Time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy with ultrafast
soft x-ray lightby
Lora Nugent-Glandorf
B.S., Wheaton College, 1996

A thesis submitted to the
Faculty of the Graduate School of the
University of Colorado in partial fulfillmentof the requirements for the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry2001

This thesis entitled:
Time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy with ultrafast soft x-ray light
written by Lora Nugent-Glandorf
has been approved for the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Stephen R. Leone

Prof. W. Carl Lineberger

Date

The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both thecontent and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above
mentioned discipline.

iii
Nugent-Glandorf, Lora (Ph.D., Physical Chemistry)
Time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy with ultrafast soft x-ray light
Thesis directed by Prof. Stephen R. Leone

Understanding the nature of chemical bonding in molecules has long been of fundamental interest, and manipulating specific chemical bonds has found practical potential in many
areas, such as polymer chemistry, biophysics, and genetics. Photoelectron spectroscopy (using
photons to eject electrons from a molecule to determine electron energies and bonding properties) has been a proven technique for gaining insight into the electronic structure of the simplest
atoms to large molecules. Here, I describe experiments designed to investigate bonding in a
simple molecule (Br2 ) by measuring electronically excited molecular states and dissociativetransient electronic states via time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy with soft x-ray light.
High-harmonic generation produces a novel, femtosecond source of soft x-rays by focusing an
ultrafast 800 nm Ti:Sapphire laser into a rare gas jet. I outline the details of the experimental
apparatus, including the optical layout, two-grating separation and compression of the highharmonic pulses, and the magnetic bottle photoelectron spectrometer. The feasibility of using
the generated soft x-ray pulses for photoelectron spectroscopy is established, and the spectral
and temporal nature of the pulses are determined. The photoelectron spectrum of the boundexcited B state of neutral Br2 is measured and the issues involved in ionization from excitedelectronic states is discussed. The time-resolved dissociation of the excited C state of Br2 is observed using a visible pump (400 nm) and a soft x-ray probe. Key results point to challenging
new problems involving the cross-sections and shapes of photoelectron features arising from
dissociating states, as well as understanding the role of cross-correlation processes versus dissociative wavepacket signals. UV-pump/soft x-ray probe photoelectron spectroscopy promises
to offer a unique and powerful way to probe excited electronic states and dissociation dynamics
of neutral molecules in the gas phase on ultrafast time scales.

iv

Acknowledgements

First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Steve Leone, who is largely responsible
for making my graduate school experience a positive one. Not only was this project originallyformed from his ideas, but has also seen success due to his advice, knowledge and experience.
Steve has been a great advisor on all fronts, from the technical and conceptual realm to personal
advice for career and life in general. For all this, and for his continuing support of me as ascientist, I am very grateful. Thanks also to Ronnie Bierbaum, my co-advisor, for her help andsupport.
I would also like to recognize OSEP, the Optical Science and Engineering Program at
CU, for continuing financial support and the opportunity to do a research internship. I choseto do my internship with Dr. Richard Haight, an IBM researcher at the T.J. Watson ResearchCenter in Yorktown Heights, NY. I am also indebted to Rich for his patience, advice, time andthe opportunity to work for him. Funding for this project was received from the Air Force Officeof Scientific Research, as well as additional equipment purchased with specific grants from the
National Science Foundation.
Next, there are all the people who worked with me over the last 4+ years on this project.
In the beginning, MK and Jen made a great team to work with as we attempted to make anempty room into some semblance of an experiment, as well as providing a great deal of comic
relief. Next came Mike Scheer, whose brains and quintessential german-ness made the x-ray
project into the great instrument it is today. The bulk of the data presented here was a resultof Mike and I working together. During my absence in New York, I should thank Tobias Vossv
for his work in the lab and for keeping Mike in check while I was away. Along the way wewere happy to have Ed Grant and Xeuming Yang, both visiting professors to JILA, work with
us while on sabbatical. Also thanks to Anneliese, a pre-grad student and a good friend for her
work on Al2 Br6 . Thanks also goes to David Samuels, the grad student who joined the projecta year ago, for his hard work in the lab in the last months and for the new ideas he brings
to the project. And to all the Leone group, past and present, thanks for all your free advice,
patience and friendships. Other key players in the realization of this experiment were Hans
Green, Blaine Horner and Dave Alchenberger from the instrument shop, and Paul Buckingham
and James Fung-a-Fat from the electronics shop. To all the support staff at JILA, thank you formaking this such a great place to do science!
To those teachers in the past who encouraged me in many ways, Mr. Warren Pettit, Dr.
Brian Miller, Dr. Narl Hung, and Dr. Mark Niemchzeck, thank you for your influence on mylife and career.
There is no room to thank all my friends who have helped me survive grad school invarious ways, but I am overwhelmingly grateful to all of you. Special thanks and love to Paula,
Allie, and Tara for great times at Tuesday lunches which kept me going, and to Jen and Sara forcontinuing to be good friends and always making me laugh. To Kitty, my only friend at IBM,
thanks for helping me survive life away from home. And to the Bible study folks, you havebeen a great encouragement to me in my personal and spiritual life, which has helped me to bea better person.
Of course, I can’t go without mentioning my husband Dave, who has provided me withunconditional love and support through our 5 years of marriage, and who is my inspiration. And
to my family, my parents and sister and brother and their families, for always welcoming mehome and for their constant encouragement and love, I am forever thankful for all of you.

vi

Contents

Chapter
1 Introduction

1

1.1

Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1

1.2

Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8

1.3

Harmonic generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

11

1.4

Coupling the high harmonic source and time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy 13

1.5

High-order harmonics and surface photoelectron spectroscopy . . . . . . . . .

2 The Experimental Apparatus

15
19

2.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19

2.2

Laser System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

20

2.3

Optical layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26

2.4

Vacuum Chamber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32

2.4.1

Pulsed Valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

32

2.4.2

Two-grating separation and compression. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

37

2.4.3

Photoelectron Spectrometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

38

2.5

An instrument for ultrafast photoelectron spectroscopy of solids: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 Characterization of high-order harmonics and static photoelectron spectroscopy
3.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46
49
49

vii
3.2

Harmonic generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49

3.3

Photoelectron Spectroscopy with soft x-ray harmonics . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55

3.4

Photoelectron spectroscopy of solid samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

62

4 Energy bandwidths of the harmonics
5 Photoelectron spectroscopy of the excited 369

0+u B state of Br2

80

5.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80

5.2

Excitation scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

5.3

Photoelectron spectra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

85

6 Pulse durations of pump and probe beams: Cross-correlation measurements

93

6.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93

6.2

800 nm + 400 nm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

93

6.3

800 nm + 266 nm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

6.4

17th harmonic + 800 nm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97

6.5

Harmonics + 400 nm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97

7 Photodissociation of Bromine

106

7.1

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106

7.2

Pump-Probe Photoelectron Spectra in Br2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

7.3

Time-traces of cross-correlation and Br atom signals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113

7.4

Ionization of the excited state wavepacket . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

7.5

Ionization cross-sections of atoms and transient states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.6

Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

viii
Bibliography

131

Appendix
A Absorption spectrum of Bromine

137

B Rydberg wavepackets in Krypton

139

ix

TablesTable
4.1

Energy bandwidths for harmonics 7-55 generated in neon . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.1

A calculation of the enhancement of the atomic cross-section compared to the75

molecular cross-section for the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. Using 10,000 molecules
as an arbitrary number, the raw photoelectron counts are used to calculate theratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
7.2

The corrections and final values for the enhancement of the atomic cross-section
compared to the molecular cross-section for harmonics 13-21. . . . . . . . . . 126

7.3

The percentages by total counts of the cross-correlation and transient photoelectron signals for three different scans and two probe wavelengths. . . . . . . . . 128

xFiguresFigure1.1

A simple molecular orbital picture demonstrating two atoms coming together
to form two molecular orbitals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.2

2

Top: A pictorial representation of a valence electron being ejected from a valence or bonding orbital with an ultraviolet (UV) photon, and a core electron
being ejected from an inner orbital with an x-ray photon. Bottom: The electron energy level diagram of the above pictures. On the left, the UV photon has
sufficient energy to eject the 3 electron. On the right, a x-ray photon is needed
to eject the 1 electron. The dotted arrows represent the energy of the ejected
photoelectron. Binding energy (B.E.) is defined as the energy with which an
electron is bound to the nucleus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.3

4(A) A schematic of an electrostatic analyzer where electrons are energy separated by their velocities. Objects shaded with dark gray represent the photon
source and the light gray objects are the detectors. The dotted line represents theelectron path through the analyzer. (B) A time-of-flight photoelectron analyzer
where electrons are energy separated by their arrival time to the detector. . . . .

1.4

The photoelectron spectrum of HBr as a function of ionization energy. The
and

5



 labels are term symbols describing the final state of HBr+. Spectrum

taken from ref. [1] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7

xi
1.5

Core level photoelectron spectra of HBr, Br2 , CH3 Br and CF3 Br showing theshifting of the 3d Br core levels due to chemical bonding (taken from ref. [2]).
Fine structure splitting of the ion states is also present in the spectra. . . . . . .

1.6

9A pictorial representation of time-resolved pump-probe photoelectron spectroscopy. The sample molecule is pumped into an electronically excited statewith a visible laser pulse. At varying time delays after the pump pulse, a probe
laser pulse ionizes the molecule and the photoelectrons are analyzed at eachtime delay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.7

10

An example of a time-resolved photoelectron experiment from ref. [3]. The( )photoelectron spectrum of I2 Ar 20 clusters is shown at various time-delays
between the pump and probe pulses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.8

12

A classical picture of high-order harmonic generation with an ultrafast laser.
The coulomb potential of the atom is perturbed in the presence of the strong
laser field, and tunneling ionization of the electron occurs. The free electron
gains energy in the electric field (Up , pondoromotive potential). As the opticalfield changes phase, the coulomb potential also oscillates and causes recombination of the electron with the atom, accompanied by the release of a highenergy photon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.9

14

The process of imprinting circuitry on a Si wafer using a photomask. The mask
is made of high-quality quartz with an image of the circuit deposited on thesurface. Photons from a light source are incident on the mask and the pattern iswritten on the Si wafer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17

xii
2.1

A schematic of the Spitfire (two stage Ti:Sapphire amplifier). The seed pulse is
first sent through the stretcher (1), and then into the first stage of amplification(Regenerative Amplifier, (2)) where it passes through a Ti:Sapphire crystal. After the maximum gain is achieved from the Regen, the pockels cell rotates thepolarization, sending the pulse into the double-pass or Linear Amplifier (3).
Finally, the pulse is directed into the compressor (4) and out onto the laser table.

2.2

21

A calibration curve for the Ocean Optics fiber-coupled CCD camera that is used
to measure the bandwidth of the seed pulse from the Tsunami Ti:Sapphire laser.
The points were measured by coupling light from a cw dye laser with known
wavelengths into the fiber optic cable and recording the oscilloscope position.
A linear fit to the data describes the relationship between wavelength and scope
position in ms, allowing for measurement of the Tsunami bandwidth. . . . . . .

2.3

22

The temporal (left) and spectral (right) profile of the seed pulse from the Tsunami
Ti:Sapphire laser measured with a commercial FROG instrument available in
the JILA Keck labs. The dotted line is a measurement of the phase of the electric field across the pulse, or the amount of frequency chirp in the pulse. A flat
phase indicates no frequency chirp across the pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.4

A schematic of the single-shot home-built autocorrelator used for determinationof the temporal pulse width of the amplified output pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . .

2.5

23

25

The temporal (left) and spectral (right) profile of the pulse from the amplified
Ti:Sapphire laser measured with a commercial FROG instrument available in
the JILA Keck labs. The slight curvature in the dotted line (representing thephase of the electric field) indicates a slight frequency chirp from the amplification process as compared to the seed pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

27

xiii
2.6

The optical layout of the pump and probe beams. The output beam is split into
pump and probe beams at the 80/20 beamsplitter (BS). The 20% reflected beam
is sent into the doubler/tripler to frequency upconvert the pulse to 400 nm or
266 nm. The pump beam then passes through a 70 cm lens (L2) into the chamber, and after reflection from the mirror inside the vacuum chamber, comes to afocus at the slit. The 400 nm beam comes to an 1 mm focal spot in the inter-

1011 W/cm2. The transmitted beamaction region, with a power density of 2 (80%) passes through a half-wave plate, a delay stage and is then focused witha 40 cm lens (L1) into the pulsed gas jet and the selected harmonic is directed
and focused into the interaction region. The 17th harmonic, as an example, isfocused to a 250 m spot with an estimated power density of 1105 W/cm2 in
the interaction region. Inset: First the pump beam is sent through a telescope
to reduce the beam size. For 2nd harmonic generation, the 800 nm beam is sent
through a BBO crystal. For 3rd harmonic generation, the 800 nm beam is split
into 2 beams where one arm is doubled in a BBO crystal and combined again
with the second 800 nm arm in a BBO crystal cut for tripling to produce 266
nm output. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.7

28

A ray tracing simulation of the 21st harmonic beam on the slit (right before theinteraction region). The beam has a diameter of 100 m in both directions.
There is some ellipticity of the beam due to the toroidal grating surface. The
toroidal grating was designed for a certain beam geometry, and the actual input
beam deviates from that slightly with the addition of the spherical grating. The
points represent 11 rays starting from different positions in the initial collimatedbeam. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

xiv
2.8

A detailed schematic of the vacuum chamber, including the pulsed valve chamber, the two grating chambers, and the magnetic bottle photoelectron spectrometer. The probe laser beam is focused into the pulsed valve gas jet at (A) where
the harmonics are created. The harmonic of choice diffracts in 1st order offof the first spherical grating at (B), then again off the second toroidal gratingat (C), and enters the interaction region at (D) where it intersects the gaseous
sample (E). Ejected photoelectrons are collected in the magnetic bottle time offlight (F) and detected with the MCP detector (G). The pump beam enters thechamber at (H) and reflects off of a mirror located slightly above the harmonic
beam and crosses the harmonic beam at a small angle in the interaction region.

2.9

33

(a) A sketch of the pulsed gas jet used for harmonic generation. Gas is released
out the 1 mm aperture when the center plunger is lifted by the puckering of
the piezo crystal when a voltage is applied. Four adjustment screws hold thepiezo crystal in place and the tension tunes the output profile of the gas pulse at
a 1 kHz repetition rate. (b) A profile of the output gas pulse measured with ahearing aid microphone. The width of the pulse can be adjusted by the width ofthe driving voltage pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34

2.10 An example of adjusting the backing pressure to the pulsed valve and recording
the intensity of the harmonic signal from the Pt-electron multiplier using argon
as the backing gas for the 9th harmonic of 800 nm. The maximum harmonic
signal occurs at 10 psi argon as shown by the arrow. The decrease in harmonic
signal when going to higher backing pressures is due to ionization of the nonlinear gas medium with higher gas densities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36

xv
2.11 Photoelectron spectrum of NO gas taken with the 9th harmonic of a long pulse,
narrowband Nd:YAG laser, Eh =10.496 eV. Here the inherent resolution of themagnetic bottle spectrometer is seen in the peak widths. The vibrational progression of the NO+ ground state gives rise to the three peaks separated by0.28 eV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40

2.12 Photoelectron spectrum due to all harmonics simultaneously incident on a sample of He gas. The first harmonic energetic enough to ionize He is the 17th(Eh =26.4 eV). Each subsequent harmonic is seen as another main ionization
peak at increasingly higher energies. Note the decrease in resolution for thehigher electron kinetic energies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42

2.13 An energy calibration curve taken from the time of flight peak positions ofFig. 2.12 and the known photoelectron energies. The dotted line is a fit to thedata from equation 7.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44

2.14 An energy calibration curve for very low photoelectron energy peaks (below
2 eV) taken from the time of flight peak positions of Fig. 2.11 and the known
photoelectron energies. The dotted line is a fit to the data from equation 7.2. . .

45

2.15 A schematic of the instrumental apparatus used during my internship at IBM
T.J. Watson Research Center, adapted from ref. [4]. The doubly amplified
Ti:Sapphire laser is focused with a 40 cm lens into a pulsed jet of neon gas
where high-order harmonics are created. The harmonics are frequency separated with a grazing incidence toroidal grating and focused onto the sample
surface after passing through a small pinhole before the UHV chamber. Photoelectrons created from the surface are directed into a TOF drift tube with aparabolic mirror and detected with a multi-mode detector. . . . . . . . . . . . .

47

xvi
3.1

A spectrum of the harmonics of 800 nm created in a gas jet of neon (top) andargon (bottom). Detection of the harmonics was accomplished by irradiatinga piece of Pt metal with the harmonic beam and detecting the ejected photoelectrons with an electron multiplier as the grating was rotated at a steadyrate. Small shoulders on the low order peaks in the top panel are the 2nd orderdiffraction of the high harmonics reflected from the grating. Harmonics 13-65
are detected in neon, and 11-27 are detected in argon. Detector settings were
3.3 kV across the electron multiplier for the neon spectrum and 2.7 kV for theargon spectrum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.2

51

The intensity of the 9th harmonic generated in Ar as a function of the driving
laser intensity in W/cm2 . Two trends are observed, attributed to the increaseof harmonic generation in a perturbative regime (dotted line) and then change
in slope due to the laser intensity causing saturation (or ionization) of the non-

1014 W=cm2 (dashed line). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

linear medium at 7.1 
3.353

The intensity of the 9th harmonic generated in Ar as a function of the positionof the driving laser focus in the gas jet. ”Zero” on the x scale designates thecenter of the gas jet. The lens used to focus the 9 mm diameter beam has a 40
cm focal length. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4

54

(a) Photoelectron spectrum due to all harmonics simultaneously incident on asample of He gas. The first harmonic energetic enough to ionize He is the 17th(Eh =26.4 eV). Each subsequent harmonic is seen as another main ionization
peak at increasingly higher energies. (b) A single harmonic (61st, Eh =95 eV),
selected by the grazing incidence grating, incident on a sample of He gas. Not
only is the main ionization peak seen, but also the 1st and 2nd satellite peaks. .

56

xvii
3.5

(a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Xe taken with the 11th harmonic (17.5 eV). (b) The photoelectron spectrum including 4d core levels of
Xe taken with the 47th harmonic (73 eV). Resolution of the system is best at
low photoelectron energies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6

57

Photoelectron spectra in Xe with the 43rd harmonic, demonstrating the ability
to tune the harmonic to an atomic Rydberg resonance. The bottom spectrum
is the 43rd harmonic of 800 nm, while the top spectrum is the 43rd harmonicof 791 nm. By tuning the fundamental beam, the harmonic is tuned into a
Rydberg level leading up to the 4d ionization threshold. The hole left by the
excited electron causes an onset of Auger electrons (shaded area). . . . . . . .

3.7

59

(a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Br2 taken with the 17th harmonic (26 eV), showing the X, A and B final states of Br+
2 . (b) A section of thephotoelectron spectrum of Br2 taken with the 49th harmonic (76.5 eV), showing
the 3dj core levels of Br+
2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.8

60

(a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Al2 Br6 taken with the 19th
harmonic. (b) The core level photoelectron spectrum of Al2 Br6 with the 55th
harmonic showing the bromine core levels. Al core levels were not observed. .

3.9

61

The photoelectron spectrum of I2 taken with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. The
I2 spectrum has a similar structure to Br2 , except that the spin orbit splittings ing state at 9.3 and 10 eV binding energies,+
the 2 u state at 11 and 11.8 eV, and the 2 +g state at 13 eV of the I2 ion are

the ion are more pronounced. The 2

observed [5] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63

3.10 The photoelectron spectrum of CH2 I2 with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. . . .

64

3.11 The photoelectron spectrum of GeBr4 with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. . . .

65

3.12 Photoelectron spectra of a GaAs (100) surface taken with harmonics 27, 41, 51
and 63 (top to bottom) of an 800 nm Ti:Sapphire laser. The 3d core levels of Ga
and As are observed at 19 and 41 eV binding energies, respectively. . . . . . .

67

xviii3.13 Photoelectron spectra of chromium metal on a Si(100) surface. The 3p corelevel is observed at 41 eV binding energy for three different harmonics (47, 55
and 59 from top to bottom). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1

68

Photoelectron spectrum of NO gas taken with the 9th harmonic of a long pulse,
narrowband Nd:YAG laser, Eh =10.496 eV (dashed line). Here the inherent
resolution of the magnetic bottle spectrometer is seen in the peak widths. The
vibrational progression of the NO+ ground state gives rise to the three peaks
separated by 0.28 eV. The solid line shows the same vibrational progression, but acquired with the 7th harmonic (centered at Eh =10.91 eV) of the fs
Ti:Sapphire laser. The broadening of the peaks is due to the energy bandwidthof the 7th harmonic. The height discrepancy in the highest binding energy peak
between the Nd:YAG laser and the 7th harmonic of the Ti:Sapphire laser is dueto the efficiency of the photoelectron spectrometer at different photoelectron energies. Though these peaks have the same binding energy, the dashed line peakat 9.8 eV corresponds to very low photoelectron energy, where the collection
efficiency is quite low. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2

70

The relative energy width of photoelectron peaks from several different gases
vs. their respective photoelectron energies. The higher energy photoelectron
peaks converge to a relative width of 4-5%. For photoelectron peaks below 4eV a new trend can be seen, where theE of the peaks is due to the energy

bandwidth of the harmonics. Target gas is He (}), Ne (), Xe (2), N2 (4), andNO ( ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

73

xix
4.3

(a) The absolute energy width of the harmonics derived from low energy photoelectron peaks (below 3 eV) are plotted as a function of the photon energy,or the harmonic used to ionize the electron from which the peak arises. The
retarding grids in the electron flight tube were not used for this data set. (b) A
more complete data set using the retarding grids to measure the bandwidths of
all the harmonics from the 9th to the 55th. Comparison of (a) and (b) shows thatno artificial broadening exists when utilizing the retarding grids. Target gases
are He (}), Ne (), Xe (2), N2 (4), and NO ( ), and the solid line is theaverage for each harmonic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.4

74

The photoelectron spectrum of NO gas with the 7th harmonic (left) and 9th
harmonic (right), showing the vibrational progression of the NO+ ground state.
The black spectrum represents the 70 fs unchirped pulse, while the light grayspectrum is taken with a positively chirped driving pulse and the dark grayspectrum is taken with a negatively chirped pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.1

77

A schematic of resonantly-enhanced excited state photoelectron spectroscopy
of a generic molecule. Process (1): A single frequency photon used to resonantly excite an intermediate state and ionize it with a multi-photon probe.
Process (2): A two-color REMPI process where one photon resonantly excites
the molecule and a photon of a different wavelength is used to multi-photon ionize the molecule. Process (3): A two-color excitation-ionization scheme where
one visible photon is used to resonantly excite an intermediate state and a VUVphoton is used for single photon ionization. The dotted arrows represent thephotoelectrons ejected from the three different processes. . . . . . . . . . . . .

81

xx
5.2

Potential energy curves for Br2 and Br+
2 . Only the X and B states of the neutral and the X and A states of the ion are shown for simplicity. The 527 nm
excitation laser pumps the netural into the 3

0+ u excited B state, and the 17th

harmonic photoionizes the excited molecules. The v” = 26 vibrational level
reached by the 527 nm photon is shown, creating a large region of FranckCondon overlap in the Br+
2 ion electronic states. The shading represents theaccessible region of the X+ and A+ ion states with the probe photon. The
intensities and energies of the photoelectrons will then be determined by the
Frank-Condon overlap. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3

83

A molecular orbital diagram of the ground and excited states of Br2 and Br+
2.
The four molecular orbital levels shown result from combinations of Br atomic
p orbitals (outer valence shell). The B and A states of the neutral have a similar
configuration but differ in orbital angular momentum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4

86

10 5 Torr taken with the 17th

The photoelectron spectrum of gaseous Br2 at 5 

harmonic of 800 nm showing the final X, A and B states of the Br2+ ion. Solidblack lines denoted 3 P2;1;0 are the known binding energies of the bare Br atom.
5.5

87

The photoelectron spectrum with the 17th harmonic only is shown in gray, while
the photoelectron spectrum with the 527 nm + 17th harmonic is shown in black.
Regions of small two-photon and atom signals are expanded for clarity. . . . .

