Grassland

3.4

GRASSLAND

Grassland as defined in Chapter 2 covers about one-quarter of the earth’s land surface (Ojima et al., 1993) andspan a range of climate conditions from arid to humid. Grasslands can vary greatly in their degree and intensityof management, from extensively managed rangelands and savannahs – where animal stocking rates and fire
regimes are the main management variables – to intensively managed (e.g. with fertilization, irrigation, specieschanges) continuous pasture and hay land. Grasslands generally have a vegetation dominated by perennial
grasses, with grazing as the predominant land use, and are distinguished from “forest” by having a tree canopy
cover of less than the threshold used in the forest definition.
Belowground carbon dominates in grassland, mainly in roots and soil organic matter. For a given climate regime,
grassland often has higher soil carbon contents than other vegetation types. Grazing and fire are common
perturbations that grassland has evolved with; consequently both the vegetation and soil carbon are relatively
resistant to moderate disturbances from grazing and fire regimes (Milchunas and Lauenroth, 1993). In many
grasslands, the presence of fire is a key factor in preventing the invasion of woody species which cansignificantly affect ecosystem carbon stores (Jackson et al., 2002).
The Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC Guidelines) deal withbiomass and soil carbon stock changes for land-use conversions between grassland and other land uses (e.g.,
cropland), soil carbon stock changes due to management changes between improved and unimproved pasture,
and CO2 emissions for wetlands that are drained and from liming of pasture.
This report complements the IPCC Guidelines by:•

Elaborating on the methodologies needed to address C stock changes in the two main pools in grassland:
living biomass and soils;•

Explicitly including impacts of natural disturbances and vegetation fires on managed grassland; and•Covering comprehensively the estimation of land use conversion to grassland.

In this section, guidance on the use of basic and advanced methodologies for inventorying and reporting
emissions and removals for grassland remaining grassland and land converted to grassland is provided forbiomass and soil carbon pools. Methods for non-CO2 emissions are also covered. Methodologies follow ahierarchical tier structure where Tier 1 methods use default values, typically with limited disaggregation of area
data. Tier 2 corresponds to use of country-specific coefficients and/or finer scale area disaggregation, which will
reduce uncertainty in emission/removal estimates. Tier 3 methods refer to the use of more complex countryspecific approaches. Where possible, default values from the IPCC Guidelines are updated and new default
values are provided based on the most up-to-date research findings.

3.4.1

Grassland Remaining Grassland

Carbon stocks in permanent grassland are influenced by human activities and natural disturbances, including
harvesting of woody biomass, rangeland degradation, grazing, fires, rehabilitation, pasture management, etc.
Annual production of biomass in grassland can be large, but due to rapid turnover and removals through grazing
and fire, standing stock of aboveground biomass rarely exceeds a few tonnes per hectare. Larger amounts canaccumulate in the woody component of vegetation, in root biomass and in soils. The extent to which carbon stocks
increase or decrease in each of these pools is affected by management practices such as those described above.
This section provides guidance on estimating carbon stock changes in grassland remaining grassland (GG) for
two carbon pools: living biomass and soils. At this time, not enough information is available to develop default
coefficients for estimating the dead organic matter pool. The total annual carbon stock change in grassland
remaining grassland is therefore the sum of annual estimates of carbon stock changes in each carbon pool—living biomass and soils—as shown in Equation 3.4.1. Estimation techniques for each pool are described
separately below.
EQUATION 3.4.1
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGG = ∆CGGLB + ∆CGGSoils
Where:∆CGG = annual change in carbon stocks in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.105

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance∆CGGLB = annual change in carbon stocks in living biomass in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CGGSoils = annual change in carbon stocks in soils in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1
To convert tonnes C to Gg CO2, multiply the value by 44/12 and by 10-3. For the convention (signs), refer to
Section 3.1.7 or Annex 3A.2 (Reporting Tables and Worksheets).
TABLE 3.4.1
TIER DESCRIPTIONS FOR SUBCATEGORIES UNDER GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND
Tier
Sub-categories

Tier 1

Tier 2Tier 3

LivingBiomass

Assume there is no change incarbon stocks.

