The Workshop 2012 for Protection of Cultural Heritagein Martapura, Republic of Indonesia
15 - 20 October 2012

The Workshop 2012 for Protection of Cultural Heritagein Martapura, Republic of Indonesia
15 - 20 October 2012

Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office,Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU)

Edited and Published by
Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office,Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU)
757 Horen-cho, Nara 630-8113 Japan
Tel: +81 (0)742 20 5001
Fax: +81 (0)742 20 5701
e-mail: nara@accu.or.jp
URL: http://www.nara.accu.or.jp
Printed by MeishinshaⒸ Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office,Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU) 2013

Preface
The Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office, Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO(ACCU) was established in August 1999 with the purpose of serving as a domestic centre forpromoting cooperation in cultural heritage protection in the Asia-Pacific region. Subsequent to its
inception, our office has been implementing a variety of programmes to help promote cultural heritage
protection activities, maintaining partnerships with international organisations, such as UNESCO
and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property(ICCROM).
The ACCU Nara’s activities include, training programmes for the human resources development,
the international conference and seminar, the website for the dissemination of information relating
to cultural heritage protection, and the world heritage lecture in local high schools. In addition to
those, ACCU Nara periodically publishes International Correspondent Report based on contributions
from appointed correspondents in the region and also conducts a regional training workshop which
dispatches a group of lecturers from Japan and implements the practical training on cultural heritage
protection on sites.
The Workshop 2012 for Protection of Cultural Heritage in Martapura, Republic of Indonesia was thesixth attempt of ACCU Nara. We were fortunate enough to receive the cooperation and support from
Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education and Culture, asa coorganiser. I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Dr Surya Helmi, Director, Mr Yoesoef
Boedi Ariyanto, Mr Amperawan Marpaung and his staff; and to all related parties for their cooperation.
The advantages of implementing the regional workshop are as follows:
1) A number of participants from one country can attend the workshop at one time.
ACCU Nara has invited a few participants from a single country to the Individual Training Course
held in Nara. However, participation is usually limited to two or three experts. It would be extremely
efficient to accept a number of people from one country at one time for providing opportunities toacquire expertise for the protection of cultural heritage.
2) The working language of the training course is their native language.
As a general rule, the working language used in both group and individual training programmes isEnglish, which sometimes gives difficulty in understanding the content of the training course forsome participants from Asia-Pacific region. Not all the participants are fluent in English. In order toresolve this kind of limitation on the communication, we have decided to use Bahasa Indonesia forthis workshop. We believe that participants can understand the lecture and instruction more easily andaccurately with interpretation.

3) The teaching materials are locally available artefacts
Different from the programmes in Nara, participants in this workshop make use of artefacts orvernacular houses indigenous to their own country for the practical training, which is familiar anduseful for them. For this year, the theme of the workshop was recording/documentation and researchmethods for wooden structures; and formulating conservation and management strategies, so we used
two traditional buildings, Gajah Baliku and Bubungan Tinggi, as the venues for practical training.
When organizing a workshop overseas, the most important part is the selection of the theme and avenue of the training course. The preliminary survey should be made prior to selecting the appropriate
theme which is most urgently needed for the country, because the training programme should also
have a long-term effect on the protection of cultural heritage after the workshop has concluded. In
organizing this workshop, we were fortunate enough to receive full cooperation from Directorate ofCultural Heritage Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education and Culture; ACCU Nara madecontinuous efforts to select the most appropriate venue for the workshop in cooperation with staffof the Directorate and we could have not concluded the workshop successfully without their warm
support.
ACCU Nara will build on this experience of the local training workshop in Indonesia for the next step.
It is also hoped that this workshop will be a step to the mutual understanding and promotion of friendly
relations between Indonesia and Japan. Lastly, I would like to express my appreciation to the Japanese
Association for Conservation of Architectural Monuments (JACAM), Nara Prefectural Government
and Nara Municipal Government for their cooperation in dispatching their officials to our workshop. I
am also thankful to the Agency for Cultural Affairs, Japan (Bunkacho) for their continuing support.

NISHIMURA Yasushi
Director
The Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office,Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU)Contents
PrefaceI.

Introduction… …………………………………………………・ 1
1. General Information
2. Programme Schedule

II.

Workshop Journal… …………………………………………・ 5

III.

Reports by parrticipants… …………………………………… 29

IV.

Texts… ………………………………………………………… 49

V.

Appendix… …………………………………………………… 73
1. Participants
2. Instructors
3. Interpreters
4. Assistants
5. Collaborators
6. Co-organiser
7. Staff Members, ACCU Nara

I. Introduction

A view of Gajha Baliku and Bubungan Tinggi

1. General Information
The Workshop 2012 for Protection of Cultural Heritagein Martapura, Republic of Indonesia
Co-organised by
Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office, Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO and
Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education and Culture
In Indonesia, there exist not only many stone structures, but also abundant architectural heritage
such as old mosques and vernacular houses which need research study for preservation. Recently,
it becomes the matter of urgency to conserve groups of traditional wooden buildings as a part ofhistoric landscapes for better utilization of them. Therefore, capacity building of human resources inarchitectural restoration becomes an urgent task for the government, because there are not sufficientnumbers of conservation architects needed to conserve wooden heritage except some areas inIndonesia.
In consideration of this situation, Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office, AsiaPacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO has decided to co-organise the workshop in Martapura,South Kalimantan, Republic of Indonesia, on recording/documentation and research methods forwooden structures; and formulating restoration and management strategies, as part of its cooperation
for cultural heritage protection in the Asia-Pacific region with Directorate of Cultural Heritage
Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education and Culture.
1.

Venue and Country
Martapura and Banjarbaru, South Kalimantan, Republic of Indonesia

2.

Date
From 15 October (Mon.) to 20 October (Sat.) 2012

3.

ThemesRecording/documentation and research methods for wooden structures; and formulating conservation and management strategies

4.

Curriculum
Lecture:・Preservation of wooden structures and its future tasks

3

・Preservation and management of a group of traditional wooden structures

・Recording/Documentation of wooden structures for formulating a restoration plan: An orientation for practical training

Practical Training:

5.

・

Drawing by measurement

・Damage survey and drawing up a restoration plan (presentations and discussion)・Formulating management strategy (presentations and discussion)

Participants
Fifteen researchers, engaging in investigation, research and preservation of cultural properties inIndonesia, who belong to research institutes, the management and preservation office for culturalproperties or museums.

6.

Language
The main working language of the training course is Bahasa Indonesia with consecutive interpretation from Japanese.

2. Programme Schedule
Date
10

4

Morning (09:00 – 12:00)

Afternoon (13:00 – 16:00)

Instructor

15

Mon.

Opening Ceremony (9:00 –)Orientation for the Workshop(10:00-)

Lecture: Restoration and Preservationof Wooden Structures

Mr Helmi
Mr Suranto
Mr Takashina

16

Tue.

Practical Training: Drawing a Floor Plan by Measurement ofWooden Structures

Mr Takashina,
Takamiya andYamaguchi

17

Wed.

Practical Training: Damage Survey and Repaired Evidence ofWooden Structures

Mr Takashina,
Takamiya andYamaguchi

18

Thu.

Practical Training : Formulating of Restoration and Conservation
Policy of Wooden Structures

Mr Takashina,
Takamiya andYamaguchi

19

Fri.

Practical Training : Drafting Conservation and Management Plans
of Wooden Structures

Mr Takashina,
Takamiya andYamaguchi

20

Sat.

Presentation and Discussion:
Formulating and Management
Strategies
Closing Ceremony

Mr Takashina,
Takamiya andYamaguchi

II. Workshop Journal

A View over the town of Martapura12 October (Fri.)ACCU staff and two instructors departed Kansai International Airport for Jakarta (via Denpasar).
Another instructor from Tokyo departed Narita Airport for Jakarta. They were joined by an interpreterin Jakarta.
13 October (Sat.)In the morning, the ACCU staff, three instructors and the interpreter traveled from Jakarta to
Banjarmasin. Upon arriving at Banjarmasin Airport, they were greeted by the tourism ambassador
for South Kalimantan Province. At the airport they met with staff members from Directorate of the
Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia (hereafterreferred to “Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museum”) and discussed the outline of the workshop
before going to the hotel. After arriving at the hotel, they performed a preliminary inspection of theworkshop venue and met with Mr Marpaung from the Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum
Bureau to discuss details of the workshop opening ceremony, including the program and task
allocation.

Welcome from the tourism ambassador

714 October (Sun.)
In the morning, the ACCU staff member and instructors inspected the hands-on training session tools,
which had been purchased at ACCU’s request by the Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum
Bureau, and determined what additional tools had to be purchased locally. They then traveled to thehands-on training venue.
They inspected the two buildings used for hands-on training, to check for tool marks on the floors,
damaged parts etc. They found it necessary to prepare flashlights. They discussed the details of thehands-on training. They also interviewed the residents of the buildings used for hands-on training.
They then purchased the necessary tools and joined another interpreter.

15 October (Mon.)In the Sapphire Room at the Hotel Permata In, the venue for the opening ceremony, Mr Yasushi
Nishimura, Director of ACCU Nara, and Mr Surya Helmi, Director of the Cultural Heritage
Preservation and Museum Bureau, signed a memorandum. At 9:00 a.m., the opening ceremony for“Workshop 2012 for the Protection of Cultural Heritage in Indonesia” began.
Guest SpeechesMr Surya Helmi, Director of Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum,The venue for the opening ceremony

8

Mr NISHIMURA and Mr NARANZUN

spoke about past cooperation between Indonesia and Japan regarding the protection of culturalproperties: disaster mitigation measures and cultural property preservation in general. He
encouraged participants to acquire as much knowledge and skills as possible from the workshop,
so that they can contribute to their local communities. He concluded his speech by expressing his
gratitude to ACCU Nara.
Mr NISHIMURA Yasushi, Director of ACCU Nara, first expressed his sincere appreciation to theIndonesian side and then gave a brief explanation of ACCU Nara. At the end of his speech, hebriefly introduced Nara and asked all attendees to remember the name “Nara.”



Mr Mohandas H. Hendrawan, Head for Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism, Province Officeof South Kalimantan, expressed his thanks to the Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservationand Museum and ACCU Nara. He stated that the workshop would be immensely helpful for
future research, preservation and maintenance of wooden structures that are designated cultural
heritages, adding that there is great significance in holding this workshop in a local region.