5.6

An expanded photoelectron spectrum of Br2 with (black) and without (gray) the
527 nm excitation laser. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.7

88

90

A further expanded photoelectron spectrum of the B)X+ transition in Br2(gray line=17th harmonic only). The dotted gray lines mark the photoelectronenergies of the peak heights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

xxi
6.1

A cross-correlation trace of the 800 nm fundamental pulse with the 400 nm
pump pulse obtained by a 4 (400 nm photon) + 1’ (800 nm photon) multiphoton
ionization in Xe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2

95

A cross-correlation trace of the 800 nm fundamental pulse with the 266 nm
pump pulse obtained by a 3 (266 nm photon) + 2’ or 3’ (800 nm photon) multiphoton ionization in Kr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.3

96

Solid line: photoelectron spectrum of Kr gas with the 17th harmonic, showing
the spin-orbit split doublet of the Kr+ ion state. Dashed line: photoelectron
spectrum of Kr gas when the 17th harmonic and an 800 nm dressing beam
are overlapped spatially and temporally. The 800 nm dressing beam adds toor subracts from the 17th harmonic ionization in an above threshold ionization
process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.4

98

(a) A valence level photoelectron spectrum of Xe with the 17th harmonic showing the sidebands created by introduction of the 400 nm dressing pulse withspatial and temporal overlap. The sideband photoelectron peaks are exactly
one 400 nm photon higher in energy than the main ionization peaks. (b) The
time-correlation of the sideband photoelectron peaks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

6.5

Cross-correlation traces of the 17th harmonic + 400 nm in Xe. (a) Toroidal grating rotated to 1st order diffraction, concave grating at 0th order reflection, iris
open (8mm), FWHM = 882  105 fs; (b) as (a) except iris at 1 mm, FWHM =449  64 fs; (c) Both toroidal and concave gratings rotated to 1st order diffraction, iris open (8mm), FWHM = 440  25 fs; (d) as (c) with iris at 1mm, FWHM
= 288  12 fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101

6.6

Cross-correlation trace of the 19th harmonic + 400 nm in Xe. The shortest
soft x-ray pulse measured to date with the instrument described here. Some
irregularity in the temporal profile may indicate an irregular spectral profile ofthe harmonic pulse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

xxii
6.7

The pulse widths of the 13th through the 21st harmonics measured by crosscorrelation with a 400 nm pulse. Error bars designate the error in the pulse
width given by the Gaussian fitting program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

7.1

A simplified potential curve diagram illustrating the pump-probe sequence andresulting photoelectrons. Process 1: Ground state absorption of the 17th harmonic resulting in photoelectrons leaving Br+
2 in both the X and A state (B ion
state not shown). Process 2: Two photon ionization with the 400 nm + the17th harmonic centered at t=0. Process 3: Ionization with the 17th harmonicfrom the excited C state of Br2 at a positive time delay (but before dissociationis complete). Process 4: After the dissociation is complete, the Br atoms are
ionized by the 17th harmonic. The total energy of the probe laser is decreased
for simplicity and size of the diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108

7.2

Three pump-probe spectra of Br2 :t=-500 fs (background), -100 fs (cross-correlation signal), and +500 fs (Br atom signal). The spectra are displaced
vertically for clarity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
7.3

An expanded region of the photoelectron spectrum of Br2 atline) and background at

t 30 fs (grayt -300 fs (black line) showing the cross-correlation

features. The feature at 7.4 eV binding energy is the above threshold ionization
resulting from the overlap of the 17th and 400 nm pulses where the Br+
2 is left in
the ground X state. The shoulder roughly centered at 9.4 eV is a similar signal,
only the Br+
2 is left in the excited A state. The signal at 8.5 eV is attributed tothe ionized excited state wavepacket as it is sliding down the dissociative curve. 111

xxiii
7.4

Normalized, subtracted pump-probe spectra of Br2 in the cross-correlation time
region (left). The spectra are displaced vertically for clarity. The panel on theright shows the appearance of the Br atom peaks in the photoelectron spectra.
The two peaks in the photoelectron spectrum are due to spin-orbit coupling in
the final Br+ state. Numbers on the vertical scale are pump-probe delay infemtoseconds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112

7.5

Total counts from the cross-correlation peak and the atomic peaks from Fig. 7.4
and additional time delay data not shown are plotted as a function of pumpprobe delay between the 400 nm pump and the 17th harmonic probe. The crosscorrelation signal is fit with Gaussian function of width 300 fs and the atomic
rise is fit with a step function described in the text. The dotted line fit of thestep function allows both step and fwhm to be variables, while the dashed line
fit fixes fwhm to 300 fs. The solid lines designate the time delay between thecenter of the cross-correlation trace and the ’step’ of the error function used to
fit the rise in atomic signal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

7.6

A similar plot as Fig. 7.5 except using the 19th harmonic as a probe. The crosscorrelation signal has a FWHM of 20417 fs and t0 of 017 fs, and the fit to
the atomic rise gives step

= 3621 fs and f whm = 367  45 fs (dotted line)

and the dashed line is a fit holding f whm at 204 fs, and step then becomes 30

20 fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116
7.7(a)The C1

u dissociate of neutral Br2 given by equation 7.3 (b) A curve repre-

senting the integral of (a) in fs per Å. The experimental result of 40 fs implies
a bond distance of 

3 Å, while a bond distance of 2Re occurs at a time of 105 fs.117

xxiv
7.8

Time traces of the cross-correlation features in the Br2 data (400 nm pump and17th harmonic probe). Black line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br+2
ion in the ground X state. Dark gray line: signal from the ATI process leaving
the Br+2 ion in the excited A state. Medium gray line: transient signal fromionization of the excited state wavepacket. Light gray line: random backgroundnoise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

7.9Time traces of the cross-correlation features in the Br2 data (400 nm pump and19th harmonic probe). Black line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br+2
ion in the ground X state. Dark gray line: signal from the ATI process leaving
the Br+2 ion in the excited A state. Medium gray line: transient signal fromionization of the excited state wavepacket. Light gray line: random backgroundnoise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

7.10 Long scans of the cross-correlation photoelectron energy region with the 19th
harmonic as a probe. The shaded areas of the photoelectron spectra on the left
correspond to the photoelectron energy regions giving rise to the time traces on
the right. The photoelectron spectrum on the very bottom is a background, withno 400 nm pump beam, and from there the time delays step up from -33 fs to+165 fs in steps of 33 fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
7.11 Photoelectron spectra of Br2 at long time delays, after the atomic signal between
1 and 2 eV photoelectron energy has reached a maximum value. The atomic
signal clearly increases as the harmonic number decreases. (The backgroundsignal in the vicinity of the atomic peaks is used for normalization.) . . . . . . 127
7.12 The cross-section enhancement factor plotted vs. the harmonic photon energy,
demonstrating that the 17th harmonic probe was not sitting on a resonance foratomic Br, but the atom signal is similarly enhanced for several harmonics. . . . 129

xxv
A.1 Absorption spectrum of Br2 from ref. [6], with lines drawn at 400 nm and 527
nm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
B.1 An energy level diagram showing the excitation of a Rydberg wavepacket in Kr
by a 3-photon absorption of 266 nm (black arrows). When an 800 nm pulse(gray arrow) is introduced, the Kr is ionized by a 1, 2, or 3 photon addition of
the 800 nm photon. Note that the ionization of Kr with 4 photons of 266 nm is
identical in energy to the 3+3’ multiphoton ionization at t = 0. . . . . . . . . . 140
B.2 Photoelectron spectrum of Kr with a time delay between the 267 nm pulse andthe 800 nm pulse of 500 fs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
B.3 Time traces of the photoelectron signal resulting from the ionization of a Rydberg wavepacket in Kr. The black trace represents the total counts in the photoelectron peak at 0.8 eV, and the dark gray from the photoelectron peak at 1.5
eV in Fig B.2. The light gray line is the black trace normalized to the dark graytrace, showing the fast oscillatory structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
B.4 The same time traces as in Fig. B.3, with the power of the 800 nm beam reduced
to 200 mW average power. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
B.5 Rydberg energy levels in Kr, showing the ns, nd3/2 and nd5/2 progressions.
The energy of three 266 nm photons is designated by the solid black line. The
dotted lines represent the energy bandwidth (FWHM) of the 266 nm pulse. . . . 145

Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1

Background
Since the discovery of the atom and its structure, consisting of a nucleus containing

smaller particles (neutrons and protons) and electrons which surround the nucleus, scientists
have been studying the electronic structure of atoms and molecules. More specifically, the fieldof quantum mechanics has attempted to understand electronic structure, among other things,
and how it relates to the chemical bonds that are formed between atoms. Fundamentally, understanding the nature of chemical bonding is important for the advancement of science. Many
practical uses stemming from our knowledge of chemical bonds exist as well in all fields ofscience, from understanding the gene sequences in DNA to controlling chemical reactions in
the atmosphere that cause pollution.
To get at the fundamental electronic structure underlying bonding in molecules, scientists
have long relied on the experimental technique of photoelectron spectroscopy. Photons are used
to eject electrons from molecules or atoms (termed ’ionization’), and the energy of the electrons
is used to infer orbital energies, or discreet energy levels of the electrons in a molecule. Whenatoms come together to form molecules, the electrons in the outer shell (or valence orbitals)
are primarily responsible for the formation of chemical bonds. By ejecting these electrons
via photoelectron spectroscopy, it is possible to better understand how atomic orbitals become
molecular orbitals. Fig. 1.1 is a simplistic picture of two atoms with one specific orbital energy
coming together to form two molecular orbitals. In a simplified view, the electrons in these outerOrbital Binding Energy

2

Molecule
Atom

Atom
Molecule

Figure 1.1: A simple molecular orbital picture demonstrating two atoms coming together toform two molecular orbitals.

3molecular orbitals now share the space around the two nuclei. In a multi- electron system, aseries of molecular orbitals are formed, from the core orbitals (the electrons close to the nucleus)
to the valence orbitals (the electrons furthest away from the nucleus and largely responsible forbonding).
In photoelectron spectroscopy, when a photon with a particular energy interacts with amolecule, an electron is ejected, as is demonstrated in Fig. 1.2. To eject a valence or outerelectron with a small binding energy, a lower energy photon is sufficient. To eject a core or
inner electron with a large binding energy, a higher energy photon is needed. This leads to theconservation of energy given by the equation:h = Epe + Ii

(1.1)



where h is the photon energy, Epe is the energy of the ejected photoelectron and Ii is the ionization energy, or binding energy of the orbital i. Equation 1.1 is an approximation resulting from
Koopmans’ theorem, which states that the ionization energy is equal to the orbital energy of theejected electron. This neglects the fact that the remaining electrons rearrange their distributions
when ionization occurs [1].
There are several ways experimentally to measure the energy of the ionized electron inphotoelectron spectroscopy. An electrostatic analyzer utilizes the fact that the energy of theelectron is related to its velocity, as is given by the extension of equation 1.1 to:

1
2

Epe = mv2 ;(1.2)

where v is the velocity of the electron and m is the mass. The electrostatic analyzer consistsof two charged plates bent at an angle. When these plates are held at a certain voltage, thedeflection path of the electron depends on its speed, and electrons with different speeds will
make it through the analyzer to the detector as the voltages are changed (Fig. 1.3(a)). If thevoltages are ramped in a consistent way, a full photoelectron spectrum can be obtained. Anothercommon method of analyzing the energies of photoelectrons is with a time-of-flight tube. Here,4

ValenceCoree-Binding Energy

hnx-ray

e-

1s

2p
2s

hnUV

B.E.

}

B.E.

3d
3p
3s

Figure 1.2: Top: A pictorial representation of a valence electron being ejected from a valenceor bonding orbital with an ultraviolet (UV) photon, and a core electron being ejected from an
inner orbital with an x-ray photon. Bottom: The electron energy level diagram of the above
pictures. On the left, the UV photon has sufficient energy to eject the 3 electron. On the right,
a x-ray photon is needed to eject the 1 electron. The dotted arrows represent the energy of theejected photoelectron. Binding energy (B.E.) is defined as the energy with which an electron isbound to the nucleus.

5

(A)

a
a
a
aa
a
Sample

+

-

(B)

a
a
a
aa
a

Flight tube

SampleFigure 1.3: (A) A schematic of an electrostatic analyzer where electrons are energy separated
by their velocities. Objects shaded with dark gray represent the photon source and the light grayobjects are the detectors. The dotted line represents the electron path through the analyzer. (B)A time-of-flight photoelectron analyzer where electrons are energy separated by their arrival
time to the detector.

6electrons are energy separated based on the arrival time of the electrons to a fast response
detector at the end of a long flight tube (Fig. 1.3(b)). The time of arrival is related to the energyof the electrons by further expanding equation 1.2:

 2
1
d
Epe = m
2 t ;

(1.3)

where d is the distance traveled by the electron (usually fixed) and t is the time-of-flight. The
latter is the type of energy analysis used for the data presented in this thesis.
The technique of photoelectron spectroscopy has several variations. First, the probe
wavelength is scanned and total photoelectron signal is detected. Here an enhancement in thesignal occurs when the incident photon energy is equal to an electronic or vibrational resonancein the atom or molecule under study, and often has similar features as in an absorption spectrum. A further extension of this first technique is to allow fast kinetic energy photoelectrons toescape and collect the low kinetic energy electrons so that only threshold resonances are measured. A second type of measurement fixes the probe wavelength and scans the energies of thephotoelectrons. The energies of the photoelectrons in turn reflect the binding energies of theelectrons in the atom or molecule. Coincidence methods are included in this second category,where the electron energies are scanned in coincidence with an ion of a certain mass.
For ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy, the He (I) lamp was once the most common
light source used. It produces radiation at 584 Å, or 21.2 eV. This photon energy is enoughto ionize the electrons in the valence orbitals for almost any molecule. Now, synchrotron lightsources are the predominant choice as described below. An example of the ultraviolet photoelectron spectrum of a simple molecule is given in Fig. 1.4, where the photon energy is fixed
and the photoelectron energies are measured. There are several noticeable features that giveimportant information about bonding in the HBr molecule. After the molecule is ionized, theoutermost orbital (the orbital with the lowest ionization energy) is split into two distinct energy
peaks. These arise from the well understood phenomenon of spin-orbit splitting. The electron
has a spin and that electron spin can interact with other electron orbitals or its own orbital an-Magnification

Photoelectron Counts

7

15
13
11
Ionization EnergyFigure 1.4: The photoelectron spectrum of HBr as a function of ionization energy. The andlabels are term symbols describing the final state of HBr+ . Spectrum taken from ref. [1]8gular momentum. This interaction causes a splitting of the orbital energies, which results in a
doublet peak in the photoelectron spectrum. The series of peaks at a higher ionization energy
result from sub-energy levels in the electron orbital, or vibrational energy levels. When a bonding electron is ejected, the H-Br+ molecule can be excited to higher vibrational energy levels,and thus the ejected electrons can lose energy, giving a series of photoelectron peaks.
The field of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy as a technique has gained momentum inthe last several decades with the introduction of synchrotron sources, a light source produced
from the acceleration of electrons in a storage ring. Synchrotron sources are capable of generating light from the infrared (m wavelengths) to the hard x-ray region (Å wavelengths) of
the electromagnetic spectrum. An example of the results from an experiment using synchrotron
radiation is given in Fig. 1.5 from ref. [2]. In this experiment the 3d core electron energies ofBr are measured for different Br-containing compounds. The observed photoelectron spectra(using a photon energy of 96 eV) demonstrate the principle of chemical shifts, where the energies of electronic orbitals of a particular atom shift depending on the nature of the atom on theother side of the chemical bond. For example, the Br atom in the Br-Br bond gives core level
energies of 78.5 and 77.5 eV (again due to spin-orbit splitting), while the Br atom in the C-Br
bond in CH3 Br gives core level energies of 77.3 and 76.3 eV.

1.2

Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy
We have seen that photoelectron spectroscopy (both valence and core level) has alreadygiven us a wealth of information about bonding in molecules. As the understanding of chemicalbonding has progressed, scientists have begun to ask new questions. For instance, how do theelectrons in a molecule rearrange when one electron is excited to a higher energy orbital? How
do chemical bonds form in time during a chemical reaction? How does a chemical bond breakin real time? The experiments presented in this thesis attempt to shed a new light on thesefundamental questions.
To address the question of molecules in excited electronic states, a two-photon, two-

9

HBr

Electron counts

Br2

CH3Br

CF3Br

80

79

78

77

76

75

Binding Energy
Figure 1.5: Core level photoelectron spectra of HBr, Br2 , CH3 Br and CF3 Br showing the shifting of the 3d Br core levels due to chemical bonding (taken from ref. [2]). Fine structure splittingof the ion states is also present in the spectra.

Preparation

Pump

Probe

t =0

t = 100 fs - 100 ps

10

Detection

Figure 1.6: A pictorial representation of time-resolved pump-probe photoelectron spectroscopy.
The sample molecule is pumped into an electronically excited state with a visible laser pulse.
At varying time delays after the pump pulse, a probe laser pulse ionizes the molecule and thephotoelectrons are analyzed at each time delay.

color experiment coupled with photoelectron spectroscopy can yield information on the energy
redistributions of an excited molecule. A visible photon is used to promote an electron intoa higher energy orbital, perturbing the entire electron distribution in the molecule, and then a
UV or soft x-ray photon (via photoelectron spectroscopy) is used to measure the energies ofthe electrons. The related two-photon technique of Raman spectroscopy has yielded vibrationaland rotational structure of a large number of molecules.
The processes of bond forming and breaking happen on extremely fast time scales, on
the order of

10 12 to 10 15 seconds. With the invention of ultrafast light sources (lasers thatgenerate very short pulses of light), photoelectron spectroscopy can be extended into the timeresolved realm. Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy aims to measure the electron distribution in a molecule as it is going through a transient process, such as dissociation. In general, one ultrafast pulse excites the system under study, and a second ultrafast pulse probes thesystem at varying time delays by ionizing the molecule and collecting the electrons produced(see Fig. 1.6). Ejected photoelectrons reflect the initial binding energies of the electrons in themolecule, therefore the time-dependent electron energy redistribution can be monitored.

11
Several research groups have demonstrated the important information gained by timeresolved photoelectron/photoion spectroscopy with visible and UV pulses, including characterization of bound and repulsive electronic states [7, 8, 9], photodissociation and recombination
dynamics of negative ions in size selected clusters [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15], fast dissociationof Rydberg states [16], and non-adiabatic dynamics of a dimer molecule [17]. An example( )is shown in Fig. 1.7, where the solvation dynamics of I2 Ar 20 clusters were measured onan ultrafast time scale by excitation of the I2 chromophore with a 780 nm pulse followed bymulti-photon ionization of the excited ion and analysis of the photoelectron energies[3]. The
two photoelectron peaks observed are attributed to the spin-orbit states of the I atom (2 P3=2 and
2P

1=2 ), a result of ionizing the I

product. The shift in the photoelectron spectrum at earlytime delays is a reflection of the shifting electron energies as the I2 bond is broken. At latertimes, the photoelectron spectra shift the opposite direction, showing a recombination of the I
and I fragments due to the surrounding cage of Ar atoms. Thus, it is demonstrated that timeresolved photoelectron spectroscopy is successful at measuring a changing electron distribution
in a dynamic system.

1.3

Harmonic generation
In the experiments presented here, we extend the possibilities of time-resolved spec-

troscopy by combining it with a novel pulsed soft x-ray source. This source originates from atechnique called high-order harmonic generation, where an ultrafast Ti:Sapphire laser is focused
into a rare gas jet and odd harmonics of the laser are created (from the 3rd to 65th). The properties of the generated light are laser-like, producing coherent, directional, ultrafast light pulses
with photon energies from 5-100 eV. With this range of energies, both valence and core level
photoelectron spectroscopy are possible, as will be demonstrated in later chapters. Due to theultrafast nature of the high harmonic pulses, time-resolved spectroscopy is also possible, wherea pulse from the master laser is used as a pump, and the harmonic pulse is used as a probe.
Since the first harmonic spectra were obtained in 1987 [18, 19], an extensive amount ofCounts

12

Photoelectron energy (eV)Figure 1.7: An example of a time-resolved photoelectron experiment from ref. [3]. The photoelectron spectrum of I2 Ar 20 clusters is shown at various time-delays between the pump andprobe pulses.

( )

13
research has been done to understand the high-order harmonic generation process as well as
the properties of the resulting VUV/soft x-ray light. There are many unique characteristics ofthe harmonic generation process itself, which have been studied through both experiment andtheory. It has been found that the extent of harmonic generation depends on several factors,
such as the nature of the rare gas medium, several aspects of the focusing conditions and spatial
mode of the fundamental laser in the non-linear medium [20], and the length and chirp of thefundamental pulse [21].
To a large extent, theory has successfully modeled these behaviors [22, 23], and the basic
process of generating high-order harmonics is well understood. A semi-classical model canqualitatively describe the harmonic generation process, in which the electron tunnels throughthe barrier formed by the Coulomb potential and the intense laser field. The electron thenrecombines with the parent atom upon reversal of the optical field, releasing coherent highorder radiation at odd harmonics of the fundamental wavelength [24] (see Fig. 1.8). However,the semi-classical model is unable to predict detailed spectral characteristics; hence, quantum
models [25, 26, 27] are required for a more complete description of harmonic generation, andare discussed in more detail in chapter 3.1.

1.4

Coupling the high harmonic source and time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy
The use of a pulsed high-harmonic soft x-ray source to probe ultrafast chemical dynam-

ics has several advantages. First, probing with a soft x-ray pulse allows the extension of ultrafast
photoelectron spectroscopy into the realm of gas phase neutral molecules, without the need for a
multi-photon probe step. Multiphoton probe steps, while effective, still have limitations in totalprobe energy and can cause resonance effects with the host of electronic states in even simple
molecules. Though some neutral gas phase molecules have accessible ion states within the ultraviolet region, the choice of target molecules need not be limited by the energy of the probe.
While soft x-ray probe wavelengths have the disadvantage of a large background due to ground14

tunnelingionization

classical motionof wave packet

radiative
recombination

Figure 1.8: A classical picture of high-order harmonic generation with an ultrafast laser. The
coulomb potential of the atom is perturbed in the presence of the strong laser field, and tunneling ionization of the electron occurs. The free electron gains energy in the electric field (Up ,pondoromotive potential). As the optical field changes phase, the coulomb potential also oscillates and causes recombination of the electron with the atom, accompanied by the release of ahigh energy photon.

15
state absorption from the neutral molecule, careful background subtraction with the use of an
optical chopper to sample every other pulse with the pump on/off can overcome this limitation.
The large range of photon energies obtained by high-harmonic generation creates a source that is
capable of ionizing into both the ground and multiple excited states of the target molecule. Thisextends the realm of information that can be gained on a particular system, as cross-sections
from neutral excited states to various ion electronic states may not only be different, but canalso change with time as the neutral excited state wavepacket evolves. Additionally, the versatility of a high-harmonic source allows both valence and core-level time-resolved spectroscopy,
giving a complete picture of the energy redistribution within the molecule. While valence level
photoelectron spectroscopy yields a wealth of information, how the core level electron energies
change upon excitation of a valence electron is not well understood. Core level spectroscopy
also gives a site specific probe of atoms in molecules that contain two or more types of atoms,
since the core level energies are specific to particular atoms. For example, in a simple molecule
like IBr, the core level signature (4d) for the I atom is in the 50 eV region, while Br (3d) levels
are in the 70 eV region.
Other groups have demonstrated the application of time-resolved surface photoelectron
spectroscopy with soft x-ray light. Picosecond dynamics of electron-phonon interactions on thinorganic films was measured by Probst and Haight [28], with a 3.5 eV excite pulse and a 22.4 eVprobe pulse, the 11th harmonic of 640 nm. Ultrafast hot electron dynamics on a Pt surface wereobserved by Siffalovic, et al [29], by focusing a visible and 70 eV high-harmonic pulse on thesurface and collecting the photoelectrons from the Pt surface. Lei, et al [30], observed a change
in a chemical bond between O2 deposited on a Pt surface on a sub-picosecond time scale using
a visible pump pulse and the 27th harmonic of 800 nm as the probe pulse.