Use country-specific values for carbon
accumulation and removal rates andannual or periodic surveys to estimate
the areas under different classes ofgrassland by climate region.

Use country-specificapproach at finespatial scale (e.g.,modeling,
measurement)

Soils

For changes in soil carbon frommineral soils use default
coefficients. The areas must be
stratified by climate and soil type.
For changes in soil carbon fromorganic soils use default
coefficients and stratify the areas byclimatic region. For emissions fromliming, use default emission factors.

For both mineral and organic soils use
some combination of default and/or
country-specific coefficients and area
estimates of increasingly finer spatial
resolution. For emissions from liming,
use emission factors differentiated byforms of lime.

Use country-specificapproach at finespatial scale (e.g.,modeling,
measurement)

3.4.1.1

C HANGE IN CARB ON STOCKS IN LIVING BIOMASS

Although the methods used for estimating biomass changes are conceptually similar between grassland, cropland,
and forest (described in detail in Section 3.2.1.1), grasslands are unique in a number of ways. Grasslands are
subject to frequent vegetation fires that can influence savannah thickening1, mortality and regrowth, and root toshoot ratio. Other management activities, such as tree and brush removal, pasture improvement, tree planting(silvopastoralism), as well as overgrazing and degradation can influence biomass stocks. For woody species insavannahs (grassland with trees), the allometric relationships differ from those used in forests because of large
numbers of multi-stem trees, large number of shrubs, hollow trees, high proportion of standing dead trees, highroot-to-shoot ratios and coppicing regeneration.

3.4.1.1.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES
Equation 3.4.2 shows the summary equation for estimating changes in carbon stocks in living biomass ingrassland remaining grassland. Depending on the methodological tier being used and data availability, grassland
can be disaggregated by type, region or climate zone.
EQUATION 3.4.2
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN LIVING BIOMASSIN GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGGLB = ∑c∑i ∑m ∆CGGLB(c,i,m)Where:∆CGGLB = annual change in carbon stocks in living biomass in grassland remaining grassland summed
across all grassland types i, climate zones c, and management regimes m, tonnes C yr-1
∆CGGLB(c,i,m) = change in carbon stocks in living biomass for a specific grassland type i, climate zone c andmanagement regime m, tonnes C yr-1
1

Savannah thickening is a general term referring to an increase in the density and biomass of woody species in grassland
ecosystems over time due to changes in fire and/or grazing regimes as well as climate changes. For example, in the southcentral US woody biomass encroachment/thickening on grasslands is estimated to have increased biomass stocks by around
0.7 tonnes d.m. ha-1 yr-1 over a several year period (Pacala et. al. 2001)

3.106

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

The living biomass pool in grassland includes above- and belowground carbon stocks in woody and herbaceous(grasses and forbs) vegetation. However, carbon stocks in the aboveground herbaceous component are usuallysmall and relatively insensitive to management; thus aboveground grass biomass is only considered for
estimating non-CO2 emissions from burning. Carbon stocks in belowground biomass of grasses are larger andmore sensitive to management changes and are therefore included in estimates of carbon stock changes in living
biomass of grassland.

