Fujitsu Limited - Climate Change 2023
C0. Introduction

C0.1(C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization.
The Fujitsu Group has pursued "operating in harmony with nature" since its founding in 1935. At Fujitsu, we believe our Purpose is “to make the world more sustainable bybuilding trust in society through innovation.” We strive to fulfill this Purpose in all of our corporate activities. As a global ICT corporation, the Fujitsu Group develops advanced
environmental technologies, and makes products and services employing these technologies available throughout the world. Through the pursuit of this mission we not only
lessen the environmental burden of our own business activities but also help to reduce the environmental burden of our customers and society.

C0.2(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data and indicate whether you will be providing emissions data for past reporting
years.
Reporting year
Start date
April 1 2022
End date
March 31 2023
Indicate if you are providing emissions data for past reporting years
No
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 1 emissions data for<Not Applicable>
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 2 emissions data for<Not Applicable>
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 3 emissions data for<Not Applicable>

C0.3(C0.3) Select the countries/areas in which you operate.
Australia
BrazilChina
Denmark
FinlandGermany
India
Japan
Malaysia
New ZealandPhilippines
Republic of Korea
Spain
Taiwan, China
Thailand
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America

C0.4(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
JPY

C0.5

CDP

Page 1 of 125

(C0.5) Select the option that describes the reporting boundary for which climate-related impacts on your business are being reported. Note that this option shouldalign with your chosen approach for consolidating your GHG inventory.
Financial control

C0.8(C0.8) Does your organization have an ISIN code or another unique identifier (e.g., Ticker, CUSIP, etc.)?
Indicate whether you are able to provide a unique identifier for your organization

Provide your unique identifier

Yes, an ISIN code

JP3818000006

C1. GovernanceC1.1(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-related issues within your organization?
Yes

C1.1a
(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) (do not include any names) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position
Responsibilities for climate-related issuesofindividual
orcommittee
Chief
Executive
Officer(CEO)

CEO in charge of environmental issues is the highest standing person responsible for oversight of the Fujitsu Group's climate change-related issues through three internal structures known as the "RiskManagement & Compliance Committee", the Sustainability Management Committee and the "Environmental Management System". CEO who is as a member of the Board directly receives a reportfrom the Risk Management & Compliance Committee that is under its immediate control and supervises the committee on its responses toward key business and climate-related risks. There areprocedures to identify, assess and manage the physical and transitional risks that may potentially occur in relation to climate change, together with a structure that oversees these procedures, in the
Risk Management & Compliance Committee. Next, the Sustainability Management Committee chaired by the CEO discusses climate-related issues, the main agenda of the Management Council. In
FY2021, for example, it was decided by the Committee to increase investment in renewable energy to achieve GHG emission reduction targets in line with the SBT 1.5°C target. In addition, the FujitsuGroup has ISO14001-based environmental management systems in place; in the systems, the Board receives reports from the "Management Council," which makes the final decisions in climate
strategies. CEO is transferred the authority concerning the execution of duty by the Board within the appropriate range, and has all the business execution authorities including the problem related tothe climatic variation.

C1.1b(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Frequency with which climaterelated issues are a scheduled
agenda item

Governance mechanisms into
which climate-related issues areintegrated

Scope ofboard-level
oversight

Please explain

Scheduled – some meetings

Reviewing and guiding annual
budgets
Overseeing major capital
expenditures
Overseeing and guiding employee
incentives
Reviewing and guiding strategy
Overseeing and guiding thedevelopment of a transition plan
Monitoring the implementation of atransition plan
Overseeing the setting of corporate
targets
Monitoring progress towards
corporate targets
Reviewing and guiding the risk
management process<Not
Applicable>

The Board receives reports on the following:- A regular report on important aspects selected, analyzed and assessed pertaining to companywide risks including
those of climate change- A report on risks pursuant to the procedures prescribed in the company risk management system in case that
unexpected events, such as natural disasters, occur- A regular report on climate change strategies determined by the Management Council (The strategies are discussed
in the Sustainability Management Committee, under the direct control of the Management Council, as the key
agendas).
The Board oversees climate change issues after receiving reports on the following:- Ensuring consistency between the strategies to contribute to tackling climate change and the business strategies,
through reviewing and guiding strategies- Progress management of GHG reduction actions (in accordance with its own targets such as SBT,RE100 etc.) tocontribute to mitigation of the climate change through reviewing and guiding major plans of actions- Notification that climate change is perceived as a significant risk through reviewing and guiding management politics

C1.1d

CDP

Page 2 of 125

(C1.1d) Does your organization have at least one board member with competence on climate-related issues?
Board
Criteria used to assess competence of board member(s) on climate-related issues
member(s) havecompetence on
climate-related
issuesRow Yes1

Primary reason for
no board-levelcompetence on
climate-related
issues

We evaluate Board Members’ abilities with respect to climate issues from the standpoints of driving and<Not Applicable>
managing initiatives. Specifically, Fujitsu’s President & CEO serves as a member of WBCSD’s Executive
Committee, where he leads global-scale Sustainability Transformation (SX) efforts to address social issues,
including climate issues.
We also evaluate Board Members’ abilities with respect to water-related issues from the standpoint of
academic expertise. One of the Board Members is appointed with the expectation that she can provide wideranging advice and direction as an academic authority on Fujitsu’s responses to changes in its external
environment and efforts to address the SDGs, including climate issues.

Explain why your organization does not have atleast one board member with competence on
climate-related issues and any plans to address
board-level competence in the future<Not Applicable>

C1.2(C1.2) Provide the highest management-level position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position or committee
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Managing major capital and/or operational expenditures related to low-carbon products or services (including R&D)
Providing climate-related employee incentives
Developing a climate transition plan
Implementing a climate transition plan
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Setting climate-related corporate targets
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities
Managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
Other, please specify (Report by Risk Compliance Committee and Sustainability Management Committee)
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Quarterly
Please explain[Description of responsibilities and organizational structure]
The CEO in the Fujitsu Group has the highest-level responsibility in making decisions on climate change-related issues based on the authority delegated by the Board;various internal committees related to climate change have a governance system in place enabling CEO tomake informed final decisions as the last responsible person. For example, Risk Management & Compliance Committee, an organization directly reporting to the Board,
manages company​wide risks including climate-related risks globally. The CEO assumes the position of thecommittee chairman. The chairman of "the Sustainability Management Committee" positioned directly below the Management Council is also assumed by the CEO.
Risk management is an example of the delegation of power by the CEO. The CEO, the chairman of Risk Management & Compliance Committee, appoints a Chief Risk
Compliance Officer as an executor of decisions of the Committee andhas the Officer execute the decisions. Climate changes is a topic related to not only risk management but also various areas such as business strategy and supply chain
management; therefore, the CEO who can manage several chief operating officers in specialized roles is
considered suitable as a chief executive related to climate change in the Fujitsu Group.
Regarding sustainability , the CEO is the chairman and chief executive of "the Sustainability Management Committee" ; however, a director in charge is appointed for the
execution of specific activities.
[Description of position specific climate-related issues monitoring process]The power to execute operations of CEO is delegated to each chief representative director in the Fujitsu Group by utilizing the operating officer system. For example, forrisk management, the person responsible for risk and compliance identifies, analyzes, and assesses critical risks and reports the results to the chairman, the CEO, at least
twice on years for deliberation. Similarly, the CEO as the chairman of the Sustainability Management Committee makes final decisions on specific policy of climate change
strategies semiannually for environmental activities, and specific management is performed under a director in charge with execution responsibilities. For example, Fujitsu
is a member of the RE100 initiative. Analysis and plans on expanding the introduction of renewable energy were presented at the Management committee, and the CEO
ultimately made a decision based on multiple perspectives, including the investment plan, timeline and impact. As a result, a decision was made to increase investment toproactively expand the use of renewable energy toward achieving GHG emission reduction targets in line with the SBT 1.5 degree target.

C1.3(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets?
Provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues
Row 1

Comment

Yes

C1.3a

CDP

Page 3 of 125

(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues (do not include the names of individuals).
Entitled to incentive
Board/Executive board
Type of incentive
Monetary reward
Incentive(s)Bonus - % of salary
Performance indicator(s)Company performance against a climate-related sustainability index (e.g., DJSI, CDP Climate Change score etc.)
Incentive plan(s) this incentive is linked to
Short-Term Incentive Plan
Further details of incentive(s)Emissions reduction project Emissions reduction target Energy reduction project Energy reduction target Efficiency project Efficiency target Behavior change related
indicator
Outstanding results with respect to the environment and climate change are reflected in Board Members’ annual performance evaluations. We took a new look at the bonus
system for our executive directors (CEO, COO, CFO) in 2022. Our aim was to strengthen our commitment to management goals that are linked to the fulfillment of Fujitsu’s
Purpose: “To make the world more sustainable by building trust in society through innovation.” This review led us to decide to add CDP, a set of third-party benchmarks on
ESG, as an evaluation indicator in determining executive directors’ bonuses.
From now on, Fujitsu’s inclusion among CDP’s A List companies will be linked to the amount of bonuses paid. And since “reduction of CO2” is included among CDP’sevaluation items, the degree to which CO2 reduction efforts have progressed will affect executive directors’ bonus payment rate (by plus or minus several percent).Whether
the company is on the CDP A List affects the bonus payment percentage (± a few percent) of the executive directors. Since being put on the A List is an incentive, multiple
items which are asked about in CDP questions are targets for the incentive.
Explain how this incentive contributes to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Considering climate issues over the short, medium, and long term can lead to adaptation to and mitigation of risks as well as new opportunities to create value. Earninghigh marks in evaluations with respect to global indices can help build a stronger upstream presence in business negotiations. It is also conducive to expanded collaboration
with business partners.

C2. Risks and opportunities

C2.1(C2.1) Does your organization have a process for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities?
Yes

C2.1a
(C2.1a) How does your organization define short-, medium- and long-term time horizons?
From (years)

To (years)

Comment

Short-term

02

FY 2022- FY 2023

Medium-term

2

10

FY 2023 - FY 2030

Long-term

1030

FY 2030 - FY2050

C2.1b(C2.1b) How does your organization define substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
We develop a scenario of climate-related risks and assess it by multiplying the five-level ranks (1 to 5 points) of "financial impact" (1 billion yen to 100 billion yen) and"occurrence frequency" ('several times per year' to 'once in ten years'). When the formula indicates the score equal or higher than the threshold value of 15, and if
countermeasures are inadequate, we define it as the substantive financial or strategic impact on our business. ([Financial impact (1-5 points)] x [Likelihood of occurrence (1-5
points)] = 15 or more on a scale of 1-25 will be considered as exceeding the threshold.)If, for example, a natural disaster such as a flood or typhoon caused devastating damages due to the impact of climate change and disrupted activities at primary sites over
several months, the loss in sales could total 50 billion yen or more. However, the presumed frequency of such occurrences is considered to be no more than once in 10 years.
Furthermore, solid disaster preventive measures have already been planned and implemented. When verified against the assessment criteria, this scenario does notcorrespond to risks that would cause substantive change in business as they fall below the threshold.

C2.2

CDP

Page 4 of 125

(C2.2) Describe your process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
More than once a year
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-termLong-term
Description of process
Fujitsu group has established the Risk Management & Compliance Committee (chaired by the CEO) as the highest-ranked decision-making body for risk management andcompliance directly under the Board. This committee monitors risk management conditions of Fujitsu group at least twice a year. The Committee executes integrated
assessment of a comprehensive group-wide risks involving finance, customers, competitor/industry, policies/regulations, security, climate-related issues, and so on. The
Committee has developed a tool for regular implementation of risk assessment, which is distributed to respective risk compliance officers who are asked to enter theanswers. The tool is designed to enable officers to report on risk threat scenarios by assessing the degree of financial impact, occurrence frequency and condition ofcountermeasures. Short-term, medium-term and long-term risks are represented in the "Likelihood of occurrence" section.
Using this tool, an assessment is conducted by departments in charge of company-wide, cross-sectional risks, namely: Public Policy and Business Development Office andenvironmental department for regulatory and market risks; marketing department and environmental department for reputational and technological risks; PR/IR Office andenvironmental department for investor risks; General Affairs Department, facilities management department and environmental department for physical risks.
The company-wide risk assessment outputs are aggregated with the results of asset-level assessment , and matrix analysis is performed on the consolidated results from
two aspects - the degree of financial impact (up to 100 billion yen) and occurrence frequency (in the next ten years and beyond) - to identify group-wide risks that are higher
on the priority ranking; then the results are reported to the Board.
Regarding potential risks such as long-term climate issues, the Sustainability Management Committee, chaired by the CEO and comprising the heads of business groups
and regions, is specifically engaged in group-wide strategy planning by considering climate-related and other environmental risks and opportunities, as well as confirmationof progress. The Sustainability Management Committee held twice a year to monitor the implementation status of climate strategy including response to risks. This provides
an opportunity for the CEOs and executive officers of business groups and regional heads to manage the entire company’s response status from the perspective ofmanagement execution.
Given that Fujitsu delivers various ICT solutions for societal issues, addressing climate change mitigation/ adaptation is a business opportunity for our technology solutions
segment 87% of sales). Each business group head analyzes opportunities and develops strategies, followed by the CEO making final decisions on a business plan andresource allocation in the Management Council.
For short-term, medium-term and long-term climate change risks and opportunities, company-wide strategies are formulated, decisions are made and progress is kept trackof while considering environmental risks and opportunities that include climate change at the Sustainability Management Committee chaired by the CEO and comprisingheads of business groups and regions.

C2.2a(C2.2a) Which risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Relevance Please explain&
inclusion

CDP

Current
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

At present, the Fujitsu Group is subject to laws and regulations in regard to GHG emissions and energy use. Those are taken into account in our risk evaluations because the Fujitsu brand
may be damaged if we violate them and costs for responsive measures may rise if they become stricter.
For example, the industrial air conditioners used in all of over 100 sites in Fujitsu Japan and coolers in our semiconductor plants are applicable for the Act on Rational Use and Proper
Management of Fluorocarbons. This law requires regular measurement and reporting of fluorocarbon leakage for industrial air conditioners and a report in the event the leakage exceeds
1,000 CO2-ton per year. If a leakage occurs, administrative authorities will conduct on-site inspection; unless complied, a fine of 200,000 yen will be imposed.
Managing the leakage of CFC is one of the compliance items in ISO14001-based Environment Management System (EMS) of Fujitsu. All offices conduct inspections once every 3 months
and large equipment run inspections on a monthly basis. Inspection results are aggregated at the environmental division through EMS's reporting procedures.
Another regulatory risk is that a levy is added to electricity costs based on the feed-in tariff (FIT) system for renewable energy in Japan. FIT accounts for about 15% of energy
procurement costs for Fujitsu in the country. In particular, while data centers and ICT services require power, we expect FIT's impact on procurement costs to further increase as thesurcharges are projected to rise.
Based on the company-wide risk management system, departments responsible for these facilities, the environmental division and the purchasing department are the main players working
on power usage and costs associated with these business activities. The purchasing department compares and analyzes power rates through utilizing our procured power system inconsidering cost optimization with the contracted power company and cutting down CO2 emissions. The environmental division performs correlation analysis of temperature and electricity
consumption, estimates energy consumption of the day based on weather forecast on the previous day, and provides information through a portal website accessible by each site.

Emerging
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

As an emerging regulation, carbon pricing is likely to be implemented in many countries in the world. Energy use is indispensable in continuing data center operation and production
activities in plants, and that account for 80 to 90% of all energy use in the Fujitsu Group. If energy price rises due to regulatory moves, Fujitsu will need to pay for additional cost.
Therefore, emerging regulation is relevant to our business and included in our risk assessment, and the trend of risk is being monitored.
For example, in Japan the Ministry of the Environment holds "A study group on how carbon pricing should be" from 2017, discussing specific policy proposals. It has been decided that theJapanese version of carbon pricing will be gradually introduced from fiscal 2023. If carbon tax and emissions trading system (ETS) are introduced in Japan in the future, Fujitsu is likely toface an increase in costs, such as capital investment cost for energy saving (current expenditure is about 1.5 billion yen per year) , energy procurement cost, credit procurement cost,procurement cost for renewable energy and certification.
For instance, if the carbon-emissions tax is introduced in Japan, it is provisionally calculated that our increases for about 1 billion yen.
For such emerging regulation risks, analysis, assessment, and management of detailed risks are performed under the company-wide risk management structure, led by Public Policy andBusiness Development Office and the environmental division as organizations responsible for these risks. Specifically, we collect information on trends of industrial associations andministries and agencies. We confirm the possibility of risk emergence and timelines. We also assess financial impact on Fujitsu. Based on the results of such risk assessment in thecompany, we conduct lobbying activities via an industrial association.

