Report/Fiscal Year of 2010

Project on Measures for Rationalizationof International Energy Use
Project on Human Resources Development
for Energy Conservation“Project on Improvement of Basefor Energy Management in ASEAN Countries”

ACTIVITY REPORTMarch 2011

The Energy Conservation Center, Japan

Table of Contents
Summary

1

I. Objectives and Background of the ProjectI-1

II. Plan of “ASEAN Energy Management System” and Implementation Plan for
2010-2011 Aiming to Build the System
II-1
II-1. “ASEAN Energy Management System” Building Plan
II-1
II-2. Implementation Plan for 2010-2011
II-3
III. Activities in Each Country(Intensive Seminar-Workshops and Visits to Companies)
III-1. Overview
III-2. Activities and Implementation Results in Each CountryIII-2-1. Vietnam
III-2-2. Brunei Darussalam
III-2-3. Cambodia
III-2-4. Indonesia
III-2-5. Myanmar
III-2-6. The Sixth Research Forum in Japan
III-3. Activity Report and Achievements in Each CountryIII-3-1. Summary Reports of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
and Company VisitsIII-3-2. Activities to Establish and Disseminate the Energy Management
Handbook

III-1
III-1
III-3
III-3
III-17
III-34
III-46
III-59
III-70
III-80
III-80
III-82

III-4. Summary of the Workshop at the Sixth Research Forum in Japan III-83
IV. Develop and Operate Functions to be equipped with “ASEAN Energy
Management System”
IV-1
IV-1. Overview
IV-1
IV-2. Operation of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management
for Industries and Buildings
IV-4
IV-2-1. Results of the Fourth Round of the Award
IV-4
IV-2-2. Analysis of Information Provision Method to Disseminate Best Practices ofEnergy Management
IV-17
IV-2-3. Points to be Improved and the Latest Plan
IV-17

IV-3. Establish a System to Utilize Existing Implementing Organizations IV-18
IV-3-1. Progress and Challenges of the System Establishment
IV-18
IV-3-2. Latest Plan
IV-18
IV-4. Developing Energy Management Tools
IV-4-1. Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook
IV-4-2. Dissemination of In-house Database and Technical Directory(Industries and Buildings)
IV-4-3. Preparing Technical Handbooks

IV-19
IV-19

IV-5. Considering Establishment of Other Information Systems

IV-20

IV-19
IV-20

V. Consultation Result at the Summary Workshop
V-1
V-1. Summary of the Results of the Projects and Achievements for
Fiscal Year 2010
V-1
V-2. Latest Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the Results of
Implementation
V-6
V-3. Policies for Future Actions and Basic Plan for 2011-2012
V-7
VI. Reference Materials (not attached to this document)
VI-1. Presentation Materials Used in Intensive Seminar-Workshop(Common for Five Countries)

VI-2. Presentation Materials Used in Training Course Utilizing Energy Management
Handbook (Common materials only)
VI-3. Presentation Materials Used in Summary and Post Workshop
VI-4. Trip ReportSummary
In spite of impact of the sudden depression originating from the U.S. financial crisis, the ASEAN
countries have been showing an economic growth. Following this, their energy consumption is also
increasing, and in the future it is expected to grow even further. It is believed that more effective
use of energy in these countries would contribute to the global warming prevention and theenvironmental preservation activities.
This project is one pillar of the ASEAN energy cooperation that is authorized at the Minister ofEnergy level on the ASEAN side as PROMEEC (Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation), which currently comprises the three projects of “Major Industries”, “Buildings”, and“Energy Management System”.
The Major Industries and Buildings energy conservation promotion projects are entering theireleventh years, while the Energy Management System project is beginning its seventh year. The
activities of the related persons in the ASEAN countries, including our counterpart organization,
the ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE), have also become increasingly active, and the projects havebecome firmly established. On the other hand, the price of crude oil, which had been continuallyrising, fell after hitting peak at US$147 a barrel, and is now on an upward trend again after
fluctuating at around US$70 a barrel. However, since the amounts of recoverable reserves arelimited, the awareness that crude oil prices will continue to rise over a long term is becoming
established. In practice, the rise in energy prices threatens companies’ competitiveness, and afurther enhancement of energy conservation promotion is being sought. In view of this change,
while it is a fact that the PROMEEC Project has been building an energy conservation promotion
base and contributing to improved awareness through implementing its activities, it has become
necessary to implement activities at an even higher level to build a base that is capable of certainly
promoting energy conservation.
Against the background described above, this project with the various ASEAN countries in thecurrent fiscal year has been positioned as the third stage, working even harder towards theimplementation and dissemination of the results that have been achieved up till now through selfhelp efforts. That is, in a continuation from the previous fiscal year, on the base of actual results
and outcomes of implementing energy audits in various types of factories and buildings in the
ASEAN countries carried out in the past, we are aiming to establish the base and educate thehuman resources required to implement and disseminate actual improvements centered on
improvement measures that are discussed and proposed in each country.
In addition to the Major Industries and Buildings project activities, this project was started in 2004
based on an agreement obtained through discussions held with representatives of each of theASEAN countries in order to more effectively achieve the above targets in an aim to improve andenhance the Energy Management System which will become the core for promoting energy
conservation in each ASEAN country. With the objective of rationalizing this project, first the basic
functions of the “ASEAN Energy Management System”, which can be commonly used in the 10
ASEAN countries, were to be constructed taking around five to six years, and this fiscal year is
positioned as the year in which this objective would be realized.
Accordingly, in this fiscal year, based on the basic plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management-1-System”, the building and operation of the functions that should be included have been started asfollows while maintaining links with the Major Industries and Buildings projects, and the results
described below have been achieved.
1. Implementation of an Award System that has the purpose of making information sharing relating
to the Best Practices of Energy Management, and announcing of awarded case studies☛ The fourth Energy Awards were completed in July 2010. 18 case studies were received as
applications from seven countries, and 13 case studies received awards.
2. Review of energy management tools (Technical Directory, In-house Database, Handbook, etc.)
and construction and operation of a dissemination system☛ Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook and creation of related handbooks
3. Construction and operation of an existing implementing organization usage system that can
provide energy audits and training☛ Registration of implementing organization in the “Online Energy Information System”, asearch system between the implementing organizations and the clients in the ASEAN
region4. Enlargement of ASEAN Network of Cooperators☛ Through providing advice to participants in Seminar-Workshops and visits to companies,
increase the number of members in the Network of Cooperators.
Specifically, the following activities were implemented, and the activities were smoothlycompleted, achieving the targets described above.
Intensive Seminar-Workshops were held in five ASEAN countries, and in addition, visits weremade to some companies and organizations. The basic plans of this project and the latest
ASEAN Energy Management System were explained to related persons, and in addition togathering opinions, we called for participation in this project and the use of related programsand tools. Furthermore, as described below, training was given in five countries on how to use
the Energy Management Handbook.
Operation of ”ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries
and Buildings”
The award system that was planned for the popularization of the best practices in energy
management in Industries and Buildings sectors in the various ASEAN countries which havebeen collected starting in fiscal year 2006 was smoothly operated, and the fourth EnergyAwards were held.
The judging committee (Board of Judges (BOJ)) meeting was held on June 8-9, 2010, and fromamong the 18 case studies from seven countries that were collected through applications for thethird Energy Awards case studies, a total of 13 cases were selected, including Best PracticeAwards to three applications each in the Industries and the Buildings categories, one Best
Practice Award in the Special Submission, and the outstanding case awards to five other casesin the Industries and Buildings categories. These awards were presented at a ceremony during
the AMEM Meeting (ASEAN Ministers Meeting on Energy) held in July 2010. Following this,in a plan to realize the wide dissemination of these award-winning case studies, details werereleased on the ASEAN Centre for Energy website.
-2-

Following this, applications for the fifth Energy Awards started from January 2011. At theimplementation of the fifth application, analysis was carried out of the results of the fourth, andthe following points were discussed and confirmed at a workshop held during the Research
Forum in Japan in November 2010. The aim was to improve the collection of case studies thatwill result in an even higher dissemination effect.
(1) It was decided to set a new category of “Special Submission” as an award for a single
improvement activity or a single project. Among definitions, “significant innovation” waschanged to “innovation/successful best practices/excellent cases” to dilute the meaning of thedefinition.
(2) From fiscal year 2010, the awards were given to applications in the two categories: large scale
factories and medium to small scale factories, both in Industries and Buildings. Classification
standard for Industries, which was a consumption of 10 million MJ, was changed to 30
million MJ a year.
Establishment and partial execution of a dissemination scheme for relevant energy management
tools (Technical Directory, In-house Database, Handbook, etc.)
The Energy Management Handbook was finally completed in January 2009. In addition, theTechnical Directory and the In-house Database, which were developed following the Major
Industries and Buildings Projects, were set as energy management basic tools together with theEnergy Management Handbook, and these were disseminated during the Intensive SeminarWorkshops and Training in each country. Collection method and the contents of the Technical
Directory and the In-house Database were reviewed.
Translation of the Energy Management Handbook into Vietnamese was implemented bypioneer companies, but the government had troubles in publishing and disseminating it.
Cambodia, Indonesia and Myanmar, which we visited this fiscal year, called for financial
support for the translation into local languages.
Establishing the Online Energy Information System
Aiming to achieve the wide utilization of existing implementing organizations in the ASEAN
countries, implementing organizations registered in the search system of implementing
organizations named “Online Energy Information System”, which was called “Cyber Search
System” until last year. Thanks to the efforts of Focal Points, the total increased to 17. Before
the registration of the customers, the system will be promoted to potential customers toencourage implementing organizations in each country to register. Again there was a discussion
on the name of the system and it was changed to “ASEAN Energy Management Service”,
starting in the next fiscal year.
Investigation of ”ASEAN Energy Management System (Step-2)” Basic Plan
Based on the activity outcomes and actual results, basic functions of the “ASEAN Energy
Management System” have almost been established as planned, and the Step-1 System has
begun operations. Based on the evaluation and with the aim of making the system more
effective, we intended to add new functions to develop it into the Step-2 System. But there wasdelay in the progress due to other issues to be solved. For the next fiscal year, the Step-2 System
will be launched only when the Step-1 System has been completed.
-3-Note that in the project in the current fiscal year, the field activities started from the Board of
Judges (BOJ) meeting which selected the fourth Energy Awards case studies in June 2010.
However, the Inception Workshop (Three Joint Projects) held in July 2010 in order to finalize theproject plan and confirm the implementation preparations essentially marked the start of activities.
Afterwards, the activities were implemented in five countries, and the activity results and outcomes
were shared jointly among the representatives from each country at the Summary and Post
Workshops (Three Joint Projects) that were held in the middle of February 2011. In addition, thepolicies of future activities after next fiscal year were discussed at the end of the workshops.
The specific activities of this project in the current fiscal year are as described below.
1. Board of Judges: June 8th-June 9th, 2010 (trip from June 6th-June 12th)
The nine members of the Evaluation Committee gathered in Hanoi, Vietnam, to evaluate the18 applications from seventh countries, and to select the awardees in Industries and Buildings.
2. Inception Workshop: July 1st-July 2nd, 2010 (trip from June 29th to July 3rd)
“Inception Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) (Major
Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME-METI Work Program 2010-2011” (held in
Singapore, common to for Industries and Buildings). There was a pre-meeting with the ASEAN
Centre for Energy.
Nineteen persons gathered, including those from ASEAN, the ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE),
and the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ), and discussed the following subjects.
Opening Remarks (representatives from the host country)
Session 1: Buildings Project Implementation Plan
Session 2: Major Industries Project Implementation Plan and Joint Activity Plan
(Joint activity: Development of Building and Major Industries In-house Database and Technical
Directory)
Session 3: Energy Management Project Implementation PlanThe Energy Management Project in the current fiscal year was planned as shown below. In the plan,
requests were received from seven countries, and it was determined that the project to be
implemented in five countries: Vietnam, Myanmar, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia and Indonesia(in the order of planned visit). The activity basically consisted of the following three:(1) Activity-1: Intensive Seminar-Workshop (Day 1)(2) Activity-2: Training Activity utilizing Energy Management Handbook (Day 2)(3) Activity-3: Visits to factories & building and counseling on the introduction, use, follow-up,
and/or new introduction of Energy Management Handbook (Day 3)
3. 1st Site Activities: August 25th-August 27th, 2010 (term of the trip: August 24th-August 28th)
Initially, the activities were scheduled to be held in Vietnam and Myanmar. But the schedule for
Myanmar was postponed to December. Therefore, it was held in Vietnam only.
(1) Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Project activities, the basic plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management System” including
functions and tools and the analysis of ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy-4-Management for Industries and Buildings in current fiscal year were presented. The teammembers requested the participants to join in the project activities and to utilize the program andtools prepared in this project. Study of the best practices, which is to be held in the group workof ISW conventionally, was not implemented this fiscal year as it is similar to the contents of thegroup work scheduled on the next day. Session 3 was for the presentation on the Awareness &Financing by the host country, ECCJ and ACE, but there were no reports from the host country.
(2) Training on Energy Management Handbook Activities
Training was implemented concerning the use of the Energy Management (EM) Handbook. In
addition to a lecture on the contents of the Energy Management Handbook, group activities
were carried out using case studies, one from Vietnam (Ocean Park Building: Building) thatreceived an award and another from Ha Noi 19 May Textile Company (Industry), which did not
win an award.
(3) Visits to concerned enterprises and organizations
Visit to a factory wishing to introduce the EM Handbook
The team visited two companies, Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company and Ocean Park Buildingthat wish to newly introduce energy management tools such as EM Handbook. Following thesite inspection, the team exchanged opinions and provided advice to improve energy
management.
4. 2nd Site Activities (October 11th-October 25th, 2010) (term of the trip: October 10th-October 26th)
Visited countries: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia and Indonesia (three countries)(1) Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Project activities, the basic plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management System” including
functions and tools and the analysis of ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings in current fiscal year were presented. The teammembers introduced analysis on the best practices of the ASEAN Best Practices of Energy
Management of current year and requested the participants to participate in the project activities
and to utilize the program and tools prepared in the project. As in Vietnam, group work was not
implemented in the ISW. The host country, ECCJ & ACE were supposed to make presentations
on Awareness & Financing, the theme for the Session 3, but Cambodia was the only nation that
presented a report.
(2) Training on Energy Management Handbook Activities
In countries other than Brunei Darussalam, training consisted of a detailed explanation on the
ASEAN EM Handbook and the lecture on how to use it. Brunei Darussalam has alreadyestablished its own Energy Management Guide based on the ASEAN EM Handbook. A
professor at Universiti Brunei Darussalam, one of the authors of this Guide, introduced it in the
training again in this year. Another EM tool “A Basic Guide to Energy Audit for Building” wasalso introduced by a professor at Institu Teknologi Brunei. In the study of best practices, eachcountry has chosen two best practices of the ASEAN Award in advance to use them in the groupwork.
(3) Visits to concerned enterprises and organizations
Visits to factories wishing to introduce the EM Handbook-5-

The team visited three locations in Brunei Darussalam, two in Cambodia and one in Indonesiathat wish to introduce the EM tools such as the EM Handbook. They were the Ministry ofDevelopment, Baiduri Bank and Datastream Technology in Brunei Darussalam, Sofitel Angkor
Hotel and Le Meridien Angkor Hotel in Cambodia, and South Pacific Viscose in Indonesia.
After the site tour, the team provided advice and exchanged opinions regarding the promotion ofenergy conservation at the enterprise/organization, while encouraging them to use the EM
Handbook and participate in the ASEAN Energy Award.
5. 3rd Site Activities: December 14th-December 16th, 2010 (term of the trip: December 11thDecember 18th )This was the first time that energy management project was implemented in Myanmar. The
schedule, which was initially set in August, was postponed to December. There was concern overthe schedule as it was immediately after the general election in November, but actually there were
no problems.
(1) Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Project activities, the basic plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management System” including
functions and tools and the analysis of ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings in current fiscal year were presented. The teammembers introduced analysis on the best practices of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practicein Energy Management of the current year. This was the first EM project implemented in thiscountry, and the participants, although they knew little about the functions, tools and concept ofenergy management, seemed to be working hard in the training. The host country, ECCJ & ACE
were supposed to make presentations on Awareness & Financing, the theme for the Session 3,
and there was a report from the host country Myanmar.
(2) Training on Energy Management Handbook Activities
Training was given on how to use the EM Handbook. Along with a lecture on the contents, twoBest Practices that received the award (Greenhills Shopping Center and Thai-German CeramicIndustries) were introduced in the group work. The team highly evaluated the participation of the
Focal Point from the MOI-2 in the group work and his proactive attitude.
(3) Visits to concerned enterprises and organizations
Visits to factories wishing to introduce the EM Handbook
The team visited Multi-Purpose Diesel Engine Factory that wished to introduce the EM tools
such as the EM Handbook. After the site tour, the team provided advice and exchanged opinions
regarding the promotion of energy conservation at the factory. This state-owned company
recently started operation and the production volume is small, with many machinery not in
operation. However, we learned that a person from this firm was present at the multinational
training held in Japan the other day (MTPEC11) and established a team for energy conservationand launched activities soon after returning to Myanmar. The team encouraged the participants
to make further efforts.
6. Research Forum in Japan: November 9th-November 11th, 2010
Ten concerned people, including the members of BOJ for the ASEAN Award System of Best
-6-

Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings gathered and discussed.
(1) Improvement for the Step-2 of the “ASEAN Energy Management System”(2) Improvement of the operation policies and the evaluation guidelines on the ASEAN Award
System of Best Practice in Energy Management
As a result, a consensus was reached on the proposal of functions related to the Step-2 System of
the ASEAN Energy Management System, and at the same time, there were suggestions for further
improvement. Also, a concrete plan for improvement on the operation policy of the ASEAN Award
of Energy Management was formulated after the review of concerned issues in the BOJ discussion
for the current year. The policy to change the operation policy from fiscal year 2011 was confirmed
among the participants, which will be implemented after consultation with the BOJ of ASEAN.
7. Summary & Post Workshop: February 16th-February 17th, 2011 (term of the trip: February 14thFebruary 18th)
Participated in the “Summary and Post Workshop on Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation (PROMEEC) (Major Industry, Building and Energy Management), SOME-METI
Work Program 2010-2011” (common to Major Industries and Buildings; held in Bangkok,
Thailand).
Twenty people from ASEAN nations, the ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE) and the ECCJ gathered
for the following summary and consultation. Due to scheduling problems, there were no
participants from Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.
Opening Remarks by the host country, etc.
Status of creating the APAEC 2010-2015 and key points
Confirmation of the basic activity policies for the Phase-3
Summary Workshop
Session 1: The results and achievements of the PROMEEC (Major Industries)
Session 2: The results and achievements of the PROMEEC (Buildings)
Session 3: The results and achievements of the PROMEEC (Energy Management)- Report on the results of activities for this fiscal year from each country and summary by ECCJ
- Policies of activities of the next fiscal year and onward: It was changed to consider functions of
the Step-2 after the finalization of the Step-1.
Post Workshop- Overall evaluation of results and basic directions for future activities in the Phase-3- 2010-2011 Basic Implementation Plan for the three projects
Based on the evaluation of actual results up to the current fiscal year, requirements for the Phase-3
were clarified. At the same time the participants agreed on the Basic Implementation Plan thatplaced great importance on “human resource development” for the next fiscal year as well. Basedon this result, it was decided that countries that wish to implement activities next fiscal year, will be
requested to prepare proposals for activities, including requests.
While providing support for establishing the base of sustainable energy conservation activities in
ASEAN nations, the PROMEEC Project Phase-3 activities have been launched on a high level-7-

seeking implementation and diffusion of energy management through further self-help efforts ofeach country.
As a result, the Step-1 System has almost been completed that has the basic functions for “ASEAN
Energy Management” shared in ASEAN, and the base for smooth operation has been established.
The dissemination activities of the key energy management tools were also active, and the ASEAN
Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings was carried out
without troubles. In addition, we have achieved many fruitful results, including the expansion of
the network of cooperation among concerned parties, companies, and organizations.
Finally, we would like to extend our heartfelt appreciation for the full cooperation of the parties
concerned, including those from the ACE and other international institutions, in making this project
possible.

-8-

I. Objectives and Background of the Project
The objective of this project is to explore and propose measures for the efficient use of energy inthe countries and regions which contribute to a stable energy supply for Japan, throughinvestigation and analysis on the energy policies and the energy consumption trend, provision ofadvice on the efficient use of energy by the exchange of people, targeting to build a stable andsuitable base for energy supply and demand to meet the international and domestic economic andsocial environment.
This project was first launched in fiscal year 2000 and is known in the ASEAN as the
PROMEEC Project. PROMEEC is the abbreviation for the “Promotion of Energy Efficiency andConservation”. It is a collaboration program between the Ministry of Economy, Trade andIndustry (METI) and ASEAN, approved by the ASEAN Ministers on Energy Meeting (AMEM)
consisting of members from 10 countries. It comprises three projects: the Major Industries
Energy Conservation Promotion Project (PROMEEC (Major Industries)), the Building Energy
Conservation Promotion Project (PROMEEC (Buildings)), and Project on Improvement of Basefor Energy Management the ASEAN (This project: PROMEEC (Energy Management)).
This project was started in fiscal year 2004, four years after the other two projects, and has
contributed to establish the ASEAN Energy Management System that is essential for promoting
energy conservation in the industry and building sectors in the ASEAN region. Also, it provides
technical and practical support for forming a mechanism to realize improvements. That is, it
supports energy conservation measures on the ASEAN side by strengthening energy
management, particularly in the fields of industries and buildings, in the ASEAN countries, and,as a result, it targets at promoting energy and environmental conservation measures of theASEAN region.
This project is for establishing the Energy Management System essential for energy conservation
in industry and building sectors, and provides support for improvements of the system from atechnical and operational point of view.
The ultimate objective of this project is to establish and operate the ASEAN Energy Management
System shared in the entire ASEAN region, and by utilizing this, contribute to establishing asustainable foundation for energy conservation in the industry and building sectors.
In order to achieve this goal, actions emphasizing the following points are being taken:
1. Make sure that the ASEAN Energy Management System has the following key functions.
The system should be easy to use and understand for the users.
♠ Supply of useful information♠ Provision of services such as energy audits and training♠ Rules and systems to appropriately and smoothly operate the above
Moreover, specific and effective sub-systems, programs and tools should be prepared inrelation to the functions above.
I-1

2. Effective link between the major industry and the building sectors regarding energy
conservation promotion projects (share information and disseminate results)
3. Create and expand the “ASEAN Network of Cooperators”, mainly from the ASEAN region,
to popularize the ASEAN Energy Management System, improve and operate the system
continuously.
The points described above should be pursued from a long-range standpoint. The Step-1
System, providing the basic functions and minimum programs, tools, and sub-systems required
was established over a 5-6 year period and it has been completed this fiscal year and operation
started. Based on the evaluation given to the operational and dissemination activities, theStep-1 will be improved. At the same time, the Step-2 System with additional functions andprograms will be established and launched.
Step-1 System that has almost been completed in the current fiscal year is being operated asshown below. In addition, activities for the dissemination and application of this system were
implemented.
(The first stage): Complete
Development of the plan of the “ASEAN Energy Management System”, based on theinvestigation on the actual situations of basis for energy management in the ASEAN countries
and on the transfer of technologies and experience realized in Japan.
The plan will be reviewed as appropriately, if necessary.
(The second stage): Step-1 System is complete. Start consideration on introducing the Step-2
System.
Developing the ASEAN Energy Management System and its operation method(The third stage): Step-1 System is complete.
Operation and improvement of the ASEAN Energy Management System by the ASEAN
countries
Programs required for the basic functions, basic tools for energy management including theEnergy Management Handbook have been completed. In addition, sub-systems like
information system to disseminate Best Practices of Energy Management gathered through theaward system, and the reciprocal search system “Online Energy Information System” between
the energy management organizations and the customers have been put into operation.
At the same time, a plan on the site activities in five countries to popularize the system in the
ASEAN region for use by concerned parties has been established and implemented. In addition,
the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries andBuildings case studies has completed its fourth awarding with great success. Improvement
policies from an operational point of view were also specified and the Board of Judges fromthe ASEAN region discussed a plan to determine the implementation rules and the evaluation
policies.
It took time to carry out the initial registration of implementing organizations in the Online
Energy Information System, but the registration of the implementing organizations has almost
been completed in the current fiscal year. However, the registration of customers is yet to be
I-2

completed, and the trial operation has been carried over to the next fiscal year. We called formore registration in the system to the ASEAN countries.
This project was organized out by the Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ),
implemented mainly by four experts in charge as shown below. The ASEAN Centre for Energy(ACE), located in Jakarta, Indonesia, cooperated in collaboration with the Focal Points of eachcountry.
From the Technical Cooperation Department, International Cooperation Division, ECCJ;
General Manager: Mr. Yutaka Ogura
Project Manager: Industries (Steel)Technical Expert: Mr. Fumio Ogawa
Leader: Industries (Petroleum Refining)Technical Expert: Mr. Takashi Sato
Sub-leader: Industries (Petrochemical Plants)
Technical Expert: Mr. Hitoshi Kaji
Sub-leader: Industries (Petrochemical Plants)

I-3

II. Plan of “ASEAN Energy Management System” and Implementation Plan for 2010-2011 toEstablish the System
II-1. “ASEAN Energy Management System” Construction Plan
The system plan of the established “ASEAN Energy Management System” is shown in Fig. II-1-1.

Regist.
Experts

ASEAN
Customers
Information
Service
ASEAN Network of
Cooperators

One-Stop
to System

Advisory
Service
EnergyAudit“ASEAN Energy
Management System”

Campaign/
Award
SystemTraining
Service
Coordination

ECCJ

ASEAN
Stakeholders
Fig. II-1-1: Plan of ASEAN Energy Management System

In the above system, the most important functions were established first as the Step-1 System, andoperation started using available functions. While assessing the results of the operation, other effectivefunctions were considered. From fiscal year 2009, it has advanced to the Step-2 System to establish
and prepare prioritized functions. It was determined to create a system and methods to continuously
improve the Step-1 System in the establishment process of the Step-2.
With this in mind, the basic schedule of the ASEAN Energy Management System has been updated.
Fig. II-1-2 shows the latest schedule of the ASEAN Energy Management System. As shown in thisfigure, The Step-1 System is supposed to be completed in fiscal year 2010, but actually it has not been
completed.
Main activities for fiscal year 2010 are:(1) The fourth Energy Awards of the “ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings” was completed without troubles. The points for
improvement in operation were discussed, especially increasing the number of applications togather more excellent case studies of energy management. To this end, two new categories oflarge-scale companies and medium to small-sized companies classified by the annual energy
consumption has been set from this fiscal year to increase opportunities of application andreceiving award. Moreover, a new category “Special Submission” was added to award energy
conservation effect achieved by single technology or facility. These were conducted to gather
more case studies of energy management.
(2) Standard energy management tools should be prepared and promoted. That is to utilize theII-1finalized ASEAN Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database and Technical Directory as
effective tools, and develop actions to utilize and disseminate these tools.
Consideration to establish and collect effective handbooks to complement these tools willcontinue.
(3) To facilitate the use of the tools by the existing implementing organizations and concerned partiesof the ASEAN region, trial use of a search system between implementing organizations andcustomers (Online Energy Information System) will start. With this system, the customers canfind a suitable implementing organization.
(4) Working towards the construction of the Step-2 System launched in fiscal year 2009, functions tobe added, together with necessary programs and tools relevant to these functions will beconsidered based on an evaluation of the Step-1 System. Construction of a useful information
supply system has already included in the plan, such as a directory of energy conservation
technology/machinery and equipment suppliers including the JASE-World Technical Directory ofenergy conservation technologies of Japan. The aim of this system is to provide such tools andrelevant information to business enterprises and offer support for commercial application.
(5) Based on the achievements of above activities, check the improvement status of the plan for the
ASEAN Energy Management System and review it as necessary.
(6) Continue actions to expand the ASEAN network of cooperators to disseminate the ASEAN
Energy Management System among as much people concerned as possible.
SystemLevel

STEP - 1

Main Activities

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Completion of "Online Energy
Information System"
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Completion

Development of Additional
Functions / Programs / Tools
STEP - 2 Working & Tuning Prepared New
Functions / Programs / Tools
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Entire Operation of ASEAN Energy
System Management System

Fig. II-1-2: Schedule for Constructing the ASEAN Energy Management System

II-2

II-2. Implementation Plan for 2010-2011
In accordance with the basic plan for constructing and operating the “ASEAN Energy Management
System” in the previous section, a plan was created. The implementation plan was finalized at the
Inception Workshop held in July 2010, and agreement was reached with the government personnel
from the ASEAN countries. Again this year, submissions of proposals were received from eachcountry in accordance with the fiscal year 2010 basic implementation plan finalized at the FY2009
Post Workshop held early March 2010. Based on the proposals, ECCJ prepared a proposal for
implementation, which was discussed at the Inception Workshop. Proposals on this project werereceived from seven countries excluding Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia. Among these, fivecountries were selected as the site for the project of this fiscal year.
Priority activities for this fiscal year are:
1. ASEAN Energy Management System: Completion of the Step-1 System and continuous operation♣ Construction of Information Provision Function and Start of Operation(1) Continue collecting and disseminating the Best Practices in Energy Management: Fourth EnergyAwarda. Smooth operation and improvement of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings
b. Improve a system to share information on award-winning case studies
c. Improve operation for collecting more case studies in a wider range(2) Development of energy management tools and guidelines for its systematic use
a. Finalize ASEAN Energy Management Handbook, reflecting the results of use in factories andbuildings
b. Establish guidelines for the effective use of the Handbook, as well as the Technical Directoryand In-house Database created for projects of major industries and buildingsc. Consideration on creating supplementary technical handbooks♣ Development of Service Provision Function regarding Energy Audits and Training(1) Start trial operation of the Online Energy Information System to facilitate the use of the existing
implementing organizations, including ESCOs, between the implementing organizations and thecustomers♣ Expand the ASEAN Network of Cooperators(1) Introduce activities and request for cooperation and participation in the projects throughworkshops and company visits
2. ASEAN Energy Management System: Construction of the Step-2 System and start of operations
3. Review of the plan for the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the activities above
Following initiatives will be taken to achieve the above goals:
1. Intensive Seminar-Workshop in the ASEAN region
The purposes of the Intensive Seminar-Workshops are: 1) introduce the PROMEEC Projects including
the Energy Management Project; 2) introduce and analyze the results of the fourth round of ASEAN
Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings; 3) introduce theII-3functions and programs of the ASEAN Energy Management System; and 4) disseminate the relevant
programs and tools.
This fiscal year, in response to the energy conservation activities of the APAEC, Session 3 on theAwareness & Financing was held to report the status of countries visited and to introduce cases inJapan and contents common to Japan and ASEAN. Group work using case studies, which was held in
the ISW, was reorganized into case studies and group discussion scheduled on the second day.
2. Training on the use of ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
The entire morning session on the second day was used to give detailed explanation on the ASEAN
Energy Management Handbook for thorough understanding by the participants. In the afternoon
session, the recent award-winning cases of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings, chosen in advance by the countries visited, each from
Industries and Buildings, were used as the material of the discussion. Application documents of thecases were distributed to the participants, who discussed analysis of the cases in accordance with theeleven Key Steps in the “Key Step Approach”, which is an important theme of the Energy
Management Handbook by SGA (small-group activity). Finally, the results were presented by thegroups.
3. Visits to Concerned Companies/Organizations
After the Intensive Seminar-Workshop and training on the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook,visit companies/organizations concerned with the following goals: (two locations in each country)(1) Provision of advice and opinion exchange regarding energy conservation activities in factories
and buildings wishing to introduce the Energy Management Handbook. This includes energy
conservation promotion, understanding of the condition of the energy management system, andthe giving of advice regarding problems.
(2) Encourage utilization of and participation in the ASEAN Energy Management System; introduce
the ASEAN Award System of Best Practice in Energy Management for Industries and Building,and if possible, request for submitting applications.
4. Activities to Operate the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings
The following activities will be developed to improve the selection process of the award-winningcases and evaluation standards in the fourth round of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices inEnergy Management for Industries and Buildings:(1) Attendance at the Meeting of BOJ
Attend the Board of Judges (BOJ) as observer in the process of evaluation and selection of casestudies(2) Call for the application in the fifth round of the award
Activities will continue to receive more applications for the fifth round, including improvement of
the evaluation standards based on the analysis of the award-winning cases in the fourth round of
the award.

II-4

5. Research Forum in Japan
Inviting the BOJ members and others concerned, the sixth Research Forum was held in Japan with thegoals below:(1) Research on the improvement for the PROMEEC Phase-3 in the ASEAN Energy Management
System(2) Improving the operation method of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings including the evaluation standards(3) Visits and meetings with the award-winning companies
6. Investigations and Creation of Tools
Continue preparation of the above activities on the Japan and ASEAN sides, investigation of the plans
based on the analysis of past implementation, and creation of tools including the Energy Management
Handbook.
The above activity plan and the schedule are shown in Table II-2-1 below.