3.4.1.1.1.1 Choice of Method
All countries should strive for improving inventory and reporting approaches by advancing to the highest tierpossible given national circumstances. It is good practice for countries to use a Tier 2 or Tier 3 approach if
carbon emissions and removals in grassland remaining grassland is a key category and if the sub-category ofliving biomass is considered significant based on principles outlined in Chapter 5. Countries should use thedecision tree in Figure 3.1.1 to help with the choice of method.
Tier 1: In grassland where management practices are static, biomass carbon stocks will be in an approximate
steady-state (i.e. carbon accumulation through plant growth is roughly balanced by losses through decomposition
and fire). In grassland where management changes are occurring over time (e.g. through savannah thickening,tree/brush removal for grazing management, improved pasture management or other practices), the stockchanges can be significant. However, information is not available to develop broadly applicable default rates ofchange in living biomass carbon stocks in grassland for these different management regimes. Therefore, the Tier
1 assumption is no change in living biomass carbon stocks.
Tier 2: At Tier 2, carbon stock changes are estimated for above- and belowground biomass in perennial woody
vegetation and for belowground biomass of grasses, as summarised in Equation 3.4.3.
EQUATION 3.4.3
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN LIVING BIOMASSIN GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGGLB(c,i,m) = (∆Bperennial + ∆Bgrasses) ● CF
Where:∆CGGLB(c,i,m) = change in carbon stocks in living biomass for a specific grassland type i, climate zone c andmanagement regime m tonnes C yr-1
∆Bperennial = change in above- and belowground perennial woody biomass, tonnes d. m. yr-1
∆Bgrasses = change in belowground biomass of grasses, tonnes d. m. yr-1
CF = carbon fraction of dry matter (default = 0.5), tonnes C (tonnes d.m.)-1
Changes in living biomass (∆B) can be estimated in one of two ways: using annual rates of growth and loss
(Equation 3.4.4) or (b) with biomass stocks at two points in time (Equation 3.4.5).
EQUATION 3.4.4
ANNUAL CHANGE IN LIVING BIOMASS ( RATE APPROACH)∆Bi = Ai ● (G – L)
Where:∆Bi = annual change in living biomass in grassland of type i, tonnes d. m. yr-1
Ai = area of grassland of type i, ha
G = average annual biomass growth, tonnes d. m. ha-1 yr-1
L = average annual biomass loss, tonnes d. m. ha-1 yr-1
The biomass difference approach (Equation 3.4.5) can be applied where data on biomass stocks are estimated atregular time intervals through some types of national inventory system. The difference between total biomass
stocks at two points in time is calculated. This value is divided by the number of years between measurements togenerate an annual rate of change in biomass stocks.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.107

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

EQUATION 3.4.5
ANNUAL CHANGE IN LIVING BIOMASS (DIFFERENCE APPROACH)∆B = (B t2 – B t1) / (t2 – t1)
Where:∆B = annual change in living biomass, tonnes d. m. yr-1
B t2 = biomass at time t2, tonnes d. m.
B t1 = biomass at time t1, tonnes d. m.
Tier 2 methods involve country- or region-specific estimates of biomass stocks by major grassland types andmanagement activity and estimates of stock change as a function of major management activity (i.e. grazing andfire regimes, productivity management).
Either of the approaches described above can be used to estimate changes in above- and belowground biomass.
In long-established grassland, changes in biomass are likely only in response to relatively recent changes (e.g.
within the past 20 yrs) in management practices. Therefore, it is good practice to associate estimates of biomasschange with specific management conditions, categorized if possible by climate and grassland type. For
example, when using the rate approach, the area of semi-arid grassland under intensive grazing should be
multiplied by coefficients (G and L) that are specific to semi-arid intensively grazed grassland. If the difference
approach is used, then biomass stocks should be measured or estimated separately for different grassland types
under specific management regimes. A stratification of management regimes/grassland conditions could include
categories such as: native, extensively managed grassland, grassland subject to woody encroachment, moderately
and severely degrading grassland, intensively managed, improved pastures (see broadly defined management
conditions in Section 3.4.1.2. on Changes in Carbon Stocks in Soils).
While Equations 3.4.4 and 3.4.5 can be used to estimate changes in belowground biomass stocks directly,
belowground biomass stocks are often approximated using expansion factors applied to aboveground biomass
stocks. Such expansion factors are ratios of belowground to aboveground biomass, otherwise known as root toshoot ratios. The ratios may vary by grassland type, climate region, and management activity. Equation 3.4.6
demonstrates how to estimate total (above- and belowground) biomass stocks. Note that aboveground biomass(BAG) must be estimated first and then applied in Equation 3.4.6. Total biomass stock (BTotal), belowgroundbiomass stock (BBG), or aboveground biomass stock (BAG) from Equation 3.4.6 can be used in Equations 3.4.5 toestimate changes in biomass stocks over time.
EQUATION 3.4.6
TOTAL BIOMASS
BTotal = BAG + BBG
andBBG = BAG ● R
Where:
BTotal = total biomass, including above- and belowground, tonnes d. m.
BAG = aboveground biomass, tonnes d. m.
BBG = belowground biomass, tonnes d. m.
R = root-to-shoot ratio, dimensionless
Tier 3: Tier 3 involves inventory systems using statistically-based sampling of carbon stocks over time and/or
process models, stratified by climate, grassland type and management regime. For example, validated speciesspecific growth models that incorporate management effects such as grazing intensity, fire, and fertilization, withcorresponding data on management activities, could be used to estimate net changes in grassland biomass carbon
stocks over time. Models can be used together with periodic sampling-based stock estimates similar to thoseused in detailed forest inventories could be applied to estimate stock changes as in Equation 3.4.5 to make spatial
extrapolations for grassland areas

