(2024) 14:20
Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00292-2

RESEARCH

Language Testing in Asia

Open Access

Unveiling the impact of language
assessment teacher education on EFL
teachers’ assessment agency and professional
development trajectory: perceptions,
opportunities, and challenges
Masoomeh Estaji1*   *Correspondence:
mestaji74@gmail.com
1

Department of English
Language and Literature, Facultyof Persian Literature and Foreign
Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i
University, South Allameh St,
Modiriat Fly‑Over, ChamranHighway, Tehran 1997967556,
Iran

Abstract
In global trends and current curricular policy reforms in second language (L2) education, there is a great emphasis on repositioning of teachers as assessors and teachers’role as responsible agents in assessment. However, various factors affect the agencyof teachers as assessors in the classroom. This study explored the ways English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers perceived the impact of the language assessment
teacher education course on their agency as assessors. Likewise, it scrutinized the challenges and opportunities teachers confronted in leveraging the acquired knowledge
and skills to enhance their assessment agency and contribute to their overall professional development. As for dataset, this phenomenological study targeted 50 EFL
teachers, with 25 participants completing an open-ended questionnaire and the other25 composing narratives. The research findings, using MAXQDA software (v. 20)
for content and thematic analysis, revealed that EFL teachers perceived a significant
positive influence of language assessment teacher education courses on their agency
as assessors in the classroom. This led to their increased confidence and competence
in assessment practices. They found limited institutional support and resources as theirmain challenges. However, they claimed opportunities would arise from collaborative
professional networks and tailored mentoring to effectively apply knowledge and skills
gained from language assessment teacher education courses for their professional
development. The findings offer valuable implications for language assessment teacher
education and professional development initiatives, illuminating the potential predicaments and expediters in enhancing teachers’ assessment agency and fostering theircontinuous professional growth.
Keywords: Assessment agency, Assessment practices, EFL teachers, Language
assessment, Professional development, Teacher education© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permitsuse, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third
party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Introduction
Classroom assessment plays a crucial role in supporting and describing the learning that occurs within L2 classrooms (Brookhart, 2004; Looney et al., 2018). Unlike
externally imposed accountability testing, these assessments are created by teachers
themselves, combining local and external standards (Martin-Kniep & Picone-Cochia,
2009; Wiliam, 2010). According to Segers (2003), effective assessment practices occur
when teachers actively engage in the assessment process and share both responsibility and control with their assessors. Active involvement in assessment is essential forteachers’ professional development and the enhancement of their teaching practices(Borko et al., 2010).
Existing research has shown increasing interest in the concept of agency in teacher
education, including English language teaching. Teacher agency, defined as the teachers’ responses to transitions and fluctuations in their instructional environment, isa critical aspect of teaching and teacher education (Pedaste & Leijen, 2020; Wang
& Zhang, 2021). From the perspective of Kusters et al. (2023), Ashton (2022), and
Ahmad and Shah (2022), teacher agency has a significant impact on shaping pedagogical quality, processes of decision-making, and ultimately student learning outcomes.
It also shapes teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment, as they engage inpurposeful decision-making or comply with externally mandated requirements (Mansouri et al., 2021; Xu, 2019). As proclaimed by Gao et al. (2018) and Sari (2021), in
the field of L2 education, teachers’ agentic practices become crucial for overcoming obstacles and restrictions brought about by educational reforms and shifts in
instructional trends. Furthermore, Biesta et al. (2015), Meihami (2023), and Polatcan
et al. (2023) claimed that teacher agency shapes L2 teachers’ career conditions andprofessionalism.
English teachers have demonstrated agency through practices such as endurance, alteration, and conformity (Le et al., 2021). In the field of education, the ecological approach(Priestley et al., 2015), positioning theory (Davies, 2000), and social cognitive theory(Bandura, 1989), have been utilized to examine agency. In the ecological approach,agency is characterized as a process influenced by social engagement, directed by experiences from the past, driven by future goals, and implemented in the present (Emirbayer& Mische, 1998). This includes examining the various facets of teacher agency such as
iterational, practical-evaluative, and projective (Priestley et al., 2015). The iterational
dimension encompasses teachers’ personal and professional histories and trajectories,
while the practical-evaluative dimension includes material, socio-cultural, and structural
aspects that influence agency. The projective dimension considers the prolonged andinterim objectives and activities that shape teacher agency (Kayi-Aydar et al., 2019).
Despite the increasing body of research on teachers’ assessment practices there
remains a scarcity of studies specifically focused on the agency of EFL teachers asassessors in the classroom, as well as the challenges and opportunities they encounterin applying their knowledge and skills to enhance their assessment agency and overall professional development. Therefore, the primary objective of this qualitative study
was to address this research gap by examining the assessment agency of EFL teachers as
catalysts for change and providing insights into the challenges and opportunities theyencountered in their professional practice.

Page 2 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Literature review
Teacher assessment agency

Agency is a complicated and multicomponential phenomenon that has been studiedin various disciplines. This concept has gained momentum in teacher education, particularly in educational assessment. Bandura (2006) describes agency as the ability tointentionally exert influence over one’s own functioning and life conditions. It involves
a sense of self-control, self-efficacy, and the vision that one’s actions can eventuate somechanges. In education, agency refers to teachers’ capacity to actively shape and impact
their professional practice.
Rogers and Wetzel (2013) emphasize that agency focuses on individuals’ capacity toact purposefully and reflectively in their environment. Initially, there was a debate about
whether individual efforts or social structures were more influential in shaping agency(Giddens, 1984). It was later recognized that agency is a dualistic concept, where individuals both shape society by their roles and activities and are influenced by the society
in which they operate (Archer, 2000). Current conceptualizations of agency give moresignificance to an individualistic view and underscore the mediating role of humanreflexivity (Akram, 2013). An ecological approach to agency gives prominence to theinterconnections between individuals and their setting (Larsen-Freeman, 2019), finding
them as interrelated and interdependent (Namgung et al., 2021).
Teacher agency is a central aspect of effective teaching and learning. The concept ofteacher agency has been discussed in the literature with various definitions provided(Kusters et al., 2023). Teacher agency empowers teachers to engage in self-directedactions and make well-informed choices in their professional practices, supportingthem in becoming active agents in their classrooms and making decisions that concurwith their professional expertise, notions, and values. Hargreaves (2004), Guerrero andCamargo-Abello (2023) and Polatcan et al. (2023) suggest that teacher agency embodies
a sense of responsibility and ownership for one’s own professional growth, as well as theability to adopt, adapt, and diversify in response to changing educational settings. Overall, as a socio-culturally mediated capacity for teachers, agency enables them to enact
and make changes in their professional practices (Ghamoushi et al., 2022; Leijen et al.,2021).
To explicate teacher agency and teacher assessment agency, several theories and models have been proposed. One eminent framework that emphasizes the influence of social
interactions and cultural contexts on agency is sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978).
According to this theory, the sociocultural setting in which they work, entailing curriculum, educational policies, and professional networks teachers’ agency is shaped by.
Another influential framework, proposed by Bronfenbrenner (1979), is ecological systems theory, which proposes that teacher agency is affected by interconnected systems,
including the individual, classroom, school, and broader social contexts. This framework
underscores the role of various elements affecting teachers’ agency, such as their individual views, school leadership, and external accountability measures. Furthermore, selfdetermination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) offers insights into the motivational planes ofagency, postulating that individuals tend to demonstrate agency when they experience
autonomy, competence, and relevance. When applied to teacher assessment agency,
this theory suggests that teachers’ incentive to engage in assessment practices may be

Page 3 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

affected by their autonomy level in designing assessments and the support they receivefrom colleagues and other administrators.
Teacher agency is influenced by past experiences, knowledge, skills, beliefs, professional engagements, goals, and contextual aspects (Priestley et al., 2015). There are also
three general approaches to teacher agency and teacher assessment agency (Ghiasvand
et al., 2023). The individual capacity approach focuses on personal control and decisionmaking (Bandura, 2001). The action-oriented approach emphasizes the influence ofteachers’ decisions on professional identity and teaching practices (Orland-Barak, 2017).
The ecological vision recognizes that agency is achieved through the complex interaction between teachers and their setting (Priestley et al., 2015). Context is seen as theheart of the educational ecosystem, and research highlights that teacher agency can be
fostered both collectively and individually through the support of collegiality and otherrelational environments (Ashton, 2022; Priestley et al., 2015; Vähäsantanen et al., 2020).
The ecological approach to teacher agency provides a comprehensive understanding of
how policies influence teachers’ actions and decision-making (Priestley et al., 2015). The
ecological understanding of teacher agency considers three distinct dimensions pertaining to the influence of the past, orientations toward the future, and active engagementin the present (Emirbayer & Mische, 1998). Professional development and collegial collaborative practices contribute to the development of teacher agency (Namgung et al.,2021). The ecological teacher agency model (Fig. 1) includes the iterational dimension(past experiences, skills, and knowledge), the projective dimension (professional aspirations and objectives), and the practical-evaluative dimension (material resources, cultural, and structural) (Priestley et al., 2015).
While assessment policy reforms may encourage teacher agency, deeply entrenched
test-oriented cultures can hinder their implementation. The significance of teacher
agency spans over pedagogical decisions and practices to include the assessment

