Mini Omnibus Division C- 12/17/2019
Fusion Text is on page 80-82 digital file,
Funding Table is on pages 97-98 digital file
DIVISION- ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIESAPPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020

The following statement to the House of Representatives and the Senate is submitted in
explanation of the agreed upon Act making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.
This explanatory statement, while repeating some report language for emphasis, does not intend tonegate the language and allocations set forth in House Report 116-83 ("House report") and Senate Report116-102 ("Senate report") and that direction shall be complied with unless specifically addressed to thecontrary in the accompanying bill or explanatory statement. Additionally, where this explanatory statement
states that the "agreement only includes" or "the following is the only" direction, any direction included in
the House or Senate report on that matter shall be considered as replaced with the direction provided within
this explanatory statement. In cases where the House or the Senate has directed the submission of a report,such report is to be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress. House or
Senate reporting requirements with deadlines prior to or within 15 days of the enactment of this Act shallbe submitted not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act. All other reporting deadlines not changedby this explanatory statement are to be met.
Funds for the individual programs and activities within the accounts in this Act are displayed in
the detailed table at the end of the explanatory statement for this Act. Funding levels that are not displayedin the detailed table are identified in this explanatory statement.
In fiscal year 2020, for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of1985 (Public Law 99- 177), the following information provides the definition of the term "program, project,
or activity" for departments and agencies under the jurisdiction of the Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Act. The term "program, project, or activity" shall include the most specific level of budget
items identified in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2020 and the explanatory
statement accompanying this Act.
No specific funds for rejecting any application for a grant available under funds appropriated bythis Act because of the use of the term "global warming" or the term "climate change" in the application
are included for any agency funded in this Act.

1

TITLE I-CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYCORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL

The summary tables included in this title set forth the dispositions with respect to the individual
appropriations, projects, and activities of the Corps of Engineers (Corps). Additional items of this Act are
discussed below.

Asian Carp.- The agreement acknowledges that the Corps completed the Report of the Chief ofEngineers for the Great Lakes- Mississippi River Interbasin Study-Brandon Road Recommended Plan in
fiscal year 2019. As the Corps prioritizes projects, it shall consider critical projects to prevent the spread ofinvasive species. The Corps is reminded that this critical project is eligible to compete for additional
funding within the Investigations account in order to initiate Planning, Engineering, and Design (PED). The
Corps is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress quarterly
updates on the progress and status of efforts to prevent the further spread of Asian carp, including theBrandon Road Recommended Plan, the location and density of carp populations, the use of emergency
procedures previously authorized by Congress, and the development, consideration, and implementation of
new technological and structural countermeasures.
There is disappointment that the administration chose to cut Corps funding for the important interagency collaborative work to address Asian carp. The Corps shall continue to collaborate at levels
commensurate with previous years with the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Stateof Illinois, and members of the Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee, including identifying
navigation protocols that would be beneficial or effective in reducing the risk of vessels inadvertently
carrying aquatic invasive species, including Asian carp, through the Brandon Road Lock and Dam in Joliet,
Illinois. Any findings of such an evaluation shall be included in the quarterly briefings to the Committees
on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress. The Corps is further directed to implement navigation
protocols shown to be effective at reducing the risk of entrainment without jeopardizing the safety ofvessels and crews. The Corps and other federal and state agencies are conducting ongoing research on
potential solutions. The Corps shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress onsuch navigation protocols and potential solutions not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act.

Budget Structure Changes. -The agreement includes House and Senate language regarding
budget structure changes.

Inland Waterways System. -The agreement includes House and Senate language.
Regional Dredge Demonstration Program.-To respond more effectively to critical national
dredging requirements resulting from significant recurring storm events, in combination with routine
annual dredging demands, the agreement directs the Corps to execute a multi-year dredging demonstration
program within the Central Gulf Coast Region.

2Key features of the program will explore innovative ways of executing dredging in a logical,
sequenced manner, unconstrained by more traditional project-specific, account-specific, or single-year
practices and seek efficiencies and cost savings by evaluating the region as a system to determine whencombining work across multiple deep draft commercial navigation projects, across years, or acrossConstruction and Operation and Maintenance accounts is appropriate. By including the Mississippi River
Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico (Southwest Pass) and other nearby Gulf Coast commercial navigation
projects, the goals of the program are to include being more responsive to dredging demands within theregion, while minimizing disruption to critical construction and maintenance dredging requirements
enterprise-wide.
To demonstrate the described multi-year efficiencies, the agreement includes $377,650,000 in a
Regional Dredge Demonstration Program funding line item in the Construction account to be used for deepdraft navigation projects in the Gulf of Mexico between Louisiana and Alabama within the Mississippi
Valley Division and the South Atlantic Division Civil Works boundaries. The Corps shall select one
deepening project in each eligible state for inclusion in the demonstration program. Projects that havepreviously received funding from the Construction account and require no new authorization shall be
eligible for inclusion in the demonstration program. Consequently, such projects shall be considered
ongoing and shall not require a new start designation. The agreement includes additional funding in the
Operation and Maintenance account to support this demonstration program. Operation and Maintenanceprojects eligible for inclusion in the demonstration program may include GulfofMexico states between
Florida and Texas, where appropriate. The agreement also includes Senate briefing and reporting
requirements.

ADDITIONAL FUNDING

The agreement includes funding above the budget request to ensure continued improvements to
our national economy, public safety, and environmental health that result from water resources projects.
This funding is for additional work that either was not included in the budget request or was inadequately
budgeted. The bill contains a provision requiring the Corps to allocate funds in accordance with only the
direction in this agreement. ln lieu of all House and Senate direction- under any heading-regarding
additional funding, new starts, and the fiscal year 2020 work plan, the Corps shall follow the direction
included in this explanatory statement.
The executive branch retains complete discretion over project-specific allocation decisions within
the additional funds provided, subject to only the direction here and under the heading "Additional
Funding" or "Additional Funding for Ongoing Work" within each of the Investigations, Construction,
Mississippi River and Tributaries, and Operation and Maintenance accounts. A study or project may not be
excluded from evaluation for being "inconsistent with administration policy." Voluntary funding in excess3

of legally-required cost shares for studies and projects is acceptable, but shall not be used as a criterion forallocating the additional funding provided or for the selection of new starts.
The administration is reminded that these funds are in addition to the budget request, andadministration budget metrics shall not be a reason to disqualify a study or project from being funded. It is
expected that all of the additional funding provided will be allocated to specific programs, projects, or
activities. The focus of the allocation process shall favor the obligation, rather than expenditure, of funds.
The Corps shall evaluate all studies and projects only within accounts and categories consistent
with previous congressional funding. When allocating the additional funding provided in this Act, theCorps shall consider eligibility and implementation decisions under Public Law 115- 123 and Public Law

116-20 so as to maximize the reduction ofrisk to public safety and infrastructure and the reduction of
future damages from floods and storms nationwide.
A project or study shall be eligible for additional funding within the Investigations, Construction,and Mississippi River and Tributaries accounts if: (1) it has received funding, other than through a
reprogramming, in at least one of the previous three fiscal years; (2) it was previously funded and could
reach a significant milestone, complete a discrete element of work, or produce significant outputs incalendar year 2020; or (3) as appropriate, it is selected as one of the new starts allowed in accordance withthis Act and the additional direction provided below. None of the additional funding in any account may be
used for any item where funding was specifically denied or for projects in the Continuing Authorities
Program. Funds shall be allocated consistent with statutory cost share requirements.

Work Plan.-Not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act, the Corps shall provide to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a work plan including the following
information: (1) a detailed description of the process and criteria used to evaluate studies and projects; (2)delineation of how these funds are to be allocated; (3) a summary of the work to be accomplished with each
allocation, including phase of work and the study or project's remaining cost to complete (excluding
Operation and Maintenance); and (4) a list of all studies and projects that were considered eligible forfunding but did not receive funding, including an explanation of whether the study or project could haveused funds in calendar year 2020 and the specific reasons each study or project was considered as being
less competitive for an allocation of funds.

New Starts.-The agreement includes six new starts in the Investigations account and six new
starts in the Construction account to be distributed across the authorized mission areas of the Corps.
Of the new starts in Investigations, one shall be for an environmental restoration study; one shallbe for a multi-purpose watershed study to address coastal resiliency; one shall be for a flood and storm
damage reduction study; one shall be for a flood and storm damage reduction study or environmental
restoration study; and two shall be for navigation studies. Of the two navigation study starts, one may be
for a Small, Remote or Subsistence Harbor navigation study. Of the new construction starts, two shall be
for navigation projects; two shall be for environmental restoration projects, of which one shall be for the
new project start requested by the administration pursuant to the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget amendments

4transmitted to Congress on May 13, 2019; and two shall be for flood and storm damage reduction,
environmental restoration, or multi-purpose projects. No funding shall be used to initiate new programs,
projects, or activities in the Mississippi River and Tributaries or Operation and Maintenance accounts.
The Corps is directed to propose a single group of new starts as a part of the work plan. None of
the funds may be used for any item for which the agreement has specifically denied funding. The Corps
may not change or substitute the new starts selected once the work plan has been provided to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress. Each new start shall be funded from theappropriate additional funding line item. Any project for which the new start requirements are not met by
the end of calendar year 2020 shall be treated as if the project had not been selected as a new start; such a
project shall be required to compete again for new start funding in future years. As all new starts are to bechosen by the Corps, all shall be considered of equal importance, and the expectation is that future budget
submissions will include appropriate funding for all new starts selected.
There continues to be confusion regarding the executive branch's policies and guidelines
regarding which studies and projects require new start designations. Therefore, the Corps is directed to
notify the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress at least seven days prior to executionof an agreement for construction of any project except environmental infrastructure projects and projects
under the Continuing Authorities Program. Additionally, the agreement reiterates and clarifies previous
congressional direction as follows. Neither study nor construction activities related to individual projects
authorized under section 1037 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act (WRRDA) of2014
shall require a new start or new investment decision; these activities shall be considered ongoing work. No
new start or new investment decision shall be required when moving from feasibility to PED. A new startdesignation shall be required to initiate construction of individually-authorized projects funded withinprogrammatic line items. No new start or new investment decision shall be required to initiate work on a
separable element of a project when construction of one or more separable elements of that project was
initiated previously; it shall be considered ongoing work. A new construction start shall not be required forwork undertaken to correct a design deficiency on an existing federal project; it shall be considered
ongoing work. The Corps is reminded that resumptions are just that-resumption of previously-initiatedstudies or projects and, as such, do not require new start designations.

In addition to the priority factors used to allocate all additional funding provided in theInvestigations account, the Corps should give careful consideration to the out-year budget impacts of thestudies selected and to whether there appears to be an identifiable local sponsor that will be ready and able
to provide, in a timely manner, the necessary cost share for the feasibility and PED phases. The Corps isreminded that the flood and storm damage reduction mission area can include instances where non-federal
sponsors are seeking assistance with flood control and unauthorized discharges from permitted wastewater
treatment facilities and that the navigation mission area includes work in remote and subsistence harbor
areas. Within the flood and storm damage reduction mission, the Corps is urged to strive for an appropriatebalance between inland and coastal projects.

5In addition to the priority factors used to allocate all additional funding provided in theConstruction account, the Corps also shall consider the out-year budget impacts of the selected new starts,
the cost sharing sponsor's ability and willingness to promptly provide the cash contribution, if any, as well
as required lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas. When considering new
construction starts, only those that can execute a project cost sharing agreement not later than December
31 , 2020, shall be chosen.
To ensure that the new construction starts are affordable and will not unduly delay completion of
any ongoing projects, the Secretary is required to submit to the Committees on Appropriations of bothHouses of Congress a realistic out-year budget scenario prior to issuing a work allowance for a new start. It
is understood that specific budget decisions are made on an annual basis and that this scenario is neither arequest for nor a guarantee of future funding for any project. Nonetheless, this scenario shall include anestimate of annual funding for each new start utilizing a realistic funding scenario through completion of
the project, as well as the specific impacts of that estimated funding on the ability of the Corps to makecontinued progress on each previously funded construction project, including impacts to the optimum
timeline and funding requirements of the ongoing projects, and on the ability to consider initiating new
projects in the future. The scenario shall assume a Construction account funding level at the average of thepast three budget requests.

INVESTIGATIONS

The agreement includes $151,000,000 for Investigations. The agreement includes legislative
language regarding parameters for new study starts.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Investigations account is shown in thefollowing table:

6

7

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

700

700

ALABAMA
MOBILE HARBOR, AL
ALASKA
46

APOON MOUTH OF YUKON, AK
ELIM SUBSISTENCE HARBOR, AK
ST. MICHAEL CANAL, AK

100
50
ARIZONA

BIRD SPRINGS WATERSHED ASSESSMENT, AZ

50

ARKANSAS

1,500

THREE RIVERS, AR

1,500

CALIFORNIALOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA (CHANNELS), CA
SALINAS RESERVOIR (SANTA MARGARITA LAKE), CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHORELINE, CA (Phase II)
SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION, CA
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA

50
243
600
800

600

400

800
400

50

50

ILLINOISINTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT LAKES-MISSISSIPPI RIVER AQUATIC NUISANCE
SPECIES, IL, IN, OH & WI
INDIANA

1,000

MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN
KANSAS

100

SOLDIER CREEK WATERSHED, KS
MAINE
MEDUXNEKEAG WATERSHED ASSEESSMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN, ME

40

MINNESOTAPRAIRIE ISLAND STURGEON LAKE HABITAT RESTORATION, MN
ST. ANTHONY FALLS, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN

112
218

-

I\

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

NEW MEXICOPUEBLOS OF SAN FELIPE, NM, WATERSHED ASSESSMENTPUEBLOS OF ZIA WATERSHED ASSESSMENT, NM

48

50

NEW YORKBUFFALO HARBOR, NY

250

--

I\

100

-

I\

9,458
1,250
1,250
1,250

-

I\

NORTH CAROLINACAPE FEAR LOCKS AND DAMS 1-3, NC

393

OHIO
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH
OREGONCOLUMBIA RIVER TREATY 2024 IMPLEMENTATION, OR & WA
COUGAR LAKE, OR
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR

I\
I\
I\

TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX
PROCTOR LAKE, TX

250

-

1,000

-

I\

755

-

I\

2,500

2,500

1,467

1,467

26,0808,017

VIRGINIANORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS DEEPENING, VA
WASHINGTON
PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE MARINE HABITAT RESTORATION, DUCKBUSH
RIVER ESTUARY, WA
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATESREMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING
FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION
FLOOD CONTROLSHORE PROTECTION
NAVIGATION
COASTAL AND DEEP-DRAFT

6,000
4,000
4,000
7,000
6,000

I\

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

360
250
1,000

9,750
6,000
17,600
360
250
2,500

INLAND
OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR COMPLIANCEACCESS TO WATER DATAAUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORTTRI-CADD
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTIONCOMMITTEE ON MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSCOORDINATION WITH OTHER WATER RESOURCE AGENCIESDISPOSITTON OF COMPLETED PROJECTSENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIESFERC LICENSING
FLOOD DAMAGE DATAFLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICESHYDROLOGIC STUDIESINTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIESINTERNAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORTINTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCE DEVELOPMENTINVENTORY OF DAMSNATIONAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
NATIONAL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDYPLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATESPLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAMPRECIPITATION STUDIESREMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORTRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

so

so

350

1,000
2,000
80
100
230
15,000
500
125

80
100
230
15,000
500
125

400

100
400
5,000
5,000
3,500
200
75
13,000

100
400
5,000
5,000
9,000
3,500
200
575
27,115

so

so

1,000
3,550
1,000

1,000
4,550
1,000
2,548

SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

50,920142,983

TOTAL, INVESTIGATIONS

77,000151,000

STREAM GAGING
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSTRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

Funded in another account.
-Funded in remaining items.

11(_

Additional Funding-The Corps is expected to allocate the additional funding provided in thisaccount primarily to specific feasibility and PED phases, rather than to Remaining Items line items as has
been the case in previous work plans.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for environmental restoration or compliance,
the Corps shall allocate not less than $9,782,000 for ecosystem restoration projects in the PED phase thathave been funded within the last three years.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for environmental restoration or complianceand other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $2,000,000 for ecosystem
restoration projects that are modifications to flood protection project authorizations to address degradedconditions due to prior flood protection work. Of the additional funding provided in this account forenvironmental restoration or compliance and other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate notless than $200,000 to PED activities for ecosystem restoration projects that also provide additional flood
storage capacity by restoring the natural habitat.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for flood and storm damage reduction and flood
control, the Corps shall allocate not less than $1,500,000 for PED for projects that are located ineconomically-disadvantaged communities where per capita income is less than half of the state and national
averages and that have previously experienced loss of life due to flooding.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for shore protection, the Corps shall allocate notless than $905,000 for the PED phase of beach renourishment projects that have been authorized by
Congress for construction.
Of the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall allocate not less than
$10,380,000 for multipurpose projects in the PED phase that have been funded within the last three years.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall consider giving
priority to completing or accelerating ongoing studies or to initiating new studies that will enhance thenation's economic development, job growth, and international competitiveness; are for projects located inareas that have suffered recent natural disasters; are for projects that protect life and property; are forprojects to restore floodplain and aquatic habitat through cost-effective and tested means; or are for projects
to address legal requirements. The Corps shall use these funds for additional work in both the feasibility
and PED phases. The agreement includes sufficient additional funding to undertake a significant amount offeasibility and PED work. The administration is reminded that a project study is not complete until the PED
phase is complete. The Corps is reminded that the updating of economic analyses and economic impact
studies are eligible to receive additional funding.

Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines.-Not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act, theCorps shall brief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on the efforts necessary todevelop implementation rules and guidelines for the final Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines forFederal Investments in Water Resources released in March 2013 and the final Interagency Guidelines
released in December 2014. The Corps shall include in this briefing a timeline for completion of the8

implementation rules and guidelines, how the Corps' ongoing planning efforts would be impacted by
implementation, impacts to funding prioritization, and any challenges associated with the development andimplementation of such rules and guidelines. The Corps is urged to prioritize these efforts.

CONSTRUCTION

The agreement includes $2,681,000,000 for Construction. The agreement includes legislative
language regarding Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee River, Tennessee. The agreement includes legislative
language regarding parameters for new construction starts.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Construction account is shown in thefollowing table:

9

\ YL ~vll\

Lb CG -l D C-.!JNS~RT TABE,E,J

10

C

)

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

S9,000S9,000200,000

200,000

130,280130,280

24,08733,17011,87633,17017,775

17,77550,00040,000CALIFORNIAAMERICAN RIVER COMMON FEATURES, NATOMAS BASIN, CA
FLORIDASOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (EVERGLADES), FL
GEORGIASAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA
ILLINOISMELVIN PRICE LOCK AND DAM IL & MO (DEFICIENCY CORRECTION)
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI
IOWA

MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD

KENTUCKYROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY MAJOR REHABILITATIONMARYLAND600 *17,300 *ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD
POPLAR ISLAND, MD
MASSACHUSETTSBOSTON HARBOR, MA

34,81434,81475,33375,33325,000200 *7,400 *
25,00036,00036,000MICHIGAN
SAULT STE MARIE NEW LOCK CONSTRUCTION, Ml
NEW JERSEYCAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ
LOWER CAPE MAY MEADOWS, CAPE MAY POINT, NJ
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ
OREGONCOLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WAI

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

55,500111,000

138,040

138,040

53,31353,313

21,602
15,694

21,602
15,694

969,608

1,028,397

PENNSYLVANIALOCKS AND DAMS 2, 3 AND 4, MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA*

SOUTH CAROLINACHARLESTON HARBOR (DEEPENING AND WIDENING), SC
TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX
WASHINGTONCOLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID (CRFM)
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATESREMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING
FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION
FLOOD CONTROLSHORE PROTECTION
NAVIGATIONINLAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND REVENUESREGIONAL DREDGE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR COMPLIANCEENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM
BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL PILOT PROGRAMCONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAMAQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)
BENEFICIAL USES DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204)
EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14)
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)
MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111)
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT(SECTION 1135)
REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS (SECTION 208)
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAMEMPLOYEES' COMPENSATIONINLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD- BOARD EXPENSEINLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD- CORPS EXPENSEINNOVATIVE FUNDING PARTNERSHIPSRESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINESTRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM

150,000
170,000
50,165
377,878
75,575
377,650
85,000100,000
100,000
24,000
7,500
1,000

1,000

1,000

17,002
17,00060275
150,000

10,00015,000*8,000
12,000
5,000
8,000
8,000
1,500
4,000
38,00017,000
60
275
3,000
5,000

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
WRRDA 2014, SECTION 1043 NON-FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION OF FEDERALPROJECTSFINAL BILL

150,000

SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

337,337

1,652,603

TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION

1,306,945

2,681,000*Includes funds requested in other accounts.

Updated Capability.-The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward fromthe budget request based on updated information regarding the amount of work that could be accomplishedin fiscal year 2020.

Additional Funding-The agreement includes additional funds for projects and activities toenhance the nation ' s economic growth and international competitiveness.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for flood control, the Corps shall allocate notless than $20,000,000 to undertake studies and recommendations for construction resulting from a Dam
Safety Modification Report completed under section 1177 of the WIIN Act (Public Law 114- 322), as
amended. Of the additional funding provided in this account for flood and storm damage reduction andflood control, the Corps shall allocate not less than $20,000,000 to additional nonstructural flood control
projects. Of the additional funding provided in this account for flood and storm damage reduction and flood
control, the Corps shall allocate not less than $25,000,000 to continue construction of projects thatprincipally address drainage in urban areas.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for navigation and other authorized project
purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $50,000,000 to continue activities to construct new
navigation infrastructure for locks and Corps-owned bridges not on the inland waterways system.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for environmental restoration or complianceand other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $25,000,000 for multistateecosystem restoration programs for which a comprehensive restoration plan is in development or has been
completed, of which not less than $5,000,000 shall be for projects or programs that restore and rehabilitate
native oyster reefs.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for environmental restoration or complianceand other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $28,000,000 for ecosystem
restoration projects that have incidental flood risk management benefits.
Of the additional funds provided in this account for flood and storm damage reduction, navigation,and other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $35,000,000 to authorized
reimbursements for projects with executed project cooperation agreements and that have completed
construction or where non-federal sponsors intend to use the funds for additional water resources
development activities.
Of the additional funds provided in this account, the Corps shall allocate not less than $40,588,000
to projects with riverfront development components.
Public Law 115-123 and Public Law 116-20 included funding within the Flood Control andCoastal Emergencies account to restore authorized shore protection projects to full project profile. Thatfunding is expected to address most of the current year capability. Therefore, to ensure funding is notdirected to where it cannot be used, the agreement includes $50,165,000 for construction of shore
protection projects. The Corps is reminded that if additional work can be done, these projects are also
eligible to compete for additional funding for flood and storm damage reduction.

11

When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps is encouraged toevaluate authorized reimbursements in the same manner as if the projects were being evaluated for new or
ongoing construction. The Corps shall not condition these funds, or any funds appropriated in this Act, on a
non-federal interest paying more than their required share in any phase of a project. When allocating theadditional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall consider giving priority to the following:1.

benefits of the funded work to the national economy;

2.

extent to which the work will enhance national, regional, or local economic development;

3.

number of jobs created directly and supported in the supply chain by the funded activity;

4.

significance to national security, including the strategic significance of commodities;

5.

ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar year, including consideration of theability of the non-federal sponsor to provide any required cost share;

6.

ability to complete the project, separable element, or project phase with the funds allocated;

7.

legal requirements, including responsibilities to Tribes;

8.

for flood and storm damage reduction projects (including authorized nonstructural measures andperiodic beach renourishments ),a.

population, economic activity, or public infrastructure at risk, as appropriate;b.

the severity of risk of flooding or the frequency with which an area has experienced
flooding; andc.
9.

preservation of historically significant communities, culture, and heritage;for shore protection projects, projects in areas that have suffered severe beach erosion requiring
additional sand placement outside of the normal beach renourishment cycle or in which the normal
beach renourishment cycle has been delayed, and projects in areas where there is risk ofenvironmental contamination;

10. for navigation projects, the number of jobs or level of economic activity to be supported bycompletion of the project, separable element, or project phase;
11. for projects cost shared with the Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF), the economic impact on
the local, regional, and national economy if the project is not funded, as well as discrete elementsof work that can be completed within the funding provided in this line item;
12. for other authorized project purposes and environmental restoration or compliance projects, toinclude the beneficial use of dredged material; and13. for environmental infrastructure, projects with the greater economic impact, projects in ruralcommunities, projects in communities with significant shoreline and instances of runoff, projects
in or that benefit counties or parishes with high poverty rates, projects in financially-distressedmunicipalities, projects that improve stormwater capture capabilities, projects that provide backup
raw water supply in the event of an emergency, and projects that will provide substantial benefits
to water quality improvements.

12

,-

- - - - --The following is the only direction with regard to the availability of additional funds for IWTF costshared projects. The agreement provides funds making use of all estimated annual revenues and some
additional prior year revenues in the IWTF for ongoing projects. The agreement includes a total
appropriation of$131 ,075,000 from the IWTF. The Corps shall continue to use, as appropriate, the Inlandand lntracoastal Waterways Twenty-Year Capital Investment Strategy dated March 2016, as the applicable20-year plan. The agreement considers the 20-year Capital Investment Strategy a planning document andtherefore not subject to administration budget metrics. The Corps shall allocate all funds provided in the
IWTF Revenues line item along with the statutory cost share from funds provided in the Navigation line
item prior to allocating the remainder of funds in the Navigation line item.
It is understood that the Corps is developing metrics for prioritization of environmental

infrastructure projects. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of bothHouses of Congress not later than 120 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on these metrics.
Notwithstanding the direction on new starts in the front matter of Title I, the Corps may allocate funds to atleast one, but not more than two environmental infrastructure authorities not previously funded, which may
include regional environmental infrastructure authorities. The Corps shall consider the impacts of future
funding when selecting these projects.

