Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution.
UCSD - GPS CASE 16 - 11

STRIKE THE IRON WHILE IT’S HOT:SILVER LINING OF THE DEEPWATER HORIZON OIL
SPILL

By: Shirley Xiaolin Xu

School of Global Policy and Strategy, UC at San Diego
Prepared for Professor Peter Gourevitch
Course on Corporate Social Responsibility
Winter 2016

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Executive Summary
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill by British Petroleum/Beyond Petroleum was the largest
oil spill catastrophe in U.S. history, with a three-year clean up, and ongoing negative
externalities six years later. The spill revealed that BP’s position as an industry leader in
corporate social responsibility fails to deliver, and the company sits on a black throne painted
green to fool consumers and the media. All involved parties were ultimately held culpable
through monetary settlements. BP has downsized in the aftermath, which actually helped boost
revenue in the subsequent years, and offset the damage of the 2015 crash in oil prices. Consumer
boycotting has barely left a scratch on BP revenue. However, the Deepwater Horizon Spillprovided a valuable window of opportunity for a drastic overhaul of energy regulatory agencies,
as well as for interest groups to successfully lobby against oil drilling off the Atlantic coast.
There still exists the threat of offshore drilling in Alaska, and potentially off the Pacific coast.
While BP has paid for its negligence with plummeted stock prices and the largest settlement in
U.S. history, there still does not exist sufficient incentive for self-regulation. In order to makeoffshore drilling and oil refinement less profitable than divestment into renewable energy,
interest groups should act fast and take advantage of the current window of opportunity topropose an offshore drilling oil tax – that, if properly phrased, will benefit all stakeholders except
the oil industry. Activists should immediately spread awareness and spark conversation bydisseminating information suggesting the long-run profitability of renewable energy over oil,both for consumers and investors, through social media and word-of-mouth. Overall, there exists
sufficient momentum for a strong push against the oil-industry hegemony and to lay thefoundation for a future of renewable energy and oil-independence.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Background

Information

Born in the late 20th century to a series of mergers and acquisitions, British Petroleum reigned as
the worlds third largest oil company, as well as an industry leader in corporate social
responsibility. Amidst a black sea of global warming skepticism and blatant regulatory defection,
BP revolutionized the American climate change dialogue. “It is hard to isolate cause and effect.
But there is now an effective consensus among the world’s leading scientists and serious andwell informed people outside the scientific community that there is a discernible human
influence on the climate, and a link between the concentration of carbon dioxide and the increasein temperature… Climate Change is a reality, and we are partly responsible,” (BP CEO Lord
John Browne, 1997 speech at Stanford University)1. The same year, BP withdrew membershipfrom the Global Climate Coalition (1989 – 2002), an interest group formed by the petroleum andautomotive industries to oppose mandatory regulations to address global warming – specificallythrough “skeptical scientist” propaganda and heavy resistance to the Kyoto Protocol. In 2000,
British Petroleum invested a rumored $211 million dollars into the rebranding of its company
image. The new “Helios mark”, a stylized sunflower symbolizing solar energy andenvironmental and cultural sensitivity (exhibit 1), illuminated the path to new internal initiatives
and external campaigns aiming to deliver the promise of Beyond Petroleum2. Perhaps British
Petroleum was truly a pioneer in its industry, with a sense of responsibility for greenhouse gas
emissions and an unprecedented determination to do its part in mitigating the apocalyptic effects
of global warming. Or, perhaps, BP executives foresaw the winner in the arbitrated climatechange debate and strategized for its long-term survival with a bold and highly effective

1

Lowe, Earnest A. “Taking Climate Change Seriously: British Petroleum’s Business Strategy”,
Corporate Environmental Strategy <http://www.indigodev.com/BPclim.html>
2"BP | Case Study" Landor. Web. 01 Mar. 2016. <http://landor.com/work/bp>