Mr Surya Helmi

Mr Nishimura

Mr Yoesoef

Mr Mohandas H. Hendrawan

9

The guest speeches were followed by presentations of commemorative gifts, name card exchange,
traditional welcoming dance, prayer for the workshop, and a photo session. After the opening
ceremony, Mr Nishimura was interviewed by local TV and newspaper reporters.
LecturesIn the morning, Mr Helmi gave a lecture covering several topics, including the Cultural Property
Protection Law of Indonesia, the reorganization of Indonesian government ministries, the current
situation, problems and research projects of underwater archeology. In the afternoon Mr Yustinus
Suranto, Instructor at the Faculty of Forestry, University of Gadjah Mada, gave a lecture in which
he briefly explained the properties, characteristics and structures of timber, as well as points to keep

A lectuer by Mr Yustinus Suranto

A lectuer by Mr Helmi

10

A lectuer by Mr Msayuki TAKASHINA.

in mind when using wood for restoring cultural heritage. Mr Suranto’s lecture was followed by thelecture of Mr Masayuki TAKASHINA, Senior Conservation Architect of the Japanese Association forConservation of Architectural Monuments, in which he explained preservation and management plans
for wooden structures in Japan; the flow of the workshop; and the planned training tasks.
Reception
Instructors and participants introduced themselves and enjoyed getting to know each other.

Interviewed by Local TV

16 October (Tue.)
Brief explanation of the buildings at the hands-on training site
Mr Hasbi Salehs, Head for Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism District Office of Banjar, explained
the historical significance of the two buildings used for hands-on training: Bubungan Tinggi and
Gajah Baliku. “Bubungan Tinggi,” which means “sharp roof,” has been used as a term to describe
the architectural style with a sharp roof. In Martapura Village, there had been a number of Bubungan
Tinggistyle structures in the past, but now they are becoming fewer. He also explained that Bubungan
Tinggi, used for training, was historically significant because it was constructed in the 1800s and used
as a royal palace.

The hands-on training site

Mr Hasbi Salehs

11Bubungan
TinggiGajah Baliku
Bubungan Tinggi
040m

Decorations of Bubungan Tinggi

Gajah Baliku

Entrance of Gajah Baliku

A Carving of Gajah Baliku

Interior decorations of Gajah Baliku

12

Carvings of Gajah Baliku

Bubungan Tinggi

Gajah Baliku

Gajah Baliku

Mr I Made Kusumajaya, Head for Cultural Heritage Preservation Office of Samarinda, explained therestoration and preservation works carried out on the buildings in the past. In the 1989 restoration,
most of the structural members had been replaced with new ones, and many of the original handcarved
wood pieces had been replaced with die-cut wood carvings. At around the same time, the wooden
paving on the paths in the surrounding area had been replaced with concrete, so that the area could be
used for parking.

Mr I Made Kusumajaya

After the instructor explained about the hands-on training planned for 16th, the 18 participants weredivided into six groups, three of which were assigned to Bubungan Tinggi and three to Gajah Baliku.
Mr Takamiya was in charge of training at Bubungan Tinggi; Mr Yamaguchi was in charge of training
at Gajah Baliku. The first task assigned to the participants was to draw a floor plan of the building towhich they were assigned. They were told to first sketch the shapes of the pillars and how the walls areconnected to the floor and ceiling, paying close attention to the structure of the building. They weretold to work individually. After sketching, they took measurements and drew a floor plan. After allparticipants had completed their floor plans, the instructors commented on several floor plans selectedfrom the two groups. A participant assigned to Bubungan Tinggi asked a question about how to draw
the shapes of the pillars.

13

Melkhiit Tolgoi

1417 October (Wed.)
The instructor gave a brief explanation of the training tasks planned for the day. Each group worked
together to inspect the building for damaged areas and tool marks, and to measure the tilt of the pillars
using plumb bobs to determine how distorted the building might be. The participants also climbed into
the attic to inspect the overall condition of the roof and identify the location, quantity and cause ofleaks. After roof inspection, they conducted an inspection of wood-processing evidences by tracing asurihon. At the end of the training session, the instructors summarized their lessons and explained theschedule of the next day.

15

18 October (Thu.)
In the morning, Mr Suranto gave a lecture as an expert on wood in which he introduced perspectives
for use in damage survey. After a brief explanation by Mr Takashina of the content of training forthe day, hands-on training was conducted on how to develop repair strategies. During the training
session there was a question-and-answer period between participants and instructors. In the afternoon,
the participants visited a group of traditional wooden structures around Martapura and also visited16

surrounding villages, to consider how the townscape as a whole, not just the two buildings used fortraining but the entire area, should be preserved.

A brief explanation by Mr Yustinus Suranto

17

Excursion in Martapura

19 October (Fri.)In the morning, each group developed a preservation and management plan in its respective training
building and in the afternoon, each group worked on preparing for a presentation in the training room
set up in the hotel where they are staying. Each group compiled data, finalized a preservation andmanagement plan and created PPT slides, while asking questions of the instructors.

18

20 October (Sat.)
Each group made a 20-minute presentation, in the order of Gajah Baliku groups (Groups 1 to 3) andBubungan Tinggi groups (Groups 4 to 6).
<Gajah Baliku Groups>
Group 1: They first explained the location, owner and historical background of Gajah Baliku andthen after explaining the damage state of the pillars, floors, windows, terrace, etc., they presented theirpreservation plan. Their plan was to start by fixing the most heavily damaged parts, in accordancewith the law. They said that the roofs were in most urgent need of repair because the walls had beendamaged by rainwater leakage, and that the exterior walls also needed painting. They expressed theiropinion that the parking lot laid with concrete blocks should be resurfaced with wooden boards,
because concrete does not suit the atmosphere of the traditional building. Questions about theirpreservation plan were raised by other groups.

A Presentation of group 1

A Presentation of group 2Group 2: They first explained the architectural structure of each room in the traditional Gajah Baliku
house and the meaning of the wood carvings. Then, while showing photographs, they explained thedamage state of the building, focusing on the under-floor area and rainwater damage to the roof. They
introduced their preservation plan, which included repairs involving partial dismantling and reroofing.
A question was raised by another group as to how the concrete area, which is used as a parking lot,19

should be improved and a discussion was deepened in this regard. Group 2 expressed the opinion thatthe concrete parking lot should be resurfaced with another material, because concrete paving did notmatch the atmosphere of the traditional building.
Group 3: They presented the dimensions of each room. Then, while showing photographs, they
explained the damage status of the building, in line with the flow of the text from the roof to the under
floor. They said that they had conducted a damage inspection with particular attention to the pillars
under the floor and the roof and presented their preservation plan, which included repairs involving
partial dismantling, replacement of the entire roof, and exterior painting to return the building to its
original color scheme. They said that all repair work undertaken should be recorded in detail for futurereference. A question was raised about roofing materials and methods. Group 3 answered that ironwood should be used for roofing and added that restoration work should take into account the requestsof local residents.
Mr Yamaguchi’s comment:
The damage inspections were very well done; in particular, the conditions of the leaking roof andcracked or rotten floors were examined very carefully. However, the repair strategies and overall
preservation and management plans must be more specific. All the groups agreed that the roof needs
repairs that involve dismantling. More consideration should be given as to how the damaged pillars

A Presentation of group 3

Mr Yamaguchi

20and the sinking foundation can be fixed. What the groups pointed out about the concrete parking lot
was a very important point as well as listening to the opinions of local residents when performing
restoration work.
<Instructor’s repair strategies>
Sinking foundation: It is preferable to perform repairs that involve dismantling, but it is costly. As tomethods for repairing the sinking foundation without dismantling, the following three were suggested:(1) replacing all the pillars; (2) underpinning the foundation; (3) replacing the damaged parts of thepillars beneath the floor. Different methods should be used for through pillars and pillars underneaththe floor.
Reroofing: Given the condition of the roof (bad roof leaks), it is better to redo the entire roof, if funds
permit. If that is not possible, at least the valley areas of the roof should be fixed.
Floors: The kitchen floor around the drain pipe in particular is badly rotted and requires repair.
Painting: Conduct research and repaint the building to its original color scheme.
Electric meter: Move the electric meter to an inconspicuous place.
Mr Takamiya’s comment:
The concrete blocks of the parking lot should be replaced with wooden boards, to restore the area asnearly as possible to its original condition. The original materials and design should be respected.
<Bubungan Tinggi Groups>
Group 4: They first explained the historical significance of the building in detail and indicated theareas requiring repairs. They said that 60% of the roof needs repair, and that repair of the foundation
should be the first priority. Other work that they pointed out includes: treating the timbers withfungicide and anti-termite agents; removing electric cords that are attached to important pillars;
replacing iron nails with wooden pegs (like those used in the original construction) in the importantrooms; and consideration of rust prevention treatment. They said that when using chemicals, timberfriendly agents should be used. In the question and answer session, another group expressed the

A Presentation of group 4

A Presentation of group 521

opinion that instead of relying only on chemicals, traditional anti-rot and anti-insect treatment methods
employing natural materials (such as tobacco, banana leaves and cloves) should be used.
Group 5: After explaining the history, address and dimensions of the building, they indicated thedamaged areas requiring repair and expressed their opinion that there should not be a souvenir shop
inside the building. They also pointed out that the painted portions should be repainted in their originalcolors.

A Presentation of group 6

Mr Takamiya

22

Mr Takashina

Group 6: They gave detailed information on the dimensions of the building and explained its
historical significance. Using photographs and a color-coded plan of the building, they showed whichparts of the building were damaged to what extent; they also proposed specific repair measures foreach damaged part. They numerically calculated the distortion of the building and pointed out thatthe building tilts in multiple directions, stating that if nothing is done to correct the problem, there isa possibility that the building could collapse completely. They pointed out the need to reinforce thefoundation and proposed the method they deem most appropriate and explained their preservation andmanagement plan, using a color-coded floor plan in which each room was colored according to its
degree of importance. They also proposed locations for installing fire-extinguishing equipment, andpillars on which to install light bulbs.
Mr Takamiya’s comment:
All the groups gave good presentations as a whole, especially Group 6. It is a great idea to follow
traditional anti-rot and anti-insect methods, using natural materials. It is desirable to remove modern
electric bulbs installed on the pillars. In Japan, there is a traditional rust prevention method, in whichnails are heated and coated with coal tar.
Mr Takashina’s comment:
It is better to use more photographs (color ones) in PPT presentations. However, as a whole, all thepresentations were well organized and very well presented, despite limited preparation time. Group 6’spresentation was excellent and was what I expected.

Mr Marpaung

Mr Saiful Mujahid, Mr Faouziah and Ms Najib, owners of Bubungan
Tinggi and Gajah Baliku Mr Nishimura and Mr Hasbi Salehs

23

The closing ceremony
Mr Marpaung reviewed the workshop and thanked ACCU and other parties concerned for theirgreat efforts and also stated that the workshop was attended by participants from various regions ofIndonesia and provided an excellent opportunity for them to enhance their knowledge and skills,
enabling them to contribute as experts to the preservation of cultural properties in their home regions.
Ms Sunarningsih of the Banjarmasin Institute of Archaeology made a speech on behalf of all theparticipants. Mr Nishimura, Director of ACCU Nara, then presented certificates of completion toparticipant representatives.