Alternative Delivery. - The Corps is reminded that Public-Private Partnerships and projects thatuti lize a split-delivery approach are eligible for additional funding in this account.

Aquatic Plant Control Program.-Ofthe funding provided for the Aquatic Plant Control Program,$1,000,000 shall be for activities for monitoring, surveys, and control of the flowering rush. Of the funding
provided for the Aquatic Plant Control Program, $5,000,000 shall be for nationwide research anddevelopment to address invasive aquatic plants; within this funding, the Corps is encouraged to support
cost shared aquatic plant management programs. Of the funding provided for the Aquatic Plant Control
Program, $15,000,000 shall be for watercraft inspection stations, as authorized by section 1039 of
WRRDA, and $3,000,000 shall be for related monitoring.

Beneficial Use ofDredged Material Pilot Program.-Tbe agreement supports the pilot program
authorized in section 1122 of the WUN Act (Public Law 114-322), but concerns remain about
implementation of the program. The agreement provides $7,500,000 for the 10 pilot projects selected todate within "Beneficial Use of Dredged Material Pilot Program." The Corps shall not use Operation and
Maintenance funds provided or allocated to the projects from which the dredged material is generated forcosts beyond the costs of the Federal Standard. The Corps shall brief the Committees on Appropriations ofboth Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act on the planned activities, costs
estimates, and potential timelines for each of the 10 selected pilot projects. The Corps is further directed tobrief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress prior to any effort to solicit or selectany additional pilot projects as authorized by the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 .

Continuing Authorities Program.- The agreement supports all sections of the Continuing
Authorities Program (CAP). Funding is provided fornine CAP sections at a total of$71 ,500,000, an

13

increase of $68,500,000 above the budget request, which proposed funding for only three sections. This
program provides a useful tool for the Corps to undertake small, localized projects without the lengthy
study and authorization process typical of larger Corps projects. Within CAP and to the extent alreadyauthorized by law, the Corps is encouraged to consider projects that enhance coastal and ocean ecosystem
resiliency and projects that restore degraded wetland habitat and stream habitat impacted by construction ofCorps levees. The management of CAP shall continue consistent with direction provided in previous fiscal
years.
The Corps is encouraged to expedite the implementation offeasibility studies approved in 2019
under section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1958. The Corps shall allow for the advancement of flood
control projects in combination with ecological benefits using natural and nature-based solutions alone orin combination with built infrastructure where appropriate for reliable risk reduction during thedevelopment of projects under section 205 of CAP.

Charleston Harbor.-The agreement includes House and Senate direction and supports the budget
request to fully fund, up to the amount in the budget request, the remaining construction activities once anamendment to the existing Project Partnership Agreement is executed. It is understood that the Corps andthe non-federal sponsor are prepared to sign the agreement upon enactment of this Act to ensure
expeditious completion of the deepening project.

Murrieta Creek.- The non-federal sponsor intends to pursue a section 221 In-Kind Credit
Contribution agreement with the Corps to do the design work to optimize the multi-purpose basin, find themost cost-effective design, and initiate excavation of the basin. The Corps is encouraged to move forwardwith timely approval of the agreement. The non-federal sponsor also is moving forward to address theoutdated information in the Corps' economic side-by-side analysis for the project in order to identify themost cost-effective project. The Corps is directed to coordinate with the non-federal sponsor, as requested,in the economic update in order to have a strong basis for proceeding with the completion of the Limited
Reevaluation Report.

South Florida Ecosystem Restoration (SFER).-As in previous years, the agreement provides
funding for all study and construction authorities related to Everglades restoration under the line item titled'' South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, Florida.' ' This single line item allows the Corps flexibility inimplementing the numerous activities underway in any given fiscal year. For fiscal year 2020, the Corps isdirected to make publicly available a comprehensive snapshot of all SFER cost share accounting down tothe project level and to ensure the accuracy of all budget justification sheets that inform SFER Integrated
Financial Plan documents by October 31 , 2020.

MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIB UTARIESThe agreement includes $375,000,000 for Mississippi River and Tributaries.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Mississippi River and Tributaries account isshown in the following table:

14

\v\~4\~t:L, -K

15lr.;- b

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

38,64916,3001,500
300

38,64916,3001,500
300

70,041

1,012

70,041540 *290 1,012

148

148

141
8,651
5,100
1,342
1,000

141
8,651
5,100
1,342
1,000
15 41 10,965
1,792
555 *

CONSTRUCTIONCHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, AR
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR
RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, AR & LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS, AR & LA
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, IL
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, KY
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA
BONNET CARRE, LA
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, LA
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA
OLD RIVER, LA
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITIINGTON AUX CHAN, MS
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN

10,965
1,792
48
4,205
438
490
9,479
1,805

5,531
188
4,663
747
4,829
1,135
5,290
675
280
404
514
4,524

48
4,205
701 438
490
9,479
1,805
930 *
152 940 *
5,531
188
4,663
747
4,829
1,135
5,290
675
280
404
514
190 4,524
28 -CORPS OF ENGINEERS - MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS}BUDGET
REQUEST

SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATESFINAL BILL

2,163

MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN

202,186

208,731

REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORKDREDGING
FLOOD CONTROLOTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESCOLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (INVESTIGATIONS)MAPPING (OPERATION)MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSIONINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (OPERATION}

4,960
1,219
90
1,417

SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

7,686

166,269

TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES

209,872

375,000"'Includes funds requested in other accounts.
-includes funds requested in remaining items.

5,000
105,090
50,000
4,960
1,219

*

Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.-When allocating the additional funding provided in thisaccount, the Corps shall consider giving priority to completing or accelerating ongoing work that will
enhance the nation's economic development, job growth, and international competitiveness or are forstudies or projects located in areas that have suffered recent natural disasters. While this funding is shown
under Remaining Items, the Corps shall use these funds in investigations, construction, and operation andmaintenance, as applicable. This may include work on remaining unconstructed features of projects
permitted and authorized by law, in response to recent flood disasters.
Of the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall allocate not less than
$30,000,000 for additional flood control construction projects, of which $15,560,000 shall be for thoseprojects with flood control, water quality, and sediment reduction benefits.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for other authorized project purposes, the Corps
shall allocate not less than $1,160,000 for operation and maintenance of facilities that are educational or tocontinue land management of mitigation features.

Mississippi River Commission-No funding is provided for this new line item. The Corps isdirected to continue funding the costs of the commission from within the funds provided for activities
within the Mississippi River and Tributaries project.
Concerns have been raised that there is a lack of fisheries expertise when making decisions toopen Corps spillways, specifically related to the economic and ecological consequences experienced bycoastal communities and ecosystems. The Corps is urged to work with the National Oceanic andAtmospheric Administration to investigate options for ensuring that the membership and staff of theMississippi River Commission include a fisheries expert.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

The agreement includes $3,790,000,000 for Operation and Maintenance.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Operation and Maintenance account is shownin the following table:

16\~s~< C""\ °'- - \1 \),__,/\[INSERT TABLE)

17

C2 -=--

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE{AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

ALABAMA
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL

13,89025,953
5,290

MOBILE HARBOR, AL
PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL
TENNESSEE - TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, AL & MS
TENNESSEE - TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS
WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA

1,800
37,3899,099

13,89025,953
5,290
168
26,031 *5 *
150 *
85 1,800
37,3899,099-

ALASKA
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK
AURORA HARBOR, AK
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK

9,685
7,236

7,236
875
200
615

*
*
*

-

*
*
600 *
2,220 *750 *HOMER HARBOR, AK
JUNEAU HARBOR, AK
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK
NOME HARBOR, AK
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, AZ

2,905

PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ

1,165

WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ

559

2,905
250 1,165
117 559

ARKANSASBEAVER LAKE, AR
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR
DEGRAY LAKE, AR
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR
DIERKS LAKE, AR
GILLHAM LAKE, AR
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR

11,099
7,858
1,762
7,466
7,148
1,579
1,410
2,545
9,043

11,099
7,858
1,762
7,466
7,148
1,579
1,410
2,545
9,043

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTHELENA HARBOR, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR
NIMROD LAKE, AR
NORFORK LAKE, AR
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR
WHITE RIVER, AR

52,475
3,245
5,732
2,009
7,342
7,339
25

FINAL BILL
15 *1,151 52,475
3,245
S,732
2,009
7,342
15 *
7,339
5 *
25

CALIFORNIABLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA
COYOTE VAUEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND CHANNEL, CA
FARMINGTON DAM, CA
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA!SABELLA LAKE, CA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA

8,050
4,977

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA
OAKLAND HARBOR {SO FOOT PROJECT), CA
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA

13,108470
1,329

REDWOOD CITY HARBOR, CA
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER {30 FOOT PROJECT}, CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL, CA
SAN FRANCISCO BAY DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, CA
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA (DRIFT REMOVAL)SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA
SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CA

3,704
6,816

712
2,638
1,696

3,583
2,197

4,226

909
743

8,050
4,977
5,290 *
3,704
6,816
712
2,638
3,962 *
1,696
3,173 13,108
470
1,329
2,750 *
3,583
2,197
20,563 *2,650 *
4,226
1,494 *
475 *
14,519 *2,030 *
1,621 *
175 *
743
405 *
3,538 *
4,530 *
4,530 *
2,880 *28 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTSANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA

6,158

SUCCESS LAKE, CA

2,729

SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CAYUBA RIVER, CA

3,205
203

FINAL BILL

6,158
3,620 *
1,464 2,729
5,800 *
3,205
1,519 *COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, CO

646
1,961
1,061

JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO

3,865
2,305

646
1,961
1,061
435 3,865
2,305
601 -

CONNECTICUTBLACK ROCK LAKE, CT
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, CT

657
779
586
1,214

MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT

880
836

STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT
THOMASTON DAM, CT
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT

851
1,139
811

657
779
586
1,214
303 880
836
800 *
851
1,139
811

DELAWARE
INDIAN RIVER INLET & BAY, DE
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DE
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE

33 *
71 -

22,255 **200 *7,740 *

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC (DRIFT REMOVAL)PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC

85 1,075 *30 *CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTWASHINGTON HARBOR, DC

FINAL BILL

25*

FLORIDACANAVERAL HARBOR, FL
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL & AL
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA
MANATEE HARBOR, FL
MIAMI HARBOR, FL
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL

19,318

3,480
8,202

1,212

REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYmM RESTORATION (EVERGLADES), FLTAMPA HARBOR, FL

5,454

1,474 *
20,230 *45 *1,173 3,480
8,310 *
8,202
230 *
230 *
2,736 *
3,970 *
373 *
1,275 *
3,410 *
120 5,454
8,530 *GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA
APALACHICOLA, CHATIAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, GA, AL & FL
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA

8,747
1,622
200
10,262
7,366
10,415J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA

10,644

RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC

9,231

SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL

7,825

8,747
1,622
200
5,783 *
10,262
7,366
10,450 *161 10,713 *
100 *
9,231
28,640 *
169 *
7,825

HAWAIIBARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI
HILO HARBOR, HI
HONOLULU HARBOR, HI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI
PORT ALLEN HARBOR, KAUAI, HI

297

297
582 *
175 *
613 -

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTPROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI

FINAL BILL

581 *
IDAHO

ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID

1,179
4,431

LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID

3,402

1,179
3,905
382 3,402
721 -ILLINOISCALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN
CARLYLE LAKE, IL
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL
CHICAGO RIVER, IL
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & IN
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & IN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR
PORTION), IL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVSPORTION), IL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL
REND LAKE, IL
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL

5,161

2,630 *
5,737
3,080 *
612
13,943537
78,9682,065
2,397 2,228
860 *
5,161

50,75950,75925,15925,1595,737
612
13,943537
78,968
2,065
2,228

5,133

75 *
5,133
709 *
1,489 *INDIANABROOKVILLE LAKE, IN
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN
INDIANA HARBOR, IN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN

5,584

J EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN
MONROE LAKE, IN
PATOKA LAKE, IN

1,866
2,298
1,433
1,371

1,218
1,203

5,584
4,335 *
1,218
1,203
8,352 *
985 1,866
2,298
1,329
1,211

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTPROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN

2,213

FINAL BILL

152 *
2,213
141 *

IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD
MISSOURI RIVER - SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO & NE
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IA
RATHBUN LAKE, IA
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA

4,447
4,743
10,543
2,504
5,178
5,762

4,447
1,422 4,743
10,543
2 *
2,504
5,178
5,762

KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS
EL DORADO LAKE, KS
ELK CITY LAKE, KS
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS

3,531
2,183
948
1,508
1,302
1,222

JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS
MARION LAKE, KS
MELVERN LAKE, KS
MILFORD LAKE, KS
PEARSON - SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS
PERRY LAKE, KS
POMONA LAKE, KS
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS

1,879
5,799
2,290
3,021
2,775
1,457
2,874
2,560

TORONTO LAKE, KS
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS
WILSON LAKE, KS

729
2,711
1,800

3,531
2,183
948
1,508
1,302
1,222
1,617 1,879
3,005
2,290
3,021
2,775
1,457
2,874
2,560
686 729
2,711
1,800

KENTUCKYBARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY
DEWEY LAKE, KY

11,091
4,087
2,299
2,422
1,551
1,956

11,091
4,087
2,054 *
2,299
2,422
1,551
1,956

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLKENTUCKY RIVER, KY
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY
NOLIN LAKE, KY
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN & OH
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN, OH, PA & WV
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY

217
2,441
1,734
273
3,203
50,577
6,891
1,362

935 *
29
2,719
2,000
2,797
3,455
887 217
2,441
1,734
273
3,203
50,577
6,891
1,362

ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY

3,404
1,166
10,647
1,689

3,404
1,166
10,647
1,689

ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY
FALLS OF THE OHIO NATIONAL WILDLIFE, KY & IN
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY
GRAYSON LAKE, KY
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY

29
2,719
2,000
2,797
3,455

5 *

LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF & BLACK, LA
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU PIERRE, LA
BAYOU SEGNITTE WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA
BAYOU TECHE, LA
CADDO LAKE, LA
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA
CHEFUNCTE RIVER & BOGUE FALIA, LA
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA
J BENN ITT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA
WALLACE LAKE, LA
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA

1,209
33

218

16,018

8,436

267

8,484
1,209
850
33

*
*

10

*

30

*

60

*

218
17,400 *20 *1,800 *
16,0181,050 *
1,330 8,436
30 *
1,800 *
1,350 *
91,970 *
25 *
200 *
267
20 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE{AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

10 *WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTALWATERWAYTO BAYOU DULAC, LA
MAINE

1,050 *
108 1,000 *
30 *
250 *

DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME
UNION RIVER, ME
MARYLANDBALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (SO FOOT), MDBALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV
NANTICOKE RIVER NORTHWEST FORK, MD
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD

214
4,382

20,400 *565 *214
175 4,382
3 *
500 *
3

*

500 *
164 4,025 *WICOMICO RIVER, MD
MASSACHUSETTS
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA
CAPE COD CANAL, MA
CAPE COD CANAL, MA
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREA, MA
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA
LITILEVILLE LAKE, MA
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET HURRICANE BARRIER, MA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA

1,140
1,196
1,141
2,071

TULLY LAKE, MA
WELLFLEET HARBOR, MA
WEST HILL DAM, MA
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA

1,245

402
416
1,024
1,221
1,104
832
915

926
1,284

1,140
1,196
1,141
2,071
9,834 *
402
416
1,024
1,221
417 1,104
832
915
1,050 *
1,245
5,000 *
926
1,284

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLMICHIGAN
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, Ml
DETROIT RIVER, Ml
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, Ml
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, Ml

34
19
35

KEWEENAW WATERWAY, Ml
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, Ml
SAGINAW RIVER, Ml
SEBEWAING RIVER, Ml
STCLAIR RIVER, Ml
ST MARYS RIVER, Ml
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, Ml

60
6,518

192 *
6,003 *
619 *
267 35530 *
2,747 *
60
1,572 *
34,714 *2,890 *MINNESOTABIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD
DULUTH - SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MNMISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVPPORTION), MN
ORWELL LAKE, MN
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN
TWO HARBORS, MN

1,239

254
5,870 *
526 1,239

54,75254,752

254
584

519
195
4,436

519
84 1954,436
530 *
1,000 *MISSISSIPPIEAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS

290

1,716
140

ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS
YAZOO RIVER, MS

290
4,355 *
109 307 *
1,716
3,860 *
140
155 *
35 *
111 *

MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO

6,786

15 *
6,786

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

CLEARWATER LAKE, MO
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS),
MO&IL
NEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MO
STOCKTON LAKE, MO
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR

BUDGET
REQUEST
3,487
11,262
1,410

FINAL BILL
3,487
11,262
949 1,410

888

888

25,04525,045

2,822

3,600
4,773
9,979

10 *
15 *
2,822
5 *
181 3,600
9 *
4,773
9,979

MONTANAFT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT
INSPECTION OF COMPLmD WORKS, MT

5,744

LIBBY DAM, MT
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT

2,213

5,744
588 2,213
126 -NEBRASKAGAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE
INSPECTION OF COMPLmD WORKS, NE

10,083
2,514

MISSOURI RIVER - KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA
PAPILLION CREEK, NE
SALT CREEKS AND TRIBUTARIES, NE

113
962
1,142

10,083
2,514
1,222 113
962
1,142

1,332
1,210

70 1,332
1,210

NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV
NEW HAMPSHIREBLACKWATER DAM, NH
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH
HOPKINTON - EVERETT LAKES, NH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH

1,020
888
1,157
2,015

1,020
888
1,157
2,015
70 -

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTOTTER BROOK LAKE, NH
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH

899

RYE HARBOR, NH
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH

932

FINAL BILL

899
300
200
932

*
*

9

*

NEW JERSEYBARNEGAT INLET, NJ
CHEESEQUAKE CREEK, NJ
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA & DE
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS, NJ
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ

so *

668

20 *
15 *
32,358 *559 432 *895 *16,600 *668
2,494 *so *RARITAN RIVER, NJ
SALEM RIVER, NJ
SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ
SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ

100 *
10 *
25 *
25 *

NEW MEXICOABIQUIU DAM, NM
COCHITI LAKE, NM
CONCHAS LAKE, NM
GALISTEO DAM, NM
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM

3,330
4,188
4,446
1,075
978

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM

1,190
1,830

TWO RIVERS DAM, NM
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL, NM

708
1,315

3,330
4,188
4,446
1,075
978
318 1,190
1,830
205 708
1,315

NEW YORKALMOND LAKE, NY
ARKPORT DAM, NY
BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, NY
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY
BRONX RIVER, NY
BROWNS CREEK, NY

826
491

s

826
491
25 *
2,077 *30 *30 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTBUFFALO HARBOR, NY
BUTIERMILK CHANNEL, NY
EAST RIVER, NY
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY
GLEN COVE CREEK, NY
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, NY
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, NY

685

FINAL BILL

250 *
30 *
455 *
685
50 *
280 *
15 *
20 *
25 *
50 *
9,300 *
1,350 *
1,742
50 *
50 *
15 *
3,604
14,100 *16,200 *6,965 *
11,171 *
1,748 *
30 *
2,602 *
884
780 *
943
N

JONES INLET, NY
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY
MATIITUCK HARBOR, NY
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL)NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)
PORTCHESTER HARBOR, NY
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY

3,604

SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY

884

WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY

943
NORTH CAROLINA

2,155
1,912
140
1,777

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC
B EVERETI JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC
FALLS LAKE, NC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC

2,155
1,912
495 *
1,777
190
806 *
25 *
7,540 *
30 *
700 *
650 *
60 *
3,351
16,560 *N

MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS, NC
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC
NEW RIVER INLET, NC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC
w KERR scon DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC

3,351

\

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLNORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN HALEY, ND
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND
HOMME LAKE, ND
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND

317
16,001
352

LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND

1,588
706

SOURIS RIVER, ND
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND

386

317
16,001352
512 1,588
706
124 386
160 *

OHIO

1,455
1,202
2,666

1,981
108 *
2,762
2,937
1,481
8,066 *
1,216 *
3,397
1,746
2,204
1,130 *
590 115
1,481
1,452
12,459
731
1,537
2,980
318 *
54
913 *
300 *
4,659 *
1,455
1,202
2,595

507
1,111

507
1,111

ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH
BERLIN LAKE, OH
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH
CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH
DELAWARE LAKE, OH
DILLON LAKE, OH
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH

1,981

MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH
MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH
OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH

115
1,481
1,452
12,459
731
1,537
2,980

ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH

2,762
2,937
1,481

3,397
1,746
2,204

54

SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH
WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH
OKLAHOMAARCADIA LAKE, OK
BIRCH LAKE, OK

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTBROKEN BOW LAKE, OK
CANTON LAKE, OK
COPAN LAKE, OK
EUFAULA LAKE, OK
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK
HEYBURN LAKE, OK
HUGO LAKE, OK
HULAH LAKE, OK
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK

3,897
1,760
1,172
7,223
5,488
1,260
343
824
1,939
1,010

KAW LAKE, OK
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK
OPTIMA LAKE, OK
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK
SARDIS LAKE, OK
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK

2,388
5,043
19,187
3,104
95
160
1,455
2,528

SKIATOOK LAKE, OK
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK
WAURIKA LAKE, OK
WISTER LAKE, OK

1,482
4,769
1,604
900

FINAL BILL

3,897
1,760
1,172
7,223
5,488
1,260
343
824
1,939
1,010
275 2,388
5,043
19,187
3,104
95
160
1,455
2,528
2,060 1,482
4,769
1,604
900

OREGONAPPLEGATE LAKE, OR
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA
CHETCO RIVER, OR
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA
COOS BAY, OR
COQUILLE RIVER, OR
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR
COUGAR LAKE, OR
DEPOE BAY, OR
DETROIT LAKE, OR
DORENA LAKE, OR
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR
GREEN PETER - FOSTER LAKES, OR
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA

1,266
1,093
1,919

1,516
3,986
1,054
1,499
305
1,504
2,078
2,631
1,441
5,964

1,266
1,093
7,657 *
954 *
23,759 *4,802 *
515 *
1,516
3,986
24 *
1,054
1,499
305
1,504
2,078
2,631
1,441
1,001 5,964

l

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTLOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR
MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA
NEHALEM BAY, OR
PORT ORFORD, OR
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR

2,187
3,862
9,904

ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR
SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OR
TILLAMOOK BAY & BAR, OR
UMPQUA RIVER, OR
WILLAMETIE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR
WILLAMETIE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, ORYAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR

FINAL BILL

2,187
3,862
9,904
20 *
1,302 *
477 *
942 *
100 975 *
3 •

65
203
1,013

9,898 *
25 *
1,099 *
65
203
1,013
4,075 *PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA
ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO TRENTON, NJ
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA

7,177
1,049
359
1,881
2,840
1,851
2,117
3,538
939

JOHNSTOWN, PA
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WVOHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH & WV
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA

21
1,582
8,316
1,435
16,86632,771
959

PROMPTON LAKE, PA
PUNXSUTAWNEY,PA
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA

555
862
4,584

2,167
6,653
1,543
335

7,177
1,049
359
1,881
2,840
1,851
2,117
3,538
939
4,130 *
2,167
6,653
1,543
335
1,112 21
1,582
6,130
1,435
16,86632,771
959
172 *
555
862
4,584

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE{AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTSCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA
STILLWATER LAKE, PA
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA

2,844
638

TIOGA - HAMMOND LAKES, PA
TIONESTA LAKE, PA
UNION CITY LAKE, PA
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD

3,061
5,510
538
1,110
926
3,238

FINAL BILL

78 4,083 *
2,844
638
120 *
3,061
5,510
538
1,110
926
3,238

PUERTO RICOINSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, PR
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PR

185 100 *730 *SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR
RHODE ISLAND
FOX POINT BARRIER, NARRANGANSITT BAY, RI
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, RI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI
PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI
WOONSOCKET, RI

2,790

698

2,790
95 300 *1,500 *
698

SOUTH CAROLINAATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC

285

285
19,476 *3,994 *
· 65 -

COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC

875*

SOUTH DAKOTABIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD

9,688
413
346
12,398

LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD

648
13,723

9,688
413
346
12,398771 648
13,723
144 -CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLTENNESSEECENTER HILL LAKE, TN
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN
J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN
NORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL HARBOR, LAKE COUNTY, TN
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN

7,577
8,272
8,059
7,656
5,837
13,31023,792

7,577
8,272
8,059
7,656
178 5,837
15 *
13,3105 *23,792655 *TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX
ARKANSAS- RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL - AREA VIII, TX
BARDWELL LAKE, TX
BELTON LAKE, TX
BENBROOK LAKE, TX
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX
CANYON LAKE, TX
CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES, TX
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX
GIWW, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX
JOE POOL LAKE, TX
LAKE KEMP, TX
LAVON LAKE, TX
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX

1,211
1,797
2,193
5,766
3,220
3,060
3,314

9,053
39
3,643

3,038
3,059
35,275
1,485

2,072
1,415
268
3,915
3,583
2,361

1,211
1,797
2,193
5,766
3,220
3,000 *
3,060
3,314
50 *
8,550 *
9,053
39
3,643
4,700 *
10,900 *4,000 *
50 *
3,038
3,059
35,275
1,485
22,000 *1,569 2,072
1,415
268
3,915
3,583
4,450 *
2,361

