US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM

NATURE | NEWSUS advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER
The Department of Energy says the US should fund ITER until 2018, and then re-evaluate its progress.
Davide Castelvecchi & Jeff Tollefson
26 May 2016

Updated: 27 May 2016

Print

Matthieu Colin/ITER

The ITER project under construction in southern France on 29 April 2016.

The troubled multibillion-euro nuclear-fusion project ITER has improved its performance and management, and the UnitedStates should continue to support the experiment at least until 2018, the US Department of Energy (DOE) said in a report toCongress released on 26 May. After that, the agency said, the country should re-evaluate its position.
ITER is an unprecedented collaboration between the European Union, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Russia and theUnited States. Its ambitious goal is to show that fusing hydrogen nuclei to make helium — the same process that heats up
the Sun and powers hydrogen bombs — is a technologically feasible way to produce electricity. The experiment is underconstruction at a site in St-Paul-lez-Durance in southern France, but the work is more than a decade behind schedule, andits costs have spiralled far above the original budget.

http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 1 of 6

US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM

In its report, the DOE acknowledges ITER’s immense scientific potential, and the substantial improvements in the project’smanagement and performance since current director-general Bernard Bigot took over in March 2015. “ITER remains thebest candidate today to demonstrate sustained burning plasma, which is a necessary precursor to demonstrating fusionenergy power,” US energy secretary Ernest Moniz writes in the report’s introduction.
But the DOE also notes that it will take more time to determine whether ITER will
ultimately succeed. The agency says that the project’s promising improvements “must bebalanced against several years of inadequate performance”. Its recommendation tocontinue US funding is contingent “on continued and sustained progress on the project,

Related stories
Nuclear physics: Pulltogether for fusion

increased transparency of the ITER project risk management process, as well as a suite

ITER's new chief willof management reforms proposed in this report that we expect will be agreed upon by theshake up troubled fusion

ITER Council”, according to Moniz’s introduction.

reactorUS plans for future of“I think it’s an outstanding report that says all of the right things,” says William Madia, afusion research

former director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee who led an independent
review of ITER in 2013. That report excoriated the way in which ITER was run, andMore related stories

proposed reforms to save the project from failure — recommendations that ITER’s
governing council embraced.
Madia says that the DOE is appropriately encouraged by recent management changes, and appropriately cautious about
whether the project is actually back on track. “Bernard is doing a terrific job, but my goodness, he’s got a lot of work to do,”he says.
Bigot acknowledges as much, and says that the DOE’s conclusions are as much as he could have hoped for at this point.
“We passed this important milestone, but we know there is still a long way to go,” he says.
Crucial expertise
The DOE is a major funder of fusion research, but it is Congress that holds the purse strings. Although the United States isbound by an international treaty to provide its share of ITER’s costs — a relatively small 9% of the project’s budget — itcannot meet its contributions if Congress does not approve them.
The report’s recommendations have already provoked scepticism on Capitol Hill. Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, thehighest-ranking Democrat on the Senate panel that oversees DOE spending, says that the United States cannot afford tokeep pace with ITER’s growing budget. The DOE estimates that the country’s current annual contribution to ITER, US$115
million, will more than double by 2018.
“The cost of ITER has grown too large and the timeframe for completion is too long,” Feinstein said in a statement. “It’s timeto wind down our role.”
Last year, the Senate proposed to end support for ITER, but backed down during final budget negotiations with the House of

http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 2 of 6

US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM

Representatives. This year, it is not clear that ITER will win a reprieve. On 12 May, the Senate approved an energy-funding
bill for fiscal year 2017 that cut all spending on ITER in favour of higher-priority projects. And on 26 May, the House rejected
its own 2017 energy-spending bill, which included money for ITER.
If the United States were to pull out, ITER would probably survive, says Mark Koepke, a plasma physicist at West Virginia
University in Morgantown, who leads a government advisory panel on fusion research. But at hearings in April, Bigot told US
lawmakers that the country’s fusion experts provide expertise that would be difficult to replace.
Madia says that it’s impossible to predict how ITER would be affected by a US exit. “It makes good cocktail conversation, but
no one knows what would actually happen,” he says.
Tokamak test
The ITER project began in 2007, with the treaty signed by its international members came into force. Its approach to fusion
is to trap heavy isotopes of hydrogen in a doughnut-shaped vacuum vessel known as a tokamak and heat them up to 150
million °C. This should force their nuclei to fuse into helium, releasing vast amounts of energy. Tokamaks have existed
around the world for decades, but ITER would be the first to release substantially more energy than was put into thehydrogen plasma. It is predicted to produce about 500 megawatts of electricity.