Mr Saiful Mujahid

24

Mr Hasbi Salehs

Ms Sunarningsih

The ceremony was closed with words of thanks from Mr Nishimura, Mr Hasbi Salehs (Head for Youth,Sports, Culture, and Tourism District Office of Banjar), and Mr Saiful Mujahid (representing the
Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum Bureau).
21 October (Sun.)
ACCU staff members and instructors visited the buildings used for training, to extend their thanks to
the owners and left Banjarmasin for Jakarta.
22 October (Mon.)In the morning, the ACCU Nara team visited the office of Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservationand Museum. Mr Nishimura expressed thanks to Mr Helmi and other persons concerned, for theircooperation and their contribution to making the workshop a success. In the evening, they traveled tothe airport in Jakarta for the flight back to Japan.
23 October (Tue.)In the morning, the ACCU Nara team arrived at Kansai International Airport.

25

The owner of the building used for training

The toilets floating on the Martapura RiverA diamond polisher

The large saw at the timber mill

The floating market in Banjarmasin

Traditionl wooden structuers in Martapura

Townscapes along the Martapura River

Vernacular houses and boadwalks along the RiverIII. Reports by Participants

The timber mill area in Martapura

Mursyidah
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Aceh

The workshop given by the committee was very satisfying and it increased knowledge in the technicalfield, especially wood conservation issues that had to be deepened to the progress of each agency inparticular. Although it is special to the Aceh region, we are in need of workshops on conservation ofgravestones and calligraphy.

Nedik Tri Nurcahyo
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Batusangkar

The workshop was incredible for us. We were reminded again in order to work systematically, fromcollecting data in the field, analyzing, and planning a preservation strategy. In addition, we also learned
discipline of time and implemented examples in our daily life. There were so many benefits gained
from the workshop for us. In the workshop we had a practical training as an individual and in the group.
We are required to draft the conservation plan of cultural heritage in a systematic and integrated way asa team. I wish this kind of workshop would continue with different materials in other places with diverse
buildings in Indonesia.
The time allocated (a week) was very short compared to the materials and tasks provided. In the future(if any) the workshop may need three weeks for theory and practice as well as planning and reportingand presentations for fruitful outcomes. Presentation time per group was also less than adequate: somewere given just 10 minutes, and others were given 30 minutes. The time for the presentation cannot bemeasured by the number of slides.
Thank you.
Arigato Gogaimasu

31

Kristanto Januardi
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Jambi

The workshop seemed to be consistently put into execution on time according to the schedule.
Although the time is limited for the workshop, all contents of the training sessions were well explained
and we could apply what we learned from the lecture to the practice. Teachers, organizers, translators,
and assistants tried their best to convey all instructional materials to us. It is obvious that withfour team’s cooperation coupled with our willingness to learn, the training process went better andsuccessful. To select the venue for the workshop seems fairly easy in Martapura, because traditional
original wooden buildings are used for in everyday life. It is a living heritage monument. In fact, such
wooden buildings are still found in many parts of Indonesia. Wooden buildings are living heritage, andparticipants were exposed to the real-life community of cultural heritage management, which was noteasy to manage. Both wooden buildings we examined in the workshop had different problems in its
preservation. It was a valuable lesson so that we can apply appropriate measures to similar issues.
The process of collecting data of wooden structures by measurement was not really new for those
who ever collected them in graduate schools, but the strategy was more practical and illustrated withclear results. We also learned a lot about the consistency and accuracy of data collection by using
the measured parameters. Wooden buildings as cultural heritage have not got a lot of attention to beconserved in many parts of Indonesia, however after attending this workshop, we can devote more
attention for handling timber buildings which are not less important than stone or brick buildings.
Instructors shared their experiences of wooden cultural heritage management in Japan, which was animportant lesson for us. Indonesia has abundant wooden cultural heritage resources in number andtype, and this workshop also opened up a new horizon for us, so we realized the necessity to makegreater efforts to preserve wooden cultural heritage. Since wooden heritage is more vulnerable thanbrick and stone, the cultural wealth of this nation would disappear faster than it is supposed.
The period of one week was considered appropriate for clear-sighted participants, energetic teachers,
and organizers. If it is possible to conduct the workshop in the future, seven to fifteen days would beappropriate. I also propose more practical training should be included because it is easier to remember
and to understand and we could ultimately utilize what we learned in our respective workplaces.
Teaching assistants facilitated a knowledge transmission process well. Translators are nice and friendly32

in explaining the contents of teachers, but they are not familiar with the field of cultural heritage
preservation, so there remained some misunderstanding among them. I think the role of the local
assistants is essential to reduce such misunderstandings.

Swedhi Hananta
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Serang

At the presentation session on the last day, we are pressed for time from the beginning team. So it does notenough time to make the sufficient presentation. There was the constant repetition of the three teams forthe traditional building of the same one, which might be somewhat boring. If each team worked on
one building or at least two teams to one, this repetition could have been avoided. During the workshop,
participants who are engaged in cultural heritage protection got in closer relationship and we learned
the conservation methods and techniques of wooden buildings in Indonesia, basically the same as thosepracticed in Japan. Through this participation, we increased our insight in the wooden conservation field and
it is expected that we can contribute to the future conservation activities in the respective agencies.
I look forward to further continuation of this kind of workshop with a growing number of participants
and in the wider region. I also wish that our relations with UNESCO will continue to be woven with
due regard to the principle of “give and take” and the spirit of nationalism.If I suggest one thing,
we should need more time to visit and observe local (indigenous) environments and the site (tourist
souvenir shop).

33Supardi
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Prambanan

The workshop was good, interesting and memorable. I could build up the experience so that I canunderstand the traditional house in the South Kalimantan. In addition I got a lot of new friends from allover Indonesia while learning together. If possible, the workshop would have been longer to offer moretime to enhance the quality of it. Moreover, if we had a special time for excursion to visit traditional
houses and the region, it would had helped us to deepen our understandings.

Bambang Susilo
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Prambanan

I was increasingly amazed by the many variations of patterns, varieties, and forms of cultural remainsof Indonesia, especially in Kalimantan remains (Banjar traditional houses). The relationship ofparticipants, organizers, and the instructors was excellent so that the activities can take place smoothly.
By participation our knowledge of the cultural heritage was more and more enriched provided by the
instructors.I look forward to better preservation of cultural heritage, which can be maintained andcared for according to the principles of conservation and science that has been given by the instructors.

34

Andi Riana
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Yogyakarta

I never expected that practical activities would be such detailed like this. This workshop was very
exciting for me. Participants can acquire new knowledge in the field of conservation of woodenbuildings, which is very beneficial for us. It is hoped that follow-up workshop will be conducted. As
the workshop was very useful for us, it should be held in a continuous and regular basis in Indonesia.

I Made Pande Parityaksa
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Gianyar

The workshop was impressive, because participants, especially me, learned a lot from the instructors.
My knowledge and ability in conservation and restoration of wooden buildings were developed andenhanced to be better. I believe that this kind of activity should often be carried out continuously toincrease the ability in the field of conservation and restoration. If the time was allocated to the practicaltraining a little more, the skills and knowledge would be more absorbed. I think the workshop was very
impressive because many participants including me lack the techniques for preservation of wooden
cultural heritage.

35

Iwaulini
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
TernateI am grateful that I could participate in the event thanks to the Directorate of Cultural Heritage andMuseum which co-organized the workshop and invited us out of UPT, and ACCU Nara for their
willingness to cooperate and to share their knowledge. Lecturers from Japan were nice and very
friendly, and interpreters were also nice and friendly. It was a valuable experience to be able toparticipate in the workshop, and it deepened knowledge, added to our experience and also friends,
even though we had language barriers, but everything can run smoothly thanks to the translators.
Lessons given by ACCU Nara were more or less similar to which we applied in implementing therestoration but I learned many skills and new knowledge done in Japan from the workshop which I
might add to the application of systems science. I also learned that good photos or photos of damage
were useful in determining the standard of care, and I think this is very important because the picture
can explain everything. The workshop was limited to a very short period for one week and I hope there
is a series of more advanced workshops in the future. The whole workshop went well and smoothly,and I may just suggest that the organizing committee allocate a special time for refreshing for us
considering most of the participants came from outside the area of South Kalimantan. Thank you andArigato.

36

Hadi Saputro Wirakusumah
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Gorontalo

The workshop seemed incredible and participants were able to recognize new areas notpreviously visited. We have got a lot of information that can be used as a reference for future
activities in the respective agencies. Hopefully this kind of workshop can continue to be held
on an ongoing basis and coupled simulation methods and techniques so the results can really beunderstood and correctly practiced. If possible, we need more time in the workshop schedule.

Leliek Agung Haldoko
Conservation Center of Borobudur Heritage

I feel very proud to be one of participants of this workshop. It was a valuable experience for me in myone and half years of working in the field of preservation of cultural heritage. Moreover, the practicaltraining of ACCU was very effective for the preservation of wooden cultural heritage. During theworkshop, many lecturers provided us with new knowledge and techniques by systematic teaching
methods. They taught us step by step and contents were clear and well-focused, and an example
was given directly in the field as well as practical, so as a participant, I was much helped to easily
understand. The lecturers were very friendly and easy to be consulted as well as their answers werevery satisfying. They applied what they had done for the preservation of heritage buildings in Japan.
I have one thing I hope for the workshop; practice conservation treatment should be taught, as thisis very important. If the conservation methods and technique will be included, participants would
be better equipped with new knowledge. It would be especially important for me who work at the
Borobudur Heritage Conservation Office and my job is to develop conservation methods of cultural
heritage in Indonesia. For that in times to come I sincerely hope such workshops can be regularly held37

every year since wooden cultural heritage in Indonesia is very numerous in the form of traditional
houses that almost each region has them. We also need the workshop to be held for the preservationof cultural heritage made of stone, brick, metal, paper, etc., so our knowledge will be more broadly
widen.
Lastly, I want to thank the Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum and ACCU Narafor co-organizing the Wooden Workshop on Protection of Cultural Heritage in Indonesia so that I canparticipate in it.

Yudhiawati
South Kalimantan Province Office of Youth, Sports, Culture,
and Tourism

During the workshop, I felt that I increasingly gain the insight into the conservation of woodenbuildings and increased knowledge of wooden building materials. I hope this workshop can be held on
an ongoing basis in the future.