CORPS OF ENGINEERS- OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTNORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX
0 C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX
PROCTOR LAKE, TX
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX

3,267
1,687
1,102
2,458

RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX
SABINE - NECHES WATERWAY, TX
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX

1,717

SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX
TOWN BLUFF DAM, BA STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX
WACO LAKE, TX
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX
WHITNEY LAKE, TX
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX

7,278
3,014
4,752
4,826
3,220
2,793
7,084
4,389

FINAL BILL

3,267
1,687
1,102
2,458
325 *
1,717
11,675 *7,278
510 3,014
4,752
500 *
4,826
3,220
2,793
7,084
4,389

UTAH
INSPECTION OF COMPLITTD WORKS, UTSCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT

25 500 -VERMONTBALL MOUNTAIN, VT
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT

2,206

NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT

1,012
1,350
863
992

2,206
159 *
1,012
1,350
863
992

VIRGIN ISLANDSINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VI

18 50 *VIRGINIAATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY -ACC, VA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY - DSC, VA
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA
HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS HARBOR, VA (DRIFT
HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA

679
640
2,612

679
640
400 *
2,612
1,700 *
120 *
440
N

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTJAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA
JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC
JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA
PHILPOTI LAKE, VA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA

11,594
2,433
765
5,504

RAPPAHANNOCK RIVER, VA
RUDEE INLET, VA
WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATIONS, VA

FINAL BILL
3,360
11,594
2,433
15,965
765
5,504
1,125
210
320
150

*
*

*
*

*
*

WASHINGTONBELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA
COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA &PORTLAND, OR
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND THE DALLES, OR
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR & ID (CRFM)
EVERITT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA
GRAYS HARBOR, WA
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA
KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA
LAKE CROCKETI (KEYSTONE HARBOR), WA
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA
UTILE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA
MOUNT SAINT HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA
SEATILE HARBOR, WA
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA
TACOMA HARBOR, WA
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA

*
588

588
52,236

2,597

4,347
7,003

1,260
4,473
3,309
2,919
2,746
266
6,546

*

1,828 *
1,057 *
2,597
1,337 *
7,828 *
4,347
7,003
1,019 6,105 *
1,623 *
9,319 *
4,473
3,309
2,919
2,746
266
6,546
1,046 *
1,725 *

*
469 -

*
297

297
66

*
*
*

184
3,607

184
3,607
440 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

WEST VIRGINIABEECH FORK LAKE, WV
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV
ELKINS, WV
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV

1,711
2,240
2,720
2,644
25

KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY & OH
R D BAI LEY LAKE, WV
STONEWALLJACKSON LAKE, WV
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV
SUTTON LAKE, WV
TYGART LAKE, WV

12,641
24,361
2,710
2,492
1,466
2,571
2,980
1,667

1,711
2,240
2,720
2,644
25
423 12,641
24,361
2,710
2,492
1,466
2,571
2,980
1,667

WISCONSINEAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI
FOX RIVER, WI
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI

1,055
11,457

KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI

13

STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WI

7

1,055
11,4573,437 *
45 13
1,341 *
230 *
7
550 *

WYOMINGINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES

1,135

189 1,135
109 -

1,774,746

2,721,816

675

40,156
532,500
50,00055,00065,00085,00016,000

REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORKNAVIGATION MAINTENANCE
DEEP-DRAFT HARBOR AND CHANNELDONOR AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS
INLAND WATERWAYS
SMALL, REMOTE, OR SUBSISTENCE NAVIGATIONOTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESAQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIP MAINTENANCE (FEM)
CIVIL WORKS WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CWWMS)
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM
COASTAL OCEAN DATA SYSTEM (CODS)CULTURAL RESOURCESCYBERSECURITY
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVEDREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVEDREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEMDREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (DOER)
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAMFACILITY PROTECTIONFISH & WILDLIFE OPERATING FISH HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTSINSPECTION OF COMPLETED FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTSINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKSMONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTSNATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM (PORTFOLIO RISK ASSESSMENT)NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP)NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORYNATIONAL (MULTIPLE PROJECT) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIE:NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REAUOCATIONSOPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATIONPERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING SUPPORT PROGRAM
RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMREGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAMRESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS PROJECTSREVIEW OF NON-FEDERAL ALTERATIONS OF CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS (SECTION 40
SCHEDULING OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONSSTEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAMSUSTAINABLE RIVERS PROGRAM (SRP)
VETERAN'S CURATION PROGRAM AND COLLECTIONS MANAGEMENTWATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT (WOTS)BUDGET
REQUEST
3,285
7,650
2,430
2,250
900
3,600

FINAL BILL

1,010
5,000
2,550
300

4,285
7,650
10,975
7,500
900
3,600
10,521
13,5002,720
10,000
6,120
300

4,182

4,182

5,400

5,400
795
5,250
20,0004,050
15,00032,784
3,780
4,875
7,650
4,500
4,500
3,330
500
392
2,000
1,400
3,500

•

*
A

8,500
8,564
900
500
5,025
4,200
500

12,0007,500
13,9004,500
15,000
3,330
500
600
3,000
1,400
8,500
5,000
8,500
5,000
900
5,000
6,500
4,200
5,500

SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

155,682

1,068,184

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

1,930,428

3,790,000*Includes funds requested in other accounts.
"Funded under projects listed under states.
-Funded in remaining items.

*AUpdated Capability. -The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward fromthe budget request based on updated information regarding the amount of work that could be accomplishedin fiscal year 2020.

Additional Funding/or Ongoing Work.-Ofthe additional funding provided in this account forother authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $2,200,000 to continue greenway
trail improvements at federal projects.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for other authorized project purposes, the Corps
shall allocate not less than $2,000,000 for efforts to combat invasive mussels at Corps-owned reservoirs.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall consider giving
priority to the following:l.

ability to complete ongoing work maintaining authorized depths and widths of harbors andshipping channels (including small, remote, or subsistence harbors), including where contaminatedsediments are present;

2.

ability to address critical maintenance backlog;

3.

presence of the U.S. Coast Guard;

4.

extent to which the work will enhance national, regional, or local economic development,
including domestic manufacturing capacity;

5.

extent to which the work will promote job growth or international competitiveness;

6.

number of jobs created directly by the funded activity;

7.

ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar year;

8.

ability to complete the project, separable element, project phase, or useful increment of workwithin the funds allocated;9.

addressing hazardous barriers to navigation due to shallow channels;

10. risk of imminent failure or closure of the facility;
11 . for small, remote, and subsistence harbors,a.

low-use ports with unexpected levels of deterioration since their last dredging; andb.

projects with public safety concerns; and12. for harbor maintenance activities,a.

total tonnage handled;b.

total exports;c.

total imports;

d.

dollar value of cargo handled;e.

energy infrastructure and national security needs served;f.

designation as strategic seaports;g.

Jack of alternative means of freight movement;h.

savings over alternative means of freight movement; and

18

1.

improvements to dredge disposal facilities that will result in long-term savings, including
a reduction in regular maintenance.

Additional funding provided for donor and energy transfer ports shall be allocated in accordancewith 33 U.S.C. 2238c. The Corps is encouraged to include funding for this program in future budget
submissions. The Corps is directed to fully execute subsection (c) of33 U.S.C. 2238c not later than 90 days
after enactment of this Act.
Concerns persist that the administration's criteria for navigation maintenance do not allow small,remote, or subsistence harbors and waterways to properly compete for scarce navigation maintenancefunds. The Corps is directed to revise the criteria used for determining which navigation projects are fundedin order to develop a reasonable and equitable allocation under this account. The agreement supports
including criteria to evaluate the economic impact that these projects provide to local and regional
economies.

Aquatic Nuisance Research Program.-Concems persist about the increasing threat to humanhealth and public safety from harmful algal blooms (HABs) on our nation's surface waters. The agreement
provides additional funds in Aquatic Nuisance Research Program to address HABs and to develop next
generation ecological models to maintain inland and intracoastal waterways, which contribute over
$649,000,000,000 annually to the U.S. economy. The agreement also provides additional funds to support
research and development that will identify the formation ofHABs and develop improved strategies forearly detection, prevention, and management techniques and procedures to reduce the occurrence andimpacts ofHABs in the nation' s water resources. The Corps is urged to work collaboratively withappropriate university partners to address these issues. The Corps is encouraged to explore opportunities toaddress HABs in the Great Lakes given the historic lake levels in the region.

Coastal Inlet Research Program.-The agreement includes Senate direction.
Gross Revenue Fees.-Improving public access to and usage of Corps facilities and the continued
enhancement of those facilities are significant policy objectives. Concerns have been raised that current
Corps policy and actions related to the fees placed on gross revenue have discouraged the enhancement offacilities and amenities at certain properties. Therefore, the Corps is urged to consider the impact of grossrevenue fees on recreational opportunities and property enhancements when determining the level ofassessed gross revenue fees.

Levee Safety.-The agreement includes House and Senate direction.
Monitoring of Completed Navigation Projects.-It is understood that the Corps continues to
explore non-destructive testing methods of inspection that can assist in performing this vital mission withincreased safety and accuracy and at significantly less cost than current methods. The agreement provides$2,000,000 for the Corps to complete an asset management plan regarding non-destructive testing methods.
Within available funds , $4,000,000 shall be to support the structural health monitoring program to facilitate
research to maximize operations, enhance efficiency, and protect asset life through catastrophic failure
mitigation. Not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act, the Corps shall brief the Committees on

19

Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on the status of these efforts, including future funding
requirements. The agreement includes Senate direction regarding fisheries .

Regional Dredge Demonstration Program. -Additional funds are provided in this account tosupport the demonstration program in accordance with the front matter under the heading "Regional
Dredge Demonstration Program."

Scheduling of Reservoir Operations.-The agreement provides that not less than $4,000,000 of theadditional funds provided in the Scheduling of Reservoir Operations line shall be for a water control
manual update for a non-Corps owned high hazard dam where: (1) the Corps has a responsibility for flood
control operations under section 7 of the Flood Control Act of 1944; (2) the dam requires coordination ofwater releases with one or more other high-hazard dams for flood control purposes; and (3) the dam owneris actively investigating the feasibility of applying forecast-informed reservoir operations technology.

Water Control Manuals.-The agreement includes Senate direction.

REGULATORY PROGRAM

The agreement includes $210,000,000 for the Regulatory Program. Additional funds included
above the budget request are to be used by Districts to decrease permit review times.

FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

The agreement includes $200,000,000 for the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.

FLOOD CONTROL AND COAST AL EMERGENCIESThe agreement includes $35,000,000 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies.
EXPENSES

The agreement includes $203,000,000 for Expenses.

OFFICE OF THE ASSIST ANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS

The agreement includes $5,000,000 for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil
Works. The agreement includes legislative language that restricts the availability of funding until the
Secretary submits the required baseline report and a work plan that allocates at least 95 percent of theadditional funding provided in each account (i.e., 95 percent of additional funding provided in
Investigations, 95 percent of additional funding provided in Construction, etc.). This restriction shall notaffect the roles and responsibilities established in previous fiscal years of the Office of the Assistant20

Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Corps headquarters, the Corps field operating agencies, or any
other executive branch agency .
A timely and accessible executive branch in the course of fulfilling its constitutional role in theappropriations process is essential. The requesting and receiving of basic, factual information, such as
budget justification materials, is vital in order to maintain a transparent and open governing process. The
agreement recognizes that some discussions internal to the executive branch are pre-decisional in nature
and, therefore, not subject to disclosure. However, the access to facts, figures, and statistics that inform
these decisions are not subject to this same sensitivity and are critical to the budget process. The
administration shall ensure timely and complete responses to these inquiries.

21

GENERAL PROVISIONS- CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

The agreement includes a provision relating to reprogramming.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the allocation of funds .
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds to carry out any contract thatcommits funds beyond the amounts appropriated for that program, project, or activity.
The agreement includes a provision concerning funding transfers related to fish hatcheries.
The agreement includes a provision regarding certain dredged material disposal activities. The
Corps is directed to brief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 90days after enactment of this Act on dredged material disposal issues.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting funds for reorganization of the Civil Works
program.
The agreement includes a provision regarding eligibility for additional funding. Whether a project
is eligible for funding under a particular provision of additional funding is a function of the technical detailsof the project; it is not a policy decision. The Chief of Engineers is the federal government's technicalexpert responsible for execution of the Civil Works program and for offering professional advice on its
development. Therefore, the provision in this agreement clarifies that a project's eligibility for additional
funding shall be solely the professional determination of the Chief of Engineers.
The agreement includes a provision regarding reallocations at a project.

22

TITLE II-DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORCENTRAL UT AH PROJECTCENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT

The agreement includes a total of$20,000,000 for the Central Utah Project Completion Account,which includes $16,700,000 for Central Utah Project construction, $1 ,800,000 for transfer to the Utah
Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Account for use by the Utah Reclamation Mitigation andConservation Commission, and $1 ,500,000 for necessary expenses of the Secretary of the Interior.

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

In lieu of all House and Senate direction regarding additional funding and the fiscal year 2020
work plan, the agreement includes direction under the heading " Additional Funding for Water and Related
Resources Work" in the Water and Related Resources account.

Unmanned Aerial Systems.-Concems remain about the threat posed to the national security of
the United States by unmanned aerial systems (UAS) that are produced by foreign-owned or controlled
corporations and operated by the Department of the Interior, to include Reclamation. The agreement
supports the Department of the Interior's recent grounding ofUAS produced by foreign-owned orcontrolled corporations and encourages Reclamation to work with other federal agencies to develop a
strategy to end all United States Government reliance on UAS from foreign-owned or controlled
corporations, while working with federal partners to find a suitable domestic alternative.

23

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(INCLUDING TRANSFERS OF FUNDS)

The agreement provides $1,512,151 ,000 for Water and Related Resources.
The agreement includes legislative language, in accordance with Public Law 114-322, to allow
the use of certain funding provided in fiscal years 2017 and 2018.
The agreement for Water and Related Resources is shown in the following table:

24

I NS~T 2-5 CL - 2- s-~C)
f,IN8ER'f 'f..tBCE]

25-

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT

OM&R

TOTAL

FINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R-

15,311
648

5,744
2,303
649
1,550
1,125

TOTAL

ARIZONAAK CHIN INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SITTLEMENT ACT PROJECTCOLORADO RIVER BASIN - CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECTCOLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEMSALT RIVER PROJECTSAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SITTLEMENT ACT PROJECTYUMA AREA PROJECTS

5,744
2,303
649
1,550
1,125

22,78915,311
6,392
2,303
899
1,550
23,914

746

898

1,644

1,577
35
5,075
1,290
1,508
28,264
7,770

8,837
2,184
5,644
2,772
3,411

10,414
2,219
10,7194,062
4,919
28,2648,140
28,780
2,170
291
8,817
14,44813,421
7,666
873
300
3,395
434

250

15,311648

22,78915,311
6,392
2,303
899
1,550
23,914

746

898

1,644

1,577
35
5,075
1,290
1,508
28,264
7,770

8,837
2,184
5,644
2,772
3,411

10,414
2,219
10,7194,062
4,919
28,2648,140
28,780
2,170
291
8,817
14,44813,421
7,666
873
300
3,395
434

250

CALIFORNIA

r/
\

V

CACHUMA PROJECTCENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT:AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION, FOLSOM DAM UNIT/MORMON ISLANDAUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT
DELTA DIVISIONEAST SIDE DIVISIONFRIANT DIVISIONSAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION SETILEMENTMISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMSREPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINT. PROGRAMSACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISIONSAN FELIPE DIVISIONSHASTA DIVISION
TRINITY RIVER DIVISIONWATER AND POWER OPERATIONSWEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT

1,675
218
474
10,371
2,628
2,758

ORLAND PROJECTSALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECTSOLANO PROJECTVENTURA RIVER PROJECT

300
1,162
380

370
28,780
495
73
8,343
4,077
10,793
4,908
873
2,233
54

1,675
218
474
10,371
2,628
2,758
300
1,162
380

370
28,780
495
73
8,343
4,077
10,793
4,908
873
2,233
54

"""

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

FINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

COLORADOANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECTARMEL UNIT, P-SMBP
COLLBRAN PROJECTCOLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECTFRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECTFRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECTGRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE IILEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY PROJECTMANCOS PROJECTNARROWS UNIT, P-SMBP
PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II
PINE RIVER PROJECTSAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CLOSED BASIN
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CONEJOS DIVISIONUNCOMPAHGRE PROJECTUPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM

5,234
4
205
96
75
135
275

-100
1,080
120
118
9
708
729

5,004
384
1,850
13,513
120
9,884
1,743
30,000
678
30
2,967
295
2,832
20
150

--

10,238388
2,055
13,609195
10,0192,018
30,000
778
30
4,047
415
2,950
29
858
729

5,234
4
205
96
75
135
275

2,642
16,000
1,476
2,037
14

41
211
13
104

100
1,080
120
118
9
708
729

5,004
384
1,850
13,513
120
9,884
1,743
30,000
678
30
2,967
295
2,832
20
150

10,238388
2,055
13,609195
10,0192,018
30,000
778
30
4,047
415
2,950
29
858
729

2,409
20
3,151
47

5,051
16,000
1,496
5,188
61

438
887

479
1,098

497
1,147
100

510
1,251
100

IDAHO
BOISE AREA PROJECTSCOLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECTLEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTMINIDOKA AREA PROJECTSPRESTON BENCH PROJECT

2,642
16,000
1,476
2,037
14

2,409
20
3,151
47

5,051
16,000
1,496
5,188
61

41
211
13
104

438
887
497
1,147
100

479
1,098
510
1,251
100

KANSASALMENA UNIT, P-SMBP
BOSTWICK UNIT, P-SMBP
CEDAR BLUFF UNIT, P-SMBP
GLEN ELDER UNIT, P-SMBP
KANSAS RIVER UNIT, P-SMBP

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)KIRWIN UNIT, P-SMBPWEBSTER UNIT, P-SMBP
WICHITA PROJECT - CHENEY DIVISIONBUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

14
11
36

371
17,457
352

188

5,126
646

TOTAL

FINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

385
17,468
388

14
11
36

371
17,457352

385
17,468
388

5,314

188
162
2,431
52

5,126
646

MONTANACANYON FERRY UNIT, P-SMBP
EAST BENCH UNIT, P-SMBP
FORT PECK RESERVATION/ DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER SYSTEMHELENA VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP

162
2,431
52

''

\~ '

398
8,495

59
139
10
90

98
1,788
74
159

157
1,927
84
249

59
139
10
90

98
1,788
74
159

157
1,927
84
249

4,992
115
595

4,401

9,393
115
595

4,992
115
595

4,401

9,393
115
595

38

LOWER MARIAS UNIT, P-SMBP
LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT86

YELLOWTAIL UNIT, P-SMBP

398
8,495

699
400
1,030
1,984
107
105

HUNTLEY PROJECTSUN RIVER PROJECT

38
86
699
400
1,030
1,984
107
105

5,314
808
2,431
290
476
95
2,272
722
3,451
1,140
1,984
505
8,600

2,431
290
476
95
2,272
722
3,451
1,140
1,984
505
8,600

HUNGRY HORSE PROJECTMILK RIVER PROJECTMISSOURI BASIN O&M, P-SMBP
ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MT RURAL WATER SYSTEM

808

238
476
57
2,186
23
3,051
110

238
476
57
2,186
23
3,051
110

NEBRASKAAINSWORTH UNIT, P-SMBP
FRENCHMAN-CAMBRIDGE UNIT, P-SMBP
MIRAGE FLATS PROJECTNORTH LOUP UNIT, P-SMBP
NEVADALAHONTAN BASIN PROJECTLAKE TAHOE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAMWATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESFINAL BILL

MANAGEMENT

OM&R

TOTAL

2,108

1,342
10,121

11,6683,450
22,582
13,821

-

68

5

20

564
12,199969

564
19,865979

RESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

NEW MEXICOCARLSBAD PROJECTMIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT

12,461
2,153

RIO GRANDE PROJECTRIO GRANDE PUEBLOS PROJECTTUCUMCARI PROJECT

68
15

2,108
12,461
2,153
68
15

1,342
10,121
11,66853,450
22,582
13,821
68
20

10

564
12,199969

564
19,865
979

39
20
31
77
54
39

203
826
600
360
1,091
503

242
846
631
437
1,145
542

444
420
772
13,079
1,801
283

420
261
567
3,040
1,055
303
2,877

864
681
1,339
16,119
2,856
586
3,265

NORTH DAKOTAr

DICKINSON UNIT, P-SMBPGARRISON DIVERSION UNIT, P-SMBP
HEART BUTTE UNIT, P-SMBP

7,666
10

7,666

OKLAHOMAARBUCKLE PROJECTMCGEE CREEK PROJECTMOUNTAIN PARK PROJECTNORMAN PROJECTWASHITA BASIN PROJECT
W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT

39
20
31
77
54
39

444
420
772
13,079
1,801
283
388

203

242

826

846

600
360
1,091
503

631
437
1,145
542

420
261
567
3,040
1,055
303
2,877

864
681
1,339
16,119
2,856
586
3,265

OREGONCROOKED RIVER PROJECTDESCHUTES PROJECTEASTERN OREGON PROJECTSKLAMATH PROJECTROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISIONTUALATIN PROJECTUMATILLA PROJECT

388

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESFINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

MANAGEMENT

OM&R

TOTAL

30
376

968
841
567

998
1,217
567
100
15
13,101
110
71
199
502

30
376

22
40
50
54
24

921
571

32
122
50
975
595

95
21
65
165
1,462
29
313
858
1,409
1,698

228
101
120
196
906
50
128
70
1,119
134

323
122
185
361
2,368
79
441
928
2,528
1,832

TOTAL

SOUTH DAKOTAANGOSTURA UNIT, P-SMBP
BELLE FOURCHE UNIT, P-SMBPKEYHOLE UNIT, P-SMBP
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT100

MNI WICONI PROJECTOAHE UNIT, P-SMBP
RAPID VALLEY PROJECTRAPID VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP
SHADEHILL UNIT, P-SMBP

I

1

15
13,101
110
71
199
501

968
841
567

100

1

15
13,101
110
71
199
501

998
1,217
567
100
15
13,101
110
71
199
502

TEXAS

l/\
I,

BALMORHEA PROJECTCANADIAN RIVER PROJECTLOWER RIO GRANDE WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMNUECES RIVER PROJECTSAN ANGELO PROJECT

22
40
50
54
24

10
82
921
571

32
122
50
975
595

95
21
65
165
1,462
29
313
858
1,409
1,698

228
101
120
196
906
50
128
70
1,119
134

323
122
185
361
2,368
79
441
928
2,528
1,832

10
82

UTAH
HYRUM PROJECT
MOON LAKE PROJECTNEWTON PROJECT
OGDEN RIVER PROJECTPROVO RIVER PROJECTSANPETE PROJECTSCOFIELD PROJECTSTRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT
WEBER BASIN PROJECT
WEBER RIVER PROJECTWATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESFINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT

OM&R

TOTAL

MANAGEMENT

OM&R

TOTAL

COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECTWASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS

5,296
381

15,36784

20,663
465

5,296
381

15,36784

20,663465

YAKIMA PROJECTYAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT

1,311

6,001

6,001

-

7,312
10,7601,311

10,76010,760WASHINGTON

7,312
10,760WYOMINGBOYSEN UNIT, P-SMBPBUFFALO BILL DAM, DAM MODIFICATION, P-SMBP

154

2,256

2,410

154

2,256

2,410

33

3,514

3,547

33

3,514

KENDRICK PROJECT

68

5,477

57

68
57

5,477

1,484
5,526

5,545
1,541

3,547
5,545

1,484

1,541

72
4

5,598
75
612

NORTH PLATTE PROJECTNORTH PLATTE AREA, P-SMBPOWL CREEK UNIT, P-SMBP
RIVERTON UNIT, P-SMBP

72
4

8

71
604

5,598
75
612

8

5,526
71
604

SHOSHONE PROJECT

34

942

976

34

942

976

189,289358,724

548,013

189,289358,724

548,013-

117,368
11,400258,077
42,500SUBTOTAL, PROJECTSREGIONAL PROGRAMSADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK:RURAL WATERFISH PASSAGE AND FISH SCREENSWATER CONSERVATION AND DELIVERYENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR COMPLIANCE

---

--

FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REHABILITATIONCOLORADO RIVER COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIESCOLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, TITLE I
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, TITLE II

21,400COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 5
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP}, SECTION 8

3,153
3,078

COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT-14,739

10,000740

6,848

21,40014,73910,00010,00010,001
3,078

3,153
3,078

740

740

117,368
11,400258,077
42,500
4,000

4,000

14,73914,73910,000

6,848

10,001
3,078
740

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R
DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DAM SAFETY PROGRAM
INITIATE SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION
SAFETY EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMSEMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAMENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (Bureauwlde)
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM (Platte River)
ENDANGERED SPEC RECOVERY IMPL PROG (Upper Colo & San Juan Riv Basins)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIONEXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES
GENERAL PLANNING ACTIVITIESINDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETILEMENTS:
AAMODT LITIGATION SETILEMENTBLACKFEET SETILEMENTCROW TRIBE RIGHTSNAVAJO GALLUP
LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAMLOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM----2,500
4,000
2,850
1,523

NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETINGOPERATION & PROGRAM MANAGEMENTPOWER PROGRAM SERVICES
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM
RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATIONRECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIONRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAMSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
SITE SECURITY ACTIVITIESUNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES - TECHNICAL SUPPORT-9,3492,132
8,301
10,00012,772
66,182
10,06031,299

3,000

--832

MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONSNATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM

1,300
72,187
19,284
1,250

11,685
2,308
922
2,121
646
2,078
3,249
1,475
11,014

1,707
307
206

1,150

-36,359

80

FINAL BILL
TOTAL

1,300
72,187
19,284
1,250

RESOURCES FACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

1,300
72,187
19,2841,250

1,300
72,187
19,284
1,250

--

2,500
4,000
2,850
1,523
9,349
2,132

2,500
4,000
2,850
1,523

8,301
10,00012,772
69,182
10,06031,299832
11,685
2,308
2,629
2,428
852
2,078
3,249

8,301
10,00012,772
66,182
10,06031,2992,625
11,01436,35918,85017,500

80

80

9,349
2,132

3,000

832
11,685
2,308
922
2,121
646
2,078
3,249

1,707
307
206

1,150
36,359

2,500
4,000
2,850
1,523
9,349
2,132
8,301
10,00012,772
69,182
10,06031,299832
11,685
2,308
2,629
2,428
852
2,078
3,249
20,00017,50036,35980

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENTWATERSMART PROGRAM:
WATERSMART GRANTS
WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM
COOPERATIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENTTOTALMANAGEMENT

10,000
1,750
250
2,000
2,901
3,000

55,000
4,179
2,250
5,200
4,000
63,617

OM&R

TOTAL

DROUGHT RESPONSES & COMPREHENSIVE DROUGHT PLANS
TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION & REUSE PROGRAM

10,000
1,750
250
2,000
2,901
3,000

SUBTOTAL, REGIONAL PROGRAMS

245,469

168,518

413,987

791,620

172,518

964,138TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES

434,758

527,242962,000

980,909531,242

1,512,151

BASIN STUDIES

It )
\

OM&R

FINAL BILLRESOURCES FACILITIES

55,000
4,179
2,250
5,200
4,000
63,617

Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act. -The agreement directs Reclamation to use funds on hand forthis settlement to initiate construction of features necessary to prevent additional cost overruns.

