HISTORICAL RIGHTS (1)
THE CHARTER OF LIBERTIES (1100)
Liberties granted by the Crown, binding the Crown and the Crown's Heirs "inperpetuity" i.e. for ever.
The Charter of Liberties (1100) was issued by King Henry I on his ascension to the throne ofEngland, at London on his Coronation. Henry I swore a Coronation Oath to We the People at
his Coronation to uphold the law (including, therefore, the Charter of Liberties (1100). The factof its existence and the wording thereof of the Charter of Liberties (1100) was confirmed by
King Edward I in paragraph 1 of the Great Charter of the Liberties of England, and of the
Liberties of the Forest (1297) CHAPTER 9 25 Edw 1 cc 1 9 29.- (short title: Magna Carta(1297) which states that King Edward I had "seen the Great Charter of the Lord Henry
sometimes King of England" of the "Liberties of England" as follows:"EDWARD by the Grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, and Duke of Guyan, [to all
Archbishops, Bishops, &c.] We have seen the Great Charter of the Lord Henry [1100]
sometimes King of England, our Father, of the Liberties of England in these words:..."
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/paragraph/p1;
The wording of the Charter of Liberties (1100) is cited in paragraph 2 of the Magna Carta(1297), which enshrines the Charter of Liberties (1100) into Statute law and remains current.
The Charter enshrines the binding Covenant made by King Henry I (and his heirs andsuccessors i.e. the Royal line - the Crown) to We the People to"give and grant" to "all Freemen of this our Realm" "these Liberties" to be "kept in our
Kingdom of England" "for ever" i.e. in perpetuity. The Covenant was made "unto thehonour of Almighty God" and "for the salvation of our souls" and "the souls of ourProgenitors and Successors" i.e. the Royal line.
The wording of the Charter of Liberties (1100) is as follows:"HENRY by the Grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and
Guyan, and Earl of Anjou, to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, Sheriffs,
Provosts, Officers, and to all Bailiffs, and other our faithful Subjects, which shall see thispresent Charter, Greeting:Know Ye, that We, unto the honour of Almighty God, and for the salvation of [oursouls and] the souls of our Progenitors and Successors [Kings of England,] to theadvancement of Holy Church and amendment of our Realm, of our mere and free will,
have given and granted to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and to all[Freemen]of this our Realm, these Liberties following, to be kept in our Kingdom ofEngland for ever."(emphasis added)

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/paragraph/p2; andhttps://archive.org/stream/pdfyuS6dgJSBYfcMp3x_/The%20Charter%20Of%20Liberties%20Of%20King%20Henry%20I%
20%281100%29_djvu.txt; andhttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/paragraph/p1

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (2)THE CARTA LIBERTATUM (1215) - (also known as the MAGNA CARTA (1215))
The “Carta Libertatum” (1215) or “The Charter of Liberties” (also known as "the Magna
Carta (1215)") , was a Charter of Liberties made between King John I and the Barons ofEngland on behalf of We the People, signed by King John I at Runnymede, England on 15th
June 1215. The Carta Libertatum (1215) set out the laws which the king and everyone else
had to follow. Chapter 29, reads:“NO free man shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties,
or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We notpass upon him, nor [condemn him,] but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of
the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice orRight.”(emphasis added)(translated from the original Latin)
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009; andThe Carta Libertatum (1215) was annulled by the Pope shortly after it was signed but wasreissued in (1216), (1217) by the King's regent and reissued in (1225) under the King's own
Great Seal, thereby confirming the King's freely given consent to the Charter. The Magna
Carta (1297) was enshrined in Statute law - including chapter 29 from the Carta
Libertatum (1215) and remains current Statute law.
You can see that this remains a current statute law by visiting
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/XXIX/1991-02-01
Here is a screen shot