3.4.1.1.1.2 Choice of Emission/Removal Factors
Tier 1: At Tier 1, the default assumption is no change in biomass stocks. Therefore, no default
emission/removal factors are provided.

3.108

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

Tier 2: Some data are available to assist in making estimates at Tier 2. The factors needed for a Tier 2 estimate
are: biomass growth (G) and loss (L) or biomass stocks at multiple points in time (Bt, Bt-1), and expansion factors
for belowground biomass.
The rate-based approach (Equation 3.4.4) requires derivation of loss rates (i.e. L in Equation 3.4.4), for woody
biomass (e.g. losses from harvest or bush removal) and belowground biomass of herbaceous species (e.g. due topasture degradation) , and net growth rates (e.g. from savannah thickening or pasture improvements) of woody
and belowground biomass (G in Equation 3.4.4). To develop carbon growth and loss coefficients from reported
carbon stock values, estimates for at least two points in time are needed. The change in carbon stocks between
two time periods are then calculated and this amount is divided by the number of years during the time period todevelop an annual rate. Rates of change should be estimated in response to changes in specific management/land
use activities (e.g. pasture fertilization, shrub removal, savannah thickening). Results from field research should
be compared to estimates of carbon growth and losses from other sources to verify that they are withindocumented ranges. Reported carbon growth and loss rates may be modified based on additional data and expert
opinion, provided clear rationale and documentation are included in the inventory report. (Note: It is important,in deriving estimates of biomass accumulation rates, to recognize that net changes in biomass stocks will occur
primarily during the first years (e.g. 20 years) following changes in management. After which time biomass
stocks will tend towards a new steady-state level with little or no change in biomass stocks occurring unlessfurther changes in management conditions occur).
Region- or country-specific data on biomass stocks over time are needed for use in Equation 3.4.5. These can beobtained through a variety of methods, including estimating density (crown coverage) of woody vegetation fromair photos (or high resolution satellite imagery) and ground-based measurement plots. Species composition,
density and above- vs. below-ground biomass can vary widely for different grassland types and conditions andthus it may be most efficient to stratify sampling and survey activities by grassland types. General guidance on
survey and sampling techniques for biomass inventories is given in Chapter 5 (Section 5.3).
Default estimates of above-ground biomass stocks and annual above-ground productivity are provided in Table
3.4.2. These are globally-averaged valued, by major climate zones, and are not intended as a basis for Tier 2
estimates of biomass stock change but can serve as defaults for estimating non-CO2 emissions from burning (seeSection 3.4.1.3) and for a first-order comparison with country-derived biomass stock estimates.
TABLE 3.4.2
DEFAULT ESTIMATES FOR STANDING BIOMASS GRASSLAND (AS DRY MATTER)
AND ABOVEGROUND NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION, CLASSIFIED BY IPCC CLIMATE ZONESIPCC Climate zone

Peak aboveground live biomass(tonnes d.m. ha-1)

Aboveground net primary production(ANPP)(tonnes d.m. ha-1 yr-1)

AverageNo. of studies

Error1

AverageNo. of studies

Error1

2

1.7

3

+ 75%

1.8

5

+ 75%

Cold Temperate - Dry

1.7

10

+ 75%

2.2

18

+ 75%

Cold Temperate -Wet

2.4

6

+ 75%

5.6

17

+ 75%

Warm Temperate – Dry

1.6

8

+ 75%

2.4

21

+ 75%

Boreal - Dry & Wet

Warm Temperate –Wet

2.7

5

+ 75%

5.8

13

+ 75%

Tropical - Dry

2.3

3

+ 75%

3.8

13

+ 75%

Tropical - Moist & Wet

6.2

4

+ 75%

8.2

10

+ 75%

Data for standing live biomass are compiled from multi-year averages reported at grassland sites registered in the ORNL DAAC NPP
database [http://www.daac.ornl.gov/NPP/html_docs/npp_site.html]. Estimates for above-ground primary production are from: Olson, R.
J., J. M. O. Scurlock, S. D. Prince, D. L. Zheng, and K. R. Johnson (eds.). 2001. NPP Multi-Biome: NPP and Driver Data for Ecosystem
Model-Data Intercomparison. Sources available on-line at [http://www.daac.ornl.gov/NPP/html_docs/EMDI_des.html]).
1