Additional Funding for Water and Related Resources Work. - The agreement includes funds
above the budget request for Water and Related Resources studies, projects, and activities. This funding is
for additional work that either was not included in the budget request or was inadequately budgeted.
Priority in allocating these funds should be given to advance and complete ongoing work, including
preconstruction activities and where environmental compliance has been completed; improve water supply
reliability; improve water deliveries; enhance national, regional, or local economic development; promote
job growth; advance tribal and nontribal water settlement studies and activities; or address critical backlog
maintenance and rehabilitation activities.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading "Water Conservation and Delivery,"$134,000,000 shall be for water storage projects as authorized in section 4007 of the WUN Act (Public Law
114-322).
Of the additional funding provided under the heading "Water Conservation and Delivery," not lessthan $20,000,000 shall be for construction activities related to projects found to be feasible by the Secretary
and that are ready to initiate for the repair of critical Reclamation canals where operational conveyancecapacity has been seriously impaired by factors such as age or land subsidence, especially those that would
imminently jeopardize Reclamation' s ability to meet water delivery obligations.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading "Water Conservation and Delivery,"$20,000,000 shall be for water conservation activities in areas that are experiencing extended drought
conditions. These water conservation activities shall include well construction and irrigation related
structural or other measures, programs and projects that result in conservation of other surface water orgroundwater, or improve water system efficiency, resiliency, reliability, delivery, and conveyance.
Reclamation is directed to brief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later
than 180 days after enactment of this Act on the status of carrying out these activities.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading ' ' Environmental Restoration orCompliance," not less than $40,000,000 shall be for activities authorized under sections 4001 and 4010 of
the WUN Act (Public Law 114-322) or as set forth in federal-state plans for restoring threatened andendangered fish species affected by the operation of Reclamation' s water projects.
Funding associated with each category may be allocated to any eligible study or project, as
appropriate, within that category; funding associated with each subcategory may be allocated only toeligible studies or projects, as appropriate, within that subcategory.
Not later than 45 days after enactment of this Act, Reclamation shall provide to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a report delineating how these funds are to be distributed, inwhich phase the work is to be accomplished, and an explanation of the criteria and rankings used to justify
each allocation.

26

Reclamation is reminded that the following activities are eligible to compete for funding under theappropriate heading: activities authorized under Indian Water Rights Settlements; all authorized rural waterprojects, including those with tribal components, those with non-tribal components, and those with both;
aquifer recharging efforts to address the ongoing backlog of related projects; conjunctive use projects andother projects to maximize groundwater storage and beneficial use; ongoing work, including
preconstruction activities, on projects that provide new or existing water supplies through additional
infrastructure; and activities authorized under section 206 of Public Law 113- 235.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery.-Ofthe funds provided in this account above the budget request,

not less than $10,000,000 shall be for Aquifer Storage and Recovery projects focused on ensuring
sustainable water supplies and protecting water quality with shared or multi-use aquifers, including
municipal, agricultural irrigation, industrial, recreation, and domestic users.
Research and Development: Desalination and Water Purification Program.-Ofthe funding

provided for this program, $12,000,000 shall be for desalination projects as authorized in section 4009(a) of
the WIIN Act (Public Law 114- 322).
WaterSMART Program: Title XVI Water Reclamation & Reuse Program.-Ofthe funding

provided for this program, $20,000,000 shall be for water recycling and reuse projects as authorized in
section 4009(c) of the WIIN Act (Public Law 114-322). Reclamation is reminded that Aquifer Storage andRecovery projects such as those cited in Reclamation's section 4009(c) Feasibility Study Review Findings
dated September 2018 are eligible to compete for funding in this program.
CALFED Water Storage Feasibility Studies. -The agreement includes Senate language.
Pick-Sloan Ability-to-Pay.-Concems persist that more than 30 Pick-Sloan irrigation districts

served by Reclamation may experience significant financial impacts should Reclamation move forwardwith the proposal to change the eligibility requirements for the program related to user's ability to pay.
Reclamation shall review the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program authorizing legislation and brief theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on its findings, including the extent to which
Congress authorized relief from operation maintenance, and replacement costs for project use power in that
program based on an irrigation district's ability to pay, how that authority has been applied over time, andthe impacts of the currently proposed changes. For federal projects, Reclamation is directed to continue toconsider irrigation district ability to pay consistent with the original intent of Congress and the 1944 FloodControl Act.
Rural Water Projects. - Voluntary funding in excess of legally required cost shares for rural waterprojects is acceptable, but shall not be used by Reclamation as a criterion for allocating additional funding
provided in this agreement or for budgeting in future years.
Buried Metallic Water Pipe. -Reclamation shall continue following its temporary design

guidance.

27

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND

The agreement provides $54,849,000 for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.

Anadromous Fish Screen Program.-The agreement includes House direction regarding theAnadromous Fish Screen Program.

CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION(INCLUDING TRANSFERS OF FUNDS)

The agreement provides $33,000,000 for the California Bay-Delta Restoration Program.

POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $60,000,000 for Policy and Administration.

Reclamation Project Reimbursability Decisions.-ln September 2017, the Department of theInterior's Office of Inspector General released a report calling into question the transparency of
Reclamation's financial participation in the State of California's Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. Although
Reclamation disputed several findings and recommendations in the report, Reclamation has taken steps to
update its current practices and internal guidelines to better align with report recommendations.
Reclamation is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress notlater than 10 days after enactment of this Act or after finalizing these updates, written copies of the relevant
documents, and not later than February 29, 2020, a list of instances ofredirecting appropriated funds fromthe intended purpose outlined in the previous year's budget request.
Concerns remain regarding administrative delays and excessive review times in the award andimplementation of financial assistance agreement funding. Reclamation is urged to address factors related
to these issues, including lags in completing contracts, in a timely and efficient manner.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISION

The agreement includes a provision limiting Reclamation to purchase not more than fivepassenger vehicles for replacement only.

28

G ENERAL PROVISIONS-D EPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

The agreement includes a provision outlining the circumstances under which the Bureau of
Reclamation may reprogram funds.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the San Luis Unit and Kesterson Reservoir in
California.
The agreement includes a provision regarding section 9504(e) of the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the CALFED Bay-Delta Authoriz.ation Act.
The agreement includes a provision regarding section 9106(g)(2) of the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the Claims Resolution Act of 2010.

29

TITLE III-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

The agreement provides $38,586,316,000 for the Department of Energy to fund programs in its
primary mission areas of science, energy, environment, and national security.
The Department shall not use any equipment, system, or service that uses telecommunications
equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate
of such entities) or services as a substantial or essential component of any system; or as critical technology
as part of any system; or maintain a contract with an entity that uses any equipment, system, or service thatuses telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (orany subsidiary or affiliate of such entities) or services as a substantial or essential component of any
system; or as critical technology as part of any system.

Working Capital Fund.-The agreement includes House report language regarding the Working
Capital Fund.

Research and Development Policy. -The Department is directed to maintain a diverse portfolio of
early-, mid-, and late-stage research, development, and market transformation activities in each appliedenergy research and development program office. The Department is further directed to fully execute thefunds appropriated in a timely manner and to keep the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress apprised of progress in implementing funded programs, projects, and activities.

US. Energy Employment Report.-The agreement only includes language in the Departmental
Administration account.

Nonprofit Foundation.-The agreement only includes language in the Departmental
Administration account.

REPROGRAMMING REQUIREMENTS

The agreement carries the Department's reprogramming authority in statute to ensure that the
Department carries out its programs consistent with congressional direction. The Department shall, whenpossible, submit consolidated, cumulative notifications to the Committees on Appropriations of bothHouses of Congress.

Definition. -A reprogramming includes the reallocation of funds from one program, project, or
activity to another within an appropriation. For construction projects, a reprogramming constitutes thereallocation of funds from one construction project to another project or a change of$2,000,000 or 10
percent, whichever is less, in the scope of an approved project.

30

ENERGY PROGRAMSENERGY EFFICIENCY AND REN EWABLE E NE RGY(INCLUDING RESCISSION OF FUNDS)

The agreement provides $2,848,000,000 for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The
agreement also includes a rescission of $58,000,000 of unused funds previously appropriated under the
Defense Production Act for biorefinery construction for a net appropriation of$2,790,000,000.

Staffing.- The Department is directed to report to the Committees on Appropriations of bothHouses of Congress not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act with a plan for reaching a staffing
level of 675 to 700 full-time equivalents by the end of fiscal year 2020. Furthermore, not more than 50
percent of Working Capital Fund costs shall be paid out of the Program Direction account.

Worliforce Deve/opment.-Within available funds, the agreement provides $20,000,000 to partnerwith a land grant university to pursue leading-edge interdisciplinary research that promotes workforce
development in emerging fields by supporting a coordinated expansion of existing joint graduate education
programs with national laboratories to prepare the next generation of scientists and engineers.
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION

Vehicle Techno/ogies.- Within available funds, the agreement includes not less than$174,700,000 for Battery and Electrification Technologies. The agreement provides not less than
$40,000,000 for electric drive research and development, of which not less than $7,000,000 is to enable
extreme fast charging and advanced battery analytics. Funding within Battery and Electrification
Technologies shall also support research and development leading to improved methods for processing andintegrating advanced metals into both lightweight structures and powertrain systems.
The agreement provides $45,000,000 for Energy Efficient Mobility Systems and $40,000,000 for
Materials Technology. Within Materials Technology, $32,500,000 is for early-stage research on multimaterial joining and propulsion materials at the national laboratories and carbon fiber-reinforced
composites at the Carbon Fiber Technology Facility. The agreement provides $70,000,000 for Advanced
Engine and Fuel Technologies.
Within available funds, the agreement provides $66,300,000 for Outreach, Deployment, andAnalysis. Within this amount, $40,000,000 is for deployment through the Clean Cities Program. Within
Outreach, Deployment, and Analysis, but outside of the Clean Cities Program, $20,000,000 is for up to fivecompetitive grant awards to develop Electric Vehicle Community Partner Projects.
Within available funds, up to $5 ,000,000 is to support research and development on two-stroke
opposed piston engines to be conducted by industry-led teams.

Bioenergy Techno/ogy.-Within available funds, the agreement includes $40,000,000 for
feedstock supply and logistics, of which not less than $5,000,000 is for upgrades at the Biomass Feedstock
National User Facility.

31

Within available funds, not less than $40,000,000 is provided for Advanced Algal Systems.
The agreement provides $9,500,000 for Analysis and Sustainability.
Within funding available for Demonstration and Market Transformation, not less than
$45,000,000 is provided to support the multi-year strategy for pre-pilot, pilot, and demonstration projects.
The agreement provides $110,000,000 for Conversion Technologies.
The agreement provides $10,000,000 to continue efforts to make full and innovative use of
biomass, municipally-derived biosolids, and other carbon already available and impacting the environment,such as municipal solid waste, plastics, and livestock waste.
Within available funds, not less than $10,000,000 is for a multi-university partnership to conduct
research and enhance educational programs that improve alternative energy production derived from urban
and suburban wastes. The Department is directed to collaborate with institutions in Canada and Mexico toleverage capacity and capitalize on North American resources.

Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies .-Within available funds, the agreement provides$7,000,000 to enable integrated energy systems using high- and low-temperature electrolyzers with theintent of advancing the H2@Scale concept and $10,000,000 to cost share the Office of Nuclear Energyhydrogen demonstration project. Within Technology Acceleration funds, $5,000,000 is for industry-led
manufacturing.
The agreement provides $45,000,000 for Hydrogen Fuel Research and Development; $25,000,000
for Hydrogen Infrastructure R&D; and $10,000,000 for safety, codes, and standards.

RENEW ABLE ENERGY

Solar Energy.- The agreement provides $60,000,000 for Concentrating Solar Power research anddevelopment, $72,000,000 for Photovoltaic R&D, $50,000,000 for Systems Integration, and $60,000,000
for Innovations in Manufacturing Competitiveness.
Within Balance of Systems Soft Costs, $1,000,000 is for the Solar Ready Vets program and$5,000,000 is for the National Community Solar Partnership program.
The Department is directed to issue two funding opportunity announcements. The firstannouncement shall be for $20,000,000 to improve photovoltaic cell technologies, including thin-film solar
cell technologies and cadmium telluride solar cell technologies, and to overcome grid integration
challenges and reduce the costs of solar adoption. The second announcement shall be for $20,000,000
focused on perovskite research, including inherently scalable production methods such as solution
processing, roll-to-roll manufacturing, the science of inherent material stability, and ultrahigh efficiency
through tandem manufacturing.

Wind Energy.-The agreement provides $31 ,800,000 for Land-Based Wind, $52,500,000 for OffShore Wind, and $9,700,000 for Grid Integration and Analysis.
Within available funds, $10,000,000 is for distributed wind technologies.

32

The agreement provides not less than $10,000,000 for a competitively awarded solicitation for
additional project development for offshore wind demonstration projects.

Water Power.-The agreement provides $109,000,000 for marine and hydrokinetic technologies.
The agreement supports research and development, testing, and partnership activities for the Powering theBlue Economy Initiative within available funds . Within funding for marine and hydrokinetic technologies,$40,000,000 is provided for competitive grants to support industry- and university-led projects to validate
the performance, reliability, maintainability, environmental impact, and cost of marine energy technology
components, devices, and systems at a variety of scales, including full scale prototypes. Awards shallsupport a balanced portfolio of marine and hydrokinetic technologies. Awards shall support wave, ocean
current, tidal, and in-river energy conversion components and systems across the high-and low-technology
readiness spectrum to increase energy capture, reliability, survivability, and integration into local orregional grids for lower costs and to assess and monitor environmental effects. Within funds forcompetitive solicitations, not more than $10,000,000 is for the Testing Expertise and Access for Marine
Energy Research Program.
Within available funds, $10,000,000 is provided to address infrastructure needs at marine energy
technology testing sites.
The agreement provides $26,000,000 under 42 U.S.C. 16352(b)(4) for the open-water wave
energy test facility. Not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act, the Department shall brief theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on its plan for completing the wave energy test
facility and funding its operations thereafter.
The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 to establish an Atlantic Marine Energy Center.
The agreement provides $39,000,000 for conventional hydropower, of which $7,000,000 is for
section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Geothermal Technologies. -The agreement provides $69,000,000 for Enhanced Geothermal
Systems. The agreement provides $20,000,000 for the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal
Energy (FORGE), with activities to include ongoing novel subsurface characterization, full-scale welldrilling, and technology research and development to accelerate the commercial pathway to large-scaleenhanced geothermal systems power generation. Not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act, theDepartment shall provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a briefing on
the current status, research agenda, use by outside entities, and decommissioning plans for FORGE.
Within available funds, $10,000,000 is provided to fund at least one demonstration project in anarea with no obvious surface expression. The Department is further directed to fund at least one
demonstration of geothermal technologies for innovative distribution of heat through ground-source heating
and cooling of district heating.

33

ENERGY EFFICIENCYAdvanced Manufacturing.-The agreement provides $25,000,000 for the Energy-Water
Desalination Hub and $25,000,000 for the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) and the Carbon
Fiber Technology Facility. Within available funds for MDF, $5,000,000 is provided for the development ofadditive systems and automation technologies.
Within available funds, the agreement supports funding for Advanced Manufacturing Researchand Development.
The agreement provides $20,000,000 for process-informed science, design, and engineering
materials and devices in harsh environments, including nuclear environments, and $5,000,000 for dynamic
catalyst science coupled with data analytics.
The agreement provides $45,000,000 for Industrial Technical Assistance. Within available funds,
the agreement provides $12,000,000 for Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Technical AssistancePartnerships (TAPs), including $5,000,000 for the TAPs and $7,000,000 for CHP activities; $10,000,000
for a voluntary technical assistance initiative to assist energy intensive manufacturing facilities and Senate
direction on the prioritization of assistance and outreach to manufacturing facilities ; $12,000,000 for 32
Industrial Assessment Centers; and $5 ,000,000 for wastewater treatment technical assistance and House
direction regarding the Department's briefing to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress on the plan to expand technical assistance in this area.
The agreement provides $20,000,000 for research and development on technologies to achieveenergy efficiency of water and wastewater treatment plants, including the deployment of alternative energy
sources, as appropriate.
The agreement provides up to $10,000,000 for the issuance of a competitive solicitation for
university or industry-led teams to improve the efficiency of industrial drying processes and foster new andinnovative drying technologies.
The agreement provides $4,000,000 for additive manufacturing work on large wind blades thatwill allow for rapid prototyping, tooling, fabrication, and testing.
The agreement provides $10,000,000 for district energy, within which the Department shall makegrants to support demonstration projects that deploy community district energy projects in association witha renewably-fueled municipal generating station.

Building Technologies.-The agreement provides $40,000,000 for Residential Buildings
Integration, $50,000,000 for Commercial Buildings Integration, and $140,000,000 for Building Energy
R&D referred to as Emerging Technologies in the Senate report.

Within available funds, $25,000,000 is provided for solid-state lighting. If the Secretary finds
solid-state lighting technology eligible for the Twenty-First Century Lamp prize, specified under section
655 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, $5,000,000 shall be made available to fund theprize or additional projects for solid-state lighting research and development.

34

The agreement provides $55,000,000 for Equipment and Building Standards. Within Equipment
and Building Standards, not less than $10,000,000 is for Building Energy Codes.

Federal Energy Management Program .-The agreement provides $2,000,000 to establish a
Performance-Based Contract National Resource Collaborative Initiative. Reports directed by the House and
Senate shall be provided not later than 120 days after enactment ofthis Act. The agreement provides$11 ,000,000 for the Assisting Federal Facilities with Energy Conservation Technologies program.

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program.-Within available funds, the agreement
provides $500,000 for technical assistance to continue the Sustainable Wastewater Infrastructure of the
Future Accelerator.

Strategic Programs.-The agreement provides $3 ,000,000 for the Energy Transition Initiative.

CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The agreement provides $156,000,000 for Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency
Response.
The agreement includes the proposed movement of the energy delivery system testing and analysis
laboratory initiative from Cybersecurity for Energy Delivery Systems (CEDS) to Infrastructure Security
and Energy Restoration (ISER).
Within available funds for CEDS, the agreement provides $10,000,000 for Consequence-driven
Cyber-informed Engineering, $10,000,000 for the DarkNet project, and $30,000,000 for the Advanced
Threat Mitigation initiative. Within available funds for CEDS, $4,000,000 is provided for university-based
research and development of scalable cyber-physical platforms for resilient and secure electric powersystems that are flexible, modular, self-healing, and autonomous. Within available funds for CEDS, theDepartment is directed to provide $6,000,000 to continue to develop and deploy cyber and cyber-physicalsolutions for distribution and municipal utility companies.

ELECTRICITY

The agreement provides $190,000,000 for Electricity.
Within Transmission Reliability, the agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 for the Grid
Research Integration and Demonstration Center.
Within Resilient Distribution Systems, the agreement provides not less than $10,000,000 for the
COMMANDER (Coordinated Management ofMicrogrids and Networked Distributed Energy Resources)
National Test Bed Laboratory.
Within Energy Storage, the agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 for battery storage
projects that meet the following criteria: are located in areas where grid capacity constraints result incurtailment of existing renewable wind energy generation; improve grid resilience for a public utility that is35

regularly affected by weather-related natural disasters; and provide rate reduction and renewable energy
benefits to businesses, farms , and residents in an economically-stressed rural area.

N UCLEAR ENERGY

The agreement provides $1,493,408,000 for Nuclear Energy. The following is the only direction
for Nuclear Energy.
The agreement includes additional control points for fiscal year 2020, and the Department isdirected to submit its fiscal year 2021 budget request using this budget structure.
The fiscal year 2018 Act directed the Department to provide to the Committees on Appropriationsof both Houses of Congress a report detailing all current programs and projects within the Office of
Nuclear Energy, whether the Department plans to continue to support each program or project, and the
expected out-year funding through completion of the program or project. The Committees are still awaiting
this report, and the Department is directed to provide this report not later than 30 days after enactment of
this Act. The Department may provide a briefing in lieu of a report, after consultation with the Committees.

Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) .-Since 2009, the Department has allocated up to 20
percent of funds appropriated to Nuclear Energy Research and Development programs to fund universityled R&D and university infrastructure projects through an open, competitive solicitation process using
formally certified peer reviewers. The Department is directed to continue this practice, with not less than
$40,000,000 for R&D activities performed at U.S. colleges and universities. The Department is directed toprovide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress quarterly briefings on the statusofNEUP and the university work being funded.

International Nuclear Energy Cooperation.-The agreement includes funds for International
Nuclear Energy Cooperation activities within Program Direction.

NUCLEAR ENERGY ENABLING TEC HNOLOGCES

Crosscutting Technology Deve/opment.-The agreement provides $10,000,000 for hybrid
integrated energy systems and not less than $7,000,000 for work on advanced sensors and instrumentation.

Nuclear Science User Facilities.-The agreement provides $10,000,000 for nuclear energy
computation system and support, $3,000,000 for the Nuclear Materials Discovery and Qualification
initiative, and not less than $3,000,000 to update the Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library.

Joint Modeling and Simulation Program.- The Department is directed to manage the Energy
Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation and the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation
Program as a single integrated program called the Joint Modeling and Simulation Program.

36

FUEL CYCLE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Mining, Conversion, and Transportation.-The Department is directed to contract not later than
60 days after enactment of this Act with a Federally-Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC)
or other independent organization to work with industry to identify key challenges in reconstituting mining
and conversion capabilities in the United States. The FFRDC or independent organization shall provide areport of its findings and recommendations directly to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act.
The Department is directed to establish a team of experts across the national laboratories andindustry to evaluate the anticipated demand for high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and the timingof that demand, and evaluate the options for meeting that demand. A report of the team' s findings andrecommendations shall be provided directly to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act.
The Department is directed to contract with a company experienced in shipping nuclear materials
to identify key challenges in shipping HALEU. The company shall provide a report of its findings andrecommendations directly to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than
180 days after enactment of this Act.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act a report that identifies any statutory,
regulatory, and Departmental policy or procedural restrictions that would prevent or inhibit the Department
from implementing public-private partnerships modeled after the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) Commercial Orbital Transportation System (COTS) experience. The report shallalso specifically describe a payment-for-milestones approach to uranium enrichment capability
development, similar to how NASA partnered with private companies in its COTS program.

Material Recovery and Waste Form Deve/opment.-The agreement provides not less than
$8,000,000 for EBR-11 Processing for HALEU.

Accident Tolerant Fuels.-The agreement provides $55,600,000 to continue the participation of
three industry-led teams in Phase 2B of the cost-shared research and development program; $20,000,000 to
support accident tolerant fuels development at the national laboratories and other facilities, including theAdvanced Test Reactor and Transient Reactor Test Facility; $15,000,000 for testing, code development,
and licensing of higher-enriched and higher burnup fuels; and $5,000,000 for development of siliconcarbide ceramic matrix composite cladding to be used in light water reactors. The Department shall award
funding for silicon-carbide ceramic matrix composite cladding to individual participants within theindustry-led teams that have demonstrated fabrication expertise in silicon-carbide composites for nuclear
fuel and have the expertise to scale-up to quantities that could support the current fleet.

Fuel Cycle Laboratory R&D.-Within available funds, the Department is directed to pursue
research and development for the use of innovative process control capabilities to support closed nuclear
fuel cycles for advanced reactors.