Rabuin Ahta
West Kalimantan Province Office of Culture and Tourism

The followings are my impression of the workshop:
1. The existence of teamwork togetherness
2. Discipline despite of the relaxed atmosphere
3. The instructors in delivering the subject matter were quite directional
4. The materials presented both in theory and practice were very memorable because they weredelivered to those ways step by step so it was easy to understand.

38

With the workshop, participants increased new knowledge from both instructors and other participantsin the field of heritage conservation whose work was mainly on wooden cultural heritage. Participantsof the workshops were selected among officials who served for the region with a lot of wooden
cultural heritage and worked for its preservation so that they can directly apply what they had learned.
Besides, most of the participants were archaeologists with the minimal educational background ofarchitecture. It is hoped that this kind of workshop should be at least two weeks in different locations.
The workshop was well organized and conducted efficiently with enough time and good facilities
provided, but the organizing committee, especially in communication with the participants needed tobe refined. The evaluation of the instructors seemed only a subjective assessment to the participants
with less objectivity.

Sunarningsih
Archaeological Office of Banjarmasin

The workshop was good, interesting and memorable. From participating in the workshop, I got a lot of
new knowledge especially concerning conservation, a lot of new friends and new links that would be
helpful in the future work. It is hoped that this kind of workshop will be held in succession, especiallyin the heritage preservation areas. If possible, the workshop places would be extended. The numberof houses on stilts in South Kalimantan is getting less, so I hope there should be more attention from
UNESCO for its preservation, not just two types of houses (high ridge and elephants Baliku) suchas Gratitude area of Telok Selong / Kampung Melayu and its surroundings. If we had more time, we
could have enough discussion in a group for presentation and time to complete the task. I also suggest
if you could allocate extra time for excursions for the participants who come from outside the island.

39

Kamarudin
Central Kalimantan Province Office of Culture and Tourism

The workshop was very interesting, because participants can share their experiences with Japanese
instructors. Participants have gained insights and knowledge of wooden cultural heritage preservation,
which can be used as a reference on their return to their respective regions. I hope this workshop canbe held every year continuously.

Sintha Yulia Sari
Banjar Regency Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth andSports, in South Kalimantan Province

The workshop was a very enjoyable activity. I increased the knowledge about cultural heritage inIndonesia. It is hoped that the workshop of this kind can be often held.

Amalia Hasna
City of Banjarbaru Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth andSports, in South Kalimantan ProvinceThis workshop has opened my horizons regarding the preservation of cultural heritage. Hopefully, thiskind of activity continues. Workshop on techniques and methods of preservation of cultural heritage
such as this should be conducted not only for wood, but also includes all materials.

40

Stevanus Reawaru
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Samarinda

I am impressed that the workshop has given me so much knowledge to improve my skills on cultural
heritage preservation as well as the practical techniques for my future. Through participation of theworkshop I gained experience and new knowledge in the field of conservation work mainly of woodenbuildings I am looking forward to participating the workshop in the future such as an advanced
document preparation with longer duration and conservation treatment of wooden structures I would
suggest for the similar workshop should be implemented for longer period so that the acquired
knowledge can be directly practiced to our work.

41

(Assistant)Muhammad Tang
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Makassar

The implementation which focused on hands-on training was helpful to understand how to deal with
cultural heritage especially timbers. Instructors gave a detailed explanation of how to understand andprovide protection for wooden cultural heritage buildings. I look forward to continuing the active
cooperation and involvement of young workers for productive outcomes. Then the execution time canbe added, with a pick up location / other objects for comparison. Into this workshop for education andtraining purposes, the certain agencies sent the aged work forces. I would suggest that we should makethe age limit for participation in the future.

(Assistant)
Prita Wikantyasning
Directorate of Internalization of Value and Cultural
Diplomacy

The workshop was interesting for me. We learned the latest techniques of preservation of wooden
cultural heritage from experts of Japan where the country has a lot of wooden cultural heritage. We
also learned the latest techniques of preservation of wooden objects from them. We hope that this kindof workshop can be held periodically in the future with same or different themes.

(Assistant)
Azahar Purwanto
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in
Samarinda

The benefits that I got from the workshop were ways how to work with other participants
and instructors as well as how to treat the valuable materials for my work in the office. After
participating this training workshop, relevant agencies can discuss on the preservation of wooden
heritage and they will mutually develop strategies based on the skills obtained from the workshop.
It is hoped in the future that participants form networks each other and also with ACCU.

42

Group for Gajah Baliku(Group1)
Mursyidah (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Aceh), Andi Riana (Province
Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Yogyakarta), and Kamarudin (Central Kalimantan
Province Office of Culture and Tourism)

43

(Group2)
Nedik Tri Nurcahyo (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Batusangkar), Iwaulini(Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Ternate), and Rabuin Ahta (West Kalimantan
Province Office of Culture and Tourism)

44

(Group3)
Kristanto Januardi (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Jambi), Swedhi Hananta(Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Serang), and Yudhiawati (South Kalimantan
Province Office of Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism)

45

Group for Bubungan Tinggi(Group4)
Supardi (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Prambanan), Bambang Susilo(Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Prambanan), Sunarningsih (Archaeological
Office of Banjarmasin)

46

(Group5)
I Made Pande Parityaksa (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Gianyar), Hadi
Saputro Wirakusumah (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Gorontalo), andSintha Yulia Sari (Banjar Regency Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth and Sports, in South Kalimantan
Province)47

(Group6)
Leliek Agung Haldoko (Conservation Center of Borobudur Heritage), Amalia Hasna (City of
Banjarbaru Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth and Sports, in South Kalimantan Province), andStevanus Reawaru (Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Samarinda)48

IV. Texts

Jack FruitPedoman Penyusunan dan Penentuan Perencanaan untuk Pemanfaatan
dan Pelestarian Cagar Budaya Penting (Bangunan)
Maret 1999
[Tujuan Pedoman]
1. Pedoman ini menunjukkan hal-hal yang penting untuk menyusun dan
menentukan perencanaan yang terkait dengan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan(selanjutnya disebut ‘perencanaan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan’) yangdijelaskan keperluannya di dalam ‘Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya Penting(Bangunan)’ (Surat Edaran Ketua Divisi Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, Badan
Kebudayaan No.161, tanggal 25 Desember 1998).
2. Pedoman ini bukan untuk menentukan metode pelestarian dan isi pemanfaatan
secara konkret untuk setiap cagar budaya penting (bangunan) secara individual,
tetapi menunjukkan hal-hal yang harus ditetapkan dalam perencanaan dan
hal-hal yang harus diperhatikan dalam bentuk dapat diterapkan pada cagar
budaya penting (bangunan) yang beranekaragam.
[Tujuan Perencanaan]
3. Perencanaan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan ditetapkan dengan tujuan untuk
memperlancar dan meningkatkan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan secara spontan
dari pemilik/penanggungjawab pengelolaan/organisasi pengelola (selanjutnya
disebut ‘pemilik dll’) melalui: 1) pemilik dll menggali dan mengetahui persoalanyang ada pada cagar budaya penting (bangunan), 2) mengetahui lingkup
kegiatan yang sanggup dilaksanakan oleh pemilik dll secara spontan untuk
pelestarian dan pemanfaatannya, dan 3) membentuk kesepakatan antara
pemilik dll, Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/Desa, dan Badan
Kebudayaan.
[Penyusunan dan Penentuan Perencanaan]
4. Pada dasarnya, Perencanaan Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan disusun dan
ditetapkan oleh pemilik dll dengan mendapatkan bimbingan dan saran dari
Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/Desa, dan jika diperlukan
berdiskusi dengan Badan Kebudayaan.
5. Komisi Pendidikan Kabupaten/Kota/Desa jika diperlukan dan berdasarkan
permintaan dari pemilik dll dapat melaksanakan semua atau sebagian daritugas penyusunan dan penentuan perencanaan sebagai wakil pemilik dll.
151

[Kawasan Perencanaan]
6. Kawasan dimana menjadi objek Perencanaan Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan(selanjutnya disebut ‘kawasan perencanaan’) ditentukan oleh pemilik dll secara
spontan di dalam lingkup tanah dimana pemilik dapat menerapkan hak dirisendiri, namun jika diperlukan dapat mencakupi kawasan di sekitarnya atas
dasar kesepakatan oleh pihak terkait.
[Isi Perencanaan]
7. Perencanaan Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan terdiri dari berbagai prosedur yangberkaitan dengan perencanaan serta pelestarian antara lain: manajemen
pelestarian, konservasi lingkungan, pencegahan bencana, dan pemanfaatan.
(mengacu pada lampiran 1)
8. Perencanaan yang berkaitan dengan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan bangunan
dan tanah yang melekat dengannya yang telah diberi perlindungan seperti
penetapan/pendaftaran oleh Pemerintah Pusat atau Pemerintah Daerah selain
cagar budaya penting (bangunan) yang termasuk kawasan perencanaan akan
ditentukan berdasarkan diskusi antara organisasi terkait.
[Bimbingan Teknis]
9. Dalamhalpenyusunandanpenentuanperencanaanpelestariandanpemanfaatan, pemilik dll dapat meminta bimbingan teknis kepada Badan
Kebudayaan berdasarkan UU Pelestarian Cagar Budaya (UU No.214, tanggal
30 Mei 1950) pasal 47 ayat 4 serta Peraturan Kementerian Pendidikan tentang
Bimbingan Teknis yang Berkaitan dengan Manajemen, Perbaikan, dll pada
Pusaka Negara dan Cagar Budaya Penting (Peraturan kementerian Pendidikan
No.29, tanggal 30 September 1975) pasal 1.
10. Jika meminta bimbingan teknis kepada Badan Kebudayaan sesuai dengan
ketentuan tersebut di atas, diantara dokumen yang meminta bimbingan teknisyang ditentukan di pasal 1 dari Peraturan Kementerian Pendidikan tentang
Bimbingan Teknis yang Berkaitan dengan Manajemen, Perbaikan, dll pada
Pusaka Negara dan Cagar Budaya Penting, dokumen yang ditentukan di pasal
1 ayat 2 no.1 dan no.2 dapat diganti dengan usulan perencanaan pelestariandan pemanfaatan.
11. Jika di dalam isi perencanaan terdapat tindakan perubahan kondisi atautindakan yang akan mempengaruhi pelestarian seperti ditentukan di pasal 43
no.1 UU Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, maka pemilik dll yang membuat
252perencanaan berdiskusi dengan Badan Kebudayaan melalui Komisi Pendidikan
Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/Desa, dan jika diperlukan meminta bimbingan
teknis kepada Badan Kebudayaan berdasarkan ketentuan UU tersebut pasal 47
ayat 4.
[Verifikasi Perencanaan]
12. Pemilik dll dapat menyerahkan 1 (satu) dokumen perencanaan kepada Badan
Kebudayaan melalui Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/ Desa dan
mendapatkan verifikasi dari Badan Kebudayaan mengenai isi perencanaan danprosedur yang diperlukan.
13. Badan Kebudayaan memberitahukan penerimaan dokumen perencanaan
kepada Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/Desa, dan ini dijadikan
pemberitahuan verifikasi.
14. Dokumen perencanaan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan disimpan 1 dokumen disetiap tempat pemilik dll, Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur/Kabupaten/Kota/ Desa,dan Badan Kebudayaan.
15. Jika ingin mengubah isi perencanaan yang sudah diverifikasikan, makapemilik dll mengirim dokumen perencanaan yang telah dirubah dan
melampirkan