II-5

Project / Activities
April

May

June

July

2010
August September October November December January

2011
February

Remarks
March(Overall）
A. Development of Detailed Project Plans / Preparatory Work
B. Contract with ACE
C. Preparation to Start Projects
D. Inception Workshop
E. Implantation of Projects
F. Post Workshop
G. Preparation of Report

11/12-19（3-Project Management）

MTPEC 11(1) Planning / Preparation / Evaluation(2) Coordination Meeting in Indonesia or Japan(3) Inception Workshop(4) Post Workshop

7/1,2

Project (Energy Management)(1) Develop Detailed Plan / Arrange for Site Activity / Develop(2) BOJ for Award System (Energy Management)(3) 1st Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits toCompanies)(4) 2nd Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits toCompanies)(5) Operation of ASEAN Award System / Establishment of ASEAN
EM System(6) Research Forum in JP (Improvement in Award System /ASEAN EM System)(7) 3rd Site Activity (Summary&Post Workshop)(8) Preparation of Report*(Ceremony)
6/8 & 9

1st Local Activities

2nd Local Activities

3 daysTable II-2-1: FY2010 Implementation Plan

II-6

Max.
4 Countries

III. Activities in Each Country(Intensive Seminar-Workshop, Training and Visits to Companies)
III-1. Overview
As scheduled, we visited 5 countries, Vietnam, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia and
Myanmar, and carried out the field activities. We stayed for 3days at each country,. On thefirst day, we held the Intensive Seminar-Workshop. On the second day, we gave the training
for use of the Energy Management Handbook. On the third day, we visited the plants andbuildings where they hoped to introduce the Energy Management Handbook into
energy-saving activities, gave advice on the activities and exchanged opinions.
In August 2010, the first dispatch was made to Vietnam. In October, the second dispatch wasmade to Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia and Indonesia, and in December, the third dispatch
was made to Myanmar. This fiscal year, the Intensive Seminar-Workshop had many
participants from a wide-ranging of organizations including government agencies,
implementing organizations, industry groups, companies and universities. The total number ofparticipants was 190. We visited up to three places in each country and a total of ninecompanies and related organizations in the above five countries.
The training for use of the Energy Management Handbook received attention of many people
concerned. In the five countries where the one-day training was implemented, 170 people
participated, exchanged questions and answers very actively and conducted Group Work withenthusiasm.
The example of the Intensive Seminar-Workshop program is shown in the Attached Material
III-2-1-1. The program is broadly composed of the following sessions:
Session 1: Overview and result of the PROMEEC project and this fiscal year’s plan
Session 2: Function and program of “ASEAN Energy Management System”(1) Overview of the latest “ASEAN Energy Management System”(2) Specific functions and programs- Result of the 4th ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industry and Building- Analysis of the result- Introduction of the implementing organizations - customer search system (Online Energy
Information System to Utilize Existing Implementing Organizations)- Introduction of the JASE-World technical directory- Introduction of the energy management tools
Session 3: “Awareness and Financing”
As described above, this fiscal year, we made changes to the conventional configuration as
follows:(1) In Session 3, conventionally, the “Training: Group activities for improvement of theEnergy Management” was conducted using the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices
in Energy Management for Industry and Building. The Training, however, had a highdegree of similarity to the case study conducted on the second day. Therefore, it was
integrated into the program on the second day. Instead, to Session 3, report by the persons
concerned under the theme “Awareness and Financing”, which was requested by APAEC,
was newly added.
(2) As part of the e-Directory, the presentation of the activities and directory of JASE-World
was included to introduce Japanese energy-saving technologies.
In addition, on the second day, the training program for use of the Energy Management
Handbook was implemented in all the five countries. The example of the program is shown in
the Attached Material III-2-1-2. This consists of two sessions.
This fiscal year, nearly three hours was newly allocated to “Explanation of the Energy
Management Handbook” toward a thorough penetration of it. Brunei Darussalam, however,III-1

had its own Energy Management Guide, and in the same way as last year, the time wasallocated to the explanation of the Guide and the building energy-saving diagnosis guide by
the person concerned from Brunei Darussalam.
Session 1: Seminar(1) Detailed explanation of the Energy Management Handbook
Session 2: Workshop: Case study through small-group activities(1) Introduction of the overview of the ASEAN Award case example selected for case study
by the host nation(2) Group Work- Discussion: Proposal of improvement using the Energy Management Handbook- Presentation of the discussion result and discussion and opinion exchange
In all the five countries, after the Intensive Seminar - Workshop and the training for use of theEnergy Management Handbook, we examined the actual use of the Energy Management
Handbook and the activity status at the pioneer companies through the visits/hearing surveys
to the companies and held consultations. With the efforts of the parties concerned in eachcountry, such as Focal Point, and the persons concerned from the ASEAN Centre for Energy,
we could implement the above activities smoothly as planned. As a result, the following
achievements were made:(1) This fiscal year, many participants from the countries and almost all companies andvarious related organizations had interests in the project and the “ASEAN Energy
Management System” program, and the project and program were evaluated as effective
to the energy-saving activities. At the same time, we could confirm that they had a desire
to participate in them.
(2) The ASEAN Award system started as a program for compiling best practices in energy
management in the “ASEAN Energy Management System” from the countries andspreading them in the ASEAN. It was held four times so far and has been attracting more
and more interests and expectations. We could advance in forming the basis for the Awardsystem including operational improvements for continuously inviting more companies forparticipation in the future.
(3) The Energy Management Handbook contains specific activity guidelines for promoting
energy conservation. The participants could experience the usefulness of the guidelines
through the group activities using the specific case examples. Brunei Darussalam has set
a policy of development and use of the national version of this Handbook as the Energy
Management Guideline at the national level.
In addition, the introduction and use of the Energy Management Handbook were
implemented at five pioneer companies. According to the result of the introduction, we
have made the ASEAN version which has versatility, and we have tried to spread it to thecountries. In Laos where we visited last year, the national language version was available.
In Vietnam, the pioneer company has been translating it to Vietnamese. In Cambodia, too,such a demand has been arising.
(4) This fiscal year as well, the “cooperators’ network” for this project has expanded to many
companies including the companies we visited. Since 2004 when we started this project,
we have visited 117 companies (plants, buildings, ESCO, etc.) and implementing
organizations, government agencies, universities/research bodies, etc., and we madesurveys and gave advice on their activities.
In all the five countries, we visited the companies/plants other than pioneer companies and wemade sure that they understood the usefulness of the energy management tools such as theEnergy Handbook and the significant achievements of the PROMEEC activities that havebeen implemented every year. At the same time, we called for participation in the ASEAN
Award system of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industry and Building.
III-2

The actual activities in each country are described in detail as follows:
III-2. Activities and Implementation Results in Each CountryIII-2-1. Vietnam
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The Intensive Seminar-Workshop was held at a large meeting room on the fourth floor ofHong Ngoc Hospital which is an affiliate of the Hong Ngoc Hotel Gr. in Hanoi. A total of
about 30 people, including Mr. Dang Hai Dung, from the Energy Efficiency & Conservation
Office of MOIT (Ministry of Industry and Trade), Mr. Nguyen Minh An, Deputy Director of
ECC/Hanoi, the persons concerned of ECC/Hanoi, the persons concerned of DOIT/Bac Giang
which is located relatively near Hanoi, and people from textile, paper/pulp, automobile,railway and machine companies, participated. The Intensive Seminar-Workshop started at 9
o’clock. Mr. Hoang Minh Lam, ECC/Hanoi, hosted almost all through the seminar, andsometimes Ms. Hang of ECC/Hanoi took the place. It was expected that many of theparticipants couldn’t understand English well, and Mr. Pham Van Duong, Vietnamese, whojoined ACE two months ago, served as interpreter in English and Vietnamese, but theinterpretation of some technical contents sometimes suspended.
(1) Welcome Remarks: Mr. Nguyen Minh An, Deputy Director of ECC/Hanoi, Mr. Ogura,and Mr. Junianto, ACE, gave an address of thanks to the cooperating organs fromeach standpoint and explained about the significance of energy-saving and
PROMEEC/EM project and the future utilization/development.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects / PROMEEC EM Projects: Presentation of Outline &Achievements of PROMEEC Project and EM (Energy Management Base
improvement) project1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Mr. Junianto, ACE):
Presentation of the EEC activities in APAEC 2010-2015 Program and the past
activities of the three PROMEEC projects: Material 1 (not attached)2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Introduction of the EM project plan for this fiscal year: Material 2 (notattached)
3) EC Law in Vietnam (Mr. Dung, MOIT): It was explained using PPT materials in
Vietnamese. The necessity of energy saving and the outline concept of Energy
Conservation Law which was approved by the Diet in Vietnam this June were
presented: Material 3 (not attached)(3) Session 2: Introduction of Functions and Program of the ASEAN Energy
Management System
1) Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ):
Explanation of dissemination of the ASEAN Award and EMHB on the ASEAN
EM System extracted from this fiscal year’s plan and the specific study
development plan of the Functions & Other Tools; Material 4 (not attached)2) Specific Functions and ProgramA) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011(Mr. Junianto, ACE): Presentation of the evaluation result for the EM section
on this fiscal year’s BOJ and introduction of the future issues; Material 5(not attached)B) Information System- Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Case (Mr. Kaji,
ECCJ): Presentation of this fiscal year’s application for the EM section andthe analysis result of the award; Material 6 (not attached)- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (Mr. Junianto, ACE): Introduction of the Online Energy
III-3

Information System and request for join/utilization. At present, 16organizations have registered as the implementating organization.; Material
7 (not attached)- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): Introduction of
JASE-World in relation to the e-Directory for Technologies & Equipment
and explanation about how to use this technical directory; Material 8 (notattached)C) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and other tools (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Presentation of the outline of the Thermal and Electrical Technology
Handbooks related to the EMHB and the national version of it at eachcountry; Material 9 (not attached)- In-House Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Junianto,ACE): Presentation of the industries, building types and activity status on
the IHDB; Material 10 (not attached)- Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Pham, ACE):
Presentation of the TD type, case examples and access method; Material 11(not attached)(4) Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing; As Awareness and Financing
were key items of APAEC, as well as at this session, they were newly added to the
PROMEEC project this fiscal year. The combination of these two topics is not
appropriate, but it was introduced as a new Session. The planned presentation by thehost country couldn’t be prepared.
1) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan (Mr.
Ogura, ECCJ): Presentation of the Energy Conservation Law and measures inJapan arising from the whole global warming situation and the issue about
exhaustion of natural resources, measures including the recent Eco-Point System
for improvement of people’s energy-saving awareness, financial assistance toenergy-saving measures and case examples of JICA/ODA energy-saving loans in
the ASEAN (Climate Change Measure Loan and Two Step Loan). In Vietnam,
these two types of loan have been applied and use of them was encouraged. ;Material 12 (not attached)
2) Financial Support System in ASEAN (Mr. Junianto, ACE): The background of thiscase in the APAEC, the ASEAN SOME Funding System and the International
Potential Funding Sources surrounding the ASEAN were introduced, but there wasno description about Japanese systems.; Material 13 (not attached)(5) Q&A
1) How is the IHDB for Building and Industry? → General information is describedfor Building, and specific information by industry is described for Industry. (Mr.
Junianto) → Is there any format sample? → See the ACE website. (Mr. Junianto)2) What will be the finance base for the Energy Audit? → It will be studied as an
APAEC Implementation Project at ACE. (Mr. Junianto)
3) How many international fundings have already been received? → Mostly handled
under government to ASEAN, now open for proposal. (Mr. Junianto)(6) Breakdown of participants1) MOIT (Ministry of Industry and Trade): Mr. Dang Hai Dung
2) ECC/Hanoi: Mr. Nguyen Minh An, Mr. Hoang Minh Lam, Mr. Nguyen Tien Luc,
Ms. Nguyen Thi Thanh Hang, etc.
3) DOIT (Department of Industry and Trade)/Bac Giang: 2 people
4) Textile: Hanoi May 19 Textile: 2 people
5) Train company: Gia Lam Train: 2 people
6) Building: 4 people; Ocean Park Building: 2 people, Melia Tower: 1 person, VGBC
(Vietnam Green Building Council): 1 person (French)
III-47) Paper and pulp: Tissue Paper: 2 people
8) Automobile: Goshi Automobile: 1 person, DeaHa Automobile Comp.: 1 person
9) Machine: Thang Lonmg Mechanic: 1 person, Mechanic & Electric Comp: 1 person,
Automate Machine: 1 person, Construction Comp: 1 person
10) Plastic: Hannel Foam Plastic: 1 person11) Rubber: Hanoi Rubber: 1 person12) Unknown business type: SAS-CTAMAD: 1 person, Viglacera: 2 people,
13) Government-related organization: Culture Organization Govt.: 1 person(7) Responses at ISW, etc. and issues
1) Stance of the Vietnamese Focal Point (MOIT) to the ASEAN PROMEEC project:
In the EM project, too, the FPs of other countries supported and accompanied us
during ISW, the Training and Advisory Visit on the EMHB. Although weunderstand the Vietnam MOIT has a small number of staff members and they arebusy, a few other people from the same office can participate and try to absorb thecontents of ISW and TR. We will make suggestions in the future whenever there isa chance. We think this is also part of human resource development.
2) As before, this time, we distributed the English version of presentation material,common to the ISW and TR. But it seemed that many of the participants couldn’t
understand English well, and Mr. Dung, MOIT, said to us that we should havetranslated the presentation material into Vietnamese. Actually, when we asked theparticipants in the middle of the lecture if they could understand English, only lessthan half of them raised their hands. Mr. Pham, ACE, served as an interpreter, but
we didn’t know whether he interpreted correctly. It was very difficult to makethem understand the contents using the English material. In the future, it seems
that it is necessary to consider translation of presentation material into local
languages in some countries.
3) Consideration of the Vietnamese version based on the EMHB English version: The
Vietnamese version ought to have been already prepared in cooperation of
VINAMILK. We requested MOIT to show us the actual version, but they didn’t
show it to us. We asked MOIT and ECC/Hanoi to increase the opportunities ofpresentation at seminars using the Vietnamese version as soon as possible if theyfound that there was an obstacle against the dissemination of EM using the English
version.
2. Training for the use of the Energy Management Handbook, etc.
The number of participants was 26 (excluding the host people from MOIT, ECC Hanoi, ACE,
ECCJ, etc.). The number of participants who attended the workshop in the afternoon
following the workshop in the morning was 22. Among them, there were about three people
who attended the workshop the previous day. Based on the number of participants, threegroups were made for Group Work that day (about seven people in one group).
Conventionally, the course on the second day was intended for companies and implementing
organizations which had special interests in introduction of the tools such as Energy
Management Handbook, In-house Database and Technical Directory to make them understandthe details and the uses of those tools.
This fiscal year, in view of the incorporation of the PROMEEC (EM) programs in Phase-3,
the contents for the second day were changed as follows:
1) In the morning, the explanation about the In-House Database and the Technical Directory
which was conventionally conducted was omitted (because the rough explanation wasgiven in the first day seminar). The remaining time was spent to the explanation of “Energy
Management Handbook”.
2) Conventionally, the “Energy Management Handbook” was explained almost page by page.
This time, the copy of this handbook was included in the Material distributed to theparticipants and the explanation was conducted using PowerPoint slides.
III-53) In the afternoon, mainly, Group Work was conducted. The Group Work which wasconventionally conducted on the first day was omitted, and conducted only on the secondday. Concerning the Group Work, the following measures were taken (in addition to theconventional measures):- Case example(s) in the host country shall be used wherever possible.
- People of the host country shall have complete control over instruction for the wholeGroup Work. (In Vietnam, this was conducted as planned and the result was successful.)4) In the final session, FP in the host country or alternative person explained about the
government’s efforts and training courses.
The characteristics of this fiscal year’s training are mentioned above. The content of the actual
training (program) is shown in the Attached Material-2. (In principle, the program on thesecond day shall be common in every country. This fiscal year, the program in Brunei
Darussalam needs to be prepared as a special program through consultation with thecounterpart. It’s because Brunei Darussalam has already prepared its own Energy
Management Guide and has proceeded ahead of the other countries as shown in the last year’s
Training that Brunei Darussalam side gave guidance for Group Work. )The implementation results of each item on the day are described below.
(1) Lecture: Lecture about the outline/characteristics of the Energy Management Handbook
and content and important guidelines in detail; Materials 14- 15 (not attached). The
lecture was given in English. Mr. Pham (from Vietnam) of ACE interpreted consecutively.
About three hours were taken for the whole morning session, but the actual lecture time
was about half because of interpretation. It seems, however, that the participants could
keep interests in the lecture using slides more continuously than lecture reading books.
The characteristics of the Handbook are Key Step Approach and Small Group Activities(SGA). Only a few people were familiar with the methodologies such as SGA-related
TQM, TPM and Kaizen. (In other countries, more people know the methodologies. So,
this response in Vietnam was unexpected.)
We had a feeling that Mr. Pham understood and interpreted the content of lecture well andproperly. After the lecture, however, it was a surprise that the participants didn’t ask anyquestion. It’s a fact that we had some concern about the degree of understanding of
lecture in English via an interpreter. Mr. Ogura, manager, forced some participants to givecomments, and the following opinions were given:- The content was good. We want to carry out what we learned here back at our company.
- Some English terms were difficult to understand.
- (others)Also, Mr. Lam of ECC Hanoi gave a comment, “it will be better to promote morefamiliarity by insertion of more cartoons in preparing the Vietnamese version of Energy
Management Handbook.”(2) Workshop (group activity); Material 16 (not attached)
1) Presentation of energy-saving activities by the following two companies:
This time, in Vietnam, we used the cases of two companies, which applied each for the
Building and Industry sections in the EM of PROMEEC ASEAN Awards 2009-2010.
A) Ocean Park Building (Building Category, 2nd Runner-up) Presenter: Mr. Vu SinhB) Ha Noi 19 May Textile Company (Industry Category) Presenter: Mr. Hoang Minh
LamA) Mr. Vu Sinh, who was mentioned as a contact person in the competition application,
gave the presentation (in Vietnamese). The company which received the 2nd
Runner-up award gave a great presentation with full confidence. But it seemed thatthe presentation took too much time.
B) The presenter of the company couldn’t attend, and Mr. Lam explained as a substitute(in Vietnamese).
The application documents for the ASEAN Energy Award Competition were provided as
III-6

materials in both cases and the Vietnamese versions were put in file for participants. In
addition, explanation was made on the day. So, the preparation for the group discussion
was almost perfect.
We had a plan to visit the Ocean Park Building on the next day, 27th, and we could get
appropriate related information in advance.
2) Experience of Group Work
Before the Group Work, ECCJ explained about the basic matters, first. It was decided
that for the analysis/evaluation of cases, the Energy Management Handbook should be
used as a standard and that it should be discussed on whether necessary items are
implemented completely.
The final presentation items based on the discussion result were as follows (as inprevious years):A) Evaluation of energy-saving activities based on the presentation contents above(Good Points), and
B) Advice on the future possible improvement plan
After the explanation by ECCJ, we left the Group Work to the voluntary guidance by
the host (Mr. Lam of ECC Hanoi), resulting in a delay of the schedule. We felt thatsome details were insufficient, but there is no help for it considering it is in the middle
stage for technology transfer from Japan to ASEAN.
Three groups were made. The number of people in each group and the selected cases
are as follows:
Group No.
Number of people
Selected case1
7
Ocean Park Building
2
7
Hanoi 19 May Textile
38
Ocean Park Building
According to the discussion schedule, the discussion time was one and a half hours.
The actual discussion was a little shortened, but there was no problem.
One white board for each group was prepared for discussion/presentation. Various
methods were used by each group. The presenter of each group was as follows:
Group 1: Mr. Nguyen Tuan Phong (10/ 10 Textile Joint Stock Company)
Group 2: Mr. Vu Sinh (Ocean Park Building)Group 3: Mr. Duong Manh Ha (Gia Lam Train Company)
Group 1 didn’t make sufficient preparation for the presentation and the presenter
explained while writing on the white board. Mr. Sinh of Group 2 gave the presentation
using the slides prepared for it with some corrections made. Group 3 gave thepresentation the smartest using newly prepared slides.
3) Comments from ECCJ and ECC Hanoi
First, ECCJ distributed the “Cross-reference of the contents of both cases and each
item of the Energy Management Handbook” (prepared by Mr. Kaji, technical expert)(something like correct answers for this Group Work) and gave an explanation.
Then, the following comments were made:- Mr. Lam, ECC Hanoi, coordinated the whole work. I am grateful to him.
- The Group Work was the first experience for most of the participants and I think it
was a good opportunity. I hope you will bring this experience back to yourworkplace and use it there.
- Generally, the time for presentation was long. Time management is also an importantelement.
- Only Group 3 introduced the members at the beginning of the presentation.
- The reason for the selection of cases was not explained. Since the key person (Mr.
Sinh) from Ocean Park (Case 1)) was in Group 2, from the aspect of fairness, anothertheme should have been selected or Mr. Sinh should have not taken an important role.
The fact that he was a leader of the Group Work as well as a presenter was not goodto the Group Work because we don’t know to what degree the other members’
III-7

opinions were reflected.
Mr. Lam also made comments (in Vietnamese).
(3) Presentation from MOIT
Mr. Dung explained the government program and Training Course using the PowerPoint
slides (in Vietnamese). We have requested Mr. Pham, ACE, to translate this material
roughly into English. In the slides, three kinds of books (Manuals/ Handbooks for Energy
Managers/ Engineers) were shown. We obtained one of them (for energy-saving audit)
later. We heard that there were descriptions related to EMHB in this book, but actually,
there was no special description about Key Step Approach and SGA. Only thedescriptions related to the data report format was found in the latter half of EMHB.
(4) Awarding of Certificates and Closing of Training
Lastly, Mr. Dung, MOIT, called the names of participants, and Mr. Ogura, General
Manager, of ECCJ, gave the participants the Certificates. After that, Mr. Dung, MOIT,
made closing remarks and the second day (Training) ended.
(5) Breakdown of the participants1) MOIT: Mr. Dang Hai Dung
2) ECC/Hanoi: 5 people; Mr. Hoang Minh Lam, Mr. Nguyen Tien Luc, Ms. Nguyen Thi
Thanh Hang, Mr. Do Van Sang, Mr. Phung Van Tue3) Textile: 10/10 Textile: 4 people, Than Long Textile: 2 people, Dong Xuan Textile: 1
person, Hanoi 19/5 Textile: 1 person4) Paper and pulp: Tissue Paper: 2 people
5) Automobile: Goshi Automobile: 1 person, DeaHa Automobile Company: 1 person
6) Rubber: Sao Vang Rubber: 1 person7) Plastic: Hannel Foam Plastic: 1 person8) Train company: Gia Lam Train Comp.: 2 people
9) Machine: Thang Long Mechanic: 1 person, Mechanic & Electric Hanoi Comp: 1
person, Equipment Comp: 1 person
10) Building: Ocean Park Building: 2 people, Melia Tower: 1 person, Estate Com: 1
person11) Others: National Center of Commerce: 1 person12) Unknown business type: SAS-CTAMAD: 1 person
3. Visit to the company
Based on this Intensive Seminar-Workshop and the Training about use of the Energy
Management Handbook, etc., we chose two companies mentioned below from the companies
which want to use the tools such as the Energy Management Handbook for the Energy
Management activities at plants and buildings and promotion of energy saving, and we visitedthe companies on August 27 and exchanged opinions. For the details, see the Attached
Material III-2-1-3.
(1) Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company(2) Ocean Park Building

III-8

Attached Material III-2-1-1 Agenda for Intensive Seminar-Workshop

AGENDA
Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
Day 1: August 25, 20 10
08:30-09:00
Registration
09:00-09:06
Welcome Remarks
Mr. Nguyen Minh An, Deputy Director of ECC Hanoi
09:06-09:22
Opening Statement
Mr. Yutaka Ogura, General Manager, The Energy Conservation Center, Japan(ECCJ)
09:22-09:35
Opening Statement
Mr. Junianto M, IT Manager, ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE)
09.35-10:00
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
10:00-11: 15
Session 1:
PROMEEC Projects / PROMEEC EM Project : Outline & Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
10:00-10:30
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Mr. Junianto - ACE)
10:30-11:00
2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project(Mr.Y.Ogura - ECCJ)
11:00-11:21
EEC Law in Vietnam(Mr. Dang Hai Dung, MOIT Viet Nam)
11:25-14:30
Session 2:“ASEAN Energy Management System” : Functions & Program
11:25-11:57
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System”(Mr. Y. Ogura - ECCJ)Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building
11:57-12:04- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-20 10 and Plan for 2010-2011(Mr Pham - ACE)
2) Information System
12:04-12:16- Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Case
(Mr. Hitoshi Kaji - ECCJ)
12:20-13:30
LUNCH
Presentation by ECCJ, ACE and Host Country2) Information System (Continued)
13:40-13:55- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (Mr. Junianto - ACE)
13:55-14:15- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Y. Ogura - ECCJ)
3) Energy Management Tools
14:15-14:30- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (Mr. Y. Ogura - ECCJ)
14:30-14:52- In-house Database for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Junianto - ACE)
15:18-15:25- Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Pham - ACE)
14:53-15:18
COFFEE BREAK
15:30-17:00
Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing
15:25-16:15
1) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System inJapan (Mr. Y. Ogura - ECCJ)
16:15-16:30
2) Financial Support System in ASEAN ( Mr. Junianto - ACE)
16:30-16:45
Q&A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop

III-9

Attached Material III-2-1-2 Agenda for Training of EMHB
Day 2: August 26, 20 10
08:30-09:00
Registration
09:00-12:30
Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ
09:04-10:02
Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN(Mr. Fumio Ogawa - ECCJ)
10.02-10:22
COFFEE BREAK
10:22-12:08
Details of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN(Mr. F. Ogawa - ECCJ)
12: 15-12:30
Q&A
12:30-13:30
LUNCH
13:30-17:00
Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities)
ECC Hanoi/ECCJ
13:38-13:56
Guidance for Group Work
(Mr. F. Ogawa - ECCJ)
13:58-14:28(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Explanation of Best Practices /EM in Building (Case 1: Ocean Park
Building)(Mr. Vu Sinh, Ocean Park Building)
14:29-14:4 1
Explanation of Best Practices /EM in Industry (Case 2: Hanoi Textile
Company)(Mr. Hoang Minh Lam, ECC Hanoi)
14:41-16:00
Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by ECC Hanoi/ECCJ- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management
Handbook”
16.00-16: 15
COFFEE BREAK
16: 15-17:05
Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2
17:05-17:36
Comments by ECCJ Experts and ECC Hanoi
17:36-17:48
Discussion on Proposed Program / Plan of EM Training in Vietnam(Mr. Dang Hai Dung, MOIT)
17:48-18:00
Awarding Certificate for Participants (MOIT, ACE & ECCJ)
18:00-18:05
Closing Remarks(Mr. Dang Hai Dung, MOIT)COMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-10Attached Material III-2-1-3: Records of the visit to
the related companies/organizations
1. Vietnam
Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Vietnam (No. 1)
Visit to Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company
NO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time August 27, Friday 8:30 to 11:30
2
Meeting place Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company
Tu Liem - Hanoi City
3Counterparts- Mr. Do Thai Giang, Vice Director
Participate in the seminar on the first day4
Accompanying -Mr. Hoang Duc Huyen (Assistant Head of Training andpersons
Propaganda)(ECC/Hanoi)-Mr. Do Van Sang (left in the middle)
5
Visitors (ACE, - Mr. Junianto M (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van Duong
ECCJ)(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Hitoshi Kaji (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)
6. Overview of the company we visited
Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company was founded in 1959 and became a joint holding
company in 2005. The company has 520 employees and manufactures athletic shoes andrubber sheets for laying on floors. The annual shipment value is 4.5 million USD and its
products are exported to Europe, Mexico, Japan, etc. The annual quantity of production forathletic shoes is 1.2 to 1.3 million pairs and that for rubber sheets is 80 thousand sheets (2square meters for one sheet).
For energy, in addition to electricity, coal is used because steam is needed in the curing
process, etc.
The annual electric power consumption is about 1,440 MWh, and the annual coalconsumption is about 650 tons.
As described above, a large amount of energy has been used. They had a strong interest in the
reduction of energy consumption, and during the process of asking guidance for ECC Hanoi
on the current status analysis, etc., they knew about this seminar and participated.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) For the electrical equipment, they have 45 kW x 8 lines of rubber mixing machines, 132
kW x 3 lines of rubber stretching devices, 90 kW x 2 lines of pressing machines and 230
kW (150 sets) of shoe sewing machines, etc.
2) For the electric power consumption ratio, the rubber mixing machines make up 35%, therubber stretching devices make up 15% and the shoe sewing machines make up about 30%.
3) In addition, they have two coal firing boilers. The capacity is 3.5 ton/h and one of the twoboilers is a spare. On the boiler, the thermal insulation of steam pipes was strengthened andcondensed water was collected.
4) The production is conducted in 3 shifts, except the sewing process of athletic shoes.
5) In September 2010, it has been decided that they will obtain ISO 14001. The engineering
team is now working on a specific plan toward improvement of the environment. Therefore,
we expected that we could get specific improvement proposals during this visit.
6) As the management method, 5S has already been introduced.
III-11

(2) Explanation, opinion and proposal on our visit including the field inspection
1) At the field, the 5S signs are put up (Vietnamese signs also start with the character S so thatthey correspond to 5S in Japanese). On the engineering aspect, thermal insulation has been
provided on the steam pipes. Also, for the lighting of the show sewing room, each sewing
machine has a switch so that the lighting can be turned on/off at individual sewing
machines. We could understand that they have been conducting a certain level ofenergy-saving activities both in the Energy Management aspect and the engineering aspect.
2) At this plant, specified employees are allocated to each line mainly in the sewing room.
Therefore, employees allocated to the line seem to know about problems the best. At thispoint, by introduction of SGA, a large energy-saving effect can be obtained.
3) Mr. Giang who gave us explanation and guided around the plant is the only person who
participated in this seminar, and we hope he could understand the importance of Energy
Management. We expect that an EC Team will be organized and they will make efforts forenergy conservation systematically.
4) Please refer to the EMHB for the actual efforts. The English version of EMHB can be
downloaded on the website of ACE. In Vietnam, VINAMILK voluntarily translates the
EMHB into Vietnamese. For the Vietnamese version, contact ECC Hanoi, MOIT.
5) For the engineering aspect, the following indications and proposals were made:The steam generating pressure of the boiler is 0.55 MPa, while the required pressureof the demand side is about 0.35 MPa. Energy saving is possible by lowering thesteam pressure generated at the boiler,.
For compressed air, the generating pressure of the compressor is 0.7 MPa, while therequired pressure of the demand side is about 0.5 MPa. Energy saving is possible bylowering the compressed air pressure generated at the compressor,.
Leaks are found on some of steam pipes and compressed air pipes. By stopping theleaks, energy saving is possible.
During the field inspection, it was raining. Coals that became wet due to rain were
supplied to the boiler. The more moisture is contained in coals, the more energy islost. In this respect, the degree of effect should be grasped and any measure should
be taken.
This boiler has no instrument for measuring the temperature and the oxygen
concentration of the exhaust gas discharged from the boiler. The temperature and theoxygen concentration of the exhaust gas are data essential to know the heat efficiencyof the boiler, and a periodic measurement is preferred.
The boiler that has been used adopts the burning method where block coals are input
by hands. It is expected that some of waste rubber such as cutting chips can be used
as an alternative energy source of coal fuels after being cut finely. Therefore, we
propose a test.
(3) Response of the company we visited
1) They understood the importance of Energy Management by SGA.
2) They also understood the points that should be technically improved.
3) They are aware of the importance of data collection through the instruction from ECC
Hanoi and these indications.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) Basically, CFL is used for the lighting of meeting room, and fluorescent lighting is used in
the plant. During daytime, natural lighting is taken in to turn off part of lighting.
2) Air conditioners are set in the office and the meeting room. During our visit, the windowsof the meeting room were opened, and the wind flow was generated using fans. We foundtheir consideration to energy conservation. In the plant, there is no air conditioner.
Ventilating fans and electric fans are used.
3) The area of the plant is divided by process, and employees are allocated by line. Transfer of
III-12

objects in each process is conducted by persons.
4) Electrical equipment such as rubber mixing machines was purchased by the unit of device.
No inverter is installed.
5) The boiler is a two-body type water-can boiler and adopts the block coal hand molding
system. The ventilation system is a balanced draft type. The name plate indicates it was
manufactured in 2008, but the appearance looks older.

III-13

Visit to PROMEEC Energy Management) related organization: Vietnam (No. 2)
Visit to Ocean Park BuildingNO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time August 27, Friday 13:50 to 17:00
2
Meeting place Hanoi Property Management Co., Ltd.
Suite 3 12, Ocean Park Building, 1 Dao Duy Anh Str., Hanoi City
3Counterparts- Mr. Vu Tien Son, Director- Ms. Phan Thu Huyen, Personnel & Admin. Manager- Mr. Vu Sinh, Chamber of Project (attended the seminar andpresented the case example)- Mr. Rhan Dung Hung (attended the seminar)4
Accompanying - Mr. Do Van Sang
persons(ECC/Hanoi)
5
Visitors (ACE, - Mr. Junianto M (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van Duong
ECCJ)(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Hitoshi Kaji (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)
6. Overview of the company we visited(1) Ocean Park Building completed its construction in 2001 and fully opened in April 2004.
It is a 21-floor office building. On the first and second floors are Trade Center and on theremaining 19 floors are offices. The total floor area is 34,620 m2.
(2) We visited the asset management section of Hanoi Maritime Holding Company, which isan asset management company.
(3) Ocean Park Building applied for the Large-Scale Building Energy Management Sectionof the 2009 ASEAN Awards and got the third prize.
(4) We visited there to check of the activity status of Energy Management and tocontinuously promote energy conservation activities.
(5) In this seminar, Mr. Vu Sinh and Mr. Rhan Dung Hung participated, and Mr. Vu Sinhpresented the activity status.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) This building is one of the largest consumers of Hanoi Electric Power Company.
Improvement in the energy consumption is required and they have a strong interest.
Because of this, in-house power generation by the emergency power-generator isconducted at irregular intervals. Mr. Vu Tien Son who gave the presentation is an engineer,
and therefore, he gave immediate answers to the questions with specific values. We could
know his interest in energy conservation.
2) 97% of the energy is electric power and the remaining 3% is light oil for the generator set(which is used at an emergency and electric power demand seasons).
3) During planning, they took energy conservation into consideration. BMS (Building
Management System) for the air conditioning facilities, refrigerant current transformation
volume control for air conditioning facilities, CFL lighting, etc. were introduced andadopted. As a result, they feel proud that the energy intensity is lower compared to that ofother buildings and they are concerned with energy intensity.
4) On the aspect of operation, generally, the setting temperature of building air conditioner is
III-14

25°C uniformly. In this building, the setting temperature of air conditioner in the common
area is 26.5°C, which is higher by 1 to 2°C. In addition, the operating time is set by season.
5) This building is approved as Green Building by the VGBC (Vietnam Green Building
Council), and they exchange information as a member of the Chief Engineers Associationof Building.
6) The electric power consumption ratio between the tenant occupation area and the common
area is 19 to 20% and 81 to 80%. The ratio of the electric power consumption of air
conditioning facilities is about 55 to 56%.
7) The tenant occupancy is stable at about 85%.
8) The engineering section prepares and manages the operation/maintenance manual (3 King
Files).
9) The consumption of lighting and power by tenant is recorded and managed every day. A
system of sending a report to the manager at abnormality has been established. Also, thenecessary data is graphed.
10) In the maintenance management, preventive maintenance (planned maintenance) has been
also introduced and implemented.
11) 5S has been introduced as a management method,.
12) At the seminar, it was pointed out that the energy-saving improvement rate was about 3%,
which was too small compared to that of the first prize case in the large-scale plant section(43% in two years). Since the building was originally constructed with awareness ofenergy saving, it seems difficult to achieve a large energy-saving improvement.
(2) Explanation, opinion and proposal on our visit including the field inspection
1) In the field, the 5S signs are put at various places. The whole places are neat and wellorganized, and we found that the workers have been well instructed. We could make surethat the efforts have been made appropriately.
2) There is a saying in Japan, “Squeezing a dry mop further.” There is no end for energy
saving. We expect a continuous improvement. The energy conservation law will be put into
effect next year in Vietnam, and it will not apply to this building. In that case, a continuous
improvement will be more indispensable.
3) It is considered that the energy-saving case example in the building section has generalversatility. From this point, it is desired that they will use the ACE Technical Directory/In
House Data Base. …(ACE’s opinion).
4) Top Policy (explanation/comment of Mr. Vu Tien Son) is clear and wonderful.
5) We confirmed that the recommendations described in the EMHB have been carried out.
6) This building is the Vietnam’s first award-winning example in the EM section of theASEAN Awards, which is worthwhile. The ASEAN Awards has the Building section in
addition to the EM section. Applications to the Building section are expected.
7) Basically, all employees must participate in SGA. From this point, it seems that theVietnamese version of EMBH is more effective. VINAMILK has been voluntarily
preparing the Vietnamese translation version. If you want to get one, contact ECC Hanoi,
MOIT.
8) Building multi-air conditioners are adopted and the outdoor units are set on the roof floor.
9) For lighting, CFLs, straight-tube fluorescent lamps, are introduced. During daytime, naturallight is used and lamps are turned off.
10) We made the following engineering indications and proposals:A) On each floor, AHU is set up, so that outside air and exhaust air are heat-exchanged
via the total heat exchanger. The intake volume of outside air, however, is notcontrolled. Therefore, if the indoor CO2 concentration, which should be measured
periodically, is under 1,000 ppm, the intake volume of outside air can be reduced andenergy conservation can be expected. We proposed a periodic measurement of indoor
CO2 concentration and adjustment of the intake volume of outside air based on themeasurement result.
III-15

B) At the field inspection, although they explained that a power-factor regulator was
installed, the power factor was 0.90 to 0.91. We felt the power factor was bad for the
existence of the power-factor regulator. We propose an investigation of the cause.
C) Many CFL downlights are used at the elevator halls and corridors. Change fromconstant use of downlights to LED down lights allows energy conservation. LED
downlight lighting fixtures are expensive, but the power consumption is small andlife is long.
(3) Response of the company we visited
1) They knew that it was important to continue Energy Management.
2) They understood technical points to be improved.
3) The SGA activities have taken root. They requested FP (ECC Hanoi) to try to apply for
another award system (Building section).
8. Overview of field inspection
1) The manuals, recording tables, etc. are organized and managed and are available instantly
whenever needed.
2) The photo of Energy Management team and responsible people is shown on the wall for
better understanding.
3) Building multi-air conditioners are adopted and outdoor units are set up on the roof floor.
No damage is found in cold insulation of the refrigerant piping.
4) On each floor, AHU is set up, so that outside air and exhaust air are heat-exchanged via thetotal heat exchanger.
5) For lighting, CFLs, straight-tube fluorescent lamps, are introduced. During daytime, naturallight is used and the lamps are turned off. For lighting of the meeting rooms, CFLs arebasically used. In the plant, fluorescent lamps are used. During daytime, natural light istaken in to reduce the use of luminaries.
6) In the fields, 5S signs are put up at various places. (“5S” comes from Japanese language
and 5S signs at Hanoi Rubber Joint Stock Company corresponded to the Japanese 5S. But
here, all the head characters are not S in Vietnamese language.)