37

Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition R&D.-Within available funds, the Department is directed to
study the behavior of spent fuel under transportation conditions and opportunities to improve safety ofspent fuel rods during transportation.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a report on innovative options for disposition ofhigh-level waste and spent nuclear fuel management. Priority should be given to technological options thatare cost-effective, are able to be implemented in the short term, and consider siting stakeholder
engagement. The Department is encouraged to use research and development funding for innovativetechnological options.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is directed to evaluate the merits
and viability of different nuclear fuel cycles and technology options, including both existing and futuretechnologies. The evaluation must account for linkages among all elements of the fuel cycle (including
waste transportation, storage, and disposal) and for broader safety, security, and non-proliferation concerns.
The Department is directed to contract with the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) not later
than 60 days after enactment of this Act to conduct a comprehensive, independent study on the waste
aspects of advanced reactors. The NAS shall convene a committee whose members have expertise inadvanced nuclear reactors, nuclear waste disposal, reprocessing, economics, and other areas of expertisethat the NAS considers essential for completion of the study. Also, the NAS committee' s consensus study
report shall provide findings and recommendations that may consider policy options as long as those do not
involve non-technical value judgements. The study 's assessment shall include typical volumes andcharacteristics of waste streams from various proposed advanced nuclear reactor technologies, including
radioisotopes of concern, radioactivity level, and thermal load. Advanced reactor technologies shall include
the designs under consideration by the Generation IV International Forum and by the Department ofEnergy. The study shall also address unique disposal or storage requirements for these wastes and shalladdress the impact of possible reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel on waste generation. In addition, the study
shall examine the economics of the possible waste disposal systems that could be required for the advanced
reactors. The study shall be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress notlater than 20 months after enactment of this Act.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act a report on new electromagnetic technologies
for the neutralization of radioactive wastes, including an evaluation of the scientific basis for thetechnology, potential effects on U.S. nuclear waste and storage, potential benefits to the nuclear powerindustry, and any implications for nuclear security.

REACTOR CONCEPTS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Advanced Small Modular Reactor R&D.- The agreement provides $ I 0,000,000 for the Joint Use
Modular Program.

38

light Water Reactor Sustainability.-The agreement provides $11 ,000,000 for a hydrogenproduction demonstration.

Advanced Reactor Technologies .-The agreement provides $20,000,000 for a new solicitation for
at least two new public-private partnerships focused on advancing reactor designs towards demonstration
phase, $20,000,000 for MW-scale reactor research and development, and $15,000,000 for Advanced
Reactor Laboratory R&D.

Versatile Advanced Test Reactor.-The agreement provides $65,000,000 for the Versatile
Advanced Test Reactor, only for activities to support completion of CD-1 . The Department is directed toprovide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress the CD-1 documentation
immediately following the Department's approval ofCD-1 for the Versatile Advanced Test Reactor.

ADV AN CED REACTOR DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM

The agreement provides $230,000,000 for the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program todemonstrate multiple advanced reactor designs. Any entity other than a national laboratory that receives
fiscal year 2020 funds of more than $200,000 under the Advanced Small Modular Reactor R&D program is
not eligible to receive fiscal year 2020 funds from within the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program.
The primary goal of this new program is to focus Department and non-federal resources on actual
construction ofreal demonstration reactors that are safe and affordable (to build and operate) in the nearand mid-term. The Department is directed to streamline its procurement process and act aggressively toensure implementation of this program is not delayed. The Department is directed to provide to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 30 days after enactment of thisAct a briefing on the schedule and milestones for this program.

National Reactor Innovation Center.-The agreement provides $20,000,000 for the National
Reactor Innovation Center to support testing, demonstration, and performance assessment to accelerate
deployment of advanced reactors.

Advanced Reactor Demonstrations.-Not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act, theSecretary shall request proposals to build two demonstration advanced reactors. The agreement provides$160,000,000 for the frrst year of the two demonstrations, and the Department is directed to provide
specific out-year cost profiles for each demonstration in future budget requests. The cost share for eachdemonstration project shall be up to 50 percent from the Department and not less than 50 percent from nonfederal sources. For purposes of this program, an advanced reactor can be any light water or non-light water
fission reactor with significant improvements compared to the current generation of operational reactors.
Significant improvements may include inherent safety features, lower waste yields, greater fuel utilization,
superior reliability, resistance to proliferation, increased thermal efficiency, and the ability to integrate into
electric and nonelectric applications. For purposes of this program, a demonstration can be an advanced
reactor operated as part of the power generation facilities of an electric utility system or in any other39manner for the purpose of demonstrating the suitability for commercial application of the advanced nuclear
reactor.
The Secretary is directed to convene an evaluation board to review the proposals and recommend
the best proposals to the Secretary based on the following criteria: (1) technical feasibility that thedemonstration can be operational in five to seven years; (2) likelihood that the design can be licensed forsafe operations by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (3) use of certified fuel design or demonstration ofa clear path to certification within five to seven years; (4) affordability of the design for full-scaleconstruction and cost of electricity generation; ( 5) ability of the team to provide its portion of the costshare; and (6) technical abilities and qualifications of teams desiring to demonstrate a proposed advanced
nuclear reactor technology. The evaluation board should consider diversity in designs for the advanced
nuclear reactors to be demonstrated and must provide the Secretary with a recommendation of which two
proposals best meet these criteria within 30 days ofreceipt of the proposals. The Secretary is directed tocontract with the recommended teams unless the Secretary certifies that such a selection is not in the national interest.
The Secretary is directed to ensure the evaluation board has the following members, in addition to
any members the Secretary selects: (1) a representative from an electric utility that operates a nuclear
power plant; (2) a representative from an entity that uses high-temperature process heat, district heating,hydrogen production, or heat for manufacturing, industrial processing, or other purposes; (3) experts fromindustry with experience in design, manufacturing, and operation of nuclear reactors; and (4) arepresentative from the finance industry with background in the nuclear field.

Risk Reduction for Future Demonstrations.-The agreement provides $30,000,000 for Risk
Reduction for Future Demonstrations. The Secretary is directed to select two to five teams that were notselected as one of the two Advanced Reactor Demonstrations and that represent a diversity in designs of theadvanced nuclear reactors to enter into cost-share agreements to address technical risks in each proposal' sreactor design. The cost share for this work shall be up to 80 percent from the Department and not less than
20 percent from non-federal sources.

Regulatory Development.- The agreement provides $15,000,000 for Regulatory Development for
the national laboratories to work with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to identify and resolve technicalchallenges with licensing advanced reactors.

Advanced Reactors Safeguards.-The agreement provides $5,000,000 for Advanced Reactors
Safeguards to evaluate safeguards issues that are unique to advanced reactors.
INFRASTRUCTURE!NL Facilities Operations and Maintenance.-The Department is directed to brief the Committees
on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act on thefunding levels required for operations and maintenance of activities at the Materials and Fuels Complex
and Advanced Test Reactor. The briefing should include an accounting of how funds have been spent for40

the previous three fiscal years and how funds will be spent for the current fiscal year. The briefing should
also include information for the next four fiscal years on the funding levels required for optimal operations
for each facility and funding levels required for multi-year infrastructure improvements.

Idaho Sitewide Safeguards and Security. -The agreement provides $15,600,000 to construct a
protective forces building at the Materials and Fuels Complex that will meet the needs for expanded
protective force and security operations under the Department's new Design Basis Threat but that will not
exceed a total project cost of$15,600,000.

FOSSIL ENERGY RES EARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

The agreement provides $750,000,000 for Fossil Energy Research and Development.
The Department is directed to submit a report and provide a briefing to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act on therecommendations for program structures that could best support and maximize the impact of expanded
research, development, and demonstration efforts in three areas: decarbonization of the industrial sector,
direct air capture, and carbon use.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 for research and development of negativeemissions technologies, including not less than $10,000,000 for direct air capture.
Within available funds for Carbon Capture, $4,000,000 is for research and optimization of carbon
capture technologies for use at industrial facilities and not less than $7,000,000 is for carbon capture
research for natural gas power systems.
Within available funds for Carbon Storage, $21 ,000,000 is for Carbon Use and Reuse.
Within available funds for Advanced Energy Systems, $25,000,000 is for Advanced Turbines and$30,000,000 is for Advanced Coal Processing, of which not less than $10,000,000 is for utilizing coal as aprecursor for high-value added products at the Carbon Fiber Technology Facility.
The Department is directed to issue a funding opportunity announcement for $30,000,000 for
Solid Oxide Fuel Cells that includes all topic areas as outlined in the recommendations of the Department's
August 2019 Report on the Status of the Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Program.
Within available funds for Cross Cutting Research, $39,000,000 is for Plant Optimization
Technologies, which includes materials R&D, water management R&D, and sensors and controls, and$4,500,000 is for the Advanced Energy Storage Initiative.
Within available funds for NETL Coal Research and Development, not less than $23,000,000 is
for the recovery ofrare earth elements and minerals from U.S. coal and coal byproduct sources.
Within available funds for Natural Gas Technologies Research, $20,000,000 is for methane
hydrate research; $12,000,000 is for Emissions Mitigation from Midstream Infrastructure; $6,000,000 is for
Emissions Quantification from Natural Gas Infrastructure; and $12,000,000 is for Environmentally Prudent
Development, including not less than $5,200,000 for the Risk Based Data Management System. The

41

Department is directed to focus on the long-term flow test on the Alaska North Slope and continue planningfor hydrates resource characterization in the Gulf of Mexico.
Within Unconventional Fossil Energy Technologies, the Department is directed to provide to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180 days after enactment of thisAct a report that outlines the Department' s efforts to maintain a stable petroleum engineering workforce
and knowledge base and future activities the Department can undertake to strengthen it.
The agreement provides $50,000,000 for NETL Infrastructure, and the Department is directed toprioritize funds for Joule, the design and construction of a sensitive compartmented information facility, theComputational Science and Engineering Center, site-wide upgrades for safety, and addressing and avoiding
deferred maintenance.

NAVAL P ETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES

The agreement provides $14,000,000 for the operation of the Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale
Reserves.

STRATEGIC P ETROLEUM RESERVEThe agreement provides $195,000,000 for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Funding above thebudget request is to address facilities development and operations, including physical security and cavern
integrity, and to maintain 1,000,000 barrels of gasoline blendstock in the Northeast Gasoline Supply
Reserve. The agreement includes legislative language regarding a drawdown and sale of oil in fiscal year
2020 and use of those proceeds.

SPR P ETROLEUM ACCOUNT
The agreement provides $10,000,000 for the SPR Petroleum Account to pay for the costs ofcertain statutorily-mandated crude oil sales.

NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVEThe agreement provides $10,000,000 for the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.

E NERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $126,800,000 for the Energy Information Administration.

42

NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENT AL CLEANUP

The agreement provides $319,200,000 for Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup.

Small Sites.-Within amounts for Small Sites cleanup, $31 ,000,000 is to continue work at
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, $18,200,000 is for the Energy Technology Engineering Center,$12,800,000 is for Idaho National Laboratory, $45,000,000 is for Moab, $10,000,000 is for excess Officeof Science facilities, and $10,000,000 is for Oak Ridge activities.

Long Term Management and Storage ofElemental Mercury.- The agreement provides$1 ,200,000 to comply with the Mercury Export Ban Act of2008 (Public Law 110-414), as amended,
regarding long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated within the United States. The
Mercury Export Ban Act of2008 (MEBA) requires the Department to be reimbursed by waste generatorsof elemental mercury for the costs of providing such management and storage, including facility operationand maintenance, security, monitoring, reporting, personnel, administration, inspections, training, frre
suppression, closure, and other costs required for compliance with applicable law.

URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND D ECOMMISSIONING FUND

The agreement provides $881,000,000 for activities funded from the Uranium Enrichment
Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund.

SCIENCEThe agreement provides $7,000,000,000 for the Office of Science.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a plan that responds to the findings andrecommendations in the Final Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Biomedical
Sciences. The plan shall include a reporting of successful collaborations between the Department and the
National Institutes of Health to date and plans to expand on those efforts.
The agreement provides $71 ,000,000 for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for the six
Office of Science programs to apply those capabilities to the Department' s mission.
The agreement provides $195,000,000 for Quantum Information Sciences across the Office of
Science programs to advance early-stage fundamental research in this field of science, including$120,000,000 to carry out a basic research program on quantum information science and $75,000,000 for
the establishment ofup to five National Quantum Information Science Research Centers. To the greatest
extent practical, this effort shall be undertaken in coordination with the National Science Foundation and
the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

43

The agreement provides not less than $ l 0,000,000 and up to $15,000,000 for research in memoryadvancements for accelerated architectures used to enhance Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.
The Department is directed to develop a collaborative research program to produce breakthroughs forintelligent memory systems that will enhance the ability of the Department to cost effectively address thelargest problems in science while keeping the United States as the leader in semiconductor technologies foradvanced computing.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 in Basic Energy Sciences and Biological andEnvironmental Research for research and development of negative emissions technologies, including notless than $5,000,000 for direct air capture.
Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR).-Within available funds, $150,000,000 is for
the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, $225,000,000 is for the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing
Facility, $110,000,000 is for the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center at Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, and $90,000,000 is for ESnet. Within available funds, not less than
$39,000,000 is for Research and Evaluation Prototypes, of which not less than $10,000,000 is for theComputational Science Graduate Fellowship program. The agreement provides not less than $155,000,000
for Mathematical, Computational, and Computer Sciences Research.
Basic Energy Sciences (BES) .-Within available funds, not less than $15,000,000 and up to$20,000,000 is for the Fuels from Sunlight Energy Innovation Hub. Within available funds, $139,000,000
is for facilities operations of the Nanoscale Science Research Centers (NSRCs), $525,000,000 is forfacilities operations of the nation's light sources, $292,000,000 is for facilities operations of the high flux
neutron sources, and $115,000,000 is for the Energy Frontier Research Centers. The agreement provides nodirection for the DISCOVER Beamline. Within available funds, $5,000,000 is for the NSRC
Recapitalization project and $5,500,000 is for the NEXT- II project.
Biological and Environmental Research (BER) .-The agreement provides not less than$391 ,000,000 for Biological Systems Science. Within available funds, not less than $100,000,000 is for thefour Bioenergy Research Centers; not less than $40,000,000 is for Biomolecular Characterization andImaging Science, of which not less than $5,000,000 is to advance the study of complex biological systems
and synthetic biology using neutrons; $77,000,000 is for the Joint Genome Institute; and not less than
$5,000,000 is for low-dose radiation research. The Department is directed to develop a low-dose radiation
research plan in coordination with the low-dose radiation research community, other federal agencies, andany other relevant entities.
Within available funds, $30,000,000 is to build upon the current modeling-focused effort and todevelop observational assets and associated research to study the nation ' s major land-water interfaces,
including the Great Lakes, by leveraging national laboratories' assets as well as local infrastructure andexpertise at universities and other research institutions.
Within available funds, $15 ,000,000 is for cloud-aerosol research and computing.

44

Within available funds, not less than $38,200,000 is for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science. Within
available funds for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science, not less than $10,000,000 is for Next Generation
Ecosystem Experiments Arctic, $8,300,000 is for the SPRUCE field site, $7,000,000 is for Next Generation
Ecosystem Experiments Tropics, $5, 100,000 is for AmeriFLUX Long-Term Earth System Observations,and $5,000,000 is to initiate planning and pilot studies for new Terrestrial Ecosystem Science manipulation
experiments.
Within available funds, not less than $31 ,800,000 is for Subsurface Biogeochemical Research,
including $6,800,000 for Watershed Function SF A and not less than $3,500,000 to support ongoing
research and discovery related to mercury biogeochemical transformations in the environment.

Fusion Energy Sciences (FES).-Within available funds, $68,000,000 is for NSTX-U operations;$4,000,000 is to support the Department's recent creation of the Innovation Network for Fusion Energy(INFUSE) research and development program; $20,000,000 is for High Energy Density Laboratory
Plasmas, including activities for LaserNetUS; and $21 ,000,000 is for the Materials Plasma Exposure
eXperiment. The Department is directed to expand the INFUSE program to allow for both domestic andinternational companies.
The agreement does not include funds for the creation of a Fusion Public-Private Partnership Cost
Share Program for reactor technologies at this time. The Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee is
directed to give full consideration to the establishment of a cost share program for reactor technologies aspart of its ongoing long-range strategic planning activity. The Department is directed to provide to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180 days after enactment of thisAct a plan on a possible cost share program for reactor technologies. The plan should include program
objectives, eligibility requirements, and a funding profile for future fiscal years.
The agreement provides $242,000,000 for the U.S. contribution to the ITER project, of which notless than $85,000,000 is for in-cash contributions.

High Energy Physics (HEP).-Within available funds, $30,000,000 is for the Sanford
Underground Research Facility, $100,000,000 is for the HL- LHC Upgrade Projects, and $15,000,000 is for
the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.

Nuclear Physics (NP).- Within available funds, $28,500,000 is for operations at the Facility for
Rare Isotope Beams. The Department is directed to provide optimal funding for operations, major items ofequipment, and other project costs.

Woriforce Development for Teachers and Scientists (WDT.S') .- The agreement provides$28,000,000 for Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists. Within available funds , $13,500,000
is for Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internships, not less than $1 ,500,000 is for Community College
Internships, and $4,500,000 is for the Graduate Student Research Program.

Science Laboratories Jrifrastructure.-The agreement includes funding to complete the land andfacilities acquisition for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

45

ADV ANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY

The agreement provides $425,000,000 for the Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy.

TITLE 17 lNNOVA TIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM

The agreement provides $32,000,000 in administrative expenses for the Loan Guarantee Program.
The agreement is offset by $3,000,000 in estimated collections from loan guarantee applicants, for a net
appropriation of$29,000,000.
As provided in 42 U.S.C. 16511, the Secretary may make guarantees under this section only for
projects that avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases andemploy new or significantly improved technologies as compared to commercial technologies in service inthe United States upon issuance of the loan guarantee.

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM

The agreement provides $5,000,000 for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan
Program. The agreement directs the Department to expeditiously evaluate and adjudicate all loan
applications received.

TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM

The agreement provides $2,000,000 for the Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program.

OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS

The agreement provides $22,000,000 for the Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs.

DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $161 ,000,000 for Departmental Administration.

Control Points.-In lieu of House and Senate direction on control points, the agreement includes
eight reprogramming control points in this account to provide flexibility in the management of support
functions . The Other Departmental Administration activity includes Management, Project Management
Oversight and Assessments, Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of Technology Transitions, Office ofSmall and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, General Counsel, Office of Policy, and Public Affairs. The

46

Department is directed to continue to submit a budget request that proposes a separate funding level foreach of these activities.
Within available funds for International Affairs, the agreement includes $2,000,000 for the Israel
Binational Industrial Research and Development (BCRD) Foundation and $4,000,000 to continue the U.S.Israel Center of Excellence in Energy Engineering and Water Technology. The agreement does not adopt
the proposal to transfer staff from the applied energy offices to International Affairs. The Department shallbrief the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after enactmentof this Act on its plans to spend funds provided in this agreement for the Office of International Affairs.

Chief Information Officer.-The agreement provides $2,000,000 for implementation of the 2 l51
Century Integrated Digital Experience Act.

Other Departmental Administration-The agreement provides $5,000,000 above the budget
request for the Office of Technology Transitions for a competitive funding opportunity for incubators
supporting energy innovation clusters, with requirements as outlined in the House report. The Department
is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not later than 180
days after enactment of this Act a report on the value of creating a nonprofit foundation, with requirements
as outlined in the House and Senate reports. The agreement provides $1 ,700,000 within available funds for
the Office of Policy to complete a U.S. energy employment report, with requirements as outlined in theHouse and Senate reports. The Department is directed to produce and release this report annually.
The agreement provides $24,316,000 for the Chief Human Capital Officer and $32,575,000 for the
Office of General Counsel.

Energy Technology Commercialization Fund.-In making awards from the Energy Technology
Commercialization Fund established under section lOOl(e) of the Energy Policy Act of2005 (42 U.S.C.
1639l(e)), the requirements for matching funds shall be determined by the Secretary of Energy inaccordance with section 988 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 16352).

Small Refinery Exemption-The agreement does not include the Senate report direction regarding
small refinery exemption.

OFFICE O F THE INSPECTOR G ENERAL

The agreement provides $54,215,000 for the Office of the Inspector General.

47

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIESNATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $16,704,592,000 for the National Nuclear Security Administration(NNSA).
The NNSA Act clearly lays out the functions of the NNSA and gives the Administrator authority
over, and responsibility for, those functions. The agreement again directs that no funds shall be used toreorganize, re-classify, or study combining any of those functions with the Department.

W EAPONS ACTIVITIESThe agreement provides $12,457,097,000 for Weapons Activities.

W8 7-l Modification Program.-In lieu of House direction, the agreement provides $112,011 ,000,
of which not more than seventy-five percent shall be obligated until the NNSA provides to the Committees
on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a report on the W87-1 Modification Program that includes
the following: (1) a list of all major design decisions that have been made or that remain open and a
description and explanation of the cost trade-offs for each decision or potential decision including surety
architecture, technologies, and potential component re-use; (2) identification of major risks andcontingency plans to address each risk, including the risk that restarting plutonium pit production will notmeet the current projected schedule; and (3) plans to address technology maturation and manufacturing
readiness.

Sea-Launched Cruise Missile Study.-In lieu of House direction, the agreement provides$80,204,000 for W80 Stockpile Systems and $5,607,000 in a new control point in Research, Development,
Test, and Evaluation for assessments and studies to support the ongoing Department of Defense Analysis of
Alternatives (AoA) for the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile. To improve oversight and visibility of these
activities, the NNSA is directed to request funding for pre-Phase 6.1 activities within this new control point
in all future budget requests. The NNSA is directed to brief the Committees on Appropriations of bothHouses of Congress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act on the status of the Ao A and therange of options being considered. Not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act, the NNSA shallprovide an estimate of the cost, schedule, and impact on NNSA' s current workload for each option underconsideration. In support of these efforts and of the AoA, the Weapons Program shall coordinate withNNSA ' s Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation.

B83 Stockpile Systems. - In lieu of House direction, the NNSA is directed to submit to theCommittees on Appropriations of both the Houses of Congress not later than 180 days after enactment of
this Act a report on the current status and future plans for the B83 system. The report shall identify options,along with rough-order of magnitude costs and key technical and policy milestones for meeting militaryrequirements through retirement, retention, and extension, including the complete replacement of the48

system. The report shall include an assessment of the supply and condition oflimited-life components, andthe testing requirements of key components. An unclassified version of the report shall be made available.

Plutonium Pit Production. - Restarting plutonium pit production will require the construction of
new facilities, refurbishment of existing facilities, and equipment installations. The financial accounting
and management processes for these three types of capital acquisition efforts are different, making
oversight of such a large project difficult. The Department is directed to manage capital acquisitions toincrease the production capacity of PF-4 beyond IO pits per year as well as associated general infrastructure
investments at Los Alamos National Laboratory to support pit production as a single project, with multiple
sub-projects, and should follow the requirements for project management under DOE Order 41 3. The
Savannah River Pit Production Facility shall also be managed as a single project with multiple sub-projects
under DOE Order 413. [n addition, the Department is directed to provide to the Committees on
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress, starting not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act,
quarterly briefings that shall include the following: ( l) the status of pits one through I 0, including the costestimate and schedule to completion, and major milestones and deliverables; (2) the status of the two
projects for production beyond 10 pits per year, including the cost estimate and schedule to completion, andmajor milestones and deliverables; and (3) how the lessons learned from the Uranium Processing Facility
Red Team Review are being applied to plutonium work.

Science.-Within amounts for Academic Alliances, $5,000,000 shall be for Tribal Colleges andUniversities and $25,000,000 shall be for the Minority Serving Institutions and Partnership Program.

Inertial Confinement Fusion and High Yield.-Within available funds, not less than $344,000,000
is for the National Ignition Facility, not less than $80,000,000 is for OMEGA, not less than $66,900,000 is
for the Z Facility, and not less than $6,000,000 is for the NIKE Laser at the Naval Research Laboratory.
The agreement directs the NNSA to submit to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a report on how the Joint Program in HighEnergy Density Laboratory Plasmas supports the national security mission of the agency. The NNSA shallsubmit to the Committees not later than 45 days after enactment of this Act a report, with appropriateclassified annexes, describing the NNSA' s plans to meet or exceed proposed near-peer technologicaldevelopments with regard to laser and pulsed power facilities and technologies. The NNSA shall include apreliminary budget to build or modify existing facilities to address shortfalls and prevent technologicalsurprise.

Independent Review of the Inertial Confinement Fusion Program.-The agreement includes
Senate direction. The NNSA is reminded that if it is determined that ignition science activities arenecessary to maintain the stockpile, the review shall recommend and prioritize research areas that would
improve the program.

Stockpile Responsiveness Program .-A necessary part of maintaining a responsive stockpile in a
cost-effective manner is understanding key drivers that impact the cost of life extension programs,
modifications, and major alterations. The NNSA is directed to task the design and production agencies to49

work together to study cost drivers and the duration and periodicity of life extensions, modifications, andalterations and to provide recommendations to the Administrator not later than 120 days after enactment of
this Act. The study should consider opportunities to improve the following: (I) the rigor with which
technology and manufacturing assessments are conducted; (2) early engagement between design andproduction agencies; and (3) implementation of design for manufacture strategies. The NNSA is directed toprovide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress the results and recommendationsof the study not later than 30 days after completion of the study.

Advanced Simulation and Computing.-Within available funds, the agreement provides$20,000,000 for advanced memory technology research and up to $48,000,000 for artificial intelligence tosupport NNSA work.

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

The agreement provides $2,164,400,000 for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.

Transfer of Excess Plutonium.-No funds were requested to transfer excess plutonium from theState of South Carolina to the State of Nevada to comply with 50 U.S.C. 2566, and no funds are provided
for this purpose.

Global Material Security.-Within available funds, not less than $45,000,000 is for the Cesium
lrradiator Replacement Program. Within this amount, up to $20,000,000 is to address the container breachin Seattle, Washington. The agreement also provides up to $12,000,000 to partner with state or local
governments to train first-responders and experts in nuclear operations, safeguards, cybersecurity, andemergency operations.