Fig. 1 Priestley et al.’s (2015) key dimensions of teacher ecological agency

Page 4 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

domain. Teacher-based assessment (TBA) emphasizes teachers’ involvement in theassessment process and allows students to be actively involved as well (Namgung et al.,2021). However, the implementation of TBA is hindered by pedagogical and sociocultural constraints. The relationship between teachers’ conceptions of assessment andtheir specialized practices is highlighted, and the need for an all-inclusive approach tocope with the intricate dimensions of assessment is emphasized.
In the domain of second language education, teachers’ agency in assessment involves
judgements about classroom-based assessment, academic ends, and the integration offormative and summative assessment (Ghiasvand et al., 2023). According to Soini et al.
(2015), assessment agency involves collaborative and transformative practices, judgmentof competence, a learning-oriented approach, and reflective practices in the classroom.
Teachers exhibit assessment agency when they view their training as a valuable learning opportunity, utilize their individual strengths, gather information about their practices at both the individual and community levels, and reflectively regulate their actions.
Teacher assessment agency specifically spotlights the teachers’ ability to engage inmomentous and fruitful assessment practices. It covers the understanding, abilities, andmindset necessary for teachers to offer valuable feedback and evaluate student learningwith precision. Nonetheless, certain teachers might oppose assessment reform and only
adopt modifications that align with their current convictions and methods. According to
Darling-Hammond (2010), the agency of teachers in assessment is crucial for enhancing student performance and enhancing teaching practices. It also entails managing theinfluence of high-stakes tests and harmonizing mandated assessments with the curriculum and classroom methodologies.
Numerous studies have examined teacher agency and teacher assessment agency,
shedding light on their impact on teaching and learning outcomes. For example, a study
by Smith and Gorard (2007) explored how teacher agency influenced student engagement and achievement. They found that teachers with a higher sense of agency weremore likely to create a positive learning environment and promote student motivationand involvement. Another seminal research conducted by Black and Wiliam (1998)
examined the influence of teacher agency in assessment on student learning. They contended that when teachers play an active role in the assessment process, they are able tooffer more precise and prompt feedback, ultimately resulting in enhanced student performance. This research underscored the significance of empowering teachers to assume
responsibility for assessment procedures.
In a recent study, Lee and Jeon (2024) investigated how EFL teachers’ assessment
agency is influenced by the affordances of information and communication technologies (ICT) in classroom-based language assessment. Their study examined the impact of
the return to face-to-face classes after online teaching on teachers’ assessment practices
and perceptions. Some studies have examined teacher agency amidst evolving assessment policies and procedures and in test-focused educational communities, where
teachers face strong pressure to align with high-stakes tests (Ali & Hamid, 2023; Willis et al., 2019). However, research on teachers’ assessment agency from an ecological
viewpoint is still in its early stages (Ashton, 2022; Willis et al., 2019). In their study, Ghiasvand et al. (2023) developed a questionnaire to measure teacher ecological assessment
agency (TEAA) by collecting data from 539 Iranian EFL teachers. The scale consisted ofPage 5 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

32 items grouped into 5 components: Iterational, Projective, Teachers’ Practical-Evaluative View, Schools’ Practical-Evaluative Effect, and Professional/Democratic Community’s Practical-Evaluative Effect. The scale demonstrated good reliability and convergent
validity. The findings of the study emphasized the significant part teacher agency playedin shaping L2 assessment practices.
Additionally, alternative assessment techniques, such as formative assessment andnegotiated assessment, have been explored in the context of teacher agency (Gosling,
2000; Poulton, 2020). Verberg et al.’s (2016) study examined teacher agency within setting of formative teacher assessment. They aimed to determine if teachers engaging in
a formative assessment procedure felt a sense agency and if this agency was visible inassessment-focused meetings. The findings showed that teachers reported a high levelof agency overall, but their agency was not consistently evident during the assessment
meetings. The study highlighted the complexities of teacher agency and its manifestationin real-time decision-making during the assessment process.
The study by Jiang et al. (2022) also found that teachers recognized the value of formative assessment activities in developing student learning and enhancing their own
teaching capacity, which underscored the importance of promoting and facilitating professional agency for sustainability in the teaching context. Figure 2 highlights the interrelated dimensions that enabled teachers to exercise their professional agency in theformative assessment process (Jiang et al., 2022).
In a seminal study, Namgung et al. (2021) examined the teacher agency of Korean
secondary English teachers (KSETs) in assessment, using an ecological framework. The
study utilized semi-structured interviews with 15 KSETs and focused on themes related
to personal experiences, professional practices, and the impact of past and present
educational environments on teacher agency. The findings revealed that the historicalemphasis on standardized testing continued to shape teachers’ perceptions and agency
in the current assessment practices guided by systemic restructuring of the curriculum.
The study highlighted the importance of teachers analyzing their experiences from a

Fig. 2 A framework of teachers’ professional agency in formative assessment implementation (Jiang et al.,2022)

Page 6 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

critical perspective, their awareness of present opportunities, and future aspirations inenacting teacher agency in assessment. However, teachers faced challenges in negotiating their agency within the existing environmental conditions, leading to struggles andthe need for ecological transformation.
As mentioned, various theories and models provide insights into the factors that
influence teacher agency, and previous studies have highlighted the positive impact ofteacher agency on teaching and learning outcomes. Teacher agency is considered crucial in teacher education, as pre-service teachers may have limited agency levels (Soiniet al., 2015). It is important for pre-service teachers to develop assessment skills and be
exposed to a variety of assessment methods during their training. Despite the growing
body of literature on teacher agency, there is a lack of research specifically focusing on
L2 education, especially in relation to assessment contexts (Ali & Hamid, 2023). Moving
forward, it is essential to continue exploring and supporting teacher agency to enhanceassessment practices, addressing the critical roles of assessment agency and professional
development in the field of EFL teaching.
Teacher assessment agency and professional development

Professional development embodies a variety of measures, activities, and processes
designed to foster teachers’ professional teaching knowledge, skills, and values toenhance student learning (Arthur, 2016; Guskey, 2000). It not only assists teachers inraising their understanding of effective teaching, but also creates a platform for them toshare their experiences and concerns. The goal is to enrich teachers’ knowledge, expertise, skills, and values in order to support student learning. Similarly, Richard and Farrell(2005) argue that professional development is intended to assist teachers in understanding teaching and their role as educators. Craft (2000) sees teachers’ professional development as a transformative process that requires a combination of engagement, support,
challenge, and success.
Given its crucial part in L2 education, teacher agency has been considered in conjunction with education quality and teachers’ professional growth (Lai et al., 2016). Althoughscholars have found it challenging to reach a consensus, they generally recognize agency
as a “socio-culturally mediated capacity to act” (Ahearn, 2001, p. 112), which is an essential aspect of teachers’ professional growth aimed at empowering them to take proactive
measures and enact transformations (Ghamoushi et al., 2022; Leijen et al., 2021).
Agency reflects teachers’ ability to act proactively and effectively to direct their own
professional growth as well as that of others (Calvert, 2016). Imants and Van der Wal(2019) have suggested a model of teacher agency that specifically concentrates on school
reform and professional development in the Netherlands, offering a potential instrument to examine the multi-dimensional intricacy of school reform and professional
development. Durrant (2019) considers teacher agency as fundamental side of school
enhancement and professional growth, aiming to offer viable ideas and tactics to notify
and appraise policy and practice.
Teachers’ prior assessment experiences, beliefs, and power relationships influence
their assessment decisions, underscoring the importance of recognizing teacher agency
in assessment practice and the urgent need to consider teacher assessment agency inprofessional development (Fazel & Ali, 2022; Ghiasvand et al., 2023; Mansouri et al.,Page 7 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