III-16

III-2-2. Brunei Darussalam
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshop (ISW)The Ball Room on the first floor of Radisson Hotel in the city was used for the ISW on thefirst day and the second day. The room was long sideways and large and had a pillar near thecenter. Therefore, two projector screens were used, and we had to give the presentation paying
attention to the both screens. On the first day of ISW, over 50 people in total participated. It
seemed that most of them participated in this PROMEEC EM for the first time. Mr. Ahmad
said that many of the participants from the related agencies and companies were Senior
Officers. Also, the persons concerned of the Ministry of Finance who we visited for OJT audit
at the PROMEEC Building at the end of September participated for two days. The article
about the first day’s ISW was written up on the next day’s newspapers (Borneo Bulletin, etc.).
The content of the program is shown in the Attached Material III-2-2-1.
(1) Welcome Remarks: Mr. Matsatejo Sokiaw, Permanent Secretary of Energy of Prime
Minister’s Office, Mr. Ogura, and Mr. Nguyen Manh Hung, Executive Director of
ACE gave an address of thanks from the respective positions to the cooperative
organizations and presented the significance and the future use/development ofenergy saving and PROMEEC/EM project. Mr. Matsatejo Sokiaw stated that theannual energy consumption amount of Brunei Darussalam was 1 Billion Brunei $ (alittle under 80 billion yen). Based on the result of the government agengy’s
energy-saving audit conducted at PROMEEC Building the previous month, it became
evident that there is room for energy conservation by at least 10% by no cost & low
cost measures. He said that if 10% of 1 billion B$ is saved, the saved amount can beused for other purposes, and they must make efforts as a great effect could be
expected. He explained about awareness development of students and children as wellas adults. Also, concerning Renewable Energy, he stated that they would study aconstruction of a 1 MW PV Solar Power Plant which is the largest-scalce power plantin the ASEAN.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Project / PROMEEC EM Project : Presentation of Outline &Achievements of PROMEEC Project and EM (Energy Management baseimprovement) Projects
1)“Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project” (Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE):
Presentation of the EEC activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program an d the past
activities of three PROMEEC projects; Material 1 (not attached)2)“Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project” (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Presentation of this fiscal year’s plan for the EM Project; Material 2 (notattached)
3)“EEC Activities Update” (Mr. Ahmad bin Mohamad): Explanation about the recent
energy-saving promotion activities as well as awareness in Brunei Darussalam. The
EM Reference for Building has already been completed, and the EM Reference forIndustry and EC Tips are under preparation. Presentation about cooperation in the
PROMEEC acitivities, application status of the ASEAN Award, the Energy
Management Policy and the implementation status, etc.: Material 3 (not attached)(3) Session 2: Presentation of Functions and Program of ASEAN Energy Management
System1) “Outline of Updated ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ):
The ASEAN EM System is extracted from this fiscal year’s plan, and thedissemination of ASEAN Award and EMHB and the specific study anddevelopment plan for Functions & Other Tools are explained. ; Material 4 (notattached)2) Specific Functions and Program
III-17

A) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- “Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011”(Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE): Presentation of the examination result at the
EM section in this fiscal year’s BOJ and the future issues; Material 5 (notattached)B) Information System- “Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases” (Mr. Sato,
ECCJ): Presentation of analysis results of contents of application and theaward winning in this fiscal year’s EM section; Material 6 (not attached)- “Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations” (Ms. Maureen Balamiento, ACE): Presentation of Online
Energy Information System and requests for participation and utilization. At
present, 16 organizations registered as implementing organizations.;
Material 7 (not attached) This time, the In-house Database and Technical
Directory described in 3) below were also explained together.
- “Introduction of JASE-World” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): In relation to thee-Directory for Technologies & Equipment, JASE-World and the use of theTechnical Directory are introduced. ; Material 8 (not attached)C) Energy Management Tools- “Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools” (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Presentation of the outline of the Thermal and Electrical Technology
Handbooks related to the EMHB and the national version of each country;
Material 9 (not attached)- “Updates on the Development of Energy Management Tools” (Ms. Maureen
Balamiento, ACE): Presentation of the activities of Technical Directory (TD)and In-house Database (IHDB); Material 10 (not attached)(4) Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing; Awareness and Financing,which are the topics of this Session, were key items at the APAEC, so they were
newly added to the PROMEEC Project this fiscal year. The combination of these two
topics is not appropriate, but we dared to combine them as a new Session. The
planned presentation by the host country was not given, but the matter about
Awareness was included in the previous EEC Activities Update by Mr. Ahmad.
1) “Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan“ (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): Presentation of the Energy Conservation Law and measures
in Japan arising from the whole global warming situation and the issue about
exhaustion of natural resources, measures including the recent eco-point system
toward increase in the people’s energy-saving awareness, the financial support
system for energy-saving measures and the case examples of JICA/ ODA energy
conservation loan in ASEAN (Climate Change Measure Loan and Two Step
Loan) ; Material 11 (not attached)2) “Financial Support System in ASEAN” (Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE): This time,the explanation about the background of this matter at the APAEC and the ASEAN
SOME Funding System, which was made last time, was not given much. Mainly,
the explanation of the tables for International Potential Funding Sources
surrounding the ASEAN was given.; Material 12 (not attached)(5) Q&A
1) A person from the cement company who had the Technical Directory by theBusiness Council, stated that although the GDP was doubled, the oil consumption
was reduced by 8%, referring to the Welcome Remarks by the former Minister
Naoshima. Concerning the statement, a question on how it was reduced was given.
After checking the content of the statement, we answered, “After theenergy-saving activities in the industry over the past 30 years, each company madeefforts to reduce the oil consumption through the oil crisis. In addition, the energy
III-18

used was shifted from oil to LNG which is a clean energy.”2) Concerning the solar energy technology, there was a question, “How has the Life
Cycle Assessment been conducted in Japan”. We commented, “We are notspecialized in solar energy/cell and cannot answer properly, but the evaluation on
the solar energy including disposal has been conducted from the viewpoint of Life
Cycle Assessment in the renewable energy field, too.”3) Is there any country where Energy Management is mandatory to industries orbuildings? → Although the EM is not directly mandatory, the Japanese Energy
Conservation Law requires that the Energy Management designated companies
prepare the management standard based on the criteria and execute it. We may say
this type of Energy Management is mandatory. In other countries, it seems that it
is not included.
4) How does the ASEAN Award, etc. become an incentive to improve forcompanies? → If the Best Practice is awarded, the company/organization name ispublicized. The company status will be upgraded and attention received, whichmeans that further, improvement will be inevitable. This is a virtuous cycle.
5) (About the Online Energy Information System) Is there any criteria for theregister? → There is no special criteria, but any organization that can offer
technical service, training and information service can register. (Ms. Maureen)6) Isn’t there any copyright problem in the EM Tools? →What is accessible on Web
sites has no problem. (Ms. Maureen)7) (Question by Mr. Ogura to the person from the cement company who had theTechnical Directory/CD by JASE-W) At what opportunity did you get thisTechnical Directory/CD? And what’s your impression of this Technical Directory?
→ He answered that he got it in the Seminar at PROMEEC Building the 2 weeks
before, and that the electricity-related contents were informative.
8) Why has the Energy Conservation Law in Japan been revised six times without
very long intervals? What revisions were made? → The revisions have been madeaccording to the changes of time and situations; strengthening of Energy
Management in industries, making the target consumption standard into two steps
for increase of Energy Management designated plans, integration of the heat andelectricity consumptions, expansion of the management range by setting units ofplants and companies and chain business operators as the management units,
inclusion of transportation in which the consumption is increasing in the targets,
request of not only report about the energy consumption but also the report about
CO2 emission reduced values for these years, etc. In Brunei Darussalam, theenergy-saving law will be developed in the future, and its revisions should bemade as needed.
9) (Concerning the ASEAN Fund) Does it have something to do with the Eco Point
system in Japan? -> It has nothing with the Eco Point system, but it is eco-friendly.
(Mr. Pham)
10) What kind of renewable energy (wind power, solar, hydro power, etc.) can beapplied as the most feasible one in Brunei Darussalam? -> How about proposing
to the Prime Minister’s Office? (Mr. Pham) Then, the project should be
conducted on a regional basis and be implemented by any other country.
(6) Breakdown of participants: Mr. Ahmad gave a comment that totally, many Senior
Officers participated. In addition to 5 people from the Energy Division of Prime
Minister’s Office, 2 people from ACE and 3 people from ECCJ, 46 people
participated and the breakdown of the participants are as follows:
1) Ministry of Development: 3 people
2) Ministry of Finance: 3 people
3) Ministry of Youth, Culture and Sport: 1 person4) Ministry of Health: 1 person
III-195) Ministry of Communication: 1 person6) Anti-Corruption Bureau, Prime Minister’s Office: 1 person7) Department of Electricity: 2 people8) Department of Mechanical & Electrical: 1 person9) Department of Audit: 1 person10) Other Ministry-related persons: 5 people11) Royal Brunei Police Force: 2 people
12) Datastream Technology: 3 people
13) Baduri Bank: 3 people
14) Brunei Shell Petroleum: 3 people
15) Brunei National Petroleum Company: 3 people
16) Brunei LNG: 2 people17) Unit Petroleum: 1 person18) Brunei Methanol Company: 1 person
19) Brunei Heidelberg Cement: 1 person20) Institut Teknologi Brunei: 1 person21) University Brunei Darussalam: 4 people22) Total E&P Borneo B.V.: 1 person23) Radio Television Brunei: 2 people24) Ms. Hiroko Furuno, Japanese Embassy: Participated in the morning session.
(7) Responses at ISW, etc. and issues
1) Relatively many questions were given, but many of them were not directly relatedwith the content of the presentation.
2) All the presentations were conducted in English without interpretation, and they
proceeded smoothly. Especially, many of the reports by ACE were short and thepresentations ended a little ahead of the schedule.
3) The ISW place was wide sideways, and there was a large pillar at the rear center ofthe place. Therefore, some blind spots were made with only one screen. We used
two screens. As a presenter, it was a little difficult to explain using a laser pointerwhile paying attention to two screens.
2. Training for the use of the Energy Management Handbook, etc.
The number of participants in the morning was 15 people from the host and 35 trainees. 29
trainees participated in the afternoon workshop. Grouping for the afternoon training was madeby the Brunei Darussalam side, and four groups were made according to the number ofparticipants.
Conventionally, the course of the second day was intended to introduce the details and uses of
the Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database and Technical Directory forcompanies and implementing organizations which had special interests in these tools andwould like to introduce them. We heard that relating with the fact that about half of the people
are the government officer workers in Brunei Darussalam, people in the relatively highpositions in each ministry were invited this fiscal year.
In addition, as special circumstances for Brunei Darussalam (in a good sense), they havealready prepared the Energy Management Guide and “A Basic Guide to Energy Audit for
Building”, and they have been in the more advanced stage in the ASEAN. In view of thecircumstances, a special content for the second day was provided as follows:
1) In the morning, the Brunei Darussalam explained the above two documents. Before that,the outline of ”Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN” which is the basis of the two
documents was explained. Explanation of the in-house database and Technical Directory
which was made before was omitted (because the outline was explained on the first day’s
seminar.)2) Conventionally, “Energy Management Handbook” was explained almost page by page,III-20but this time, the explanation was given showing the PowerPoint slides. The slidematerial was prepared for all ASEAN countries. In Brunei Darussalam, because of thelimited time, necessary slides were selected as appropriate, and the focus was put on
making them understand the relation with the “Energy Management Guide” which was
the topic of the next lecture.
3) In the afternoon, mainly the Group Work was conducted. The Group Work wasconventionally conducted on the first day, but it was omitted and conducted only on thesecond day. In the Group Work, the following measures were taken more attentively(than before):- One example from the best practices of ASEAN Award Competition in Brunei
Darussalam (in 2009, HSBC) and one example from the industry (in 2010, BLNG)
were chosen to be used.
- The orginizer in the host country should have complete control over the guidance of thewhole Group Work. (In Brunei Darussalam, the Group Work was conducted last year,
too. This fiscal year, it was conducted more smoothly and the result was successful.)4) In the last item, FP in the host country explained about the efforts made by thegovernment and training courses.
The characteristics for this fiscal year are as described above. The content of the actual
training (program) is shown in the Attached Material III-2-2-2.
The implementation result of each item on the day is described below:(1) Lecture on the detailed content of the Energy Management Handbook, etc. and important
guidelines
1) “Outline of EM Handbook” (Mr. Ogawa, ECCJ); Material 13 (not attached)
ECCJ emphasized the connection of the content of the EM Handbook with thefollowing items:
Major questions to this:- What was the most effective tool among various tools (according to yourexperience)?
- Who can become Energy Manager?
- What should we do in order that a small number of people do a work for a large area?
- What is the measure to promote awareness?
2) “Energy Management Guide” (Dr. Lim Chee Ming (UBD)); Material 14 (not attached)
Dr. Lim Chee Ming, University Brunei Darussalam, explained about the material (in abooklet form) made by the Brunei Darussalam side. He is used to give lectures at theuniversities, and his explanation was simple and to the point.
Major questions to this are as follows:- In Singapore, there is a plan to enhance EE&C education. How about in Brunei
Darussalam?
- How will be the training for Energy Manager?
- To whom should we submit any opinion on the Energy Management Guide?
- Isn’t too much included in the EM Guide?
- Will the EM Guide become mandatory by law in the future?
- Is any incentive given when Green Management is implemented?
- What should we do to get fund in implementing EE&C?
3) “A Basic Guide to Energy Audit for Buildings” (Mr. Ady Syarmin Taib (ITB));
Material 15 (not attached)
Mr. Haji Ady Syarmin bin Haji Mohamad Taib, Institute Technologi Brunei, explained
the material prepared by the Brunei Darussalam side (which was under printing).
Major questions to this are as follows:- Numeric figures are necessary for the benchmarking of BEEI.
- What is the subsidy for EE&C activities?
- How about the consideration for Government Buildings?
- In the case of a small house, the value of BEEI becomes large. Is there no help for it?
III-21

- Spread sheet for BEEI is needed.
- For the design made 10 years ago, it has currently been said that the facilities should
be upgraded for EE&C. We are confused about it.
(2) Workshop (group activities)
1) “Guidance for Group Work” (Mr. Sato, ECCJ); Material 16 (not attached)
Before starting the group work, first, ECCJ explained about the basic matters.
After that, the following two study cases were presented:
A) Head-office building of HSBC (Hongkong Shanghai Bank); Material 17 (notattached)
B) BLNG (Brunei LNG); Material 18 (not attached)A) Mr. Lim Boon Teck, Manager, Corporate Sustainability, gave the presentation. The
EM team visited the company 2 years ago. They conducted EE&C activities withenthusiasm, which was reflected in the presentation.
B) Ms. Hjn Nurul Hasanan gave the presentation. They have achieved safe and highefficiency results, which were explained to the point.
2) Experience of group work
In the analysis/evaluation of cases, the Energy Management Guide of Brunei
Darussalam was used just as the standard, and the discussion was made on whether thenecessary items were conducted without omission.
Based on the discussion result, the items for the presentation made finally are as
follows (as usual):A) Evaluation of energy-saving activities based on the content of the above
presentation (Good Points), and
B) Advice on future feasible improvement plan
After the explanation by ECCJ, the work shop was left to the host to give instructions
voluntarily.
Four groups were made. The number of people and the selected case in each group are
as follows:
Group No
Number of people
Selected case1
8 peopleHSBC
2
8 people
BLNG
3
6 peopleHSBC
4
7 people
BLNG
The scheduled time for discussion was one and a half hours. The time was a little
reduced but there was no problem.
Sets of bound sheets were prepared for discussion/presentation for each group. Only
Group 3 used it during the presentation. (Group 3 also prepared PP, but the PP didn’t
open successfully on PC and the sheet material was used.) All the other groups
prepared the material by PowerPoint on PC.
The points common to all groups were as follows:- Despite the short period of time, the output was well-organized.
- The discussion was made based on the eight steps in Energy Management Guide.
The points which were different by group were as follows:- Some groups had a group name, but others didn’t.
- Some groups have specified the member’s roles, but others not.
3) Comments of the companies used as casesA) Mr. Lim commented, “The content presented does not indicate the complete actual
status. There are some misunderstandings. However, I don’t retort item by item
because of the time limit.”B) Ms. Hasanan had no comment.
4) Comments of D r. Lim, UBD, ECCJ and Mr. Taib, ITB
There were many opinions that the points described in the above 2) were highly valued.
In order to visualize the result, it was summarized in one sheet of table or the
III-22

evaluation points were classified by color (by some groups).
(3) Presentation by the counterpart country
Mr. Ahmad, PMO Energy Division, explained under the title of ”Discussion on Proposed
Program/Plan of EM Training” about the actual status of EE&C activities, problems andthe future plan in Brunei Darussalam (including expectations to Japan).; Material 19 (seethe circular.)(4) Awarding of certificates and closing remarks
Mr. Ogura, manager, Mr. Ahmad and Mr. Pham handed the Certificates to all the trainees.
(5) Breakdown of the participants
It is almost the same as that on the first day and omitted.
4. Visit to companies
Based on this Intensive Seminar-Workshop and Training for the use of the Energy
Management Handbook, etc., we chose three companies described below from the companies
which want to use the tools such as Energy Management Handbook in Energy Management
activities at plants and buildings and promotion of energy saving, and we visited thecompanies on October 13 and exchanged opinions. For the details, see the Attached Material
III-2-2-3.
(1) Ministry of Development(2) Baiduri Bank Sdn Bhd(3) Datastream Technology
5. Wrap up Meeting
In the evening of October 13, after the visit to the companies, we had a wrap-up meeting with
Mr. Ahmad, FP, and Mr. Pham, ACE at Radisson Hotel. The contents of the meeting are as
follows:(1) We thanked them for the success of the three-day’s EM Project under the great efforts andsuport of Prime Minister’s Office with Mr. Ahmad although the minister andorganization/system/members were changed. Also, we expressed our gratitude to Mr.
Ahmad for his active support and accompany throughout the three days.
(2) On the first and second days, over 50 people participants gathered, which was more than
expected, and many related ministries and representative organizaitons/companies,
especially, Senior Officers, participated. We expressed out gratitude about this, too.
(3) The lecture on “Energy Management Guide” and ”A Basic Guide to Energy Audit for
Buildings” and the instruction about the Group Work by Dr. Lim were given this fiscal
year, too, which were given for the fist time last year. All the participants did the GroupWork with enthusiasm, and the results which were more successful than last year, were
given. We expressed our gratitude and admiration about the subsequent completion andpreparation of some EE&C tools. However, we commented that there was anotherpossible improvement in the procedure of Group Work.
(4) They had a desire for Japanese cooperation in the establishment of Energy Management
Module in the Master Course of UBD and its implementaion, and they said they would
submit a formal request, separately. We replied that upon our receipt of the request, we
would study about the procedure with the persons concerned including the METI.
6. Others(1) For the first time in a year, we visited Brunei Darussalam for the PROMEEC/EM Project.
We heard that the minister was changed, the related agency (Prime Minister’s Office)made organizational changes and the personnel was reloacated during the period fromseveral months ago to half a month ago. In the Prime Minister’s Office, the Minister ofEnergy was changed and a person who came from the military succeeded. It seemed that
Mr. Ahmad had difficulty in getting the understanding and approval from the newminister. However, Dr. Lim. UBD (University Brunei Darussalam) who has made efforts
III-23

to prepare and spread the EMG (Energy Management Guide) in Brunei Darussalam saysthat the new minister is on friendly terms with the boss of Dr. Lim at UBD and is easy totalk with.
(2) At present, the position of Director General of the Energy Division to which Mr. Ahmad
belongs is vacant. Mr. Sokiaw, permanent secretary, is the direct boss of Mr. Ahmad, andthe minister is the supervisor above him. The name of the unit to which Mr. Ahmad
belongs was changed from Sustainable Energy to Energy Efficiency & Conservation.
Also, Mr. Hakeem and Ms. Dina who seem to have been Mr. Ahmad’s capable
subordinates were transferred to the other divisions. From that point of view, it seemedthat Mr. Ahmad had difficulty, but Mr. Ahmad has been keeping up as a leader. We
commented that we could support without much difficulty thanks to Mr. Ahmad.
(3) Furthermore, Mr. Ahmad and Dr. Lim, UBD, said, “We are thinking of incorporating
Energy Management Module in Master Course of UBD starting in January next year. We
want to allocate two weeks, 40 hours, to the Energy Management Module, and we would
like to get the cooperation of ECCJ for pay. We also want to include Energy Audit in it.
We will make a forma request, separately, around March to April next year.” To this, we
commented, “Upon our receipt of the formal written request, we will consult with METI
and make a study, with the time and condition taken into consideration.”(4) The related photos are shown in the Attached Material. (not attached)III-24

Burunei
Darussalam version

Attached Material III-2-2-1 Agenda of Intensive Seminar-Workshop

FINAL AGENDA
Intensive Seminar - Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
Venue: Radisson Hotel
October 11, 2010
08:00-08:45

08:45-09:15

09.15-10:00
10:00-11:15
10:00-10:40

10:41-11:14
11:15-14:30
11:15-11:48
11:48-12:30

12:30-13:30
13:35-14:15

14:15-14:25
14:25-15:05
15:05-15:46
15:05-15:35
15:35-15:4 1
15:41-15:46

Registration
Arrival of Guest of Honour
Recital of Surah Al-Fatihah
Welcoming Speech by Guest of Honour:Mr. Matsatejo Sokiaw, Permanent
Secretary, Energy Division, Prime Minister’s OfficeOpening Statement by The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (Mr. Yutaka
Ogura, ECCJ)
Opening Statement by ASEAN Centre for Energy (Mr. Nguyen Manh Hung,
ACE)
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline &Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Mr. Pham Duong, ACE)
2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ)
Presentation by Host Country
EEC Activities Update (Mr. Ahmad Mohamad, Head of Sustainable Energy
Unit, Energy Division, Prime Minister’s Office)Session 2: “ASEAN Energy Management System”: Functions & Program
Presentation by ECCJ
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)
Presentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011(Mr. Pham Duong, ACE)
2) Information System- Information System to Disseminate Awarded Cases (Mr. Takashi Sato, ECCJ)LUNCH
2) Information System (Continued)- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (Ms. Maureen Balamiento, ACE)
- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)- Updates on the Development of Energy Management Tools (Ms. Maureen,
ACE)
Q&A
COFFEE BREAK
Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing
1) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System inJapan (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)
2) Financial Support System in ASEAN (Mr. Pham, ACE)
Q&A
End of Day 1 Intensive Seminar-Workshop

III-25

Attached Material III-2-2-2 Agenda of Training of EMHB

Final AGENDA
Training: Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
Venue: Radisson Hotel
October 12, 2010
08:00-08:30
Registration
08:30-12:30
Session 1: Outline of Energy Management Handbook/Guide & Other Tools
by ECCJ/Host Country
08:30-09:30
Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (Mr. Ogawa, ECCJ)
09.30-10:00
COFFEE BREAK
10:00-12:00
Explanation by Host Country- Outline of Energy Management Guide (Dr. Lim Chee Ming, UBD)
- Outline of Basic Guide to Building Energy Audit (Mr. Ady Syarmin Taib,
ITB)
12:00-12:15
Q&A
12: 15-13:30
LUNCH
13:30-17:00
Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by Host
Country/ECCJ
13:30-13:45
Guidance for Group Work (Mr. Sato, ECCJ)
13:45-14:08

14:09-14:24
14:25-16:00

16.00-16: 12
16:12-16:55
16:55-17:05
17:07-17:12
17:13-17:18
17:19-17:20(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Explanation of Best Practices/EM in Building by Host Country (Case 1) HSBC by Mr. Lim Boon Teck, HSBC
Explanation of Best Practices/EM in Industry by Host Country (Case 2) BLNG by BLNG
Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by Dr. Lim- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management
Handbook/Guide”
COFFEE BREAK
Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2
Comments by ECCJ Experts and Dr. Lim & Dr. Ady
Discussion on Proposed Program/Plan of EM Training including last year
activity in Host Country moderated by FP
Ceremony of Certificates
Closing Remarks by Host Country
COMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-26

Attached Material III-2-2-3: Records of the visit to the relatedcompanies/organizations
Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Brunei Darussalam (No. 1)
Visit to Ministry of Development
NO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time October 13, Wednesday 8:15 to 10:30
2
Visit place
Ministry of Development, Headquarter, Old Airport
3

4

5Counterparts(MOD)

Mr. Abidin Saidin: Acting Head, Building Control & Construction
Industry Division (ABC), Ministry of Development (MOD),
Dr. Rehaniyatr (DME/PWD-MOD, and other 10 people
Accompanying - Mr.Ahamad Bin Haji Mohaned: Head of Energy Efficiency &persons
Conservation Unit, Energy Division, Prime Minister’s Office
(PMO)
(PMO)
- Mr. Muhammad Aznul Azrin Zain: Social Duties Officer, EE&C,
ED, PMO
Visitors (ACE, - Ms. Maureen (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van Duong
ECCJ)(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)

6. Overview of the company we visited
Mr. Ogura and Mr. Ahamad explained about the outline of PROMEEC and the purpose of thevisit. In addition, they expressed their gratitude to Dr. Rehaniyatr (female) for theparticipation into the two-day seminar and training and the presentation at SGA. They said
that the visit is not intended for Energy Audit but for Advisory visit and that it was ajust-glance based visit. From the viewpoint of Energy Management, they said that they would
advise on whether the energy conservation has been implemented complying with the Key
Step.
The building was constructed 16 years ago, and it is a 7-story building. The ministry consistsof eight divisions (units) such as Administration and Finance Division (DAF), Land Use,
Housing & Environment Policy Planning Division (LHE) and Science Technology & Internal
Division (STI), and the number of staff members is 250 people.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) Structure in General: From the material prepared by MOD- Construction Type: Low Rise Building- Architectural Style: Modernism(The building does not face to the south so that the sunlight does not enter.)2) The outline of the building is as follows:- Room area: 933. 12 m2- Floor area: 1,861.2 m2- Total gross area: 13,029 m2- Total gross area for parking: 3,688.8 m2
3) Air Conditioning System:
There are two reciprocating liquid chillers and one scroll liquid chiller. The building iscooled by AHU on each floor. They are operated for 14 hours, from 4 o’clock in themorning to 6 o’clock in the evening, on the days of the week except Friday and Sunday.
The office hours are from 7:45 in the morning to 4:30 in the evening. They explained that
III-27

the chillers have not been in good conditions and the operation has started early in themorning, but they didn’t give us sufficient explanation.
4) Lighting:
36W and 18W electronic ballast fluorescent lamps are used. In some rooms, CFLs areused.
5) They said that the annual electric power consumption was 84,000 kWh/y. We pointed outthat it seemed too small and that it must be 840,000 kWh/y. They explained that the value
might be the consumption only by air conditioning, but no clear explanation was given.
They have not observed the electric power consumption from the viewpoint of BEEI,, andhave not noticed that the value is not normal.
6) Mr. Abidin explained that the person who leaves the workplace last turns off the light in theplace and checks whether any light remains lit up after all employees left the company. He
also said that PCs bear the stickers to promote energy conservation, and they have to create
a committee and promote energy conservation in the future. He also explained that they had
to consider a system for making proposals to the Management.
7) The room temperature is set at 20°C.
8) Emergency Generator: 500 KVA
9) Chillers: Manufactured by Carrier. The inlet temperature is 8.9°C, the outlet temperature is
6.6°C, and there is no flow controller and inverter. (They explained that there is no need fora controller and an inverter because the operation starts one by one.)10) The power factor was indicated at 0.8, and we asked about the accuracy. They simply told
us there might be a failure in the measuring instrument.
(2) Contents of consultation about our explanation, opinion and proposal on our visit
including field inspection(2)-1 Status of the field
1) The lights were turned off in the Entrance Hall on the first floor. All the fluorescent lamps
have refractors.
2) We looked around at each floor, and found places where the lights are left on even if no one
is there.
3) The chillers and AHU controllers are located at 50m distant from the main building andlocked carefully, so adjustment cannot be made easily.
4) All the three elevators operate during the daytime. The number of operating elevators may
be reduced.
5) The setting temperature in the office is low, and the room is air-conditioned too much eventhough workers are not in the room.
6) Some people sitting by the windows in the room turn on the lights only in the morning andevening.
7) Water was dripping from the cold insulation materials around the chillers. Also, cold
insulation is not working at some places. We pointed out later.
8) In the room, the lights are turned on and off using switches provided at about three points.
There is no individual switch such as a string switch.
9) During lunch time, they have no practice of turning off the lights and PCs.
(2)-2 Our opinions and proposals
Comments from our side and Mr. Ahamad are as follows:
1) The first step is to grasp the current usage amount by week, month and year (baseline).
Based on the data, the effect after improvement will be known. The data should be grasped
properly so that an analysis can be made according to the EM Guide.
2) First, energy conservation at no cost/low cost shall be started.
3) A large investment provides an immediate result, but sustainable efforts are needed andimportant.
- The whole area of many exterior walls is covered by glass. It makes the inside of building
III-28bright, but it seems that sunlight has a relatively large effect on the temperature of thebuilding inside. The glass walls and window should have double structure, or insulation
films should be applied to the glass walls and windows.
4) If the temperature of air-conditioner is raised by 1°C, the electric power can be reduced by
7%. A rise of the setting temperature should be tried.
5) The stand-by electric power is relatively large (this is also 7%), and we recommend that theplugs should be removed from the outlets.
(3) Response of the company we visited
1) As Mr. Abidin admits, some staff members say that they don’t care about the electriccharges because they are paid by the government. It shows a lack of energy-saving
awareness, and systematic measures are required. Mr. Abidin also realized the necessity. Dr.
Rehaniyatr says that they would like to spread energy conservation at other ministries if it
succeeds at their ministry. This may be the effect of the seminar/training.
8. Overview of field inspection(1) There a possibility that sensible measures of electric room cannot be taken due toexcessively strict management.
(2) The air-conditioning temperature is too low. We emphasized that a rise by 1°C would saveenergy by 7%.
(3) The AHU controller is in the electric room, and it is not possible to control easily.
(4) As a result of the trial calculation of BEEI, it was found that the obtained value was very
abnormal. Therefore, we requested them to check the annual power consumption again.
As mentioned above, most of the staff members of this ministry have little energy-saving
awareness. It seems necessary to improve the awareness of the staff, first.

III-29

Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Brunei Darussalam (No.2)
Visit to Baiduri BankNO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time
October 13, Wednesday 10:45 to 13:30
2
Meeting place - Baiduri Bank HQ, Kiarong Complex (Block A & B)
- Baiduri Finance
3Counterparts- Mr. Pierre Imhof: General Manager, Baiduri Bank HQ- Mr. Andrew Young: Deputy General Manager, Operation
Management Div.
- Ms. Veronica Chong: Senior Manager, HR & Finance Division- Ms. Dorothy Newn: Manager, Corporate Communications &Marketing- Mr. Azaleen Dato Mustapha: Senior Manager, Treasury- Mr. Tham Boon Kong: Property Manager
4
Accompanying - Mr.Ahamad Bin Haji Mohaned: Head of Energy Efficiency &persons
Conservation Unit, Energy Division, Prime Minister’s Office
(PMO)
(PMO)
- Mr. Muhammad Aznul Azrin Zain: Social Duties Officer, EE&C,
ED, PMO
5
Visitors (ACE, - Ms. Maureen (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van
ECCJ)Duong(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)
6. Overview of the company we visited(1) Baiduri Bank HQ is a new bank which was established in 1994. French capital is partly
incorporated. Mr. Pierre Imhof, General Manager, who is in the top position, is a Frenchas you imagine from his name. The total number of the head office and branch offices is
12. The number of employees in 1997 was 85, and that in 2010 is about 500. The head
office consists of Block A and Block B.
(2) The outline including the above content was briefly presented using PPT.
7. Content of energy conservation related matters/hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) The total floor area of Block A is 3,432.8 m2 and that of Block B is 858.2 m2.
2) The monthly power consumptions and the electricity charge amounts for the year 2009 andfrom January to September of 2010 were shown in the table. Many of the monthly
consumptions for 2009, however, were shown with the mark X as unknown, and as a result,the annual consumption for 2009 was not shown. The electricity charge for 2009 was
578,783.27 B$ (1 B$; Brunei $=0.88 US$), and that for the period from January to
September of 2010 was 655,778 B$, which already exceeds the previous month. There
were wide variations in the power consumption and electricity charge by year, and thepower consumption and the electricity charge for each month didn’t correspond to eachother.
3) Although the power consumption and electricity charge for each month didn’t correspondto each other in the same table, the monthly BEEI (Building Energy Efficiency Index) was
shown in kWh/m2 and kWh/FTE (Full Time Equivalent: human resources input
conversion). The base monthly values were varying, and it seems that the monthly BEEI
III-30has no great significance. They said that the target value was several hundreds kWh/m2/Y
in FTE 200 people.
4) There are 166 ACs, most of which are split units and which are partly FCUs (Fan Coil
Unit). There is no chiller.
5) They want to minimize the energy consumption.
6) The outside glasses are double glazing or tinted windows. They say that the heat balance by
daylight from the outside and sunlight is considered.
7) For the ceiling area lighting, fluorescent lamps have been changed to CFLs this fiscal year.
8) The number of copying machines has been reduced by integration.
9) They say that they recommend to set the temperature at 23°C, but it is necessary not to
reduce comfortability of employees as well as customers.
10) They say that they have made efforts for paperless from the environmental aspect, andwritten bills are being replaced with electronic bills.
(2) Explanation, opinion and proposal on our visit including the field inspection
1) We explained the outline of the PROMEEC/EM PROJECT which is the background of thevisit. We strongly proposed that with the participants in the ISW & TR on October 11 and12 as a core, the Energy Management system should be established based on the EM Guide
by Brunei Darussalam, and that first, EC Committee and EC Team should be formed andthe total energy consumption data (bills may be used) for at least one year should becollected to compile the BEEI.
2) We collected some replies to questionnaire at the PROMEEC/Building. As described in thelast sheet, the BEEI for offices in the ASEAN is on the level of 200 kWh/m2. Withreference to this, the energy consumption level will be obtained by calculating the BEEI for
Baiduri Bank.
3) We recommended that the BEEIs should be estimated separately for Block A and Block B,
and compare them.
4) As the case study at the TR on October 12, we recommended to refer to the case of HSBC
which was a bank that received the ASEAN Award as reference. As mentioned in the TR,
we emphasized that a rise of the setting temperature for AC by 1°C would result in theenergy saving of 7%.
5) It is very good that they conduct the activities from the aspect of Energy Management, too.
In order to improve energy-saving awareness, it is expected that more enlightenment
stickers will be posted and further activities will be promoted. However, unless the current
energy consumption status is grasped properly and the baseline is clarified, the futureenergy-saving effects cannot be grasped. We recommended to re-compile the data properly.
(3) Response of the company we visited
1) The preparations such as preparation of PPT materials for introduction of the outline aswell as studies about BEEI, etc. were made very appropriately.
2) It was found that they were leading the way in implementing energy-saving activities andtheir awareness was high.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) The setting temperature of the GM’s office is 23°C.
2) There are large glass surfaces, which are double glazing.
3) At the work zone, the lights are turned off when no one stays there.
4) CFLs are also used.
5) In some vacant meeting rooms, however, the lights were left lit up and AC remained ON.
6) A considerable amount of natural light is taken in.
7) In Block B, local switches for the ceiling area lighting are adopted at IT Center.