1.5

High-order harmonics and surface photoelectron spectroscopy
Photoelectron spectroscopy has also been used extensively as a probe for surface struc-ture and bonding in condensed phase materials. As part of an internship program, I had the op-

16
portunity to work on another instrument designed to use a similar harmonic generation source
for surface photoelectron studies. Since the internship was at IBM, improving computer components and the speed with which they are fabricated is high priority. To make a complex computer
chip requires 20 layers of microscopic circuitry on a Si wafer. Each layer is patterned onto the
Si wafer with a device called a photomask. Fig. 1.9 demonstrates the patterning process, wherea light source is incident upon the photomask, a high purity quartz plate with images of thecircuit, and the circuit pattern is transfered to the Si wafer.
These photomasks are expensive to make and the ability to precisely repair flaws in thepatterns permits a significant reduction in cost and time of chip production. The photomask
patterns consist of the deposition of heavy metals on the quartz surface, such as Cr or W. The
use of femtosecond ultrafast lasers has already proven to be an effective tool for precise removalof unwanted metal material, such as bridges between small parts of the circuit pattern [31]. The
other component in mask repair is the replacement of oblated or chipped metal materials. Deposition and detection of Cr metal without the use of high-temperature ovens, which might further
damage the photomask, is the aim of the surface photoelectron spectroscopy experiments. A
gaseous metal coordination compound, Cr(CO)6 , is thought to be a solution to metal-oven deposition. Cr(CO)6 is deposited on the surface and the surface is subsequently cooled with liquid
N2 . The CO ligands are then photolyzed with a UV laser beam in the areas in need of repair,leaving only the Cr metal on the surface. The remaining Cr(CO)6 is released upon heating. To
begin to characterize the feasibility of this process, it is necessary to find a way to deposit anddetect the Cr on a Si surface. Since ultrafast photoelectron spectroscopy is surface sensitive,
a high-harmonic source can be used to detect the core level photoelectron signature of Cr (3p)after it is deposited on the surface. Eventually the dynamics of the deposition of Cr via Cr(CO)6
can also be monitored using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy.
In this thesis I describe in detail results obtained using the novel combination of timeresolved photoelectron spectroscopy and a visible/UV pump coupled with a soft x-ray probe.
The harmonic generation source and the properties of the incident soft x-ray radiation are out-

17Light source

Photomask

Si wafer

Figure 1.9: The process of imprinting circuitry on a Si wafer using a photomask. The mask ismade of high-quality quartz with an image of the circuit deposited on the surface. Photons froma light source are incident on the mask and the pattern is written on the Si wafer.

18
lined, including a demonstration of tunability and control of the harmonic source, measurementsof the energy bandwidths of generated harmonics, and several examples of soft x-ray valence
and core level photoelectron spectroscopy of gas phase atoms and molecules, as well as condensed phase samples. Techniques for calibrating the overlap and temporal width of the pumpand probe beams are discussed, and above threshold ionization cross-correlation traces between
pump and probe beams are shown. The photoelectron spectrum of the bound B state of Br2 ismeasured with a 527 nm excitation laser and a 17th harmonic probe. The dynamic photodissociation of Br2 is observed in a 400 nm pump- 17th harmonic probe set-up, demonstrating theability to monitor a gas phase reaction in real time.

Chapter 2

The Experimental Apparatus

2.1

Introduction
The instrument was designed for ultrafast UV/visible-pump soft x-ray-probe photoelec-tron spectroscopy for the purpose of investigating the dissociation of gas phase molecules. This
unique approach to studying fundamental gas phase chemical dynamics will open up a new dimension to ultrafast spectroscopy, specifically by the potential to understand both valence andcore level energy redistribution in a dissociating molecule. To this end, the instrument describedhere was built.
A 70 fs, 2.2 mJ Ti:saphhire laser is used to generate high harmonics (up to 100 eV pho-

% of the beam into a pulsed jet of rare gas (Ne or Ar).

tons) of 800 nm light by focusing  80

These harmonics are frequency separated by a pair of grazing incidence gratings and refocused%

into the interaction region of a magnetic bottle photoelectron spectrometer. The remaining 20of the light is frequency doubled or tripled in appropriate non-linear crystals, and subsequently
focused and overlapped with the harmonic beam in the interaction region. Samples to be studied
are leaked into the chamber through a small nozzle opening. After excitation and ionization of
the sample by the pump and probe beams, photoelectrons are collected by a microchannel plate
detector located at the end of a 1.4 m flight tube. Here I describe the Ti:Sapphire laser system,
the pulsed valve used for harmonic generation, the two-grating set-up used for harmonic selection and compression, and the design and characterization of the magnetic bottle photoelectron
spectrometer.

20

2.2

Laser System
The laser system is a commercial Spectra Physics model, containing a seed Ti:Sapphireoscillator, a pulse stretcher, two stages of amplification and a pulse compressor. A layout of
the complete laser system is shown in Fig. 2.1. The seed laser(Tsunmai) is pumped by a diodepumped cw Nd:VO4 laser (Millenia) at 532 nm with 4.1 W of average power. The oscillator
gives pulses centered at 800 nm with 400 mW average power at a cavity frequency of 82
MHz. To calibrate the spectral bandwidth (as well as a constant monitoring of mode-locking),% of the beam is sent into a fiber optic cable coupled to a small grating monochromator and1

CCD camera (Ocean Optics Instruments). The signal from the CCD camera is read on an oscilloscope, and the signal is converted to a wavelength scale. To calibrate the oscilloscope signal
to a wavelength scale, several known wavelengths (measured independently with a wavemeter) from a cw dye laser were coupled into the fiber optic cable and the position read on theoscilloscope. This calibration curve is shown in Fig. 2.2. The linear relationship between the
wavelength and scope position is given by the following equation:
Scope Position (time in ms)= 4:37(0:03)  10 2 (nm) 30:2(0:2)(2.1)

In this way, the bandwidth of the seed laser is measured on a daily basis to be 16 nm.
The temporal width of the seed pulse is 57 fs, measured with a commercial autocorrelator. Traces of both the spectral and temporal profile were also measured independently with acommercial FROG (Frequency Resolved Optical Gating) instrument available in the JILA KeckLabs. A good discussion of the FROG technique can be found in Ref. [32]. The results of the
FROG are shown in Fig. 2.3, and they agree well with the previously described measurementsfrom the fiber optic and commercial autocorrelator. The dotted line plotted over the temporal
trace of the seed pulse in Fig. 2.3 is the phase profile, which is also measured by the FROG
instrument. The flat nature of the phase curve indicates that no frequency chirp exists in thepulse. The transform limit (i.e., the shortest pulse possible with a given bandwidth as limited

21

Merlin(Regen)Merlin(Linear Amp.)(1)

Tsunami(2)(3)

Millenia(4)

Spitfire
Figure 2.1: A schematic of the Spitfire (two stage Ti:Sapphire amplifier). The seed pulse is first
sent through the stretcher (1), and then into the first stage of amplification (Regenerative Amplifier, (2)) where it passes through a Ti:Sapphire crystal. After the maximum gain is achieved
from the Regen, the pockels cell rotates the polarization, sending the pulse into the double-passor Linear Amplifier (3). Finally, the pulse is directed into the compressor (4) and out onto thelaser table.

22

Figure 2.2: A calibration curve for the Ocean Optics fiber-coupled CCD camera that is used tomeasure the bandwidth of the seed pulse from the Tsunami Ti:Sapphire laser. The points were
measured by coupling light from a cw dye laser with known wavelengths into the fiber optic
cable and recording the oscilloscope position. A linear fit to the data describes the relationship between wavelength and scope position in ms, allowing for measurement of the Tsunami
bandwidth.

23

Figure 2.3: The temporal (left) and spectral (right) profile of the seed pulse from the Tsunami
Ti:Sapphire laser measured with a commercial FROG instrument available in the JILA Kecklabs. The dotted line is a measurement of the phase of the electric field across the pulse, or theamount of frequency chirp in the pulse. A flat phase indicates no frequency chirp across thepulse.

24by the uncertainty principle) of an ultrafast Gaussian pulse is given by the simplified equation:

 (Hz)  t(s) = 0:44:(2.2)

For a pulse centered at 800 nm with a 16 nm spectral bandwidth, the limit of the temporal pulse
width is calculated to be 59 fs, which is within the experimental error of experimental measurements (both from the commercial autocorrelator and the FROG), showing the transform-limited
nature of the seed pulse. Other error could be introduced in such a calculation if the pulse shapeis not strictly Gaussian.
The seed pulses are then injected into the amplifier, which first sends the beam througha grating-based stretcher, and then the pulse is directed into a multi-pass regenerative amplifier
pumped by a 9 W, 1 kHz, Q-switched Nd:YLF laser. The average power after the first amplification stage is 1 W. The pulses are further amplified in a double pass linear amplifier, pumpedby 12 W of 532 nm light from a Nd:YLF laser identical to the one used in the first stage. The
average power before compression is 3 W and is reduced to 2.2 W after compression due toreflection losses from multiple passes off the compressor grating. The layout of the amplifier isgiven in Fig. 2.1.

% of the beam

The temporal width of the final output pulse is determined by splitting off 1

into a home-built single-shot autocorrelator (Fig. 2.4). The autocorrelator divides the beam into
two arms, one of which is on a delay stage controlled by a micrometer. The beams are focusedwith a cylindrical lens into a BBO crystal cut for 2nd harmonic generation. The inset of Fig. 2.4
shows the basic principle of autocorrelation. The horizontal stripe-like focus produced by thecylindrical lens allows the two beams to have a large area of spatial overlap, creating a 400 nm
beam that is an image of the overlap of the two pulses. The 400 nm output is then focused
onto a CCD camera and the signal is observed on an oscilloscope. When the two pulses overlap
in time, the spatial overlap corresponds to their temporal width (related by the speed of light),
according to the following equation:

!



1
2


xmic (m)
F W HMtrace (ms)pulse width(fs) =0:6  tscope(ms) 
0:3 m=fs ;

(2.3)

25

CCD camera
Concave
lens

Cylindrical
lens

BBO

Iris
Delay
stage
BS
BBO

Pulse 1

Pulse 2

Doubledlight

Dt
Figure 2.4: A schematic of the single-shot home-built autocorrelator used for determination of
the temporal pulse width of the amplified output pulse.

26
where

xmic(m)=tscope(ms) is the calibration factor relating the scale on the scope to themicron stage of the mobile arm of the autocorrelator, FWHMtrace is the full width at half maximum of the autocorrelation trace, 0.3 m/fs is the speed of light and 0.6 is a factor accounting
for the shape of the autocorrelation trace, assumed to be Gaussian.
The laser system yields a consistent pulse width of 70-80 fs, assuming a Gaussian pulse
profile, while the spectral bandwidth is preserved through the amplification process. The final
output of the amplified pulse was also measured by the FROG instrument mentioned above.
These results are shown in Fig. 2.5. The temporal profile of the amplified pulse has a FWHM
of 69 3 fs, while the spectral profile still has a FWHM of 16 nm. The dotted line indicating
the phase or chirp of the pulse is slightly curved compared to the one for the initial seed pulse,
indicating a slight frequency chirp in the amplified pulse. This is to be expected in the amplification process, as a small amount of linear frequency chirp results from the mirrors, lenses and
Ti:Sapphire crystals encountered by the pulse which cannot be fully compensated for by thecompressor grating.

2.3

Optical layout
The layout of the pump and probe optical beams is shown in Fig. 2.6. The 9 mm diameter%

output beam of the Spitfire travels first through a 80/20 beamsplitter, and the transmitted 80

beam continues through a half-wave plate (labeled ’P’), which is changed between 0Æ and 45Æ
to match the polarization of the pump beam. After passing through a stepper-motor controlled
delay stage, the beam is focused into the vacuum chamber with a 40 cm lens to an 100 mspot 1 mm above the output of the pulsed valve where harmonics of the laser are created. The
harmonics as well as the residual 800 nm beam travel through a baffle with a 1 mm opening.
The combined beam then hits the first concave grating (4 m radius of curvature, 1200 lines/mm)
which can be rotated to select a single harmonic. The harmonic and residual 800 nm beam
diverge from the focus in the pulsed valve chamber and appear as a 4 mm spot on the grating.
When the grating is rotated to 0th order, the 800 nm beam can be seen through a small win-

27

Figure 2.5: The temporal (left) and spectral (right) profile of the pulse from the amplified
Ti:Sapphire laser measured with a commercial FROG instrument available in the JILA Kecklabs. The slight curvature in the dotted line (representing the phase of the electric field) indicates a slight frequency chirp from the amplification process as compared to the seed pulse.

28
Convexlens

AmplifierStretcher/Compressor

Concavelens

Nd:YLF pump

Ti:Sapphire
Oscillator

Nd:YLF pump

Nd:YVO4 pump

BBO (2nd)

3rd harmonic
generationBS
BBO (3rd)

Delay
stage

D P
BBO (2nd)

2rd harmonic
generation

MirrorMirrorautocorrelator

probe

Aperture

L1

Grating

Grating
Iris

Pulsed
Valve

Iris
Iris
Slit
Pt detector

L2
BS

doubler/
triplerInteraction
regionPump

Pvariabledelay

Figure 2.6: The optical layout of the pump and probe beams. The output beam is split into
pump and probe beams at the 80/20 beamsplitter (BS). The 20% reflected beam is sent into the
doubler/tripler to frequency upconvert the pulse to 400 nm or 266 nm. The pump beam thenpasses through a 70 cm lens (L2) into the chamber, and after reflection from the mirror inside
the vacuum chamber, comes to a focus at the slit. The 400 nm beam comes to an 1 mm focal
spot in the interaction region, with a power density of 2  11 W/cm2 . The transmitted beam
(80%) passes through a half-wave plate, a delay stage and is then focused with a 40 cm lens(L1) into the pulsed gas jet and the selected harmonic is directed and focused into the interaction
region. The 17th harmonic, as an example, is focused to a 250 m spot with an estimated power
density of 1105 W/cm2 in the interaction region. Inset: First the pump beam is sent througha telescope to reduce the beam size. For 2nd harmonic generation, the 800 nm beam is sent
through a BBO crystal. For 3rd harmonic generation, the 800 nm beam is split into 2 beams
where one arm is doubled in a BBO crystal and combined again with the second 800 nm arm ina BBO crystal cut for tripling to produce 266 nm output.

10

29
dow on an iris (iris 1 in Fig. 2.6) located inside the chamber and used for alignment purposes.
The second grating (a toroidal surface with two different radii of curvature) is located 80 cm
from the first. Here the beam has diverged significantly from the tight focus in the pulsed valve
chamber and the toroidal surface of the grating serves to refocus the harmonic beam as well as
correct for spherical aberrations induced by using spherical optics at grazing incidence angles.
While the first spherical grating causes a slight decrease in the angle of divergence of the beam,
the toroidal grating is the most effective refocusing optic. It has a radius of curvature of 2 m
in the plane defined by the optical beam, and a 40 mm radius of curvature in the plane perpendicular to the optical beam propagation direction. Ray tracing simulations predict an optimal
100-300 m diameter focus (wavelength dependent) of the harmonic beam in the interaction
region when both gratings are rotated to inside first order diffraction. An example of the resultsof the ray tracing program is given in Fig. 2.7, where the focal plane of the 21st harmonic isshown at the slit. Fig. 2.6. The harmonic beam then passes through two more irises before
focusing at the slit, which is located 5 cm before the interaction region. The beam then passes
directly in front of the sample nozzle and hits a piece of Pt metal, and the resulting photoelectrons produced via the photoelectric effect are directed onto an electron multiplier to detect thepresence of the harmonics.
The other 20% of the beam is sent through a home-built doubler/tripler to create pumpwavelengths of 400 nm or 266 nm. The layout of the doubler/tripler is shown in the inset of% of the original beam (2.3 mJ) is first sent through a telescope to

Figure 2.6. For doubling, 20

reduce the beam size. It then passes through a 0.1 mm thick BBO crystal cut for 2nd harmonic
generation. The average power of the 400 nm beam is 140 J, an 40% conversion efficiency.
For tripling, the beam is first sent through a 50/50 beamsplitter and one arm is doubled as described above. The other arm is sent through a delay stage controlled by a micrometer, followed
by a half-wave plate set at 45Æ . The two beams (800 and 400 nm) are then overlapped spatiallyand temporally in a wavemixing crystal (also BBO, cut for tripiling) with a dichroic mirror to
produce 266 nm light. The residual 400 and 800 nm beams are separated out by using optics

30

Figure 2.7: A ray tracing simulation of the 21st harmonic beam on the slit (right before theinteraction region). The beam has a diameter of 100 m in both directions. There is some
ellipticity of the beam due to the toroidal grating surface. The toroidal grating was designed fora certain beam geometry, and the actual input beam deviates from that slightly with the additionof the spherical grating. The points represent 11 rays starting from different positions in theinitial collimated beam.

31
coated for 266 nm to direct the tripled beam into the chamber. Approximately 60 J of 266 nm
is produced, a 15% conversion efficiency from the original 800 nm beam energy. The pumpbeam can be switched from 266 nm to 400 nm by taking out the tripling crystal and replacing
the 50/50 beamsplitter with a mirror.
The distance of the pump beam is matched roughly to the path length of the harmonic
beam inside the vacuum chamber, so that the range of the delay stage encompasses the perfectdistance. The pump beam is focused with a 70 cm lens mounted on an x-y-z micrometer stage
before entering the chamber after the second grating. The beam reflects off a mirror located lessthan 1 cm above the harmonic beam and then passes through the top of the slit, which is wider
than the center of the slit where the probe beam passes through, allowing for some range of
motion to overlap the pump beam with the probe beam (see Fig. 2.6). The two beams overlap
in the interaction region at an 1Æ angle. The pump beam hits a window on the back of thechamber where a mask is placed to aid in alignment.
The most important alignment tool is a mobile aperture (1 mm hole in a small pieceof copper metal) mounted on a translating vacuum feedthrough. This aperture is placed in theinteraction region where the pump and probe beams cross. The typical alignment procedure is
as follows: Align the fundamental 800 nm beam (with both gratings rotated to 0th order) andthe pump beam (400 or 266 nm) through all the apertures, irises, and the slit located inside andoutside of the vacuum chamber (which can be vented during this first step for initial alignment).
Here it is important to ensure the 800 nm beam is as centered as possible on both gratings
by using an infrared viewer. When both beams are going through the aperture located in theinteraction region, keep the mobile aperture in place. After the chamber is under vacuum,
remove the aperture and attempt to find the 800 nm + 400 nm multiphoton ionization signal inxenon (described in chapter 6). The x-y-z stage holding the lens that focuses the pump beam
can be moved in small steps (10 m) to optimize the pump-probe signal. Next, turn on thepulsed valve to create harmonics and re-position the mobile aperture into the interaction region.
Rotate the toroidal grating to the desired harmonic while leaving the spherical grating at 0th

32
order. Read the signal on the Pt-electron multiplier showing the presence of the harmonic.
If the signal increases when the mobile aperture is removed from the interaction region, thegrating is not properly aligned. To improve the alignment, move the aperture back into placeand iteratively translate and rotate the grating to increase the harmonic signal on the detector.
Then attempt to find the harmonic + 400 nm (or 266 nm) above threshold ionization signal inxenon (also described in chapter 6). Again, the x-y-z stage can be adjusted to optimize pumpprobe signals. Once this is accomplished, rotate the spherical grating away from the 0th order tothe inside 1st order until the harmonic signal reappears. Follow the same procedure for properalignment of the spherical grating.

2.4

Vacuum Chamber
Figure 2.8 is a diagram of the vacuum chamber containing the pulsed valve, gratingsand photoelectron spectrometer. The stainless steel vacuum chamber is pumped by 5 turbo
pumps, the location of which are designated by the outgoing arrows in Fig. 2.8. Three of thefive turbo pumps have a pumping speed of 500 L/s (spherical and toroidal grating chamber
and interaction chamber), while the flight tube turbo has a pumping speed of 400 L/s, and thechamber with the pump beam mirror has a pumping speed of 300 L/s. The pumping speeds
were chosen by estimating the volume of the chamber and the gas flow rate (for both the pulsed
valve and the sample) and calculating the pumping speed needed to keep the chambers below

10 6 Torr. The two pumps located on the interaction chamber and flight tube are chemicallyresistant, and clean N2 is flowed at a steady rate over the bearings of all turbo pumps to prevent

10 8 to 210 7 Torr.

damage by corrosive gases. Typical base vacuum pressures are 5
2.4.1

Pulsed Valve
The pulsed valve consists of a stainless steel housing containing a gas inlet and a piezo

crystal (Fig. 2.9(a)). The piezo crystal is attached to a center plunger with an o-ring seal. Whena voltage is applied, the puckering of the crystal causes the plunger to open and allow gas

TurboDifferential
Pumping
aperture

Spherical
grating

Grating
manipulators

Turbo

Toroidalgrating

Pump beam
entrance
SamplenozzleTurbo

Magnetic Bottle
Time-of-Flight

Turbo

Interaction
regionPt detector

Magneitc
field lines

MCP

Figure 2.8: A detailed schematic of the vacuum chamber, including the pulsed valve chamber, the two grating chambers, and the magnetic bottle
photoelectron spectrometer. The probe laser beam is focused into the pulsed valve gas jet at (A) where the harmonics are created. The harmonic ofchoice diffracts in 1st order off of the first spherical grating at (B), then again off the second toroidal grating at (C), and enters the interaction region at(D) where it intersects the gaseous sample (E). Ejected photoelectrons are collected in the magnetic bottle time of flight (F) and detected with the MCP
detector (G). The pump beam enters the chamber at (H) and reflects off of a mirror located slightly above the harmonic beam and crosses the harmonic
beam at a small angle in the interaction region.

Rare gaspulsed jet

Roots
pump

Turbo

33

34

(A)

Body of valve

Adjustment
screwsO-ring seal

Center

Piezo crystal

plunger(B)

FWHM=
120 ms

0

200

400

600

800

Time (ms)Figure 2.9: (a) A sketch of the pulsed gas jet used for harmonic generation. Gas is released out
the 1 mm aperture when the center plunger is lifted by the puckering of the piezo crystal when avoltage is applied. Four adjustment screws hold the piezo crystal in place and the tension tunes
the output profile of the gas pulse at a 1 kHz repetition rate. (b) A profile of the output gas pulse
measured with a hearing aid microphone. The width of the pulse can be adjusted by the widthof the driving voltage pulse.

