ACCU Nara International Correspondent
The ACCU correspondents periodically send reports on cultural heritage protection activities in which they have been
recently involved. This is a collection of fifteen reports with one special report submitted by international correspondents
in the Asia-Pacific region.

The Eighth Regular Report
Contents
Cambodia

1

Srun Tech
Living with Heritage: Kok Preah Phnom Community

China

3

Ma Chaolong
Conservation and Restoration of Longmen Grottoes - World Cultural Heritage

India

6

Vasant Kumar Swarnkar
Conservation of Stepwells at Delhi

India

10

Bhuvan Vikrama
Stone Inlay Work in Agra Monuments and its Restoration

Indonesia

14

Mohammad Natsir Ridwan Muslim
Preservation of Kimpulan Temple

Malaysia

17

A Ghafar Bin Ahmad
Restoration of Building Façade at the Sultan Abdul Samad Building, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Nepal

20

Suresh Suras ShresthaThunderbolt Damaged the Pratappur Temple in Swayambhu

New Zealand

22

Matthew Schmidt
The Origins of Brown Trout (Salmo fario) in New Zealand: the Otago Acclimatisation Society Opoho Fish Ponds 1868-1885

Papua New Guinea

27

Naomi Faik Simet
Historical Development of Lapita in Papua New Guinea

Philippines

29

Mary Grace Lualhati Barretto-Tesoro
Transforming Perspectives: The Stone Ruins in Barangay Pinagbayanan, San Juan, Batangas, Philippines

Samoa

31

Mainifo Viliamu
Preservation of Traditional Knowledge in Samoa

Sri Lanka

33

Sujeeva Kaushalyani Peiris Deraniyagala
Conservation of Stupas in Sri Lanka with Special Reference to Three Selected Stupas : Abhayagiri, Jetavana and Sandagiri

Thailand36

Pongthorn Hiengkaew
Restoration of Ubosot (Main Hall) of Wat Borom Nivasana Raja Vora Vihara, Bangkok

Uzbekistan

39

Akmaljon Ulmasov
Foreign Experience on Conservation of Museum Objects

Viet Nam

42

Nguyen Chi Cong
The Two Ancient Graves in Luc Trieu AgeSpecial ReportUzbekistan
Akmaljon Ulmasov
For the Contribution to Cultural Heritage Studying-In Tashkent Young Archeologists Have Received the Incentive Award of Ikuo Hirayama-

43

Cambodia
Cambodia

Living with Heritage: Kok Preah Phnom Community
Srun Teck, Archaeologist
APSARA (Authority for the Protection and Management of Angkor and the Region of Siem Reap)
Kok Preah Phnom community is located in Slat village,
Sre Kvav commune, Angkor Chhum district, Siem Reap
province about 100 kilometers from Siem Reap town.
The ancient road from Angkor Capital to Phimai temple(presently in NoKor Rachasima Province, Thailand) passed
through a part of Angkor Chhum district. The Living
Angkor Road Project (LARP) on this ancient road was a
joint research project between APSARA Authority and the
University of Thai Artists.
The project aimed to investigate both tangible andintangible heritages. Researchers focused on theinfrastructure of tangible heritage such as stone bridges,
chapels of hospitals, chapels of rest-houses, temples, dikes
and ancient reservoirs. The intangible heritage was foundby observing local people’s tradition, because they settled
along the ancient road since early times (Im Sokrithy,
Ea Darith, Heng Than, Khieu Chan, Srun Tech and Kim
Samnang, 2007: 315).

Archaeological map of Siem Reap

According to the report of LARP team, they discoveredthat Kol village (located in Kol commnume, Angkor
Chhum district) was probably an ancient town in Angkor
period. In aerial photos, we can see many ancient infrastructures. During the research, they found three stonebridges, five temples, six ancient mounds, eight ancient
reservoirs, two other paths connecting the main road andhistoric/ prehistoric sites with stone tools, human bones
and potteries.
Although Slat village was not included in the LARP’s
research, Kok Preah Phnom has high archaeological value
due to its location; it is about 775 kilometers north of Kol
village and about 275 kilometers east along the north-west
ancient road.
On the other hand, about three kilometers on the northwest of Slat village, there were two ancient mounds.
The first was called Kok Andoek Slab (with threesurrounding moats) and the other was Kok Prateal (westof Kok Andoek Slab). These two mounds were a kindof prehistoric sites in Sleng Spean village, Sleng Spean
commune, Srey Snam district, Siem Reap province.
Kok Preah Phnom community settled on some parts ofPreah Phnom temple and Kok Chak (surrounded by amoat with a water reservoir on the north and piles ofbricks). Besides, they also found many kinds of stone tools
such as axes, hatchets and some potsherds. Based on theseevidences, they concluded that Kok Preah Phnom had
likely been a place of human activity or human settlement
since the prehistoric times until today.
Nowadays, Kok Preah Phnom community set the dwellingon the west dike of Preah Phnom pond for the purpose of
agriculture by depending on natural resource with threemain ancient reservoirs. In the whole community, mostof the houses are built in wood and in Khmer traditional

1

Kok Preah Phnom Temple

Village view

Elevation from east

Elevation from northCambodia

style. Houses are built on stilts where people live upstairs
and surrounded by many kinds of fruit-trees.
Preah Phnom temple was built in brick with five towers in
two ranges. It had two inscriptions written in Sanskrit. The
first one was on the door frame of the southern tower,
which was inventoried as K.593 in 930 A.D. in the reign ofthe king Jayavarman IV. And the other was on the door
frame of the central tower, inventoried as K.454 in 1101 A.D.
in the reign of the king Jayavarman VI (G. Cœdés, Paris
1951: 119). The third inscription was written in Khmer,
inventoried as K.594 in the 10th century.
By reading three inscriptions, we can conclude that
this temple was probably built in the reign of the king
Jayavarman IV in the 10th century and renovated in thereign of the king Jayavarman VI in the 12th century.

Example: one of wooden houses in Kok Preah Phnom Community

One more point to note is that the villagers are always
celebrating agrarian rites, practices of animism and homage
to Neak Ta who is a spiritual village protector every year.
The ceremony is taken place at Preah Phnom temple
asking for good luck, health, the good rice harvest for theyear to come, and of course, for the abundant honey forthe coming year.
Recommendation:-M inimize any development projects in the region,
because the current landscape and environment provide
the high values to the community.
-P reserve the existing landscape and environment,
because they are the valuable resources for the future
village.
-E ncourage local people to preserve their identity andtheir natural and cultural resources.
-E nhance and promote the community values in present
context.
- Any approach for the community should be ensured toreach “sustainable development” which is a mechanismof gradual equilibrium between nature, culture, human,social and economic activities.
-F or near future plans, the energy, domestic sanitation andcommunity organization should be taken into accountand formalized.

Villagers are celebrating agrarian rites and practices ofanimism, homage to Neak Ta at Preah Phnom temple.

Offerings to Keak Ta, inside the temple
Stone and iron tools were found in the village.

2

ChinaChina

Conservation and Restoration of Longmen Grottoes - World Cultural Heritage
Ma Chaolong, Deputy Director
Grotto Conservation Center of Longmen Grottoes Academy
I. Brief Introduction to Longmen Grottoes
Located 13 kilometers to the south of Luoyang City,
carved on the cliffs of the Longmen hill along thebanks of the Yihe river, Longmen Grottoes began to
be constructed at the time when Emperor Xiaowen of
Northern Wei dynasty moved the capital to Luoyang(around A.D. 493), and the carving went on and off for
more than 400 years. Kept here are over 2,000 caves andniches of different sizes, more than 100,000 Buddhist
statues, and over 2,800 pieces of inscriptions. The statues,
inscriptions, paintings and calligraphy decorations madein different dynasties, which reflect such contents as
Buddhism, architecture, music, folk customs, sculpture,
painting, medicine and cultural exchanges of different
times, have important historical and archaeological values
in the study of the artistic styles, social features andtechnical development of different times.

dilapidation, grotto leaking and sculpture weathering,which are the most common and severe.

In 1961, the State Council promulgated it a key cultural
relic site for special conservation. In 2000, it was inscribedon the World Heritage List by UNESCO. World Heritage
Evaluation Commission of UNESCO made a consensus
that firstly, the sculptures of the Longmen Grottoes are
an outstanding manifestation of human artistic creativity.
Secondly, the Longmen Grottoes illustrate the perfectionof a long-established art form which was to play a highly
significant role in the cultural evolution of this region of
Asia. Thirdly, the high cultural level and sophisticatedsociety of Tang dynasty of China is encapsulated in the
exceptional stone carvings of the Longmen Grottoes.

The Grottoes are in face of many problems. For example,
some rocks have been corroded, and some sculptures arecovered with solidified magma of limestone. The washingof rains, the weathering of rocks, wild grass and trees arealso serious problems. As a result, chaps can be seen in
the rock bases of the caves, water leaks through somecrevices, and some rocks have collapsed. The surface ofsculptures is deteriorating and damaged. From geologicalpoint of view, the caves are located in a geologicalenvironment of fragile karst with a relatively low capacityand fast environment degrading. Once the rocks andsculptures are damaged, it is difficult to repair them. Ever
since the 1970s, planned conservation and repair projects
have been initiated and implemented. Reinforcing steel
riveting was used in the constructions to strengthen
the rocks, a seeping-proof layer of cement was applied

During its history of more than 1,500 years, Longmen
Grottoes have been damaged by nature as well as humanfactors. Now it suffers various diseases such as rock

II. Conservation Problems of Longmen Grottoes
It has been 1,500 years since Longmen Grottoes werecarved in Northern Wei dynasty. Due to geological/
geographical conditions and the influence of naturalstress (caused by denudation, weathering, leaking water,etc.), structure joints and cracks on rock masses havebeen widening and stress-release crevices have beendeveloping. They looks like cobwebs scattered on rocks
and sculptures, threatening the stability and security ofthe stone carvings. Some of the carvings have broken
or fallen off, such as hands of Grand Losana, head of
Kasyapa, the Heavenly King and Vajra on the south wallat the Fengxiansi cave, the bases of and Buddhist statues
in Bazuosi cave and Dawanwufo cave.

Far-view of Longmen

3cliffs. In the Song dynasty, nine chambers were built over
Grand Losana at Fenxiansi cave for protection. Thereafter,
remains of repair works at different historical times canbe found in Longmen.

III. The History of Conservation
Various conservation measures have been taken indifferent times ever since Longmen Grottoes began to be
designed and constructed. As early as in Northern Wei
dynasty, the caves were designed with arch ceilings toincrease their stability. In the Tang dynasty, herringbone
drain ditches were built over Grand Losana at Fengxiansi
cave. And remains of water-proof slates and roofs canstill be seen atop some small caves carved on the hillEver since the 1950s, conservation and restoration workof Longmen Grottoes has been carried out for over 50
years, mainly centered on the collapse of grotto wallrock, the weathering of sculptures and cave leakage. The
consolidation of the Fengxiansi cave from 1971 to 1974,
was the first grotto conservation and consolidation projectin the country, saving and conserving the Fengxiansi
cave, and the most representative work at Longmen withmodern engineering technology. From 1987 to 1992,
Comprehensive Harness Project of Longmen Grottoes was
implemented, with the rock body on the east and west
hills being consolidated, and the problem of the stabilityof the rocks basically solved, and cave leakage controlled.
In 2002, UNESCO Conservation and Restoration Project ofLongmen Grottoes started with a total investment of 1.25

Springs in Longmen

Crevice in the carvings

Weathering on the surface of carvings

Water and microorganism on the surface of carvings

China

on the top of the caves, plank roadways and staircases
was repaired and constructed, and enclosure along thesides of the site to be protected have been established.
However, no specific methods have been found to securelong-lasting or permanent conservation and managementof the caves in terms of rock mass displacement, caveleaking and weathering of the surface of the sculptures.
Meanwhile, further researches are expected to guarantee
the durability of previous strengthening by steel riveting
and water-proof layers.

4Chinamillion US dollars, and completed in 2009. The aim of the
project is to decide upon the directions of the all-purpose
conservation and restoration, with comprehensive
protection measures taken. In 2004, the Conservation and
Restoration Project of Shuangyao Cave at Longmen, coimplemented by China and Italy, was put in practice. The
practice of full-scale restoration of the surface diseases of
the Shuangyao Cave will be of guiding significance to theconservation and restoration of other caves at Longmen.
In order to enhance protection work of Longmen
Grottoes, we constituted the Layout of Longmen Grottoes
Zone and the Protective and Administrative Ordinanceof Longmen Grottoes, which provided legal basis for
our work. We have had a great deal of hard workon protection of Longmen Grottoes in the past years.
Through long time efforts we have solved the stability
problem of caves on the whole and amended theleaking condition of caves effectively. In April 2003, theprotection zone was closed to public traffic in conformity
with the promise to UNESCO. The whole environment
quality of grotto protective zone has been improved
obviously.
IV. Main Conservation Job at Present
For a long period, we had placed our efforts onconservation for rescue. In recent years, we have been
paying attention to daily maintenance and engineeringconservation. It always takes us most of time on theseworks every year. As a result, the grottoes have been ingood and stable conditions. However, further researchis necessary so as to resolve such challenging works
on the weathering of statues, seeping in the caves, andincreasing tourist pressure. Along with the inscription
on World Heritage List by UNESCO, international andbi-lateral collaborations have become more and more
frequent and such affective projects as UNESCO Longmen
Grottoes Conservation and Restoration Project lasting forseveral years have played a significant role as well ascivil collaboration projects. Benefiting from this, sevenfellows in the Conservation Center have all attended
different training courses or other study opportunities
these years. However, due to a shortage of fund, thelaboratory specialized on cave conservation has not been
established for so many years. A simple and low-gradelaboratory cannot be suitable for the developing demandsof conservation and restoration works. So, we applied
for Italian soft loan to establish a modern laboratory two
years ago. By the time accomplished two years later, abrand-new advanced and modern laboratory specialized
for conservation and restoration will be built before us.
We are searching new methods and collaboration tosolve the problem of Longmen Grottoes, and welcoming
all walls of international societies taking part in theconservation of Longmen Grottoes, which belongs to all
over the world and contributes to the history and memoryof human beings.