III-31

Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Brunei Darussalam (No.3)
Visit to DATASTREAM TECHNOLOGY (DST)NO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time October 13, Wednesday 14: 15 to 17:00
2
Meeting place Datastream Technology (DST), Headquarters
3
4

5

Counterparts- Mr.Awang Muslim bin Hj Mohd Yussof (Manager, Electric Power(DST)
Services Group Asset Management), and other 6 people
Accompanying - Mr.Ahamad Bin Haji Mohaned: Head of Energy Efficiency &persons
Conservation Unit, Energy Division, Prime Minister’s Office
(PMO)
(PMO)
- Mr. Muhammad Aznul Azrin Zain: Social Duties Officer, EE&C,
ED, PMO
Visitors (ACE, - Ms. Maureen (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van
ECCJ)Duong(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)

6. Overview of the company we visited
At the beginning of the meeting, prayers were given and the explanation about Safety
Evacuation was given. Mr. Ogura explained about the purpose of the visit and introduced the
PROMEEC and visitors. The business of the company is tele-communication. The company
moved in the 14-story glass-walled building in 2003. At present, it has 400 employees.
(1) Outline of the building- Total Gross Area: 9,110 m2- Parking Area: 8,010 m2- Total Air Conditioning area: 8,851 m2- Annual electric power consumption: 3,982.510 kWh/y- BEEI: 437.16 (too high, it’s a problem.)- Operation Hours: 7.5 Hours- Chiller: 6 units, 2 of them are stand-by.
- AHU (example on the 7th floor): Supply: 10°C，Return: 15°C
- The 13th and 14th floors are the idling space which is only used at the time of events
held about twice a year. No energy is consumed. The 12th floor is for executives and thefloors from 3rd floor to 11th floor are used as general offices.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) This time, 3 subordinates were sent to the seminar/training. They learned a lot.
2) The room setting temperature is 22°C and it is adjusted by room.
3) To prevent heat from entering from the windows, V-Cool (Tinted window) is adopted.
4) To save energy, LCD type monitors are adopted for PCs.
5) Fluorescent lamps have been changed to the highest efficient ones.
6) The photocopy machine is placed at the center of the room for shared use.
7) The BEEI is very large, and they want to know the cause.
8) They have six 313 kW chillers and four 45 kW pumps. Three of the pumps operate 24
hours a day.
9) Stand-by generator: 2 units of 837/670
III-3210) Office Equipment: PC (150W); 284 sets, Printer (1200W); 24 sets, Fax Machine (500W);
10 sets, Photocopy; 12 sets
11) Lighting: FL 18W: 117 pieces
FL 36W: 1320 pieces
FL 40W: 192 pieces
Halogen: 20W; 103 pieces, 50W; 209 pieces, 300W; 32 pieces, 1000W; 2 pieces12) Electric power consumption ratio: Air-conditioner 80%, lighting 7%, Office equipment
11%(2) Contents of consultation about our explanation, opinion and proposal on our visit
including the field inspection
1) Energy conservation should be started with No/Low Cost Measures complying with the
EM Guide.
2) A rise of the setting temperature of air-conditioner by 1°C can save the electric power by
7%.
3) The reason why the BEEI is large may be that the building is fully glass-walled and thechillers operate 24 hours a day because the Call Center operates 24 hours a day.
4) It has been decided that the 24-hour operating Call Center will be moved to another place.
1.5 units of chillers among 6 chillers were used for the Call Center so far.
(3) Response of the company we visited
Mr. Wang and his subordinates know that the BEEI is high, and they are considering about
how the energy consumption should be reduced. The fact that they sent 3 staff members to theseminar/training may show their intention. They have requested Carrier, which is amanufacturer of chillers, to present the FS(Feasibility Study) and to study about proposed
measures. Although the FS was created at the beginning of this fiscal year, it mentioned,“ECCJ chose DST and visited it.” Since it is quite recently that they chose DST, we do notquite understand it.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) In the near future, the VAV (Variable Air Volume) will be introduced to control thetemperature automatically.
2) It seems that the energy consumption is large because of the building structure (fully
glass-walled) and the large energy consumption of the 24-hour operating Call Center.
Change of the glasses to double glazing and the transfer of the Call Centre will reduceenergy consumption.
3) Awareness and training for the employees should be promoted.
4) The energy consumption of each floor should be grasped (the sub-meter should be also setup), and monthly data should be obtained. In order to raise the incentive for energy
conservation, it is necessary to let the employees compete by floor units and provide bonus.
5) The number of switches should be increased so that the lights can be turned off more
frequently.
6) In Brunei Darussalam, there is another similar glass-walled building for TV company. We
recommend that the inquiry should be made on what kind of energy-saving measures havebeen taken there and how high the BEEI is.
We made discussions as above. It is necessary to follow up the improvements for one year.

III-33

III-2-3. Cambodia
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The EM Project in Cambodia was held at Apsara Angkor Hotel in Seam Reap City, which islocated 250 km northwest from the capital, Phnom Penh. Seam Reap City is the famous place
for the World Heritages, Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom. With the background, many ofparticipants were people involved in hotel business. We had a preliminary meeting with Mr.
Vuthy, FP, and Ms. Irma, ACE, in the evening of the day when we arrived, which was theprevious day of the seminar, and checked the meeting place and the materials. The number ofparticipants was about 34 including the host people. The program is shown in the Attached
Material III-2-3-1.
(1) Welcome Remarks: Mr. Vuthy (Deputy Director, Dept. of Energy Technique, Ministryof Industry, Mines and Energy) who is a Focal Point of Cambodia side in place of Mr.
Tun Leang (General Manager of Energy Dept., MIME) who was scheduled to address
the remarks, Mr. Ogura and Ms. Irma Suryani, ACE, (who was in place of Ms.
Maureen who would participate in the afternoon) expressed their gratitude to thecooperating organizations from their own positions and presented the significance andthe future utilization/development of energy conservation and the PROMEEC/EMPROJECT.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Presentation of Outline &Achievements of PROMEEC Projects and EM (Energy Management infrastructure
improvement t) projects
1) “Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project” (Ms. Irma, ACE): Presentationof the past status of EEC activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program and three
PROMEEC projects; Material 1 (not attached)2) “Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project” (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Presentation of this fiscal year’s plan for the EM PROJECT; Material 2(not attached)
3) “PROMEEC Project Activities in Cambodia” (Mr. Vuthy): Concerning the electric
power situations in Cambodia, electricity is supplied to only 20% of all houses(cities; 60%, local regions; 10%). The electric charge is 9-25 cent/kWh at theplaces having the power network, which is a little high. In the energy policy, it was
specified that an appropriate amount of electric power should be supplied to all
over the country at an appropriate price. They presented that change of 100 million
incandescent lamps to CFLs would reduce the power consumption by about
50MW, and this would be an impact that corresponds to one power plant requiring
an investment of 50 million US$. The actual development result of the three
PROMEEC projects in this country was presented, and the potential energy-saving
estimations at rice mill, brick kiln, rubber refinery and garment sector by UNIDO
were presented; Material 20 (not attached)(3) Session 2: Presentation of Functions and Program of ASEAN Energy Management
System1) “Outline of Updated ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ):
ASEAN EM System was extracted from this year’s plan, and we explained about
the dissemination of ASEAN Award and EMHB and specific development plan of
Functions & Other Tools.; Material 4 (not attached)2) Specific Functions and ProgramA) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- “Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011”(Ms. Irma ACE): Presentation of the evaluation result for the EM section at
BOJ and the future issue; Material 5 (not attached)B) Information System
III-34

- “Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases” (Mr. Sato,
ECCJ): Explanation about application for this fiscal year’s EM section andanalysis result of the award-winning case; Material 6 (not attached)- “Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations” (Ms. Maureen, ACE): Introduction of Online Energy
Information System and requests by the participants/users. At present, 16organizations have registered as implementing organizations. ; Material 7(not attached)- “Introduction of JASE-World” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): In connection with thee-Directory for Technologies & Equipment, how to use the JASE-World andits Technical Directory was presented.; Material 8 (not attached)C) Energy Management Tools- “Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools” (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Presentation of the outline of Heat and Electricity Technology
Handbook related to the EMHB and introduction of the each country’s
national version; Material 9 (not attached)- “Updates on the Development of Energy Management Tools” (Ms. Maureen
Balamiento, ACE): Presentation of the status of activities for Technical
Directory (TD) and In-house Database (IHDB); Material 10 (not attached)(4) Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing; The host country gave thepresentation.
1) “Situation of Environmental Awareness in Cambodia” (Mr. Vuthy, MIME): The
report was easy to understand, in which the global warming issue was recognizedfirmly and many photos were used. The industries in Cambodia are mainly
small-scale industries and the consumption of fossil resources is still small.
Therefore, they mentioned that the effect of climate change on the country was notlarge, but the effect of use of higher energy efficiency lighting (CFL) was presented,
their efforts on renewable energy were listed up, and they mentioned about
improvement of awareness through education, etc. In addition, they clarified
awareness and barrier from the financial and legal aspect.; Material 21 (notattached)
2) “Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan”(Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): Presentation of the Energy Conservation Law and measures inJapan arising from the whole global warming situation and the issue about
exhaustion of natural resources, measures including the recent eco-point system
toward increase in the people’s energy-saving awareness, the financial support
system for energy-saving measures and the case examples of JICA/ODA
energy-saving loan in ASEAN (Climate Change Measure Loan and Two Step
Loan) ; Material 11 (not attached)3) “Financial Support System in ASEAN” (Ms. Maureen, ACE): The background of
this matter at the APAEC and the international potential funding sources
surrounding the ASEAN SOME Funding System and the ASEAN were presented,
but no description about Japan was included. ; Material 12 (not attached)(5) Q&A
1) It is expected that in Cambodia, much solar energy can be used. How about the
introduction plan of solar system into hotels? Why hasn’t it been developed morepositively? → They expressed their agreement with the idea, but there are someproblems such as the high import tax from China, which is 30%. (Mr. Vuthy)2) How about the LED promotion measure? → The person in charge of Ministry ofCommerce (Mr. Vuthy) → As Mr. Vuthy explained about the estimation example of
CFL previously, how about studying about LED, too? (Mr. Ogura). The electriccharge is expensive and it should be studied on the economical base. (Mr. Sato)
3) The power standard of IEEC applies to Transmission for Household, but it is not
III-35

applicable to Building yet. Don’t you suggest that the ISO Standard should apply tothe ministry? If it is available, when will it be introduced? It seems that JICA also
has developed the standard. How about it? → They have not been introduced yet.
(Mr. Vuthy) We have no information of standard consideration of JICA. (Mr.
Ogura)
4) The participant from Cambrew (Mr. Ty Puthy) asked about the result of the visit on
the PROMEEC Industry in September this fiscal year and about the sharing of theexperience at the OJT Energy Audit by the PROMEEC Industry Team with theparticipants in this seminar. They gave us comments about cooling system, steam,AC, air compressor, etc., but change of compressor according to therecommendation will cost too much and will be difficult to realize. → If there is
any inquiry to ECCJ Expert, contact us through Mr. Vuthy. Then, we will study.
(Mr. Ogura)5) The Cambodian government has been promoting energy conservation of thedemand side mainly. How is the energy conservation of the supply side conductedin Japan? How is the efficiency of electrical products managed in Japan? → The
efficiency of power plant has been managed as one of benchmarks in the Energy
Conservation Law in Japan. The efficiency of products is regulated in the Top
Runner Program and also regulated by Power Factor as the criteria/management
standard guide. (Mr. Ogura)6) Can the fund of ASEAN be applied? → Application shall be submitted through FP,
and then SOME of ASEAN will make a judgment. (Ms. Maureen) → Is there any
special application condition for the Fund? → There is no special condition. (Ms.
Maureen)(6) Breakdown of participants
1) People involved in hotels: 18 people; Sofitel Angkor, Aspara Angkor, Le Meridien
Angkor, Raffles Grand, Angkor Century, Monoreach Angkor, Empress Angkor,
Allson Angkor, Pacific, LonRatanak Angkor, Borei Angkor, Angkor Miracle Resort,
The Sothea
2) People involved in industries: 2 people; Cambrew (2 people)
3) Commercial: 2 people; Lucky Mall, Canadian Bank
4) Local governmental persons concerned: DIME (Department of Industry, Mine andEnergy); 3 people, Department of Electricity; 1 person5) Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy (MIME):3 people; Mr. Lieng Vuthy, Mr.
Khlaing Amaradararith, Mr. Khlauth Ousa*(*: His father is a vice minister ofMIME.)(7) Responses at ISW, etc. and issues
1) During the presentation, we asked the participants about their divisions (hotel,
industry, business, government-relations, etc.), whether they had ever participatedin the past PROMEEC projects, they had heard about the project, they had
known/heard about the Energy Management and ESCO, etc. They responded to thefirst question about the divisions by a show of hands, but it seemed that they had
hardly participated in the project and had hardly known about them.
2) Many of the participants were people involved in hotels, but no one raised hands tothe question on whether they had heard about BEEI/EEI.
2. Training for the use of the Energy Management Handbook, etc.
(8+1)* people from the host and 28 trainees participated. The number of trainees who
participated in the afternoon workshop after finishing the morning lecture was 26. According
to the number of participants, three groups were made for the Group Work.
* 3 people from ECCJ, 2 people from ACE, 3 people from MIME and Mr. Van, presenterfrom Sofitel Hotel
III-36

As mentioned previously, conventionally, the workshop on the second day was intended forcompanies and implementing organizations which considered introduction of the tools such as
Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database and Technical Directory. This time, theworkshop was held at Seam Reap, and so most of the participants were peopled involved in
hotels. Therefore, from a fundamental point of view, we focused on that they would
understand the methodology of Energy Management Handbook correctly and apply it to theirown operations.
As mentioned before, we planned the second day for this fiscal year’s workshop as follows,
considering the PROMEEC (EM) program is in Phase-3:
1) We used the whole morning on the explanation of “Energy Management Handbook”.
2) The “Energy Management Handbook” was explained using PowerPoint slides.
3) We used the whole afternoon on the second day only for the training of Group Work. The
following conditions were set for the training:- The case of Sofitel Angkor Hotel in Cambodia shall be used.
- The host (Cambodia side) shall have complete control over the whole Group Work.
4) At the last item, Cambodian FP (Mr. Vuthy) explained about the government efforts,
training courses, etc.
The characteristics of this fiscal year’s workshop were as mentioned above, and the content of
the actual training (program) is shown in the Attached Material III-2-3-2.
The implementation result of each item for the day is described below.
(1) Lecture on the detailed content of the Energy Management Handbook and important
guidelines (Mr. Ogawa, ECCJ); Material 13 (not attached)
As described later, about 75% of the trainees were people involved in hotels. Therefore,
we tried to bring up the topics related to hotels in the explanation of the content of Energy
Management Handbook. As a result, the trainees looked very interested in the lecture.
Two questions concerning the content of lecture were given. One was about the fixed partand the fluctuant part of the energy consumption, and the other was about seven tools of
QC.
For the former question, we showed the corresponding slides again and emphasized that
increase in the energy intensity could be controlled to some degree by reducing theconsumption of the fixed part even when the occupancy rate of hotel was reduced.
For the latter question, we explained briefly about seven tools showing each of them byslides. We realized through this lecture that Japanese effective methods such as 5S andactivities by small groups had not been widely used (at least in the hotel industry in
Cambodia). Giving education in this field will lead to successful results not only inenergy conservation but also in many other fields.
(2) Workshop (group activities);
1) “Guidance for Group Work” (Mr. Sato, ECCJ): Before starting Group Work, ECCJ
explained about the basic matters. ; Material 16 (not attached)
2) Presentation of the efforts for energy conservation by Sofitel Angkor Hotel; Material
22 (not attached)
Sofitel Angkor Hotel applied for the 2009 ASEAN Energy Award Competition and won
the 2nd Runner-up. We distributed the copy of the application form to the trainees as
the training material.
Mr. Sam Van, Sofitel Angkor Hotel, gave supplementary explanation below to thetrainees:- They did all necessary things starting with top management commitment andorganization as described in the material.
- Among them, SGA (Small Group Activities) were conducted in all the departments.
Without them, energy-saving activities wouldn’t have been successful. (We thoughtthat he said so, but when we asked about the activities again in the advisory visit on
the next day, we were told that each 2 people from six departments such as Food &III-37

Beverage Services, Kitchen, and Housekeeping are sent to the Energy Conservation
Team for which Mr. Van, Engineering Manager, serves as chairman and they hold ameeting once a week to grasp and manage the status of energy-saving activities. It
seems that the activities are different from Japanese small group activities.)- We gave the training for raising awareness of all employees.
After that, he didn’t belong to any group and answered the questions from the membersof each group as needed.
3) Experience through Group WorkIn the analysis/evaluation of cases, we decided to discuss whether the necessary items
were implemented without omission using the Energy Management Handbook as astandard.
The final presentation items based on the discussion result were as follows (in thesame way as in many other countries):A) Evaluation of energy-saving activities based on the above presentation contents(Good Points), and
B) Advice on the future possible improvement plan
After the explanation by ECCJ, we left the group work to the voluntary guidance by
the host.
Three groups were made. The number of people in each group is as follows:
Group No.
Number of people
1
8 people2
9 people3
9 people
It was decided that the time for discussion shall be one and a half hours as scheduled.
One set of blank paper binded in a board was prepared for each group’s
discussion/presentation. Every group filled in the blank paper during discussion.
In the presentation by each group, each group had its own name and presented thecomposition of members. Good points and suggestions for the future were output, andeach group listed up more suggestion items (than expected).
4) Apart from the Group Work, Cambrew presented the state of energy-saving activities.
The Major Industry team of ECCJ visited the company in September this fiscal year
and conducted an audit. In the presentation, the guidance made at the audit was
included. And the circulation of the material was omitted.
5) Comments from ECCJ and MIME
- We were impressed with the Group Work because it was generally conducted verysmoothly. Since most of the participants had no experience of Group Work, we wereconcerned. But there was no problem.
- Concerning the principal point of this Group Work, “Use of KSA (Key Step
Approach)”, Group 1 did very well, but the other groups didn’t present sufficiently.
- We think that with the same theme, each group studied a lot by watching the othergroups’ presentations.
- We expected that the case adopted this time was a successful example and it might bedifficult to find suggestions. But every group raised a lot of suggestions and did well.
- In the case of hotels, basically, Good Housekeeping should be done first. (MIME)(3) Presentation of the host country
Mr. Vuthy explained about Proposed Program/Plan of EM Training in Cambodia that they
had a plan for translating the Energy Management Handbook into Cambodian language,
they would make a plan for another seminar for that purpose, and they had an objective of
spreading it to energy consumers over the country.
(4) Awarding of certificates and closing remarks
Mr. Ogura, Mr. Vuthy and Ms. Irma came up on the platform and handed certificates tothe participants. Ms. Maureen, ACE, gave an address of thanks and closing remarks.
(5) Breakdown of the participants (excluding the host (8+1) people)
III-38

1) People involved in hotels
2) People involved in plants
3) Government (central/local)
4) Others
Total

21 people
2 people2 people3 people
28 people

3. Visit to company
Based on this Intensive Seminar – Workshop and Training for the use of the Energy
Management Handbook, etc., we chose two companies mentioned below from the companies
which want to use the tools such as Energy Management Handbook for Energy Management
activities at plants and buildings and for promotion of energy conservation, and we visited thecompanies on October 19 for opinion exchange. For the details, see the Attached Material
III-2-3-3.
(1) Sofitel Angkor Hotel(2) Le Meridien Angkor Hotel
4. Wrap up Meeting
After we visited Le Meridien Hotel, we returned to Apsara Hotel where we stayed and Mr.
Vuthy and Mr. Khlaing, MIME, Ms. Maureen, ACE, Ms. Irma and three people from ECCJ
had a wrap up meeting for this PROMEEC EM Project in Cambodia to confrim the following
points:(1) We expressed our thanks for the successful closing of Intensive Seminar - Workshop,
Training Course and Advisory Visit which had been well prepared by the efforts of Mr.
Vuthy, et. al, MIME.
(2) We also expressed our thanks to three people from MIME for taking their good leadershipas well as giving guidance and comments to each group in the Group Work.
(3) Concerning the wide spread of EMHB (Energy Management Handbook), the translation
into the Cambodian language (Khmer) has not been proceeding because of the lack ofbudget. We suggested that although translation and printing require the budget
accordingly, the whole EMHB does not have to be translated and it should be considered
about translation starting with Part II for distribution of the translation volume and cost. If
it is still difficult from the aspect of budget, they should consult with ACE. (In the
background, the idea that the translation and printing was requested to GTZ, Germany,
because of the lack of budget was raised the other day, but we judged the idea was notproper and told them that we could give a little more support.)(4) They wanted to conduct the EMHB Training in several provinces in the future, and we
asked them to make a try.
(5) We knew through this visit that Le Meridien Hotel, which was guided by USA Starwood
as parent company, has been conducting Energy Management activities positively. As wetold them during the visit, we asked to instruct to apply for the ASEAN EM Award nextyear.
(6) We told them that we would respond to any question or inquiry from Sothea Hotel andCambrew through Mr. Vuthy.
5. Others
The related photos are shown in the Attached Material. (not attached)III-39Cambodia version

Attached Material III-2-3-1 Agenda of ISW

FINAL AGENDA
Intensive Seminar - Workshop
Promotion of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
Venue: Siem Reap
October 15, 20 10
08:30-09:00
Registration
09:00-09:10
Welcome Remarks by Mr. Lieng Vuthy, Deputy Director of Energy Technique,MIME
09:10-09:20
Opening Statement by The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (Mr. Y. Ogura,
ECCJ)
09:20-09:30
Opening Statement by ASEAN Centre for Energy (Ms. Irma Suryani, ACE)
09.30-10:00
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
10:00-11:15
Session 1:
PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project : Outline & Achievements
10:00-11:11
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Ms. Irama, ACE)
2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Y.
Ogura, ECCJ)
11:11-11:26
Presentation by Mr. Lieng Vuthy, MIME
Realized Activities/Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects
11:26-14:30
Session 2:“ASEAN Energy Management System” : Functions & Program
11:26-11:56
Presentation by ECCJ
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Y. Ogura,
ECCJ)
11:56-12:40
Presentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011(Ms. Irma, ACE)
2) Information System- Information Analyses to Ease Dissemination Awarded Cases (Mr. Takashi
Sato, ECCJ)
12:40-13:33
LUNCH
13:33-14:52
Presentation by ECCJ, and ACE
2) Information System (Continued)- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (Ms. Maureen, ACE)
- Introduction of JASE-World (Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ)
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ)-Updates on the Development of Energy Management Tools (Ms. Maureen,ACE)
14:53-15:20
Q&A
15:20-15:40
COFFEE BREAK
15:40-17:00
Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing
15:40-15:48
1) Situation of Environmental Awareness in Cambodia (Mr. Lieng Vuthy,
Deputy Director of Energy Technique )15:48-16:22
2) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System inJapan (Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ)
16:22-16:28
3) Financial Support System in Host Country and ASEAN (Ms. Maureen, ACE)
16:28-17:00
Q&A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
III-40Attached Material III-2-3-2 Agenda of Training

DRAFT AGENDA
Training: Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
October 18, 201008:30-09:00
09:00-12:30

Registration
Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ

09:00-10:32

Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 1) (Mr. Fumio
Ogawa, ECCJ)
COFFEE BREAK
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 2) (Mr. F.
Ogawa, ECCJ)
Q&A
LUNCH
Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by Host
Country/ECCJ
Guidance for Group Work by Mr. T. Sato, ECCJ
(Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practices of EM)
Explanation of Best Practices/EM in Building by Sofitel Angkor Hotel (Case)Group Work Based on Cases Study by Host Country/ECCJ- Preparation for Group Work- Discussion by Groups:
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management
Handbook”
COFFEE BREAK
Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Study
Presentation of Result on PROMEEC Industry in Cambrew by Cambrew
Comments by ECCJ Experts
Discussion on Proposed Program/Plan of EM Training in Host Country
moderated by Mr. Vuthy
Awarding Ceremony of Certificate to ParticipantsClosing Remarks by Ms. Maureen, ACE
COMPLETION OF TRAINING

10.32-10:52
10:52-12:09
12: 15-12:45
12:45-13:38
13:38-17:00
13:38-13:58
13:59-14:05
14:06-15:28

15.28-15:57
15:57-16:08
16:10-16:18
16:19-16:34
16:35-16:46
16:30-16:45
16:45-16:50
16:50

III-41

Attached Material III-2-3-3: Records of the visit to therelated companies/organizations
Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Cambodia (No. 1)
Visit to Sofitel Angkor HotelNO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time October 19, Tuesday 9:00 to 11:00
2
Meeting place Sofitel Angkor Hotel
3
4

5Counterparts
Accompanying
persons(MIME)
Visitors (ACE,
ECCJ)- Mr.Sam Van (Engineering Manager) and his subordinate- Mr. Lieng Vuthy- Mr. Khlaing Amaradararith(*MIME: Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy)- Ms. Maureen Balamiento (IT Specialist, ACE), Ms. Irma Suryani(ACE)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)

6. Overview of the company we visitedFirst, Mr. Ogura expressed his thanks for the participation of Sofitel Hotel in theseminar/training and explained about the purpose of visit and the outline of PROMECC. This
hotel applied to the EM of the 2008 PROMEEC Award system and won the 2nd Runner-up.
The number of employees of this hotel is 320, and the hotel opened eight years ago. The areaof the whole site is 60,000 m2 and the area of the garden is 30,000 m2.
Mr. Sam Van, who guided us, was Quality Manager at ITW (conglomerate company) in the
US. The former Engineering Manager of Sofitel was transferred to Sofitel newly establishedin Phnom Penh, and Mr. Sam Van was appointed swiftly to the new post at the end of
September this fiscal year. He looked very busy, saying “I grasp most of the content of mywork, but I don’t have enough time.” We hurriedly had a meeting at the hotel lobby andfinished the observation tour in the hotel. The Engineering Division takes on the task ofgiving energy-saving education to new employees and temporary staff members in addition toits original tasks.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) Outline of hotel (by the 2008 ASEAN EM Award Entry Form)- Type of Building: Single core/1 Shape/3 Stories/1 Basement- Total Gross Floor Area (TGFA):60,000 m2- Gross settable area: 1.195 m2- Car Park Area: 5,000 m2- Air Conditioned Area (ACA): 30,000m2- Non-air-conditioned area: 30,000m2- Plot area(Total GFA/ground area): 60%- Number of Guest Room: 238- Fresh air exchange rate: 1:3- Annual energy consumption: 3,141,120 kWh/y- BEEI: 4.3 kWh/m2 (This is the value for TGFA on a monthly basis. On an annual basis,
ACA is 105 kWh/m2. The BEEI is very low for hotel. We requested to re-check thevalues.)2) Energy management: The Energy Management Committee is organized, which consists of
12 people in total, one to two representative persons from each division. As no/low costIII-42

measures, they implement the turning-off of lights and the reduction of the number offluorescent lamps.
3) The energy consumption data is collected every day, every week and every month. If any
unusual change is found, they take an immediate action. They also compile the energy
consumption data from the viewpoint of number of guests and occupancy.
4) Recent matters to be specified for Sofitel Hotel- Biogas are produced from kitchen wastes and used as fuel for sustainability of kitchen(about 10 m3 fermentation tank).
- Condensing heat of chillers is used as the heating source of hot water.
5) The boiler and chillers are old and planned to be replaced with new ones.
6) The owner has enthusiasm for energy conservation from the viewpoint of cost reduction.
Involvement of Management should be continued from now on.
(2) Explanation, opinion and proposals on our visit including the field inspection
1) Concerning the BEE Index, although the figures are abnormal, the base data should beclarified. Specifically, it is possible that the usage of fuel other than electricity can be
unified and compiled into MJ.
2) We want them to use the EMHB more positively.
(3) Response of the company we visited
1) Mr. Sam Van is very active, and he said that they have a system for collecting opinionsfrom the employees and their motto is Open, Transparency.
2) Mr. Sam expressed his thanks for the 2-day training because Japanese experiences wereincorporated in it and it was a very good and useful training for them.
3) They have the in-house award system, where the Monthly Best Staff is chosen and awards
are also given to those who contributed to energy conservation.
4) Sofitel has an Accord (Manual), which contains provisions about energy conservation andsetting temperature.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) All the lights in the corridors were off unless necessary.
2) Since it is a first-class hotel, it is clean and well-organized.
3) There are two chillers (manufactured by Trane). Since it is in the low season now, one
chiller operates. Power Factor: 0.94
4) When the case example of the hotel was taken up in the Group Work on the previous day,each group raised a lot of good points and points to be improved in the future. We told themto hear the details from the subordinate who joined the inspection till the end.
5) Lastly, we told them that we knew that they had been conducting activities positively fromthe energy-saving point of view, and that we would like to invite them to trainings otherthan PROMEEC as the case may be.

III-43

Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Cambodia (No.2)
Visit to Le Meridian Angkor HotelNO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time October 19, Tuesday 13:15 to 15:00
2
Meeting place Le Meridian Angkor Hotel
3
4

5Counterparts- Masahiro Taguchi, Sales division manager, Mr. Fernando JOSEPH(Chief Engineer) and other 3 people
Accompanying - Mr. Lieng Vuthy
persons- Mr. Khlaing Amaradararith(MIME)(*MIME: Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy)
Visitors (ACE, - Ms. Maureen Balamiento (IT Specialist, ACE), Ms. Irma Suryani
ECCJ)
(ACE)
- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)

6. Overview of the company we visitedFirst, Mr. Ogura, manager, expressed his thanks for the participation of two people from Le
Meridian Hotel in the seminar/training and explained about the purpose of visit and theoutline of PROMEEC Project. Le Meridian Hotel is under the umbrella of Starwood, US, andis on the same rank as Sheraton. They have 1,000 hotels in the world. The number of
employees is 230, 10% of them belong to the Engineering Department. The hotel opened in
2004. Mr. Francis Chu (Raffles Angkor Hotel) who participated in this seminar/training is thepredecessor of Mr. Fernando.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) Outline of the hotel (The total site area is 9 Ha.)- Gross Floor Area: 10,000m2- It is difficult to keep the five-star rating, and they have been working hard.
- According to the Starwood standard, the room temperature in tropical regions is set at 23
to 25°C.
2) There are boards of Sixsigma, Safety & Health, and Training & Development. It shows thatin-hotel activities have been conducted positively. On the Training Board, the trainees whoplan to receive the training and its schedule were shown.
3) They have made efforts with the recognition of energy conservation as a key. Theenergy-saving activities are conducted according to the Starwood’s manual, and they must
submit the energy consumption to the parent company once a month.
4) In 2007, the electric power supply source was changed from the in-house power generation
to the National Grid via EDC (Cambodia Electricity Corporation). As a result, the electriccharge was reduced to half.
5) Two years ago, the Energy Conservation Committee named Sixsigma was established.
6) 50% of the electric power consumption is by chillers and 20% is by air conditioners, and
30% is by lighting and motors.
7) Steam traps which corroded two years ago were replaced. Condensate is also collected.
(2) Explanation, opinion and proposals on our visit including the field inspection- The hotel is clean and well-organized, and we feel that the employees are well-disciplined.
- We strongly hope they will apply for the next ASEAN Award.
III-44

(3) Response of the company we visited1) Surprisingly, a Japanese sales manager appeared. He says that he worked at various hotels
in the world.
2) It is a first-class hotel, and so the inside is very clean. The persons in charge have a highenergy-saving awareness. All the unnecessary lights were turned off.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) The 5-ton boiler supplys hot water for guest rooms and to the laundry at the load of 50:50.
The steam pressure varies between 80 and 120 psig. We proposed there may be somemeasure against it. No equipment made in Japan was found. They say that they know theequipment made in Japan is good in quality but it is expensive.
2) As is the case with Sofitel, the company policy is Open, Transparency. Recently, the pointon management was set as Sustainability. (In the past, No. 1 point was Safety against
terrorism, etc.)

