JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of Absorption Chiller to Chemical
Factory

Reference number

ID024

Third-party entity (TPE)

Japan Quality Assurance Organization (JQA)(TPE-ID-003)

Project participant contracting the TPETokyo Century Corporation

Date of completion of this report

05/03/2020

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
methodology
the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Republic of Indonesia, in line
assessmentwith Indonesia’s procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage
1JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Mr.
Tadashi
JQA
Team Leader
Ms.
YoshidaMr.
HiroshiInternal
JQA
Ms.
Motokawa
Reviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Schemecompetence*

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The PDD form was checked and confirmed as complete in accordance with the JCM
Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report (JCM_ID_GL_
PDD_MR_ver03.0). The latest version of the JCM PDD form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver02.0) is
used for the PDD of the proposed project (Version 01.0 dated 09/01/2020 for First edition andVersion 01.1 dated 18/02/2020 for Second edition).

The validation was conducted on thefirst edition of the PDD.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the PDD is completed using the valid version of the
PDD form and drafted in line with the JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design
Document and Monitoring Report.

C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce GHG emissions from the power
consumption of chiller by replacing the existing chiller with project absorption chiller which3

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

generates chilled water used for cooling in the sulfamic acid production process. The steamdriven absorption chiller installed by the proposed project is Type NES-630 with a cooling
capacity of 630 USRt, made by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd.

Compared to thereference chiller, energy-saving of up to 96% is expected for the project absorption chiller, andtherefore the implementation of the proposed project contributes to the significant GHG
emission reductions.

The project absorption chiller uses steam as heat source, water as

refrigerant and lithium bromide as absorption solution, respectively, and generates chilledwater by repeating the cycle of evaporation - absorption - generation - condensation under thecoexistence of refrigerant and absorption solution.

The steam is generated by recovering

waste heat from sulfuric acid production plant and it is supplied to the absorption chiller.

Asa result, the proposed project would reduce the emission of 712 tCO2 per year under the mostrepresentative cooling capacity conditions and 5,334 tCO2 in total during the monitoring periodof 2019 - 2027.
The proposed project is conducted at the chemical factory located in Karawang Regency,
West Java Province, Indonesia, and implemented by PT. Timuraya Tunggal from the Republicof Indonesia and Tokyo Century Corporation from Japan. The commissioning of the projectchiller was satisfactorily completed on 24/10/2018, which is confirmed by the Certificate ofCompletion of Commissioning signed by PT. Timuraya Tunggal and Kawasaki ThermalEngineering Co., Ltd.

After installing the project chiller in October 2018, the technicalmalfunction was found in the monitoring system (EVERY FIT) during the test operation in
November 2018 and it took about 4 months to fix the problem.

As such the starting date ofproject operation was forced to postpone until 05/03/2019, which is confirmed by the Reportfrom Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd. dated 10/02/2020 that the use of the monitored
data after 05/03/2019 is recommended for the calculation of emission reductions.

The

expected operational lifetime of the project is 8 years, which is based on the legal durable years
for the production facilities of chemical industry issued by Ministry of Finance, Japan.
The proposed project was partially financed by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE),
Japan, through the Financing Programme for JCM Model projects, which provides financial
support of less than half of the initial investment for the projects in order to acquire JCM credits.
As for technology transfer, Tokyo Century Corporation has conducted OJT training on theoperation and monitoring of the project absorption chiller system for the engineering staffs of
PT. Timuraya Tunggal in October 2018. The annual service has been contracted between PT.
Timuraya Tunggal and PT. Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia for the periodical maintenance of the
project chiller system.
The validation team has assessed the PDD and the supporting documents through the desk
review and the interview with the PPs, without on-site visit, to validate the requirements aboutaccuracy and completeness of the project description. No on-site visit is justified as follows:4

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The validation of the accuracy and completeness of the project description has been conductedby the document review and interviews. The sufficient evidences and information relevant to
the project description have been obtained without on-site visit.