2021). Understanding pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment is crucial for providing appropriate professional training and helping them develop a more balanced viewof assessment (Brown & Remesal, 2012; Levy-Vered & Alhija, 2018).
An ecological perspective recognizes the growth of teacher agency through theimplementation of professional development initiatives and collaborative interactions
with colleagues. Teacher professional development courses and programs should takeaccount of these findings and provide EFL teachers with guidance, instruction, and feedback on their assessment performance. This approach can effectively support teachers
in enhancing their professionalism and agency in the domain of language assessment.
Teacher support and professional development are crucial in fostering active participation and agency within the educational ecosystem, ultimately contributing to its overall
prosperity.
Successful assessment reform revolves around two critical elements: Teacher professionalism and creating an environment that facilitates co-regulation between teachersand students (Laveault, 2016). It is crucial to prioritize regular and targeted in-school
professional development for teachers. This approach enhances their assessment literacy, fosters an effective assessment culture, and recognizes the professionalism of teachers while addressing the specific needs of their students (Klenowski & Wyatt-Smith,2014). Several recent studies have focused on cultivating assessment capacity in teacher
education programs. For instance, Hendawy Al-Mahdy et al. (2024) found that principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency influence teacher professional learning in Oman. Their findings suggest that fostering a supportive school environment andpromoting teacher agency can significantly contribute to teachers’ professional development. DeLuca et al. (2024) also explored the development of assessment competency inteacher education. They show that promoting assessment competency is a central component of teacher professionalization.
Furthermore, recent studies emphasize the significance of assessment practices forshaping student identities (Nieminen, 2024) and teacher identities (Estaji & Ghiasvand,2023, 2024), as well as the importance of feedback and formative assessment in the classroom (Khan et al., 2023; Phakiti & Steinhoff, 2023; Samaie & Valizadeh, 2023; Varieret al., 2024). International comparative studies by Härmälä (2023) and López (2023) also
contribute to understanding teachers’ assessment practices. The research indicates thatteacher assessment agency and their professional development are closely linked andcrucial for the quality of instruction and student learning. These studies underscore thesignificance of teacher assessment agency in promoting effective classroom assessment
practices and supporting teachers’ professional development. By cultivating assessment
literacy and agency, teacher education programs can better prepare EFL teachers to navigate the challenges and opportunities in language assessment.
Overall, the literature on teacher assessment agency and professional development
has demonstrated the significance of teacher agency in assessment practice and the roleof professional development in promoting assessment literacy and educational reform.
To gain a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics involved regarding the roleof teacher education courses in teachers’ agency in assessment and their professional
development, the following research questions were raised in this study.

Page 8 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

1. How do EFL teachers perceive the influence of a language assessment teacher education course on their agency as assessors in the classroom?
2. What are the challenges and opportunities faced by EFL teachers in translating theknowledge and skills they gain through a language assessment teacher education
course to promote their assessment agency and contribute to their overall professional development?

Methodology
Research design

This research study utilized a phenomenological approach to explore the firsthand experiences and perspectives of EFL teachers regarding the influence of language assessment
teacher education on their assessment agency and professional development. Phenomenology allowed for a focus on the subjective accounts of teachers, providing in-depth
insights into how they enacted and made sense of their assessment agency. Informed by
the works of Richardson (1999), Croker (2009), Sin (2010), and Stolz (2020), the study
aimed to uncover the essence of the teachers’ experiences related to language assessment teacher education, capturing detailed and contextualized viewpoints. This methodology provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities encountered by
EFL teachers in their professional development within the language assessment domain.
It enabled the collection of rich and contextualized data that would reveal the complex
nature of teacher assessment agency in the EFL context.
Participants and setting

The research study comprised 50 EFL teachers selected through purposive samplingfrom an initial pool of 60 teacher participants. The participants, all Iranian EFL teachers
ranging in age from 22 to 53 years old, consisted of 30% male (n = 15) and 70% female(n = 35), with substantial teaching experience (5 years or more) and holding either an
MA (80%, n = 40) or a PhD (20%, n = 10) in Teaching English as a Foreign Language(TEFL). These participants were deliberately selected for their expertise and firsthandexperience in the research topic. Initially, 25 Iranian EFL teachers were targeted to complete a teacher perception questionnaire, sharing their valuable insights on how language assessment teacher education impacted their role as assessors in the classroom.
This approach allowed for a focused exploration of the perceptions and experiences ofqualified EFL teachers with a deep understanding of the impact of language assessment
teacher education course on their assessment agency.
Concurrently, 25 teachers from the initial pool of participants were purposively
selected to provide narratives and descriptions of the challenges and opportunities
encountered in translating the knowledge and skills gained through language assessment teacher education into the enhancement of their assessment agency and overall
professional development. By employing purposive sampling, the study ensured theinclusion of participants who had experienced the central phenomenon being explored,
thus enriching the qualitative data collection with diverse and comprehensive perspectives. This deliberate selection of participants with extensive teaching experience andadvanced qualifications aimed to capture a nuanced understanding of the impact ofPage 9 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

language assessment teacher education on EFL teachers’ professional growth trajectories and assessment agency within the specific context of Iranian EFL classrooms.
Instruments

Considering the study’s purpose and its qualitative nature, different qualitative tools
were utilized. The research tools comprised an open-ended teacher perceptions questionnaire and a narrative frame.
Open‑ended questionnaire

To demystify EFL teachers’ perspectives and personal experiences as for the impact ofa language assessment teacher education course on their assessment responsibilities in
the classroom, the researcher utilized an open-ended questionnaire. This questionnaire
aimed to elicit detailed and varied responses from teachers, assisting them to express
their thoughts openly. The questions were meticulously designed by the researcher,drawing on the existing literature in teacher’s educational assessment, with a particular emphasis on teacher assessment agency (Appendix 1). The questionnaire comprised
three sections: (A) Informed Consent, which obtained participants’ written consent
for ethical compliance, (B) Demographic Information, which gathered details like age,gender, teaching experience, educational background, and institutional context, and(C) Open-Ended Questions, which explored participants’ perceptions of the language
assessment teacher education course’s impact on their professional practice as EFL language assessors through six questions.
To ensure the content validity of the open-ended questions, three experienced language experts in teacher education and educational assessment reviewed the questions
for language and content quality. These experts, known for their publications in the field,
offered valuable feedback on clarity, relevance, and appropriateness. Incorporating theirinsights, the questions were refined to improve their quality and effectiveness in prompting meaningful participant responses. Additionally, the Content Validity Index (CVI)
was utilized by the researcher to assess the questionnaire’s content validity, guaranteeing a comprehensive exploration of teachers’ experiences and insights related to teacher
assessment agency.
Narrative inquiry

In this study, narratives were utilized to capture the firsthand experiences and viewpoints of EFL teachers who have experienced a language assessment teacher education
course. By employing narratives, the researcher sought to offer a detailed insight into thechallenges and opportunities these teachers encountered in applying their knowledge
and skills to enhance assessment practices and advance their professional growth. Thisnarrative approach facilitated a thorough exploration of participants’ experiences within
their teaching contexts and career development. The study focused on personal experience narratives, where participants reflected on their personal encounters and provided
detailed descriptions of challenges, opportunities, and insights stemming from the language assessment teacher education course they have experienced.
The narrative inquiry comprised six specific points to prompt reflective and detailed
responses from participants (Appendix 2). The participants were encouraged to share

Page 10 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

specific examples and insights to enrich their narratives, enabling a comprehensive
examination of their experiences. To ensure the content validity of the narrative framework, three experts in teacher education and educational assessment evaluated its alignment with the research objectives and its ability to capture the nuanced experiences of
EFL teachers in applying their knowledge and skills. To confirm that the narratives gathered were pertinent and meaningful to the study’s goals, the CVI was employed.
Data collection procedure

The stages taken to carry out the study can be outlined as follows: Primarily, theresearcher developed two qualitative instruments, an open-ended questionnaire anda narrative inquiry, in compliance with the research objectives. Content validity of theitems in both tools was ensured before administration. The data were collected throughthe distribution of the open-ended questionnaire and the written narrative frame among
25 EFL teachers each. All the research participants (n = 50) were required to complete
the questionnaire and narratives within a stipulated time frame of ten days after being
informed of how to do so. The dataset was gathered by distributing the open-ended
questionnaire, which consisted of three main sections, and the narrative frame toteacher participants via WhatsApp and Telegram. After the data collection, the researchers double-checked the gathered data from both the questionnaire and the narrative formissing parts and typos to ensure completeness and accuracy. Once the data verification
was completed, the researcher embarked on content analysis to analyze the participants’
answers to the instruments. Content analysis was conducted to gain insights into theparticipants’ conceptions and lived experiences, providing a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced by EFL teachers in translating the knowledge and skills gained through a language assessment teacher education course.
Data analysis

In this study, the researcher attempted to be impartial and incubate her own experiences
and worldviews as a university professor of the same education context to maintainresearcher positionality. To analyze the data, the researcher employed a content analysis
approach to analyze the respondents’ answers to the open-ended questionnaire and narratives. This method involves the systematic classification of data to uncover patterns
and generate well-supported interpretations (Friedman, 2012). The researchers adopted
the summative approach to content analysis and particularly used phenomenographic
qualitative analysis (PQA) based on the model by Stenfors-Hayes et al. (2013), encompassed seven stages that involved becoming familiar with the data, summarizing it, making comparisons and contrasts, grouping related information, articulating key findings,
and providing a final label or categorization.
The content analysis was conducted using the latest version of MAXQDA software (version 2023) to promote the reliability of the analysis, as employing ComputerAssisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) can bolster the credibility of thefindings (Baralt, 2012). To ensure the credibility of the findings, the process of content
analysis was carried out independently by three coders. The intercoder reliability (ICR)
was measured through Cohen’s Kappa (κ), and the coefficient was found to be 0.96, demonstrating a high level of agreement between the coders. Furthermore, the technique ofPage 11 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Page 12 of 28

Table 1 Impact of language assessment education on teachers’ classroom assessment agency
Themes

Sub-Themes

Percentage

Enhanced Approach to Assessment

Deeper Understanding of Assessment Methods
and Techniques

92%

Emphasis on Performance-Based Assessments

56%

Increased Confidence and Competence

Ability to make informed and contextually
relevant decisions

80%

Impact on Autonomy and Decision-Making

Empowerment in Decision-Making andAutonomy

64%

Enhanced Opportunities for Peer Collaboration
and Professional Development

Enhancements for Supporting EFL Teachers

56%

Shift in Attitudes and Beliefs

Changes in Attitudes Toward Assessment

40%

Improved Assessment Tools and Techniques

Broader Repertoire of Assessment Tools andTechniques

24%

Fig. 3 Impact of language assessment education on teachers’ classroom assessment agency

respondent validation was employed to strengthen the credibility of the analysis. This
involved checking 5 open-ended questionnaires and 5 narratives to assess the precision
and accuracy of the generated themes and subthemes against the datasets.