III-45

III-2-4. Indonesia
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The Intensive Seminar-Workshop (ISW) was held at a conference room on the 3rd floor of
Manhattan Hotel, near the ACE Office, which was followed by the training course on the nextday. Thirty-some participants, including those from the organizer, attended the ISW on thefirst day. However, participants from New Renewable Energy & Energy Conservation of
MEMR (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources), the FP, were just two: Ms. Maryam
Ayuni, Director for New Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation and Mr. Surpiyadi
who was also present at the PROMEEC post-workshop and inception workshop by deputy.
As the two left the conference room earlier than other participants, about seven ACE members
were forced to take a leading role in this workshop, including registration. Ms. Indarti , FP,
and others were unable to be present due to three other meetings held during the same period,
but their dependence on the ACE, local organization, left us doubts whether they were reallycommitted with this meeting. We want them to maintain a proactive stance and show theirinitiatives. They did not clarify the final agenda before we left Japan to Indonesia. Program ofthis meeting is shown in Attachment Material III-2-4-1.
(1) Welcome remarks and opening statement：Ms. Maryam Ayuni, Director for New
Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation, MEMR, Mr. Ogura of ECCJ, and Ms.
Cindy Rianti, who was there on behalf of Mr. Nguyen Manh Hung representing ACE
expressed their gratitude to the cooperating organizations from their own position andintroduced significance, future development and applications of energy conservation
and PROMEEC/EM Projects. Ms. Maryam Ayuni spoke mostly in Indonesianlanguage, so we couldn’t comprehend what she said, except for English phrases like
“ASEAN Award”, “Japan-Denmark-Holland”, “benchmark”, “EM seminar-workshop& training”. She may be talking about support of foreign nations.
(2) Generally, Session One starts immediately after a break including group photo session,
but this time there was a brief self-introduction of the participants because there wastime as reports from subject countries were omitted in the following session.
Although not in detail, we could understand the outline of the participants’
background, such as industry (the cement industry or the textile company we planned
to visit, or hotels), government and public organization or engineering, whichfacilitated proceedings and talks in the following sessions.
(3) Session 1: PROMEEC Project/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements
Introduction of the PROMEEC Projects as a whole and EM (Improvement of Energy
Management Base) Project1) “Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project” (Mr. Oscarlito Malvar, ACE):
Mr. Malvar explained the EEC activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program andpast activities of three PROMEEC Projects, as shown in Attachment Material 1(not attached)2) “Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project” (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): He introduced the EM project plan for this fiscal year, as shown in the
Attachment Material 2 (not attached)3) “Government Regulation on Energy Conservation and Result of
PROMEEC-Energy Management Activities in Indonesia” (Ms. Indarti, MEMR):This report, which was initially included in the program, was canceled on the day.
The speaker was unable to be present at the meeting, but it seemed that there wasno one who was going to speak on behalf of the speaker. As a result, there were noreports from the host country on the day and the next day, leaving the participants
an impression that the host country is not much committed to this meeting.
Brochures on the energy conservation act of Indonesia completed in 2009 (written
III-46

in Indonesian) and two documents about building and industry energy
management system, also in Indonesian, were distributed to the participants,
possibly for reference. But the latter was left on the reception table and not handed
out to the participants.
(4) Session 2: Introduction of Functions and Program of ASEAN Energy Management
System1) “Outline of Updated ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)：
ASEAN EM System described in this fiscal year’s plan was extracted to explain
about ASEAN Award, diffusion of EMHB, concrete development plan for
Functions & Other Tools, as described in the Attachment Material 4 (not attached)2) Specific Functions and ProgramA) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in EM for Industry and Building- “Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011”(Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE): He introduced the results in EM section of this
BOJ and future challenges, as shown in the Attachment Material 5 (notattached)B) Information System- “Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Cases” (Mr. Sato,
ECCJ)：Mr. Sato introduced analysis of this fiscal year’s applications and theawardees in the EM section, as shown in the Attachment Material 6. (notattached)- “Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations” (Mr. Junianto M, ACE): He introduced the Online Energy
Information System and made requests to participate and use the system. At
present 17 organizations* registered as implementation organization.
(recently one more company from Singapore registered) Attachment Material
7 (not attached)- “Introduction of JASE-World” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ): He introduced
JASE-World and how to use the e-Directory for Technologies & Equipment:
Attachment Material 8 (not attached)C) Energy Management Tools- “Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and Other Tools” (Mr. Ogura
from ECCJ): He introduced the outline of the Handbook on heat andelectricity related to EMHB and translations in other languages. Attachment
Material 9 (not attached)- “In-house Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings” from “Updates on
the Development of Energy Management Tools” (Mr. Junianto M, ACE):
IHDB by industry, classification of buildings and past activities. Attachment
Material 10 (not attached to this document)- “Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings” from “Updates on
the Development of Energy Management Tools” (Mr. Junianto M, ACE): Mr.
Junianto introduced types of TD, cases and the access method. Attachment
Material 10 (not attached)(5) Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing; There was no presentation fromthe host country that we requested.
1) “Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System inJapan“ (Mr. Ogura from ECCJ): Starting with the current situation of global
warming and the issue of resource exhaustion, he explained the Energy
Conservation Law of Japan, measures of energy conservation and those aimed atenhancing awareness of the Japanese people including the eco-point system. Ogura
also introduced the financial support system for energy conservation measures andloans for energy conservation provided by JICA/ODA in ASEAN nations (loans tocope with climate change and the Two Step Loan). Shown in the Attachment
III-47Material 12 (not attached)2) “Financial Support System in ASEAN” (Mr. Chanatip Suksai, ACE): Distributed
material was just a sheet of paper describing the international potential funding
sources for ASEAN nations. Shown in Attachment Material 13 (not attached)(6) Q&A
1) Is an EMHB by country necessary? → Basically, EMHB for ASEAN can be usedin common, but translation in local languages or making an abstract, as in Brunei
Darussalam, is allowed.
2) Are there similar projects organized by JICA? → JICA offers the Master Plan for
Energy Conservation, but ECCJ is the sole organization that develops and promotes
the system, handbook and tools of energy management.
3) What’s the difference between ISO 50001 and EMHB? → ISO 50001, which will
be finalized by the end of this fiscal year, requires energy management based on the
PDCA cycle as with EMHB, but as whole, the regulations are general. Last year,
the Indonesian government has set its own energy conservation act, and it was
distributed to the participants today. Regulations on energy management in the act
must be observed first. However, for the future, customers in Europe or in the USA
may require ISO50001 when exporting goods. It may not be so troublesome toobtain the ISO50001 certification if the EMHB for ASEAN is implemented.
4) This fiscal year, period of work in Indonesia was October 21-25. We want to havemore opportunities to visit local companies. → As explained earlier, basically threedays are allocated to each nation in this EM project. ISW and training are done
today and tomorrow, followed by an advisory visit to Viscose, who is present today,on the third day. FP has chosen the company to visit, and we ask you for yourunderstanding that it may not be possible to visit more companies due togeographical and time limit.
5) Can EMHB be downloaded for free? → Yes. EMHB related tools can be down
loaded on ACE or ECCJ website and JASE-W’s Technical Directory can also be
downloaded on ECCJ website, for free.
6) When will EEH (Electricity Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook) beavailable? → In our plan, it will be completed by the end of current fiscal year anduploaded.
7) Can SEI (Specific Energy Index) be available on ACE’s website? → The Ministry(MEMR) will consider the issue. (Mr. Junianto)
8) Japan has set a goal to reduce CO2 emissions by 6%. What stance do the Japanese
government and private enterprises take toward CDM Projects? → The Japanese
government has focused on CO2 emissions trading with other nations,
implementing many projects through NEDO or other organizations. Private
enterprises make efforts of their own. However, there is an issue of budget and cost.
Emissions trading program in Japan has been launched.
9) Ms. Indarti will accept applications and provide consultations on the ASEAN
Award. (Mr. Pham)(7) Breakdown of the participants
1) Semen Tonasa: 2 people
2) Semen Baturaja: 2 people
3) Semen Bogor: 1 person4) Indonesia Cement: 1 person5) South Pacific Viscose (Textile):3 people
6) Association Textile Indonesia: 1 person7) Hotel Association: 1 person8) Parklane Hotel: 1 person9) Bakrie Tower (Building): 1 person
10) Building Management: 1 person
III-4811) Industry & Energy Agency (Building): 2 people12) From the building sector: 1 person
13) The Pakubuwono Residence: 1 person14) Engineering Association: 1 person15) MEMR Research & Development Center for Electricity and Renewable Energy
Technology: 2 people16) Education & Training Center for Electricity & Renewable Energy: 2 people17) Local Government (Environment): 1 person18) Unaffiliated: 5 people(8) Achievements and challenges of ISW
1) In PROMEEC Projects, each of EM and Building had one participant.
2) Brief self introduction of the participants at the beginning helped us understanding
the background of participants and was beneficial for the proceeding. Although it
was a small group, we had participants who came all the way, thanks to the efforts
of FP.
3) We understand that there may be a reason, but FP side was not committed to thisproject on the first and second day, showing little passion and eagerness to leadthis project for the future. We should tell them that unless they will grow out ofdependence on ECCJ and ACE in Indonesia, they will not be able to receive
continuous support.
2. Training for the use of the Energy Management Handbook, etc.
There were about 20 participants excluding those from the organizer, most of whom were theparticipants of ISW on the previous day. Seventeen trainees present at the afternoon workshop
were divided into two groups.
Basically, we made the same preparations as in Cambodia on the second day. Because training
on energy management was not provided in Indonesia last year, we focused on helping
participants to have correct understanding on how to use the Energy Management Handbook
and apply it to their day-to-day work.
Plan for the second day is as follows: (almost similar to that for Cambodia)
1) The entire morning session was for explaining the Energy Management Handbook.
2) Explanation of the Energy Management Handbook was made using PowerPoint slides.
3) Group work was implemented only in the afternoon session on the second day:
- One case of Indonesia factory and one for building were chosen from applications to
the ASEAN Award Competition.
- Group work was supposed to be led by the organizer from Indonesia.
(Actually they were heavily dependent on the Japanese side due to the lack of
preparation of the Indonesian government)4) Ms. Indarti, FP of Indonesia, was supposed to give explanations on the government
initiatives and the training course at the end of the session.
(Explanations were not given due to the lack of preparations on the Indonesian side)
The above is the outline of this fiscal year’s training. Training program actually given isshown in the Attachment Material III-2-4-2.
Achievements of the day are described below:(1) Lecture: Outline and features, detailed explanation and important guidelines of theEnergy Management Handbook (Mr. Ogawa, ECCJ): Attachment Material 13 (notattachedOn the previous day, most of the trainees were found to be able to understand English
without interpreters. On this day the lecture was given in English, in a slow andintelligible manner. They seemed to have understood the explanation for the most part.
We tried to quote contents of application documents of two case studies which were
III-49going to be used in the group work in the afternoon session.
There were two questions on the lecture, both from Mr. Christianto Surowo from the
Pakubuwono Residence:
Q: Isn’t it difficult to set numerical targets as the top policy (such as targets to reduceenergy consumption)?
A: That’s a good question. But it may be possible to roughly set goals referring tosuccessful examples of the competitors in the industry. But such goals are not reliable,
not based on detailed consideration. Problem is: what will happen when the goal will
not be achieved? Frankly speaking, there will be two cases: one is to set numericaltargets roughly, but the leaders and the organization must be flexible enough so as thefact that the goals will not be achieved will not become a problem; another is to set
lower numerical targets than the level that may be achieved. If the goal is achieved,
all will be happy. But this will leave a question whether the goal was too low. The
choice between these two will be made based on the culture of the organization andthe qualification of the leaders.
Q: How about adding awareness and actions on energy conservation in the job
description of the subordinates?
A: It may be possible if it is natural to add to the job of the subordinate.
(2) Workshop (Group Work)
1) “Guidance for Group Work” (Sato, ECCJ): Prior to the group work, ECCJ gavebriefings on the work: Attachment Material 16 (not attached)2) Explanations by persons involved in two cases
The two cases were introduced:A) Semen Tonasa
Semen Tonasa received the First Runner Up (highest award) in the EM for industries
in the 2009-2010 ASEAN Energy Award Competition. Mr. Ridwan Puruomo from
Semen Tonasa gave an explanation for more than 30 minutes using PowerPoint slides.
Although it was done in Indonesian, we had understood the contents in advance byreading application documents.
B) Mangga Dua Square
Mangga Dua Square received the 2nd Runner Up award in the EM for buildings in the
2008-2009 ASEAN Energy Award Competition. Mr. Didik Kurniadi (Building
Manager) of the company gave explanations using PowerPoint slides. It was a brief
explanation but to the point, given in English.
3) Group WorkFor the analysis and assessment of these two cases, Energy Management Handbook wasused as the standard to check whether required items are implemented.
As with other nations, the items for final presentation after the discussion are as follows:A) Evaluation of energy conservation activities based on the above (good points）andB) Suggestions for future improvement
After the briefing by ECCJ, the organizer was supposed to take a leading role. Due to thelack of preparation on the Indonesian side, we had to support them.
There were two groups:
Group NO
Number of peopleA
8 peopleB
9 people
The discussion was planned to last about 1 and half hours. Actually both groups finishedalso preparations for the presentation within that time.
For use in the discussion and the presentation of each group, we provided a sheet of white
paper put on a board, but both groups created PowerPoint presentation using PC in thediscussion.
PowerPoint presentations of both groups were well organized, which starts with the
III-50introduction of the group members and includes good points and suggestions. We were
impressed that the presentations included many suggestions although the case studies
were successful examples.
4) Comments from ECCJ
- Group work proceeded very smoothly. Most of the participants were inexperienced inenergy management, but there were no problems.
- Both groups made good presentation on the use of KSA, the main theme of this group
work. Presentation of the group B was excellent.
- We expected it may be difficult to give suggestions for improvement from successful
cases, but both groups did.
- We hope the group members to let their subordinates and others learn about what theyacquired in this training, when they return to the workplace.
(3) Presentation from the Indonesian government
Actually this was canceled due to the lack of preparation of the Indonesian government.
However, in the closing remarks, Ms. Indarti said that Indonesia should learn more fromJapan and the EM System. Training program is too short to learn. She said she hoped
participants to disseminate EMHB at the workplace.
(4) Awarding of certificates and closing remarks
Ms. Indarti, Mr. Ogura, and Mr. Junianto came up to the stage and handed certificates tothe participants. Lastly, Mr. Pham of ACE expressed his gratitude and gave closing
remarks.
(5) Breakdown of the participants (excluding those from the organizer)
1) Buildings
2 people
2) Factories
10 people
3) Government (central and local)
4 people4) Others and unknown
4 people
Total
20 people

3. Visit to companies
Following the intensive seminar-workshop and the training on the use of Energy Management
Handbook, we have chosen a company from those wishing to utilize the Energy Management
Handbook and other tools for their energy management of factories and buildings or
promoting energy conservation, and visited the company on October 25. For details, pleaserefer to the Attachment Material III-2-4-3.
(1) South Pacific Viscose: Textile manufacturer (viscose fiber)

4. Others(1) This fiscal year’s workshop held in Jakarta received support of many ACE members. In
addition to Mr. Manh Hung, Mr. Zamora, Ms. Maureen, Mr. Junianto and Mr. Pham
Duong, who are involved in the PROMEEC/EM projects, we had support of Ms. Cindy,
Mr. Oscarlito, Mr. Chanatip and Mr. Bernard for giving remarks, lectures, assuming a roleof MC (Master of Ceremony) and receptionists at the registration. Mr. Pham Duong, Mr.
Oscarlito, Mr. Chanatip, who are new at ACE, carried out their responsibilities without
problems.
(2) Around the same period, from October 18th to 22nd, the 1st Energy Supply Security
Planning the ASEAN (ESSPA) Workshop organized by IEEJ was held at anotherconference room on the same floor of the hotel (10th floor of Manhattan Hotel). We met
Mr. Shigeru Kimura of IEEJ, director for research in charge of quantitative analysis andexchanged greetings. There were representatives of ASEAN nations there. Dr. Lim atUniversiti Brunei Darussalam, who cooperated with us in EM projects in Brunei
Darussalam, was there. We happened to see Dr. Lim in front of the hotel desk on the
III-51

previous night for check-in.
(3) Photos are shown in the Attachment Material 12. (not attached )III-52

Attached Material III-2-4-1 Agenda for ISW

Indonesia

ACE

EE&C-SSN

DGNREEC

METI

ECCJ

INTENSIVE SEMINAR-WORKSHOP ON
THE PROMOTION ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION(PROMEEC) - ENERGY MANAGEMENTUNDER THE SOME-METI WORK PROGRAMME 2010-2011
21 October 2010, Jakarta, Indonesia
FINAL AGENDA
8:30
9:10

9:20

9:30
9:45
10:05
10:15
10:49
(Canceled)

11:17
11:45

12:21
13:40

-

9:10
9:20

Registration
Welcome Remarks
Ms. Maryam Ayuni, Director of New Renewable Energy and Energy
Utilization, DGNREEC – MEMR
- 9:30 Opening Statement
Mr. Yutaka Ogura, General Manager, The Energy Conservation Center, Japan(ECCJ)- 9:40 Opening Statement
Ms. Cindy Rianti, ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE)- 10:05 Photo Session and Coffee Break- 10:15 Self Introduction of Participants
SESSION I: PROMEEC Projects- 10:48 Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Projects
Mr. Oscarlito Malvar, ACE- 11:08 Outline and Plan of PROMEEC - Energy Management Project
Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ
Government Regulation on Energy Conservation and Result of
PROMEEC-Energy Management Activities in Indonesia
Ms. Indarti, Head, Energy Conservation Division, DGNREEC - MEMRSESSION II: ASEAN Energy Management System “Function & Program”- 11:45 Outline of updated “ASEAN Energy Management System”
Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ
12:21 Specific Function and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industry and Building (Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010
and Plan for 2010-2011)
Mr. Pham Van Duong, ACE
2) Information System (Information Analysis to ease Dissemination ofAwarded Case
Mr. Takashi Sato, ECCJ
- 13:40 Lunch- 14:37 3) Information System (On-line Energy Information System to Utilize the
Existing Implementing Organizations)
Mr. Junianto M, ACE
4) Introduction of JASE-WorldMr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ
5) Energy Management Tools:
Energy Management Handbook
III-53

Mr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ
In-house Database for Industries and Buildings
Mr. Junianto M, ACE
Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings
Mr. Junianto M, ACE
14:37

-

14:53

-

15:30
15:34

-

14:50

Q &A
SESSION III: Environmental Awareness and Financing
15:30 Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in JapanMr. Y. Ogura, ECCJ
15:33 Financial Support System in ASEAN
Mr. Chanatip Suksai, ACE
15:45 Q & A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop

III-54

Attached Material III-2-4-2 Agenda for Training

ACE

EE&C-SSN

DGNREEC

METI

ECCJ

TRAINING ONUTILIZING “ENERGY MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK & ENERGY MANAGEMENT TOOLS”
UNDER THE SOME-METI WORK PROGRAMME 2010-2011
22 October 2010, Jakarta, Indonesia
FINAL AGENDA
8:30

-

9:17

9:18

-

10:16

10:16
10:40

-

10:40
11:55

11:55
13:35
13:48

13:30
13:48
-

14:06

14:04
14:17

14:18

-

14:49

14:50

-

15:50

15:50
16:06

-

16:05
16:23

16:23
16:32
16:40

-

Registration
SESSION I: Seminar by ECCJ
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (Part 1)
Mr. Fumio Ogawa, ECCJ
Coffee Break
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (Part 2)
Mr. Fumio Ogawa, ECCJ
Lunch
Supplement of EMHB and Q & A
SESSION II: Training for Small Group Activities
Guidance for Group WorkMr. Takashi Sato, ECCJ
Experience of Dissemination of ASEAN Award Best Practice of Energy
Management
Explanation of Best Practices/Energy Management in Industry(Case Study 1: Mangga Dua Square)
Explanation of Best Practices/Energy Management in Building(Case Study 2: Power Management in PT. Semen Tonasa (Persero))Group Work based on Cases Study 1 & 2 by ECCJ
Preparation for Group Work
Discussion by Groups:
Coffee Break
Presentation by participants:
Result of Group Work for Case Study 1 & 2

16:31

Comments by ECCJ Experts

16:40
16:55

Closing Remarks by Ms. Indarti (NFP ASEAN EE&C SSN)
Awarding Ceremony of Certificate to ParticipantsCompletion of Training

III-55

Attachment Material III-2-4-3 Report of Visit to
Relevant Companies and Organizations
Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Indonesia (No. 1)
Visit to South Pacific Viscose
NO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time October 25, Monday 9:00 to 14:00
2
Meeting place PT. South Pacific Viscose: Factory
Desa Cicadas, Purwakarta 41101, West Java, Indonesia
3
Counterparts- Mr. Saleel R Nayak (Vice President, Chemicals & Utilities), Mr.
Sundara Rajan V (Vice President, Fiber Production), Mr. Rosa
Belawan (Senior Manager, Utilities Plant, Chairman of Energy
Committee), Mr. Zakaria (Vice Chairman of E.C.), Dr. Knoglinger
Johann (Process Optimization Manager), Mr. Abdul Haris (Deputy
Manager, Process Development)
4
Accompanying - Ms. Devi (New Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation,
persons
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources,)
5

Visitors (ACEand ECCJ)- Mr. Junianto M (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Duong (ACE)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)

6. Overview of the company we visited(1) South Pacific Viscose factory is located about 100km away from Jakarta to the Bandung
direction, which takes 2 hours by car when the road is not busy. The reason why thislocation has been chosen is that the Indonesian government at the time attracted
labor-intensive industries to this place, there is much water (this factory consumes 58
million liters of water daily, having its own dam) and it is near the consumption area such
as Jakarta and Bandung. The 75-hectare plant employs 1,600 people and operates withthe three-shift system, producing viscose made of pulp. Rather than used as is, viscose isoften mixed with cotton and polyester.
(2) South Pacific Viscose is a member of Lenzing Group headquartered in Austria. After its
foundation in 1982, India, one of its initial shareholders, sold its capital holdings to
Lenzing Group. Currently the Lenzing Group owns a 90% share while the remaining 10%
owned by local capital. At present there are three Indians (two V.P.s) in this plant. Outside
Indonesia, Lenzing Group has another plant in Nanjing, China. Daily output of theIndonesian plant, which was at first 50 tons, has increased to 600 tons. The company is
now expanding the plant on a land nearby, meaning that the company’s business is doing
well. The parent company has a policy to focus on the use of renewable energy,
environmental preservation and sustainability, while increasing production and savingenergy. The plant aims to be a green factory. It has obtained ISO9001 and ISO14001
certifications.
(3) Mr Ogura expressed gratitude that there were four participants in the seminar and training
from Viscose. He also explained the objectives of the visit and the outline of the
PROMEEC Project.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of Hearing
1) Production scale: 220,000 ton/y2) Production facility: The plant is an integrated chemical factory to produce viscose textile
from material pulp, mainly imported from South Africa. Product is exported to Japan,
III-56

Europe and the USA. In Japan, their viscose is mixed with Stensel brand textiles. Na2SO4,
by-product of viscose textiles, is used at glass or paper manufacturing, creating a nichemarket.
3) Activities regarding EM- (Margin Enhancement Project (MEP) was started in 2006. With this, Energy and Utilities
Saving Team started activities. Each division has SGA organization and reports energy
management results to top management. Top management has a clear policy on EM.
- In addition, PKK (Indonesian abbreviation for Small group activities including
Employee’s Idea Collections and Suggestion System) functions well. Excellent cases are
rewarded. PKK Bulletin is issued.
- Priorities are given to no or low-cost ideas. These were replaced with the words learned in
the seminar and training provided last week.
- Process Development (PDE) optimizes the use of energy and materials. PDE provides
technical support to various energy conservation activities.
- PDE is implemented in the medium & high investment projects to test the effectiveness.
- PDE handles ideas suggested by the employees.
- In the factory, ideas are classified into no or low cost idea, medium cost idea or highinvestment idea, depending on the scale of projects on energy conservation.
A) No/low cost idea
- Put a sticker on the switch to promote energy conservation- Install a sub-meter for each colony (company house) to promote energy conservation- Regularly check the steam trap
- Change the location of the lighting switch for the convenience of the users
B) Medium investment project- Chemical Cleaning System of Heat Recovery PHE (Plate Heat Exchanger)- Replace existing SW-pre-heater with a new one- Replace reciprocating type compressor to a screw type- Introduce inverter fans and pumps
C) High investment project- Heat Recovery in a sulfuric plant- Replace freon chiller with ammonium chiller
D) Energy conservation projects for the future- Reorganization of the condensate polishing unit
- Preheat of all make-up waterE) Unauthorized projects- Complete condensate recovery- Introduce the latest topsoe process to the fibre dryerF) Future projects- Modification of caustic adsorption chiller- Separation of the cooling tower(2) Participants from South Pacific Viscose seemed to be interested in the ISO 50001 system,
but have no specific knowledge about the system. We told them that it will be finalized by
the end of the year. Also we told that it is a general certification based on the PDCA cycle
as described in the explanation for EMHB. South Pacific Viscose, which has obtained
ISO9001 and ISO14001 and implementing EEC and EM activities may be able to obtain
the ISO 50001 certification easily.
(3) Complying with the instruction from top management, the company aims at a 3% energy
reduction. Degree of attainment is checked every 6 months. After 6 months a new goal isset.
1) All departments are required to analyze the collected data and make a chart to top
management once a week and once a month.
2) Benchmarking is implemented with the factories in the same corporate group.
III-57

3) The adjacent factory is a competitor also manufacturing the same product. Birla Group ofIndia is the competitor for the company, too.
4) Half of the production cost is for materials. Energy cost accounts for about 10-15% of thetotal.
5) 10% of electricity is purchased and the remaining 90% is generated in-house. Electricity
generated with the cogeneration system is cheaper than purchasing power. National Grid,the electricity supplier, is sometimes hit by thunder, causing power failure, which is themost serious problem for the manufacturing process of textile companies. Fuel for in-house
power generation is coal of Indonesia (Java and Sumatra).
(4) Explanations, opinions and suggestions from ECCJ after the inspection of the factory1) This large scale factory can be called chemical plant, rather than a textile plant.
2) Most of unnecessary lightings were turned off, but the warehouse having natural daylight
was lit. The person in charge said that some workers are still unconscious of energy
conservation.
3) Dr. Knoglinger Johann gave a detailed explanation on the plant facilities and the
manufacturing process. One of the colleagues said that he has received a Ph. D. in physics
and offers various ideas on energy conservation of the factory.
(5) Attitude toward EM
1) The company seemed to be focused on energy management, enrolling four employees inthe seminar and the training. They have prepared a presentation based on what they havelearned before our visit.
2) Persons in charge of energy management are willing to introduce EMHB, but they wait forthe decision of top management.
8. Overview of field inspection
1) There was a question over advanced, high efficiency motor of Japan. We asked thequestioner to refer to the distributed compact disc of JASE-W.
2) It would be effective to create an Indonesian version of the EMHB and distribute to theemployees.
3) We advised the company to make an application to the EM section of the ASEAN Award.
4) We understood that they were committed to clarifying policies of top management,
employee training at the training center, improving technical capabilities and introducing
PDCA. We hope that they will make further efforts on EM.

III-58

III-2-5. Myanmar
1. Implementation of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
The two-day Intensive Seminar-Workshop took place at Majestic Room, Hotel Amara in apolitical town of Nay Pyi Taw of the new capital of the company. Nay Pyi Taw is a political
capital and 80% of 100,000 residents are government officials, many of them living alone
leaving their families to Yangonn. Except for the diet house, ministry buildings spotted in thewoods, group of houses for government officials scattered around the town and hotels forforeign agencies concentrated near Hotel Amara, there were few offices of private enterprises,
shopping centers and restaurants. Some joked about this vast, quiet town that it will require
100 years for revitalization.
Participants in the list were 26, except for the Deputy Minister for Minister of Industry (2) andthe Director at the Ministry of Energy and their subordinates, who were present at the time of
opening remarks.
Chairman for the first two days was Ms. Naing Naing Linn (Deputy Assistant Director,
Directorate of Myanmar Industrial Planning) from Minister of Industry (2), who spoke inclear English. Most of the male participants wore their ethnic costume called loungyi.
Program for the 1st day is shown in the Attachment Material III-2-5-1.
(1) Welcome remarks: Mr. Kyaw Swa Khine, Deputy Minister of MOI-2, Mr. Pe Zin Tun,
Director of MOE, Mr. Ogura of ECCJ and Mr. Junianto from ACE. Each expressed
appreciation for cooperating organizations, significance and future development ofenergy conservation and PROMEEC/EM projects, from their perspectives. Outline of
the remarks of the first two is described below.
This time, opening remarks was given by two people from different ministries forsome reason of the country: MOI-2 handled this EM project, although MOE assumes
responsibility of energy management and energy conservation in general. Later weknew that there are many agencies handling energy issues and it is unclear which
ministry takes a leading role in promoting energy conservation. There were reporters
and photographers from local newspaper and TV companies. On the next day theseminar was introduced in a newspaper.
1) Mr. Kyaw Swa Khine：First expressed gratitude for the persons involved in theseminar. Global Warming issue is a problem that must be shared throughout theworld. Energy efficiency technology is important. Less energy use also decreases
cost of production. EE&C will be promoted with the support of Japan. EM
Handbook & Tools will be effective, but how to use it will be crucial. Valuableknow-how of EM and EE&C should be shared. Exchange of information fromgovernment to private companies is important. ASEAN Award Best Practice & EM
Tools is important. Need to stimulus awareness on energy conservation. Again
expressed gratitude for the support of METI/ECCJ, wishing a success of thisseminar.
2) Mr. Pe Zin Tun： First expressed gratitude for the persons involved in this seminar,
including METI. Thanked ACE for organizing the ASEAN Award for Renewable
Energy. EM System should be introduced to buildings and industries. Monitoring
system of EE&C is important. More future issue must be learned. Expressed thanks
for the experts for their support.
3) In the statement from ECCJ, we told a bit about insufficient outcomes of COP16 in
Cancun, Mexico, that ended last week.
(2) Session 1: PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project: Outline & Achievements
Introduction of the outline of PROMEEC Projects and EM (building foundations forenergy management) projects
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (Pham Van Duong, ACE): EEC
activities in the APAEC 2010-2015 Program and past activities of three
III-59

PROMEEC projects were introduced. Attachment Material 1 (not attached to thisdocument)
2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ): Plan for this fiscal year’s EM projects was introduced. Attachment
Material 2 (not attached)3) Realized Activities/Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects in
Myanmar (Mr. U Tin Htut, Ministry of Energy): In Myanmar, seven ministries
excluding MOI-(1) and (2) that handled energy policies and energy issues.
Ministry of Energy was defined as a coordinator among these ministries. Major
activities related to energy implemented since 1991 were introduced. Past
applications to PROMEEC Projects/ASEAN Award. Plans for the future include:
preparations to introduce AEMAS Energy Manager System, outline of improving
basic skills, goals for EE&C and the action plan, methods to improve energy
efficiency were explained. Attachment Material 3 (not attached to this document)(3) Session 2: Introduction of Functions & Program of ASEAN Energy Management
System1) Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (Mr. Ogura, ECCJ)：
ASEAN EM System was extracted from this fiscal year’s plan and detailed
explanation was given to the ASEAN Award, promotion of EMHB and concrete
development plan of Functions & Other Tools. When we asked about EMHB
(Energy Management Handbook), nobody except for Mr. Than Oo, FP, knew about
it. Five persons knew the fact that there are no ESCO in Myanmar at present. They
also knew about PDCA cycle. Attachment Material 4 (not attached)2) Specific Functions and ProgramA) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011(Mr. Pham V. Duong, ACE)：Results in the EM section of this fiscal year’s
BOJ and future challenges were introduced. Attachment Material 5 (notattached)B) Information System- Information Analyses to ease Dissemination of Awarded Case (Mr. Sato,
ECCJ)：Mr. Sato introduced this fiscal year’s applications to EM section andanalysis of award results. He asked about regulations on room temperature insummer in Myanmar, but the answer was no. Average electricity charge in
Myanmar is US 2.5 cent /kWh. A participant said electricity charge in
Myanmar is cheap as hydraulic power generation covers 80-85% ofelectricity consumption in the country. Attachment Material 6 (not attached)- Introduction of JASE-World (Ogura, ECCJ)：Relating to e-Directory forTechnologies & Equipment, Ogura introduced JASE-World and how to use
technical database. Then, ten English brochures with a compact disc werehanded to Mr. Than Oo so that he can distribute to the participants asnecessary. Attachment Material 7 (not attached to this document)C) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook (EMHB) and other tools (Mr. Ogura,
ECCJ)：Outline of EMHB, related thermal and power technology handbook
and translated versions: Attachment Material 8 (not attached)- Technical Directory (TD) for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Junianto, ACE):
Types, cases and access methods of TD were introduced. Attachment
Material 9 (not attached to this document)- In-house Database (IHDB) for Industries and Buildings (Mr. Junianto, ACE):
Introduction of IHDB by industry, type of buildings and status of activities.
Attachment Material 10 (not attached to this document)
III-60- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (Mr. Junianto, ACE): Introduction of Online Energy
Information System and request for participation and registration. Up to now
17 organizations have registered as an implementing organization.
Attachment Material 11 (not attached)(4) Session 3: Environmental Awareness and Financing;1) Situation of Awareness Raising (Mr. Than Oo, Ministry of Industry No.2 ):Confirming effectiveness of the PROMEEC projects (including MTPEC training
in Japan) and asking why wasteful use of energy is occurring, Mr. Than Oo said
that government subsidy for electricity charges hinders development of awarenesstoward energy conservation in the nation. An agency that will take a key role in
improving EE consciousness is necessary (he said to us that this part should not betranslated). He said that EMHB should be translated in Burmese so that it can beused in the private sector and by SME, and that he wanted to distribute andpopularize the Burmese version. He wished to join the AEMAS Project forcapacity building of energy managers in the country. Using TV cartoons will beeffective to raise awareness among people, but it is costly and needs support. A
great deal of efforts is needed to raise awareness of the people. (It was very frankwith a clear and correct understanding of the current situation. We commented
later that it was an excellent presentation.) Attachment Material 12 (not attached)2) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan (Mr.
Ogura, ECCJ)： Starting with the overall situation of the global warming and theissue of resource depletion, Ogura explained the Energy Conservation Law ofJapan, measures of energy conservation and those aimed at enhancing awareness of
the Japanese people including the eco-point system. Mr. Ogura also introduced thefinancial support system for energy conservation measures and loans for energy
conservation provided by JICA/ODA in ASEAN nations (loans to cope withclimate change and the Two Step Loan). Attachment Material 13 (not attached)
3) Financial Support System in ASEAN (Mr. Pham, ACE): International Potential
Funding Sources for ASEAN was introduced in a sheet of paper, but Japan was not
mentioned in the paper. Attachment Material 14 (not attached)(5) Q&A
1) Please explain the method of registration to the Online Energy Information System.
→ If requested, ACE will ask for an approval of MOE and MOI-(2). → Will theregistration form be sent by email? It may be difficult considering thecommunication environment of Myanmar. → Needs government approval.
2) Promotion of energy conservation is difficult in Myanmar as the energy cost ischeap (ex. 2.5 cents/kWh for government agencies). What can we do to promoteenergy conservation? → Cheap energy cost makes it hard to raise awarenesstoward energy conservation and make investment as the term of collection becomes
longer. However, if energy consumption decreases through energy conservation,
cost will be cut and energy security will be enhanced. That will contribute topreservation of the environment and prevent global warming.
3) (Question by an oil refinery company) We have invested $15 million to renovate
heat exchangers to improve production capacity, but we do not know whether
investment is effective. → You must have considered collection of investment in
the planning phase so we do not know whether it is effective or not. But it can beconsidered effective if the investment is recovered in 3-4 years. → Is it effective if
it takes longer? → If it takes 5-10 years, the factory may need expansion of
production capacity and environmental measures in addition to conserving energy.
You should check if such measures are necessary for the factory. → Ogawa
clarified and explained the problems based on his memory of past visits to thecompany in 2004 and 2006. But the focus of the discussion went off the subject ofIII-61

energy management. Speakers agreed to discuss this issue during a break.
4) How about the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) other than CO2, such as HFC,in Japan? → We do not directly handle reduction of GHG other than CO2, asdifferent ministry handles the matter. In Japan, using chrolofluorocarbon in the air
conditioners and refrigerators is prohibited and chlorofluorocarbon is recovered
when cars are disassembled.
5) Although it was not a question, former director of MOI-(2) requested to establish
Energy Conservation Act mainly by MOE. Mr. Tin Htut from Ministry of Energy
said it is difficult at present. → ECCJ commented that other ASEAN members,
Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam have established their own act and the Philippines
and Singapore are currently considering establishing their own, and ECCJ hopes
Myanmar to formulate one.
6) Some complained that Myanmar has no energy policies, no energy conservation act
and no regulations.
7) Will ECCJ or NEDO provide financial support to biogas projects or gas generationin rice mills? → ECCJ does not have such budget and projects, but NEDO may beinterested in biogas or bioethanol business related to CDM.
(6) Breakdown of the participants
1) Ministry of Industry No.2: 6 people (excluding 4 ladies at the reception or MC)
2) Ministry of Energy: 3 people
3) Ministry of Industry No.1: 2 people
4) Ministry of Electric No.1: 2 people5) Ministry of Electric No.2: 2 people
6) Ministry of Agriculture: 2 people
7) Ministry of Information: 1 person8) Ministry of Science: 2 people
9) Ministry of Forest: 2 people10) Myanmar Engineering Society: 2 people11) Fame Pharmaceuticals: 1 person12) Kaung Kyaw Say Engineering: 1 person13) ACE: 2 people
14) ECCJ: 3 people(7) Other achievements and challenges of the ISW
1) Ministry of Industry No. 2 made efforts in making preparations to make this event
successful. Presentation materials were well prepared, and proceeding of meetings
was excellent. Registration list and Questionnaire for Participation were delivered
and collected without problems.
2) Initially there were few questions, but many asked questions in the Q&A session
later. Participants exchanged their opinions freely and interacted.
3) As described earlier, participants were not familiar with key words and concepts ofenergy management such as EMHB, PDCA and ESCO. It was anticipated because
it was the first EM project in the country. Myanmar will still need introductory
projects on energy management.
2. Training for the use of the Energy Management Handbook, etc.
There were 25 participants, except for those from ECCJ and ACE. All were present from thelecture in the morning to the workshop in the afternoon. Expecting that the number will
decrease in the afternoon and considering that there were two successful cases for discussion,
participants were divided into two group. (Excluding those serviced as an advisor orcoordinator, there were one group of 11 and another of 12, 23 in total.)
Generally, on the second day, participants learned details and how to use the Energy
III-62