EJF Riche/ITER

The foundations of ITER’s doughnut-shaped tokamak chamber take shape in April 2016.

http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 3 of 6

US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM

The project was originally due to be completed in 10 years for !5 billion (US$5.6 billion), but it has been plagued by a seriesof delays. The latest DOE report comes against a backdrop of criticism directed at ITER’s former management, and somesubsequent progress towards improvement.
Observers say that under previous director-general Osamu Motojima, who was in office from 2010 to 2015, the experiment
was in denial about slipping deadlines and witnessed a drop in staff morale. After the independent review by Madia, theITER Council accelerated the transition to a new director-general, nominating Bigot, a French nuclear physicist withextensive management experience, in late 2014.
By November 2015, Bigot’s team had presented a revised timetable for the project, and estimated that it would cost an extra!4.6 billion to bring it to completion. The team said that the earliest possible date for getting hydrogen plasma to run inside
the machine was 2025, and that it would take several years after that for the project to inject the heavier hydrogen isotopes
tritium and deuterium, and achieve fusion.
Rigorous schedule
In April, an external review from the ITER Council Working Group confirmed that progress had been made on implementing
the recommendations of the Madia report, and that the new management had been realistic about the earliest possible datefor plasma. “One of the things we came away with is that the schedule that has been prepared by the ITER team is very
rigorous,” says group member Steven Cowley, head of the UK Atomic Energy Authority. But the reviewers also pointed outthat the estimates of costs and completion date did not take into account possible contingencies.
Keeping to this plan would ITER's members to increase their contributions. So Bigot’s team also proposed a more modest
plan, which focuses on achieving first plasma on time but delays fusion. This should save money by postponing the parts ofconstruction that are not needed for first plasma but no one has yet calculated how much.
“This is the most complicated piece of engineering anybody has ever attempted, ever,” says Cowley. “Anybody who thought
this project was going to be easy and was going to sail through has never seen a big project.”
The latest DOE report recommends funding the cost increases cited by Bigot, but remains sceptical about the schedule. Itoutlines two funding scenarios: one based on achieving first plasma in 2025, and a more realistic scenario that pushes thedate back to 2028.
Bigot insists that the 2025 deadline is technically achievable, and says that partner countries should do everything they canto meet that deadline. “If we are successful, it will be a real breakthrough for the energy supply of the world,” he says. “Weare fully committed to deliver.”Naturedoi:10.1038/nature.2016.19994

Updates
Updated: Added comment from ITER director-general Bernard Bigot.
http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 4 of 6

US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM

Related stories and links
From nature.com
Nuclear physics: Pull together for fusion
09 June 2015
ITER's new chief will shake up troubled fusion reactor
21 November 2014
US plans for future of fusion research
22 September 2014
Five-year delay would spell end of ITER
31 July 2014
ITER keeps eye on prize
15 October 2013
Fusion project struggles to put the pieces together
26 October 2012
US fusion in budget vice
24 July 2012
From elsewhere
Energy Department report to Congress
ITER

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be
re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend
comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

1 comment

Subscribe to comments

SEXI LADY • 2016-05-27 01:54 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F4pKJUt6oM

See other News & Comment articles from Nature
NatureISSN 0028-0836

EISSN 1476-4687

http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 5 of 6

US advised to stick with troubled fusion reactor ITER : Nature News & Comment

5/28/16 2:46 PM© 2016 Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, CrossRef and COUNTER

http://www.nature.com/news/us-advised-to-stick-with-troubled-fusion-reactor-iter-1.19994

Page 6 of 6