.

I

'

"

'f.I

I

•

,

SixteenI.

1..

finifTE"""R wi/Dom 16
A Journal of Words and Pictures for the Lesbian
Imagination in All Women

Founding editors: Harriet Desmoines & Catherine Nicholson
SII'16 was produced in Lincoln, Nebraska ,by the following staff:
Editors : Catherine, Harriet, C. ColettePoetry Editor : Susan Leigh Star
Shipping: Donna Saunders
Staff: Edy Ambroz, Nancy Bowen , Vicki
Nogle
Special thanks to Debbie Alicen and Helen
Moore for photography

Publishers: Michelle Cliff & Adrienne Rich

SW16 is being distributed fromAmherst, Massachusetts, by the
new editors, Michelle Cliff andAdrienne Rich.

Cover photographs by Deborah Alicen
Model : Sister PoohPrinted by New Victoria Printers, Inc.,
Lebanon, New Hampshire

This issue was funded in part by a grant from the Coordinating Council of Literary
Maga zines, with funds CCLM has received from the National Endowment for theArts.

ISSN: 0196-1853

Copyright ©Sinister Wisdom, 1981. All rights reserved to individual authors and artists.
Published quarterly
Individual subscriptions: 1 year (4 issues) $10.00
2 years (8 issues) $18.00(For out-of-the-U.S. subs : $12 .00 for 1 year; $21 for 2 years; U. S. dollars only)
Institutional subscriptions: 4 issues $15.00
Supporting subscriptions: $25.00 and up
Sample copy : $3 .10 (including postage)
NEW ADDRESS: SINISTER WISDOM, P.O.Box 660, Amherst, MA 01004

ThiS bLesbian ook Is Pan

Contents

Karlene Faith & Robin Ruth Linden

Sex Is Always the Headliner
Look Me in the Eye

Barbara Macdonald

I Want My Accent Back

Not in Cars

11
20

Sandy Covahey

2432

Diane Ayott

poem for betty lorenz

2

Susan Leigh StarOn the Edge of the Fringe
Drawing

COllect· Hsrstory A of the
IOn
"rch·
-LHEF IVes
, INc.

Dinah Wernick

33
34

Achy Obejas

The Eye of the Be*Hold *Her

Arlene Raven

35

Perilous Passages:
Lynda Koolish

PhotographTrapeze43

Meg Jochild

44
Cellan Jay

Meditation on Movement
Uorona52
55

Achy Obejas

Emily's Arrows

Barbara Wilson

56

And Be My Love

Karen Saum

60
68

Julie

Lynn Watson

Those ''Other'' Kind of Women
Seduction Scene
The Shell

Laura Davis

Irene Yarrow

Diana Rivers

Responses
Photograph

Jan Phillips

71
73

80
88
88

Sinister Wisdom: The First Five Years-An Album
PhotographLynda Koolish

A Domestic History

Catherine Nicholson & Harriet Desmoines

95
97

C. Colette

103

A Few of the Friends Who Helped (photographs)

III

An Interview
Contributors' Notes

115

1

Karlene Faith

Sex Is Always the Headliner
Introduction by Robin Ruth Linden

Karlene Faith's Journal: Summer 1972

Juanita has been morose all week since getting her write-up. It happened
Tuesday night after our talk about race and sex and where it all connects. "I
was really caught up in what we were talkin' about, and when I got to thecottage, I was following my girlfriend around, telling her about it. She's likefamily to me. When she went in to take a bath, I went in and sat on the sideof the tub, just talkin' to her and washin' her back, like I do with my husband and kids at home. No big thing. The police came along and gave us awrite-up for homosexuality-can you believe that? Most of these staff arereally sick. Giving me a felony write-up just for talkin' to my friend andwashin' her back. "I first met Lorene months ago in the staff snack bar, where she was a waitress. She's a beauty. Tall, strong body, big bright black eyes, delicate braids
circling her head, a smile to melt the heart. She wanted to know about thebook I was reading, Maya Angelou's I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, so I
left it for her. She read it, loved it, we talked about it, and I started bringing
her other things she wanted to read. After we'd talked only about books fora month, she started talking about her life-her addiction and arrests, hermisery as a prostitute. And she talked about her dreams-getting out, finding
work as a model, buying some decent furniture and a car, making a homewith her girlfriend.
Lorene's leaving tomorrow, and today she got a message to me asking me
to meet her. She told me she had something important to say, and after a lotof hesitation she blurted out, "I've told you the truth about everything else,
but you know my friend I talk about? How would you feel if you knew that
we were . .. you know . .. I don't know how to tell you . . . I really love her.
You know?"
I started to say that I'd assumed all along that she ana her girlfriend werelovers, that she was a lesbum ... But she protested, "No! I'm not a lesbian.
I'm not homosexual. I'm just in love with this woman, don't you see?" It
was the stigma, yet one more /abel, that she recoiled from. We talked for along time about how to deal with fear and guilt in a world where other people
make up the rules, even in matters of the heart. She said it was the first time
she'd admitted that she loves a woman. I hope it isn't the last.
In trod uction
In the late 1960s, when "women's liberation" was nascent and the antiwar movement was the focal point of American radical politics, a strong, antiMy special thanks to Robin Linden for the incredible patience and inspiring and skillededitorial assistance which I received from her in preparing this piece for Sinister Wisdom.
Copyright © Karlene Faith, 1979/80

2

racist prison resistance movement had begun to take root. Although "free"
women were active in the' movement's leadership, before the early 1970s
there was little support or opportunity for women who had been .incarcerated
to speak publicly about their prison experience .
The stereotypes of women prisoners are forbidding. Social scientists havecolluded with the media to create images of sadistic bull dykes who terrorize
the entire prison community. Rarely have these stereotypes been recognized
for the homophobia they embody and encourage.
The actual daily lives of people who are warehoused in "total institutions"like prisons and mental hospitals have traditionally been hidden from outsiders.
During the 1970s, women in California made tremendous progress in gaining
access to and accountability from the California Institution for Women (CIW),
the state prison in Frontera, sixty miles east of Los Angeles. In 1980 accessproblems are no less serious. Nonetheless, over the past decade, we have succeeded in exposing the conditions of women's lives behind prison walls.
Karlene Faith is a lifetime community activist. In 1968 she began working
with men and women caught up in the California criminal justice system. In
1972 Karlene broke new ground when she began to concentrate intensively
on interviews and cultural support work with the women at CIW. Later thatyear she organized the Santa Cruz Women's Prison Project, which, until 1976,
brought hundreds of outsiders into the prison as volunteer participants in educational, political and cultural programs. The Prison Project developed a statewide prisoner support network which still functions informally and throughnumerous offshoot organizations. In the early days of "women's music,"
Karlene worked with the Women on Wheels production of a concert tour ofCalifornia . This tour brought the issue of prison access to the awareness ofnearly 10,000 people, primarily women .
Karlene and I spent an afternoon talking about her work inside CIW as aninterviewer-advocate-teacher-friend .... I told Karlene that when I first readher work on sexuality in prison I was amazed at the women's openness about
their most intimate selves. Karlene explained that when she began interviewing
at CIW, she hadn't expected that sexuality would be an ongoing matter ofdiscussion:
Actually, I was reticent to bring up the subject of sexuality and relationships between women. For years male (and male-identified) social scientists
have made a fetish out of homosexuality in prisons. The images they haveproduced, couched in academic language, have been seriously offensive toprisoners and have reinforced the worst homophobic stereotypes of lesbians
and gay men. I didn't want to feed into that American obsession with sex.
And yet in every conversation and interview, matters of intimacy between
women came up in one context or another.
So there it was. Like everyone else; women in prison were interested intalking about sexuality. What they wanted, Simply, was for their own truths
to be told. Prisoners are the only true experts about life in prison-what itmeans to live behind cell bars, coiled razor and barbed wire fences,laser
beams, electronic doors and guarded walls. What the rest of us can do is
document their reality in so far as they choose to share it with us.
The following article is adapted from a chapter by the same title in Curtains
Over the Bars, Karlene's book in progress .

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Rules and Regulations of the Director of Corrections. Title 15 (Crime Prevention
and Corrections), Article 1. Section 3007 (Sexual Behavior).
"Inmates may not participate in illegal sexual acts. Inmates are specifically excluded3

in laws which remove legal restraints from acts between consenting adults. Inmates
must avoid deliberately placing themselves in situations and behaving in a manner
which is designed to encourage illegal sexual acts."

Norma : The institutional policy on homosexuality is "Don't Get Caught."
Otherwise you get a write-up and disciplinary action. They can't officiallycondone it, even though it's no longer against the law on the outside. There's
no such thing as rape in here, the way they play it up in books and movies.
"Homosexual ity in Prison!" They make it sound like prison invented it. If awoman cuts her hair, they figure she's turned gay. Sex is always the headliner.
Susan : I never felt threatened by it, nor did anyone ever express to me thatthey did . There were none of the horror stories you hear, or see in the movies.
Stories of women being raped, having brooms stuck up them, held down, forced
to do it. I never, never saw any intimidation to be involved sexually. I neversaw or experienced it ever happening except between two consenting adultwomen who both wanted to become sexually close ...
Juanita: Homosexuality in here isn't like the things you see on TV -S & M
trips, shower stall rapes, the horrible things. My feelings about it have reallychanged since I've been locked up. We can talk about it with each other. We canrespect each other. I have fears about it for myself, but hey, if that's what
you want to do, I'm not going to look down on it. I wish people wouldn't
look at it as dirty or nasty . If society d idn't look on things that way, it could
be accepted and not be a big thing .
Prisons frustrate every natural human need. The need for good food mustbe suppressed. The need for restful sleep must be allayed . The need for joyous work must be buried. The need for uncensored time with friends must be
ignored . And the need for sexual comfort must be denied . But it doesn't work .
To be deprived of life's sensory experiences is not to lose interest in them.
To the contrary .
Upon admission to the state prison , each woman who is a "known" orsuspected "homosexual " is labeled . During the time she is locked up, she will
carry an " H on her jacket " - her official administrative file where the label isrecorded . It is commonly estimated by "corrections" officials that between
15 and 20 percent of women prisoners are "true homosexuals. " This figure is
probably irrelevant , since many women are falsely labeled "homosexual" andother women who are lesbians go undetected .
Often , a new prisoner is labeled "homosexual" if her clothing or mannerisms appear "masculine." A woman can be coerced into confessing to be a"homosexual" if she is sufficiently harassed by the suspecting staff and/or
psychiatrist. Or rumors of a prisoner's "homosexuality," either verbal or written , may be passed along the chain of law enforcement agencies that process
her before she reaches the dead end of prison . There is often no formal verification of such rumors , and a woman - lesbian or not-may even be unawarethat she has an "H on her jacket." Nonetheless , while in prison, many women
will leam to love other women .
Susan : Probably more than 90 percent of the women here get involved inhomosexual relationships-actually making love with another woman-whether
just to try it once or twice, or to be involved in an ongoing way. Some women
never encountered homosexuality before they came to CIW. Others, whether
or not they were involved before CIW, learned about it in juvenile hall orcounty jails. And some have been lesbians for lifetimes.
4

Joann: I understand homosexuality now. I even respect it. Women becomemuch closer in here than they would on the streets. Women like me who havebeen involved with men their entire life are thrown off into this institution
with all these beautiful women-well, of course, prison breeds homosexuality .
If you need something, there's no man to call, so you get closer to womenthan you would on the streets. In here a friendship can turn to -love, eventhough outside it would just be a good, strong friendship. And after you getlove, sex is just another step. You don't have to say, "e'mon, let's try it ... "It just happens. I learned that I don't need men. A lot of women are withmen because it's all they know. If I do find a man to be with when I get out,
it will be strictly by my own choice.

One of the functions of prison is to cultivate submissiveness and dependency. Yet, for many women, being severed from any possibility of depend.
ence on men is the first step toward independence of mind. Often, the emergence of self accompanies newly discovered intimacy with other women. As
women learn to love other women, they may also learn to love themselves.
And a woman's growing regard for her own body is often the key to thistransition.
Sandra: My self-image was very low until four years ago when I came toprison . I've always felt self-conscious about my body, inadequate, and it distracted from my experience as a female. When I started menstruating, I thought
it was because I'd been masturbating, and that I'd done something wrong. And
there was so much stress placed on having large breasts and a tiny waist. I hadneither and I felt flawed and guilty, somehow to blame. If my self-image had
been better, I don't believe I would have kept on picking inferior men forpartners. Since I've been here with women, I've been able to accept myself,and I've found freedom. I don't feel guilt anymore . I've been with the same
woman all four years, and she has helped me overcome a lot of my guilt about
myself.

Prison. Home to the birth of a freedom. Freedom from guilt.
Roberta: I never really liked women until I came here, I guess because I
didn't like myself. We have so much time together, to really know each other.
It's really something to have friends who know everything about you, andstill like you. Until I came here, I was very ashamed of my body, but now
I'm pretty damned proud of it. And I know now that there's nothing wrong
with homosexuality. I'm a woman and now I'm proud of it. And I like to bewith a woman who is also proud of it. It's time we all·started listening to ourown souls, instead of to all the perverted rules other people make up for us.
For women like Sandra and Roberta, learning to accept and love themselvesis the great paradox of prison confmement.
Susan: A lot of women in here grew up always in subservient relationshipsin relationship to the families they were raised in, to their jobs, to the menin their life. Then all of a sudden they're ripped from all their connections,ripped off from their husbands, ripped off from their children, and placed inprison on their own. Alone. They don't have these people, these men, to lean
on or hide behind anymore. They're in interactions with people who are strangers. They don't know these other women . And they're forced to find out
who they are. There's a whole lot of women who come to incredible realizations about who they are as people, and where their strengths really are, untapped sources of strength within themselves . ..
5

Even if women go back to their men, the relationships will have to change
in a good way. A lot of times you get married when you're really young, andyou have a couple of kids, and pretty soon you're not sleeping together except maybe once a month, and the woman's not being satisfied. Well, here
she is in this situation where she gets into a relationship with another woman,and she finds out about her own sexual needs, her likes, her dislikes, because
she's experiencing it with another woman. Sure a lot of women go back to
men when they get out, but they have a stronger basis to struggle with them.

Female prisoners are often stereotyped as "stud broads" -women who fromphysical appearance might be easily mistaken for men. Yet probably less than
3 percent of the women I observed in the prison fit the "stud broad" stereotype-never more than twenty women in a population exceeding six hundred.
Contrary to the images in homophobic research and the media, "stud broads"
are no more likely than other women to be aggressive or hostile, and in fact
they are often unusually quiet and gentle. As a group, these women command 'respect from other prisoners, as though they were men, and they are often
the target of both positive and negative attention. Some "stud broads" recoil
from playing the "butch" in relationships, while others act out the role withconfidence and flair, making the most of their desirability to "femmes."
Susall: When you go around here, you see maybe four, five women in thewhole prison who are righteous stud broads. Not very many. But those women
really use sex to control other women. They perpetuate a lot of things that
I don't think are good, like "you do the laundry, you get me a cup of coffee."
They get these services by satisfying a woman sexually, which really trips meout.
I struggle against that kind of role playing because I don't think it's positive. But it's not the dominant thing that's happening. You find that the women who get involved with stud broads are usually ones that have a husband
and think it's to their benefit to be dominated. What's the role of women insociety? The women who are vulnerable to these kinds of relationships arethose whose whole life experience made them think they were inferior. They
need somebody to give them guidance for what they do in their life, somebody to tell them what to do. They need to be emotionally and sexually dependent.
What's real interesting to me is the difference in the sexual relationship ofa stud broad and a woman, and just two women. Two women satisfy eachother sexually. There's equal sharing of whatever's going on, whatever it is.
The stud broad sometimes won't allow herself to be touched. She is then notvulnerable, the way men are not supposed to be ... But not a lot of women
are into rol€ playing.
"Jailhouse Turn-Out" (JTO) is prison vernacular for a woman who has her
first sexual experience with another woman while she is incarcerated. Her unguarded enthusiasm and openness about her new sexual discoveries are often
offensive and painful to older lesbians who must live with the "H" stigma.
Kathryn: If you're unfortunate enough to have homosexual on your record,
your life is really miserable. I'm one of those with an "H on my jacket," so
I'm really considered a detriment to the prison society, even though I live
very quietly in here. And yet they'll let these jailhouse turn-outs come in here

6

and move in with their latest trick and carryon, conducting themselves in adisgraceful manner all over the campus. Yet someone who has been homosexual for years comes in here, and they're immediately set upon to change
to a "better way of life."
They told me if I was ever caught in my room with a woman, I'd go to
rack (solitary deprivation). It would go with me to the board and hold up
my (release) date. I'm not in here for being a lesbian, but you'd think I was
because of the way they carried on about it when I went to the board formy time. They didn't talk to me at all about my crime, which involved agreat deal of money. They talked to me about my homosexuality. I really
don't think they understand about love. They don't understand two people
just loving each other. It has to be something nasty, and it has to be physical.
All love isn't physical.
Nanna: Before coming here I had talked with myself and admitted theentire truth about being a woman who loves women, and in doing so I no
longer felt guilty or wrong. But this place is full of phonies trying to imitatehomosexuals. If I was younger, they would make me feel ashamed of being
what I am. I've seen so many one-sided affairs, getting someone involved withthem, really in love, then dropping that person to move on to another.
Just a small percentage of women enter this place as real sure-enough lesbians. The rest are playing a game, and I can't prostitute myself or them. I
don't need sex to the point where I just gotta have a woman . A relationshiphas to be on a high plane before I can enjoy the sex side of it. It's hard tofind someone to hit it off with so you can have a happy relationship. It's like
it is anywhere when you're new and alone. You don't just walk into a newsituation and find someone you can love and live with. I've found out that
there are lots of things to do with energy, and sex is just one of them.
Being "butch" in here requires that I think twice on every word and actionthat could possibly have any significance regarding another woman. Inmatesand staff pick up real quick on it if I talk to the same woman too often . Lest
it be overheard, I can't say out loud that I "love" someone. They try to makeyou feel base and degraded, and I know I'm neither.
These women who come in here and pretend to be butches are damned
repulsive to me. If you know who and what you are, you don't need to signify. I know that as a woman I can offer a fuller life to another woman thana man can, for the simple reason I can understand her. If you really care forsomebody, you might want to just touch them. And men don't seem to know
how to do that. With a woman neither of us needs to pretend or hold backour desires. We can be exactly what we are-two women experiencing deep,
heartfelt and soul-shaking emotions. There's so much more to homosexual
love than sex.
When I remember my love, I think of intimate conversations; two heads
bent together studying a small seashell; lying in bed late on Sundays with thecoffee pot, TV and Sunday paper; dressing up together and stepping out now
and then, knowing we made a striking pair and laughing at befuddled males;
walking in the house after a long work day with contentment flooding over
the tension and the tiredness; not being able to afford a whole dozen red roses,
so I bought just one, and she cried.

Lobotomies, electroshock therapy, aversion therapy and chemotherapy have7

often been employed as "cures" for "homosexuals" in state ami federal prisons.
Such extreme physical torture in the name of "treatment" for homosexuality
is currently going out of fashion, especially in women's institutions. Concerned
activists and their (few) allies among mental health professionals have hadsome success in getting the courts to prohibit such forms of "cruel and unusual
punishment." It is only slightly reassuring to know that psychosurgery, forexample, cannot legally be performed without the "informed consent" of the"patient"/prisoner. However, psychological coercion is still a primary methodof controlling "undesirable" behavior. And just as the tradition in this country's
prisons was to segregate African-Americans, so have "homosexuals" often been
separated from the other prisoners. It is a tradition, in most societies, to isolate
those who are feared.
Annie: When I was at the Los Angeles County Jail they had a "Daddy Tank"
where they put all the women they think are lesbians in the same cell block.
They crowd two or three women into cells built for one. Women in the Daddy
Tank can't have contact with any of the other women in the jail, can't go anywhere without an escort, have to sit in the back row if there's a movie. All
the Daddy Tank women are assigned to the laundry night shift. You're totallyostracized, night and day. And you always have to be careful to not have any
physical contact with each other, not even holding hands.
I figured that if these nazis are so opposed to us, we must be okay. How
can you respect the opinions of people who are so uptight and cruel, always
hassling, accusing, talking obscene, looking for new ways to punish you, tak·ing your good time, putting you in solitary-the whole bit. It was pretty ob·
vious to me that the guards in that jail were the ones who were really sick.
They said I was sick because I wanted to be close to my friend, and since she
was the one person who I knew really cared about me in there, it just didn't
make any sense. I admit I had my own funny ideas about homosexuals before
I went to jail that first time. I had to learn the hard way that it's not homo·sexuals who are sick and hung up around sex; it's the ignorant people who
are out to get them.
Nonetheless, "staff" is responsible for deciding whether and when to punish
a woman for engaging in "Physical Contact," the official sign that "homosexuality" might be lurking just around the corner.
Rosanna: Homosexuality is technically against all the rules, and oral sex
will get you three years tacked onto your time. But any PC-physical contactcan be considered homosexual by the staff. I'd been close to the same partner
for over a year before they busted us one day for being in a "compromising"position. We were sitting on the steps talking, with our arms on each other's
shoulders. If they'd been on the ball, they could have caught us long ago in areal compromising situation. They're lazy about it, at least some of them someof the time. It's like they wait 'til they're in a bad mood, and then they startbusting everybody. We touch each othe all the time, all of us. It's nice. But
it's an easy thing for them to catch somebody in a PC, and it's a handy threat
for them to always be holding over our heads.
Each time a prison rule is broken by one or more prisoners, the staff is
supposed to write up a report. A "write-up" is equivalent to police arrest, anddepending on the seriousness of the "crime," it is considered either a misde·meanor or a prison felony. Physical Contact in prison is a felony action . If awoman is written up, her punishment will be determined at a disciplinary8

hearing.
There are many rules within a prison and there are many prisoners. It is
not possible for the harried staff to observe and write up every rule infraction .
Write-ups are made arbitrarily and erratically.
A woman who is written up for Physical Contact may simply be scolded
and warned that the next time she will be severely punished. She may beordered to avoid all contact with her close friend. She may be sent to solitaryconfmement, i.e., rack. She may be required to be "counseled" by a chaplainor psychologist, who may attempt to "help" her understand her "sinfulness"or her "sickness," whether or not she wishes to be "saved" or "cured." To
help women overcome their "wickedness" or "deviance," some of these male"counselors" may offer "sex therapy." The most serious threat or punishment
is loss of good time or time added to the original sentence.
Susan: Either you throw abandon to the wind and hope you don't getcaught-you never know when the pig's gonna walk down the hall and makea surprise check-or you have a pinner. A pinner is somebody who sits out
in the hall, and when the cop starts walking down the hall, she whistles or
gives some other high sign that tells you you have about 20 seconds to get up
and be presentable. Which means you're never completely naked, you're neverable to just relax in each other's arms, to get completely involved in making
love. There is always the tension involved. But people manage in spite of it.
Women are able to comfort each other emotionally and physically. To holdeach other, to touch and be gentle and listen and care. To love each other. In
a prison situation that is a very beautiful thing.
Everybody knows what a relationship is, and sex is not the primary partof any relationship, and it isn't in prison either. Sex is a very important partof a relationship-when all the barriers are gone, and you're really exposed toanother person. But what is more primary is the friendship, how you sharedealing with the world. Somebody to face this madness with.
Trust and loyalty between close friends can be severely tested by the constant threat and danger which accompany intimacy inside prison . However,the challenges a woman faces in forming bonds with other women, both inand out of prison, can also be strengthening. Nowadays, when a woman isreleased from prison, there is a women's community that awaits her.
Gino: Ten years ago I was thrown in jail three times for wearing "men's"
clothes. Now I wear what I want and no one's busting me for it, and I attribute the change to women on the streets who have been fighting for women's
rights, for lesbian rights. It was real hard when I first came out of prison, it's
always real hard. But getting in touch with the women's movement has madea big difference to me, and I'm so happy it's come about. Job resources, healthcare, women's coffeehouses-there was never anyplace like that before. Now
there's a whole community. I used to have to sneak around to be a lesbian,and it was just like being in prison. Now I can be a lesbian and still deal withmen at work, and it's great to be able to do that. Equal rights means that now
I can get a job working with machinery, working with and beside men, andit's okay. I know we've got a long way to go, and whether you're a convict
or a free sister, we've all got our work cut out for us. But the war's on, so
fasten your seat belts.

9Karlene's Journal: Spring 1973
Yesterday, I was called to an urgent meeting with the warden and three ofher highest ranking subordinates. Staff had replJrted to them that I've been
observed kissing women (prisoners) who greet my arrivals at the institution,and the nervous administrators wondered if I realize the seriousness of such
behavior. I tried to explain that where I come from kisses and embraces arehealthy and natural exchanges of affection, but they reminded me of the institution 's rules and warned me to use better judgment in the future.
People die from not being loved, and from not loving, and unloved andunloving people become dead social weight long before they meet the grave.
When such people are in positions of power, they endanger our lives and our
freedoms. Moral responsibility demands that we protect ourselves against themand their ideas. As I listened to the prison authorities reprimand me, I felt
sad for them. I could feel no love from them, only fear. And I rejoiced in myheart for the hundreds of women I had known in their prison who would
never be so firmly imprisoned as the keepers of the keys.

10

Barbara Macdonald

Look Me in the Eye
Cynthia and I decided to go on the March to Take Back the Night. It
wasn't a decision we carne to easily . The notice hung on the refrigerator door
for weeks. Cynthia mentioned it from time to time and I had a vague feelingof dragging my feet, of never really saying I wanted to go but never saying I
didn't. So when the evening carne and we were having dinner, I knew that I
had better decide how I did feel about marching or I was going to have to getup from the table, put on my coat, and go with her.
Finally, I said I .didn't think the march was the right method to use forwhat women wanted to accomplish. "I agree with Melanie Kaye ," * I said.
"Men don't take us seriously because they don't have to. Men don't take usseriously because they aren't physically afraid of us. Men rape women because
they can.""But, Barbara, the only way to draw attention to what is happening is for
women, by the thousands , to get out there in the streets and shout to theworld, 'We won't put up with this violence any longer.' ''"How will shouting that you won't put up with it any longer change anything? I agree with Kaye. Men rape because they can. To go out into the streetsto say that we are being raped and murdered-what does that accomplish?"
For the first time it occurred to me to ask myself and to put the question toCynthia: ''What is the purpose of the march? What do we hope the march willdo?"
Cynthia reached for Equal Times and read me her answer. "Because thenight is our time of greatest fear, a time when many women are confmed totheir homes for fear of attack on the street, we march at night to say together,
we will fight our fear, we will take back the night.""But Cynthia, aren't the women just bluffmg? What do we mean fight our
fear? A woman has to be out of her mind or plain stupid not to be scared todeath on the street at night. And what do we mean take back the night? We'rein no position to take back anything. You can't demand without power. I suspect the march is based on some hope that society doesn't really know thefacts about violence against women and that when society has the facts it willcorrect the wrong. You know they won't. The facts are evident all around us .
Everybody knows that women are not safe because of men 's violence, and telling them again won't change anything. More than that, I think that to marchthrough the streets saying that you are being murdered and raped and that you
aren't safe except oil one night in the year with several thousand women toprotect you is to invite more violence. Since we have no power- all the marchers
are really doing is pleading for mercy."
I always try to win an argument by throwing in a lot of words and flailingmy arms around, but Cynthia didn't raise her fork or her voice. "Barbara,
everything women do invites violence. We can't let others go out and not standwith them, and we need numbers, especially because it's going to rain tonight.
"Women and Violence," Sinister Wisdom 9 (Spring 1979)11

Besides, you need the exercise ." Cynthia's last thrust was to remind me thatneither of us had really walked since we got back from the summer. 1 agreed
I needed the exercise , so we put on our rain gear and headed for the subway .
By the time we arrived at Kenmore Square I was into the spirit of the thing,
and as we lined up , six in a row, I recalled some of Cynthia's earlier arguments
for coming. "Maybe just because it's good for the women who are there isreason enough for going, even if it doesn't accomplish anything else ," and I
found myself silently agreeing that it was reason enough.
Women were dressed in somber colors-parkas, capes, and slickers becauseof the rain . Kenmore Square was dark except for a few lights from the closed
shops reflected on Commonwealth Avenue's dark wet pavement. We were
lined up along the edge of the center green so as not to block traffic while
we waited for the march to begin.
Monitors carrying flashlights, dressed in bright yellow slickers and hoods,
moved like monks down dark corridors, back and forth along the lines, giving
instructions , advising us about how long the wait would be , reminding us towatch out for the curb when we stepped into the street as we would be marching in close ranks and unable to see the curb ahead . One of the marshals who
had been assigned to our ranks and who was to march with us throughout themarch blew her whistle to give us our instructions : to keep our ranks closed;
if men tried to enter our ranks, to say nothing, but to join arms and partition
him out to the side so that he could not enter. She cautioned us , "Try not
to touch the men because that incites them."
So we are six abreast, Cynthia on the outside, and we are waiting to startwhen it occurs to me that there just might be a rough encounter. I don't know
why I did it , maybe some of the old dyke left over in me from the '30s, but
anyway , I thought , having lived twenty years longer , I had probably seen a lot
more fracases than Cynthia had, so as we milled around in the dark impatiently
waiting , I moved over to the outside. Cynthia was unaware for a few moments,
then realized the switch , laughed and took her place back.
Then a man walked by with leaflets telling us that the real oppressor was
not men but capitalism, and I was about to ask him what the hell he thought
the difference was when I remembered our instructions and feeling like a race
horse waiting at the gate, I snorted, stamped my feet and waited.
I felt the exhilaration, the oneness with the women around me, the senseof at last doing something instead of passively grinding my teeth with anger,
as I do every morning when I pick up the Globe to see what woman was murdered the night before. I felt the energy of the Wanderground , the convictionthat the war was real and the Day would come.
I don 't know exactly when I sensed that something was wrong and noticed
that Cynthia was no longer beside me but a few feet away where the monitor
was talking to her. I joined them. At first the conversation was not clear tome, and I glanced at Cynthia's face for some clue . There was none. The monitor was at first evasive and then chose her words with care, "If you think you
can't keep up , you should go to the head of the march." Gradually , I took in ,like a series of blows, what the situation was, that the monitor had thoughtthat because my hair is grey, because I am Sixty-five and because I look sixtyfive , I might be unable to keep up; that her concern was that I might, if slower,
leave a gap between the ranks in which men might try to enter; and that she
could not say this to me . I stepped directly in front of the monitor for eye12

to-eye contact to force her to talk to me instead of about me , saying only to
Cynthia, "She means me , Cynthia." I faced the monitor with rage. "You have
got to be kidding; I don't believe this." My fists were clenched at the injusticeas I felt the all too familiar wave of helplessness and fury engulf me . Then, in 'the glow of the flashlight , I saw the monitor's face and heard her words of
discomfort and confusion. She said that she was sorry , that she had not known
what to do, whether to say anything to me or not, and fmally she had asked
others if she should. She wanted to apologize. I said it was all right but it
wasn't all right. Sometimes I wonder if it will ever be all right.
She went back to her monitoring and I tried to go back to where I had
been in my head before the encounter. Back to the exhilaration, back when
I was feeling and remembering Cynthia's words, "If the march doesn't accomplish anything else , it is good for the women doing it." But there was no way
back. I took my place beside Cynthia but I knew that this march could not
be good for me . The monitor came back to me a second time , she wanted toapologize again, she explained that she had not known what to do. I assured
her I understood that she had not known what to do. For at that moment, I
did not know, myself, what I thought she should have done.
We continued to wait in the darkness but nothing was the same. I felt theold caution I used to feel entering a bar, not knowing whether or not it wasa men's-only bar- the dread of being told I did not belong there. With thesame furtiveness , I now glanced at the women around me, at the six womenin the rank ahead of me . We had been laughing together earlier at the man
who wanted to convince us that capitalism was our oppressor; at least, I had
thought we were laughing together-now I wondered. I looked at the womenin the row behind me . I wondered how I looked to them . My short stature,
my grey hair, my wrinkled face-I wondered how sixty-five years looked tothem. And finally I iooked at the four other women who were to walk besideme. I wondered how they felt about being with me. I wondered if I shouldtake the ann of the woman next to me and tried to remember the instructions,but all I could recall was my shock and shame, hearing the monitor's words,"If you can't keep up, go to the head of the march," hearing once more that
I was a problem and did not fit. All my life in a man's world, I was a problem because I was a woman; now I'm a problem in a woman's world because
I'm a sixty-five-year-old woman. Hearing once more that I was not in the rightplace and thinking, "If not here, where?"
Finally, we heard the signal to start and' with hesitancy I took the ann of
the woman next to me. I wondered if she had some idea that I needed her
support. God knows I needed hers and everybody else's , but not for walking;my rage alone would have carried me twenty miles and a foot off the pavement.
The march was a strange scene from where I was. We passed through bl ocksof dark apartment houses where only scattered lights indicated anyone washome . It felt more like marching thrQugh an empty city in which only a few
people were left. In front of many of the apartment buildings, four or fivemen stood outside together and the women could be seen at the windows
above, some waving, some not.
I chanted with the rest:
We have the power
We have the right
The streets are ours
And we'll prove it tonight13

But I heard the lie in my own voice .
Weare angry, proud and strong
Freedom is our righteous song.
I studied the wet pavement under my feet and tried to get some hold on
what had happened. I wondered how to feel proud and strong when womenaround me were telling me I was weak. I wondered how I looked to otherpeople, and I kept feeling my own muscles and reassuring myself, "Barbara,
you don't feel very weak to me." I wondered what Cynthia was feeling, andI wondered if I would ever have the confidence to make love to her again.
At one point, hating myself and the women around me , I found myself
wishing some of the grinning men on the curb would start something so I
could put my fist in somebody's face. I shouted :Puerto Rican , Black and WhiteSame struggle , same fightand I wondered where I came in . I was tired of young women who could notlook me in the eye , of the monitor who could talk about me but not to me.
I was tired and distrustful of a woman's movement that seemed to feel everyone's oppression but mine, and I wondered why in hell I was there.
Sometimes as we were marching, I would look at some woman leaning outof her apartment window and I would think, ''Why don't you get some guts
and come on out and join us? " But then I would think, "Don't come out if
you're over sixty; the greeting you get will send you right back in again."
We flnished the march and hung around Blackstone Park for awhile. Somewoman with a tape recorder. for New England Today, a radio program, stopped
and asked if Cynthia and I would comment on the march. I said that I wishedmore women had come out of their houses, but in the back of my mind I waswondering, ''Why did this woman ask me? Does she want the Older Woman's
Viewpoint?" Finally, we took the subway home.
But I was left with the experience-with the rage that had no place to go.
I could see no way to put the anger on the monitor , and I fought not to put
it on my aging body . I recalled the monitor's face above her flashlight, sincere
in her discomfort and apology-that she "had not known what to do ." I tried
to look at it from where she was. What could she do? The ranks were expected
to stay close together in order that men could not enter. There might be a lotof women who could not keep up. And how could she know whether they
could or not without asking? And why should I fmd her assfurlption that I
might not be able to keep up so painful?
Repeatedly, I told myself that there would be nothing wrong with being
physically weak. Lots o~ people are. If it does not happen to pe true of me
now, it will be true of me soon. If I have pride in my strength now, it is false
pride and if I feel shame in my lack of strength later, I will have let someone
else in my head for the rest of my life.
I would go over it all again in my mind . The monitors were looking for
women who would march slower, I told myself, and I looked sixty-flve andthey picked me. But why me? Out of flve thousand women there must havebeen thirty about to come down with the flu , flfty suffering from a hangover,
and at least a hundred who were going to get a blister on their heel before
the march was over. So why me? If you are a woman about to come downwith the flu or your head is bursting with a hangover, you will either decide
not to march to have sense enough to quit. Why can't it also be assumed that14