Material Management and Minimization-Within amounts for Laboratory and Partnership
Support, $10,000,000 is for technical support of global industry partners that are seeking to minimize theuse of highly-enriched uranium in the production of Mo-99 and $35,000,000 is to support newcompetitively-awarded cooperative agreements to establish a stable domestic source ofMo-99. The NNSA
may select one or more recipients and is directed to consider technology maturity in the selection process.

Nonproliferation and Arms Control.-The agreement directs the NNSA to support technical andpolicy work conducted by the Office of Nuclear Energy to ensure nuclear safeguards, security measures,and technologies are integrated into advanced nuclear reactor designs.

NAVAL REACTORS(INCLUDfNG TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

The agreement provides $1,648,396,000 for Naval Reactors.

50

FEDERAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $434,699,000 for Federal Salaries and Expenses.
The NNSA is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress starting not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act a monthly update that includes monthly
hiring, attrition, and costs, with the data broken out to show excepted service and non-excepted service
employees separately. In addition, not later than July 1, 2020, the NNSA shall provide the Committees abriefing on its efforts to streamline hiring for non-excepted service employees and actions being taken to
make full use of its hiring authorities.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIESDEFENSE ENVIRONMENT AL CLEANUP

The agreement provides $6,255,000,000 for Defense Environmental Cleanup.

Rich/and.-Within available funds for Central Plateau Remediation, the agreement redirects$11 ,800,000 in prior year funds from the Containerized Sludge Removal Project to replace and upgrade
power supply infrastructure in support of direct feed low-activity waste operations. Further, within
available funds, the Department is directed to carry out maintenance, repair, and public safety efforts at
historical sites, such as B Reactor, including facility improvements needed to expand public access andinterpretive programs. None of the Richland Operations funds shall be used to directly carry out waste
removal or treatment activities within the Office of River Protection' s tank farms.

Idaho Site. -The Department is urged to continue developing and testing the methods andequipment necessary to retrieve and transfer calcine waste to a permanent repository. The Department
should also continue the engineering design work required to install the calcine waste retrieval equipmentin the Calcine Solids Storage facility.

Oak Ridge Reservation.-The agreement provides no funding for the new landfill. The
Department is directed to perform an evaluation of the cost of onsite disposal compared to offsite disposal,
including the economic impacts to the local community, and to brief the Committees on Appropriations ofboth Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act. The bill provides $5,900,000
for Community and Regulatory Support. The Department is permitted to fund the Federal Facility
Agreement (FF A) grant upon receiving a detailed work plan from the state for the upcoming year that
identifies all critical work to be performed pursuant to the FF A grant and a schedule for meeting program
milestones. Further, the Department is directed to provide quarterly updates on compliance with the work
plan and schedule to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress.

Savannah River Site.-Within available funds for Risk Management Operations, the agreement
provides $5,000,000 to begin remediation of the D-Area and $20,000,000 for H-Canyon operations. Any51

unused funds in the 05-0-405 Salt Waste Processing Facility construction line-item may be used for SWPF
operations.

O THER D EFENSE A CTIVITIESThe agreement provides $906,000,000 for Other Defense Activities. With respect to Order 140. l ,concerns persist with the Order's demonstrated impacts on the ability of the DNFSB to carry out its
congressionally-mandated responsibilities. To ensure the DNFSB can continue to meet its statutory
oversight responsibilities, the Department is directed to collaborate with the DNFSB to address the Board' s
specific concerns with Order 140.1. The Department must demonstrate a renewed focus on adequate
protection of public health and safety, including the health and safety of workers. The agreement includes
the House requirement for an evaluation by the Comptroller General but does not include the Houserequirement regarding a Memorandum of Understanding.

POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONSBONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION FUND

The agreement provides no appropriation for the Bonneville Power Administration, which derives
its funding from revenues deposited into the Bonneville Power Administration Fund. The agreement
includes legislative language permanently authorizing certain activities related to state clean energy
programs.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $0 for the Southeastern Power Administration.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $10,400,000 for the Southwestern Power
Administration. To ensure sufficient authority to meet purchase power and wheeling needs, the agreement
includes $28,000,000 above the level credited as offsetting collections by the Congressional Budget Office.
The Department is directed to continue working with the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress to provide necessary information to address this scoring issue for future fiscal years.

52

CONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA POWER
ADMINISTRATION(INCLUDING RESCISSION OF FUNDS)

The agreement provides a net appropriation of$89, 196,000 for the Western Area Power
Administration. The agreement includes a rescission of $176,000 as proposed in the budget request. To
ensure sufficient authority to meet purchase power and wheeling needs, the agreement includes$59,000,000 above the level credited as offsetting collections by the Congressional Budget Office. The
Department is directed to continue working with the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses ofCongress to provide necessary information to address this scoring issue for future fiscal years.

FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $228,000 for the Falcon and Amistad Operatingand Maintenance Fund.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSIONSALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $382,000,000 for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Revenues for FERC are set to an amount equal to the budget authority, resulting in a net appropriation of$0.
FERC is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress notlater than 180 days after enactment of this Act a study and report outlining the barriers and opportunities
for high voltage transmission, including over the nation's transportation corridors. The report shall examine
the reliability and resilience benefits, permitting barriers, and any barriers in state or federal policy ormarkets.

53

GENERAL PROVISIONS- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(INCLUDING TRANSFER AND RE SCISSION OF FUNDS)

The agreement includes a modified provision prohibiting the use of funds provided in this title toinitiate requests for proposals, other solicitations, or arrangements for new programs or activities that have
not yet been approved and funded by Congress; requires notification or a report for certain funding actions ;prohibits funds to be used for certain multi-year "Energy Programs" activities without notification; andprohibits the obligation or expenditure of funds provided in this title through a reprogramming of funds
except in certain circumstances.
The agreement includes a provision authorizing intelligence activities of the Department of Energy
for purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 194 7.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this title for capitalconstruction of high hazard nuclear facilities, unless certain independent oversight is conducted.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this title to approve criticaldecision-2 or critical decision-3 for certain construction projects, unless a separate independent costestimate has been developed for that critical decision.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting funds in the Defense Nuclear Nonproliferationaccount for certain activities and assistance in the Russian Federation.
The agreement includes a provision regarding authority to release refined petroleum product fromthe Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
The agreement includes a provision regarding environmental stewardship and endangered species
recovery efforts.
The agreement includes a provision regarding a rescission.
The agreement includes a provision regarding mercury storage.
The agreement includes a provision regarding pay for power system dispatchers.

54

~S-a._ - S~ r/\

Q

(IN!NS~ER'RTF-'T~AtHBLhlEH-J- - -55

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amount s in th o usands )FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

344,000
226,000
120 , 000

73,40040 , 000
44 , 000

396,000
259 , 500
150 , 000

690,000

157 , 400

805 , 500

246 , 500
92 , 000
105 , 000
84,00067 , 000
23 , 700
45 , 000
28 , 000

280,000
104 , 000
148 , 000
110,000

ENERGY PROGRAMSENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
Sustainable Transportation :Vehicle technologies ...
Bioenergy technologies ., . ....... .
Hydrog e n and fuel cell technologies ... .. .
Subtotal , Sustainable Transportation ... ... , .. •.

---- -------- --- ---- ---- - -- ------- ---Renewable Energy :Solar energy technologies ... ..... . .. . ....... . .
Wind energy technologies .. .
Wate r power tec hnologies .
Geothermal technologies . . ...... . ....... .
Subtotal . Renewable Energy ........ •... . ..

----- ------- ----------- - ----- -- ----527 , 500

163,700

642 , 000

320 , 000
226,000
30,00080,50057 , 000
8 , 400

395 , 000
285,000
40,000

Energy Efficiency :Advanced manufacturing . ... . ............. . ..•...•..

Building technologies ............. . .
. . .. . .. .. . .. .
Federal energy management program . ....... .. . .. .

Weatheri zat ion and Intergovernmental Programs:
Weatheri zat ion:
Weatheri zat i on assistance program .

Training and technical assistance ..
Subtota 1 • Weatheri zat ion .......... .
State Energy Program Grants .

254,000
3,000

305,000
3,500

257 , 000

308,500

55 , 000

62,500Subtotal , Weatherization and Intergovernmental

Program .

312,000

Subtotal , Energy Efficiency . . ..

Corporate Support:
Facilities and infrastructure:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) .... •Program di rection ......... .
Strategic programs . .
. . ... .. . . . ..... ..... .. ... .

145 , 900

1 , 091,000

97 , 000
162,500
14,000107 , 000
122 , 000

130 , 000
165,000
14 , 500------------ ------------ ------------

Subtotal , Corporate Support .....•. . . . . . •...•. . •.

273 , 500

Subtotal , Energy efficiency and renewab 1e energy ..

2 , 379,000

229 , 000

309 , 500

696 , 000

2,848,000-353 , 000

Use of prior year balances . . .

Re sci ssi on .

371,000

888 , 000

. ... . . . .................. .

TOTAL , ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY .

-58 , 000
2,379,000

343,000

2,790,000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Infrastructure security and energy restoration .
Program direction . ... ....... .. . .. .................... .

89 , 500
19,00011 , 500

75 , 000
70 . 000
11 ,500

95,00048,00013,000TOTAL, CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY , AND
EMERGENCY RESPONSE .
. ............... .

120,000

156,500

156 , 000

Transmission reliabil i ty .......... .
Resilient distribution systems.

39,00040.00070,50027,90057 , 000
45,000

Energy Storage :Research.
. ........ . ...... .
Construction : 20-0E-100 Grid Storage Launchpad ...

46 , 000

43,5005 , 000

55,0001,000

Subtotal , Energy Storage ........ .. . ..... .

46 , 000

48,50056 , 000

Transmission per mitt i ng and techni ca 1 assistance .
Program direction .............................. .

7,000
7,000
17,0009 , 000
7,000
19,6007 .ooo7 , 000
18 , 000

TOTAL, ELECTRICITY ....... . .. , . ..... , ... ...• ..

156,000

182,500

190,000

CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY, AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Cybersecurity for energy delivery systems (CEDS) .

ELECTRICITY

Transformer resi 1 ience and advanced components ....... .

NUCLEAR ENERGY
Research and deve 1opment :Integrated university program ....•..• . ..•.. .. .. .....
STEP R&D ................... ... .

5 . 000
5 , 000

5 , 000
5,000

Nuclear energy enabling technologies :Crosscutting Technology Development . . . . . . . .. .. .... .
Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation .... .
Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling and Simulation .. .
Joint Modeling and Simulation Program ........ .

50 , 000
31 , 000
27 , 585

17 , 400
30 , 000

Nuclear Science User Facilities ............... .

44,00027,60023 , 450

35 , 000
30,00023,450152,585

98 , 450

113,450

Trans format ion a 1 Challenger Reactor .
Subtotal , Nuclear energy enabling technologies . .
Fuel Cycle research and development:
Civil Nuclear Enrichment ..... .
Front End Fuel Cycle :25,00040 , 000

Mining, Conversion, and Transportation .. .
Ci vi 1 Nuclear Enrichment . . . ..... .. .

2,000
40 , 000

Subtotal . Front End Fuel Cycle ..

42,000Material Recovery and Waste Form Development .... .
Advanced Fuels: . . . . . . . .
. .. . ................ .

38,000125 , 000

6,000
36,000

Acc i dent To 1 erant Fue ls . ................ ... .. . .

30 , 000
95 , 600
30 , 000

Tri so Fue 1 and Graphite Oual ifi cation ..... .. . . .•. .
Subtotal, Advanced Fuels.

125,000

System Analysis and Integration ..

8 , 500

36,000125,600

Materials Protection, Accounting and Control
Techno 1 ogy . .
. ... ......... .
Fuel Cycle Laboratory R&D ..
Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition R&D .

6 , 000

3 , 000

63 ,9 15

5,000

20,00062,500DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY( Amount s in th o us ands )FY 20 20
RequestFinal Bill263,91590 , 000

305 , 100

100 , 000
47,000111,500
65,00010,00030,15075 , 000
100 , 000

100,000
47,00055 , 000
65 , 000

FY 2019
EnactedInt e gra ted Waste Management System ..
Subt o t a l , Fuel Cycle resear c h an d de velopment .
Reactor c onc epts RD&D :Advan c ed Small Modular Reactor R&D ..... . . . . .. , . .. , ..
Light Water Rea c tor Sustainability.
Advanced Reactor Te chno 1 ogi es : ..... .
Versatile Advan c ed Test Reactor R&D .... . . . . .. • .. . • . .
Subtotal , Rea c to r concepts RD&D .

22 , 500

25 , 000------------ ----------- -----323------, 500
215 , 150
267 , 000

Advanc ed Reactors Demon strati on Program :Nati anal Rea c to r Innovation Center .
Demonstration 1.
Demonstrat i on 2 ... . ...... . . ... .
Risk Reduction for Future Demon strati ans . . .
Regulatory Development .
.. .... .. .. . .. ..
Advanced Reactor s Safeguards .

20 , 000
80 , 000
80 , 000
30 , 000
15 , 000
5,000. .... . . .. .

---- ----- -- - ------------ -------- --- Subtotal , Advanced Reactors Demonstration
Program . .

Internati anal nuclear energy cooperation . ... . .. .. , . .
Subtotal , Research and development ....... .

230 , 000
3 , 000------------ -------------- --------753 , 000
403,600
925 , 550

Infrastru c tu re :ORNL Nuclear Facilities O&M .... .... . . . . ... . .
IN L Fac ilities Operations and Maintenance .
Resear c h Reac tor Infrastructure . . .. ... ... ... .. .
Construction :Sample Preparat i on Laboratory , IN L ..
Radiological facilities management:
Spac e and defense infrastructure . . .
Research reactor infrastructure . . .... . . . . . . . . .

20,000280 , 000
9 , 000

25 , 450
20 , 000
9,000

9,000

29,DOO

9,000

288,000

204,000

Construction:
16-E - 200 Sample Preparation Laboratory, INL

30,0005 , 242

Subtotal , Construction ..

30,0005 , 242

Subtotal, Radiological facilities management ..
Idaho facilities management :Idaho operations and infrastructure .. .. .. .. .. . . .

------------ ----- ---- --- ------------

Subtotal , Idaho facilities management ..

318 , 000

209 , 242

Subtotal , Infrastructure . . .

347,000

218,242

334,450

Idaho si tewi de safeguards and security .
Program direction ....

146,090
80,0001 37 , 808
64 , 350

153 , 408
80 , 000

1,326,090

824 , 000

1 , 493 , 408

TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY .... . . . . .. , .. . . .. .. . . , .. .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY( Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
Request100,671
98 , 096
129,683
56,35054 , 000
22 , 430
25 , 000

39 , 800
29,000185 , 300
72,82560 , 500

Final Bil l

FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH ANO DEVELOPMENT
Coal CCS and Power Systems :Carbon Capture .... .......... . ... . . .• .. • . . .• . . •• .. •. .
Carbon Storage .
. .•.. • .....
Advanced Energy Systems .. ......... .
Cross Cutting Research .
.. ............. .. .. . ..
NETL Coal Research and Development.
. .•.. • ... . .
STEP ( Superc ritical CO2 ) ....... .

Transformational Coal Pilots .. .. ............ .. , . . .. .

117,800
100 ,000
120 , 000
56,00061 , 000
16 , 000
20,000------------ ------------

Subtotal , Coal CCS and Power Systems . . .

486 , 230

387 , 425

490 ,800

Natu r al Gas Technologies :Re se arch .
. ... ....... ........... .

51 , 000

10,73051 , 000

NETL Research and Operations ..... .•. . • . ..• . . . ... • ... . .
NETL Infrastructure .. . .

46 , 000
61 ,070700
50 , 000
45 , 000

19,00061,045700
40 , 000
43 ,1 00

46 , 000
61 , 500
700
50,00050 , 000

TOTAL , FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .....

740 , 000

562,000

750,000

10 , 000

14,00014,000235 , 000
-300 , 000
300 , 000

174,000-450,000
450 , 000

195,000-450,000
450 , 000

Un convent i anal fess il energy tech no 1 ogi es frompetroleum - oil technologies .. .... ........ .. ...... ..

Program direction . ... .
Special recruitment programs.....

. .. . .. . ... .. ..... . .

NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES .. ... .. , .. • . .
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVESTRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE . ... ... ........... , .. , ..
Sale of crude oil . . .
Use of sale proceeds . . . .................. . ... • ..• . ..•.
TOTAL , STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE .... ..• • . . , • . •. .

------------ ------------ -----------235 , 000

174 , 000

195 , 000SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNTSPR Petroleum Account ........ .
Sale of NGSR refined petroleum product ......... .
Use of NGSR refined petroleum product sale proceeds .
TOTAL , SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNT .. . .

10 , 000

10,000-96,000
27,00010,000-69 , 000

10 , 000NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVENORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE .
Sale of Northeast Home Heat 1 ng Oil Reserves .
TOTAL , NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE .

ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION ... . . . . .

10 , 000

10,000-90,000------------ ------------ -------- -- -10 , 000-90 , 000

10,000125 , 000

118 , 000

126 , 800

2 , 240
101,304
131 , 456
75 , 000

2 , 500
103,073
66 , 692
75,215

2 , 500
113 , 085
127,000
75 , 215
1,200============ ------------ ------------

NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA) ..
Gaseous Diffusion Pl ants .......... .
Small sites ... .... . . . ... .
West Valley Demonstration Project ...
Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury ... ..•. . .. .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY( Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019

EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bil l

310,000

247,480

319 , 200

195 , 000
206,000

109 , 439
207 , 215

195 , 693
240 , 000

366,931

304 , 559

367,193

10,00010 , 000

Community and Regu la tory Support ....
TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP . .. .

200

URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION
AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
Oak Ridge ......................... .
Nuclear facility D&D , Paducah.

Portsmouth :Nuclear facility D&D , Portsmouth ..

Construction :20-U-401 On - site waste disposal facility (CellLine 2&3) ......
. ............. .
15-U-408 On-site waste disposal facility ,Portsmouth .

41,168

41,102

41,102

Subtotal , Portsmouth .

408 , 099

355,661

418 , 295

21,03011,00021,762
21,035

21 , 762
5 , 250

841 , 129

715 , 112

881,000

Advanced scientific computing research :Advanced scientific computing research . . . . . .......... .
Construction :702 , 794

732 , 153

791,265

17-SC-20 SC Exascale Computing Project (SC-ECP) . ... . . ,232 , 706

188 , 735

188,735

935 , 500

920,888980,000

1 , 757 , 700

1 , 675 , 285

1 , 853,000

130,000

150,000

170,000

60 , 000

5 , 000

60 , 000

60 , 000

13 , 000

60 , 000

28,0001,000

14 , 000
1 , 000

50 , 000
20,000Pens i on and community and regulatory support . ..... . .. .
Title X uranium / thorium reimbursement program .
TOTAL, UED&D FUND ...

SCIENCE

Subtotal , Advanced sci ent i fi c computing

research . ......... .. ................ .
Basic energy sciences :Research . . .. ..............•......•......•... • ...... ,Construction :13-SC-10 LINAC coherent light source II(LCLS-II) , SLAC ....... .. ...... . . .... .
18-SC-10 Advanced Photon Source Upgrade (APS-U) ,ANL .....
18-SC-11 Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power,
Upgrade (PPU), ORNL ................ ..
18-SC-12 Advanced Light Source , Upgrade (ALS-U),
LBNL. . ...... . ... . ..
. ........ . .. . .. . .
18-SC-13 LINAC coherent light source II HE( LCLS-II-HE ), SLAC .. .
19-SC-14 Second Target Station ( STS) , ORNL .
Subtotal , Construction .

Subtotal , Bas ic energy sciences .. . ... .. . .

Biological and environmental research ...... .. , ... . .. , .
Fusion energy sciences
Research . ... .

129 , 300-- ------ ---- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -------408 , 300

183 , 000

360,000

2,166 , 000

1,858,285

2,213 , 000

705 , 000

494,434

750,000

432 , 000

294 , 750

414,000------ ----- - ------------ ------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Construct i on:
20-SC-61 Matter in Extreme Conditions (MEC)
Petawatt Upgrade , SLAC ...
14-SC-60 U. S . Contributions to ITER .

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bi 11

132 , 000

1 , 000
107 , 000

15 , 000
242 , 000

Subtotal, Construction .

132,000

108,000

257,000

Subtotal , Fusion energy sciences ... .. .. .. . . .

564,000

402 , 750

671 , 000

800 , 000

648 , 038

814 , 000

20,00020 , 000

60 , 000

High energy physics :Research . ....... .

Construction:
18-SC-42 Proton Improvement Plan II ( PIP-II ),FNAL .
.. .............. ..
11-SC - 41 Muon to electron conversion experiment,

FNAL .. . . . . .. . ... .................. .
11-SC-40 Long baseline neutrino facility / deep
underground neutrino experiment (L BNF /DUNE),FNAL ....... . . . ....
. ................ .
Subtotal, Construction ........... . . .. .. • ..
Subtotal , High energy physics ......... .. .

30,000130 , 000

100,000

171 , 000

180,000

120,000

231,000------------ ------------ ----------------------- ------------ -----------980,000

768,038

1,045,000

615,000

579,854660,000

Nuclear physics:
Ope rat i ens and maintenance . ............... • ......•..

Construction:
20-SC-52 Electron Ion Collider (EIC) ........
20-SC-51 U. S . Stable Isotope Production andResearch Center (U.S. SIPRC ), ORNL . ..
14-SC-50 Facility for rare isotope beams( FRIB) Michigan State Uni vars Hy .

1 , 000

75,0005 , 000

12 , 000

40 , 000

40 , 000--- --------- ------------ --- --- ---- -75,000

45 , 000

53 , 000

690,000

624,854713,000

Workforce development for teachers and scientists . . .

22,50019,50028 , 000Science laboratories infrastructure:
Infrastructure support:
Payment 1 n 11 eu of taxes ..
Oak Ridge landlord ....... .
Facilities and i nfrast ructu re . . .... . ...... , . . .. .
Oak Ridge nuclear operations ................. . . .

1,713
6,434
45,543
26 , 000

4 , 540
5 , 61025,05010,0004 , 540
5 , 61056 , 850
26,00079 , 690

45,20093 , 000

3 , 000
20 , 000
2 , 000

11 , 000
15 , 000
2 , 000

5,000

10 , 000

7,000

12,0006,400

20 , 000
20 , 000

30 , 000
25 , 000
5,000
24 , 000

30 , 000
15 , 000
6,000
9,000

30 , 000
25 , 000
15,00023 , 000

Subtotal , Construction ...
Subtotal , Nuclear physics ............. .

Subtotal, Infrastructure support ....... . .• . .

Construction:
20-SC-77 Large Scale Collaboration Center , SLAC .
20-SC. 76 Craft Resources Support Facility, ORNL .
20-SC. 75 CEBAF Renovation and Expansion, TJNAF .
20-SC-72 Seismic Safety and Infrastructure
Upgrades, LBNL ..
.. .........
20-SC-71 Critical Utilities Rehabilitation
Project , BNL .. ................ ............... .
19-SC-71 Science User Support Center (SUSC), BNL .
19-SC-72 Electrical Capacity and Distribution
Capability, ANL......
. ................. .
19-SC-73 Translational Research Capability , ORNL ..
19-SC-74 BioEPIC Building , LBNL . . .
18-SC-71 Energy Sciences Capability , PNNL .........
17 - SC· 71 Integrated Engineering Research Center ,------------ ------------ -------- --- ------------- ---- ---- --- - ------------

DEPARTMENT DF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FNAL ........... . ...... .
17-SC-73 Core Facility Revitalization, BNL.
20-SC-7B Tritium System Demolition and Disposal,
PPPL ...
20-SC-79 Argonne Utilities Upgrade, ANL ...
20-SC-BO Li near Assets Modernization Project, LBNL
20-SC-81 Critical Utilities Infrastructure
Revitalization, SLAC .. .... .
20-SC-82 Utilities Infrastructure Project, FNAL.

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

20 , 000
42 , 200

10 , 000

22,00013 , 000
500
500
500
500

Subtotal , Construction: ..

153,200

118 , 400

208 , 000

Subtotal , Science laboratories infrastructure .

232,890

163,600

301,000

Safeguards and security .
Science program direction . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . .

106,110
183 , 000

110 , 623
183 , 000

112,700
186,300

6,585,000

5,545 , 972

7 , 000,000

TOTAL, SCIENCE ... . .. . . • ..• . ..•.. •. .

90,000NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL . . ............ . ......... .
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY
ARPA-E projects.

Program direction ........ .
Rescission of prior year balances ... . . . . . .. .. ... . . . . . .
TOTAL, ARPA-E .... ......... .

334 , 750
31,250390,000
35,000-287,000

366,000-287,000

425 , 000

33,000-15 , 000

3,000
-3 , 000-160,659-224 , 000

32,000-3,00018,000-384 , 659

29 , 000

TITLE 17 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PGM

Admi ni strati ve expenses . .. ..... .
Offsetting collection.
Rescission.
Cancellation of Commitment Authority ........ .. ....... .
TOTAL, TITLE 17 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN
GUARANTEE PROGRAM ..... .... .. ........ .

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM

Admi ni strati ve expenses . .... .
TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLESMANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAM ............ . .

5,000

5,000

5 , 000

5,000

TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM

Admi ni strati ve expenses.

1,000

TOTAL , TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM ..

2,000- 8,500

Rescission .