Results and discussion
Perceptions of EFL Teachers on the impact of language assessment education on classroom
assessment agency

To respond to the first research question, an open-ended questionnaire was designed
whose outcomes revealed the following dimensions (Table 1, Fig. 3) regarding the impactof language assessment teacher education on their approach to assess students’ language
skills in EFL classroom: Enhanced approach to assessment, increased confidence andcompetence, improved assessment tools and techniques, shift in attitudes and beliefs,
and Impact on autonomy and decision-making.
Figure 3 also indicates that the vast majority of participants (92%) found Enhanced
approach to assessment as the most prominent influence of a language assessment
teacher education course on their agency as assessors. In other words, they foundthe course profoundly influential in their assessment practices in several ways. The
respondents affirmed that the language assessment teacher education course has

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

strengthened their evaluation methods for assessing students’ language abilities. Thischange is attributed to the course’s emphasis on adopting a comprehensive and fairapproach that includes all skills, rather than just reading and writing.
The main benefit of course has been giving me a deeper understanding of various
assessment methods and techniques, enabling me to utilize a more comprehensive
and balanced approach to assessing my students’ language abilities. (T17)
The participants (56%) specially emphasized the positive influence of language
assessment courses on the implementation of performance-based assessments. These
assessments, which include activities like role-plays, presentations, and projects,
accurately reflect real-life language use.
I have learned to develop performance-based assessments that authentically represent real-life language use. (T9)
Likewise, the participants expressed their belief that enrolling in such courses (80%)
would enhance their confidence and proficiency as assessors. They acknowledged thatthese courses would provide a comprehensive understanding of assessment principles
and techniques, resulting in more accurate and effective evaluations. Notably, someof the participants (24%) reported acquiring new assessment tools and techniquesthrough the course. This has enabled them to design assessments that are tailored toalign with specific learning objectives and student needs. The participants stressed
how the course has expanded their repertoire of assessment methods, allowing forthe creation of versatile and effective evaluations that cater to diverse language proficiency levels and individual learning preferences.
Through the course, I familiarized with a big range of assessment tools and techniques. I got better orientation regarding how to design more varied and effective assessment practices that adjust to different language proficiency levels andlearning preferences. (T6)
Moreover, they proclaimed that (40%) completing the teacher education course has
led to a positive shift in their attitudes and beliefs toward language assessment. They
underscored their current prioritization of formative assessment, which accentuates
ongoing feedback and progress rather than solely relying on summative evaluation.
The participants predominantly focused on the evident shifts in their perspectives
toward language assessment subsequent to their engagement in the teacher education
course. The participants suggested using diverse assessment methods to evaluate different aspects of language proficiency and reducing reliance on traditional standardized tests.
By knowing about the significance of using multiple assessment methods, I
learned how to capture the diverse aspects of language proficiency, moving awayfrom relying solely on traditional, standardized tests. (T22)
Similarly, some participants (64%) thought that the course has empowered themto exercise greater autonomy and decision-making in assessment practices within
their EFL classroom. It has encouraged them to adapt assessments to suit individual

Page 13 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Page 14 of 28

Table 2 Contributions of language assessment teacher education to teachers’ classroom
assessment agency
ThemesPercentage

Alignment with Curriculum and Learning Objectives

76%

Reflective Practice and Metacognitive Awareness

52%

Collaborative Assessment Practices

36%

Student and Teacher Engagement and Empowerment

28%

Differentiation and Flexibility in Assessment

12%

Fig. 4 Contributions of language assessment education to teachers’ classroom assessment agency

student needs and learning styles. This theme highlights how the course has empowered the teachers to make more informed and contextually relevant decisions regarding assessment design, implementation, and interpretation.
I feel that I can currently make more informed and contextually relevant decisions regarding assessment design, implementation, and interpretation. (T5)More than a half (56%) expressed the need for practical training, examining various scenarios and critical incidents, and collaboration opportunities to enhance theirunderstanding and application of assessment concepts in real classroom. They also
recommended ongoing professional development focused on emerging assessment andtechnologies to ensure teachers stay updated.
For supporting EFL teachers in their role as language assessors, I believe thatincorporating more practical, hands-on experiences and opportunities for collaborative assessment design and analysis would be beneficial. (T9)Moreover, some other themes were extracted from EFL teachers regarding how
they perceived the influence of the language assessment teacher education course on
their agency as assessors in the classroom (Table 2, Fig. 4). The participants found“Alignment with Curriculum and Learning Objectives” (76%), “Reflective Practiceand Metacognitive Awareness” (52%), “Collaborative Assessment Practices” (36%),

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20“Student and Teacher Engagement and Empowerment” (28%), and “Differentiation
and Flexibility in Assessment” (12%) as the major impacts of the language assessment teacher education course on their classroom agency as assessors. More specifically, the participants perceived the course’s contribution to their ability to “alignassessment practices more closely with the intended curriculum, learning objectives,and standards”. The participants referred to the “development of their reflective skills
and metacognitive awareness in their assessment practices” as a result of the language assessment teacher education course. They asserted that the course facilitatedtheir capacity to “critically evaluate their assessment approaches” and “identify areasof need for improvement and continual enhancements”. They noted that “the course
prompted them to deeply reflect on their methods of assessing students and explore
alternative strategies”. I realized that I had certain beliefs and preferences when it
came to testing, but now I understand how they can affect my students I constantly
think about how my choices in assessments can impact the way my students learn”.
The teachers shed light on the influence of the course on their ability to “engage in collaborative assessment practices”, such as “co-designing assessments”, “moderating scoring”,
or “sharing assessment data with colleagues”. They stressed how the course empoweredthem to involve students more actively in the assessment process, such as through “selfassessment, peer feedback, or student-generated assessment tasks” that would in turnimpact “student motivation”, “ownership of learning”, and “overall engagement”. “Seeing
the positive impact of involving students in assessment design and peer feedback has been
incredibly rewarding. They are taking ownership of their progress in ways I never thoughtpossible”. Likewise, the teachers perceived the impact of the course on their ability to“design and implement differentiated assessment strategies to cater to the diverse needs
and learning styles of their students”, leading to increase in “flexibility and adaptability intheir assessment practices and agency as assessors”.
The responses and themes identified underscore the impact of experiencing a teacher
education course on understanding assessment methods, expanding the repertoireof assessment tools, emphasizing performance-based assessments, shifting attitudes
toward assessment, empowering decision-making and autonomy, and the need for further support and enhancements for EFL teachers. Likewise, the findings indicate thatthe language assessment teacher education course would have a profound impact on the
EFL teachers’ classroom assessment agency, enhancing their ability to align assessmentswith curricular objectives, fostering reflective and metacognitive practices, promoting
collaborative assessment approaches, empowering both students and teachers, and enabling greater differentiation and flexibility in their assessment strategies.
Challenges and opportunities in translating language assessment education for EFL
Teachers to enhance their assessment agency and professional growth

To respond to the second research question, a narrative frame was designed whosefindings revealed the following dimensions (Table 3, Fig. 5) regarding the challenges
and opportunities faced by EFL teachers in translating the knowledge and skills gained
through a language assessment teacher education course to enhance their assessment
agency and professional development: Adapting Assessment Methods to Diverse Student Population, Designing Authentic and Meaningful Assessments, Effectiveness ofPage 15 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Page 16 of 28

Table 3 Enhancing EFL teachers’ assessment skills through language assessment education
Themes

Sub-Themes

Percentage

Need for Continued Training and Collaboration

Continued training, mentorship, and Collaboration

92%

Adapting Assessment Methods to Diverse
Student Population

Applying theoretical assessment concepts intoclassroom practices

80%

Designing Authentic and Meaningful Assessments

A more student-centered approach to assessment

60%

Effectiveness of Formative and PerformanceBased Assessment

Techniques to integrate knowledge and skills
into teaching practices

52%

Critical and Reflective Stance
Toward Language Assessment

Developing a more reflective perspective

24%

Focusing on Emerging Assessment
Trends and Technologies

Implementing innovative assessment strategies

12%Fig. 5 Enhancing EFL teachers’ assessment skills through language assessment education