•
if a sixty-five-year-old woman doesn't feel up to a march , she won't choose;
to march? I still come to only one conclusion: the monitor didn't pick meout because I looked weak; she picked me out because she believes that a
sixty-five-year-old woman lacks judgment about what she can do. She thought
I did not perceive the situation and that I did not know what I was doing.
We had chanted:
Our bodies, our lives
Our right to decide.
Did she think I had no right to decide?
Sixty-five is older-that's true. Sixty-five may be slower-that's also true.
But who should know more about what sixty-five can do than the woman
who is living it? All our lives we look over a situation and decide whether or
not to participate according to our ability. From six to ninety-six, we measure
our strength and our agility for the situation at hand. Why did the monitor
assume that I had suddenly lost that ability at sixty-five?
One may reply to this that it is well known that very old people lack judgment. I'm not willing to accept even that general statement. Lots of people
lack judgment-drunk people, psychotic people, plain happy excited peoplebut old and lacking judgment don't go together-old and cautious sometimes
do. When I was young, it seemed like everybody over thirty thought, "Theyoung lack judgment." Now I'm sixty-five, and the women in their thirties
think I lack judgment, and I am not about to go through that round for asecond time without examining very carefully this movement that is rejectingme.
As I thought about it, I could see that the women's movement, the second
wave, has just come of age; she is barely twenty-one. She is made up largelyof young women in their twenties and thirties who are concerned with their
physical strength as well as their political strength. And well they should be.
For the generations of women who came before them were considered bymen to be weak (despite considerable evidence to the contrary), and women,
as a result, viewed themselves as weak, thus limiting the development of theirbodies even more. Physical weakness, all too soon, was equated with being
mentally inferior and women were segregated out of the mainstream of power,
put on a pedestal or at the head of the line, where the ''weaker. sex" was ineven a greater position of vulnerability.
But the young women who make up the movement today are physicallystronger and want to feel their physical strength. They are jogging, runningin marathons, working out in gyms to build up muscle, practicing karate andjudo, and, it seems, the young women are beginning to worry about what to
do with other women they consider ''weak.'' And again the equation is quickly
made that physically weaker is mentally weaker, and the next thought is toseparate them out. (put them at the front of the line.)
I could see that, in another setting, I might not have felt the humiliation
and, later, the fear so acutely. But this march was a march to say, "We arestrong and we will not be victimized by men." So the message of the younger
woman, ''You are older and weak," I could only hear as, "You make us vulnerable by your weakness. You are the weak link in our strong chain, so go
to the front of the line."
Later, as I began to internalize the message and to hear it from within instead of from without , my fear grew. I saw that I lived in an unsafe world as
15

all women do. Male violence is everywhere. But at a time when young womenare building up physical strength to combat the violence, I am growing older
and will be growing weaker. On a dark street, hearing footsteps behind me, I
will be less able to run, less able to ward off a weapon or a fist, and less able
to call out and be heard. My fear of such a scene paralyzed me.
Alone, I examined my predicament. As I took in the inevitability of mybecoming less and less able to protect myself, all I could feel was a kind ofhopelessness and panic. But then I did what I have always done in my life
when I had to face some given, some painful reality that cannot be changed,that will not go away, that must be lived with in some way. And I thought,''Then I will yield to this fear. If it is something that must be, then ,it must
be and I will not fight what I know I cannot win with." But as the panic
began to subside, it dawned on me that men have always been stronger thanI was. TIlis was no new experience that was going to come with aging. Men
were stronger than I was when I was in my twenties and in my thirties andin my forties, and it would never have occurred to me in those years to giveup without a fight. I realized that my feelings of shame grew out of the fearthat I would not fIght-that I would betray myself. In place of the fear cameold primitive knowledge, animal knowledge. The knowledge of the animal who
lives her life out; who, blind with age, will smell and feel her way to the endof life. Who, old and blind, with her back to the wall, will face the enemy,bare her teeth and inflict whatever wound she can on animal or man, twice
her size, who thinks he has come upon some easy prey. As long as she has
strength left, she will not feed the enemy; not one more meal from her flesh
will she give to strengthen him.
Thus I healed myself and could feel whole again, connected to my aging
body, wanting to live my life out in partnership with it, without feelings ofhumiliation because of its difference, and without the fear that I would sowant to disclaim it that I would fail to protect it.
Although much of what happened to me in the march is resolved for me,
I am still angry at the ageism in the women's movement. I am angry at what
it does to me and at what it must be doing to many other women of my age .
It also makes me distrustful of the movement itself, as it seems to me thatsuch ageism, entrenched in the minds of the women of this second wave, must
be some indication of the degree to which we have all internalized male values.
And then I began to wonder: Where are the Susan B. Anthonys, the Carrie
Nations, the Pankhursts today? These post-menopausal women were marching
all over the place a hundred years ago, and no one was asking them if they
could keep up. It was then I realized that this is probably the first time inhistory that the mass of rebelling angry women are so young. In the first wave
in this country and in England, angry women in mid-life and older were marching and visible. In the photographs in Emmeline Pankhurst's My Own Story,
I see older women marching with younger women, and older women weresmashing windows and setting fires all over London, and women in mid-lifeand older were going to prison and going on hunger strikes and being forcefed.
Emmeline Pankhurst was fifty-nine when she marched to King's Gate andwas arrested. Six years earlier she describes the evening the deputation marchedwith their petition to the prime minister:
Then our deputation set forth. Accompanying me as leader were two
16highly respectable women of advanced years, Mrs. Saul Solomon, whose
husband had been the Prime Minister of the Cape, and Miss Neligan , oneof the foremost of the pioneer educators of England. We three and fiveother women were preceded by Miss Elaine Howey, who , riding fast went
on horseback to announce our coming.
Thus I suspect it would have been unheard of in the first wave to stop an
older woman in a march and question her about whether she could keep up.
It is probably evidence of our growth and increasing strength that for the
first time younger women make up the mass of the second wave. Made possible
for the first time because young women are more knowledgeable than they
were a hundred years ago, better read and with more literature to read thanever before, and freer because the younger woman of today is not caught inenforced heterosexual coupling until much later in her life and may, in fact,
not choose heterosexuality. A hundred years ago, much of the radical feminist
political action was probably not visible to most young women, who were indomestic servitude or were already burdened with unwanted pregnancies andsmall children, and unable to read and with no way out. This increased visibilityof young women is certainly due in part to the efforts of the older women of
the first wave.
But the primary reason that the second wave is made up of ypung womenis that the second wave rose out of a different time in patriarchal history- it
rose out of a time of a patriarchally supported white middle-class youth culture.
This important difference in the two waves is not one that I can dismiss lightly
with the popular observation that' emphasis on youth neglects an older population. That is to trivialize what has been taking place since the first wave andthe development of the youth culture . It does not make clear to me what happened to me in the Boston march; it does not explain to me why I do nothave eye-to-eye contact with younger women as I enter my mid-sixties, and it
does not explain to me what happened to the older feminist activists who
were such an important part of our earlier history.
In the first wave , when the angry older women were marching, most women
were slaves to their husbands, as were his children whom he could put to workin factories and mines and into domestic servitude as soon as they were strong
enough. The mother had no real power over her life and no real power overthe lives of her children. But it was profitable for the father to give the motherauthority over the children . In his absence, she represented his authority andkept the children in subjection . Frequently she was beaten by her husband forher children's insubordination, and she in turn beat the children to keep themin line.
But with the advent of child labor laws and children's rights, the father lost
power over his children. Out from under the father's tyranny , the children
were a burden and an expense instead of a source of income , and they became
the woman's problem. The mother still had the care of the children, but now
she had to try to control them without the father 's power. Once the father
had said to the mother, "I want them fed; feed them. I want them clothed
for the workplace; clothe them. I want them God-fearing and industrious ;teach them. I want them obedient ; beat them." But now it was not in thefather's interest to control the children , and he did not transfer his power tothe mother; instead , she was left powerless to protect herself from their battering demands. The children out from under the tyranny of the father's rule17

w~r~ free in their own way to tyrannize the powerless mother . Now it was thechildren. who borrowed power from the father , who were saying to her, "Feedme. clothe me. Buy me everything. The fathers say you must." And indeed
the fathers are saying clearly , "The children must have everything. If you area good mother , your children's laundry will be Downy soft and perfumed.
You will tempt your children's appetites and feel pride to hear them demand,'More sausages , Mom.' You will send them out in white clothes to play in the
mud to prove that you know how to wash their clothes cleaner than the woman next door. You will make sure the environment your children live in isscrubbed , polished , sanitized and odorless . You will wipe their noses and bottoms with the softest tissue in the world, all the time rubbing your hands inlotion so your callouses and red cracks won't feel rough on your children's
soft skin."It seems to me that never in such a few years has the patriarchy been able
to develop a new elite leisure class of consumers and a slave class to serve
them-an elite class that stays out of the job market and does not threaten
the father 's job , but consumes endlessly to ensure his job .
A hundred years ago" the mother's value to the Fathers was that she raised
God-fearing industrious children who could bring income into the family until
they left the home. Now the mother's value to the Fathers is that she raises
children to expect the best, to be good consumers, to remain as children as
long as possible and out of the job market , and she hopes that society willvalue her for how well she serves them. The elitism of the children is still exploi,tation of the children. Now , instead of the exploitation by the single father,
it is the exploitation by the collective Fathers, But the woman is still slave,and now she has two masters to serve .
The evidence is iJ,11 around us that youth is bonded with the patriarchy inthe enslavement of the older woman. There would, in fact, be no youth culture
without the powerless older woman. There can be no leisure elite consumingclass unless it is off the back of someone. The older woman is who the younger
women are better than-who they are more powerful than and who is compelled
to serve them. This is not true of men; older men still have power, power tobe president , power to be Walter Cronkite, and power to marry younger women.
Men are not the se(vants of youth; older women are .
, The lines between the powerfui and the powerless have always had to bevery clearly drawh ,- and nowhere is this more evident than in the clothes ofmen , the young , and women. The clothes of the young woman are designed
to ; at least, give ,the illusion of power and freedom, and the clothes of theolder woman are designed to make her look sexless, dowdy, and separated
from the rest of society . Little boys and young men for high occasions dress
fashionably like older men, in suit and vest, but no young woman dresses 'fashionably by imitating the dress of older women.
It becomes more clear that the present attitude of women in their twenties
and thirties has' been shaped since childhood by patriarchy to view the older
woman as powerless, less important than the fathers and the children, andthere to serve them both; and like all who serve, the older woman soon becomes invisible.
.
From the back of the house to the front of the march is not that differentboth' result in' invisibility. In a march of five thousand women, all you have to
do is' separate out the women in their sixties; and unless the observer happens18

to see the first few lines of the march, she watches five thousand women goby and is left with the impression that there is not a sixty-year-old woman
among them.
I watched the 80 Women to Watch in the 80's go by in Ms . magazine lastmonth, and I learned that there are only six women in their fifties worth
watching and only one woman in her sixties worth watching. That's invisibility .
I find the whole line-up of women to watch in the 80's very patriarchal ,and I would prefer not to see it at all. But worse, Ms. magazine asked older
women to make the selection, a selection that excluded them . That's one way
to get permission to oppress-ask the older woman, not to be co-equal, but
to step aside for the younger woman. Sheila Tobias stepped aside by saying,"Established women have the responsibility to boost others. One reason thefirst wave of feminism died out is that it failed to create new leaders."
To me something in her statement smacks of maternal self-sacrifice andinvisibility: the young women asked Tobias to make herself invisible and she
made herself invisible. Nor do I think that the first wave of feminism diedbecause the women failed to create new leadership. I think it died because
the women decided to put their own needs aside to help the good old boys
win a war; and when they got ready to take up the struggle again, they discovered they were slave to two masters.
Given the nature of the question put to Tobias, it is not surprising that
she responded in patriarchal language: the word boost suggests help on "theway up," someone on the bottom boosting another to a higher level. Suchan image conjures up the possibility that the one being boosted may well have
her foot on the booster. Such a word seems a long way from the beginningsof this second wave that consciously avoided hierarchical structure.
I hurt that the committee who selected the eighty women to watch tellsme that I am invisible, that no sixty-five-year-old woman is still in process
and worth watching; but they give no better message to the women pictured
there in their forties, as it must be plain to them that they will be invisible
in ten years, in their fifties and sixties.
Several months have gone by since Cynthia and I went to the Boston march ,and I only begin to see how I came to be there at sixty-five in this particulartime in our history and how the monitor came to be there. I only begin to
see who we both are and how men are still defining our feelings about ourselves and each other.
.

19

I WANT MY ACCENT BACK
Halloween , October 31, 1979
for Cindy, my sister, and for Cher'rie Moraga Lawrence, also my sister

it is cold in Rhode Island today . Here San Francisco blooms blueand gold/sunlight burns
it is the last day of the old year . tonight
we share the Feast of the Dead begin the silence the move into dark
toward winter light.
I have been dressed in black for days
I am finally getting ready to mournmy difference from you.
ii

it turned out so dry here , cindy. beached
on a clay that slips with my own wetness i deludedin the movement i moved
away and away and away. queer
how the beach kept receding queer
how there was never a way to holdon to the changes
all around me
and nevera name that would make sense queeriii

my first class
way of being
had no accidents. it never fit me before, so now that I know how to say
workingclass it don't fit no better. and the word "token," like a light bulb
peeling apart from its center strips lonely white glare from lonely whiteglare until
only a thintungsten wire remains.
I can't lie to you.
we laughed together too many times; plotted
escape too trustingly took too many baths in the sameused water.
Seventeen years
we shared a room
though I never saw you naked .
there is no escape . I am wired to you like soundputting on airs
is impossible

20

iv
Radcliffe College, Class of 1976, magna cum laude.
Stanford University, graduate studies.
currently pursuing PhD at California. Publications.
I never knew we had an accent.
My rust week of college, sitting on the floor
with Andover and Exeter and Taft,stoned, I said,"nawh wida than a bon doah."
Andover turns to me, be
mused: "Whatis a 'bon doah'? A musical instrument ...?" I laugh nervously ...casually"you know, the doa of a bon." Andover laughs: a barn door. A good natured
hearty chuckle the others join in pahk the cah in havad yahd the conversation
turns
by 9:00 the next morning my accent disappeared. except
when I talk too fast, or to you
my soft r's my dull t's my idears
are in visib Ie I clip
my speech

and when I have tried to imitate a New England accent
my tongue stumbles: it comes out Southern or British.
in my roomnights trying to get it backface burning girlhelp me goddam it help me get it righttalk to me . talk to me.
talk to me .

I have satv
get your nose out of that book. get some fresh air.
what happens in those books is not the reality. Just because you readabout it doesn't mean it's so . Your father and I have been around
longer than you have, don't be so smart.
my nose is stuck in this book. It seems to be some kind of
epoxy I tug and tug there's blood on the pages I can't read the writing anymore
my whole face is flattened into white paper
print on me.
vidyke my cousin Sally's a dyke they locked her up in McClean's
where those Harvard doctors practice to learn to be mental doctors
day after day she slashed at her hands with knives
she lived with a woman before that
auntie Beulah says, she's lazy, wants a free ride gram went to see her anyway
my mother said, 'don't you go
all the way to becoming a man with this women's lib stuff' and inever went
to see her because i had heard that she was jealous
i went to college
21

before they locked her up, I made several of my own
slashes with a kitchen knife fourneat slices, and later, a long jagged one.
I told the Harvard doctors
I got caught
in a machine. They neverpressed it.
Later, I would dream that they had and locked us up next door to each other
Sally and me
when I'm tense or angry now, my left hand still stings, turns red at the scar.
would we have held each other stopped bleeding
would we wash our handsof love would we talk to each othervii
there's no back to go to.
backed up backed in backed down backed aroundI never belonged.
This amnesia of place is like a deaththirst once you move away it turns out
so different so queer
the blending in had seemed easy, bleaching
my teeth my freckles the big black holes in mynightmares that didn 't keep up with the rest of me
but you lookjust like them talklike them soften soften a working
girl femme white in whiteface will it cover the bad skin?
well rna I'll never be a gentleman and a scholar
when i saw that woman that stone butch i wanted to run to her and hide in her
no i said to my lover
she doesn 't offend me
she don't.
my father cried at graduatjon_
i haven't gone all the way
sink or swim, they said the Harvard board of overseers is giving you thisopportunity your college board scores indicate
equality
last year they offered me a job making more than both my parents put together
she used to lock me out of the house soI'dget mynose out of that book
fresh airwhen I have a kid I'll never treat her like this, and we were never more
fierce, cindy, than vowing this, small fists curled blue eyes matched, locked
just let me go just let me go just let me go just let me goonce you move away
where .
once you move away
passing_
at least I can type_or wait tables.

22

think you're too good for us here, now, huh sue?
when are you coming back this way? cindy.
i will be your maid of honor. don't do it oh don't don't please be different
you'l/ get caught there
vii
there is rach in this place we will talk we will talkthere is danger in this place.
dear cher'rie you write of your own life , a brown girl gone white gonebrown , brown :"The danger lies in ranking the oppressions. The danger
lies in failing to acknowledge
the specificity of the oppression."*for years I have lived with the inexactness of oppression
among labels simple analyses
but I never knew I had an accent.
I want to say this so clearly:
it was annihilation I feared. There is nothing in the words
working class that tastes of this confusion this clear Rhode Island winterlight this sister now hold me touch me I'm done with talking hold me
nothing in the words to break this clear-Susan Leigh Star
*from "La Guera" by Cher'rie Moraga Lawrence23Sandy Covahey

On the Edge of the Fringe
I wrote this journal four years ago. The physical act of writing helped mesurvive a major crisis of existence and direction. I've chosen to share it because
I think it may have value for other lesbians (particularly those who are survivorsof the "great lesbian wars"). I've edited the journal twice. Both times I've
tried to resist the temptation to alter the contents and change meanings. I've
tried to edit only for clarification, continuity, and to whittle down its considerable length. I'm writing this introduction to provide some backgroundinformation and fill in some of the gaps that occur when you are writing foryourself and not for an audience.
I became involved in the Women's Liberation Movement early in 1969.
The anti-lesbianism with the Women's Movement of that time has been well
documented , so I won't go into my specific experiences, which were similar
to those of lesbian feminists all over the country. My main problem was finding other lesbians who were interested in feminism. I tried hard to start alesbian group. Eventually, enough of us found each other to form our owngroup. For the most part , this was a very exciting time.
By 1971-72 many changes were occurring within the Baltimore feminist
community. Longtime straight feminists were coming out as lesbians, theWomen's Center was becoming more and more a lesbian center, women's
dances were becoming lesbian dances, and so on. Some of the new "women'sliberation lesbians" were going to lesbian bars and making contacts with, andfrequently enemies of, the long-established "old gay" lesbian community. It
was a time of discovery, experimentation, and change. One of the important
realizations of this period was that there was a growing community of lesbian
feminists locally, nationally, and internationally.
Barbara and I became friends and eventually lovers during the spring andsummer of 1972. In the fall we moved into an apartment within the boundariesof the newly emerging lesbian feminist ghetto. At about this same time twofads developed within the community . Suddenly it was "in" to be doing nontraditional blue collar work and to be a lower class dyke. Since I was a known
lower class dyke and at the time working as a mechanic's helper, I found myself in the position of having new status . This was occasionally exciting and I
cashed in on it some , but mostly it was confusing and irritating. I hated theglorification of poverty and the lifestyle of downward mobility which was also
in fashion.
Meanwhile, some women from the community decided it would be fun
and productive to put together a local lesbian poetry book. It was around theissue of this poetry book that the "Class Split" happened, occurred, or was
engineered- depending on one's point of view. What happened basically wasthat all the known lower class dykes in the community (except me), including(or led by - again, depending on one's point of view) women who'd recently
moved up from Washington, D.C., announced at a poetry book meeting thatthey would no longer work on the book or with middle class lesbians in general.
24

I had been told about this action beforehand, but I didn't fully support it.
The whole series of events beginning with and revolving around this classsplit is the key to understanding the journal. Barbara and I were quite literallycaught in the middle of the split. We were lovers and friends. She was a middle
class dyke - I was a lower class dyke. Our relationship violated the new morality .
We made everyone either uncomfortable or angry. We suffered tremendous
abuse because we wouldn't go along with the new program. Some subtle, somepretty damn overt. It was not pleasant.
Speaking for myself, I was man-ipulated , man-euvered , guilt-tripped, andpushed to the edge. The message was clear and often repeated. I was a traitor
to the lower class. I was selling out to the middle class and betraying my real
sisters . r was in a more or less constant state of pain, confusion, and bewilderment. I started losing balance within myself. It took me years to recenter.
My problem was that everything seemed half right. My sense of logic said
yes, this is probably necessary. My instincts said no, something feels funny
about all of this shit. On one hand I had much class anger, but somewhere I
didn't trust the motives of some of the lower class dykes . On the other hand
I loved and cared for Barbara and didn't want to end the relationship , butsomewhere I did feel unsure and guilty. This confusion made me very vulnerable. I was also sick and tired of women pushing conformity to standards
that depended on style and fad more than anything else . I didn't like being
pushed to the wall.
Thinking and writing about all of this now, even though it happened years
ago, is still hard for me. I've been fortunate in that over the past couple ofyears several of us who were involved in the various camps have gotten together and trusted each other enough to share our experiences of the split. I
have a fairly good understanding now of what happened and why it happened.
Mini-wars like this scar everyone involved in one way or another.
Barbara and I stayed together and gradually began to isolate ourselves fromthe community. When the lower class dykes had a faIling out, we worked with
two of them on a local newsletter called "Desperate Living." After the firsttwo issues and more of the same pressures around the issues of the class split
and our interclass relationship, we quit.
Within a year or two we'd evolved into almost total isolation. This included
not answering the telephone or doorbell or responding to notes left by friends .
We had some contact with the lesbian community, but it was minimal. For atime we even worked with straight women at a rape crisis center. We wereriJiculously dependent on each other.
The journal begins at the point where Barbara had found a new lover. Our
relationship was in the process of painfully and bitterly ending. I was very
sick from a flu, an infection, and eventually malnutrition. I was attempting
to break out of isolation and reestablish contact with old friends. Mostly I
was just trying to recenter and find reason and balance within myself to survive in this alien world.
I would like to thank my friends, especially Lee Hopwood and Mary Kay
Lyman, for their support, encouragement, and constructive criticism.
February 23, 1976. If most of your needs are being met by two peopleyourself and another woman- and the other woman stops meeting any ofyour needs , you have to make conscious decisions about what to do withyourself.
25

What I want are close supportive relationships with a few women that havemutuality and balance and caring as a basic part of their existence. Also that
there exists a knowledge that those relationships are necessary for the survivalof each woman and of the community itself, so that each woman understands
from the gut why no one should be trashed unless they're trashing everybody
else . What I am looking for are women who have a strong sense of themselves
and know why feminism is absolutely essential for their survival. I want to bea survivor and I want to meet and be with other women who also want to be
survivors.
I am sick of feeling guilty , frustrated , bitter , resigned, and always angry . I
am sick of being inert. I want to be a builder. A dream-in to-reality carpenter,and I want to be with other women who feel the same .
February 25, 1976. I have decided to make this a journal for as long as I
need/want to use it. I still have a terrible pain in my chest , but I feel better
than yesterday.
I have been leaving this lying around and that probably isn't the best thing
to do. I'm beginning to feel a need for secrecy with it.
Strange thought-this is the first time since I was fifteen that I haven't
been involved in an intense lOving relationship with another woman ...
I'm beginning to think again about leaving the city . Not now but maybe
during the summer or fall. In August I'd have a whole year of paste-up andprinting experience. If things aren't better for me by then, 111 leave. Sell all
the shit I can't store somewhere and maybe go to the southwest and then to
San Francisco.
I have this sense of things closing in on me. Almost as though people wereafraid of me or something, and I think it is a true feeling. I have been a realfool to put up with Barbara's possessive, jealous shit all this time. Why did I
think it was funny with her , and yet when M. pulled less of it but basicallythe same shit I was always furious? I think that somewhere within myself I
really thought Barbara and I would keep our relationship on a constant lOving
level for years-even if we didn 't live together , even if we stopped being lovers,
even if we came out of isolation . You would think that all the times I have
lived this, from each and every side , that I would have a working knowledgeof how to handle it. Where is my survival sense? Why am I becoming so resigned to this death thing. Every question leads to ten questions.
Why does everyone keep asking me if I've met any new people? Are they
trying to set me up with someone new? By being "unattached" have I suddenly
become a potential threat? I am morbidly depressed and I don't think it's because I'm sick. What has happened is that I have hit this point where reality
and hope have clashed and hope is losing the battle. The great community I
wanted doesn 't seem to have much possibility for existence. All the womenI've run into lately seem to be walking on thin ice, keeping their own heads
and their own relationships together.
I have decided to give a lot of thought to suicide. Not impulsive or impetuous suicide, but well-thought-out, well-planned, deliberately constructedsuicide.
There are three reasons that keep leading me to think of it. The first is thetotal absolute re-realization that I am not afraid of death. To me dying seems
like a natural part of the life cycle. The second reason is that I am so very
very tired and weak . I feel like I have to be strong to survive, and I feel too

26

weak to handle it. All I feel physically and emotionally is pain. The third
reason is that I don't know if I'm into this life business anymore. I am seriously questioning my will to live. If I have one, why isn't it pulling me now when
I need all my strength and have so little? I also have grave doubts about feminism. Not the basic concepts-I know that they are real on a gut level. I guess
it's the current practice that is getting me down. At least in this city, I don't
think there is ever going to be a serious effort to deal with class and privilege .
As long as that holds true, I feel that feminism will be a dying movement-or
at least stagnant.
I can understand Bo's frustration at wanting to die so bad and not being
able to kill herself. I feel something close to the opposite-if I can't live theway I want, why should I keep trying and trying when I'm not afraid to killmyself? Maybe I want to live in a utopia; only it seems to me possible to havesome of that now. Not only possible but absolutely essential. Maybe it's only
essential to me-which of course is probably right, otherwise it would exist or
at least show signs of beginning to exist-which is another good reason to consider whether or not I should check out of this whole set up.

March 1, 1976, late a.m. I still have a lot of pain, but it's not as constantas before. I've just about given up hope of ever feeling physically good again.
I have lost an incredible amount of weight in the past two weeks . I'm trying
to eat as much as I can, but most of the time it's a real struggle. I have completely lost the ability to eat and sleep regularly. It wouldn't be so bad if I
didn't feel so fucking weak. It freaks the hell out of me that I can't carrythat damn trash bag down two flights and around the block to the alley. I
mean shit, if I can't do that, what the hell can I do? Not much. I'm not doing such a hot job of taking care of myself.
All I seem able to do with any degree of consistency is to smoke and smoke .
I remember vividly when I hit total bottom before, and I remember that I
started fighting like hell to get my shit together and I did. I think that I knew
I was getting too close to the edge of insanity, and when authority people
started getting involved in it all, I freaked and was scared as hell and I managed
to get myself together in a real hurry.
Things are different now. I feel clear-headed and clear-Sighted and calmand resigned. I know that I want to die. April 1st. April Fool's Day, very
appropriate! That seems to be the day when all my decisions and loose-endtyings have to be finished. I have a hell of a lot to do between now and then.
I'm trying to figure out if 1 should write a will. It's also ironic and humorous to think the only thing stopping me from doing that is that it's too fucking expensive. It costs too much to be born, too much to exist, and too muchto die-at least patriarchy is consistent! I don't know why I want a will anyway. I don't own anything of value. The only thing 1 have that's worth any
money are my tools, and they're only worth five or six hundred dollars. The
only other thing I have that's valuable is all the feminist literature I've beensaving all these years.
It amuses me to knoW that 1 can be so out of it and yet con.tinue to function in a halfway decent level so that no one knows how 100se 'I really am.
(Ego, Sandy, ego ... ) I am no longer a survivor, and yet no one knows it
except me. 111 continue to do all the things 1 have to do-ll1 go to work anddo my paste-up and printing and get the magazine out on time, 111 keep trying
27

to fmd a place to live, I'll see Lee on Wednesday, I'll help Susan print "Desperate Living," I'll go to the International Women's Day thing and talk to
women I haven't seen much of in the past two or three years. I'll go to thenext women's dance and see those same women again, I'll go and talk to
Dorothy and I'll go and talk to Jenny and tell her that I'm sorry for being
such a shit to her, I'll try and explain how my feelings about straight women
have changed because my feelings about survival have changed. I'll probably
go see Ann one more time and call Shirley again too. Detailing details, Sandy,
detailing details ...
March 2, 1976. I'm no longer amused about being out of control and nobody knowing it. I'm starting to feel afraid because I'm not doing such a hot
job of pretending healthiness, My boss and everyone at work acted weird
around me all day. I'm having trouble keeping my face together on the bus.
The thing that scares me is that my craziness seems to be growing beyond
my control, and that scares me because I'm afraid of authority people getting
control of me and locking me up. I just couldn't stand being locked up, andI know how easily it could happen if I don't take extreme care in public situations, especially at work and on the bus.
I just decided I can't keep my appointment at the out-patient clinic at thehospital tomorrow . Suppose I freak out in there and they lock me in the hospital?
I had a dream last night that freaked me out. I wanted to write it down
this morning, but I was late for work and I had to rush to catch my bus. So
now it's all foggy except for one part: My mother was there in her uniform
and her pastel raincoat and her plastic shopping bag to carry her work shoes
in . All these women were there in their uniforms and their good clothes toride the bus in, with their pastel raincoats and carrying their plastic shoppingbags with their work clothes in them. My mother was handing me clothes,and I was putting them on and looking and acting like a zombie . Finally there
I was with nylons and shoes and uniform and pastel raincoat and plastic shopping bag. The next thing I remember my mother and I and all those women
went to the bus stop, and I got on a bus and looked out the window. They
were all smiling and waving at me and giggling with each other. Everyone was
happy but me, and I was feeling and acting like a robot.

March 3, 1976.... I really want a vacation from my life; if I were rich,
I'd do just that. Not being rich, I guess I'll have to settle for just being dead.
Undated. Boss said, "Your nerves are shot." I giggled a lot and he said
drink coffee, drink coffee . Soothsay can't play today. Nobody home at theshop , stop the presses, that's all she wrote. Bus day. Nice lady. Poor andlonely . Seen her before and before and before. She's real poor. Can't decide,is she a day worker or an aide? Hard to tell. Sometimes she gets on near thehome . Not always. Old and lonely she is and talked to me all the way home.
I tried and tried and tried. Couldn't reach, but she seemed happy for anything.
Such a waste. Old and lonely and poor and complaining about the rate hike.
How they're robbing poor people who can't choose not to ride the bus. She
talked about Dundalk. Shit, does she ride all the way from there to Towson
every day? Racist too. Always, almost, hand in hand, the combination. The
stage whisper, "colored," loud enough for all the black women within ten
feet to hear and they did and reacted and I didn't have the heart to cut her

28

off. And life goes on-isn't this the way always? In the middle- or rather outside all the spirals-backwards too? Descent (decent) not ascent (assent). You
wanted to write but you went crazy instead. Ho hurn, ho hurn. Typed thaton the composer at work a zillion times. Witches Brew [a cat] , I love you
too!
Undated. Strength, courage , and energy for the facade. You must keep it
intact. The surface is mattersome.
March 7, 1976. I called Sarina in the height of my loss of self and shereached and I responded. She has helped me to get a bit of my core trustand faith back.
March 8, 1976. I feel very reflective tonight. Yesterday I went to the International Women's Day (one day early) thing sponsored by the Women's
Union. My reactions to it were mixed. Also my reactions to seeing and beinga part of a group with all of those different women. Many of whom I haven't
seen in literally years, thanks to good old isolation.
I hated the slide show on working women. To me it seemed that the lower
class women were tokened in to make the show ''well rounded." I was reallydisappointed in the Feminist Chorus . Maybe it's just me, but somehow I don't
think that labor songs which are based in very real pain should be laughed andgiggled through , and sung as light little ditties.
Then a woman sang a song about God and Jesus that really blew my mind .
I think I was wrong about the Metropolitan Community Church and Ann wasright. Instead of acting as a survival/transition thing it exists for lesbians as
an end/institution in and of itself. Sometimes I forget that Christianity has
been really drummed into some women .
March 13, 1976. I listened to Sophie's Parlor [old Washington, D.C. feminist radio show] today. It was neat, great 30's and 40's blues. Thoughts: Class
differences cannot be blocked, ignored , overlooked, or glorified. Privilege exists
and cannot be hidden, or disregarded as a constant factor of every and any
relationship. It will not go away. Anger and guilt usually act as negatives. Angeris a real positive reality reaction if kept in a political class-conscious reality, as
opposed to self-destructive anger. Guilt is destructive to everyone and changes
nothing. I must try to get to the ocean soon; I need the continuity of the sea.
Undated. I feel like a bump on a log, as my mother would say. I am going
through so many changes so fast that I can hardly keep track of it all. I'm
getting back these heavy feelings of determination and resolve to not take any
shit off anybody. I'm glad I let my anger out to Barb , even if I did spend
hours stomping around at work, muttering and slamming doors and poundingon everything in sight. It was worth it to get the anger out. It was real positive
anger. I hope that someday I'll be able to get angry without having the ad renalin carry me off for hours and hours; it's so hard for me to calm down when
I let myself get really angry .
Undated. Capitalism is a pile of shit; I've known that in my gut for years
and years. State capitalism is a pile of shit too. It took me longer to get clear
on that 'cause on the surface it comes across looking as though it meets basic
survival needs. The more I think about them the closer they seem to be. I
remember years ago I ran into this member of the John Birch Society who
kept yelling that U.S. corporations were secretly plotting with Russia to estab-29

lish joint global control. I don't know why I thought she was so off the wall;
anything seems possible to me now.
March 15, 1976, a.m. I have been furiously angry for four solid days. I
can hardly believe it-I haven't allowed myself to be this angry in years.
March 17, 1976. 18th, actually, a.m. April Fool's is getting real close; itseems like doomsday , re-birthday , whatever, all rolled up in my head. I thought
this suicide shit was over, but it isn't. It's coming back now stronger than ever.
I really cannot stand feeling like this . I am in a state of total panic. I can't
stand the thought of not being able to afford to live alone . Is that why I'mback at this point again? It always seems to come down to money, or rather
lack of money and privilege. Am I just using that as an excuse? Lee and I
were talking the other day about once poor white trash, always poor white
trash , shit isn't it the truth?
Undated. What is needed for survival? Food, water, place to live , clothes
for the weather, work-paid or not , dreams/hope/visions of change, trust in
self/others? caring, love of self/others? self-sufficiency/mutuality?
March 25, 1976. Class seems to be a dead, or rather paralyzed , issue . The
boundary lines are fainter but still definitely exist. Maybe it's water underthe bridge , but the bridge still exists and the water's still flowing and I don't
see any fundamental change. Except maybe that while I've been in isolation,
a whole new crop of downwardly mobile women has moved into town . And
as far as I've been able to find out, no one is talking {let alone doing anything
concrete) about class and privilege at all, except for myoId favorite, "organizing
the working class." Well, Sandy me girl , things haven't changed all that much.
Undated. Me, today. I have choices and alternatives. I can make choices
rather than must make choices. Self-hatred knows no bounds and can groweven when it seems it couldn't possibly be more intense. Understanding andgetting support to understand my own and other women's class realities is the
only way for me to overcome it. I thought I had my class shit pretty together,and I was real wrong about that. I had hardly begun to get it together. It isa continuing process. Fighting for my own class reality is a continuing process
also.
Working is very important to me. Seeing my labor produce something I
feel good about is very important. Using my creativity and tiring myself out
in the process is important. Using my hands to do/to make is necessary andpositive. Bridging the mind/body male-created split is important , and I do it
at work. Working at the magazine, despite the drawbacks of rotten pay andno benefits , plus my boss's tantrums, is an important and positive aspect of
my life. I should not give it up unless the negatives increase dramatically . Although it is important for me to live alone, I will not give up my job solely
because of economic reasons. If I must , I'll settle my stuff at Lee and Claire's
and live at Susan's for awhile rather than give up my job . Meanwhile I'll pushthat fucker for more money.
Some bills I have I won't be able to pay for ages , the medical center andthe clinic, also the fucking student defense loan that's been hanging over myhead all these years will have to hang there a few more.
Saturday night, March 27, 1976. Today, again, bitterness; only this time30

it's from understanding too much , knowing too much . Seeing other women
war together and knowing both sides . Feeling like I have been fighting bothsides within myself for a long time, but especially lately. Feeling like I finallyknow which side I want to struggle for and seeing that side championed by
one woman agamst another.
What I know is that there has to be a joining of the personal and the political. Not in a run-away purist sense ; but in the sense that you are struggling
and fighting from the gut for y ourself, and not for some unknown Mass("other") or learned concept. Each of us is alone , and we have to struggle
alone to survive . Self-strength can be helped by outside people and events ,but can only really come to existence from the inside. There must be some
type of individual strength before collectivity can even happen. Differences
don't go away by calling all attempts to deal with them "divisiveness." Allthis fucking middle class shit about having to produce something all the fucking time , production , production, production. If you don't have proof-credentials-that you are a fucking producer (even though those credentials areusually just so much male bullshit, they still count), you are worth shit andyour thoughts and opinions are worth shit because you aren't doing yourpart (''your fair share") toward production . Production of what? Why , production of "The Revolution" of course . No Comment.
. .. By myself or with other women I am still alone with myself. Keepingthat self intact and as strong as possible is survival. Fighting for that seWs
existence and its right to exist halfway decently with as much self-deterrnination as possible is the point where that self has to join other selves for its own
good, and that is politics at the root.
Laying aside that self for the larger good is male Christian crap. Fighting a
textbook war , fantasizing about saving the third world, leaving aside "women's
issues" until after the revolution (the what?), being an organizer (missionary)of the "working class" ("others," read inferiors) is just so much destructive
useless garbage.
There have to be new and better ways for selves to work and be together
minus these insane structures and dumb pipedreams of an instant revolutionthat is suddenly going to make everything different.
It seems to me revolution is only a long-drawn-out process of gradual change .
I want to know how and where to put my two cents into the process.