The stone leaking-proof shelf, remains of Tang dynasty

Cement leaking-proof shelves

5

The water-leaking project of caves

IndiaIndia

Conservation of Stepwells at Delhi
Vasant Kumar Swarnkar, Deputy Superintending Archaeologist
Archaeological Survey of India
Stepwells, (also called bawdi or baoli or vaav) arewells or ponds in which the water can be reached bydescending a set of steps. They may be covered andprotected, and are often of architectural significance. It
can be multi-storied also in which a bullock turns thewater wheel ("Rehat") to raise the water in the well to thefirst or second floor. Mainly stepwells having two parts:
a well shaft and a complex of dalans, rooms and stairsleading down to the water. The construction may beutilitarian, but sometimes includes significant architecturalembellishment
The concept of stepwells is known from inscriptions
to date back as far as circa 5th century A.D. and it
may even have its origin from the time of Indus Valley
Civilization. However, most stepwells appear to haveflourished during the 8th to 18th centuries. They werean essential rain harvesting, groundwater recharging andstorage system. But stepwells also express an aesthetic
aspect of Indian life and are examples of what water,
art and architecture meant for simple folk. They are
most common in the west of India. They may be also
found in the other more arid regions of the subcontinent,
extending into Pakistan.
When the Muslim forces of Mohammad Ghori, led by
Qutubuddin Aibak defeated the Rajput ruler Prithviraj
Chauhan near Delhi in 1192 and established their empire
in India, they were fully aware of the hardship they had
faced in the deserts they had traveled through. They
knew by experience that water was of prime importanceto the welfare of their people and that Rajput Delhi hadvery limited resources of it, situated as it was on the dry
and boulder strength area around Mehrauli.
Amongst the early water reservoirs was one in the Lal Kot
area, hardly adequate to meet the growing requirementsof the times. No much of it has survived today. Anotheris Suraj kund built by Suraj Pal ancestor of Prithviraj inthe southern part of Delhi. This huge water reservoir
was built around A.D. 1061 with stone embankment. It
was built at the foot of some gigantic stone steps in asemicircular shape. The masonry work shows splendid
engineering skill in the arrangements for letting fresh
water and draining the excess.
As per the archival records, there were 629 water bodies,but due to rapid urbanization and development manyof them are now dried and have lost their existence.
The Archaeological Survey of India has 15 water bodies
under its control in Delhi out of which 12 are conserved
and revived during the past few years. Steps were taken
to ensure and maintain their originality. Most of the
stepwells were damaged and in dilapidated condition.
Their walls were fallen, Chhajja stones were damaged
and missing and the structure were filled with debris andmuck. No water was evident.
For the first time in several centuries, these baolis werecleared of all rubbish down to their original foundation (insome cases 80-100 feet below the ground level). This had
to be done manually due to the compact nature of theaccumulated waste. The process was carefully supervised.
The work used a combination of ancient techniqueand modern technology. Building materials and crafts
were similar to those used by original builders, as India
was fortunate in having living building traditions, andconservation projects are an opportunity to ensure thatthey continue. At the same time, high-definition survey
using 3D scanner and GPR was conducted to understandthe underline soil condition and to plan conservation
works accordingly. Here the brief description of somewater bodies is given and the work done by theArchaeological Survey of India with the photographs.
Uggar Sain Ki Baoli
Uggar Sains's baoli, situated near Cannaught place,belongs to 15th century. At the level of the ground thisbaoli measure 192' by 45' over all and at water level 129'3" by 24' 6". It was built of rubble masonry and dressed
hard stone. The baoli is built in three parts. The first was
the rectangular swimming pool like area with a longflight of steps flanked by a thick wall with two series ofarched niches. The second part of the baoli was a deep
circular well having 25' 6" diameter. The area of baoli is
435 square meters.
Rajon-Ki-Bain (Baoli)
Rajon-ki-Bain a four tier stepped well, lies south of
Adham Khan's tomb at Mehrauli and appears to derive
its name from the fact that it was for a time used bymasons (raj). It belongs to the Lodi period and from theinscription in the pavilion, it was buit in A.D. 1512. The
baoli is oblong with steps leading downwards towards
south. The walls of the lowest visible storey are decorated
with small but deeply recessed arches. The area of baoli
is 858.36 square meters.
Gandhak-Ki-Baoli
Gandhak-ki-Baoli, built with rubble masonry, lies
about 100m. South of Adham Khan's tomb is so called
because of the smell of Sulphur (gandhak) in its water.
It is believed to have been built in the reign of Iltumish(A.D. 1211-36). It has five tiers, each tier narrowing as it
descends towards the bottom, with a circular well at its
southern end. Each tier is reached by way of galleries
on the east and west which give access to the circularportion of the well.
Baoli at Munirka
This baoli, located at Munirka, is built of random rubble
masonry and has a circular well at its southern end

6

Indiawhich is flanked by domed turrets and also has narrowwinding staircases to reach the water level. Thick walls ofeastern and western have a series of arched niches. It isassignable to Lodi period (A.D. 1451-1526). The area ofthe baoli is 350 square meters.
Baoli at Ghiaspur (Nizamuddin)This baoli is situated in the village Nizamuddin, believed
to have been built by the Saint Nizamudding, at thenorthern doorway of the enclosure of the Nizamuddin'stomb. It is said to have been the cause of contention
between Nizamud-Din and Ghiyasu'd-Din Tughlaq Shah.
It is enclosed by dressed stone walls on the south. Thislarge baoli is considered sacred by the followers ofHazrat Nizamu'd-Din Auliya). The area of the baoli is657.80 square meters.
Baoli at Purana Qila
Towards the south-west of the Qile-a-Kuhna mosque, thislarge stepped well (baoli) is situated inside Purana Qila.
Since the fort was built on a high ground, the groundwater level was far down. So, the baoli was constructedto provide the water facility. It was designed in this waythat the water should be covered and its evaporation
process should be minimized. Its roof was constructedwith a series of gradually receding arches. It has eightynine steps and eight landings. The step portion of thebaoli measure about 22.25 m in depth. Its northern
extreme terminates into a circular well with a series ofgradually receding arches. The area of the baoli is 675
square meters.
Baoli at Red Fort
The baoli, situated at Red Fort, is built of rubble masonryand dressed with hard stone. It consists of an octagonal
shaft, having 6.50 diameter and 14.27m deep with anadjoining tank, which measures about 6.10 m x 6.10 m.
In the north and west direction there are flight of steps
flanked by a thick wall with arched apartments on eitherside. The total area of baoli is 597 square meters.
Hauz-I-Shamsi
On the southern outskirts of Mehrauli, this large tank
was built in 1230 by Shamsu'd-Din Iltimish. Originally it
is said to have covered hundred acres of land and waslined with red sandstone. It was repaired by Alau'dDin Khilji and Firoz Shah Tughluq. The tradition saysthat the prophet appeared once to Iltumish in a dreamand pointed out this site to him as suitable for building
the tank which he had in mind. The next morning
Iltumish noticed here the print of one of the hoofs of theprophet's horse, around which he built a domed platformand excavated the tank. The water of the tank is regarded
as sacred, and several graves of Muslims saints lie around
it. The area of this tank is 2000 square meters.
Old Baoli on the Ridge
Old baoli, located on the ridge in north Delhi, is amassive structure of rubble masonry. It was originallyencircled by a series of chambers. The water reservoirs
and remains of drains were intended for supplying water
to the Kushk-i-Shikar or Jahan Numa palace of Firoz
Shah. A tunnel was discovered leading from the north7

wall of the baoli but its purpose could not be ascertained.
The total area of the baoli is 1250 square meters.
Baoli at Tughluqabad Fort
In the Tughluqabad Fort, palace complex has this fairly
large baoli excavated deep into the bedrock. To give it
a proper shape, masonry retaining walls and staircases
were provided. While the outer face of the masonry is ofashlars, the core is of random rubble set in lime mortar.
Evidence of a projected platform built on the northern
retaining wall for drawing water from the baoli still canbe seen. Construction of the fort was quarried locallyand caused depressions which may have served as water
reservoirs for use in dry seasons. The total area of thebaoli is 414 square meters. The citadel complex has
another large baoli, which lies in 840 square meters.

Baoli Arab-Ki-Sarai
Arab Sarai, is about 325 metres south-west of Humayun's
Tomb and was built in 1560-61 by Humayun's senior wife
Bega Begum or Haji Begum has a remains of a baoli. It
is said that the she brought three hundred Arab priests(Mullah) with her return from the pilgrimage of Mecca
and settled them here, and the baoli's water were usedfor various utilitarian purposes. This circular step well
has a flight of steps to reach the water level. It is built ofrandom rubble masonry and the total area of this baoli is54.64 square meters.
Baoli at Kotla Firoz ShahIn the Kotla Firoz Shah complex, a circular baoli stands
immediately north-west of the pyramidal lat structure witha range of subterranean apartment, the remains of which
are observed at the upper terrace enclosed by a low
open stone railing. This circular well has no staircases toreach to the level of water unlike other step wells. It is
not covered and has a pulley to lift water. There are twostory rooms around the well. There is a complex systemof water channels and pipes to lift the water to the roof
from where it is taken out and even animals can drink
water. The roof is topped by chhatris and surroundedby railing which probably might have been used forrecreational activity. The total area of the baoli is 876.13
square meters.

References(1) Nath R., An Illustrated Glossary of Indo-Muslim Architecture, Jaipur,
1986.
(2) S harma, Y. D., Delhi and Its Neighborhood, Reprint, New Delhi, 1982.
(3) H asan, Zafar, Monuments of Delhi, Lasting Splendor of the Great
Mughals and Others, Reprint, New Delhi, 1987.
(4) Nanda, Ratish et al, Delhi: The Built Heritage, A Listing, New Delhi:
INTACH, 1999.
(5) Livingstone, M., Steps to Water(6) Jain-Neubauer, Jutta, The Stepwells of Gujrat, New Delhi, 1981.

IndiaBaoli at Giyaspur (Nizamuddin), bfore
conservation

Gandhk-ki-Baoli , after conservation

Baoli at Red Fort, after conservation

Baoli at Giyaspur (Nizamuddin), after
conservation

Baoli at Arab-kiSarai (during work)

Baoli at Arab-ki-Sarai(during work)

Hauz-I-Shamsi, covered with vegetation

Gandhk-ki-Baoli , before conservation

Baoli at Red Fort in dilapidated condition

Hauz-I-Shamsi, after removal of vegetation

8

IndiaRajon-ki-Bain (Baoli ), in damaged condition andfilled with debris

Rajon-ki-Bain (Baoli ), after conservation

Uggar Sain ki Baoli , filled with debris

Uggar Sain ki Baoli , after de-silting andconservation

Baoli at Munirka, in dilapidated condition andfilled with debris

Baoli at Munirka, present condition

Baoli at Kotla Firoz Shah in damaged condition

Baoli at Kotla Firoz Shah, after conservation

Baoli at Purana Qila, present view

Baoli at Purana Qila, closed in the past

Baoli at Purana Qila, during conservation

Baoli at Tughluqaqbad Fort in damaged condition

9

Baoli at Tughluqabad Fort, during conservation

IndiaIndia

Stone Inlay Work in Agra Monuments and its Restoration
Bhuvan Vikrama, Assistant Archaeologist
Archaeological Survey of India
Introduction
A method of inlaying coloured marbles or semi-precious
stones into a stone base, often in geometric or flower
patterns is called Pacchikaari in India. It became popularin India during the Mughal rule. It is often treatedas an imitation of Pietradura so popular in the early
17th century in Europe. However, many of the Indianbuildings showed similar decorations in glazed tiles. It
appears that the inlay of stone in stone was an extensionof the same technique in different medium during theMughal period. This shift most probably was due to the
induction of new building material during the Mughals.
The shift from the lime plastered random rubble masonry
decorated with patterns in stucco or with mosaic ofcoloured ceramic tiles to the stone-veneered brick-workor rubble masonry was more or less responsible for the
introduction of the new technique of embellishment withinlaying of stone in the veneering stone.
Of the Mughal monuments the first to be built in Agra
was a pleasure garden (AA) Ram Bagh by Babur, though
it has been latter embellished by his grandson Jehangir, it
does not show any attempt to inlay decoration. Though
not many of the buildings of Akbar survive in their
original state of construction monuments of this period
show robustness and are generally bland on the exterior,
however, Humayun’s tomb at Delhi being one good
exception. Humayun’s tomb shows just a little blend of
red and white stone, perhaps to define the outlines andto render it a snow peak effect. In the Chatris (cupolas)at the corners do show patterns in coloured tiles inlayedin the stucco. At Humayun’ tomb the inlayed pieces arelarger in size, still they fall under the category of stone
inlay decoration.
At Agra almost all the Mughal monuments such as
Akbar’s Tomb, buildings in Agra Fort, Itemad-udDaula’s Tomb, monuments in Fatehpur Sikri and Taj
Mahal bear stone inlay decoration. In these monuments
a gradually increasing degree of perfection, precisenessand sophistication can be observed which gets itself
epitomized in the crowning glory Taj Mahal.
Types of Inlay WorkAll the inlay work available at Agra monuments materiallycan be divided in two broad categories a) Sand stone
as base and b) Marble as base. Thematically, it can be
categorized as a) simple geometric patterns, b) complex
geometric, c) complex floral and d) inscriptions. The
last two categories are technically the most complicated.
Material used, however, does not differ so much. On the
red sandstone base generally white marble is used in
combination with black limestone to execute geometricpatterns both simple as well as complex. On the marble
base, a variety of semiprecious stones (Table. 1) are used

for creating the complex floral patterns, while black limestone is used in executing the inscriptions.
Name of the
Semiprecious stone
Ajuba
AlabasterBlack marble
Bloodstone
Carnelian
Coral
Emerald
Golden stone
GulabiJadwarJasperLapis Lazuli
Load stone
Melachite
NakhudOnyx
PituniaReg
Sapphire
Tarquoise

Name in the text
Not known
Rukham
Musa
Abri
Aqiq
MoongaZamurradTilai
Not known
Not known
Yashab
Lajward
Maqnatis
Dhana- i-farang
Suleimani
Not known
ChambalNilam
FirozaPlace ofProcurement
Surat
MakranaJhari
GwaliorBaghdadIndian Ocean
Not known
Not known
Not known
CambaySri Lanka
GwaliorRussiaSabalgarh
DeccanNot known
Not known
Tibet

Table 1
These carved stones were set in the stone grooves witha cementing or binding agent. This cementing material isalso mentioned in the contemporary texts and it included
various organic substances as well as inorganic/ mineralmaterial. At present, white cement and marble dust arealso included in the cementing agent for fixing the inlays
in the grooves. The ingredients and their approximate
proportions are:Ingredient of Mortar
White lime
Marble dust
White cement
Gond (Gum of acacia arabica )Batasha (candied sugar drops) / Gur- jaggery/ jaggeree

traditional unrefined non-centrifugal
whole cane sugar. It is a concentrated
product of cane juice without
separation of the molasses and crystals.

Bael giri (pulp of wood apple aegle
marmolus)Curdor as per equirement
Urad Dal – Vigna mungoor as per requirement

Approx. Quantity(in one quintal)
15 kg
70 kg
10 kg
2.25 kg

1.25 kg

0.50 kg
0.50 kg
0.50 kg

Table 210

IndiaNeed for Conservation/ Restoration
Time and the vagaries of nature coupled with humanactions (inaction as well) the monuments fall prey todecay. They need to be strengthened from time totime through day to day cleaning, monitoring, fixing
the breakage and prolonging the decay – all of whichfall under conservation. Thus, conservation becomesa continuous activity about the monument. The
causes of decay are generally universal and some arecontrollable while the others cannot be controlled. At
Agra the extreme weather and human intervention are
the prominent causes of decay and deterioration. Air
pollution and bird excreta mixed with rain also further
the deterioration.
Causes of Decay
For the inlay, the main causes of decay are theincompatibility of the two materials used, the mortar
behavior and inherent weakness of the base stone. For
most of the Agra monuments the base stone is red sandstone except at Itemad-ud-Daula’s tomb and Taj Mahal(mausoleum) where it is marble. Red sandstone being asedimentary rock suffers from inherent weaknesses like
exfoliation and fragmenting as well as cracking due tothe rusting of iron dowel. The inlay pieces technically aresimply set inside a groove made in the base stone withthe help of a cementing agent which in case of Mughalmonuments is special putty made with a combination oforganic as well as inorganic materials.
Problems relating to the inlay are not uniform in all themonuments or in all places in the same monument. Even
if the differential exposure to the sun, or the air velocity
and direction and the dynamic thrust of the lashing rains
is discounted the problems differ from exterior to interior.
Indoor problems include the regular dusting and cleaningof the surface and touch by the visitors and rise inhumidity and carbon dioxide levels due to human resiration. Outdoor effects are multi-fold and almost universal.
But all these lead to:• Weathering of the base stones• Weathering of the inlay pieces• Deadening of binding mortar• Human vandalism
It has been observed that the maximum deterioration of
the inlay pieces occurs up to two metres from the base,mainly because:• Greater moisture content nearer the ground level
which initiates the weathering of the base stone, inDocumentation before restoration:
Yellow is the existing and white is
the missing inlay.