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
corporate social responsibility campaign. After all, even the GCC’s own technical experts wereadvising that the science backing the human influence on global warming was irrefutable3.
Regardless, according to a clearly BP-sponsored blog article on Landor, a branding consultancy,“nine months after the launch, 97 percent of employees were aware of the brand idea, and 9 out
of 10 agreed that BP was heading in the right direction.” Browne publically committed to reduce
BP’s greenhouse gas emissions by 10 percent by 2010.
On April 20, 2010, BP was responsible for what is considered the largest marine oil spill in thehistory of the petroleum industry. The Deepwater Horizon explosion in the Gulf of Mexico,alternatively known as the BP oil spill, was an 87-day underwater oil leak that discharged an
estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil, forming a continuous plume more than 35 kilometers inlengths and 1100 meters in depth4. Emergency clean-up measures post-spill, such as the sprayingof chemical dispersants, exacerbated the irrevocable ecological damage of the catastrophe,
further destroying marine ecosystems in contaminated waters5. The incident led to 11 deaths, 17
injuries6, and caused, debatably, the worst environmental disaster in US history.
According to New Scientist magazine, eight major failures caused the BP oil spill:
1. Failure of sealing cement due to substandard formulation
2. Failure of pipe seals to stop the flow of gas

3

Revkin, Andrew C. Industry Ignored Its Scientists on Climate, New York Times. April 23, 2009.

4

Camilli, et al. "Tracking Hydrocarbon Plume Transport and Biodegradation at Deepwater Horizon."
Science Magazine, Oct. 2010. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://science.sciencemag.org/content/330/6001/201.short>.
5"A Lot of Oil on the Loose, Not So Much to Be Found." Science (n.d.): n. pag. AAAS, 13 Aug. 2010.
Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
6

Griffith, Angela. "Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Cause Mapping." Think Reliably. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://www.thinkreliability.com/CM-DeepwaterHorizon.aspx>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
3. Misinterpreted pressure indicators to determine whether the well was sealed
4. Late surface detection of the leak
5. Failure of blowout preventer valve to seal leak within the rig
6. Failure of the mud-gas separator to divert debris and flammable gas from the rig
7. Failure of the onboard gas detection system to sound an alarm and seal off contamination
8. A defective emergency shut-of system7.
In essence, every operational step of BP’s disaster-prevention mechanism failed miserably.
Meanwhile, Beyond Petroleum Sustainability Review 2009 boasted, “We have decades ofexperience of using cutting-edge skills and technology to undertake complex oil and gas
projects… such as ultra deep water. One of our recent finds, the Tiber field in the Gulf of
Mexico, was made by drilling a well 31,000 feet deep into the earth in water 4,000 feet deep.”8
Who is to Blame?
The central cause of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion was a failure of the cement
seal at the base of the oil-containing well, exacerbated by a cascade of human and mechanicalerrors that allowed excessively pressurized natural gas to shoot onto the drilling platform,
causing an explosion and fire. A 500-page, two-part report compiled by the Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement and the Coast Guard ultimately concluded
that British Petroleum and the well’s owner were responsible for the accident, citing sevenviolations of federal safety and environmental regulations. The report further asserted that BP’s

7

"The Eight Failures That Caused the Gulf Oil Spill." New Scientist. N.p., 08 Sept. 2010. Web. 09 Feb.
2016. <https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19425-the-eight-failures-that-caused-the-gulf-oil-spill/>.
8"Sustainability Review 2009." Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/sustainability/groupreports/bp_sustainability_review_2009.pdf>

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
chief contractors – Transocean, who owned the drilling rig, and Halliburton, who were
responsible for cementing operations – shared the burden. Transocean, Halliburton, and BP, in
response, engaged in multibillion-dollar litigation in an attempt to spread the enormous costs of
the accident, as well as the subsequent fines and compensation packages. Halliburton released apublic statement asserting, “operational responsibility lies solely with BP,” attributing the failure
to poor well design on the part of BP, not crew incompetence or subpar cement quality9. A
spokesperson for Transocean claimed that BP made major decisions leading up to the blowout,
while the crew followed their strict training and “took appropriate actions based on the limited
information made available to them.10”
A study by the National Oil Spill Commission released in 2011 concluded that root causes of theoil spill were systemic to deepwater drilling – which, due to the increase in operations personnel
compared to traditional drilling, leads to a “telephone” effect of miscommunications. However,
the report underplayed the culpability of the corporate key players, citing “a failure of industry
management” as the clear root cause of the blowout 11 . The panel recommended, “better
management of decision-making processes within BP and other companies, better
communication within and between BP and its contractors and effective training of key
engineering and rig personnel.” Dialogue regarding the root causes of the oil spill name the key
players, but fall short of highlighting the root causes. Little official scholarly discussion exists
regarding the role of government in the Deepwater Horizon disaster. No offshore drilling
9

Broder, John. "BP Shortcuts Led to Gulf Oil Spill, Report Says." The New York Times. The New YorkTimes, 14 Sept. 2011. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/science/earth/15spill.html>.
10