Page 5 of 125

Relevance Please explain&
inclusion
Technology Relevant,alwaysincludedElectricity use is essential for ICT, in particular super computers and PC servers (including Fujitsu's products) consume a large amount of electricity. The pursuit of energy efficiency would
greatly contribute to our market competitiveness, whereas there is a risk that we may lose our competitive edge over our competitors in the technological development competition.
Therefore, we always include this in the risk assessment.
For example, one of the technological development projects Fujitsu is now focused upon is quantum computing. In 2020, Fujitsu started research and development on quantum computing
in all areas from hardware to software, and spanning from basic to applied, through open innovation with leading research institutions across the globe (RIKEN, the University of Tokyo,
Quantum Benchmark, etc.), and is actively making upfront investments. However, there is a concern in case if we cannot have supremacy in the technological development competition,
our share or profitability may decrease.
Under the company-wide risk management structure, each technology development unit and marketing department, which are responsible for such technological risks, play an active rolein analyzing, evaluating, and managing risks in detail including the trends of other companies. On the other hand, for information gathering regarding cutting-edge environmental
technologies, the Environmental division plays an active role in collecting information on the trends of other companies via industrial groups such as JEITA (Japan Electronics andInformation Technology Industries Association).
Furthermore, the 11th Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan (FY2023-FY2025) aims to resolve environmental and social issues by setting eight targets in three global risks areas
highlighted by the World Economic Forum: “Climate Change,” “Resource Circulation,” and “Living in Harmony with Nature.” These targets are mapped against the two values of “Customers
and Society” and “Fujitsu and the Supply Chain. In the area of Climate Change, we have set reduction targets for FY2025 to achieve Net Zero emissions of greenhouse gases from ourbusiness activities and from the entire value chain. We will achieve them through the strategic introduction of renewable energy and the development of energy conservation throughadvanced ICT. At the same time, we will promote efforts to grasp and reduce the environmental impact of our suppliers and achieve further energy savings by our products.

Legal

Relevant, If the disclosure of climate change-related risks in business is insufficient, there is a non-zero chance that our shareholders and stakeholders file a lawsuit against us; therefore, it issometimes included in the risk assessment appropriately.
included
After COP 21 in 2015, investment to Fujitsu Group by investors making passive investment in consideration of ESG is increasing.
In fact, there was a lawsuit in 2016 in which shareholders sued an Australian bank for neglecting to appropriately disclose climate change-related business risks. As our shareholders
individually inquire on matters pertaining to climate change, we recognize that investors perceive this as a risk.
A number of overseas ESG investors has acquired Fujitsu's stocks, and the holding rate has increased by about 15% since the adoption of the Paris Agreement. These investors tend toplace importance on disclosure of information related to climate change. Appropriate information disclosure is becoming increasingly important, including assessment of risks related toclimate change in business and results of current activities for measures against global warming. We strives to provide information to all stakeholders by holding ESG briefing sessions
every year since FY 2015 and by disclosing information through our websites, CDP responses, etc.
Under the company-wide risk management structure, we grasp the interests of stakeholders and confirm the possibility of emergence of lawsuit risk, led by environmental department ,IR/PR office and legal department as organizations responsible for lawsuit risk. The risk of lawsuit against our company is assessed when the results of trend survey were reported fromexternal organizations and a climate-related lawsuit was filed against other companies.

MarketRelevant,
alwaysincluded

The market is expected to become more sensitive to the energy consumption levels of products and services and to the amount of energy savings achieved from solutions, following theincreasing demand for GHG reductions to companies and risks of cost increases through the introduction of carbon taxes.
Demands for low-carbon supercomputers and HPC (high-performing computing) have been increasing for the past few years as those are used as platforms for big data analysis andartificial intelligence. The reason energy-saving supercomputers are increasing in demand is the massive utility costs required in running supercomputers. Consequently, supercomputerswith poor power efficiency will not be chosen by customers due to the high operational costs required and lead to business opportunity losses. As a result of collecting information on
customer requests on improving energy efficiency, it has been determined that expanding demand for such low-carbon products is a potential business risk and has since always been
included in risk assessments.
For example, the annual power consumption of the supercomputer previously delivered by Fujitsu was equivalent to that of about 30,000 general households. When electricity rates rose,
the impact was so great that a simple calculation indicated an increase in operating expenses of more than 200 million yen annually. The Company has since announced a successor
model with significantly improved power performance, but a lack of continuous improvement in energy-saving performance would pose risks of missing business opportunities.
As this risk is especially relevant to Fujitsu's system platform area, which accounts for 617 billion yen of sales in FY2022; in order to respond to the market's increase in demand, the FujitsuGroup is focusing on the development of next-generation HPC-related technology, including CPUs with lower power consumption and circuit technology development.
We will also lose business opportunities if the amount of energy consumption reduced from our solutions is low against competitors. Therefore, we will increase business opportunities by
maximizing energy efficiency through leveraging our AI-powered Zinrai solution and Digital Annealer that uses digital circuits inspired by quantum phenomena for high-speed solutions for
optimization problems.

Reputation Relevant,alwaysincluded

If the Fujitsu Group ranks low in rating related to climate-related measures, or if we becomes the target of NGO's negative campaign or boycott campaign, our brand image will bedamaged, which may result in a risk of causing long-term negative impact on business, such as decrease in social credibility, increased cost to respond to the situation, and decreased
loyalty of employees. Therefore, reputation risk is always included in the risk assessment.
For example, together with eight other ICT companies, Fujitsu Finland was a subject of the survey called "How Green Is My Interest?", which is a company assessment carried out by aninternational NGO in 2013, and the benchmark report on energy use was published. While Fujitsu Finland was acknowledged as advanced due to the high energy efficiency of the data
center, the limited use of renewable energy was revealed (the second lowest in rank). This NGO is influential in Finland and the NWE and CEE regions (Europe) where our sales accountfor 72% of our total overseas sales. Therefore, we accelerated the use of renewable energy in Fujitsu Finland, in order to avoid a risk that this NGO may denounce us.
Detailed analysis, assessment, and management of such reputation risks are performed under the company-wide risk management structure, led by PR office and environmental
department as organizations responsible for the risk. We monitor NGO's proposals, lobbying activities, and survey reports and check the possibility of risks.

AcutephysicalRelevant,
alwaysincludedDue to occurrences of acute natural disasters such as large-scale flood damage, sudden downpours, and lightning, business sites and data centers of the Fujitsu Group may suffer fromfloods and severed energy supply. We include acute physical risks in the risk assessment as we recognize the possibilities of business impact such as failures of electric devices andpower-supply facilities, loss of important data, production line stops, and leakage of toxic substances. For example, there was a case that almost led to service suspension after sudden
heavy rain exceeded the area's water treatment capacity within a short time period and flooded into a Fujitsu Group company's office.
Since Fujitsu's data centers bear the responsibilities for system operations of customers as the platforms for providing outsourcing services, operation suspension by natural disasters must
be prevented. At the primary data centers in Gunma Prefecture, Hyogo Prefectures, etc., we have raised the floor level of the buildings higher than ground level, improved drainage design
to prevent puddles on the roof, and carried out periodical waterproofing work, in order to avoid flood risks in case disasters should occur. We make efforts for our business continuity andachieve stable operation of customers' systems.
As for such acute physical risks in Fujitsu business sites, the general affairs department, facility management department, and data center operation department play an active role in risk
assessments. Based on the data center facility standards (Tier), which are external certified standards, and our in-house facility management standards, internal audits from the quality
control department carries out on-site audits and risk assessment in each phase of planning, designing, construction, and operation of buildings. This allows the entire group to ensure theprevention of physical risks due to acute natural disasters and maintain our business continuity.
In FY2020, Fujitsu assessed the risk of flooding at its locations, including those of group companies. As a result, it installed waterproof banks for the main building of Fujitsu's Kawasaki
Plant, an important hub for the Company's internal network, and throughout Fujitsu Solution Square.

Chronic
physicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Rising average temperatures due to climate change cause air conditioning energy of data centers, plants and offices, alongside energy costs in general, to increase. For example, our data
center has seen about a 3% increase in energy usage per every 1°C increase in the average annual outside temperature. In addition, there will be consequences in the event IT equipmentin our data center cannot be sufficiently cooled, such as reduced arithmetic processing capacity and shortened equipment life.
To fully utilize energy conservation and renewable energy, the new building at our data center in Gunma prefecture makes use of high-efficiency UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply), freecooling and green energy such as solar power. Feasible energy conservation initiatives have also been reviewed and implemented in other locations as well.
With regard to energy consumption and costs associated with business activities, the divisions responsible for facilities, the environment and purchasing play a central role in determining
risks through assessments and predictions of power cost increases by collecting data on energy consumption from each facility. When planning and repairing sites, the purchasing
department compares and analyzes power rates through utilizing the company's procured power system in considering cost optimization with the contracted power company and cutting
down CO2 emissions while also planning energy-saving designs. Environmental department performs correlation analysis of temperature and electricity consumption, estimates energy
consumption of the day based on the weather forecast on the previous day, and provides information through a portal website accessible by each site.

C2.3(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.3a

CDP

Page 6 of 125

(C2.3a) Provide details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Risk 1
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Emerging regulation

Carbon pricing mechanisms

Primary potential financial impact
Increased indirect (operating) costs
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
Carbon taxes are being introduced in Europe, the United States, China, Australia, and various other countries where Fujitsu has business bases. In Japan, too, discussions
are underway on a proposed system to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, and the government has decided to introduce a Japanese version of carbon pricing in stages
beginning in FY2023. If a carbon tax is introduced, the risk of future cost increases could arise. Such increases could be seen in capital investment expenditure for energy
conservation (1.5 billion yen in FY2021), energy procurement costs, credit procurement costs, and procurement costs for renewable energy electricity and certificates.
For example, according to the the IEA Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP) 2DS Scenario, carbon taxes may begin in the U.S. at $35/t-CO2 in 2020 and it could
increase linearly to $210/t-CO2 by 2050. (At present, the US has not introduced a carbon tax at a national level. The current administration, however, has pledged to
introduce carbon border adjustment measures, and discussions on implementing a carbon tax may suddenly emerge going forward.) As there are business sites of Fujitsu
America and Fujitsu Network Communications (FNC), the power consumption in the country accounts for 8.5% of Fujitsu Group's total power consumption of all overseas
sites. If Fujitsu's US locations do not continually use power derived from renewable energy sources, The cost of the carbon tax could have a financial impact ranging from30 million yen to as high as 210 million yen. The Japanese government (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and Ministry of the Environment (MOE)) iscurrently discussing the introduction of carbon pricing to achieve zero carbon emissions by 2050, which could pose risks of increased costs going forward.
Regarding the carbon pricing policy, in countries with an emissions trading system, as distinct from carbon taxes, a financial impact occurs only when there is an excess ofemissions. Therefore, we consider the impact is limited.
A simple simulation of the Scope 1 & 2 emissions (497490 t-CO2) of the entire Fujitsu Group, it is equivalent to a financial impact of 1.3 billion to 9.1 billion yen (Calculated
as 131 yen to the dollar).
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
1303423800
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
13685949900
Explanation of financial impact figure
Regulatory compliance cost regarding electricity procurement is included in operating costs. If we do not shift to renewable energy, we will be obliged to pay carbon taxes,
which will lead to an increase in operating costs.
According to the 450 scenario of the IEA World Energy Outlook(2020), carbon taxes may be introduced to the U.S. at $20/t-CO2, and it is expected to be raised to $140/tCO2 by 2040. To simply simulate by applying this tax rate to Scope 1 & 2 emissions (497490 t-CO2) of the entire Fujitsu Group, it is equivalent to a financial impact of 1.3
billion to 9.1 billion yen (Calculated as 131 yen to the dollar).
We also take it into consideration of the worst-case scenario. According to the IEA Energy Technology Perspectives (ETP) 2DS Scenario, there is a report that carbon taxes
in the U.S. will rise up to $210/t-CO2 by 2050, it is equivalent to a financial impact of 14.7 billion yen.
Cost of response to risk
1500000000
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
To minimize the regulatory risks, we simultaneously promotes (1) progressive expansion of renewable energy(RE) use and (2) thorough energy conservation.
(1) As we pursue to expand the use of RE, we joined 'RE100 Initiative' in 2018 with a goal of 40% by 2030 and 100% by 2050.
For example, since June 2022, Fujitsu Australia has been using renewable energy to cover approximately 40% of the electricity it uses at its data centers. This is equivalent
to about 30% of Fujitsu Australia’s total annual electric power consumption and will offset approximately 30,000 tons of Fujitsu Australia’s annual greenhouse gas
emissions. Fujitsu Australia’s effort is an important step toward decarbonizing its operations and providing low-GHG-emitting services to its customers. This initiative willlead to a reduction in the amount of carbon tax paid, as well.
(2) Each business group set and manage energy reduction target based on Fujitsu's Science Based Target updated in 2020. We promote a reduction in emissions throughthe evaluation of priority projects, based on the Facility Investment Guidelines which set criteria for investment from economical and environmental perspectives.
For example,In 2020, Fujitsu Frontech Ltd. has introduced SOFC to its Kumagaya Service Solution Center(SSC) . In light of introducing this fuel cell power generation
system, approximately 50% of the electricity consumed at the Kumagaya SSC can be supplied by the fuel cells and reduce annual CO2 emissions by approximately 35%(compared to FY 2018) compared to when all power needed is procured from its power company.
With our promotion of the use of renewable energy and energy-saving facilities, etc., in response to the increased introduction of carbon pricing in various countries, wewere able to avoid costs of 85 million yen for renewable energy and 940 million yen for energy-saving facilities, respectively.
'The 'Cost of response to risk' was calculated by totaling the capital investment budget for global warming countermeasures in FY2021 (1.5 billion yen/year).The breakdown
is mostly investment for energy conservation, with about 80% for new introduction of air conditioners and refrigerators, and about 20% for LED lighting.
Comment
CDP

Page 7 of 125

Identifier
Risk 2
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driverMarketOther, please specify (Changes in electricity prices due to decarbonization)

Primary potential financial impact
Increased indirect (operating) costs
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
In the Fujitsu Group, the energy use in the operation of data centers and production in plants accounts for 80 to 90 percent of the total energy use in the group. As energy
use is essential in business activities, we consider an increase in expenditure associated with the fluctuation of electricity prices as a risk, and take it seriously.
In particular, we are concerned about ’decarbonization surcharges’ as a transition risk. In Japan where Fujitsu's data centers are located, for example, there is a Feed-in
Tariff (FIT) scheme for renewable energy. The surcharge unit price, According to the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy,It is estimated the amount will reach 4.7
trillion yen in 2030. The unit price of the surcharge, which was 3.45 yen/kWh in FY2022, is expected to rise by about 10% with the increase in renewable energy.
If FIT surcharge rises in the future, it will lead to an increase in our expenditure, and our cost competitiveness of data center-related services such as out-sourcing for
instance, will decline.
We anticipate possibilities that the similar low-carbon obligation schemes in other countries, either an emerging or strengthened regulation, may impact other Fujitsu sites
as well, as maximum potential impact of a surcharge equivalent to 4.1 billion yen is estimated.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
4100000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Currently, FIT surcharge has brought a financial impact to Fujitsu sites in Japan. Considering that the similar scheme will also bring a financial impact to our sites in othercountries in the future, based on the in-house estimation of FIT surcharge in Japan as of 2030 (1.1 times of the current surcharge unit price 3.45 yen/kWh) on the purchased
electricity volume of the Fujitsu Group worldwide (it was 1,058,560MWh in FY2022), an impact of about 4.1 billion yen is expected.
Cost of response to risk
120000000
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
The Fujitsu Group must lower its electric power consumption to mitigate the financial impact of charges associated with the FIT surcharge system. We evaluate priority
projects based on our Capital Investment Guidelines, which set internal standards for capital investment from economic and environmental perspectives. We then apply
best-practice measures to develop innovative technologies and internal practices.
For example, we introduced into some data centers in the Kanto and Hokuriku regions an air-conditioning control system that utilizes Fujitsu-developed AI (machinelearning). This system minimizes the power needed to cool high-performance, high-heat-generating servers and other IT equipment to address their increasing power
consumption (heat generation). This step has reduced annual power consumption by over 20%(FY 2019 and beyond). We are likewise implementing energy-saving
measures for air conditioners at data centers of other business sites by frequently reassessing the cooling temperature and flow rate of chilled water. Such measures
include extending the operating hours of outdoor air cooling and using free cooling. By deploying these measures across our organization, we are endeavoring to minimize
the risk that FIT surcharges will affect our financial circumstances.
The "Cost of response to risk" was calculated by aggregating R&D costs for promoting energy conservation, such as power reduction technologies in FY2020 (costs fordeveloping technology to reduce power consumption of servers by accelerating processing speed, etc.). (120 million yen/year). The breakdown is about 50% for thedevelopment of energy conservation technologies for data centers and about 50% for the development of manufacturing processes and other related technologies.
At Fujitsu, we plan to invest 1 to 2 billion yen annually over the short to medium term in energy-saving equipment and other decarbonization measures. We will also reduce
power costs by installing energy-saving equipment.
Comment
Identifier
Risk 3
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Reputation