The team reviews those

documents to determine whether the information in the PDD is accurate and complete, andinterviews with the PPs, when necessary the related stakeholders, for understanding the
proposed JCM project.
The persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in Section E of this report.
Regarding the address of project site and the outline of project activity, the validation teamraised CAR 01 and CL 01and these issues were resolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>< CAR 01 >The address of the project site in A.3 of the PDD is not correctly provided.
< Comments from the PPs >The address in A.3 of the PDD has been updated in the revised PDD ver01.1.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised PDD that the address of the project site iscorrectly revised. Thus, CAR 01 is closed.
< CL 01 >The PPs are requested to clarify whether the emission reduction is achieved by newly
introducing absorption chiller or replacing the existing chiller with absorption chiller in A.2of the PDD.

Furthermore, it is not clearly described why the introduction of absorption

chiller contributes to the reduction of GHG emissions.
< Comments from the PPs >Absorption chiller mainly uses steam to generate chilled water. For this reason, absorption
chiller contributes to achieving the emission reduction by significantly reducing the factory's
electricity consumption for generating chilled water compared to the existing chiller.
Section A.2 of the PDD has been revised.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised PDD and relevant documents andinterview with the PPs that the proposed project has replaced the existing chiller with steamdriven absorption chiller (NES-630, made by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd.) togenerate chilled water more efficiently used in the sulfamic acid production process at thechemical factory.

Thus, CL 01 is closed.

5

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the description of the proposed project in the revised
PDD complies with the supporting documents and information obtained through the desk
review and the interview with the PPs, and the description is accurate and complete.

C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The approved methodology JCM_ID_AM022_ver01.0 "Introduction of Absorption
Chiller" is applied to the proposed project.

The methodology is approved by the JC on

31/10/2019 (JC9, Annex 3) and valid at the time of the validation.
The validation team has assessed whether the selected methodology is applicable to the
proposed project.

The project applicability was checked against four eligibility criteria

contained in the approved methodology. The project information for each eligibility criterion
and the assessment/conclusion about its applicability to the proposed project are summarized
in the following table.
Eligibility
criteria

Descriptions specified in
the methodology

Project information

Criterion
1

Project chiller is anabsorption chiller with acapacity which is lessthan or equals to 1,300
USRt.
* 1 USRt = 3.52 kW

The proposed project
installs a new steam
absorption chiller from
Kawasaki
ThermalEngineering Co., Ltd.
(KTE) Type NES-630
with a capacity of 630
USRt

6

Assessment
conclusion

and

It is confirmed throughthe review of the relevant
documents and the interview with the PPs that theabsorption chiller (NES630) with a cooling
capacity of 630 USRt lessthan 1,300 USRt, madeby Kawasaki ThermalEngineering Co., Ltd.,
has been installed andoperatedtosupplychilled water used forcooling in sulfamic acidproduction
process.
Hence, Criterion 1 issatisfied.

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Criterion
2

Periodical
check
is The Indonesian projectplanned more than four owner plans to conduct(4) times annually.
periodical check morethan four (4) times ayear.

It is confirmed throughthe review of the relevant
documents and the interview with the PPs that
Annual Service Contract
was made between PT.
Timuraya Tunggal andPT.
GikokoKogyo
Indonesia on 24/12/2019
to conduct periodical
check 4 times annually.
Hence, Criterion 2 issatisfied.

Criterion
3

In the case of replacing
the existing chiller withthe project chiller, a planfor
preventionofreleasing refrigerant usedin the existing chiller tothe air (e.g. re- Executionof this plan is checked at
the time of verification,in order to confirm that
refrigerant used for the
existing one replaced by
the project is prevented
from being released tothe air.
In the case that theexisting chiller is NOT
replaced with the projectchiller, this criterion is
not applied.

Project chiller uses
water as refrigerant.
As for the existing
chillers, the Indonesian
project owner prepareda plan for prevention ofrefrigerant release to the
air from the existing
chiller, which has beenshared with the Japanese project participant.

It is confirmed throughthe review of Letter ofConsent
andtheinterview with the PPsthat Plan for preventionof refrigerant releasefrom existing chiller at
PT Timuraya Tunggal
dated 28/12/2019 has
been prepared by PT.
Timuraya Tunggal inaccordance with themethodology ID AM022.
Hence, Criterion 3 issatisfied.

Criterion
4

In the case that projectabsorption chiller uses
fossil fuel for its heatsource, such fossil fuel isgas fuel.

The project absorption
chiller is not expected touse fossil fuel for its
heat source.

It is confirmed throughthe review of the relevant
documents and the interview with the PPs that theabsorption chiller uses
steam as heat source.
Hence, Criterion 4 issatisfied.