Broder, John. "Blunders Abounded Before Gulf Spill, Panel Says." The New York Times. The New
York Times, 05 Jan. 2011. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/science/earth/06spill.html?_r=1&ref=gulfofmexico2010>.
11

New York Times, see 10.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
regulation or disaster response regulations existed at the time of the oil spill. Perhaps worth
noting as well is the role of the consumer in enabling BP’s growth with environmentally
damaging lifestyle choices, and reduced consumer pressure and oversight post-rebranding.12
In June 2012, BP established the $20 billion Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Trust to settle claims
arising from the oil spill. This came after the BP-established claims settlement organization Gulf
Coast Claims Facility (GCCF) was deemed illegitimate by the US government and replaced by acourt supervised settlement program13. Three years after the incident, BP announced that thecompensation fund was beginning to dry up, and the organization would continue to pay
settlements from profits14. Concurrently, BP attempted to stem the flow of incoming claims bytirelessly appealing claims and even filing a claim to remove the court-appointed administrator15.
In January 2013, BP pled guilty to 11 counts of felony manslaughter, one count of felonyobstruction of Congress, and violations of the Clear Water and Migratory Bird Treaty Acts
Finally, in July 2015, BP agreed to pay $18.7 billion in settlements to the U.S. government andfive states to resolve all claims, with the exception of worker compensation16. The Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill has shown that: governmental regulation for spill prevention and response are

12

Angus, Ian. "Did Consumers Cause the BP Oil Disaster?" Climate & Capitalism, 15 Aug. 2010. Web.
09 Feb. 2016. <http://climateandcapitalism.com/2010/08/15/did-consumers-cause-the-bp-oil-disaster/>.
13

McDonell, Colin (March 2012). "Comment. The Gulf Coast Claims Facility and the Deepwater
Horizon Litigation: Judicial Regulation of Private Compensation Schemes" (PDF). Stanford Law Review
14

Scheck, Justin. "BP Says Spill Fund Is Running on Fumes." Wall Street Journal, 30 July 2013. Web. 09
Feb. 2016. <http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323854904578637180606036090>.
15

Gerken, James. "Patrick Juneau, BP Spill Claims Administrator, Urges Dismissal Of Company's
Lawsuit." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 01 Apr. 2013. Web. 09 Feb. 2016.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/01/patrick-juneau-bp-spill-settlement_n_2994406.html>.
16

Wade, Terry, and Kristen Hayes. "BP Reaches $18.7 Billion Settlement over Deadly 2010 Spill."
Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 02 July 2015. Web. 09 Feb. 2016. <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-bpgulfmexico-settlement-idUSKCN0PC1BW20150702>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
insufficient, and that industry standards and norms fail to ensure worker and environmental
safety.
Underlying Causes
Why did British Petroleum, the original oil giant with a conscience, allow for the cost-cutting,irresponsible behavior that caused such a disaster? In 2009, a year before the incident, oil prices
fell to an all time low at $53 a barrel, compared to $91 the previous year17. However, a glance at
historical financial ratios indicates that, despite lower revenue, BP enjoyed a typical gross ratioof 21%. What did reflect the economic downturn for the oil industry were net income andearnings per share – which fell nearly $1.5018, indicating that shareholder pressure may be
another factor in BP’s frugality.
Failure of governmental oversight, industry capture, and hubris set the stage. "In the event of an
unanticipated blowout resulting in an oil spill," read the exploration plan that BP submitted on
March 10, 2009, to the U.S. Department of the Interior's Minerals Management Service (MMS),
which then managed and regulated offshore drilling, "it is unlikely to have an impact based on
the industry-wide standards for using proven equipment and technology for such responses."19
However, a 2000 environmental assessment for a Shell deepwater drilling operation, 2002 MMS
environmental impact statement for the Gulf of Mexico drilling program, as well as a 2004 reportcommissioned by the MMS highlight the difficulties in containing a deepwater blowout.