March 28, 1976. I've been reading about natural anarchy , which of course
is where I've been for years, only I didn't know it had a name ...
April 2, 1976. I moved out of the apartment on Wednesday night. It was
raining and I was very depressed. Lee was decent , especially considering that
she was irritated because her new car kept fucking up. Wednesday night at
Susan's I was totally freaked . Today I am a bit more oriented and feeling
better. I'm beginning to figure things out: buses, clothes, which of my stuff
is here and which stuff at Lee and Claire's should be here. I need to do a few
things like get something heavy and more permanent to hang over the big
street-level window in my room and rig something to use to hang up some of
my clothes. Shit, it's really cold in here.
I walked all over the place today. Went down to Chase Street to the bank.
Also got my hair cut. If I could just get the money Mom owes me , in a monthor so I could probably have enough to get an apartment. I really don't want31

to be at Susan's at all. and the sooner I get out of here the better for all concerned. After the political / personal fight Susan and I had , it took real desperation to ge t me to move in here .
Hey , self, you survived April Fool's Day . Happy re-birthday!

32

Drawing by Diane Ayott

POEM FOR BETTY LORENZ

i want this house i saywhat do i have to do
to get it
fill out an application she says
but don't you dare
if it's the 2 of you
we don't rent to 2 men
or to 2 girls
women i think to myself
you dumb broad it's women
betty calls gail& gail calls & says hey look lady
don't you know this is illegal
against the law
immoral plain stupid
lemme talk to yr boss
he's not here now she says
would you like to call latermeanwhile all on a l-l hour parking meter
we talk to the man say we've done this before
lived together for over a yearbought a car together etc& he says what 's all this women's liberation
bullshit
still on the meter we get to fill out
our very own application to rent
& the dumb broad with whom we're familiar by now
takes names no addresses
addresses no phone numbers all our credit
shot to hell but we're given equal opportunity
our time's running out & she's explainingthat we all get a fair shake& we're trying hard to listen trying not
to be rude but don't feel bad if we are
i'm not sure how much we can check out
she says since it's all out-of-state
but we 'll let you know•33

yr application has been approved she says
i'm afraid to give her my name in caseshe thinks she's talking to somebody else
but she can't see me over the phone so it's just as wellthat i pretend i'm calm & knew it all alongthat it's my houseit was nothing
i expected it
sure you did god says

-Dinah Wernick

not in cars
dark danger in the shadows of the city city city drivingby the danger darkness urban buildings and the men men
that serve as girders beams the backbone of the danger
men in windows stories high indiscriminately lurching fromthe speeding cars the freeway thieves that drop theircompliments their vile demands commands from rustingcars on cracking crosstown roads twisting twisted shadows
grotesque mouths that vomit words like green white bullets
to the womyn on the sidewalks in the buildings not in cars
- Achy Obejas

Arlene Raven

THE EYE OF THE BE*HOLD*HER

The Lesbian Vision of Romaine Brooks
Romaine Brooks is called Thief of Souls because when she painted her
portraits, she "captured" the essence of the sitter. (This you will read everywhere you can read.)l The truth is that she restored souls. Lesbian souls.
Romaine Brooks' portrait of herself in a riding habit , top hat shading hereyes looking directly at us. The eye of the creator meets the eye of the beholder eye to eye. The Lesbian eye , how is she different? And what is woman's
art apart from man's perceptions?
Romaine Brooks was virtually unknown in this country until 1971, when
Adelyn Breeskin introduced her work in a major exhibition and catalogue at
the National Collection of Fine Arts, Washington, D.C. I had never heard of
Romaine Brooks, even though, in 1971, I had completed coursework for a
PhD. in art history. But once I had heard of her; once I had seen her paintings and drawings; I searched for her-her influences, affInities, and contemporaries-in books about twentieth-century visual art.
But I found her nowhere. She had been yet another woman lost in thepool of silence which still is women's contribution to art. An American (inParis), she gave her entire estate to our National Collection of Fine Arts justbefore she died (alone) in 1970 at the age of ninety-six. Not only alone , but
obscure. She had not shown her work in thirty years. Re/dis/covered the same
year of her death by Adelyn Breeskin and by her own gift of the whole ofher art, but still alone. The epitaph she wrote for herself was ''Here Remains
Romaine, Who Romaine Remains." And the (unpublished) memoirs of herlife she titled "No Pleasant Memories."
Of artists alone, Judy Chicago says: "When men are alone, they aren't
really alone - they are alone in their studios supported by systems. But womenare really alone, without any system, and that is not just alone-that is isolated
and powerless."2Romaine Brooks was outside of the main stream of IJ10dern
art, which was located on the left bank (only) of the Seine River in Paris,
France , during the first quarter of this century. (Brooks worked in Englandand France, where she meandered along the left and right [wrong] bank ofthat stream .) A portrait painter, she was considered to be neither experimental nor innovative. Not very modern. Meaning, in the language of the avantgarde, not very good. Romaine Brooks was certainly not a great one like
Picasso, Braque, or Matisse .3
Silence and isolation are blood sisters, mothered by denial. Silence denies
existence, and isolation denies the environment of existence- content , commonality, context, community, and , finally , vision.
Romaine Brooks was isolated as an oddity. (That she was odd we cah readin each of the few texts written about her.) Cast out side of the major legitimizing categories of twentieth-century art, to which her work may have been35

above : LA BARONNED'ERLANGER

above: MISS NATALIEBARNEY"L ' AMAZONE "left: SELF-PORTRAIT
DE ROMAINE
BROOKS

below: WEEPING
VENUS

36

appropriately and interestingly connected, her art has rather been analyzed
almost exclusively in relationship to her (unfortunate) personal life, to explain(away) its deviation from normal art and conventional art interpretation . For
example: ''The work of Romaine Brooks cannot be separated from her life.
It had its roots in experiences that marked and marred her and provided theobsessive themes for her portraits and drawings."4
How, then, can we evoke her heritage? Locate her support network? See
her work in a cultural context, within the tradition of her time?
Consider a tradition of modern art : that art is self-referential and self-ex.
planatory. A work of art must stand on its own . Everyone has heard this ,but what does it mean? That a work of art can stand on its own , be understood, without information about the environment in which it was created ,means only that there is complete agreement about what the context of avisual statement is. The context of art is culture. But the only major recognized art we know is male-created art within male culture underlaid by amale perception of the universe. Not culture itself, but male culture. Not
perception itself, but male perception . Within that context , a work of art
can stand on its own.
What of the work of art which is not created by men for men? Throughwhat perception may we begin to see?
Romaine Brooks' Weeping Venus. A slight , frail figure. Not a voluptuous
earth goddess but a christ-like figure, an aspect of the Trinity or the Triple
Goddess. About this Venus Natalie Barney wrote,
Yet as the God-man crucified
Her body expiates the sin
That love and life with her begin!S
A primary mythic and spiritual concept in female form. Not simply the appearance, but the underlying perception of the world , is the point of departureof a Lesbian vision.
Our mutual sidewise glances (fixed , frozen ; under the wrath of the fathers
we could not bat an eye) . Who we are and have been to one another. What
we have expressed . Seeing ourselves with our own eyes. Sharing a common
vision.
There may be a Lesbian form. But the form of a hidden culture is the inbetween, the inter-face . So that even - perhaps especially- in visual art , appearances aren 't everything.
Whistler is the artist Romaine Brooks is said to have followed in her own
way. We can read in her memoirs that she (uniquely) admired his work. Leaving Capri at the turn of the century for England, Brooks took a studio on
Tite Street where Whistler lived . And , forsaking her earlier bright palette , she
modulated her tones (after Whistler, it is said) to black, white , and grey .
Whistler's Rose and Silver, "La Princess du Pays de la Porcelaine" (1864)
and Romaine Brooks'Miss Natalie Barney, L 'Amazone (1920). Rose andSilver could be an illustration of Whistler 's well-known exoticism - the exoticism of an influx of oriental art, artifacts, and attitudes about decoration to
England in the latter nineteenth century. You can see in the picture an oriental rug ; a fan held by a woman in an embroidered kimono , standing in frontof an oriental screen. This is a picture of a woman, but nothing in the picture
belongs to this woman. She does not even seem to be oriental. We· are not tolook at Whistler's Rose and Silver as a picture of her. We are rather to look37

at it as a certain number of things , including this woman, which belong toan oriental influence on contemporary art in nineteenth-century England .
This influence, in turn , finds an illustration in the home of a wealth Englishman-his rug, screen, fan, kimono , and woman.
The portrait of Natalie Barney by Romaine Brooks can also be called
bourgeois-pertaining to private property interests. And here, too, is a versionof the idea of the exotic. The exotic is not only a cross-cultural influence on
art , but the exotic is the vehicle through which Lesbianism is expressed . Everything in this picture belongs to Natalie Barney. Her necklace-alternately blue/
green/sphere/pyramid/triangle-is an Amazon necklace. Her fur , a sign of thewealthy bourgeoisie , is· also an animal skin which Brooks often used in her
paintings to refer to the Amazons. The horse, a table decoration, reminds usthat Natalie Barney was L 'Amazone, horsewoman, who unrestrainedly rodein the woods near her home for most of her lifetime . Not only Amazon, but
Amazon of letters . Remy de Gourmont wrote to her his Lettres a l'Amazone.
But more important , she wrote as an Amazon such aphorisms as,
Let no woman renounce her natural crown
Lest man take her for his equal [from her notebooks]
Everything in Romaine Brooks' portrait refers us to Natalie Barney's attributes
and to their exoticism. Exotic meaning excitingly strange, unusual in colorand design , introduced from a foreign country. The land of the Amazons. And
from the past, the race of Amazon women. The past recreated in contemporary
life , reclaiming the power of the Amazon woman in the person of the contemporary Lesbian creator.
Brooks' palette of black, white , and grey varied to red . The red hair of
Amazons. Notice Romaine Brooks' portrait of the Baronne Emile D'Erlanger(l924). A large, powerful woman , red hair. John Usher reviewed this picture
in 1926 in International Studio: "Luminosity without radiance, which suggeststhat one has just missed glimpsing the last rays of the sun as they dropped
onto russet hair a leopard robe and faded in the amber eyes of the cat." Redhair of the Amazon , leopard robes draped over one shoulder, back from herother shoulder, ahnost baring her breast. The cat, of the same animal skin,said to be the Baronne's husband , is in her powerful domain. Women andanimals create a lost sense of our nature.
Romaine Brooks' portrait of the Baronne D'Erlanger cannot be taken as
including her husband in any significant way, despite the documented similarityof the cat to the lady's spouse. Romaine Brooks never portrayed the relations
b~tween men and women. In fact , her portrait of Jean Cocteau had originally
included two women beside him on the railing looking toward the Eiffel Tower.
But Romaine Brooks cut this picture in two.
In the cage is the lion. She paces with her memories . Her body is a recordof her past. As she moves back and forth , one may see it all: the lean frame,
the muscular legs, the paw enclosing long sharp claws, the astonishing speedof her response . She was born in this garden. She has never in her life stretchedthose legs .6
It is significant that in Romaine Brooks' portrait of the Baronne D'Erlanger,
the caged animal is not a symbol for woman.
Chasseresse (1920) is another Amazon. The skins drape her body , leaving
one breast bare. She touches her mountain goat with friendly comradeship .

38above: "UNA" LADYTROUBRIDGE

above : CHASSERESSE
left : ELISABETH DE
GRAMONT

below: RENATI BOR GATTI AU
PIANOThe background of this painting is abstracted , with a section or ray of lightrevealing a mountain in the distance . Her glance also looks to the distance,
inward as well as outward . To another time , outside of contemporary life,
when women were strong and powerful in a world which reflected our strengthand power. The Chasseresse is a Lesbian fantasy . The model for her image,
Eyre de Lanux . a Lesbian lover of Romaine Brooks.
Natalie Barney was a lover of Romaine Brooks for over half of this century.
Natalie Barney is of this race, and of this heritage . In her life and work , Natalie
Barney re-<:reated Lesbian Nation : In 1904 she and Renee Vivien traveled toLesbos to found a Sapphic school of poetry and love; her Temple of Friendship. a small Greek-like structure in her garden at 20 Rue Jacob, was a templeof honor and celebration of women's relationships and achievements. Natalie
Barney 's life was a fine art of Lesbian love. Romaine Brooks' portrait of
Natalie Barney- of a woman , by a woman , for women. A portrait in which
Lesbian creators share a common vision .
Romaine Brooks painted a number of stunning portraits of Lesbian contemporaries during the 1920s- among them Natalie Barney; Elisabeth de Gramont , Duchesse de Clermont-Tonnerre ; Renata Borgatti ; and Una Troubridge.
These images are unique in the history of art. Because they are proud images.
Images of women who were talented , successful, independent ; who chose to
be Lesbians as they chose to be creators . With conviction , style , and joy . Without reference to pornographic sex or perversion. As a self-identification linked
to solitude and the creative life.
Renata Borgatti sits at the piano. She wears dark robes-of the composer,
the scholar , the Lesbian? And short hair , no hairdo . Another title for thispainting is Musical Inspiration. Borgatti is completely absorbed in her work.
Sh e is the inspired creator of music , not - as is more usual in visual art- thesubject or impetus for male creativity.
How does this image of a Lesbian by a Lesbian compare with other images
painted by Lesbian artists? Alas , although some of our most gifted and recognized artists have been and are Lesbians, they do not wish to make themselves
known to us . There are very few visible artists known to be Lesbians. Of these ,fewer still have dealt with the subject of Lesbianism in their work . Certainly
no other Lesbian artist contemporary with Brooks made Lesbianism a persistent theme in her work nor brought it to her own personal sphere by referringto herself and her colleagues and friends .
It is no accident that more explicit Lesbian sexual relationships were painted
by male artists. Obviously , their interest in the subject could not be attributed
to Lesbianism . Courbet's Sleep , in which two goddesses , unconscious , are displayed by the male artist for the voyeuristic pleasure of male spectator andpatron . Lautrec 's pathetic , aging prostitutes turning to one another for comfort.
Renan 's saccharine symbolist idealization of Sappho : Sappho , whose art andlife made her a symbol for Lesbian strength and love , is not a poet and politicalleader here but a sexual delight, lying breasts up in the grass .
There are also derisive caricatures of Lesbians . During the period in which
Romaine Brooks was portraying Lesbians in her circle in her way, male cartoonists viciously ridiculed some of the same women. Radclyffe Hall and Una
Troubridge, for example, in reaction to Hall's pioneering novel , The Well of
Loneliness, in which she dared to defend rather than condemn Lesbianism.
Leo Dowd , in The Bookseller, and Beresford Egan , in an illustration for The
40

Sink of Solitude, an anonymously written poem mocking The Well of Loneliness, both made devastating stereotypical dyke/castrators of Hall and Troubridge.
Romaine Brooks' portrait of Una Troubridge (1924) may also appropriately
be called a Lesbian stereotype. The tuxedo, the severe (red) hair , the monocle ,the squat hounds given Una by John (Radclyffe Hall). Brooks might have conveyed some personal sarca.sm here. She did not always have the charm of her
lover , Natalie Barney. At times she was sour, sometimes defensive. Often she
kept to herself, and sometimes lashed out at others. She considered distasteful
the staunch Catholicism and sentimental dedication of Hall and Troubridge tobringing the understanding of the Lesbian way of life to the general pUblic.
But consider this way of dressing. The same way that Radclyffe Hall dressed.
Cross-dressing. A sign of freedom, independence , and unmistakable Lesbianism.
The most profound influences on Brooks' work were the congenial atmosphere of her time and the literature which emerged from and expressed it. The
1920s was a period in which damnatory attitudes toward homosexuality subsided for a time . Havelock Ellis' Studies in the Psychology of Sex promoted"sexual inversion" from a sinful disease to a (sick) variation on the sexual
norm. The Ellis-Freud controversy on the origin of homosexuality brought
the subject to public attention. The nineteenth-century feminist movement
had created more freedom for women to live as they wished. And literature
about homosexuality boomed after 1915, from mocking satires like Compton
Mackenzie's Extraordinary Women to Hall's impassioned The Well of Loneliness. Admiration of the Lesbian as a model of post-war independence and theunfettered life made her an attractive rather than a depraved figure.
All of the uniquely explicit Lesbian images which were created during thisperiod , with the exception of Romaine Brooks' portraits, were in literature.
Virginia Woolfs Orlando (1928). A man becomes a woman becomes a manover a period of centuries. A person who is not a member of an opposite sex.
A creature who lived in-between history, in a continuous present. Gertrude
Stein comments: "After all every century has to be made by somebody being
something and it is difficult to do it again and anyway when it is done it isdone and having been done it does not make any time to begin again. WhenI began writing I was making a continuous present a continuous beginningagain and again ... "7 Vita Sackville-West, Virginia Woolfs lover , poses forthe illustration photos; is the image of Orlando, to whom Virginia Woolf dedicates this work .
Rose O'Neill's Master-Mistress (1922). Rose O'Neill, who invented the
Kewpie Don, also invented the master-mistress (after the master-mistress of
Shakespeare's passion). A book of her poems and illustrations , a monstercreature suggesting sexual ambiguity, unification, and human completeness.
The Master-Mistress
All in the drowse of life I saw a shape,
A lovely monster reared up from the restless rock,More secret and more loud than other beasts.
It, seeming two in one,
With dreadful beauty doomed,
Folded itself, in chanting like a flood.
I said , "Your name, 0 Master-mistress? "But it, answering not,41Folded itself, in chanting like a flood.
ll1e Lesbian. The turning, the monstrosity, the sublime beauty .
Androgyny, usually interpreted as a synthesis of male and female to fonn
a hennaphroditic hybrid or referring to one who is under-sexual, is for O'Neill,
Brooks, and Woolf, specifically Lesbian. And creation of the monster, the synthesis, the human, is synonymous with the creation of (Lesbian) art.
Romaine Brooks' support network-which is Lesbian, literary, and artistichas been made invisible, erased by silence . Because it is Lesbian, literary, andartistic. In the face of evidence to the contrary : Natalie Barney's salon / Renee
Vivien's sapphic poetry / Colette's Claudine / Djuna Barnes' Nightwood / Lianede Pougy's Idyl/e Saphique / Virginia Woolfs letters to Ethel Smyth / Georgia
O'Keeffe's letters to Edna St. Vincent Millay / Natalie Barney's letters to Gertrude Stein / Gertrude Stein's "Four Saints in Three Acts" / Florine Stettheimer's
stage sets for Stein's "Four Saints in Three Acts" / Alice B. Toklas' cookbook /Gertrude Stein's Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas / Margaret Anderson's autobiography / Una Troubridge's biography of Radclyffe Hall / Virginia Woolfs
assistance in publishing Hall / Virginia Woolfs A Room of One's Own / Georgia
O'Keeffe's paintings / H.D.'s poems / Bernice Abbott's photographs / Janet
Flanner's journal / Elisabeth de Gramont's memoirs / Sylvia Beach's Shakespeare
and Co. / Lucie Delarue-Madrus' Sappho Desesperee / Frida Kahlo's paintings /Colette's The Pure and the Impure / Natalie Barney's Souvenirs Indiscrets /Bryher's The Heart of Artemis / Marie Laurencin's paintings ...
I could continue to weave this network , or with Sappho / Rosa Bonheur /Adrienne Rich / Jeannette Foster / Harmony Hammond / Mary Daly / Fran
Winant / Willa Cather ... we could inter-weave the continuous present of thepresence of the proper environment in which to see clearly the art of Romaine
Brooks.
Romaine Brooks' portrait of herself looking directly at us . We begin tosee her Lesbian vision.
NOTES
1. Adelyn Breeskin's Romaine Brooks, "Thief of Souls" (Washington, D.C., Smithsonian
Institution Press, 1971) and Meryle Secrest's Between Me and Life: A Biography of Romaine
Brooks (New York, Doubleday, 1974) remain the only substantial sources of information
on Brooks' life and work aside from the artist's unpublished memoirs, "No Pleasant Memories," housed in the archives on Brooks at the National Collection of Fine Arts, Washington,
D.C. A number of theses and dissertations on Brooks' work are in progress, and in additiona few articles in feminist publica tions supply an appreciation of Brooks' Lesbianism, which
Breeskin tactfully omitted and which Secrest treats homophobically .
2. Susan Rennie and Arlene Raven, "The Dinner Party Project: An Interview with Judy
Chicago," Chrysalis, 1:4 (Spring 1978) , p. 100.
3. Gertrude Stein's portrait of Matisse, originally published in the August 1912 issue of
Camera Work, talks about Matisse's, and men's greatness. 'This one was certainly a greatman, this one was certainly clearly expressing something." My remark paraphrases this essay.
4. Secrest, Between Me and Life, p . xvii.
5. Natalie Barney, "The Weeping Venus," from Poems and Poemes, au tres alliances(paris: Emile-Paul, 1920) .
6. Susan Griffin, Woman and Nature (Harper & Row, 1978), p . 105 .
7. Gertrude Stein, Everybody's Autobiography (New York : Random House, 1937), fromthe Vintage Books edition, p. 251 .

42Perilous Passages
Paradoxical Positions&

Prickly Pears

photograph 'by Lyl/da Koolish43Meg Jochild

Trapeze
We are snowed into the Wimmin's House ; even with the chains on we cannot move from the driveway. We wait all morning for the snow plow. I am
so bored that I go into a frenzy of cleaning house. The others are glad andmake sly suggestions as to what I might do next. I sing the same song endlessly. an old song with new words , whilst visions of Amazons soar in myhead :o once I was happy but now I'm forlorn
Like an old coat that is tattered and torn
Left in this cruel world to fret and to mourn
Betrayed by a girl in her teens .
Now this girl that I loved , she was handsome
And I tried all I knew , her to please
But I never could please her one quarter as wellAs the dyke on the flying trapeze , oh , oooh ,She flies through the air with the greatest of ease
The daring young dyke on the flying trapeze
Her movements are graceful , and how she does please
But my love she has stolen away.
The plow does not come by three o'clock. At four o'clock, dark is nearlyupon us , the snow is falling harder, and our electricity goes out. No heat, nowater. The phone is not working. We are a little worried. I must go to work
the next morning; I know my boss will not accept my excuse. Jobs are hardto fmd . I volunteer to walk to the nearest house , our neighbors' who are ahalf mile away and that much closer to a real road ; they have a vehicle thatcan manage in the snow.
I bundle up , stuff chocolate and a flashlight in my pocket , and leave withmy dog. She is so small that she keeps getting trapped in the drifts, and I pullher out impatiently. All the way I sing and think of how much you like thesnow. I think grimly, I bet you wouldn 't like all this. But as I think it , I am
not sure . I remember that when we were falling in love, you would rather kissme in icy fields than by a warm fire.
The neighbors are not at home , looks like they haven't been there for acouple of days. In desperation, I dig a path to the door and try the knob; itis open and, feeling like a burglar, I enter. I leave the dog outside and she
howls a protest. I fmd the phone, and, blessedly, it works. I call for help andam reassured. I call my boss and he says he will come pick me up. I thankhim sourly. Then I trudge home.
When I sing my song again, moving my arms in the appropriate motions
at the appropriate times, someone in the kitchen snickers. Ah, the supportiveness of collective life.
That night I dream I am a youngster , being taken up on the ropes for the
first time. I stand on the small , slightly swaying platform; twenty feet below
the net has been jerried; beside me is my mother, lean and firm and silent.
We are both wearing old brown leotards. I am only ten.
I have been doing exercises for six months, to develop the muscles I willneed. But today, after all, I do not use them.

44

My father and my older cousin stand on either side of the net ; their faces
are turned up to me, unsmiling. My mother is urgently repeating the instructions: control your fall, fall flat on your back, relax but keep your body parallel , let yourself bounce to a halt, only then try to move from the net. I am
only half-listening; I do not sweat yet , but under my arms is unpleasant heat.
I am looking down, wondering how I can jump off into that emptiness .
My mother lets me look; knowing always what is below is part of what I
must learn in the act. Then she hugs me, says , "Once you fly , you will neverwant to stop ," and I almost smile. She says, "Now!" and raises her hand to
signal the catchers. I do not go for a second, but before she can speak again ,I crouch, spring, and am faIling, twisting. I want to scream in terror , but there
is no time before I hit the net sideways.
Great squares of hemp jerk at my body, my muscles down my spine arejangled and burn, I am airborne again for too little time to count , then I am
shuttling back and forth from flight to net, a ball between two paddles, until
finally the motion has subsided and I am cradled in the net. I am ready tocry.
I feel my father's hands, suddenly ; he is reaching up through the net, heis telling me to move, his voice is tight with fear.
I say that I am all right. I sit up and bob in the net some more from the
motion ; I begin crawling to the side. When my arms or legs miss the rope andplunge helplessly through the holes in the net , my father eases me back through.
He follows me to the edge ; my cousin is there , trying to steady the net; I slide
off into their arms and stand. I am bruised and giddy, but I have done it. Suddenly I grin and shout. I wave to my mother, who waves back joyously . I am
standing on the earth but I am no longer her slave . I am ready to climb up
and jump again.
My father runs his hands over me , checkirlg for breaks. He pulls my arms
and legs, feeling the tendons , asking me if I hurt. I shake my head impatiently
and pull away , swarming back up the rope ladder . At the top my mother holds
me soundlessly, gripping me close for a minute; I welcome her embrace ; I feel
older. Her eyes are glistening as I face the edge again.
It is still not easy, to dive off into space. But as the day goes on, I becomesmooth and eager, able to move in the air, once crying "wheee!" all the way
down. When at last we stop, hours later, I hear my mother tell my father, "I
see why they are taught while they are young; she will do fme." I am laughing as I wake.
I am startled at the vividness of my dream. That day I receive a letter fromyou, the first in months. It is written on the back of a flyer for a rally, amarch followed by speakers. Your name jumps out at me : you are making aspeech on "Classism in the Wimmin's Movement." I try to imagine you making a speech; I recall your resistance when I first explained classism to you. I
turn over the flyer and read the three paragraphs.
You tell me about the rally, about your excitement, how it went well andyou received thunderous applause . You say, "Thank you for believing in me
for so long, and helping me to learn to believe in myself." I feel a surge ofpride; I am glad that you have written. Yet, as I reread over and over thepaper you have sent, the pride gives way to an uneasy feeling. I am bitter thatyou grew only after I left, only after one too many fights over the gap between
us. The bitterness turns into anger.
I rip up the letter. Jude sees me from the hall; she stops and quietly asks45

me what is wrong. I reply hotly, "She says thanks for getting out of her life
so she can live it for herself." Jude raises an eyebrow and leaves. I think about
what I have just said . The ache returns; I decide to wait to write you until I
am sure I will not fill the letter with passion and recrimination. I do not write
for two months.
I dream again . I am chalking my hands and wrists. Again, my mother isbeside me; the rest are below. But today, I will take the bar from its hookbeside me and swing out on it, hopefully to return . I listen intently to mymother: if you feel yourself slipping, she says, jerk yourself upward , pop yourwrist , and get another grip. She hands me the bar , shows me where to hold.
I take a breath , then pull myself up and point my legs as I start the swing.
Immediately, pain sears into my shoulders and arms . I hold on for a coupleof feet , then let go , feeling the agony subside as I do so , relaxing into thefamiliarity of the fall. When I leave the net , I am embarrassed , but no one
else appears to be. My father tells me something about centrifugal force . I
listen politely and ascend again . My mother rubs my shoulders ; they are already sore.
I take the bar and swing again; again, I must let go. No one laughs; no one
criticizes. My mother says only , "It is hard to learn." I am encouraged . As I
take the bar , I think about the unbearable pull when my feet leave their support and my arms stretch out; I think about where it hurts , and try to flex
those muscles . I can feel them ; I realize the months of exercises have given
me control where I need it. The third time , I think to myself.
I push out. Instead of abandoning my body to dangle from the bar, I keep
the muscles in my shoulders just a little tight; I am holding myself up , nothanging. It hurts , but it can be borne. I am carried along to the end of theswing, like a clock's pendulum ; momentarily , I am motionless; then the return
trip begins. It is too abrupt; I do not know how to make the change. I slip
and fall.
No one speaks of the fall. They are glowing, praising me for being able tohold on at only the third try. The adrenalin flows through me. My motherwhispers, "This time ," and I feel she is right.
As I fly out again, I am aware of the air brushing into the scoop of mybody. In the split second at the end of the flight , I relax my legs and let mybody go convex, readjusting the muscles . It is enough. I am returning, blindly ,my back to the platform. I want to see the look on my mother's face , but
before I can twist my head to the side, her arm is coming around me strong
and sure , and I am pulled onto the stand , tumbling into my mother's arms. I
tremble, with happiness , I think. Amid the cries from below, I hear my mothermurmur, "Fledgling rides the wind, hmm?" and I think of how much I love
her. She takes a turn on the ropes, swift, fluid , and rippling , laughing as shelands back beside me . Again , I wake to my own laughter.
You write to me , asking if you may come for a visit at Thanksgiving. I
call to tell you yes. I explain that we in the House will go to a cabin up by
Lemon Lake on Thanksgiving Day , a crowd of dykes having a vegetarian feast.
I mention that we all plan to fast the day afterward. You find this amusing.
You will spend The Day with your current lover and fly up that night. I
arrange to pick you up at the airport.
When you arrive, a snowstorm is blanketing the night. The effort of driving
through it plus the prospect of the fast the next day has left me ravenous.
When we get back to the House, I set out all the leftovers on the breakfast

bar . You and the rest sit around on stools or the floor , and we talk of theholiday while I nibble at this and that.
When we go to bed , I am exhausted. I cuddle into you and drop off. The
next morning is delicious. We touch and giggle and are very cozy , until wewake fully. Then we slip back into our roles, self-consciously; you even go
into the bathroom to dress. I grin at that.
I am ravenous again; I take my vitamins and watch you enviously as you
make pancakes and scrambled eggs. I suggest that we spend the day up in
Kenebec Pass, by Maiden Falls and the old ghost towns . You agree and packan enormous lunch , even after I remind you that I will not be eating. I fill acanteen and dress in several layers .
The day is still and clear and much colder than during the snowstorm thenight before . The snow is cleared away down in the valley; but as we drive
higher , into the mountains , it is a thick cover everywhere. By the time we
get to Kenebec, the chains are barely pulling the car along. Maiden Falls is
half frozen , with an edge of ice like new lace. An occasional sheet of ice isfrozen into the swirl and tangle of the rapids, while the water can be heard
rushing on underneath.
Even with all I have on , I am still cold . You look blue and enchanted; youhave not seen a winter like this since you were a child. You sit on a large flatrock , gingerly , and watch the waterfall . I am hesitant to sit next to you. Because I am not watching the waterfall as intently as you, I catch a movementin the sky above us. I look, and see an eagle making passes in the windy reachover our heads . You follow my gaze ; later you tell me that you have neverseen an eagle before. You lie back on the rock, eyes to the sky , and stretchout an arm for me. I curl beside you , and we are an audience for the eagle.
When she leaves, a wall that was between us has fallen. We kiss shyly andthen storm the mountain, following the falls ever upward but going slowly
enough that we may talk. We talk of everything, open, intunate; it is scary ,but you are reassuring and blunt. We talk of our other lovers; we talk of how
we can raise our daughter away from each other; we talk of our parents, theirprogress in understanding our lives; we talk of our past , with a growing gratitude that the memories can be as good as they are, that we remember thesame things ; and we share what glimpses we have of our days that will riseahead of us.
We fmd the remains of Parett City ; I take a picture of you leaning out thethree-cornered window of a crumbled gambling hall. We are friends again.
That night I carmot help shaking when I slip into bed with you. You holdme, trying to soothe the tremors; then you make love to me. I am delighted
to find that your body is not at all familiar, I can learn you once again, andyou cry when you corne and go to sleep with tears still drying on my arm .
As our chests rise and fall together , I sleep, and dream.
I stand in the ring below the trapeze. All of us stand there together, myfamily and I. We will not chalk until we reach the top , because tonight weare performing. People must not understand how we do what we do; theywant to be dazzled, mystified.
My mother goes up the rope first. For performance nights , we use a rope
instead of a ladder. There is more drama in slithering up a thick, curling rope ,hand over hand, without a pause. I follow her. My father holds the rope forme; my cousin is climbing the rope at the other end , to the catcher's bar . My
cousin is catcher because he is the most powerfully built and least excitable.