35through the 1 mm diameter opening. A power supply produces -300 V dc output, which firstpasses through a high voltage pulse generator to generate 120 s pulses from 0 to -300 V. These
pulses are sent to the piezo crystal, causing it to pulse at a 1 kHz repetition rate to match theTi:Sapphire laser. A voltage pulse with shorter duration was found to damage the piezo crystal.
The voltage pulser is triggered by an output from the laser which is delayed by the correct
amount to overlap the peak of the gas pulse with the laser pulse. Careful adjustment of thetension of the center plunger as well as four outer screws (labeled in Fig. 2.9(a)) is necessary toobtain a clean 1 kHz gas pulse (for example, if one of the screws is too tight, a double bounce
can occur, giving two gas peaks per laser pulse). Upon initial installation, the profile of the gas
pulse was measured with a hearing aid microphone placed 5 cm above the valve opening andthe signal amplified 100 before being read on an oscilloscope (Fig. 2.9(b)). The width as wellas the height of the gas pulse can be adjusted by adjusting the width and voltage of the driving
voltage pulse (always a negative driving pulse). The pulse height (indicating the amount of gas
per pulse) is set at the value for maximum harmonic generation while the width of the pulse is
set to 100-200 s. An increase in the pulse height increases the background chamber pressure
linearly (15 mTorr per -30 V step for Ne, 1 mTorr per -30 V step for Ar). The chamber pressure
increase with increasing pulse width is negligible.
The backing pressure of the gas to the pulsed valve differs depending on whether argon
or neon is used as the non-linear media. For low order harmonics (7th-25th), argon is used ata backing pressure of 10 psi. For higher harmonics (27th-65th), neon is used with a backing
pressure of 40 psi. The backing pressure is adjusted for maximum harmonic signal on the Pt
detector. An example of this is shown in Fig. 2.10, where the signal on the Pt-electron multiplierfrom the 9th harmonic was recorded as a function of argon backing pressure. The pulsed valve
chamber rises to 50 mTorr for argon and 150 mTorr for neon. The pulsed valve chamber is1018 atoms/cm3 are in the volume of

pumped by an 800 L/s roots pump. An estimated 1 

the laser focus. The 1 mm baffle opening allows the harmonic beam to pass through to thefirst grating chamber while serving as a differential pumping aperture. The pressure of the first36

Figure 2.10: An example of adjusting the backing pressure to the pulsed valve and recording
the intensity of the harmonic signal from the Pt-electron multiplier using argon as the backing
gas for the 9th harmonic of 800 nm. The maximum harmonic signal occurs at 10 psi argon asshown by the arrow. The decrease in harmonic signal when going to higher backing pressuresis due to ionization of the non-linear gas medium with higher gas densities.

37

10 6 Torr while the pulsed valve is running.

grating chamber is 1 
2.4.2

Two-grating separation and compression
The separation of the individual harmonics is achieved with a pair of grazing-incidence

gratings. Only one grating is required for wavelength separation, but the second is needed
to temporally re-compress the pulses. The first spherical grating (1200 lines/mm, 4 m radiusof curvature, gold coated) is blazed for normal incidence but used at grazing incidence (165Æ
total angle) for the soft x-ray beam. The 4 m radius of curvature translates to 1 m input andoutput arm lengths due to the Rowland circle [33]. The grating is mounted on a 1” thick rod
attached to a rotation stage coupled to a baffle, allowing rotation and translation of the grating in
vacuum. The baffle is mounted with the top flange attached to a micron translation stage alongwith set screws to adjust the tilt in all directions. All of these degrees of freedom are necessary
for proper alignment of the harmonic beam. The 800 nm beam reflects at 0th order while thegrating is turned to the inside first order to pass the selected harmonic. The second grating (300lines/mm) has a toroidal shape and gold-coated surface with two radii of curvature (2 m in theplane defined by the optical beam, and 40 mm in the plane perpendicular to that one). The severe
toroidal surface compensates for the spherical aberrations of using spherical optics at grazing
incidence, and the harmonic beam is focused to a spot instead of a vertical line. The toroidal
grating was designed specifically for grazing incidence diffraction of the soft x-ray harmonic
beam, and it is thus blazed at a shallow (2Æ ) angle for better diffraction efficiency. This gratingis also on a similar translation/rotation stage as described above. The temporal compressionof the ultrafast pulses using these two gratings is described in chapter 6, and the geometry ofgratings in this instrument compared to a compression due to the wavelength spreading of an
ultrafast pulse is described (as a theoretical possibility) in ref. [34].

38
2.4.3

Photoelectron Spectrometer
The photoelectron spectrometer consists of the sample nozzle, the Pt metal plus electron

multiplier used to detect the presence of the harmonic beam, a magnetic bottle time-of-flight(TOF) tube, and a microchannel plate detector (MCP) for detection of the photoelectrons. For
gaseous samples, a needle valve is used to control the effusive flow of the sample into thechamber through a 1 mm nozzle opening located very close to the overlap of the laser beams.
For liquid samples, such as Br2 , the vapor pressure over the liquid is sufficient to leak thegaseous sample into the chamber. Solid samples are heated with heating tape to produce thevapor pressures needed in the interaction region. The interaction chamber rises to a backgroundpressure of no more than

5  10 5 Torr during experiments, giving an average sample density

1012 molecules/cm3 or slightly greater directly after the nozzle opening. The electronof 1.6 multiplier at the end of the x-ray beam, described earlier, is positively biased to detect electrons
coming off a Pt surface caused by the photoelectric effect with the soft x-ray beam. A coneshaped differential pumping aperture (illustrated in Figure 2.8) is located directly above theinteraction region. The differential pumping allows the interaction chamber to rise to higher
pressures while holding the flight tube at an acceptable pressure for the MCP detector (approx.

10 6 Torr), and it also reduces electron-molecule collision effects in the flight tube, which5

can lead to a large, broad background signal on the MCP detector.
The microchannel plate detector is a double stack of thin (2 mm) plates containing tiny
channels. When electrons ejected from the sample enter the channels (coated with a dielectricmaterial), they multiply by bouncing off the inside of these channels, creating a cascade ofelectrons. The front of the MCP is biased at a high positive voltage (+2.4 to 2.8 kV), while theanode (or electron collecter) is biased at +100 to 300 V. This drives the electron multiplication
towards the anode, where the current is measured with respect to ground. If a large number ofelectrons (1  105 counts/laser shot) hit the detector within an amount of time shorter thanthe detector response time ( 5 ns), the detector channels become ’saturated’, and the signal

39
out is not a true indication of the original number of electrons.
The magnetic bottle configuration ensures good collection efficiency of the ejected pho-74

toelectrons [35]. Strong ( : kGauss) SmCo permanent magnets are placed 1 cm below theinteraction region, while a 3 A dc current is passed through a coil wrapped around the entire
flight tube. This configuration creates a high magnetic field in the interaction region and a low
magnetic field in the flight tube, as illustrated by the field lines in Fig. 2.8. The permanent magnet position for highest collection efficiency is 2 cm below the interaction region, however, theelectron energy resolution decreases as the gap is increased. The photoelectron signal decreases% by a 5 cm gap. The trajectories of the electrons in the top 2 sphere of theapproximately 50

interaction region are thus turned upward by the high magnetic field and a larger percentage ofphotoelectrons are collected by the MCP than in the case of a normal time-of-flight.

2.4.3.1

Resolution of the Magnetic Bottle Spectrometer

To calibrate the resolution of the magnetic bottle time-of-flight spectrometer, a narrow
bandwidth laser source was used to photoionize NO gas. The 9th harmonic of 1064 nm (118 nm)
was created by focusing the standard 355 nm output (3rd harmonic) of a commercial Nd:YAG
laser into a static cell of Xe gas at 3 Torr. The 118 nm output (10.5 eV) was used to ionize
NO slightly above threshold (9.26 eV, [36]), giving low energy photoelectron peaks (below
2 eV). This photoelectron spectrum is shown in Fig. 2.11. Vibrational resolution is achievedin the NO+ X state, and photoelectrons resulting from v=0, 1, and 2 are observed. In thisway the inherent resolution of the system was determined independently of the ultrafast laser.
The bandwidth of the NO photoelectron peaks using the nanosecond laser is limited by the
resolution of the spectrometer and not by the narrow bandwidth of the laser. The best reported

Epe=Epe  1% [35], when the magnetic fields are meticulously
adjusted. The Epe =Epe of our NO data was found to be  5%, giving the basic resolution formagnetic bottle resolution is

the magnetic bottle spectrometer.
The resolution of the magnetic bottle is best at low photoelectron energies (below 3 eV),

40

Figure 2.11: Photoelectron spectrum of NO gas taken with the 9th harmonic of a long pulse,
narrowband Nd:YAG laser, Eh =10.496 eV. Here the inherent resolution of the magnetic bottle
spectrometer is seen in the peak widths. The vibrational progression of the NO+ ground state
gives rise to the three peaks separated by 0.28 eV.

41where the resolution is limited by the bandwidth of the laser. At intermediate photoelectronenergies, the resolution is limited by the magnetic bottle ( E=E= 5%). At very high pho-toelectron energies, the data collection process determines the limit of resolution, since thetime-of-flight signal is recorded in 5 ns bins. To achieve the best resolution for a particular
photoelectron energy range, the flight tube itself (a 6 ” diameter tube,  1.2 m long) is electrically isolated from the rest of the interaction chamber and can be held at a voltage whichis adjustable from 0-40 V. In this way, the flight tube voltage can be adjusted to discriminate
against low energy electrons and bring the desired part of the spectrum into the region of best
resolution.
After photoelectrons are collected by the MCP detector, signal pulses are sent througha 100x preamplifier before being read by a multi channel scalar (MCS). The MCS is triggeredby a photodiode signal originating from the 800 nm laser beam before it enters the pulsed valve
chamber. The signal pulses are then collected in 5 ns bins after the arrival of the trigger pulse.
Typical photoelectron spectra record 250,000 total electron counts in 30,000 laser pulses (1 datacollection pass per laser pulse), with peak heights ranging from 500-10,000 counts. With a laser
repetition rate of 1 kHz, a 30,000 pass scan takes about 30 seconds. For pump-probe spectra,
where transient signals are much smaller, 100,000 pass scans are typically used.

2.4.3.2

Energy Calibration

For proper energy scaling of the raw time-of-flight data, the magnetic bottle spectrometermust be calibrated using known photon energies and samples with well known binding energies.
To accomplish this, the harmonics from the Ti:Sapphire laser are used to produce photoionization spectra. When light from the zeroth order diffraction of the grating, the specular reflection,is incident upon a sample of helium gas, the photoelectron spectrum in Fig. 2.12 is obtained.
The first harmonic to ionize He is the 17th (26.35 eV), and each higher harmonic ionizes He as
well, giving a harmonic spectrum. Up to the 37th harmonic the spectrum is clearly resolved.
By compiling the He data for the various harmonics, a calibration of the magnetic bottle

42

Figure 2.12: Photoelectron spectrum due to all harmonics simultaneously incident on a sample
of He gas. The first harmonic energetic enough to ionize He is the 17th (Eh =26.4 eV). Eachsubsequent harmonic is seen as another main ionization peak at increasingly higher energies.
Note the decrease in resolution for the higher electron kinetic energies.

43
spectrometer over the full kinetic energy range is made. A plot of the known photoelectronenergy, Epe= EhIp (where Epe is photoelectron energy, Eh is the photon energy, and Ip

is the ionization potential of the sample), vs. time-of-flight of the electrons, t, is expected tofollow the equation:

 2
1
d
Epe = me
2 t ;

(2.4)

where me is the mass of the electron, and d is the distance traveled by the electron. To fit theacquired data to a proper t 2 curve, both a time (t0 ) and energy offset (E0 )are introduced, andequation 7.1 becomes:


2
1
d
Epe = E0 + me
2 (t + t0) :(2.5)

A plot of the photoelectron energies (determined by the known energy of the harmonic minus theionization energy of Helium) vs. the measured time of flight is given in Fig. 2.13. By allowingd, t0 , and E0 from equation 7.2 to be variables, a nearly perfect fit to the data is obtained (shownas the dotted line in Fig. 2.13, giving values of dand E0= 1:38(0:04) m, t0 = 0:03(0:01)s,= 0:16(0:15) eV). The flight tube distance agrees well with the physical dimensionsof the system, and the t0 offset is due to the inherent delay between the arrival of the laser pulse
at the interaction region and the trigger signal derived from a photodiode. The energy offset isnearly zero within the uncertainty. However, with the creation of a large amount of ions so close
to metal surfaces (i.e., the nozzle, the permanent magnet housing, and the cone), it is possiblethat small contact potentials exist in the interaction region. The surfaces close to the interaction
region are therefore coated with a fine graphite layer to minimize charging effects.
Low energy (below 3 eV) photoelectron peaks are even more sensitive to this type ofcalibration, and a separate fit for low energy peaks was accomplished using the spectrum in
Fig. 2.11. Again, a fit to equation 7.2 using the known energy of the laser and binding energiesof the v=0, 1, and 2 levels of NO, along with the recorded time of flight positions of these peaks
was accomplished. Here, the flight tube distance remained fixed and only the two parameters,

t0 and E0 , were varied to obtain the dotted line curve in Fig. 2.14. The values of t0 and E0 for44

Figure 2.13: An energy calibration curve taken from the time of flight peak positions of Fig. 2.12
and the known photoelectron energies. The dotted line is a fit to the data from equation 7.1.

45

Figure 2.14: An energy calibration curve for very low photoelectron energy peaks (below 2 eV)
taken from the time of flight peak positions of Fig. 2.11 and the known photoelectron energies.
The dotted line is a fit to the data from equation 7.2.

460 01)s and 0.44(0.01), respectively. The value of t0

this data fit were found to be -0.12 ( :agrees quite well, while the E0 is slightly larger. Low photoelectron peaks are expected to be
more sensitive to small energy offsets and thus the fit to the NO data could give a somewhat
different value of E0 . In general, the first calibration scale is used when reporting photoelectron
spectra, unless very low energy photoelectron (or long time-of-flight) peaks exist.

2.5

An instrument for ultrafast photoelectron spectroscopy of solids: IBM T.J.
Watson Research Center
As a recipient of an Optical Science and Engineering Program (OSEP) fellowship at CU,

I had the opportunity to do an internship for 3 months with Dr. Richard Haight at the IBM
T.J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, NY. While there, I was able to work with avery similar harmonic generation source, but coupled to a low-pressure vacuum chamber built
for photoelectron spectroscopic studies of surfaces. An outline of the experimental apparatus isshown in Fig. 2.15, adapted from ref. [4]. Briefly, a commercial Ti:Sapphire laser system (Coherent) consists of a 532 nm Nd:YAG pump laser, a Ti:Sapphire oscillator, a pulse stretcher andregenerative amplifier (pumped by a 527 nm Nd:YLF laser), and a pulse compressor. My goal
for the internship was to first build a double pass amplifier similar to the one in the Spitfire (seeFig. 2.1) for the purpose of creating higher order harmonics for surface core-level photoelectron
spectroscopy and eventually time-resolved studies. The optimal double-pass amplifier configuration is shown in Fig. 2.15. The beam is taken out of the stretcher and focused into a 2nd
Ti:Sapphire crystal which is pumped by the 527 nm output of another Nd:YLF laser. The beamis refocused for a second pass through the Ti:Sapphire crystal, and the final output sent into thecompressor. Without the double pass amplifier, the final output of the laser system was 400
mW average power at a 500 Hz repetition rate with a pulse width of 75 fs. With the addition of
the double pass amplifier, the final output power is increased to 750 mW, or 1.5 mJ/pulse at 500
Hz.

% transmitted

The final output beam is split with a 90/10 beamsplitter (BS) and the 90

47

527 pump

527 pump
D

BS

Pulsedvalve

Regen/
Stretcher

Ti:Sapphireoscillator

Compressor

532 nm pump

BBO crystal
Delay line

Grazing incidence
toroidal grating
TOF
detector
UHV chamber

Multi-mode detector
Drift tube

Samplesurface

UHV chamber
Parabolic mirror
Harmonic light

Figure 2.15: A schematic of the instrumental apparatus used during my internship at IBM
T.J. Watson Research Center, adapted from ref. [4]. The doubly amplified Ti:Sapphire laser
is focused with a 40 cm lens into a pulsed jet of neon gas where high-order harmonics are
created. The harmonics are frequency separated with a grazing incidence toroidal grating andfocused onto the sample surface after passing through a small pinhole before the UHV chamber.
Photoelectrons created from the surface are directed into a TOF drift tube with a parabolic
mirror and detected with a multi-mode detector.

48
beam is focused into a commercial pulsed gas jet (with Ar or Ne) operating at 500 Hz. Before
the addition of the linear double-pass amplifier, only harmonics up to the 31st were available,
and with the new 1.5 mJ output, up to the 65th harmonic was observed in Ne. The generated
harmonics are frequency separated with a grazing-incidence toroidal grating, and focused onto asolid sample after passing through a 2 mm pinhole before the UHV chamber. The UHV chamberconsists of a sample manipulator, with the ability to change samples and deposit thin films invacuum, a voltage-biased parabolic mirror to direct and collimate the generated photoelectrons,a drift tube for energy separation of the electrons and a multi-mode detector. The sample wasbiased at -6 V to repel electrons towards the mirror, and the voltage on the parabolic mirror washeld at a positive voltage of 30 V to guide the ejected photoelectrons into the drift tube.
Three types of samples were used. First, a cleaved GaAs (111) surface was used to calibrate the harmonic energies by ejecting core electrons from surface Ga and As atoms. Second, a
Si sample was used as the substrate and Cr metal was deposited on this surface for measurementof the Cr core levels. Cr metal was heated in a crucible in vacuum and the amount of material deposited on the Si surface was measured using a quartz crystal microbalance. Lastly, I attempted
to deposit Cr(CO)6 , a gaseous compound, on a Si surface. The Si surface is cooled with liquid
N2 to cause the molecules to condense on the surface. Then, when the sample is brought toroom temperature, the Cr should remain on the surface and the CO molecules will evaporate
off. This last scheme for depositing Cr is much cleaner and better for use in photomask repair,as is discussed in chapter 1.

Chapter 3

Characterization of high-order harmonics and static photoelectron spectroscopy

3.1

Introduction
The ability to reproduce and understand known photoelectron spectra with the harmonics

is an essential step leading to their use for time-resolved spectroscopy. Energy bandwidths of theharmonics, issues of chirp, data collection efficiency and harmonic intensity are all parameters
determined by photoelectron spectroscopy and provide necessary knowledge for interpretationof time-resolved spectra. This instrument was designed not as a high-resolution photoelectron
spectrometer, nor to push the limits of high-harmonic generation, but instead to combine theultrafast nature and energy range of the harmonics with photoelectron spectroscopy of moderate
resolution to give a novel apparatus for the study of ultrafast chemical dynamics.

3.2

Harmonic generation
Before attempting pump-probe experiments, it is necessary to characterize the harmonic

generation source and the photoelectron spectrometer. Two harmonic spectra are shown in
Figure 3.1, the first with neon as the non-linear media and the second with argon. These spectra
were taken by irradiating the Pt electron multiplier with the harmonic beam while rotating
the toroidal grating (the concave grating remaining at 0th order) at a constant speed using a
stepper-motor device coupled to the rotation stage on which the grating is mounted. The angle

50of reflection of the grating is related to the photon energy by the well known grating equation:

Eh =

mhc
;
d(sini + sind)where m is the integer number describing the order of diffraction (in this case m
the groove spacing, and(3.1)= 1), d is

i and d are the incidence and diffraction angles, respectively (withrespect to the grating normal) [33]. In this way the rotation of the grating can be calibrated tothe specific harmonic energy. The harmonic spectrum generated in neon shows a sharp rise inintensity for the first few harmonics followed by a plateau over a large range of harmonics, andagain a sharp cutoff in the harmonic intensity around 100 eV. The harmonic intensities depend
on a number of factors, including the intensity of the laser focus, the pulse duration of thedriving laser, and the position of the focus in the gas jet. For both spectra in Fig. 3.1, the laser

1014 W/cm2 ) and the pulse duration (80 fs) are the same, and the focus

intensity at the focus (5 is slightly before the jet (2-3 mm). For the higher harmonics (41st and above), moving the
focus towards the center of the jet gives a slightly better harmonic signal. The harmonic plateau
and sharp cutoff in intensity in Fig. 3.1 are common features seen in harmonic generation anddiscussed in detail in the literature [37, 21, 38, 25]. The smaller peaks between the lower
harmonics in the neon spectrum are 2nd order diffraction of the higher harmonics from thegrating.
The relative intensities between the two spectra in Fig. 3.1 are derived from the electron
multiplier voltage, which was +2.7 kV for the argon spectrum and +3.3 kV for the neon spectrum. Taking the gain vs. voltage of the detector into account (i.e., the difference in gain with
voltage applied to the detector) , and assuming the cross-section for photoionization of the Pt
metal to be nearly constant over the range of harmonics, generating harmonics in argon yields
on average an order of magnitude greater photon flux than when using neon. From cross sections of Xe 5p photoelectron lines [36] the photon flux of the 17th harmonic (26.5 eV photon

106 photons/pulse. From known cross-sections of He satelliteenergy) is calculated to be 3

lines [39] (leaving the He+ in an excited state), the photon flux of the 61st harmonic (95 eV

51

Figure 3.1: A spectrum of the harmonics of 800 nm created in a gas jet of neon (top) and argon(bottom). Detection of the harmonics was accomplished by irradiating a piece of Pt metal withthe harmonic beam and detecting the ejected photoelectrons with an electron multiplier as thegrating was rotated at a steady rate. Small shoulders on the low order peaks in the top panel
are the 2nd order diffraction of the high harmonics reflected from the grating. Harmonics 13-65
are detected in neon, and 11-27 are detected in argon. Detector settings were 3.3 kV across theelectron multiplier for the neon spectrum and 2.7 kV for the argon spectrum.

52

105 photons/pulse. Therefore, argon is more efficient forphoton energy) is estimated to be 1

producing the lower harmonics, which are used for valence-level photoelectron spectroscopy,
and neon, while less efficient, yields higher harmonics with energies well suited to core-level
photoelectron spectroscopy.
Although this instrument was not built for the study of the inherent process of highharmonic generation, some initial diagnostic studies were done. In the early literature, themost prominent systematic experiments for harmonic generation sources are to measure theintensity of the generated light as a function of driving laser intensity and as a function of theposition of the laser focus in the gas jet [37, 40, 41, 42, 43]. With a series of neutral density
filters, the intensity of the driving laser beam was varied while monitoring the intensity of
the 9th harmonic with the Pt-electron multiplier, giving the plot in Fig. 3.2. The harmonic

1014 W/cm2, and a shallower positive

intensity seems to follow one positive slope from 5-7 

1014 W/cm2. Lisio, et al [40] report a similar effect which they attribute toslope from 7-10 

the the harmonics first being generated in a perturbative regime (dotted line in Fig. 3.2), until
saturation (or ionization) of the non-linear medium (argon) occurs due to the increasing laser
intensity, causing a different trend (dashed line). While the numerical value of the slope forthe two trends may not agree with ref. [40], experimental differences could account for these
discrepancies.
Using the output intensity of the 9th harmonic of 800 nm (read by the Pt-electron multiplier), the position of the laser focus was translated between 3 cm before the center of thejet to 2 cm after the gas jet, which is shown in Fig. 3.3. The structured nature of the signal
as a function of position in the gas jet is related to phase-matching of the generated harmonicwith respect to the driving laser pulse [44], or more specifically the coherence length (Lcoh )over which the harmonic light is generated. Salieres, et al [43] shows a strong dependence ofthe spatial characteristics of generated harmonics as a function of the position of the focus in
the gas jet. While we were not able to measure the spatial profile of the harmonics, a change inthe spatial profile of the harmonic light could account for changes in the harmonic intensity on

53

Figure 3.2: The intensity of the 9th harmonic generated in Ar as a function of the driving laser
intensity in W/cm2 . Two trends are observed, attributed to the increase of harmonic generation
in a perturbative regime (dotted line) and then change in slope due to the laser intensity causing
saturation (or ionization) of the non-linear medium at 7.1  14 W=cm2 (dashed line).

10

54

Figure 3.3: The intensity of the 9th harmonic generated in Ar as a function of the position of
the driving laser focus in the gas jet. ”Zero” on the x scale designates the center of the gas jet.
The lens used to focus the 9 mm diameter beam has a 40 cm focal length.

55
the detector.