CDP

Increased stakeholder concern or negative stakeholder feedback

Page 8 of 125

Primary potential financial impact
Decreased revenues due to reduced demand for products and services
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
If the Fujitsu Group is ranked low regarding countermeasures against climate change or if the group becomes the target of NGO's negative campaigns or boycott, our brandvalue will be weakened, and there are risks of a long-term negative impact on our business such as a loss of social credibility, an increase in cost for measures, and adecrease in employees' loyalty.In fact, in recent years, investors and business partners have been demanding more proactive disclosure of climate change measures, andcontractual terms and conditions require climate change measures such as greenhouse gas emission reductions, so we recognize that a company-wide approach isessential. According to the RE100 2022 annual disclosure report, the “Services” sector, to which Fujitsu belongs, had a 60% renewable energy utilization rate in 2021, andthe average target year for achieving RE100 is 2027, which is ahead of other industries. The sector is facing intensified competition and higher sector-specific risks.
For example, together with eight other ICT companies, Fujitsu Finland was a subject of the survey called "How Green Is My Interest?", which is an company assessment
carried out by an international NGO in 2013, and the benchmark report on energy use including our company's information was published. While Fujitsu Finland was
acknowledged as advanced due to the high energy efficiency of the data center, the limited use of renewable energy was revealed by the report (the second lowest inrank). This NGO is influential in Finland and the NWE and CEE region (Europe) where our sales account for 72% of our total overseas sales.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Very likely
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
26300000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
If by any chance the situations get aggravated as to cause product recalls, it will have a significant financial impact. By studying other companies' cases, we estimate that
there was a 7 to 15% decrease of revenue due to the impact of extraordinary loss and cost for countermeasures. However, in many cases, behind these worst situations,
there are faults on a company's side, including false description of product information. Thus, even if our company becomes the target of negative campaigns or boycott, itis predicted that the impact on sales will remain small, as long as there is no significant negligence made by our company.
To estimate the potential financial impact on overseas sites' sales of 1316.9 billion yen, where NGO's influences are relatively strong, the financial impact will be around26.3 billion yen if an impact of 1% occurs for two years.
Cost of response to risk
200000000
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
To avoid reputation risks, Fujitsu gathers information on major environment-related rating surveys, as well as performance data pertaining to climate change at each of its
sites, in an effort to be up-to-date. As a result, recognizing the importance of introducing renewable energy(RE), Fujitsu joined the Science Based Target Initiative and theRE100 Initiative, in order to expand our use of RE following the internationally common framework; and we have set targets of 40% of RE use by 2030 and 100% by 2050.
In line with this goal, Fujitsu is also working to expand the use of RE primarily in its data centers outside Japan. To that end, Fujitsu is surveying the cost of introducing RE to
this end.
For example, in Fujitsu Finland, a benchmark report in comparison with other eight ICT companies was published. While Fujitsu Finland was acknowledged as advanced
due to the high energy efficiency of the data center, the limited use of RE was revealed and ranked the second lowest. In addition, considering surging carbon taxes inFinland, a decision was made to shift the power source to RE at the Management Board of Fujitsu Finland. As a result, since 2014, Fujitsu Finland have been purchasing
certified, 100% RE (wind power) in its facilities including offices and data centers, in spite of the fact that they are rental facilities.
Furthermore, based on case studies in Finland, we believe that the rate of RE use can be a reputational risk for customers in providing data center services globally, and weare developing carbon neutral data center service offerings, mainly for data center operations with typically high emissions, both in Japan and abroad. Specifically, we
completed a switch to 100% RE for all power required to operate the FUJITSU Hybrid IT Service FJcloud, a cloud service provided by Fujitsu data centers in Japan, by
FY2022.
The 'Cost of response to risk' is calculated as internal costs for responding to ESG-related information disclosure in order to mitigate and avoid risks of reputation damage.
(The costs of major environmental rating surveys and data monitoring at each site are calculated by multiplying the personnel costs per person of 20 million yen per year by
the number of employees 10 corresponding to the risk (200 million yen).)Of this amount, about 10% was for environment-related rating surveys and the remaining about
90% was for data monitoring at each site.
Comment

C2.4(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.4a
(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.

CDP

Page 9 of 125

Identifier
Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development of new products or services through R&D and innovation
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues through access to new and emerging markets
Company-specific description
Globally, the transportation sector has particularly high CO2 emissions, and a significant impact on climate change.In Japan, logistics is becoming increasingly important as
a form of infrastructure that supports society. However, driver shortages and traffic congestion accompanying growing logistics volume, increasing CO2 emissions, andother concerns have become important issues. Thus, reducing CO2 in the logistics sector, which accounts for more than one-third of CO2 emissions in the transportation
sector, is an urgent and extremely important challenge that must be overcome to achieve the greenhouse gas reduction target (35% reduction in the transportation sector)
set in the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures.
As a service provider, Fujitsu provides logistics solutions and other systems and services ranging from supply chain management strategy planning to development andoperation. We aim to contribute to environmental and social issues such as the reduction of CO2 emissions through our business by solving logistics efficiency issues with
our technologies.
To meet such customer needs, Fujitsu's quantum computing technology Digital Annealer, a new architecture that rapidly solves "combinatorial optimization problems" using
a digital circuit design inspired by quantum phenomena, can be applied. By utilizing Digital Annealer, we were able to reduce CO2 emissions by 8.9%, not only by reducing
calculation time, but also by discovering effective distribution routes, improving loading efficiency, and improving the efficiency of the number of trucks and total mileage
driven. We also confirmed a 2 ~ 5% reduction in distribution costs, including the number of drivers, number of trucks, mileage, and sorting work. This technology thus
possesses an overwhelming advantage over conventional methods.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
4192000000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
According to the GeSI (Global e-Sustainability Initiative) report (Based on a detailed model that quantifies the broad social and economic benefits of ICT, it reports on ICT ’s contribution to reducing global CO2 emissions and realizing a sustainable society), new sales that the ICT sector will generate in regards to global warming
countermeasures are estimated to be about 2 trillion dollars as of 2030 based. If we apply our IT service share of 1.6% in the world in FY2020 (source: IDC Japan), we canestimate that Fujitsu will have new market opportunities of about 4.2 trillion yen (Calculated as 131 yen to the dollar). Among them, logistics market opportunities are
assumed to be around 4,192 billions of yen, which is about 1/10 of the market opportunity.
Cost to realize opportunity
18900000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Fujitsu is endeavoring to generate opportunities in the logistics industry in relation to reducing their fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.
As a result, in 2020, for example, Fujitsu and Toyota Systems Corporation jointly conducted a demonstration using Digital Annealer to optimize the distribution network forparts required for automobile manufacturing. To solve the problem of searching for more than 3 million routes to purchase parts from more than several hundred suppliers,
pass through relay warehouses, and deliver them to factories, Digital Annealer was used to calculate and optimize logistics costs, including fleet size, total distancetraveled, and sorting operations. As a result, it was confirmed that a massive number of optimization calculations could be performed in a very short time span. Furthermore,
the demonstration indicated this technology can potentially reduce logistics-related costs by approximately 2% to 5% by discovering effective logistics routes that could
previously not be found, thereby improving loading efficiency and increasing fleet efficiency and total distance traveled.
As such, this technology possesses an overwhelming advantage over conventional methods and provides an opportunity to capture the market.
We began making Fujitsu Computing as a Service (CaaS)—which includes the Digital Annealer adopted here as a component technology—available in Japan from October
2022 and will be gradually expanding globally in FY2023. CaaS is a set of services that makes advanced computing and software technologies easily accessible toeveryone.
The 'Cost to realize opportunity' is calculated as R&D costs on services pertaining to climate change (calculated by multiplying the Fujitsu Group's R&D costs in FY2022(109.5 billion yen) by the ratio of low-carbon services (17.2%): 18.9 billion yen/year). These include solution services and infrastructure services such as cloud.By 2030, we
aim to increase sales by offering environmental impact reduction-related components as added value when discussing measures to address issues in various industries
with customers.
Under our Fujitsu Uvance brand, which envisions society in 2030, we aim to increase sales by providing added value from the perspective of reducing environmental impact
when discussing measures to address issues in various industries with our customers, and contribute to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 on a global scale.
Comment
Identifier
Opp2
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
CDP

Page 10 of 125

Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development and/or expansion of low emission goods and services
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific description
Fujitsu recognizes that there is a large demand for energy-saving products in the global market. In recent years, in the public sector, there has been a higher demand for aserver called HPC (High Performing Computing) and supercompeter as a basis of big data and AI.
At present, the cost of cooling energy for data centers is extremely high due to the high heat generation of HPCs, and there is thus strong demand for energy-saving
products. To meet the growing market demand for energy-saving products, the Fujitsu Group is focusing on the development of supercomputer-related technologies such
as CPUs with low power consumption per performance, and circuit technology.
For example, the annual power consumption of the supercomputer previously delivered by Fujitsu was equivalent to that of about 30,000 general households. Whenelectricity rates rose, the impact was so great that a simple calculation indicated an increase in operating expenses of more than 200 million yen annually. In light of this, theCompany has strengthened its development of system implementation technology to achieve high performance and energy conservation. The prototype supercomputerequipped with this technology has ranked #1 in the Green500 supercomputer energy efficiency ranking in 2019. This system implementation technology reduces CPU
power consumption in addition to mitigating power loss across the entire system by applying measures such as reduced power loss from the power-supply unit through theuse of Fujitsu's proprietary circuit method and latest high-efficiency circuits. As a result, the overall power loss across the entire system has fallen significantly from 24% to14%, achieving one of the world's highest power-efficiency performances. This unique energy-saving technology possesses market advantage over competitors.
As for Fujitsu's business segment, it is considered that the system platform category (servers, storage systems, network products, etc.), which contributes to sales of 678.1
billion yen, will enjoy the benefits of this business opportunity.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
61800000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
The HPC (High Performing Computing) market has been growing steadily. According to the survey conducted by a U.S. research company, Hyperion Research,The HPC
cloud market is expected to grow from 6.3 billion USD in 2022 to nearly 11.5 billion USD by 2026. The 5-year CAGR from 2021 to 2026 is 17.6%.
If we assume that the Fujitsu's system platform area, which accounts for 678.1 billion yen of sales in FY2022, will grow to 17.6% by 2026, we can expect an increase insales by about 618.8 billion yen.
Cost to realize opportunity
18900000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
While the demand for servers including HPC (High-Performing Computing) and supercomputers is on the rise as foundations for big data and AI, further improvements inenergy-saving performance is anticipated given that they consume significant amounts of power.
In order to obtain business opportunities through energy-saving products, since FY2013, Fujitsu has been promoting product development focusing on "energy efficiency"
when products are used, which has a significant impact on the product life cycle. To achieve SBT, the Environmental Action Plan Stage X from FY2021 states that the
Fujitsu Group will "Reduce CO2 emissions due to power consumption during product usage in FY2021 by at least 37% (compared to FY2013)" and the Group continues todevelop energy-saving products by setting energy efficiency and power consumption during use as indicators.
As a result, for example, the PRIMEHPC FX1000 supercomputer, which has achieved one of the world's best power consumption performances, was developed andoffered to the market by thoroughly reducing the power loss of the entire system through applying Fujitsu's proprietary circuit method and latest high-efficiency circuits.This
supercomputer system was installed in Canon Inc. in 2020 for use in simulations in Canon’s product development processes. By reducing unnecessary product prototype
developments, benefits including shortened product development phases, cost reductions, and product performance, quality and functionality improvements are anticipatedthrough advanced energy-saving performance.
This proprietary energy-saving technology possesses market advantages over competitors and thus implies opportunities for capturing the market.
The 'Cost to realize opportunity' is calculated as R&D costs on products pertaining to climate change (calculated by multiplying the Fujitsu Group's R&D costs in FY2022(109.5 billion yen) by the ratio of low-carbon products (17.2%): 18.9 billion yen/year). Approximately 63% account for system products, and approximately 37% account for
network products.
Also, Fujitsu plans to invest 700 billion yen in business growth over the three years of its mid-term plan (2023-2025). Our technology strategy is one of the major areas ofinvestment for business growth; in the “computing field,” we will develop computing technology with high performance, high scalability, high reliability, and low power
consumption.
Comment
Identifier
Opp3
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
CDP

Page 11 of 125

Development of climate adaptation, resilience and insurance risk solutions
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific description
Fujitsu Group is keen to leverage our cutting-edge ICT for contributing to various adaptation measures.
When a disaster occurs, municipalities play a critical role in communicating evacuation advisories to residents. And one of the biggest challenges they face is the timing of it.
Simulation technology for predicting weather conditions and the scale of disasters is an effective way to solve this problem. The use of ICT in disaster prevention andmitigation is in great demand among local governments and above, and the research and development on weather-forecasting and disaster-prediction technologies,
together with the provision of related services, will generate business opportunities for Fujitsu.
An example is our construction of a supercomputer that forecasts the occurrence of linear precipitation zones, a cause of torrential rain-related disasters such as landslides
and river flooding, for the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) in 2023. Applying our high-performance and high-reliability PRIMEHPC FX1000, we are working to help
realize a safe, secure, and resilient society by supporting the JMA in its efforts to provide prompt, more accurate linear precipitation zone predictions and by contributing todisaster prevention and mitigation by tying those predictions to torrential rain preparations and early evacuation.
In 2020, Fujitsu also started providing an artificial intelligence (AI) water-management forecasting system that predicts river water levels during floods. This system utilizes
Fujitsu's AI-based proprietary technology that enables real-time, highly accurate prediction of river levels every 10 minutes for up to six hours in advance during floods,
even for small and medium-sized rivers with limited water level data available. This system will help local governments to make appropriate decisions regarding disasterprevention and mitigation, including executing rapid on-site response and issuing evacuation advisories.
The Japanese government's budget for disaster prevention and mitigation is approximately 4.7 trillion yen (FY2023 budget plan), and the IT infrastructure-related budget
can be estimated at approximately 10%, or 470 billion yen, based on a breakdown of budget items. Given that demand for IT services for disaster prevention and mitigation
is high in other countries as well, business opportunities worth approximately 24.8 billion yen are anticipated when taking into account Fujitsu's share of the IT services
market.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
24800000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
In recent years, disasters caused by abnormal weather considered to be triggered by climate change are on the rise. Following this, Japan is shifting more importance on
preparing for such disasters.The Japanese government's budget for disaster prevention and mitigation is approximately 4.7 trillion yen (FY2023 budget plan), and the IT
infrastructure-related budget can be estimated at approximately 10%, or 470 billion yen, based on a breakdown of budget items. Given that demand for IT services fordisaster prevention and mitigation is high in other countries as well, for example, if Fujitsu's 1.6% share of the global IT services market in FY2020 (Source: IDC Japan) is
applied to the budget scales of three developed countries including Japan and three emerging countries (estimated at 0.1 times the budget scale), business opportunities
worth approximately 24.8 billion yen are anticipated. (3 developed countries: 470 billion yen x 3 countries + 3 emerging countries (1/10th of budget scale): 470 billion yen x
0.1 x 3 countries) x Fujitsu's IT service share: 1.6%)
Cost to realize opportunity
18900000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Fujitsu advocates "Co-creation in an ecosystem" in its business strategy, and strives to resolve social issues including climate change issues, through big data analysis
powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and working with local governments and companies. Systematic city planning and efficient devising of disaster response plans basedon simulations of natural disasters are pivotal in preparing for disasters caused by climate change. Fujitsu's AI technology is extremely helpful in running such simulations
needed in adapting to climate change.
In 2020, we developed an AI-based water management forecasting system that uses machine learning to predict river water levels based on past rainfall and water leveldata.
The system can predict water levels at ten-minute intervals for up to six hours ahead by importing forecasted rainfall amounts. This capability will be useful to local
governments when preparing on-site response plans, issuing evacuation orders, or making other disaster prevention and mitigation decisions.
The system has been delivered to several municipalities who are now verifying consistency between actual and predicted values and studying practical applications. In
addition, more and more companies are adopting our Digital Resilience Service, which we launched in 2021 to support disaster response and business continuity. In thisway, we are creating new use cases, such as applications in crisis management as part of in-house general affairs and routine operations in the construction industry.
Additionally, Fujitsu intends to provide value to society under the “Trusted Society” concept to realize a prosperous, safe, secure, sustainable, and livable city bybackcasting from the vision of the world in 2030 as it should be.
The 'Cost to realize opportunity' is calculated as R&D costs on services pertaining to climate change (calculated by multiplying the Fujitsu Group's R&D costs in FY2022(109.5 billion yen) by the ratio of low-carbon products (17.2%): 18.9 billion yen/year). These include solution services and infrastructure services such as cloud.
Also, Fujitsu plans to invest 700 billion yen in business growth over the three years of its mid-term plan (2023-2025). Our technology strategy is one of the major areas ofinvestment for business growth; in the “AI field” and the “converging technologies field,” we are developing technologies to accelerate social implementation of technology ina wide range of fields, such as disaster prevention.
Comment

C3. Business Strategy

CDP

Page 12 of 125

C3.1(C3.1) Does your organization’s strategy include a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world?
Row 1
Climate transition planYes, we have a climate transition plan which aligns with a 1.5°C world
Publicly available climate transition plan
Yes
Mechanism by which feedback is collected from shareholders on your climate transition plan
We have a different feedback mechanism in place
Description of feedback mechanism
We have two mechanisms for obtaining feedback from investors. The first is an annual ESG briefing held for investors and the media. We use these briefings to explain ourtransition plans and receive feedback from investors through question-and-answer sessions and post-briefing questionnaire responses. The second is a feedback scheme
connected with the Integrated Report. We receive feedback on our transition plans, environmental initiatives, and information disclosure through questionnaires andinterviews after publishing the report.
Frequency of feedback collectionMore frequently than annually
Attach any relevant documents which detail your climate transition plan (optional)
https://www.fujitsu.com/global/about/ir/library/presentations/
Explain why your organization does not have a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world and any plans to develop one in the future<Not Applicable>
Explain why climate-related risks and opportunities have not influenced your strategy<Not Applicable>

C3.2(C3.2) Does your organization use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its strategy?
Use of climate-related scenario
analysis to inform strategy
Row Yes, qualitative and quantitative
1

Primary reason why your organization does not use climate-related Explain why your organization does not use climate-related scenario analysis toscenario analysis to inform its strategy
inform its strategy and any plans to use it in the future<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C3.2a(C3.2a) Provide details of your organization’s use of climate-related scenario analysis.
Climate-related
scenario

Scenario Temperature Parameters, assumptions, analytical choices
analysis alignment ofcoverage scenario

Transition Bespoke
scenarios transition
scenario

Company- 1.5ºC
wide

We identified businesses that are susceptible to climate change impacts (Sustainable Manufacturing [petrochemicals, automobiles,
food, and electronics businesses], Trusted Society, and Hybrid IT [data center business]) using the 1.5°C and 4°C scenarios. We then conducted scenario analyses
with a time horizon of 2050.
For opportunities, we estimated their maximum values based on share percentage and other factors, and then calculated the business impact as the main parameters
for increases or decreases in market size due to climate change.
As for risks, we devised hypotheses as follows. As policy regulation risk, that our response costs will rise and our corporate value will decrease due to tougher laws
and regulations concerning greenhouse gas emissions and energy use (e.g., carbon tax and energy saving policy). As market risk, that the price of electricity will soar
due to efforts to promote a carbon-neutral society (e.g., increasing electrification). As technology risk, that we will lose business opportunities if we fall behind due tofierce competition in technology development (e.g., energy-saving performance and low-carbon services) and cannot satisfy market needs. And as reputation risk, that
our costs for responding to the demands of investors, customers, and other stakeholders will increase.