17

McMahon, Tim. "Historical Crude Oil Prices (Table)." InflationData.com, 01 Mar. 2015. Web. 09 Feb.
2016. <http://inflationdata.com/Inflation/Inflation_Rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp>.
18"BP PLC ADR." Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for (BP). Morningstar, n.d. Web. 18 Mar.
2016. <http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=BP>.
19

Lehner, Peter, and Bob Deans. In Deep Water: The Anatomy of a Disaster, the Fate of the Gulf, andEnding Our Oil Addiction. New York: Experiment, 2010. 105. Print.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Unfortunately, the reports also suggested a minimal likelihood (1.4%) of an unprecedented
deepwater oil spill20, causing MMS to simply ignore the risks.
ImpactScientists are still in the process of quantifying the environmental impact of the Deepwater
Horizon Spill. Reports have implied that the number of recovered carcasses equates number ofdeaths, which underestimates the actual toll by up to 50 times.
The oil spill led directly to a series of fishery closures. Five years later, the fishing industry in the
Gulf of Mexico region remains gutted. Oyster season shrank from six months to only one monthin the years following the spill, leading to a massive loss in income for small-businessfishermen21. The tourism industry has suffered as well, with beach closures lasting three years
after the spill and recovery slow to come. BP has contributed to short-term solutions with ad
campaigns encouraging tourism to the Gulf, as well as rental of local homes and fishing boats forthe three-year cleanup operation 22 . However, claims are slow to deliver and lump-sum
compensation cannot remedy the long-term devastation to the local fishing industry.

20

Soraghan, Mike. "Industry Claims of 'Proven' Technology Went Unchallenged at MMS." Energy &Environment. New York Times, 02 June 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2016.
<http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/06/02/02greenwire-industry-claims-of-proven-technology-wentunch-55514.html?pagewanted=all>.
21

Ludwig, Mike. "Gulf Fishermen Still Struggling Five Years After the BP Spill." Truthout. N.p., 20 Apr.
2015. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/30319-gulf-fishermen-still-strugglingfive-years-after-the-bp-spill>.
22

Elliot, Debbie. "5 Years After BP Oil Spill, Effects Linger And Recovery Is Slow." NPR, 20 Apr. 2015.
Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.npr.org/2015/04/20/400374744/5-years-after-bp-oil-spill-effects-lingerand-recovery-is-slow>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
In response to the incident, theObama administration issued amoratorium on offshore drilling,

Exhibit 1

enforced by the U.S. Department of
the Interior. The ban was heavily
contested by the oil industry andlifted six months later, along withnew, loosely enforced regulations.
The administration proposed a fiveyear ban on offshore drilling on the
coasts,which

encounteredsignificant resistance in congress, and was compromised to cover only the Eastern Gulf of
Mexico. In March 2016, the Obama administration proposed a new offshore leasing program,eliminating previously promised auctions in the Atlantic, and instead offering limited drillingrights in the Arctic near Alaska. This was a direct response to the public backlash following the
Deepwater Horizon oil spills23.
Mechanisms of Change
In order to prevent future incidents such as the Deepwater Horizon Spill, and to hold all culpableparties responsible, it is imperative that the legislators, regulators, and profit-makers place safety
and environmental sustainability at a higher priority than profitability and efficiency. In essence,
23

Dlouhy, Jennifer. "Obama Bars Atlantic Offshore Oil Drilling in Policy Reversal." Bloomberg
Business, 15 Mar. 2016. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-0315/obama-said-to-bar-atlantic-coast-oil-drilling-in-policy-reversal>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
the key is to increased corporate social responsibility in the oil industry is to make offshore
drilling unprofitable. The energy industry, as a collective entity, has one priority: to prolong its
profitability for as long as possible. Within the industry, companies such as BP, Shell, andChevron have occupied the highly profitable oil-and-gas niche. The oil industry has captured
U.S. society and governance for decades, with negative impacts rippling through society ranging
from the destruction of electric vehicles in California in the 1990s24, to incentivizing militaryinvasion of a foreign country in 2003.
Collective Action theory suggests that a “window of opportunity” (Kingdon, 1984) is imperativefor effective change – i.e. even after resolving coordination problems, an interest group needs a
catalyzing event that destabilizes the status quo in order to strengthen and maximize the impact
of its collective action. Six years after the Deepwater Horizon Spill, the dust begins to settle as
stakeholders shift focus to the future, rather than frantic damage control of the past. Oil and gas
companies are diversifying their portfolios, heavily investing in renewable energy as futuresources of revenue rather than reputational boons. Renewable energy consumption grew by 12%
in 2014 globally, while oil consumption grew only 0.8% and coal and natural gas by 0.4%, allsignificantly below historic averages. Solar generation, in particular, grew 38%. In a side-by-side
production versus consumption by region comparison released by BP (Exhibit 3), oil production
significantly outpaces production25. Only the Asia Pacific has experienced a significant increase24

