat, 1652, panel, 116 x 87 cm,
Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, inv. nr. SK-A-995, in which the little boy firmly grips one of the goat’s
horns, and 246–48, no. 67 for Gerbrand van den Eeckhout, Willem Woutersz Oorthoord in a Goat-Cart,
1662, oil on canvas, 96 x 121 cm, Private Collection (formerly New York, Jack Kilgore).
8. On the benificial powers of red coral for children, see Saskia Kuus, “Jacob Willems Delff, Portrait of a
Two-Year Old Boy, 1582, panel, Rijksmueum, inv. no. SK-A-1907,” in Pride and Joy: Children’sPortraits in the Netherlands 1500–1700, ed. Jan Baptist Bedeaux and Rudi Ekkart (Exh. cat. Haarlem,Frans Hals Museum; Antwerp, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten) (New York, 2000), 102.
9. E-mail correspondence with Marieke de Winkel, April 2014 (copy on file at the Leiden Gallery): “thistype of case used by women to carry their crochet needles or knives was common in the seventeenth andeighteenth centuries and was the precursor of the so-called chatelaine.” Thanks to Marieke de Winkel,
who also lists examples taken from Dutch inventories of the 1630s.
10. I am indebted to Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. for this suggestion.
11. Sale of Elizabeth Valckenier, née Hooft (1712–96), widow of Wouter Valckenier (1705–84),
Amsterdam; Rycken, Amsterdam, 31 August 1796, no. 33. See also the Provenance and the Technical
Summary: the signature is no longer visible on the painting.
12. Alfred von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstler-Lexikon: Auf Grund Archivalischer Forschungen
Bearbeitet 3 vols. (Vienna, 1906–11), 2:90. See also a note by Cornelis Hofstede de Groot of ca. 1909
pertaining to this painting, preserved in the Hofstede de Groot fiches at the RKD in The Hague, inwhich he tentatively suggests an attribution to Maes. Hofstede de Groot noted that the least
Rembrandtesque features of the painting are the lack of anatomy in the goat, the rendition of the boy,and the vegetation on the ground.
13. Hofstede de Groot, Cornelis, A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch Painters of
the Seventeenth Century Based on the Work of John Smith, ed. and trans. Edward G. Hawke, 5: 500, no.
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 7 of 11

89, 8 vols. (London, 1907–28), originally published as Beschreibendes und kritisches Verzeichnis derWerke der hervorragendsten höllandischen Maler des XVII. Jahrhunderts, 10 vols. (Esslingen and Paris,
1907–28); Wilhelm von Bode, Der Meister der holländischen und vlamischen Malerschulen (Leipzig,1919), 66; 9th ed. (Leipzig, 1958), 77; Wilhelm Valentiner, Nicolaes Maes (Berlin, 1924), 11, 44, fig. 6;
Werner Sumowski, “Christus segnet die Kinder: Bemerkungen zu einem Frühwerk von Nicolaes Maes,”
Festschrift für Hans Ladendorf, ed. Peter Bloch and Gisela Zick (Cologne, 1970), 42; Werner
Sumowski, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 6 vols (Landau and Pfalz, 1983–94), 3: 2011, 2055, no.
1329; 6: 3628, 3677, no. 1329; Leon Krempel, Studien zu den datierten Gemälden des Nicolaes Maes
(1634–1693) (Petersberg, 2000), 44–46, pl. II, 362, no. D 40, fig. 5.
14. For a discussion of the dating and the widely accepted attribution of the London painting to Maes, see
Marjorie M. Wieseman, “Christus zegent de kinderen,” in De Zichtbaere Werelt: Schilderkunst uit deGouden Eeuw in Hollands oudste stad, ed. Peter Marijnissen, Wim de Paus, Peter Schoon, and George
Schweitzer (Exh. cat. Dordrecht, Dordrechts Museum) (Zwolle, 1992), 228. See Piet Bakker’s
biography in this catalogue: already five years later, in around 1658, Maes adapted a smoother style inwhich he continued to work until his death.
15. Werner Sumowski, Drawings of the Rembrandt School, 10 vols. (New York, 1979–92), 8:4116, no.
1835.
16. William Walker Robinson, “The Early Works of Nicolaes Maes, 1653–1661” (PhD diss., Harvard
University, 1996), no. C-12, as by School of Rembrandt. Many thanks to Mr. Robinson for sharing his
current thoughts on the attribution in e-mail correspondence of March 2014 (copy on file at The Leiden
Collection), from which this citation is taken.
17. See the biography of Maes by Piet Bakker in this catalogue. Leon Krempel, Nicolaes Maes (Petersberg,
2000), 44–46, pl. II, 362, no. D 40, fig. 5, places the painting after Abraham Dismissing Hagar andIshmael and Christ Blessing the Children.
18. See Provenance. For Michiel van Musscher’s portraits, see MM-102a/b. Wouter Valckenier was the
grandson of Cornelis Valckenier (1640–1700), Pieter’s second cousin.
19. See Provenance. The editors would like to express their thanks to Gary Schwartz for calling ourattention to revisions and additional research regarding the Rothschild provenance in January 2022