Represents a nominal estimate of error, equivalent to two times standard deviation, as a percentage of the mean.

2

Due to limited data, dry and moist zones for the boreal temperature regime and moist and wet zones for the tropical temperature regime
were combined.

Estimating below-ground biomass can be an important component of biomass surveys of grassland but fieldmeasurements are laborious and difficult and thus expansion factors to estimate below-ground biomass fromabove-ground biomass are often used. Adaptations to fire and grazing have led to higher root-to-shoot ratios
compared to many other ecosystems; thus forest-based biomass expansion factors cannot be applied without
modification. Root-to-shoot ratios show wide ranges in values at both individual species (e.g. Anderson et al.,1972) and community scales (e.g. Jackson et al., 1996; Cairns et al., 1997). Thus it is recommended to use, as far
as possible, empirically-derived root-to-shoot ratios specific to a region or vegetation type. Table 3.4.3 provides

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.109

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

default root-to-shoot ratios for major grassland ecosystems of the world; these data can be used as defaults whencountries do not have more regionally specific information to develop country-specific ratios. Ratios forwoodland/savannah and shrublands are also included for use by countries that include these lands in thegrassland section of their inventory.
Tier 3: Tier 3 approaches, e.g. using a combination of dynamic models along with inventory measurements ofbiomass stock changes, do not employ simple stock change or emission factors per se. Estimates ofemissions/removals using model-based approaches derive from the interaction of multiple equations that
estimate the net change of biomass stocks within the models. Key criteria in selecting appropriate models arethat they are capable of representing all of the management practices that are represented in the activity data. It is
critical that the model be validated with independent observations from country or region-specific field locations
that are representatives of the variability of climate, soil and grassland management systems in the country.

Grassland

TABLE 3.4.3
DEFAULT EXPANSION FACTORS (ROOT-TO-SHOOT [R:S] RATIOS)FOR THE MAJOR SAVANNAH/RANGELAND ECOSYSTEMS OF THE WORLD

Other

Vegetation type

Approximate IPCC climate zone1

R:S
ratio

n

Error2

Steppe/tundra/prairie grassland

Boreal (Dry & Wet), Cold Temperate
Wet, Warm Temperate Wet

4.0

7+ 150%

Semi-arid grassland

Dry (Cold Temperate, Warm
Temperate and Tropical)

2.8

9

+ 95%

Sub-tropical/ tropical grassland

Tropical Moist & Wet

1.6

7

Woodland/savanna

0.5

19

Shrubland

2.8

9+ 130%+ 80%+ 144%

1

Classification of the source data was by grassland biome types and thus correspondence to the IPCC climate zones are approximations.

2

Error estimates are given as two times standard deviation, as a percentage of the mean.