Physicalclimatescenarios

RCP
8.5

Company- <Not
wide
Applicable>

We identified businesses that are susceptible to climate change impacts (Sustainable Manufacturing [petrochemicals, automobiles, food, and electronics businesses],Trusted Society, and Hybrid IT [data center business]) using the 1.5°C and 4°C scenarios. We then conducted scenario analyses that looked up to the year 2050.
For opportunities, we estimated their maximum values based on share percentage and other factors, and then calculated the business impacts as the main parameters
for increases or decreases in market size due to climate change. We formulated various hypotheses. Among them were that changes in precipitation and weather
patterns, rising average temperatures, sea level rise, and drought will increase our response costs (air conditioning and relocation for disaster avoidance), and that
increasingly intense abnormal weather phenomena will lead to operational shutdowns (including in the supply chain) and rising recovery costs.

C3.2b

CDP

Page 13 of 125

(C3.2b) Provide details of the focal questions your organization seeks to address by using climate-related scenario analysis, and summarize the results withrespect to these questions.
Row 1
Focal questions
Consistency and resilience of our company business and climate change strategies across multiple scenarios (1.5 °C, 4 °C) of climate change. In addition, identify the
direction of business strategies in the business focus areas in each scenario.
Results of the climate-related scenario analysis with respect to the focal questionsFirst half of 2021, We conducted our scenario analysis in four steps: “risk materiality assessment,” “scenario definition,” “business impact assessment,” and “a study of We
conducted our scenario analysis in four steps: “risk materiality assessment,” “scenario definition,” “business impact assessment,” and “a study of countermeasures.”
Focusing on the example of the automotive IT solutions business in the 1.5°C scenario, we estimated that global carbon pricing, emission targets, and policies would
accelerate the trend toward tighter regulation of internal combustion engines and carbon neutrality throughout the product life cycle in the automotive industry, an industry
which is a major source of business for us. We identified a growing need to visualize CO2 emissions throughout the supply chain, to develop strategies to become carbon
neutral, and to support measures using digital technology to reduce environmental impact throughout product lifecycles as a whole, stimulated by demand for enhanced
CO2 traceability using digital technology such as blockchain in the supply chains of our client industries. This is an opportunity for us to increase our IT solutions sales.
Based on the results of the scenario analysis, In addition, in our Sustainability Manufacturing Department (which deals with IT solutions for manufacturing clients), which
one of Fujitsu's priority business areas. From the second half of 2021, we has established “Carbon Neutrality” as a theme for providing value, and have already started
offering services such as CO2 emissions visualization and strategic support for achieving carbon neutrality.
We judged that our business demonstrated resilience from medium- and long-term perspectives. We reached this conclusion based on the consistency of the businessstrategy in the Fujitsu Group (orientation of the offering menu for each priority business area) and climate change strategy (SBT 1.5°C) and development of company-wide
promotion of the above stated risk countermeasures.

C3.3

CDP

Page 14 of 125

(C3.3) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your strategy.
Have climate- Description of influence
related risks
andopportunities
influenced
your strategy
in this area?
Products
andservices

Yes

Increased sales opportunities for ICT products and solutions services that can contribute to climate change "mitigation" affect revenue. At the moment, climate change-related solutions,products and services account for 29% of sales. We expect the proportion to further increase, thereby affecting our short and medium-term strategies.
Specifically, Fujitsu reflected in its strategy the promotion of development of energy-saving technologies for its products. By providing energy-saving products and services, we cancontribute to reducing cusutomer's power usage. This is also in line with the customer demands to reduce CO2 emissions and leads to enhanced competitiveness of our products andservices as well as market superiority.
Demands for HPC (High Performing Computing) servers as foundations for big data analysis and AI are increasing in recent years. As server performance evolves, power consumption
and heat generation increase, and the power consumption of ancillary facilities such as air conditioners for cooling the server likewise increases. As such, power consumption pertaining
to servers and air conditioning for cooling are becoming major issues for customers and society. Fujitsu views the reduction of CO2 emissions during customer use through increasing
focus on energy-saving product development as a business opportunity.
In particular, Fujitsu is strengthening product development focusing on a system implementation technology, to reduce power consumption in HPC for big data analysis and AI. This
technology reduces CPU power consumption in addition to mitigating power loss across the entire system with measures including the reduction of power loss of the power supply unit
through the use of Fujitsu's proprietary circuit method and the latest high-efficiency circuits. As a result, the overall power loss has been significantly reduced from 24% to 14%,
achieving one of the world's highest power efficiency performances. Fujitsu has been offering products incorporating this technology since 2020. This unique energy-saving technology
has a market advantage our over competitors.
Since the provision of such energy-saving products leads to a reduction in CO2 emissions during use by customers, Fujitsu aims to reduce CO2 emissions during use by 12.5%(Compared to FY2020) by FY2030, and develop and provide advanced energy-saving products to customers.

Supplychain
and/or
value
chain

Yes

An increase in natural disasters, alongside other physical risks, impact the company, such as making our procurement of parts difficult. Furthermore, when it comes to procurement
items, regulatory risks have an impact on the business, such as through price increases of the procurement items regulatory risks. These factors consequently affected Fujitsu's shortand medium-term business strategies, including strengthening risk management for the supply chain.
For example, we recognize that physical risks, such as floods extraordinary in scale, will particularly affect our business partners in Southeast Asia. In 2011 when significant flooding hit
Thailand, our procurement of parts was delayed due to the shutdown of supplier plants and distribution networks were disrupted, resulting in a decrease of sales by 28 billion yen. We
immediately surveyed approximately 80 of our business partners in Thailand, which manufacture storage, semiconductors, power supplies and other products, on damages, theirprogress toward recovery and their impacts on our company. Although we were able to minimize the impact by ordering from other suppliers as necessary among other measures, theevents changed our strategies on suppliers, including our strengthening of our BCM (business continuity management) strategy. Specifically, we added monitoring of BCM activities
through surveys, analysis of survey responses, and support for BCM enhancement through feedback of analysis results to suppliers to the strategy. In addition, Fujitsu has been using
the standardized forms by the JEITA (Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association) Materials Committee since its FY2014 survey. For business partners thatwere determined to be particularly possessing risks through the survey, we reduce risks on our company by minimizing impact on our business through activities such as multi-sourcing.
Fujitsu has incorporated a strategy to maintain and continue these activities and reduce risks.

Investment Yes
in R&D

Increased opportunities to provide ICT products and solutions services that contribute to "mitigation" and "adaptation" of climate change impact revenue. At the moment, climatechange-related solutions, products and services account for 29% of sales. While the impact is already significant, we expect the proportion to further increase, thereby affecting ourshort- and medium-term strategies and leading to the selection and concentration of investment areas in R&D. Fujitsu advocates the use of ICT to empower people and create value forbusiness and society. All R&D activities for this concept generally contribute to climate change countermeasures and sustainability. In 2020, Fujitsu started research and developmentof quantum computing technology said to be capable of cutting down power consumption significantly, in all areas from hardware to software, and from basics to application, throughopen innovation with leading research institutions across the globe (RIKEN, the University of Tokyo, etc.).
Under the 10th Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan, we strove to promote and expand customers’ and society’s use of renewable energy by expanding renewable energy use at
our own business sites through virtual power purchase agreements (VPPA) and other initiatives, and by utilizing the Fujitsu Group’s own advanced ICT technologies, such as
blockchain technology. In FY2021, we achieved success in energy-saving technology by raising delivery efficiency in logistics. We accomplished this by applying a unique Fujitsu
quantum computing technology called “Digital Annealer,” a new architecture for solving “combinatorial optimization problems” at high speed using a digital circuit inspired by quantum
phenomena. We also had successes in AI and other new technologies that can predict water levels along rivers for which past rainfall and water level data are scarce. These
technologies can contribute to disaster prevention, which is one form of climate change adaptation.
We plan to invest 700 billion yen in business growth areas, including technology strategies, to create value for society and customers and transform Fujitsu into a DX company.

Operations Yes

Regulatory risks increase the costs of responding to regulatory changes. In order to minimize the impact of this, short-, medium- and long-term business strategies were changed, withthe promotion of energy conservation activities in operations added.
For example, Fujitsu Climate and Energy Vision, a medium- and long-term environmental vision designed toward 2017 and 2050, was established to promote energy conservation anddecarbonization in long-term operations. The Vision was recognized as an SBT as a scientifically based GHG reduction target. In 2020, the Company upgraded to SBT 1.5°C
certification. And received Net 0 certification in July 2023.In addition, Fujitsu joined RE100 in 2018 to accelerate the use of renewable energy.
In the short to medium term, for example, various measures are being actively promoted to enable compliance with these laws and regulations in response to trends in regulations,
including the Act on Rational Use and Proper Management of Fluorocarbons and the Act on the Rational Use of Energy. Specifically, Fujitsu is actively promoting activities to reduce
CO2, such as strengthening environmental data management at each business site, introducing state-of-the-art low-carbon facilities and optimizing operations as energy conservation
measures, improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, and conserving electricity in lighting and OA equipment, as well as expanding the purchase and use of renewableenergy. In Japan, as a regulatory risk, a levy was added to the cost of electricity under the feed-in tariff (FIT) for renewable energy. To this, Fujitsu is strengthening energy conservation
measures. Through the energy-saving measures, CO2 emissions in FY2020 were reduced by approximately 2.5% from the previous year. The introduction of renewable energy also
expanded by 22.2% compared to FY2017.
Fujitsu has set a target of reducing CO2 emissions from its group companies by 71.4% (compared to FY2013 levels) by FY2030, and is promoting the abovementioned energy-saving
measures and the introduction of renewable energy. Specifically, the Environmental Action Plan Stage X (FY2021-FY2022) has set goals of "reducing GHG emissions from businesssites by 15% or more, compared with the base year of FY2013" and "increasing renewable energy usage to 30% of total electricity in FY2022."

C3.4(C3.4) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your financial planning.
Financialplanning
elements
that havebeen
influenced
Row Capital
1
expenditures

Description of influence

Regulatory risks, such as compliance with the current Act on Rational Use and Proper Management of Fluorocarbons, coupled with the projected increase in carbon taxes, have impacted to
Fujitsu's capital expenditures. In order to minimize the operation cost increase brought about by these regulations, capital investments to promote energy conservation were affected. For
example, investments on global warming prevention such as energy-saving equipment and replacements to better air-conditioning efficiency totaled approximately 1.5 billion yen in2022.
In addition, expenses were incurred for regular building repairs and reinforcements to guard against potential damage to facility building and production equipment in the event of a large-scaletorrential rain or the occurrence of tropical storms, which are physical risks associated with climate change. In terms of financial impact, these expenses constituted 10% or more of capital
investment among Fujitsu’s capital expenditures. Because it addresses both climate change and aging of facilities, We plan to make capital investments of approximately 1 billion yen in
FY2023. We intend to continue investing this amount over the short to medium term, and therefore our plans call for making investments of between 1 and 2 billion yen each year.

C3.5

CDP

Page 15 of 125

(C3.5) In your organization’s financial accounting, do you identify spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climate transition?

Row
1

Identification of spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climatetransition

Indicate the level at which you identify the alignment of your spending/revenue with a sustainable financetaxonomy

Yes, we identify alignment with our climate transition plan

<Not Applicable>

C3.5a(C3.5a) Quantify the percentage share of your spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climate transition.
Financial Metric
Revenue/Turnover
Type of alignment being reported for this financial metric
Alignment with our climate transition plan
Taxonomy under which information is being reported<Not Applicable>
Objective under which alignment is being reported<Not Applicable>
Amount of selected financial metric that is aligned in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4)
0Percentage share of selected financial metric aligned in the reporting year (%)
0
Percentage share of selected financial metric planned to align in 2025 (%)
4.2
Percentage share of selected financial metric planned to align in 2030 (%)
8.4
Describe the methodology used to identify spending/revenue that is aligned
Rate of sales increase gained by providing a Carbon Neutral Data Center (CNDC) The percentage of increase assumes that the improvement in energy consumption
intensity is the percentage of increase in sales due to the CNDC in a 1.5°C world. The 1.5°C scenario: Uses IEA’s “Net Zero by 2050”

C4. Targets and performance

C4.1(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was active in the reporting year?
Absolute target

C4.1a(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Target reference number
Abs 1
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, and this target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
Target ambition
1.5°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s)Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Base year
2020
CDP

Page 16 of 125

Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
74944
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
540292
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)
615236
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1
100
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2
100
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)

CDPPage 17 of 125

<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)<Not Applicable>
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
100
Target year
2030
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
42
Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
356836.88
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
64680
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
339290
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 18 of 125

Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)403970
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
81.7595663638483
Target status in reporting year
RevisedPlease explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
The target scope is company-wide and there are no exceptions.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
This target is a revised version of the SBT 1.5 °C target, which was certified in 2021, as Near-term SBT based on the SBT net 0 standard, and SBTi certification was
obtained. As a short-term objective for achieving SBT, the Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan (Stage X) for FY2021-2022 sets a goal of “[reducing] GHG emissions
from business sites by 4.2% or more annually, compared with the base year (FY2013)” in line with the SBT1.5°C target. By promoting energy conservation and expanding
the introduction of renewable energy, we posted actual results for FY2022 that were 17% lower than the previous year. We have therefore achieved this short-term
objective .
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>
Target reference number
Abs 2
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, and this target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
Target ambition
2°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s)Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method<Not Applicable>
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 11: Use of sold products
Base year
2020
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
1104149
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
CDPPage 19 of 125

<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
3899880
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
5004029
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)
5004029
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)
20.6
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 20 of 125

Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)
72.7
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)
93.3
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
93.3
Target year
2030
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
25
Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
3753021.75
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)1361000
Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)3692976
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 21 of 125

Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)5053976
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)5053976
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]-3.9925428090045
Target status in reporting year
RevisedPlease explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
Of Scope 3 categories, Category 1 + Category 11 accounts for approximately 93% of Scope 3 overall, so the total value of these two categories is the target setting range.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
This target is a revised version of the SBT 1.5 °C target, which was certified in 2021, as Near-term SBT based on the SBT net 0 standard, and SBTi certification was
obtained.
Measures are being taken to achieve the targets for categories 1 and 11.
In category 1, suppliers are required to implement initiatives to reduce CO2 emissions under the Fujitsu Group Green Procurement Standards. In Category 11, we arepromoting the development of products that can contribute to the reduction of power consumption during product use by customers by actively adopting energy-saving
technologies and continuously improving energy efficiency.
In fiscal 2022, emissions of 1,361,000 tons-CO2 in category 1 and 3,692,976 tons-CO2 in category 11 increased . To achieve these targets, we will promote theintroduction of renewable energy in the supply chain by strengthening engagement in the supply chain, and aim to reduce GHG emissions in scope 3.
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>
Target reference number
Abs 3
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, and this target has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative
Target ambition
1.5°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s)Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 3
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)Category 1: Purchased goods and services
Category 11: Use of sold products
Base year
2020
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
74944
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
540292
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
1104149
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
CDP

Page 22 of 125

Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
3899880
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
5004029
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)
5619265
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1
100
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2
100
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)
20.6
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 23 of 125

Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)
72.7
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)
93.3
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
94
Target year
2040
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
90
Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
561926.5
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
64680
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
339290
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)1361000
Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)3692976
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)

CDPPage 24 of 125

<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)5053976
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)5457946
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
3.18980032679244
Target status in reporting year
New
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
Of Scope 3 categories, Category 1 + Category 11 accounts for approximately 93% of Scope 3 overall, so the target scope is the sum of these two categories.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
This target received SBTi certification as a long-term SBT based on the SBT net zero standard. Plans for achieving the targets are described in the responses to abs 1 andabs 2. In fiscal 2022, we achieved a 2.9% reduction from the base year.
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>

C4.2(C4.2) Did you have any other climate-related targets that were active in the reporting year?
Target(s) to increase low-carbon energy consumption or production
Net-zero target(s)

C4.2a

CDP

Page 25 of 125

(C4.2a) Provide details of your target(s) to increase low-carbon energy consumption or production.
Target reference number
Low 1
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Company-wide
Target type: energy carrier
Electricity
Target type: activity
Consumption
Target type: energy source
Renewable energy source(s) only
Base year
2020
Consumption or production of selected energy carrier in base year (MWh)1239.696% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in base year
10.1
Target year2030
% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in target year100
% share of low-carbon or renewable energy in reporting year30
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
22.1357063403782
Target status in reporting year
RevisedIs this target part of an emissions target?
Abs1
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
RE100
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
The target covers all electric power purchased within the Fujitsu Group.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
The target covers all electric power purchased within the Fujitsu Group.
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
We joined the RE100 initiative in July 2018. By 2030, the target was changed to 100% of electricity use derived from renewable energy.
As an interim target, we aim to get at least 40% of the electric power we use from renewable energy sources by 2030. To achieve this goal, our Environmental Action Plan
(Stage Ⅺ) (FY2022-2025) set a target renewable energy rate in FY2025 of 50% or more. Nevertheless, we achieved a 30% renewable energy rate in FY2022.
We worked to increase the renewable energy usage rates of our factories and other facilities in Japan and to use VPPA in Australia.
List the actions which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>

C4.2c

CDP

Page 26 of 125

(C4.2c) Provide details of your net-zero target(s).
Target reference number
NZ1
Target coverage
Company-wide
Absolute/intensity emission target(s) linked to this net-zero target
Abs1
Abs2
Abs3
Target year for achieving net zero2040
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, we consider this a science-based target, and we have committed to seek validation of this target by the Science Based Targets initiative in the next two years
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
The target scope is company-wide and there are no exceptions. SBTi is currently reviewing 2040 targets that meet the SBTi net 0 standard.
Do you intend to neutralize any unabated emissions with permanent carbon removals at the target year?
Yes
Planned milestones and/or near-term investments for neutralization at target year
We expect that GHG emissions to be neutralized in 2040 will be less than 10% of the base year level. We anticipate that neutralization will be achieved through carbon
credits from forest conservation. We are therefore planning to formulate an investment plan while keeping an eye on trends in the forest carbon credit market inaccordance with the Paris Agreement’s Article 6.
Planned actions to mitigate emissions beyond your value chain (optional)

C4.3(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year? Note that this can include those in the planning and/or
implementation phases.
Yes

C4.3a
(C4.3a) Identify the total number of initiatives at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings.
Number of initiatives

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e (only for rows marked *)Under investigation

16

870

To be implemented*

26

1240

Implementation commenced*

41

2760

Implemented*

46

12770

Not to be implemented

4

C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)7532
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
100000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
63000000
Payback period
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
CDP

Page 27 of 125

3-5 years
Comment
Optimizing air conditioning temperatures in offices, saving electricity and increasing efficiency in lighting and office equipment.This is part of the action plan for FY 2022 –2023. It will continue after the activities are completed.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Lighting

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
1423
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
29000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
183000000
Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
Energy-Saving measures for equipment, mainly motor facilities (Free cooling, inverters, introduction of energy-saving equipment, fuel conversion, etc.) This is part of theaction plan for FY 2022 – 2023. It will continue after the activities are completed.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Motors and drives

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)35
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
2000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
10000000
Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
Improve efficiency (production innovation activities) by reviewing manufacturing processes, and improve the proper operation and management of power plants. In thesemiconductor division, we will continue to switch to gases with low global warming potential and install abatement equipment on new and existing production lines. This ispart of the action plan for FY 2022 – 2023. It will continue after the activities are completed.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Maintenance program

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)727
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Mandatory
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
24000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
1170000000

CDP

Page 28 of 125

Payback period>25 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Renewal of electric power receiving and distribution facilities such as transformers and transformers at substations of buildings and factories. Although the CO2 emission
reduction effect by the modernization is small and the return of investment is long term, it is necessary for the maintenance of the office. This is part of the action plan for FY
2022 – 2023. We will continue to do so after the activities are completed.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in production processes

Process optimization

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)2908
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
83000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
0Payback period<1 year
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
Improve efficiency by reviewing manufacturing processes (production innovation activities) and improve the proper operation and management of manufacturing facilities.
Continued integration of production lines as a whole, improvement of tact time, application of energy-saving mode, etc. This is part of the action plan for FY 2022 – 2024. It
will continue after the activities are completed.
Initiative category & Initiative typeLow-carbon energy generation

Solar PV

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
145
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
4000000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
30000000
Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
Solar panels installed on the roof of the plant. This is part of the action plan for FY 2022 – 2024. It will continue after the activities are completed.

C4.3c(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?

CDP

MethodComment

Other(Sustainability
Management
Committee)

In the "the Sustainable Management Committee", which examines company-wide policies, and its subordinate organizations, we set reduction targets for each business group (business unit),
improve facilities and processes in the manufacturing area (mounting, assembly, and testing processes), strengthen activities through the development of new technologies, and evaluate priority
projects and promote their implementation based on the "capital investment guidelines", which sets criteria for capital investment from the economic and environmental perspectives.

Page 29 of 125

C4.5(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods and/or services as low-carbon products?
Yes

C4.5a
(C4.5a) Provide details of your products and/or services that you classify as low-carbon products.
Level of aggregation
Group of products or services
Taxonomy used to classify product(s) or service(s) as low-carbon
Other, please specify (ITU-T "Environmental impact assessment method for ICT products, networks, and services (L. 1410)")
Type of product(s) or service(s)Systems integration

Other, please specify (Solutions)

Description of product(s) or service(s)We develop low environmental impact solutions so that, by providing them to our customers, we can help lower society’s GHG emissions.
By introducing IT solutions, we are contributing to emissions reductions for our customers, most notably with respect to Scope 2 and Scope 3.
As a specific initiative underway since FY2004, the Fujitsu Group has been quantitatively evaluating the environmental impact reduction effect (i.e., achieved reductions incarbon dioxide emissions) brought by solutions and certifying those products and services having a reduction effect of 15% or more as “environmentally friendly solutions.”(Total number of certifications: 500)
In addition, we quantitatively evaluate the extent to which the introduction of IT solution-based products reduces customers’ environmental impact from the following
perspectives.
1) We evaluate the environmental contribution effects that the introduction of an IT solution has. Our focus includes increased operational efficiency and other efficiencyrelated effects within the IT solution’s energy and resource-saving effects.
2) We evaluate both factors that increase environmental impact and those that reduce environmental impact, and then clearly indicate the overall environmental contribution
effect.
Have you estimated the avoided emissions of this low-carbon product(s) or service(s)YesMethodology used to calculate avoided emissions
Evaluating the carbon-reducing impacts of ICT
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the low-carbon product(s) or services(s)Use stage
Functional unit used
One solution service
Reference product/service or baseline scenario used
CO2 emissions from solution services before ICT introduction
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the reference product/service or baseline scenario
Use stage
Estimated avoided emissions (metric tons CO2e per functional unit) compared to reference product/service or baseline scenario
269000Explain your calculation of avoided emissions, including any assumptions
We convert “seven environmental impact factors” (consumption of goods, movement of people, movement of goods, office space, warehouse space, electric power
consumption by ICT/network equipment, and network data communication volume) into CO2 emissions before and after ICT introduction using a database. We thencalculate reductions in CO2 emissions that are associated with the ICT solution’s introduction.
We also focus our evaluations on the processes used by customers that produce the largest amount of CO2 emissions.
Revenue generated from low-carbon product(s) or service(s) as % of total revenue in the reporting year
9.9
Level of aggregation
Product or service
Taxonomy used to classify product(s) or service(s) as low-carbon
Other, please specify (IEC 62075 "Audio, Video, Information and Communications Technology Equipment - Design for the Environment")
Type of product(s) or service(s)Other

Other, please specify ( ICT equipment)

Description of product(s) or service(s)To promote the development of environmentally friendly products, we conduct environmental assessments for all newly designed and developed products to ensure that all
are environmentally friendly.
We certify products having enhanced environmentally-friendly qualities as “Green Products.”
One of the criteria we set for designation as a Green Product is “energy conservation.” This leads to lower GHG emissions throughout the entire Fujitsu Group andcontributes to SBT achievement.
Have you estimated the avoided emissions of this low-carbon product(s) or service(s)CDPPage 30 of 125

Yes
Methodology used to calculate avoided emissions
Evaluating the carbon-reducing impacts of ICT
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the low-carbon product(s) or services(s)Use stage
Functional unit used
CO2 emissions during product use
Reference product/service or baseline scenario used
CO2 emissions from the use of old productsLife cycle stage(s) covered for the reference product/service or baseline scenario
Use stage
Estimated avoided emissions (metric tons CO2e per functional unit) compared to reference product/service or baseline scenario
0.16
Explain your calculation of avoided emissions, including any assumptions“Total CO2 emissions from newly developed products in use in FY2021” (1) is calculated fromthe “actual development of new products in FY2021” and the actual number of units shipped.
Here, CO2 emissions (2) are calculated with the assumption that the “actual development of new products in FY2021” mentioned above is zero.
The difference between (1) and (2) is obtained and further divided by the actual number of units shipped to calculate the amount of reduction contribution.
Revenue generated from low-carbon product(s) or service(s) as % of total revenue in the reporting year
17.22

C5. Emissions methodology

C5.1(C5.1) Is this your first year of reporting emissions data to CDP?
No

C5.1a
(C5.1a) Has your organization undergone any structural changes in the reporting year, or are any previous structural changes being accounted for in thisdisclosure of emissions data?
Row 1
Has there been a structural change?
Yes, a divestment
Name of organization(s) acquired, divested from, or merged withMie Fujitsu Semiconductor Mie Factory, FDK Sanyo Factory, Fujitsu Interconnect Technologies Kurohime Factory, Fujitsu Semiconductor Aizu-Wakamatsu Factory,
FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GmbH, Fujitsu Semiconductor Wafer Solution Co., Ltd. (2021/8/1), Smart Agriculture Culture Iwata Corporation (2021/10/1)
Details of structural change(s), including completion dates
By the start of the reporting year (2022/4/1), the sale of Mie Fujitsu Semiconductor Mie Plant, FDK Sanyo Plant, Fujitsu Interconnect Technologies Kurohime Plant, Fujitsu
Semiconductor Aizu-Wakamatsu Plant, FUJITSU TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GmbH, Fujitsu Semiconductor wafer solutions Co., Ltd. (2021/8/1), and Smart Agriculture
Iwata Corporation (2021/10/1) had completed. GHG emissions from the sale decreased.

C5.1b
(C5.1b) Has your emissions accounting methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition changed in the reporting year?

Row 1

Change(s) in methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition?

Details of methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition change(s)No<Not Applicable>

C5.1c

CDP

Page 31 of 125

(C5.1c) Have your organization’s base year emissions and past years’ emissions been recalculated as a result of any changes or errors reported in C5.1a and/or
C5.1b?

Row
1

Base year
recalculation

Scope(s)recalculated

Base year emissions recalculation policy, including significance threshold

Past years’
recalculation

Yes

Scope 1
Scope 2, locationbased
Scope 2, marketbased

It is the policy to carry out base year recalculation in accordance with the GHG Protocol whenever there are changes such as
boundary changes.

Yes

C5.2
(C5.2) Provide your base year and base year emissions.
Scope 1
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
74944
Comment
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
582321
Comment
Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
540292
Comment
Scope 3 category 1: Purchased goods and services
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
1104149
Comment
Scope 3 category 2: Capital goods
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
15000
Comment

CDP

Page 32 of 125

Scope 3 category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
98960
Comment
Scope 3 category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
52457
Comment
Scope 3 category 5: Waste generated in operations
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
3540
Comment
Scope 3 category 6: Business travel
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
26880
Comment
Scope 3 category 7: Employee commuting
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
4650
Comment
Scope 3 category 8: Upstream leased assets
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
107750Comment
Scope 3 category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)200
Comment

CDP

Page 33 of 125

Scope 3 category 10: Processing of sold products
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
12153
Comment
Scope 3 category 11: Use of sold products
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
3899880
Comment
Scope 3 category 12: End of life treatment of sold products
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)1180
Comment
Scope 3 category 13: Downstream leased assets
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 14: Franchises
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3 category 15: Investments
Base year start
April 1 2020
Base year end
March 31 2021
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
38920
Comment
Scope 3: Other (upstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3: Other (downstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C5.3

CDP

Page 34 of 125

(C5.3) Select the name of the standard, protocol, or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate emissions.
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming, Superseded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global
Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment)
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)

C6. Emissions data

C6.1
(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
64680
Start date
<Not Applicable>
End date<Not Applicable>
Comment

C6.2(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
Row 1​Scope 2, location-based​
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Scope 2, market-based
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Comment

C6.3(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Scope 2, location-based
475543
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
340858Start date
<Not Applicable>
End date<Not Applicable>
Comment

C6.4(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions that are within your selectedreporting boundary which are not included in your disclosure?
No

C6.5(C6.5) Account for your organization’s gross global Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.

CDP

Page 35 of 125

Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)1361000
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Calculated based on "Procurement volume of materials within the fiscal year × emission intensity per procurement volume". Emissions intensity per unit of procurement isbased on the Environmental Impact Intensity Data Book (3EID) prepared by the Global Environment Research Center, National Institute for Environmental Studies, National
Research and Development.
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
11000
Emissions calculation methodology
Average spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Total receipt and inspected amount of construction properties in the fiscal year x emission intensity (source: Emission Intensity Database for Calculating GHG Emissions ofOrganizations Throughout the Supply Chain (Ver. 3.2)
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
85157
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Annual quantity of fuel oil/gas and electricity/heat purchased (consumed) primarily at Fujitsu-owned facilities x emissions intensity (source: prepared from Ministry of theEnvironment and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Emission Intensity Database for Calculating GHG Emissions of Organizations Throughout the Supply Chain(Ver. 3.2) and Emission Intensity Database for Japan; IDEA Ver. 2.3 [for calculation of supply chain greenhouse gas emissions])
Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
43917
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Domestic transportation: CO2 emissions from domestic transportation for which Fujitsu Group is the shipper CO2 emissions from domestic transportation for which FujitsuGroup is consignor, based on the Act on the Rational Use of Energy; fuel efficiency method (for some vehicles); and improved ton/kilometer method (for vehicles, railroads,
aircraft, and ships) International transportation/overseas intra-regional transportation: ton/kilometers transported x emission intensity (source: GHG Protocol Emission
Factor Database)

CDP

Page 36 of 125

Waste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Not relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
3700
Emissions calculation methodology
Waste-type-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Annual volume of waste treated/recycled by waste type and treatment method generated primarily at Fujitsu-owned facilities x emissions intensity per unit of annual
treated/recycled volume (source: prepared from Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Emission Intensity Database for Calculating GHG
Emissions of Organizations Throughout the Supply Chain (Ver. 3.2) and Emission Intensity Database for Japan; IDEA Ver. 2.3 [for calculation of supply chain greenhousegas emissions]) The Fujitsu Group considers anything less than 0.1% of the total Scope 3 amount to be irrelevant. This category satisfies that criterion.
Business travel
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
47890
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain(means of transportation) Σ (transportation cost paid x emission intensity) (Source: Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Basic
Guidelines on Accounting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Throughout the Supply Chain (Ver. 2.5) and Emission Intensity Database (Ver. 3.3))
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
4860
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
For the portion using public transportation (means of transportation) Σ (transportation cost paid x emission intensity) (Source: Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry, Basic Guidelines on Accounting for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Throughout the Supply Chain (Ver.2.5) and Emission Intensity Database(Ver. 3.3)) For the portion using private vehicles, Σ (transported persons/kilometer x emission intensity) Transported persons/kilometers is calculated from transportation
allowances/gasoline prices, and fuel consumption.
Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
72420
Emissions calculation methodology
Asset-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
9.7
Please explain
Annual quantity of fuel oil/gas and electricity/heat consumed at leased facilities x emission intensity per unit of fuel oil/gas and electricity/heat consumed (source: Japan:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation, Reporting and Publication System based on the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures; overseas: IEA, CO2
Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2021)

CDP

Page 37 of 125

Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Not relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
150
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
The movement of consumers at the time of purchase is set as the scenario, and calculation is made by multiplying the amount of activity (person/kilometer) by the emission
factor (source: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation, Reporting and Publication System based on the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures). The
Fujitsu Group considers anything less than 0.1% of the total Scope 3 amount to be irrelevant. This category meets that threshold.
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
16000
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Calculated as “sales volume of intermediate products x emissions intensity per unit of processing volume.” Here, the sales volume of intermediate products is Fujitsu’s
Device Solutions sales, and the emissions intensity per unit of processing volume comes from Fujitsu’s 2015 assembly plant data.
Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)3692976
Emissions calculation methodology
Other, please specify (Calculated based on "Power consumption during product use x emission intensity per unit of electricity".)
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Calculated as “electric power consumption during product use x emissions intensity per unit of electric power.” Here, “electric power consumption during product use” iscalculated by multiplying the amount of electric power used during the assumed usage time per product unit by the number of units shipped in the relevant fiscal year. The
amount of electric power used during the assumed usage time per product unit is calculated using the following formula. Power consumption(kWh) = electricity
consumption (kW) x hours of use (hours/day) x number of days of use per year x years of use *Hours of use, days of use per year, and years of use are set based on
Fujitsu’s in-house scenarios.Additionally, “emissions intensity per unit of electric power” is based on the CO2 emission factors (FY2021) of the Electric Power Council for a
Low Carbon Society.
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
5302
Emissions calculation methodology
Waste-type-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
9.7
Please explain
Calculates the environmental impact when shipped products reach the end of life, are collected by a recycling center, and undergo recycling or disposal. Σ ((1) Total weightof all products sold (including packaging materials) (t) x (2) Percentage of Waste Disposed by Type and Method (%) x (3) Emission factor of waste disposal method(tCO2e/t)) Here, (1) Total weight of all products sold: Three material types [metal, plastic, and paper] (calculated from the LCA report) (2) Percentage of all waste processedby waste disposal: 3 types [recycled, incinerated, and landfill] (using actual results from recycling centers) (3) Emission factor of waste disposal method: Uses the emission
factor for each type of waste and disposal method The Fujitsu Group considers anything less than 0.1% of the total Scope 3 amount to be irrelevant. This category meetsthat threshold.