11•

case of red sandstone, or results in the swelling of
the mortar that pushes the inlay piece outside.
T wo-metre-height is within human reach andthe already weak inlay pieces fall victims toadventurous human beings.

The Restoration
The method adopted for the restoration involves:- Identification of the damage or decay- Documentation of the decayed panel- Procurement of raw material similar to the qualityused- Preparation of the base, if required- Preparation of the inlay pieces- Preparation of the cementing agent/ mortar- Fixing of the inlay pieces, and- Post restoration documentation.
The process involves preparation of a document detailingexisting and the missing inlay pieces as well as thecondition of the base stone. The next step is to trace themissing inlay piece and then a thin metal sheet is cut
in the desired shape. It is pasted on the slab of stone
from which the inlay is to be fashioned. To cut the stone
traditional methods are used. A bow of bamboo withstring of twisted wires is used to saw the stone fixed
on a frame. Sand is used as abrasive with water to run
down the excess sand to facilitate a fine cut. Where thebase stone is worn out and needs to be replaced. First
the pattern is trace on the finished surface of new slab
and the grooves are chiseled with traditional tools byengravers. And then the same process of tracing andfashioning the inlay pieces is followed. While procuring
the raw material care is taken to get as similar material as
possible to the original used. To ensure it, petrographic
reports are obtained and comparative reports are also
drawn.
Conclusion
Deterioration and decay of inlay pieces or inlay panels
does not bespeak of the structural weakness, and it only
makes the monument ugly. It is like a skin disease which
if untreated keeps on spreading and when chronic canpenetrate the inner fabric of the structure. Therefore,
the vigil keeps going and the first sign of weakness is
attended to properly. Surely, a stitch in time saves nine.
Conservation and restoration have kept the monuments
in fine state.

Post-restoration documentation (not of thesame panel) : Chocolate is replaced basestone; white is the new inlay.

A missing inlay piece before restoration

IndiaTaking impression of the missing inlay piecewith paper

Preparation of format in tin sheet according to
the impression

Checking the size of tin format with the missing
one

Fixing the format on the frame

An inlay piece is cut using a bow string saw.

The traditional method

Traditional tools

Inherent cracks aided by human vandalism: A broken inlay.

Most delicate work on the lower grave stone

Photographic documentation

Post-restoration photographic
documentation

Intricate inlay work: Stone(jasper) of different hues
are used to show the folds(above); 53 tiny pieces ofcamelian make a flower.

Most complicated inlay work: Inscriptions,
1. Mausoleum façade 2. Main entrance

12

IndiaModerate weathering of top surface of base stone and deadening of mortar: Restored Akbar's Tomb

2. Properly restored Itemad-ud-Daula's Tomb

1.a Heavily weathered base
1.b Missing inlay due to deadening of mortar

Weathered base and missing inlay pieces, during restoration base stone was replaced and grooved:
Itimad-ud-Daula's Tomb

Restored inlays of turret: Taj Mahal

Restoration of missing inlay pieces: Riverside wall, Taj Mahal

13

Indonesia
Mohammad Nasir Ridwan Muslim, Section Head
Directorate of Archaeological Heritage, Ministry of Culture and Tourism
Introduction
The Kimpulan Temple is a newly discovered temple
in Indonesia. This temple was discovered incidentallyon 11 December 2009, during the construction workof the library of Islamic University of Indonesia. The
information about this new temple was then immediately
reported to the Archaeological Office of Yogyakarta. On
12 December 2009, Archaeological Office of Yogyakarta
conducted a survey. The Kimpulan Temple has a unique
history; in the past, the temple had a Hindu backgroundand now rediscovered in the integrated complex ofIslamic University of Indonesia.
The Kimpulan Temple located at Kimpulan Village,
Sleman District, Yogyakarta Province, approximately 14.5
km from the city of Yogyakarta (figure 1). When Mount
Merapi erupted in November 2010, Kimpulan Temple
was also affected. The temple located less than 20 miles
from Mount Merapi and it was covered by volcanic ashes.
As a result of this eruption impact, the restoration work
was delayed for one month. The restoration of the temple
completed at the end of January 2011.
This report informs the working stages of the temple fromits discovery to preservation.
Stages of Preservation
Preservation works included rescue excavation, feasibility
studies, technical studies of restoration, and land-use
planning. Rescue excavation was carried out for safely
collecting archaeology data at the time of the discovery of
the structure. The focus of the rescue excavation was tosearch whole structures horizontally: the main building,the ancillary building and the main yard.
Implementation of a rescue excavation method was
conducted by using a system box of 2 x 2 m with spit
excavation technique. In order to obtain the maximum
accuracy, the interval depth of excavation was set every
20 cm. Rescue excavation activities have resulted in

Figure 1. Location of Kimpulan Temple between Borobudur temple,
Prambanan Temple and Yogyakarta City

Indonesia

Preservation of Kimpulan Temple

findings of two buildings, namely the main temple with asize of 6 x 6 m and the ancillary temple with the size of 4x 6 m (figure 4, 5 & 6). Both temple buildings was open
without a booth nor a roof, with a height of 213 cm fromthe wall structure of the ground level. In the main temple,
there were a Ganesha statue overlooking the west, thephallus, the yoni, and 12 units of rocks protruding above
the floor (figure 4). In the temple there were ancillary
Nandi statue pedestal flanked by two pieces yoni phallus(north) and the stone box (south). Inside the temple
floor surface, 8 extolled ancillary base was also found,so it was concluded that the temple building Kimpulan
possibily had wooden poles and the roof of organic
materials. Activities of rescue excavations was conductedfrom 19 December 2009 to 30 January 2010 in threestages.
The next step was to conduct a study of restoration
feasibility. The purpose of this study was to determine thefeasibility of Kimpulan temple: is it worth to be restored
or not? Based on the results of the feasibility study, data
showed that the authenticity of the temple was guranteedwith mostly the original materials. So, this temple wasworth to be restored.
According to the procedure of restoration of cultural
heritage, restoration works began with technical studies.
Technical studies of restoration was undertaken to identify
the damage, to determine the conservation plan, andland-use planning. At this stage of work, archaeologicalexcavations was also carried out to identify objects and toobserve damage of the temple structure (figure 6,7 & 8).
Restoration Works
The restoration works of Kimpulan Temple was madefor physical protection, by improving the structure of
the main temple, ancillary temple, fence and land-use.
Based on the results of technical studies restoration, there
were several data obtained: sunked floors and fallen of

Figure 2. Condition of Kimpulan temple

14

Indonesia

The focus of the repair method was directed to repairing
the damaged part of the temple building, fence repair,and conservation materials. While land settlement,
directed to refund the original maiveld on main yard andthe land adjacent to the outer walls of new buildings, aswell as rain water channel settings.
The stages of restoration of Kimpulan Temple include:
1. Preparation
	Preparatory work was made for the preparation offacilities and infrastructure supporting the restorationwork.
2. Coding	Coding or signing on stones before dismantling thestone floor was done by marking dismantled stones
by certain codes on all four sides of the stone on
the upper surface with white paint. The aim of thisprocess is to ease the reinstallment of the stones to its
original position (figure 9).
3. Dismantling	Dismantling was carried out on the floor of the main
temple and ancillary temples that have been coded.
The dismantling of the stone floor was made forresearch of materials under the floor (archaeologicalexcavations), strengthening the structure of thecarrying capacity of the soil under the floor, andinstallation of plumbing. The dismantled stones werearranged regularly in the workshop’s yard.
4. Archaeological Excavations
	Archaeological excavation was carried out on the
ground under the floor of the building and outside
the building. It was conducted within the building
to determine the soil structure and soil bearing
capacity and to search for other important materials.
Archaeological excavation at the main temple wasconducted to a depth of 100 m, and managed to finda peripih box1 made of white stones, shards of gold,iron, plates and bowls of bronze. In the excavationon the ancillary temples they discovered fragmentsof iron in the form of a spatula, and a peripih box ofandesite. In the excavation on the yard between themain temple and the ancillary temples, four fragmentsof pottery and bronze were unearthed. Excavationon the main yard was made to show the original soil.

Figure 3. Rescue excavation

15

This activity was carried out in January 2011 after the
eruption of Mount Merapi. A display of the soil layers
in the eastern ancillary temples was made to provide
geologic information of Kimpulan Temple (figure 11& 12).

building component parts of the northwest corner of thetemple due to exposure to heavy equipment at work
digging the foundation.

5. Conservation
	Conservation treatment was done on the stones
temple and unearthed objects. Microorganisms(lichen) on the stone were cleaned for preservationand objects were also cleaned and conserved in thelaboratory (figure 10).
6. Reassembling	The stone floor of the temple was placed according
to its original layout. Reassembling of the stones
is done after the archaeological excavation, soil
research, assembly of water lines, and strengthening
the structure of the soil under the floor. The damaged
or lost stones were replaced with new stones with thesame quality as the original.
7. Final Completion	Final completion was made by sculpting andalignment of the new stones that were installed.
8. Land-use planning	Kimpulan Temple located within the construction siteof library building, Islamic University of Indonesia, so
the new land-use was planned based on the redesignof library building and landscapes.
Closing
The preservation work of Kimpulan Temple throughseveral phases was provided in a standard operational
procedure of preservation of cultural heritage. The
preservation of Kimpulan Temple developed highpublic appreciation on cultural heritage. Changes in thethe original plan of library building to adjust with thecondition of the old temple showed true wisdom ofknowledge. The complete restoration of the temple andthe constuction of library building will be inaugurated at
the end of this year.
Reference Photos : Archaeological Office of Yogyakarta
1Peripih box is a stone or ceramic container that is placed in the bottom wells
or Hindu Buddhist temple. These containers can be either a box or vessel, in
which objects are stored in the form of offering gemstones, precious metals,
ash, mirrors, inscriptions, or seeds intended for the worship of certain gods. The
number of holes in peripih is generally odd.

Figure 4. The Main Temple

Figure 5. The Ancillary Temple

Indonesia

Figure 6. Condition of Ganesha statue on the main temple

Figure 7. Measurement and drawing for technical study

Figure 8. Sondir test

Figure 9. Coding on stones before dismantling

Figure 10. Cleaning of the temple wall

Figure 11. Excavation of yard after eruption of Mount Merapi

Figure 12. Some of the findings under floor of the main temple

Figure 13. The Kimpulan temple after restoration, in front of the newbuilding (library)16

Malaysia
Malaysia

Restoration of Building Façade at the Sultan Abdul Samad Building,
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
A Ghafar Bin Ahmad, Deputy Commissioner of Heritage
Department of National Heritage, Ministry of Information, Communications and Culture

17

Introduction
Located between the Dataran Merdeka (Independence
Square) and the Gombak-Klang River in the heart ofKuala Lumpur, the Sultan Abdul Samad Building has
been one of the most beautiful heritage landmarks ofthe city, attracting local and foreign tourists. Due to its
immense architectural, historical and cultural significance,
the building was listed as one of the National Heritage
in 2007 under the National Heritage Act 2005. In August
2009, the Federal Government had allocated an amountof RM2.37 million (USD 764,516) through the Departmentof National Heritage for the restoration of building façade
at the Sultan Abdul Samad Building. The works included
salt desalination, treatment of rising damp, repair andreplacement of old bricks, re-plastering and repainting ofplastered building elements. The restoration works werecarried out through the Design and Build procurement
method over a period of eight months from the 17th ofAugust 2009 until the 16th of April 2010.

of 152,000 Straits Dollars, the building was named after
Sultan Abdul Samad (1804-1898), the reigning Sultan of
Selangor at the time of its construction. The foundationstone was laid by Sir Charles Mitchell, the Governorof Straits Settlements on the 6th of October 1894. The
building was once used for several government offices
including the Secretariat offices of Selangor, the Selangor
State Government Treasury, the Accountant-General’s
Office, the Marriage Registry; and the Federal and High
Courts. The building had been the focal point of many
historical events of the country including the declarationof the independence of Malaysia which took place infront of the building (Independence Square) on the 31stof August, 1957 where the Union Jack flag was lowered
and replaced with the national flag of Malaysia. The
building has since undergone several restoration works
including its interior to meet modern office requirements.
Today, the building is used to house the Ministry ofInformation, Communication and Culture, Malaysia.

Historical Background
The Sultan Abdul Samad Building was designed by a
British architect, Arthur Charles Alfred Norman (18581944). However, it is likely that there were others
including Charles Edwin Spooner (1853-1909) as the StateEngineer and Director of the Public Works Department;
and those who worked under Norman such as Regent
Alfred John Bidwell (1869-1918) and Arthur Benison
Hubback (1871-1948) who had contributed their designideas, suggestions and even carried out the detaildrawings of the building. Built in 1894-1897 at the cost

Architectural SignificanceThe Sultan Abdul Samad Building portrays the Moghul
architectural style constructed entirely of exposed red
clay bricks (pressed bricks) pointed with grey lime;
and white plaster lined arches. This two-level building
occupies a ground area of 4,208.5 square metres (45,300
square feet) with an F-shaped floor plan. The building
has a front façade stretching 137.2 metres (450 feet) along
Jalan Raja with different forms of arches (key hole, ogee,
pointed and horseshoe), an imposing central porch; andthree copper domes topped with a copper chhatri. The

Upon completion in 1897, the Sultan Abdul Samad
Building has a front façade stretching 137.2 metres(450 feet) along Jalan Raja, making it the largest
building of its day.

The building front façade with its immense 41.2
metre (135 feet) clock tower, central porch, threecopper domes topped with a copper chhatris; anddifferent forms of arches (key hole, ogee, pointed
and horseshoe).

Located in front of the Dataran Merdeka(Independence Square, left), the Sultan Abdul
Samad Building has been one of the mostbeautiful heritage landmarks of Kuala Lumpur,
attracting local and foreign tourists.

Porous brick on the brickworks

Surface damage on the brickworks

Salt contamination (primary efflorescence) on the
brickworks

Restoration of Building Façade
Before restoration works began, a dilapidation survey was
conducted to identify the building defects, mainly on thebuilding façade (exterior walls and columns). Among thebuilding defects found at the building façade were salt
contamination, rising damp, stained walls and columns,
harmful growth; and also broken and porous bricks andmortar joints. The restoration works concentrated mainly
on walls, columns, arches, windows, cornices, parapets
and balustrades. The restoration works were divided into
three main stages as follows:i. Stage 1: Salt Desalination and Chemical Injection of
Damp-proof Course
Salt contamination and rising damp were two common
defects found at the building façade. Both defects areclosely related. Salt contamination is due to various
reasons including the seepage of ground water derivingfrom the nearby Gombak-Klang River, constant traffic
pollution mainly along Jalan Raja, unsuitable chemicals
used for cleaning works in the building; and fireworks'
carbon dioxide emissions from special celebrations
held around the building. Various types of soluble salts
are known to cause damages to the brickworks mainlyon the walls and columns including sodium chloride,
carbonates, nitrates and sulphates of calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium sulphate and magnesium chloride. The
salts, in the form of white powder (efflorescence) andcrystallisation (sub-florescence), had caused the bricks,
mortar joints and lime plaster to crumble, resulting in aserious damage to the building. The restoration works
involved a salt desalination process through the poultice
technique called Cocoon; and the chemical injection of
damp-proof course (DPC). The Cocoon method, a mixtureof pharmaceutical grade cellulose fibers and distilledwater, was applied on affected exposed brickworks.
After two weeks of the Cocoon application, the dried-out
damp-absorbent material was removed whilst drawing
away the salts from the walls and columns. The process
was repeated twice to reduce the salt concentration to an
acceptable level. The DPC was applied before the second
treatment of Cocoon to create a moisture-barrier at thebase of walls and columns.