3.3

Photoelectron Spectroscopy with soft x-ray harmonics
When both gratings are rotated to the 0th order, all the harmonics together are used

for photoionization of the sample. This is the case in Fig. 3.4(a), where all the harmonics(generated in Ne) are incident on a sample of He (the same as Fig 2.12, chapter 2). The firstharmonic to ionize the He 1s electron is the 17th (26.5 eV photon energy), and each successive
harmonic ionizes He as well. By rotating the grating away from the specular reflection, single
harmonics can be selected. Fig. 3.4(b) shows the photoelectron spectrum that results froma single harmonic incident on He, in this case the 61st. Not only do we observe the main
photoionization peak, but also the first and second satellite peaks. This illustrates the feasibility
for use of the high harmonics to observe photoelectron features with small cross sections (10 20-10 22 cm2 [39]). Since the binding energy and the cross sections of the He main and satellite
peaks are well known, we are able to calculate the photon flux present in a single harmonic(chapter 2).
Figure 3.5(a) illustrates the simple photoelectron spectrum of Xe gas taken with the11th harmonic of 800 nm (17 eV photon energy). The two peaks result from ionization of
the 5pj electrons, with a spin-orbit splitting between the final Xe+ j = 32 and 12 levels of 1.4
eV. Figure 3.5(b) is the photoelectron spectrum of Xe taken with the 47th harmonic (73 eV
photon energy), with a final Xe+ core 4dj level splitting (j= 52 ; 32 ) of 2 eV [45](shown on a log
scale). Once the incident photon energy is high enough to eject core electrons, a series of auger
electrons also appear, as well as the electrons ejected from the valence levels, which have very
high photoelectron energies. Taking the relative photoelectron energy scales in (a) and (b) of
Figure 3.5 into account, the core level peaks are broader than the valence level peaks, which is a
result of the energy bandwidth of the harmonic used to ionize Xe. The 11th and 47th harmonics
have energy bandwidths of 0.11 eV and 0.44 eV, respectively. The energy bandwidths of theharmonics are discussed in chapter 4.

56

Figure 3.4: (a) Photoelectron spectrum due to all harmonics simultaneously incident on a sample of He gas. The first harmonic energetic enough to ionize He is the 17th (Eh =26.4 eV). Eachsubsequent harmonic is seen as another main ionization peak at increasingly higher energies.
(b) A single harmonic (61st, Eh =95 eV), selected by the grazing incidence grating, incident ona sample of He gas. Not only is the main ionization peak seen, but also the 1st and 2nd satellite
peaks.

57

Figure 3.5: (a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Xe taken with the 11th harmonic(17.5 eV). (b) The photoelectron spectrum including 4d core levels of Xe taken with the 47th
harmonic (73 eV). Resolution of the system is best at low photoelectron energies.

58
Still using Xe as the target gas, Fig. 3.6 demonstrates the tunability of the harmonicsource. By tuning the fundamental 800 nm laser, we are able in effect to tune the harmonicenergy. Figure 3.6 shows two spectra of Xe with the 43rd harmonic, the bottom with the fundamental laser tuned to 800 nm, and the top with the laser tuned to 791 nm. The 43rd harmonicof 800 nm is slightly below the 4d ionization threshold of Xe, and only the valence level electrons are observed. Upon tuning to 791 nm, the 43rd harmonic is slightly more energetic, and a
Rydberg resonance leading up to the ionization threshold is reached. When the core electron is
excited to this high Rydberg state, a series of Auger electrons results (shown as the shaded areain Fig. 3.6) due to the electron hole left in the 4d core. This added versatility of the harmonicsource is important for time-resolved experiments as well, as cross-sections and accessibility ofelectronic states can be manipulated by adjusting the energy of the probe.
The valence and core level photoelectron spectra of Br2 are shown in Figure 7(a) and (b).
Three peaks are seen in Fig 7(a) when the 11th harmonic is incident on Br2 , corresponding to
final electronic states X(2g ), A(2u ) and B(2g ) of Br+2 [5, 46]. The X and A state are bothspin-orbit coupled, giving a doublet peak, although the A state splitting is small compared tothe energy bandwidth of the harmonic and appears as a broad peak. In the right hand panel,
the spin-orbit split 4dj levels of the final Br+
2 state are observed upon illumination by the 53rd
harmonic (82 eV) [2].
Similarly, the valence and core level photoelectron spectra of a more complex molecule,
Al2 Br6 , is shown in Fig. 3.8(a) and (b). Al2 Br6 is actually a dimer, made up of two AlBr3
monomers and linked by two bridging bromine atoms, leaving four terminal bromine atoms [47].
Surprisingly, previous photoelectron spectra from the literature are scarce for Al2 Br6 , and thevalence level spectrum obtained here differs somewhat from that reported in the literature. Reference [47] divides the spectrum of Al2 Br6 into four sections: band A, from 10.8-12.7 eV,resulting from ionization from non-bonding orbitals of the terminal Br atoms, band B, from
13-14 eV, resulting from ionization from Al3p-Br4p bonding orbitals, band C, from 14-15 eV,resulting from ionization from the bridging Br atom lone pair orbitals, and band D, from 16-

59

Figure 3.6: Photoelectron spectra in Xe with the 43rd harmonic, demonstrating the ability totune the harmonic to an atomic Rydberg resonance. The bottom spectrum is the 43rd harmonicof 800 nm, while the top spectrum is the 43rd harmonic of 791 nm. By tuning the fundamental
beam, the harmonic is tuned into a Rydberg level leading up to the 4d ionization threshold. The
hole left by the excited electron causes an onset of Auger electrons (shaded area).

60

Figure 3.7: (a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Br2 taken with the 17th harmonic(26 eV), showing the X, A and B final states of Br+
2 . (b) A section of the photoelectron spectrumof Br2 taken with the 49th harmonic (76.5 eV), showing the 3dj core levels of Br+2.

61

Figure 3.8: (a) The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Al2 Br6 taken with the 19th harmonic. (b) The core level photoelectron spectrum of Al2 Br6 with the 55th harmonic showing
the bromine core levels. Al core levels were not observed.

62
17 eV, resulting from ionization from the Al3s-Br4p orbitals. While each of these regions isobserved in our photoelectron spectrum, the intensity ratios between the peaks is considerably
different that in Ref. [47]. A HeI source was used in Ref. [47] to obtain the spectrum, which
produces radiation at 584 Å, or 21.2 eV, while the 17th harmonic has a photon energy of 26 eV.
While differences in ionization cross-sections could account for intensity variations between
the two spectra, it is not expected to have a dramatic effect. From a simplistic picture, the lowbinding energy band does indeed resemble that from Br2 , supporting the statement that they
originate from the terminal Br atoms. A more thorough theoretical treatment of this molecule
is needed for a conclusive interpretation of the spectrum.
Figure 3.8(b) shows the core level photoelectron spectrum of Al2 Br6 using the 55th harmonic. The observed bromine core levels are very similar to the Br+
2 core level spectrum in
Fig. 7(b). The low binding energy peak is nearly identical, while the high binding energy peak
appears broader by about 20% and slightly shifted ( 0.2 eV) to lower binding energy. Thisis consistent with the conclusions of Ref. [2], stating that lower electronegative substitutents(Al) produce a lower binding energy for the Br+ 3d core levels. Some broadening might also
be expected due to the presence of both terminal and bridging Br atoms. The feature at higher
binding energy (79.5 eV) could be evidence of the observation of Al 2d core levels, expected tobe 2 eV higher than the Br core levels, with a splitting of only 0.4 eV. The intensity ratio isalso roughly consistent with the ratio of Br atoms to Al atoms (3:1).
For reference, photoelectron spectra of other gas phase molecules taken with the harmonics are shown in Figs. 3.9, 3.10, and 3.11, which are spectra of I2 , CH2 I2 , and GeBr4 ,respectively. Descriptions and references (if available) are given in the figure captions.

3.4

Photoelectron spectroscopy of solid samples
As mentioned in chapter 2, I also had the opportunity to use harmonics from an 800

nm laser to obtain photoelectron spectra of solid samples. To calibrate the high-harmonics
generated, a cleaved GaAs (100) surface was used as the sample. The 3d core levels of Ga

63

Figure 3.9: The photoelectron spectrum of I2 taken with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. The I2
spectrum has a similar structure to Br2 , except that the spin orbit splittings in the ion are more
pronounced. The 2 g state at 9.3 and 10 eV binding energies, the 2 u state at 11 and 11.8 eV,+
and the 2 +g state at 13 eV of the I2 ion are observed [5]







64

Figure 3.10: The photoelectron spectrum of CH2 I2 with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm.

65

Figure 3.11: The photoelectron spectrum of GeBr4 with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm.

66
and As are 19 and 41 eV, respectively [48]. Spectra taken with various harmonics are shown infigure 3.12, where photon energies of 42 V, 63.5 eV, 79 eV and 98 eV correspond to harmonics
27, 41, 51 and 63 of 800 nm. As can be seen from the figure, the 27th harmonic does not havesufficient energy to ionize the 3d core levels of As, but only Ga. The 41st harmonic is justabove the 3d ionization threshold for As, so the collection effeciency is low for the low energy
photoelectrons. The spectrum with the 51st harmonic shows the strongest peaks for both Ga
and As. The photon flux of the 63rd harmonic is considerably lower than for the 51st, whencomparing the spectra, due to the 63rd harmonic being near the cutoff region for harmonic
generation.
The next step was to observe a photoelectron signature of chromium metal on a siliconsurface. Fig. 3.13 shows photoelectron spectra of a thin layer of Cr metal (70 Å) on a Si(100) surface. The Cr core level signature (3p, binding energy=41.2 eV [49]), while weaker
than the Ga and As 3d levels, can clearly be seen upon ionization with the 47th, 55th and 59th
harmonics. Though photoelectron spectra were attempted after depositing Cr on a Si surface
by introducing Cr(CO)6 to a liquid N2 cooled surface, the results were inconclusive and moreexperiments need to be done (i.e., time ran out!).

67

Ehn=42 eV

Photoelectron Counts

Ehn=63.5 eV

Ehn=79 eV

Ehn=98 eV

0

10

20

30

40

50

Binding Energy (eV)Figure 3.12: Photoelectron spectra of a GaAs (100) surface taken with harmonics 27, 41, 51
and 63 (top to bottom) of an 800 nm Ti:Sapphire laser. The 3d core levels of Ga and As areobserved at 19 and 41 eV binding energies, respectively.

68

Photoelectron Counts

Ehn=72.8 eV

Ehn=85.3 eV

Ehn=91.5 eV

0

20

40

60

80

100

Photoelectron Energy (eV)Figure 3.13: Photoelectron spectra of chromium metal on a Si(100) surface. The 3p core levelis observed at 41 eV binding energy for three different harmonics (47, 55 and 59 from top tobottom).

Chapter 4

Energy bandwidths of the harmonics

The energy bandwidths of the generated harmonic light will ultimately determine theresolution of the photoelectron spectra obtained, as discussed in chapter 2. High resolution
cannot be expected with an ultrafast source, due to the short pulse length and consequent large
frequency bandwidth of the laser. However, moderate resolution is needed to observe not only
energy splittings in static photoelectron spectra of atoms and molecules, but also to resolve
chemical shifts when using the harmonics for pump probe spectroscopy. Therefore, a systematic
study of the bandwidths of the harmonics generated in neon was accomplished, as is describedhere.
The energy widths of low energy photoelectron peaks (below 3 eV) result from the energy width of the harmonic used to ionize the sample. This is demonstrated in Fig. 4.1, where
the same spectrum of NO gas taken with a narrowband Nd:YAG laser (10.5 eV) and with the
7th harmonic of the Ti:Saphhire laser (10.85 eV) are overlaid. The dotted line in this figureis the same as in Fig. 2.11, showing the inherent resolution of the magnetic bottle spectrometer. The solid line, resulting from ionization with the 7th harmonic of the Ti:Sapphire laser,
demonstrates the broadening of the photoelectron peaks due to the energy bandwidth of the 7th
harmonic.
TheEpe=Epe for any magnetic bottle system is approximately a constant number with

Epe [35], therefore limiting the useful energy range over which bandwidth information of thelight source can be obtained. For example, for aEpe=Epe of 5% there is already a spec-

70

Figure 4.1: Photoelectron spectrum of NO gas taken with the 9th harmonic of a long pulse,
narrowband Nd:YAG laser, Eh =10.496 eV (dashed line). Here the inherent resolution of themagnetic bottle spectrometer is seen in the peak widths. The vibrational progression of theNO+ ground state gives rise to the three peaks separated by 0.28 eV. The solid line shows thesame vibrational progression, but acquired with the 7th harmonic (centered at Eh =10.91 eV)of the fs Ti:Sapphire laser. The broadening of the peaks is due to the energy bandwidth of the
7th harmonic. The height discrepancy in the highest binding energy peak between the Nd:YAG
laser and the 7th harmonic of the Ti:Sapphire laser is due to the efficiency of the photoelectron
spectrometer at different photoelectron energies. Though these peaks have the same binding
energy, the dashed line peak at 9.8 eV corresponds to very low photoelectron energy, where thecollection efficiency is quite low.

71
trometer broadening of 0.25 eV at a photoelectron energy of 5 eV. Therefore, for photoelectron
peaks at energies beyond 5 eV, a broadening due to the energy bandwidth of the photon sourcethat is less than 0.25 eV is masked by the spectrometer resolution. This means that unambiguous bandwidth information can only be extracted from low kinetic-energy photoelectron
peaks. In this work two methods are therefore utilized. Specific atomic or molecular transitions
that fortuitously yield low energy electrons for certain harmonics are studied in one series ofmeasurements and the retarding grids are used to lower the electron energies in the other.
To obtain bandwidth measurements of the harmonics, photoelectron spectra of several
atomic and molecular gases were taken, using either the specular reflection of the gratings orindividual harmonics. From these photoelectron spectra, we measured photoelectron peaks
resulting from ionization of a number of different harmonics. First, by using several different
target gases, it is possible to obtain low energy photoelectron peaks directly resulting fromionization with a range of harmonics. Each atom or molecule has a characteristic ionization
potential and precise core-level binding energies.
In addition to Xe (see Fig. 3.5, chapter 3), photoelectron spectra of Ne, Ar, and Kr werealso taken. Similar to Xe, the main ionization peaks of these other rare gases exhibit a doublet
structure due to the spin-orbit splitting of the ionic ground state. This splitting is too small
in the cases of Ne and Ar to be fully resolved and the corresponding peaks were not used forbandwidth measurements. Ionization of rare gases from ns levels, on the other hand, does
not suffer from spin orbit splitting, but the cross sections are generally small. This ionization
process was only observed in the case of Ne.
Photoelectron spectroscopy of molecular gases with the harmonics is also possible, andseveral peaks from N2 and NO were measured. The peaks from NO, shown as the solid line in
Fig. 4.1, are especially important, since they represent the same vibrational progression that was
obtained with the narrow band Nd:YAG laser, except using the 7th harmonic of the Ti:Sapphirelaser. Comparison of the two spectra in Fig. 4.1 clearly shows the broadening of the photoelectron peaks due to the bandwidth of the 7th harmonic.

72
Using all the data discussed above from He, Kr, Xe, N2 , and NO, we measured the fullwidth at half maximum of several photoelectron peaks with energies ranging from 1-20 eV. In
Fig. 4.2, a plot of

Epe=Epe vs. photoelectron energy, Epe, is shown. From this figure twodifferent trends in measured bandwidth can be seen. The high kinetic energy photoelectron% which is due to the spectrometer resolution, and the peaks

peaks converge to a value around 5

below  4 eV photoelectron kinetic energy show a steep rise, where the bandwidth is primarily
due to the energy width of the harmonic light used to eject that electron. We then take the points
below 4 eV in Fig. 4.2 and, after deconvolution with the spectrometer width, plot
equal toEpe (nowEh ) as a function of photon energy, Eh , in Fig. 4.3(a). All the points in Fig. 4.3(a)were taken without the use of the retarding grids.
A more complete study was done, however, by utilizing the retarding grids in the magnetic bottle system. In this way, a particular transition (for example, the main ionization peakof He) can be selected, and the electron kinetic energy is shifted into the region where thebandwidth of the laser dominates the spectrometer width for each harmonic (under 3 eV photoelectron kinetic energy after deceleration) . Fig. 4.3b showsEh vs. Eh for the measured

bandwidths of all harmonics from the 9th to the 55th using the main ionization line in He and

(5

)

(4

)

the Xe ! Xe+ p3=2 and Xe ! Xe+ d5=2 transitions. It can be seen from comparison of
the two plots in Fig. 4.3 that the general trend is very similar, which gives confirmation that any
broadening effect of the retarding grids can be ruled out. A list of the averageEh values forharmonics 9-55 is given in Table 4.
In Fig. 4.2, the natural widths of the Xe 4d core level peaks are taken into account. Corelevel ionization results in an ionic core hole state that decays very rapidly via Auger processes.
Hence, core level photoelectron peaks may exhibit a significant natural linewidth. The widthof the Xe 4d levels has been the subject of several previous investigations, which report widths
between 0.10 and 0.12 eV [50, 51]. The measured widths of the Xe 4d peaks in Fig. 4.3 andTable 4 are corrected for both the spectrometer broadening and the natural linewidth.
Another source of chirp and thus temporal broadening of the high harmonics stems from

73

Figure 4.2: The relative energy width of photoelectron peaks from several different gases vs.
their respective photoelectron energies. The higher energy photoelectron peaks converge to a
relative width of 4-5%. For photoelectron peaks below 4 eV a new trend can be seen, where
the E of the peaks is due to the energy bandwidth of the harmonics. Target gas is He (}), Ne(), Xe (2), N2 (4), and NO ( ).

74

Figure 4.3: (a) The absolute energy width of the harmonics derived from low energy photoelectron peaks (below 3 eV) are plotted as a function of the photon energy, or the harmonicused to ionize the electron from which the peak arises. The retarding grids in the electron flighttube were not used for this data set. (b) A more complete data set using the retarding grids tomeasure the bandwidths of all the harmonics from the 9th to the 55th. Comparison of (a) and(b) shows that no artificial broadening exists when utilizing the retarding grids. Target gases
are He (}), Ne (), Xe (2), N2 (4), and NO ( ), and the solid line is the average for eachharmonic.

Harmonic
7
9
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31

E (eV) Harmonic E (eV)
0.11
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.11
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.16
0.14
0.17
0.19
0.20

33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
53
55

75

0.21
0.23
0.22
0.28
0.29
0.38
0.37
0.44
0.45
0.43
0.40
0.42

Table 4.1: Energy bandwidths for harmonics 7-55 generated in neon

the harmonic generation process itself. It has been reported that an unchirped driving pulse produces negatively chirped harmonics and that the best high harmonic generation is achieved if
the driving pulse is slightly positively chirped [52]. We have investigated the effect of a chirped
fundamental pulse on the high harmonic photoelectron spectra for both positive and negative
chirps of up to 0.3 nm/fs. While for small positive chirps of 0.1 nm/fs the harmonic generation efficiency is slightly improved compared to an unchirped driving pulse, the efficiency drops
off strongly for more positively and for negatively chirped pulses. The measured bandwidths,
however, remain constant except for large negative chirps where a broadening of about a factorof 1.5 was observed. A demonstration of this is seen in Fig. 4.4, where photoelectron spectraof NO with both the 7th and the 9th harmonic are shown. Very little broadening in the photoelectron spectra can be seen between spectra with an unchirped, negatively chirped or positively
chirped pulse, in contrast to the results from ref. [52] where chirping the 10 fs driving pulse gaveeither discreet harmonics (negative chirp) or a continuum (positive chirp). Though no broadening effects are observed, small energy shifts in the spectrum indicate the center wavelength of
the harmonic is effected as the fundamental laser chirp is varied. This could be due to a change

76
in the wavelength of the fundamental laser.
In one experiment with similar conditions to the system here, a narrow slit monochromator is used to scan through the 27th harmonic of a 140 fs Cr:LiSAF laser. The energy bandwidth of the 27th harmonic is found to be 0.12 eV [53]. This agrees well with the result
from this work (0.17 eV for the 27th harmonic), because a slightly larger energy bandwidth isexpected here corresponding to our shorter pulse length. In another experiment, the 7th and9th harmonics of a 100 fs Ti:Sapphire laser are measured to have a FWHM of 0.1 eV [40],also consistent with the measurements here. Measured bandwidths of harmonics generated
by picosecond lasers, such as in Ref. [54], are quite narrow and cannot be compared directly
to the results found here. Though other harmonic spectra are reported throughout the literature [20, 21, 41, 55], bandwidth measurements are not discussed and are not easily derived
from the figures.
The general trend seen in Fig. 4.3 is a gradually increasing bandwidth from the 7th harmonic to the 45th harmonic, from 0.11(0.03) eV to 0.37(0.03) eV. The higher harmonics,
from the 47th-55th, seem to reach a plateau centered around 0.43 eV. Theoretical treatments ofspectral width vs. harmonic number do exist for driving laser pulses 30 fs [25, 26]. Comparison of the results reported here and these theoretical predictions is difficult for several reasons.
First, for longer driving laser pulses, theory becomes increasingly difficult as more optical cycles must be treated numerically. Second, for very short pulses, saturation due to ionization of
the non-linear gas medium is not reached, since the response time of the atoms is slow compared to the temporal envelope of the pulse. In the case of longer pulses, however, saturation isreached somewhere after the peak of the pulse on the falling edge. Nevertheless, we believe it
is beneficial to mention the results of theoretical calculations and draw comparisons where it isappropriate.
According to calculations in the single atom picture of harmonic generation from shortpulses, the phase structure of the generated harmonics plays a significant role [25]. A simple
quadratic phase structure gives rise to linear chirp in the pulse, and no broadening of the spec-

77

Figure 4.4: The photoelectron spectrum of NO gas with the 7th harmonic (left) and 9th harmonic (right), showing the vibrational progression of the NO+ ground state. The black spectrum
represents the 70 fs unchirped pulse, while the light gray spectrum is taken with a positively
chirped driving pulse and the dark gray spectrum is taken with a negatively chirped pulse.

78
trum within the pulse occurs. On the other hand, a complex phase structure with higher orderterms leads to non-linear chirp and thus broadening of the spectrum through the introductionof new spectral components. The phase of the generated harmonics is said to be dependent on
the intensity variation of the driving pulse, which changes dramatically during harmonic generation for a very short pulse. In this single atom picture, the lower and mid range harmonics
have a complex phase structure, due to the fact that these harmonics are created over a larger
number of optical cycles, with contributions from the rising edge, the peak, and the falling edgeof the pulse. The higher harmonics near the cutoff, however, are created over the few optical
cycles near the peak of the pulse, giving rise to a simple quadratic phase structure. This leads
to a calculated harmonic spectrum with broad, unresolved lower harmonics and well resolved
harmonics near the cutoff.
However, when the macroscopic conditions of harmonic generation are considered in addition to the single atom response, the results can be much different. In ref. [26], several aspectsof the bulk medium are considered, such as phase matching and the focus position of the laser
with respect to the gas jet. They give a two trajectory picture of harmonic generation, where
the ionized electron can return to the ion on a short or long trajectory. These two trajectories
can interfere with each other, or one can dominate depending on the conditions of harmonic
generation. If the jet is located after the focus, the short return time is dominant, which results
in a weak intensity dependence of the phase. This gives rise to a well-resolved spectrum withdecreasing widths for decreasing harmonics orders. If the jet is at the focus, the calculated
spectrum shows the opposite trend.
The argument that the high harmonics near the cutoff are created only near the peak ofthe driving pulse is expected to remain true for 70 fs pulses. Therefore, it could be argued thatthe plateau seen in Fig. 4.3(b) is due to this effect, namely that the harmonics in the cutoff region
exhibit only a constant linear chirp and no further broadening is seen. It may seem that the two
trajectory picture could account for the fact that we see a decreasing bandwidth with decreasing
harmonic number but we do not observe any difference in the bandwidths of the high harmonics

79
when the position of the jet with respect to the focus is changed. We therefore conclude that atheoretical study based on the particular parameters of this experiment is needed to fully explain
the observed bandwidth trends.