Provenance
Wouter Valckenier (1705–84), Amsterdam; by descent to his widow Elizabeth Hooft (1712–96) (hersale, Rycken, Amsterdam, 31 August 1796, lot 33, as by Rembrandt [to B. Carli for 1,413 florins]).
Josephus Augustinus Brentano (1753–1821), Amsterdam, by 1813 (his sale, De Vries & Brondgeest,
Amsterdam, 13 May 1822, as by Rembrandt [to De Vries for 3,205 florins]).
Lord Charles Townshend (1785–1853), London, by 1824.
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 8 of 11

Christianus Johannes Nieuwenhuys (1775–1837) (his sale, Christie’s, London, 10 May 1833, no. 123, as
by Rembrandt [to Gordon for 610 guineas]).
Sir Anthony Nathan de Rothschild (1810–76), 1st Baronet, London, 1833; by descent to his nephew,
Alfred Charles de Rothschild (1842–1918), London; [through Charles Davis, London, to J. Pierpont
Morgan].
Pierpont Morgan (1837–1913), New York, July 1909.
Baron Paul Hatvany (1899–1977), London, possibly by 1960 (his sale, Christie’s, London, 11 July 1980,
no. 17 [through Hans Cramer to Dr. Anton C.R. Dreesmann for £32,000].
Dr. Anton C.R. Dreesmann (1923–2000), Laren; on consignment to Douwes Fine Art, Amsterdam,
1995–96; sale, Christie’s, London, 11 April 2002, no. 538, unsold; sale, Christie’s, New York, 19 April
2007, no. 80 [to Johnny Van Haeften, Ltd.]).
[Johnny Van Haeften, Ltd., London].
From whom acquired by the present owner in 2007.

Exhibition History
London, British Institution, 1824, no. 119, as by Rembrandt [lent by Lord Charles Townshend, London].
London, Matthiesen Gallery, Rembrandt’s Influence in the 17th Century, 20 February–2 April 1953, no.
49 [lent by a Private Collection].
The Hague, Mauritshuis, “Terugzien in bewondering: A Collector’s Choice,” 19 February–9 March
1982, no. 53 [lent by Anton C. R. Dreesmann].
Notre Dame, Indiana, Snite Museum of Art, “A Dutch Treat: Selections of XVII and XVIII Century
Dutch Art from the Collection of Dr. A. C. R. Dreesmann,” 17 October–26 December 1982, no. 8 [lentby Anton C. R. Dreesmann].
The Hague, Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder, “The Hoogsteder Exhibition of Rembrandt’s Academy,” 4
February–2 May 1992, no. 30.
Amsterdam, Gebr. Douwes Fine Art, “Selling Exhibition of Old Master Paintings,” 27 November
1995–19 January 1996, no. 27.
Oxford, Ashmolean Museum, on loan with the permanent collection, August 2015–August 2016 [lent by
the present owner].

References© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 9 of 11

Smith, John. A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch, Flemish, and French
Painters. London, 1836, 7: 74, no. 175 (as by Rembrandt van Rijn).
Waagen, Gustav Friedrich. Treasures of Art in Great Britain: Being an Account of the Chief Collectionsof Paintings, Drawings, Sculptures, Illuminates Mss., etc. London, 1854, 2: 281 (as by Rembrandt van
Rijn).
Von Wurzbach, Alfred. Niederländisches Künstler-Lexikon. Vienna, 1910, 2: 90.
Hofstede de Groot, Cornelis. A Catalogue Raisonné of the Works of the Most Eminent Dutch Painters of
the Seventeenth Century Based on the Work of John Smith. Edited and translated by Edward G. Hawke.
London, 1916, 6: 500, no. 89.
Von Bode, Wilhelm. Die Meister der holländischen und vlämischen Malerschulen. Leipzig, 1917, 65.
Von Bode, Wilhelm. Die Meister der holländischen und vlämischen Malerschulen. 2nd rev. Edition.
Leipzig, 1919, 66.
Valentiner, Wilhelm. Nicolaes Maes. Berlin, 1924, 11, 44, fig. 6.
Wichmann, H. “Review of Valentiner, Nicolaes Maes.” Der Cicerone 16 (1924): 778.
Gerson, Horst. Rembrandt’s Influence in the 17th Century. Exh. cat. London, The Matthiesen Gallery.
London, 1953, no. 49.
Von Bode, Wilhelm. Die Meister der holländischen und flämischen Malerschulen: Neu bearbeitet undergänzt von Eduard Plietszch. 9th edition. Edited by Eduard Plietzsch. Leipzig, 1958, 77.
Cunningham, Charles C. “Two Paintings by Gerbrandt van den Eeckhout.” Wadsworth Atheneum
Bulletin 5, no. 6 (Winter 1960): 19–20, fig. 11.
Sumowski, Werner. “Christus segnet die Kinder. Bemerkungen zu einem Frühwerk von Nicolaes Maes.”
In Festschrift für Hans Ladendorf. Edited by Peter Bloch and Gisela Zick, 42. Cologne, 1970.
Mauritshuis. Terugzien in bewondering: A Collector’s Choice. Exh. cat. The Hague, Mauritshuis. The
Hague, 1982, 146, no. 53.
Simons, Florianne. “Mother and Three Children.” In On Loan from Holland: A Dutch Treat. Selections of
XVII and XVIII Century Art from the Collection of Dr. A.C.R. Dreesmann. Edited by Charles Rosenberg,
54, no. 8. Exh. cat. Notre Dame, Indiana, The Snite Museum of Art. Notre Dame, Indiana, 1982.
Sumowski, Werner. Drawings of the Rembrandt School. Edited and translated by Walter L. Strauss. New
York, 1984, 8: 4116, under no. 1835.
Sumowski, Werner. Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler. Vol. 3, B. Keil – J. Ovens. Landau, 1984, 2011,
2055, no. 1329.
Huys Janssen, Paul. “Nicolaes Maes, Young Woman with Three Children.” In The Hoogsteder Exhibition
of Rembrandt’s Academy. Edited by Paul Huys Janssen and Werner Sumowski, 236–39, no. 30. Exh.
cat. The Hague, Hoogsteder & Hoogsteder. Zwolle, 1992.
Sumowski, Werner. “In Praise of Rembrandt’s Pupils.” In The Hoogsteder Exhibition of Rembrandt’s
Academy. Edited by Paul Huys Janssen and Werner Sumowski, 74. Exh. cat. The Hague, Hoogsteder &Hoogsteder. Zwolle, 1992.
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 10 of 11