Malaysia

5.48 metres (18 feet) high porch in the centre of thefront façade is massive with its Gothic arches and thickcolumns. Besides the central porch, the most imposing
feature of the building is its immense clock tower, risingfrom the centre of the building to a height of 41.2 metres(135 feet) above the ground. This central clock tower isflanked by two circular towers, having stairways leading
to the first floor. All towers have onion-shaped domes
with copper coverings. Upon completion in 1897, thebuilding had used a total of 4 million bricks, 2,500 barrelsof cement, 18,000 pikuls of lime, 4,000 cubic yards ofsand, 5,000 pounds of copper, 50 tons of steel and ironand 30,000 cubic feet of timber, making it the largest
building of its day.

ii. Stage 2: Treatment of Old Bricks
A thorough inspection of the old bricks mainly on walls
and columns was conducted by the building contractor
prior to the restoration works in order to determine thequantity of bricks that needed to be repaired or replaced.
From the inspection, a large number of the old bricks
suffered from either porosity or surface damage. The oldbricks that were found to be porous had to be replacedwith new bricks of the same dimensions, characteristics
and strength. These porous bricks were carefully
removed using rubber hammer; whilst the broken bricks
were treated by patching them up with a mixture ofbrick dust and fine sand. Since there was no new brickavailable in the market that matched the old bricks, thebuilding contractor had to outsource the new bricks froma traditional brick kiln in Ekor Kuching, Padang Serai,
Kedah, a state of northern Malaysia. The new bricks
were traditionally produced under firing temperaturesof not more than 1000 Celsius. The mineral content
of the raw materials (soil), firing temperature and theatmosphere in the kiln had produced the fired colour of
new clay bricks that matched the old bricks. Hence, thenew bricks blended harmoniously with the existing old
bricks. All electrical wirings, power cables, light bulbs,
blocked letterings and signages that were previously
fixed onto the wall surfaces were carefully removed.
Safety nettings were also fixed onto the scaffoldings
to provide protection from falling debris. Any harmful
growth, dirt and stains on the brick surfaces and arches
were removed and cleaned using controlled water jet andsoft brush. The restoration works were carried out in five

The sequence of brick replacement on the wall18

Malaysia

different zones due to the wide span of the building andthe repetitious method of façade treatment.
iii. Stage 3: Re-plastering and Painting of Building Elements
All plastered building elements including arches,
cornices, pilasters, columns, balustrades and parapets
were inspected and documented before restoration
works were carried out. Any cracked or broken elements
were carefully repaired and re-plastered using a mixtureof lime, sand and pozzolanic additives. The building
elements were then painted with a water-based paint thatmatched the existing colour of the building which is lightcream.
Laboratory Tests
Apart from the detailed recording and documenting of
the conditions of the building before, during and after
restoration; three laboratory tests were carried out on
selected building materials. The reason was mainly toidentify the level of salt content, the component elementsof building materials; and the compressive strength of the
new wall plaster. For example, salt samples were takenfrom various affected areas, before and after the Cocoon
application for the ion chromatography tests to determine
the ion compositions by specifying the percentages ofsoluble salts in the samples. Several samples from theexisting plaster were also taken for the X-ray fluorescence(XRF) analyses to determine the component elements andproportion. Whilst, testing of the compressive strengthof the new plaster was carried out at the site using theSchmidt hammer rebound test.
Conclusion
Restoration of building façade at the Sultan Abdul
Samad Building in the capital city of Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia has posed a great challenge to building

professionals involved in the project including thebuilding contractor, conservator, architect and quantity
surveyor. Understanding the nature of building defects
and applying the appropriate treatment of building
restoration require in-depth knowledge and experience inbuilding conservation. One of the challenges faced in thisrestoration work was to outsource new bricks to replace
the old bricks in the building since there was limited
quantity of traditionally produced bricks available in themarket. Brick replacement was carried out accordingly
to avoid any further damage to the brickworks. Overall,
adopting a clear framework of building conservation has
been effective in ensuring all works were carried out
satisfactorily. Despite all these challenges, the project wasconsidered successful in maintaining the building façades
to its original form, design as well as material. The
Department of National Heritage had played a major rolein giving advice and guidance to the building contractor
and consultants throughout the project duration.
References

A Ghafar Ahmad, “Chronological Biography of Arthur Charles Alfred
Norman”, Journal of Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiati
c Society, Vol. LXX Part 1, June 1997.
Dickie, M., "Bangunan Sultan Abdul Samad, Jalan Raja", Majalah Akitek,
March and April 1986.
Gullick, J.M., "The Bangunan Sultan Abdul Samad", Journal of Malaysian
Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. LXV, Part 1, June 1992.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan_Abdul_Samad_Building, assessed on 11thof July 2011.
http://www.malaysian-explorer.com/sultanAbdulSamadBuilding.html,
assessed on 11th of July 2011.

Close-up view of the newly fixed bricks on the wall Salt desalination through the application of Cocoon(reddish in colour)
methodDuring the façade treatment,
safety nettings were fixed on
the scaffoldings to provide
protection from falling debris.

19

The front façade of the building before restoration

Chemical injection of damp-proof course

The new look of the building front façade after restoration.
All electrical wirings, power cables, light bulbs, blocked
letterings and signages on the building façades were
carefully removed.

NepalNepal

Thunderbolt Damaged the Pratappur Temple in Swayambhu
Suresh Suras Shrestha, Archaeological Officer
Department of Archaeology, Ministry of Federal Affairs, Constituent Assembly, Parliamentary Affairs and Culture
Historical Background
Monument of Nepal is synthesized significantly in the
Kathmandu Valley-Kathmandu, Patan, and Bhaktapur;
which represents an epitome of harmony in urban design,
typical architecture and refined culture. The history of thevalley began with the accounts preserved in a numberof chronicles, which mention Gopalas and Mahishapalas
had ruled the valley as far as in 7th century BC. Later on
the Lichchhavi, Malla, Rana and Shah period extended
the typical cultural significance relating to the monumentsthat made them a living cultural heritage these days
continuously. However, Lichchhavi period (4th–8th
century AD) is known as "Classical Era" and "Golden
Age" and Later Malla period (14th–17th century AD) is
known as the "Golden Age" for Nepalese architecture andworkmanship of bronze, wood and stone in Kathmandu
valley. Many of the monuments were constructed in
Kathmandu valley during these periods. Pratappur was
also constructed in Malla period by very popular kingPratap Malla during his reign (1641-1674 AD). The
temple was constructed in Shikhara style architecture.
Especially the multi-roofed, the dome and the Shikhara(mountain/hill or peak) style were popular architecture
to build temples in Nepal at that time. Shikhar style wasalso known as Nagara and Gabdhakuta style as well.
However, there is lack of evidence on the history of
Shikhara style temples construction in Nepal, but it was
already developed in northern India around 6th century
AD. There are numerous examples of this style during
16th and 17th century AD in Nepal. Acknowledging allthese significant universal cultural values, UNESCO listed
the valley on the list of World Heritage in 1979, which
consists three Malla Durbar Squares (Hanumadhoka,
Patan and Bhaktapur Durbar Square), Swayambhu,
Bouddha, Pashupatinath and Changunarayan.
Physical Structure of Pratappur Temple
The temple itself is built in Shikhara style and its heightis 60 feet, which is located in the east of Swayambhu

Recently cordoned temple area

View after the accident

Mahachaita (the great Swayambhu Stupa), just on theright side of Vajra after the eastern steep sloppy stairs
on the hill top and Anantapura is on the left. Length of
the temple is 19.9 feet and width is 17 feet as well. The
temple is made up of brick wall with lime surkhi mortar
and lime sukhi plaster that is built with the wooden
skeleton inside it for the better protection during theearthquake. Some stone pillars, stones paving andwooden doors, windows and some other parts werealso used in the temple. Actually the bricks for wall,
wood for doors and windows, internal skeleton of thetemple, pillars, stones for pillars, paving and lime surkhi
for mortar and plaster were used in the temple. These
are the traditional construction materials in and around
Kathmandu valley and Nepal as well especially in the
medieval period and later. The temple is physically very
beautiful in Shikhara style having a projection above themain gate with beautifully carving in the window whichis constructed on the stone pillars and those pillars are
fixed on the stone of steps, which followed towards the
sanctum of the temple. The temple is dedicated to theTantrism in Buddhism that no one is allowed to enter
inside except the priests.
Damaging of the temple
The temple was once collapsed in 2003 when it wascaught by fire. It was reconstructed completely according
to the traditional methods and norms of archaeologicalconservation at that time. Reconstruction of the temple
took a year for its completion in 2003. After about sevenyears of its reconstruction, on 15th February 2011 around4:45-5:00 in the morning (according to the local people)
there was a very big sound striking with thunderbolt andthe most of the local residents felt like an earthquake.
Most of the residents of Kathmandu valley thought that
there was a big thunderbolt somewhere within the core
and/or around its adjacent area. Unfortunately it wasin the core area of Swayambhu Protected Monument
Zone, a component of Kathmandu Valley World Heritage

The southern upper part damaged by thunderbolt

20

NepalProperty and it damaged the significant temple in thearea. When Department of Archaeology (DoA) got
information about it, the morning inspection was madeby officials including Director General of Department ofArchaeology and immediately the area was cordoned forthe security of the visitors because the bricks bats werestill falling down from the temple. Significant numbers of
pigeons were died due to this disaster around the temple
area.
Especially the upper part just below the pinnacle in
the northern, western and southern side were badly
damaged, cracks were there in almost all of the sides
and the foundation close to the main entrance oftemple in the southern part was also badly damaged.
Everything was documented by the officials (from
DoA) for rescue of the temple immediately. With thecoordination of Federation Swayambhu Management
and Conservation (FSMC), the community based nongovernmental organization (looking for the conservationand management of Swayambhu area and it is registeredin the government according to the NGO Registration Act
of Nepal), DoA has started the preliminary rescue work tostop further damaging of the temple and begun to study
for further actions. Now, DoA and the FSMC is preparing
for the further renovation work of the temple according
to the recommendation of the study which is going on
and after the completion of preliminary work. To open
the temple to the study for further renovation, traditionalreligious puja was held for three days.
Conclusion
However, the natural disaster never comes with the preinformation, but harms very badly to the human beingsand its environment as well. So, we should be prepared

The western upper damaged part

Damaged-above the main entrance gate of the temple

21

for every possible natural calamities or disaster (during
and post disaster) and preparedness should be readyregarding such a disaster. The human beings was not
physically harmed by this calamity in Swayambhu, but
it was possible after the accident, if the area was notcordoned and not controlled by the authorities. The
authorities must consider seriously on such a natural
disaster which damaged our valuable cultural heritageby giving priority to immediate renovation. There is
no doubt that those cultural heritages are not only
the property of the entire community or area, but theproperty of all human beings and its communities in
the world and those are gifted to this generation by ourancestors. In this context we hope, the Pratappur Temple
will be renovated very soon coordinating to all of the
stakeholders by the government. In the meantime, thepreliminary conservation work has been just completed
and reported that the temple should be dismantled andrenovated as a reconstruction in the same design/style.
So, now Department of Archaeology is going to renovate
the temple as per the recommendation of the preliminaryconservation and study report.

The foundation close to main entrance in southern part

Damaged in the northern lower part of the temple

Effect to the pigeonsNorthern damaged part of thetemplePratappur - during thepreliminary conservation

New Zealand
Matthew Schmidt, Regional Archaeologist, Otago/Southland
The New Zealand Historic Places Trust
Introduction
New Zealand’s geographical isolation produced a floral
and faunal environment unique in the world. Terrestrial
fauna was dominated by birds, lizards and insects withno land mammals present, the only native mammals
being bats. The fresh water rivers, streams and lakes
were also devoid of any large ‘sport’ fish such as trout,salmon, perch or carp. Although there are ca. 35 speciesof native or indigenous freshwater fish species, they aresmall in comparison to the traditional European andAmerican ‘sport’ fish and many are only active at night(source: NIWA Atlas of NZ Freshwater Fishes 2010).
Therefore, both Maori, who first settled New Zealand in
ca. 1300 AD, and the later Europeans/Pakeha colonisers,
who made first contact with Maori in 1769, depended onfish from the sea. The only fresh water species predated
extensively by Maori were tuna/eel (Anguilla australis,
Anguilla dieffenbachii), kanakana/lamprey (Geotria
australis), inanga/whitebait (Galaxias maculatus) andupokororo/grayling (Prototroctes oxyrhynchus)
In the late 1860s, various Acclimatisation Societies around
New Zealand began to experiment with the introductionof various European and American faunal species so as toprovide terrestrial food resources for the growing colonial
population. The introduction of fresh water sport fish was
one of the key aims of these societies so as European/
Pakeha inland populations had a reliable source of fresh
fish. Hence in 1867, the Government introduced the Troutand Salmon Protection Act 1867 which made provision
for "the preservation and propagation of Salmon andTrout in this Colony".
The Otago Acclimatisation Society Fish Ponds at Opoho
Creek, Dunedin were therefore built as a result of theColonial Government’s aim of populating the fresh water
environments of the Otago region with sport fish. These
ponds, built in 1868, are believed to be the origin of thefirst successful release of Brown Trout (Salmo fario) in
New Zealand. This event, alongside the later successful
release of other sports fish, has resulted in trout fishing in
New Zealand becoming a major contributor to the tourism
industry today, with the Mataura River in Southland being
considered the best river in the world for brown trout
fishing.
This first report on the Otago Acclimatisation Society
Opoho Fish Ponds Preservation Project describes how
the ponds were re-discovered, the initial investigations
to determine how they were built and how the site is
proposed to be preserved and managed as part of arecreational/historic experience.
Re-discovery of the Opoho Fish Ponds
The Fish Ponds were brought to the attention of the New
Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) in January 2011
by Mountain Bike Otago track builders working on acommunity recreation bike track located in native bushnext to Opoho Creek in Dunedin (Figures 1 & 2). The