CDP

Page 38 of 125

Downstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
We have no accounting items of downstream leased assets and no sales from leasing. Therefore "Downstream leased assets" is "not relevant".
Franchises
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
We have no accounting items of franchises and no sales from it. Therefore "Franchises" is "not relevant".
Investments
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
26880
Emissions calculation methodology
Average data method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain(Investment first.) Σ (Number of investments first Scope1 and Number of emissions x investment ratio Scope2)
Other (upstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Other (downstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain

C6.7(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic carbon relevant to your organization?
No

C6.10
CDP

Page 39 of 125

(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit currency total revenue and provide any
additional intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Intensity figure
1.092e-7
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, metric tons CO2e)405541
Metric denominator
unit total revenue
Metric denominator: Unit total
3713700000000
Scope 2 figure used
Market-based% change from previous year
21.27
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason(s) for change
Change in renewable energy consumption
Other emissions reduction activities
Change in revenue
Please explain
・Increased use of renewable energy
・Optimization of air conditioning temperature in offices, energy saving and efficiency improvement of lighting and OA equipment.
・Improve efficiency (production innovation activities) by reviewing manufacturing processes, and improve the proper operation and management of power plants. In thesemiconductor division, we will continue to switch to gases with low global warming potential and install abatement equipment on new and existing production lines.
・Energy-Saving measures for equipment, mainly motor facilities (Free cooling, inverters, introduction of energy-saving equipment, fuel conversion, etc.)
GHG emissions decreased by 18.5% from the previous year due to the above-mentioned reduction activities, sales increased by 3.5% from the previous year, and the basic
unit decreased by 21.3% from the previous year (21.3% = (0. 0000001378 - 0. 0000001092)/0.0 . 0000001387 * 100).

C7. Emissions breakdowns

C7.1(C7.1) Does your organization break down its Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type?
Yes

C7.1a
(C7.1a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type and provide the source of each used greenhouse warming potential(GWP).
Greenhouse gas

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons of CO2e)

GWP Reference

CO2

62720

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5 – 100 year)

PFCs

1470

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5 – 100 year)

HFCs

280

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5 – 100 year)

Other, please specify (CH3)10IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5 – 100 year)

SF6

200

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5 – 100 year)

C7.2

CDP

Page 40 of 125

(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Japan

59550

United States of America

440

Malaysia

2820

China

30

Republic of Korea

360

Philippines

190

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

1130

India

150

Thailand

10

C7.3(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division
By activity

C7.3a(C7.3a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 1 emissions (metric ton CO2e)

Production of information/communication equipment

60060

Others4250

C7.3c(C7.3c) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Production

2000

Air conditioning

62680

C7.5
(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)Japan360044273480

United States of America

7220

2920

Germany

5830

0Malaysia

11270

11270

China

3070

3680

Republic of Korea

1930

1930

Philippines

4550

2680

Taiwan, China

2650

2470

Thailand

460

460

India

1770

840

Brazil3030Australia

65640

40890

Sweden100

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

10030

0

Finland

720

80

Spain

130

10

Denmark

120

120

New Zealand

60

0

C7.6
CDP

Page 41 of 125

(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division
By activity

C7.6a(C7.6a) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Production of information/communication equipment

291620211138Others183923129720C7.6c(C7.6c) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Production

185462132935Air conditioning/heat source

218750156795Lighting, OA, etc.

71331

51129

C7.7
(C7.7) Is your organization able to break down your emissions data for any of the subsidiaries included in your CDP response?
Yes

C7.7a
(C7.7a) Break down your gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by subsidiary.
Subsidiary name
Fujitsu Ltd.
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
ISIN code – bond
ISIN code – bondJP3818000006
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
13247
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
190656
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
152477
Comment
Subsidiary name

CDP

Page 42 of 125

SHINKO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
ISIN code – bond
ISIN code – bond
JP3375800004
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
44230
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
149920
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)102790Comment
Subsidiary name
FDK CORPORATION
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
ISIN code – bond
ISIN code – bond
JP3820400004
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
3690
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
26830
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
26290
Comment
Subsidiary name
FUJITSU AUSTRALIA LTD.
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
Please selectISIN code – bond

CDP

Page 43 of 125

<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
65640
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
40890
Comment
Subsidiary name
FUJITSU FRONTECH CHUNGHO GLOBAL PRODUCTS Co. Ltd.
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
ISIN code – bond
ISIN code – bondJP3818200002
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)1150
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
8330
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
6130
Comment

C7.9(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Decreased

C7.9a

CDP

Page 44 of 125

(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined), and for each of them specify how your emissions compare
to the previous year.
Change in emissions(metric tons CO2e)

Direction of change Emissions valuein emissions(percentage)

Please explain calculation

Change in renewableenergy consumption

45180

Decreased

9.1

Reduce emissions from renewable energy sources, which increased in fiscal 2022. FY 2022 reduction 45,180/FY
2021 emissions 497,490 = -9.1%

Other emissions
reduction activities

7850

Decreased

1.6

Reduction of emissions through projects implemented in fiscal 2022 (Capital investment and investment
improvement). FY 2022 reduction -7,850/FY 2021 emissions 497,490 = -1.6%

Divestment<Not Applicable>

Acquisitions<Not Applicable>

Mergers<Not Applicable>

Change in output

17990

Decreased

3.6

Increased emissions due to increased production at manufacturing plants in Japan. FY 2022 decrease 17,990/FY
2021 emissions 497,490 = 3.6%

Change in methodology

12560

Decreased

2.5

Reduction in CO2 emissions due to fluctuations in the CO2 emission coefficient for electricity. FY 2022 decrease
12,560/FY 2021 emissions 497,490 = -2.5%

Change in boundary

8370

Decreased

1.7

Reduction in emissions due to a reduction in the scope of group companies. FY 2022 decrease -8,370/FY 2021
emissions 497,490 = -1.7%

Change in physicaloperating conditions<Not Applicable>

Unidentified<Not Applicable>

Other<Not Applicable>

C7.9b(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-based Scope 2 emissions figure or a market-based Scope 2
emissions figure?
Market-based

C8. Energy

C8.1(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

C8.2(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Indicate whether your organization undertook this energy-related activity in the reporting year
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling

Yes

Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling

Yes

C8.2a
(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
Heating value

MWh from renewable sources MWh from non-renewable sources

Total (renewable and non-renewable) MWh

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)

HHV (higher heating value) 0337706337706

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity<Not Applicable>

3188427431661062008

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

<Not Applicable>

0

1769

1769

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam<Not Applicable>

0

0

0

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling<Not Applicable>

0

9005

9005

Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy<Not Applicable>

1066<Not Applicable>

1646

Total energy consumption<Not Applicable>

3199071092227

1412134

C8.2b

CDP

Page 45 of 125

(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this fuel application
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of heat

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of steam

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of cooling

Yes

Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation

Yes

C8.2c
(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.
Sustainable biomass
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling0
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Other biomass
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling0
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Other renewable fuels (e.g. renewable hydrogen)Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling0
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment

CDP

Page 46 of 125

Coal
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling0
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Oil
Heating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
25780
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
580
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
23810
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
20
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling
1370
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Total amount of heavy oil A heavy oil, kerosene, diesel oil, and gasoline
Gas
Heating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
309050
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
70100
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
208370
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling
23440
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
7140
Comment
Total amount of heavy oil Natural gas, LNG,City gas

CDP

Page 47 of 125

Other non-renewable fuels (e.g. non-renewable hydrogen)Heating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
2880
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat2880
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling0
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
The amount of Liquefied Petroleum gas
Total fuelHeating value
HHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
337710
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
580
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
96790
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
208390
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling
24810
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
7140
Comment

C8.2d(C8.2d) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and cooling your organization has generated and consumed in the reporting year.
Total Gross generation(MWh)

Generation that is consumed by theorganization (MWh)Gross generation from renewable sources Generation from renewable sources that is consumed by the(MWh)organization (MWh)Electricity 1646

1646

1066

1066

Heat

0

0

0

0

Steam

0

0

0

0

Cooling

0

0

0

0

C8.2g
(C8.2g) Provide a breakdown by country/area of your non-fuel energy consumption in the reporting year.
Country/areaJapan
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)820960Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)1010
Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)10260
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
CDP

Page 48 of 125

832230
Country/area
United States of America
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)20430
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
20430
Country/area
Australia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)96770
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)140
Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
96910
Country/area
Germany
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)18760
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
18760
Country/area
FinlandConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)8910
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)390
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
9300
Country/area
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

CDP

Page 49 of 125

Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)52010
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)120
Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
52130
Country/area
India
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)2570
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)330
Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
2900
Country/area
BrazilConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)350
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
350
Country/area
China
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)5000
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
5000
Country/area
Taiwan, China
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)4850
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0
CDPPage 50 of 125

Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
4850
Country/area
Denmark
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1220
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)100
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1320
Country/area
ThailandConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)980
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)50
Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1030
Country/area
Malaysia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)17310
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
17310
Country/area
Republic of Korea
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)4140
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0
CDPPage 51 of 125

Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
4140
Country/area
Philippines
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)6430
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
6430
Country/area
Spain
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)810
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)30
Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
840
Country/area
New ZealandConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)570
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
Please selectConsumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
570
Country/area
SwedenConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)60
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
No
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
60
CDP

Page 52 of 125

C8.2h
(C8.2h) Provide details of your organization’s renewable electricity purchases in the reporting year by country/area.
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Renewable electricity mix, please specify (Hydropower and solar power,other)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)51893
Tracking instrument used
REGO
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2015
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Germany
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeHydropower (capacity unknown)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)18762
Tracking instrument used
GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Germany
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2016
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
TÜV SÜD
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Finland
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeWind
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)8914
Tracking instrument used
CDP

Page 53 of 125

GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Finland
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2015
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
SwedenSourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeHydropower (capacity unknown)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)200
Tracking instrument used
GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
SwedenAre you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2022
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Spain
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeHydropower (capacity unknown)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)806
Tracking instrument used
GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Spain
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2020
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment

CDP

Page 54 of 125

Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
India
Sourcing method
Purchase from an on-site installation owned by a third party (on-site PPA)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)329
Tracking instrument used
Contract
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
India
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2019
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2019
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
India
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1350
Tracking instrument used
I-REC
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
India
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2018
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2022
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
United States of America
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeWind
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)5476
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
CDP

Page 55 of 125

Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2020
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2022
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
Green-eComment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
United States of America
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology typeWind
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)6702
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2018
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
Green-eComment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
New Zealand
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Large hydropower (>25 MW)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)572
Tracking instrument used
NZREC
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
New Zealand
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
1965
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Australia
Sourcing method
Financial (virtual) power purchase agreement (VPPA)

CDP

Page 56 of 125

Renewable electricity technology typeWind
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)36479
Tracking instrument used
Australian LGC
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Australia
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2018
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2022
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Philippines
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Renewable electricity mix, please specify (Hydropower and solar power)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)2662
Tracking instrument used
Contract
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Philippines
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)13962
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2013
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022

CDP

Page 57 of 125

Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)21188
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2014
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)31514
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2015
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)
12024

CDP

Page 58 of 125

Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2016
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)15566
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2017
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)8980
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2018
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label

CDP

Page 59 of 125

Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)27222
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2019
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)14907
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2020
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1529
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan

CDP

Page 60 of 125

Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2021
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1166
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2022
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2022
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)6533
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2014
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan

CDP

Page 61 of 125

Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1007
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2015
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1919
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2017
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)5474
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2019

CDP

Page 62 of 125

Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Large hydropower (>25 MW)
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)6300
Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
1954
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Renewable electricity mix, please specify (hydro power and geothermal power )Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)3340
Tracking instrument used
Contract
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Renewable electricity mix, please specify (Hydropower and solar power)

CDP

Page 63 of 125

Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)11525
Tracking instrument used
Contract
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment
Country/area of consumption of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Sourcing method
Retail supply contract with an electricity supplier (retail green electricity)
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Renewable electricity consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)866Tracking instrument used
NFC - Renewable
Country/area of origin (generation) of purchased renewable electricity
Japan
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)2020
Vintage of the renewable energy/attribute (i.e. year of generation)
2022
Supply arrangement start year
2021
Additional, voluntary label associated with purchased renewable electricity
No additional, voluntary label
Comment

C8.2i(C8.2i) Provide details of your organization’s low-carbon heat, steam, and cooling purchases in the reporting year by country/area..
Sourcing method
None (no purchases of low-carbon heat, steam, or cooling)
Country/area of consumption of low-carbon heat, steam or cooling<Not Applicable>
Energy carrier<Not Applicable>
Low-carbon technology type
<Not Applicable>
Low-carbon heat, steam, or cooling consumed (MWh)<Not Applicable>
Comment

C8.2j

CDP

Page 64 of 125

(C8.2j) Provide details of your organization’s renewable electricity generation by country/area in the reporting year.
Country/area of generation
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Facility capacity (MW)
0.15
Total renewable electricity generated by this facility in the reporting year (MWh)123.7
Renewable electricity consumed by your organization from this facility in the reporting year (MWh)123.7
Energy attribute certificates issued for this generation
Yes
Type of energy attribute certificate
REGO
Comment
Country/area of generation
Australia
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Facility capacity (MW)
0.1
Total renewable electricity generated by this facility in the reporting year (MWh)138.2
Renewable electricity consumed by your organization from this facility in the reporting year (MWh)138.2
Energy attribute certificates issued for this generation
No
Type of energy attribute certificate<Not Applicable>
Comment
Country/area of generation
Thailand
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Facility capacity (MW)
0.01
Total renewable electricity generated by this facility in the reporting year (MWh)45.8
Renewable electricity consumed by your organization from this facility in the reporting year (MWh)45.8
Energy attribute certificates issued for this generation
No
Type of energy attribute certificate<Not Applicable>
Comment
Country/area of generationJapan
Renewable electricity technology type
Solar
Facility capacity (MW)
0.4
Total renewable electricity generated by this facility in the reporting year (MWh)428.9
Renewable electricity consumed by your organization from this facility in the reporting year (MWh)428.9
Energy attribute certificates issued for this generation
No
Type of energy attribute certificate

CDP

Page 65 of 125

<Not Applicable>
Comment

C8.2k(C8.2k) Describe how your organization’s renewable electricity sourcing strategy directly or indirectly contributes to bringing new capacity into the grid in the
countries/areas in which you operate.
In our company's renewable power procurement strategy, increasing the ratio of renewable energy in Japan, where promotion of renewable energy is lagging behind from thestandpoint of users, will also affect the ratio of renewable energy in other users. As a result, efforts to make maximum use of the power transmission network to increase
renewable energy will be activated. In 2022, electric power companies in Japan and our company collaborated to conduct a demonstration test using electric powercompanies' transmission facilities in order to realize a dynamic rating (technology that flexibly operates transmission capacity of transmission and transformation facilities),
which is expected as a next-generation power network technology to expand the introduction of renewable energy. The Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (Agency
for Natural Resources and Energy) started a non-farm type connection in 2021, which is one of the efforts of the Japanese version of Connect & Manage. In the future, if
there is a physical shortage of the transmission network, investment in the expansion of the transmission network capacity will be developed.

C8.2l(C8.2l) In the reporting year, has your organization faced any challenges to sourcing renewable electricity?