Regarding the MoU in Criterion 3, the validation team raised CL 02 and this issue wasresolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>< CL 02 >It is not clear why the MoU is provided for Criterion 3 in B.2 of the PDD.

7

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0< Comments from the PPs >The MoU mentioned that the project owner will follow according with laws and regulationsof Indonesia.

However, the clearer statement has been provided by the project owner for theplan for prevention of refrigerant release to the air from the existing chiller.

The answer toCriterion 3 in B.2 of the PDD has been revised.
< Assessment by the TPE >On 19/06/2019, the PPs prepared the MoU which states that, when selling or disposing of
the existing chiller replaced by the property, it shall handle such in accordance with the laws
and regulations of Indonesia.

After this, PT. Timuraya Tunggal prepared the clearer anddetailed Letter of Consent on the handling procedures of refrigerant from the existing chiller,i.e., Plan for prevention of refrigerant release from existing chiller, dated 28/12/2019.
It is confirmed through the review of the MoU and Letter of Consent that Criterion 3 issatisfied with Letter of Consent only, therefore MoU is removed. Thus, CL 02 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the proposed project is eligible for applying the valid
version of the approved methodology ID_AM022 and all eligibility criteria have been met by
the proposed project.

C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The proposed project aims to reduce CO2 emissions from the power consumption of chiller
by replacing the existing chiller with energy-saving absorption chiller at the chemical factory
located in Karawang Regency, Indonesia.
Reference emissions are sourced from the power consumption by reference chiller andproject emissions are sourced from the power consumption by project absorption chiller.
Reference emissions are GHG emissions from the use of reference chiller(s), which isdetermined as centrifugal chiller in this methodology.

This value is calculated from coolingenergy of project chiller, COP of reference chiller and CO2 emission factor for consumed
electricity, which is expressed by Equation (1), in accordance with the methodology
ID_AM022:
REp = Σ(CPJ,i,p /COPRE,i x EFelec )---------------- (1)Where:
REp:

Reference emissions during the period p (tCO2/p)8

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

CPJ,i,p: Cooling energy generated by project absorption chiller iduring the period p (MWh/p)

COPRE,i :COP of reference chiller i (-)

EFelec: CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity (tCO2/MWh)i:

Identification number of the project absorption chiller

Cooling energy generated by project absorption chiller (CPJ,i,p) is calculated by Equation(2), in accordance with the JCM ID_AM010_ver01.0:
CPJ,i,p =Σ(water flow rate x (Toutlet – Tinlet) x Cp x ρ x 10-3 x hOP,i) x 0.2778------------(2)

Where:
Water flow rate : Quantity of chilled water generated by the project absorption
chiller i per hour (m3/h)
Tinlet:Inlet temperature of the feed water for chilled water to be generated
by the project absorption chiller i per hour (℃)

Toutlet:Outlet temperature of the chilled water generated by the projectabsorption chiller i per hour (℃)

Cp:

Specific heat capacity of water (MJ/tonne-℃]

ρ: Density of water (tonne /m3)hOP, i:Operating hours of the project absorption chiller (h)0.2778 : Conversion coefficient from MJ to kWh (kWh/MJ)
The value of COPRE,i is selected from the default COP values provided in the table of themethodology ID_AM022.

As the cooling capacity of the project absorption chiller is 630

USRt (Type: NES 630 made by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd.), the value of COP
is determined to be 5.90.
As the grid electricity is consumed by the project absorption chiller, the most recent CO2
emission factor of Jamali grid (EFelec), 0.877 tCO2/MWh (ex-post value), is applied in thecalculation of reference emissions.

The value is sourced from “Emission Factor of Electricity

Interconnection Systems (2016)”, Indonesia Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) website, basedon data obtained by Directorate General of Electricity, Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources, Indonesia. This value is confirmed by the review of “IGES List of Grid Emission
Factor” which summarizes the most recently available data up to October 2019 published byhost country governments.
It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents and the interview with the PPs

9JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

that the project-specific parameters to be fixed ex-ante such as COPRE,i and EFelec are correctly
applied in the calculation of reference emissions.
Project emissions are GHG emissions from the use of project chiller(s), which are the sumof emissions from electricity consumption and fossil fuel consumption.