Note: The oil and automobile industries joined forces to halt production of electric vehicles,
unconditionally recall and destroy the vehicles, suspend research of improved technology, and pressure
the California Air Resources Board to revoke its Zero Emissions Mandate, aimed to require 10% of all
vehicles produced for sale in California be emissions free by 2003. The goal was not met, and the ZEVremains in perpetual revision.
Who Killed the Electric Car? Dir. Chris Paine. By Chris Paine and Martin Sheen. Prod. Jessie Deeter.
Sony Pictures Classics, 2006. DVD.
25

Graphic sources: "BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015." Fuel and Energy Abstracts 37.1
(1996): 67. BP Stats. BP, June 2015. Web. 18 Mar. 2016.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attributionin oil consumption; however, the region has also enjoyed the largest increase in consumption of
Exhibit 2

renewable energy (Exhibit 2), and isin the early stages of establishingrenewable-energy infrastructure to
wean off of oil dependency. The
global decline in demand is reflectedin the recent drop in oil prices.

Exhibit 3

The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris has committed 195
countries globally to emission reduction. Despite the vague language of the agreement and lackof enforcement, it set an important precedent for the future of the energy industry. Earth Institute<http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-2015/bp-statistical-reviewof-world-energy-2015-full-report.pdf>

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Director Jeffrey Sachs advised investors against oil companies, stating that investors should
divest from carbon-reliant firms if they could not react to political and regulatory efforts to halt
climate change.26 Oil and gas companies, exemplified by BP, are squeezed from the top andbottom to either change, or disappear. One could argue that the sole motivation for selfregulation is self-interest. A firm will only practice corporate social responsibility if the benefits
outweigh the costs. The costs of oil and gas production have certainly increased since the oil
industry’s hegemony a decade ago, while benefits show long-run decline. This is the perfectwindow of opportunity: a combination of a decrease in international consumption of oil, andincreased reputational costs of lack of self-regulation due to shift in global prioritization ofenvironmental sustainability. Collective action efforts can minimize offshore drilling,significantly reduce the influence of the oil industry on state governance, and increase the costs
of non-compliance to exceed profit.
There are two avenues of collective action: widespread consumer boycotting, and small grouptargeted lobbying. Consumer boycotting, in direct response to the Deepwater Horizon Spill, is a
simple refusal to use BP or Arco (owned by BP) gas stations. According to NPR, anti-BP
sentiment was widespread post-spill, and consumer watchdog organizations Public Citizen called
for a nationwide boycott27. However, this has proven to be ineffective. BP stocks fell sharply
after April 2010, and after experiencing impressive growth in 2011 and four years of relative
stability, have fallen once again to a second all-time low 28 . BP downsized to fund the26

Pearce, Andrew. "Jeffrey Sachs: Fund Managers Have a Duty to Dump Fossil Fuels." Financial News.
N.p., 07 Dec. 2015. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2015-12-07/sachs222>.
27

Neuman, Scott. "As BP Backlash Grows, So Do Calls For Boycott." NPR. N.p., 23 May 2012. Web. 18
Mar. 2016. <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127110643>.
28"BP Stock Quote." Market Watch. Web. 18 Mar. 2016.
<http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/bp>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution$43.5billion compensation fund, which actually helped BP stay afloat during the 2015 35%
downward spike in oil prices. However, based on BP’s financials, revenue increased post-spill
until 2015. BP’s downstream (refined oil) business raked in a pre-tax profit of $2.3billion, an
increase from the previous year, and significantly more profitable than the upstream (exploration
and refinement) business, which netted only $800million pre tax, compared to $3.9billion in
2014.29 This suggests that the repercussions of Deepwater Horizon – increased governmental
restrictions and limited permit sales – combined with low per barrel price of refined oil has
crippled BP’s drilling business, yet consumer boycotting did not even make a dent in BP’srefined oil sales. In fact, consumer boycotting of BP oil hurts gas station owners more than thecompany, who are trapped under long-term contracts, and whose earnings depend the stations’sales. The actual gasoline sold at any station is a mixture of fuel from multiple refiners, so thedirect impact of any slowdown at BP-branded stations is minimal for the company, which canalso sell excess supplies as private-label fuels to other retailers.30 Therefore, BP and similar oiland-gas companies are simply too big to fail, untouchable by consumer boycotting.
A “bottom-up” approach to exert pressure on BP to take corporate social responsibility
responsibly has proven ineffective; therefore, top-down pressure from governmental oversightand internal pressure from employees and shareholders are the other available influences.
Interest groups play a significant role in influencing governmental oversight, prominent
economists and financial advisors influence shareholders, while media influences the employees.