New Zealand

The Origins of Brown Trout (Salmo fario) in New Zealand:
the Otago Acclimatisation Society Opoho Fish Ponds 1868-1885

track builders noticed stonework while clearing a pathfor their track and so ceased their work and contacted
the NZHPT. A local resident believed the stonework andassociated depressions in the bush were possibly theoriginal 19th century Otago Acclimatisation Society Fish
Ponds. A site visit by myself with historic records about
the ponds, including a map of the ponds drawn in 1880
(Figure 3), appeared to confirm that the features were theoriginal ponds and that the track had been built between
the upper and lower ponds, avoiding the main heritage
features. This fortuitous re-discovery meant that thissignificant heritage site for the history of the introductionof fresh water game fish in New Zealand could be
examined and investigated and decisions made on its
preservation and future management. The site now has
a New Zealand Archaeological Association Site Record
Number I44/490.
Brief History of the Fish Ponds
The Fish Ponds at Opoho were built in 1868 for the
purpose of establishing a viable fresh water sport fisheryin Otago. From these ponds brown trout (Salmo fario)
and other species of foreign fresh water fish were hatchedand grown for release not only in Otago, but in otherlocations around the South Island. As noted above, it wasalso from these ponds that the first successful hatching ofbrown trout in Otago occurred in October 1868, with thefirst successful release of brown trout into a New Zealandwaterway occurring in the same year (Figure 4).
The ponds were so successful that between 1868 and
1885, local newspapers the Otago Daily Times and Otago
Witness followed the development and successes of thehatching process and fish rearing at the ponds throughpublication of the Otago Acclimatisation Society articles
and meeting minutes.
In 1881, fish scientist W.C Arthur provided a detailed
description in the Transactions and Proceedings of theRoyal Society of New Zealand (Volume 14:196-201) of the
Otago Acclimatisation Society’s efforts to hatch brown
trout (Salmo fario) at the ponds. Arthur noted that thehatchery’s manager, Mr Clifford, was sent to Tasmania in
1868 to the Salmon Commissioners to obtain 800 brown
trout ova with a further 1000 ova sourced in 1869 and720 ova in 1870. These ova were almost all successfully
hatched and “These young trout formed the original stock,from which most of the streams in Otago may now be said
to be stocked in measure.” (pg 196).
Arthur (1881) provided a detailed map of the fish ponds
and hatchery house showing how the ponds wereconstructed (Figure 3). Of crucial importance to theponds was the fresh water system which not only had toprovide water free of human and animal contaminants,
but also water with a temperature that was ideal for thehatching of the ovum and the rearing of the resulting
fry. Arthur’s (1881) article on the success of the hatcheryand ponds provides a fascinating insight into how crucial

22

New Zealandthis small hatchery was for establishing fresh water fish
species as a food source for New Zealand. He notes that
other fish species hatched at Opoho included Salmo
umbla (the charr), the English salmon (Salmo salar), Sea
trout (S. trutta), Californian salmon (Salmo quinnat, orOncorhynchus quinnat) & whitefish (Coregonus albus)
and in Figure 5 can be seen an illustration by Arthur ofthe developmental stages of Trout bred at the hatcheries.
In 1885, the hatchery was deemed too small and a new
hatchery was built further up the Opoho Creek gully.
This larger hatchery continued the success of the first
hatchery and was a noted tourist destination for visitors
to Dunedin in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Archaeological Assessment
The initial site visit in January 2011 identified the twohatchery ponds as ‘pits’ in the bush covered by extensive
leaf litter (Figures 6 to 15). The lower pond was built
into the base of a cutting made into a natural slope andmeasured ca. 4m x 6m. The upper pond was dug intoa flat area above the cut slope face and measured ca.
3m x 5m (Figures 6 & 10). These measurements were
only approximations due to obscuring bush, but theponds were quite distinctive features in the bush andmatched those depicted in the 1880 map. How they
were constructed could not be ascertained, though some
exposed stonework suggested the lower pond was stone
lined.
Stonework above the northern edge of the lower pond
(Figures 11 & 12) was in the location of a small structure,possibly a hut, on the 1880 map. This structure was inline with the water supply coming from the upper pond
and so may have been related to controlling the waterflow into the lower pond. The small race that connected
the lower and upper pond was damaged by the recently
built mountain bike track but the stonework for theoverflow from the upper pond to the lower appeared
intact (Figure 10). Pieces of roofing slate were foundin the leaf litter around the lower pond which implieda roofed structure had been present somewhere at thislocation (Figure 13). Trees, saplings and ferns were noted
as damaging the site by growing out of the original pond
walls and any exposed stonework.
Further up the gully, two iron riveted boxes wereidentified roughly in the position on the 1880 map (Figures
14 & 15). These boxes were possibly part of the filter
system noted on Arthur’s map of the site and describedby him (1881:206) as being located on the outside of the‘Hatching House’. The boxes were in good condition andmay confirm the location of the original hatchery house.
However, Opoho Creek has been diverted at this locationand so it is possible that any remains of the housestructure may have been destroyed by this diversion.
Overall, the initial archaeological assessment indicated that
the Otago Acclimatisation Society Fish Ponds were in a
relatively intact state considering their age and location
in a forest environment. How they were built, however,needed to be confirmed as did how much impact 126
years of vegetation growth had had on the ponds since
their abandonment. The location of the ponds next to acommunity mountain bike track also meant that there wasan opportunity to present the ponds as a recreational/historicexperience as part of the mountain bike track design.

23

The following recommendations were therefore proposedto the NZHPT and Mountain Bike Otago for the
management of the ponds:•

An Archaeological Authority from the NZHPT isapplied for under Section 11 of the Historic Places
Act (1993) for any further track works undertaken
around the ponds and for any archaeological work
carried out on the ponds.

•T he ponds must be fenced in a manner that ensures
no mountain bikers can bike through the ponds,
over known stonework or lean on the surviving
stone structure (possibly a hut) above the lower
pond.

•

The surface of the bike track must be designed
to ensure that the track fill does not slip or creep
down onto any surviving stonework or into theponds.

•

Water run-off from the track must be controlled todivert water from running down into the ponds oronto any stonework.

•T he ponds should be archaeologically investigatedto determine how the ponds were constructed,
clarify whether the ponds were stone faced orwere simply dug into the natural earth, andadvice on what further archaeological work andmanagement of the ponds is required to ensure
their preservation.

•

Vegetation should be removed from the around thesite and the known stonework as soon as possible
under direction of an archaeologist. This will
provide further information on the site and remove
the immediate risks to the stonework.

Archaeological Investigation and Project Support
The NZHPT granted an Archaeological Authority (No.
2011/363) in April 2011 for the mountain bike track
construction and for the archaeological investigation andthe preservation and management of the fish ponds.
The ponds were archaeologically investigated in May
and June 2011. The first investigation in May sought toverify how the ponds were constructed. By test pitting
and selectively excavating by trowel around the top
edges of the lower pond, it was confirmed that thispond was stone lined, at least in part, with its walls
constructed using cobbles from the Opoho Creek (Figures
16 and 17). The stonework for the pond was also more
extensive than implied by the shape seen underneaththe vegetation cover during the initial Archaeological
Assessment (Figures 18). The terrace around the top of
the lower pond was test pitted and appeared to indicatethat the access around the pond may have been coveredby pebbles from the creek so as to provide a dry walking
surface (Figure 19).
The second investigation in June involved extensive
vegetation clearance by hand around the lower pond
to further confirm its layout as shown in Arthur’s 1880
map, examine the impact of vegetation on the site(particularly any stonework) and remove vegetation
which was clearly damaging site features. It could beThe two investigations therefore confirmed that the site
was in good condition but required direct management
to ensure its long term survival. The investigations also
showed that the ponds could be presented as a heritagesite integrated into the mountain bike track which would
help in promoting not only the track but the site as aheritage asset for the community.

New Zealandseen after this clearance that Arthur’s 1880 map was very
accurate in depicting the layout of the surviving ponds.
The vegetation clearance also showed that the walls of
the lower pond were all stone faced and were being
directly affected by plants growing out of the sloping
interior faces of the pond forcing out the cobbling on thewalls (Figure 20). Two large trees were also destroying
the small stone hut(?) located at the top of the pond (seeFigures 3 & 21). Without further vegetation clearance
and management, the surviving stonework of the lower
pond and small hut(?) would eventually collapse. Also
found during the vegetation clearance were more broken
roofing slates. Their presence indicates that one of thestructures, either the small structure/hut(?) at the top of
the lower pond or the large pond itself, was roofed.
Figure 1. Location of the Otago Acclimatisation Society 1868 - 1885
Opoho Fish Ponds in Dunedin.

Key to any successful heritage preservation andmanagement project is support by way of funding, labour
and time. Mountain Bike Otago has been proactive indonating labour, materials and equipment for the Opoho
Fish Ponds Preservation Project, and will be contributing
funds for an Interpretation Panel to be installed at thesite. In addition, Fish & Game New Zealand, which
represents “the interests of anglers and hunters, andprovides co-ordination of the management, enhancement,
and maintenance of sports fish and game (Section 26B of
the Conservation Act 1987)” for New Zealand, will also
be contributing funds to the Interpretation Panel throughits Otago Region office.
In a later ACCU Nara International Correspondent
report, I will present the results of further archaeologicalinvestigations of the ponds and the outcomes of thepreservation and management of the site as part of arecreation/historic track.
References
Arthur, W. 1881. History of Fish Culture in New Zealand.
Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of
New Zealand Volume 14, Pages 196 to 201.
Arthur, W. 1878. On the Brown Trout introduced into
Otago. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Societyof New Zealand, Volume 11, Pages 271 – 290.

Figure 2. Location of the Otago Acclimatisation Society 1868 - 1885
Opoho Fish Ponds in native bush, next to Opoho Creek, Dunedin.
Also shown is the location of the possible remains of the original filter
tanks (see Figure 3).

NIWA Atlas of NZ Freshwater Fishes 2010. http://www.
niwa.co.nz/our-science/freshwater/tools/fishatlas
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Hamish Seaton of Mountain Bike
Otago for his support in preserving and managing the
Opoho Fish Ponds site, Niall Watson from Fish & Game
Otago for the contribution of funds for an Interpretation
Panel and Jonathan Howard (Built Heritage Advisor,
NZHPT) for his research on the stone walling of thelower pond.
Figure 3. Arthur's 1880 sketch map of the ponds (Arthur 1881:208209).

24

New ZealandFigure 7. Stonework on the south side of the lower pond viewed frominside the pond. This possibly controlled the rate of flow of water outof the pond (see Figure 18) (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 4. Arthur's table of the ‘history' of fresh water sport fish being
released by various Acclimatisation Societies around New Zealand (Arthur
1881:208-209). Note the importance the Otago Acclimatisation Society
played in the release of brown trout (Salmo fario).

Figure 8. The upper pond obscured by vegetation. View west (photo:
Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 5. Arthur's 1880 sketch of the developmental stages of Trout
hatched at the Opoho Hatchery Ponds (Arthur 1881:208-209).
Figure 9. Start of small race leading out of the upper pond towards thelower pond. View South (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 6. Lower pond. View SE. The range pole sits in the bottom of the pond
and on the right of the photograph is the small terrace which runs around theoutside of the structure (see Figure 1) (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

25

Figure 10. Stonework on the outside south edge of the upper pondfrom where the race exited towards the lower pond. Photographtaken from the new track, view North. (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

New ZealandFigure 11. Stonework on the north side of the lower pondin the location of the small structure, possibly a hut,on Arthur's 1880 map. View SE. Function unknown atpresent but it is located where the water from the upper
pond flowed into the lower pond. The edge of the new
track can be seen in the foreground (photo: Matthew
Schmidt).

Figure 12. View across new track to thestonework on the upper north side of the lower
pond. The structure may be a small hut. View
SE. The range pole sits in the lower pond (photo:
Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 13. Pieces of roofing slate found in theleaf litter next to the lower pond. The slates
may have originated from a roof which was built
over the small hut(?) structure noted on Arthur's
1880 map at the top of the lower pond (photo:
Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 14. The two iron water stores in thebush in the approximate location noted in
Arthur's 1880 map of the hatchery. The stores/
boxes may have been the‘filter' used to further
clean the water for the hatching boxes (photo:
Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 15. Another view of the possible‘filter'
stores/boxes (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 16. Two views of the stone walling of the lower large
pond revealed during the first archaeological investigationin May 2011. Vegetation was cleared from around the pond
and secateurs used to cut vegetation growing out of thewalls. Note the pond was full of water during the site visit
so whether the whole pond was stone lined could not beestablished at that time (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 17. Another view of the stonework revealed in May 2011 showing the vegetation around theponds obscuring the structures (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 18. Stonework present at the outflow point of thelower large pond (see Arthur's 1880 map, Figure 3). The
scale sits on the location where the tailrace exits thepond taking water back to Opoho Creek (photo: Matthew
Schmidt).

Figure 19. A test pit on the terrace which runs
around the edge of the lower pond revealed
pebbles which may have been used to create adry walking surface (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 21. The stone structure which may havebeen a roofed hut, at the top of the lower pond.
A large tree is growing out of the stonework (leftin photograph) with saplings and ferns growing
out of other areas (see also Figures 11 and 12)(photo: Matthew Schmidt).

Figure 20. The lower large pond after clearingof the vegetation. Compare with Figure 16.
Hamish Seaton, President of Mountain Bike
Otago, is clearing dirt from the pond walls after
cutting out vegetation using secateurs andloppers (photo: Matthew Schmidt).

26

Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea

Historical Development of Lapita in Papua New Guinea
Naomi Faik Simet, Dance Researcher
Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies
The following report was taken from Sinclaire Solomon’s
article which was published in the local newspaper – The
National’s Weekender on Friday, July 15, 2011: p 2.
Papua New Guinea is known for its Lapita history whichaccording to an article by Sinclair Solomon which was
published in the National’s Weekender, “Archaeologists
digging at an ancient settlement site near Port Moresby
have made a monumental discovery that will mostcertainly rewrite the history of the Lapita people of
the Bismark Archipelago who colonized much of thewestern Melanesian islands and western Polynesia morethan 3,000 years ago. They found Lapita pottery sherds,
indicating the first known presence of these island people
on mainland Papua New Guinea, thereby quashing thelong-held belief that these early settlers had bypassed themainland on their island hopping conquest”. Solomon
further reports that the “archaeologists are now hoping tofind further evidence that their newly-discovered migrants
had pushed further west along the south coast to theTorres Straits and mainland Australia”.
This discovery was further stated in the latest editionof the journal Australia Archaeology by Ian J. McNivenof the Monash University’s school of geography andenvironmental sciences and a team from Monash, theUniversity of Papua New Guinea, Queensland University,
James Cook University and CSIRO. Solomon describes
the location of the discovery as being “20 km northwestof Port Moresby, in Caution Bay, Central province
where archaeologists have found remains of an ancient
settlement dating back about 4,000 years and started
digging into the past in 2009-10, hitting paydirt at
between 155cm and 127cm into one of their five digs”.
In an email communicated to the National by Professor
Glenn Summerhayes of the University of Otago, New
Zealand, he confirms that “the research there is rewriting the archaeology textbooks of the western Pacific”.
Professor specializes on Lapita history and is credited withdiscovering many Lapita sites in the Bismark Archipelagofrom New Ireland to West New Britain. Although
not involved directly in the Caution Bay excavations,
Summerhayes states in his email that “Lapita was foundwest of Port Moresby – this is exciting stuff!”“Lapita is a story of how the first people arrived andsettled in the Pacific between 1200 BC and 1000 BC,
moving west from the Bismark Archipelago islands ofManus, New Ireland and New Britain to the Solomon
Islands, Vanuatu, New Caledonia, Fiji and Western
Polynesia including Tonga and Samoa. According
to Australian Archaeologists, McNiven and Co, “themigration of these Austronesian speakers represented
the last great chapter of human global colonization. The
earliest migrants also made a distinct type of pottery with27

finely-made dentate-stamped designs and known “Lapita”
which were found along their westward migratory route.
However, the Caution Bay discovery, according toarchaeologists suggests that somewhere along the line,
a migratory arm of the Lapita people moved westward
along the southern New Guinea coast towards Australia.
The archaeologists further added that “The new Lapita
sites date back from 2900 to 2500 cal BP and represent
a newly-discovered migratory arm of Lapita expansions
that moved westwards along the southern New Guinea
coast towards Australia. These marine specialists ate
shellfish, fish and marine turtles along the Papua New
Guinea mainland coast, reflecting subsistence continuities
with local pre-Lapita peoples dating back to 4200 cal
BP. Lapita artifacts include characteristic ceramics, shellarmbands, stone adzes and obsidian tools. Our Lapita
discoveries support hypotheses for the migration ofpottery – bearing Melanesian marine specialists into
Torres Strait of northeast Australia c.2500 cal BP…and
what is the earliest known evidence for human settlementof the south coast of New Guinea”.
“An interesting aspect of Caution Bay was that it was apreviously settled coastline before the arrival of the Lapita
colonizers unlike their Remote Oceania settlements (seemap). Their presence of more than 400 years raised thequestion of the western limit of these migrating peoples,
the archaeologists noted. Pottery dating back to c.2500
cal BP in Torres Strait located 500km west of Caution
Bay suggests influences from the Papua New Guinea
mainland and/or from long-distance seafaring ceramicists.
While recent DNA analyses found no recent Melanesian
intrusions into Aboriginal Australia, such conclusions
are premature given analytical exclusion of relevant
DNA samples from northeast Australia. The presenceof pottery-bearing Melanesian peoples on Australia’s
doorstep allows hypotheses for Melanesian cultural
influences down the Australian east coast over the past
3,000 years plausibly to include genetic transfers andeven migration”.