“these Liberties following, to be kept in our Kingdom of England for ever."Notice the last words - this law still stands, and is binding FOR EVER in Kingdom ofEngland. For ever means it cannot be repealed or overturned – regardless of which
bureaucrats happen to be in power.
This law states that you cannot be imprisoned (i.e. quarantine), or have your property
removed, or be outlawed or exiled, or be harmed (destroyed in any way) except by the lawful
judgement of your peers. In other words by lawful and democratic process – not by decree.
This should be noted, especially in regard to –1. the imminent introduction of a Pandemic Treaty in 2024, whereby WHO member
states surrender sovereignty to an unelected body – the WHO – delegating to them thesole right to declare a pandemic, and decree what measures are mandated globally –including the forceful inoculation with untested, unsafe, ineffective and demonstrably
dangerous mRNA injections, forced lockdowns and destruction of businesses,
restrictions on free movement, restrictions on access to employment, education,
medical treatment, masking, forced quarantine for non-compliant, and social isolation(distancing).
2. the imminent introduction of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to decree who
shall have access to currency based upon compliance with decreed policies and withthe degree to which your opinions agree with a government narrative.
3. the imminent introduction of digital identity, which can be used to exclude groups
and individuals from access to public spaces, internet, services, and the fundamental
necessities for living.
All these are in flagrant contravention of the most fundamental body of establishedlaw – the Magna Carta, which, as you have seen, is CURRENT STATUTE LAW.

HABEUS CORPUS ACT (1679)
Chapter 29 of the Magna Carta (1215) is enshrined further in current UK Statute law in theHabeus Corpus Act 1679 CHAPTER 2 31
Chapter 2 binds the crown to obeying the law and provides further security for the "Libertyof the Subject", The introductory text states that it is:"An Act for the better securing the Liberty of the Subject and for Prevention of
Imprisonments beyond the Seas."
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/31/2/contents

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (3)THE MAGNA CARTA (1225)
Upon becoming an adult in February 1225, King Henry III reissued the Magna Carta (1225)
under his seal - the Great Seal of Henry III - binding himself and his heirs "in perpetuity".
The authentication with the Great Seal of Henry III removed, once and for all, any suggestionthat the Magna Carta's liberties were the product of coercion. In exchange, the People agreed
to a "tax on moveables" to fund the King's campaign to defend his lands in Gascony, France.
The Magna Carta (1225) is a legally binding contract between the Crown and We thePeople, with financial consideration paid by We the People for the benefit of the Rights
and Liberties granted under the contract. This legal position is confirmed in the Magna
Carta (1297) which is current statute law (see below).
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009 - paragraph [10]https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/magna-carta-1225; andThe UK Government states that the "Magna Carta set out the laws which the king andeveryone else had to follow" and that "Copies of Magna Carta were sent out to be read out ineach county of England so that everyone knew of its existence."https://www.parliament.uk/about/livingheritage/evolutionofparliament/originsofparliament/birthofparliament/overview/magnacarta/
magnacartaclauses/
Chapter 1 of "The Great Charter of the Liberties of England” - Magna Carta - (1225) provided
that the King had:“granted to all free-men of our kingdom … for ever, all the liberties…”.

written out below

This Covenant was incorporated into chapter 1 with the King’s Covenant that the Church of
England should be free and “shall have all her whole Rights and Liberties inviolable.”https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009
Under the Magna Carta (1225), all merchants, unless publicly prohibited beforehand, could
safely and securely enter, leave and travel through England by land and water to buy andsell, without any unjust exactions, except in time of war - an early recognition of theimportance of, relatively, free trade and movement.
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009
Note, “15 minute cities” are a flagrant breach of this clause, and therefore highly illegal, as arealso all restrictions forcing merchants to close their businesses and stay at home.
Note also that merchants must be allowed to enter and leave England by water. So restrictions
on foreign travel are strictly prohibited.
Chapter 9 of the Magna Carta (1225) granted, first, the City of London all its old liberties
and customs and, secondly, gave the same to all of the cities, boroughs, towns and theBarons of the Five [or Cinque] Ports. This is current law, as enshrined in current Statute law
under section IX of the Magna Carta (1297) as follows:"IX

Liberties of London, &c.