As the projectabsorption chiller uses steam generated by waste heat from sulfuric acid production plant,
instead of steam generated by firing fossil fuel, the project emissions in the proposed project
are calculated from electricity consumption only.

The amount of electricity consumption isestimated for the pumps for absorbing solution and refrigerant in the project chiller.

Theelectricity consumed by chilled water pump, cooling water pump and cooling tower is excluded
from the amount of electricity consumption since these pumps exist in both reference andproject chiller systems. Thus, the project emissions for the proposed project are calculated
from the amount of electricity consumed by the pumps for absorbing solution and refrigerant
in the project chiller, which is expressed by Equation (3), in accordance with the methodology
ID_AM022:
PEp = Σ(ECPJ,I,p x EFelec ) + Σ(FCPJ,I,p x NCVfuel,i x EFfuel,i /1000 )= Σ(ECPJ,I,p x EFelec )--------------- (3)Where:
PEp:

Project emissions during the period p (tCO2/p)

ECPJ,I,p:Electricity consumption by project absorption chiller iduring the period p (MWh/p)

FFelec:CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity (tCO2/MWh)

FCPJ,i,p : Gas fuel consumption by project absorption chiller i during the period p(Nm3/p)
NCVfuel,i : Net calorific value of gas fuel consumed by project absorption
chiller i (MJ/Nm3)
EFfuel,i: CO2 emission factor for gas fuel consumed by project absorption
chiller i (tCO2/GJ)i:

Identification number of project absorption chiller

The value of ECPJ,i,p is calculated by using Method II given in the methodology, i.e., thevalue is calculated by multiplying the electric power by operating hours of the project chiller.
The value of electric power of the project absorption chiller (EPPJ,i) is determined to be 7.6 kW
based on the manufacturer’s specification, which includes power consumption of pumps forabsorbing solution and refrigerant in the project chiller.

10

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Thus, the GHG emission reductions during the period p are calculated by Equation (4), inline with the approved methodology:
ERp = REp – PEp----------------- (4)Where:
ERp : Emission reductions during the period p (tCO2/p)
REp : Reference emissions during the period p (tCO2/p)
PEp :Project emissions during the period p (tCO2/p)

As a result, the annual emission reductions are calculated as follows:
ERp = REp – PEp= Σ(CPJ,i,p /COPRE,i x EFelec ) - ∑(ECPJ,I,p x EFelec )= (330 x 3.52 x 4,290) / 5.90 x 0.8770) – (7.6 x 4,290/1,000) x 0.8770=

712 tCO2

The GHG annual emission reductions are estimated to be 712 tCO2 under the mostrepresentative cooling capacity condition and the sum of the emission reductions for the periodof 2019 – 2027 is estimated to be 5,334 tCO2.
It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents and the interview with the PPsthat all GHG emission sources specified by the applied methodology are identified, and thereference emissions (REp), project emissions (PEp) and emission reductions (ERp) in the revised
PDD (ver01.1) and Monitoring Plan Sheet are correctly calculated, in accordance with themethodology ID_AM022_ver01.0.
Regarding the CO2 emission source, inconsistency of emission reductions between PDD
and MPS, calculation method of CPJ,i,p, estimation of ECPJ,i,p, CO2 emission factor of the grid,
estimation of annual emission reductions and correctness of EPPJ,i value, the validation teamraised CAR 02 – CAR 07 and these issues were resolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>< CAR 02 >The source of CO2 emissions from power consumption of chiller is not clearly described in
C.2 of the PDD.
< Comments from the PPs >The source of CO2 emissions from power consumption is added to the figure shown in C.2of the PDD.

It is calculated as per Method II stipulated in MPS (input).

