ITER

Project Management

Hans H. ALTFELD, Head of ITER Project Control OfficeNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  1/68

Table of Contents

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  2/68

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  3/68

ITER

Project Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  4/68

ITER

Structural ComplexityDrawings:
A380:
79,000
ITER: 250,000
Cost ofDevelopment
ISS: 100 €bn
ITER: 20 €bn

GlobalSupply Chain

Parts:
747:
5106
ITER: 10106
Cultures:- Science vs industrial- Non-nuclear vs nuclear

Project FTEs:
A380: 6,000
ITER: 3,000

Systemof Systems

Interface
Challenges andSystems

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  5/68

ITER

Structural Complexity
Drawings:
A380:
79,000
ITER: 250,000

Governance
Structure(s)GlobalSupply Chain

Cost ofDevelopment
ISS: 100 €bn
ITER: 20 €bn
Parts:
747:5106
ITER: 10106
Cultures:- Science vs industrial- Non-nuclear vs nuclear

Project FTEs:
A380: 6,000
ITER: 3,000

Systemof Systems

Interface
Challenges andSystems

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  6/68

ITER

Structural Complexity
Drawings:
A380:79,000
ITER: 250,000

 ITER Agreement set up a structure where IO as the overall
integrator doesProject
notFTEs:
have organizational control over the
Cost of
A380: 6,000
Domestic Agencies(component suppliers)
Development

Governance
Structure(s)ITER: 3,000
ISS: 100 €bn Domestic Agencies have their own reporting and financial/
ITER: 20 €bnbudgetary structure
SystemGlobalSupply Chain
Drivers for IO of(scheduleprogress, functional performance,Parts:
Systemscost optimization) and DAs (individual entity cost
747:
5overall
106
6
ITER: 10reduction)10
are not always aligned
Cultures:- Science vs industrial- Non-nuclear vs nuclear

Interface
Challenges andSystems

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  7/68

ITER

Structural Complexity
Cultures:
A380: 1 Member
ISS:5 Members
ITER: 7 MembersGovernance
Structure(s)GlobalSupply Chain

Drawings:
A380:
79,000
ITER: 250,000
Cost ofDevelopment
ISS: 100 €bn
ITER: 20 €bn
Parts:
747:
5106
ITER: 10106

Cultures:- Science vs industrial- Non-nuclear vs nuclear

Project FTEs:
A380: 6,000
ITER: 3,000

Systemof Systems

Interface
Challenges andSystems

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  8/68

ITER

Structural Complexity
Cultures:
A380: 1 Member
ISS:
5 Members
ITER: 7 Members

Governance
Structure(s)GlobalSupply Chain

Drawings:
A380:79,000
ITER: 250,000
Cost ofDevelopment (ca.)
ISS: 100 €bn
ITER: 20 €bn
Parts:
747:5106
ITER: 10106

Cultures:- Science vs industrial- Non-nuclear vs nuclear

Project FTEs:
A380: 6,000
ITER: 3,000

Systemof Systems

Interface
Challenges andSystems

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  9/68

ITER

Dynamic Complexity
Technology
Changes

Financing
Changes

Product
Changes

Objectives
Changes
Process
Changes

PeopleChangesOrganization
Changes

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  10/68

ITER

Risks (and Issues)

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  11/68

ITER

Project Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  12/68

ITER

Project Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  13/68

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  14/68

<2013ExceNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  rpt	  15/68

2013

Excerpt	  ITER Management Assessment (“Madia Report”)

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  16/68

2013

Excerpt	  ITER Management Assessment (“Madia Report”)

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  17/68

2015

Exce

Action Plan presented by elect DG B. BigotNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  rpt	  18/68

2015

Exce

Action Plan presented by elect DG B. Bigot

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  rpt	  19/68

2015

Exce

Action Plan presented by elect DG B. Bigot

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  rpt	  20/68

Table of Contents

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  21/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  22/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  23/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Plant	  Breakdown	  Structure	  (PBS)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  24/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Work	  Breakdown	  Structure	  (WBS)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  25/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Requirements	  and	  V&V	  Management	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  26/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Schedule	  Governance	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  27/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Geographic	  Breakdown	  Structure	  (GBS)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  28/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity
ITER	  Organiza�on	  Breakdown	  Structure	  (OBS)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  29/68

TodayAddressing Structural Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  30/68