3.4.1.1.1.3 Choice of Activity Data
Activity data in this section refer to estimates of land areas (Ai) of long-term grassland (i.e. not recently
converted from other land uses). In addition, countries will need to estimate area burned each year to estimate
non-CO2 emissions. Chapter 2 provides general guidance on approaches for obtaining and categorizing area bydifferent land use classes. For estimating emissions and removals from this source, countries need to obtain area
estimates for grassland, disaggregated as required to correspond to the available emission factors and otherparameters. Because Tier 1 assumes no net change in grassland biomass through growth and losses, there is noneed to develop activity data at Tier 1, except to estimate non-CO2 emissions associated with burning (Section
3.4.1.3). Guidance below is for developing activity data for Tiers 2 and 3 methods.
Annual or periodic surveys are used in conjunction with the approaches outlined in Chapter 2 to estimate theaverage annual area of land in grassland. The area estimates are further sub-divided into general climate regions
and management practices to match the G and L values. International statistics such as FAO databases, IPCC
Guidelines, and other sources can be used to estimate the area of land in grassland. Area of grassland burning
can be estimated from knowledge of the average fire frequency for different grassland types or from moreaccurate assessments, such as use of remote sensing to inventory burned areas.
To improve estimates, more detailed annual or periodic surveys are used to estimate the areas of grassland
stratified by grassland types, climatic regions and management regimes. If finer resolution country-specific data
are only partially available, countries are encouraged to extrapolate to the entire land base of grassland using
sound assumptions from best available knowledge.
Tier 3 requires high-resolution activity data disaggregated at sub-national to fine grid scales. Similar to Tier 2, landarea is classified into specific grassland types by major climate, and management categories. If possible, spatially
explicit area estimates are used to facilitate complete coverage of the grassland and ensure that areas are not overor underestimated. Furthermore, spatially explicit area estimates can be related to locally relevant carbon
accumulation and removal rates, and restocking and management impacts, improving the accuracy of estimates.

3.4.1.1.1.4 Uncertainty Assessm ent
Because Tier 1 assumes no change in grassland biomass, it is not relevant to develop uncertainty estimates forTier 1. Guidance below is for developing uncertainty estimates for Tiers 2 and 3 methods.

3.110

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

Sources of uncertainty include the degree of accuracy in land area estimates (Ai), fraction of land area burned(fburned,i), carbon increase and loss (G and L), carbon stock (B), and expansion factor (EF) terms. It is goodpractice to calculate error estimates (i.e., standard deviations, standard error, or ranges) for each of thesecountry-defined terms and to use these estimates in a basic uncertainty assessment. Default uncertainty estimatesprovided in Table 3.4.3 can be used for the biomass expansion factors.
Tier 2 approaches may also use finer resolution activity data, such as area estimates for different climatic regions
or for grassland management systems within national boundaries. The finer-resolution data will reduce
uncertainty levels when associated with carbon accumulation factors defined for those finer-scale land bases.
This information can be used with a measure of uncertainty in area estimates from Chapter 2 to assess theuncertainty in estimates of carbon emissions and removals in grassland biomass using the Tier 1 methodology
for uncertainty analysis in Chapter 5.2 (Identifying and quantifying uncertainties).

3.4.1.2

C HANGE IN CARB ON STOCKS IN SOILS

3.4.1.2.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUESThe IPCC Guidelines provide methods for estimating CO2 Emissions and Uptake by Soils from Land-Use andManagement (Section 5.3) that can be applied to all land uses, including grassland. The methodology considers
organic carbon stock changes (CO2 emissions or removals) for mineral soils, CO2 emissions from organic soils(i.e. peat or muck soils) converted to pastures and emissions of CO2 from liming of grassland soils.
For carbon stock changes in mineral soils, the IPCC Guidelines define soil carbon stocks as organic carbon
incorporated into mineral soil horizons to a depth of 30cm and do not include C in surface residue (i.e. deadorganic matter) or changes in inorganic carbon (i.e. carbonate minerals). In most grassland soils, surface residue
represents a minor stock compared with carbon within the soil.
The summary Equation 3.4.7 for estimating the change in carbon stocks in soils is shown below:
EQUATION 3.4.7
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN SOILS IN GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGGSoils = ∆CGGMineral – ∆CGGOrganic – ∆CGGLiming
Where:∆CGGSoils = annual change in carbon stocks in soils in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CGGMineral = annual change in carbon stocks in mineral soils in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CGGOrganic = annual change in carbon stocks in organic soils in grassland remaining grassland (estimatedas net annual flux), tonnes C yr-1
∆CGGLiming = annual C emissions from lime application to grassland, tonnes C yr-1
For Tier 1 and 2 methods, changes in dead organic matter and inorganic carbon stocks should be assumed to be
zero. If dead organic matter is included in a Tier 3 approach, measurements should be based on the lowest
amounts present during an annual cycle to avoid including newly senesced plant material that represents atransient organic matter pool. Selection of the most suitable tier will depend on: (i) availability and detail ofactivity data on grassland management and changes in management over time, (ii) availability of suitable
information to estimate base C stocks and stock change and emission factors, and (iii) availability of dedicatednational inventory systems designed for soils.
All countries should strive for improving inventory and reporting approaches by advancing to the highest tierpossible given national circumstances. It is good practice for countries to use a Tier 2 or Tier 3 approach if
carbon emissions and removals in grassland remaining grassland is a key category and if the sub-category of soilorganic matter is considered significant based on principles outlined in Chapter 5. Countries should use thedecision tree in Figure 3.1.1 to help with the choice of method.