1,000-8,5002,000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amoun ts in th ousands )FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

13 , 200
4 , 800

4,479
3 , 52117, 000
5 , 000

18 , 000

8 , 000

22,0005 , 395
6 , 200
48 , 912
10 , 169

5 ,1 19
5 , 895
52 , 000
9 , 494

OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS
Indian energy program .
Prog ram Direc ti on . ........ ...... .
TOTAL, OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND
PROGRAMS .
. ..... .. . . .
DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

Admi ni strati ve operations :Salaries and expenses :Off ic e of the Sec r etary :Program direc tion .

. ......... .
Congressional and intergovernmental aff airs .

Ch i e f Fi nan ci al Officer ....
. .. .. . .... .
Economi c impact and diversity .................. .
International Affairs ........ ........... .
Chief Information Off i cer ..... .
Artificia l Intelligence and Technology Off i ce .
Other Depa r tmental Admi ni st ration .... .. . .. . . .

Subtotal , Salaries and expenses ........ . . . .

Subtotal , Administrative operations .. .

131 , 624

124 , 554

173 , 247

152 , 953

5,119
4,395
52 , 000
10,16926 , 825
140 ,200
2 , 500
152 , 262

375 , 547

350 , 015

393,470-- ---- --- --- ------- -- -- - -- --- ------ -------- ----- --------····-----------375 , 547
350 , 015
393 , 470
40 , 000

40 , 000

40 , 000

Subtotal , Departmental administration .. .

415 , 547

390 , 015

433 , 470

Use of prior-year balances .. . .. . ..... . . .. . .. .
Funding from other defense activities ............... . .

-2 , 000- 151 , 689- 179 , 092-179, 092

261 , 858

210,923

254,378

St r ategic pa r tnership projects .. .. .......... .

Total , Departmental administration (gross) . .. .

Miscellaneous revenues . .. ... ... . . .... .. . .
TOTAL , DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION ( net ) ... , ..

.. . .. ....... ···· ·· ····· · .. . ... . ... . .

·· · · · ·· · · · · · ... .. .. .. . .. . ... .. . .....
-96 , 000

-93,378-93 , 378

165 , 858

117 , 545

161 , 000

51 , 330

54 , 215

54 , 215

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Offi ce of the inspector general . .

36 , 100

Internati anal Affairs ...... .. . ... ....• • ..•......

TOTAL , ENERGY PROGRAMS ..... .. ...... , ... , .. . •. ...

13 , 472 , 407

8,349 ,265

14,633,623

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amount s in thou s ands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

794,049
48 , 888
65,000304 , 285
654,766
53 , 000

792,611792 , 611

10,000304,186
898 , 551

10 , 000
304 , 186
898 , 551

112 , 011

112 , 011

71 , 232
89,80481 , 299
85 , 811
51,543
98,262
157 , 815

71 , 232
89 , 804
81 , 299
80 , 204
51 , 543
98 , 262
157 , 815

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIESNATIO NAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES
Direc ted s tockpi 1e work:
Life Extension Programs and Maj or al terat i ans
B61 Life exte nsion program ..
W7 6 Life extension program .
W76 ·2 Modification program . . ..... . .. . .
was Alteration program . . . .. . .. ... . . .. . . •.. . •.. . • ..•.
W80-4 Life e xtension program ..... . . . . . .. . . . . . .
IW-1 .............. . ............ . . . . . . ... . . . . . ..•.
WS7-1 Mo d ification Program
Stoc kpile s ystems :861 Stockpile systems . .
. .. . . . . . •. . . • .
W76 Stockpile systems ....•... • .. , ....... • .
W78 Stockpile systems ..... . . . . . . .. .
WSO Stockpile systems .
.. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .
B83 Stockpile systems .
. .... • ......
W87 Stockpile systems .... . . . . .. . . .. •. . . • .. . • . . . .
was Stockpile systems .
. ....•.. • .

64,54784,30081 , 329
80,20435 , 082
83,107
170,913---------- -- -- ---------- ------------

Subtotal , Stockpile systems . ... . ..... . . • . . . • .. •.

599 , 482

635,766

630 , 159

Weapons dismantlement and disposition .. . ... . . ...... .

56,00047 , 500

56 , 000

Stoc kp i le services :Production support ...
. . .. . . ... .
Research and Development support ...........•..
R and D certification and safety . . .
Management , technology, and production .... . . .. . .

510,000
36 , 150
201 , 840
300 , 736

543 , 964
39,339236 , 235
305 , 000

543 , 964
39 , 339
236 , 235
305,000------------ -------- --- - ----- ------1,048 , 726

1 , 124 , 538

1,124 , 538

Uranium sustainment .. .... . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87,182

94 , 146

94,146

Plutonium sustainment :Plutonium sustainment operat i ons .... . . . .. .. .
Plutonium pit production project . ..... . ... .

286 , 282
75 , 000

691 , 284
21 , 156

691 , 284
21 , 156

Subtotal , Plutonium susta i nment ...... .. ... . . . . .

361 , 282

712 , 440

712,440

Tritium sustainment .................. . . .. . . . .. . .
Lithium sustainment .................. .. ... ... . . .
Domestic uranium enrichment . ... .
HEU down bl end . .
. .......... .. . . . . .. • . . . • . .. .
Strategic materials sustainment.

290 , 275
29 , 135
50 , 000

269 , 000
28 , 800
140 , 000

216,196

256 , 808

269,000
28,80070 , 000
90 , 000
256 , 808

Subtotal , Stockpile serv i ces ...............•..

Strategic materials :----- - --- ----- ---------- ---- -----1 , 034 , 070
1,501 . 194
1,521 , 194
Subtotal , Strategic materials .. . . . . ... . . . . . •. . ..
Subtotal , Directed stockpile work .. . .

------------ ----- ----- -- -- --- ----- -4 , 658 , 266

5,426 , 357

5,449 , 250

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY( Amounts in thousands )Resear c h , Development , Te st and Eva 1 uat ion (RDT&E) :Sc ienc e :Advanced c ertification ... .
Primary assessment technologies ......... .
Dynamic materials properties . .. ..... . .. . . . . . .. . .
Advanced radiography ................... • .. . • .. ..
Secondary assessment technologies ............. , .
Academic al 1 i ances and partnerships .
Enhanced capabilities for subcriticalexperiments .... . ...... .. .. .. ........ .
Subtota 1 , Science . ...•...... • .. , ... • .

Engineering:
Enhanced surety ....... . . ......... . ....... .
Weapons system engineering assessment technology
De 11 very environments . .... .

Nu c lear survivability .. .
Stu di es and assessments . ..... . . •.. . •.. , . .. • .. .. .
Enhanced su rvei 11 ance . ... .

Stockpile responsiveness . ... .

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFina l Bi ll

57,71089,313120,000
32,54477,55353,36457,71095,169133,800
32,54477,55344 , 625

57 , 710
95 , 169
128 , 000
32,71077 , 553
56,00050,000145.160

145 , 160

39 , 717
23,02946 , 500

43 , 000
35 , 945

48,23035 , 945
53 , 932

45,14734,00057 , 747
39,83053 , 932
5 , 60755 , 000
70 , 000

101,140

55,649106,000

77,915
6 , 596

66,128
8,571

75,000B, 571

8,492

350 , 791

12,000338,247

366 , 937

544 , 934

480,595

565 , 000

670,119789,849

789 , 849

23 , 000

50,00050 , 000

47 , 000

50 , 000

50 , 000

717 , 119

839,849

839 , 849

. ...........
--- -··----- ............
480 , 484
586,561
592 , 302----------------------190,123
233 , 954
263,484···········Subtotal , Engineering ..
Inertial confinement fusion ignition andhigh yield :Ignition and other stockpile programs ...... • ..

Diagnostics , cryogenics and experimental
support . . . . . .. . ......... ............ . ... .
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion .... . .. .
Joint program in high energy density
laboratory plasmas ....... .. . ........... .
Facility operations and target production .. .
Subtotal , Inertial confinement fusion
ignition and high yield ............ .
Advanced simulation and computing :Advanced simulatio n and computing ........ . . . ..... .
Construction :18-D-670 Exascale class computer coolingequipment, LANL . . ........ .. . ........... .
18-D-620 Exascale computing facility
modernization project, LLNL ..............•..•.
Subtotal , Construction.
Subtotal , Advanced simulation, Comput i ng andConstruction . ........ .... . ........ .

8 , 492--- -- ·-· --- - -·---------- ------------

24,000.. .. ...... .. ....... . .... . ...........
.. .......... ............ . ...........

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

12 , 000
38,64430 , 914

18 , 500
48 , 410
69 , 998

18 , 500
48 , 410
70,000

Advanced manufacturing development :Additive manfactu ring .

. ....... , .... .

Component manufacturing development . . . . ...... . .. .. .

Process techno 1 ogy deve 1 opment ......... .. . . .
Subtotal, Advanced manufacturing development ....

------------ ------------ --------- --81 , 558

136,908

136,910------------ ------------ -----------2,014,218

2,277 , 867

2 , 397 , 545

Infrastructure and Ope rat i ens :Ope rat i ans of facilities .
.. .......... . ....... .
Safety and environmental ope rat ions .
. .. . . . .. .... .
Maintenance and repair of f aci 1 it i es . ... .. . . . . . . ... .

870 , 000
110 , 000
515 , 000

905 , 000
119 , 000
456 , 000

900,000
110 , 000
456,000

Recapi tali zat ion:
Infrastructure and safety .
Capabi 1 i ty based investments .

450 , 000
109 , 057

447 , 657
135 , 341

447 , 657
135 , 341

559 , 057

582 , 998

582 , 998

Subtotal , RDT&E ..

Subtotal, Recapitalization . ..... ... , . .. . . ... ... .

Construction:
19 - 0 - 670 138kV Power Transmission System
Replacement , NNSS ........ .
18-0-680 Material staging facility, PX .. .. ... ... . .
18-0-650 Tritium production capability , SRS .... . , .
18-0-690 Lithium production capability , Y-12 ..... .
18-D-690 , Lithium processing facility , Y-12 ..... .
17-0-640 U1a complex enhancements project , NNSA ..
16-0-515 Albuquerque Complex project ....... .. . . . . .
15-0-612 , Emergency Operations Center , LLNL .
15-0-611 , Emergency Operations Center, SNL ....... .
15-0-301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX ... .
06-0-141 Uranium Processing Facility , Y- 12 ....... .
Chemistry and metallurgy replacement (CMRR):
04-0-125 Chemistry and metallurgy replacement
project , LANL ......... .

6,000

6 , 000

27 , 000

27,00032 , 000
35 , 000

32,00035,000703 , 000

5,000
4,000
123 , 000
745 , 000

5 , 000
4 , 000
80,000745,000

219 , 842

168 , 444

168 , 444

Subtotal , Construction ....... .

1 , 033,795

1 , 145 , 444

1 , 102 , 444

Subtotal , Infrastructure and Operations ...

3 , 087 , 852

3,208 , 442

3 , 151 , 442

Secure transportation asset :Operations and equipment .
Program direction ...... ... ....... .... .... .

176 , 617
102,022

209 , 502
107 , 660

185,000
107 , 660

Subtotal, Secure transportation asset ... .

278,639

317,162

292 , 660

690,638

778 , 213

750 , 000

24,00019 , 000
20 , 000
47 , 953

Defense nuclear security :Defense nuclear security .... . ... .... .. . ... .. ... .. . . .

Construction:
17 -0- 710 West end protected area reduction
project , Y-12 ................ .

25 , 000

Subtotal, Defense nuclear security . ... .. ... .. .. .

690 , 638

778 , 213

775,000

Information technology and cyber security . .......... . .
Legacy contractor pens i ans . ..... .
Use of prior year balances ......... . ... . . . . . . . . .

221,175
162,292-13,080

309 , 362
91 , 200

300,000
91 , 200

11,100,000

12 , 408,603

12 , 457 , 097

TOTAL , WEAPONS ACTIVITIES ........ , .. . , . .•.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amount s in thou s ands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

46 .339
127 , 433
78 , 907
154 , 429

48,83990,51360,827
142 , 171

58 , 000
147 , 002
78,907
159,000

407 , 108

342 , 350

442,909

114 . 000
32 , 925
186 , 608

99 , 000
32 . 925
186 , 608
45 , 000

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
Defense Nu c lea r Nonproliferation Programs :Global material security :International nuclear security .... .
Domestic radiologic security ...... .
International radiologic security .
Nuclear smuggling detection ....

.. . ... . .. . .

Subtotal , Global material security.

------------ ------- -- -- - ----- ----- --Material management and minimization :HEU Reactor Conversion .

Nuclear material removal .

. .. . .. ..... .

Material disposition.... ..
.. ... . .... ... ..
Laboratory and partnership support ................. .
Subtotal , Material management and mini mi zat ion . .. .

32,925225 , 869
35,000--- --293-- --, 794-- - -- ---- ---- ·· ........... .
333,533

363 , 533

Nonproliferation and arms contro l ...

129,703137 , 267

140,000

Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D :Proliferation detection ... .. . .. . .... .
Nuclear detonation detection ............... .. . . .
Nonprol 1 fer at ion fuels development . ... .
Nonproliferation Stewardship program .. ............. .

281 , 521
195 , 749
98 , 300

304,040
191 , 317

299,046
196 , 617
15,00022,500Subtotal, Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D ... .

575 , 570

495 , 357

533,163

220 , 000

220 , 000
79 , 000

220 , 000
79 , 000

220,000

299 . 000

299 . 000

28 , 640

13,70013,700

1 , 654 , 815

1 , 621 , 207

1 , 792,305

Nonproliferation construction:
99 - 0-143 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication
Facility . SRS . .... .
18 - 0-150 Surplus plutonium disposition project , SRS.
Subtotal , Nonproliferation construction ., .. . .. ... .

Legacy contractor pens i ans . .
Subtotal , Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Programs . . . . .
. .. . .......... .
Nuclear counterterrori sm and incident response
program:
Nuclear counterterrori sm and incident response.
Emergency Ope rat i ans . ..................... .
Counterterrori sm and Counterpro 1 i ferat ion . .. .. .. .

319 , 185
35,545336,550.. . . . ....... ....... . . .. .

35 , 545
336,550. .. . .. ... . ..

Subtotal, Nuclear counterterrorism and incident
response program.

Use of prior-year balances ....
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation ..

319 , 185
- 25 , 000

372,095

1,949,000

1,993,302

372 , 095.. . ..... . .. . .. . ......... . .. . ........
2,164 , 400- 19,000

Rescission .

... . ... ..... . . .......... . . ..........

TOTAL , DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION ..

1,930 . 000

1,993,302

2 , 164 , 400

514 , 951
138 , 000
250 , 000
525,764

531,20575,500155 , 000
553,591

516,205
75 , 500
170 , 000
553,591

NAVAL REACTORS
Naval reactors development . . ..

Columbia-cl ass reactor systems development . ......... , .
S8G Prototype refueling ....
Naval reactors operations and infrastructure ....... . . .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands )FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Program direc tion ...... ..... . .

48 , 709

50 , 500

50,500Co nstruction:
20-0-931 , KL Fue l development l abo ratory .
19-0-930 KS Overhead Pi p i ng .
17-D-911 BL Fire System Upgrade .
14-0 - 901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization
project , NRF . . .
. ........ . .

10 , 994
13 , 200

23 , 700
20 , 900

23 , 700
20,900287 , 000

238 , 000

238,000

311 ,1 94

282,600

282,600

1 , 788,618

1 , 648,396

1 , 648 , 396

410 , 000

434 , 699

434,699

15,228,618

16,485 , 000

16,704,592

4,889

4,987

4,987

193,692
660,358
10,121

139 , 750
472,949
5 , 121

236 , 102
654 , 800
10 , 121

1 , 000

11 , 000

11 , 000

Subtotal , Constru c tion . ..
TOTAL , NAVAL REACTORS ..... . ...•.. , . .. , ...... , .... .

FEDERAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES . .. .. ...•... . ... . ..•..

TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION . . .

------- --- -- --- ---- --- -- ---- -- -- ----

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Closure sites admi ni strati on . .
Rich l and :River corridor and other cleanup operations .
Central plateau remediation .
RL Community and regulatory support ... . .
Construction:
18-0-404 WESF Modifications and capsule storage ..

--- ------ --- ---------- -- ---- ---- ---Subtotal , Construction ... .

1, 00011 , 000

11 , 000----------- - ------------ -- ------ --- Subtotal, Richland .......... . ...... . .. , ... , .... .

865,171

628 , 820

912 , 023

Office of River Protection :Waste treatment and i mmobi l i zat ion pl ant
commission i ng . . ........... .................... .
Rad liquid tank waste stabilizat i on and disposition .

15 , 000
771 , 947

15 , 000
677 , 460

15 , 000
775 , 000

640 , 000
30,00020 , 000

776 , 000
25 , 000
15 , 000

Construction :15-0-409 Low activity waste pretreatment system ...
18-0 - 16 Waste treatment and immobilization p l ant LBL/Direct feed LAW ........................ .
01-0 - 16 D Hi gh-level waste facility . .... .
01 -0-16 E Pretreatment facility ................. ..
Subtota 1 , Construction ....... .

56 , 053
655 , 000
60 , 000
15 , 000------------ ------------ -----------786 , 053

ORP Low - level waste offsite disposal . ... .

690 , 000

816,000

10,00010,000------------ --- -- ------- -----------Subtotal , Office of River Protection .. .
Idaho Nati ona 1 Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste di sposition ....... ... ...... .
Idaho community and regulatory support. . .....•.
ID Excess facilities D&D .................... .. .... .
Total, Idaho National Laboratory .

1 , 573,000

1 , 392,460

1,616,000

420 , 000
3,200
10 , 000

331 , 354
3 , 500

430 , 000
3,500------------ ------------ -- ---------433,200

334 , 854

433 , 500

1 , 704
15 , 000
60,136

1 , 727
15 , 300
60,737

1 , 727
15 , 300
60 , 737

NNSA sites and Nevada of fsites :Lawrence Livermore Nati anal Laboratory . . . .... . . . . .
Separations Process Research Unit ....... .
Nevada . ........................ . .......... .. ..• . ..

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Sandia National Laboratory ........ . .. .. .. .. . ... . . .
Los A1 amos National Laboratory . .. .
LLNL Excess facilities D&D.

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill2 , 600
220,000
25,0002,652
195,462
128,000

2 , 652
220,000
65,000------------ ------------ -----------Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites .
Oak Ridge Reservation :OR Nuc 1 ear facility D&D ...
U2 33 disposition program . .
OR Cleanup and disposition . .

Construction :17 - 0 - 401 On-site waste disposal facility.
14-0-403 Outfall 200 mercury treatment facility .
Subtotal, Construction .. .
OR Community & regulatory support.
OR Technology development and deployment .

324,440

403,878

365 , 416

189 , 000
52,30074,00093 , 693
45 , 000
82 , 000

213 , 000
55,000101,100

10,00076 , 000

15 , 269
49 , 000

70,00086,00064,26970,000

5,700
3,000

4,819
3 , 000

5,900
5 , 000------------ ------------ ------------

Total, Oak Ridge Reservation ...

410,000

292 .781

450 , 000

Savannah River Site :SR Site risk management operat i ons :SR Site risk management ope rat i ans . ..

489 , 460

490,613506,366

1,259

6 , 792

6,792

Construction:
18-0-402 Emergency Operations Center
Rep 1acement , SR ............... . .

------------ ------------ -----------Total, SR Site risk management operations .. .

SR Community and regulatory support ................ .
SR Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization anddisposition .

Construction :20-0-402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative
Facility (AMC) ............................... .
20-0-401 Saltstone Disposal Unit #10, 11, 12 .. .
19-0-701 SR Security system replacement ..... .
18-0-402 Saltstone disposal unit #8/9 ......... .
17-0-402 Saltstone disposal Unit #7 , SRS.
05-0-405 Salt waste processing facility , SRS ....

490 .719

497 , 405

513,158

11 , 249

4,749

11,249696 , 869

797, 706

820,106

50 , 000
500

25,000500
4,525
20 , 000
40,034
21 , 200

10,0007,577
41,243130 , 000

51 , 750
40,034
20 , 988------------ --------- --- -----------188,820

163 , 272

111 , 259

1 , 387,657

1 , 463,132

1,455,772

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .... .. .. .. . ..... . .. . .. .. .

311 , 695

299 , 088

294 , 353

Construction:
15-0-411 Safety significant confinement
ventilation system, WIPP .............. .
15-0-412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP .
. .... . . . . . . •84 , 212
1,000

58 , 054
34,50058 , 054
44,500396,907391 , 642

396 , 907

298 , 500
12,979304,434
25 , 000-7 ,577

278,908
12 , 979
317,622281 , 119
12,979313,097
25 , 000-11 ,800

Subtotal , Construction . .... .
Total , Savannah River Site.

Total, Waste isolation pilot plant ..
Program di rec ti on .. . . . . . . .
. ....... .... . .. .
Program support . . .
. ....•.. • .
Safeguards and Security .. ..... . , , .. , .. .
Technology development .......... .. . , .. . . .. , . .. • ... . .. ,Use of prior year balances . . .... .. .. . .

-------- -- -- --------- -- - ---- ---- ----

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Subtotal , Defense Environmental Cleanup . .
Re sci ssi on .

TOTAL , DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill6,028 . 600

5,522,063

6 ,255 , 000-4 , 600-15 , 562

6,024,000

5,506,501

6,255,000

133,839
69 , 000

139 , 628
72 , 881

136 , 839
71 ,ODO

202,839

212 . 509

207,839

24,06852,70224 . 068
57 , 211

24 , 068
54,711

76 , 770

81 , 279

266,378

254 , 578

273 , 409

140,575
18,302

283,767
19,262

142,767
19 .262

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

Env iro nment , health , safety and security :Environment , health , safety and security .....• .. .•.

Program direction ... . .. . . .. .
Subtotal , Environment , Health . safety and security

Enterprise assessments :Enterprise assessments . .. .
Program direction ..... ........ .
Subtotal,

Enterprise assessments ..

Specialized security activities . .
Office of Legacy Management :Legacy management . . . .

Program direction .................. .

------------ ---- --- ---- - -----------78 , 779------------ ------------ ------- ---- -Subtotal , Office of Legacy Management .... ..• ...•..

158 , 877

303,029

162 , 029

Defense re 1 ated admi ni strati ve support . . .... ....... . . .

151,689
5,739-2,000179 , 092
4 , 852

179 . 092
4 . 852

860,292

1 . 035,339

906 . 000

Office of hearings and appeals ..............•.
Use of prior year balances .
. ...... ... ... .
TOTAL , OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES . . .

DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL .

26,000TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES ..

22,112 , 910

23,052 , 840

23 , 865 , 592

68,8246,500

80,4196,597

70,704
6,597

75,32487,01677,301-13,824-55,000-6,500-14, 704- 65,715-6,597-14,704-56,000-6,597POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS (1)
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

Operat ion and maintenance :Purchase power and wheeling .. ............. . . .
Program direction ..

. .. .......•

Subtotal, Operation and maintenance . .
Less alternative financing (PPW) ... .
Offsetting collections (for PPW) ...... . ...... . ... . ..
Offsetting collections (PD).
TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION ...... • ...

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

17,00660 , 000
32,995
16,875

13 , 639
93 , 000
35,157
15,067

13 , 639
68,00035 , 157
15,067

SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

Operation and maintenance :Operating expenses .......
. ..... . .. . ... . .. . . .
Purchase power and wheeling . .... . .. . . ....... ..... .
Program di rec ti on . ........ .
Construction ....................... . .. .
Subtotal , Operation and maintenance.
Less alternative financing (for O&M) .
Less alternative financing (for PPW) .
Less alternative financing (Const) ...
Offsetting col 1 actions (PD).
. . . . • ... • .
Offsetting collections (for O&M).
Offsetting collections (for PPW) .............. .. .
TOTAL , SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION . .

------------ ------------ -----------126,876

156 , 863

131 , 863

-8,894-10,000-12 , 180
-29,695-5, 707-50, 000-6,018-10,000-10,070-31 , 467
-5 , 908-83,000-6,018-25 , 000
-10 ,070-31 , 467
-5 , 908-43,000

10,40010 , 400

10 , 400

32 , 632
77,056486,396
238 , 483

45,887
72,176547,650
250,091

45,887
72,176
515 , 769
250 , 091

-6 , 600-39,922-44, 719-288 ,769-149, 142
-24, 445-258,881-8 , 954-5,000-176-6 , 600-39,922- 44, 719
-288,769-149 , 142-24, 445-227,000-8 , 954-5 , 000-176------------ ----- ------- ------------

WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION

Operation and maintenance :Construction and rehabi 1 i tat ion . ........... .
Operation and maintenance . ........... . . .. .. . . . ... .
Purchase power and wheeling . ........ .. .
Program di rec ti on. . . .
. ........ .
Subtotal, Operation and maintenance .... . .. . . . .
Less alternative financing (for O&M). .

. ...... . • . .

Less alternative financing (for Construction) .... .
Less alternative financing (for Program Dir .) .... .
Less alternative financing (for PPW) ....
Offsetting collections (for program direction) ..
Offsetting co 11 ect ions ( for O&M) .
Offsetting collections (P.L. 108-477 , P . L . 109-103) .
Offsetting collections (P.L. 98-381) .

----------------------- -----------915,804
883,923
834,567-7, 758-27 , 077
-39 , 136
-260 , 954-150 , 761-25 , 009
-225 , 442-9 , 058

Use of prior-year balances .......... .. .
Rescission of prior-year balances ... .

------------ ------------ -------- ---TOTAL , WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION ..