Performance-Based Assessments, Critical and Reflective Stance Toward Language
Assessment, Need for Continued Training and Collaboration, Advocacy for StudentCentered Assessment Practices.
Figure 5 also indicates that most of the teachers (80%) referred to the challenge ofadapting new assessment methods and techniques to suit the specific needs and proficiency levels of a diverse student population as their main impediment. They emphasized the difficulty in ensuring fair and inclusive assessments due to varied language
backgrounds and learning styles of their students.
The main challenge for me is effectively applying theoretical assessment concepts,
such as reliability and validity, into practical classroom assessment practices.
Indeed, implementing assessment principles seamlessly in day-to-day teachingremains a big challenge for me. (T9)The main predicament I have faced is the need for adapting some novel assessment methods and techniques to suit the specific needs and proficiency levels of
my diverse student population. (T23)

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

In addition, more than a half of the teachers (60%) focused on the opportunity identified in applying the knowledge and skills from the course to promote the assessment
agency by designing more authentic and meaningful assessments that truly reflect
the students’ language abilities. They specifically suggested engaging in discussions
with colleagues and administrators about the importance of using diverse assessment
methods to capture the multifaceted nature of language proficiency.
To enhance my assessment agency, an opportunity that stands out in applying theknowledge and skills from the course is the possibility to design more tailored andeffective assessments that concur with student needs and learning objectives. This
creates a conducive learning environment and results in a more student-centeredapproach to assessment. (T20)
To promote my assessment agency, an opportunity that I have identified is theability to design more authentic and meaningful assessments that truly reflect mystudents’ language abilities. (T14)
Some teachers (52%) referred to the effectiveness of incorporating formative and performance-based assessments, such as role-plays and project-based assessments, into
teaching practice. They stressed out the benefits of these assessments in providing
more accurate reflection of students’ language abilities and creating an engaging andinteractive learning setting.
When incorporating the acquired knowledge and skills into my teaching practice,
I assume that formative assessment techniques and strategies have been particularly fruitful as they improve learning outcomes and not only provide valuable
feedback to students but also inform instructional decisions. (T22).
In integrating the acquired knowledge and skills into my pedagogical practices,performance-based assessment, such as role-plays and project-based assessments, has been particularly influential. (T5)
One fourth of the participants (24%) thought of the impact of the language assessment teacher education course in developing a more critical and reflective stancetoward language assessment. They highlighted the deeper understanding gained
regarding the impact of assessment on language learning and the need for continuous
improvement in this area.
The course has helped me to develop a more critical and reflective perspective
toward language assessment. It has given me a deeper understanding of the influence of assessment on language learning and the need for continuous improvement in this area. (T19)
The vast majority of teacher participants (92%) underscored the need for further
support or resources in the realm of ongoing professional development and collaboration. They emphasized the importance of access to continued training, mentorship,
and opportunities for collaborative assessment design and analysis to successfully
integrate new assessment practices into teaching repertoire.

Page 17 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Page 18 of 28

In terms of contributing to my overall professional development, the language
assessment teacher education course has significantly enhanced my ability to design
and implement assessments that are fair, valid, and authentic. This has improved
both my assessment practices and elevated the quality of my teaching and student
learning experiences. (T2)
Access to continued training, mentorship, and opportunities for collaborative assessment design and analysis would greatly support the successful integration of newassessment practices into my teaching repertoire. (T24)
Few teachers (12%) discussed concentrating on the emerging assessment trends andtechnologies and the leveraging of the knowledge and skills acquired to play a more
active role in advocating for student-centered, authentic assessment practices within theinstitutes. They underlined the aim collaborate with colleagues to incorporate innovative assessment practices and develop a more comprehensive and inclusive approachto language assessment, ultimately enhancing the teacher’s role as an EFL teacher andassessor.
Collaborating with colleagues will definitely develop a more comprehensive andinclusive approach to language assessment. It can enhance my role as an EFL
teacher and assessor and promote a more robust assessment culture in the classroom context. (T21)
To effectively translate the knowledge and skills gained from the course into practice,a specific area where I believe further support or resources are needed is ongoingprofessional development focused on emerging assessment trends and technologies.
For sure, staying updated with the latest advancements in language assessment isneeded to ensure continuous improvement in assessment practices. (T6)
Looking ahead, by implementing innovative assessment strategies, fostering a culture of continuous improvement, and actively contributing to the professional development of both myself and my students, I envision enhancing my role as an EFL
teacher and assessor. (T13)
Besides, as major challenges faced by EFL teachers in translating their language assessment knowledge and skills into practice to foster their assessment agency (Table 4 andTable 4 Challenges confronted by EFL teachers in translating their language assessment
knowledge and skills
ThemesPercentage

Ethical Considerations in Language Assessment

68%

Emotional and Psychological Aspects of Assessment

64%

Impact on Student Learning and Engagement48%

Collaboration and Peer Learning

36%

Developing Assessment Literacy and Expertise24%

Navigating Institutional Constraints and Policies

16%

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Fig. 6 Teachers’ challenges in translating their language assessment knowledge and skills

Fig. 6), the participants referred to the “Ethical Considerations in Language Assessment”(68%), “Emotional and Psychological Aspects of Assessment” (64%), “Impact on Student
Learning and Engagement” (48%), “Collaboration and Peer Learning” (36%), “Developing Assessment Literacy and Expertise” (24%) and “Navigating Institutional Constraints
and Policies” (16%). In particular, EFL teachers addressed issues such as “bias”, “fairness”, and “inclusivity” in assessment practices, as well as the importance of maintaining“confidentiality and privacy” when collecting and analyzing the assessment data. They
also stressed the emotional and psychological challenges they faced when implementing novel assessment approaches, such as “anxiety”, “resistance”, or “self-efficacy” concerns. Likewise, they discussed how they coped with and managed the emotional labor
involved in promoting their assessment agency and professional development. One
participant claimed that “Trying to change my assessment practices has been incredibly
stressful. I constantly worry about whether I’m doing it right, and I often feel self-conscious
when my students struggle with the new assessment formats”. Another one felt that “It canbe very tiring and challenging to keep promoting student-centered assessment methods,
especially when facing resistance from parents or administrators. However, I remain committed to this because I believe it is the best way to support my’ learning”.
The teachers also reiterated how the application of their assessment knowledge andskills influenced “student learning outcomes”, “motivation”, and “engagement” and highlighted the need for “teachers’ reflections on the positive and/or negative impacts of theirassessment practices on students”. As one stated that “When I implemented the performance-based assessments I learned about, I noticed a significant increase in my students’motivation and engagement. They displayed more dedication in their learning journey
and assumed responsibility for monitoring their own learning and progress”. The participants concentrated on the role of “collaboration with colleagues”, “subject-matter
experts”, or “assessment specialists” in supporting EFL teachers’ efforts to apply theirassessment knowledge and skills. In preparing them for the practical challenges of classroom-based assessment, they considered the strategies by which they can “develop theirassessment literacy and expertise over time”, and “the factors that contribute to or hinder
this process”. The teacher participants also underscored the challenges posed by “institutional policies”, “curricula”, or “administrative requirements” that may hinder their ability to implement the knowledge and skills gained from the language assessment teacher

Page 19 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

education course. This challenge is represented in one participant’s remark as statedthat “I have been working hard to promote student-centered assessment practices, but mydepartment’s head is reluctant to embrace change and continues to favor traditional testing methods, despite my efforts to demonstrate how alternative approaches can enhance
student learning”.
The narratives provide invaluable insights into the challenges and opportunities facedby the teacher in translating the knowledge and skills gained from the language assessment teacher education course. The themes identified reflect the teacher’s experiences
and aspirations related to promoting assessment agency and contributing to overall professional development. Besides, the findings revealed that EFL teachers encountered a
range of challenges in applying their language assessment expertise, including navigating
institutional policies and constraints, developing their overall assessment literacy andexpertise, leveraging collaboration and peer learning opportunities, addressing the emotional and psychological aspects of assessment, considering the ethical implications of
their practices, and evaluating the impact on student learning and engagement.