3.4.1.2.1.1 Choice of Method
The method used to estimate carbon stock changes in mineral soils is different from the method used for organicsoils. It is also possible that countries will use different Tiers to prepare estimates of the separate components on

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.111

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

this subcategory, given availability of resources. Thus, mineral soils, organic soils, and emissions from liming
are discussed separately below.

Mineral Soils
For mineral soils, the estimation method is based on changes in soil C stocks over a finite period followingchanges in management that impact soil C, as shown in Equation 3.4.8. Previous soil C stocks (SOC(0-T) ) andsoil C stocks in the inventory year (SOC0) for the area of a grassland system in the inventory are estimated fromreference carbon stocks (Table 3.4.4) and stock change factors (Table 3.4.5), applied for the respective time
points. Here a grassland system refers to a specific climate, soil and management combination. Annual rates ofemissions (source) or removals (sink) are calculated as the difference in stocks (over time) divided by theinventory time period. The default time period is 20 years.
EQUATION 3.4.8
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN MINERAL SOILS FOR A SINGLE GRASSLAND SYSTEM∆CGGMineral = [(SOC0 – SOC(0 –T)) ● A ] / T
SOC = SOCREF ● FLU ● FMG ● FI
Where:∆CGGMineral = annual change in carbon stocks in mineral soils, tonnes C yr-1
SOC0 = soil organic carbon stock in the inventory year, tonnes C ha-1
SOC(0-T) = soil organic carbon stock T years prior to the inventory, tonnes C ha-1
T = inventory time period, yr (default is 20 yr)
A = land area of each parcel, ha
SOCREF = the reference carbon stock, tonnes C ha-1; see Table 3.4.4
FLU = stock change factor for land use or land-use change type, dimensionless; see Table 3.4.5
FMG = stock change factor for management regime, dimensionless; see Table 3.4.5
FI = stock change factor for input of organic matter, dimensionless; see Table 3.4.5
The types of land use and management factors supplied are broadly defined and include: 1) a land use factor (FLU)
that reflects C stock levels relative to native ecosystems, 2) a management factor (FMG) that represents broad
categories of improved and degraded grassland and 3) an input factor (FI) representing different levels of C
inputs to soil, which is implemented for improved grassland only. If the area was in other land use (e.g. forest
land, cropland) at the beginning of the inventory period, then guidance provided under Section 3.4.2, Land
Converted to Grassland, should be followed.
The calculation steps for determining SOC0 and SOC(0-T) and net soil C stock change per ha of land area are as
follows:
Step 1: Select the reference carbon stock value (SOCREF), based on climate and soil type, for each area ofgrassland being inventoried.
Step 2: Select the management condition of the grassland (FMG) present at beginning of the inventory period(e.g. 20 years ago) and the C input level (FI). These factors, multiplied by the reference soil C stock,
provide the estimate of ‘initial’ soil C stock (SOC(0-T)) for the inventory period. Note for Grassland
Remaining Grassland the land use factor (FLU) always equals 1.
Step 3: Calculate SOC0 by repeating step 2 using the same reference carbon stock (SOCREF) and FLU=1, but withmanagement and input factors that represent conditions in (current) inventory year.
Step 4: Calculate the average annual change in soil C stock for the area over the inventory period (∆CGGMineral)