When my father joins us, there is room only for our f~et on the small platform . We lean our bodies out, hanging on the guys , trying to hide our nervousness with carefully rehearsed grace.
My cousin has begun swinging on his bar ; he is sitting on the bar, his backto us . At a certain point , when the swing is going straight enough, he flips
over backward ; his knees catch on the bar, his legs wind round the ropes .
Now he faces us, upside down.
He has practiced for hours at a time to keep the muscles in his legs from
cramping. to keep from being dizzy as the blood flows to his head and stays
there . If either of these happen , it could be fatal , though tonight we are using
a net. We use a net because 1 am only twelve . In another year, we will again
perform without a net.
1 am not afraid of this coming , being without a net. I have learned how
little a net really means ; the fall is to be avoided always , whether the net isthere or not. After the lessons are learned , there is no excuse for a fall. And
the net is not so big . If one falls while in motion , one can twist, but not movebodily through the air to one side or the other. It is easy to miss the net altogether. Or break a bone in the net. Or slip at the platform. A catcher below
is more effective than a net. But we are a small family. All of us are on theropes.
Someday , my younger siblings will join us ; then my father and my cousin
will go below. They will be older, too slow to do their tricks well anymore ,but still strong enough and fast enough to break our fall with their bodies.
Only someone in your family will volunteer to be a catcher below, because it
usually means death to stop an object of a hundred or more pounds from athirty-foot fall. Until we are more , we hope for no accidents .
I realize that all this review and speculation has passed through my head in
the less than a minute we have stood on the platform. With this realization ,like the breaking of a spell, I awaken. The dream does not feel finished . Perhaps it is a result of the ongoing upheaval in my life .
I come to visit you and other friends , to explain that I am moving to San
Francisco , that the mountains have given me back my sense of self and now
I must "do things." You are upset with my decision . You say I always moveaway from you. You are right. Still , we manage to spend time with each otherthat is not crowded with walls and judgments .
The night before I take my leave, crossing the continent to the land ofdykes and honey, we spend hours saying good -bye. We sit in your yard , underneath a gentle crescent in the early spring . It is warm enough to enjoy thesitting out and damp enough to enjoy sitting close together. I keep saying, .
''Well , it's really late and I must make an early start tomorrow ," and we smileand touch hands, and then suddenly we are off again talking feverishly without
realizing how it has happened. Finally, I stand , looking resolute, and you holdme tightly and then you say "wait" and run into the house.
When you return, you have a big Texas orange in your hands. You place
it in my two hands, and I look at you with a wondering grin. "A present ,"you laugh , "to remind you of home when you miss it the most." I cannot
help but cry; you cannot help but kiss my tears into your wet and wetter lips ;we cannot help but kiss passionately , sadly, until I break away and jump into
my car and run from your waves and cries of "Be careful!"
I leave the orange on the dash of my car . All across Texas and New Mexico48

I look at it, wondering if now is the time, is this when the pain is the worst ,how can I tell when the bleeding will shortly begin to flow less and the woundcommence heal ing over? The orange bothers me until in AJbuquerque, when
I make up my mind how I will use it. When~ I go through the enchanted mesas
and buttes just leading into Arizona, a place that had been ours once and that
I had not recla imed for my own. There, in the Painted Desert, we had gone
through during a sunset, and we were so moved that we couldn't even talk;
we only listened to the ghosts and ancient chants that came to us on the wind .
One of our best times, and I had not yet come back to let the regret wash
through me until I was clean and could make memories in my own nameonce again. When I came to that place, I would open the orange and eat it
slowly, letting the smell and the acidity of the juice seep into my own flesh
like salt, cauterizing swiftly, so that I might continue on without leaving apiece of me behind.
I stopped for the night, glad at least that r would not see the region insunset again , but by the calmer light of morning , the unseen light of morning.
The next day , before I reach the place where I will eat the orange , I approach
the inspection point that prevents citrus fruits (among other things) from entering Arizona and California. I throw the orange under my seat in a panic
and try to drain the guilt from my eyes; silly , to feel so paranoid over such alittle crime ; I've done things a thousand times worse. When I am asked, I den ythat I am carrying any fruit. My voice sounds funny to me, but I guess notto them . I am waved on.
Without the orange visible, I forget about it. I reach Kingman before I re member it. Somehow I have driven through the place where I was going to
eat it without noticing where I was. At this realization I am both agonizedand exhilarated. I pull out the orange and eat it with relish. The trip begins
to take on new symbolism for me. Not only am I cutting ties , I am ftlling inthe spaces with new visions.
I try to remember what I had been thinking of that distracted me so when
I drove through the familiar mesas. I cannot recall , but it stops mattering immediately. As I drive into California , I have a momentary sensation that I am
flying. I throw the orange peels into the Mojave , hoping they will provide
nourishment for the delicate life there.
That nigllt , journey over , the dream returns , picking itself up where it had
left off. r am standing in the charged silence of a people-packed tent , rea chingfor the bar so that I may begin the show. I begin , not because I am the youngest and least experienced ; it is because r am the liglltest, and better on mycousin to ease him into the tremendous impact of a moving body suddenly
hanging onto the ends of his arms .
I do a simple move: out to my cousin, my feet to his hands , one swing
upside down, my face sweeping the crowds but I see nothing , back to the bar,then up to home. Now , in the act , there are no words of praise , no time forreassurance, only a glance that is, really , enougll. My mother laun ches herself
as soon as r hand her the bar. She catches hand-to-hand with my cousin , flips
to return, and is not even sweating yet when she lands. My father does a halftwist to my cousin, meaning he is caugllt by the backs of his hands . He does
a full twist to return. My mother's hand is tensely resting on my neck. The
first is over for each of us. From here, it is easier.
We build gradually until the climax of the show. I do a somersault to my49

cousin. still feeling a small kernel of panic rise in my throat as I hurtle end
over end . trying not to nat ten out in my forward flight. The panic is swallowed
each time I am abruptly halted by call oused flesh seizing my wrists. Then I
return to the hands of my father. who has swung out on the bar just in time
to catch me.
He returns me. then keeps swinging, reversing himself, as my cousin leaves
the catcher's bar and sends it out alone, timing its sweep to the finest fractionof a second. Now that the pressure is off me, I practice by watching my father.
My mother has taught me that in order to do a series of moves as complicatedas those in a single trick, practice is not enough. I must know every part ofevery move. like the building blocks that they are. Then I must put them together in order, imagining every detail, while an internal clock measures off
the seconds. I must imagine this sequence so often that it is thoroughly familiar to me before I ever try it. One reason for this method is that I will know
when I make an error as I make it. But what I appreciate most about it isthat it has transformed the air for me. In the beginning, the vast amount of
air around the platform was just a space that thousands of my small body
could fit into; I was never sure my body would do what I wanted it to in somuch open space. But when I had learned a sequence in my mind, it becamea track in the air, from bar to bar , a tunnel that just fit my body and seemedto hold me up . Now I stood and watched my father, remembering what hewould do next, envisioning his track before he is on it. It is very comforting.
My father does a double somersault to the second bar that my cousin has
sent to him, completes the swing, then returns with a one-and-a-half twist. I
am impressed with the mechanical perfection of my father's actions, and I am
tracking him , but I am not out there with him. I dimly hear the roar of thewatchers; already I am losing concentration, now that my role is almost over;my father and I bow.
My mother takes the bar and jumps off; my cousin has caught his bar andtimes it again. Now I can see the moisture on my mother's face. I hope she
chalked herself before she began ; we keep the chalk up here; we are supposed
to use it every time under the lights, to counteract the sweat that runs down
our arms. I feel a thin web of connection to my mother. As I watch her, I
am learning, the empathy is so strong. I wish her part were over , yet I also
thrill to the confidence and birdness of her.
My mother does not do anything on the first swinging, though she could
just as easily; she is playing to the crowd, prolonging their suspense. But on
the second swing, she goes into a one-and-a-half somersault ; the calf and ankleof each foot find the rope and cling; she has caught herself upside down, alone .
Before the crowd can end its gasp, she is coming up high above the secondbar and falling down to it in a two-and-a-half twist.
I want to hug her madly when she is safely back ; instead, we wave at thecrowd. My cousin projects himself out and lets go, a churning spiral to thenet below. My mother is next , with a series of convoluted somersaults; then
my father; then me with as much as I can manage, a single flip, the colors
around me blurring as I move within motion to the resistance of the net.
We flip over the side of the net in turn ; I join them, the last, and we linkarms and bow. I am thinking about how much the crowd loves the solo stunts,
how deceptive these are . The foot-and-leg catch is easier on the body, especially for my mother , with her mighty legs. It is in a way harder to be a catcher,50

being responsible for those coming toward you, having to gear your timing to$omeone else's, keeping a sense of balance while always upside down, being
jerked repeatedly, all the hard work with none of the glamour. That is why
my dull cousin, who can perform over and over without making a mistake or
being bored , is our catcher. I am glad to be on the other side . As we scamperout of the ring, I awaken, tired and satisfied.
The next time I see you, it is on your own territory. I come to your city,
not mine anymore ; I drive through the heavy traffic one afternoon and knockat the door of the house you share with your lover. She is in the living room,
watching television. I am slightly ill at ease; I do not know what to say to her.
She ignores me altogether, her eyes on the screen. I am relieved; I stand there,
watching the news with her, as you get ready .
We are going out to eat. As you come into the room on our way out, thenewscast takes on an urgent tone. Mechanically we watch. The camera is showing Karl Wallenda crossing the wire seventy feet above a South American street.
He teeters as I hear the words " . .. fell to his death today ... " I want tolook away but I do not. The wind catches him; we see him fall , try to hang
onto the wire, then fingers give. He plummets to the pavement below . The
camera is on him all the way.
I feel sick; I turn and bury my face in your shoulder . You say, ''Why are
they showing that on tv?" Your lover shrugs and says, "If they didn't, someone else would ." She is angry at us both for embracing in front of her. I pull
you out of the door.
I am unable to drive; I am shaking. We skip dinner. I buy a bottle of wine ,get drunk gratefully , and we go to a quiet place in a thicketed park to talk .
For some reason we are avoiding any mention of Karl Wallenda's fall. You
touch me much, but are more silent than I am .
Finally I begin letting my feelings out. In some way the fall is a threat tome . I tell you about my dreams. It rushes out in a jumble and I feel better,but I need a response from you. I wait, oddly alert. You say that you think
I am overreacting to the newscast , upsetting as it was.
I do not try to explain anymore. I say, "I want our relationship to stayexactly as it is right now." You are very affected; you feel that you have fmallypleased me, after all the years of my discontent. But I know that I have insulted
you, I have laid a death knell on our association, because of course we willchange, we will move from here and now, and I am not ready for this. I withdraw from you before we even say good,bye . You do not notice. You kiss me
cheerfully and step away. I do not watch you go.
When I am at last home again , I gather up the dictionary and open it speculatively . I look for the root word of trapeze: trapezium, the Latin, meaning"a quadrilateral having no parallel sides." In front of me, suddenly, I see thebar, suspended from two ropes which are hooked to supports in the top of
the tent. I see the curve of the tent, the widening ropes , the bar: a closed
figure . I hear my mother's voice telling me the muscles in my shoulders thatmake me able to raise my head are called the trapezius. I considef my life,
how the boundaries of it no longer conform to any thing but the impulse thatmoves me. I think, I move from one part of my life to another , and the distance between the parts is never the same twice.
I put away the dictionary and go to bed. I stretch out in the width of mybed, enjoying the luxury of so much space for myself. I do not dream , at all .
51

Cellan Jay

Meditation on Movement
In the beginning was the beginning and that has never changed. After thateverything changed / and never stopped changing.
In the beginning (we all had high hopes . Here was a place where we could be
more ourselves than we ever had been . Here was a place where the struggle tosurvive , to create space for ourselves, was so immediate a reality that the possibilities for creating alternatives multiplied spectacularly. In taking just precisely what we needed , and not waiting to be given, or attempting to earn,or buying with any of the current dishonest and contradictory currencies, thedelineation of our selves in opposition to the enemy crystalized; the war wason and we loved it.) In the end /everybody left and I stayed. For six weeks I lived in a bare white room ,painting the black birds of death on the walls and other symbols of power
and mystery. In another photograph all of our belongings are in the street ;in the background the house is boarded up. We later broke into the houseand set fires in all the rooms, huddling in the shadows outside with a finerain dusting our faces, watching, watching the fire, our eyes, our hearts fillingwith flame , until we heard sirens and escaped into the dark broken streets /this was no revenge. We said it was a ritual act of love.
I later returned to a place I had left before. I wrote:when I came to this house after so many months, I thought I saw myself
as I was then siipping out the back door to feed the chickens. I ran after you,
Cellan , you looked like me, you were wearing my clothes; I called after you,
you were humming a song I wrote the last time, I knew it was you though
you were more of a witch then than I have become; you were waiting foryour lover who has come and gone twice since then, you were living in theattic (I have lived at the top of many houses in two cities since then, I am
older and harder, J have broken since then, I am broken now) but I knew it
was you. J called your name repeatedly, I called your other names but you
wouldn't answer me, you wouldn't answer me. J ran after you and you dissolved into the side of the woodshed. J collapsed and rolled in the mud, cursing the chickens, cursing my bad luck, cursing the rain, it has been raining
steadily for two weeks. In the end J left without seeing you again. What has
become of you?
[she'll turn up. Maybe not here but somewhere. Certainly not in the way
I expected / anything is not attracted by the desperation in any other thing,
there is no need to say what.] Or for example:
My friend left me / I left my friend in a hilly dry region in the south. The
hills were surprisingly and spectacularly green. The city rose out of the earth
in orange hues. The sky, needless to say, was very, very blue. The currencyof the land was so inflated that the least expensive item rang up in the hun-52

dreds . I couldn't understand anything-the language, the blue wire of a skythat dissected me in the mornings before I could get out of bed, the dreams
that sickened me even in my waking hours, the planets in different dimensions
my friend and I had occupied , huddled into the aloneness behind our eyes.
When we left each other, and she went south and I went north and neithe rof us knew where we were going, I struggled not to believe the lie that wewould never get there / though we never did
as far as I know / but that is more because my conception of where anywhere is and how any woman gets there has /Moved on .
II

SHE CAME INTO A ROOMI lay drunk full of myself on the hillside in the snow , looking up throughthe branches of trees into the stars, snow falling on me, stars and the coldnight air ftIling me up. I lay there twenty minutes , maybe half an hour. I
staggered up the hill and came hushed into a room , the sky falling off me inribbons. I came /hushed into a room. Women were naked by the fire. They complained of
the cold she brought in. They were tearing the pages from a book and laying
them on the hot coals, their blank eyes staring at the curling blue-black pages.
The woman ran screaming from the room back out into the night and flung
herself into a snow bank. She lay there wiL1. the tears freezing on her face.
She lay there twenty minutes , maybe half an hour. [She entered the roomand the women
took from her her damp clothes, they took her into the soft warm flesh of
their bodies . We later burned the pages of a book which was full of lies.]
She came into the room .
I cursed / I screamed / I ran from the room.
MARIANNE STAYED. We are like that. We have never yet gone the same
way at the same time. She thought she would come but I knew she would
stay for I wanted so badly not to travel alone, I wanted so badly to stay but
I couldn't and therefore I knew I would hate her for staying and she did butby the time she knew she would stay I had stopped hating her for I knew she
would stay and I would go and we would kiss on the platform and I would
wave as the train pulled out and be sad for some time until I stopped that
we never did go the same way because that is how we are and so we did. It
is unlikely I will ever again be in that room so if they ever smashed things
up that night, as I hoped , they have certainly by now repaired the damage
and , I hope , moved on. I will never know for sure. [wiz en J explained thesituation to Noelle J said though she thinks now that she will, Marianne will

not be on the train tonight and she said neither will you. But she had missed
the point entirely.}
III

Other endings made naked by a combination of circumstances persist in
my imagination:,

S3

How we sang that night, in the empty warehouse on the canal! How wesang- breaking into our power right in front of their noses, on the very day
they thought they had us down once and for all, how we sang- like the arrogant outsiders, the awful outlaws we were; jumping, hooting, banging on thedrums, and the one clear voice of the flute changing and binding, ranging in
the high notes of our beings, our furious beings. The flutist played all night.
Long after we slept, her tune vested my dreams with the significance ofan ending. I felt finished / in the morning
I was too weary to ask myself, what now?
She said she was weary, she said she was resting, she said this moment is a
riddle to me and I am baffled by the unfolding of events; why don't things
go on? She was weary she said, and she was resting she said but later she
was forced to admit errors had been made. She realized she had been waiting
to be claimed by movement, she had forgotten how to claim her Self and had
therefore dis-membered her Moving Self; she was not resting , she was waiting
and in waiting, she came to be waiting on the master who, ever-quick to perceive a lady-in-waiting, a victim, had proceeded to colonize her waiting-roomwith demons and delusions she had thought long left behind. To be passive
is to be a victim. To be a victim is to be afraid. A victim is colonized by fear,a spiraling fear that creates for the victim a fearful reality. All her fears are
realized. She colludes in her own oppression, by oppressing herself She has
STOPPED MOVING:
RED ALERT.
IVCONCLUSION
It is so hot and dry here. She needn't have feared coming back. What isfamiliar, is so in a kind way. She walks a lot. Dust blows up out of her footsteps. She has stopped asking, how does movement occur, having realized how
the question was wrong, having realized how the answer does not exist within
the confmes of language. If she answered herself at all, she said, by occurring,
simply. Once she said, movement occurs in direct proportion to the fearlessness of the spirit. Yesterday she wrote in the book she carries everywherethe goddess is not a moralist. And underneath this, in heavy strokes: THE
PAST IS PAST AND THE FUTURE IS MADE.

Having recaptured belief, she believes this is true .

54

Llorona
cry sorrow sorrow
corning with your dried snakes charm
charming the crazed andthe innocent with your lyrical
lunacymysticaltales of the moon
you claim immortalityyou
you think you 71 find me there
docilebewildered
the lost child torn fromyou by demons that swirl andburn amidst the goldenbrown hair of your devil devilchild
oh cry sorrow withyour spells and the magic noone doubts you own
the power that swallows everyone's
fantasies
you claim life foreverusing scars for tears and anoise noise that shakes
reverberates
beating all the passion
with a passion
the black sweet bruises and dark systems
wanting to wring them out ofme out of you
you claim life foreveragain and again thinking
I'll be there steady readyto take up the fightof mother and daughter divided
unsatisfied foreverantagonistic cry sorrow
let your ovary
throb from the pain of my absence
I am the daughter the children
shredded castrated decapitatedin the arid desert
the blood red flames in your eyes
which serve as blinders
to keep you from seeing what
you wish not to seetake a white womon to lie
with youclean smooth asenamelthe veins plainly visible
through vynil skinrest your head on what
you claim so close to perfection
and take repose
rest rest
but then when all seems finally
quiet
there's a beat beata beat in your heada pain in your abdomenysiempresiempre por lasnochesthere's that fearful wailing-Achy Obejas

ssBarbara Wilson

Emily's Arrows
1. 1969
His parents kept asking, "When are you going to get married?"
My parents were "disappointed ." However, they gave us a used vacuum
cleaner to help us set up housekeeping.
I used it faithfully.
I was very married.

2. Henry Miller and the Taxi Dancer
At first we were very happy in our rebellion; then we began to quarrel.
Robbo was suddenly after me to get a job , though he didn't have one either.
He was going to school on a scholarship which turned out not to be sufficientfor the two of us. A nineteen year old college drop-out, I sat at home, cleaned
and read. I especially read about Henry Miller's enigmatic wife, June, in Anais
Nin's diaries.
" ... the phosphorescent color of her skin , her huntress profile, the evennessof her teeth. She is bizarre , fantastic, nervous, like someone in a high fever. Her
beauty drowned me. As I sat before her, I felt I would do anything she asked ofme,"

Robbo read Henry Miller and it made him horny, but he didn't like it when
I faltered on about Anais Nin 's attraction to Henry's wife.
One day I ringed my eyes with black eyeliner , like June in the photograph.
"You look like an idiot. Wash that off," Robbo said when he came home
in a bad mood. ''Why don 't you get a job and do something?"
June Miller had been a taxi dancer when Henry met her. She took drugs andlived at the fever point of existence. She carried on with women and everybody.
I said I would get a job when he got one.
It was our first fight and I hated him .

3. Fast Foods
A week later we bo th got part-time jobs at the Taco Bell on Pacific Coast
Highway , right across from Shephard 's Ambulance . Two or three times anhour the electric d oors rose up to spit out a flashing, wailing rescue car. It
was harrowing at first, but you could get used to it.
Our Taco Bell manager assured us that "fast foods are the wave of the future.. . " A skinny , sly man with yellow , erupting skin , Handy had trained inTe xas at the Taco Bell School for Managers . He had also been with Kentucky
Fried for a while. He was pleased we caught on so quickly to burrito making .
He lectured Robbo: "Stick around. Yem can rise to the top in this biz. Lookat me , not much older than yourself. I'm bringing it in all right."
Handy thOUght Robbo should quit college and go to manager school. He
was impressed that Robbo could chop twenty pounds of onions without crying.

4. Emily
Emily was the person I most often worked with in the afternoons . She was
sixteen or seventeen and was still in high school. She was tall , dark-haired andalmost beautiful , except for one thing:56

Emily looked as if she had fallen asleep and someone had drawn lines in fme
pencil across one cheek ; they radiated out from a dimple or scar near her left ear.
"I'm glad you didn't try and brush it off first thing," she told me a few
days after we began to work together. "Most people do."
Her parents were bringing a suit against the doctor who had put her faceback together after a motorcycle accident. He had left the dirt in.
Emily was metaphysically inclined. The sirens didn't bother her. She believedin karma, reincarnation, afterlife, everything. She was working her way through
The Tibetan Book of the Dead. During slow times at the counter she read me bits.
She wanted to move to San Francisco when she graduated in June. She
took acid every weekend.
"Get back to work , girls ," Handy admonished us. ''Wipe up that bean goop
when there's no customers ."He did not suggest we go to manager school.

5. (Un)married Life
was easier with both of us working at Taco Bell , as we ate burritos , tostados ,tacos and soft drinks two meals a day .
Nevertheless , as spring began to turn into summer I grew more and moredepressed . I cried and read , read and cried . I read every single novel of Henry
Miller's to find out more about June, returning always for reference to thefirst volume of Anais Nin's diaries.
Anais said Henry lied about June, made her into a character , did not touch
her true essence . Anais told June , "You're the only woman who ever answered
the fantasies I had about what a woman should be ."Anais told Henry, "If there is an explanation of the mystery , it is this: thelove between women is a refuge and an escape into harmony and narcissism inplace of conflict. In the love between man and woman there is resistance andconflict. Two women do not judge each other. They form an alliance. It is, ina way, self-love. I love June because she is the woman I would like to be.""It's not my fault you're unhappy ," Robbo told me . "Do something withyour life."
Do something, always do something. He made it sound so easy . But all myenergy had gone into my rebellion , first to initiate it, then to sustain it. I had
dropped out and I had moved in with Robbo . I felt too weak to do anythingelse. I dreamed of dramatic gestures , a life at fever pitch, knowing a woman
like June Miller, being her-while day after day I served out beans with a smearof red or green chile sauce and listened to the ambulances scream .

6. Emily's Acid Trip
Emily asked me if I would like to take acid with her one weekend . First I said
yes , then I changed my mind . I had taken acid with Robbo once and I had cried
the whole time. But I said I would spend the evening with Emily while she tripped.
She had borrowed someone's apartment as she still lived at home with herparents. It was one of the barest apartments I have ever been in ; there wastoilet paper in the bathroom and that was about all .
No, it wasn't quite empty . On the bare wooden floor of the living room
were two corduroy bean bag pillows and a big spool table with a clay pipe
and a dish of strawberries, the first of the season.
We smoked some weed and lay bumpily back onto the pillows .
"You sure you don't want to try it?" Emily asked, taking two tabs out ofher front shirt pocket.
57

I shook my head. I felt high enough and just frne . I looked longingly at the
curves of the strawberries. "I'm starving," I said.
"Me too," Emily joked and popped one ('If the tabs.
I think I was waiting for something to happen immediately.
Nothing did.
We smoked more weed , and I began to eat the strawberries, holding mygreed in check, taking only one at a time, letting my tongue first brush thefaint prickles up and down , then rubbing the berry over my lips so that someof the juice escaped and stained them, frnally breaking into the fruit in slow
bites , exposing the feathery white center.
''Whoo! Are you getting into those strawberries," Emily giggled; then she
bent over and kissed me quickly , almost experimentally , on the mouth while
I still had one of the berries in my teeth.
I was more amazed than anything to see her face close-up , with the graphite
tattoo spraying across her cheek like a comet.
"Don't worry ," Emily said , worldly or embarrassed , leaning back once again,out of sight behind the spool table.
I wasn 't worried ; no , not that . And if she had asked me, I would have said unhesitatingly that I had liked it. She didn't ask though , or say anything at all fora while.

7. The Reincarnation of June Miller
Later, while staring at the ceiling, I launched into an animated description ofJune Miller: "She had tuberculosis, but she didn't mind it. It helped her live a fiery
life, that's what she wanted - to burn up , not to be ordinary. She lied about everything, she couldn't help it. She needed life to be interesting. She had affairs withmen and women . Anais Nin was in love with her , lots of women were. She believedin Dostoievsky like the Bible. She lived in New York and Paris, she might havebeen a drug addict, she was very beautiful, and she wore kohl around her eyes ."My voice drifted off. I looked expectantly at Emily , beautiful and drugged ,as dreamy as a harem girl in her Indian shirt, with a veil of scars over her expression. Would she be as moved by June's life as I was?
Emily said nothing for a moment; then she ventured in a far-away voice ,"Maybe you're her reincarnation. Or is she dead yet?"
I didn't know, to tell the truth. I was taken aback by the question . I foundI hardly believed in June as a real person ; she was so much a symbol in mymind, though of what, I would have found it difficult to say.
"You know what I'd like to do?" I surprised myself by saying. "Is get someblack eyeliner and dance naked around the room ."But right after that I fell asleep .
8. My Dream (/ think)
I opened my eyes and saw Emily across the room, in front of a full-length
mirror I hadn't noticed before. She was naked and could have been dancing,though it was very slow, more like a plant weaving in the wind . She wasshadowy and white and lovely , and the thin scars on her face formed a kindof mantilla or a spider's web over her cheek .
I wanted to touch her very much.
I said, in a voice that sounded like my voice, but still odd, "Give me anotherstrawberry, June."58

9. More Sirens
Then I was awake. I didn't have any idea what time it was.
"Emily," I whispered. "Where are you?"
She was lying, asleep and fully clothed, behind the spool table, half on a
. pillow and half on the floor . I knew I should leave, Robbo would kill me.
I didn't wake her then , but leaned over and brushed her scarred cheek withmy lips. It was soft; the dirt lay lightly under the skin.
A siren began its long shriek the minute I stepped out the door. It was only
about five blocks to our house, but on the way I had to go past the Taco Bell .
Robbo and Handy were just closing up when I got there. They let me in. Handy
was friendly and wanted to put me right to work.
"Could you just wipe off that counter?" he asked, giving me a rag.
But Robbo was furious. "What the fuck are you doing out at 2 A.M.?"
I didn't know if I'd done anything to be ashamed of, but I suddenly felt
as guilty as if I had. In some vital way I had been unfaithful to him, andeverything was different. I didn't even want to look in his direction.
But the doors of Shephard's Ambulance tore open then and spewed out
another screaming car, cutting off all conversation long enough for me tothink up an excuse.
"I got Dad to drop me off here so I could walk you home ," I said, lying
as skillfully as June Miller ever had , embracing my deception.

10. Emily's Arrows
Emily graduated that June, a few weeks after our evening together, andmoved to San Francisco . She gave me a copy of The Tibetan Book of the
Dead and I gave her the first volume of Nin 's diary. We hugged each othergood -bye beneath Handy's somewhat disgusted eye, in the back of the Taco
Bell where I had been stirring refried beans. I wanted to ask her why she had
kissed me or if she had really danced naked before the mirrors. Instead I begged
her im pulsively, "Don't get yo ur face fixed ."She just laughed. "Forget you," she said .
Not long after that Robbo and I split up. "I'm tired of masculine/feminine
conflict ," I told him rather grandly. "Yeah, well I hope you get it together
sometime ," he returned .
I gave the vacuum cleaner back to my parents and returned to college.
Soon I was studying the usual subjects and demonstrating against the war,and had fo rgotten all about June Miller.
Not quite: years later I fell in love with a woman who had once worked
as a topless dancer in New York. She had the same dark-rimmed, world-weary
eyes and pouting cheeks as Henry Miller's photograph of June in the Diary.
I remember once telling this woman about Emily . I ended my description
with something I had never thought of before , "Some of the lines on her facewere like arrows."''Which direction were they pointing? " she wanted to know.
I laughed and shook my head. "They weren 't pointing anywhere," I said.
''Were they?"59

Karen Saum

And Be My Love
Ann discovered she was in love on the day the world almost came to an
end. It was glorious that October day in 1962. In Iowa it was softly hued ,russet , copper , yellow and gold . Not so in the Caribbean , .where life balanced
delicately on the tightly drawn will of two men. There , in her mind's eye , Ann
saw colors bold as a Parker Bros. game board : a cobalt sea and an emeraldisland surrounded by steely grey markers with tiny stars and stripes on the prow .
Advancing move by move were the battleships of the other side , each with its
bright red hammer and sickle . Bristling the circumference of the board were thedoomsday missiles. They were black and they all looked alike .
At six-thirty that morning Ann opened her cellar door. The wicker basket
in her hands overflowed with diapers. She paused before stepping out on thegrass, white and delicate as a bridal veil. The tide of golden air spilling over thebrim of the plain had blandished night away except under the ferns and behind
the willow where the clothesline was strung. The world seemed suspended in a
golden gel , delicate as floating milkweed .
Then the air assailed her nose and her lungs. It was frosted and acrid withthe odor of nighttime fires', the smell whipping her like pennants flying . She
stepped out briskly . Wind rustle.d a pile of leaves . A squirrel ran out on a limb
to abuse a jay . In_the distance j on the other side of town , the whistle of theexpress bustled along ahead of the sun.
She smelled coffee . That meant David was up. And so must Sara be , shethought. At this very minute perhaps Sara is making coffee , because surely
she'l want an early start. And she tried to conjure a picture of Sara in a kitchen
performing the prosaic routine of coffee making. But she could not. All she
could see , and that quite clearly ( the diapers had disappeared ; she hung them bytouch) , was Sara that night walking down the dormitory corridor with her glass
full of vodka saying defiantly , " It's not water , you know. It really is vodka ."Half of her , she confided later, wanted to be thrown out. But of course no one
believed her. "If I'd said it was water ," she remarked bitterly , " they 'd 've had-old Mrs . Grundy with her belt ful of keys up to smell and I'd 've been out on myear ."
No, Ann decided, Sara would have her first cup of coffee somewhere on theroad, on the way. Somewhere memorable , a peg to hang the whole adventure
on. Ann could hear her telling it, see her : " Moody's Diner on route 30 , a sadlittle cafe. That 's where I had coffee the day I stopped in Iowa to visit Ann thattime. The short order cook was Lymon Willis. Really he was ."Before the laundry basket was empty , Ann's fingers were blue and the diapers
frozen , their folds and wrinkles hard as metal , projecting rigidly at odd angles
from the line. In the kitchen she warmed her hands under the cold water tap andlistened . She could hear David in his study opening and shutting drawers. Thatmeant he was 'having difficulty ,' probably with his introduction for that after·
noon of Adele Gray. Still , he wasn 't slamming them , so it could be worse . She
didn 't understand why he was being so fretful. It wasn't that he admired Gray's

60

poetry. Perhaps that was the trouble. Ann would have loved to introduce her.
She had hinted as much to David , but either he hadn't heard or he chose toignore the hints as she dropped them. In the early morning kitch en , drying her
hands, Ann imagined herself on the stage , Adele Gray behind her , and before
her, spreading into the shadows under the balcony , recedin g up under the eaves,
all the students of Trenton College , all the faculty , all the trustees , and all th e
most important people of Cambridge , Iowa. Her heart caught in her throat andher mouth turned dry. Still, as chairman of the English department David spokefrom that stage all the time, she reasoned, paring it down to size . He reallyshouldn't mind.
Upstairs she heard babies' voices. Aaron and Adam. They were both up .
Where was Paul? She put water on for cereal and eggs in a pan to boil , thenwent to see. Paul was still asleep in his crib , his face red and. wet with perspiration. Not a fever. Not today . Not with seven , maybe eight, people coming todinner. Not when it was the whole English department and Adele Gray. Maybeit would pass. She tiptoed out and left him. In the hall , Adam caromed off her
thigh . She caught and steadied him . He smelled awful. The guilt on his faceneeded no corroboration.
"I'm sorry, Mommy. It was an accident. "Into the toilet she hurried him , the one at the head of the stairs because it
was closest, and cleaned him there . As soon as she had him on his back , he began to charm, blew spit bubbles at her and baby raspberries.
"Not today , friend ," she said , but her severity fluttered lightly over otherpassions, and Adam , mocking her , drew his brows down too in a knot between
his eyes and shook his head at her disapprovingly.
''What are you supposed to do first thing in the morning , Adam ?" she said ,keeping the upper hand.
"Go potty.""That 's right. Now get dressed. And tell Aaron to get dressed. His bus will
be here in half an hour." Aaron, five , was in kindergarten .
The phone in the kitchen began to ring. Ann dropped the loaded diaper inthe toilet bowl and ran downstairs.
It was Jennifer in Iowa City . She and Ann had decided the night before tosend telegrams protesting the Cuban blockade and to get , each of them , twenty
other people to protest too.
"Have you heard the news this morning? " Jennifer said .
The water for the cereal had almost all boiled away , Ann saw . She thougl1 t.
'The eggs will be hard ; David won 't eat his .' "No ," she said , " I haven 't had achance .""Don't bother. It's not encouraging. Did you get your telegrams off? ""Six of them . Well, eight with mine and David's.""Six! Is that all? Listen , you tell those people in Cambridge from me if they
don't send telegrams soon, their vote to keep the world's not going to ge t co unted.""I'll tell them . I've got to go now , Jennifer." She hung up . A grey vort ex ofpanic opened in her belly , and for a moment tl1e hundreds o f tl1ings to be do nethat day went bobbing crazily out of reach . She steadied hersel f against vertigo .
thrust the anxiety back into an obscure recess of her gut where it co ul d churnunattended.
"One thing at a time , Owl ," Sara would say . Ann clung to the th ough t.
61

Breakfast first. But here it was seven o'clock, and she was already runningten minutes behind. That was ten minutes an hour. She flipped the checkered
cloth across the table; by this evening when her dinner guests arrived, how much
would it be? Two hours. If things kept on like this, she would be two hours
behind schedule . The glasses down from the cupboard, cereal bowls on the stove,sugar, spoons . . . the cups! And she smiled as a vision came sailing across her
mind: the English department and their wives and Adele Gray all milling about
with frosty breath in the cold night air on the verandah un til she was ready.
David flustered and apologetic , fiddling with his watch, cocking it to his ear tohear the tick and say every few minutes, "I can 't understand it. She always runs
right on schedule."
The phone rang again . She should have left it off the hook. Where would
she find twelve more people in Cambridge to cable the President? Suddenly the
primary colors of that Caribbean game board dominated the whole plane of her
mind. If something wasn't done, there wouldn't be a dinner party tonight. She
wished Sara was here with her , now. She wished Paul would get up. It was so
odd fixing breakfast without him underfoot, and she felt an ache of grief flow
through her arms at the absence of his perpetual irritation.
"Hello?"It was Karl, one of those who had refused to cable the President.
"Good morning. It is very early and I am sorry to call at this hour. Is David
available?""Good morning , Karl. I'll call him.""Ann, were you successful in your search for telegrams?""So, so. Six others besides David and me. If it's done by popular vote, I
think the world loses.""Such things, they cannot be decided in this way ," Karl said. He was an historian. His opinions issued ex cathedra.
''Well, maybe not. I'll get David."
But before she could call him, there was a terrified scream from the bathroom
at the head of the stairs and David's feet pounding down the hall .
''Who left the diaper in the toilet this time?" David 's voice licked downstairs
into the kitchen. "Aaron, why don 't you ever look before you flush! Ann!
Would you come look at this mess?""It's Karl for you, honey. And breadfast is ready ," she called up into the tumult, willing it to calm . "He'll be here in a minute , Karl."
Ten after seven. And the orange juice wasn 't made . If they didn't blow up
the world , she was going to be in a pack of trouble , she could see that right now ;and she laughed aloud. What Sara would say to that! "You're the only person I
know whose life's a distraction to her ," she said once. It seemed funny and theyboth laughed. What was it Sara had wanted her to do? She couldn 't remember
any more , or why she hadn't. David was the same. He complained when she
didn't read a chapter he wrote or an article right then when he gave it to her.
Her life , Sara and David both seemed to feel, had no shape to it , at least thatthey could tell. And yet the thOUght of Sara's coming comforted her. Sara's
presence seemed to hover brightly over the breakfast table, fluttering the air.
"Sara's coming!" She blurted it out. She hadn't meant to. Hadn't meant tomention it at all . It would just make David cross ; she knew that. "But we 'rehaving a dinner party tonight ," she could almost hear him say. And Sara had
been vague. She might not stay. What was she driving to Des Moines for any-62

way? It was all very strange.
David's head came up from the notes he had propped against the sugar bowl.
Aaron paused , his milk glass halfway to his lips , alert for trouble , his hair wet
and slicked back. He'd been into David's hair tonic again. She could smell it.
But David's attention never quite broke loose from the notes he was reading, never quite caught the new fact she had tossed out to him unexpectedly.
"Oh, good," he murmured. Aaron finished his milk, and next thing they were
all tumbling from the table and out the door.
She decided when they were gone to have another cup of coffee. Somehow
she was back on schedule again . It was just past seven-thirty. She would call
Dr. Thomas at home about Paul , but not until eight. It couldn't be the chicken
pox. It just couldn't, not today .
Sara had never seen Paul , the thought struck her just then, tangled up withthe certainty that it was chicken pox. Had to be. Rachel called yesterday to report Julie had them. But yesterday Ann brushed it aside as too incongruous.
How could anyone get chicken pox when the world might end . That's what she
must have been thinking. "You remind me of a turtle," Sara said . What was it
she had done? Ann couldn't remember. ''When you feel the world touching you ,you just settle back inside that shell where nothing else fits and wait til it goesaway again." Probably it was when she started to sleep with David . How strangethat it was she, serious Ann, who was caught and not Sara. How intense she had
been then ; she could hardly remember the feel of it anymore, just the fact: intent on 'doing something ·with her life.'
Then, that last time Sara was here, lighting for a moment , on her way to
London , or to New York, to read a paper , or to attend a conference, going somewhere, to do something; they had sat up late into the night talking. Once Paul
had stirred and Sara had laid her hand on Ann's undulating belly. "If it's agirl , what will you call her?" Sara asked. "Sara," Ann said as if it had all been
decided, not something that just sprang to her lips from nowhere , from love.
"Mommy!""Mommy!"Adam's cries had been falling for some time like summer showers, unheeded.
"Mommy! It's raining from the ceiling! I told you a hundred times!""Oh my god! The diaper!" Ann knocked over her cup as she jumped up. And
that was the bathroom for guests. Eight o'clock. How had that happened! There
she was half an hour late again and the doctor to call. Not the plumber. Please
not the plumber. Please don't let that goddam diaper be flushed all the way
down, she prayed , flying up the stairs two at a time.
The air that day was gorged with words. People everywhere kept tuned into hear the latest bulletin:" ... as the Russian ships approach Rendezvous Point . .. "" ... no further word on the results of that meeting ... "" ... from Washington on the thousands of telegrams pouring into the WhiteHouse: the American people are 100 percent behind the President and his firm
stand ... "Karl said, "Neither of them can back down now, it has gone too far . They
would lose too much face.""But it's unthinkable .""I am afraid it is inevitable."" ... as the Russian ships approach Rendezvous Point ... "63

Sara left Oberlin at quarter to six that morning with a thermos of coffee forrest areas along the way . It was dark when she left, and she had still not decided whether to stop at Ann's . Ann was so apt not to approve. And David! If
David found out , he would probably show her the door. No, she couldn't bear
it. not now . Afterwards perhaps . After she had been to Des Moines. Des Moines,
magic place . She would call Ann from Cedar Rapids and stop on the way backwith Nancy safe beside her.
Nancy! Sara looked at her watch. It was just six. Nancy would be getting up ,just now opening her eyes and reaching to turn off the alarm , her hand so slender , so soft to touch .
"Come live with me and be my love , and we will all the pleasures prove,"
Sara sang to a tune she invented as she drove into the becoming day .