Table of Contents

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  31/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  32/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
ITER	  Management	  &	  Quality	  Program	  (MQP)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  33/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
ITER	  Management	  &	  Quality	  Program	  (MQP)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  34/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
ITER	  Management	  &	  Quality	  Program	  (MQP)	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  35/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Baselines	   Technical	  Baseline	   Updated	  Cost	  and	  Schedule	  Baseline	  approved	  ‘ad	  referendum’	  in	  November	  2016	   a�er	  review	  by	  an	  ITER	  Council	  Working	  Group	  on	  the	  Independent	  Review	  of	  the	  Updated	  Long	  Term	  Schedule	  and	  Human	  Resources	  (ICRG)	   based	  on	  best	  technically	  achievable	  and	  risk-­‐
reducing	  ‘4-­‐Stage	  Approach’	  from	  FP	  (Dec	  ‘25)	  to	  DT	  opera�ons	  (Dec	  ‘35)	   on	  purpose	  without	  ini�al	  schedule	  or	  cost	  con�ngency	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  36/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Baselines	   Technical	  Baseline	   Updated	  Cost	  and	  Schedule	  Baseline	  approved	  ‘ad	  referendum’	  in	  November	  2016	   a�er	  review	  by	  an	  ITER	  Council	  Working	  Group	  on	  the	  Independent	  Review	  of	  the	  Updated	  Long	  Term	  Schedule	  and	  Human	  Resources	  (ICRG)	   based	  on	  best	  technically	  achievable	  and	  risk-­‐
reducing	  ‘4-­‐Stage	  Approach’	  from	  FP	  (Dec	  ‘25)	  to	  DT	  opera�ons	  (Dec	  ‘35)	   on	  purpose	  without	  ini�al	  schedule	  or	  cost	  con�ngency	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  37/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Decision	  Making	  Hierarchy	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  38/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Decision	  Making	  Hierarchy	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  39/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Reserve	  Fund	   covers	  cost	  of	  IO-­‐directed	  design/	  scope	  changes	  post-­‐March	  2015	   1.05	  Billion	  EUR	  in	  the	  Updated	  Baseline	   at	  the	  discre�on	  of	  the	  DG,	  subject	  to	  EPB	  consulta�on	   ~	  29%	  used	  so	  far/	  in	  pipeline	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  40/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity
Reserve	  Fund	   covers	  cost	  of	  IO-­‐directed	  design/	  scope	  changes	  post-­‐March	  2015	   1.05	  Billion	  EUR	  in	  the	  Updated	  Baseline	   at	  the	  discre�on	  of	  the	  DG,	  subject	  to	  EPB	  consulta�on	   ~	  29%	  used	  so	  far/	  in	  pipeline	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  41/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  42/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  43/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(1)	  Worldwide	  Connec�vity	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  44/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(2)	  Integrated	  Project	  Teams	  ENGINEERING	  CONSTRUCTION	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  45/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(2)	  Integrated	  Project	  Teams	  ENGINEERING	  CONSTRUCTION	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  46/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(2)	  Integrated	  Project	  Teams	  ENGINEERING	  CONSTRUCTION	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  47/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(1)	  Experience-­‐based	  People	  Selec�on	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  48/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(2)	  ITER	  Academy	  Knowledge	  Awareness	  Behaviours	  Leadership	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  49/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity(3)	  Annual	  Performance	  Assessment	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  50/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity

Frequencyof Change

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  51/68

TodayAddressing Dynamic Complexity

Frequencyof Change

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  52/68

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  53/68

TodayAddressing Issues and Risks
ITER	  R&OM	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  54/68

TodayAddressing Issues and Risks
ITER	  R&OM	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  55/68

TodayAddressing Issues and Risks
ITER	  R&OM	  NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  56/68

Table of Contents

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  57/68

TodaySystems Engineering and Design Integration

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  58/68

TodayProduct Lifecycle Management (PLM) SystemNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  59/68

TodayProject Status Reporting

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  60/68

TodayExternal Audits

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  61/68

Table of Contents

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  62/68

Summary
GeneralNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  63/68Summary
GeneralNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  64/68

Summary
GeneralNAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  65/68

Summary

Nuclear Safety

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  66/68

Summary

Nuclear Safety

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  67/68

Thank You!

NAS	  Commi�ee	  on	  Strategic	  Plan	  for	  US	  Burning	  Plasma	  Research,	  1	  -­‐	  2	  Feb.	  2018	  68/68