Papua New Guinea

Lapita pottery from the five sites at Caution Bay dating between 2900 and 2500 cal BP

Pre-Lapita burial dating to between 2900 and 4200 cal BP: Photograph by Ian J. McNiven

Study area (light gray shading indicates previously-known distribution of Lapita)

28

Philippines
Philippines

Transforming Perspectives: The Stone Ruins in Barangay Pinagbayanan,
San Juan, Batangas, Philippines
Mary Grace Lualhati Barretto-Tesoro, Associate Professor
University of the Philippines
We excavated the ruins of two stone houses or bahayna bato in the old capital of San Juan, Batangas from2009 to 2011 (Barretto-Tesoro et al. 2009, UP-ASP 2010,
UP-ASP forthcoming) (Figure 1). These stone houses
date to the late 1800s, based on the recovered artefacts,
which correspond to the establishment of San Juan as aseparate municipality. According to popular accounts, thecapital originally founded along Tayabas Bay in 1843 wasofficially transferred 7 kilometres inland in 1890 becauseof constant flooding (Pineda 1992). To date, these ruins
are the first stone houses systematically excavated in thePhilippines. This research project aims to 1. Identify andinterpret the earliest evidence for settlement in San Juan,and 2. Investigate the developmental history of San Juanfrom its pre-colonial past to the present.
In this short report, I will focus on one of the stone
houses labelled Structure B (Figure 2) and how the
excavation changed how the locals view the site.
We recovered over 4000 artefacts. Each artefact wasinventoried and assigned an accession code. Finds
include fragments of baldosa or floor tiles, tisa or roof tile
fragments which were used as aggregates to form mortar,earthenware pottery sherds, earthenware lid sherds, glass
shards, wine bottle shards, Chinese porcelain sherds,
European porcelain sherds, stoneware sherds, square
nails of various sizes, round nails, metal bolts, metalscrews, pieces of metal roof sheets, animal bones, metal
blade, beads, stone pestle, capiz shells, wooden and glass
buttons, bullet casings, metal utensils, and metal caps forbottles.
Based on the exposed stone features and artefacts
recovered, Structure B most probably functioned as adomestic unit. Its floor plan, architecture, and location
within the old town complex of San Juan suggest that
it was a bahay na bato (stone house). The house is ofrectangular shape orientated at an east-west direction.
It measures 9.35 m x 24.4 m. Its first floor area is 228.14
m2. It was made up of two floors, where the groundfloor was surrounded by stone walls made of adobe
and conglomerate blocks bound by lime mortar andcement. The upper storey was most probably made ofwood. We recorded postholes indicating that wooden
posts, probably molave (Vitex geniculate, Bl.) based oninterviews with locals, were incorporated in the walls.
Double walling system was utilised where two walls
were built side by side. The space between the walls
was filled with lime mortar and cement mixture. The
workers utilised adobe blocks and mortar for foundations(Figure 3). The foundations for the stone pedestals of
the wooden posts were thicker and deeper comparedto the adobe foundations of the walls. Four stone pillars
in the eastern section of Structure B were recorded.
These pillars were enclosed and bounded by the north,east, and south perimeter walls of the house. A possible

29

entrance was found in the northwest side of the houseindicated by conglomerate paver. On the opposite sideof the house, adobe paver was found on the northeast.
It appears that this entrance was closed off after sometime. The western section of the house was probably
constructed later based on the plaster on the sides of thestone pedestals. Disturbances in the form of pits cut eachother signifying several unsystematic excavations most
likely linked with treasure-hunting activities. These pits
are concentrated between the stone pillars. According
to accounts, the main cause of the house’s destruction
was the collection of stone blocks by the locals for theconstruction of fishponds and tungko. Tungko refers tostones used as stands in a hearth.
We commenced archaeological research in San Juan in
2008. Since the first excavation of Structure A, anotherstone house, in 2009 and the most recent excavationof Structure B in April-May 2011, the local residents are
more knowledgeable about their town’s history.
The people of Pinagbayanan have realised the potentialof the stone ruins as historical areas which can be
developed for tourism. At the culmination of the
excavation, an exhibit displaying preliminary finds andinterpretations communicate to the public the academic
and educational aspects of the excavation which locals,
initially, associated with treasure-hunting. We firmly
believed that promoting archaeology through souvenir
programmes, exhibits, hand-outs, public lectures convey
the cultural significance of Structure B alongside withother stone ruins in the town. Through these activities, we
encourage the locals to alter their perspective regardingstone ruins in their community from a source of stone
blocks for personal use to an archaeological heritage site.
It is by engaging the public and disseminating informationthat misconceptions are clarified and corrected (BarrettoTesoro 2010; Valientes 2009). Knowledge about thesite generated by academic rigour is appreciated by thecommunity. And it is this knowledge which compels
people to protect the site as they view the ruins aspart of their heritage. Although the stone ruins of
Pinagbayanan are not as ancient as other heritage sites their construction dates to the late 1800s – the young age
produces an intimate attachment to the ruins. Informants
remember how the ruins were part of their childhood
experiences which include playing within the premises ofStructure B, knowing people who actually resided there,
stories they heard from grandparents, and as participantsor spectators in its destruction. In the past, children
would run every time they the pass Structure B to avoid
the kapre, a mythical creature described as a giant
male smoking tobacco. The excavation added anotherdimension to Structure B, from an intact house to ruins toan archaeological site.

Philippines

We have learned that it is important to involve the publicin the protection of heritage sites and this should begin
with giving them access to the site and information. The
practice of archaeology should no longer be contained
within the classroom but must actively listen and interact
with the locals whose interests and views must be
considered. Locals then develop a sense of ownershipand stewardship towards the site.
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the Office of the Chancellorin collaboration with the Office of the Vice-Chancellor
for Research and Development, of the University of
the Philippines Diliman for funding support throughthe Outright Research Grant. Many thanks also to the
University of the Philippines-Archaeological Studies
Program 2011 Field School Excavation Team.
References
Barretto-Tesoro, G., P. Piper, A. Pineda , P. Basilia, J.
Ceron, T. Reyes, E. Lim, K. Maguire, K. Manalo, L. Sioco,
A. Ramirez Jr. 2009. An archaeological investigation of'Structure A' in San Juan, Batangas. University of thePhilippines-Archaeological Studies Program.
Barretto-Tesoro, M. G. 2010. “Problems and Needs for
Cultural Heritage Protection and Restoration Activities in
the Philippines,” in Research Analysis and Preservationof Archaeological Sites and Remains, Training Course on
Cultural Heritage Protection in the Asia-Pacific Region
2010. Edited by Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation
Office Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO (ACCU),
pp. 202-220. Nara, Japan: Cultural Heritage Protection
Cooperation Office, Asia-Pacific Cultural Centre for
UNESCO (ACCU).

Figure 1: Map of San Juan, Batangas showing Barangay Pinagbayanan(Pineda 1992)

Pineda, F. Editor. 1992. In Celebration of the 100 Yearsof San Juan, Batangas 1890-1990. Manila: Residents of
San Juan with the cooperation of the San Juan Municipal
Government through the iniative of Mayor Abelardo S.
De Villa and his staff.
University of the Philippines-Archaeological Studies
Program. 2010. An Archaeological Investigation of'Structure A' in San Juan, Batangas: The Second Season.
University of the Philippines-Archaeological Studies
Program.

Figure 2: View of Structure B from the east during the exhibit (Photo
by Archie Tesoro)

University of the Philippines-Archaeological Studies
Program. forthcoming. An Archaeological Investigationof 'Structure B' in San Juan, Batangas. University of thePhilippines-Archaeological Studies Program.
Valientes, E. W. A. 2009. “Raising Local Heritage
Consciousness through Archaeology Field Schools,” in
ACCU Nara International Correspondent The Fourth
Regular Report with Special Reports, pp. 11-13. Nara:
Cultural Heritage Protection Cooperation Office, Asia/
Pacific Cultural Centre for UNESCO.
Figure 3: One of the stone foundations of Structure B (Photo by
Archie Tesoro)

30

SamoaSamoa

Preservation of Traditional Knowledge in Samoa
Mainifo Viliamu, Senior Museum Officer
Ministry of Education, Sports and Culture
Traditional Samoan society was and remains rich inintangible culture and traditional knowledge. Much ofthis knowledge remains in the minds of people and they
have been able to hand them down from generation to
generation to the point where they finally reached us.
However our heritage is threatened by both inappropriate
and abusive exploitation, and by its erosion due to themany forces entering our society. Our concerns arefor the protection, preservation and promotion of ourheritage and traditional knowledge. Traditional Samoansociety was mostly oral this means that culture had to be
kept in other forms and now comprises what we know
as traditional intangible culture, or traditional knowledge
which includes:
1. Folklore which covers tales, legends and myths,
their themes and background
2. Expressive arts which include songs, dances andtheir patterns and movement
3. Language which include oratory speech, poems
and the art of forming articulating them
4. H istorical documents which record Samoan
historical heritage
5. Economic activities which include:- Knowledge utilized in gardening/agriculture- Fishing and techniques and associated rituals- The use of rituals involved in pigeon snaring- Rites and ceremonies performed in death- Marriages and ceremonial exchange of goods andmaterials- Launching of canoes and associated ceremonies- Harvest celebration of first crops (talomua andufimua)- Tattooing and associated ceremonies- Ceremonies for launching of a new Samoan houseand associated rituals.
Intangible Cultural Heritage forms the “soul” of ourculture and central to its preservation and promotionis the safeguarding and revitalization of knowledge
and skills which are the foundation and indigenous
culture. The most important, and initial step at this pointis the identification and recognition of custodians ofindigenous knowledge and skills. The core objective isto build and create links between the custodians and the
younger generation and to encourage the transmissionof knowledge because it is in danger of disappearing. As

Secondary schools culture day competition31

custodians pass away, they may take their knowledge
and skills with them to the grave. Samoa as a wholeis targeting to revitalize navigation and boat building
which have been slowly disappeared. But some areas
are widely practiced such as traditional agriculture andcooking, oratory, carving and weaving. This means thatthe products are still readily available, but still they canfall to the same edge and that is as each day passes, we
forecast the loss of important information that shouldhave been properly documented. It stands as a warning
for all Samoa, when a custodian passes away, withouttransmitting the knowledge, metaphorically, a “library iscompletely burnt to the ground.”Objectives
Samoa at the moment has no project because of lack offunds. This was one objective of the workshop held in
June 2010 by our organization is to find a way forward
where UNESCO can provide financial support for Samoa
in its effort to safeguard its ICH.
So I will use what we are doing at the moment. As
mentioned before the aim for all these is to◦Build and create links between the custodians and the
younger generation◦Encourage the transmission of knowledge because it isin danger of disappearing.
◦Document all the gathered information for all research
and findings of our ICH.
Methods Use
There are nonetheless a range of activities which weseek to promote intangible heritage. Public, private andmission schools teach Samoan Language, culture andhistory and organize special events teaching tradition
skills and promoting Samoan culture such as Culture
Days, Samoan dance competitions and Samoan speechcompetitions. Samoa also participates in a National
Regional and International Festivals including the 4-yearlyFestival of Arts which it hosted in 1996.
The MESC, the MWCSD, the women in businessassociation, Handicraft association all involve in the
promoting of cultural activities. Some specialists intraditional knowledge and skills have established their

Culture officers interviewing custodianof Falealupo in Savai'iNevertheless our Culture Division is conducting quarterly
research a year to collect information for the continuationof the Samoa Ne’i Galo. Samoa Ne’i Galo in English
is “Samoa Lest we Forget” it is a compilation of oral
tradition and the legends of Samoa. We firstly notify
particular areas like the villages and the right people tointerview. At the same time we are still in negotiation
with the owner of Samoa’s old yacht for transportation
to the selected places and people with the knowledgeof navigation methods using the stars and sea currents.
It is the same for boat building, less people with thetechnique of building our own traditional boat someare old and we try our best to capture any information
relevant so that we are able to pass on the younger
generation thus reviving and bringing our culture to life.
Our culture division also conducted a workshop in Junelast year, it was the National Workshop on Safeguarding
Intangible Cultural Heritage in Samoa it was an effort
initiated by UNESCO with the assistance of the Ministry of
Education Sports and Culture. Participants and presenterswere selected from relevant Government Ministries,
Non Government Organizations’ Artists associations,individual artists, media, Education Institutions andrepresentatives from the community. Its objectives is tofind a way forward where UNESCO can provide support
for Samoa in its effort to safeguard its ICH, to raise thelevel of awareness of the participants regarding Samoa’s
ICH and issues surrounding it with the emphasis on theConvention for safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage,
2003 and to ratify the convention and use as a tool for
safeguarding ICH in Samoa. This workshop was one
strategy suggested by our Ministry to negotiate with theselected people mentioned before for ways of protecting
and promoting Samoa’s ICH.
Achievements
These activities helped achieved many things in ways ofsafeguarding intangible culture in Samoa. The collectionsof tales, myths and legends have properly documented
in the series called “Samoa ne’i Galo” or “Lest we forget”

Legend in Falealupo called theFoot of Moso the giant.

which is an ongoing work throughout the year. We also
have the Samoan dictionary or the monolingual collectionof Samoan vocabulary in both Samoan and English.
Also we have books called “The mafuaala o upu” orwords originated from Samoan House, Samoan food andTraditional Samoan games. These findings have beenrecorded in books and by the help of the old people
which we interview. It is a great help for our young
people of today these are used in schools and tertiary
institutions in Samoa.

Samoa

own associations, for example traditional birth attendants,
the Taulasea Association and the Malofie Association, tostrengthen their particular area. Church organizations andcivil society organizations offer vocational workshops
disseminating traditional skills, mainly weaving,
carving and siapo making. The main objective of thistraining is also to help families with income generating
opportunities.