11

A note has been

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

also added on this in C.2.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised PDD that the source of CO2 emissions
from power consumption by the project absorption chiller is appropriately illustrated in the
figure of C.2 of the PDD. Thus, CAR 02 is closed.
< CAR 03 >The values of reference emissions and emission reductions are not consistent between C.3of the PDD and MPS (Input_Separate).
< Comments from the PPs >CPJ,i,p in MPS (Input_Separate) has been revised using the most representative figure within
8 years of the project lifetime, instead of using an average data among the project lifetime.
The estimated reference emissions based on the amount of cooling using an average data energy
generated by the project absorption chiller for each year are given in C.3 of the PDD.
< Assessment by the TPE >The emission reductions are calculated by using the most representative cooling capacityof the absorption chiller, i.e., 330 USRt, within 8 years of the project lifetime, instead of using
an average cooling capacity for 8 years, i.e., 309.92 USRt. It is confirmed through the review
of relevant documents and the interview with the PPs that the emission reductions are correctly
calculated to give 712 tCO2/p under the most representative cooling capacity condition. Thus,
CAR 03 is closed.
< CAR 04 >The measurement method of CPJ,i,p is not provided in the cell of "(h) Measurement method
and procedures" in Table 1 of the MPS. The PPs are requested to provide the formula tocalculate the value of CPJ,i,p including monitoring items (such as flow and temperature ofchilled water).
< Comments from the PPs >The formula has been added to the column (h) of CPJ,i,p.
< Assessment by the TPE >The formula to calculate cooling energy generated by project absorption chiller is provided
in the column (h) of the MPS as follows:
CPJ,i,p =Σ(water flow rate x (Toutlet – Tinlet) x Cp x ρ x 10-3 x hOP,i ) x 0.2778
It is confirmed through the review of the revised MPS that the cooling energy is calculated12

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

based on the measured data of water flow rate, inlet/outlet temperature of chilled water andoperating hours of the chiller, and the formula is correct.

Thus, CAR 04 is closed.

< CAR 05 >The value of ECPJ,i,p is calculated by Method II.

The PPs are requested to check thecorrectness of monitoring option, source of data, monitoring frequency in Table 1 of the MPS
and monitoring point (2) in C.2 of the PDD.
< Comments from the PPs >As monitoring point (2) is calculated using the catalogue value of the electric power of theabsorption chiller and monitored operating hours, monitoring point (2) has been removed from
C.2 of the PDD.
< Assessment by the TPE >As Method II is selected for the determination of ECPJ,i,p in the proposed project, the valueof ECPJ,i,p is calculated using the catalogue value of the electric power of the absorption chiller(7.6 kW) and monitored operating hours.

It is confirmed through the review of the revised

MPS that the description in the cells of (f) Monitoring option, (g) Source of data and (i)Monitoring frequency in Table 1 is given for the case of Method I.

Thus, CAR 05 is closed.

< CAR 06 >As JC Indonesia guides the use of ex-post value for grid emission factor, 0.8770 tCO2/MWhshall be applied for Jamali grid.
< Comments from the PPs >The grid emission factor has been revised using JAMALI 2016 ex-post data.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MPS that the ex-post value of Jamali
grid (0.8770 tCO2/MWh) as CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity is applied for the
calculation of reference /project emissions, which is sourced from “Emission Factor of
Electricity Interconnection Systems 2016” Indonesia Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM)
website, based on data obtained by Directorate General of Electricity, Ministry of Energy andMineral Resources, Indonesia. Thus, CAR 06 is closed.
< CAR 07 >The value of EPPJ,i of the project chiller (75 kW) is not consistent with the value given inits specification.
< Comments from the PPs >Value of EPPJ,i has been revised in the updated MPS (7.6 kW) to be consistent with the13

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

specification.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MPS (input_separate) and the specificationof NES-630 that the value of electric power of the project absorption chiller (EPPJ,i) is correctly
provided based on its specification. Thus, CAR 07 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team confirms that all emission sources and GHG types specified in theapproved methodology are appropriately identified. The validation team concludes that thevalues of parameters to be monitored ex-post in the MPS are correctly estimated based on thecooling energy generated by project absorption chiller and operating hours of the projectabsorption chiller and the values for the project-specific parameters to be fixed ex-ante listed
in the MPS are also correctly determined.

In addition, the equations to calculate reference

emissions, project emissions and emission reductions for the proposed project are appropriately
derived and the annual emission reductions are correctly calculated using parameters and datain the MPS.

C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The purpose of the proposed project is to reduce CO2 emissions from the power
consumption of chiller by replacing reference centrifugal chiller with project absorption chiller.
The PDD states that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is not required, because theproposed project does not conduct a physical development with an impact to the society as wellas the environment around the project site. According to the Ministry of Environment decree
no 05 year 2012, there is no stipulation which requires EIA assessment to such kind of thetechnology implementation.