Discussion
This study was an attempt to explore the impact of language assessment teacher education on EFL teachers’ assessment agency and professional development track. Likewise, the findings shed light on teachers’ perceptions of the challenges and opportunities
faced by EFL teachers in translating the knowledge and skills gained through such acourse to promote their assessment agency and contribute to their overall professional
development.
The findings of the first research question demonstrated several facets of impact,
including enhanced approach to assessment, increased confidence and competence,
improved assessment tools and techniques, shift in attitudes and beliefs, and impact
on autonomy and decision-making. Studies by Black and Wiliam (1998), Darling-Hammond (2010), Smith and Gorard (2007), and Soini et al. (2015) have similarly highlighted
the positive impact of teacher education on assessment methods and techniques andpractices. The majority of participants proclaimed that the language assessment teacher
education course enhanced their approach to assessment by providing them with an indepth understanding of assessment methods and techniques. This finding represented
the prominence of providing teachers with comprehensive knowledge and skills inassessment to enable them to design assessments that accurately reflect students’ language abilities (Priestley et al., 2015). Moreover, the participants emphasized the positive
influence of the course on their confidence and competence as assessors, in tune withthe perspectives of Hasselgreen et al. (2004), Vogt et al. (2008), Vogt and Tsagari (2014),
advocating that the course contributed to their professional growth in assessment.
The participants also reported that the course improved their assessment tools andtechniques, enabling them to have a broader collection and selection of assessment
methods. This finding suggests that the course equipped the teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to design assessments that accommodate with specificlearning objectives and student needs and expectations. Additionally, the participants
spotlighted a shift in their attitudes and beliefs toward assessment, evincing the significance of formative assessment and reducing reliance on traditional standardized

Page 20 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

tests. This finding reflects the impact of the course on teachers’ perspectives andtheir adoption of student-centered assessment practices (Namgung et al., 2021). Furthermore, the participants reported that the language assessment teacher education
course empowered them to exercise greater autonomy and decision-making in assessment practices within their EFL classrooms. This finding suggests that the course
provided the teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to make informed andcontextually relevant decisions regarding assessment design, implementation, andinterpretation (Fazel & Ali, 2022; Ghiasvand et al., 2023; Mansouri et al., 2021). The
participants also illuminated the need for practical training, collaboration opportunities, and ongoing professional development to boost their understanding and application of assessment concepts in real classrooms (Brown & Remesal, 2012; Levy-Vered& Alhija, 2018). This finding highlights the significance of providing teachers with
continuous support and opportunities for growth in assessment.
The participants identified other major impacts of the language assessment teacher
education course on their classroom agency as assessors. The effects encompassed
various aspects such as aligning with curriculum and learning objectives, promoting
reflective practice and metacognitive awareness, fostering collaborative assessment
practices, enhancing student and teacher engagement and empowerment, and facilitating differentiation and flexibility in assessment. Some researchers like Lee and Jeon
(2024) as well as DeLuca et al. (2024) found that the participants attested to the effectiveness of the teacher education course supporting the alignment of their assessment
practices with curriculum and learning objectives. They also noted that the course
would improve their reflective skills and metacognitive awareness (Härmälä, 2023;
López, 2023). Additionally, the participants would engage in collaborative assessment
practices, such as co-designing assessments and sharing assessment data with colleagues (Cong-Lem, 2024; Varier et al., 2024). The course would also empower themto involve students actively in the assessment process (Phakiti & Steinhoff, 2023; Yin& Park, 2023). Furthermore, it would enhance their ability to design and implement
differentiated assessment strategies (Khan et al., 2023; Samaie & Valizadeh, 2023).
The second research question revolved around the challenges and opportunities
faced by EFL teachers in translating the knowledge and skills gained through a language assessment teacher education course to enhance their assessment agency andprofessional development. The findings showcased several dimensions of challenges
and opportunities, including adapting assessment methods to varied student population, designing authentic and meaningful assessments, the effectiveness of performance-based assessments, critical and reflective stance toward language assessment,
the need for constant training and collaboration, and focusing on emerging assessment trends and technologies. The participants identified adapting assessment methods to a diverse student population as a major challenge. This finding highlights theintricacy of assessment in diverse classrooms and the need for teachers to consider
students’ perceived needs and proficiency levels when designing assessments (Guerrero & Camargo-Abello, 2023; Hargreaves, 2004), Polatcan et al., 2023). The participants also posited particular emphasis on the opportunity to design authentic andmeaningful assessments that truly reflect students’ language abilities. This finding

Page 21 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

suggests that the knowledge and skills gained through the course can empower teachers to create assessments that align with student needs and learning goals.
The participants also pinpointed on the effectiveness of incorporating formative andperformance-based assessments into teaching practice. This finding implies that theseassessment techniques can strengthen student learning outcomes and provide students
and teachers with valuable feedback (Ghiasvand et al., 2023; Gosling, 2000; Poulton,
2020; Soini et al., 2015; Verberg et al., 2016). Moreover, the participants referred to theseminal role of developing a critical and reflective stance toward language assessment,
which is in accord with the worldviews of Rogers and Wetzel (2013) and Soini et al.
(2015), advising that teachers need to constantly promote their assessment practices andstay abreast of emerging assessment trends and technologies. The participants determined the need for constant training, collaboration, and ongoing professional development as crucial for translating the knowledge and skills gained through the course into
practice. This finding highlights the significance of providing teachers with constantsupport and opportunities for growth in assessment (Namgung et al., 2021; Soini et al.,2015). The participants also accentuated the seminal role collaboration with colleagues
played in developing a comprehensive and inclusive approach to language assessment.
Several challenges were specified by the teacher participants in translating their language assessment knowledge and skills into practice to foster their assessment agency.
The challenges presented in this study encompassed ethical aspects within language
assessment, addressing issues like bias, fairness, and inclusivity. Additionally, the significance of maintaining confidentiality and privacy during the gleaning and analysis ofassessment data was emphasized. Consistent with the recent research by Nazari et al.
(2024) and Faryabi et al. (2024), participants in this study stressed the emotional andpsychological hurdles encountered while adopting innovative assessment methods,
including feelings of anxiety, resistance, and self-efficacy concerns. Additionally, theparticipants discussed how the application of their assessment knowledge and skills
influenced student learning outcomes, motivation, and engagement, emphasizing theneed for teachers’ reflections on the positive and/or negative impacts of their assessment practices on students which supports the findings of Nieminen (2024). Concurringwith the findings of Krulatz et al. (2024) and DeLuca et al. (2024), the participants in thisstudy underscored the role of collaboration with colleagues, subject-matter experts, orassessment specialists in supporting their efforts to apply their assessment knowledge
and skills, and considered strategies to develop their assessment literacy and expertiseover time. Furthermore, the participants highlighted the challenges posed by institutional policies, curricula, or administrative requirements that may hinder their ability
to implement the knowledge and skills gained from the language assessment teacher
education course, all acknowledging the results in Yin and Park’s (2023) and Ekin et al.’s(2024) study.
Overall, the findings showcase the significance of comprehensive teacher education
programs that equip teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to design assessments that accurately reflect students’ language abilities and promote student-centeredassessment practices. The findings also underscore the dire need for constant support,
collaboration, and ongoing professional development to intensify teachers’ assessment
agency and contribute to their overall professional growth. While this study contributes

Page 22 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

to the literature on teacher assessment agency, further empirical evidence is required tomore deeply explore the complex interplay between teacher professional development,
assessment practices, and the multifaceted contextual factors that enable or hinder
teachers in exercising their assessment agency within the classroom.

Conclusion and implications
The research findings indicate that the language assessment teacher education course
has drastically impacted EFL teachers’ approach to assessing students’ language skillsin the classroom. It has promoted the teachers’ assessment agency and contributed
to their overall professional development in the field of EFL teaching. The course has
improved teachers’ understanding of assessment methods and techniques. It has raised
their confidence and competence in assessment, and enriched their assessment tools
and resources. It also fosters a shift in attitudes, enabling teachers to exert greater autonomy and decision-making in assessment. The study also illuminates the need for enduring support and development opportunities, including practical training, collaboration,and professional development focused on emerging assessment trends and technologies.
Adjusting assessments to diverse student populations is identified both as a challenge
and an opportunity to design more authentic and meaningful assessments. The effectiveness of formative and performance-based assessments is recognized as a valuableapproach. Likewise, a critical and reflective stance toward assessment is emphasized.
Constant training, collaboration, and advocacy for student-centered assessment practices are underlined as important power meters for EFL teachers to pursue.
As for implications of the study, firstly, the study stresses the importance of providing EFL teachers with language assessment teacher education courses that enhancetheir assessment agency and professional development. These courses should prioritize
developing teachers’ understanding of assessment methods and techniques, enhancing
their confidence and competence in assessment practices, and empowering them to havemore autonomy and decision-making in assessments. It is important to provide continued support opportunities for growth to EFL teachers, including practical training, collaboration, and professional development that focuses on current assessment trends andtechnological advancements.
Furthermore, the study underscores the importance of addressing the challenges facedby EFL teachers in translating the knowledge and skills gained from language assessment
teacher education courses. Teacher educators and language and education policymakers
should offer support and resources to aid EFL teachers in adapting assessment methods
to miscellaneous student populations, designing authentic and meaningful assessments,
and developing a critical and reflective standpoint toward language assessment. Persistent training, mentorship, and collaboration opportunities should also be presented so
as to buttress EFL teachers in integrating new assessment practices into their teachingrepertoire and upholding student-centered assessment practices.
The limitations of this study should be acknowledged. Firstly, the study was conducted with a specified group of EFL teachers in a determined context, which may
restrict the generalizability of the findings. Future research should seek to replicate the study with a more gigantic and varied sample of EFL teachers to ensure
the reliability and validity of the findings. Future research can also take advantage