29

Ahmed, Kamal. "BP – Low Oil Price Isn't All Bad News." BBC News. N.p., 27 Oct. 2015. Web. 18
Mar. 2016. <http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34645976>.
30

West, India. "Gas Station Owners Bear Brunt of BP Consumer Boycott." Economy. North American
Media, 02 July 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://newamericamedia.org/2010/07/gas-station-ownersbear-brunt-of-bp-consumer-boycott.php>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Increased Government Oversight
The sheer magnitude of the catastrophe destabilized the influence of oil industry in government;
The White House took the window of opportunity to mobilize eleven diverse governmental
agencies in a joint taskforce to address the oil spill, and billed BP for the largest settlement in
U.S. History. Halliburton, the cement operating company, agreed to pay $1.1billion to settle its
share of claims with Gulf Coast business owners. Transocean, the owner of the oil drill, settled a$1billion liability for violating the Clean Water Act. Transocean sued BP for legal fees, but
contributed $212million to cleanup efforts31. These settlements set an important legal precedent,
reinforcing that every hint of negligence involved in the incident can be held liable for thecatastrophe.
The President also rejected a BP-funded investigative report; instead establishing an Oil Spill
Commission consisting of the unbiased Coast Guard and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
which is less likely to be swayed by oil industry bribes. The participation of several
environment-oriented agencies in the cleanup of the spill legitimizes their significance, increases
their funding, and strengthens their influence – particularly useful during a time when congress
was infested by vocal climate-change deniers and proponents of offshore drilling, fraking,pipelining, and various environmentally damaging oil and gas industry practices. Theinternational attention on the spill also launched an environmental fervor amongst the populacethat undoubtedly influenced their governments to cooperate unanimously during the COP21
negotiations in 2015. The silver lining to the Deepwater Horizon Spill catastrophe is that theincident pulled a massive fire alarm on the failures of governmental oversight on offshore
31"BP Settles Oil Spill-related Claims with Halliburton, Transocean." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 21 May
2015. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-halliburton-bp-oilspillidUSKBN0O52LL20150521>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
drilling, and the lack of effective disaster-prevention and containment infrastructure underscoredthe hubris of the oil industry.
The Minerals Management Service (MMS), previously delegated oversight for offshore drilling,
was disbanded in 2011. The Bureau of Ocean Management (BOEM) took over as the regulatory
body, while oversight is delegated to a separate Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement (BSEE). Currently, the U.S. is a massive net oil exporter; despite an international
push toward renewable energy, there are significant internal interests to maintaining U.S.
dependency on oil. Exhibit 4 illustrates the organizational structure of the new BOEM, Exhibit 5
provides the original MMS organization structure, and Exhibit 6 shows the organizational
structure of the BSEE. The new organization has several departments whose central mission is
not the management of oil resources and revenue as was the MMS, but rather renewable energy
and environmental sustainability. In addition, instead of one massive offshore management
branch with limited oversight and whose negligence resulted in the Deepwater Horizon Spill, theBOEM is not only audited by a separate review unit, but has an intricate organizational structurethat prevents negligence. Each regional department has its own environmental sub-division,
while the BOEM also has a central Office of Environmental Programs for two-tiered preliminary
evaluation. After a rig passes the initial inspection, the BSEE again has a two-tiered inspection
system to ensure periodic checkups and consistent compliance to safety and environmental
standards. In addition, in the same bureau that supervises offshore oil drilling, there exists the
Office of Renewable Energy – effectively cementing governmental commitment to developmentof renewable energy and weaning off oil-dependency. The new BSEE-BOEM team ensures both
fire alarm and police patrol oversight over not only offshore oil drilling, but also casts a shadowof influence the growth of the U.S. energy industries.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
In a positive example of effective community organization, the Obama Administration recently
cancelled extensive Atlantic Offshore Drilling Plans. This is the direct result of an adamantgrassroots campaign led by all 34 East Coast chapters of the Surfrider Foundation, along withnumerous local politicians, businesses, communities, and environmental groups. 32 The
abolishment of MMS, the establishment of BOEM and BSEE, the harsh punishment of all parties
linked to the incident, and revocation of the Atlantic Offshore Drilling Plans are all effective
mechanisms of pressure that limit the influence of the oil-and-gas industry on regulation, andencourage adherence to the growing international norm of corporate social responsibility.
Internal Pressure – Stockholders
As previously mentioned, economist and special advisor to the UN Secretary General Jeffrey
Sachs publically advised investors against investing in oil companies that fail to divest to
renewable sources of energy. Mr. Sachs has predicted that if the Arabian peninsula continues to
exploit oil unchecked, the Arabian Gulf will become uninhabitable in 210033. In addition, due toglobal rise in renewable energy consumption (see Exhibit 2), supply of oil exceeds demand.
Many regions of the world have already reached grid parity (Exhibit 7) – when an alternative
source of energy is just as cost effective as the main electricity power grid. Therefore, forwardthinking stakeholders should either diversify to renewable energy companies, or exert pressureon oil-and-gas firms to divest away from oil and into renewable energy.
32