Management Handbook, In-house database and Technical Directory, targeting at companies
and organizations interested in introducing these tools.
As the PROMEEC (EM) Program is now in the phase-3 and most of the participants areministry officials, contents for the second day have been changed as follows:
1) Introduction of in-house database and Technical Directory was omitted in the morning (itwas explained on the first day). It was replaced by the description of the Energy
Handbook.
2) Generally, explanation of the Energy Handbook is given page by page, but this time key
points were explained using PowerPoint presentation. The handbook will be distributed
to the participants.
3) Group work, which is generally conducted both on the first and second days, was doneon the second day only. Due to the cancellation of the plan or other reasons, there was ablank time for Myanmar. Actually this was the first time for the country to learn about
EM and participate in the workshop and group work. Therefore, we decided to explain
and give advice in small-group activities and group works. (as described later, it was agreat success)Actual training program is shown in Attachment Material III-2-5-2.
The followings are the achievements on the day:
(3) Lecture: “Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN” Outline and features of
the Energy Management Handbook, detailed explanation and important guidelines, from
Mr. Ogawa, ECCJ: Attachment Material 15 (not attached)(4) Workshop (group work）: ”Guidance for Group Work” (Sato, ECCJ) Attachment Material
16 (not attached)1) Introduction of the following two cases of energy conservation
A) Greenhills Shopping Center (a building in the Philippines)B) Thai-German Ceramic Industries (TGCI factory in Thailand）
First we considered asking Mr. Than Oo to explain these cases. But based on theassumption that the participants have read the application materials included in thematerial distributed on the previous day, we omitted explanation of these cases.
2) Group work
As described earlier, this was actually the first time for Myanmar to join group work andthey received an adequate explanation on basic matters on the group work. Basically,
Energy Management Handbook was used for the analysis and assessment of the cases tocheck whether required items are implemented.
Items to be included in the presentation and discussion are: (same as before)
A) Assessment on energy conservation activities (good points), and
B) Advice on the future improvement plans
Participants were divided into two groups, as follows:
Group NO
Number of people
Case to be consideredA
11 people
GreenhillsB
12 people
TGCI
Some participants said they needed more time than the initial schedule, which was one
and a half hours.
We prepared a flip chart to be used in the discussion and presentation, but both groups
made their own presentation using PowerPoint slides, which implied high presentation
skills of the participants. Presentations were made by:Group A Mr. Htun Naing Aung (Kaung Kyaw Say Company)
Group B Mr. Than Oo (Ministry of Industry No.2)
Both groups were excellent in grasping the contents of each other, following the Key
Step Approach method described in the Energy Management Handbook. However,III-63

presentation of group A needed a little improvement compared with the one of group B,
which showed good points and advice for future improvement. Mr. Than Oo, who served
as a coordinator of the entire group work, joined discussion passionately, even taking therole as the presenter.
3) Comments from ECCJ experts
Comments from three experts at ECCJ were as follows:- Although it was the first time for the participants, I was impressed with the fruitful
discussion and contents as well as the appropriateness of the presentations. Though thetime was limited, participants created well-organized PowerPoint presentations.
Compared with other ASEAN nations doing similar group work, you can be a leader ofsuch countries.
- It was encouraging for me to learn that you have well understood the methodology of
EM Handbook explained in the morning session, especially the Key Step Approach, andare ready to use it.
- Today’s participants, most of whom are from government agencies, will take a positionof leadership for the private sector. We hope you to make this methodology familiar andmake achievements. It would be effective for SGA to organize this kind of workshop
and implement group work.
(5) Comments of the host country
This item is designed to allow Focal Point of the host country to introduce EC Plan andTraining Program of the country. Mr. Than Oo expressed gratitude for METI and ECCJ,
gave words of encouragement for the participants to have better contact with each otherin daily work. He also made a wide range of explanations on the award of certificates.
(6) Award of certificates and closing remarks
Mr. Ogura, Mr. Junianto and Mr. Win Khaing handed certificates to the participants
divided into three groups.
(7) Closing remarks by Mr. Win Khaing
Lastly, Mr. Win Khaing from MES (Myanmar Engineering Society) gave closing
remarks, summarized as follows:- Thanks to the efforts of METI, ECCJ, ACE, people from MOI-2 including Mr. Than Oo
and the participants, today’s program was very fruitful.
- I have just returned from the AEMAS (ASEAN Energy Manager Accreditation System)
conference held in Bangkok. Our country still needs international support of the United
Nations, Japan and EU. Among those, this PROMEEC project was very effective andimportant.
- I learned a lot from PROMEEC projects in the past. I hope this will be continued
without troubles.
- ASEAN EM System tools including TD, IHDB, EM Handbook and On-line Energy
Information System are highly effective. I believe participants well understood in theseminar and training.
- MES has been chosen as a service provider in Myanmar in the On-line Energy
Information System. If there are any questions, even if not related to EC, please contact
us freely.
- I am happy about everyone’s performance in the SGA group work. Compliments fromECCJ experts were very encouraging.
- As discussed today, application to ASEAN Energy Award will be our next goal. A
hospital in Myanmar once made application to this competition. Although it failed to
win a prize, it achieved significant results: Improvement in EC has led to a reduction ofmonthly energy cost of US$2,000.
- Last but not least, I thank ECCJ experts again.
(5) Breakdown of the participants
Most of 25 participants, as listed below, are from government agencies. Mr. Win Khaingfrom MES, who also serves as a BOJ member of the ASEAN Energy Award, assumed aIII-64

role of general advisor. Ms. Naing Naing Linn (MOI-2), who was the master of ceremony,
did not join the group work.
1) Ministry of Industry No. 2: 7 people
2) Ministry of Energy: 3 people
3) Ministry of Industry No. 1: 2 people
4) Ministry of Electricity No. 1 : 2 people5) Ministry of Science: 2 people
6) Ministry of Agriculture: 2 people
7) Ministry of Forest: 2 people8) MES: 3 people
9) Private companies: 2 people
4. Visit to companies
Following the intensive seminar-workshop and the training on the use of Energy Management
Handbook, we have chosen a company from those wishing to utilize the Energy Management
Handbook and other tools for their energy management of factories and buildings or
promoting energy conservation and visited the company on December 16. For details, pleaserefer to the Attachment Material III-2-5-3.
(1) Multi-Purpose Diesel Engine FactoryIII-65

Attachment Material III-2-5-1 Agenda for Intensive Seminar-Workshop

AGENDA
Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Promotion Of Energy Efficiency And Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
The Amara Hotel, Nay Pyi Taw
08:30-09:00
09:00-09:10
09:10-09:20
09:20-09:30
09:30-09:40
09.40-10:00
10:00-11:15
10:00-10:45

10:45-11:15
11:15-14:30
11:15-11:45
11:45-12:15

12:30-13:30
13:30-15:00

15:00-15:15
15:15-15:30
15:30-17:00
15:30-15:45
15:45-16:15
16:15-16:45
16:45-17:00

14 December, 2010

Registration
Welcome Remarks by Deputy Minister of MOI-2, Mr. Kyaw Swa Khine
Welcome Address by Director of MOE , Mr. Pe Zin Tun
Opening Statement by The Energy Conservation Center, Japan (ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka
OGURA)
Opening Statement by ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE, Mr.Junianto)
COFFEE BREAK & GROUP PHOTO SESSION
Session 1 :PROMEEC Projects/PROMEEC EM Project : Outline & Achievements
Presentation by ACE & ECCJ
1) Outline and Achievements of PROMEEC Project (ACE, Mr.Pham Van Duong)2) Outline and Plan of PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project (ECCJ, Mr.
Yutaka OGURA)
Presentation (by Host country)
Realized Activities/Outstanding Improvement through PROMEEC Projects,(MOE,
Mr. Tin Htut,)
Session 2:“ASEAN Energy Management System” : Functions & Program
Presentation by ECCJ
Outline of Updated “ASEAN Energy Management System” (ECCJ ,Mr. Yutaka
OGURA)
Presentation by ECCJ and ACE
Specific Functions and Program
1) ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in E.M. for Industry and Building- Outline, Results of ASEAN Awards for 2009-2010 and Plan for 2010-2011 (ACE,
Mr. Pham)2) Information System- Information System to Disseminate Awarded Cases (ECCJ, Mr.Takashi SATO)
LUNCH
Presentation by ECCJ, and ACE
2) Information System (Continued)- Introduction of JASE-World (ECCJ ,Mr. Yutaka OGURA)
3) Energy Management Tools- Energy Management Handbook and other tools (ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka OGURA)- In-house Database for Industries and Buildings (ACE, Mr.Junianto)- Technical Directory for Industries and Buildings (ACE, Mr.Junianto)- Online Energy Information System to Utilize The Existing Implementing
Organizations (ACE, Mr. Junianto))
Q&A
COFFEE BREAK
Session 3: Awareness and Financing
1) Situation of Awareness Raising By (Host country) （MOI-2,Mr. Than Oo）
2) Situation of Environmental Awareness and Financial Support System in Japan(ECCJ, Mr. Yutaka OGURA)
3) Financial Support System in ASEAN (ACE, Mr. Pham Van Duong )Q&A
End of Intensive Seminar-Workshop
III-66

Attachment Material III-2-5-2 Agenda for Training of EMHBAGENDA
Training: Utilization of “Energy Management Handbook and Tools for ASEAN”
Promotion of Energy Efficiency and Conservation (PROMEEC) - Energy Management
Under The SOME-METI Work Programme 2010-2011
The Amara Hotel, NayPyiTaw
08:30-09:00
09:00-12:30
09:00-10:30

10.30-10:45
10:45-12:15
12:15-12:30
12:30-13:30
13:30-17:00
13:30-14:00
14:00-15:45

15.45-16:00
16:00-16:30
16:30-16:45
16:45-17:00
17:00-17:10

15 December, 2010

Registration
Session 1: Seminar by ECCJ
Explanation by ECCJ:
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 1) (ECCJ, Mr. Fumio
OGAWA)
COFFEE BREAK
Outline of Energy Management Handbook for ASEAN (part 2) (ECCJ, Mr. Fumio
OGAWA)Q&A
LUNCH
Session 2: Workshop (Training for Small Group Activities) by Host Country/ECCJ
Guidance for Group Work by( ECCJ, Mr.Takashi SATO)
Group Work Based on Cases Studies 1 & 2 by Host Country/ECCJ
Case 1: Greenhill Shopping Center, Philippines, 1st Runner-Up; 2009 Best Practices/EM in Building
Case 2: Thai-German Ceramic Industry Public Company Ltd of Thailand, Winner;
2010 Best Practices /EM in Industry- Preparation for Group Work : (Participants)- Discussion by Groups: (Participants)
Guideline and Basic Plan to Improve Using “Energy Management Handbook”
COFFEE BREAK
Presentation by Participants:
Results of Group Work for Cases Studies 1 & 2 (Participants)
Comments by ECCJ Experts and Host Country
Discussion on Proposed Program/Plan of EM Training in Host Country moderated
by FP (Mr. Than Oo)
Closing Remarks by Host Country by ( MES, Mr. Win Khaing)
COMPLETION OF TRAINING

III-67

Attachment Material III-2-5-3 Advisory Visit
Visit to PROMEEC (Energy Management) related organization: Myanmar (No. 1)
Visit to Multi-Purpose Diesel Engine Factory
NO.
Item
Content
1
Date and time December 16, Thursday 9:20 to 11:00
2
Meeting place Ministry of Industry(2) Myanma*1 Automobile and Engine
Industry(MADI)
Multi Purpose Diesel Engine Factory
3Counterparts- Mr. Zaw Tun (General Manager), Mr. Hay Win Aung(Principle),
Mr.Sai Kyaw Kyaw Oo*2 (Assistant General Manager) and other7-8 persons
4
Accompanying - Mr. Than Oo (Director)
persons(from MOI(2))
5
Visitors (ACE - Mr. Junianto M (IT Specialist, ACE), Mr. Pham Van Duongand ECCJ)(Technical Expert)- Mr. Yutaka Ogura (General Manager, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Fumio Ogawa (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)- Mr. Takashi Sato (Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation
Department, ECCJ)*1: Myanma (no “r” at the end of the spelling)*2: Mr.Sai Kyaw Kyaw Oo attended MTPEC11
6. Overview of the company we visited
Multi-Purpose Diesel Engine Factory is located in Thagaya region, about 40-minute drivefrom the Myanmar capital Nay Pyi Taw on highway to the direction of Yangon. Constructionof the plant started in 2006 with financial and technical support of the Chinese government
and was completed in 2009. One year has passed, but most of the machinery were not usedand employees seemed to have little work. It cost about US$112 million. There were three
training center buildings near the factory, constructed with the support of the government ofSouth Korea (KOICA). The factory stretches on approx. 5,000 acres of land.
It is the only diesel engine factory in the country and belongs to the Ministry of Industry (2).
Workers wore uniform of MOI (2). It has a goal to manufacture 700 units a year, but actually
its output is about one-tenth of the target, with production facilities being left idle. The reason
for this situation, whether market or technology, is unknown, but it was built jointly by thegovernments of China and Myanmar for political purpose. Diesel engines produced in thefactory are purchased by the Chinese government. In some areas, experts from China were
working.
The factory has the following facilities:
1) Foundry Shop
2) Forging Shop
3) Machine Shop (1&2)
4) Heat Treatment Shop
5) Assembly Shop
6) Maintenance Shop
At present there are 600 employees to manufacture three types of diesel engines: 405 hp (V6),542 hp (V8), and 820 hp (V12), to be mounted on tractors, trucks, power generators andmarine applications.
7. Content of hearing/consultation(1) Content of hearing
1) Power consumption of the past one year is recorded, which was about US$37,000. The
III-68

factory has identified ten machineries that consume massive energy in the factory.
2) The plant is not operating fully and the ratio of energy cost in its total production cost is
unknown. The plant is not at the stage to promote energy conservation yet.
3) The top priority for the time being is stable operation to get the production on track.
4) Mr. Than Oo requested benchmarks for automotive engine factories and cement factories.
(2) Explanations, opinions and suggestions from ECCJ after the inspection of the factory1) When in full operation, energy consumption data per month or year will be available.
Comparison of the data will help improving energy index (energy consumption per unit
production)2) Interior of the plant is clean as it is not fully operating. But when in full operation, it will
become dirty. Please remember “5S”.
3) Most of the lightings in the plant are turned off, taking in natural light. The ceiling isinsulated, to cool the interior in summer.
4) Workers wore sandals and loungyi (loincloth) in a workplace handling heavy workpieces
and most of the workers did not wear helmets when operating cranes, paying little attention
to workplace safety.
(3) On the day of the visit
1)Electric vehicle was used for factory tour. Person in charge stood at the entrance of eachshop to greet us. It was the first time that they accept Japanese visitors and took photos ofus. They have accepted Chinese and Korean visitors in the past.
2) We could feel their welcoming mood, but regretfully, there were no comments about thefactory because most of them were not operating. We were impressed with the preparation
for the seminar and training, responses and hospitalities.
8. Overview of field inspection1) It seemed odd that there are many workers in a quiet factory with most of the machinery
not operating.
2) Mr. Sai Kyaw Kyaw Oo, who joined the MTPEC11 training held earlier, suggested toestablish the Energy Conservation Team within the plant and it was adopted. We are happy
that he put knowledge gained in the training into practice immediately. We will continue
closely watching the future development.

III-69

III-2-6. The Sixth Research Forum in Japan(Outline)
Under the Energy Management (EM) Projects, as one of PROMEEC (Promotion of Energy
Efficiency and Conservation) Projects targeting ASEAN nations, the sixth Research Forum
was held from November 9 to 11 in Tokyo and other areas inviting 10 researchers, mainly
from Board of Judges of the Award System for Best Practices of Energy Conservation from
9* ASEAN nations and one from ACE. Achievement of this successful forum is reported
below, with the objective and the program. (*one country was absent)(Objectives of the Research Forum)(1) Considerations and researches on functions to be added to PROMEEC Phase-3, ”ASEAN
Energy Management System” Step-2(2) Analysis and researches that contribute to the improvement in system operation and theevaluation standards to gather and diffuse the best practices in “ASEAN Award System ofBest Practices in Energy Management” in a more effective way(3) Input of experiences of Japan that contribute to the above (Energy Management System,
the aim of the award system and the advantages to join this award system)(Program)
Refer to Attachment Material III-2-6-1.
(Participants)
BOJ (Board of Judges) member or Focal Point, one from each ASEAN member nations, one
from ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE), totaling 10, eight from Japan and an interpreter.
Representative from Brunei Darussalam was absent. (list of the participants is shown in
Attachment Material III-2-6-2.)(Description of the Forum and Results)
1. Positioning and Objectives of this Research Forum
This Research Forum is held as part of PROMEEC (energy management) Projects launched in
2004. In this project, “ASEAN Energy Management System” Step-1 (basic functions andprograms) have been established and launched by fiscal 2008, followed by the Step-2 System.
Up to now, planned programs, information systems, energy management tools have been
prepared and operated almost as planned. As one of key programs, ASEAN Award System
of Best Practices in Energy Management for the collection and popularization of bestpractices in energy management was launched in fiscal 2006. In July 2010, the forth round ofaward was held and completed successfully. This research forum is for participants fromJapan and ASEAN nations to make researches and discuss how to improve present conditions
and establish policies for future on a higher level, to make the award system more effective.
The sixth round of the Research Forum had following objectives. Lectures, factory tour andworkshop were provided to the participants.
(1) Improvement of “ASEAN Energy Management System”
Researches and discussions regarding additional functions to Step-2 System as well as related
programs, subsystems and tools, based on the results of “ASEAN Energy Management
System” Step-1 System.
(2) Operation policy of EM Award System and improvement evaluation guidelines
Improving operation of EM Award System and related evaluation guidelines with the aim ofcollecting more cases of energy management and effectively promotion of such cases in
ASEAN
2. Contents of the Research Forum
Program outline and the organization are as follows:
III-702.1. 1st Day(1) Opening remarks by Mr. Ishihara, General Manager of Division, ECCJ: Confirmed theimportance of ASEAN-Japan cooperation, significance of ASEAN Award System and thesignificance of cooperation between BOJ members and relevant people for the
improvement of the award system. Also, Mr. Ishihara expressed his hope that this forum
will be a fruitful one.
(2) Keynote Speech by Mr. Yoshida”Introduction and Keynote”：Mr. Yoshida, General Manager of ECCJ, explained thepositioning of the forum, 10-year history of the PROMEEC Projects and future direction,change in international cooperation for around PROMEEC, importance of humanresources development, relevance with ISO50001, strengthening functions of the ASEAN
EM System, points for improvement in the ASEAN Award System, and points to be
confirmed.
There was a comment whether comparison between ISO50001 and ASEAN EM System
can be included or introduced in PROMEEC Projects. Responding to this comment, Mr.
Yoshida said that there was no immediate introduction plan but discussion how it will bereflected on the PROMEEC Projects should be made.
Then, Mr. Ishihara added: “EM can be applied to ISO50001 but it is still in the drafting
phase. Organization of EM in the Energy Conservation Law and ISO50001 (DIS) areslightly different and needs a little revision. ISO14001 is popular and some say that
ISO50001 is an extension of ISO14001. Both systems are consistent but somearrangements may be necessary for harmonization, including Energy Conservation Law.
After that, ISO50001 will be an effective tool for Japanese companies. Each country has
its own law for energy conservation but ISO is common internationally. From thisviewpoint, sharing Best Practices among multiple countries, including USA, will beeffective. U.S.A. and Japan hope to continue using ISO. Therefore, international tools to
promote Best Practices through the Award will be used. Cooperation and efforts of eachcountry will be essential and Japan should cooperate with ASEAN nations. ”(3) Lecture
Recent trend of the Award System for Best Practices of Energy Conservation in Japan:
Recent trend and future outlook of the Award System, which was renewed in 2009, basedon the selection results were introduced. Energy Conservation Grand Prize for excellent
energy conservation equipment will not be held for FY2010 due to the screening processin May 2010, but ECCJ is considering holding a presentation to introduce best practicesof energy conservation on a voluntary basis (by Mr. Tsujimoto)In response to this, Mr. Budi asked: “In Japan, there were 14,300 applications since theAward System was launched, but we have troubles in collecting best practices inIndonesia. Do you have some benefit system or a reward system in Japan?” Dr. Manan of
Malaysia also expressed similar view, saying: “Cash prize is more attractive than justgiving awards. Companies in Malaysia are reluctant to disclose the process in theirapplication. How about in Japan?”. Response from ECCJ was: “After the first and second
oil crisis, production cost in Japan surged as we procure most of energy sources overseas.
To survive in international competition, energy conservation has become a key issue forbusiness management. Thanks to suggestions for improvement through SGA activities,
we have successfully reduced necessary energy for manufacturing. Also, Energy
Conservation Law established in 1979 is a milestone, encouraging businesses to submit
applications for the Award. Followers appeared for applications on energy conservation
measures in the petrochemical or chemical industry, but we understood that there were
not in other fields. ”
Energy Management System under the revised Energy Conservation Act: Mr. Ogura
described details of the energy management system starting in fiscal 2010 required by the
III-71

revised Energy Conservation Law.
Questions in response to this were about the method to have businesses comply with theLaw, description of a chain business operator, the number of designated energy managers
in large universities, benchmark for power companies, whether mid to small enterprises
are required to submit a thick periodic report, relationship with SME store in the chain
store, and the person responsible for organizing the report on energy data in a small-scale
chain store without engineers or energy managers. Mr. Ogura answered to thesequestions.
(4) Recognition of current status and analysis- The fourth EM Award System selection results: outline and future agenda wereintroduced by Mr. Oscarlito Malvar (ACE)- Mr. Sato of ECCJ introduced analysis of this fiscal year’s applications and awardees aswell as the past results of energy intensity in hotels, hospitals and shopping malls. In
relation to this, Ms.Latha Ganesh asked whether floor area must be shown in theapplication, but Mr. Sato answered that it is already shown as the item to be included in
the guideline.
- Introduction of Awards given in Japan for FY2009 (Denso’s CGO) from Mr. Ogura.
Mr. Budi asked about the access to ECCJ webiste, user name and password. Mr.
Ogura answered that website is access-free and user name and password are required
to access to the data on the training website and they will be provided later. After that,the asnwer was changed that the training website is accessible only by those who
received training. Mr. Dung said he wanted to know the selection criteria in Japan, and
Mr. Tsujimoto obtained relevant documents and sent English translation to Mr. Dunglater.
- Analysis of Best Practices in the ASEAN Award System using Key Step Approach by
Mr. Ogawa of ECCJ: Mr. Ogawa again described the outline of ASEAN EM Handbook
and introduced that the application submitted by Epson Optical Inc. of the Philippines,
which received an award this fiscal year, was based on the Key Step Approach. He also
said that there were many statements on human resources development.
2.2. 2nd Day:
(1) Factory Tour: Significance and advantages of Japanese companies’ participation in theAward System and information sharing among applicants
Visit to Asahi Sangyo Co., Ltd. based in Honjo city, Saitama pref., for meeting with therelevant personnel and a factory tour
(2) Opinion exchange: Opinion exchange between participants from ASEAN and Japaneseexperts through a lecture and a factory tour
Asahi Sangyo Co., Ltd. was founded in 1948 and initially produced agricultural
machinery. Today it manufactures automotive parts. It is capitalized at 96 million yen
and employs 80 people. Its main customer is Sanden. A large part of its energy
consumption is electricity, and 30 percent of which is for operating air compressor.
This fact was considered when studying energy conservation measures. As a result, it
successfully reduced electricity consumption and was declassified from a type 2
designated energy management factory. Application on this achievement was submitted
to ECCJ and it received the Chairman Prize of ECCJ three years ago.
The aim of this visit to Asahi Sangyo, which has received the Chairman Prize of ECCJ
as the Best Practice of Energy Conservation in FY 2008, is to explain energy
conservation policy of the company and relevant activities, significance ofparticipating in the Award System and the advantage of information sharing with othercompanies, in order to increase applications and encourage participation in the system.
Asahi Sangyo was awarded a prize for its application titled “Mission to be Declassified
from a type 2 designated energy management factory “and it was explained to theIII-72

visitors. The fact that a small company with less than 80 employees submitted a logical,
persuasive application on energy conservation approach and made significant results
attracted attention of the participants. In the Q&A session, there was a question on the
EM tool that the company uses. The answer was the company had been involved in
TPM activities, which was also given an award. About the future policy, personnel
from Asahi Sangyo said that it has achieved quantitative target and will consider
reduction of energy intensity. This visit must be valuable and have given theparticipants clues to increase applications in the ASEAN countries. At the last of thevisit Ms. Amaraporn expressed her gratitude.
2.3. 3rd Day:
(1) Workshop- Improvement for the establishment of the Step-2 System of the ASEAN Energy
Management System: Mr. Ogura assumed the post of chairman with the cooperation of
Mr. Yoshida.
1) Before this research forum, the participants were asked for opinions regarding thefunctions of the ASEAN EM System. Mr. Habitan gave a detailed comment, Mr.
Vuty and Mr. Bouathep, who was absent on the day, provided responses by e-mail.
Some others answered that they will give comments on the day. Here, thecomments from four persons were introduced and the chairman asked forcomments of each participants. Many agreed that the Tools, including the EMHB,
are effective. From those from Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand said theywanted support for translation into local languages and distribution of the booklet.
2) One of the participants asked for the ASEAN Energy Audit Manual (Handbook),
but we suggested to summarize existing handbooks of each country. As the issue is
not relevant to this PROMEEC EM Project, it should be considered in the industry
and building projects of the PROMEEC. Singapore is currently considering the
introduction of the ISO50001.
3) An icon of ”Online Energy Information System” has appeared on the ACE
webiste. Asked about the progress of setting an icon for ”One Stop to System (orOne Stop Service)”, which is currently database only, they answered that thewebsite will be updated in the following week, placing the icon for it.
4) We encouraged ACE to prepare the Registration Form of the Advisory Service,with the registered experts on a voluntary basis. It was unclear who will be
responsible for the answer. Some said the disclaimer article should be added. Thisissue will be discussed in the next Post Workshop.
5) The participants agreed to create a list of ESCO for the e-Directory on a trial basis.
6) We have requested discussions on the National Training Program at the seminarafter the OJT analysis or other occasions, but this has not been put into practice.
Some commented that the EA(Energy Audit) HB (Manual) of the ASEAN Version
should be created. In addition, there was a discussion on how to harmonize
AEMAS (ASEAN Energy Manager Accreditation System) or the ISO50001 with
the PROMEEC Projects.
- Improving operation of the EM Award System and the assessment guidelines: Ms.
Amaraporn served as chairman and Mr. Habitan as vice-chairman.
As in the previous discussion, the participants were asked in advance to givecomments on the discussions carried forward from the fourth BOJ meeting and Ms.
Amaraporn and Mr. Habitan provided us with detailed comments beforehand.
Initially, Ms. Amaraporn said that the number of applications has been decreasing andasked for efforts to increase the number of applications. In the category of small andmedium enterprises that started this fiscal year, there were no applications on the EM
III-73

of the industry and two regarding EM of buildings.
1) Starting from this fiscal year, applications were divided into two groups by scale,large or mid and small. However, the standard is low: 2000MWh/Y (= 2 million
kWh/Y) for buildings and 10 million MJ/Y for the industry.
2) The phrase “involve significant innovation” may not be appropriate as thedefinition of special submission.
3) Are there any improvement for evaluation standard to facilitate determination,such as creating a chart showing an improvement in energy efficiency or
introducing normalizing to give scores?
There were active discussions on the above subjects. Outline of the discussions and theconclusion are as follows:
1) Comments from the participants were: 1) combined total of electricity and fuelshould be used; 2) the standard value should be changed to 4 million kWh/Y; 3)
how about adding a new category for the floor area of 10,000 m2 or smaller; 4)definition of “fuel” in the industry category is confusing so it should be changed
to ”total energy consumption” or ”oil equivalent”; 5) in the industry category, thestandard should be changed to 30 million MJ/Y from present 10 million MJ/Y; 6)
that contradicts to last year’s decision to set a low standard. Eventually, it was
decided that no change will be made for the EM for buildings while ”30 million
MJ/Y of total energy consumption will be introduced for the industries”. Taking thedifference of converted value of fuel and electricity by country, “National
Conversion Table” will be added at the end of the application document.
2) “Significant innovation” in the requirements of special submission is not
appropriate for EM projects, both for buildings and industries. To increase thenumber of applications, this will be changed to “involve innovation/successful bestpractices/excellent cases”.
3) Energy conservation measures summary table used in the case of Epson Optical, anawardee of this fiscal year, will be a model to show a change in the improvement ofenergy efficiency. Normalization of the evaluation score used as the screening
standard in the buildings was introduced. To avoid giving too much awards, likethree best practices both in the building and industry categories, the method of
normalization will be included as the supplementary document for review by BOJ.
(→prepared by ACE) There was no comment on the “Improvement of Guideline”,
but the conclusion of the discussion will be released on the ACE website (change of
the Submission Sheet) and also at the Seminar-Workshop. Lastly, the schedule forthe next year was confirmed: applications will be accepted from January and thedeadline will be May.
3. Achievement of the Research ForumAs described above, the following outputs have been obtained through lectures, analysis andactive discussions at the subsequent workshop:(1) Policy for improvement of the PROMEEC Phase-3, Step-2 of the ASEAN Energy
Management System
1) There were requests for support to publish the EMHB translated into the local
language to make it widely known. ACE/ECCJ will consider the request.
2) ASEAN version of the EA Handbook/Manual will be discussed with the PROMEEC
industry and the building team.
3) Harmonization with ISO50001 will be considered for the future.
4) We are going to check the “One Stop to System” icon on the ACE website alreadyposted. As for “Advisory Service”, ACE will prepare the registration form to discuss
operation methods and disclaimer policies at the post workshop.
(2) Improving operation and the evaluation guideline of the EM Award System
III-74

1) Classification standards of large enterprises and small and medium sized enterprises:
no change for the building category but the standard will be changed to 30 million
MJ/Y for the industry category.
2) A requirement for the special submission was changed to ”involve
innovation/successful best practices/excellent cases”.
3) It was decided to introduce normalizing method in the EM screening. Supplementary
documents will be prepared by ACE.
Based on the achievements above, ACE will prepare application documents and theguidelines in January 2011, officially announcing the acceptance the applications for the 5th
ASEAN EM Best Practices.
Lastly, Ms. Amaraporn (Thailand) who served as the chairman of the ASEAN Award System
of Best Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings for three years, gave anaddress before her term ends. She recommended vice chairman, Mr. Habitan (Philippines) as
the successor, which was agreed unanimously. Dr. Manan (Malaysia) was recommended as
the next vice chairman, which was also approved immediately.
As stated above, the sixth Research Forum held in Japan finished with a lot of significant
achievements. We hope the PROMEEC Projects and the “ASEAN Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings” will further be improved.
Photos of the Research Forum are shown in the Attachment Material. (not attached)−End of main part−III-75

Attachment Material III-2-6-1 Program of the Research ForumFY2010 International Project for the Efficient Use of Energy[Project on Human Resources Development for Energy Conservation: Project on
Improvement of Base for Energy Management in ASEAN Countries]- (The 6th Research Forum in Japan) November 9, 2010
Technical Cooperation Department, International Cooperation Division
1. Objectives(1) Research on the functions to be added in the Step-2 to improve the ASEAN Energy
Management System(2) Operation of a system to collect and diffuse the best practices in the ASEAN Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management in a more effective way; analysis andresearch that contribute to the improvement of the evaluation standards(3) Input of experiences of Japan that contribute to the above (Energy Management System,
the aim of the award system and advantages to join the award system)
2. Period: November 9-11, 2010 (three days)
3. Invited Researchers: One from each country from the following: total number was 11 (seethe Attachment Material III-2-6-2)(1) Members of the BOJ for the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management(2) Focal Point of the ASEAN EE&C-SSN (Energy Efficiency & Conservation Sub-Sector
Network)(3) Technical staff of the ASEAN Centre for Energy
4. Schedule
Schedule
Contents
Nov. 8(Mo Departure and arrival in Japann)
Nov. 9(Tue) 9:30-12:30
Location:
9:30-9:40 Opening Remarks by Mr. Ishihara, ECCJ
Room 804
9:40-9:45 Briefing of the Schedule by Mr. Ogura, ECCJ (Advisor for theof theASEAN EM Award System)
Tekko
9:45-9:50 Group Photo Session
Kaikan9:50-10:20 Keynote Speech by Mr. Yoshida, ECCJ (Manager of the PROMEEC
Projects)
10:20-10:30 COFFEE BREAK
10:30-11:30 Recent Trend of the Award System of the Best Practices ofEnergy Conservation in Japan (Mr. Tsujimoto)
11:30-12:30 Energy Management System under the Revised Energy
Conservation Law of Japan (Mr. Ogura)
14:00-17:00
Analysis, Researches and Comparison of the Applications andAward-winning Practices in the Fourth ASEAN Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management and the Awarding of Successful Cases ofEnergy Conservation in Factory & Building for FY2009 in Japan
14:00-14:30 Comments from the BOJ on the Fourth Meeting(representative of ASEAN BOJ and ACE)
14:30-15:10 Description of the Analysis of the Applications (Mr. Sato,
Technical Expert)
15:10-15:30 Introduction of Successful Cases in Japan for FY2009（Mr.
Ogura)
15:30-15:50 COFFEE BREAK
15:50-16:30 Comparison of Best Practices in ASEAN and Key Step
Approach of ASEAN EMHB (Mr. Ogawa, technical expert at ECCJ)
16:30-17:00 Discussion and Opinion Exchange：Possibility for Improvement
III-76

Nov. 10in Honjo
City

Nov. 11
Location:
Room 804of theTekko
Kaikanbased on Past Applications and Awards (Chaired by Mr. Ogura)(Wed) 9:30-12:00 (Move)
13:15-15:15 Factory Tour to Asahi Sangyo (awarded as a Successful Case ofEnergy Conservation in Factory & Building)(Theme) Advantages of Participating in the Award System and Information
Sharing
15:15-18:00 (Move) Mr. Ogura, Mr. Sato and Ms. Tamura of ECCJ
(Thu) 9:30-12:30 Workshop (Session 1)
Roles and Functions expected for the ASEAN Energy Management Systemin the PROMEEC Step - 2 Chaired by Mr. Ogura, Advisors: Mr. Yoshida, Mr.
Ushio, Mr. Sato, and Mr. Ogawa

14:00-16:15 Workshop (Session 2)
Improving Classification and Evaluation Standards for the ASEAN Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management Chairperson: Ms.
Amaraporn, representative of the BOJ); Advisor: Mr. Yoshida, Mr. Ushio, Mr.
Ogura, Mr. Sato and Mr. Ogawa
16:20-16:30 Summary of the Workshop (chaired by Mr. Ogura)Nov. 12(Fri) Leave Japan* Address of the Tekko Kaikan: 3-2-10 Nihonbashi Kayabacho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo(nearest station: Kayabacho Station, Hibiya Line)

III-77

Attachment Material III-2-6-2 List of Participants

List of Participants for FY2010 Energy Management Research Forum (November 9-11)
November 9, 2010
1. Participants from ASEAN
No.
NameCountry
Affiliation and Title
AbsentBrunei
Darussalam
1 Mr. Lieng Vuthy (*)(**)
Cambodia Deputy Director, Department of Energy
Technique
Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy
2 Mr. Budi Harjanto Listijono
Indonesia President Director(*)
University of Catholic Atma Jaya Jakarta
3 Mr. Viengsay CHANTHA
Lao PDR
Chief of LEPTS Regulatory Unit,(**)
Electric Power Management Division
Ministry of Energy and Mines
4 Mr. (Dr.) Zainuddin Bin Abd
Malaysia
Professor (Chemical and Natural
Manan (*)
Resources Engineering)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
5 Mr. U Win Khaing (*)
Myanmar Vice President
Myanmar Engineering Society
6 Mr. Artemio Ponesto Habitan Philippines OIC-Division Chief(*)
Department of Energy
7 Ms. GANESH, Latha Ratnam Singapore Senior Principal Analyst(*)
Energy Market Authority
8 Ms. Amaraporn
Thailand
Senior Scientist
Achavangkool
Department of Alternative Energy(*)
Development and Efficiency (DEDE)
9 Mr. Dang Hai Dung (*)
VietnamDeputy Chief Of Technical Standards
and Metrology Division
Ministry of Industry and Trade
10 Mr. Oscarlito Carillaga
Indonesia Technical Officer
MalvarASEAN Centre for Energy(*)Member of the Board of Judges for the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices inEnergy Management for Industries and Buildings(**) ASEAN EE&C-SSN Focal Point

III-78

2. Participants from Japan
2-1. Lecturers and Advisors (The Energy Conservation Center, Japan)
Mr, Akira Ishihara, Division Manager, International Cooperation Division
Mr. Kazuhiko Yoshida, General Manager, Cooperation Planning and Management
Department (PROMEEC project manager/advisor for the ASEAN EM Award System)
Mr. Yoshitaka Ushio, General Manager, Technical Cooperation Department (Manager of
PROMEEC Building/observer for the ASEAN EM Award System)
Mr. Yutaka Ogura, General Manager, Technical Cooperation Department (PROMEEC EM
project manager/advisor for the ASEAN EM Award System)
Mr. Hisakazu Tsujimoto, General Manager, Technology Planning and Management
Department(in charge of operating the Awarding of Successful Case of Energy
Conservation in Factory & Building of Japan; dissemination of the best practices andtechnologies)
Mr. Takashi Sato, Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation Department (in charge of
PROMEEC EM project/advisor for the ASEAN EM Award System)
Mr. Fumio Ogawa, Technical Expert, Technical Cooperation Department (in charge of
PROMEEC EM project/advisor for the ASEAN EM Award System)
Ms. Katsuko Tamura, Cooperation Planning and Management Department
2-2. Greetings on 9th (METI)International Affairs Section, Policy Planning Division, Energy Conservation and Renewable
Energy Department, Agency for Natural Resources and Energy : absent this fiscal year
2-3. Interpreter (Nov. 9th and 10th)
Ms. Maki Haga from Congress Corporation

III-79

III-3. Activity Report and Achievements in Each CountryIII-3-1. Summary Reports of Intensive Seminar-Workshop and Company Visits
Activities described above have resulted in the following achievements for the establishmentof the ASEAN Energy Management System:(1) As shown in the Table III-3-1-1, number of participants reached 190, who understood andwere interested in the activities of the Project and the functions and programs of theASEAN Energy Management System. The participants also understood the usability ofenergy management tools prepared in the system in group works.
(2) As shown in the Table III-3-1-2, a total of 170 people received training to use the Energy
Management Handbook, including persons from pioneer companies in five countries whoare in charge of introducing the Energy Management Handbook. The participants were
given explanations on the contents of the handbook, activity guidelines and how to use
related tools including In-house Database, through workshops to experience group works
to make researches on energy management of the pioneer companies.
(3) In addition, participants visited nine factories/buildings/related organizations in fivecountries to introduce this project, its significance and functions, programs and tools of
the ASEAN Energy Management System. At the same time we exchanged opinions andprovided advice regarding the challenges of energy conservation for factories andbuildings, asking for continuous support as well. In most cases participants of theIntensive Seminar-Workshop or the training greeted us.
(4) For the companies planning to introduce and use the Energy Management Handbook,follow-up of activities was provided and future action plan was discussed.
(5) These activities have helped us increase the number of companies interested in joining
this project and willing to cooperate us in the future increased.
(6) As a result, cooperation network among companies, organizations and persons concernedin ASEAN has been expanded. As shown in the Table III-3-3, it should be noted that wehave successfully received support from many parties by visiting a total of 117
government agencies or implementing bodies in the seven years since the start of thisproject in 2004.
(7) After the Sixth Research Forum in Japan, researchers in ASEAN provided valuablecomments on the points to improve the ASEAN Energy Management System, which will
become reference for the future. Also evaluation guidelines were reviewed based on theanalysis of the result of the fourth ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industry and Building. Application guidelines were revised as well.