Therefore, the validation team confirms that EIA is not required.

<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the proposed project does not require the EIA.

The

implementation of the project is in line with the regulations in the Republic of Indonesia andthe requirements of the JCM.

14

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs conducted a local stakeholder consultation under the EIA at Swiss Belinn
Karawang Hotel on 14/11/2018.

Prior to the meeting, the invitation letter was delivered tothe stakeholders on 25/10/2018.
Following public and private entities are identified as stakeholders and they were invitedfor Local Stakeholders’ Consultation Meeting:- Indonesia JCM Secretariat- Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs (CMEA)- Environmental and Sanitation Agency (DLHK), Karawang Regency- Environmental Agency (DLH), West Java Province- Industrial and Trade Agency (Disperindag), Karawang Regency- Cooperation Division, Governance and Cooperation Bureau, West Java Province-

Production and Industry Bureau, West Java Province
Energy and Mineral Resources Agency (DESDM), West Java Province
Industry and Trade Agency (Disperindag), West Java Province
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE), Indonesia Chapter
Indonesia Inorganic Basic Chemicals Association (AKIDA)
PT Century Tokyo Leasing Indonesia
PT Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia
Nippon Koei Co., Ltd.
Takasago Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd.
Azbil Corporation
CIMB Niaga
Mitsubishi Corporation
PT Monokem SuryaPT DIC Graphic
PT Pupuk Kujang
Other companies
Jakarta Globe
NNA Japan Co., Ltd.
The local stakeholders provided positive comments for the proposed project. No negative

issues that require actions to be taken by the PPs were raised through the consultation.

It isconfirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the interview with the PPs thatthe stakeholder consultation process was appropriately conducted to collect stakeholders’opinions on the project. The summary of the comments received in the consultation and due
account of all comments taken by the PPs are fully described in the PDD.
<Findings>
15

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the PPs have completed a local stakeholder consultation
process under the EIA and invited comments on the proposed project from the local
stakeholders. The summary of the comments received is provided in the PDD in a completemanner and the PPs have taken due account of all the comments and described this process in
the PDD.

C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The Monitoring Plan consists of the Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet
which comply with the approved Methodology JCM_ID_AM022_ver01.0.

The coolingenergy generated by the project absorption chiller (CPJ,j,p) during the period p is calculated
based on the measured data of water flow rate, inlet/outlet temperature of the chilled water andoperating hours of project absorption chiller (hOP,i,p). The parameter of hOP,i,p is counted by
EVERY FIT management system.
The monitoring points for cooling energy (1), i.e., measurement of water flow rate andinlet/outlet temperature of chilled water, and operating hours of the absorption chiller (4) areproperly located at the right positions of absorption chiller system, respectively, as illustrated
by the figure in C.2 of the PDD. The measured data is automatically recorded by EVERY
FIT management system.
Two monitoring parameters of CPJ,i,p and hOP,i,p are continuously measured and hourly recorded.
The aggregated data is double-checked by a responsible personnel on a monthly basis. The
water flow meter (DY150-DALBJ1-0D, made by YOKOGAWA.) and the thermistor (PB3FC43-S1, made by Shibaura Electronics Co., Ltd.) are replaced or calibrated according to thenational regulation or manufacturer’s recommendation.

The water flow meter installed by the

proposed project was tested and certified by Yokogawa Electric Corporation at the time of
shipment from the factory on 13/06/2018.
All monitored data which are required for verification and issuance will be kept andarchived electronically for two years after the final issuance of the credits.
The roles and responsibilities of the personnel are described in Monitoring Structure Sheet.
The monitoring structure consists of JCM Project Manager (Japan), Engineering Manager(Indonesia) and Project Operators (Indonesia). JCM Project Manager prepares monitoring
report.

In Indonesia, Engineering Manager is in charge of project implementation,

16

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

calibration of measuring equipment and monitoring result and Project Operators are
responsible for daily recording and checking of monitoring data.
It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the interview with thePPs that the monitoring plan complies with the requirements of the approved methodology and
the PPs are able to implement the monitoring activity appropriately according to the monitoring
plan.
Regarding the archiving of data and the monitoring structure, JQA raised CL 03 and CL 04
and these issues were resolved as explained in "Findings".
<Findings>< CL 03 >The description on the archiving of data in the MSS is to be moved to the cell of "(h)Measurement methods and procedures" in the MPS.
< Comments from the PPs >The description on the archiving of the data in the MSS has been moved to the cell of (h).
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MPS and MSS that the description on thearchiving of data in the MSS was moved to the cell of (h) Measurement methods andprocedures" in the MPS.