Row 1

Challenges to sourcing renewable electricity

Challenges faced by your organization which were not country/area-specificYes, in specific countries/areas in which we operate<Not Applicable>

C8.2m(C8.2m) Provide details of the country/area-specific challenges to sourcing renewable electricity faced by your organization in the reporting year.
Country/area Reason(s) why it waschallenging to source
renewable electricity within
selected country/area

Provide additional details of the barriers faced within this country/areaJapan

Arbitrary grid usage charges
Prohibitively priced renewableelectricity

In the past, renewable energy prices remained high in Japan, and there was an issue of cost increase in the procurement of renewable electricity in our company.
However, due to the change of the non-fossil certificate system in November 2021, it became possible to purchase directly from customers without going through aretail electricity provider, and cost reduction became possible by forming a scheme to procure at the head office. It is still higher than in Europe, so it is necessary
to change the system to make it even cheaper in the future. However, the lowest price of renewable energy will go up from 2023, and the cost of renewableenergy procurement in our company will rise again.

Japan

Lack of electricity market
structure supporting bilateral
PPAs
Other, please specify (・It is
unclear how to properly accountfor the loss or loss. ・There is noclear guidance on whether thecommodity is subject to the
Commodity Futures Trading Act.)

With regard to Japan's established VPPA mechanisms in Europe and Oceania, Japan has participated in the Japan Climate Leaders Partnership (JCLP) and theRenewable Energy Foundation's corporate group activities related to the promotion of renewable energy. Although a guide on VPPA has already been publishedand is now being established, there are still some issues unique to Japan, such as the lack of accounting treatment for purchase costs, etc., which have made it
impossible to resolve the situation in which the options for procurement of renewable electricity are becoming limited. Currently, there is no option to easilypurchase renewable energy at low prices other than the purchase of non-fossil certificates, and in the future, the government should increase the number of
options considering the case where non-fossil certificates cannot be purchased.

C9. Additional metrics

C9.1(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.

C10. Verification

C10.1(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Verification/assurance status

CDP

Scope 1

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 3

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Page 66 of 125

C10.1a(C10.1a) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 1 emissions, and attach the relevant statements.
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Underway but not complete for reporting year – previous statement of process attachedType of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
第三者保証報告書.pdf
Page/ section reference
1-2 page
Relevant standard
ISAE3000
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1b
(C10.1b) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 2 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 2 approach
Scope 2 location-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Underway but not complete for reporting year – previous statement of process attachedType of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
第三者保証報告書.pdf
Page/ section reference
1-2 page
Relevant standard
ISAE3000
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
Scope 2 approach
Scope 2 market-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Underway but not complete for reporting year – previous statement of process attachedType of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
第三者保証報告書.pdf
Page/ section reference
1-2 page
Relevant standard
ISAE3000
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1c

CDP

Page 67 of 125

(C10.1c) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 3 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 3 category
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services
Scope 3: Use of sold products
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Underway but not complete for reporting year – previous statement of process attachedType of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
第三者保証報告書.pdf
Page/section reference
1-2 page
Relevant standard
ISAE3000
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.2
(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related information reported in your CDP disclosure other than the emissions figures reported in C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
In progress

C11. Carbon pricing

C11.1(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS, Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
Yes

C11.1a(C11.1a) Select the carbon pricing regulation(s) which impacts your operations.
Tokyo CaT - ETS

C11.1b

CDP

Page 68 of 125

(C11.1b) Complete the following table for each of the emissions trading schemes you are regulated by.
Tokyo CaT - ETS% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS
2.1% of Scope 2 emissions covered by the ETS
1.9
Period start date
April 1 2022
Period end date
March 31 2023
Allowances allocated13134
Allowances purchased
0
Verified Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e
1430
Verified Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e6528
Details of ownership
Facilities we own and operate
Comment
The latest published figure of FY2022 results from Tokyo is not published, so it is an estimated value.

C11.1d(C11.1d) What is your strategy for complying with the systems you are regulated by or anticipate being regulated by?
In cases where participation is required by laws and regulations, etc., Fujitsu will work towards reducing emissions (or achieve target ratios) as much as possible throughvoluntary efforts. And while observing social and market trends, Fujitsu will participate when a reliable trading system has been established. With regard to Fujitsu's efforts to
reduce emissions, we formulated the Fujitsu Climate and Energy Vision in 2017, a medium and long-term environmental initiative spanning to 2050 designed to achieve
decarbonization in the long term. This was recognized as a Science-Based Target (SBT), scientific GHG reduction goal. In 2020, We are Science Based Targets (SBT) 1.5°C
certified. The goal of SBT is to “reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 71.4% compared to 2013 by 2030 .” This goal is in line with the greenhouse gas emission reduction
strategy laid out in the Paris Agreement. And Reported to the Board of Directors as in the Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan (Stage X) for FY2021-2022, it has set a
goal of "reducing GHG emissions from business sites by 4.2% or more annually, compared with the base year (FY2013) " in line with the SBT1.5°C target. These were
presented and discussed by the Sustainability Management Committee, which is chaired by the Representative Director & President and comprising the heads of businessgroups and regions.
In Japan, various measures are being taken to reduce the energy consumption rate by 1% on average in a span of 5 years in accordance with the Energy Conservation Law.
Each location sets planned values for GHG emissions, including energy usage, and the Environmental division reviews the Group's overall expected achievement rate basedon these planned values. In addition, the Environmental division uses an in-house data collection system to periodically monitor energy usage and other data for eachlocation. In the event issues such as exceeding the planned value by a large margin occur, the Environmental division manages the overall progress towards achievement
and compliance with laws and regulations through encouraging efforts to achieve targets and the like. Our efforts have allowed us to continuously achieve our goals throughto 2022. As a result, we has continued to score “S ranks” in the business classification evaluation system of the Energy Conservation Law, which has been in place since2016.
For example, Fujitsu's Kamata Plant is subject to Tokyo's Cap-and-Trade Program. Through the abovementioned target management and reduction measures (Promotion ofhighly efficient energy use through operation management by the Central Monitoring System for Building Equipment and building inspectors), the plant has never exceeded
the allocated amount, and as of 2022, there has been no need to supplement the reduction through emissions trading.

C11.2(C11.2) Has your organization canceled any project-based carbon credits within the reporting year?
Yes

C11.2a(C11.2a) Provide details of the project-based carbon credits canceled by your organization in the reporting year.
Project type
Energy efficiency: own generation
Type of mitigation activity
Emissions reduction
Project description
GS1247 VPA 211 Sierra Leone Safe Water

CDP

Page 69 of 125

Credits canceled by your organization from this project in the reporting year (metric tons CO2e)160
Purpose of cancellation
Voluntary offsetting
Are you able to report the vintage of the credits at cancellation?
No
Vintage of credits at cancellation<Not Applicable>
Were these credits issued to or purchased by your organization?
Purchased
Credits issued by which carbon-crediting programGold Standard
Method(s) the program uses to assess additionality for this project
Positive lists
Approach(es) by which the selected program requires this project to address reversal risk
No risk of reversal
Potential sources of leakage the selected program requires this project to have assessed
Upstream/downstream emissions
Provide details of other issues the selected program requires projects to address“Under Gold Standard’s rules, and its ‘Emission Reductions from Safe Drinking Water Supply’ methodology, the project was deemed additional due to its presence in a
Least Developed country and the use of a Community Services-based methodology”"The risk of reversal has been deemed not relevant for this activity type" Gold Standard“All Gold Standard for the Global Goals documentation is available. This includes Gold Standard’s requirements related to double-counting, safeguarding against negative
economic, environmental and social harm, and stakeholder inclusivity, amongst other requirements that projects must comply with.”
Comment
Project type
Energy efficiency: own generation
Type of mitigation activity
Emissions reduction
Project description
GS2446 GS1265 African Biomass Energy Conservation PoA Malawi Biomass Conservation
Credits canceled by your organization from this project in the reporting year (metric tons CO2e)160
Purpose of cancellation
Voluntary offsetting
Are you able to report the vintage of the credits at cancellation?
No
Vintage of credits at cancellation<Not Applicable>
Were these credits issued to or purchased by your organization?
Purchased
Credits issued by which carbon-crediting programGold Standard
Method(s) the program uses to assess additionality for this project
Positive lists
Approach(es) by which the selected program requires this project to address reversal risk
No risk of reversal
Potential sources of leakage the selected program requires this project to have assessed
Activity-shifting
Provide details of other issues the selected program requires projects to address
The project has been deemed additional due to its inclusion on a positive list established by Gold Standard, due to the size of the project and the technology/activity typeadopted.
"The risk of reversal has been deemed not relevant for this activity type" Gold Standard.
“All Gold Standard for the Global Goals documentation is available. This includes Gold Standard’s requirements related to double-counting, safeguarding against negative
economic, environmental and social harm, and stakeholder inclusivity, amongst other requirements that projects must comply with.”
Comment
Project type
Afforestation
Type of mitigation activity
Emissions reduction
Project description
VCS1477 The Katingan Mentaya REDD+ project

CDP

Page 70 of 125

Credits canceled by your organization from this project in the reporting year (metric tons CO2e)100
Purpose of cancellation
Voluntary offsetting
Are you able to report the vintage of the credits at cancellation?
No
Vintage of credits at cancellation<Not Applicable>
Were these credits issued to or purchased by your organization?
Purchased
Credits issued by which carbon-crediting program
VCS (Verified Carbon Standard)
Method(s) the program uses to assess additionality for this project
Investment analysis
Barrier analysis
Approach(es) by which the selected program requires this project to address reversal risk
Monitoring and compensation
Potential sources of leakage the selected program requires this project to have assessed
Activity-shifting
Ecological leakage
Provide details of other issues the selected program requires projects to address
Land right and conflicts:
The centralistic land tenure policies of the 70’s and 80’s led to both confusion and conflict among local communities, as lands they had traditionally recognised as their own
were designated as lying within the national forest estate and were therefore open to commercial exploitation. As time has passed the situation has slowly improved, withmore and more village land being progressively excised from the forest estate as land tenure and planning practices have improved.
The Katingan Project is designed and implemented to fully recognize customary rights and community land tenure. The project has facilitated participatory land-use
mapping and demarcated land-use boundaries in the project-zone villages based on customary rights. While this process has allowed a formal consensus to be reached on
the project area, the process has also helped local communities to resolve conflicts within the wider project zone. The outcomes can then feed directly into local planning
processes and get formal recognition.
Comment

C11.3(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal price on carbon?
Yes

C11.3aCDP

Page 71 of 125

(C11.3a) Provide details of how your organization uses an internal price on carbon.
Type of internal carbon priceInternal fee
How the price is determined
Price/cost of voluntary carbon offset credits
Objective(s) for implementing this internal carbon price
Change internal behavior
Scope(s) covered
Scope 1
Scope 2
Pricing approach used – spatial variance
Uniform
Pricing approach used – temporal variance
StaticIndicate how you expect the price to change over time
<Not Applicable>
Actual price(s) used – minimum (currency as specified in C0.4 per metric ton CO2e)
4000
Actual price(s) used – maximum (currency as specified in C0.4 per metric ton CO2e)
4000
Business decision-making processes this internal carbon price is applied toCapital expenditure
Operations
Mandatory enforcement of this internal carbon price within these business decision-making processes
No
Explain how this internal carbon price has contributed to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Striving to achieve our science-based targets, we set upper limits on CO2 emissions for each business site, and if Group-wide emissions exceed our target, we cover theexcess by purchasing renewable energy certificates, investing in energy-efficient equipment, and taking other pertinent steps. The expenses required are recovered fromeach business unit in proportion to its amount of excess. Each office and business unit fully understands this system and recognizes that recovery represents “risk.” This
recognition provides a major motivation for Group entities to strengthen their efforts to conserve energy and introduce renewable energy (a motivation to engage in internal
activities in all regions, divisions, and operations).
Thus, the primary objective of introducing internal carbon pricing is to encourage internal behavioral changes and improve energy efficiency to achieve each business site’sgoals. Internal carbon pricing helps to push the decision-making process toward lower carbon in capital expenditure and operations.

C12. Engagement

C12.1(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on climate-related issues?
Yes, our suppliers
Yes, our customers/clients

C12.1aCDP

Page 72 of 125

(C12.1a) Provide details of your climate-related supplier engagement strategy.
Type of engagement
Information collection (understanding supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Collect GHG emissions data at least annually from suppliersCollect targets information at least annually from suppliersCollect climate-related risk and opportunity information at least annually from suppliers% of suppliers by number
6.7% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
80% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
80
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
Suppliers with top in annual funding procurement amount and suppliers involved with our main products are categorized as our “key suppliers.” These suppliers areapplicable to our annual environmental activities survey that investigates their CO2 emission and reduction activities as well as collaboration with other organizations(suppliers, industrial groups, governmental work groups, relevant NPOs, etc.). the rationale for applying such scope include the high procurement amounts (it covers about
80% of total amount) and relevance to the Fujitsu’s key products, and thus involve particularly important suppliers to the environmental activities survey. Moreover, we
include CO2 reduction activities as one of our requirements in our Green Procurement Standard and request all (100%) of our suppliers to comply. The reason we require
this to 100% of our suppliers is that the Fujitsu Group endeavors on environmental activities in all of its business realms, and the procurement of more materials and parts
with low environmental impact is one facet of these activities.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
We survey and find out the implementation status of our "key suppliers", particularly those involving in our main products and those with large transactions with us.
・As an indicator of the success of the collaboration, the company is working with an annual target of a survey response rate of 90% or more based on the judgment thatemissions and trends can be sufficiently grasped. In FY 2022, 95.9% of suppliers responded, achieving the target.
・The results of the survey are reflected in Fujitsu Group's supplier evaluation, and corrective requests are being made to suppliers with insufficient activities.
・We also analyze responses and provide feedback about activity trends to suppliers who participated in the implementation survey, and request them further promotion ofthese activities. For example, we support the implementation of energy saving measures such as heat insulation and energy-saving operations for a supplier's
manufacturing equipment based on results of such information gathering. We helped the supplier expect 4% reduction of GHG emission and build consciousness towards
energy conservation for the supplier. To roll out these activities on upper stream of the supply chain, we have requested our key suppliers to ask their business partners(second-tier suppliers from Fujitsu Group's perspective) to implement these activities.
・In fiscal 2022, 24.2% of major business partners requested their own business partners to carry out activities, up from 23.5% in fiscal 2021. In total, more than 61,000
suppliers have been asked to carry out the activities but is expected to have a significant ripple effect on the upstream supply chain.
Comment
Type of engagement
Engagement & incentivization (changing supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Provide training, support, and best practices on how to set science-based targets
Other, please specify (Offering educational materials on greenhouse gas reduction free of charge on the website)% of suppliers by number
10.2% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
79.3% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
80
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
The top 80% of funds procured from Fujitsu Group's manufacturing and service (excluding licensing) suppliers came from activities targeting major suppliers.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successAs a new initiative from FY2022, we have requested our major suppliers to set CO2 reduction targets in line with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), which is theinternational standard. In addition to suppliers of parts and materials related to manufacturing, which are the conventional targets of CO2 emission reduction, the targets
have been expanded to include suppliers in the service field to more strongly promote global warming mitigation efforts. Since this was an advanced attempt that demanded
we set targets in accordance with international standards, we considered it necessary to carefully explain the background to the activities, including the social situation, to
our suppliers and seek their understanding and cooperation. We set 80% or more attendance as an indicator of success. We requested 293 companies to attend a briefing
session; 261 companies participated. We believe that the 89.1% attendance rate was quite a success. In addition, study sessions (webinars) were held to explain theprocedures for setting targets and to discuss FAQs and other information. We support our suppliers' CO2 emission reduction activities by providing a simple tool thatenables visualization of their [SCOPE 1 and 2] CO2 emissions and determines compliance with SBTi standard target setting.
Comment
We held a briefing session on setting reduction targets in line with the SBTi, and 89.1% of our targeting suppliers participated in the session in FY2022.