Wieseman, Marjorie M. “Christus zegent de kinderen.” In De Zichtbaere Werelt: Schilderkunst uit deGouden Eeuw in Hollands oudste stad. Edited by Peter Marijnissen et al., 228. Exh. cat. Dordrecht,
Dordrechts Museum. Zwolle, 1992.
Sumowski, Werner. Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler. Vol. 6, Einleitung und Schluβwort, Corrigenda undAddenda, Nachträge 2 – Ortsregister, Ikonographisches Register – Bibliographie, Künstlerverzeichnis I –VI. Landau, 1994, 3628, 3677, no. 1329.
Hall, Michael. “The English Rothschilds as Collectors.” In The Rothschilds: Essays on the History of aEuropean Family. Edited by Georg Heuberger, 272–73, 281–82. Suffolk, 1994.
Robinson, William Walker. “The Early Works of Nicolaes Maes, 1653–1661.” PhD diss. Harvard
University, 1996, 269, no. C-12 (as by school of Rembrandt).
Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild. Vol. 1, Money Prophets 1798–1848. New York, 1998,
341–42.
Ferguson, Niall. The World’s Banker: The History of the House of Rothschild. London, 1998, 360–61.
Krempel, Léon. Studien zu den datierten Gemälden des Nicolaes Maes (1634-1693). Petersberg, 2000,
44–46, pl. II, 362, no. D 40, fig. 5.
Liedtke, Walter. Dutch Paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York, 2007, 1: 435, under no.
108.

Technical Summary
The support, a single piece of medium-weight, plain-weave fabric with tacking margins removed, has been
lined. Paper tape covers the fabric edges along all four sides. Cusping along the lower edge is not as
pronounced as that along the remaining three sides, although it appears the original dimensions have not beensignificantly altered. A number of chalk inscriptions, a black stencil, and three paper labels are located along
the stretcher reverse, but there are no wax seals or import stamps along the lining or stretcher.
A border of gray ground remains exposed along the outer edges of the fabric. The paint has been thinly
applied through the dark tones and with impasto through the light tones. Broad, gestural brushstrokes of paintdescribe the forms and give vibrancy to the surface.
Infrared images reveal carbon black was used in the laying in of the composition. The horns of the goat andbackground foliage have been delineated with strokes of carbon black, as have the deepest shadows beneaththe arms of the left hand figure and the shadow falling across the ground beneath the feet of the goat.
No underdrawing is readily apparent in infrared images. Compositional changes visible in the images and as
pentimenti include a slight change to the bodice of the central figure and to the proper right shoulder, which
was shifted lower during the paint stage.
The painting is unsigned and undated.[1]© 2024 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Woman with Three Children and a Goat
Page 11 of 11

The painting has not undergone conservation treatment since its acquisition in 2007 and remains in a goodstate of preservation.[2]Technical Summary Endnotes

1. Inscription, canvas weave, and ground and paint descriptions based on personal examination of February
2014, while the painting was framed and glazed at a private viewing room in New York.
2. Entry based in part on a 2012 examination report written by Simon Howell and Rachel Casey-Thomasof R. M. S. Shephard Associates, Wimbledon, UK.

© 2024 The Leiden Collection