***It was a day of convergings. The Adele Gray lecture was at three in Lorrimer
Chapel. David insisted Ann attend. She wanted to. of course. But . . . Paul did
have chicken pox. The pustules had emerged and he was miserable . Karl had
phoned again and suggested to Ann a group telegram. The wording was milder
than she liked , but it was a vote against holding the Apocalypse on October 22,
1962 . By nine-thirty , with her blessing , it was on its way to Washington overthirteen signatures. She managed to extract the diaper from the toilet without
a plumber and to remove five gallons of water from the bathroom floor before
it shorted the ancient electrical wiring. At two-thirty , when the babysitter arrived , the house was ready for company and what could be prepared for dinner
beforehand had been. Ann was running right on schedule.
Adele Gray , after a gracious introduction by David, spoke for a little overan hour. She quickly moved from the lectern, stiffly centered in a glare of lights,
to a less well-lighted area to the side and front of the stage. She was standing
most of the time only a few yards from Ann . The timbre of her voice without
the thinning distortion of electronic boosting was rich, and if her features were
obscure to those sitting in the balcony, her communion with her audience there
in the shadow where she could see them was profound. She was vibrantly alive.
Ann felt herself caught in the net of her words ; she hung from the beam ofher black eyes which roved the audience but returned again and again to Ann's
waiting eyes. Ann came to feel as if she and Adele Gray were alone in a vast
space . She felt herself, her thoughts , all her sensations, gathered in a concentrated stream and drawn toward the woman on stage as iron filings are energized and pointed and pulled through space by the attractive power of a magnet.
. The intermittent touch of their eyes seemed to her as natural and insistent as
the peristaltic contractions of hunger. For an hour Ann was completely absorbed
by Adele Gray .
Ann was one of the last people to leave Lorrimer Chapel. The chapel sat ona ridge which ran like a spine through the village of Cambridge, cutting it in
two . She paused for a moment on the top step . The town spreading out below
her with its white frame houses visible through the autumn trees , showing clearly now the cloistered silhouettes of winter, seemed like the New England of
Gray's poems to her. The sun as it descended into the oblivion of the vast western plain was beginning to draw to itself on broad bands of gold the light lin gering in small pools where it was cupped , in the petal of a late rose , among
the amber stubble of gardens , and from reluctant window panes where pieces
of it caught fire and burned in a blaze of red and yellow . The air was liqUid,as it had been in the early morning, and the smell of burning leaves and woodfires promised to the people hurrying homeward the comforts of hearth, contented children and good things for supper. Ann should have hurried home too ,,to be sure that all those comforts were prepared; or perhaps she should havegone first to the faculty lounge to meet Adele Gray . She did neither ; she wan dered in an aimless way, as she had not wandered in years , down past the libraryto the pond which in the twilight was a hazy confection of greys, and there shewalked with her head bent forward and her hands plunged deep in the pocketsof her coat. She did not want to meet Adele Gray. It was that conviction which
drove her out of the chapel when she fmally left and turned her north toward
the pond and away from 109 Elm Street , where in an hour and a half they would
would all be converging and she must be ready with drinks and hors d 'oeuvres
and a well-timed glimpse of shiny babies ready for bed. But she did not want tomeet Adele Gray .
Every time her mind reached that point it would leap to Sara , to the imageof Sara, Sara driving, Sara on her way to Cambridge , and there with Sara it seemed to get stuck until some memory from the afternoon , a phrase Adele Gray
had uttered while her eyes held Ann's , nudged her back into an awareness ofthe present. In an hour, less than an hour , the whole English department would
converge on her house and Adele Gray with them. But she did not want to meet
Adele Gray. Her body stiffened at the thought of touching her hand. Then likean acrobat her mind flew to the waiting image of Sara, of Sara rushing to meether.
Understanding when it came was complete. It arrived whole and perfect. It
was as if in the somersault her mind made in its fall from Adele Gray to Sara
the world had turned too, swung upside down, so that when her thoughts cameto rest again on Sara , the world had changed . She was in love with Sara. It was
suddenly so clear. The evening star winked red . It knew . It knew what she longed to do was to hold Sara in her arms, that she had always wanted this. The
fine leafless threads of a willow brushed her cheek as Sara's hair had brushed
it so many times and she had not known , but the willow knew . Water rippled
the shore and the wind in the willows called Sara's name. They had always
known and so had she . And Adele Gray . And Adele Gray. She turned. She flew
home. Her feet never touched the ground . Sara was coming. Sara! Sara! herheart sang.
" Come live with me and be my love ," passers-by heard Ann sing , and it madethem smile to see a girl in love running through .the falling dark in a world which
had just been saved .
Ann had left an 'emergency list' with Peggy , the baby sitter, in case she waslate , so though she arrived home only half an hour before her guests , things were
well in hand when they appeared , even to a fire in the library.
Ann drank her cocktail on the run: Paul was sleeping but she brought Aaron
and Adam , freshly bathed and dressed for bed , to meet the 'company '; she prepared a second tray of hors d 'oeuvres ; Adele Gray was cold and Ann brought
her a hand-crocheted sweater she kept for special occasions ; and , finally , she finished setting the table and announced that dinner was served.
Ann avoided touching Adele Gray until after dinner. Her hands were full ofcoats when they were introduced , but the meeting of their eyes again at suchclose quarters caused an odd contraction of Ann's bowels and she laughed , she

65thought afterwards inanely , and said, "I feel we've met already." But Gray's
attention was drawn away just then by David to an engraving he wanted to show
her. And of course at dinner she sat at the other end of the table. Ann was justas glad because she couldn't keep her mind on anything anyone was saying, whatwith wondering what had happened to Sara and the way phrases and comments
Gray had made that afternoon turned through her head like messages on a revolving sign board. Relief that the world was still intact bubbled through theconversation , and everyone drank more wine than Ann had anticipated. But the
Gantners and the Ewells had each brought a bottle , and these were opened andamid toasts to 'the Ks,' were drunk. The academic talk with which dinner began
turned, as it so often did, Ann thought , simply silly. By the time dinner ended
she found herself laughing a good deal . And after dinner she sat next to Adele
Gray on the sofa David called a love seat. She took Adele's hand and began totalk earnestly with her about poetry and life and love. Ann asked whether Adelethought it strange that she , Ann, had just discovered that very day, not threehours before, that she was in love with Sara. Adele said it did not seem strange
so much perhaps as difficult. That puzzled Ann at first.
"You mean because of David ," she said at last.
''Well, yes , certainly . David ." Adele paused and sighed. "But I was thinking
of Sara.""Sara?""You said she was engaged.""Oh. She was very young then . Just twenty .""But she may not love women, dear.""Oh." Ann thought about it for a moment. She sniffed her brandy . She sipped
it. She peered into the bowl of her glass. It was all gold . "S/le does ," she said , andshe smiled. "I'm sure that Sara loves women too. " Ann could not have explained
why this was so clear to her, this and many other things , things she could notremember or even think of, all of them clear, astonishingly clear.
David called to her then from the fireplace where he was standing, smiling,handsome and assured, surrounded by his guests , his department, his books ,bibelots and plaster busts of Shakespeare and Caesar , dispensing his hospitality
with the geniality of a Norse chief among his thralls .
"Ann , I think it's time for coffee and the pie. Ann's pie is marvelous ," hesaid to Adele Gray as Ann left the room. "It's my mother's recipe ," he addedwith a lingering slur of the South on his tongue.
Everyone left at ten . .. eleven Boston time , Adele Gray reminded them.
David went to bed as soon as they had gone. Ann stayed up . Sara should havecalled hours before. Ann washed the dishes , endlessly it seemed, but still Sara
did not call. It was midnight and the kitchen floor still wet from the mop when
the phone finally rang .
''Where have you been? Where are you? " Ann cried.
"Didn't David tell you?" Sara said. " called from Cedar Rapids about five,and you weren't there ." Sara's voice was full with love .
"No, no . He never told me." Ann felt the healing balm. "Oh, Owl , I love
you," she cried.
"I know, Owl. I know, and I love you too . Owl, I have something very important to tell you.""Owl ... Sara ..."
"I'm in love, Ann. With a woman."66

"I know .. .""Her name is Nancy .""Nancy .""That's why I'm in Des Moines . I'm bringing her back with me . We are going to live together, Owl. At Oberlin . She's a painter. Ann . . . Ann , say something to me ."They decided together it would be best to postpone a visit until later. Because of David. They both agreed about that. Ann said of course she didn 't disapprove , but , she said , she would rather not talk to Nancy on the phone, notjust then , not until later , until after they had met. During the Christmas breakthey agreed would be a good time to get together. David might even babysit
the older boys . Ann could come to Oberlin with Paul.
"Who was almost Sara ." Sara's voice brimmed with her joy .
"Yes , almost, Sara," said Ann .
The next morning at breakfast David said to her , "Oh, your lesbian pal called
yesterday. I forgot to tell you ."''Who?'' Ann asked .
"Sara. Are there more?" And then David talked a while about how much
she had drunk the night before and how she surely must have known when she
was making a spectacle of herself, sitting on the love seat and holding her hand,that Adele Gray was a known lesbian. She admitted as much , publicly .
According to the New York Times the next day, of the hundreds of thousands of people who sent telegrams to the White House, only forty-one did notsupport President Kennedy's blockade of Cuba. For weeks Ann was alternately
frightened, dumbfounded and awed by the fact that she, Ann Markham, of Cambridge, Iowa , was personally responsible for over half of the protests received by
the President of the United States on The Day the World Almost Came to an
End . But after two months passed, right before Christmas, the mystery was solved. She received a letter with the Presidential Seal . It thanked her for her supportof the President during the country's crisis.
Everything depended , she fmally decided, on how you looked at it , or as
David said right away, on the perspective you brought to bear on the matter .

SPECIAL RECOMMENDATION :We would like to recommend to Sinister Wisdom readers the superb
Iowa City Women's Press. They are experienced , expert, and excellent
printers. For 271 years they have treated SW and its editors withpatience and tender , loving care. We want them to know that welove them .
-Harriet and Catherine
Iowa City Women's Press
529 S. Gilbert Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240

67

Lynn Watson

Julie
Julie is the booty in your childhood dream. She appears walking along theshore of Mud Lake one afternoon when you are both thirteen . You are sittingin the hollow of your favorite bush, plotting a raid on the abandoned resort
down the street. You tried it once at the age of seven and were caught. The
old lady who lived in the alley across the way saw you crawling through thewindow with a cardboard box. She called your brother, instead of the police.
All the candy bars , cards , and poker chips had to be replaced. And then the
horrible punishment - to go to your brother's house and study, every day after
school. How long did it last , this interminable sentence? Months? And then theafternoon in spring when all your friends were going to town for a coke andyou had to go, too ... He found you ; he drug you home.
How long was it before the guilt wore off- the bruises healed on your wristand your mother agreed to buy you the boat-two-seater, styrofoam that she
couldn't afford, on her salary from the phone company? You were a natural on
the water; a Tom Sawyer behind the rudder, you followed the coast for adven ture. Along the east side of the lake you would slow the motor and watch therich ladies sunbathing on their private docks. How your eyes lingered over theirlong limbs , turned with the sun over their flanks. You would imagine yourself
lying beside them on a blanket, drinking a coke ...
Or perhaps you would have to escape. Perhaps they would catch your lushbrown eyes peering over the boat and would call to you to keep them company ;to mow their lawns ; to see if the mail had come. Some would stand on the shore
waving their arms and shouting in frustration . Others would grasp the rope that
kept their own boat tied to the shore and try to lasso yo ur rudder. But you wereno longer Tom Sawyer, in the face of their desire. You became Moses in the bulrushes , your innocent brown eyes floating down the coast. You would drift into
the middle of the lake and lose consciousness. The clouds were trains of elephants
and monkeys ; or the blocks of letters on a baby necklace. But you would notthink ; you would not choose metaphors; you would drift into nothingness as
the sun set its colors on the west side of the lake.
Then you would start the motor, Tom Sawyer once more, the approach ofnight making you raucous. There would still be time to take a swing around theisland, the point called Lover's Bluff, or watch the lights of the amusement park
blink on in the distance.
Could it have been on a night like this that you first met Julie, walking on
the shore of Mud Lake? Surely it must have been close to dusk , you plottingin the bush under an invisible eye-patch, whispering to shipmates the plan for
attack; she appearing from the west, the dust particles of dusk playing like gnats
around her head. She must have been wearing pedal pushers, a sweater, and somekeds. You didn't suspect that anyone was approaching your spot until you heard
the hum that was too high-pitched for water. Perhaps you thought it was yourown boat whistling against the pull of the rope. Then you heard the splash as
she threw in a rock ..
You peeked and it was a revelation-you had seen her at church. She went

68with her mother and brother. She was quiet. You watched as she dug her toe inthe sand for rocks, her long brown hair masking the thin prettiness of her face.
The bush shook as you slid gently from your hiding place. She was bending overa large rock that her toe had uncovered when you said hello. Your voice did notfrighten her because she had been humming. She looked up and smiled, recognizing you from school. You had everything in common.
You discovered your houses were only a street apart. It was nothing to takethe short-cut through Mrs. Pritchard's yard now that you went over to help Juliebabysit her brother. Her parents went out every night.
How did it happen?-her mother must have wondered, her father wrinkling
his forehead. For surely he liked you; had adopted you, in fact, as his second
daughter, knowing your own father was never present. And there was something
in the way you rolled your shorts, in your bowlegged walk, that made him susceptible, that made him want to hold you on his lap.
And perhaps he was right; perhaps you were looking for a new set of parents.
On the day of the accident, on the school field trip, you cried for Julie's mother,even when your own had arrived. It wasn't very serious-just stubbed your little
toe on the dock and it had pulled right off; four toes on the left foot your trademark for life, your early distinction ... let all future lovers remark-this woman
is related to Captain Hook ...
So you left your mother alone in the house every night and wen t to visit
Julie. Small , sweet Julie. I have no idea how it began. Did you play with dolls?
Did you take lessons from the flames in the fireplace? Did you whisper secrets
in the dark or chew gum under the sheets?
You began touching each other because you said it felt good. She was shy at
first; then not as shy as you, under the blankets every night (yes I am jealous).
You would put her brother to bed and then explore each other; every inch ofyour bodies, in innocence, was open to every kind of caress. It was like beingout in the boat together and drifting with the waves; it felt natural; it felt good.
How long did it last? -mon ths? -the feeling stronger than fears; the pleasuresstronger than doubts . You brought her presents by the day, by the week-acandy gum machine; a blue felt coin purse; and most important and cherished,a gilt crucifix she kept on her dresser. No one seemed to notice the abundanceof gifts; or was it a secret you kept to yourselves? Were you the diplomat-did
you advise her not to tell? For surely she was impulsive; wanted to share herhappiness. Maybe your instinct for caution was precocious; was part of the knowledge of your own mother's violence; the baton crashing down on the chair-not
your back-and breaking it.
But Julie's parents were religious-went out every night, kept themselves contented; they let you ramble over Mud Lake like bandits; gave you free tugging
on each other's scarves (Is that why you still wear them?) Who was Tom Sawyer
and who was Beckie Thatcher; or did you take turns?? Did you sit in the hollow
together smoking invisible cigars and conjuring ghosts and goblins for a crew?
Did you kiss watching the colored lights of the amusement park?
Your mother was only two houses up the street, mumbling as she boiled hervegetables for dinner. Where were you anyway?? As if she didn't know; spending all your time with that Julie girl; running in and out of the house to getthings-a softball mitt, your binoculars, a coat. In and out as if she were runninga hotel , not a house. As if she weren't your mother but a housekeeper; washingyour dirty butter knives, picking up stray underpants, never knowing if you were69coming home for dinner. And surely you were somewhere within the block; within calling distance, perhaps.
Then it happened-the second revelation; the fall from bliss. You came homefrom school one day and all your presents to Julie, even the crucifix, were piledon the front porch. Your mother conveyed her mother's message-you were nolonger welcome in their house. You couldn't listen; you ran through the streets;
you hid til dark . Then you snuck to Julie's house. She opened the door; sheshrank. Yes it was true; you could never see her again; she had wanted to makesure it was all right that you touched ; she had confessed.
Her father had not wanted to impose the sentence; you had sensed this, told
me this as we strolled along the shores of Mud Lake. Her parents still live in thehouse; her brother rode by on his bike as we walked along the street. You showed me Julie's photograph. She's teaching somewhere in the Midwest; never married; an in tense face; wide-eyed; almost frightened.

Announcing a New Quarterly for the Common Dyke
COMMON LIVES/LESBIAN LIVES
fiction * autobiography * herstory * photography * journal
theory & analysis * oral hers tory * correspondence
interviews * biography * graphics * reminiscences * reviews
articles * performed art

Common Lives/Lesbian Lives was created from a personal/political need to record
lesbian experience and thought. Common Lives/Lesbian Lives seeks to dis-cover
our past, claim our present and envision our future, as part of the process of defming our lesbian community.
To clairn community with all dykes, we need to share the diversity of experiencesthat have separated us, such as differences of color, size, class, background, age
and physical ability. Therefore we actively solicit contributions from all lesbians.
Tell your stories, collaborate with others, excerpt your diaries and journals andcorrespondence. Send in your work now. Xerox is OK.

Common Lives/Lesbian Lives 1 will appear in August, 1981. For a flier describing
the publication in more detail and the collective producing it, send a self-addressed
stamped envelope to our address.
Common Lives/Lesbian Lives
Box 1553
Iowa City, Iowa 52240

70

single copy $3
individual sub· $1 O/yr
insti tu tional sub $ 20/yr

Laura Davis

Those "Other" Kind of Women
Emily had long straight blond hair and a big tomboy smile . Louisiana tallc
Liked to wear overalls which always seemed too big for her smallness, her
pear-shaped girlness. She was the only person I ever met who actually said ,"Aw, shucks."
Well, this particular night, we drove up and down Federal Boulevard , backand forth from east side to west side, shooting up and down all those Denveralleys which jigsaw through the city, mated to the streets they stand behind.
It was Columbian we were smoking, being long before the days of sinsemilla.
And Budweiser we were drinking , before I got sophisticated enough to knowthat San Miguel Darks were better.
Emily was driving wild as usual. In fact, I think I could say that next tome, Emily was just about the craziest driver I've ever met. I'd seen her pullwheelies and outchase cops-just grinning and settled back on her hips, drivin'.
I held on tight to my seat and jes' screamed with the brakes.
Now when I first met Emily, back in San Antonio , she was living with
Chuck, but I knew, deep down, (cause I'd heard the rumors) that she wasone of those "other" kind of women. But I liked her anyway. I figured what
she did in bed was her own business.
But this night, this particular June night, bein' my last night in town, mygood -bye night to Emily, I decided to fmally broach the subject.
"Err ... umm, well, Emily , I, uh ... ""You trying to say something, Laura?" (She always did seem to nail meright up against the wall.)"Yes, Emily. I, well, I just was wondering ... I, just, uh ... wanted toknow .. . ""Know what, Laura?" she smiled, mischievous, knowing goddamn wellwhat I wanted to bring up.
''Well, Emily , uh ... what's it like?" I fmally blurted out.
''What's what like, honey?" she asked.
"You know .""Know what?"
My voice raised in intensity. A teeth-bared whisper, urgent. "You know!"
Emily looked me right in the eye and smiled. Then deliberate : "I don't
have the slightest idea what you're talkin' about." An appropriate pause:''Want another beer?"
Silence between us . End of Round One. I took the beer and drank, recouping. I knew she was enjoying it. I just knew it. I put on my best casual voice,''Well, you know, it wasn't important to me anyway." I sighed my best nonchalant sigh and turned to stare meaningfully out the window.
Emily screeched to a halt at a red light. Her own peculiar form of punctuation. ''What wasn't important, hon?"Well, as you can imagine, by now I was feelin' just as sweaty palmed aswhen I got caught stealing that scarf at J.C. Penney's . That woman had satme down in her office and made me take everything out of my purse and lay
it on her desk-my morocco red hand-stitched wallet, my diaphragm, my peace71

sign hash pipe , my oozing tube of spermicidal jelly, my copy of Pedagogy of(he Oppressed - everything , that is , except the scarf she knew was on the bottom.
" Emily ," I began .
''Why , honey ," she remarked, swerving around a corner, "you look redderthan a coyote's balls in hell."
I took a few deep and lingering breaths . "I'll count to three," I thought,"and then I'll say it." One , two . .. My mind drifted to a cartoon I had seen
with a mother feeding her two year old. "Just three more spoonfuls-one,
two , twenty-six , eighty-four, thirty, twelve, three, all gone!" I stopped counting . No words . Nothing but a knot in my throat bigger than any half hitch
I'd ever seen .
" Having t rouble getting it out?" she asked, sweetly. And then she did it.
Reached right over to my lap and grabbed my hand. "You can tell Emily."
Oh my God. A woman has taken hold of my hand . One of those women.
I'd never felt such a hand - light , quiet, yet firm like it belonged there . No
sweaty palm , claiming possession . A small and delicate hand holding mine .
The little tic I get that lifts my eyelid up and slams it down again like a snapping turtle started just about then. But I felt warm right from the touch ofthat hand all the way down to my toes .
" Emily ," I babbled . "What's going on? ""On? " she asked, squeezing my hand, her fingernails playing with the top
skin of my hand , her nails teasing my flesh . ''We 're just enjoyin' our last night
together. Anything special you want to do? ""Do? " I burbled. "Uh, well, uh, yes, I mean, no, nothing special."''Well , how about this?" she asked , pulling up short at the sidewalk . "I'dlike to kiss you. "Something akin to a short circuit ground me down to a halt, an eye-popping ,mouth-open halt. "Kiss me? " I thought. "She wants to kiss me ?" Oh boy , did
I want those thin and delicate Louisiana lips on mine. Again, the problem of
no voice. I managed to squeak out, "Okay ."I think I must have had my face all screwed up like a prune in heat , because
she laughed. She bent over me slow and quiet , like a wild cat caressing her
young, and touched her lips to mine. She kept them there , her tongue teasing
my mouth, gently , oh so gently , a soft pussywillow kiss.
It was the kiss I had dreamed of all those years Scott Weiner had thrust
his smelly sausage tongue into my mouth. Through all the hours of spin thebottle and seven minutes in heaven and post office . Through all the third
grade make-out sessions with Keith Rand on the mattress in Celia Sara's basement. Through all the red and swollen gums I nursed after gashes from His
braces , finally now, after notch upon notch etched impermeably on my diaphragm , this woman , this girl child , placed her mouth on mine and simply
kissed me, turning me inside out and upside down until the me I knew began
to melt , dissolving right into the pile of the red shag carpeting of her Datsun
B2 10 , never to re cover.
My bein g screamed , "TILT! TILT!" My heart beating like a whole armyof he arts, t hrobbing right up through the top of my head . She stroked myhair, smiled. I know there were tears in my eyes . "Well , how'd you like yourfir st kiss by a woman?" she asked.
1 didn 't say anything. I just turned around and kissed her back, full throttleon the lips , kissed her back.
And I've never been the same since.

Irene Yarrow

Seduction Scene... talked to Kate this morning. Told her I broke up with Judith . Thingto remember: be proud of my strength-giving up when it was time to, leaving when it was clear we'd never make each other happy. Misery allover again.
And it was . And as for Kate herself, the two-sided wonder, the very best andthe very worst, her sides already filled three and a half years of my journal
with magic and misery, at last become moaning and mourning and nothing
magical at all, so she can just put herself together with Judith now and thetwo of them move on to occupy my past full of wraiths: Jeanne and Jackie ,Joyce and Justine and Janice, on and on. Back, through Danny and Markand my ex-husband, whose name I don't care to write here. And further back ,to the biggest ghost of all, my mother Mildred .
As I write this, I'm on the beach with Nicholas, my grown son, Leah, hislove, Jennifer, my daughter. When I look in the mirror, a hundred times aday, a woman I choose to see as ageless looks back: in fact she's 38, her children nearly grown, while she looks around 30 and feels 19 or 2, depending.
And Goddess willing she'll stay young forever, because how can a 19 year old2 year old woman, overnight, become middle aged? Though that isn't thewhole truth, because she can feel every bit of her 38, too ...
Jennifer, my daughter, looking in the mirror a hundred times a day , wants
to know why her ass and ears stick out , her feet are big and turned in. Nickwants to know why he can't just be in love and happy all the time. I wantto know all those things too. Who's going to tell me? Who's going to makelife come true for me the way it's supposed to? You are, Ruth, I hear myself
answering from deep inside, only you. But why does it have to be that way?
Can't I have some help? Can't someone else do it for me instead?
... I mean , I woke up with Judith in my bed for four months, several
times a week, once for two weeks straight, 14 mornings her tiny beautiful
body there beside me. Months of slowly opening up and trusting. Trusting
she'd be there , that she'd want to hear, learning she was who to tell, listen
to, share with, open up to, little by little and more and more. For months
increasingly it was she I spent all my time with and told all my dreams to.
Learning to let her love me. Until, one day, sitting in the kitchen, she opened
her mouth and it said, like the quick change in a nightmare when good suddenly becomes bad , the nice man a monster, it said she was having a little
trouble ... being close. Beginning of the end. A month later it was over. My
Judy. But first we hoped, tried, pretended, one particularly beautiful moment
I remember saying, "Hold onto me, Judith, because I would do anything for
you ... " She remembers it too . .. it seems that's what really started herrunning! It was too much, hearing that. Which is, essentially-, the thing I can't
understand, the problem that's killing me: why doesn't closeness feel goodto so many people? Why didn't it keep feeling good to Judith?
But so what. Now I'm not on the beach any more . I seem to be writing
this in pieces , like a patchwork quilt , like tlle one I made, hanging on the73white wall in my bedroom: three by four feet, a woman-sign banner madefrom a sample lhlLlk I found of men's suit fabrics, grey and brown plaids,
snlids and pinst ripes, enjoying the irony of the large, squarish woman-sign inthe L'enter nutlined with lavender cross-stitches , the whole thing edged withpale pink-lavcnder satin _ .. and Kate came to hate it and wanted me to takeit dmvn. Hurt and angry, I refused. This isn't your house anyway, it's minea reference to her not wanting to live with me ...
I'm in the house at Deep Eddy now. It's almost evening. Susan and Linda,
lovt'rs. are asleep on the couch . Spaghetti's in the pot. Brownies on the stove,cnoling. And I'm waiting for my friends to wake, trying to write a story.
Story of my life as usual.
Taking in everything around her, Ruth couldn't keep from smiling. The
scene from the porch was nothing short of idyllic. Even the porch itself: sobig. wrapping around from the side to the front of the house, with its broad
deck of grey painted boards , sturdy white railing, wide enough to sit on comfortably. while leaning back against the strong posts going up, up to support
the roof overhead: or comfortable seats to choose from, a rocker , a butterfly
chair covered in faded green, a beige hammock ... and a table against thehouse wall holding iced tea , brownies, ashtray , two joints, matches. And fromthe porch. a tiny upstate New York town, wide unpaved road, large, well-built
houses surrounded by lawns. Across the way , an old couple in rocking chairson their porch, pillars of the town. Deep Eddy , New York State. Not a tourist
town. but a river and beach five minutes from where they sat.
" What about you , RUtll? Do you want to get married again?"Legs crossed and swinging , Stephanie stole a look into Ruth's eyes, a franklook for a long moment. and then away. Lightly tanned, a beautiful womanof 37 . Unexpectedly there when tlley arrived for the weekend, one of theothers who shared the house they were staying at. A teacher ; a talkative, energetic. funny , warm, lovely woman. Straight. But acting like she was attracted.
Meaning? Meaning what? Ruth had no idea. She did know she'd like to kiss
Stephanie though. They'd had fun all weekend together, going to the yard
sale and poking through 1940's Woman Day magazines marked 2¢, old lace
shawls and pillows and lamps and dishes and silverware, each buying wonderful bargains and talking about their New York apartments and how they madethem pretty ... the way Stephanie'd made the house at Deep Eddy so pretty,
with her wonderful finds full of character and history and humor. Then going to the river and floating on inner tubes for hours, surrounded by children,and coming back to the house to cook dinner and bake mint brownies fromscratch, according to Stephanie's secret-from-her-mother recipe. They'd beenclose and warm for two days, and the feelings had been growing-at least for
Ruth they had.
Closing her eyes , she sighed as she imagined lightly rubbing her hand over
Stephanie's high, beautiful breasts, ran the tip of her tongue tentatively andlovingly all along the outline of the other woman's lips, then slowly entered
her mouth. With her other hand she gently stroked Stephanie's back ... what
was the question? Oh - get married?
"-or just live with someone, or what?" Stephanie looked right at her again,
frank but furtive too, looking away and then back. Ruth tried to hold her eyes.
"Married? No . Or yes, I do. But not the way you mean it."Risky! Why did she say that? Annoyed with herself, Ruth was the one tos74look away now . Something caught her eye. In the last light of the day, asmall yellow bird flew by the porch, landed on a lowish branch of a high tree,
and fussed with its young. Out back, the 89 year old man who lived next door
picked a few tender young green beans and put them in a basket he had beside him on the damp ground.
Why had she said that! '''Not the way you mean it!'" Stephanie didn't
want to hear that-did she? Did she know what Ruth was hinting at? Know
it inside herself anyway, somewhere maybe was she looking for it, scared but
searching, running away and hiding, but coming back for more? Or not-of
course not. Why should she. It was so easy, and so clear, the whole world
was Deep Eddy-or New York City, same difference-the old man and theyellow bird, the couple across the street and in every other house, old andyoung, all the same, straight.
Straight women! Ruth knew them ... she'd been one for so long. And so
had Jeanne, first love, and gone back to being one. Jeanne-seen on the street
last week, still just as beautiful, deeply sensual even in the way she walked,
held her hands, her head, and somewhere inside herself was Ruth still in lovewith her? Or did you never stop loving the ones you really loved, was that
it? Seven years a lesbian-no, forget that, 38 years old, and who had she really
loved? Aside from her mother, her children. Her first boyfriend, Danny? And
her real, her long-time lovers, Jeanne, Jackie, Kate. None of them ever reallygiven up? And this Judith, this beautiful, 25 year old, 13-years-younger onewhat did she matter; what were three months. Ruth had never really let her
in anyway. Certainly not all the way. Knock, knock, who's there. No one.
Not so fast, young woman. Let me see your ID. Who cared anyway. Get themto start writing resumes soon. List your affectional, sexual, closeness levels.
Past relationships? Number, duration?
''What do you mean-uh-not like I mean it how?"
Stephanie had brown eyes, brown hair, in a nice Jewish face, and energy
like her own. And straight. Why'd she have to be straight. She wants to getmarried-I want to get married . 4-{lver. Judy and Ruth forever. Ruth and Kate
forever. Niagara Falls, that time it almost was forever-and he didn't evenmake the really-loved list. Thirteen years. Let me out, out, out. Well, now,
yes, I want to get married again, Stephanie. You're very attractive, have you
ever tried women? Lesbians make the best lovers. We are not just good friends.
I know you know. DYKE, printed on her T-shirt, sun visor, and ring . The
Well of Loneliness? You know? Stonewall, DaB, LFL. And fmally the radioat the beach the other day, blaring WKTU disco, then suddenly, " ... have aquestion about the gay lifestyle? Or just want to rap? Call the Gay Switchboard, 929-9889 ... " followed by an ad for Sunkist oranges.
A seduction scene? But what if she rejected. But so attractive. But to sleep
with so many women? Sixteen, at last count ... sixteen! And count them she
did, every time there was a new one she'd write about it, in her journal andmaybe in a poem, but eventually she'd actually list them, wanting to keep
track as well as to sort them-them!-out and categorize them, different ways
at different times, how many all together, how many-a coincidence?-had
names beginning with the same letter, "J"-at present nine, over half of her sixteen women! How many Jewish and how many Irish Catholic, how many onenight stands, short, or long term relationships, how many butch, femme, or in
between, short or tall, big or small, how many much younger than she was. And
75then dwelling on and analyzing and discussing all these counts and scores anddifferences . What did they all mean? What were the specifications of her perfect
lover , and what was "bottom line "? Her journal was the most remarkable mixture of dear diary outpourings of both grief and joy, le~ters never meant to be
mailed, much introspection , the beginnings of poems along with occasional completed ones, and these lists and other recapitulations of all the women she'd been
involved with . But so many , it would be easy to get the impression that she liked
or wanted it that way , needed to play around. It wasn't true, she didn't, wasn't
the type . Hated non-monogamy .. . and serial monogamy. She 'd been married 13
years, faithfully! All she really wanted was one , one forever, one happily ever after like they had said , had promised her since she was a little girl. But it neverworked out that way , so eventually there 'd be another one . But to just keep adding them on? Shouldn 't there be some limit?
Oh , why not do it. Get more stoned-they'd already started. Put on music,
disco, Donna Summers! Dance! Laugh , touch , flirt just a little , nothing you could
pinpoint exactly . Switch to slow music . Dance along- together but apart, no touching. But move alluringly . Then , careful-but sure-touch .
Possible reactions:•. . . "What are you doing , are you crazy?" Or ,. . . "Oh, Ruth, I thOUght you'd never touch me ... " Seduction scene.
But no, don 't, caution, stop , red light , she's straight, and straight womenStephanie was looking at her. Don't seem too weird now, she told herself,
and don't space out- you'll scare her away - but yes. Take the plunge . Lookback, warm and frank. Excitement beginning to take hold of her, she gathered
herself together, back to the conversation she kept dreaming away from .
"I mean yes, I want to get married again too , Stephanie ." She said thename caressingly, which was how she felt. "I want to very much . But not toa man. To a woman."
Pause.
Silence . And more silence .
Unable to keep from spacing out now, Ruth felt the lightness of her head .
Oh, don't get scared, Stephanie, she felt herself wanting to say , I don't wantto make a lesbian out of you, I just want to sleep with you. Giggles starting
to work their way up and out like the hiccups. 2 , 4, 6, 8, how do you know
your wife is straight. Stephanie. You're 37 years old . Come to bed with me.
You'll like the way it feels, I am good, I am very , very good .
Screen door . Opening and closing. Out of her spaciness, pulling herself back .
What was happening. Stephanie gone in the house? No, or else come back, be. cause she was on the other side of the porch now , smoking .... What am I
doing, Ruth thought, I hate kissing mouths that taste of cigarette smoke! no , wait , that's not the point ...
Looking around her, it was really dark now , moths, crickets so noisy you
wanted to cover your ears at times, while at others they just became a partof the night and you didn't even hear them, and lightning bugs , bats farther
out , or up , watch out, beautiful moon, stars like you never saw in the city ,big trees, black sky. Going over toward where Stephanie stood , all the way
thinking oh, no , how can I possibly try again . I can't, why , just to get hurt
one more time , just to have to face up to my " unrealistic expectations," that's
what Judith said . Just to have one more woman come in close and send hersoaring with the intimacy, the pure sensuality of it , the joy, the sex, the76touches, the looks, the loving, the sweeping uplifting sensual soar of it, thatthickened her voice, her throat fIned with so much tender passion that she
really, truly believed that at last it had happened and she was going to be
happy ... and then to have the woman go away again, or have to go awayherself. She couldn't do it again, ever. She choked it back, all the expectations,the joy and the grief. No more.
But the porch. The empty iced tea glasses, the brownies from before, still
sitting on the table. Rock music and raucous laughter from the bar on the
highway a block away, fun of rednecks and drunken laughter. Then fading
somewhat, someone closing a door.
Stephanie stood leaning against the porch railing, smoking and shaking, theshaking visible as her glowing cigarette end made weird stacatto jabs at thenight air, twitching like a drunken fIrefly. The smoke quivered in the air infront of her, as if to hide her face, her pretty, forthright, but right now ~~yface. Scared, uptight and tense, but waves of her sensuality still coming acrossdense, strong, and wonderful, the way they had been all weekend. Beautiful
straight woman. Turning away as Ruth approached.
"Stephanie? What's wrong?"
No answer.
Not knowing what to do, Ruth went to the hammock , thought about it,then passed it and settled angrily in a chair. Stop it! she demanded, stop it
this instant, I won't have it. I won't open up again. Get back, feelings! Back!
I don't like you, I don't want you. Get away from me, breath-catching desire,tingling cunt! Go away, agony of wanting, wishing, lusting!
They were ignoring her completely. She felt it. Her chest filling and herthroat swelling with the huskiness, her body simply taking over, the cornersof her mouth turning up in smiling anticipation. She couldn't believe it was
happening. And her mind-flitting around, unablp. to concentrate. Focusing,jumping. Stephanie. Judith. Kate. The porch. Dreaming. The bathroom. Oh,
right, the bathroom, on the toilet yesterday just after Stephanie arrived, going into the bathroom and sitting on the toilet and seeing it on the cabinet,
Stephanie's makeup bag! When had she last seen one like that. Little bulging
plastic bag, unzippered . Slyly, smiling to herself at what she was about to do,
thinking naughty but picking up the bag ... full to the brim with bottles,
tubes, brushes, razor. Lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, blusher, of course, ofcourse. Stephanie's present and her own past, heaped heaVy in the plastic bagthat pressed cool against her naked thighs .
. . . Estoderme Flowing Emulsion .. . . This wonderful emulsion helps yourskin remain soft, smooth, youthful-looking. Daily, its moisture-retaining
ingredients help prevent dryness, giving your complexion the radiance andfreshness of youth.
Straight women! Oh, it took her back, to herself, to Jeanne, remembering,
flashing momentarily on the lipstick that had been on Jeanne's mouth, thefIrst time they kissed ... not that all lesbians wore no makeup. But for Ruth
that had been a part of the transition, of coming out, of learning to love herself, her body, the way she looked, in "natural color, nothing added or removed ,and it was still a part of her life.
Estee Lauder fresh air makeup base-a rich but sheer foundation that not
only covers tiny imperfections and smooths out texture, but also irnpaIts