C12.1b

CDP

Page 73 of 125

(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Type of engagement & Details of engagement
Education/information sharing

Share information about your products and relevant certification schemes (i.e. Energy STAR)% of customers by number
59% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
0.3
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
Given that almost all of FUJITSU's ICT products are provided to business customers, the acquisition of the ENERGY STAR certification directly relates to whether we cansecure business opportunities particularly because the Europe region customers accounting for 71% of the sales revenue of our overseas sales bases and the Americas
region customers accounting for 6% quite often specify that the acquisition of the certification is a requirement for procurement. In addition, the acquisition of thiscertification is an appeal factor demonstrating that we actively employ energy-saving technologies, continuously engage in advancing energy efficiency and thereby drive
forward our development of products capable of contributing to the reduction of electricity consumed by customers' use of products. For that reason, we have engaged inefforts to acquire the ENERGY STAR certification and to share information. [Scope of engagement] The Fujitsu's product groups targeted for engagement with customers
through acquisition of ENERGY STAR are computers, displays, and imaging equipment, as those products are covered by the program. Engagement targets primarily theEurope and Americas region corporate customers. This is because many the Europe and Americas region corporate users require ENERGY STAR certification as aprocurement requirement.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
For PCs, based on the Energy Star standard, the ratio of products whose actual* TEC value (standard power consumption) is lower than the TEC Max (maximum value of
the Energy Star standard) is calculated. According to this, 56% of new products launched in 2022 met the Energy Star standard. (TEC (Typical energy consumption) is anumerical value indicating the standard annual power consumption.) The incorporation of various technologies has contributed to reducing power consumption forcustomers during product usage and also led to Energy Star certifications (examples include incorporation of a new microprocessor with advanced energy conservation
performance, high-efficiency power source, power-saving displays, optimization of low-power control, enhancement of the power management function, LSI integration,
reduction of the numbers of components and incorporation of power-saving devices).As a specific example, the Energy Star TEC rate for FUJITSU Notebook LIFEBOOKU757 is 70% less than the maximum TEC rate that meets Energy Star requirements. Customers' power consumption during product usage is 17% less compared to theprevious model (LIFEBOOK U536) even when including consumption from both standby and operation. By developing energy-saving products and communicating theirenergy-saving performance to customers through product catalogs, etc. and selecting Fujitsu products for customers, "Scope 3 cat. 11" is reduced as a result.Therefore,
Fujitsu uses the "Scope 3 cat. 11" numbers as a measure of customer engagement success. Specifically, we believe that achieving "Reduce CO2 emissions by 30% by
FY2030 (Compared to FY2013)" is a success. As a milestone, the Fujitsu Group's Environmental Action Plan Stage IX has set a target of " Reducing CO2 emissions by
14% by FY2020 (compared to FY2013)". At the moment, the Group has reduced emissions at a level exceeding the target. As a milestone, the Fujitsu Group's 10
Environmental Action Plan established the goal of reducing CO2 emissions by 17% by fiscal 2020 (compared to fiscal 2013 levels).Moreover, it contributes to abatement ofemission (Scope3(cat.11)) of about 4,374tons-CO2 at the entire notebook PC.

C12.2(C12.2) Do your suppliers have to meet climate-related requirements as part of your organization’s purchasing process?
Yes, climate-related requirements are included in our supplier contracts

C12.2a(C12.2a) Provide details of the climate-related requirements that suppliers have to meet as part of your organization’s purchasing process and the compliancemechanisms in place.
Climate-related requirement
Implementation of emissions reduction initiatives
Description of this climate related requirement
The Fujitsu Group promotes procurement from suppliers who satisfy the requirements of "Green Procurement", such as "Establishment of Environmental Management
System", "Compliance with Fujitsu Group Specified Chemical Substances Regulations", "Establishment of Management System for Chemical Substances in Products","Efforts to Reduce or Reduce CO2 Emissions", "Efforts to Preserve Biodiversity", and "Efforts to Preserve Water Resources". As for CO2 emissions, we require major
suppliers to set emission reduction targets based on scientific grounds.
% suppliers by procurement spend that have to comply with this climate-related requirement100% suppliers by procurement spend in compliance with this climate-related requirement
95.9
Mechanisms for monitoring compliance with this climate-related requirement
Supplier scorecard or rating
Response to supplier non-compliance with this climate-related requirement
Other, please specify (Subtract the supplier's evaluation score and request correction.)

C12.3

CDP

Page 74 of 125

(C12.3) Does your organization engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate?
Row 1
External engagement activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Yes, we engage directly with policy makers
Yes, our membership of/engagement with trade associations could influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Yes, we fund organizations or individuals whose activities could influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes
Attach commitment or position statement(s)[Sustainability Data Book] 5-3-1-1 ：Fujitsu Group Environment Goals https://www.fujitsu.com/jp/documents/about/resources/reports/sustainabilityreport/2022report/fujitsudatabook2022.pdf
Describe the process(es) your organization has in place to ensure that your external engagement activities are consistent with your climate commitments and/or
climate transition plan
We are monitoring. Using monitoring data, the Department of Environment, which promotes environmental management throughout the Fujitsu Group, is responsible foranalyzing whether direct and indirect policy collaborations are consistent with the Group's climate change strategy. The results of the analysis are presented and discussed
by the Sustainability Management Committee, which is chaired by the CEO and composed of the heads of business groups, regions, and sustainability departments, whichmeets periodically twice a year. Through this process, we are building mechanisms to ensure that our internal climate change strategies and our corporate commitments
through industry associations are consistent across business units and regions. In addition, internal education on environmental strategies is conducted on a regular basis toensure a thorough understanding of these strategies, and efforts are made to avoid any discrepancies.
Primary reason for not engaging in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate<Not Applicable>
Explain why your organization does not engage in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate<Not Applicable>

C12.3a(C12.3a) On what policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate has your organization been engaging directly with policy makers in the reporting year?
Specify the policy, law, or regulation on which your organization is engaging with policy makers
Sixth Basic Energy Plan and Green Growth Strategy
Category of policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Climate change mitigation
Focus area of policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Climate-related targets
Policy, law, or regulation geographic coverage
National
Country/area/region the policy, law, or regulation applies toJapanYour organization’s position on the policy, law, or regulation
Support with minor exceptions
Description of engagement with policy makers
Looking to realize a decarbonized society as early as possible, we presented an “opinion statement for the G7 Ministers' Meeting on Climate, Energy and Environment in
Sapporo and Hiroshima Summit” focused on the Japanese government’s “Sixth Strategic Energy Plan” and “Green Growth Strategy” through the Japan Climate Leaders’Partnership (JCLP), of which Fujitsu is a full member. The statement includes “decarbonization of the power sector,” “accelerating the use of renewable energy,” and“introduction of carbon pricing” among other recommendations.
Details of exceptions (if applicable) and your organization’s proposed alternative approach to the policy, law or regulation
For the Sixth Strategic Energy Plan’s FY2030 power source composition ratio, we suggest the following alternative approaches:
1. Decarbonize the power sector by 2035
2. Accelerate the maximum introduction of renewable energy as the power source with the highest priority and reduce dependence on fossil fuels
3. Achieve an early phase-out of coal-fired power generation without emission reduction measures
For the positioning of carbon pricing within the Green Growth Strategy, we propose the following alternative approach:
4. Introduce carbon pricing that encourages the rapid expansion of cost-effective decarbonization technologies
For the Green Growth Strategy’s automobile/battery industry growth strategy, we propose the following alternative approach:
5. Set a target of 100% ZEVs in new passenger car sales by 2035 as well as ambitious targets for large vehicles
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement on this policy, law, or regulation is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes, we have evaluated, and it is aligned
Please explain whether this policy, law or regulation is central to the achievement of your climate transition plan and, if so, how?
While not central to achieving the Climate Change Transition Plan, progress in decarbonizing the power sector and introducing renewable energy will have a positive effectin terms of reducing Scope 2 and Scope 3 GHG emissions, as the grid GHG emission factor will come down, and thereby contribute to the plan’s achievement. If little
progress is made in decarbonizing the power sector and introducing renewable energy, additional cost burdens will arise for the introduction of renewable energy.

C12.3b

CDP

Page 75 of 125

(C12.3b) Provide details of the trade associations your organization is a member of, or engages with, which are likely to take a position on any policy, law or
regulation that may impact the climate.
Trade association
Japan Business Federation (Keidanren)
Is your organization’s position on climate change policy consistent with theirs?
Consistent
Has your organization attempted to influence their position in the reporting year?
Yes, we publicly promoted their current position
Describe how your organization’s position is consistent with or differs from the trade association’s position, and any actions taken to influence their position
In response to the Japanese government's 2050 carbon-neutral declaration, Keidanren declared that "We are highly commended by the business community andcommitted to working together with the government to become carbon-neutral in 2050.". This is in line with our company's position.
Funding figure your organization provided to this trade association in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
Describe the aim of your organization’s funding<Not Applicable>
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement with this trade association is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes, we have evaluated, and it is aligned

C12.3c(C12.3c) Provide details of the funding you provided to other organizations or individuals in the reporting year whose activities could influence policy, law, or
regulation that may impact the climate.
Type of organization or individual
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) or charitable organization
State the organization or individual to which you provided funding
The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (The World Business Council for Sustainable Development) is an organization led by the CEOs of approximately
200 global companies. There are 6 clusters of regularly active projects, including Climate Change and Energy, that advocate for major economic system changes in linewith the Sustainable Development Goals/Paris Climate Agreement/Vision 2050.
Funding figure your organization provided to this organization or individual in the reporting year (currency as selected in C0.4)
13000000
Describe the aim of this funding and how it could influence policy, law or regulation that may impact the climate
Fujitsu has been a member of the WBCSD since 2013, has worked on several themes, and has been on the Board since 2018. We join environment-related projects of the
WBCSD and other initiatives to address climate change through industry. It participates in the "Cities and Mobility" working group in order to make use of ICT knowledge inorder to solve the transportation issues faced by cities. The WBCSD also worked to revise Vision 2050, a long-term vision at the core of the WBCSD's activities, andformulated Vision 2050: Time to Transform, a long-term vision through 2050, in March 2021. Vision 2050: Time to Transform outlines the transformations that companies
must undertake in 9 areas, including energy, manufacturing and resources, and health and wellbeing, and provides specific actions for the next 10 years. This vision andtransformation path is in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the goals of the Paris Agreement, and implementing policy recommendations can affectpolicies, laws or regulations that may affect the climate. Fujitsu's vision for the future is consistent with Vision 2050: Time to Transform, and the two companies are working
together toward the realization of a sustainable society under the slogan of "Creating trust in society through innovation and making the world more sustainable" purpose.
These are the objectives of funding.
Have you evaluated whether this funding is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes, we have evaluated, and it is aligned

C12.4

CDP

Page 76 of 125

(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places
other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Publication
In mainstream reports, incorporating the TCFD recommendations
StatusComplete
Attach the document
有報2022all.pdf
Page/Section reference
p.17-p.20
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment
Publication
In mainstream reports, in line with the CDSB framework (as amended to incorporate the TCFD recommendations)
StatusUnderway – previous year attached
Attach the document
IntegratedReport2022-all.pdf
Page/Section reference
p.63-p.69
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment
Publication
In voluntary sustainability report
StatusUnderway – previous year attached
Attach the document
fujitsudatabook2022e.pdf
Page/Section reference
5-3-2,5-3-3,5-3-4
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment

C12.5(C12.5) Indicate the collaborative frameworks, initiatives and/or commitments related to environmental issues for which you are a signatory/member.
Environmental collaborative framework,
initiative and/or commitment

Describe your organization’s role within each framework, initiative and/or commitment

Row Alliance for Climate Action (ACA)
We have the following two roles in each framework, initiative, and commitment:
1
Business Ambition for 1.5C
1. To promote our own GHG reductions toward achieving the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target
Japan Climate Leaders’ Partnership (JCLP)
2. To urge society to achieve the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C target
RE100
Specific activities addressing the former include acquiring SBT Net Zero certification, joining RE100, and disclosing information in accordance with theRace to Zero Campaign
TCFD.
Science Based Targets Network (SBTN)
Specific activities addressing the latter include policy recommendations to the Japanese government through JCLP and supporting the formulation of the
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures WBCSD’s long-term vision “Vision 2050: Time to Transform.”(TCFD)UN Global Compact
We Mean Business
World Business Council for Sustainable
Development (WBCSD)

CDP

Page 77 of 125

C15. Biodiversity

C15.1(C15.1) Is there board-level oversight and/or executive management-level responsibility for biodiversity-related issues within your organization?
Board-level oversight and/or executive
management-level responsibility forbiodiversity-related issues
Row Yes, both board-level oversight and executive
1
management-level responsibility

Description of oversight and objectives relating to biodiversity

Scope ofboard-level
oversight

The Sustainability Management Committee, which is chaired by the CEO and consists of senior management, is responsible for reviewing<Not
short-term and medium- to long-term strategies and targets related to the environment, including biodiversity, as well as risks andApplicable>
opportunities, and checking progress.
For examples, The 11th Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan (2023-2025) calls for action to “Reduce negative impacts on biodiversity inthe areas of corporate activities, including supply chains, by at least 12.5% from 2020 levels and to promote activities that increase positive
impacts on biodiversity.”.
The contents of deliberations and reports by the Sustainability Management Committee are reported to the Board of Directors after
deliberation by the Management Committee. The Board of Directors receives this report and supervises environmental activities including
biodiversity.

C15.2(C15.2) Has your organization made a public commitment and/or endorsed any initiatives related to biodiversity?
Indicate whether your organization made a
Biodiversity-related public commitments
public commitment or endorsed any initiatives
related to biodiversity

Initiatives endorsed

Row Yes, we have made public commitments andOther, please specify (We are committed to reducing the loss of biodiversity due to our own activities
SDG
1
publicly endorsed initiatives related to biodiversity through the establishment and implementation of targets to "visualize and reduce the impacts of corporate Other, please specify (Keidanren Initiative foractivities on ecosystems and biodiversity.".)Biodiversity Conservation、Japan BusinessInitiative for Biodiversity)

C15.3

CDP

Page 78 of 125

(C15.3) Does your organization assess the impacts and dependencies of its value chain on biodiversity?
Impacts on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
Yes
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Upstream
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity
Other, please specify (Ecological footprint)
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)“Ecological footprint” was selected as an indicator for assessing biodiversity dependence and impacts because it was proposed by the 24th Meeting of the Subsidiary Body
on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity (SBSTTA24) as a candidate indicator for Target 15 for 2030 under the KunmingMontreal Global Biodiversity Framework and because it can be used to comprehensively assess the entire range of corporate activities.
Ecological footprint was calculated by inputting “CO2 emissions,” “business site area,” “waste incineration/landfill,” “NOx and SOx emissions,” “BOD and COD emissions,”
and “chemical substance emissions” as items impacting on biodiversity. The results of an ecological footprint assessment that included both dependence and impact
showed that “CO2 emissions” and “energy use” together accounted for a 99% share among all impact factors. In other words, it was found that implementing measures toreduce GHG emissions and energy use would be effective not only in combating climate change but also in preserving biodiversity, and therefore it was decided to do evenmore to promote climate change countermeasures. Looking to reduce our negative impacts, we will monitor our ecological footprint over time to assess the reduction effects
measures are having.
Dependencies on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
Yes
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Upstream
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity
Other, please specify (Ecological footprint)
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)“Ecological footprint” was selected as an indicator for assessing biodiversity dependence and impacts because it was proposed by the 24th Meeting of the Subsidiary Body
on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice to the Convention on Biological Diversity (SBSTTA24) as a candidate indicator for Target 15 for 2030 under the KunmingMontreal Global Biodiversity Framework and because it can be used to comprehensively assess the entire range of corporate activities.
Ecological footprint was calculated by inputting “amount of biological resources used,” “amount of non-biological resources used,” “amount of water used,” “amount ofenergy used,” and “amount of chemicals used” as items dependent on biodiversity. The results of an ecological footprint assessment that included both dependence andimpact showed that “CO2 emissions” and “energy use” together accounted for a 99% share among all impact factors. In other words, it was found that implementing
measures to reduce GHG emissions and energy use would be effective not only in combating climate change but also in preserving biodiversity, and therefore it was
decided to do even more to promote climate change countermeasures. Looking to reduce our negative impacts, we will monitor our ecological footprint over time to assess
the reduction effects measures are having.

C15.4(C15.4) Does your organization have activities located in or near to biodiversity- sensitive areas in the reporting year?
Not assessed

C15.5(C15.5) What actions has your organization taken in the reporting year to progress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Have you taken any actions in the reporting period toprogress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Row Yes, we are taking actions to progress our biodiversity-related
1commitments

Type of action taken to progress biodiversity- related commitments
Land/water management
Species management
Law & policy
Other, please specify (The Fujitsu Group Environmental Action Plan (Stage X) (2021-2022), which lays out short-term targets, sets “Visualize
and reduce the impact of corporate activities on ecosystems and on biodiversity” as one aim.)

C15.6(C15.6) Does your organization use biodiversity indicators to monitor performance across its activities?

Row 1

CDP

Does your organization use indicators to monitor biodiversity performance?

Indicators used to monitor biodiversity performance

Yes, we use indicators

Pressure indicators

Page 79 of 125

C15.7(C15.7) Have you published information about your organization’s response to biodiversity-related issues for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP
response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Report typeContent elements

Attach the document and indicate where in the document the relevant biodiversity
information is located

In voluntary sustainability report or other voluntarycommunications

Content of biodiversity-related policies or commitments
Governance
Other, please specify (Short-term targets and examplesof activities)

5-3-1-8 : EMS, Environmental Management Framework
5-3-1-13 : Environmental Risk Management Stracture
5-3-1-18,19 : Conserving Biodiversity
5-3-3-27,28,29 : Environmental Action Plan, Living in Harmony with Nature (Conservation of
Biodiversity)

C16. Signoff

C-FI(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional information or context that you feel is relevant to your organization's response. Please note that this field is optional
and is not scored.

C16.1(C16.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.

Row 1

Job title

Corresponding job category

President and Representative Director

Chief Executive Officer (CEO)SC. Supply chain module

SC0.0(SC0.0) If you would like to do so, please provide a separate introduction to this module.

SC0.1(SC0.1) What is your company’s annual revenue for the stated reporting period?
Annual Revenue
Row 13713700000000

SC1.1
Later, delete

CDP

Page 80 of 125