On the other hand, we are not only recording our past
properly but we are also improved economically. The
knowledge and skills from trainings like the vocational
workshops done throughout schools, churches and otherorganization have helped them become individual andearning money for living. Thus by creating business
opportunities, they are able to start small business fromscratch. All they need are their creative skills and a little
bit of capital to start a small business to support theirfamilies. This coincides with the government strategies inalleviating poverty through business opportunities.
Conclusion
Even though Samoa has not yet ratifies the Convention
but still there is high hope that we can save a lot of ourintangible cultural heritage through methods and ideas
being practice by our ministry and other organizations. As
mention our ICH target is to ratify the Convention 2003
and in priority of negotiation with the Gaualofa ship in
Samoa’s Navigation. People in the past used to read thetime and weather by sea current, stars, moon and the sun,but due to the advance technology of today these skills
and knowledge is disappearing. So as with boat building,
it is the same problem there are few people left with theunderstanding of these things so therefore we are doing
research, workshops to collect all of these information for
documentation. Yet we have collected and recorded a lotof these and being put together in our publication of the
Samoa Ne’i Galo series and Monolingual dictionary like
Origin of words from different traditional Samoan Culture
like traditional food and games. Last but not the least, by
exercising these traditional knowledge and skills of doing
things people and student that cannot reach tertiary levelcan become individual and fast money earner to sustain
life, for example skills of elei printing, carving helped
them being creative enough to sell and get money. So not
only we are safeguarding our Intangible Cultural Heritage
but we also help alleviate poverty with our people.

Students are learning and capturing the knowledge and skills of making the elei or the Samoan print

32

Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka

Conservation of Stupas in Sri Lanka with Special Reference to Three Selected
Stupas : Abhayagiri, Jetavana and Sandagiri
Sujeeva Kaushalyani Peiris Deraniyagala, Conservation Supervisor
Central Cultural Fund
Stupa is one of the most venerated entities in a Buddhist
temple since it enshrines relics of Lord Buddha or things
closely related to Buddha and Buddhism. Stupa has along history in the island and almost dates back to thetimes of the introduction of Buddhism to the island by
Arahat Mahinda in the 3rd century B.C. Stupas vary inshapes and size and those early mega stupas are mostly
bubble shape or heap of paddy shape [other main shapes
in Sri Lanka are pot shape and bell shape]. But all the
stupas contained essential components and followedsame construction principles. Since objective of thisarticle is to discuss the recent issues of conservation inthree selected stupas, it will not go into details of stupas
and their construction. But in many ancient inscriptions
installed near the great stupas and the Great Chronicle[The Mahavamsa], which was written in the 5th century,
describes these topics in detail.
Ancient people in Sri Lanka built several mega stupasusing burnt bricks. It was said that brick is the unitof ancient civilization in the island. Stupa is a uniquestructure that developed through the times of Lord
Buddha in India and the concept arrived in the islandwith Arahat Mahinda, who brought and introduced
Buddhism to the islanders. He himself supervised theconstruction of the first stupa in Sri Lanka – Thuparama
in Anuradhapura in the 3rd century B.C. But with thetime, the form and structure of the stupa began to evolve
according to the local ideas and concepts, which resulted
in stupa’s form unique to the Island.
Among these stupas, Jetavana – the tallest brick built
structure in the world, Abhayagiri – the second highest
brick structure, Ruvanveli Stupa, all in Anuradhapura holda special place in the minds of Buddhists in the island.
From the 3rd century B.C. to the end of the 13th century
A.D. [end of Polonnaruva Kingdom] the stupa stoodsuperior in temples. Throughout this period several stupas
rising above 100 m were built and then came the gradualdecline. After medieval period stupas became smaller insize and later its significance was somewhat diminished –not in the religious aspect but in architecture – with theshrine room gaining elaborate detailing and colour mostprobably due to the influence of Hinduism.
During the past three decades the Central Cultural Fundhas involved in the conservation of many stupas andconservation of Great Jetavana is completed recently.
Presently Abhayagiri Stupa in Anuradhapura and the
Sandagiri Stupa in Tissamaharama [Southern Province]
are being conserved. All these three stupas were built
during Anuradhapura period although the Sandagiriya
is located in the Southern tip of the island far awayfrom Anuradhapura. During the 1st century B.C. a
regional prince Mahanaga, who eloped the Capital inorder to avoid assassination, built this small stupa in
Tissamaharama.

33

Abhayagiri Stupa is built by King Valagamba [B.C. 88 – 76]reached 106.7 m height originally, but presently stands
at 73 m. Until building of Jetavana, this was the highest
brick structure in the world. Burnt bricks were used tobuild this stupa using butter clay slurry as the mortar. It
is believed that the ancient people used some fibrousbotanic materials and bee honey to ensure bonding
between bricks and mortar. But these cannot be traced
now as they have degenerated and reduced to carbon
with time. During the excavations the CCF researchers
has been able to establish that they have used lime screed
at the Cube [Snh. Hathareskotuwa] level to strengthen the
bricks and to prevent water penetration just like we use
concrete in modern times. There were 4 sizes of bricks
used in ancient times viz. 320 mm x 280 mm x 85 mm at
lowest level [Basal Rings or Pesawa (Snh)]; 450 mm x 230
mm x 80 mm at the dome; 250 mm x 160 mm x 70 mm at
the cube; and 210 mm x 150 mm x 55 mm at the spire.
Jetavana Stupa, the highest, presently at 70.7 m [original
height 121.9 m] is built in the 3rd century A.D. by King
Mahasena [A.D. 269 – 296], was a huge brick structurethat reached 120 m in height and becoming the third
highest structure in the ancient world, after the twopyramids of Giza. Original stupa had a Yupa stone anda pinnacle, but during subsequent restorations it hadchanged to a pinnacle. Mud bricks were used in varying
sizes to suit the position and mortar was thin butter clay
slurry, which enabled the bricks practically sitting on topof the ones at the lower layer. This has resulted strong
brickwork not weaken by wide strips of mortar. During
the excavations carried out at the beginning of theconservation programme it was revealed that although
the outer brick work is weaken due to weathering, thedome is stable up to the 84th course of bricks. And it
also revealed that the dome was not entirely solid as it
was believed, but from a certain height it was filled withbrickbats placed in mud mortar.
Sandagiriya Stupa was comparatively small but its age
goes back to early Anuradhapura period and obviously
oldest of the three. It is built by Prince Mahanaga, aregional ruler and a brother of King Devanampiyatissa(B. C. 250 - 210) enshrining relics sent by Emperor Asoka
of India. Therefore this stupa is believed to be the oldest
stupa in the southern part of the country, which has
undergone periodic restorations and enlargements fromtime to time. Its shape and form also underwent changes
according to the whims and fancies of the restorers. The
temple is built on 200 x 200 ft platform. Present height ofthe stupa dome is 17 m. This stupa has had a Yupa stone
and a pinnacle with chatra, which is obviously an Indianstyle. These ancient granite pieces are now lying on the
stupa Terrace.
Conservation processes of these three stupas aredifferent from each other. Conservation of Jetavana wasConservation of Abhayagiri Stupa was more organized
and lessons learnt at Jetavana were helpful to do thework more efficiently. It was decided not to use cementon this conservation and a new mortar was developed
analyzing the ancient ones. Slaked lime, paddy husk ash,anthill clay and tile powder were mixed in 1 : 1 : 2 : 2
ratio and this were used as the mortar. Presently 70% of
the dome is completed while the spire is fully conserved.
Another debate was on going at present whether thisdome should be lime plastered as in other stupas in theisland. It is argued that Sri Lankan temples are livingmonuments and the devotees would prefer to pay
homage and place their offerings at a completed stupa.

Sri Lanka

commenced as early as 1982 and progressed very slowly
because conservators were not willing to take any risks.
Thus every precaution was taken to avoid a catastrophe
situation and many professionals – architects, engineers,archaeologists, and conservators - were involved in theconservation process. Policy was to work with minimal
intervention and conserve the dome up to 84th brickcourse and from then upwards consolidates the bricks
taken in 36 ft wide strips at a time. The brick work of
the stupa to be left unplastered while the curvature of
the dome should not be perfected in order to recognize
its historic value. One major step was the decision toinsert stainless steel rods radially and circumferentiallyto stabilize the brick work and to insert a reinforced
concrete collar at the base of the cube.

Abhayagiri stupa before conservation

Abhayagiri during conservation (1)Conservation of the historic Sandagiri Stupa is also
nearing completion. Its conservation process is similar
to that of Abhayagiri and the same mortar is being used.
Here also two way opinions on the conservation are
experienced. One faction is arguing to complete theconservation with plastering and placing the Yupa stone
with chatras as in Indian style, while others argue that
Yupa and chatras belonged to a period when the dome ismuch smaller. The final decision has not been taken yet
and it is forwarded to Archaeological Advisory Committee
and an expert panel to make a final decision.
Central Cultural Fund has done impressive amountof work towards conservation of historic places in Sri
Lanka since its inception in 1980. Conservation of thesemega stupas are bold attempts when considered their
historic value, age and sensitive religious aspects. Many
individuals assisted in the conservation work while
one stands tall among them. He is Dr. Roland Silva, thefounder Director General of the CCF, whose dedication,
determination and leadership was behind the successes
achieved.

Abhayagiri during conservation (2)[I dedicated this article to Dr. Roland Silva, who revived
architectural conservation in Sri Lanka and dedicatedprecious 50 years for the upliftment of conservation andheritage management in the island.]Photo Credits: Abhayagiri Project and Archt. Jayatissa HerathMaterial transport using manpower at Abhayagiri

34

Sri Lanka
Work at Abhayagiri Dome

Jatavana stupa before conservation

Jatavana stupa; conservation at the lower dome

Jatavana dome during conservation

Ancient and new brick layers at the cube,
Jetavana stupa

Base of the pinnacle, Jetavana stupa

Jatavana stupa conservation of the dome

New bricks are being laid at Sandagiri stupa.

35

Restoration of mouldings,
Jetavana stupa cube

Sandagiriya brick work at 10 m level

Ancient brick layers of Sandagiriya

Sandagiriya from the entranceThailand
ThailandRestoration of Ubosot (Main Hall) of Wat Borom Nivasana Raja Vora Vihara,
BangkokPongthorn Hiengkaew, Conservation Architect
Office of Archaeology, Fine Arts Department, Ministry of Culture
Introduction
Wat Borom Nivasana Raja Vora Vihara is a royal temple
situated in Phathumwan district, Bangkok. The former
name was Wat Borom-sukkha or Wat Naok. The temple
is a hybrid of eastern and western decorations. Therefore,
it is an original temple in changing architectural planning
design in relation to the reform of Buddhism in thereign of King Rama IV, the dawn of time change of Siamfrom traditional society to society influenced by westerncountries.
In 2009, temple was in deteriorated condition because of
inappropriate maintenance for a long time and a change
in the surroundings. Hence, Fine Arts Department, Wat
Borom Nivasana Raja Vora Vihara and Crown Property
Bureau established the restoration projects of Wat Borom
Nivasana Raja Vora Vihara. Here, the paper presents thefirst phase of the project that is the restoration of Ubosot(main hall of the temple). It took one year and the cost
was 13,000,000 Baht ($ US 434,000).
History and Location
In the reign of King Rama III, Prince Mongkut (King

Figure1: Old picture of Ubosot, taken
before the first Restoration in 1889

Figure 2: King Rama IV

Rama IV) was a monk. Wat Borom Nivasana Raja Vora
Vihara was built by governor of Prince Mongkut. In 1832,
the descendabt of the gover nor presented the temple toPrince Mongkut and then the reconstruction had been
done until 1851. At that time, the name of the temple was
Wat Borom Sukkha (The Great Happiness).
Wat Borom Sukkha was known in general name as Wat
Naok since it was out of the city wall. The temple wasclosed to Klong Mahanak that was the main route toeastern part of Thailand. Prince Mongkut used the temple
for meditation and for seeking asylum. He dedicatedhimself in Buddhism study together with studying several
technologies from western countries. He found that, in
Siam, any belief in Buddhism was inappropriate. Hence,
he started to reform Buddhism in Siam. An improvement
was done in the planning of shrine area in order to makeit a sacred area.
Planning of Shrine Area (Buddha Vasana)
Commonly, there are two areas in a temple, shrine area
(Buddha Vasana) and monk residential area (Sankka
Vasana). The shrine area is composed of Ubosot, stupa,

Figure 3 : Lay out of Wat Borom Nivasana Shrine area

Figure 4 : Aerial view of Wat Borom Figure 5 : View of Ubosot before Figure 6 : Gable of Ubosot before Figure 7 : Window of Ubosot before restoration;
restoration
Nivasana Shrine area, taken in 1946
restoration, decorated with gilded Gable of Ubosot before restoration, decorated withgilded stucco and colour glass mosaic; Wooden
stucco and colourglass mosaic
pane, decorated with gilded and colour glass mosaic

36

Thailandand vihara. The monk residential area consists of Kutti
and a multipurpose hall. The shrine area is the importantpart in temple and is the area of worship. The planning
design is related to Buddhism regulations in order tomake sacred area.
After the restoration in 1832, the new plan of the shrinearea was designed and the plan has been used nowadays.
The plan is in the main axis, east to west axis, composedof Bodhi tree, Ubosot, the main stupa, and the cloister
enclosing the main stupa. The plan has been used anddeveloped in building of royal temples in the reign ofKing Rama IV.
Architecture and decoration of Ubosot
The characteristic of architecture of Ubosot is traditional
Thai style. According to Buddhism reform in Siam andfor easy maintenance, the size of Ubosot is smaller
than Ubosot in the past. The wall structure of Ubosot iswall bearing, brick, and mortar. The structure of roof ismade from teak wood. The roof tiles are earthen glazed
tiles together with colour glass mosaic decorated roof
ornaments. The Ubosot has special characteristics; thedecoration is a hybrid of Thai and western styles, forexample, the use of colour style in building and ceilingdecorations (evidence from during work) and mural
painting. The mural painting is a well-known paintingin Thailand. It is painted by Khau-in Khong, the 19th
century Thai famous painter. The story of painting isabout questions in Buddhism by applying western
astrology and scenes of western people’s life in thepainting that are different from other traditional paintings
usually telling about Lord Buddha’s life.

change in architectural and decorative objects.
Therefore, the restoration work aimed
1. to restore and stabilize architecture and decoration of
Ubosot by using traditional materials and techniques inrespect to the value of historic monument;
2. to investigate and collect evidence in the original
building and the past restoration in term of techniquesand materials that may be found during the work;
3. to preserve and conserve original objects as many as
possible.
Then, the Ubosot restoration projects were to set scaffold
up, to build a temporary roof to cover the roof of Ubosot,
to pull the roof tile down, to repair any damaged partsof Ubosot, and to investigate evidence of Ubosot. It was
found that structural and architectural members of Ubosot
and details of decoration were repaired at least 2-3 times
and were changed from original ones. From the resultsof works and documents, the detail of action framework
was improved and the cost was recalculated to meet theactual expenses.
Conclusion
The restoration work of Ubosot of Wat Borom Nivasana
Raja Vora Vihara, revealed what happened in the past
175 years. The development in arts and techniques of
construction in any periods was learnt from restoration
works. Moreover, it shows that Siamese society in thetime of changing learned how to adjust itself to easterncountries while influence of western countries was
growing.