77

a clear, dewy, "country air" finish of sheen without shine.
And the release of slowly letting it all go. The eye shadow went last, she remembered. No, then the leg shaving.
Go-Bronze Bronzing Jel. New Go-Bronze will give you the golden glow thatused to come only from the sun itself! Can be applied under, over, or without makeup.
Then she found the small bottle of toilet water-L'Air du Temps by Nina
Ricci, Paris and New York. The smell, beautiful-and familiar. Where? A lover?
The women she knew now wore body oils if anything-musk, patchouli. She
herself liked a special East India patchouli, a while ago it was almost a trademark, the lover she was with then calling her Patchouli Mama ... no, wait,
now she remembered, it was her aunt! Her great aunt Florence used to wear
it. Coming to visit once a year, so dressed up, her rich great aunt Florence,
Ruth wove fantasies about her that lasted the whole year, till her next visit .. .
how she'd take Ruth away and love her with a sweetness that matched thedelicious smell of her perfume. It was L'Air du Temps, she remembered ...
and now the familiar smell, and Stephanie was in the chair beside hers.
Silence. Her heart flew.
"I'm sorry ," Stephanie began. "I didn't know I, I mean, I shouldn't havereacted like that.""Like what?" Her own voice, Ruth noticed, was calm and quiet, Stephanie's
high-pitched and hurrying.
"Running out like that!""It's all right. I figured you needed to move around or something."''Move around! I needed to run! Why did you say that-oh, never mind,
wait, I didn't mean that, I ... " She drew a long breath . Two. Opened her
mouth to go on. Ruth stopped her.
''What's that you have on?" She felt herself smiling, smiling all over-her
lips, her toes, her fmgers, they were all curling with the delight of it, the wonderful, special space she got in when she was turned on, when things seemedpromising, most of all when she made love, the space she'd discovered only
since coming out, but that every woman she was with commented on, how
she became quite transported .. . it was happening now. She embraced thesensations. She could do nothing but. "It smells so good," she heard herself
say softly, intimately. "Really."
Inside the house, a new record dropped down onto the turntable, and suddenly Janis Joplin was singing in a way that expressed exactly the lust Ruth
had to admit she was feeling. And she wanted, all she wanted now was to beable to simply reach out and touch the woman beside her. How didn't matter,it could be anyone of the many ways she wanted, needed to touch her ...
soft and gentle and caressingly, or powerfully, or sensually; with her wholehand or just her fmgertips or both her arms around her tight-any way, butjust to touch her. Must. Please. Wouldn't she? She had to.
She was scared too, though, and something in the way Stephanie was looking at her caught her up short, and her mind raced off again. Kate. Write her?
Meaning to tell her so many things for so long-but then she was always meaning to, never able to, not just since the relationship ended, during it too, there
were just things that contradicted each other, always so many contradictions,is that what life was about? So the very saying of them canceled out the otherhalf of what she needed to say. Oh, two-sided woman, I loved your one side78

so much, I hated your other, wanted you to get rid of it, couldn't li ve withit, couldn't in the end. And always afraid I'd lose you and giving you all thepower, that's how it felt to me , and then you, afterward s, after it was finallyall over, telling me you were always scared shitless I'd leave you . Oh, fairy
godmother, why can't the world come out the way it's supposed to? Why
couldn't we have stayed together happily-ever-after , Kate?
This woman next to her. Who was she, and would it happen that Ruth
would find out, grow to know her and love her? Years from now would theylook back on and recount and retell the story of their getting together a hundred times to all their friends, mostly other couples, like themselves who
lived together and would continue to do so happily forever and ever after?
Was Stephanie the one who was going to make her life come true? Or was
that, of course, impossible in this world, this real world of real people, andjust one more manifestation of her "unrealistic expectations" of love andromance, thanks to Hollywood, USA.
Now she strained against that dream to pull herself back . She had to. Thiswas it-certainly not hers alone, but this was her personal struggle. How could
she live with that forever-after constantly haunting her ... and failing her?
But how could she live without it? She didn't know any answers ... neverhad. Maybe never would. And so, having no way of knowing whether she was
finally fighting it off or just succumbing to it one more time , she forcibly
stopped thinking and pulled herself back to the present.
Forced back by pure willpower , the past faded , submerging for the moment
all the hurts and pain , the loss and disappointment, Kate and Judith and Jeanneand so on all the way back to her mother . Lips and toes curled up and smiling,
she allowed the present to rematerialize , deliciously , in the sounds of Deep
Eddy-where she was right then , that moment- the crickets loud, the music
and laughter from the bar far away , the wings of a moth brushing against andescaping the yellow bug light on the porch ceiling- and below it, best of all ,the soft and unexpected -or wasn't it really ey.pected all a1ong?- touch ofStephanie's hand moving wordlessly into her own.
THE LESBIANINSIDER INSIGHTER INCITER-. . . a Lesbian newspaper!

Subs: For 13 issues, $9 (USA), $ 13 (Ca nada), $18 (others)

LESBIAN PHOTOS, ART, & WRITING wanted
2104 Stevens Ave . So., Minneapolis, MN 55404 (USA)79Diana Rivers

The ShellOver , over , time to go back . Time to go back and end it. Rage smolderingin the car that could ignite in a moment and at the same time coldness, ice
filling all the space , pressing on her chest , on her breath. Just the two of themin that car locked together , each other's reality, each other's world , the twoof them seeming alone forever in that car . Other people going by are inaccessible strangers, sealed in their own vehicles, flat and distant as a movie-no help
there .
I hate this , Sara keeps thinking , I hate this. I want to get out. I'd rather
hitchhike . I'd rather walk. I can't stand being in this car another minute , but
she doesn't speak or move . She sits staring straight ahead with her teeth clenched . The landscape pitches too fast at them around sudden curves . Slow down,
slow down, let me out. I want to get out. When the wheels slide on the gravel
shoulder , she glances quickly at Tasha . Tasha's proftle is like stone , terrible
stone flesh that radiates hate. I'll pack and leave , Sara thinks, I'll go to Carol's.
Tomorrow I'll be on my way to Washington. I never should have stayed in
Eugene . She feels the shell pressing against her leg and takes it out of her pocket , not daring to look at it. How quickly this all happened , her life changing
course and now changing back , and how little control she seems to have.
Her first night in town she'd met Tasha at a dance . Sara was traveling, needing to move on, to be alone. Then this woman was dancing with her , sinuous,
undulating , almost hypnotic, flowing around her , blazing with fire . She moves
like a golden snake, Sara thought. Cords of energy flashed between them , winding around Sara , binding her .
"How long are you staying in Eugene?""I'm not. I'm on my way to Washington.""You could spare us a few days. "After the fifth dance Tasha said , "Let's go to my room. We can put on somerecords . It's too smoky here ."" I'm supposed to be staying with my friend Carol.""You can call her from there ."Why not , Sara thought , wasn't it part of traveling? Tasha put on a checkered cap , a man's suit jacket and boots , her long skirt swirling out between . She
took Sara's arm and they went out together. The golden snake had turned
into a street butch. Sara remembered laughing with pleasure in the cool night
air. This would be worth a lost day .
Tasha had a big room on the second floor. It overlooked the yard . Talltrees arched against the windows . They didn 't go out for three days . Tasha
kept saying, " It's never been like this , not with anyone, never before ."The bed was jumbled chaos. Sara had rolled over on her back. She wasstaring at the ceiling, floating in some deep sea of herself, watching the swirling color patterns from the crystals in the window. Tasha's face pressed against
her breast, wet and warm. They had been loving for hours swimming insideeach other , two merging bodies of water , wave over wave in a dark tide . Now
80

Irene Yarrow

Seduction Scene... talked to Kate this morning. Told her I broke up with Judith. Thingto remember : be proud of my strength-giving up when it was time to , leaving when it was clear we'd never make each other happy. Misery allover again.
And it was . And as for Kate herself, the two-sided wonder , the very best andthe very worst, her sides already filled three and a half years of my journal
with magic and misery, at last become moaning and mourning and nothing
magical at all , so she can just put herself together with Judith now and thetwo of them move on to occupy my past full of wraiths: Jeanne and Jackie,
Joyce and Justine and Janice, on and on. Back, through Danny and Markand my ex-husband, whose name I don't care to write here. And further back,to the biggest ghost of all , my mother Mildred .
As I write this, I'm on the beach with Nicholas, my grown son , Leah , hislove, Jennifer, my daughter. When I look in the mirror, a hundred times a
day , a woman I choose to see as ageless looks back: in fact she 's 38 , her children nearly grown, while she looks around 30 and feels 19 or 2 , depending .
And Goddess willing shell stay young forever, because how can a 19 year old2 year old woman, overnight, become middle aged? Though that isn 't thewhole truth, because she can feel every bit of her 38, too ...
Jennifer , my daughter, looking in the mirror a hundred times a day , wants
to know why her ass and ears stick out , her feet are big and turned in. Nickwants to know why he can't just be in love and happy all the time. I wantto know all those things too. Who's going to tell me? Who's going to makelife come true for me the way it's supposed to? You are, Ruth, I hear myself
answering from deep inside, only you . But why does it have to be that way?
Can't I have some help? Can't someone else do it for me instead?
. . . I mean , I woke up with Judith in my bed for four months, several
times a week, once for two weeks straight , 14 mornings her tiny beautiful
body there beside me. Months of slowly opening up and trusting. Trusting
she'd be there, that she'd want to hear, learning she was who to tell, listen
to, share with, open up to, little by little and more and more. For months
increasingly it was she I spent all my time with and told all my dreams to.
Learning to let her love me. Until , one day , sitting in the kitchen, she opened
her mouth and it said, like the quick change in a nightmare when good suddenly becomes bad, the nice man a monster , it said she was having a little
trouble .. . being close . Beginning of the end. A month later it was over. My
Judy. But first we hoped, tried , pretended , one particularly beautiful moment
I remember saying, "Hold onto me , Judith, because I would do anything for
you . .. " She remembers it too ... it seems that's what really started herrunning! It was too much , hearing that. Which is , essentially-, the thing I can 't
understand, the problem that's killing me : why doesn't closeness feel goodto so many people? Why didn 't it keep feeling good to Judith?
But so what. Now I'm not on the beach any more. I seem to be writing
this in pieces , like a patchwork quilt , like the one I made, hanging on the73white wall in my bl?druom : tlm.!1? by four feet , a woman -sign banner madefrom a sampll? book I found of men's suit fabril:s, grey and brown plaids,
solids and pinstripes, I?njoying the irony of the large, squarish woman-sign inthl? -:I?ntl?r l)\1tlinl?d with lavl?ndcr noss-stitdlCs, the whole thing edged withpak pink-l:.Jvl?nder satin . .. and Kate came to hate it and wanted me to takeit down. Hurt and angry , I refu sed. This isn't your house anyway , it's minea rl?fl?ren-:e to her not wanting to live with me ...
I'm in the house at Deep Eddy now. It's almost evening. Susan and Linda,
lovt'rs, art' aslt'ep on the couch. Spaghetti's in the pot. Brownies on the stove ,-:ooling. And I'm waiting for my friends to wake , trying to write a story.
Story of my life as usual.
Taking in everything around her , Ruth couldn't keep from smiling. The
sane from the porch was nothing short of idyllic . Even the porch itself: sobig, wrapping around from the side to the front of the house , with its broad
ded;, of grey painted boards, sturdy white railing, wide enough to sit on comfortabl y , while leaning back against the strong posts going up , up to support
the roof overhead: or comfortable seats to choose from, a rocker, a butterfly-:hair covered in faded green, a beige hammock .. . and a table against thehouse wall holding iced tea , brownies, ashtray , two joints , matches. And fromthe porch. a tiny upstate New York town , wide unpaved road , large , well-built
houses surrounded by lawns. Across the way, an old couple in rocking chairson their porch. pillars of the town. Deep Eddy, New York State . Not a tourist
town. but a river and beach five minutes from where they sat.
"What about you, Ruth? Do you want to get married again?"Legs crossed and swinging , Stephanie stole a look into Ruth's eyes, a franklook for a long moment. and then away. Lightly tanned , a beautiful womanof 37. Unexpectedly there when they arrived for the weekend, one of theothers who shared the house they were staying at. A teacher; a talkative , energeti c. funny , warm , lovely woman. Straight. But acting like she was attracted .
Meaning? Meaning what? Ruth had no idea. She did know she'd like to kiss
Stephanie though. They 'd had fun all weekend together , going to the yard
sale and poking through 1940's Woman s Day magazines marked 2¢, old lace
shawls and pillows and lamps and dishes and silverware , each buying wonderful bargains and talking about their New York apartments and how they madethem pretty .. . the way Stephanie'd made the house at Deep Eddy so pretty,
with her wonderful finds full of character and history and humor. Then going to the river and floating on inner tubes for hours, surrounded by children,and coming back to the house to cook dinner and bake mint brownies fromscratch , according to Stephanie's secret-from-her-mother recipe. They'd beenclose and warm for two days, and the feelings had been growing- at least for
Ruth they had.
Closing her eyes , she sighed as she imagined lightly rubbing her hand over
Stephanie's high , beautiful breasts, ran the tip of her tongue tentatively andlovingly all along the outline of the other woman's lips, then slowly entered
her mouth. With her other hand she gently stroked Stephanie's back ... what
was the question? Oh- get married?
" - or just live with someone, or what?" Stephanie looked right at her again,
frank but furtive too, looking away and then back. Ruth tried to hold her eyes.
"Married? No. Or yes , I do. But not the way you mean it."Risky! Why did she say that? Annoyed with herself, Ruth was the one to74look away now. Something caught her eye. In the last light of the day, asmall yellow bird flew by the porch, landed on a lowish branch of a high tree,
and fussed with its young. Out back, the 89 year old man who lived next door
picked a few tender young green beans and put them in a basket he had beside him on the damp ground.
Why had she said that! '''Not the way you mean it!'" Stephanie didn't
want to hear that-did she? Did she know what Ruth was hinting at? Know
it inside herself anyway, somewhere maybe was she looking for it, scared but
searching, running away and hiding, but coming back for more? Or not-of
course not. Why should she. It was so easy, and so clear, the whole world
was Deep Eddy-or New York City, same difference-the old man and theyellow bird, the couple across the street and in every other house, old andyoung, all the same, straight.
Straight women! Ruth knew them ... she'd been one for so long. And so
had Jeanne, first love, and gone back to being one. Jeanne-seen on the street
last week, still just as beautiful, deeply sensual even in the way she walked,
held her hands, her head, and somewhere inside herself was Ruth still in lovewith her? Or did you never stop loving the ones you really loved, was that
it? Seven years a lesbian-no, forget that, 38 years old, and who had she really
loved? Aside from her mother, her children. Her first boyfriend, Danny? And
her real, her long-time lovers, Jeanne, Jackie, Kate. None of them ever reallygiven up? And this Judith, this beautiful, 25 year old, 13-years-younger onewhat did she matter; what were three months. Ruth had never really let her
in anyway. Certainly not all the way. Knock, knock, who's there. No one.
Not so fast, young woman. Let me see your I.D. Who cared anyway. Get themto start writing resumes soon. List your affectional, sexual, closeness levels.
Past relationships? Number, duration?
"What do you mean-uh-not like I mean it how?"
Stephanie had brown eyes, brown hair, in a nice Jewish face, and energy
like her own. And straight. Why'd she have to be straight. She wants to getmarried-I want to get married. 4-ever. Judy and Ruth forever. Ruth and Kate
forever. Niagara Falls, that time it almost was forever-and he didn't evenmake the really-loved list. Thirteen years. Let me out, out, out. Well, now,
yes, I want to get married again, Stephanie. You're very attractive, have you
ever tried women? Lesbians make the best lovers. We are not just good friends.
I know you know. DYKE, printed on her T-shirt, sun visor, and ring. The
Well of Loneliness? You know? Stonewall, DOB, LFL. And finally the radioat the beach the other day, blaring WKTU disco, then suddenly, " ... have aquestion about the gay lifestyle? Or just want to rap? Call the Gay Switchboard, 929-9889 ... " followed by an ad for Sunkist oranges.
A seduction scene? But what if she rejected. But so attractive. But to sleep
with so many women? Sixteen, at last count ... sixteen! And count them she
did, every time there was a new one she'd write about it, in her journal andmaybe in a poem, but eventually she'd actually list them, wanting to keep
track as well as to sort them-theml-out and categorize them, different ways
at different times, how many all together, how many-a coincidence?-had
names beginning with the same letter, "J" -at present nine, over half of her sixteen women! How many Jewish and how many Irish Catholic, how many onenight stands, short, or long term relationships, how many butch, femme, or in
between, short or tall, big or small, how many much younger than she was. And
75then dwelling on and analyzing and discussing all these counts and scores anddifferences . What did they all mean'? What were the specifications of her perfect
lover , and what was "bottom line " ? Her journal was the most remarkable mixture of dear diary outpourings of both grief and joy, letters never meant to be
mailed, much introspection , the beginnings of poems along with occasional completed ones, and these lists and other recapitulations of all the women she'd been
involved with . But so many , it would be easy to get the impression that she liked
or wanted it that way, needed to play around. It wasn't true, she didn't, wasn't
the type . Hated non-monogamy .. . and serial monogamy. She'd been married 13
years, faithfully! All she really wanted was one, one forever, one happily ever after like they had said , had promised her since she was a little girl. But it neverworked out that way, so eventually there 'd be another one . But to just keep adding them on? Shouldn't there be some limit?
Oh, why not do it. Get more stoned-they'd already started . Put on music,
disco , Donna Summers! Dance! Laugh , touch , flirt just a little , nothing you could
pinpoint exactly . Switch to slow music . Dance along-together but apart, no touching . But move alluringly . Then, careful- but sure-touch.
Possible reactions:... "What are you doing, are you crazy?" Or,.. . "Oh, Ruth , I thought you'd never touch me . . . " Seduction scene .
But no, don't, caution, stop, red light, she 's straight , and straight womenStephanie was looking at her. Don't seem too weird now , she told herself,
and don't space out-youl1 scare her away-but yes. Take the plunge . Lookback , warm and frank. Excitement beginning to take hold of her , she gathered
herself together, back to the conversation she kept dreaming away from .
"I mean yes, I want to get married again too, Stephanie ." She said thename careSSingly , which was how she felt. "I want to very much . But not toa man . To a woman."
Pause.
Silence. And more silence.
Unable to keep from spacing out now , Ruth felt the lightness of her head.
Oh , don't get scared , Stephanie , she felt herself wanting to say , I don't wantto make a lesbian out of you, I just want to sleep with you . Giggles starting
to work their way up and out like the hiccups . 2 ,4, 6 , 8, how do you know
your wife is straight. Stephanie. You're 37 years old. Come to bed with me .
You 11 like the way it feels, I am good, I am very , very good.
Screen door. Opening and closing. Out of her spaciness, pulling herself back .
What was happening. Stephanie gone in the house? No, or else come back , be. cause she was on the other side of the porch now , smoking . ... What am I
doing, Ruth thought , I hate kissing mouths that taste of cigarette smoke! no , wait , that's not the point ...
Looking around her , it was really dark now, moths , crickets so noisy you
wanted to cover your ears at times , while at others they just became a partof the night and you didn't even hear them , and lightning bugs , bats farther
out , or up , watch out, beautiful moon, stars like you never saw in the city ,big trees , black sky . Going over toward where Stephanie stood , all the way
thinking oh , no , how can I possibly try again . I can't, why, just to get hurt
one more time , just to have to face up to my "unrealistic expectations," that's
what Judith said . Just to have one more woman come in close and send hersoaring with the intimacy , the pure sensuality of it, the joy , the sex, the76touches, the looks, the loving, the sweeping uplifting sensual soar of it, thatthickened her voice, her throat fIlled with so much tender passion that she
really, truly believed that at last it had happened and she was going to be
happy ... and then to have the woman go away again, or have to go awayherself. She couldn't do it again, ever. She choked it back, all the expectations,the joy and the grief. No more.
But the porch. The empty iced tea glasses, the brownies from before, still
sitting on the table. Rock music and raucous laughter from the bar on the
highway a block away, full of rednecks and drunken laughter. Then fading
somewhat, someone closing a door.
Stephanie stood leaning against the porch railing, smoking and shaking, theshaking visible as her glowing cigarette end made weird stacatto jabs at thenight air, twitching like a drunken firefly. The smoke quivered in the air infront of her, as if to hide her face , her pretty, forthright, but right now o1:yface. Scared, uptight and tense, but waves of her sensuality still coming acrossdense, strong, and wonderful, the way they had been all weekend. Beautiful
straight woman. Turning away as Ruth approached.
"Stephanie? What's wrong?"
No answer.
Not knowing what to do, Ruth went to the hammock, thought about it,then passed it and settled angrily in a chair. Stop it! she demanded, stop it
this instant, I won't have it. I won't open up again. Get back, feelings! Back!
I don't like you, I don't want you. Get away from me, breath-catching desire,tingling cunt! Go away, agony of wanting, wishing, lusting!
They were ignoring her completely. She felt it. Her chest filling and herthroat swelling with the huskiness, her body simply taking over, the cornersof her mouth turning up in smiling anticipation. She couldn't believe it was
happening. And her mind-flitting around, unablr. to concentrate. Focusing,jumping. Stephanie . Judith. Kate. The porch. Dreaming. The bathroom. Oh,
right, the bathroom , on the toilet yesterday just after Stephanie arrived, going into the bathroom and sitting on the toilet and seeing it on the cabinet,
Stephanie's makeup bag! When had she last seen one like that. Little bulging
plastic bag, unzippered. Slyly, smiling to herself at what she was about to do,
thinking naughty but picking up the bag ... full to the brim with bottles,
tubes, brushes, razor. Lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, blusher, of course, ofcourse. Stephanie's present and her own past, heaped heaVy in the plastic bagthat pressed cool against her naked thighs .
. . . Estoderme Flowing Emulsion .... This wonderful emulsion helps yourskin remain soft, smooth, youthful-looking. Daily, its moisture-retaining
ingredients help prevent dryness, giving your complexion the radiance andfreshness of youth.
Straight women! Oh, it took her back, to herself, to Jeanne , remembering,
flashing momentarily on the lipstick that had been on Jeanne's mouth, thefirst time they kissed . . . not that all lesbians wore no makeup. But for Ruth
that had been a part of the transition, of coming out, of learning to love herself, her body, the way she looked , in "natural color, nothing added or removed,
and it was still a part of her life.
Estee Lauder fresh air makeup base-a rich but sheer foundation that not
only covers tiny imperfections and smooths out texture, but also imparts77

a clear, dewy , "country air" finish of sheen without shine.
And the release of slowly letting it all go. The eye shadow went last, she remembered. No, then the leg shaving.
Go-Bronze Bronzing Jei. New Go-Bronze will give you the golden glow thatused to come only from the sun itself! Can be applied under, over, or without makeup.
Then she found the small bottle of toilet water-L'Air du Temps by Nina
Ricci, Paris and New York. The smell, beautiful-and familiar. Where? A lover?
The women she knew now wore body oils if anything-musk, patchouli. She
herself liked a special East India patchouli, a while ago it was almost a trademark, the lover she was with then calling her Patchouli Mama ... no, wait,
now she remembered, it was her aunt! Her great aunt Florence used to wear
it. Coming to visit once a year, so dressed up, her rich great aunt Florence ,Ruth wove fantasies about her that lasted the whole year, till her next visit . ..
how she'd take Ruth away and love her with a sweetness that matched thedelicious smell of her perfume. It was L'Air du Temps, she remembered ...
and now the familiar smell, and Stephanie was in the chair beside hers.
Silence. Her heart flew .
"I'm sorry," Stephanie began . "I didn't know I, I mean, I shouldn't havereacted like that.""Like what?" Her own voice, Ruth noticed, was calm and quiet , Stephanie's
high-pitched and hurrying.
"Running out like that!""It's all right. I figured you needed to move around or something."''Move around! I needed to run! Why did you say that-oh, never mind ,wait, I didn 't mean that, I ... " She drew a long breath. Two. Opened her
mouth to go on. Ruth stopped her.
''What's that you have on?" She felt herself smiling, smiling all over- herlips, her toes, her fmgers, they were all curling with the delight of it, the wonderful, special space she got in when she was turned on, when things seemedpromising, most of all when she made love , the space she'd discovered only
since coming out, but that every woman she was with commented on, how
she became quite transported ... it was happening now. She embraced thesensations. She could do nothing but. "It smells so good," she heard herself
say softly , intimately. "Really."
Inside the house, a new record dropped down onto the turntable, and suddenly Janis Joplin was singing in a way that expressed exactly the lust Ruth
had to admit she was feeling . And she wanted, all she wanted now was to beable to simply reach out and touch the woman beside her. How didn't matter,it could be anyone of the many ways she wanted, needed to touch her ...
soft and gentle and caressingly, or powerfully, or sensually; with her wholehand or just her fingertips or both her arms around her tight-any way, butjust to touch her. Must. Please. Wouldn't she? She had to.
She was scared too, though, and something in the way Stephanie was looking at her caught her up short, and her mind raced off again. Kate. Write her?
Meaning to tell her so many things for so long-but then she was always meaning to, never able to, not just since the relationship ended, during it too, there
were just things that contradicted each other, always so many contradictions,is that what life was about? So the very saying of them canceled out the otherhalf of what she needed to say. Oh, two-sided woman, I loved your one side78

so much , I hated your other , wanted you to get rid of it , couldn 't live withit , couldn't in the end . And always afraid I'd lose you and giving you all thepower, that's how it felt to me , and th en you , afterwards , afte r it was finallyall over , telling me you were always scared shitl ess I'd leave yo u. Oh , fa iry
godmother, why can't the wo rld come out the way it's supposed to? Why
couldn't we have stayed together happily-ever-afte r, Kate?
This woman next to her. Who was she, and would it happen that Ruth
would find out, grow to know her and love her? Years from now would theylook back on and recoun t and retell the story of their getting together a hundred times to all their friends, mostly other couples, like themselves who
lived together and would continue to do so happily forever and ever after?
Was Stephanie the one who was going to make her life come true? Or was
that, of course, impossible in this world, this real world of real people , andjust one more manifestation of her "unrealistic expectations" of love andromance , thanks to Hollywood, USA.
Now she strained against that dream to pull herself back . She had to. Thiswas it-certainly not hers alone , but this was her personal struggle. How could
she live with that forever-after constantly haunting her ... and failing her?
But how could she live without it? She didn 't know any answers ... neverhad . Maybe never would . And so , having no way of knowing whether she was
finally fighting it off or just succumbing to it one more time , she forcibly
stopped thinking and pulled herself back to the present.
Forced back by pure Willpower, the past faded, submerging for the moment
all the hurts and pain , the loss and disappointment , Kate and Judith and Jeanneand so on all the way back to her mother. Lips and toes curled up and smiling,
she allowed the present to rematerialize , deliciously, in the sounds of Deep
Eddy-where she was right then , that moment-the crickets loud , the music
and laughter from the bar far away , the wings of a moth brushing against andescaping the yellow bug light on the porch ceiling- and below it , best of all,the soft and unexpected-or wasn 't it really ey.pected all along? - touch ofStephanie's hand moving wordlessly into her own.
.
THE LESBIANINSIDER INSIGHTER INCITER-. . . a Lesbian newspaper!

Subs: For 13 issues, $9 (USA). $13 (Canada) , $18 (others)

LESBIAN PHOTOS, ART, & WRITING wanted
2 104 Stevens Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55404 (USA)79Diana Rivers

The ShellOver, over, time to go back. Time to go back and end it. Rage smolderingin the car that could ignite in a moment and at the same time coldness, ice
filling all the space, pressing on her chest, on her breath. Just the two of themin that car locked together, each other's reality, each other's world, the twoof them seeming alone forever in that car. Other people going by are inaccessible strangers, sealed in their own vehicles, flat and distant as a movie-no help
there.
I hate this, Sara keeps thinking, I hate this. I want to get out. I'd rather
hitchhike. I'd rather walk. 1 can't stand being in this car another minute, but
she doesn't speak or move. She sits staring straight ahead with her teeth clenched. The landscape pitches too fast at them around sudden curves. Slow down,
slow down, let me out. I want to get out. When the wheels slide on the gravel
shoulder, she glances quickly at Tasha. Tasha's prome is like stone, terrible
stone flesh that radiates hat~. 111 pack and leave, Sara thinks, 111 go to Carol's.
Tomorrow 111 be on my way to Washington. I never should have stayed in
Eugene. She feels the shell pressing against her leg and takes it out of her pocket, not daring to look at it. How quickly this all happened, her life changing
course and now changing back, and how little control she seems to have.
Her first night in town she'd met Tasha at a dance. Sara was traveling, needing to move on, to be alone. Then this woman was dancing with her, sinuous,
undulating, almost hypnotic, flowing around her, blazing with fire. She moves
like a golden snake, Sara thought. Cords of energy flashed between them, winding around Sara, binding her.
"How long are you staying in Eugene?""I'm not. I'm on my way to Washington.""You could spare us a few days."
After the fifth dance Tasha said, "Let's go to my room. We can put on somerecords. It's too smoky here.""I'm supposed to be staying with my friend Caro!.""You can call her from there."
Why not, Sara thought, wasn't it part of traveling? Tasha put on a checkered cap, a man's suit jacket and boots, her long skirt swirling out between. She
took Sara's arm and they wen t out together. The golden snake had turned
into a street butch. Sara remembered laughing with pleasure in the cool night
air. This would be worth a lost day .
Tasha had a big room on the second floor. It overlooked the yard. Talltrees arched against the windows. They didn't go out for three days. Tasha
kept saying, "It's never been like this, not with anyone, never before."
The bed was jumbled chaos. Sara had rolled over on her back. She wasstaring at the ceiling, floating in some deep sea of herself, watching the swirling color patterns from the crystals in the window. Tasha's face pressed against
her breast, wet and warm. They had been lOving for hours swimming insideeach other, two merging bodies of water, wave over wave in a dark tide. Now

80

Dear Sinister Wisdom:
In SW 13, Barbara Grier defended herself against criticism which she perceived ascharacterizing Naiad Press as "opportunistic," and in the process she insulted me alongwith every other person who is less than physically perfect: "Do I need to add that evena deaf, blind, and dumb opportunist would snatch at the chance to publish her work if
publishing for aggrandizement were one's goal." Using the words "deaf, blind, and dumb"as synonymous with "imperceptive" or "incompetent" lends her statement no extra
positive impact, while it demonstrates an outrageous insensitivity for the feelings of physically impaired persons. I urge her and all other apparently "whole" persons to examine
their feelings toward persons with impairments. Such an examination often reveals somefear, some anxiety, and more than a trace of condescension. These emotions can beworked through, which will allow one to learn that deaf, blind, and dumb persons canwork as competently as non-impaired persons. Impaired persons vary just like membersof any group vary on most characteristics. Some are ethical, others are opportunistic;some are tall and some short. On some level, I expect Grier knows these ·things.
Referring to a race, class, or type of people to connote a single characteristic relies
on stereotypes, and stereotypes can almost always be relied upon to be inaccurate andhurtful. Patriarchal, white society has traditionally characterized women, people of otherraces, and impaired persons as incompetent, substandard creatures. Our linguistic cliches
i:eflect this attitude. We must all stretch our minds and emotions to understand the damaging impact of such commonplace phrases, and we must flex our language into newshapes that will more accurately and sensitively represent what we are trying to communicate.
-Betty Bird
Washington, D.C .