Stauffer, Pete. "Federal Government Just Canceled Plans for Extensive Atlantic Offshore Drilling." The
Inertia. 16 Mar. 2016. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.theinertia.com/environment/federal-governmentjust-canceled-plans-for-extensive-atlantic-offshore-drilling/>.
For the curious, a long list of letters and resolutions opposing offshore drilling:
http://usa.oceana.org/seismic-airgun-testing/grassroots-opposition-atlantic-drilling
33

Bouyamorn, Alan. "Warning to End High-cost Oil Production from Top US Economist." The National.
N.p., 28 Jan. 2016. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.thenational.ae/business/energy/warning-to-endhigh-cost-oil-production-from-top-us-economist>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Of course, there is resistance to Mr. Sachs’s
message. Forbes recently published an
editorial titled, “Four Ways to Invest in the
Eventual Rise in Oil Prices”34, in which thewriter recognizes the excess supply-todemand ratio, but attributes it to a slow inglobal economy rather than a rise inrenewableenergy.

TheInternational

Exhibit 7
Source: Deutsch Bank, as of Feb 2015

Monetary Fund 2016 forecast predicts that Chinese growth will slow, Middle Eastern growth
will increase, while European growth holds steady35. Referring to Exhibit 3, Asia is the biggest
consumer of oil, while Middle Eastern and European consumption have held steady over the past
two and a half decades. In addition, Exhibit 2 shows that China has shown exponential growth inrenewable energy usage, and Europe has firmly established itself as the world leader inrenewable energy development. From a big-picture economic standpoint, it is easy to see that the
cost-benefit analysis leans in favor of renewable energy. It is imperative that stockholders cometo that conclusion as well, and exert pressure on the oil-and-gas companies, so that the benefitsof increased investment in renewable energy outweigh the loss of earnings in foregone oil
production and refinement. The key is information dissemination. This can be done from two
avenues:

34

Wibberly, Ryan. "Four Ways To Invest In The Eventual Rise In Oil Prices." Forbes. Forbes Magazine,
26 Jan. 2016. Web. 18 Mar. 2016. <http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanwibberley/2016/01/26/four-ways-toinvest-in-the-eventual-rise-in-oil-prices/#6e897b8e0133>.
35