Restoration work
The work was started with a condition survey in order to
get information on deterioration and to assemble basic
data of Ubosot such as materials, change in structural,architectural, and decorative objects of Ubosot as well as
environment of Ubosot, behaviour and the need of theowner. Then, data analysis and the communication towhom related to the temple were conducted in order toestablish the action framework. After that, architectural
drawing of restoration plan was done and the cost wasestimated.
From the survey, the main problems of Ubosot
deterioration were revealed, which was inappropriate
methods and materials used in restoration in the past andFigure 9 : The haven scene in mural painting
inside Ubosot, Saturn in western astronomy
and traditional angles

37

Figure8 : Corridor ceiling of Ubosot before
restoration, decorated with gilded stencil
pattern on red colour

Figure10 : Tracing for the original decorationof ceiling, inside Ubosot, light green layer

Figure 11 : The simulated perspective of theoriginal decoration of corridor ceiling, gilded
stencil pattern on blue colour

Thailand

Figure12 : Project parties on discussion about the evidences

Figure13 : Engraving the new architectural ornament bytraditional craftsmen

Figure15-16 : Restoring wooden panes by traditional craftsmen

Figure14 : Restoring the stucco
on the gable by using traditional
lime

Figure17-19 : Ubosot after restoration

Figure 20 : Ubosot after restoration

Figure 21 : Inside of Ubosot after
restoration38

Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan

Foreign Experience on Conservation of Museum Objects
Akmaljon Ulmasov, Researcher
Fine Arts Scientific Research Institute, Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan
Introduction
In the first quarter of this year, I took part in the training
program in National Museum of Korea organized by
Korea Foundation on fellowship for field research. The
program includes two sessions:1) General museum works (introduction of galleries,
museum facilities, environments, etc.)
2) T raining in the Conservation Science Laboratory(hereafter referred to CSL).
I can’t experience whole museum works and treatment at
the conservation laboratory in particular, but I learned abrief overview of researches as a whole.
The National Museum of Korea is the representative
cultural establishment of Korea. Despite the various
difficulties and hardships connected with history in Asia,
the museum has not only survived, but also managed to
expand and enrich its collections. According to statistics,
the number of visitors of NMK in 2010 has made 3
million, and 15 million during 5 years (2005-2010). Thesefigures rated NMK as abreast large museums of the world(detail in: www.museum.go.kr).
CSL of the museum is one of the biggest conservation
centres in the country. It deals with all criteria and arequirement of the world standards, and in some technicalparameters it even surpasses other laboratories of large
known museums of the developed countries. CSL (Team)is subdividing into 9 sectors: Museum Environment,
Stone and Wall Painting, Metal Objects, Wooden Objects,
Wooden Craft, Paintings and Papers, Potteries andCeramics, Textile, Scientific Analysis. Apparently from theaforesaid, each sector is intended for a certain categoryof museum subjects. As the term of training was short, I
can only work in some sectors. However, the experiencein the museum was successful and useful for me. One of
the successful practice was in the stone and wall painting
sector (Instructor: Mrs. Jo, Yeon-tae) of CSL.
Stone and wall painting section is one of the major
sectors of Conservation Science Laboratory of NMK. Hereresearchers hold practical conservation works on stone
objects, such as tools of labor, sculptures, pagodas, etc.,
covering from the Neolithic age to the late Middle Ages.
Besides those, conservation works on the wall paintings
on the stone or clay basis are carried out.
Practice I. Conservation of the stone tools: a plow of the
Neolithic period
1. Visual survey
Instrument of labor (the plow) was made of hard stone
in good quality. The sizes were 33 cm in length, 16.5 cm
in width, 3.2 cm in thickness, and 2,850 g in weight. The
object was broken in the middle for unknown reasons to
us. At the previous restoration works it was stuck together
by acrylic glue (cyanacrilate glue 401). Along the edges

39of the object, approximately two-third of the surface
was lost. At the top of the left corner, the surface wasbroken away. On two parts (at the left - on top, on theright - below), cracks were observed. They were more
appreciable on the back part of the object. There were
stains from oil substances on a surface on both parts,
but more on the back part. The object was in satisfactory
condition and needed mechanical clearing.
2. Cleaning
In visual observation, it was not noticed that there wasan inscription of a field code number on the surface. The
inscription was located in a prominent part and inscribedby a large, black font. Therefore, first of all cleaning had
to begin with an inscription.
Materials for clearing: Universal Paint Remover (UPR1),
Vulpex Liquid Soap, White Spirit, Sterilizing Liquid (SL),Blotting Paper.
2.1. Removing of an inscription by UPR
At first, on a surface of an inscription, UPR was applied
by a wadded tampon. Through 15 - 20 minutes, thedissolved, softened paints were removed with wadded
tampons. After that there still were dirt traces on thesurface. Liquid soap with water, in the ratio of 1:10 (500
ml of water and 50 ml SL) were put on the polluted
surface and were cleared by a brush. Thus, clearing was
repeated until dirt leaved completely.
After the cleaning, the object was washed away bymeans of distilled water. In the laboratory, they used theSterilizing Liquid of local manufacture. It was possible totreat it in the various ways: means of a brush or a spray.
During dispersion the object was regularly wiped by ablotting paper.
2.2. Mechanical clearing
After the clearing, traces of inscription were still
remained, so the object was cleared by a mechanical way.
That is, clearing was made by a scalpel with illuminatedmagnifier. After removal of traces, the object was again
washed away by liquid soap and the distilled water.
2.3. Chemical processing
Chemical clearing was applied when dirt can't beremoved by means of usual and mechanical clearing.
Such clearing make by means of ethanol and acetone
solvents. After chemical clearing, it was washed by liquidsoap and the distilled water.

1 

Universal Paint Remover – using for remove oil colors or acrylics. Applywith a brush. Leave it for 15-30 minutes, remove with a scarper. Rinse
with water. Source: www.pebeo.com

4. Coloring (Toning)
Coloring of the filled cracks and object followed andit was one of important processes of conservation andconsequently demanded special attention. At first, filledparts were colored with a mixture prepared from glue
Cemedine, Mikro-ballon and a pigment. Then toning was
made by acrylic paints.
5. Photography
Process of conservation work finished with taking
photography. Photographing was carried out at the
special photo-studio equipped with the modern
equipment, photo devices and all necessary accessories.
The object was recorded on a film (for archive), and ina digital format for use (for example, at the edition of
publications or processing’s on the computer).
Practice II. Creation of replica (copy) a fragment of wall
painting and its conservation
1. Coating• o n a ready framework of the necessary size wasstretched fabric of an impressive grade (for example,
flax or other);• a fabric surface was processed some times by rabbitskin glue3.
2. Portraying and Coloring• o n a ready framework with the grounded fabric drewgraphic drawing of wall painting with;• o utlines a sketched in ink;• n ecessary colors approaching to the original. Hereare applied the mixtures prepared from powdery
pigments on the basis of glue made from seaweed
funori4;• after general toning painting were detailed, and it isartificially grew old (cracks, peelings and losses etc.).
3. Conservation
3.1. Covering of surface of painting by special paper:• nine rectangular sheets of a cellulose paper (Rayon
Paper5) completely covered a surface of a frameworkwith lateral edges;• then, the sheets were pasted on a surface of painting
by funori glue, one after another. When standard
sheets are pasted, it is necessary to pay attention to
the paper texture. At gluing of the next sheet, thenext sheet should cover edge of the previous;• b ehind the first layer stuck second layer of paper,
but, this time took whole sheet of paper, named "The
Korean paper" (Mulberry Paper6).
3.2. Removing of a paper and processing of painting(stabilization)• after drying a paper unstuck. For this purpose the••surface was humidified with the distilled water, andsurpluses of water were removed by a two-layer
absorbing paper;the humidified, softened paper was removed stage bystage with special care. At first, remove the top layer,then the bottom.
the following was "stabilization"; cracks were covered
with funori glue. At the closing stage all surface
became covered with funori glue.

Uzbekistan

3. Filling
After the clearing, filling of cracks of object followed.
This process was made by means of filler - putties from
Epoxy Putty (Quick Wood 2) which was dissolved in
spirit, acetone, ethanol, etc. These solvents help softeningof pitch and hardening prolongation that helps deeper
penetration of a solution in cracks. After careful puttying,pitches were leveled with cracks, and at level it was alittle below an object surface.

Conclusion
In summary, what only I can conclude is that it is
impossible to capture whole picture of museum
work and conservation work in this short training.
In addition, Korean National Museum is very large
with multidimensional exhibitions. Each gallery has
an independent theme for research. Galleries in theaggregate reflect whole history, culture and a life of thepeople lived in the Korean peninsula. It is only possible
to tell that Conservation Science Laboratory of themuseum is the (significant) model, and exemplary andthe ideal establishment for Korea and other countries. To
date, in my country this level of the museum isn’t reachedyet. On this occasion, I would ask the Korea Foundation
to support us and make opportunities to participate in the
future research.
2 

Quick Wood – Epoxy Putty Stick is a hand-knead able, fast-setting polymer
compound for permanent repairs to wood. It also bonds to metal, glass,masonry and many plastics. It comes in a handy "Tootsie-roll®" form
with the curing agent encapsulated in the contrasting color base material.
Source: www.polymerics.com
3 
Rabbit-skin glue is a sizing that also acts as an adhesive. It is essentiallyrefined rabbit collagen, and was originally used as an ingredient intraditional gesso.
4 
Funori is 100% seaweed, used primarily for repairs of old works on paperor textiles. Adhesive is not too strong and therefore will not damage
original pieces. Add funori to boiling water, stirring well. Continue to cook
until desired stickiness is achieved. Source: http://store.hiromipaper.com/
funoriseaweed.aspx
5 
Rayon paper is a manufactured regenerated cellulose fiber. Because it isproduced from naturally occurring polymers, it is neither a truly synthetic
fiber nor a natural fiber; it is a semi-synthetic or artificial fiber. Rayon is
known by the names viscose rayon and art silk in the textile industry.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayon
6 

Mulberry paper – Morus is a genus of flowering plants in the family Moraceae. The
10–16 species of deciduous trees are commonly known as Mulberries. They arenative to warm temperate and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, Europe, and theAmericas, with the majority of the species native to Asia.

Before conservation

After conservation40

Uzbekistan
41

Process of drawing

Process of painting

Sticking of paper

Consolidation

Sticked paper

Final image

Viet Nam
Viet Nam

The Two Ancient Graves in Luc Trieu Age
Nguyen Chi Cong, Staff
Center for Preservation of the Co Loa Historical Site and Hanoi Citadel
Recently, when a construction company tried to lay
sluices in Hanoi Ciputra, (Nhat Tao village, Dong Ngac
commune, Tu Liem district), two 2000-year-old ancientgraves with 30 antiques were accidently found. An
ancient bed was also found soon at 200 m in distance,
which was similar to one of ancient wells found in ThangLong citadel sites.
Excavators lost some brick lines upper the well’swall, however the main body of the well was rather
undamaged. Bricks inside the well were of many different
dates, from 6th century to 15th century, which proved
long existence through time of residents in regions next
to Red river and formed Dai La citadel’s outside.
The two graves were found in parallel, built in rolled
boss including grapefruit section-shaped bricks on top.
Patterned bricks were in the walls inside and grave’sroof. The bigger grave had ‘coin’ structures, ‘diamond crossly shaped’ structures, and the left part had ‘fishbone’
structures. In particular, in the bigger grave we found thatabout 40 bricks had Chinese characters in the edges.
The Eastern Han grave dated about 100-200 BC. The
two graves were deepened underground about 2.0 m.
The bigger grave was 4.7 m long and 2.0 m high. The
left one was 3.9 m long, 1.2 m wide and 1.0 m high.
The grave’s walls were made by heaping up terra-cotta
brick(s) without any adhesive agent, but they have beenpreserved until now. On the surface of bricks had ‘coinshaped’ and crossing diamond-shaped structures whichwere very complicated. Although the police force of thecommune protected around the region, the artefacts were
hidden because of being afraid of loss.
In the near distance, an ancient well was also foundwhich looked like the ancient well found in Thang Long
royal citadel sites. Archaeologists believed that there may
exist an old settlement, or a village along the Red Riverburied in thousands years.
After ten days of excavation, the artefacts were gradually
unearthed. The bigger grave had 27 artefacts in total,
mainly consisting of glazed or non-glazed pottery. The
smaller grave had five artefacts, notably which included
a chicken’s head shaped ceramic vase that was very
beautiful: its crest, eyes, tails can be still seen clearly.
This was the most valuable item in the excavation. Basedon the grave’s structures and excavated artefacts, it was
acknowledged that the first grave was dated a little earlier
than the second grave. However, two valuable artefacts
were almost destroyed by evildoers like many othergraves around the region. As a measure to preserve theancient well and two above- mentioned graves, bothscientists and leaders of the department of Ha Noi Culture
Information and Tourism agreed to number each brick of
the two graves and cut sections of the ancient graves forrelocation to be displayed into the museum.

The two ancient graves in Luc Trieu age (4th to 6th century during the Chinese domination)

Chinese characterson the brick

Workers are digging the ancient well.

Patterned bricks of coin and diamond shape42Special ReportUzbekistan

Uzbekistan

For the Contribution to Cultural Heritage Studying-In Tashkent Young Archeologists Have Received the Incentive Award of Ikuo HirayamaAkmaljon Ulmasov, Researcher
Fine Arts Scientific Research Institute, Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan
On 15th June 2011, in the International Caravanseraiof Culture (ICC) Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan, there
has been a ceremony of the Incentive Award of Ikuo
Hirayama in the field of archaeology.
Five young experts from Uzbekistan, Japan and Russia
who have brought the special contribution to thedevelopment of archaeology in scientific and practicalspheres became winners of the award founded by
the well-known Japanese public figure with a view ofencouragement of young scientists-archaeologists andhistorians.
In the awarding ceremony many honorable guests
attended: Mr Yoshihisa Kuroda, the ambassador of Japanin Uzbekistan; Mr Tursunali Kuziev, the former chairmanof Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan; representatives of theforeign and domestic organization; scientific and creative
public; and mass media.
In welcoming speeches, Mr Shigeo Aoki, Professor ofCyber University, Tokyo, Japan, an expert in conservationof archaeological objects addressed that Incentive
Award of Ikuo Hirayama in the field of archaeology was
founded for the purpose of encouraging young scientists,archaeologists and historians to study for the revival andpopularization of centuries-old traditions of the Great Silk
Road.

cultural heritage and to new discoveries. It once again
confirmed an important role of Uzbekistan in the world
civilization development, and marked itself steadfast
attention of the country leaders to preservation andpopularization of the richest heritage of the Great SilkRoad.
Incentive Award of Ikuo Hirayama was awarded to
five young experts from the different countries, whowere active participants of archaeological researches,
restoration and preservation of a cultural heritage of thecountries of the Great Silk Road.
Winners of the award of Ikuo Hirayama of 2011:
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.
The award will stimulate young experts to devote more
profound research of this unique part of the world43

M itsuru Haga (Japan), Professor of Tohoku University,
the representative of Management Center for the
Advancement of Higher Education.
G orin Alexey Nikolaevich (Uzbekistan), Research
Assistant, Department of History of Arts of Fine Arts
Institute, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan.
Shunpei Iwai (Japan), Lecturer, Ryukoku Museum
Central Asian Archaeology, for the contributionof researching the history and archaeologicalmonuments in Uzbekistan.
T ikhonov Roman Vladimirovich (Russia), Postgraduate Student, Eletsk State University named after
I.A. Bunin.
K ayumova Dilfuza Abdurahimovna (Uzbekistan),
Restorer, The State Museum of the History of
Uzbekistan.