dokumenperencanaan

sebelum

dirubahuntuk

memintaverifikasi ulang dari Badan Kebudayaan.
16. Diantara surat permohonan ijin yang ditentukan di Peraturan tentang
Permohonan Ijin PerubahanKondisi Pusaka Negara dan Cagar Budaya Penting(Peraturan Komisi Pelestarian Cagar Budaya No.3, tanggal 29 Juni 1954),
dokumen lampiran yang ditetapkan di pasal 2 ayat 1 no.1 s/d no.3 di Peraturan
tersebut dapat diganti dengan dokumen perencanaan yang sudah diverifikasi
sebagai sebagian dari dokumen lampiran tersebut, namun jika diperlukan
ditambahkan dokumen spesifikasi dll.
17. Diantara surat pemberitahuan yang ditetapkan di Peraturan tentang
Pemberitahuan Perbaikan Pusaka Negara dan Cagar Budaya Penting(Peraturan Komisi Pelestarian Cagar Budaya No.4, tanggal 29 Juni 1954), surat
lampiran yang ditetapkan di pasal 1 ayat 2 no.1 dan no.2 di Perarutan tersebut
dapat diganti dengan dokumen peencanaan yang sudah diverifikasi sebagai
sebagian dari dokumen lampiran tersebut, namun jika diperlukan ditambahkan
dokumen spesifikasi dll.
[Koordinasi dengan Organisasi Pemerintah Terkait]
18. Komisi Pendidikan Prefektur dan Komisi Pendidikan Kabupaten/Kota/ Desa3

53

memberikan bimbingan dan saran jika diminta oleh pemilik dll, dan
mengkoordinir hal-hal dibawah ini bersama pihak-pihak terkait dari organisasi
pemerintah terkait.
(1) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan kebijakan penataan kota (perencanaan
perkotaan,

penataandaerah,perencanaan

pariwisata,perencanaan

perlindungan lingkungan, dll);(2) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan tindakan pencegahan bencana (perencanaan
pemadaman api/kebakaran, latihan pencegahan kebakaran, tindakan
terhadap

bencanagempa

pegunungan/pengendalianbumi,

banjir,perencanaan

kerjasama

penataandengangrup

kawasanpemadamapi/warga setempat, dll);(3) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan kegiatan pembelajaran komunitas (kegiatan
pendidikan sosial, kegiatan pendidikan seumur hidup, dll);(4) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan pelestarian cagar budaya (perubahan
kondisi dll);(5) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan penduduk/warga komunitas
setempat (penataan lingkungan sekitar, dll); dan(6) Hal-hal lain yang diperlukan.
[Penyusunan Perencanaan]
19. Struktur dan isi konkret Perencanaan Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan berbeda
sesuai dengan jenis dan sifat cagar budaya yang menjadi objek serta pedomanpemanfaatan, dan membuat perencanaan dengan memperhatikan padamanajemen pelestarian, perlindungan lingkungan, pencegahan bencana serta
pemanfaatan dengan mengacu pada ‘Ringkasan Penyusunan PerencanaanStandaruntuk

Pelestariandan

Pemanfaatan

Cagar

BudayaPenting(bangunan)’ yang dibuat secara terpisah, dan menentukan berbagai proseduryang berkaitan dengan pelestarian. (mengacu pada lampiran 2)454

[Lampiran 1] Arus Prosedur Penyusunan dan Penentuan Perencanaan
Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya Penting (Bangunan)
Penentuan Kawasan Perencanaan↓
Perencanaan Manajemen
Pelestarian

Perencanaan Perlindungan
Lingkungan

Perencanaan Pencegahan

Verifikasi kondisi saat ini

Verifikasi Kondisi saat ini↓↓

Penentuan bagian/posisi

Kawasan dan klasifikasi↓

bangunan

Pedoman Pelestarian

BencanaPenanganan terhadap
pencegahan kebakaran &kriminalitas
Penanganan Anti Gempa↓
Pedoman pelestarian↓↓

Penanganan Anti

Perencanaan

Perencanaan

Angin/Topandan perlindungan

Manajemen

Perbaikan↓

Penanganan terhadap
bencana lain

Persoalan dan
penanganan untuk
pencegahan bencana

Perencanaan Pemanfaatan
Pedoman↓
Perencanaan Umum
↓

Dasar
↓

Perencanaan Dasar untuk Pemanfaatan↓

Persoalan/Tantangan menuju Pelaksanaan/Implementasi

Verifikasi Sejumlah Prosedur yang berkaitan dengan Pelestarian

555

[Lampiran 2] Struktur Standar Perencanaan Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan
Cagar Budaya Penting (Bangunan)<Standar/Pedoman dll>

<Struktur Standar Perencanaan>
BAB I: Garis Besar Perencanaan

Perencanaan Pelestarian & Pemanfaatan-(1) Penyusunan Perencanaan

Pedoman ini(2) Nama Cagar Budaya dll(3) Garis Besar Cagar Budaya(4) Perkembangan Pelestarian Cagar Budaya(5) Kondisi Pelestarian dan Persoalannya(6) Garis Besar Perencanaan
Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestarian

BAB II: Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestarian-(1) Kondisi Manajemen Pelestarian Masa Kini

“HandbookPelestariandan

Manajemen Cagar Budaya: versi.

(2) Pedoman Pelestarian

Bangunan”(3) Perencanaan Manajeman(4) Perencanaan Perbaikan

Perencanaan Perlindungan Lingkungan

BAB III: Perencanaan Perlindungan Lingkungan(1) Kondisi Perlindungan Lingkungan Masa Kini dan Persoalannya(2) Pedoman Dasar Perlindungan Lingkungan(3) Klasifikasi/Pembagian Kawasan dan Pedoman Perlindungan(4) Klasifikasi/Pembagian Bangunan dan Pedoman pelestarian(5) Persoalan dan Penanganan untuk Pencegahan Bencana

Perencanaan Pencegahan Bencana-“Mengenai

KeamananBAB IV: Perencanaan Pencegahan Bencanayang(1) Penanganan Pencegahan Kebakaran & Kriminalitas

Meyakinkan di Bangunan Cagar(2) Penanganan Anti/Tahan Gempa

Budaya pada saat Gempa Bumi ”(3) Penanganan terhadap Angin/Topan(4) Penanganan terhadap Bencana Lain
BABV: Perencanaan Pemanfaatan

Perencanaan Pemanfaatan-“Mengenai

Pemanfaatan

Cagar

Budaya (Bangunan)”(1) Pedoman dasar pemanfaatan secara Terbuka dll(2) Perencanaan Terbuka/Umum(3) Perencanaan Dasar Pemanfaatan

Berbagai Prosedur yang berkaitan
dengan Pelestarian(4) Persoalan menuju Pelaksanaan/Implementasi
BAB VI: Berbagai Prosedur yang Berkaitan dengan Pelestarian
656

[Lampiran]

Ringkasan Penyusunan Perencanaan Standar untuk
Pelestarian dan Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya Penting (bangunan)

BAB I

Penyusunan Perencanaan

hlm.2

BAB II Penyusunan ‘Garis Besar Perencanaan’hlm.10BAB III Penyusunan ‘Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestarian’hlm.13BAB IV Penyusunan ‘Perencanaan Perlindungan Lingkungan’hlm.

BAB V Penyusunan ‘Perencanaan Pencegahan Bencana’hlm.

BAB VI Penyusunan ‘Perencanaan Pemanfaatan’hlm.

BAB VII Penyusunan ‘Berbagai Prosedur yang Berkaitan dengan Pelestarian’
hlm.

1

57

BAB I

Penyusunan Perencanaan[Penentuan Kawasan Perencanaan]
1. Berikut ini adalah lingkup tanah standar yang perlu diperhatikan ketika pemilik
dll menentukan kawasan perencanaan secara spontan.
(1) Tanah yang membentuk suatu nilai yang terpadu dengan cagar budaya penting(bangunan)dan

ditentukan

sebagaicagar

budayapentingbersamabangunannya.
(2) Tanah yang memenuhi syarat dibawah ini selain yang disebutkan di (1):a. Tanah yang membentuk nilainya yang terpadu dengan cagar budaya(bangunan)
1) Tanah yang diberi perlindungan atau terdaftar sebagai situs bersejarah(shiseki), pemandangan/lanskap indah (meisho), atau sebutan yang lainoleh negara atau pemerintah daerah;2) Tanah yang harus ada untuk memahami cagar budaya bersangkutan.
b. Tanah di sekitarnya yang terpadu dengan cagar budaya penting (bangunan)
dan membentuk nilainya, dan merupakan lanskap dan lingkungan
bersejarah.
1) Tanah yang membentuk lanskap dan lingkungan alam di lokasi dimana
cagar budaya bersangkutan berdiri.
2) Tanah yang membentuk lanskap dan lingkungan yang berkaitan erat
dengan kehidupan dan kegiatan usaha yang dilaksanakan di cagar
budaya bersangkutan.
c. Tanah yang diperuntukkan untuk melestarikan cagar budaya penting(bangunan)
1) Tanahyang

diperuntukkan

untuk

pelaksanaan

perbaikandanpelestarian serta manajemen perawatan.
2) Tanah yang perlu ada penanganan perlindungan untuk melestarikan
cagar budaya bersangkutan seperti tanah menanjak tajam di samping
cagar budaya.
3) Tanah yang diperlukan dari segi pencegahan kebakaran dan kegiatan
pemadaman api.
4) Tanah yang lain yang diperlukan dari segi pencegahan bencana.
d. Tanah yang diperlukan untuk mengupayakan cagar budaya penting(bangunan) dibuka umum dan pemanfaatan tepat yang lain.
1) Tanah yang diperlukan untuk menjaga keamanan pada saat terjadi
bencana, antara lain menyediakan jalur evakuasi, dll.
2582) Tanah yang diperlukan untuk pemanfaatan yang lebih praktis/nyaman
seiring dengan dibukanya cagar budaya bersangkutan kepada publik
dan pemanfaatan lain, antara lain penataan fasilitas pendukung, dll.
[Isi Perencanaan]
2. Berikut ini adalah isi standar yang harus dimuatkan di dalam perencanaanpelestarian dan pemanfaatan:(1) Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestarian1) Perencanaan manajemen pelestarian memverifikasi keberadaan nilai cagar
budaya penting (bangunan) dan menentukan pedoman untuk manajemen
pelestarian dengan mengkategorikan bagian/posisi bangunan.
2) Dalam hal manajemen pelestarian di tanah yang ditentukan sebagai tanahyang membentuk suatu nilai yang bersatu padu dengan cagar budaya
penting (bangunan), ditangani di dalam perencanaan perlindungan
lingkungan.
3) Perencanaan manajemen pelestarian mengacu pada pedoman ini dan‘Handbook Pelestarian dan Manajemen Cagar Budaya versi Bangunan’(Oktober 1994, supervisi oleh Subdivisi Bangunan, Divisi Pelestarian Cagar
Budaya, Badan kebudayaan; diterbitkan oleh Nationwide National Treasure