THE City of London shall have all the old Liberties and Customs [which it hath been used tohave]. Moreover We will and grant, that all other Cities, Boroughs, Towns, and the Baronsof the Five Ports, and all other Ports, shall have all their Liberties and free Customs."(emphasis added)
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009 -para [17]https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/IX; andThe concluding saving clause of the Magna Carta (1225) provided that:“[A]nd if anything be procured by any person contrary to the premises, it shall be had of
no force or effect”.
Thus, the King himself ensured, that by his own promise he would obey the law. This clausealso provides that no law or action taken to derogate from the provisions of the Magna
Carta (1225) would be legal and would have no legal effect.
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009 - para [22]Note this last clause. Any law or action passed that undermines the provisions laid out in the
Magna Carta is itself ILLEGAL and of NO LEGAL EFFECT.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (4)THE MAGNA CARTA (1297) - THE GREAT CHARTER OF THE LIBERTIES OF
ENGLAND, AND OF THE LIBERTIES OF THE FOREST
The Magna Carta (1297) is a legally binding contract between the Crown and We the People,
with financial consideration paid by We the People of a "fifteenth part of their moveables" forthe legally enforceable benefit of the Rights and Liberties granted under the contract.
The Magna Carta (1297) was granted "for ever" i.e. in perpetuity, thereby binding the Crown
and its Heirs and Successors for ever.
It remains current Statute law.
After 1225, monarchs regularly confirmed the Magna Carta, and Edward I confirmed the
Magna Carta again in 1297 in the Confirmation of the Charters (1297) - in exchange foranother tax on moveables provided by the People, thereby creating a legally binding
contract "for ever" i.e. in perpetuity. The Magna Carta (1297) CHAPTER 9 25 Edw 1 cc 1
9 29 was entered on to England's statute roll book, where it remains as current Statute law.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/contents
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009 - para [22]https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/search/?q=Magna%20Carta%20uncovered.
King Edward I at Westminster confirmed and granted the Charter of Liberties i.e. the "freeLiberties" and "free Custom" which "they have had in time passed" to "all Persons"- entitled"THE GREAT CHARTER OF THE LIBERTIES OF ENGLAND, AND OF THE
LIBERTIES OF THE FOREST" on the twenty-eighth day of March in the twenty-eighthyear of his Reign - the "Magna Carta (1297)". It is current UK Statute law.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/contents
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Magna Carta (1297) cite the Charter of Liberties (1100) inter alia:“Know Ye, that We, unto the honour of Almighty God, and for the salvation of [oursouls and] the souls of our Progenitors and Successors [Kings of England,] to theadvancement of Holy Church and amendment of our Realm, of our meer and free will,
have given and granted to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and toall [Freemen] of this our Realm, these Liberties following, to be kept in our Kingdom ofEngland for ever."(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/paragraph/p1,
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/paragraph/p2
Section 1 of the Magna Carta (1297) states that King Edward I has "granted and given" to "all

the Freemen of our Realm" thereby binding him and his heirs "for ever" i.e. in perpetuitythese "Liberties" "for ever" - i.e. in perpetuity I

Confirmation of Liberties.

FIRST, We have granted to God, and by this our present Charter have confirmed, for Us
and our Heirs for ever, that the Church of England shall be free, and shall have all her whole
Rights and Liberties inviolable.
We have granted also, and given to all the Freemen of our Realm, for Us and our Heirsfor ever, these Liberties under - written, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, ofUs and our Heirs for ever.
(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/I
Section 29 of the Magna Carta (1297) states:" XXIX Imprisonment, &c. contrary to Law. Administration of Justice.
NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, orfree Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We notpass upon him, nor [condemn him,] but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of theLand. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right."(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/XXIX
General Saving provisions of the Magna Carta (1297) - no right for the Crown or any
person to derogate from a Person's "free Liberties" and "free Customs" which are"holden within this Realm"- any such derogation to be null and void and of no effect
The following "General Saving" provisions and the "Observance of these Liberties" remain as
current UK Statute law. King Edward I "reserved to" "all Persons" their "free Liberties" and"free Customs" which the Crown had granted to be "holden within this our Realm". Edward I
promised that he and his heirs will "observe the same against all Persons, in like-wise." i.e.
all persons are equal under the law. " In return, Edward I received consideration from thepeople a "Fifteenth Part of all their moveables" thereby forming a legally binding contract.
These provisions are found under the "wrapper" provisions of the Magna Carta (1297) interalia:"General Saving. Observance of these Liberties. Subsidy, in respect of this Charter andCharter of the Forest.
Reserving to all Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Templars, Hospitallers,
Earls,
Barons, and all Persons, as well Spiritual as Temporal, all their [free Liberties] and free
Customs, which they have had in time passed.
And all these Customs and Liberties aforesaid, which We have granted to be holden
within this our Realm, [as much as appertaineth to Us and our Heirs, we shall observe; and]

