平成 29 年 4 月 24 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 029 号

本資料は、インドネシアで初めての日系知的財産コンサルタント会社であるハキンダ・インターナショナルが、インドネシア及びその近隣諸国の知財関連ニュースを英語で提供するものです。本文内容の無断での転載、再配信、掲示板への掲載等はお断りいたします。
情報の内容につきましては正確を期すように努めておりますが、正確性を保証するものではありません。本情報の利用の結果発生するいかなる不利益に対しましてもその責任を負いませんので予めご了承願います。

implementation of Mark Law because it includes
well-known mark application.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 10 January 2017)<Indonesia> J. Casanova Won the Mark Case
Supreme Court cancels decision of Commercial Court ofCentral Jakarta in case
No.56/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Desain/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst andfurther agrees to cancel mark Casanova
No.IDM000324610 (class 3) in the name of Irawan
Gunawan (defendant) because it was filed with having
bad faith. Further, DGIP will delete the registration of thesaid mark from the General Register.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 3 January 2017)<Indonesia> Business Practitioners Request
More Dissemination of the New Trademark
Law
Some businessmen associations (APMETI, AMKREI)
state that they need more dissemination of the new marklaw because many of their members having lack ofinformation. In addition to information of filing etc., theyalso ask for reduced fee for filing applications.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 17 January 2017)<Indonesia> PT Rajawali Ask Judges toCancel Patent of Pump
In case no.67/Pdt.Sus-Paten/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt,.Pst, PT
Rajawali Parama Konstruksi (plaintiff, dealer ofArmstrong pump) asks judges to cancel patent of "verticalpump installation" No.IDP000040892 in the name ofPoltak Sitinjak (defendant) because it has no novelty. As abackground, plaintiff explains that previously defendant
was an Armstrong pump dealer and imported the productfrom S.A Armstrong Limited-Canada and further they
files a patent application for vertical pump installation in2013 and it was granted in 2016. Agreement between
defendant and S.A Armstrong was terminated in May
2016. However, afterwards, defendant claims thatplaintiff had infringe their patent right.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 5 January 2017)<Indonesia> Trademark Application Backlog:
211.000
Due to lack of human resources at Mark Office, currently,
there are 211.000 pending mark applications. With only 5staffs, they receive 65.000 mark applications (70% aredomestic applications) each year. Since Mark Officecannot receive new employee during moratorium, theyplan to hire vendors to help them expedite reducing thenumber of said backlog.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 24 January 2017)<Indonesia> Apology Notice<Indonesia> Ministry Regulation for Mark
Application Will Be Issued

Indra Ranty (Toko Ira) and Indra Hadjar/Agus domiciled
in Gorontalo, apologizes to The Gillete Company, LLC
because of using mark “Gillette” without any consent andselling products using the said mark.
(Kompas, 30 January 2017)

Following the implementation of Law No.20 year 2016
regarding Mark and Geographic Indication, DGIP statesthat ministry regulation regarding mark application soon
will be issued. Currently, the said regulation is waiting tobe approved by Ministry of Law and HR. DGIP also
states that the said regulation will improve the<Indonesia>
Cancellation“MATSUNAGA”
1ofMarks

平成 29 年 4 月 24 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 029 号

Ministry Regulation No.67/2016 regarding markapplication has been issued. This regulation is derivationof Law No.20 year 1026 regarding Mark and GeographicIndication. This regulation also discloses the criteria of
well-known mark. The said criteria is defined byconsidering the general knowledge of society about thesaid mark in the related field. It includes the scope of use
within a region, degree of knowledge of society about thesaid mark in the related field, applications in othercountries, and embedded value if the mark obtained froma reputation and quality guarantee of the goods.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 21 February 2017)

Commercial Court of Central Jakarta, in caseNo.44/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.pst, agrees tocancel registration of marks “Pro Matsunaga”
No.IDM000477031 and “logo” No.IDM000443216 inclass 9 owned by Lie Senihian (defendant) because thesaid marks have similarities with marks “Matsunaga” No.
IDM000503466 and No.D002016034356 owned byplaintiff. The defendant was also considered as having
bad faith when filing those marks. Responding thedecision, defendant plans to submit cassation to SupremeCourt.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 31 January 2017)<Indonesia> Cancellation
BROTHERS COSMETIC”

ofMark<Indonesia> Apology Notice“K.

Awen Harsono (Toko SELLA HEALTHCARE) domiciledin ITC Depok and Mall Mega Bekasi, apologizes to 3M
Company (“3M”), because of selling fake product(Stethoscope; mark: LITMANN). Awen Harsono also
paid a compensation for the damage caused.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 21 February 2017)

J&K Internatural Co., ltd. (plaintiff) ask commercial court
to cancel registration of mark “K. Brothers Cosmetic”(class 5) owned by Kho Theng Tian (defendant) because
the said mark has similarity with their marks “K.
Brothers”. The plaintiff is a producer of cosmetic
products in Thailand.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 1 February 2017)<Indonesia> Proenza Schouler Lost the MarkCase<Indonesia> Apology NoticeCommercial Court of Central Jakarta agrees with theanswer of DGIP (defendant II) and decides that theycannot accept the lawsuit filed by Proenza Schouler LLC(plaintiff) because the Power of Attorney is not valid.
Previously, in caseNo.60/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Desain/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, theplaintiff asks Commercial Court of Central Jakarta tocancel registration of mark “Proenza Schouler”
No.IDM000410586 in class 25 in the name of defendant I
because it has similarities with marks “Proenza Schouler”
No. D002016011264/ D002016011267/D002016011271
owned by plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 22 February 2017)

Hereby, Yanura (Suryabaru IT, Surabaya), Bryan Kurnia(Room 56, Jakarta, Arief Sunardi (Inotech, Bandung), Siti
Rosdiah (Asean Notebook, Jakarta) and Rio Suriyono(Ruphen Shop, Jakarta) apologizes to Microsoft for
selling pirated software (Microsoft Windows/Offices) in
our stores.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 1 February 2017)<Indonesia> Patent of Pump Case Update
Following patent cancellation lawsuit filed by PT
Rajawali Parama Konstruksi (plaintiff) in case no.67/Pdt.
Sus-Paten/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt,.Pst, Poltak Sitinjak(defendant) argues that according to Art. 70 of PatentLaw No.13/2016, instead of commercial court, the party
who proper to handle the case is Patent AppealCommission. Previously, plaintiff asked commercial court
to cancel patent of vertical pump installation
No.IDP000040892 in the name of defendant because it
has no novelty.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 10 February 2017)<Indonesia> Mark “MATSUNAGA” Case,Defendant Submits a Cassation
On 20 February 2017, Lie Senihian (defendant) submit
cassation to Supreme Court to respond decision ofCommercial Court of Central Jakarta, in caseNo.44/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.pst, whichcancelled registration of marks “Pro Matsunaga”
No.IDM000477031 and “logo” No.IDM000443216 inclass 9 owned by defendant because the said marks have
similarities with marks “Matsunaga” No. IDM000503466
and No.D002016034356 owned by Matsunaga
manufacturing Co., Ltd. (plaintiff).
(Bisnis Indonesia, 13 March 2017)<Indonesia> Ministry Regulation for Mark
Application is issued2