Chapter 5
Photoelectron spectroscopy of the excited 3 0+ u B state of Br2

5.1

Introduction
Photoelectron spectroscopy of molecular excited states has been a topic of interest in

many research groups, largely since the introduction of pulsed lasers [56]. The pulsed laser
allows for a technique termed Resonance Enhanced Multi-Photon Ionization, or REMPI. In
REMPI, one or more photons are used to excite a molecule to an intermediate state, and several
additional photons (either of the same wavelength or a new wavelength) are used to ionize themolecule, as is demonstrated in Fig. 5.1. In this example, the photoelectron spectrum observed
is due to the Franck-Condon overlap (overlap of the vibrational wavefunctions) between the excited neutral state and the ground ionic state. Specifically, the REMPI technique has been used
to study processes such as one-photon forbidden transitions (O2 ), super-excited states (NO),small van der Waals complexes (NO-Ar), and structural isomers and IVR (internal vibrational
relaxation) of several organic molecules [57].
While REMPI has been largely successful, some difficulty exists using a multi-photon
ionization step, similar to the discussion in chapter 1. First of all, it is possible to inadvertently
overlap a second resonance during the ionization step (such as a Rydberg state), in which casethe photoelectron spectrum observed is due to the overlap of this second resonantly excitedstate and the ion state [58]. Secondly, the total energy of the probe is still limited by the number
photons available, where the probability of adding an additional photon decreases as n , where is the density of photons and n is the number of photons.

81

Ion excitedstate

Binding Energy

Ion groundstate

Neutral excitedstates

(1)

(2)

(3)

Neutral groundstate

Figure 5.1: A schematic of resonantly-enhanced excited state photoelectron spectroscopy of ageneric molecule. Process (1): A single frequency photon used to resonantly excite an intermediate state and ionize it with a multi-photon probe. Process (2): A two-color REMPI process
where one photon resonantly excites the molecule and a photon of a different wavelength is used
to multi-photon ionize the molecule. Process (3): A two-color excitation-ionization scheme
where one visible photon is used to resonantly excite an intermediate state and a VUV photon isused for single photon ionization. The dotted arrows represent the photoelectrons ejected fromthe three different processes.

82
A two-color, two-photon excitation-ionization scheme has also been demonstrated in theliterature as a supplement to the information already available using the REMPI technique [59](also shown in Fig. 5.1). Here, a single photon ionization step eliminates unwanted resonances and simplifies the photoelectron spectrum. Four-wave mixing is used to create VUVlight (around 8 eV photon energy) to extend the range of molecules studied. Using a tunable
laser source for the excitation step also increases the amount of information available, as different vibrational states can be selected in the intermediate excited state. In particular, the excitedstate photoelectron spectra of NO and pyrazine are discussed in ref. [59].
The introduction of an XUV photon source to the field of excited state photoelectron
spectroscopy has still further reaching applications. Again, multiple ion states are accessible
with an XUV source, unlike multi-photon and VUV ionization steps, and both electronic andvibrational transitions can be probed between excited neutral states and ion states. Excited state
photoelectron spectroscopy, specifically with an XUV light source, provides a link between
the molecular orbital picture of a simple molecule and the electronic transitions observed in anexperiment. The most important implication lies in the possibility of core-level photoelectron
spectroscopy of molecules. While vibrational overlap and forbidden electronic transitions havebeen studied for some molecular systems, how a core-level electron distribution changes in an
excited molecule is not well understood. Here we show the first attempts at experiments aiming
to understand the valence level photoelectron spectrum of an excited bound state of Br2 , withthe hope that this excitation-ionization scheme can be extended to core level spectroscopy in
the near future.

5.2

Excitation scheme
The two-photon scheme used to excite and probe the B state of Br2 is shown along withthe potential energy curves of Br2 /Br+
2 in Fig. 5.2. A pulsed green laser (doubled Nd:YLF @527 nm,  100 ns, 600 mW) is used to promote a population of Br2 molecules into the B excited state. Approximately 50 ns later, the high-harmonic beam (17th) is then used to ionize the

83

130
Photoelectrons A
120
X

V(R) x 103 cm-1

110

Br2+

100
90

~

~ 17th harmonic

30

An’’= 29B

20

X
527 nm10

0.2

R (nm)

Br2
0.4

Figure 5.2: Potential energy curves for Br2 and Br+
2 . Only the X and B states of the neutral
and the X and A states of the ion are shown for simplicity. The 527 nm excitation laser pumps
the netural into the 3 0+ u excited B state, and the 17th harmonic photoionizes the excitedmolecules. The v” = 26 vibrational level reached by the 527 nm photon is shown, creating alarge region of Franck-Condon overlap in the Br+
2 ion electronic states. The shading represents
the accessible region of the X+ and A+ ion states with the probe photon. The intensities andenergies of the photoelectrons will then be determined by the Frank-Condon overlap.

84
sample, creating photoelectrons from both the excited Br2 molecules and the molecules left in
the X ground state. The lifetime of the Br2 B state at 527 nm is  1 s [60], therefore probing
at a 50 ns delay with a 100 ns pulse should sample the excited state before complete predissociation. In this experiment, the intensities (and energies) of the photoelectrons generated fromionizing the excited state are determined by the maximum wavefunction overlap between the
excited state and final ion state vibrational levels.
A calculation of the vibrational energy levels in the B state reveals that the narrowband
Nd:YAG laser excites primarily the v’ = 26 vibrational level of the B state (including the zero
point energy of the ground X state). This calculation is given in equation 5.1.

Ev"=0 + Eh = Te (X ) B )!e(v0 + 1=2) + !e xe (v0 + 1=2)2



(5.1)

In this equation, Ev"=0 denotes the energy of the zero vibrational level of the ground X state,Eh is the photon energy of 527 nm, Te (X ) B ) is the transition energy from v”=0 of the X
state to v’=0 of the B state, and !e and !e xe are the vibrational constants of the B state given
in ref. [61]. Thus far we have ignored the Boltzmann distribution [1] of the ground X state of
Br2 at room temperature. The weights of the v” states in the X state of Br2 calculated by the
Boltzmann distribution (ni /N, where ni is the population of the ith energy level and N is thetotal population) are: v” = 0, weight = 0.54
 v” = 1, weight = 0.24
 v” = 2, weight = 0.11
 v” = 3, weight = 0.05
 v” = 4, weight = 0.02
 v” = 5, weight = 0.01.

85
Therefore, while the majority of the signal originates from v” = 0, v” = 1 and 2 cannot be
discounted. The vibrational levels obtained in the B state originating from v” = 1 and 2 would
then be v’ = 33 and 39, respectively. Determining the vibrational level reached in the excited
B state is important, since this will ultimately determine the extent of Franck-Condon overlap
with the Br+
2 ion states, and the energies of the ejected photoelectrons.
In a simple molecular orbital picture, the electron configurations (estimated) for the neutral and excited states of Br2 and Br+
2 are given in Fig. 5.3. From the ground neutral state, itis easy to reach the electron configuration of the ground and first two excited states of the ion,
simply by removing an electron from the appropriate orbital. However, when starting from theelectron configuration of the excited B state of the neutral, transitions into the ion configurations must involve the movement of 2 electrons, with the exception of the B)X+ transition.
This is the goal of excited state photoelectron spectroscopy, to link the understanding of a simple molecular orbital picture to the experimental observations of electronic transitions beyond
ground state ionization spectroscopy.

5.3

Photoelectron spectra
The valence level photoelectron spectrum of Br2 taken with the 17th harmonic of 800 nm

is shown again in Figure 5.4. The three final electronic states of the molecular ion accessible
with this photon energy are observed (labeled X, A and B). The solid lines in Fig. 5.4 indicate theknown binding energies of the Br+ atomic states [46]. In Fig. 5.5, the photoelectron spectrumof Br2 with the introduction of the 527 nm excitation laser along with the 17th harmonic is
expanded from the dotted box in Fig. 5.4 . The expansion of the photoelectron spectra is due
to a flight tube retarding voltage ( - 14 V) used to clearly observe small signals and obtainbetter energy resolution. The larger peaks labeled X)X+ and X)A+ are due to the groundstate absorption of the 17th harmonic leaving the ion in the X and A states (10.5 and 13 eV
binding energy, respectively). The new signal in the 527 nm + 17th harmonic spectrum at 8.5
eV results from the ionization of the Br2 neutral in the excited B state, leaving the ion in the X

86

4su*
4pg*
4pu
4sg
2

2

X Pg

A Pu

2

B Sg

ION

NEUTRAL

4su*
4pg*
4pu
4sg
1

+

X Sg

3

3

A P1u, B P0u+

1

C Pu

Figure 5.3: A molecular orbital diagram of the ground and excited states of Br2 and Br+
2 . Thefour molecular orbital levels shown result from combinations of Br atomic p orbitals (outervalence shell). The B and A states of the neutral have a similar configuration but differ inorbital angular momentum.

87

10

5 Torr taken with the 17th
Figure 5.4: The photoelectron spectrum of gaseous Br2 at 5 
harmonic of 800 nm showing the final X, A and B states of the Br2+ ion. Solid black lines
denoted 3 P2;1;0 are the known binding energies of the bare Br atom.

88

Figure 5.5: The photoelectron spectrum with the 17th harmonic only is shown in gray, while
the photoelectron spectrum with the 527 nm + 17th harmonic is shown in black. Regions ofsmall two-photon and atom signals are expanded for clarity.

89
ground state. The peaks at 11.8 and 12.2 eV are photoelectron signatures of the Br atoms. The
B state of Br2 is known to be predissociative [62], especially when excited to a high vibrational
state, so the observation of Br atoms is not surprising. If the B)A+ transition existed, thephotoelectron peak would be expected to appear at 10.6 eV, and would be buried under thephotoelectron peak from the X)X+ transition. Similarly, the B)B+ transition is expected toappear as a photoelectron peak at 12.3 eV, very close to the smaller Br atomic peak, but should
be observable.
Figures 5.6 and 5.7 show the photoelectron spectrum of the B)X+ transition expanded
further by incrementally increasing the flight tube voltage. In both spectra, there are several
interesting features. First, Fig. 5.6 demonstrates that the signal from the X)X+ transition decreases as the B)X+ signal increases. This is due to the depletion of ground state molecules
as a population of the sample is pumped into the excited state. According to the absorption
spectrum in appendix A, the cross section for absorption at 527 nm is 1.510 19 cm2 . Using
the photon flux of the 527 nm (1.61015 photons/pulse, or 0.6 mJ/pulse), the percentage of

0 02%. A second point is that there is no visible pho-molecules excited to the B state is  :toelectron peak corresponding to the B)B+ transition. If it were of similar magnitude to theX)X+ photoelectron signal, it should be visible above the background. However, according
to molecular orbital diagrams, it would require a 2 electron transition to go from the B neutral
state to the B ionic state. One expects such transitions to be very weak.
Lastly, Fig. 5.7 demonstrates that ionization from the B (v’= 26) in the neutral leaves
the ion in excited vibrational states of the ground electronic state. If the ground X state of Br+2
was left in the v” = 0 vibrational level after a two-photon resonant ionization, the photoelectron
peak would be expected to appear at 8.15 eV binding energy (the energy of a 527 nm photonis 2.36 eV, and the 17th harmonic is 26.35 eV). However, in the experiment, the maximumof the B)X+ photoelectron peak appears at 8.5 eV (corresponding to v=8). This indicatesthat the Br+
2 (X) state is vibrationally excited, most likely due to the Franck-Condon overlap
resulting from the change in geometry from the excited Br2 to the Br+
2 . Instead of a symmetric

90

Figure 5.6: An expanded photoelectron spectrum of Br2 with (black) and without (gray) the
527 nm excitation laser.

91

Figure 5.7: A further expanded photoelectron spectrum of the B)X+ transition in Br2 (grayline=17th harmonic only). The dotted gray lines mark the photoelectron energies of the peakheights.

92
peak, we also observe a long tail to higher binding energies, indicating even higher vibrational
levels are excited (the multiple peak pattern is repeatable). The intensities of the vibrational
peaks in Fig. 5.7 are likely due to Franck-Condon overlap between the neutral B state and theionic X state vibrational levels. There is also the additional spin-orbit splitting of the Br+
2 (X)state, which is 0.4 eV. This energy splitting does not agree with the adjacent peak splittings
in Fig. 5.7, but it is the difference between the peaks at 8.5 and 8.9 eV, for instance. Thereis probably some combination of spin-orbit splitting and vibrational Franck-Condon overlap
responsible for the pattern of peaks observed.
These are the most recent results presented in this thesis, and the interpretations are still
preliminary. A more comprehensive evaluation of the results, including a theoretical FranckCondon overlap simulation, will be required to fully understand the data. However, this proves
to be a successful extension of the well documented REMPI technique, and will allow for the
study of gas phase molecules not accessible with lower energy probe lasers. Experiments in thenear future will likely include core-level photoelectron spectroscopy of the B state of Br2 , aswell as low lying excited states of other simple molecules, such as IBr or I2 .

Chapter 6

Pulse durations of pump and probe beams: Cross-correlation measurements

6.1

Introduction
The alignment of the pump and probe beams, both spatially and temporally, is one of

the most important factors for success in the time-resolved experiments. This task becomes
especially difficult when the probe beam is in the soft x-ray region of the spectrum. Here I
describe the method by which we successfully overlapped and obtained time-resolved photoelectron signals between the UV pump and soft x-ray beams when using the dual grating set-up
for separation of the harmonics. Temporal pulse widths for the 400 and 266 nm pump beams aswell as a number of harmonics are extracted from the cross-correlation measurements.

6.2

800 nm + 400 nm
The first step involves rotating both gratings to 0th order reflection of 800 nm and over-lapping the 400 nm pump beam with the 800 nm beam in the interaction region. When the 400
nm pump beam is incident on a sample of Xe gas (I.P.=12.1 eV [45]), it takes a 4 photon process
to ionize the 5p 5 electron. When the 800 nm beam is introduced, provided the beams are over2
lapped spatially and temporally, a photoelectron peak at higher energy from a 4 + 1’ ionization
process is observed (4 photons 400 nm + 1 photon 800 nm). By maximizing the photoelectron
counts in this peak, the overlap is optimized. This is also useful as an in-situ measurement of
the cross-correlation between the 800 and 400 nm pulses. By moving the delay stage in 10

m steps around the peak of the overlap, a series of points are obtained by calculating the area

94
under the time-correlated photoelectron peak and plotting it as a function of pump-probe delay.
Figure 6.1 is an example of a typical cross-correlation signal between the 400 nm and 800 nm
pulses. The Gaussian fit to the data has a FWHM of 1163 fs. Given the temporal width of
the 800 nm pulse of 805 fs with the autocorrelator, the temporal width of the 400 nm pulse iscalculated to be 84 6 fs, assuming Gaussian pulse profiles.

6.3

800 nm + 266 nm
The specularly reflected 800 nm beam can also be overlapped with the 266 nm pumpbeam with Kr as a target gas. In this case, it takes four photons of 266 nm to ionize krypton(I.P=14.1 eV [45]). The three photon process, however, is very close to the ionization threshold,and when the 800 nm and 266 nm beams overlap spatially and temporally, photoelectron signals
with electron kinetic energies corresponding to (3 + 1’) (3 photons 266 + 1 photon 800 nm), (3+ 2’) and (3 + 3’) multiphoton processes are observed. Signals from the (3 + 2’) and (3 + 3’)
multiphoton processes only are used to make the cross-correlation trace given in Fig. 6.2. The(3 + 1’) multiphoton signal continues out to long times (pump-probe delays from 200 fs to 10
ps have been measured). This results from a Rydberg wavepacket excitation in Kr, where thethree photon process (266 nm) excites a population into the high-lying Rydberg states leading
up to the 5p ionization threshold. The 800 nm pulse then comes in at a later time and ionizes theevolving wavepacket, creating a long-lived signal. Some experiments were done to probe thiswavepacket signal, which are outlined in Appendix 1. The cross-correlation signal between the
800 nm and 266 nm pulses has a FWHM of 1574 fs, giving a 266 nm pulse width of 1356
fs. Some broadening of the pulse is expected in the third harmonic generation, simply due tothe group velocity spread of the wavelengths in the pulse as it passes through several lenses andharmonic generation crystals.

95

Figure 6.1: A cross-correlation trace of the 800 nm fundamental pulse with the 400 nm pumppulse obtained by a 4 (400 nm photon) + 1’ (800 nm photon) multiphoton ionization in Xe.

96

Figure 6.2: A cross-correlation trace of the 800 nm fundamental pulse with the 266 nm pumppulse obtained by a 3 (266 nm photon) + 2’ or 3’ (800 nm photon) multiphoton ionization in Kr.

97

6.4

17th harmonic + 800 nm
Once the 800 nm beam is properly aligned, the toroidal grating is rotated to the 17th

harmonic, leaving the spherical grating at 0th order. An aperture which is on a translation
feedthrough can be moved into the interaction region to ensure that the harmonic beam passes
through the same point in space as the 800 nm beam. For the inital attempt at observing a% of the 800 nm beam that is split off at theharmonic-visible pump-probe signal, the full 20

beam splitter is used as the pump beam (420 mW average power). With Kr as the sample gas,
the 17th harmonic and the 800 nm beam are overlapped in the interaction region. When thepulses overlap at t=0, a time correlated signal is observed in the photoelectron spectrum. Thissignal is an above threshold ionization (ATI) process in which the 17th harmonic first ionizes
the Kr sample and the 800 nm pump beam (or dressing beam) adds to or subtracts from thephotoelectron energy to create sidebands in the photoelectron spectrum. This ATI process iswell documented in the literature [54, 63]. An example of this photoelectron spectrum is shownin Fig. 6.3. With a negative flight tube voltage of 10 V, the main ionization peaks at photoelectron energies of 2.75 and 3.51 eV are seen in both the photoelectron spectra with the 17th
harmonic only (solid line) and with the 17th harmonic + 800 nm dressing beam (dashed line).
When the dashed line spectrum is expanded, three ATI processes are observed; the addition of
one and two 800 nm photons and the subtraction of one 800 nm photon. These peaks increase
and decrease as the 17th harmonic pulse and the 800 nm pulse are delayed in time with respect
to each other and appear strongest at a delay time of t = 0, which is demonstrated in the next
section.

6.5

Harmonics + 400 nm
As with the 800 nm beam, cross-correlation signals using Xe as the target gas are ob-served using the 400 nm pump beam. An example of a photoelectron spectrum with the 17th
harmonic and the 400 nm beam overlapped in a sample of Xe is shown in Fig. 6.4(a), while

98

Figure 6.3: Solid line: photoelectron spectrum of Kr gas with the 17th harmonic, showing thespin-orbit split doublet of the Kr+ ion state. Dashed line: photoelectron spectrum of Kr gas
when the 17th harmonic and an 800 nm dressing beam are overlapped spatially and temporally.
The 800 nm dressing beam adds to or subracts from the 17th harmonic ionization in an above
threshold ionization process.

99
Fig. 6.4(b) demonstrates the time-correlation of the sideband peaks as the harmonic pulse isswept across the 400 nm pulse by moving the delay stage. Here we demonstrate that even witha relatively weak 400 nm beam (140 J per pulse), we are able to observe the ATI process.
In this way, a cross-correlation trace due to the overlap of the 17th harmonic and the 400 nm
pulses is obtained in a similar fashion as described above. The cross correlation signal with
one grating rotated and the iris before the toroidal grating fully open (8 mm) has a FWHM of888100 fs, as is shown in Fig. 6.5(a). When the iris before the toroidal grating is reduced
to 1 mm, the cross correlation trace in Fig. 6.5(b) is obtained, which has a FWHM of 44165
fs. This is an indication that the grating produces a temporal stretching of the harmonic pulse,which we will call pulse front or phase front tilt. The more lines on the grating that are illuminated, the greater the stretching effect on the pulse due to each line delaying the pulse front by
one wavelength [34].
There is another common stretching effect induced by using gratings with ultrafast pulses
called group velocity dispersion (GVD). This is simply the diffraction-angle spreading by thegrating of the range of wavelengths that make up the ultrafast pulse. It is not possible to compensate for both pulse front tilt and GVD stretching effects using two gratings, as the required
geometry is different. In a typical stretcher/compressor design in most amplified ultrafast lasers,
GVD is compensated by having two gratings effectively facing and parallel to each other so thatthe path-lengths of the different wavelengths will be equivalent. To compensate for pulse front
tilt, the gratings must be in the configuration shown in Fig. 2.6, in order that the part of thebeam that reflects from the far end of the first grating (with respect to the source) will be thefirst to hit the second grating, so that the paths of the different spatial sections of the beam will
be equivalent. In this case, since the gratings are used at severe grazing angles, pulse front tilt
is the dominant stretching effect.
In our case, the second grating is introduced to compensate for the pulse front tilt stretching effect. Although other frequency selection techniques are available such as deformablemirrors and multi-layer mirrors [29, 64], it is necessary in this experiment to have as clean

100

Figure 6.4: (a) A valence level photoelectron spectrum of Xe with the 17th harmonic showing
the sidebands created by introduction of the 400 nm dressing pulse with spatial and temporal
overlap. The sideband photoelectron peaks are exactly one 400 nm photon higher in energy
than the main ionization peaks. (b) The time-correlation of the sideband photoelectron peaks.

101

Figure 6.5: Cross-correlation traces of the 17th harmonic + 400 nm in Xe. (a) Toroidal gratingrotated to 1st order diffraction, concave grating at 0th order reflection, iris open (8mm), FWHM
= 882  105 fs; (b) as (a) except iris at 1 mm, FWHM = 449  64 fs; (c) Both toroidal andconcave gratings rotated to 1st order diffraction, iris open (8mm), FWHM = 440  25 fs; (d) as(c) with iris at 1mm, FWHM = 288  12 fs.

102
a separation of the desired harmonic as possible. This is because pump-probe signatures are
small signals (often 1%) above the background signal arising from ground state absorption

and ionization of the harmonic. Even a small leakage of neighboring harmonics could mask thedesired pump-probe signals. In addition, using gratings allows for a large range of accessibleenergies with relative ease of switching between harmonics.
When the spherical grating is rotated to 1st order diffraction and the iris before the second
grating is 8 mm in diameter, a cross correlation between the 17th and 400 nm beams with a
FWHM of 45132 fs (Fig. 6.5(c)). Comparing this to the width with one grating rotated, an
improvement of a factor of 2 in the width of the cross correlation is observed. Again, whenreducing the iris to 1 mm, the cross correlation narrows as is shown in Fig. 6.5(d). Althoughsome amount of linear chirp from the gratings is still present, there is still an improvement, witha FWHM of 28812 fs. Using 846 fs as the temporal width of the 400 nm pulse, the shortest
17th harmonic pulse width is calculated to be 27513 fs.
A ray tracing program was used to find the optimal distance between the two gratings forcompression of the harmonic pulse. The distances from the ray tracing optimization are 18.2
cm from the focus in the jet to the center of the spherical grating, 80 cm from the center of thespherical grating to the center of the toroidal grating, and 93.1 cm from the center of the toroidal
grating to the slit. The physical dimensions of the system were matched to these numbers withan accuracy of within 1 cm. According to the calculations, the compression would be best forthe 21st harmonic for the current chamber dimensions. The distance between the two gratings
as well as the number of lines illuminated on the gratings by the harmonic beam are criticalparameters in the calculation of the compression. Experimentally, however, it was found thatthe 19th harmonic has the shortest pulse width. Figure 6.6 demonstrates the shortest soft x-ray
pulse achieved to date with this apparatus, with a FWHM of 20013 fs. Again, using the 84 fs
pulse width of the 400 nm pulse, the FWHM of the soft x-ray pulse is calculated to be 18214
fs. The widths of the neighboring harmonics become wider on either side of the 19th harmonic,
with the 21st having a similar width as the 17th harmonic. The temporal widths of all the103

Figure 6.6: Cross-correlation trace of the 19th harmonic + 400 nm in Xe. The shortest soft x-ray
pulse measured to date with the instrument described here. Some irregularity in the temporalprofile may indicate an irregular spectral profile of the harmonic pulse.

104
harmonics measured are summarized in Fig. 6.7. It is important to note that the stretching effectof pulse front tilt goes as a function of 3 , therefore the higher harmonics (41st and above) arenot expected to suffer from such a large temporal stretching effect, and only the toroidal grating
should be required when using the higher harmonics for pump-probe experiments.

105

Figure 6.7: The pulse widths of the 13th through the 21st harmonics measured by crosscorrelation with a 400 nm pulse. Error bars designate the error in the pulse width given by
the Gaussian fitting program.