all Men of this our Realm, as well Spiritual as Temporal, [as much as in them is, shallobservethe same against all Persons, in like- wise.]And for this our Gift and Grant of these Liberties, and of other contained in our Charterof Liberties of our Forest, the Archbishops,
Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons,
Knights, Freeholders, and other our Subjects, have given unto Us the Fifteenth Part of all their
Movables.
And We have granted unto them on the other part, that neither We nor our Heirs shallprocure or do anything whereby the Liberties in this Charter contained shall be infringed
or broken.
And if anything be procured by any person contrary to the premises, it shall be had of noforce nor effect.".....
We, Ratifying and approving these Gifts and Grants aforesaid, confirm and make strong
all the same for Us and our Heirs perpetually, and by the Tenor of these Presents do renew
the same:
Willing and granting for Us and our Heirs, that [this Charter and] all and singular his
Articles for ever shall be steadfastly, firmly, and inviolably observed;[and if] any Article in the same Charter contained yet hitherto peradventure hath not been kept
[We will and by authority royal command from henceforth firmly they be observed].
In Witness whereof We have caused these our Letters Patents to be made.
[Edward our son at Westminster, the twenty-eighth day of March in the twenty-eighth year of
our Reign.]"(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/wrapper1

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (5)CONFIRMATION OF THE CHARTERS (1297)
King Edward confirmed the Charter of Liberties in the Confirmation of the Charters Act (1297)
CHAPTER 6 25 Edw 1 cc 1 6. It is current Statute law. Section 1 states:"I

Confirmation of the Charters. Publication thereof.

EDWARD, by the Grace of God, King of England, Lord of Ireland, and Duke of Guyan, To
All those that these present Letters shall hear or see, Greeting. Know Ye that We, to the honour
of God, and of Holy Church, and to the Profit of our Realm, have granted for us and ourHeirs, that the Charter of Liberties, . . . which were made by Common Assent of all the
Realm, in the time of King Henry our Father, shall be kept in every point without breach.
And We will that . . . our Justices, Sheriffs, Mayors, and other Ministers, which under
Us have the Laws of our Land to guide, [shall allow the said Charters pleaded before
them in Judgment in all their points;] that is to wit, the Great Charter as the Common
Law, . . . "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc16/25/6/section/I

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (6)THE STATUTE OF THE FIFTH (1351)
The Statute of the Fifth was passed by King Edward III at London on 10th October 1351.
Section IV of the Statute the Fifth (1351) is current UK Statute law. It states:“IV
None shall be taken upon Suggestion without lawful Presentment;
disfranchised, but by Course of Law.

nor

"Whereas it is contained in the Great Charter of the Franchises of England, [the Magna
Carta (1297)] that none shall be imprisoned nor put out of his Freehold, nor of his Franchises
nor free Custom, unless it be by the Law of the Land;
It is accorded assented, and stablished, That from henceforth none
shall be taken by
Petition or Suggestion made to our Lord the King, or to his Council, unless it be by Indictment
or Presentment of good and lawful People of the same neighbourhood where such Deeds bedone, in due Manner, or by Process made by Writ original at the Common Law; nor that none
be out of his Franchises, nor of his Freeholds, unless he be duly brought into answer, andforejudged of the same by the Course of the Law;
and if any-thing be done against the same, it shall be redressed and holden for none."(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3Stat5/25/4/section/IV; andSection VI of the Confirmation of the Charters Act (1297) is current Statute law and states:“VI

No Aids or Prises shall be taken but by Consent of the Realm.