Page 23 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

of multiple data collection methods to extend our apprehension of the impact oflanguage assessment teacher education on EFL teachers’ assessment agency andprofessional growth path. Secondly, the study hinged on self-reported data from
EFL teachers, which may cause bias and social desirability effects. Mixed-methods
approaches can be also employed to triangulate the findings and provide a morecomprehensive understanding of the impact of language assessment teacher education on EFL teachers’ assessment agency and professional development trajectory.
Further research is needed to build upon these findings and explore the impact oflanguage assessment teacher education in different contexts such as ESL and EAP
settings and with different groups of EFL teachers, including novice and experienced
individuals. It is recommended to provide language assessment teacher education
courses for teachers of virtual classes, focusing on assessment methods and developing their confidence and competence in assessment practices. Ongoing support andprofessional development opportunities should be offered, including practical training, collaboration, and awareness of emerging assessment trends and technologies
like technology-enhanced assessments and assessment in the digital environment,
among others. Additionally, an interesting line of further research could explore
the contribution of assessment agency to teacher assessment identity. Prior studies
by Author (2023, 2024) have emphasized the significant role of assessment agency
in shaping teachers’ assessment identity and professional growth. Examining theinterplay between these constructs could yield valuable insights into how language
assessment education can better support the development of EFL teachers and theirclassroom practices. Finally, the other avenue of research could be exploring thelong-term effects of language assessment teacher education courses and programson teachers’ assessment agency and student learning outcomes.

Appendix 1
Open‑Ended Questionnaire

1. How has the language assessment teacher education course influenced yourapproach to assessing students’ language skills in the classroom?
2. In what specific ways has the course enhanced your confidence and competence as
an assessor of students’ language abilities?
3. Can you provide examples of how the course has impacted your ability to create anduse effective assessment tools and techniques in your EFL classroom?
4. Have you noticed any changes in your attitudes and beliefs toward language assessment since completing the teacher education course? If so, can you describe thesechanges?
5. How do you perceive the impact of the course on your autonomy and decision-making as an assessor in your EFL classroom?
6. In what ways do you think the course could be further improved to better support
EFL teachers in their role as language assessors?

Page 24 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Appendix 2
Narrative Inquiry

As an EFL teacher who has completed a language assessment teacher education course, I
have encountered various challenges and opportunities in translating the knowledge andskills I gained to promote my assessment agency and contribute to my overall professional
development. In this regard, I would like to seek your insights on the following points:
1. One of the main challenges I have faced in translating the knowledge and skills
gained from the language assessment teacher education course is _______________________________.
2. An opportunity that I have identified in applying the knowledge and skills from thecourse to promote my assessment agency is _______________________________.
3. When it comes to integrating the acquired knowledge and skills into my teachingpractice, I find that _______________________________.
4. In terms of contributing to my overall professional development, the language assessment teacher education course has helped me to _______________________________.
5. A specific area where I believe further support or resources are needed to effectivelytranslate the knowledge and skills gained from the course into practice is _______________________________.
6. Looking ahead, I envision that by leveraging the knowledge and skills acquired, I
can _______________________________ to enhance my role as an EFL teacher andassessor.

Abbreviations
CAQDAS	Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software
CVI	Content Validity Index
EFL	English as a Foreign Language
ICR	Intercoder reliability
KSETs	Korean secondary English teachers
L2	Second language
PQA	Phenomenographic qualitative analysis
TBA	Teacher-based assessment
TEA	Teacher ecological assessment agency
TEFL	Teaching English as a Foreign Language
Acknowledgements
The authors highly appreciate the insightful comments suggested by the editor and anonymous reviewers.
Author’s contributions
The study was conceptualized, conducted, written, edited, and approved for publication by a single author acting independently throughout the research process.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.

Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national
research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in this study.

Page 25 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Consent for publication
The author consents to the publication of the manuscript upon its acceptance.
Competing interests
None.
Received: 7 May 2024 Accepted: 2 June 2024

References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109–137. http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​
30692​11
Ahmad, H., & Shah, S. R. (2022). Teacher agency and professional development: A study on Cambridge English teacher
program in the Arabian Gulf. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2080352. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​23311​86X.​2022.​20803​52
Akram, S. (2013). Fully unconscious and prone to habit: The characteristics of agency in the structure and agency dialectic. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 43(1), 45–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jtsb.​12002
Ali, M. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2023). Teacher agency and washback: Insights from classrooms in rural Bangladesh. ELT Journal,
77(1), 52–61. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​elt/​ccac0​05
Archer, M. S. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Arthur, L. (2016). Communities of practice in higher education: Professional learning in an academic career. International
Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 230–241. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​13601​44X.​2015.​11278​13
Ashton, K. (2022). Language teacher agency in emergency online teaching. System, 105, 102713. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​system.​2021.​102713
Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023). Tracing the dynamics of Teacher Assessment Identity (TAI) through web-based audio
diaries. The Qualitative Report, 28(9), 2681–2715. https://​doi.​org/​10.​46743/​2160-​3715/​2023.​5903
Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2024). Expanding novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers’ assessment identity landscape:
Does online explicit instruction make a difference? International Journal of Language Testing, 14(1), 131–149. https://​doi.​org/​10.​22034/​ijlt.​2023.​413583.​1279
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​0003-​066x.​44.9.​1175
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://​doi.​
org/​10.​1146/​annur​ev.​psych.​52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2006). Towards a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/j.​1745-​6916.​2006.​00011.x
Baralt, M. (2012). Coding qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A
practical guide (pp. 222–244). Wiley Blackwell.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640.
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​13540​602.​2015.​10443​25
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan,
80(2), 139–148. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​00317​21710​09200​119
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development: Processes andcontent. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 548–556). Elsevier.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record,
106(3), 429–458. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/j.​1467-​9620.​2004.​00346.x
Brown, G. T. L., & Remesal, A. (2012). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Across-cultural comparison. The
Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 75–89. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5209/​rev_​SJOP.​2012.​v15.​n1.​37286
Calvert, L. (2016). Moving from compliance to agency: What teachers need to make professional learning work. Learning
Forward & NCTAF.
Cong-Lem, N. (2024). Teacher agency for change and development in higher education: A scoping literature review.
International Journal of Educational Reform, 10567879231224744.
Craft, A. (2000). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Croker, R. A. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research inapplied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 4–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure andimprove teaching. Center for American Progress.
Davies, B. (2000). A Body of Writing 1990–1999. AltaMira Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
DeLuca, C., Willis, J., Cowie, B., Harrison, C., & Coombs, A. (2024). The landscape of assessment education. In Learning toassess: Cultivating assessment capacity in teacher education (pp. 19–48). Springer Nature.
Durrant, J. (2019). Teacher agency, professional development, and school improvement. Routledge. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4324/​97813​15106​434
Ekin, S., Balaman, U., & Badem-Korkmaz, F. (2024). Tracking telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 31–60.
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1515/​appli​rev-​2020-​0147
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1086/​231294
Faryabi, F., Rahimi, M., & Davin, K. J. (2024). Professional development as Praxis: EFL teachers’ challenges in learning to
implement dynamic assessment of writing. TESOL Journal, 15(1), e734. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​tesj.​734