Chapter 7

Photodissociation of Bromine

7.1

Introduction
As a chemical bond is broken (or made), the electron distribution changes on an ultrafast

time scale to accommodate the moving nuclei. To understand how this electron distributionchanges with time is not only of fundamental interest but will also provide critical informationon the specific chemical system and the dynamics of the ensuing reaction. In a simple system(Br2 ), we observe a real time signature of a bond breaking in a gas phase molecule by measuring
the kinetic energies of the ejected electrons as a function of pump-probe time delay. The changing electron distribution of the dissociating molecule is reflected in the binding energies of theelectrons themselves and thus is detectable in its valence and core level soft x-ray photoelectron
spectra.
Bromine was chosen as the initial sample for study for a number of reasons, the mostimportant being that it is a simple system with a straightforward static photoelectron spectrum,

10 19 cm2).

and that it also has a relatively strong absorption cross-section at 400 nm (5 

The results presented here demonstrate that a number of complex issues exist even in a simple
system, including above threshold cross-correlation features vs. transient signals, the onset of
atomic photoelectron signals, multiple final ion states, and issues of atomic and transient stateionization cross-sections. Here I outline the details of the results for the photodissociation of
Br2 and discuss the analysis of the data and possible interpretations.

107

7.2

Pump-Probe Photoelectron Spectra in Br2
The photodissociation scheme for probing the time-resolved dynamics of Br2 is as fol-

lows:
400nm

Br2 (X 1 +g)!

Br2(C 1 u ) ! 2Br(2 P 3 )247nm

Br2 or Br!

Br2+(X; A; B ) or Br+ (3 P2;1;0 ) + e :The 400 nm pump pulse excites the neutral Br2 molecule to the C 1

u dissociative state,

and at time delays ranging from - 500 fs to + 1 ps the 17th harmonic probes the electron distribution by photoelectron spectroscopy. Figure 7.1 gives the potential energy curve diagram of
Br2 /Br+
2 taken from refs. [65] and [61]. This simplified diagram illustrates 4 different processes
that are observed in the data presented here. These include: (1) the background signal fromground state ionization by the 17th harmonic, (2) the cross-correlation signals at t=0, (3) ionization of the excited state wavepacket before dissociation is complete, and (4) the ionization of
the final Br atom products. These different processes are discussed in more detail below. The
diagram shows only the X and C electronic states of neutral Br2 and the X and A states of Br+
2
for simplicity, since these are the important electronic states involved in the photodissociationand ionization processes in the pump-probe experiment.
Figure 7.2 expands three pump-probe spectra from the same dotted box in Fig. 5.4, corresponding to pump-probe delays of -500 fs, -100 fs, and +500 fs. In Fig. 7.2, the backgroundbetween the molecular peaks increases due to saturation of the detector on the main peak inorder to amplify the small pump-probe signal. The spectrum corresponding tot = 500 fs

is the background signal that appears with the soft x-ray pulse coming before the 400 nm pumppulse. The signal in thet=-100 fs spectrum at 7.5 eV binding energy is indicative of a cross-correlation, by means of a two photon (400 nm + 17th harmonic pulses) ionization of the Br2

108

2
3

4
A

14

1

Br2

17th

V(R) [eV]

~

10

~

400 nm

+ 3

2

3

+

~

~
C
X

1
0.2

2

Dt

3

~

+ 1

Br ( P3/2) + Br ( P2)

X
12

2

Br ( P3/2) + Br ( D2)

R [nm]Br ( P3/2) + Br ( P3/2)

Br2
0.4

Figure 7.1: A simplified potential curve diagram illustrating the pump-probe sequence andresulting photoelectrons. Process 1: Ground state absorption of the 17th harmonic resulting
in photoelectrons leaving Br+
2 in both the X and A state (B ion state not shown). Process
2: Two photon ionization with the 400 nm + the 17th harmonic centered at t=0. Process 3:
Ionization with the 17th harmonic from the excited C state of Br2 at a positive time delay (butbefore dissociation is complete). Process 4: After the dissociation is complete, the Br atoms
are ionized by the 17th harmonic. The total energy of the probe laser is decreased for simplicity
and size of the diagram.

109



Figure 7.2: Three pump-probe spectra of Br2 :t=-500 fs (background), -100 fs (crosscorrelation signal), and +500 fs (Br atom signal). The spectra are displaced vertically for clarity.

110
molecule. There are two processes which could result in a photoelectron signal at this energy.
First, the 400 nm pulse promotes the wavepacket resonantly to the excited state and then the
wavepacket is instantaneously ionized by the 17th harmonic. Second, a purely above thresholdionization process could also occur (similar to the case in Xe), where the 17th harmonic ionizes Br2 and the 400 nm adds on to the ionization energy at t = 0. If the signal is due to thewave packet on the dissociative state, then the photoelectron spectra of the dissociative state isobserved directly. Due to issues discussed later in this chapter, it is most likely a combinationof the two processes. This cross-correlation feature is also useful as an internal determinationof the temporal width of the soft x-ray pulse. The cross-correlation signal should be a doublet,
mirroring the one-photon ionization molecular peak leading to the X state of Br+
2 , however, itappears at a photoelectron energy where the magnetic bottle resolution is less than the doublet
separation. Cross-correlation features are also expected where the Br+
2 is produced in the A andB states. The A state cross-correlation signal has been observed, appearing as a small shoulder
on the low binding energy side of the X state background peak. Although the B state signal
has not yet been observed, it is expected to be of a similar binding energy as the atomic signal,
further complicating the spectrum. An expanded photoelectron spectrum highlighting the crosscorrelation features is shown in Fig. 7.3. A signal in between the cross-correlations leading to
the X state and the A state of the ion is attributed to the excited state wavepacket being ionized
after sliding down the dissociative curve, which is discussed in more detail later in the chapter.
Lastly, in thet=+500 fs spectrum, photoelectron peaks from the Br atom are observed at the

expected binding energies while the cross-correlation signal is no longer present. This atomic

signal persists at long time delays ( t=100 ps) compared to the time scale of the dissociation



dynamics ( t <500 fs).
In Fig. 7.4, several photoelectron spectra are normalized and the background molecularsignal is subtracted so that only the time-correlated signal remains. Figure 7.4 show a seriesof pump-probe spectra in the relevant energy ranges where the time-correlated peaks of thecross-correlation and atomic peaks appear. The small shift of the photoelectron spectra to lower

111



Figure 7.3: An expanded region of the photoelectron spectrum of Br2 at t 30 fs (gray line)
and background at t -300 fs (black line) showing the cross-correlation features. The feature
at 7.4 eV binding energy is the above threshold ionization resulting from the overlap of the 17thand 400 nm pulses where the Br+
2 is left in the ground X state. The shoulder roughly centeredat 9.4 eV is a similar signal, only the Br+
2 is left in the excited A state. The signal at 8.5 eV isattributed to the ionized excited state wavepacket as it is sliding down the dissociative curve.



112

Figure 7.4: Normalized, subtracted pump-probe spectra of Br2 in the cross-correlation time region (left). The spectra are displaced vertically for clarity. The panel on the right shows theappearance of the Br atom peaks in the photoelectron spectra. The two peaks in the photoelectron spectrum are due to spin-orbit coupling in the final Br+ state. Numbers on the vertical scale
are pump-probe delay in femtoseconds.

113
binding energies with increasing time delay is the result of a linear chirp in the soft x-ray pulsethat is not compensated by the grating pair. From the data, it is clear that the atomic peaks risevery quickly, although their onset is delayed slightly with respect to the cross-correlation.

7.3

Time-traces of cross-correlation and Br atom signals
The delay between the center of the cross-correlation and the atomic rise is more clearlyseen in Fig. 7.5 where the total photoelectron counts under both the cross-correlation peak andthe atomic peaks are plotted vs. pump-probe delay. The solid line represents a Gaussian fit to
the cross-correlation data points (filled circles) corresponding to the following equation:

2
S (t) = S0 + A  exp 44ln2 (tt0 )f whm

!2 3
5:

(7.1)

S(t) is the total signal, S0 is the y offset of the curve (or constant background signal), A is thepeak height, t0 is the time value of the peak of the curve, and f whm is the full width at half
maximum of the Gaussian curve. The fit to the data gives a full width at half maximum of30014 fs and peak time t0 = 0 14 fs. The dotted line is a fit to the rise of the total atomic
signal (diamonds) with a smoothed step function given by the following equation:

1(t
S (t) = erf2pstep )2 ln2
f whm!

+ 12 :(7.2)

S(t) is the total signal, step is the average time delay between a hypothetical instantaneous
photon absorption and product atom formation, and f whm is the full width at half maximum of
the above mentioned Gaussian [66]. The best fit to the data was found with f whm
and step= 25013 fs= 40  13fs. The discrepancy between the f whm values obtained from the Gaussianfunction and the step function could indicate that the atomic rise is less effected by the wingsof the cross-correlation between the 400 nm and soft x-ray pulses, and the time resolution
is determined by the middle part of the pulse, which would give a smaller value for fwhm .
However, the dashed line is the same step function fit to the atomic data, only with f whm fixed

13 fs,

at the cross correlation value of 300 fs. The value of step for the dashed curve is 37
well within experimental error for the earlier value.

114

Figure 7.5: Total counts from the cross-correlation peak and the atomic peaks from Fig. 7.4 andadditional time delay data not shown are plotted as a function of pump-probe delay between the
400 nm pump and the 17th harmonic probe. The cross correlation signal is fit with Gaussianfunction of width 300 fs and the atomic rise is fit with a step function described in the text.
The dotted line fit of the step function allows both step and f whm to be variables, while thedashed line fit fixes fwhm to 300 fs. The solid lines designate the time delay between the centerof the cross-correlation trace and the ’step’ of the error function used to fit the rise in atomic
signal.

115
A similar delay is seen when using the 19th harmonic as the probe, which has a shorter%

duration as discussed in chapter 6. The cross-correlation and atomic signals are about 50

weaker when using the 19th harmonic as the probe compared to the data taken with the 17th
harmonic. The time traces for the 19th harmonic data set are shown in Fig. 7.6. In this data set,the cross-correlation is narrower, with a FWHM of 20417 fs and t0 of 017 fs resulting fromthe Gaussian fit. There is also a significant shoulder seen in the data at negative times. Witha shorter soft x-ray pulse, some irregularities in the temporal profile could indicate structurein the spectral or spatial profile of the soft x-ray pulse, probably caused during the harmonic
generation processes itself. The atomic data with the 19th harmonic is more scattered than in thecase of the 17th harmonic due to decreased atomic signal. The shoulder of the cross-correlation
peak also shifts the atomic curve. Atoms created at the peak of the local maximum (shoulder)will shift the step to earlier times. While the parameters for the step function fit to the atomic
data have large errors (step = 3621 fs and f whm= 367  45 fs), the trend remains same asin the 17th harmonic data. Again, the dashed line in Fig. 7.6 is from equation 7.2, except with

20 fs.

the fwhm held at 204 fs. The value of step then becomes 30 This 40 fs delay of the onset of the atomic signal with respect to the center of the crosscorrelation suggests a very fast dissociation time for the Br2 molecule. A first order approximation of the dissociation time of Br2 is accomplished by using a total energy equation andcalculating the integral under the 1

u dissociative curve. From Ref. [67], I use equation (9)as the estimate of the dissociative curve, derived based on experimental lifetime measurements
and valid in the region 2.5  R 3.5 Å. The equation is as follows:

U (R) = Ulimit7+ 1:594  10 cm 1

R9:384!
(see Fig. 7.7(a)):(7.3)

where U(R) is the potential energy as a function of R, the internuclear distance, and Ulimit is theatomic limit with respect to the ground state neutral well. The 9.384 power represents the steep
repulsion of the dissociative curve. By generating a series of points along this curve, the integral
under the curve is determined numerically. First, the integrand relating time of dissociation (t)116Figure 7.6: A similar plot as Fig. 7.5 except using the 19th harmonic as a probe. The crosscorrelation signal has a FWHM of 20417 fs and t0 of 017 fs, and the fit to the atomic rise
21 fs and fwhm
 fs (dotted line) and the dashed line is a fit
gives step
holding fwhm at 204 fs, and step then becomes 30  fs.

= 36= 367 45

20

117



Figure 7.7: (a)The C1 u dissociate of neutral Br2 given by equation 7.3 (b) A curve representing the integral of (a) in fs per Å. The experimental result of 40 fs implies a bond distance of Å, while a bond distance of 2Re occurs at a time of 105 fs.

3

118
to internuclear distance (R) is calculated from the following equations:

Etotal =Etotal =EKE + EP E
1
2

 2
R
t

+ U (R ):Since t and R are the variables, I rearrange to solve for dt as a function of dR:

dt =

s

2 (E



total

U (R))

! 1

dR

(7.4)

where Etotal (in Joules) is the total energy put into the system, EKE is the kinetic energy of
the atoms with respect to the center of mass, EP E is the potential curve given by equation 7.3(converted to Joules), and  is the reduced mass of Br2 in kg. Numerical integration of theabove integrand results in the curve in Fig. 7.7(b), relating time and internuclear distance (afterconversion to fs and Å).

3

This calculation reveals that in 40 fs the Br-Br separation will have reached  Å froman initial equilibrium bond distance of Re= 2:23Å in the ground state [65]. This elongatedbond distance is in a regime where atomic behavior cannot be ruled out, but it is still closer toRe than 2Re , a bond distance where it is safe to assume the bond is completely broken. Shortly
after the two pulses begin to overlap, there is always some percentage of the soft x-ray probe
pulse that follows the much shorter 400 nm pump pulse. With an estimated dissociation timeof 40 fs, some signal due to atoms in the interaction region should appear at very early timedelays. However, one might also expect a broad peak in the atomic region at early time delays,
with signal coming from the dissociating wavepacket over several regions of the dissociative
curve. Then at later time delays, the atomic peak should become narrower as the dissociationis nearly complete. The results presented in Fig 7.4 show no visible broadening of the atomic
peak at early time delays. However, such a broadening of the signal could be wider than 1 eV
considering the energy scale covered by the 1

u curve. If this is the case, the broad signal might

be impossible to detect above the background parent molecule signal level [see Fig. 7.2].
Another explanation of the observations is the possible existence of an ion-induced
dipole potential curve that would almost mirror the neutral dissociative curve, except with a119very shallow well. This could cause the photoelectron feature arising from the dissociating
wavepacket to appear at a nearly constant energy. This could also account for the lack of shiftof the atomic Br peaks that is observed. The discrepancy in the fwhm values from the crosscorrelation and the convoluted step function fit (especially in the data taken with the 19th harmonic) lends some validity to this idea. It is perhaps not complete to describe the dissociation
dynamics as an instantaneous step function. The longer f whm from the step function fit of the
19th harmonic data (where the time resolution is the best) could indicate that another process isgoing on, creating a longer time delay than the width of the cross-correlation.

7.4

Ionization of the excited state wavepacket
The analysis of the dissociative state photoelectron spectra is complicated by multiple

final states of the ion and multiple cross-correlation features. If the ion is left in the X state after

24

ionization at a dissociative bond distance of  : Å, a photoelectron peak between the two
observed cross-correlation peaks (that leave the Br+
2 in the X state and A state) is expected. The

85

small peak in Fig. 7.3 at  : eV binding energy could arise from the dissociating wavepacket.
This signal rises and decays on the appropriate time scale for it to be a dissociative state photoelectron feature. This transient signal is analyzed more closely as demonstrated in Fig. 7.8.
Four time traces are taken from the pump-probe photoelectron spectra with the 400 nm pumpand 17th harmonic probe. The features are shifted in electron kinetic energy, but they are collected here on one pump-probe time trace. The black line is the cross-correlation leaving theBr+
2 ion in the X state (corresponding to the signal from 6.5 to 8 eV binding energy in Fig. 7.3),
the dotted line is the cross-correlation leaving the ion in the A state (9-9.5 eV), the medium grayline is the transient signal from 8-9 eV, and the light gray line is a random sampling of background signal from 5-6 eV binding energy. The transient signal clearly rises above the random
noise trace and also has a similar Gaussian shape and width as the cross-correlation traces. Thisis consistent with what would be expected if the excited state wavepacket were ionized after
moving out on the dissociative curve. As energy is deposited into kinetic energy of the atoms,

120

Figure 7.8: Time traces of the cross-correlation features in the Br2 data (400 nm pump and 17th
harmonic probe). Black line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br+
2 ion in the ground X+
state. Dark gray line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br2 ion in the excited A state.
Medium gray line: transient signal from ionization of the excited state wavepacket. Light grayline: random background noise.

121
less energy is available to the electrons. Figure 7.9 shows similar time traces obtained using the
19th harmonic as a probe. Again, the transient time trace is observed to rise above the noiselevel with a similar shape as the cross-correlation features.
As mentioned earlier in the chapter, there are two competing two-photon processes; (1)ATI where the harmonic ionizes Br2 followed by adding one 400 nm photon above the ionization threshold, and (2) the promotion of the excited state wavepacket by the 400 nm pulse
followed by ionization with the harmonic. These are indistinguishable at t = 0, as the photoelectron possesses the same energy. If the excited wavepacket from process (2) slides out on the
dissociative curve and is then ionized, however, the photoelectron peak will appear at a lower
photoelectron energy. This is feasible if the wavepacket quickly falls down the steeply sloped
section of the dissociative curve and then moves slowly in comparison when reaching the flatter
section. The position of the transient photoelectron peak (Fig. 7.3) indicates that the wavepacket
is ionized at an energy of 17000 cm 1 on the 1

u curve. Looking at the shape of the curvein Fig. 7.7(a), it is reasonable to assume that the wavepacket quickly falls down the steep slope
from 25000 cm 1 to 18000 cm 1 , and is then ionized from the flatter part of the curve.
Scans averaged over a larger number of laser pulses per time step were also taken of thistransient signal from time delays of -33 fs to +165 fs with the 19th harmonic as a probe. The
relevant part of the photoelectron spectrum for these time delays is shown in Fig. 7.10, as wellas time traces for the ATI cross-correlations and transient state. These photoelectron spectra areplotted with photoelectron energy as the x axis instead of binding energy, as in Fig. 7.3. Again,
it is clear that the transient signal (shaded region from 4.9 to 5.5 eV) rises above the random
noise signal and has a structure similar to the cross-correlation features. From these time traces,
as well as from Figs. 7.8 and 7.9, the peak of the transient signal is slightly delayed in timefrom the peak of the cross-correlation traces. This is also consistent with the wavepacket being
ionized after it has moved out on the dissociative curve with a small time delay. However, thisobserved delay between the peak of the cross-correlation and the peak of the transient signal
time trace is very small (10-20 fs) and it is difficult to be certain of such a small time delay with

122

Figure 7.9: Time traces of the cross-correlation features in the Br2 data (400 nm pump and 19th
harmonic probe). Black line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br+
2 ion in the ground X+
state. Dark gray line: signal from the ATI process leaving the Br2 ion in the excited A state.
Medium gray line: transient signal from ionization of the excited state wavepacket. Light grayline: random background noise.

123

Figure 7.10: Long scans of the cross-correlation photoelectron energy region with the 19th
harmonic as a probe. The shaded areas of the photoelectron spectra on the left correspond to
the photoelectron energy regions giving rise to the time traces on the right. The photoelectron
spectrum on the very bottom is a background, with no 400 nm pump beam, and from there thetime delays step up from -33 fs to +165 fs in steps of 33 fs.

124
errors of 10 fs.

7.5

Ionization cross-sections of atoms and transient states
Another important result is the obvious difference in the ionization cross-section between

the bromine molecule and the atom at the 47 nm probe wavelength. From the reported absorption cross-section of neutral Br2 (5 x 10 19 cm2 ) [6] and laser energy at 400 nm , an estimated

0:02% of the molecules in the interaction region reach the excited dissociative state, leaving therest in the ground state, as is described in the following calculations:
Percentage of molecules excited from X!C state in Br2
molecules in interaction region:= 5  10 5 Torr  3:26  1016 molecules/cm3 /Torr
N = 1:6  1012 molecules/cm 3
Nflux of 400 nm light:= hc
6:626  10 34 J  s  3  1010 cm=sE =400  10 7cm
E = 5  10 19 J/photon
photons in 150 J: = 3  1014 photonsEabsorption of Br2 sample:A= N`= 5  10 19 cm2  1:6  1012 /cm3  1 cm
A = 8  10 7
A  flux = 8  107  3  1014 photons
A  flux = 3:2  108
A% molecules in C excited state:

125

3:28  108  100 = 0.02%
1:6  1012
The counts in the atomic peaks are compared to the total counts in the A state molecularpeak. Any decrease in the molecular A state signal due to the presence of the 400 nm pumpbeam is imperceptible, therefore it is estimated as being less than the noise level of the data

% of the total A state signal-note, this number is not used in the calculation, but rather
the 0.02% from above), while the atomic peak increases by  5% of that same A state signal.

(0.8

Note, the area under the peaks in Fig. 7.2 is not representative of the total counts used in thecalculation, because the A state appears compressed on the energy scale. The A state signal
is in turn 

30% of the total signal originating from the ground state of neutral Br2. Fromthese numbers we can calculate the ratio of the atomic and molecular cross-section for the 17th
harmonic in Br2 , as is shown in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1: A calculation of the enhancement of the atomic cross-section compared to the molecular cross-section for the 17th harmonic of 800 nm. Using 10,000 molecules as an arbitrary
number, the raw photoelectron counts are used to calculate the ratio.
Br2 X to Br+
2 A
30
3,000

%

43915  0:8%
= 14.6zof 10,000 mol.
molecules
countscounts/molecules554/14.6

Br 2 P to Br+ 3 P
0.02
4

%

2218  7%y= 554z 40

of 10,000 mol.
atoms
countscounts/atoms

 total counts in A state peak averaged over 10 identical scansy total counts in atom peaks averaged over 5 identical scans at long delay times
zsimilar to cross-section (), assuming path length is the same

The enhancement of the atomic signal compared to the molecular signal raises interestingquestions about pump-probe spectroscopy with soft x-rays. If the cross-section of the Br atoms
was not enhanced, the photoelectron signal would likely be imperceptible above the backgroundnoise. From the calculated estimate of the photodissociation yield, the 17th harmonic probe
wavelength is 40 times more sensitive to the atoms than to the ground state molecule (taking

126
into account the stoichiometric ratio of Br2 to Br). One possibility is that the 17th harmonic
accidentally overlaps with a resonance that enhances the atomic cross section. To attempt tofully understand this enhancement in cross-section, several different harmonics (13-21) wereused in the same pump-probe experiment. A comparison of the resulting photoelectron spectra
is given in Fig. 7.11. The spectra are normalized to the background signal on either side of
the atomic peaks. It is clear from Fig. 7.11 that the atomic signal increases with decreasing
harmonic number, as the energy of the probe approaches the threshold for ionization.
For the photoelectron spectra in Fig. 7.11, a similar calculation was done to determine thecross-section ratio for harmonics 13-21. A problem arises, however, when comparing data fromthe various harmonics. The flight tube voltage varies between data sets, causing the number of
total counts in the molecular A state to change due to cutting off part of the photoelectron peak.
This affects the outcome of the cross-section calculation since the atomic peaks are referenced
to the molecular A state peak. To ensure that the calculation of the cross-section enhancement
is correct, the ratios of the counts in the molecular A state peak to the counts in the molecular
X state peak were determined for the pump-probe scans and then compared to the A/X ratio
for a photoelectron scan where the A state was not at the edge of the energy cutoff. Assuming
the X state peak is only slightly saturating the detector, which is the case since the spin-orbit
doublet is still visible, comparing these two ratios gives a correction factor. The results of thesecalculations are given in Table 7.2. The final cross-section enhancement factors are plotted
Table 7.2: The corrections and final values for the enhancement of the atomic cross-section
compared to the molecular cross-section for harmonics 13-21.
harmonic
13
15
17
19
21

Br =Br2
113.17
84.25
53.65
60.33
65.20

error
5.46
1.61
4.91
1.64
0.81

correction factor
2.02
1.73
1.16
2.35
3.00

final Br =Br2
56.1
48.8
46.1
25.7
21.7

 based on the error from averaging several scans with identical detector and flight tube voltage
settings, as well as the pressure of Br2

127

Figure 7.11: Photoelectron spectra of Br2 at long time delays, after the atomic signal between
1 and 2 eV photoelectron energy has reached a maximum value. The atomic signal clearly
increases as the harmonic number decreases. (The background signal in the vicinity of theatomic peaks is used for normalization.)