MOREOVER we have granted for Us and our Heirs as well to
Archbishops,
Bishops,Abbots, Priors, and other Folk of Holy Church, as also to Earls, Barons, and to all the
Communalty of the Land, thatfor no business from henceforth we shall take suchmanner of Aids, Tasks, nor Prises, but by the common assent of the Realm, and for thecommon profit thereof, saving the ancient Aids and Prises due and accustomed."https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc16/25/6/section/VI; andSection XI of the Confirmation of the Charters Act (1297) is current Statute law and states:“X1
And Be it Remembered this same Charter, in the same Terms, word for word, wassealed in Flanders under the King’s Great Seal, that is to say, at Ghent the fifth day of
November in the twenty-fifth year of the Reign of our aforesaid Lord the King, and sent into
England."https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc16/25/6/section/wrapper1

When we consider the plandemic – people have been imprisoned (quarantined) andsubjected to assault (forced /coerced medical treatment), without any recourse to law.
There has been no evidence provided that
1. the unvaccinated have demonstrated any intent to harm others
2. the unvaccinated have caused any actual harm
3. No evidence has been provided that the unvaccinated are asymptomatic carriers
So in the complete absence of scientific evidence, imprisonments and harms have been
afflicted upon the population.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (7)THE LIBERTY OF SUBJECT ACT (1354)
The Liberty of Subject Act (1354) 28 Edw III c 3 was passed in the reign of King Edward III andis current Statute law. Section III provides that:“III None shall be condemned without due Process of Law.
“no Man of what Estate or Condition that he be, shall be put out of Land or Tenement, nor
taken, nor imprisoned, nor disinherited, nor put to Death, without being brought in Answer
by due Process of the Law."(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/28/3
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009#_ftn4- para [25] ; andThis rule states that evidence must be provided – and the accused allowed to defend himself
with counter-evidence – before a jury of unbiased peers.
In the case of the Plandemic, this would mean a fair appraisal of both sides of the argument,
and a jury consisting of scientists and doctors who had not been threatened into silence, or
subjected to extensive media propaganda.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (8)CONFIRMATION OF THE CHARTERS AND STATUTES (1416)
Confirmation of the Charters and Statutes (1416) 1416 CHAPTER 1 4 Hen 5 Stat 2 confirmsthat the "Great Charter" and "all other Statutes and Ordinances made in his Time" and "in theTimes of his noble Progenitors Kings of England" and "not repealed" "shall be firmly held andkept in all Points" - at section 1:"I

Charters and Statutes confirmed.

FIRST, That the Great Charter, . . . F1, and all other Statutes and Ordinances made in his Time,and in the Times of his noble Progenitors Kings of England, and not repealed, shall be firmly
holden and kept in all Points."
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Hen5Stat2/4/1/section/I

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (9)CONFIRMATION OF LIBERTIES (1423)
King Henry VI confirmed to "all the King's People" and also "all the Cities and Boroughs" thatthey shall "have and enjoy" all their "Liberties and Franchises" "well used". The King also
confirmed that these "Liberties and Franchises well used" "shall ....not be repealed, nor by
the Common Law are repeal-able". This Confirmation was enshrined in the Confirmation of
Liberties Act (1423) CHAPTER 1 2 Hen 6 and is current Statute law. Section 1 of theConfirmation of Liberties Act (1423) states:"I

Liberties confirmed.