III-80Country
Vietnam
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
MyanmarNo. of participants
30
56
34
39
31
190

Total

Table III-3-1-1: No. of Participants in the Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Country
Vietnam
Brunei Darussalam
Cambodia
Indonesia
MyanmarNo. of participants
26
50
37
27
30
170

Total

Indonesia

Lao PDR

Malaysia

MyanmarPhilippines

Singapore

Thailand

Vietnam

Total

Cambodia

Governmentorganization
Powercompany orstate-owned
company
Implementing
organization
Industryorganization,
university orothereducationaland research
institution
NGO / NPO
Privatecompany(factory orbuilding)
and ESCO

Brunei
Darussalam

Table III-3-1-2: No. of Participants in the Training to Use Energy Management
Handbook (by country)

Total

3

1

2

1

2

1

3

1

2

3

19

0

3

2

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

9

0

0

3

0

2

0

2

0

2

5

14

1

2

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

1

6

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

12

7

11

10

4

0

7

0

8

9

68

16

13

19

12

8

2

14

2

12

19
Grand
total

117

Table III-3-1-3: Classification of the Companies/Organizations and Cumulative Total of
VisitsIII-81

III-3-2. Activities to Finalize and Disseminate the Energy Management Handbook
This fiscal year, we continued activities of the previous year and provided training mainly on
the finalized ASEAN Energy Management Handbook and dissemination of it. Status of therevision and translation into local languages of this handbook taking the status and thenecessity of it in the country into consideration is: in Brunei Darussalam, the translated
version was created and the contents were introduced in this training, as in the previous year.
The training was given by the professor of Universiti Brunei Darussalam. This helped thecountry to build a foundation for the next step. Myanmar, in which this project is
implemented for the first time, showed their proactive efforts. Through this training many
participants were able to understand the Handbook. While it was made clear that many
countries still want support for translation into their local languages and printing/publishing.
1. Training on the Energy Management Handbook
As described in III-2 above, training on the Energy Management Handbook was provided infive countries this fiscal year including Vietnam, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia
and Myanmar. Top priority was given to the detailed description of the Key Step Approachand then the application of it to Small Group Activity (SGA).
The one-day training was on how to use the Energy Management Handbook, In-house
Database and Technical Directory, including detailed explanation, based on the basic programas shown below:
1) Lecture on detailed contents and important guidelines of the Energy Management
Handbook
2) Workshop (group activities): ASEAN Award Best Practices, one from industry and one
from buildings were chosen in advance in each country. Copies of the application documents
were distributed on the day.
a) The outline of the best practices was introduced.
b) Based on a) above, evaluate and understand the contents using the Key Step Approach,an energy management method introduced in the Energy Management Handbook. Also,group work was implemented aiming at extracting good points and development newideas for improvement.
2. Vietnam
As in the Lao PDR, the Energy Management Handbook has been translated into theVietnamese with the cooperation of pioneer companies. We expected dissemination of it, but
actually it has not been printed and publicized. In Vietnam, the Diet passed the Energy
Conservation Act of the country in June 2010 and the concerned parties may be busy.
Relevant handbook or guidebook was introduced. We hope the Vietnamese version of theEnergy Management Handbook will be printed and disseminated in the near future.
3. Brunei Darussalam
In Brunei Darussalam, there was an instruction by ECCJ experts for the dissemination of theEnergy Management Handbook in June 2009. Following this, the country created its own
Energy Management Guide based on the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook. Last year,
a professor at University Brunei Darussalam introduced and gave a lecture on the guide,
providing training as well. This was a model case of training implemented again by the hostcountry of Phase-3, at which ASEAN PROMEEC Project aims. This was the second year andthe speaker seemed experienced in giving an introduction of the energy conservation analysis
guidelines for buildings.
4. Cambodia, Indonesia and Myanmar
Participants from these three countries listened to the lecture on the Handbook intently andjoined group work. Many of them said that they need translated version, printed and published.
This was the first time of this training for Myanmar. Participants from Myanmar , including
FP, were actively involved in the training.
III-82

III-4. Summary of the Workshop at the Sixth Research Forum in Japan
1. Policy to improve functions of the Step-2 System of the ASEAN Energy Management
SystemOpinions from the participants were summarized as follows:(1) Request for support for translation and publishing the local version of the EMHB will beconsidered by ACE/ECCJ.
(2) ASEAN version of the EA Handbook/Manual will be discussed with the PROMEEC
industry and the building team.
(3) Harmonization with ISO50001 will be considered for the future.
(4) We are going to check the “One Stop to System” icon on the ACE website already posted.
As for ”Advisory Service”, ACE will prepare the registration form to discuss operation
methods and disclaimer policies at the post workshop.
(5) ACE will soon prepare a Registration Form of the Advisory Service to continue
discussing the actual operation method and disclaimers in the post workshop.
2. Policy for the improvement of the operation and evaluation guidelines for the Award
System of Best Practices in Energy Management
Improvement of operation and evaluation guidelines of the ASEAN Award System of Best
Practice in Energy Management was discussed in the sixth Research Forum, based on the
consultation results of BOJ in 2010. The following decisions were made:(1) Standards for large enterprises and small and medium enterprises: unchanged forbuildings, but for industries the standard was changed to 30 million MJ/Y.
(2) Part of the requirements for Special Submission was changed to ”involve
innovation/successful best practices/excellent cases”(3) It was decided to introduce normalizing method in the EM screening. Supplementary
documents will be prepared by ACE.
With the achievements described above, the Sixth Research Forum held in Japan finishedsuccessfully. We hope the PROMEEC Project and the “ASEAN Award System of Best
Practices in Energy Management for Industries and Buildings” will further be improved.

III-83

IV. Develop and Operate Functions to be included in the “ASEAN Energy Management
System”
IV-1. Overview
With a goal to establish and operate the basic functions of the ASEAN Energy Management
System by fiscal year 2009, efforts have been made to finalize the Step-1 System, but it has
yet to be completed. The Step-1 System consists of basic functions to provide information,
including:(1) Best practices of energy management (Industries and Buildings)(2) Completed energy management tools(3) Information for the search system between the implementing organizations and thecustomers
Following programs and tools have been established and operated to gather and offer
information above. Progress of establishment of these programs/tools is shown in Table
IV-1-1.
(1) Collect and disseminate the best practices in energy management for industries andbuildings
1) Plan, establish and operate the ASEAN Award of Best Practices in Energy
Management for Industries and Buildings
2) Create a website to introduce award-winning practices (on the website of the ASEAN
Centre for Energy)(2) Energy management tools
1) “ASEAN Energy Management Handbook” (finalized in fiscal year 2008)
2) In-house Database and Technical Directory (being improved and established forindustries and buildings)
3) Methods to use these tools(3) Information system for the search system between the implementing organizations and thecustomers
1) Online Energy Information System (search system between the implementing
organizations and the customers) (accepting registration being and preparing for thetrial operation)
Currently promoting registration of implementing organizations and the customers
through Focal Point of each country
These have been finalized and are now being operated except for the Online Energy
Information System, which is being prepared for trial operation for verification andfinalization of the system specifications, about two years behind the initial schedule. Thisdelay is attributed to the fact that check points have been pointed out before requestingregistration to the implementing organizations for Focal Points, which is taking longer timethan initially expected and the number of registration to date is small.
Also, functions to be added to the Step-2 System and programs and tools to improve
Step-1 System are being considered.
Specifically, it was confirmed that service provision function to support energy conservationin the Step-2 System and the installation of “One Stop System” for users’ convenience in the
ASEAN Energy Management System should be prioritized.
A plan is under consideration to make a system to encourage specialists in the ASEAN andJapan to provide advices and answer and give support to the inquiries to the users.

IV-1

In addition, a plan is currently under study to prepare technical handbooks to improve thetools (Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook and the Electrical Energy
Efficiency Improvement Handbook) as well as to develop an information provision system onenergy conservation technologies and energy saving equipment manufacturers and ESCO,
named e-Directory, in which equipment manufacturers voluntarily register on the Internet.

IV-2

PROMEEC (Energy Management)
ASEAN Energy Management System: Functions and Programs/Tools

Functions

1. Sharing Information

2. Service Provision

3. Rule / Scheme andPrograms and Tools
Conditions for 1&2
1. PROGRAMS
1-1. Award System of EM Best Practices
Done/Under Working
National Competition(Depends on Countries)(Collection and Dissemination of Best Practices)(Improving)
1-2. Registration of ASEAN-Japan Experts
Under Study
Under Study(Voluntary Self-Registration)(Advisory Services)
1-3. Expansion of Network ASEAN Cooperators' Network
On-going
Voluntary Based on(Cooperation to Activities and Information Sources)
Individual Conditions
2. SUB-SYSTEMS and TOOLS
2-1. Information System to Disseminate (ACE / ECCJ Web.)No Rules and Conditions(1) Best Practices in Energy Management
Done / Improvement(2) ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
Finalized(3) In-house Database (Standardized Data Files)
Developing (Partially Done)(4) Technical Directory
Developing (Partially Done)
2-2. Handbooks(1) ASEAN Energy Management Handbook
Finalized
One-day Training ** Training : Actual Use(2) Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement handbook
Finalized(3) Electrical Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook
Finalizing
2-3. Online Energy Information System to Use Implementing Orgs. Ready for Trial
Bridging Stakeholders in Security / National Rule
(Depends on Organization)(Bridging Implementing Organizations and Customers)(Registration in System)
ASEAN
2-3. Directories(1) Directory of ESCOs
Under Preparation
Under Study(VolunarySelf-Registration)(2) Directory of Suppliers (Equipment & Tech.)
Under Preparation

Table IV-1-1: Functions, Plans and Tools of the Energy Management System

IV-3

IV-2. Operation of the Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings
Operation of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management for
Industries and Buildings began in the latter half of fiscal year 2006, which successfully ended
its fourth round in July 2010. Based on the results and analysis of the award-winning practices,evaluation standards and application guidelines were revised in January 2011. Then,submission of applications for the fifth round of the award began.
IV-2-1. Results of the Fourth Round of the Award
1. The 4th Meeting of the Board of Judges (BOJ-EM) for the ASEAN Best Practices
Competition for Energy Management
On June 8 and 9, 2010, seven BOJ members for the award system of the ASEAN bestpractices of energy management (BOJ-EM) from the ASEAN countries, except for Singapore,
Philippines and Vietnam, an ECCJ observer and two persons from the ACE secretariat, a totalof 10, met in Vietnam for review of the applications in the buildings and industries sections.
Prior to this the applications were sent from the Focal Point of each nation to the ACE
secretariat by early May 2010.
This was the fourth round of the award, chosen from seven applications in the buildings
section, eight in the industries section and three from the “Special Submission” section sentfrom seven countries, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Philippines,
Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam. After the two-day screening session, three applications ineach of large-scale buildings section and the industries section were chosen, while one case ineach of small to medium-sized buildings and the Special Submission section. By country, four
from Thailand, two from the Philippines and one from Indonesia. In the buildings section
Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam were chosen while Thailand and Indonesia were given
awards in the industries sector. After a discussion of BOJ members, it was agreed that thescreening method needs review in consideration of the fact that three cases were chosen bothin the Industries and the Buildings sections. This issue was discussed at this year’s Research
Forum and the introduction of normalizing method has been confirmed.
Beginning in this year, a new category was introduced for small and medium enterprises byannual energy consumption to offer more opportunities to win award, but there were no
applications in the Industries section.
(1) List of applications
There were seven applications (two for small and medium buildings and five for large-scalebuildings) in the buildings section, eight in the industries section and three in the special
section of industries from seven countries of Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Indonesia,
Philippines, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam, totaling 18.
Buildings (7 applications)
Small to mid-sized buildings
Indonesia
Hotel Sendona Manado
ThailandSomdej Prasongkharach XVII Hospital
Large-scale
Malaysia
Block F, Public Work Department Headquarters
Philippines Market! Market!
ThailandPhyathai Sriracha General Hospital
Pranakorn Sri Ayutthaya Hospital
Vietnam
Ocean Park Building

IV-4

Industries (8 applications)
Small to mid-sized industries: no applications
Large-scale
Brunei
Brunei LPG Sendirian BerhadIndonesia
PT. Semen Tonasa
PT. Semen Baturaja
Philippines Dolefl
Philippines EPSON Optical Inc.
ThailandRayong Gas Separation Plant
Thai-German Ceramic Industry Public Company
VietnamHanoi Textile Company
Special Submissions
Indonesia
PT. Semen Tonasa
Myanmar
FAME Pharmaceuticals
ThailandEconomizer of Charoen(2) Result
After the two-day screening process, the following eight cases, four in the Industries section
and four in the Buildings section were chosen as the winner. While five cases, two from theIndustries section and three from the Buildings section were selected as the runner-up, asshown below:
Buildings
Small to mid-sized buildings
Somdej Prasongkharach XVII Hospital
Winnerst
1 Runner-Up
Hotel Sendona Manado
Large-scale
Phyathai Sriracha General Hospital
WinnerPranakorn Sri Ayutthaya Hospital
WinnerMarket! Market!
Winner
1st Runner-Up
Block F, Public Work Department Headquartersnd
2 Runner-Up Ocean Park Building
Industries (large-scale)
PT. Semen Tonasa
WinnerThai-German Ceramic Industry Public Company
WinnerPhilippines EPSON Optical Inc.
Winnerst
1 Runner-Up
Rayong Gas Separation Plant
2nd Runner-Up PT. Semen Baturaja
Special Submission
Economizer of Charoen
Winner(*) Each judge of the board gives a score out of 100, and the average of scores of all judges
will be given. Judges are not allowed to give a score to the company from his/her homecountry. In the Special Submission section, selection was made by a majority of themembers.
Detailed documents of the above 18 applications are stored at the Technical Cooperation
Department, International Cooperation Division, ECCJ, and ASEAN Centre for Energy.
(3) Discussion after the evaluation

IV-51) New category for small and medium enterprises
Large-sized enterprises consume a large amount of energy and have advanced technologies onenergy management. That means that it is highly unlikely that small and medium enterprises
receive award under the current scheme. Against this background, a new category for small
and medium enterprises, which has been discussed since last year, was established in fiscal
year 2009. This was discussed at the Research Forum held in Tokyo in December 2009. At
the forum, BOJ members have adopted the definition of small and medium enterprises asfollows:
Buildings: Electricity consumption per year: 2,000 MWh or lessIndustries: Fuel consumption per year：10 Million MJ or less
There was a discussion to revise the standards of energy consumption for large-scale andsmall and medium enterprises at the Research Forum held in November 2010, following thefourth award. As a result, the new standard for the industries section was set at 30 Million
MJ.
2) Review of the definition of the Special Submission
This new category was added from the fourth award after the Research Forum in December
2009, but we received no applications in the industries section. In order to increase
opportunities, revision of definition was discussed at the Research Forum in November 2010.
3) Introduction of the normalization method
In the fourth round of the award in 2010, three cases in each of the Industries and the
Buildings categories were given the same score, all of which received the highest award.
Reflecting such a situation, the BOJ meeting discussed the review of how the scores are given.
It was decided at the Research Forum in November 2010 to introduce the normalizing
method to prevent giving the same score to more than one application.
2. Analysis of the award-winning cases
Proposals for improvement included in 18 applications in either buildings or industries sectionof the fourth ASEAN Best Practices Competition for Energy Management were analyzed
from the following standpoints of view:(1) Project activity(2) Major improvement proposals(3) Conserved energy and its economic aspect(4) Invested amount(5) Possibility of dissemination
One application case includes multiple proposals for energy conservation, resulting in asynergic and organic effect on energy conservation. Analyzing these helps finding an effective
dissemination method, while improving the application and evaluation guidelines. The result
was introduced at the Intensive Seminar-Workshop held in five countries as a topic ofdiscussion for the participants. Also it was shared with the BOJ-EM members when thereview was considered on the evaluation guidelines at the Research Forum in November 2010
held in Japan.
Details of the analysis are shown in Tables IV-2-1, IV-2-2 and IV-2-3 below:
This year, applicants included companies which project personnel visited for opinion
exchange and provision of support and companies which cooperated in our energy audit
activities, to show actual improvement results. We expect such applications will continue toincrease in the future.

IV-6

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (1) (Industries-1)
Country
BruneiIndonesia

Name of Company Sub-Industry(Outline of Company)
Brunei LNG
LNG
Sendirian Berhad
Number of
employees: 521:
Annual Fuel
Consumption in
2009: 1.04 mtpa;

PT. Semen Tonasa Cement
Number of
employees: 1,800:
Annual ElectricConsumption in
2009:351 Juta
kWh/y & 3.4 Million
kcal/yName of Project / Activity(Name of Project) Energy efficiency at Brunei LNG Sendirian
Berhad in Brunei Darussalam(Outline) In the company , energy efficiency improvement is notjust about applying new technologies but more importantly is how
creative and innovative we are in creating a working environment
where people are fully motivated to perform to their best and inleading their key stakeholders to share a common purpose.

Key Improvements
Investment measures(1) Advance Process Control (APC)(2) Boil off Gas (BOG) Compressor Replacement/Upgrading Project(3) Cooling water system Rejuvenation(Name of Project) Energy Management in PT. Semen Tonasa
Investment. (1) Power Management System((Outline) The company has been committed to run an effective ,Synchronization power supply PT.PLN and BTG )efficient, sustainable and increased production with eco-friendly.
(2) Electric Energy saving Program
The company has conducted a variety of energy management(3) Biomass fuel for Kiln
programs, Project Implementation Power Management System,(4) Hot gas for coal drying plant
Electric Energy Saving Program, Adding the third material to replace (5) Waste Heat Recovery generator (WHRG)
clinker, biomass as fuel substitution Kiln, Hot Gas for coal drying
plant, utilization of flue gas combustion for electricity generation iscalled Waste Heat Recovery Generator (WHRG). Results of thisprogram provides significant improvement seen from theperformance of the company, Seems to affect the sustainability ofincreased production of cement with the operation and reduceenergy intensity.

IV-7

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestmentn.a.

Possibility to
Disseminate

Others(1) 14,000 t/y(2) 4 MMB$/y(3) 4% improvement inenergy use

n.a.

To be
focused on
current
activities
and noninvestment
measures.

Total Power Save: 4.5
Billion Rp.

(1) 1.5 year for Power (1) 3.2 Billion Rp Possibility toWinnermanagement
for Power
apply in other(2) 0.4 for ThermalManagement. cement factories
Management(2) 6.8 Billion Rp in terms of thefor Thermal
improvement ofManagement
energy efficiency
index.

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (1) (Industries-2)
Country

Name of Company

Sub-Industry

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Outline of Company)

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment

Possibility to
Disseminate

OthersIndonesia

PT. Semen Baturaja Cement
Number of
employees: 550:
Annual Electric in
2008 :
85,900,00kWh/y(Name of Project) Energy Management for Productivity Improvement A. Non-Investment
in PT. Semen Baturaja(Outline) (1) TPM
The company has vision to be efficient, competitive and growing(2)Implementation Procedure in Peak Loadcompany. The vision drives every employee to operate the plant
B. Investment (1) Install VSD ESP fan
efficiently and environmental friendly, management has establish(2) Retrofit Stacker Limestone from Relay System to PLC
Energy Committee in order to realize the plant vision.
system(3)
Implementation of energy the efficiency programs has given the
Install system Control Timer Water Pump
positive impact to the plant by increasing productivity by 3.7 %(4) Install Soft Starter at Compressor
equivalent to IDR 2273 Billion.

.A.(1)21 Billion Rp(2) 1.6 Billion Rp
B.
(1) 893MWh/y(2) n.a.
(3) 28 MWh/y (4)72MWh/y(1) 0.48 year
B.(1) 300MM Rp Measures for
2nd Runner(2) (2)148 MMRp
reduction ofUP(3) 0.51 year (4)3.97 (3)10 MMRpelectricity will be
year(4)200 MMRp
effective for othercementindustries.

Philippines

Dole Philippines
Incorporated
Number of
employees: 5081:
Annual ElectricConsumption in
2009: 52.6 GWh/y& 11990 Kl/y(Name of Project) Dolefil's Best Practice in Energy Efficiency &Conservation(Outline) The company's commitment in improving energy efficiency
and mitigating environmental degradation does not only mean tosatisfy its stipulations in Environmental Management System (EMS) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). but also tosustain its operation and protect the welfare of its people.
Responding to the challenge, various measures were employed
along with the promotion awareness to all employees. It is definitely
the company's way of developing a culture on energy efficiency andconservation anchored on commitment and cooperation.

A. Non-Investment (1)Automation of dryer motor, packmotor(2) Switching off lamps(3) Switching off freezer compressor and cooker /cooker
drive(4) Replacing chilled water with potable water
B. Investment(1) Use of RO water as boiler make -up water(2) Steam and hot water line insulation(3) Replacement of fluorescent lamps(4) VSD for centrifuge motors

A.(1) 765MWh/y(2) 297MWh/y(3) 258 MWh/y(4) 14 MWh/y
B. (1)584kL/Y(2) 180 Kl/y(3) 537MWh/y(4) 297 MWh/y(1) Payback;
0.54year(2) 0.43 year(3) 0.77 year(4) 0.57 year

(1) 150thousand US$(2) 37 thousand
US$ (3)27
thousand US$(4)11 thousand
US$

Philippines

Philippines Epson glass
Optical Inc. Numberof Employee: 911
Annual Electric;
6,500MWh/y(Name of Project) Energy management Program- a Global
Commitment : Philippines Epson Optical Inc(Outline) The company is capable of producing 10.8 million lenses
annually without major changes in current facilities. Production
transfer from Japan to Philippines will be expected such as 1.74
product code and special order. The company has advocacy inproduction of environment. Striving for continues growth and beworld's renowned manufacturer of High Index Ophthalmic Lens
without compromising the basic of the future generations.

B. Investment(1) Replacement of JF Washer with the Manual Portable
Washer(2) Removal of Multicoat Washer and MC Annealing Oven
(3) Removal of Pre-Washer in the 12th Bath Washer New
line(4)Process conversion - Gasket to Tape Process(5) Elimination of NMP washer #1 & #2

(1) 203MWh/y(2) 726 MWh/y(3) 126 MWh/y(4) 1117 MWh/y(5) 312 MWh/y

1) Payback period
0.07 year(2) 0.002 year(3) 0.01 year( 4) 4.3 year(5) 0.00002 year

1) 1287US$(2) 203US$(3) 87.2 US$(4) 2781M US$(5) 271 US$

Food

IV-8

By the adoption
Winnerof improvement
activities inJapanese way &activeinvestments,
energy efficiency
index wasimproved much.
These measures
will be applicablefor other.

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (1) (Industries-3)
Country
Thailand

Name of Company Sub-Industry(Outline of Company)
Rayong Gas
Gas
Separation Plant
Number of
employees: 423:
Annual Electric &Fuel in 2009:
72,629MkW/h &14,514,090GJ/y;Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment

Possibility to
Disseminate(Name of Project) Energy Management in Rayong Gas Separation A. Non Investment
Plant PTT Public Company Limited Thailand(1) Split type of air conditioner cleaning(2009)(Outline) Strategic objectives of the company focus on energy and (2) Optimization of LPG production mode (2009)
cost effectiveness also environmental concern GSP recognize how Investment
important of organization participation on energy conservation.
(1) Split type air conditioner replacement (2009)
Campaigns were arranged for encourage knowledge sharing, energy (2) Advanced Process Control (2008)
conservation QC stories. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) small
group activities, and engineering's modification and improvement
system. These activities establish knowledge management (KM) oforganization also forward to sustainable improvement.

A.(1)227,549kWh/y(19,500US$)B. (2) 21,300kWh/y(63,700US$)B. (1) 217,500kWh/y(18,600US$)(2) 84584 GJ/y(1) 3.8 years(2) 0.76 year

(1) 70,000US$ Methodologies((2) 224,000US$ SGA for
maintenance,
Knowledge
sharing) of thecompany areapplicable forother factories.

ThailandThai-German
Ceramic
Ceramic Industry
Public Company(TGCI), Annual
EnergyConsumption:1118x
106 MJ(Name of Project) Energy Conservation in TGCI (Outline) The vision A. Non-Investment
of TGCI is that ceramic business has a profit from a sustainable(1) Reduce Motor Conveyer
Policy; Reduce production costs and Operating expenses, Stable (2) Auto Stop Line Conveyer
sales price maintaining and sales target increasing, Personnel(3) Set point optimum temp. Cooling Tower
development, Management and Technology system for satisfy
B. Investment
customers. Then the sustainable development made TGCI reducing (1) Install Inverter Final Cooling Blower
energy consumption continuously in 2007=8.29 GJ/Ton.( Reducing (2) Install Ozone Cooling Towerof energy consumption to 48% comparing in 2006) The results of the (3) Install Inverter Pump
business reduced cost within three year up=9.8 million US$ using
TQM & TPM methodologies.

A.(1) 74483kWh/y(2) 82760kWh/y(3)125112kWh/yB.(1)1140490kWh/y(2)1714000kWh/y(3) 289655kWh/yB. (1) 0.27 year(2) 0.17 year
(3)0.32year(1) 894,000Baht Effective(2)840,000 Baht measures and(3)273000Baht effective small
investment
attained large
energyconservation
results in addition
to TPM & TQM
activities. These
will be applicablefor otherfactories.

Vietnam

Ha Noi May 19
Textile Company
Number of
Employee;1137,
Annual ElectricConsumption in
2009; 13,665,002
kWh/y( Name of Project) The step-by-step improvement on energy
management at enterprise(Outline) The company's Policy on energy management is " Energy
saving is increased income for yourself". For an enterprise to
implement energy saving is an important factor. Recognizing theimportance of energy saving, the company has implemented thetechnical solutions and management to save energy.

(1) 33930kWh/y(2) 1068MWh/y(3) 997 MWh/y(4) 473 MWh/y(5) 132MWh/y(1) Payback period
3.13 year(2) 2.3-3.7 years(3) 2.7 years(4) 2.6 years(5) 2.4 yearn.a.

TextileB. Investment (1) Installing inverter for air-conditioning
supply pump( Coolant & Hot Water Pumps)(2) Install inverters for Fibre machine system(3) Replacing dust filters and retrofitting air conditioning for
fibre factory(4)
Installing air conditioning dust filters for Textile factory(5) Lighting system

IV-9

Better to divide
into Noninvestment andInvestment
measures.

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (1) (Industries-Special Submission-1)
Country
Indonesia

Name of Company Sub-Industry(Outline of Company)
PT Semen Tonasa Cement
Number of
employees:1800 :Annual ElectricConsumption in
2009: 351 x million
kW/h;MyanmarFame
Pharmaceuticals
Number of
employees: 303 :Annual Energy
consumption in
2009: 3.8x106 MJ;

ThailandCharoen Pokphand Dairy
Food Public
Production
Company (PTF)
Number of
employees: 190 :Annual Fuel Use in
2009: 640,000ton/y;Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy(Name of Project) Economizer
Investment(Outline) The purpose of this project was to achieve maximum fuelutilization and reduce fuel cost by recovering heat from theexhausted gas at the exhausted pipes of both boilers andtransferring this heat to increase feed water temperature 29 ℃ to 60℃ before going to feed tank of the boiler system. By seriallyconnecting both heat exchangers, they could get better fuelutilization and reduced their fuel usage around 639.778 ton per yearby the Small Group Activities.

(1) Installation Economizer

IV-10

Possibility to
Disseminate

OthersPayback period 1.5
year(1) 580,000US$ Utilization of
Renewable
Energy(1) 216 million
KJ/y(3000US$)(2)172 million KJ/y(
2400US$)(3) 216 million KJ/y(2925US$)(1) Payback period
2years(2) 1 year(3) 0.5 year

(1) 6000US$ (2) Effective in the
reduction of fossil
2000US$ (3)fuel1000US$(1) 640,000Baht /y(1) Pay back: 0.22
year(1) 140,000 Baht Energy saving
Winnermeasures(
Installation
economizer) for
thermal energy
are very effective( only 3 months
payback period)
and applied forother industries
where notinstalled yet.

(Name of Project) Power Management for Energy Conservation in
Due to the lack of supply from PT PLN, the company(1) 4.5 million (IDR 000)
PT. Semen Tonasa(Outline) The implement Energy management, in the case the Power
company management applies the power management based on
management System Project with synchronization (setting)
Energy Management to obtain maximum results. This is apparent PT power supply.
from the decrease in electricity consumption (kWh) of 22% in 2008
from the plan and 23% in 2009 from the plan, as well as increased
production of 8% and 3% years (2008 -2009), Index kWh/Ton
Cement decreased 104 and 100 kWh/Ton of cement ( 2008 -2009),
and EBITA increased 28% and 25% (2008^2009). This success is
supported by several programs that have been made, but there arestill opportunity to make efficient and innovation to improve company
performance, especially electrical energy savings in the PT. Semen
Tonasa.

Pharmaceuti (Name of Project) Fame Pharmaceuticals Factory
Investment (1) Adoption of Natural Sun Drying Roomcals
(Outline) At the early stage of company establishment, it became to (2)Natural Air drying Room
face the problem of lack of electricity due to the development of(3) Briquette making Machineindustries in the country. They change the use of alternate
Renewable Energy such as Solar Energy from fossil fuel use whenworldwide disputing of fossil fuel depletion and global warming pointof view. The factory applied the source of energy for unit operationfrom fossil fuel base to Renewable energy base.

Investment

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (2) (Large-scale Buildings-1)
Country
Malaysia

Philippines

Name of Company

Category(Outline of Company)
Public Works
OfficeDepartment (PWD)
Malaysia
Number of employees:
836 : Annual ElectricConsumption in2008(BEI) :200.3kWh/m2/y;Station Square East
Shopping Mall
Commercial
Corporation Number of
employees: 384 :Annual ElectricConsumption in 2009 :n.a.

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy(Name of Project) Energy Management of Block F, Public A. Non-Investment ProjectWorks Department Malaysia headquarters, Kuala Lumpur (1) ESM-1 Shutting off AHU at the Cafeteria (2)ESM-2(Outline) The energy saving measures carried out by
Automatic PC Shut Down
(3)
PWD were of the no cost and low cost with an investment Addressing Air Infiltrationof RM 30,000 for sub metering and posters. The payback (4) Rescheduling of AC operation hours in Main
period of 1.72 months results in saving RMs, 313,670.
Prayers HallPWD has made a commitment to Public Services
B. Investment projects:
Department on saving electricity through no cost and low (1) Supply and installation of 6 digital Meters
cost measures for selected existing buildings. The target (2) Posters and Stickers
range or Key Performance Indicator from the baseline was
10 % to 15 %.

(Name of Project) Market! Comprehensive Energy
Management(Outline) Market! Market! System-wide strategies havebeen effective in cutting down the building's energy
consumption. These energy efficiency strategies involve
both traditional and the emergent technologies. Amongthe energy efficiency program implemented are: 1)
Installation of VSD for AHU and water pumps 2)Use of
LED fire exit light 3)Polarized refrigerant oil additives ,etc.

Investment(1) VSD for AHU
Use of LED exit light
Reactive Current Treatment(4) Installation of E-clean to Heat exchangers(5) Polarized Refrigerant Oil Additives(6) VSD for water pump

A. No-Investment
Reduction from5,799,750kWh to
5,229,442 kWh
B. Investment
Reduction from
203.5kWh/m2/y to183.49kWh/m2/y

B. Investment(2) (1) 264GWh/y(3) (2) 4.8 GWh/y (3)246 GWh/y(4) 26 GWh/y(5) 275 GWh/y(6) 96 GWh/yInvestment

A. 9.84 % Saving B. (1) RM
Investment Payback 18,000
1.72 year(2) RM
12,000

Possibility to
Disseminate

They have
1st Runner-Up
implemented nocost & low-costenergy conservation
measures by the
adoption of energy
efficiency index
management.

(1)Payback 1.7 years (1)46,700US$ (1) As the shopping
Winner(2) 3 year s(2)3808US$ complex includes(3)2 years(3)74,900US$ various tenants, many(4) 2 years(4)6,521US$ type of stores(cinemas,(5) 2 years(5)(6) 2 years
84,000US$ supermarket, office,etc.), it is important to(6)obtain their
22,000US$
cooperation in Energy
Conservation. And
they experienced
much staff
participation and their
upgrading knowledge.
These would beapplicable for otherbuildings.
(2) They obtained
sustainable activities
and implementing
organization.
(3) No-investment
measures are also
important.

IV-11

StatusTable IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (2) (Large-scale Buildings-2)
Country
VietnamThailand

Name of Company

Category(Outline of Company)
Ocean Park Building Office
Number of employees:
1247 : Annual
Electric in 2009
:3915MW/h;Prakanorn Sri
Ayutthaya Hospital
Number of
employees:1498
Annual Energy use
2009;29,000GJ/y

Hospital

Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyInvestment(Name of Project) Energy efficiency consumption,
A. Non-investment
increase business efficiency. We are committed to(1) Install time, temperature and operating automatic
sharing the responsibility with the community .
programs daily, weekly, seasonal for Air condition(Outline) Ocean Park Tower is a big load of Hanoi
systemElectricity company. They have backup generator for(2) Regular maintenance for Air conditioning units
power failures. By studying data, they have an overview of (3) Control devices used at peak power
the use of unit's electricity. Energy consumption changed (4) Controller working mode of the elevator indramatically over each month, the months of use mostaccordance with the working conditions
energy are in the summer. The purpose of energy
B. Investment
management activities in the building is to reduce the(1) Install BMS system to control the central air
consumption to the maximum extent while ensuringconditioning
energy demand necessary of business operations.
(2) Dividing lighting plot, turn off turn on the light inSpecific objectives are advocacy, raising awareness ofaccordance with working conditions
staff in energy conservation. On the other hand,(3) Replace lighting with energy saving devices
constantly learning, searching for new technical solutions (4) Paste the insulating film for the windows
to reduce energy consumption of the devices.

A. No-Investment
Project (1)76MWh/y(2) 96Mwh/y(3 )36MWh/y(4) 3MWh/y
B. Investment(1) 152MWh/y(2) 49MWh/y(3) 150MWh/y(4) 156MWh/y(1)700 Million They implemented 2nd Runner-Up
VN dongenergy conservation(2) 150Million by the measures of
VN dong
BMS data, lighting(3)250 Million management,
VN dong
improvement of air(4) conditioning ,reduction of numberof elevators. These
measures will beapplicable for otherbuildings.

(Name of Project) Comprehensive Energy Management for A. Non-Investment (1) Reduce Number of bulb
Building
B. Investment (1) Install pull switch(Outline) Through the vision of the hospital director and(2) Operation load management of Split-type air
hospital lead team, the Energy Conservation Committee conditioners(ECC) was to manage energy conservation in the hospital. (3) Install VSD boiler burnerWith active ECC team, energy specialists and engineer
consultants, member of energy saving and employees
serve as operating team to drive the "ready to give"organization with of the CEOs' support which led them toenergy efficiency index reduce 18.8 % was brought about
3 factors including people ware, hard ware and systemware.