128
versus harmonic photon energy in Fig. 7.12. The trend in Fig. 7.12 is consistent with the trend
observed in Fig. 7.11, further supporting the calculation of the cross-section enhancement. This
figure also demonstrates that the 17th harmonic probe energy was not hitting a resonance in theionization cross-section for Br, but that the cross-section is similarly enhanced for neighboring
harmonics (although to varying degrees). It is also important to notice that even though theatomic signal is enhanced by a factor of 20 for the 21st harmonic, it is barely visible above
the background noise.
An important scientific question is whether the cross-section of the dissociative molecular state is similarly enhanced. If not, a broad signal originating from the dissociative state of
the molecule in the atomic photoionization energy region may be easily obscured. Similarly,
cross-correlation features from the above threshold ionization process can mask photoelectron
signals arising from transient states. For three different scans where the transient signal (discussed in section 7.4) was observed, the percentage of the total two-photon signal around t=0
of each type of signal (ATI signal leaving the Br+
2 in the X and A states, as well as the transient
signal from ionization of the excited state wavepacket) is calculated in Table 7.3. Interestingly,
Table 7.3: The percentages by total counts of the cross-correlation and transient photoelectron
signals for three different scans and two probe wavelengths.
scan
17th + 400 nm
19th + 400 nm
19th + 400 nm

Figure
7.8
7.9
7.10

% X ATI % A ATI % X transient
53.9
56.6
54.4

33.1
34.7
33.2

13.0
8.6
12.4

 %of the sum of X state and A state ATI signals and transient signal arising from theintermediate neutral excited state (or total two-photon molecular signal)

the fraction of transient signal does not change dramatically when going from the 17th to the19th harmonic, while the atomic cross-section is reduced by a factor of 2 from the 17th to the
19th. This points to the possibility that the cross-sectional enhancements might be different
for transient states than for the final atomic products. This type of information is crucial whenattempting to measure the time dynamics of transient states.

129

Figure 7.12: The cross-section enhancement factor plotted vs. the harmonic photon energy,
demonstrating that the 17th harmonic probe was not sitting on a resonance for atomic Br, but
the atom signal is similarly enhanced for several harmonics.

130

7.6

Conclusions
In a simple molecule like Br2 , we demonstrate the many factors that come into play whenmeasuring ionization from excited states and excited state photodissociation dynamics. Theseissues have important implications for future pump-probe spectroscopies, specifically with soft
x-rays. Electron distributions from excited neutral to ion states, the complication of above
threshold ionization features in time-resolved spectroscopy, the time-dependent appearance of
atomic photoelectron signals, the enhancement of ionization cross-sections of atomic species vs.
molecular species, and the shapes and cross-sections of signals arising from excited transientstates are all relatively unexplored phenomena. For neutral gas phase species, UV/visible-pumpsoft x-ray probe photoelectron spectroscopy proves to be a powerful tool for probing dissociation and excited state dynamics, both in the nanosecond and femtosecond regime.

Bibliography[1] Atkins. Physical Chemistry. W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 5th edition, 1994. p.
615.
[2] Johnson, Cutler, Bancroft, Hu, and Tan. High-resolution photoabsorption and photoelectron spectra of bromine-containing molecules at the br 3d edge: the importance of lignad
field splitting. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 30:4899–4917, 1997.
[3] Greenblatt, Zanni, and Neumark. Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. Science,
276:1675, 1997.
[4] Haight. Photoemission with laser generated harmonics tunable to 80 ev. Applied Optics,
35:6445, 1996.
[5] Cornford, Frost, McDowell, Ragle, and Stenhouse. Photoelectron spectra of the halogens.
J. Chem. Phys., 54:2651, 1971.
[6] Hubinger and Nee. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, 86:1, 1995.
[7] Zanni, Taylor, Greenblatt, Soep, and Neumark. Characterization of the i2 anion groundstate using conventional and femtosecond photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys.,
106:19, 1997.
[8] Davies, LeClaire, Continetti, and Hayden. Femtosecond time-resolved photoelectronphotoion coincidence imaging studies of dissociation dynamics. J. Chem. Phys., 111:1–4,
1999.
[9] Fischer, Vrakking, Villeneuve, and Stolow. Femtosecond time-resolved zero kinetic energy photoelectron and photoionization spectroscopy studies of i2 wavepacket dynamics.
Chem. Phys., 207:331–354, 1996.
[10] Vorsa, Campagnola, Nandi, Larsson, and Lineberger. Photofragmentation of i2 arn clusters: Observation of metastable isomeric fragments. J. Chem. Phys., 105:2298–2307,
1996.
[11] Vorsa, Nandi, Campagnola, Larsson, and Lineberger. Recombination dynamics of photodissociated i2 in size selected ar and co2 clusters. J. Chem. Phys., 106:1402–1410,
1997.

132
[12] Sanov, Sanford, Nandi, and Lineberger. Spin-orbit relaxation and recombination dynamics
in i2 (co2 n and i2 (ocs)n cluster ions: A new type of photofragment caging reaction. J.
Chem. Phys., 111:664–675, 1999.

)[13] Faeder and Parson. Ultrafast reaction dynamics in cluster ions: Simulation of the transient photoelectron spectrum of i2 arn photodissociation. J. Chem. Phys., 108:3909–3914,
1998.
[14] Gruebele and Zewail. Femtosecond wavepacket spectroscopy: Coherences, the potential
and structural determination. J. Chem. Phys., 98:883–902, 1993.
[15] Ben-Nun, Levine, and Fleming. Solvent-induced nonadiabatic transitions in iodine: An
ultrafast pump-probe computational study. J. Chem. Phys., 105:3035–3056, 1996.
[16] Sorensen, Bjorneholm, Hjelte, Kihlgren, Ohrwall, Sundin, Svenson, Buil, Descamps,
L’Huillier, Norin, and Wahlstrom. Femtosecond pump-probe photoelectron spectroscopy
of predissociative rydberg states in acetylene. J. Chem. Phys., 112:8083–8042, 2000.
[17] Blanchet and Stolow. Nonadiabatic dynamics in polyatomic systems studied by femtosecond time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys., 108:4371–4374, 1998.
[18] Ferray, L’Hullier, Li, Lompre, Manifray, and Manus. Multiple-harmonic conversion of1064-nm radiation in rare-gases. J. Phys B, 21:L31, 1988.
[19] McPherson, Gibson, Jara, Johann, Luk, McIntyre, Boyer, and Phodes. Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum ultraviolet-radiation in the rare-gases. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B,
4:825, 1987.
[20] Wahlstrom, Larsson, Persson, Starczewski, Salieries Svanberg, Balcou, and L’Huillier.
High-order harmonic-generation in rare-gases with an intense short-pulse laser. Phys.
Rev. A, 48:4709, 1993.
[21] Zhou, Peatross, Murnane, and Kapteyn. Enhanced high-harmonic generation using 25 fs
laser pulses. PRL, 76:752–755, 1996.
[22] Lewenstein, Balcou, Yu, Ivanov, L’Huillier, and Corkum. Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields. Phys. Rev. A, 49:2117, 1994.
[23] Sanpera, Watson, Lewenstein, and Burnett. Harmonic-generation control. Phys. Rev. A,
54:4320, 1996.
[24] Corkum. Plasma perspective on strong-field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett,
73:1994, 1993.
[25] Schafer and Kulander. Harmonic generation from ultrafast pump lasers. PRL, 78:638–641,
1997.
[26] Salieres, Antoine, de Bohan, and Lewenstein. Temporal and spectral tailoring of highorder harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:5544–5547, 1998.
[27] Kan, Capjack, and Rankin. High harmonic generation. Phys. Rev. A, 52:R4336, 1995.

133[28] Probst and Haight. Unoccupied molecular orbital states of tris (8-hydroxy quinoline)
aluminum: Observation and dynamics. Appl. Phys. Lett., 71:202–204, 1997.
[29] Siffalovic, Drescher, Spieweck, Wiesenthal, Lim, Weidner, Elizarov, and Heinzmann.
Laser-based apparatus for extended ultraviolet femtosecond time-resolved photoemission
spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instr., 72:30–35, 2001.
[30] Bauer, Lei, Read, Tobey, Murnane, and Kapteyn. Direct observation of a chemical reaction
on a pt surface with high-order harmonics. 2001.
[31] Haight, Hayden, Longo, Neary, and Wagner. Mars: Femtosecond laser mask advanced
repair system in manufacturing. J VAC SCI TECHNOL B, 17:3137, 1999.
[32] Eaton. Studies of nonlinear femtosecond pulse propagation in bulk materials. PhD thesis,
University of Colorado, 1999.
[33] Margaritondo. Introduction to Synchotron Radiation, volume p. 59. New York, Oxford
University Press,), 1988.
[34] Villoresi. On the optical analysis of the x-ray path-lengths in the diffraction of femtosecond xuv and soft x-ray pulses. Laser and particle beams, 18:529, 2000.
[35] Kruit and Read. Magnetic-field parallelizer for 2-pi electronspectrometer and electronimage magnifier. J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum., 16:313, 1983.
[36] Turner, Baker, Baker, and Brundle. Molecular Photoelectron Spectroscopy. John Wileyand Sons Ltd, London, 1970.
[37] Wahlstrom, Larsson, Persson, Starczweski, and Svanberg. High-order harmonic generation in rare gases with an intense short-pulse laser. Phys. Rev. A, 48:4709–4720, 1993.
[38] Balcou, Huillier, and Escande. High-order harmonic generation processes in classical andquantum anharmonic oscillators. Phys. Rev. A, 53:3456–3468, 1996.
[39] Svensson, Kikas, Ausmees, Osborne, Aksela, Naves de Brito, and Nommiste. Absolute
photoionization cross sections of excited he states in the near-threshold region. J. Phys. B,
28:L293, 1995.
[40] de Lisio, Altucci, Bruzzese, De Filippo, Solimen, Bellini, and Foggi. Harmonic generationin an ionized gas medium with a 100-femtosecond, high repetition rate laser source atintermediate intensities. Appl. Phys. B, 64:323, 1997.
[41] L’Huillier, Lewenstien, Balcou, Salieres, Ivanov, Larsson, and Wahlstrom. Phasematching effects in strong-field harmonic-generation. Phys. Rev. A, 48:R3433, 1993.
[42] L’Huillier. Generation and applications of high order harmonics: An alternative coherent
short-pulse xuv source. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., 151:445, 1996.
[43] Salieres, L’Huillier, and Lewenstein. Coherence control of high-order harmonics. Phys.
Rev. Lett., 74:3776, 1995.
[44] L’Huillier, Balcou, Candel, Schafer, and Kulander. Calculations of high-order harmonic
generation processes in xe at 1064 nm. Phys. Rev. A, 46:2778, 1992.

134[45] Cardona and Eds. Ley. Photoemission in Solids I: General Principles. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1978. with additional corrections.
[46] Kimura, Yamazaki, and Achiba. He I (584 å) photoelectron spectra and photoionization
cross sections of atomic chlorine and bromine. Chem. Phys. Lett., 58:104–107, 1978.
[47] Lappert, Brian Pedley, Sharp, and Guest. Bonding studies of compounds of boron andelements of groups 3-5. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2, 72:539, 1976.
[48] Hufner. Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. p. 365.
[49] Fuggle and Mrtensson. Core-level binding energies in metals. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat.
Phenom., 21:275, 1980.
[50] Masui, Shigemasa, Yagishita, and Sellin. New measurements of the widths of the xe 4dlevels. J. Phys. B, 28:4529, 1995.
[51] Ausmees, Osborne, Moberg, Svensson, Aksela, Sairanen, Kivimaki, Naves de Brito,
Nommiste, Jauhiainen, and Aksela. Observation of anomalous behavior of the xe 4d
photoelectron satellites. Phys. Rev. A, 51:855, 1995.
[52] Chang, Rundquist, Wang, Christov, Kapteyn, and Murnane. Temporal phase control ofsoft-x-ray harmonic emission. Phys. Rev. A, 58:R30, 1998.
[53] Balcou, Salieres, Budil, Ditmire, Perry, and L’Huillier. Z. Phys. D., 34:107, 1995.
[54] Larsson, Mevel, Zerne, L’Huillier, Wahlstrom, and Svanberg. Two colour time-resolved
spectroscopy of helium using high-order harmonics. J. Phys. B, 28:L53–L58, 1995.
[55] Altucci, Delfin, Roos, Gaarde, L’Huillier, and Mercer. Frequency-resolved time-gatedhigh-order harmonics. Phys. Rev. A, 58:3934, 1998.
[56] Pratt. Excited-state molecular photoionization dynamics. Rep. Prog. Phys., 58:821, 1995.
[57] Kimura. Development of laser photoelectron spectroscopy based on resonantly enhanced
multiphoton ionization. JOURNAL OF ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY AND RELATEDPHENOMENA, 100:273–296, 1999.
[58] Kimura. Molecular dynamic photoelectron spectroscopy using resonant multiphoton
ionization for photophysics and photochemistry. International Reviews in Physical
Chemistry, 6:195, 1987.
[59] Kimura, Takahashi, Okuyama, and Plazibat. Application of mpi photoelectron spectroscopy to excited molecules. use of tunable vuv laser radiation. J. of Elect. Spec. andRel. Phen., 51:383, 1990.
[60] Capelle, Sakurai, and Broida. Lifetimes and self-quenching cross sections of vibrational
levels in the b state of bromine excited by a tunable dye laser. J. Chem. Phys., 54:1728,
1971.
[61] Herzberg. Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure: Spectra of Diatomic Molecules.
New York; Prentice-Hall, 1939.

135[62] Clyne and Heaven. Theoretical treatment of the spontaneous predissociation of br2 b 3  .
J. Chem. Phys., 76:5342, 1982.
[63] Bouhal, Evans, Grillion, Mysyrowicz, Breger, Agostini, Constantinescu, Muller, andvon der Linde. Cross-correlation measurement of femtosecond noncollinear high-orderharmonics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 14:950–956, 1997.
[64] Zeek, Maginnis, Backus, Russek, Murnane, Mourou, Kapteyn, and Vdovin. Pulse compression by use of deformable mirrors. Opt. Lett., 24:493–495, 1999.
[65] Peterson and Smith. Chem. Phys., 30:407, 1977.
[66] Kim, McCamant, Shu, and Mathies. J. Phys. Chem. B, 105(2001):1240, 2001.
[67] Clyne, Heaven, and Tellinghuisen. Theoretical treatment of the spontaneous predissociation of br2 , b3  +u . J. Chem. Phys., 76:5341, 1982.

(0 )[68] Trembaly, Larzilliere, Combet-Farnoux, and Morin. Photoelectron spectrosocpy of atomic
iodine produced by laser photodissociation. Phys. Rev. A, 38:3804–3807, 1988.
[69] Nugent-Glandorf, Scheer, Krishnamurthy, Odom, and Leone. Photoelectron spectroscopic
determination of the energy bandwidths of high-order harmonics (7th-55th) produced byan ultrafast laser in neon. Phys. Rev. A, 62:23812–1–7, 2000.
[70] Gisselbrecht, Descamps, Lynga, L’Huillier, Wahlstrom, and Meyer. Absolute photoionization cross sections of excited he states in the near threshold region. PRL, 23:4607–4610,
1999.
[71] Durfee, Rundquist, Backus, Herne, Murnane, and Kapteyn. Phase matching of high-orderharmonics in hollow waveguides. PRL, 83:2187–2190, 1999.
[72] Krause, Schafer, and Kulander. Calculation of photoemission from atoms subject to intense laser fields. Phys. Rev. A, 45:4998, 1992.
[73] Shon, Suda, and Midorikawa. Generation and propagation of attosecond pulses in he gas
with sub-10-fs driver pulses. Phys. Rev. A, 60:2587, 1999.
[74] Platonenko and Strelkov. Generation of a single attosecond x-ray pulse. Quant. Elec.,
28:749, 1998.
[75] Glover, Schoenlein, Chin, and Shank. Observation of laser assisted photoelectric effectand femtosecond high order harmonic radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:2468, 1996.
[76] Bouhal, Salieres, Breger, Agostini, Hamoniaux, Mysyrowicz, Antonetti, Constantinescu,
and Muller. High-order harmonic-generation in rare-gases - a new source in photoionization spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A, 58:389, 1998.
[77] Ditmire, Crane, Nyuyen, DaSilva, and Perry. Energy-yield and conversion-efficiency measurements of high-order harmonic radiation. Phys. Rev. A, 51:R902, 1995.
[78] Watson, Sanpera, and Burnett. Pulse-shape effects and blueshifting in the single-atomharmonic-generation from neutral species and ions. Phys. Rev. A, 51:1458, 1995.

136[79] J.C. Diels and W. Rudolph. Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena. Academic Press, San
Diego, 1996.
[80] de Lange. Laser photoelectron spectroscopy: mixed traits of excited states. JOURNAL
OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-FARADAY TRANSACTIONS, 94:3409–3419, 1998.
[81] Nilsen, Hansen, Selsto, and Madsen. Laser excitation of angular rydberg wavepackets. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS,
32:4995–5007, 1999.
[82] Mecking and Lambropoulos. Nondispersing radial rydberg wavepackets in doubly coredriven two-electron atoms. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND
OPTICAL PHYSICS, 31:3353–3361, 1998.
[83] RAITHEL, HELD, MARMET, and WALTHER. Rubidium rydberg atoms in strong static
fields. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICAL PHYSICS,
27:2849–2866, 1994.
[84] GROCHMALICKI and LEWENSTEIN. Excitation of rydberg wavepackets by shortlaser-pulses. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS B-ATOMIC MOLECULAR AND OPTICALPHYSICS, 21:3285–3302, 1988.

Appendix A

Absorption spectrum of Bromine

2

Cross section (x10 ) cm

-19

0

20

40

60

80

300

Wavelength (nm)

400

500

600

Figure A.1: Absorption spectrum of Br2 from ref. [6], with lines drawn at 400 nm and 527 nm.

200

Linear
scale

Log
scale

- 22

10

- 21

- 20

10

10

10

- 19

- 18

10

138

Cross Section (log10)

Appendix B

Rydberg wavepackets in Krypton

While looking for a 3+1’ multiphoton photoelectron signature in Kr using ultrafast 266
nm and 800 nm pulses, we inadvertently stumbled across a long lived signal coming from a
Rydberg wavepacket excitation. The energy level diagram of Kr is shown in Fig. B.1. Threephotons of 266 nm light (black arrows) possess an energy which is slightly below the ionizationthreshold of Kr, with enough bandwidth to excite a large number of Rydberg levels. At t =0, when the two pulses overlap, photoelectron signals are observed from a 3+1’ (1), 3+2’ (2),and 3+3’ (3) (overlapped with a 4 photon signal from the 267 only) multiphoton ionization,(where the gray arrows represent the 800 nm photons in Fig. B.1). At long times, however,these photoelectron signals persist at a reduced count rate. An example of the photoelectron
spectrum at long time delays (500 fs) is given in Fig. B.2. The labels (1), (2) and (3) relate thephotoelectron peaks in Fig. B.2 to the photon process in Fig. B.1. There are 3 sets of doublet
peaks separated by 1.5 eV (the energy of an 800 nm photon). Each doublet represents the spin
orbit splitting in the Kr+ ion. The doublet labeled (1) results from ionization of the Rydberg
wavepacket with one 800 nm photon. The second doublet peaks (labeled (2)) are photoelectrons
from ionization of the Rydberg wavepacket with 2 photons of 800 nm. The photoelectron peaks
labeled (3) do not change with pump-probe delay and are attributed to a 4-photon ionization of
Kr with the 266 nm laser.
Taking the total photoelectron counts in the peak at 0.8 eV (leaving the Kr+ ion in thehigh energy spin orbit state) from Fig. B.2 and plotting this versus pump-probe delay gives the

140

4p

(1)

(2)

(3)

1s
Figure B.1: An energy level diagram showing the excitation of a Rydberg wavepacket in Kr
by a 3-photon absorption of 266 nm (black arrows). When an 800 nm pulse (gray arrow) is
introduced, the Kr is ionized by a 1, 2, or 3 photon addition of the 800 nm photon. Note thatthe ionization of Kr with 4 photons of 266 nm is identical in energy to the 3+3’ multiphoton
ionization at t = 0.

141

Figure B.2: Photoelectron spectrum of Kr with a time delay between the 267 nm pulse and the
800 nm pulse of 500 fs.

142
black curve in Fig. B.3. A fast oscillatory structure with a period of 60 fs is observed on
top of a slower oscillation of about 2 ps. The peak at 1.5 eV (leaving the Kr+ ion in the low
energy spin orbit state) in Fig. B.2 shows primarily the slow 2 ps oscillation (shown as the darkgray line in Fig. B.3). When the black time trace is normalized to the dark gray time trace(effectively taking out the slow 2 ps oscillation), the light gray time trace results, showing only
the fast oscillatory structure.
The energy/pulse of the 266 nm beam remained constant at 60 J, but the 800 nm beam
was varied in an attempt to understand the oscillatory structure of the photoelectron signals. In
Fig. B.3, the 800 nm power was held at 1.4 mJ/pulse. Fig. B.4, however, shows the same time
traces as in Fig. B.3, but with the 800 nm beam reduced to 200 J/pulse by reducing the first iris

% of the beam). The difference between the time-

inside the chamber (effectively blocking 85

correlation of the two photoelectron peaks (leaving the ion in two different spin-orbit states) is
unclear, unless some coupling between spin orbit energy levels and the Rydberg energy levels
exists. However, it is still the same 800 nm photon which ionizes the Rydberg wavepacket, andit would seem unlikely that the spin orbit states of the ion would yield different signals.
The Rydberg progressions leading up to the ionization threshold in Kr are given in
Fig. B.5, calculated from Charlotte Moore’s Rydberg equations. The probability of ionizing
a Rydberg wavepacket is greater when the electron is near the nucleus, which is likely the causeof the fast oscillatory structure of the photoelectron signal. The period of the fast oscillation (60fs or 555 cm 1 ) could be due to a beating between two Rydberg energy levels. In other words,
both energy levels are excited by the bandwidth of the laser and the frequency of recurrence of
the wavepacket then becomes the difference in energy between these two states. The energy difference between the ns = 10 and 11 calculated Rydberg levels is 545 cm 1 , which is likely wellwithin the error of the experimental measurement (perhaps properly fitting the data with a sinwave would give a more accurate number for the oscillation period with uncertainties, a Fouriertransform of the data was attempted, but there are not enough points for a good result). The slow
oscillatory structure is more puzzling. In the field of a high peak power laser, the Rydberg levels

143

Figure B.3: Time traces of the photoelectron signal resulting from the ionization of a Rydberg
wavepacket in Kr. The black trace represents the total counts in the photoelectron peak at 0.8
eV, and the dark gray from the photoelectron peak at 1.5 eV in Fig B.2. The light gray line isthe black trace normalized to the dark gray trace, showing the fast oscillatory structure.

144

Figure B.4: The same time traces as in Fig. B.3, with the power of the 800 nm beam reduced to
200 mW average power.

145

Figure B.5: Rydberg energy levels in Kr, showing the ns, nd3/2 and nd5/2 progressions. Theenergy of three 266 nm photons is designated by the solid black line. The dotted lines represent
the energy bandwidth (FWHM) of the 266 nm pulse.

146
can be shifted in energy due to an AC stark effect. If a large number of energy levels (shiftedto varying degrees) are populated, a slow oscillatory structure from the addition of many faster
oscillations could result. The data was never fully analyzed, but some work was done by Ed
Grant, which is summed up in a Microsoft Excel file named ’Kr Rydberg states(Ed).xls’. Some
helpful references are [81, 82, 83, 84].