Dear Barbara Grier,
Enclosed is a copy of my response to your comments which appeared in Sinister
Wisdom 13.
I expect you made your comments about blind, deaf, and dumb persons without
thinking of their impact on persons in these groups. I am blind, and I felt I had to respond merely because so many people say such things without thinking.
Harriet and Catherine said you might like the opportunity to submit a comment on
my remarks and have yours appear in the same issue as mine.
Sincerely,
Betty Bird
Dear Betty Bird:
You are right, of course, I said it without thinking, and I am very sorry.
Barbara Grier
Dear Harriet and Catherine,... 1 want to thank and applaud you for publishing Elly Bulkin's courageous article"On Racism and Writing" in Sinister Wisdom 13. (Shared of course by Beth Hodges andElly.) This article has had direct and important effects in my life-it has brought information into focus in a new way, so that I see differently (as has happened to me onlywith the best of lesbian feminist writing-''Woman-Identified Woman" or ''Women andHonor" or, most recently, Gyn/Ecology), and has also inspired direct action.
As Elly Bulkin suggests, I have begun an anti-racism consciousness raising group in
Los Angeles at the Woman's Building. It is the second such group in Los Angeles forwhite women .... With each woman in the group, I feel moved and challenged and educated by the commitment and insight she brings.
I believe this article should not be read as an attack on Mary Daly-Bulkin is notsaying her book should not have meaning for us-but precisely because of its powerful
impact, Daly's ignoring of racism is dangerous, as is white feminists' inability to perceiveit.
Once again, thank you.
In Sisterhood,
Terry Wolverton

89Dear Sinister Wisdom,
Please thank Elly Bulkin fl)r h.:r lead article un racism (in Sillister Wisdom 13) . It's
one of the most p-ractical artil'ks I've rcad on the subject ; it gives me and other white
w('men specific suggestions about how to open up our thinking patterns, how, in ourwriting and speaking, to push outward the boundaries of our frequently token asso<:overing remarks about ract! and .:lass. It's also informative , packed with specifics, an excellent
reading list and materials for future reference; the articulation of the distinction between"non-;acist" and "anti-racist" is a real gift. And it's provocative; it makes me want to
act and think in different and more profound personal ways about racism.
Best of all, the article is good criticism. By that I mean that Bulkin does not "dump"
or "trash." Instead, she treats the writers she's critical of (at least those still living) withrespect and with the recognition that each of them (and even she herself, particularly
she herself) is still growing, still changing, still capable of making mistakes, still open tohearing criticism that will encourage dialogue and help both parties to growth and change.
What's most important to me in our building of a movement is the ways we treat
each other along the way. If good criticism is also selfo<:riticism and if it is, as the bestof the Chinese revolutionaries tell us, an act of love and concern between friends (people
fighting for the same ultimate goals), then Elly Bulkin has given us here a good exampleof how we can participate in and appreciate that process. Our (lesbian-feminist) literary
criticism as well as our personal interactions can only benefit from good work like this.
Even beyond Bulkin's article, thanks are due to Beth Hodges and the staff that worked
with her for another fine issue of Sinister Wisdom.
Sincerely,
Sally M. Gearhart
San Francisco
Letter to the Editor:
While reading Elly Bulkin's article "Racism and Writing," uneasy feelings were aroused
in me. Forbidding undertones seemed to be prevalent. Was I wrong?? After re-reading thearticle, the same feelings prevailed. Are feminist writers now to be purged for their "Sinsof Omissions" set forth by the "Litany of Inclusions" in the conclusion of Bulkin's
critical/crippled analysis? Is Big Brother/Sister lurking in the shadows-peering/sneering?
Has Patriarchy permeated women's lives and minds for so long that even feminist groups
adopt/adapt their ideology/methodology in an attempt to tame their most courageous
sisters?
I was enraged at the author's shallow analysis used in an effort to discredit such a
profound thinker and scholar as Mary Daly. Its main purpose seemed to be to harness
her genius. She whose words have en-spirited/in-spired the belief that woman is loved
and loving and her reality is be-ing. Would Elly Bulkin have me believe that Mary Daly
would reduce/exclude the meaning of the unique sufferings, contributions, creativity of
any woman whatever race, creed, color or class. Never! Whose purpose would be served
if one(s) could bind this creative genius? Are individual fears, egos, jealousies involved?
We are keenly aware of the devastation done to women in patriarchal history. If this is
the direction the Feminist Movement is taking, then every woman's journey would beinterrupted and her-story again erased . We need to support and encourage each other'screativity -not limit it.
Before concluding, I would like to comment on Elly Bulkin's obvious objection to
Mary Daly's statement "Big Words-for it is written for big strong women out of respect
for strength" and her reference to another woman's infuriated and insulted reaction tothese words . Although I am a woman with only a high school education-hopefully, oneof the "Strong" ones-they did not deter/intimidate me. Gyn/Ee%gy spoke to me personally of things past, present and future with such intensity/integrity, which encompassed
all women, that I am grateful I was "Strong" enough to be sparked by it.
Struggling Feminist
Louise Mullaley
Dorchester, Massachusetts
Dear Women of Sinister WisdomI am writing to you because Elly Bulkin's "Racism and Writing" article [SW 13)
moved me to regard in more depth the chain of atrocities that link racism with sexism.

90Bulkin stated that "racism is in each of us," and "it creeps in even when [she] is mostconscious of avoiding it (perhaps in [her] article)." Something has crept into her consciousness and prevented her from diso<:overing the origins of oppression . She did not
pervade the disguises which patriarchy uses to mask its crimes against women.
Bound by the patriarchal mind-bendings, Bulkin forgot an important feminist principle
and blamed women for their victimization by men. She says that her "immigrant grandmother" is responsible for racist attitudes creeping in. She then blames her mother andfather. This is a too-simple perception of the development of racism. I thOUght that such
schemata had been thrown out with Freud's theories that the mother is responsible for
man's woes.
Having done what Bulkin suggested and used the ''formats developed by women looking at patriarchal oppression ... [to] look at how we have been taught racist attitudes,"I had to perceive her article as taking the blame for racism from the men who generate
it and placing it on women.
A principle that Bulkin seems to have once adopted and given up is intellectual separatism. She says that women who decided to stop "reading work by and/or about men ...
will ultimately fmd it impossible to learn about the lives of women of color while holding
to strictly separatist principles." In conflict with this idea of retaining male texts, she
seems to think that Mary Daly's pervasion of white male texts is invalid and racist. Bulkin
defames Daly's character for her use of male scholarship to make connections between
crosso<:ultural patterns of misogyny, while recommending that we read works by Third
World men (because the lives of women of color are linked with the lives of their men).
To me, Daly's use of men's half-truths to elicit an underlying truth is much more powerful than an examination of male texts because women's lives are linked with men's.
Another contradiction Bulkin makes is to say that women should give each other"supportive criticism" just before she proceeds to discredit Mary Daly. I can fmd no
criticisms Bulkin makes of Daly that hold true after a seriously reflective struggle with
the ideas she presents. Due to the lengthy discussion one would have to engage in to
dispute the multiple discrepancies I found in Bulkin's article, I have chosen to take issue
with a point she made that may not be immediately transparent. Bulkin damns Daly forher praise of Katherine Mayo. Bulkin says that Daly saw racism in Mayo's Mother India,
an expose of Indian men's murder/rape/mutilation of women. Bulkin avers that Dalythought Mayo's racism was "beyond notice [and] beneath mention." How could Daly
have seen racism and still have it beyond her notice?
It is true that Daly did not condemn Mayo for her sexism or her British nationalism.
However, Bulkin did Daly an injustice by saying that her motivations were racist in origin .
I'm sure no one will champion the idea that Daly is pro-sexism or pro-nationalism: shedoes strongly believe that all oppression is connected with man's will to subjugate women.
The unveiling of men's possession/rape/murder of women is what Daly praises Mayo for.
A second motive for not discrediting Mayo is apparent in Daly's recognition of detraction
by male misogynists (and women who have had misogyny creep into their minds) that
distracts us from the actual sufferings of the women whose situation Mayo was trying tochange. Daly spent several pages (Gyn/Ec%gy, pp. 127-30) listing numerous attempts
to discredit Mayo's condemnation of suttee and child marriage. Rather than discussing
Mayo's belief that British men wanted to better the lives of Indian women, she chose togive credit to a woman whose book is the primary source of documentation of the actual
victimization of Indian women. Witness to the plausibility of this motive is one of thepassages from Mother India that Daly chose to cite:
Mayo presented evidence of a horror show that defies description, citing medical
evidence from the Indian Legislative Assembly Debates of 1922. I will cite just fourof the cases of child-wives brought to Indian hospitals, as described in Mayo's appendix :A. Aged 9. Day after marriage. Left femur dislocated, pelvis crushed out of shape,
flesh hanging in shreds . ..
I. Aged about 7. Living with husband. Died in great agony after three days ...
L. Aged 11. From great violence done to her person, will be a cripple for life. No
use of her lower extremities.
M. Aged about 10. Crawled to hospital on her hands and knees. Has never beenable to stand erect since her marriage. [Gyn/Ec%gy, p. 127 ; Mother India, p. 412]
It is men's freedom to perpetrate these atrocities on women that Mayo worked tostop. It is the Indian women's victimization that Mary Daly wills to stop, and a feminist
recognition of crosso<:ultural planetary oppression of women that she is concerned with.
Daly recognizes the allied forces of men who keep all women in slavery. There is a pattern91

that cnslavcment follows. One pattern is the feminization of males, such as the myth that
pic'turc's thc' black male being castrated by a matriarchal black woman . Daly sensed thec'masculation of Jewish men victimized in the Nazi's concentration on extermination of
their r;l\:e. [n other words, Da[y believes that mer, turn other men into women in orderto keep them in an inferior position. Daly also connects the gynocidal practices of American gynecologists with those of Nazis:
Like the body- and mind-gyneco[ogists of America, the physicians and psychiatrists
who justified and participated in the Nazi extermination and medical experimentation
programs operated in the tradition of the Torture Cross society. Although their victimsmental patients and Jews - were of both sexes, a1[ lVere cast into the victim ro[e modeledon that of the victims of patriarchal gynocide, which is the root and paradigm for
genocide . [GYII /Ecology. p. 298]
Daly is not willing to trust to the compassion of any men to stem the !low of women's
blood. Katherine Mayo did, and so (it seems) does Elly Bu[kin. Mayo believed that British
men did not want Indian men to kil[ women - she did not realize that gynocide knows nocultural bounds. Mayo sa\\' British men instituting laws against suttee and child marriage
and believed they were better than the men who were opcllly raping and killing women.
Bulkin sees the lives of Third World women as "[inked, often inextricably" with Third
World men. men who want the freedom of their women as well as their own. Men pretend
to fig.ht for the freedom of women as long as it enables them to convince women to use
their energy to bring them more power. This was true in the case of the British in India,
and [ believe proves true for black men in white America .
There is an excellent article written by Sandra Williams on "Sexism and the B[ackMale" [Smith Collegc Journal of Aji·o·Americall Studies ([ 975-76), pp . 1-5) which provided me with some necessary insights to make connections between the emasculation of" oppressed males" and the SUbjugation of women by those males. The quote is long but
extremely relevant; therein the issue of blaming. the mother also arises again :This author's opinion of the matriarchy myth is that it is a hoax designed to exempt
white America from responsibility for the oppression of blacks and instead to shift the
responsibility to black women. The acceptance of this myth is also evidence that American society views as patho[ogical any model of femininity that is not consistent withthe accepted mode\. It is true that black women have not been passive objects as the
majority of white women in America have been characterized .... However, to refer toblack women as matriarchs is to contradict the reality of their existence . . .
An integral part of the matriarchy theory is the theory of the castrated black male .
Moynihan discusses this idea in his study when he says, "Both as a husband and as afather the Negro male is made to feel inadequate ... " He is made to feel inadequate
not only by white society but by the black woman. Moynihan quotes Thomas Pettigrew:''The Negro wife in this situation can easily become disgusted with her financially dependent husband, and her rejection of him further alienates the male from family life.
Embittered by their experiences with men, many Negro mothers act to perpetuate themother-<:entered pattern by taking a greater interest in their daughters than their sons."
Thus, Moynihan says, black mothers are instrumental in the castration of black men.
Surprisingly, some black men agree in part with Moynihan's theory of the castrated
black male. For instance, Eldridge Cleaver, in a letter addressed to all black women,from all black men, says, "Across the naked abyss of negated masculinity, of four hundred years minus my Balls, we face each other today, my queen ... [ want you to knowthat [ feared to look in to your eyes because I knew I would find reflected there a merciless indictment of my impotence and a compelling challenge to redeem my conquered
manhood."
In contrast to the castrated black male, there is the defeminized black female,
Sapphire, or the Amazon as Cleaver calls her. Cleaver charges white society with projecting the Amazon image on black women, an image which coincides with their c1assfunction in society.* [*Some connections should be made here to the Amazon image
as it applies to black women and lesbians, but time and space do not here permit what
would be a complicated analysis.)... Thus, many black men while branding Moynihan's theory a myth, have at thesame time sought to overcome this theory. This phenomenon has been evident in theattitudes and statements made by many black men and some black women about women's roles in the movement for black liberation. Some black revolutionaries have advocated a secondary role for women in the movement in the belief that it is of primary
importance that black men "regain their manhood."[t should be noted that Sandra Williams and I came to different conclusions in our
fmal analysis; but given the information presented here, I feel free to conclude that masculinism produces multiple versions of oppression that take on the disguise of racism,92

classism, etc. The stage for their theatrical productions is the world where men strut andfret across the bodies of women.
The hardest enemy to figh t is the one you can't see. This is why a planetary perspective of patriarchy is one which we must attain to freely love our Selves, our Sisters andour Earth. This is what Gyn/Ecology means.
I hope that Elly Bulkin will find her Self free to revise her opinions on Mary Daly's
racism and to read Gyn/Ec%gy again .
In Sisterhood and Struggle,
Marguerite Fentin
Amherst, Massachusetts
To the Editor :It seems that someone, whose name I keep forgetting, has stirred bitter word s andpoisonous feelings among feminists as bold as Mary Daly, as courageous as Adrienne Rich ,as bold and courageous as all feminists who try to live by the tru th of our convictions.
She wrote an article attacking Mary Daly as a racist. Adrienne Rich has lent tacit support
to this attack by allowing her name to be printed among the readers of the manuscript
article . The charge is so absurd I laughed when first told about it , but I was puzzled by
the presence of Adrienne Rich in what had impressed me as the feeble ravings of a shortsighted mind . At each telling and recounting there were new ripples, new echos. This
thing has grown into a monster which divides women into antagonistic factions, involves
black and white women, and ultimately undermines the power of Mary Daly here, Adrienne
Rich there, Audre Lorde elsewhere, and every feminist everywhere. And it made me angry.
It sounds to me as if the issue is not racism but the hurts and unresolved feelings
caused by sexism, which includes racism. Just as yesterday's "c1assism" was a way ofworking a sense of gUilt out of one's system-especially if you were born into the moneyedclass who was paying your way through expensive schools - so racism today obscures theuneasiness of the oppressed and oppressors alike as well as the failure to confron t differences with compassion and intelligence. In this sense, both classism and racism are one
and the same crock of shit. They exist in real life as manifestations of evil , a fact which
Mary Daly has understood better than anyone involved in this quarrel. Her writings area blatant denunciation of them, a lucid and powerful analysis of the mechanisms bywhich they are allowed to function. This, to me, is far more important than her silenceson the racism in some of her sources.
It has always been easier to latch on to an idea than to examine your own life inorder to purify it of the emotions and attitudes we have all learned and know we must
un-learn so as to free and enrich our lives. To make racism into an issue separate fromthe general pollution the patriarchy carefully and systematically unloads into all aspectsof life creates the stultifying situation whereby women of the feminist movement takedivisive positions that frustrate women on the move who form the women 's movement.
And since no one has yet invented an instant cure for the difficulties we experience inhandling differences and disagreements in a culture that has done its best to keep womenfrom bonding it would be nice if those who have a personal axe to grind would grind it
privately. Without the acrimony of envy, the futility of nit-picking, the corrosiveness of
guilt and the expediency of opportunism.
If the woman who wrote her nasty piece about Mary Daly understands as worshipthe profound gratitude so many women feel for those who have given us the words withwhich to fight destructiveness it is her problem. I wish she had had the decency to work
it out for herself but if she had to use print, I wish she had been honest. In a whitemale supremacist society, all women have oppressed each other in varying degrees thathave nothing to do with virtue and everything to do with the hazards of birth. The point
is to recognize our share and push it out of our lives as we live it. The point is not to
induce yet other supremacist inventions: guilt, which leaves one wide open to gross manipulation; envy, which goads some to steal a bit of limelight at her sisters' expense ; selfdeceit, which conceals a lack of courage, integrity, and self-esteem.
Andree Collard
Norwell, Massachusetts

93

Dear Sinister Wisdom,
While not surprised by the ne~ative published responses to "Racism and Writing" [SW13) received thus far from Andree Collard, Marguerite Fen tin , H. Patricia Hynes, andLouise Mullaley, I was taken aback by the extent to which my arguments were distorted,
my character maligned, and no possibility granted that I might actually be seriously concerned with racism. In SW 15, for example, Hynes reduces my article to a ridiculous
formula (Homophobia + Racism = Oppression) entirely of her own conception and thenspends several paragraphs detailing my inadequacies for believing in it; she distortinglyinterprets my belief in equal access to health care for all women as my "assumption"that "more health care from this same system is unequivocably desirable," rather thanrecognizing that the choice is nearly always between inadequate health care from thissystem or no health Cilre at all.
The most basic assumption of these responses is that I am out to "get" Mary Dalyand that I've acted out of "individual fears, egos, jealousies" (Mullaley) and out of "alack of courage, integrity, and self-esteem" (Collard).· My discussion of Gyn/Ecology(5 of the article's 20 pages) were actually very much of an afterthought, an example
chosen once I'd outlined the article. I had intended a brief discussion of the book, but
soon found Daly's omissions at least as important to my overall thesis as what she did
include. In the absence of a tradition of white lesbians offering criticism to other whitelesbians regarding racism, I perhaps did not sufficiently stress (1) the extent to which
work by other white lesbians could have been cited as well; and (2) the reality that,while we are each ultimately responsible for our work, we do it too often within a framework in which other women encourage, support, do not sufficiently challenge our biases.
In the absence of that tradition, of a norm in which those of us who are white are regularly held accountable for our racism, the very fact of my criticizing a specific whitelesbian made her seem singled out.
Readers can go back to my article to form their own opinions. Infinitely more important than the article itself is the issue of what can happen when white women go beyond
theoretical formulations to criticize specific instances of racism. I have been able to receive these responses with considerable equanimity in large part because of the fairly
visible role I have played within the lesbian writing community: I can feel some confidence that my work as a whole will help undercut the attacks on my character, including
the charges that the article demonstrates my "woman-hatred" and that I am not "womancentered" in my thinking (Hynes). Had this been my fust published essay, I might havefound the responses personally shattering and felt at least tempted to question whether
I would ever raise such criticism again, no matter how well I could substantiate it.
The overriding issue involves the potentially chilling effect of such personal responses
on other white lesbians who have already been confronting racism-their own and others'or who are considering doing so. We need to fmd ways to validate racism as the legitimate
concern of white women and to support attempts to confront these issues. We need tounderstand racism as something white women have all learned and white privilege assomething we benefit from each day. As we accept the responsibility to be accountablefor our own racist actions, statements and omissions; as we recognize that our commitment to anti-racism in no way lessens our commitment to anti-sexism; as we understand"racism" as a characterization intended to open dialogue rather than to seal it in defensiveness; as we seek out criticism from women who, in their differences from us, aremore likely to question and hone our assumptions, those of us who are white can begin
to take a crucial step toward healing divisions between women of color and white women,
recognizing, as Cherne Moraga Lawrence writes, that "the passage is through, not over,not by, not around, but through."In sisterhood,
Elly Bulkin
Brooklyn, New York
·Audre Lorde has received no negative written feedback for "An Open Letter to Mary Daly,"a criticism of the racism in Gyn/Ecology. I wonder if these four women will respond to her
as they've done to me or will attempt to nullify the words of a Black lesbian-feminist throughthe crashing silence of their rejoinder.

94

Sinister Wisdom
the first five years

Harriet & Catherine
photograph by Lynda Koolish

AN ALBUM

95

Special Thanks from Harriet and Catherine
to Leigh Star
-without whom we couldn't have made it!

to the Lincoln Legion of Lesbians-for their help, support, and courage.

.,c:

.!:!

«.r::.

.

.,o

.0

o

:>.

.0

.r::.

0.

~

£o'"

.r::.

0.

and to the scores of women who have contributed- their talents, their /abor, their money, their support,
and their love.
.

96

A Domestic History
I. In the Beginning-

Catherine&
Harriet(by Catherine)

1976-Charlotte, North Carolina
January: We are alone. We talk about Amazon Quarterly, now defunct ,how it should not just die with no progeny, how something like it should
continue; then talk ourselves into believing we could do it.
February : The "something like" AQ is named "Sinister Wisdom ," a witchyphrase from Joanna Russ's The Female Man that we've fallen in love with.
(One of our friends tells us that the title is gimmicky and probably won 't
wear well . We ignore her.) The logo comes from Jane Ellen Harrison 's Prologomena to the Study of Greek Religion (p. 275), a Boeotian plate painting of
the Corn-goddess (Demeter and Persephone in one figure) which Catherine
feels graphically represents the title. We make a flyer and send it to womenand institutions whose addresses are in the New Woman's Survival Sourcebook.
Also to Beth Hodges, who had done the Margins special issue on "Lesbian
Feminist Writing and Publishing" (1974) . Also to anyone we can think ofthat might be interested in contributing or subscribing.
HoW' does 2 wo man survive when she steps out from the deathpr ocession Qf patriarchy? How does s he t.hink wi thout
thi n k in g ' their' thoughts, dreaming ' their' dreams. repeating' thei r' patterns? '''e're tryin g to answer the q uestio ns in
ou r own l ives and fi nding only hi nts and clues so we
decided to make a space to attract other clues. otherattempts at living and thinking pa~t the patriarchy.

We cal l o u r space Sinister \Vi sdom because the root meaningo f s ini ster is ' from the left side ' . The La,. . of the Fathers
e qua t es right-over- Ie f t and ''''hite-over-black and heterosexual - over - homosexual and male - over-fema l e with good -over ev i l . We want to turn these patriarchal va lues upside
down as a necessary prelude to creat ing our o\",n.
We wan t to print what ~Iary Daly ca lls "ludic cerebration.
t he free play of intuitinn in our own space , giving rise tot h inki ng that i s vigorous, informed, multi - dimensional.
i ndependen t, creative, tough . " We need thinking that comesout of t he deepest parts of woman - identified experience:t hin king that is outrageous, undiluted. monstrous: thinking
that exorcises the Godfathers, allowing the most devalued
frag ments of self to emerge undistorted by guilt andunt hwarted by shame.
The consc i ousness Sinister \';isdom will express is--briefly -t hat of t he lesbian or lunatic who embraces her boundary/c r iminal stat us, with the aim of creating a n e'~' species ina new time/space.
The three i ssues of Volume 1 ''''ill come out ,lu I,· 1. 1976 ::\ovember 1 , 1976 : ~Iarch 1, 1977. (Submission deadlines::\pril 15 , August 15 , and Oecember 15 . ) Subscription rate~are $4.50/one vear : overseas surface $5.50; institutions$8.00, sustaining subscriptions $25 . 00 . Check payable
to Sinister \.Jisdom.

March : We open a bank account in SW's name: we are a partnership , welegally exist. Beth stops to see us on her way north. We talk non-stop. She isencouraging; she gives us many more names and addresses. More flyers sent
out. We receive a manuscript which we had solicited from Julia Stanley inSouth Dakota; we receive unsolicited mss. from LA, NYC, Oregon, and someexciting poems from a Susan Leigh Star in Boston.
April: Harriet is typing copy on a rented IBM Selectric; Catherine is learning to paste-up from Laurel Galana's "How To Make a Magazine" in the AQ
97

:lI1thology Tile Lesbia1l Reader, and looking for a printer. Charlotte printers
are too expensive. Find one in Clover, South Carolina - old family firm - prints:I lot of Baptist Church literature-we are nelVOUS. But Mr. G. will print a
thousand copies of SW for $450 if we do collating and stapling. We say yes.
Harriet writes her "Notes for a Magazine," which announces the radical
stance ofI am thrilled by her integrity of vision, which I share. But I'mscared to death by the bald admission that we are lesbians -that SW is devoted
to the creation of a lesbian imagination, "and in all known societies lesbians
are a criminal class , those who are cast out." To declare these things in print!
On the other hand, announcing around, above, under, and through the truthof who we are and what we aim to do seems to me unthinkable. [As to fearand courage, I think H and I complemented each other : she was bold about
stating her politics, but afraid , lacking in confidence, about our ability toactually do a magazine. Coming from a career of doing the impossible intheatre, I was more confident about the doing , but coming from a life of
disguises, encoding , I was mortally afraid of telling the truth about myself
and my vision.]
May: Beth stops on her way south. We ask her if we can print the second
lesbian writing and publishing issue she's now planning. She agrees; it will be
our second issue, scheduled for November . .. . Kent- close friend of a friendoffers a press- an ancient Multilith 1250, not in working order-rent-free fora year. C & H move out of their bedroom to make way for the press and an
expanding SW office. Three Charlotte dykes form press collective and pledge
to get the press in working order. (They never did.) C is still learning to pasteup, with Jan Millsapps and Marianne Lieberman advising her on design ....
We select a drawing of Marianne's for the cover : one of a Mexican woman
who looks like a real Amazon, pointing to the left-hand side of the page. But
because she is actually pointing right with her right hand, should we reverse
the image? Do we identify with the model, or does the left-to-right reading
convention dominate us? Big dilemma . Decide finally that the sinister connotations are stronger as she stands. Besides, her position corresponds to that of
the goddess figure in our logo ... . Marianne and I drive down to Clover toshow her large cover drawing to the printer. Mr. G. turns pale, asks if there
will be photographs of nude women in the magazine. I assure him no- we
can't afford to print photographs. Then he says he will make the cover plate
himself, after working hours-"so the men and the girls in the shop won't beembarrassed." I begin to worry: what will happen when he sees the text of
SW? What will happen when the term lesbian leaps from the page at the "menand the girls"? Nightmare fantasies of Mr. G and his men burning the paste-up
in self-righteous revulsion. Or sabotaging the job by blurring all the print or
what? I'm too naive to know what atrocities can be perpetrated by press men .
. . . Our mailbox is beginning to ftll up. Example: "Sisters, Have seen an ad
about you in several places lately & the latest was L. Connection. Am very
interested in carrying your publication in my small feminist bookstore-please
send ordering information, including bulk rates. (Is it possible just to order 2
or 3 copies?) Thanks. (signed) Moonyean, Womanspace, Tempe, Ariz." Yes,
Moonyean, it is possible, and what are bulk rates? And our phone rings alot. Long distance from Chicago: "Hello, is this Harriet or Catherine? I'm
Nancy Adair and I got your name and number from Julia Stanley ... " Dykes
traveling south sleep overnight on our sun porch.

Sw.

98

June: We deliver the copy. We are very nervous. We insist on paying $100
in advance-I'm hoping this will somehow insure its safety: a propitiatoryoffering to the mercenary printers' gods or devils. The men and the girls are
too busy to pay us much mind-no one looks at our precious paste-up . Whew-!
... Three weeks later we return for the boxes of printed sheets. Mr. G has
put together and stapled one copy for us. It is beautiful, it is dazzling, it isreal! We stop at a Catawba river restaurant on the South Carolina side-so we
can order a cocktail (illegal in N.C.) to toast the Lady Sw. Back home with
4500 sheets of print to be collated. We throw our first collating party (SW I
through 8 would be collated and bound by the hands of our friends.) Roundand round the room-ten women walking round and round to the tunes of
Alix Dobkin, Meg Christian, Nina Simone. (Later one of the women wrote''The Collating Song" to memorialize the occasion.)
July: The little manual saddle-stitch stapler which the printer has loaned
us doesn't work. So back we must go to Clover and Mr. G, who by this time
would be as relieved to be "shed" of us as we of him. But before we fmish
packing the boxes in the car, a woman we've never seen shows up at our door.
She nervously introduces herself as Debbie P., a friend of a friend, and chatters away about nothing much; but she knows why she has come and what
she wants : she wants a copy of SW I. We tell her that the copies aren't boundyet, to come back in a few days. This won't do. She wants a copy right now ,and she'll take it as it is. I go in the office and grab the copy Mr. G had stapled
for us. It's a bit soiled by now, but she doesn't mind at all. She pays us incash for a subscription, but when we ask her address, she says no-that she
prefers to stop by and pick up a copy of each issue. About a week later she
returns with a small blue fIle case which contains her journal and asks if wemind keeping it for her. We don't mind ; we store it in our bedroom closet.
She returns the following week just to talk. We have made our first friend
through SW. During the next six months she becomes a regular helper withSW, moves out of an intolerable marriage-and the blue fIle case comes outof the closet. She changes her name from Debbie P. to Debbie Alicen, a namethat reclaims her dead mother. When SW moves to Nebraska in '78 , she andher woman lover follow the Lady across half a continent.
July 4: As the US of Amerika is celebrating its 200th birthday, Sinister
Wisdom, Volume I, Number I, is officially published.
August: Along with Mandy and Paula, two members of the Charlotte
Lesbian Press Collective, we drive in Lavender Jane (H's purple Valiant) to
Nebraska to attend the first Women in Print Conference. The conference isbeing held at a Campfire Girls' camp near Omaha. We are as excited as sevenyear-old Bluebirds arriving for their first week away from home. Here on thebanks of the Platte River, close to the geographic center of the USA, women
are gathering from the north, south, east, and west-publishers, editors of
women's books, magazines, newsletters, newspapers, and comic books; women
printers, bookstore managers, librarians, and distributors of women's booksall of them (except perhaps Liza and Penny from the new Dyke magazine)
more experienced, more seasoned than us. There in the heat, the drought, theconstant whistling of the prairie winds, the dried grass jumping with grasshoppers, 130-odd women gather to tell their stories of the vicissitua~s of womenin print. "What problems have you had? How did you solve them? What mistakes have you made?" We have no problems yet, we haven't made any mis-99

takes yet - we have little to say. We listen to Quest, Country Women, Women:
A loumal of Liberation, Lesbian Connection, Dyke, Second Wave, Black
Maria , Chomo Uri, Womanspirit, Moonstorm; to Off Our Backs, Plexus, Big
Mama Rag, Feminary; to Diana Press, Naiad Press , Daughters, Inc., Lollipop
Power , Metis Press, Northwest Matrix, Whole Women Press, Women's Press
Collective, Iowa City Women's Press, Tower Press. We learn a lot-about collectives and their struggles , about taxes, about record keeping, about fundraising, about failures, about buru-out, about who is lesbian and who isn't(almost everyone there is), about agents and harassment, about the rising costof paper , the prohibitive cost of paper, about what-can-we-do-about the exorbitant cost of paper. (One inventive woman begins to experiment- mixing
grasshopper juice and prairie grass in the camp kitchen blender to make paper.)
We argue over vision and strategy. We form networks. A beaming Barbara
Grier keeps reminding us that "History is being made. We are making history!"
A distraught June Arnold keeps reminding us to wear our official badge (anelegant gold satin ribbon with Women in Print lettered in bright blue) because
there are agents in our workshops, our dining room , our beds! and we mustrout them out! .. . SW makes friends : WIND (Women in Distribution) wants
to distribute the Lady. We learn that despite Majority Report 's recent review
which had deemed our first issue "murky and pretentious ," SW is consideredby most women there to be a worthy successor to AQ and The Ladder. ...
It is a heady experience-our heads are reeling-Catherine's head reeled somuch that stoneo<:old sober she slipped in the shower room and broke herankle. Being the oldest woman there-;t fact she's been painfully aware ofsince she arrived-she is mortified by her sudden glaring helplessness. She wants
to hide out the rest of the week in her cot in Merryhill Cabin 2. But this is
not allowed: in true Campfire Girl tradition, Women's Press Collective andCountry Women make a saddle of their arms and hands and carry her down
to the meadow (now dubbed the Mountaingroves' Meadow because Ruth andJean discovered it and claimed it as Womanspirit space). And as the week
draws to a close , we begin to sense ,our power-begin to believe what we keep
telling each other: that we are not an alternative press, but the real press!
that through sharing our skills and resources , that together , we will not only
survive, we will prevail! (1981-100king back, we recall that there were no
black women present; and we do not remember much serious discussion about
their absence .)The Fall: Back in Charlotte. With the help of the network, we locate printers
Leslie Kahn and Nancy Blood of Whole Women Press in Durham, N.C . They
agree to print SW 2 on their old and temperamental Multilith 1250, and Diana
Press (still in Baltimore) agrees to bind it. What a comfort to know that fromnow on the Lady would be in the gentle, caring hands of lesbian printers .. . .
But editing problems are escalating. Our guest editor, who had felt herself
torn apart by the conflicting demands of her writing friends and her publishingfriends,· is becoming emotionally paralyzed-unable to make decisions. With
Beth now way out in Kansas, misunderstandings are inevitable, and we all
make mistakes. But since the three of us had agreed that it was essential tohave the special issue on lesbian writing and publishing out in time for the
December convention of the MLA in New York City , we reach a point when
production has to begin. So dissatisfactions and hurt feelings notwithstanding,·See Beth's account of her feelings in SW 2, pp. 122-26 .

100

H and I make the decisions, and by the skin of everyone's teeth we arrive in
NYC with two shopping bags full of the book issue 2. Despite its imperfections
and omissions, it was timely and bold and provocative, and we were proud of
it. And when Harriet asked Barbara Smith and the black feminist Combahee
River Collective to do a special issue of SW** in the spring, the first year
ended hopefully.
**This issue didn't materialize because the collective decided it wasn't yet ready to do one.