Important Cultural Asset Owner League).
(2) Perencanaan Perlindungan Lingkungan
1) Perencanaan perlindungan lingkungan yang objeknya seluruh kawasan
perencanaan bertujuan untuk menjaga nilai cagar budaya yang bersatu
padu dengan cagar budaya penting (bangunan) dan melindungi lanskap dan
lingkungan sekitarnya, dan mengklasifikasikan kawasan perencanaan danbangunan selain cagar budaya penting (bangunan) sesuai dengan isi
perlindungan, dan menentukan pedoman perlindungan untuk setiap
klasifikasi.
2) Selain itu, menentukan perencanaan yang berkaitan dengan penataan
fasilitas yang diperlukan untuk melindungi lingkungan tanah di sekitar
cagar budaya bersangkutan (selanjutnya disebut ‘fasilitas perlindungan
lingkungan’)yang diperlukan untuk pelestarian cagar budaya penting(bangunan).
(3) Perencanaan Pencegahan Bencana
1) Bertujuan untuk melindungi cagar budaya penting (bangunan) dari bencanaseperti kebakaran dan gempa bumi, menjaga keamanan, dan menggali
persoalan dari segi pencegahan bencana, dan menentukan penangananyang diperlukan.
2) Dalam hal penanganan anti/tahan gempa mengacu pada pedoman ini dan
359‘Mengenai Menjaga Keamanan di Bangunan Cagar Budaya pada saat
Gempa Bumi’ (Surat edaran Ketua Divisi Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, Badan
Kebudayaan, No.41, tanggal 17 Januari 1996).
(4) Perencanaan Pemanfaatan
1) Perencanaan pemanfaatan menentukan hal-hal yang diperlukan untuk
memanfaatkan dan membuka cagar budaya penting (bangunan) kepada
publik dengan tepat tanpa mengurangi nilai cagar budaya tersebut, dan
menentukan pedoman dasar mengenai pemanfaatan seperti membuka
untuk publik pada saat ini dan masa yang akan datang.
2) Isi yang konkret direncanakan berdasarkan pertimbangan dari pemilik dllyang spontan, namun jika merencanakan fasilitas yang memiliki sifat
umum yang tinggi atau membutuhkan pengetahuan spesial, makapertimbangan dengan mendengarkan pendapat dari pihak terkait.
3) Dan, jika meneruskan penggunaan untuk sehari-hari oleh orang tertentu
seperti pemilik dll sebagai tempat tinggal dan usaha atau/dan jika
disediakan khusus sebagai sarana keagamaan seperti kuil, maka semua
atau sebagian perencanaan pemanfaatan dapat dikurangi sesuai dengan
kondisi.
4) Perencanaan pemanfaatan mengacu pada pedoman ini dan ‘Mengenai
Pemanfaatan Cagar Budaya Penting (Bangunan) ’ (Surat Edaran Kepala
Divisi Pelestarian Cagar Budaya No.161, tanggal 26 Desember 1996).
(5) Berbagai Prosedur yang Berkaitan dengan Pelestarian
Denganini,menjelaskan

perijinandanpelaporanyang

dibutuhkan

berdasarkan UU Cagar Budaya dan peraturan terkait mengenai tindakan
konkret yang dimuat di dalam perencanaan yang berkaitan dengan manajemen
pelestarian,

perlindungan

lingkungan,pencegahan

bencana,serta

pemanfaatan.
[Penelitian]
3. Pemilik dll mendapatkan bantuan dari tenaga ahli yang tepat mengenai
pelaksanaan penelitian yang disebut dibawah ini yang dibutuhkan sesuai dengan
isi perencanaan:(1) Penelitian mengenai lingkungan historis
a. Penelitian melalui dokumen sejarah seperti gambar dan manuskrip kuno,
dll.
b. Penelitian melalui foto kuno dan wawancara, dll.
c. Lanskap historis dan lingkungan yang perlu dilindungi.
(2) Penelitian terhadap lingkungan alama. Topografi, geologi, vegetasi, sistem pengairan, dll.
460

b. Prediksi kerugian/kerusakan yang akan disebabkan oleh bencana alamserta pertimbangan penanganannya.
(3) Penelitian dari segi Bangunan
a. Penelitian historis (asal usul pendirian, nilai dan ciri khas/karakteristik,dll)b. Penelitian kondisi saat ini (kondisi kerusakan, keamanan konstruksi, dll)
(4) Pengukuran dan Ilustrasi (peta topografi, gembar penataan)(5) Menata/Merangkumkan syarat perencanaan
a. Kondisi saat ini dan permasalahan pelestarian dan pemanfaatan.
b. Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan masyarakat komunitas (minat dari warga
komunitas/organisasi/kelompok serta sistem bantuan)c. Latar belakang peraturan/undang-undang dan kebijakan pemerintah
daerah(perencanaan

perkotaan,

penataankawasan,revitalisasi

kebudayaan, perencanaan wisata, dll)
(6) Penelitian terhadap penataan fasilitas dll
a. Penilaian terhadap fasilitas yang sudah ada
b. Persoalan dan prospek penataan fasilitas dll(7) Hal-hal lain yang diperlukan untuk pelestarian dan pemanfaatan[Struktur Perencanaan]
4. Struktur perencanaan bisa berbeda karena kesamaan/perbedaan jenis dan sifat
cagar budaya yang menjadi objek dan pedoman pemanfaatannya, namun memiliki
struktur standar seperti dibawah ini:
(1) Garis Besar Perencanaan
a. Penyusunan perencanaan
1) Tanggal/bulan/tahun penyusunan perencanaan
2) Penyusun perencanaan
b. Nama cagar budaya dll
1) Nama cagar budaya penting (bangunan)
2) Konstruksi bangunan dan gaya/tipenya3) Nama dan alamat pemilik dll
c. Garis besar cagar budaya
1) Struktur cagar budaya
2) Garis besar cagar budaya
3) Nilai cagar budaya
d. Riwayat pelestarian cagar budaya
1) Riwayat proyek pelestarian2) Riwayat pemanfaatan
e. Kondisi saat ini dan persoalan untuk pelestarian5611) Kondisi saat ini dan persoalan untuk pelestarian2) Kondisi saat ini dan persoalan untuk pemanfaatanf.

Garis besar perencanaan
1) Kawasan perencanaan2) Tujuan perencanaan
3) Pedoman dasar
4) Garis besar perencanaan(2) Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestariana. Kondisi manajemen pelestarian saat ini
1) Kondisi pelestarian2) Kondisi manajemen
b. Pedoman pelestarian1) Penentuan bagian dan pedoman pelestarian2) Penentuan posisi dan pedoman pelestarianc. Perencanaan manajemen
1) Sistem panajemen
2) Metode maajemen
d. Perencanaan perbaikan
1) Penanganan perbaikan dan perawatan yang dibutuhkan untuk
sementawa waktu
2) Perencanaan pelestarian dan perbaikan untuk masa yang akan datang(3) Perencanaan Perlindungan Lingkungana. Kondisi saat ini dan persoalan perlindungan lingkunganb. Pedoman dasar perlindungan lingkunganc. Klasifikasi/Pembagian kawasan dan pedoman perlindungan
1) Klasifikasi/Pembagian kawasan
2) Pedoman dasar perlindungan di setiap kawasand. Klasifikasi/Pembagian bangunan dan pedoman pelestarian
1) Klasifikasi/Pembagian bangunan
2) Pedoman pelestarian bangunan
e. Persoalan dan penanganan dari segi pencegahan bencana
1) Persoalan dari segi pencegahan bencana
2) Penanganan perbaikan untuk sementara dan pedoman penanganan
untuk masa yang akan datang
3) Perencanaan penataan fasilitas untuk perlindungan lingkungan
4) Manajemen pepohonan di sekitarnya(4) Perencanaan Pencegahan Bencana
a. Penanganan anti kebakaran dan kriminalitas
6621) Persoalan yang berkaitan dengan keamanan ketika terjadi kebakaran
2) Perencanaan manajemen anti kebakaran
3) Perencanaan anti kriminalitas
4) Perencanaan fasilitas pencegahan bencana (fasilitas anti kebakaran dan
kriminalitas)
b. Penanganan anti/tahan gempa
1) Verifikasi ketahanan gempa
2) Pedoman penanganan saat gempa bumic. Penanganan anti/tahan angin/topan
1) Asumsi kerusakan/kerugian2) Pedoman penanganan untuk masa yang akan datangd. Penanganan terhadap bencana lain
1) Bencana yang dapat diperkirakan
2) Penanganan perbaikan untuk sementara dan pedoman penanganan
untuk masa yang akan datang(5) Perencanaan pemanfaatan
a. Pedoman dasar untuk dibuka untuk publik dan pemanfaatan lainb. Perencanaan untuk dibuka untuk publik
1) Perencanaan untuk bangunan dibuka untuk publik
2) Perencanaan dokumen/referensi terkait yang dibuka untuk publik
c. Perencanaan dasar pemanfaatan
1) Merangkum syarat perencanaan
2) Perencanaan pembangunan
3) Perencanaan penataan perbatasan dan sekitarnya
4) Perencanaan manajemen dan pengelolaand. Persoalan menuju implementasi(6) Berbagai Prosedur yang berkaitan dengan Pelestarian[Penyusunan Dokumen/Surat Perencanaan]
5. Surat/Dokumen Perencanaan Perestarian dan Pemanfaatan dibuat sesuai dengan
ketentuan sebagai berikut:(1) Dokumen perencanaan menggunakan kertas A4, kalimat tersusun secara
horisontal, dan ditutup sebelah kiri.
(2) Gambar tata letak menggunakan skala sekitar 1:500, gambar dua dimensi
menggunakan skala sekitar 1:200, pada dasarnya berukuran yang muat didalam satu halaman kertas A4.
(3) Perencanaan pelestarian dan manajemen dilengkapi gambar/grafik sebagai
berikut:
a. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan lingkup kawasan perencanaan dan
763tanah yang ditentukan serta klasifikasi pembagian kawasan (kawasan
pelestarian, kawasan perlindungan, kawasan penataan, dll).
b. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan klasifikasi pelestarian cagar budaya
penting (bangunan) dan bangunan cagar budaya yang lain (cagar budaya
tingkat prefektur, cagar budaya tingkat kota/desa, cagar budaya terdaftar,dll).
c. Gambar dua dimensi yang menunjukkan klasifikasi bagian (bagianpelestarian, bagian perlindungan, bagian yang lain) dari cagar budaya
penting (bangunan).