Thus, CL 03 is closed.

< CL 04 >The role and responsibility of Tokyo Century Corporation and who is responsible formaking Monitoring Report are not described explicitly.
< Comments from the PPs >Tokyo Century Corporation is a "JCM Project Manager" who is in charge of preparing amonitoring report in the MSS.

MSS has been revised accordingly.

< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised MSS and the interview with the PPs that
JCM Project Manager (Tokyo Century Corporation) has been newly added who is in charge ofpreparing monitoring report.

Thus, CL 04 is closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the description of the MPS and MSS complies with therequirements of applied methodology and JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design
Document and Monitoring Report, and the monitoring points as well as measuring equipment
are also appropriate. Thus, the PPs have demonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure17

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

and their abilities to implement the monitoring activity appropriately.

C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was provided to JQA for review on 09/01/2020, in the valid form
(JCM_ID_F_MoC_ver01.0) at the time of validation, in which Tokyo Century Corporation isnominated as the focal point.

The MoC was signed by the authorized representatives of PT.

Timuraya Tunggal on 26/12/2019 and by the authorized representatives of Tokyo Century
Corporation on 25/12/2019, along with the contact details.
The validation team has checked the personal identities and employment status of theauthorized signatories through their business cards. Primary authorized signatory of Tokyo
Century Corporation is Deputy General Manager of International Solutions Support Division,and alternate authorized signatory is Manager of the same Division.

Primary authorized

signatory of PT. Timuraya Tunggal is Director and alternate authorized signatory is Director.
It is confirmed through the check of business cards and the interview with the PPs that all
corporate and personal details including specimen signatures and the information in the MoC
are valid and accurate as requested in the JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the MoC is completed using the valid version of theform, and the information and the specimen signature of the PPs provided in the MoC are
correct and sufficient, in compliance with the requirements of the JCM Guidelines.

It isdemonstrated that the MoC is correctly completed and dully authorized.

C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The representative of focal point entity in the MoC, Deputy General Manager ofInternational Solutions Support Division of Tokyo Century Corporation, declares that the
proposed project is not registered under any other international climate mitigation mechanism
other than the JCM. It is confirmed through the check of publicly available information (e.g.
CDM/JI website, etc.) that the proposed project is not registered under any other international
climate mitigation mechanisms in terms of the name of entity, applied technology, scale andlocation.
18

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the proposed project is not registered under any otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms and hence it will not result in double counting of
GHG emission reductions.

C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
For the proposed project, the installation of the project facilities was satisfactorily
completed on 24/10/2018 at the project site.

However, due to the malfunction of themonitoring system, i.e., EVERY FIT Management system, found in November 2018, thestarting date of project operation was forced to postpone until 05/03/2019 after fixing themonitoring system and the completion of test runs.

It is confirmed through the review of

relevant document and the interview with the PPs that the monitoring activity of the proposed
project was actually commenced on 05/03/2019.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
The validation team concludes that the starting date of project operation, 05/03/2019, iscorrect and does not predate 01/01/2013 as required by the Guideline of the JCM project.

C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No more issues are raised in the validation of the proposed project.
<Findings>
Not applicable.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Not applicable.

19

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD was made publicly available for 30days from 15/01/2020 to 13/02/2020 to invite public comments on the following JCM website:
https://www.jcm.go.jp/id-jp/projects/73
No public comments were received.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
Not applicable.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees- Yasuhiko Sakuta

Manager, International Solutions Support Division,
Tokyo Century Corporation- Ricky Tagar Risnauli Senior Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
Co., Ltd.
- Yukimi Shimura

Senior Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
Co., Ltd.