IMF World Economic Outlook (WEO). International Monetary Fund, Jan. 2016. Web. 18 Mar. 2016.
<https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/update/01/>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
1. Scholarly Publications. Mr. Sachs, or an eager graduate student (Mr. McCord, perhaps?) could
publish a paper predicting the long-run decline of the oil industry, and clearly outlining thebenefits of renewable energy to the overall economy and to the sustainability of the energy
industry.
2. Social Networking and Media. Mainstream investment forums such as Forbes, Investopedia,
and CNN Money remain optimistic for the future of oil, and are actively encouraging investors totake advantage of the economic downturn, which is interpreted as part of the natural cycle of acommodity. There currently lacks prominent counterargument in favor of Mr. Sach’s
perspective. A simple blog post, community seminar, or even conversation in the right crowd canplant the seed for this perspective to seep into the mainstream. In addition, there exist numerous
articles regarding Mr. Sach’s conclusion. Interest groups can share those articles on social media,
paired with information regarding the COP21 global commitment to renewable energy, as wellas the boom in solar infrastructure across the world, particularly China. Given the speed at which
information spreads online, this grassroots campaign will simultaneously educate the millennial
populace – who will become the stockholders and stakeholders in the next decade – and generate
conversation that will inevitably reach tech-savvy investors.
Interest Group Lobbying
While interest groups won a massive victory March 2016 by successfully lobbying against
offshore drilling in the Atlantic, the Obama Administration still plans to auction drilling permits
in the Arctic Ocean off Alaska, after a two-year ban instated in October 2015 expires in 2017.
This diversion makes a bittersweet victory for Environmentalists. Shell, Dutch oil giant, hasabandoned plans to drill in Alaska indefinitely after investors experienced cold feet at theCopyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
massive expenditure and disappointing quantities of resources36. The Arctic is considered one of
the most technically challenging regions for petroleum exploration, as well as one with the mostfragile ecosystem. Shell investors have already deemed the expedition unprofitable. With the
Atlantic and two-thirds of the Gulf of Mexico off-limits, oil-and-gasp companies will likely
target the Pacific. The newly established regulatory agencies will inevitably dull with time. If
predictions of an oil economic recovery are correct, then the window of opportunity may last
only two more years before the oil-and-gas industries re-accumulate wealth and power, andestablish their influence. On the off-chance that a Republican takes office in 2016, and the senate
demographic does not change, then the West Coast may very well face the same dilemma as theEast Coast, with significantly less sympathetic leadership. Interest groups on the West Coast
should begin conducting research immediately on potential allies, as well as engage in
aforementioned social media information dissemination denouncing offshore drilling andpraising the spread of renewable energy.
To make offshore drilling unprofitable, interest groups have two options: lobby for a moratoriumon all offshore drilling, or instate an offshore drilling oil tax. The former, while ideal, is anineffective solution: in 2008, George W. Bush rescinded Bill Clinton’s executive order to ban
offshore drilling in California until 2012. In addition, an offshore drilling oil tax will attract
support not only from the Pacific region, but also throughout the coastal United States. Potential
opponents are socially conservative taxpayers, the oil industry, the automobile industry, andassociated demographics. Potential allies are the manufacturers of Electric Vehicles such as
Tesla; surfers, divers, sailors, and ocean-sport enthusiasts; as well as coastal and gulf fishing and
36

Gerken, James. "Shell's Alaska Offshore Drilling Plans Abandoned Until Next Year." The Huffington
Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 17 Sept. 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2016.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/shell-alaska-offshore-drilling_n_1889214.html>.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
tourism industries, particularly in Alaska and the Pacific. As the largest economy in the UnitedStates, California has significant influence over Washington, particularly on issues concerning its
own coastline. Sacramento lobbyists, interest groups, and environmentally conscious socialites
should already engage in conversation regarding the future of offshore oil drilling, bringing up
the 1969 Santa Barbara offshore drilling oil spill and refusing to allow the 2010 Deepwater
Horizon Spill to fade into obscurity. Students will also play a significant role, as California hasmore degree-granting institutions than any other state, and all seven campuses of the Universityof California are influential research institutions. Three campuses are coastal – with UC San
Diego as a world-renowned leader in environmental sustainability; UC Berkeley is notorious forsocial activism; UC Davis has close proximity to state governance in Sacramento; and the UCLA
community has significant influence over media and popular culture. The majority will surely
oppose further expansion of offshore off the Pacific Coast. If presented as the only viable option
to suppress oil-and-gas industry expansionism, an offshore drilling tax could mobilize significant
support. In order to properly coordinate such a large and diverse coalition, interest groups should
begin planning and disseminating information immediately to establish a foundation.
Conservative tax-payers could potentially be persuaded to join the cost as well. The majority of
car owners would oppose an oil tax on the already exorbitant California gas prices. However,with the rise of electric vehicles in California, there is great potential. California alreadysubsidizes electric vehicles, with charging stations installed in urban hubs and many universities.
In addition, existing offshore oil rigs in California and the Gulf of Mexico have been highly
contested for decades. The increased tax revenue from them can help the Gulf region expedite its
recovery; and relieve overpopulated coastal cities that suffer from parking problems withincreased public transportation, and even electric buses – which will further lower the demandCopyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
for oil consumption. As electric vehicles become increasingly popular, the love affair between
the oil and automobile industries is nearing the end of its honeymoon stage. All but 13 US states
have renewable energy standards (Exhibit 7); with new green energy infrastructure built daily,
the future of legislation points toward increased emissions regulation and subsidization ofrenewable energy. Demand for electric cars is on the rise. With proper phrasing, an offshore
drilling oil tax can benefit everyone except the oil industry.

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Exhibits
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Exhibit 3

Exhibit 4

Additional Exhibits

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Exhibit 5

Exhibit 6

Copyright 2016. No quotation or citation without attribution
Exhibit 6