(Jika diperlukan menambahkan gambar tampak

luar/elevasi, gambar atap/roof plan)d. Table yang menunjukkan klasifikasi komponen cagar budaya penting(bangunan). (Jika diperlukan menambahkan foto yang diberi petunjuk)(4) Perencanaan perlindungan lingkungan dilengkapi gambar sebagai berikut:
a. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan klasifikasi bangunan dll (bangunan
yang dilestarikan, bangunan yang dilindungi, bangunan lain).
b. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan kondisi saat ini dan perencanaan
penataan fasilitas perlindungan lingkungan (dinding pelindung, pagar
pelindung, sarana drainase, bangunan pelindung, lahan kosong untuk
pencegahan kebakaran, jalur pencegahan bencana, dinding anti kebakaran
di luar bangunan, dll).
c. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan kondisi pohon-pohon di sekitar cagar
budaya (ada/tidaknya pohon yang berbahaya).
(5) Perencanaan pencegahan bencana dilengkapi gambar sebagai berikut:
a. Gambar tata letak kawasan manajemen kebakaran.
b. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan kondisi sarana anti kebakaran(sarana peringatan kebakaran, sarana pemadam api, sarana anti petir,sarana anti kriminalitas, dll) saat ini serta perencanaan penataan.
(6) Perencanaan pemanfaatan dilengkapi gambar sebagai berikut:
a. Gambar tata letak yang menunjukkan lingkup tanah/lahan yang dibuka
kepada publik serta pedoman dasar pemanfaatan.
b. Gambar dua dimensi yang menunjukkan lingkup bangunan yang dibuka
kepada publik serta pedoman dasar pemanfataan.
c. Gambar tata letak, dua dimensi, dll yang menunjukkan perencanaan dasar
pemanfaatan dan penataan.
(7) Jika pemerintah prefektur/kabupaten/kota/desa menetapkan peraturan/perda
manajemen mengenai pelestarian cagar budaya penting (bangunan) yangbersangkutan, maka dilampirkan peraturan tersebut.
(8) Jika pemilik dll membuat perjanjian mengenai pelestarian cagar budaya
864

penting(bangunan)yang

bersangkutan

bersama

pihak

yang

berhakmenempatinya, maka melampirkan perjanjian tersebut.

965

BAB II

Penyusunan ‘Garis Besar Perencanaan’

1. Penyusunan Perencanaan(1) Tanggal, bulan, tahun penyusunan perencanaan (dalam hal revisi: tanggal,bulan, tahun revisi)(2) Penyusun Perencanaan
1) Pada prinsipnya pemilik dll.
2) Jika pemerintah daerah yang bukan pemilik dll menyusun perencanaan,menuliskan alasannya.
2. Nama Cagar Budaya(1) Nama cagar budaya penting (bangunan)a. Nama notifikasi di lembaran negara dan nomorb. Tanggal, bulan, tahun penentuan(2) Konstruksi dan pola bangunan
a. Konstruksi dan pola di notifikasi lembaran negara
1) Cantumkan tanah dan bangunan yang ditentukan sebagai sesuatu yangmembentuk sebuah nilai terpadu dengan bangunan.
2) Jika ada perubahan isi diatas ini setelah perubahan kondisi, makakonstruksi dan pola disini adalah konstruksi dan pola setelah ada
perubahan.
3) Jika ukuran yang menunjukkan skala berbeda dengan ukuran nyata,maka yang diambil adalah ukuran nyata.
b. Hal-hal yang dicantumkan secara khusus
Jika di dalam bangunan tersimpan/diletakkan barang seni kerajinan atau
cagar budaya yang lain yang dilindungi oleh negara atau pemerintah
daerah, maka dicantumkan klasifikasi dan objek pelestarian seperti
penentuan, pendaftaran, dsb.
(3) Nama dan alamat pemilik dll1) Dalam hal badan, mencamtumkan nama badan, alamat, nama wakil.
2) Jika ada penanggungjawab pengelolaan/manajemen yang ditentukan dipasal 31 ayat 2 UU Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, maka dicantumkan nama
dan alamat (dalam hal badan, mencantumkan nama badan, alamat,
nama wakil).
3) Jika ada organisasi pengelolaan/manajemen yang ditentukan di pasal
32-2 UU Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, maka mencantumkan nama dan
alamat.
4) Jika ada tanah dll yang kewenangannga dimiliki oleh bukan pemilik dll,
maka mencantumkan nama orang tersebut, alamat, dan kewenangannya.
1066

3. Garis Besar Cagar Budaya(1) Struktur cagar budaya
Dalam hal bangunan, situs bersejarah, lanskap indah yang dilindungi oleh
negara dan pemerintah daerah, menunjukkan klasifikasi pelestarian seperti
penetapan/terdaftar dan objeknya.
(2) Garis besar cagar budaya
a. Lingkungan lokasi
b. Sejarah pendirianc. Sifat sarana: fungsi historis atau kegunaan, serta perkembangannya
d. Masa rekonstruksi yang umum dan isinya(3) Nilai cagar budaya
Mencantumkan nilai cagar budaya berdasarkan penjelasan penetapan dll
sebagai referensi. Jika mengutip penjelasan penetapan, menambahkan/mengurangi
kalimat tersebut berdasarkan fakta yang diketahui setelah penetapan.
4. Asal-usul pelestarian cagar budaya(1) Riwayat proyek pelestarian
Mencantumkan hal-hal dibawah ini mengenai proyek pelestarian (pelestarianperbaikan, perlindungan lingkungan, sarana pencegahan bencana, dll) yangtelah dilaksanakan selama ini.
1) Tahun pelaksanaan proyek2) Isi proyek yang umum
3) Klasifikasi perbaikan biaya sendiri, proyek bersubsidi, dll.
4) Hasil proyek dan persoalan yang muncul pasca proyek(2) Riwayat pemanfaatan
Mencantumkan isi pemanfaatan saat ini dan penanganan yang telahdilaksanakan untuk pemanfaatan.
5. Kondisi dan Persoalan Pelestarian(1) Kondisi dan persoalan pelestarian
Dari segi manajemen pelestarian, perlindungan lingkungan, dan pencegahan
bencana, mencantumkan kondisi dan persoalan pelestarian.
(2) Kondisi dan persoalan pemanfaatan
Mencantumkan secara ringkas mengenai pelestarian bangunan cagar budaya
yang berhubungan dengan isi pemanfaatan saat ini serta persoalan yangberkaitan dengan penyediaan keamaman.
6. Garis Besar Perencanaan(1) Kawasan perencanaan
Menunjukkan kawasan yang menjadi objek perencanaan pelestarian dan
pemanfaatan.
1167

(2) Tujuan perencanaan(3) Pedoman dasar(4) Garis besar perencanaan
Garis besar perencanaan yang berkaitan dengan manajemen pelestarian,
perlindungan lingkungan, pencegahan bencana, dan pemanfaatan dijelaskan
dengan sederhana melalui gambar tata letak dan gambar dua dimensi.

1268

BAB III

Penyusunan ‘Perencanaan Manajemen Pelestarian’1. Kondisi Manajemen Pelestarian Saat Ini(1) Kondisi Pelestarian
Melaksanakan survey kasat mata mengenai kondisi kerusakan cagar budaya
penting (bangunan) dan mencatat sesuai dengan urutan dibawah ini di setiap
bangunan.

Dalam hal survey yang sulit dilaksanakan hanya melalui kasat

mata seperti bagian lantai dan bagian di balik atap, dilaksanakan dengan
dibantu oleh pihak-pihak terkait.
1) Fondasi
2) Kerangka struktur
3) Sambungan struktur4) Emperan
5) Struktur atap, atap
6) Bukaan (sisi beranda, langit-langit, pintu/jendela, dll)
7) Cat, komponen logam(2) Kondisi Manajemen
Menulis mengenai sistem/mekanisme manajemen saat ini dan metodemanajemen.
2. Pedoman Pelestarian
Dalam hal setiap cagar budaya penting (bangunan) di dalam kawasan perencanaan,
ditentukan pedoman pelestarian dengan menetapkan bagian dan komponen
melalui metode yang diuraikan di bawah ini.

Bangunan dan struktur yangditunjuk secara jelas sebagai muatan di areal tanah yang ditetapkan pun dibuat
pedoman pelestarian berdasarkan metode ini.
(1) Pedoman untuk penentuan dan pelestarian bagianAtap, tampak luar dinding (setiap sisi), atau setiap ruangan dijadikan sebagai
satuan, dan menentukan ‘bagian’ sesuai dengan klasifikasi standar dibawah ini
untuk menentukan pedoman pelestarian mengenai gaya, desain, teknologi/teknik,
dan sebagainya.
a. Bagian yang dilestarikan
Bagian ini adalah bagian yang diperlukan pelestarian yang teliti untuk
melindungi nilai sebagai cagar budaya, pada umumnya bagian yang terdiri
dari standar 1 atau 2 dari komponen yang dijelaskan dibawah ini.
1) Dalam hal dinding, kolom/tiang, lantai, balok, atap, dll sebagai struktur
utama dan biasanya terlihat kecuali terdapat masalah konstruksi
tertentu, bagian tersebut pada dasarnya dijadikan ‘bagian yang
dilestarikan’ dari pandangan cagar budaya publik.
13