89 , 372
89 , 196============ ------------------------

89 , 196

4 , 440-1 , 340- 372-2 , 500

5,647-2 , 932-1, 187-1, 300

5,647-2,932-1, 187-1 ,300

228

228

228

100 , 000

99 , 824

99 , 824

369 , 900
-369, 900

382 , 000
-382,000

382,000-382,000FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING ANO MAINTENANCE FUND

Operation and maintenance .
Offsett i ng collections.

Less alternative financing ..
. . ... . ... . ... . .
Use of prior-year balances ............ .
TOTAL, FALCON AND AMI ST AD O&M FUND .
TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS .
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission .

FERC revenues .

. ...... . . .. .

. .............. .

Total , FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.

General Provision :Energy Programs Rescission ( re sci ssi on) .. . .

-12 , 723

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
Enacted

GRAND TOTAL , DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY .. ...
(Total amount appropriated). .
. .. . • .. • ... •...
(Rescissions) ..
. . ...... .... • .

FY 2020
RequestFina l Bill

35,685,317
31,501,929
38,586,316(35 , 708 , 917) (32,197,826) (38,657,215 )(-23,600)(-695,897)(-70,899)

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS

Energy efficiency and renewable energy . ..... . ........ .
Cybersecuri ty , Energy Security, and Emergency Response
Electricity ......... .
Nuclear energy . . .
. ................. ..... .
Fossil Energy Research and Development .....•... ... • . ..
Naval Petro 1eum & Oi 1 Shale Reserves .
. ........• . ..

Strategic petroleum reserve . ............ ... .
SPR Petroleum Account . . . .. ....... .. ... .. ... •.. . ...• . .•Northeast home heating oi 1 reserve ... .............. . . .
Energy Information Administration .. .
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup . .... . .... • .. . ... •. ..
Uranium enrichment D&D fund .

Science......
. ....... ............ . .
Nuclear Waste Disposal ... ........... .... .
Advanced Research Proj acts Agency-Energy . ............ .
Title 17 Innovative technology loan guarantee program .

Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loan pgm .. .
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee program . .
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs . . .

Departmenta 1 admi ni strati on . . . . .

. .. . ... .. . . . .

Office of the Inspector General ... .

2 , 379 , 000
120 , 000
156,000
1 , 326,090
740 , 000
10 , 000
235,000
10 , 000
10 , 000
125,000
310,000
841,129
6,585,000
366 , 000
18,0005 , 000
1,000
18,000165 , 858
51 , 330

International Affairs ............. .
Atomic energy defense activities :National Nuclear Security Admi ni strati on :. ... .. .. .. . .
Weapons act i vi t 1es . . . . . . . . . . .
Defense nuclear nonproliferation . .
Naval reactors . ............ . .
Feder a 1 Salaries and Expenses.

11 , 100 , 000
1 , 930,000
1 , 788 , 618
410 , 000

343,000
156,500
182,500
824,000
562,000
14,000174 , 000
-69,000-90, 000
118,000
247,480
715 , 112
5 , 545,972
90,000-287,000-384,659-8 , 500
8,000
117,545
54 , 215
36,10012,408 , 603
1 . 993 , 302
1,648 , 396
434,699

2 , 790,000
156,000
190,000
1 , 493 , 408
750,000
14 , 000
195 , 000
10,00010,000126 , 800
319,200
881,000
7 , 000 , 000
425,000
29,0005 , 000
2 , 000
22,000161,000
54 , 215

12 , 457 , 097
2 . 164 , 400
1 , 648 , 396
434,699------------ ------------ ---- ---- ---Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Admin ....• . .

15,228,618

16 , 485 , 000

16 , 704 , 592

Defense environmental cleanup . . .... ... .
Other defense activities . . . ... . . ....... .
Defense nuclear waste disposal . .
. .............. .

6,024,000
860 , 292

5,506 , 501
1 , 035 , 339
26 , 000

6,255 , 000
906,000

Total , Atomic Energy Defense Activities ....•...•..

22,112 , 910

23 , 052 , 840

23 , 865 , 592

10,40089 , 372
228

10,40089 , 196
228

10 , 400
89 , 196
228

100,000

99 , 824

99 , 824

369,900-369 , 900

382 , 000
- 382 , 000

382 , 000
-382 , 000

Power marketing admi ni st rat ions ( 1) :Southeastern Power Admi ni strati on . .. ............. . . .
Southwestern Power Admi ni strati on . . .
Western Area Power Admi ni strati on . ............... .
Falcon and Ami stad operating and maintenance fund .
Total , Power Marketing Administrations ...... .
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission :Salaries and expenses . . ...... .
Revenues . ................ . .... .
General Provision :Energy Programs Rescission ( rescission) .... ........ .
Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy . . .

------------ ---------- -- --- ---- ------12 , 723
35 , 685 , 317

31 , 501 , 929

38,586 , 316

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2019
Enacted1/

Totals include alternative financing costs ,reimbursable agreement funding, and power purchaseand wheeling expenditures . Offsetting co 11 ect ion

totals reflect funds collected for annual
expenses, including power purchase and wheeling

FY 2020
RequestFinal BillTITLE IV-INDEPENDENT AGENCIESAPPALACHIAN REGIONAL COMMISSION

The agreement provides $175 ,000,000 for the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). The
following is the only direction for the Appalachian Regional Commission.
The agreement includes the budget request proposal to address the substance abuse crisis that
disproportionally affects Appalachia and the budget request proposal for activities in support of the
POWER Initiative.
To diversify and enhance regional business development, $10,000,000 is provided to continue theprogram of high-speed broadband deployment in distressed counties within the Central Appalachian region
that have been most negatively impacted by the downturn in the coal industry. The agreement provides$5,000,000 for a program of high-speed broadband deployment in economically distressed counties within
the North Central and Northern Appalachian regions.
Within available funds, not less than $16,000,000 is for a program of industrial site and workforce
development in Southern and South Central Appalachia, focused primarily on the automotive suppliersector and the aviation sector. Up to $13,500,000 of that amount is for activities in Southern Appalachia.
The funds shall be distributed to states that have distressed counties in Southern and South Central
Appalachia using the ARC Area Development Formula.
Within available funding, $16,000,000 is for a program of basic infrastructure improvements indistressed counties in Central Appalachia. Funds shall be distributed according to ARC's distressedcounties formula and shall be in addition to the regular allocation to distressed counties.
The ARC is directed to provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress
not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a report on the percentage of funding that has been
directed to persistent-poverty counties and high-poverty areas in the last three fiscal years. For the purposesof the report, the term persistent-poverty counties means any county that has had 20 percent or more of its
population living in poverty over the past 30 years, as measured by the 1990 and 2000 decennial censuses
and the most recent Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates. For the purposes of the report, the termhigh-poverty area means any census tract with a poverty rate of at least 20 percent as measured by the

2013- 2017 five-year data series available from the American Community Survey of the Census Bureau.

D EFENSE N UCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY B OARDSALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $31 ,000,000 for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The Board
is directed to ensure a minimum of 110 full-time equivalents or report why it was unable to do so to theCommittees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress. The Board is further directed to establish andfill an Executive Director of Operations position. The agreement does not provide funding for any other56elements of the Board' s August 15, 2018, reorganization plan. The agreement does not include the House
report requirement regarding a Memorandum of Understanding.

DELTA REGIONAL A UTHORITYSALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $30,000,000 for the Delta Regional Authority.

DENALI COlvlMISSION

The agreement provides $15,000,000 for the Denali Commission.

NORTHERN BORDER REGIONAL COlvlMISSION

The agreement provides $25,000,000 for the Northern Border Regional Commission.
Within available funds, not less than $4,000,000 is for initiatives that seek to address the decline inforest-based economies throughout the region and $750,000 is for the State Capacity Building Grant
Program.

SOUTHEAST CRESCENT REGIONAL COlvlMISSION

The agreement provides $250,000 for the Southeast Crescent Regional Commission.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COlvlMISSIONSALARIES AND EXPENSES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (Commission) mission is to ensure the safety and securityof the nation' s use of nuclear power and nuclear materials and protect the workers and public who use andbenefit from these materials and facilities. The agreement provides $842,236,000 for Commission salaries
and expenses. This amount is offset by estimated revenues of$717,125,000, resulting in a net appropriationof$125,111 ,000. The agreement provides $15,478,000 for activities related to the development ofregulatory infrastructure for advanced nuclear reactor technologies and $14,500,000 for international
activities, which are not subject to the Commission' s fee recovery collection requirements. The agreement
directs the use of$40,000,000 in prior-year unobligated balances.

Unobligated Balances from Prior Appropriations.-The Commission carries unobligated balancesfrom appropriations received in prior years. The agreement requires the use of$40,000,000 of thesebalances, derived from fee-based activities. The Commission is directed to apply these savings in a mannerthat continues to ensure the protection of public health and safety and maintains the effectiveness of the57

current inspection program. Because the Commission has already collected fees corresponding to these
activities in prior years, the agreement does not include these funds within the fee base calculation for
determining authorized revenues and does not provide authority to collect additional offsetting receipts fortheir use. Any remaining unobligated balances carried forward from prior years are subject to thereprogramming guidelines in section 402 ofthis Act, and shall be used only to supplement appropriations
consistent with those guidelines.
{Dollars in thousands)

Account

Final Bill

Nuclear Reactor Safety ....... .. ... .... .. ..... . ... ... .... ... ... .. .... .. ... .... .. .... .. ... ... ...... ... ... ... .. . ... .... .
Integrated University Program ............... ... ... ........... .... . ..... .. .. .. .. .. .......... . .... ............. . ... ..
Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety ... ..... . ... ... ..... . ... .... ..... .... ............... .. ... ... .. ..... .. .. . ... .. .
Decommissioning and Low-Level Waste ....... .. ... ........... . ... .......... .. .... .. .... .. .... ... .. .... ... .. .. .
Corporate Support ................................. ... ............ .. .... .... ...... .. ... ... ........... ..... .. . ......... .
Use of Prior-Year Balances ... ... ... ........ . ...... .. .. ..... .. . ...... ......... ........ . ...... ... ..... .. .. ... ..... . ..

$447,574
16,000103,191
22 ,891
292,580-40,000

TOTAL, Nuclear Regulatory Commission .. . .... .. .. ... . ... ... ... .. . ....... .. ...... ............. ........... .... .

842 ,236

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

The agreement provides $13,314,000 for the Office of Inspector General in the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. This amount is offset by revenues of$10,929,000, resulting in a net appropriationof $2,385,000.
The agreement provides $1,171,000 to provide inspector general services for the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board.

NUCLEAR W ASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD
SALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $3,600,000 for the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.

58

GENERAL PROVISIONS-INDEPENDENT AGENCIESThe agreement includes a provision instructing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on
responding to congressional requests for information.
The agreement includes a provision relating to reprogramming.

59

TITLE V----GENERAL PROVISIONS(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

The agreement includes a provision relating to lobbying restrictions.
The agreement includes a provision relating to transfer authority. No additional transfer authority
is implied or conveyed by this provision. For the purposes of this provision, the term ''transfer" shall mean
the shifting of all or part of the budget authority in one account to another. In addition to transfers provided
in this Act or other appropriations Acts, and existing authorities, such as the Economy Act (31 U.S.C.
1535), by which one part of the United States Government may provide goods or services to another part,
this Act allows transfers using section 4705 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2745) and 15
U.S.C. 638 regarding SBIR/STTR.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting funds to be used in contravention of the executive
order entitled "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations."
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds to establish or maintain acomputer network unless such network blocks the viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography,
except for law enforcement investigation, prosecution, or adjudication activities.

60

~ \ (A -rz,e T\ I\\ &(\lJ l \C[INSE-R~ -- - - - - - _ _ _ .

61

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

125 , 000
2 , 163,000
366,000
3,739,500
200,000

77,0001,306,945
209,672
1,930,426
200 , 000

151,000
2,6B1 ,000
375,000
3,790,000
210,000+26, 000+496,000+7 ,000+50 , 500
+10,000+74 , 000
+1,374,055+165 , 126+1 , 659 , 572+10 , 000

150 , 000
35,000193,000

200,000
35,000203,000+50,000

27,000167,000+200,000+6 , 000+16,000

TITLE I - DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Corps of Engineers - Civil

Investigations.
Construction.
Mississippi River and Tributaries ...
Operation and Hai ntenance . . . .
. ........ .
Regulatory Program ...... . . .. ................... .

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(~SAAP) .
. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ..... .. . ..... . . •Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies ... . ... . ....... .•Expenses.. .

. .... . ..... .

Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil
Works) .
. . . . ...... .
Harbor Hai ntenance Trust Fund . . .
Inland Waterways Trust Fund ...... .. .. .. . .. . . ..

5,000

5,000
965,000
55,500+10,000

5,000-965,000-55 , 500--=====-====== ============== ==============
Total , title I, Department of Defense - Civil ...

6 , 996,500

4,963,745

7,650,000+651,500+2,666 , 255

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Billvs Enacted

Final Bill

Final 6111

15 , 000

10,00020,000+5,000+10 , 000

1,391,992
62,00835,00061 , 000

962,000
54,84933,00060 , 000

1,512,151
54,84933,00060 , 000+120, 159
-7 , 159-2 , 000-1 , 000+550 , 151

Central Valley Project Restoration Fund .. .
California Bay-Delta Restoration ...
Poli cy and Administrati on ... .

Total , Bureau of Re clamation ...... . . .

1,550,000

1,109,849

1 , 660,000+110 , 000+550 , 151

1 , 565,000

1 , 119,849

1 , 680,000+115 , 000+560 , 151

vs Request

TITLE II - DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Central Utah ProjectCentral Utah Project Completion Acco unt ... . . ..... .. , ..
Bureau of Reel amati on
Water and Related Resources .

Total, title II , Department of the Interior .....

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill2,379,000

343,000

2,848 , 000

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request+469 , 000-58,000+2 , 505 , 000-58,000+411,000+2,447,000+36,000+34, 000-500+7 , 500+160,000+7,318+653 , 808

TITLE I II - DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy .....
Rescission.
. ... ..... .
Subtotal .
Cybersecuri ty, Energy Security , and Emergency Response

Electr icity ....................................... .
Nuclear Energy .
Defense function . .

Subtotal .
Fo ssil Ene r gy Research and Development . . .

Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves .... .... . . .. . .. .
Strategic Petroleum Reserve .
Sale of crude oil ....... .

Use of sale proceeds ........ .. ..... . . . . . .
Subtotal .

-58,000------- ------- -------------- ---------------------------- --------------

2,379,000

343,000

2,790,000

120,000
156,000

156,500
182,500

156,000
190,000

1 , 180 , 000
146 , 090

686,192
137,808

1 , 340,000

1,326 , 090

824 , 000

1 , 493 , 408+167 , 318+669 , 408

740,000
10 , 000
235 , 000
-300,000
300,000

562,000
14,000174 , 000
-450, 000
450,000

750 , 000
14,000195 , 000
-450,000
450 , 000

+10,000+4,000-40 , 000
-150,000+150 , 000+188 , 000

235,000

174,000

195,000-40 , 000

+21 ,000

153 , 408-------- ------ -- -------- ---- -- -- ------ -- ---------------- -------------- --------------+15 , 600-------------- --------------+21 , 000-------------- --------------

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RE LA TEO AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2020
(Amounts in thousands)

SPR Pe t ro 1 eum Account . ...... ...... , . .. • . . •.
Sal e of Petroleum Produ c t .. .. ..... . .. . .. . .. . .. . . .

FY 2019
Enac ted

FY 2020
Request10 , 000

27 , 000- 96 , 000

Final Bi ll
Final Billvs Enac ted

10 , 000

Final Billvs Request-17 , 000
+96 , 000-------------- -------------- ------------- Subtotal .

10 , 000

Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve . . . .... . .. •... . . . . .
Sale of Home Heating Oil Reserve .. .
Subtotal .. .
Energy Informati o n Adm in istrat i on .. .
Non-defense Environmental Cl eanup ......... .

Uranium Enr i chment Oec ontam 1 nation and Dec ommi ssi oni ng
Fund ..

Sc ience . .... .

+79,000

10 , 000+10,000+90,000------- ------- -------------- -------------10 , 000-90 , 000

10 , 000

125,000
310 , 000

11B,OOO
247 , 480

126 , BOO
319 , 200

+1 , 800+9 , 200+8 , 800+71 , 720

841 , 129
6 , 585 , 000

715,1125 , 545 , 972
90,000881 , 000
7 , 000 , 000+39 , 871
+415 , 000+165 , 888+1 , 454 , 028-90,000

425 , 000

+59 , 000

+425 , 000+287,000

366 , 000

Res c i ss ion .. .

+100 , 000-287,000

Subtotal .
Tit 1e 17 Innovative Tec hn o 1 ogy Loan Guarantee Program .
Offsetting collecti on .... .. ......... .. ..... . ... .. .

Rescission.

10,000-90, 000

Nuc lea r Waste Di s pos al .............. .
Advan ced Research Proj ects Agency - Energy . . .

-69 , 000

10,000366 , 000

-287,000

425,000+59 , 000

+71 2, 000

33 , 000·15,000

3 , 000·3,000-160,659-224, 000

32 , 000-3 , 000-1,000+12,000+29 , 000

-384 , 659

29 , 000. .. .... . ... .

Cancel 1 at ion of Cammi tment Authority . .. ... .. . . . . . .
Subtotal ........................... . . . • ... . .

18 , 000+160,659+224 , 000+11,000+413 , 659

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

5,000
2 , 000+1,000+5 , 000+2 , 000+8 , 500

2,000+1,000+10,500

Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loans
program. .
. .......... . . .. .
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program .

Re sci ssi on .

5 , 000
1,000. .... ...... . ..... . . . . .. . . .. . . .

Subtotal .. ........... .

-8 , 500
1,000-8,500

Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs .

18 , 000

8,000

22,000+4,000+14 , 000

Departmental Administration ........ .. .

261,858-96,000

210,923-93,378

254 , 378
-93 , 378

-7,480+2 , 622+43 , 455

Net appropriation ................... • .. . . .. • ..

165 , 858

117,545

161 , 000

-4,858+43,455

Office of the Inspector General .... .. .. . . • .. •. ... ..• ..

51 , 330

54 , 215
36 , 100

54 , 215+2 , 885

13,472,407

8,349,265

14,633,623+1, 161,216

Miscellaneous revenues .. .

Internati anal Affairs .
Total , Energy programs .... .. • . . . • .. • ..•... • ..• • .

-36, 100+6,284,358

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

11,100,000
1,949,000-19 , 000

12,408,603
1 , 993 , 302

12,457,097
2 , 164 , 400+1 , 357,097+215 , 400+19, 000+48 , 494
+171 , 098

1,930,000

1,993 , 302

2 , 164 , 400+234 , 400+171 , 098

1,788,618
410 , 000

1,648 , 396
434 , 699

1,648 , 396
434 , 699

-140,222+24 , 699

15 , 228 , 618

16 , 485 , 000

16,704 , 592+1 ,475 , 974+219,592

6 , 028 , 600-4 , 600

5 , 522,063-15,562

6 , 255 ,000

+226,400+4 , 600+732,937+15,562

Subtotal ..

6 , 024 , 000

5 , 506 , 501

6 , 255 ,000

+231 , 000+748 , 499

Other Defense Activities .

860 , 292

1 , 035,339
26,000906 ,000+45,708-129, 339
-26 , 000

Total , Environmental and Other Defense Activities.

6 , 884 , 292

6 , 567,840

7 , 161,000+276,708+593, 160

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities ..

22 , 112,910

23 , 052,840

23,865,592+1 ,752,682+812 , 752

Atomic Energy Defense Act i vi ti es

National Nuclear Security Administration
Weapons Activities .
Defense Nuc 1ear Non pro lifer at 1 on.

Rescission . ......... .

-------------- -------------- -- ------- -- ---Subtotal .
Naval Reactors ................... .. ... .. . . . . . . .... .
Federal Salaries and Expenses. . .

. ................. .

Total, National Nuclear Security Administration.

-------------- -------------- --------------

Environmental and Other Defense Activities
Defense Environmental Cleanup . .. .

Rescission .

Defense Nuclear Waste Disposal ............... .. .

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts 1 n thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal 8111

Final Bil l
vs Enacted

6,500-6,5006 , 597-6,597

6 , 597-6,597+97-97

45 , 802-35,40247, 775-37 ,3 75

47 , 775-37 ,375+1 , 973-1 , 973

10 , 400

10,40010,400265 , 142
-175, 770

262 , 959
-173,58 7-176

262 , 959
-173,587-176

89,372

89,19689,196-176

1,568-1 ,340

3,160-2, 932

3,160-2,932+1,592-1,592

Power Marketing Administrations /1
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power
Administration .. .

Offsetting collections .
Subtotal .
Operation and maintenance , Southwestern Power
Administration .

Offsetting collections ...... .
Subtotal .
Construction, Rehabilitation , Operation and
Maintenance , Western Area Power Admi ni strati on .

Offsetting collections.
Rescission.
Subtotal.
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund .....
Offsetting collections .............. .
Subtotal ..
Total, Power Marketing Administrations .. , , . . ,, ..

228

228

228

100 , 000

99,82499 , 824-2 , 183+2 , 183
-176

-176

Final Billvs Request

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELDPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bill

Final 8111

vs Enacted

vs Request

369,900-369 , 900

382 , 000
-382,000

382 , 000
-382 ,000+12, 100-12, 100-12 , 723

-12,723-12 , 723

38,586,316(38,657,215)(-70,899)+2,900,999(+2,948 , 298)(-47,299)+7 ,084, 387(+6,459,389)(+624,998)

Federal Energy Regulatory Cammi ssi on
Sa 1ari es and expenses. . .
. . ..... .
Revenues applied . ........•... . ... ......... ..

Subtotal .............. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . .•General Provision:
Energy Programs Rescission (rescission) . . ... . .. .. .. .. .

Total , title I II , Department of Energy.
Appropri at i ans .
. .. . . .. . ...... .
Rescissions ........... . ..
. ............ .

35 , 685,317(35,708,917)( -23, 600)

31,501 , 929(32,197 , 826)
( -695 , 897)

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2020
(Amount s in thousands)
FY 2019
Enac ted

FY 2020
RequestFinal Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Bi 11

165,000
31,00025,00015 , 000
20 , 000
250

165,000
29 , 450
2,500
7 , 300
B50

175 , 000
31,00030,00015,00025,000250+10 , 000

+10 , 000
+1, 550+27,500+7 , 700+24, 150+250

696 , 350
-770 , 477

907,765- 746 , 669

642 , 236
-717 , 125-56, 114+53 , 352

-65 , 529
+31 , 544

127 , 673

159 , 096

125 , 111

-2 , 762-33 , 965

12 , 609-10 , 355

13 , 314-10,929

13 , 314-10 , 929

+705
-574

2,254

2 , 365

2 , 365+131

130 , 127

161 , 461

127 , 496

-2,631-33 , 965

3 , 600

3,600

3 , 600

369 , 977

370,161

407 , 346

+17 , 369

+37, 165

Final Bi 11

vs Request

TITLE IV - INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appala c hian Regional Commission .. .

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board .
Delta Regional Authority .
Denali Commission . . .................... .
Northern Border Regional Commission . . . . ... . . . .. . . . .. . .

Southeast Crescent Regional Cammi ssion.
Nu c lear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses .
Revenues .

Subtotal . .
Office of Inspector General . .... . ...... . .

Revenues .
Subtotal ...
Total, Nu c lear Regulatory Commission .
Nu clear Waste Technical Review Board ....

Total , title IV, Independent agencies .... .

+5,000+5, 000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

TITLE V - GENERAL PROVISIONSCol or ado River Basin Fund.

Total, Title V, General Provisions .....

21,400-21 , 400

21 , 400-21,400

35,000740,000
575,000
908,000
1,000 , 000-35, 000-740,000-575,000-908,000- 1 , 000 , 000

3,258 , 000-3,258,000

350

-350

OTHER APPROPRIATIONSADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR DISASTERRELIEF ACT, 2019
Corps of Engineers - Civil
Investigations (emergency) ............... .

Construction (emergency) ...................... .
Mississippi River and Tributaries (emergency) ........ .
Ope rat i ans and maintenance (emergency) ..... .. .. ... .
Flood control and coastal emergencies (emergency).
Total , Corps of Engineers ....

----------

Central Utah ProjectCentral Utah Project Completion Account ( emergency) ...

c-

Final Billvs Request

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020
(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2019
EnactedFY 2020
RequestFinal Bill
Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

Bureau of Reclamation
Water and Related Resources (emergency) ..... • .........

Total, Additional Supplemental Appropriations
For Disaster Relief Act , 2019 ..... . . . . .

15,500-15,500

3,273,850-3,273 , 850+10,367,958(+9 , 742,960)(-70,899)+389,618(+3 , 710 , 767)(-3,273,850)(-47 , 299)

48 , 323 , 662
48 , 343,000+3 , 663,468+3 , 703,000+10 , 367,958+10,283,958

Grand total .
Appropri au ons .
.. .. .. .. • .. . • .
.. . ...... . .
Emergency appropriations . ... .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . ..... . .
Rescissions... . .. .
. . ... . ........ ..... . . .

47,934,044( 44, 683 , 794)
(3,273 , 850)
( - 23 , 600)

37,955,704(38 , 651 , 601)

48,323,662(48 , 394 , 561)(-695,897)

Grand total less Emergency appropriations .... • .
Di scretionary (total) ................. .

44,660,194
44,640,000

37 , 955 , 704
38,059 , 042

1/

Totals adjusted to net out alternative financing
costs, reimbursable agreement funding, and powerpurchase and wheeling expenditures . Offsettingcollection totals only reflect funds co 11 acted
for annual expenses , excluding power purchasewheeling(+624,998)