A.(1) 167,900kWh/y B. (1)0.67 year
B. Investment(2)0.30 year (3)2.11(1)13,800 kWh/y
year(2)207 000kWh/y(3)2760kWh/y

IV-12(1) Payout 4.5years(2) 3.1years(3) 1.6 years(4) 0

Possibility to
Disseminate

Status(1) 6000 Baht Energy conservation Winner(2) 215,500 activities have been
Baht
achieved by all(3)20,000
participation, raising
Baht
awareness ofimportance of
EE&C.

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (2) (Large-scale Buildings-3)
Country
Thailand

Name of Company

Category(Outline of Company)
Pyathai Sriracha
Hospital
General Hospital
Number of
employees:1000 :Annual ElectricConsumption in 2008 :26,200GJ/y;Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
Economy(Name of Project) Energy Conservation Campaign at
A. Non-Investment
A. Non-investment(2009):
Pyathai Sriracha General Hospital(Outline) (1)Adjust operating time for kitchen air conditioner (1) 61,900kWh/y
The energy conservation campaign has been introduced (2) Switch off unnecessary light at entry area after (2) 12,000 kWh/yand practiced by the staff in all levels, where the
9pm
B. Investment
management has recognized the importance of the(1) 11,000kWh/y
B. Investment
energy conservation and management. By applied the (1 )Separate control switch for the 2nd floor(2) 9180kWh/yproper technology, replaced two of the out of date chillers (2) Replace lamp for parking area(3)8760 kWh/ywith the high efficiency chillers, used the concept of "air (3) Install timer switch for dish washer exhaust hood (4) 3310 kWh/yto air heat exchange, replaced the halogen light with LED (4) Install pull switch for the 4th floor(5)26,500 kWh/ylight, and install the software (Energy Management(5) Install controller for FCU of patient room on 11th andsystem and Chiller Management Software) to manage the 12th floor
energy use in every part of facility". A results, energy
efficiency index reduced 39%. To achieve best energy
management , they have adopted concept " the people
ware, hard ware and system ware."

IV-13

Investment

Possibility to
Disseminate

Status(1) Payout 0.02 year (1) THB 549 By the effective
Winner(2) Payout 1.42 years (2) THB
investment and(3) 0.02 year
39,000active leadership of(4) 0.1 year(3)THB 642 top management,(5) 0.35 year(4)THB 1000 big energy(5)THB
conservation has
27,500been achieved.
These methodology
will be applicablefor other hospitals.

Table IV-2-1: Analysis of Applications (2) (Small to Medium-scale Buildings-1)
Country
Thailand

Name of Company

Category(Outline of Company)
Somdej Prasongkarach Hospital
XVII Hospital
Number of employees:
623 : Annual Energy
use in 2009 :8035GJ/y;Name of Project / Activity

Key Improvements(Name of Project) Energy Management
A. Non-Investment Project(Outline) All staff started to implement "Low Carbon(1) Boiler pressure reducing from 7Bar to 3.5Bar (2)Traditional Project". Then they established the policies(1) Removal of starter for unused fluorescent
People Ware ( Team work in small group) (2) Hard Ware( (3) Turn off fluorescent at lunch time
Minimum energy loss) (3) System Ware (Energy Saving (4) Reduce the use of air conditioner
B.
Committee). As results, even though the increase of
Investment Project
patients, energy consumption of the hospital has been
(1) Using high efficiency air conditioner
stable in the past three years. It means energy reduction (2) Preventive maintenance program for air conditioner
achieve by 38%. They try to disseminate these measures (3) Reduce service time of pump and aerator
to other hospitals and governmental buildings.
(4) reduce length of water pipe

Annual Effect
Saved Energy
EconomyA. No-Investment
Project(1) 12,000L diesel/y(344,000Baht/y)(2) 21,000kWh/y(68,200Baht/y)(3) 6,400kWh/y (21,000
baht/y)(4) 144,500kWh/y(462,000Baht/y)B. Investment(1) Payback 1.5 year
(2) Payback 0.07
year(3) Payback 0.13
year(4) Payback 4.1year

B. Investment (1)78,000kWh/y(392,500Baht/y)(2) 225,00kWh/y(96,400 Baht/y)(3) 5785kWh/y(19,000Baht/y)(4) 556kWh/y(2000Baht/y)Indonesia

Sedona Manado
Hotel
Resort Hotel
Number of employees:
150 : Annual ElectricConsumption in 2009 :3,650,000kWh/y;(Name of Project) Energy and Green Management
Practices to serve the Environment(Outline) The consumed energy could be reduced from357kWh/month in 2008 to 302kWh/month in 2009
(reduction by 15%).They implement various activities on
the establishment of the energy committee, capacity
building including educational training.

A. Non-Investment(1) Reschedule of Sewage treatment Plant (STP);
Avoiding peak time.
(2)Adjustment Laundry operation time(3) Reschedule of Exhaust Fan for Guest room(4) Reschedule operation of Laundry Exhaust Fan(5) Lowering hot water supply temperature from 60 deg
to 50 deg.
(6) Lowering water supply pressure to 3.5bar to 2.5
bar.
B. Investment (1) Replacement of key tag(2) Replacement of incandes cent lamp to fluores cent
lamp

IV-14

Non-Investment
B. Investment(1) 6800US$/y(1) Payback 1 year(2)100L/d(2) Payback 1 year
Diesel(27,400US$/y)(3)75,000kWh/y(6801U
S$/y)(4)75kwh/d(12,400US$/y)
B. Investment(1) 114kWh/d(
3710US$/Y)(2) 18,5000US$/y

Investment

Possibility to
Disseminate

Status(1)393,000(1) As the Hospital
WinnerBaht
has implemented the(2) 27,000
EM Project based on
Baht
3 categories, People(3) 2,400
Ware, Hard ware andBaht(4) System Ware. The
8,000 Baht
methodology would
be applied for otherhospitals andbuildings.
(2) Hospital's energy
management has
been implemented by
all participation andeffective/ small
investment.
(3) Various projects
used in the hospitalwere very common
and will be utilized inother hospitals.

(1)3578US$ (1) House-keeping(2) 1000US$ energy saving
measures will beapplicable for otherhotels (resort hotels).

1st RunnerUp

Table IV-2-2 APPLICABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGIES(From Entry Form for ASEAN Awarding System 2009-2010)
Investment Category
A. Non-Investment(Housekeeping)

Typical Measures

Field to be applicable
Industry
Building

1) Improvement Operation Conditionsa) Steam ,Air Leak & Water Leak Prevention/Repairb) Reduction of blow downc) Operating Condition Adjustment(Chiller operating hours,AHU, Kichen,Laundry )○Remarks (Applied by )

○
○
○
○

○
○

a) Lowering Steam Supply Pressure○○(Somedejprasongkharach Hospital)b) Lowering Air Pressure○3) Shortening of operation time in Air conditioner○○

Grand Mercure4) Turning off & Reduction for Lighting, using sunlight
Pull down switch (Improving Lighting System)(Turn off Unnecessary Lighting)○○

Many Applicants○○5) Demand Side Management (Load Management)○○

6) Setting standard of Room temp.& proper control of fresh air andPreparation Manual○○

7) Auto Stop Line Conveyor○

1) Improvement of Lighting systema) Changing high efficiency lights, Film & Blind shadingb) Install Electric Ballastc) Install LCD

○
○
○

○
○
○

Many Building (OGDC, Majestic H.)○○

Grand Mercure
Thai Ceramic

○
○

○
○
○
○
○

OGDC

○
○

○
○

a) VSD in AFU Fanb) VSD in Chilled Water Pump& Cooling Water Pumpc) VSD in Ventilation in Basement

○
○

○
○

Many industries and buildings(Grand Mercure, Thai Ceramic (TCC),
Greenhill, Majestic,
Keppel Land)

2) High Eff. Burner
3) Roof Insulation○○○

Thai Ceramic(TCC)
Greenhill4) Installation High Efficiency Motor○○

PT Eastern Pearl Flour

5) Install Capacitator& Power Factor Correction with Capacitator
6) Rice Husk or Biomass Feeding into Boiler or Kiln
7) Less Energy Material Transportation
8) Solar & Wind Energy Usage

○
○
○
○
○

○

1) Changing of Fuel for Boiler/Furnacea) Change Heavy Fuel Oil or Diesel to LPG Boiler
2) Furnace on Line Cleaning3) Cooling Tower Cleaning System
4) Self Generation
5) Plant Chiller upgrading
6) Insulated windows
7) Adsorption Chiller

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

Sriracha Hospital
TCRSS, Grand Mercure

Station Square, Public Works
Sedona Manado Hotel

2) Lowering of Utility Conditions (Possible Research)

B. Low Investment( <0.05 Million $)C. Medium Investment(Turn-off PC/ Public Works Dept.)2) Reduce Heat loss (Insulation)a) Change insulator of Boilerb) Reduce of Heat Loss at Kiln
3) Installation Sub-meter system
4) Heat Recovery from waste water5) Auto Senor in elevator6) Replace electric water heater to Solar energy heater7) Installation BMS
1) Installation Variable Speed Drivers

Many Buildings, Public works Dept.

TGCI

Majestic

TCRSS

Ocean Park Building
Fame
Ocean Park Building(0.05~1.5 Million $)D. High Investment( >1.5Million $)IV-15

Station Square
Tonasa Semen
PT Eastern Pearl Flour

○

Fame

○

Fame, PT Semen Tonasa
Sri Ayutthaya Hospital

○
○
○
○

Greenhill

Tonasa Cement
Mead Johnson
Majestic H.
ManggaTable IV-2-3 ENERGY MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES(From Entry Form for ASEAN Awarding System 2009-2010)
Activities Category

Typical Activities

Field to be applicable
Industry Building

Remarks(Applied by )A. Company Policy
1 )3R's Principles( Reduce, Reuse/Recycle and Replenishment)2) Company policy on efficient, economic and environmentally
responsible, Application latest and best technologies
3) Reduction of Energy consumption
4) Environmental Protection

○
○

○
○

TCC, Sofitel ( gabage recycle), Grand Mercure
TCC

○
○

○
○

Epson Philippines
Epson Philippines

5) Energy and Material Reduction
6) To be ASEAN Leader7) Eliminate dependency of fossil fuel(Renewable Energy)8) Cost Leadership, Cost competitiveness

○
○
○
○

○
○
○

TCRSS

9) Safety & Environment○10) Energy and Cost reduction○
11) People Development○
12) Be innovative, creative, good team player○13) Quality, Occupational Health and Environmental○
14) 3S (Save energy, save earth and save cost)○15) Green Banking , Green Hotel
16) Search for latest and best technology○17) Challenge & Kaizen○18) people ware. Hard ware System ware○19) Think before Use○20) Optimize plant efficiency, Improvement of Energy efficiency
○

○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

PT. Tonasa
Epson Philippines

1) Energy Conservation Committee/Energy Efficiency Team

○
○

○
○

All applicants2) Small Group Activity/All Participation & 5S activities○○

3) Company's Awarding System
4) Energy Information center

○
○

○
○

5) Human development Program
6) Awareness campaign, Long term learning system
7) Information Sharing○○

Many Applicants

○

○

TCRSS

○
○

○
○

Sedona Manado Hotel, Gas Separation Thailand
PT Semen Tonasa, GSP,
Somedejprasongkharach Hospital3) Set standard of Room Temp.
4) QCC Activity5) Sustainable Development Guidelines

○
○
○

○
○
○

OGDC, AGC
TCRSS

1) Educational Training (Internal& External training)○○

All ApplicantsExternal Training (Sriracha General Hospital)(EC Education for Emplyees)
2) Chief Engineers Meeting
3) Campaign, Brochure ,Sticker
4) Training & workshop on EE

○
○
○
○

○
○
○
○

Grand Mercure,TCRSS, HSBC
Keppel LandTCRSS, TCC, Grand Mercure1) Suggestion Box
2) Energy Information Board/ Center

○
○

○
○

Ha Noi Textile, Sri Ayutthaya Hospital3) Energy Exhibition○○

Sri Ayutthaya Hospital4) Visiting Other Organizations(Study Visit)
5) Hiring External Consultants

○
○

○
○

Sri Ayutthaya Hospital6) Cooperation with ESCO○○

Greenhill(130,000US$)

SofitelB. Organization

C.Standard/Manual 1) PDCA cycle and keeping standardization
2) TQM, Preventive Maintenance(PM), Kaizen

D. Training

D. Others

IV-16

Fame , PT Tonasa Semen
PT Eastern Pearl Flour,TCRSS

TCC

PT. Tonasa
PT.Eastern
Brunei HSBC, Majestic
Greenhill

Epson Philippines
SrirachaHospital, Sri Ayuttaya Hospital
Sri Ayuttaya Hospital
Brunei LNG, Dolefil's

PT. Tonasa Semen,Sri Ayuttaya Hospital, Ha Noi
TextileGas separation Thailand,
Somedejprasongkharach hospital
GSP, Sri Ayutthaya Hospitl Sedona Manado Hotel

TCC

PT. Semen Tonasa, GSP, Ha Noi Textile
Ocean Park Building, Sri racha hospitalIV-2-2. Analysis of Information Provision Method to Disseminate Best Practices ofEnergy Management
Award-winning practices are introduced on the website of the ASEAN Centre for Energy.
In addition, the best practices were used as case study at Seminar-Workshops and training on
the Energy Management Handbooks in each country. This deepens understanding toward
energy management, including analysis of the contents. Although the number of target peopleis small, this method is highly effective. Particularly, case studies combining theaward-winning practices and others left out in the final selection are effective.
ECCJ proposed a new category to gather and commend single cases or projects for
improvement, which was put into practice first in fiscal year 2010.
IV-2-3. Points to be Improved and the Latest Plan
Based on the opinions of the members of the evaluation committee at the fourth award thatsuccessfully ended in June, analysis of the award-winning best practices in Japan and thereports on the promotion and implementation of award in each country, discussion was madeon the improvement aiming for operating this award system more effectively, including therevision of the evaluation guidelines. As a result, quality of the applications in the fourthaward was improved. However, the followings were decided for the purpose of promoting
collection and dissemination of good practices.
(1) Expand opportunities for small & medium sized enterprises
Classify the companies into two by energy consumption: those consuming a lot ofenergy and those consuming less. Operation has begun in fiscal year 2010. The
standard has been revised upward in response to the discussion to revise the standard
for the Major Industries section.
(2) Partial revision of a new category to give awards to single cases of improvement
In response to a proposal by the ECCJ, a new category to give awards to single cases ofimprovement was set up. Judges are given just two options: yes or no to each application, but
the number of applications was just three in the Industries section. In November 2010, partial
revision of the definition was discussed and adopted in the Research Forum in Japan. The
revised application guidelines were distributed to the BOJ members and the Focal Point ofeach country. Also it was released on the ASEAN Centre for Energy’s website.
As in the previous year, the fifth awarding is scheduled as follows:(1) Application deadline(By country)
Late April 2011 (schedule to be determined by the country)(ASEAN)May 12, 2011 (to be submitted to the ACE)
(2) Select ASEAN winners
Early June 2011 (organized by BOJ-EM)(3) Official announcement and the awarding ceremony
July 2011 (AMEM-ASEAN Minister of Energy Meeting)(4) Announcement of the winners Around September 2011

IV-17

IV-3. Establish a System to Utilize Existing Implementing Organizations (Online Energy
Information System)
IV-3-1. Progress and Challenges of the System Establishment
This year, the designed system has been improved to encourage registration of theimplementing organizations, but there has been no registration of the customers and thesystem is not in trial operation.
This information system aims at providing access for the clients in ASEAN that need services
such as energy audits or training to directly contact the providers of such services in the
ASEAN. Specifically, this system has following functions:(1) Information database of the clients
Stores information that the client needs,, including the content, scope, basic specifications andconditions of the service, along with the client’s corporate outline. However, in the discussion
these contents were considered unnecessary.
(2) Information database of the existing implementing organizations
Stores registered information, including the content, scope, basic specifications and conditionsof the service that an existing implementing organization provides, together with the outlineof the implementing organization.
(3) Search system between the customers and the implementing organizations (Online Energy
Information System)
Searches and presents matching results between clients and the implementing organizations
by comparing information of the clients and the implementing organizations. If the conditionsof the two match or almost match, they can access mutually to the detailed information.
Clients and implementing organizations, after gaining necessary information using this system,
directly contact each other to negotiate on detailed conditions, and proceed to contract matters.
Provision of information and services for the individual negotiations is not handled by thissystem.
Off- line registration and search system and display screens have been prepared, now readyfor test operation. Focal Point in each country is currently advancing registration process after
re-confirmation with local implementing organizations.
Initial registration process is taking longer than expected, causing a delay in the initial plan.
IV-3-2. Latest Plan
It took time to consider the problems stated above and the registration process has beentime-consuming. In fiscal year 2010, number of registered implementing organizations
increased marginally, making it unable to start trial operation.
As the registration of the clients is considered unnecessary, we requested at the Post
Workshop to the Focal Points of each country to increase the number of implementing
organizations, attract clients’ attention and facilitate contact to the implementing organization.
Moreover, we requested the Focal Points to approach prospective clients on a trial basis. Aftera discussion of its title, it was changed to the “ASEAN Energy Management Service “starting
next year.

IV-18

IV-4. Developing Energy Management Tools
The Energy Management System has entered the Step-2 in fiscal year 2010. Relevant tools,
including Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database, Technical Directory forindustries and buildings and other technical handbooks are for achieving the most effective
method of energy management. The entire plan and problems are shown in Table IV-1-1(p.IV-3). Description of each item will follow:
IV-4-1. Dissemination of the Energy Management Handbook
The final version of the ASEAN Energy Management Handbook (English) was prepared andreleased on the website of the ECCJ and ACE, for download. It is introduced at various
seminars and workshops for dissemination. We proposed translation of the handbook in local
languages in countries that need this handbook, but it shows little progress due to the budget
issue.
1. Translation into local languages and publishing
In Vietnam, the handbook has been translated into the local language with the cooperation ofpioneer companies, but it takes time for publishing regarding budget processing by thegovernment authorities. However, at the Summary Workshop, there was a report that it has
been printed and published. We will check the progress of it.
Among the countries visited this fiscal year, there were requests from Cambodia, Myanmar
and Indonesia for translation. Vietnam also requested support for printing and publishing.
From Lao PDR, not included in the country of visit, there was a request for support to publish
more of it.
IV-4-2. Dissemination of In-house Database and Technical Directory (Industries andBuildings)
1. Dissemination of In-house Database (industries and buildings)
In-house Database (IHDB) was introduced at the Intensive Seminar-Workshop held in fivecountries this year.
The PROMEED Major Industries Team insisted to use the IHDB at the energy conservation
analysis on OJT. Our Energy Management Team will promote the use of it as one of effectiveenergy management tools.
2. Dissemination of Technical Directory (industries and buildings)
Collected information so far is being organized by ACE under the instruction of ECCJ experts.
At present there are 149 in the Industries and 66 in the Buildings.
To make the function more effective and disseminate technologies related to theaward-winning case studies in ASEAN, the Industries Team will make improvements jointlywith the ACE:
(1) Basic policy on TD
TD is a system to gather and use technical items gained through the PROMEEC Projects as
a directory, not aiming at constructing a technical database.
(2) Data SourceAward-winning cases in 1) Energy Efficiency Building; and 2) Energy Management/ Best
Practices Building & Industries of the ASEAN Energy Awards will be the base ofTechnical Database.
(3) System to be used
TD and Awards website will be linked to allow direct access to the documents on theAwards webiste from TD, to introduce the award-winning cases to the users.

IV-19

IV-4-3. Preparing Technical Handbooks
Energy management handbooks present action guidelines for practicing and administration of
the energy management. Handbooks providing technical improvement guidelines ontechnologies will be of help to offer energy management guidelines to promote integrated
energy conservation activities.
At present there has been a project between Japan and Thailand and the English translation of
the Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook has been finalized. Also, the English
version of the Electrical Energy Efficiency Improvement Handbook will be completed soon.
These were discussed at this year’s Intensive Seminar-Workshop. We will make further efforts
to finalize these, while gathering other handbooks and manuals on energy management andenergy conservation and upload it on the ACE website so that they will be used in common as
reference.
IV-5. Considering Establishment of Other Information Systems
As previously pointed out, providing information on ESCO and companies offering energy
conservation technologies and equipment will be effective for companies and persons incharge in the ASEAN region to promote energy conservation, in addition to the use of tools
and information described earlier. In this Project the followings will be prepared. Specificcompany names and others that own energy conservation facilities and technologies will begathered and organized. We requested cooperation on it at the Summary and the Post
Workshop.
(1) ESCO Directory(2) Directory of companies offering energy conservation technologies and equipment
This fiscal year, website to access to the JASE-World technical directory regarding majorenergy conservation technologies of Japan was introduced on various occasions.
We plan to create a format for FP to provide relevant information. The format will be sentfrom ACE and gathered information will be organized by the end of the next fiscal year.

IV-20

V. Discussion Result at the Summary Workshop
On February 16 and 17, 2011, the Summary and Post Workshop was held in Bangkok, Thailand, toshare information and discuss among Focal Points of 10 ASEAN countries in the ASEAN. The
participants confirmed and evaluated results of three projects and consulted on the future plan. At
the Summary Workshop, participants discussed the evaluation and achievements of energy
management projects and the basic plan for fiscal year 2011 and onward. Program of the Summary
and Post Workshop is shown in the Attachment Material V-1-1.
V-1. Summary of the Results of the Projects and Achievements for Fiscal Year 2010
As in the previous year, there were various activities of energy management. Preparation of thetools and systems made a steady progress. Award System for the best practices of energy
management was carried out without any problems. As a result, the Step-1 System of the ASEAN
Energy Management System was almost completed and operations have started.
Activities to establish the Step-2 System started smoothly. Part of Step-2 System has already started.
Followings are the results and achievements of the projects of this fiscal year:
1. While disseminating the programs and tools of the ASEAN Energy Management System(AEMS) through Intensive Seminar-Workshop (ISW), Training to use the Energy Management
Handbook and Visits to factories and buildings in five countries in ASEAN was implemented, while
expanding the network of cooperating companies and organizations. In Brunei Darussalam, we
confirmed that the foundations for self-sustainability has being developed, as the training is givenby the local instructor using the handbook written in the local language, as in the previous year. In
Vietnam, we did not recognize the EMHB written in the local language, but the participant reported
that they have a plan to disseminate it. Also, there were requests for support in translation of thehandbook and publishing from Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar.
2. Step-1 System of ASEAN Energy Management System with basic functions and relevant
programs and tools has almost been completed.
1) Award system for the collection and dissemination of the best practices of energy management
was smoothly implemented. At a workshop in Japan, following guidelines for further
improvement were discussed and developed, based on the discussion of the BOJ.
- Factories and buildings were classified into two categories (large or small & medium)
depending on the amount of energy consumption. As for industries, the standard value wasrevised to 30 Million MJ/Y from present 10 Million MJ/Y.
- “Significant innovation” in the definition of the Special Submission category has been reworded
to “innovation/best practices/excellent cases”.
2) A trial operation of the Online Energy Information System, which is a search system for the
existing implementing organizations and clients, is being preparing. Registration of 17
implementing organizations has been completed, and they are waiting for the registration ofclients. As the trial operation is not proceeding smoothly, registration of the implementing
organizations were encouraged while registration of the clients were passed over, which wasconsidered unnecessary. After that, we asked parties concerned in each country to implement trial
operation. Again at the Summary Workshop there was a discussion to change the name to the“ASEAN Energy Management Service”, which was adopted.
3) It was determined to lessen priority of the establishment of functions and programs of the
STEP-2 System. It will be implemented when the progress of the Step-1 System will be
confirmed.
3. Expand a network of cooperators through local activities. Intensive Seminar-Workshop had about
1,132 participants since fiscal year 2006 while about 533 people attended training since fiscal year
2007. A team of experts visited a total of about 117 companies and organizations since fiscal year
2004, to expand the network through instruction, including the dissemination of achievements inenergy management.
4. Key points for improvement- Encourage applications to the award system- Prepare for the test operation of the Online Energy Information System (ASEAN Energy
Management Service)
V-1

Attachment Material V-1-1: Summary and Post Workshop Program

AGENDASUMMARY AND POST WORKSHOPPROMOTION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION (PROMEEC)(MAJOR INDUSTRY, BUILDING AND ENERGY MANAGEMENT)
SOME-METI WORK PROGRAMME 2010-2011
16-17 February 2011, The Twin Towers Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand
Day 1: 16 February 2011
08:00

-

08:30

REGISTRATION

08:30

-

09:15

Opening Session

08:30

-

08:35

- Statement from the Host Country

08:35

-

08:40

- Opening Statement from EE&C-SSN Coordinator

08:40

-

08:45

- Opening Statement from ACE

08:45

-

08:50

- Opening Speech by ECCJ

08:50

-

09:15

Election of Co-Chairs & Rapporteur, Adoption of the Agenda & Photo
SessionSUMMARY WORKSHOP

09:15

-

09:25

Activities on EE&C Recently Developed under APAEC 2010-2015 (ACE)

09:25

-

09:40

Basic Direction and Key Points for Evaluation toward Phase – 3 (ECCJ)SESSION 1
09:40

-

10:25

PROMEEC – MAJOR INDUSTRY
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal Points- Expectation and Actual Results and Achievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to be Shared with OtherCountries

09:40

-

09:55

Presentation by Cambodia

09:55

-

10:10

Presentation by Lao PDR

10:10

-

10:25

Presentation by Thailand

10:25

-

10:40

Coffee Break

10:40

-

11:00

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress in Preparation of Technical Directoryand Development of In-house Database by ACE

V-2

11:00-

11:30

3. Summary and Evaluation of Activities (ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in Cambodia / Lao PDR / Thailand- Evaluation of Achievements and Results of Local OJT Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Improving Technical Directory and Developing
In-house Database including Dissemination- Overall Evaluation and Required Improvements toward Phase-3

11:30

-

11:50

4. Proposed Plan for 2011– 2012 : Explanation & Discussion (ECCJ)

11:50

-

12:30

Q & A and Overall Discussion

12:30

-

14:00

Lunch

SESSION 2
14:00

-

15:00

PROMEEC – BUILDING
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal Points- Expectation and Actual Results and Achievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to be Shared with OtherCountries

14:00

-

14:15

Presentation by Brunei Darussalam

14:15

-

14:30

Presentation by Indonesia

14:30

-

14:45

Presentation by Philippines

14:45

-

15:00

Presentation by Thailand

15:00

-

15:15

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress in Preparation of Technical Directoryand Dissemination of In-house Database by ACE

15:15

-

15:45

3. Summary and Evaluation of Activities (ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in Brunei Darussalam / Indonesia / Philippines /Thailand- Evaluation of Achievements / Results of Local OJT Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Improving Technical Directory and In-house
Database including Dissemination- Overall Evaluation and Required Improvements toward Phase-3

15:45

-

16:00

Coffee Break

16:00

-

16:20

4. Proposed Plan for 2011– 2012 : Explanation & Discussion (ECCJ)

16:20

-

16:45

Q & A and Overall Discussion
END of Session for Day 1

18:30

Reception Dinner

V-3

Day 2 : 17 February 2011
SESSION 3
09:00

-

10:15

PROMEEC – Energy Management
1. Evaluation of Local Activities by Focal Points- Expectation and Actual Results and Achievements- Points to be Improved and Achievements to be Shared with OtherCountries

09:00

-

09:15

Presentation by Brunei Darussalam

09:15

-

09:30

Presentation by Cambodia

09:30

-

09:45

Presentation by Indonesia

09:45

-

10:00

Presentation by Myanmar

10:00

-

10:15

Presentation by Vietnam

10:15

-

10:30

2. Status and Evaluation of Progress in Award System for E.M. /Preparation of ASEAN E.M. System (Step-2) / Online Energy Information
System for Implementing Organizations – Customer by ACE

10:30

-

10:45

Coffee Break

10:45

-

11:15

3. Summary and Evaluation of Activities (ECCJ)- Results : Main Activities in 5 Countries and “Research Forum in Japan”- Evaluation of Achievements and Results of Local Activities- Evaluation of Progress in Preparation of Programs and Systems to
Establish “ASEAN Energy Management System”- Overall Evaluation and Required Improvements toward Phase -3

11:15

-

11:45

4. Proposed Plan for 2011 – 2012 : Explanation & Discussion (ECCJ)

11:45

-

12:15

Q&A and Overall Discussion

12:15

-

13:30

Lunch
POST-WORKSHOP

13:30

-

14:30

Summary : Overall Evaluation of Achievements and Basic Direction of
Future Activities Toward Phase – 3 (ECCJ)

14:30

-

15:00

Confirmation of Future Plan including Basic Plan for 2011 – 2012 (ECCJ)

15:00

-

15:15

Coffee Break

15:15

-

15:45

PROMEEC-Major Industries

15:45

-

16:15

PROMEEC-Buildings

16:15

-

16:45

PROMEEC-Energy Management

16:45

-

17:00

Closing Statements by
1. Chairperson of EE&C-SSN
V-4

2. ECCJ
3. ACE
4. Representative of Host Country
End of Meeting

V-5

V-2. Latest Plan of the ASEAN Energy Management System based on the Results of
Implementation
The Step-1 System has almost been completed except for the Online Energy Information System
according to the plan, and the operation began. Additional functions to be included in the Step-2
System and programs and tools for the Step-1/Step-2 Systems have been discussed.
After that, development plan for the Step-2 System was newly created, including continuous
improvement of Step-1 System.
To operate the ASEAN Energy Management System in a stable and sustainable way, systematic
infrastructure for the maintenance and expansion of the system will be necessary.
This plan is described in Fig. V-2-1 below:
SystemLevel

STEP - 1

Main Activities

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Completion of "Online Energy
Information System"
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Development of Additional
Functions / Programs / Tools

Completion

STEP - 2 Working & Tuning Prepared New
Functions / Programs / Tools
Verification & Improvement in
Programs & Tools
Entire Operation of ASEAN Energy
System Management System
Fig. V-2-1: ASEAN Energy Management System Establishment Program
At the same time, network of relevant organizations, corporations and people in ASEAN, who are
the users and cooperators of this system, should be established and operated.
In the Phase-3 of the PROMEEC project, ASEAN Energy Management System should function
well and be used as an effective tool to build a foundation to implement and disseminate this system,
based on the voluntary efforts of the ASEAN. The following actions will be implemented based on
the above concept. The items 1 and 2 are for the improvement of the Step-1 System, while the item
3 is for the establishment and preparation of the Step-2 System.
1. Improving Functions and Programs Currently in Operation(1) A system to collect and disseminate best practices in energy management
By improving operation of the ASEAN Award System of Best Practices in Energy Management
for Industries and Building, whose policies having been fixed at a workshop in Japan, it will bepossible to collect better practices of energy management. At the same time, an environmentthat allows all 10 countries to actively apply for the award has been developed.
1) Follow-up for the review of award categories- Classify the factories and buildings into two depending on the energy consumption volume(large or small and medium)- Award single improvement cases as well as existing awards for factories and buildings
cases.
2) Review standard values and the definitions.
V-6

2. Complete and Start Operation of Functions and Programs being Established(1) Establish and disseminate basic tools of energy management
Continue one-day training on how to use basic tools of energy management including thefinalized Energy Management Handbook, In-house Database and Technical Directory.
(2) Increase the number of registration of the implementing organizations and speed up trial
operation and verification of the Online Energy Information System for clients andimplementing organizations for the purpose of utilizing existing implementing organizations forenergy analysis and training.
3. Newly Established and Constructed Functions and Programs(1) Develop and introduce new tools
Complementary handbooks on technical aspects will be prepared for the basic tools of energy
management listed above. Specifically, they are Thermal Energy Efficiency Improvement(TEEI) Handbook and Electrical Energy Efficiency Improvement (EEH) Handbook, preparedwith the cooperation based on the Green Partnership Program (GPP) policy dialogue between
Thailand and Japan, and these will be translated in English for use in ASEAN nations.
The former has been completed and ready for download from ECCJ and ACE websites, but
English translation of the latter has yet to be finalized. It will be completed by the end of thisfiscal year.
(2) Prepare information provision system on energy conservation business (e-Directory)
To provide access to the companies offering energy conservation technologies and equipment,
develop a directory to introduce ESCOs (Energy Service Companies) and enterprises thatprovide energy conservation technologies and equipment and contact persons. Establishment of
an information system to use it as an e-Directory on the website of ASEAN Centre for Energy(ACE) will be discussed. Energy conservation technologies in Japan, summarized as
JASE-World, were introduced together with its website. Discussion started to gather othersimilar information found in the ASEAN nations.
(3) Improvement of the ASEAN Energy Management System to enhance usability(3)-1 “One Stop to System”
The system aims at improving accessibility to the necessary information for the users, butbuilding the function will be time-consuming and costly. It will start when (1) and (2) above
will show progress.
(3)-2 “Advisory Service”
When decision cannot be made by using the “One Stop to System” or further advice by
experts is necessary, a function will be added to give advice to the users by experts, who
voluntarily register in the system. But there are challenges such as registration of experts in
the ASEAN. As with (3)-1 above, it will start when (1) and (2) above will show progress.
V-3. Policies for Future Actions and Basic Plan for 2011-2012
Marking the 12th year of the PROMEEC Project, necessary actions for Phase-3 have been
confirmed for 2011-2012.
Phase-3 is a step to develop voluntary activities based on the past achievements. We shared thefollowing three points as basic principles of the Phase-3:
1) Human resources development to promote energy conservation
2) Establish a system necessary for human resources development and prepare programs and tools
for related activities
3) Build human and organizational networks in the ASEAN region
In addition, complementary cooperation among ASEAN nations will be necessary.
Based on these principles, actions for the next fiscal year and onward have been determined. These
were explained and discussed at the Post Workshop, where consensus was achieved.
1. Further dissemination of the EMHB and training
V-7

2. More registration to the “ASEAN Energy Management Service” (former name: Online Energy
Information System) and improvement of the service
3. Gather information for the e-Directory of energy conservation facilities and technologies in the
ASEAN
4. Consider harmonization between the ISO 50001 and EMHB
Based on the above, the following activities will be implemented in the ASEAN region and Japan:
1. Actions for dissemination and establishment of the energy management system in up to fivecountries, in response to the proposal of each country1) Intensive Seminar-Workshop
Introduction of the programs and tools of the ASEAN Energy Management System
2) Training
Training to utilize energy management tools, mainly on the EMHB (including workshop toestablish the program for the basic course of energy management in each country)
3) Visits to factories and buildings for giving advice4) Expansion of the Network of Cooperators through activities described above
2. The 6th Research Forum in Japan
1) ASEAN Energy Management System：Analysis of the status of the STEP-1 and the policy toformulate the STEP-2 System
2) Review of the operation of the award system, based on the analysis and evaluation of the fifthround of the award
Project plan suggested by ECCJ and agreed is shown in Table V-3-1.
Lastly, it was agreed to utilize the PROMEEC Projects to continue contribution to the commercial
development of energy conservation technologies and facilities of Japan.

V-8

Table V-3-1: Plan for the PROMEEC (Energy Management) Project 2011-2012

Project / Activities
April

May

June

July

2011
2012
August September October November December January February

Remarks
March(Overall）
A. Development of Detailed Project Plans / Preparatory Work
B. Contract with ACE
C. Preparation to Start Projects
D. Inception Workshop
E. Implantation of Projects
F. Post Workshop
G. Preparation of Report（3-Project Management）

MTPEC 12

(1) Planning / Preparation / Evaluation(2) Coordination Meeting in Indonesia or Japan(3) Inception Workshop(4) Post Workshop

3. Project (Energy Management)(1) Develop Detailed Plan / Arrange for Site Activity /(2) BOJ for Award System (Energy Management)(3) 1st Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits
to Companies)(4) 2nd Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits
to Companies)(5) 3rd Site Activities (Intensive Seminar-Workshop / Visits
to Companies)(6) Operation of ASEAN Award System / Establishment of
ASEAN EM System(7) Research Forum in JP (Improvement in Award System /(8) 4th Site Activity (Summary&Post Workshop)(9) Preparation of Report*(Ceremony)Max.
5 Countries

1st Local Activities
2nd Local Activities
3rd Local Activities

V-9

Persons or organizations wishing to publish thecontents of this report should obtain the permission of
the Technical Cooperation Department, International
Cooperation Division of the Energy Conservation
Center, Japan beforehand.
Tel.: +81-3-5543-3018
Fax: +81-3-5543-3022