692) Yang bisa dijadikan bagian yang dilindungi atau bagian yang lain didalam adalah bagian yang sudah kehilangan kondisi asli sebagai cagar
budaya karena rekonstruksi, bagian yang tidak diperlukan pelestarianyang teliti dan tidak akan menghilangkan nilai secara keseluruhan, danbagian yang diperbolehkan perubahan untuk manajemen, pemanfaatan(terutama bagian yang digunakan untuk hunian), dan perkuatan.
b. Bagian yang dilindungi
Bagian yang perlu dipertahankan dan dilindungi, terdiri dari komponenyang tergolong standar 4 atau 5 yang dijelaskan dibawah ini.
(2) Penentuan Komponen dan Pedoman Pelestariana. Penentuan Komponen
Dalam hal setiap bagian yang telah ditentukan di paragraf sebelumnya,
menentukan pedoman perlindungan dengan menetapkan ‘komponen’berdasarkan klasifikasi standar seperti di bawah ini dengan lingkup yangjelas melalui peninjauan kasat mata dan survey sederhana dengan
serangkaian material/bahan (dinding, lantai, langit-langit, jendela, kusen,
pemanas ruangan, hiasan emperan di dalam ruangan, dll) dijadikan satuan
komponen.
1) Standar 1: Komponen yang dilaksanakan pelestarian bahan itu sendiri.
2) Standar 2: Komponen yang dilaksanakan bentuk, material, finishing,pewarnaan bahan.
3) Standar 3: Komponen yang dilestarikan bentuk dan pewarnaan utama.
4) Standar 4: Komponen yang perlu diperhatikan desainnya.
5) Standar 5: Komponen yang diserahkan pada pertimbangan yang bebas
dari pemilik dll.
b. Hal-hal yang perlu diperhatikan untuk penentuan komponen
Dalam hal penentuan komponen, diperhatikan hal-hal di bawah ini:
1) Dalam hal bagian yang dilestarikan, pada umumnya menerapkan
standar 1 untuk komponen yang perlu diperhatikan segi desain seperti
hiasan, komponen yang material atau spesifikasinya khas/istimewa, dan
komponen yang membentuk struktur utama; standar 2 diterapkan
untuk komponen yang perlu perbaikan dengan menggantikan material
secara berkala; standar 3 diterapkan hanya pada komponen yang perlu
perubahan untuk memanfaatan atau perkuatan.
2) Dalam hal bagian yang dilindungi, diterapkan standar 3 untuk
komponen

yang

perlu

diharmonisasikan

denganbagianyang

dilestarikan; komponen yang perlu perubahan untuk pemanfaatan atau
perkuatan diterapkan standar 4.

Dan, jika ada komponen yang perlu
1470dilestarikan secara khusus, diterapkan standar 1 atau standar 2.
3) Untuk bagian yag lain, komponen yang berpadu dengan bagian yang
dilestarikan dari segi desain, menerapkan standar 4; yang lain bisa
diterapkan standar 5.

Jika ada komponen yang perlu dilstarikan

secara khusus, diterapkan standar 1 atau standar 2.
4) Untuk komponen yang pertimbangannya sulit, diklasifikasikan padastandar yang lebih tinggi berdasarkan sudut pandang pelestarian cagar
budaya.
5) Komponen yang ditutup dengan bahan/material pembangunan baru
dicatat ‘tidak diketahui’; dan klasifikasi yang berkaitan dengan baik
atau

tidaknyapembongkaran

atau

pembaruanmaterialyang

menutupinya dicantum dengan tanda ( ).
3. Perencanaan Manajemen(1) Sistem manajemen
1) Mencantumkan pedoman manajemen untuk kedepannya, antara lainorganisasi manajemen, pembagian tugas, struktur perhubungan, dll.
2) Jika menyerahkan manajemen kepada pihak lain, mencantumkan kepada
siapa diserahkan, isi penyerahan manajemen, pembagian tugas dengan
pemilik dll.
3) Jika ada yang menempati sesuai dengan hak sebagai penghuni selain
pemilik dll, maka dicantumkan isi manajemen yang orang tersebut
laksanakan.
(2) Metode manajemena. Manajemen lingkungan pelestarian
Mencantumkan metode manajemen yang konkret dalam hal sebagai berikutyang diperlukan utuk mempertahankan lingkungan pelestarian bangunan
dengan baik:
1) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan pembersihan dan penataan;2) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan sinar matahari dan ventilasi;3) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan pencegahan kerusakan dari semut,
seranggga, dan busuk/keropos;
4) Hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan kerusakan oleh angin, air, dan salju;
5) Dan lain-lain.
b. Manajemen untuk mempertahankan/merawat bangunan
Berikut ini dalah isi tindakan untuk manajemen seperti perbaikan skala
kecil yang tidak perlu laporan perbaikan:
1) Eksterior dan fondasi;2) Koridor luar dan lantai bagian di bawah;
15713) Dinding luar;4) Dinding dalam;5) Lantai dan tatami;6) Atap dan talang;7) Bukaan;8) Komponen logam;
9) Cat dan pewarnaan;
10) Dan sebagainya.
c. Yang lainnya:
1) Manajemen bangunan ditentukan sebagai sesuatu yang membentuk
suatu nilai secara berpadu dengan bangunan dilaksanakan sesuai
dengan referensi “Pedoman Penanganan Cagar Budaya (Barang Seni
Kerajinan)” (diterbitkan oleh Divisi Kesenian dan Kerajinan, BagianPelestarian Cagar Budaya, Badan Kebudayaan, Maret 1997), dan
menentukan perencanaan mengenai metode penyimpanan, dll.
2) Menentukan perencanaan mengenai metode penyimpanan bahan lamayang diangkat/dipindahkan ketika perbaikan, dan melengkapi daftar
yang ditulis bahan, nama, jumlah, tempat penyimpanan, dll.
4. Perencanaan Perbaikan(1) Penanganan perbaikan dan perawatan yang diperlukan untuk sementara
waktu(2) Perencanaan perbaikan dan pelestarian untuk kedepannya
a. Mencatat mengenai kebutuhan perbaikan untuk pelestarian yang mendasar,
serta prospek pelaksanaan proyek.
b. Jika sudah ada perencanaan proyek konkret, menantumkan ringkasannya,
dan menyusun perencanaan perbaikan secara terpisah.

1672

V. Appendix

Bubungan Tinggi

1.
1

Participants
Mursyidah
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Aceh

2

Nedik Tri Nurcahyo
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Batusangkar

3

Kristanto Januardi
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Jambi

4

Swedhi Hananta
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Serang5

SupardiProvince Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Prambanan

6

Bambang Susilo
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Prambanan

7

Andi Riana
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Yogyakarta

8

I Made Pande Parityaksa
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Gianyar

9

Iwaulini
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Ternate

10

Hadi Saputro Wirakusumah
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Gorontalo

11

Leliek Agung Haldoko
Conservation Center of Borobudur Heritage

12

Yudhiawati
South Kalimantan Province Office of Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism

13

Rabuin Ahta
West Kalimantan Province Office of Culture and Tourism

14

Sunarningsih
Archaeological Office of Banjarmasin

15

Kamarudin
Central Kalimantan Province Office of Culture and Tourism

16

Sintha Yulia Sari
Banjar Regency Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth and Sports, in South Kalimantan Province

17

Amalia Hasna
City of Banjarbaru Office of Culture, Tourism, Youth and Sports, in South Kalimantan Province

18

Stevanus Reawaru
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Samarinda

74

2.

Instructors
Surya Helmi
Director
Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museum,
Ministry of Education and Culture
E Building, 11th Floor, JalanJenderal, Sudirman Senayan,
Jakarta 10270, Indonesia
Tel & Fax: (+62) 21 5725531
helmicbm@gmail.com
Yustinus Suranto
Professer
Faculty of Forestry, University of Gadjah Mada
Jln. Agro No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
HP: (+62) 812 2880 3985
surantoyustinus@yahoo.com

TAKASHINA Masayuki
Senior Conservation Architect
Adviser
The Japanese Association for Conservation of Architectural
Monuments (JACAM)
2-32-15 Nishinippori Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-0013 Japan
Tel: (+81) 3 6458 3642 Fax: (+81) 3 6458 3643
Tanago47@f3.dion.ne.jp
TAKAMIYA Kunihiro
Restoration Architect
Nara Prefectural Board of Education
Cultural Assets Preservation Section
30 Noboriohji-cho, Nara 630-8501 Japan
Tel: (+81) 742 27 9865 Fax: (+81) 742 27 5386
Takamiya-kunihiro@office.pref.nara.lg.jp

YAMAGUCHI Isamu
Researcher
Nara Municipal Board of Education
Cultural Properties Division
1-1-1 Nijo-oji-minami, Nara 630-8580 Japan
Tel & Fax: (+81) 742 34 4859
yamaguchi-isamu@city.nara.lg.jp

75

3.

Interpreters
NUMAZAWA Urara
Translator / Interpreter
Jin.Gejayan Gg.Argulo No.13C Santren, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Tel & Fax: (+62) 274 555120
HP: (+62) 81 2295 0362 / 813 1081 8797
urarasae@yahoo.co.jp

Rasmi Nur Aeni (Amik)
Translator / Interpreter
Jl. Gurameh Raya Selatan Perum Taman Mino Asri 7E Tegalrejo,
Minomartani, Sleman, Yogyakarta, 55283 Indonesia
HP: (+62) 81578600126
rasminuraeni@gmail.com

4.

Assistants
Muhammad Tang
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Makassar
Prita Wikantyasning
Directorate of Internalisation of Value and Cultural Diplomacy
Azahar Purwanto
Province Office of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Samarinda

5.

Collaborators
Mohandas H. Hendrawan
Head for Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism Province Office of South Kalimantan
Hasbi Salehs
Head for Youth, Sports, Culture, and Tourism District Office of Banjar
I Made Kusumajaya
Head for Cultural Heritage Preservation Office of Samarinda
Mr Bambang Wiku
Head for Archaeological Research Office of Banjarmasin
Fauziah, Owner of Bubungan Tinggi Traditional House
Najib, Owner of Gajah Baliku Traditional House

76

6.

Co-organiser
Directorate of Cultural Heritage Preservation and Museum, Ministry of Education andCultureSurya Helmi, Director
Yoesoef Boedi Ariyanto, Head of Conservation DivisionAmperawan Marpaung
Saiful Mujahid
Dewi Murwaningrum
Fitriana Iftatika
Shalihah Sri Prabarani
Kahnifudin Malik
Sri Lestari Handayani
Sri Winanti
Surya Hendari
Suratman
Dadang Sudarmadji
Ihda Alhusnayaini
Supardal

7.

Staff Members, ACCU NaraNISHIMURA Yasushi, Director
TAKAHASHI Wataru, Deputy Director
KOBAYASHI Ken’ichi, Director, Programme Operation Department
WAKIYA Kyoko, Director, International Cooperation Division
HORIKAWA Kazuko, Chief, Planning & Coordination Division
OTANI Yasuko, Chief , International Cooperation Division
NISHIDA Michiko, Staff, Planning & Coordination Division
SHIMOMURA Nobuhito, Staff, International Cooperation Division
Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office,Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU)
757 Horen-cho, Nara 630-8113 Japan
Tel: (+81) 742 20 5001 Fax: (+81) 742 20 5701
e-mail: nara@accu.or.jp
URL: http://www.nara.accu.or.jp

77

78

Group photo at Martapura

79

Memorandum of Understanding80