E.2. List of documents received
1. PDD, ver. 01.0, 09/01/2020 and ver. 01.1, 18/02/2020
2. Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet, ver. 01.0, 09/01/2020,ver. 01.1, 18/02/2020
3. JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (MoC) submitted for JC, dated
08/01/2020
4. Business cards of Primary authorised signatory, Alternate authorised signatory fromJapanese and Thailand sides along with Contact person
5. JCM Approved Methodology (ID_AM022_ver01.0, 31/10/2019 (JC9, Annex 3))
6. Monitoring Spreadsheet (ID_AM022_ver01.0)
7. JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (JCM_ID_F_MoC_ver01.0)
8. JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_ID_Glossary_ver02.0)
9. JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_ID_PCP_ver05.0)

20

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

10. JCM Project Design Document Form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver02.0)
11. JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_ID_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0)
12. JCM Validation Report Form (JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0)
13. JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_ID_GL_VV_ver01.0)
14-1. Layout diagram of steam-driven absorption chiller system installed at the chemicalfactory
14-2. Electric wiring diagram of steam-driven absorption chiller system
15. Certificate of Completion of Commissioning issued by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering
Co., Ltd., dated 24/10/2018
16. Company profile of PT. Timuraya Tunggal
17. Company profile of Tokyo Century Corporation
18. Letter from Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd. dated 10/02/2020 which reports
the trouble-shooting of the monitoring system and the starting date of monitoring on
05/03/2019
19. Legal durable year list issued by Ministry of Finance, Japan, to demonstrate the expected
operational lifetime (8 years) of the chemical industry facilities
20. Contract of the proposed project between Tokyo Century Corporation and Global
Environment Centre Foundation (GEC) dated 02/04/2018
21-1. Records of the staff training for operation and monitoring of the absorption chiller
system conducted on 24/10/2018, using Instruction Manual
21-2. Photo after training
22. Instruction Manual of Kawasaki Double-Effect Absorption Chiller Efficio Series,
including Operation and Maintenance Procedures, issued by Kawasaki ThermalEngineering Co., Ltd.
23. Catalogue and specification of absorption chiller Efficio series, Type NES-630, issued
by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd.
24-1. Plan for prevention of refrigerant release from existing chiller at PT. Timuraya
Tunggal, dated 28/12/2019
24-2. MoU among PT. Timuraya Tunggal, Tokyo Century Corporation and PT. Century
Tokyo Leasing Indonesia, dated 19/06/2019
25. Annual Service Contract for Kawasaki Steam Absorption Chiller – NES 630, issued by
PT. Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia on 24/12/2019
26. Integrated Management System “Every Fit” Handling Instruction for Software, issued
by Kawasaki Thermal Engineering Co., Ltd., 16/05/2017 for First edition
27. Sample of daily data sheet recorded by the proposed project28-1. Ministry of Environment decree no 05 year 2012,21

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

28-2. Environmental Impact Assessment Guidebook for Japanese Companies in Overseas
Business Development, IGES, March 201529-1. Minutes of the LSC meeting held on 14/11/2018
29-2. Attendee’s list for the LSC meeting
29-3. Invitation letter sent to the stakeholders dated on 25/10/2018
29-4. “Technology of absorption chiller” presented by Gikoko Kogyo Indonesia
29-5. “Tokyo Century Group with the JCM” presented by Tokyo Century Corporation
29-6. “MRV of the project” presented by Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
29-7. “Steam absorption chiller” presented by PT. Timuraya Tunggal
30. Specification of flow meter (DY150-DALBJ1-0D), made by Yokogawa Electric
Corporation
31. Test certificate of flow meter (DY150-DALBJ1-0D) issued by Yokogawa Electric
Corporation on 13/06/2018
32. User’s manual of Vortex flow meter, Yokogawa Electric Corporation, 21th Edition
33. Specification of thermistor (PB3FC-43-S1), made by Shibaura Electronics Co., Ltd.
34. Ministry of Trade decree 68-2018 for Guideline for Calibration in Indonesia
35. 2016 CO2 emission factor of the grid in Indonesia
36. Estimation of CO2 emission reductions for the proposed project
37. Diagram of monitoring structure for the proposed project22

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s verification team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.

Statement of competenceStatement of competence
Name:

Name:

Dr. Tadashi Yoshida

Mr. Hiroshi Motokawa

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function

Function

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
Validator

2014/12/22

Validator

2014/12/22

Verifier

2014/12/22

Verifier

2014/12/22

Team leader

2014/12/22

Team leader

2014/12/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes

Technical area within sectoral scopes

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2015/11/12

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas

2014/12/22

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation23

2014/12/22-