Page 26 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Fazel, I., & Ali, A. M. (2022). EAP teachers’ knowledge and use of learning-oriented assessment: A cross-contextual study.
System, 104, 102685. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​system.​2021.​102685
Friedman, T. L. (2012, May 16). Come the revolution. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www.​nytim​es.​com/​2012/​
05/​16/​opini​on/​fried​man-​come-​the-​revol​ution.​html
Gao, X., Tao, J., & Gong, Y. A. (2018). Sociocultural inquiry on teacher agency and professional identity in curriculum
reforms. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1, 19–28.
Ghamoushi, M., Zenouzagh, Z. M., & Hashamdar, M. (2022). Development and validation of a potential assessment inventory for assessing EFL teachers’ ecological agency. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–24. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​
s40468-​022-​00190-5
Ghiasvand, F., Jahanbakhsh, A., & Sharifpour, P. (2023). Designing and validating an assessment agency questionnaire for EFL teachers: An ecological perspective. Language Testing in Asia, 13(41), 1–22. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​
s40468-​023-​00255-z
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. University of California Press.
Gosling, D. (2000). Using Habermas to evaluate two approaches to negotiated assessment. Assessment & Evaluation inHigher Education, 25(3), 293–304. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​02602​93005​01351​58
Guerrero, A. L., & Camargo-Abello, M. (2023). Teachers’ agency in the implementation of an early childhood education
policy program in schools in Bogotá, Colombia. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 17(1), 1–24.
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s40723-​023-​00104-9
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Grading policies that work against standards...and how to fix them. NASSP Bulletin, 84(620), 20–29.
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​01926​36500​08462​003
Hargreaves, A. (2004). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Härmälä, M. (2023). Finnish compulsory school English and Swedish teachers’ classroom assessment practices. Language
Teaching Research Quarterly, 37, 108–124. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltrq.​2023.​37.​05
Hasselgreen, A., Carlsen, C., & Helness, H. (2004). European survey of language testing and assessment needs. Part One: General Findings. Part One: General Findings. http://​www.​ealta.​eu.​org/​docum​ents/​resou​rces/​survey-​report-​pt1.​pdf
Hendawy Al-Mahdy, Y. F., Hallinger, P., Emam, M., Hammad, W., Alabri, K. M., & Al-Harthi, K. (2024). Supporting teacher
professional learning in Oman: The effects of principal leadership, teacher trust, and teacher agency. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 52(2), 395–416. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​17411​43221​10644​28
Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2019). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00220​272.​2019.​16048​09
Jiang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2022). An ecological approach to understanding university English teachers’ professional
agency in implementing formative assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(916980), 1–19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​
fpsyg.​2022.​916980
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2019). A language teacher’s agency in the development of her professional identities: A narrative casestudy. Journal of Latinos and Education, 18(1), 4–18. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​15348​431.​2017.​14063​60
Khan, A., Hassan, N., & Ali, A. (2023). Implementing formative assessment in Malaysia: Teachers’ viewpoints. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 7, 28–41. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltf.​2023.​07.​03
Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. SAGE.
Krulatz, A., Christison, M., Lorenz, E., & Sevinç, Y. (2024). The impact of teacher professional development on teacher cognition and multilingual teaching practices. International Journal of Multilingualism, 21(2), 711–727. https://​doi.​org/​10.​
1080/​14790​718.​2022.​21076​48
Kusters, M., van der Rijst, R., de Vetten, A., & Admiraal, W. (2023). University lecturers as change agents: How do they
perceive their professional agency? Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104097. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​tate.​2023.​
104097Lai, C., Li, Z., & Gong, Y. (2016). Teacher agency and professional learning in cross-cultural teaching contexts: Accounts ofChinese teachers from international schools in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 12–21. https://​doi.​
org/​10.​1016/j.​tate.​2015.​11.​007
Larsen–Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern
Language Journal, 103(SI), 61–79. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​modl.​12536
Laveault, D. (2016). Assessment policy enactment in education systems: A few reasons to be optimistic. In D. Laveault & L.
Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 21–34). Springer.
Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in
response to language policy reform: A Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 199–224.
https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​14664​208.​2020.​17412​09
Lee, S., & Jeon, J. (2024). Teacher agency and ICT affordances in classroom-based language assessment: The return toface-to-face classes after online teaching. System, 121, 103218. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​system.​2023.​103218
Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., & Baucal, A. (2021). Assessing student teachers’ agency and using it for predicting commitment toteaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–17. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​02619​768.​2021.​18895​07
Levy-Vered, A., & Alhija, F. N. A. (2018). The power of a basic assessment course in changing preservice teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 84–93. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​stued​uc.​2018.​04.​003
Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualizing the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher
assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​
09695​94x.​2016.​12680​90
López, A. A. (2023). ESL teachers’ perceptions of effective classroom assessment feedback. Language Teaching Research
Quarterly, 37, 91–107. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltrq.​2023.​37.​04
Mansouri, B., Molana, K., & Nazari, M. (2021). The interconnection between second language teachers’ language assessment literacy and professional agency: The mediating role of institutional policies. System, 103, 1–11. https://​doi.​org/​
10.​1016/j.​system.​2021.​102674
Martin-Kniep, G., & Picone-Cochia, J (2009). Change the way you teach, improve the way students learn. ASCD.
Meihami, H. (2023). Situated learning in CALL teacher preparation programs: an ecological perspective to student-teachers’ agency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​09588​221.​2023.​21736​14

Page 27 of 28

Estaji ﻿Language Testing in Asia

(2024) 14:20

Namgung, W., Moate, J., & Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2021). Repositioning teachers as assessors: Compromised aspirations andcontested agency. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 15(2), 49–69. https://​doi.​org/​10.​47862/​apples.​101524
Nazari, M., Karimpour, S., & Ranjbar, M. (2024). Emotion labor as professional development work: Insights from teachers
doing action research. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 222–250. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​tesq.​3226
Nieminen, J. H. (2024). How does assessment shape student identities? An integrative review. Studies in Higher Education,
1–19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​03075​079.​2024.​23348​44
Orland-Barak, L. (2017). Learning teacher agency in teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 247–252). SAGE.
Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2020). Decision making through the angle of the ecological model of agency. In 2020 IEEE 20th
International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 243–245). IEEE. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​icalt
49669.2020.00080
Phakiti, A., & Steinhoff, A. (2023). Five golden rules for successful classroom assessment based on what we have learnt
from J. D. Brown. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 37, 76–90. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltrq.​2023.​37.​03
Polatcan, M., Arslan, P., & Balci, A. (2023). The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy regarding the relationship between
transformational school leadership and teacher agency. Educational Studies, 49(5), 823–841. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​
03055​698.​2021.​18945​49
Poulton, P. (2020). Teacher agency in curriculum reform: The role of assessment in enabling and constraining primaryteachers’ agency. Curriculum Perspectives, 40(1), 35–48. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s41297-​020-​00100-w
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1999). The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research. Review of Educational Research,69(1), 53–82. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2307/​11706​44
Rogers, R., & Wetzel, M. M. (2013). Studying agency in literacy teacher education: A layered approach to positive discourse
analysis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 62–92. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​15427​587.​2013.​753845
Samaie, M., & Valizadeh, P. (2023). The gap between teaching, assessment, and learning: EFL teachers’ perceptions andstrategies. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 7, 12–27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltf.​2023.​07.​02
Sari, D. R. (2021). Rural EFL teachers’ emotions and agency in online language teaching: I will survive. Vision: Journal for
Language and Foreign Language Learning, 10(1), 1–16. https://​doi.​org/​10.​21580/​vjv10​i17727
Segers, M. S. R. (2003). Evaluating the overall test: Looking for multiple validity measures. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 119–141). Kluwer.
Sin, S. (2010). Considerations of quality in phenomenographic research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(4),305–319. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​16094​06910​00900​401
Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2007). Who succeeds in teacher training? Research Papers in Education, 22(4), 465–482. https://​doi.​
org/​10.​1080/​02671​52070​16510​86
Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., Toom, A., & Pyhältö, K. (2015). What contributes to first-year student teachers’ sense of professional
agency in the classroom? Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 641–659. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​13540​602.​2015.​10443​26
Stenfors-Hayes, T., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2013). A phenomenographic approach to research in medical education.
Medical Education, 47(3), 261–270. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​medu.​12101
Stolz, S. A. (2020). Phenomenology and phenomenography in educational research: A critique. Educational Philosophy
and Theory, 52(10), 1077–1096. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​00131​857.​2020.​17240​88
Vähäsantanen, K., & Hökkä, P.K., & Paloniemi, S. (2020). University teachers’ profes- sional identity work and emotions in
the context of an arts-based identity coach- ing program. In L. McKay, G. Barton, S. Garvis, & V. Sappa (Eds.), ArtsBased Research, Resilience and Well-being Across the Lifespan (pp. 233–256). Palgrave Mamillan.
Varier, D., Powell, M. G., Dodman, S., Ives, S. T., DeMulder, E., & View, J. L. (2024). Use and usefulness of assessments to
inform instruction: Developing a K-12 classroom teacher assessment practice measure. Educational Assessment,
1–22. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​10627​197.​2024.​23169​07
Verberg, C. P., Tigelaar, D. E., van Veen, K., & Verloop, N. (2016). Teacher agency within the context of formative teacher
assessment: An in-depth analysis. Educational Studies, 42(5), 534–552. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​03055​698.​2016.​12310​
60
Vogt, K., Guerin, E., Sahinkarakas, S., Pavlou, P., Tsagari, D., & Afiri, Q. (2008, May 8–11). Assessment literacy of foreign
language teachers in Europe – current trends and future perspectives [Paper presentation]. The 5th EALTA Conference,
Athens, Greece.
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language
Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​15434​303.​2014.​960046
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y., & Zhang, W. (2021). The effects of principal support on teachers’ professional skills: The mediating role of schoolwide inclusive practices and teacher agency. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(6),773–787. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​10349​12X.​2021.​19506​49
Wiliam, D. (2010). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Willis, J., McGraw, K., & Graham, L. (2019). Conditions that mediate teacher agency during assessment reform. English
Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(2), 233–248. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1108/​ETPC-​11-​2018-​0108
Xu, Y. (2019). English language teacher assessment literacy in practice. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 517–539). Springer International Publishing.
Yin, G., & Park, E. (2023). Exploring the implementation of assessment for learning in the Asian EFL context: A systematic
research synthesis. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 36, 1–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​32038/​ltrq.​2023.​36.​01

Publisher’s NoteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Page 28 of 28