II . The Middle(by Harriet)

In issue 1 we'd promised to publish for a year, and then "if contributionsof money and labor materialize, we'll continue for a second year, a second
volume of three issues ." By the spring of '77 "we're jubilant, adding to thenotes for issue 3, after a section flippantly titled "How To Go Internationalon Grits and Turnip Greens": "Did we forget to tell you that OF COURSE
Sinister Wisdom will be carrying on for another year ... or three." The coverof SW 3 is a Tee Corinne solarized photograph of two acrobatically inclined
women making love, which Harriet is convinced will land us in jail. Instead,at the request of several subscribers, it becomes a fund-raising poster, onethat will pull SW out of the red time and time again.
But the summer of '77 is a long hot one, and the notes for issue 4 allude
several times to the rise of the white-collar Klan and end with "Voices (Cryptic,
in Riddles, at Night)," an attempt to speak indirectly about something we
couldn't speak about directly, our first serious-and what then seemed to us
devastating-clashes with lesbian publishers and writers we admired. Here are
two of the voices:(infuriated): But what is a Lesbian magazine supposed to BE?
(whisper): ... a guerrilla field manual-updated by the full moon.
(disgusted): You talk as though Lesbians were an army. Army, hah! An army at eachother's throats.
(whisper) : Divisions give strength; only keep moving.

Sinister Wisdom did keep moving-at such a pace its history begins to blur.
September 1977. Issue 4 goes to press in Durham, and Gloria Gyn andDebbie AIicen take care of the mail while Catherine and I head for the Midwest, selling magazines, seeing old friends and making new ones, hunting ideas
and a likely new home for SW in Ann Arbor, Lansing, Chicago, Milwaukee,
Madison, Minneapolis, Iowa City, Omaha, Lincoln, Kansas City, Columbia,
and St. Louis. Then back to Charlotte and learning to set type on a composer
for issue 5. Leigh Star visits in February, and we all get a new form of motion
sickness from the giddiness of non-stop talking . She agrees to take over thejob of selecting poetry for sw.
But with SW growing, Catherine and I are still yearning after a collective
to share the responsibilities of decision making, production, and office work.
Soon after number 5 comes out, Julia Penelope calls and says that a groupof women in Lincoln will work with SW if we'll move there. We decide to doit, and spend the next several months in a chaos of packing boxes, reminding
ourselves that something is bound to come of an this. Mab Segrest arrives
from Durham that spring to help us put together SW 6, the fmal issue ofSinister Wisdom's second year, and the last to be edited in North Carolina.
July 1978. Kitty-Pooh and Sister-Pooh (sister tortoiseshells born on Halloween; our muses and familiars) howl incessantly from Charlotte to an Asheville truckstop, where Kitty-Pooh escapes and we spend three hours coaxing

lUI

her out of a parked diesel. Eleven hundred miles later, we limp into Lincoln.
It is 10:30 at night, the temperature is 100 degrees, the cats have screamed
all through western Iowa, but there is a welcoming party at Julia's. Leigh andSarah Hoagland have exorcised the house my parents rented for us of its bornagain-Christian past; and a few weeks later, Deidre McCalla and Llena de la
Madrugada play for SW's first benefit, which ends with Deidre singing ''The
Road I Took to You" and Catherine and I bursting into grateful, if embarrassed,tears .
August-December 1978. The pace accelerates as Sinister Wisdom goes tofour issues a year and 3136 "R" Street transforms itself into an unofficial
Lesbian Center . The phone rings constantly; friends arrive from both coasts;
the basement (SW's first full-size office) fills up with inventory, jerry-rigged
desks and work tables, cardboard files. We drive back through Iowa to pickup issue 6, the first of many trips in what will prove to be a long and fruitful(ten-issue) relationship with Joan, Barb, Michelle, and Farrell of Iowa City
Women's Press. A woman in Omaha gives me access to her typesetter for issue
7; Friday work nights are in full swing; SW acquires three contributing editors(Beth Hodges, Mab Segrest, Sarah Hoagland); and Debbie AIicen takes chargeof advertising. I begin free-lance copyediting jobs for the university press, andin December- after a favorable Tarot reading by house-mate Bobby LaceyCatherine and I decide to buy an old IBM composer that will enable us tostart a typesetting business as well as provide a much needed resource for
Sinister Wisdom.
Ice covers Nebraska-local dykes insist that not every winter is like thisone, but we don't believe them-and we're beginning to be subject to a lurking
dissatisfaction. The discouraging truth, we say to each other in private, is that
help alone will not get us through the next-how many?-years with Sinister
Wisdom. Ending the magazine is unthinkable, but we seem already , after three
years, to be running out of steam.
III. An Ending and a Bridge
Something very intriguing happens in New York City at the end of 1978(see interview following). It may be an illusory hope, or it may be a way to
end our responsibility for Sinister Wisdom without ending the magazine herself. We try to shove it to the back of our mind (where it refuses to stay),
and get on with the job of making SW better despite the creeping emotional
paralysis of its publishers. The notes for issue 8 (written in January 1979, thelast time we would attempt to be an active written presence in the magazine)
try to comprehend and overcome that paralysis:
Doing a lesbian magazine, we had fmally recognized with some shock, would continue
to be grueling: never enough time, never enough money, and our mistakes compounding
themselves. It had become for us an easy relief to stop talking with each other about
content and direction, to stop writing "Notes for a Magazine," and to concentrate instead on worrying about filing systems, the tax return the IRS was hounding us about,
the guilt-inducing pile of unanswered correspondence. And we did make some headway
in solving the practical problems of magazine survival ....
We had silently agreed to stop wondering on why's and focus on how's because
dreams and desires and their halting articulation in new/old words don't get a magazine
out. And yet they do too, in ways we began to sense. We had both seen enough of whatcynicism does to Lesbian projects, to Lesbian lives-cynicism, and the hysteria which is
its other face . Going through the motions of activism, dropping out, pulling back, lapsing
into the undertow of passivity and despair that sucks constantly at our feet; and theother face-the lashings out at other women, the destructive winds that blow through102

Lesbian groups, Lesbian "communities." We knew what happens when you forget
to remember why you're doing what you're doing; and we knew how much easier
it is to forge t than to remem ber.

The following two years would be filled with the excitement of travelingto the East Coast and to California , the solidifying of old friendships and themaking of new ones, the steady growth of the magazine, escalating free-lance
work, personal loss and illness, and the ongoing labor of producing eight moreissues of Sinister Wisdom ; but as 1979 began, our passion for the magazine
had already shifted focus and become essentially a passion for assuring its
continuation .

An Interview by C. Colette

NOTE: The follo wing excerpts are taken
fr om a series of interviews taped in late
December 1980, and early January 1981.

C. Colette: What changes has the magazine gone through in five years?
Catherine: Well , I'll begin to answer you by talking about concrete changesthe technical changes. When we began in the winter of '76 , we planned to
publish SW three times a year. Two years later, it became a quarterly. The
number of pages grew from 72 in the first issue to the present 112 pages. Itchanged, too, in style of print-from IBM-Selectric typewriter to regular typesetting-and , last year , from saddle-stitched to perfect , or square-back , binding
The edition has grown from 1000 to 3000 copies per issue .
CC: These are cosmetic changes . What about changes in vision? in politics?
in content?
Harriet: I don 't think the politics have changed any ; I don't think thevision has changed any. There's a wider variety of voices in it now, but ournotion of what we were trying to do hasn't changed that much.
C: I don't think the vision has changed. As far as con ten t is concerned ,the magazine has depend~d a great deal on what we've received in the mail.
We've solicited very little . It's interesting that in the beginning we got a lotof poetry but hardly any fiction . As far as theory is concerned , there havebeen periods when we received a lot of it, and long dry periods when nothingcame in .
CC: Having recently gone back and read SW 1, I find that there is a great
difference between what was going on in the beginning and what is going onnow, not in terms of vision necessarily , or radicalness , but there was a lot oftalk of wildness , of living on the boundary. That wildness is really apparent103

in the first issue, and I don't know whether it was because of the newness
and formlessness of the idea or the excitement or what, but there's somethinga little more polished now, a little more self-assured, that I'm seeing as botha plus and a minu!i. The theory seems just as wild in some respects-for instance, in issue 14 the analysis of heterosexism is just as startling, as mindreversing, as things in the first issue - b ut there is a smoothness now . It may
be that there exists a body of theory and literature that women writing now
for SW are writing in response to, or becoming a part of, while the first issue
seems so speculative, so questioning. But actually I don't know how to characterize the change .
c: It seems to me that you've done a good job of characterizing the beginnings of SW: the roughness, the wildness, the speculation, the questions
raised and partly answered. Susan Griffin made a wonderfully apt comment
in issue 2 : She said, "I want to send you something rough-not unworked,
unthought, but rough, showing 'the mark of the hand.'" There is a slickness
now that ties in with the look of the typeset copy. The cosmetic changes I
mentioned earlier reflect changes in style . More women who write for SW
now have refined their viewpoint before they write .
CC: And looking at issue 1, I get the image of raving women sitting at
typewritersH: But when we started , we didn 't think that anyone agreed with usc: Or very fewH: Very few. We were real isolated, and from everything we could tell byreading off our backs and so on, separatism was just dead, and everyone else
had gone through it , and here we were sitting down in Charlotte not having
gone all the way through itCC: Sounds like it's a stage or a phase or somethingH: Everybody else seemed to be saying that lesbianism was dead-or, rather ,there was no need to make such a big deal about it any longer-and here wewere waiting for someone in Boston or San Francisco to start a successor to
Amazon Quarterly, which had died in the spring of 1975, and we waited andwaited and waitedCC: In SW 1 you said that not all SW readers or contributors were lesbianor lesbian-identified, but that you didn't think this affected the magazine's
lesbian perspective because most women seem to write ahead of themselves,
and you thought that SW left the ninth door ajar-which I just loved. Do you
still see SW as leaving that door open?
H: Yeah .
. C: No. That is, I think we do, but I'm not sure that the magazine does
any more. What I mean is that SW has come to be viewed as a lesbian magazine, and that non-lesbians regard it primarily as lesbian propaganda . The
phrases "for the lesbian imagination " (which Harriet coined in her "Notes for
a Magazine" in issue 1) and "for the lesbian imagination in all women" (which
we later began to use as part of our logo) are no longer seen or heard by ourreaders or by most straight women who know about the magazine but choose
not to read it.
H: I still think that phrase "the lesbian imagination in all women" is very
important because it changes the definition of lesbian and makes it clear thatwhat we're talking about is consciousness . It also makes clear that we're nottalking about lesbians as being innately different from other women.
CC: Yes, because then you're caught in that thing of being considered marginal.

c: I agree completely with you, Harriet. But from representing SWat conferences like the NWSA [National Women's Studies Association] , I've foundthat straight feminists regard the journal as marginal, as speaking to a minorityof women whom they may respect or at least tolerate, but whose literature
has nothing to do with them . Remember when Adrienne Rich , way back at
the 1976 MLA [Modern Language Association] convention, used the phrase"It is the lesbian in us ... " - remember the furor that greeted her , the misunderstanding of what to us were clear and truthful statements : " [t is thelesbian in us who drives us to feel imaginatively, render in language , grasp, thefull connection between woman and woman . It is the lesbian in us who iscreative , for the dutiful daughter of the fathers in us is only a hack ."· Well ,I don't think things have changed much since 1976.
CC: What does the phrase "the lesbian imagination" mean to you ?
H: The other day Catherine started reading Nor Hall's The Moon and theVirgin.t Nor H~ll is a Jungian - which is too bad - but she has this fascinating
chapter on Artemis-Hekate women , which is what she calls lesbians , or " women on the Amazcn pole ," wherever that is. Anyway , the first thing Hallsays about the Amazon is that she is "unconventional in any culture :she iswild mountain woman, woman alone , fighter, hunter, dancer, lover of animals ,protectress of all newborn sucking and roving creatures . .. Her heart , in theEskimo Tolk story , was the first drum ." The drum I just loved-it reminded
me of how the old Drastik Dyke collective in Charlotte defined lesbian: multiple orgasms, multiple angers, multiple laughters, and rhythm .
C: One way to get to a sense of "lesbian imagination" is to look at the
attributes of Artemis-Hekate. Nor Hall describes Artemis as "virgin queen of
the universe, source of the drawing-down and rising-up energy of plants, planets ,and people." Her energy is the free-flowing movement of the universe , andit's that energy - the rhythm of Artemis - which is expressed in the ritual dancesthat Jane Harrison says are the beginnings of theatre and art.
H : Artemis-Hekate is the Lady of the Wild Things , but she's also the goddessof perilous passage -she appears at moments of grea t change. She 's Changing
Woman , actually - she's transformation and shape-shifting - which also has to dowith her having , or being , instinctual rhythm , since it 's rhythm that gets us
from one realm to the next. So Artemis leads dances , and she is a midwife ,and she is also present at the dance into deathC: That's where the Hekate aspect of Artemis-Hekate comes into the
Demeter-Persephone story. HeRaie is the only one who hears Persephone's
cries when she is being abducted by Hades , and it's Hekate who protects Persephone in the underworld .
H : Hekate lives in a cave at the entrance to the underworld , and she knows
her way in the darkC: Toni McNaron , when she reviews Beginning with 0 in SW 8 , cites NorHall as the. source of her idea that Artemis-Hekate hears both horizontallyand vertically and because of that it is Artemis-Hekate who brings women together. Demeter wanders horizontally , crying out for her daughter ; Persephone's
journey is vertical ; and Hekate hears both the mother and the daughter - shestands at the crossroads where the two come together.
*Later included with an after-n o te in Sillister Wisdo /ll 3 (Spring 19 77 ) , pp . 6-9 ; and in all
U es, Secrets, tllld Silell ce (New Yprk : W. W. Nor ton , 1979) , pp . 199-202.
t (New York : Harper & Row , 1980). See pp . 109-32.

105

H: And Nor Hall connects that story with Artemis-Hekate women being
the ones who are able to welcome women out of marriages-out of Hadeswhere their "lust and lustre have dimmed." She calls this lesbian ability the"good magic of giving women back to themselves ."One very interesting point she mentions but doesn't emphasize is that
Demeter. Persephone , and Artemis are part of a group of women. At the timeof the seduction, they're all together in a meadow, carrying on, dancing andplaying . Nor Hall connects lesbians with midwifing but never with actuallygiving birth themselves, and yet it sounds to me like Demeter is really a lesbian mother - why else would she and her daughter be fooling around in ameadow with a bunch of wild women?
C: Artemis isn't anti-motherhood, she's anti-marriage. The attribute parthellos-also an attribute of Athena-is translated as "virgin" by the boys,
but it really means "one apart," one having space apart. Or one set apart asa shaman is set apart -on the outside and yet paradoxically at the center, or
matrix, of a culture. All this connects with separatism .
H : It also connects with the warrior aspect of Artemis because she wreaks
vengeance on men who break the laws of parthenos, who violate the freedomof women or children or animals.
C: Cindy, how do you interpret the phrase "lesbian imagination in all
women"?
CC: At first I thought it might serve as a cop-out for straight women. As
long as they could assert that they were writing out of a lesbian imagination,
it forestalled or replaced the need to really be a lesbian . But it clearly doesn't
do that for women . I'm thinking particularly of a woman who submitted
some work to us and said , "I'm straight, but you say it's for the lesbian imagination in all women, and I feel totally woman-identified in my life, except
for my husband." And the pieces she submitted had everything to do withthe conflicts between men and women and nothing to do with relationships
between women. They weren't suitable in other ways, but the most striking
thing was that the content was so different from what we normally publish.
C: Feminism has come to represent strongly the rights of women with men,and SW does not address itself to these issues, so it is marginal to straightfeminists if their eyes are glued on making it more habitable to live with menH : (laughing) Making marriage habitable!
CC: Making men palatableH: I think "the lesbian imagination in all women" is a kind of challenge.
If you're going to appeal to the wild part of women as being the lesbian part,the part that wants to run free, then I guess it's natural that that comes out
as being a challenge . It isn't the call of a real cozy sisterhood -a circle oftrust among huntresses, warrior women, is not going to be like a c-r group.
It's not where you support each other in your traumas so much as it's where
you support each other's independence, which is not necessarily as attractive.
It's also a challenge to the whole set-up that says heterosexuality is a choice
to begin with-or a choice that women can make freely. How can you believe
you've chosen freely what people have been trying your whole life to coerce
you into?
CC: How do you relate "sinister wisdom" to ''lesbian imagination"?
H : They're both paradoxical because sinister is not supposed to go withwisdom, and lesbian and imagination don't go together very well-106cc: Why? Because lesbians are seen as carnal under patriarchy?
H: Right. And it's paradoxical to think of a lesbian imagination in all women since lesbians are supposed to be marginal. It just seems like both phrases
are internally contradictory, but they're only contradictory if you're accepting
patriarchal definitions of the words.
CC: You're usually only considered to have wisdom in this culture if you
know the right things, and we're advocating knowing the left things.
H: Both phrases keep taking on new layers of meaning the more you workwith them-they're sort of open-ended. If we really knew exactly what wewere talking about, we wouldn't have any trouble selecting things for themagazine. We'd know if this was or wasn't sinister wisdom.
C: But we'd probably never have anything in it then, because the writer isliving with contradictions. I remember once we were trying to decide why weselected some things and not others, and we decided that very often there
would be a failure of nerve on the part of the writer that would show itself
somehow. The writer would start out perhaps with a shQcking premise andthen would dilute it. It seemed she was so scared of what she was saying that
she had to dilute it. I found that to be true almost any time I tried to write
anything down. What we felt was more successful was when the writer had
the courage, the boldness, to make those statements and then not back away.
To stand on the things that she said. And I think we've published a lot of
unsuccessful or failed stuff in SW because it's really hard to fmd material
that does not betray itself out of fear.
H: You can see it happen all the time. It also happens when women neverstart writing, or never finish writing what we beginC: I think SW has just groped with these things. We do have Michelle Cliff's"Notes on Speechlessness ," which is about struggling to overcome that fear.
CC: Audre Lorde says that your silence will not save you. And patriarchy
tells you that silence is golden! (long pause) Well, all this helps clarify sinister
wisdom as a criterion. What we're really asking of a piece is, does this breaktaboos? is this reversing patriarchal logic? is this wise?
H: It's like sinister wisdom is a much broader standard to use in judging
stuff that comes in than lesbian imagination .
CC: No, I think lesbian imagination is broader. If you're going to say thatthe lesbian imagination is wildness , and that it comes out of self-definition
and freedom, that allows for more leeway than sinister wisdom, which is veryclear that it is an attack on the patriarchy. Even though the lesbian imagination is almost inherently that, it doesn't really say anything about the patriarchy in the way that sinister wisdom does.
C: Sinister wisdom is more defiant. It's saucyCC: ImpertinentH: SlyC: It's a bad attitude.
CC: Lesbian imagination seems more wholesome to me. It's like the goodplace you get into when you're looking inward, and sinister wisdom is looking
outward and squinting.
H: Wrinkling up your nose.
CC: It's almost like I expect a goddess to have lesbian imaginlltion, but awitch to have sinister wisdom.

****

107

CC: I'm always amused by readers who think that being involved with SWmeans you spend most of your time at the office thinking about Ideas with acapital 1. It's real funny to me because I think of the time we actually spend
down there stamping thingsC: Or figuring out what to say to the subscriber who messed up herCC: And writing threatening letters to gay bookstores that don't pay up!
None of that glamor of a real intellectual approach to feminism.
H: I think it's funny because one reason I wanted to get out of Sinister
Wisdo/ll was to have more time to think.
(Gales of laughter)
C: That's why we got into it - we wanted some more stuff to think on and now we feel like we don't have time to think . Get it out, get it out Ce: There 's no time to think, we have to go to the post office!
H : There's no time to think, the books have to be balanced CC: But seriously , has editing SW affected you in ways you'll take withyou when you leave?
H : We learned all these skills, we met all these women, we had all this fun,
we had all this agonyC: We feel like we belong to a network that we helped make, and we plan
to continue to be a part of that network in some capacity .
CC: I know what readers have felt SW has left them with, but I was trying
to figure out what you felt it had left you with because I suspect they're very
different things.
e: I think I really won't know until six months from now or a year from
now , how much it has meant, how much it's given. I just know it is a greatdeal. It has been a life force for me-perhaps the most enriching experienceof my long life.
H: I'm ambivalent, as usual. For one thing I want to be rid of the responsibilities, and for another thing I feel like I'll probably roll over and die. Or
that wouldn't it be terrible if everything is downhill from now onCC: Well, it's certainly going to remove some structure from your lives.
So many of your waking hours are spent doing things for SW, and that's beenat the center. (long silence) I know that when I first saw a copy of SW- it
was issue 5-it was lunatic to me . All I could do was look at it and be totallybaffled; it took me a long time to sort out what it meant to me. But as aformer reader-I read it now, but as a former only-a-reader-I felt that themagazine was terribly important because it led me somewhere. It was morethan a door, it was a fucking superhighway. The things I've gotten from it asa worker on the magazine are very different; they were in part skills and inpart a stronger commitment to feminism-it wasn't so far outside me, lesbian
feminism was something I did every day, it was my work. And of course therelationship that developed with you all and the importance of finding thoseother women. A sense that there really is a network, that it's not just wishful
thinking.

****

CC: Do you have any regrets?
C: Oh, yes-many. The major one for me is that as the circulation and thedemands on our time increased, we became passive editors. Our energy was
focused on maintenance-we were not thinking, not raising important questions
or projecting special issues.

108

H: Yes. And this kind of passivity shows up in the whiteness of the magazine more than in any other way. Most of what comes in the mail comes fromwhite women wri-ters, and if you depend on the mail, if you depend on theinitiative of women who already consider themselves writers , if you don't goout and solicit material, most of what you end up publishing is by white women. Which is what I feel worst about, mostly because it has meant that SW
has so far conveyed a distorted - or at least very limited - sense of what being
a lesbian means, of what a "lesbian imagination" can do.
C: I agree. Back in '77 , before we became such passive editors , while wewere still in North Carolina and living close to our black friends Adrienne M.
and Clara G., it seemed that SW was moving naturally toward a balanced content - because Adrienne and Clara were constantly opening our eyes. In issue
3, for instance, there's a review by the four of us, talking about The Ladderanthologies. In discussing "Getting Ripped Off," written by a white woman
about her experiences as a social worker in the Puerto Rican ghetto of New
York City, Clara called the author "Big Daddy's daughter":Clara : I began to call her Big Daddy's daughter after I read the essays which I assume
described her background - I thought of "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof" and I began looking
around for Big Daddy . After that I could understand where she was coming from andwhy her head was so twisted in this area . .. I appreciated her talent, but she really mademe mad. I wanted to say to her, don't call yourself a feminist , or talk about feminism,
which is supposed to encompass us all , and then I see that you're looking at other womenas though they don't exist - especially Third World women . So how can you expect me
to identify with things you write when you write insulting stuff like that?
Adrienne: I got the impression from these books that a lot of writers don't expect
Third World women to identify and they don't care. And that's ok but we need to behonest about that. I remember that in the introduction to The Lavender Herring Barbara
Grier laments the fact that only one Black woman had contributed essays - Anita Cornwell-why weren't there more of them. Whenever Black women are mentioned , it's why
aren't there more of them, why don 't you do something . But I get the impression thatmost white women don't really want us to do anything because if we did, it would probably be in conflict with what they are doing- ... The dilemma for Black women inthis society is, of course, that racism is so deadly-the patriarchy is too - but which comes
first for us and can we deal with them both at the same time? And if so, with whom can
we work?

CC: Are there other regrets that you want to talk about?
C: Yes-failing to answer all the letters. We always had this sense of urgency,of responsibility to keep SW coming out regularly. This was a priority. The
wonderful, nurturing, sustaining letters we received from women all overparticularly isolated lesbians - well, we were poor correspondents, we didn't
always answer them. But we felt partly justified because we were giving tremendously of ourselves to keep SW going-its presence was our letter to ourworld and, most importantly, our reply to women who had taken the time
to write us about how life-giving it was to them. Those who wrote kept us
going, and I wanted immediately to fly to them with the latest issue in mybeak and drop it on their bedroom windowsill .
H: I'm sorry we didn't continue what we started in issue 3, a listing of all
the women who contributed to SW-money, labor, love, their writing, roomand-boarding us on tripsC: Susan and Katie doctoring our bodies, Marilyn and Carolyn doctoring
our soulsH: The list is so long by now, we're bound to leave somebody off. But I
do want to mention specifically that Donna Saunders donated her time to109

pack almost all the SW orders for 216 years , which is probably some kind ofrecord in feminist publishing.

****
cc: How were the new editors chosen?
C: Well , that was a remarkable coincidence .... In the fall of 1978, wewere really depressed, and very tired . We began to think that perhaps the
only way we could get relief from SW was to turn it over to someone else.
But we had not sat around and said, "Now, if we're gonna turn over thismagazine , who will we turn it over to?" We had not yet got to that point.
And then Harriet went to the MLA convention in New York City in Decemberof 1978 andH: And there was this party at the Lesbian Herstory Archives. Michelle
Cliff came up , introduced herself, and said that she and Adrienne were thinking about starting a magazine in a couple of years and would Catherine and I
give them some practical advice . And I said, ''Why don't you take over SW?"and she said, "Are you serious?" and I said, "Sure," and she said, "Let mego get Adrienne ." So she got Adrienne and the three of us said this is something to talk about. When I got back to Lincoln, Catherine and I talked about
it and thought oh this would be perfect. So then we had a correspondence
about it which went on for a long time, all very tentative, and then in May
Adrienne came to Lincoln to do a reading and the three of us decided we
couldn't decide anything because Michelle wasn't there. Then Catherine andI went to New England in the fall of '79 and spent some time with them,and we all agreed to a transfer date of January 1981.
C: So the next year was spent in working through the details of the transfer.
CC: How do you feel about their adopting SW?
C: When Harriet told me that Adrienne and Michelle were interested incontinuing SW, I couldn't believe our good fortune. We both felt that considering all the circumstances, if we had tried to think of who would be ideallysuited to hand the Lady over to, our first choice would have been these women. Even though I had not met Michelle at that time, we had corresponded,talked on the phone, and SW had published her work, which I admired very
much-particularly the "Notes on Speechlessness," which seemed to speak forme . Adrienne had long been a supporter of SW-she was one of the first subscribers and one of the first women to impress on us the particular Significanceof the magazine and the importance of keeping it going :H: What it came down to was that we trusted their judgment. And at
every new crisis in what's turned out to be a two-year turnover process, they've
given us more reason to trust them . So we know the Lady is in good hands.
And we're getting excited about what's going to come out of all this- what
our sibylline selves predict, in case anyone's interested , is that they11 carryon , while simultaneously deepening and hroadening, the original vision of sw.
CC: Do you have any last words?
C: Only that without you , Cindy, we couldn 't have made it through thelast two years . . . . Do you want the last word, Harriet?
H: No! I mean, yes.

110

A FEW OF OUR FRIENDS WHO HELPED:IN NEBRASKA

Vicki Nogle

Edy Ambroz

photographs
by Deborah Alicen

Donna Saunders111

Tee Corinne: "Self-Portrait Collage for my 37th birthday"" In it I am (top left to bottom right) 23,31 , 34, and 36 in the background picture ,"

112

.
c:

;
;;z

Lynda Koolishc:~::l
IN SAN FRANCISCO

..
..

iii
c:
~

::l

III

Robin Ruth Linden
Susan Leigh Star & Maude Elizabeth

photograph by Lynda Koollsh

113

IN NORTH CAROLINA
photograph by Deborah Allcen

Drastik Dykes and friends

APOLOGIES- We apologize for listing Melanie Kaye as the sole author of "Sexual Power" in Sinister
Wisdom 15 . The credit should have read "Ideas, Melanie Kaye and Michaele; Words, MelanieKaye."- Our apologies to Jane Gapen for the faulty proofreading on her poem "The Slaughter
House" in SW 15 . The line "I saw this and other things which horrified me at the time"(p. 21) should have been omitted.
-We apologize for omitting the last line on p. 21 of issue 14 . The final stanza of Karen
Snider's poem "Mabel the Able : good witch of the North" should read: "Will Dorothy
suddenly appear, crashing / throug~ the air my remote doorways? / All day she lands onherself, provoking a storm./Will she come in time to gather me in her country/arms - pitting
her youthful miracles/against my sagging breasts-will she press me to test/my magic again ;will she bring home a new list/on Hollow's Eve, twenty more names, will we curse/therapists, make it rain ... drizzle . .. spellbound / thigh to thigh? Will I find new strength /inside this darkness . . . will the rage unfold me? /1 am an old woman, a spinster, a crone ,/my candle burns low, my skin flakes // a sacred hag among win ter spaces / dreaming of cows
with wings."

PLEASE RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

114

Contributors' Notes
Debbie Alicen is a transplanted Southerner now thriving in Nebraska . She writes stories
and takes photographs as recreation.
Diane Ayott is an artist and art educator living quietly in the North Shore area of Massachusetts.
Sandy Covahey is a printer and country woman in exile, among other things, who lives
in Baltimore , Maryland .
Laura Davis. "I live in the Santa Cruz mountains, work as a problem-solving counselor
with women, write and edit for Matrix newsmagazine in my spare time . My greatest asset(in my own estimation) is my ability to laugh at myself. My worst flaw (also in iny own
estimation) is I forget to stop."
Karlene Faith is a mother, writer, teacher and communi ty organizer with special interests
in music, cross-cultural alliances and women in prison.
Cellan Jay is currently living in Silly Servant City in Kanada where it is impera tive forthe sake of sanity that she take long flights of the imagination . She has been previously
published in several an thologies.
Meg Jochild is a Texan living in San Francisco . '''Trapeze' found its beginning in a
dream . I seem to do a lot of writing at night during my sleep, which I find makes for fu nnights and a good use of every minute. (These two things might be the idealized goals of
every active dyke.)"
Lynda Koolish is a poet and photographer living in San Francisco. She is writing a bookon feminist poets.
Robin Ruth Linden is an editor and video producer living in San Francisco.
Barbara Macdonald lives with Cynthia in Cambridge . She is 67 now, for the first timein her life.
Achy Obejas is a Cuban-born poet , 24 years old, currently working for Terrapin Records
in Chicago as promotions and distribution coordinator, although her usual line of work isjournalism . She manages Sirani Avedis.
Jan Phillips is a wandering free-lance photographer currently staked out in Hawaii . Her
work has been published in off our backs, Plexus, and various women's publications.
Arlene Raven is an art historian and former executive editor of Chrysalis. "The Eye ofthe Be*Hold*Her" is part of a book-length manuscript.
Diana Rivers. "I am living in rural Arkansas , on woman's land , in a small cabin I built
myself. Have been writing stories about nine years, taking them seriously for about four,and am now working on a full-length Lesbian fantasy, wanting to give voice and form to
our visions."
Karen Saum . "Ex-academic, current bureaucrat, writer, and video producer (Working
Wom en of Waldo County and She Knew a Phoenix: Interviews with May Sarton) . The
Sarton tape, completed 9/80, concludes an episode in my life that began in circumstances
similar to the one in the story."
Susan Leigh Star has joined Lesbians-25-and-Over, having survived universities, movement politics, and being hit by a car.
Lynn Watson is a skip-breakfast artist from the Sonoma Mtns. "Julie" is a chapter fromher yet unpublished novel Alimony or Death of the Clock. Rhyming gives her energy .
Dinah Wernick has given away cemetery lots over the phone, washed cars, worked in aceramics studio, and washed dishes before deciding on sales and marketing management.
Barbara Wilson has most recen tly published in 13th Moon , Chomo Uri, and Sing, HearenlyMuse. Her first book of short stories, Talk & Contact, was published by Seal Press, which
will release her second book, Thin lee, in the spring of 1981.
Irene Yarrow's work has appeared in Amazon Quarterly, The Lesbian Reader, and the
Nation . A novel, Ashes, Ashes, We All Fall Down, was published in 1972 by Simon &Schuster (under the name Irene Schramm) .
Tee Corinne, creator of the SW poster, has a new book, Labia Flowers, forthcomingfrom Naiad Press.

Dear Lee Kinard,
Thank you for your faithful and generous support of SW
during the last four years.
Affectionately,
Harriet and Catherine

115

,:

NEW ADDRESS FOR POSTERIn the spring of 1977, a Tee Corinne solarized photograph of two women
making love appeared on the cover of Sinister Wisdom 3, followed by adeluge of requests for a poster. The poster was printed in the summer of
1977: a duplicate of that cover, black on gray, IT' x 22." Beginning inJanuary 1981, the Lincoln Legion of Lesbians has taken over the sale anddistribution of the Tee Corinne poster.
LLL
Send all poster orders to:
P.O.Box 30137
Lincoln, Nebraska 68503
Posters are $3.00 each plus $1 .00 for postage & handling(for 2-4 posters add .20 per poster)
Bulk rates for 5 or more posters are $2.00 each plus postage.
Also available in feminist bookstores.
NEW SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
Individuals: one year (4 issues) = $10.00
two years (8 issues)= $18.00
Out-of-the-U.S. subs: one year = $12.00.
two years= $21.00(U.S. dollars only)
Institutions: one year(4 issues) = $15.00
Supporting Subscriptions:$25.00 and up

SINISTER WISDOM
P.O. Box 660
Amherst, MA 01004
I would like to subscribe to Sinister Wisdom, beginning with issue 17
Enclosed is _________ .
NAME ________________________________________________ _ADDRESS _____________________ ~------------------------___________________________ 1. _____________ ZIP ----------

Enclosed is _________ . Please send SW to my friend.
NAME _______________________ _ _______________________ _ADDRESS __ _________________________ _ _________________ _________________________ _ _ ___ ___________ ZIP _________ _BACK ISSUES (please circle) : No.4: $2.25 ; No .5: $2.25; No.7 : $2.50 ; No .8: $2.50 ;No.14: $3.00 ; No.15 : $3.00.
(Add 60 cents postage for every 1-2 copies ordered)
TOTAL ENCLOSED: _ _ __

SUBMISSIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE
All submissions and business correspondence should be addressed to
SINISTER WISDOM, P. O. Box 660, Amherst, MA 01004.
With submissions please enclose an SASE for return of manuscript. If
you would like an acknowledgment, please also enclose a stamped
postcard . Please send xeroxes or photographs , not originals , of art
work.

SW BACK ISSUES, WHILE THEY LAST
Issue 4 (Fall 1977): stories of mothers and daughters and witches and lovers ;Joanna Russ's tale for the girlchild in all of us; Lesbian separatism from theinside; photo-essay; interview ; reviews , letters and poetry . 96 pp., $2 .25.
Issue 5 (Winter 1978): Susan Leigh Star, "Lesbian Feminism as an Altered
State of Consciousness"; Judith Schwarz, " Researching Lesbian History";
Michelle Cliff on speechlessness; Lesbian Day speech by Barbara Grier; fiction ;poetry; photo-essay; reviews; interview. 104 pp., $2 .25.
Issue 7 (Fall 1978): myths, monsters, teeth , etc . Jane Caputi on patriarchal
fish stories; Judith Schwarz on being physically different ; self-portraits inprose and poetry by Alice Bloch and Susan Wood -Thompson; feminist musings by Melanie Kaye; plus a wealth of fiction, poetry , reviews, drawings, andphotographs . 104 pp ., $2.50
Issue 8 (Winter 1979): "did you say lu-uv?"; storytelling by Sherry Thomasand Audre Lorde; photographs by Deborah Snow; poetry by Judy Grahn;notes on deafness; essay on "that plaee- where nothing is"; interview ; reviews ;"Scrambled Eggs:'; and much more poetry and fiction. 104 pp . $2 .50.
Issue 14 (Summer , 1980): Lesbian/Straight sister-struggles ; Marilyn Fryeturns a jaundiced eye on Women's Studies ; Karen Snider's dorothy poems ;fiction by Jane Rule, Joan Gibbs , Sandy Boucher, and others; Lesbian Americana; class and closet ; families ; responses ; graphics; more! 11 2 pp . $3.00 .
Issue 15 (Fall 1980): "Lesbianism: Sexuality and Power ; The Patriarchy :Violence and Pornography ." Guest editors Sarah Lucia Hoagland and Julia
Penelope. Includes essays and articles by Susan Chute, Andrea Dworkin ,Melanie Kaye , Michaele , and Cynthia Rich ; poetry ; personal testimony; reviews; response ; photographs ; and much more. 112 pp. $3.00.

SW16

3.00