FIRST, That Holy Church, and all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and all other the King’s
People, having Liberties and Franchises,
and also all the Cities and Boroughs shall haveand enjoy all their Liberties and Franchises well used, and not repealed, nor by the Common
Law repeal-able."(emphasis added)
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Hen6/2/1/section/I; and"Rex Debet Esse Sub Lege, Quia Lex Facit Regem" - "The king should be subject to the law
for the law makes the king."
https://www.duhaime.org/Legal-Dictionary/Term/RexDebetEsseSubLegeQuiaLexFacitRegem
Sir Edward Coke, the then Lord Chief Justice, wrote in "Prohibitions del Roy", that in 1607, he
had told King James I that:“...His Majesty was not learned in the laws of his realm of England, and causes which concern
the life, or inheritance, or goods, or fortunes of
his subjects, are not to be decided bynatural reason but by the artificial reason and judgment of law... and: that the law was thegolden met-wand and measure to try the causes of the subjects; and which protected his
Majesty in safety and peace: with which the King was greatly offended, and said, that then heshould be under the law, which was treason to affirm, as he said ; to which I said, that Bractonsaith, quod Rex non debet esse sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege.”Translation:"The king is under no man, yet he is under God and the law, for the law makes the king."
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judges-speeches/justice-rares/rares-j20151009#_ftn4Bracton was an English Judge who died in 1258.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25721291

The liberties of the King’s people are not repeal-able. There are no conditions under which
it is right to imprison a man or medically assault him without provision of evidence fromboth the accuser and the defendant before an unbiased jury of peers.
These liberties are not repeal-able, so must always be upheld.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS (10)The Petition of Right [1627]
The Petition of Right [1627] 1627 CHAPTER 1 3 Cha 1 concerns the "Rights and Liberties" ofthe individual. It is current Statute law. Section VIII contains We the People's Petition of our
Rights and Liberties to the Crown seeking redress.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha1/3/1/section/VIIIHISTORICAL RIGHTS (11)
THE BILLOF RIGHTS (1688)
The Bill of Rights [1688] is an Act of Parliament declaring the "Rights and Liberties" of the"Subject" as at that date. The Bill of Rights (1688) is an Act of Parliament and is current Statutelaw, despite being called a "Bill". The Bill of Rights (1688) recites previous Human Rights andLiberties confirmed and enshrined in Usages, Customs, Common law, Statutes and previous
Charters of Liberties prior to 1688 (see above). The Bill of Rights 1688 states, inter alia:"An Act declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the
Crowne."(17th Century English)(emphasis added).

The introduction to the Bill of Rights [1688] confirms that "the Subject" has "antient Rights
and Liberties" under the title "The Subject's Rights".
https://archive.org/stream/pdfyuS6dgJSBYfcMp3x_/The%20Charter%20Of%20Liberties%20Of%20King%20Henry%20I%20%
281100%29_djvu.txt
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction; andThe Bill of Rights 1688 sets out that "Subjects' Liberties to be allowed" and that "Ministers
hereafter to serve according to the same" .
https://archive.org/stream/pdfyuS6dgJSBYfcMp3x_/The%20Charter%20Of%20Liberties%20Of%20King%20Henry%20I%20%
281100%29_djvu.txt
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMarSess2/1/2/introduction; ; andThe Bill of Rights 1688 places limits on the powers of the Crown. Section I of the Bill of Rights
requires that the King and or Queen swears a Declaration according to the wording of 30
Car. II. [1678] ie Charles II, 1678: (Stat. 2.) "An Act for the more effectual preserving the Kings
Person and Government by disabling Papists from sitting in either House of Parlyament.' i.e.
that the King and or Queen and or Ministers and others must swear under Oath that they
are a Protestant and will Declare that they will uphold our Protestant religion as establishedby law. (see the Declaration sworn, made and signed by Queen Elizabeth II in accordance withthe wording enshrined in the Accession Declaration Act 1910 on 4th November 1952 (below).
- in Statutes of the Realm: Volume 5, 1628-80, ed. John Raithby (s.l, 1819), pp. 894-896. British
History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol5/pp894-896 [accessed 8
November 2021].; andThe Protestant Religion must be upheld by the King and Queen. The Protestant religion
requires no person should be treated unjustly – a fair trial must be accorded them.