3.112

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

Example: For an Ultisol soil in a tropical moist climate, SOCRef (0-30 cm) is 47 tonnes C ha-1.
Under management resulting in an unimproved, moderately overgrazed pasture, the soil carbon
stock at the beginning of the inventory period (default is 20 yr previous) is (SOCRef ● FLU ● FMG ●FI) = 47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.97 ● 1 = 45.6 tonnes C ha-1. Improved pasture with fertiliser
addition (FMG = 1.17) is the management condition in the (current) inventory year, yielding a soil
carbon stock estimate of 47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 1.17 ● 1 = 55 tonnes C ha-1. Thus the averageannual change in soil C stock for the area over the inventory period is calculated as (55 tonnes C
ha-1 – 45.6 tonnes C ha-1) / 20 yrs = 0.47 tonnes C ha-1 yr-1.
Tier 1: For Tier 1, default reference carbon stocks and stock change factors are used (as shown in Equation 3.4.8)
for major grassland systems in a country, stratified by the default climate and soil types (Equation 3.4.9). For theaggregate area of grassland remaining grassland, stock changes can be calculated either by tracking managementchanges and calculating stock changes on individual parcels of land (Equation 3.4.9A) or by calculating aggregate
soil carbon stocks at the start and end of the inventory period from more general data on the area distribution ofgrassland systems (Equation 3.4.9B). Aggregate results will be the same with either approach, the main difference
being that attribution of the effects of specific changes in management requires activity data that tracks
management changes on specific areas of land. Default values for this calculation are described in Section
3.4.1.2.1.2.
EQUATION 3.4.9
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN MINERAL SOILSIN TOTAL GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGGMineral = ∑c∑s∑i [(SOC0 – SOC(0 –T)) ● A ] c,s,i / T(A)∆CGGMineral = ∑ c ∑ s ∑ i (SOC0 ● A) c,s,i – ∑ c ∑ s ∑ i (SOC(0 –T) ● A) c,s,i / T(B)

Where:∆CGGMineral = annual change in carbon stocks in mineral soils, tonnes C yr-1
SOC0 = soil organic carbon stock in the inventory year, tonnes C ha-1
SOC(0 – T) = soil organic carbon stock T years prior to the inventory, tonnes C ha-1
T = inventory time period, yr (default is 20 yr)
A = land area of each parcel, hac represents the climate zones, s the soil types, and i the set of major grassland types that are present in acountry.
Example: The following example shows calculations for aggregate areas of grassland soil carbon
stock change using Equation 3.4.9B. In a tropical moist climate on Ultisol soils, there are 1Mha ofpermanent grassland. The native reference carbon stock (SOCRef) for the climate/soil type is 47
tonnes C ha-1. At the beginning of the inventory calculation period (i.e. 20 yrs earlier) the
distribution of grassland systems was 500,000 ha of unmanaged native grassland, 400,000 ha ofunimproved, moderately degraded grazing land and 100,000 ha of heavily degraded grassland.
Thus initial soil carbon stocks for the area were: 500,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 1 ● 1) +400,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.97 ● 1) + 100,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.7 ● 1) =45.026 million tonnes C. In the (current) inventory year, there are: 300,000 ha of unmanaged
native grassland, 300,000 ha of unimproved, moderately degraded grazing land, 200,000 ha ofheavily degraded grassland, 100,000 ha of improved pasture receiving fertiliser, and 100,000 ha ofhighly improved pasture receiving fertiliser together with irrigation. Thus total soil carbon stocks
in the inventory year are: 300,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 1 ● 1) + 300,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C
ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.97 ● 1) + 200,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.7 ● 1) + 100,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C
ha-1 ● 1 ● 1.17 ● 1) + 100,000 ha ● (47 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 1.17 ● 1.11) = 45.960 million tonnes C.
The average annual stock change over the period for the entire area is: (45.960 – 45.026) million
tonnes C/20 yr = 0.934 million tonnes/20 yr = 46,695 tonnes per year soil C stock increase.
Tier 2: For Tier 2, the same basic equations as in Tier 1 are used but country-specific values for reference
carbon stocks and/or stock change factors are used. In addition, Tier 2 approaches will likely involve a moredetailed stratification of management systems if sufficient data are available.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.113

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

Tier 3: Tier 3 approaches, using a combination of dynamic models along with detailed soil C emission/stockchange inventory measurements, will likely not employ simple stock change or emission factors per se.
Estimates of emissions using model-based approaches derive from the interaction of multiple equations that
estimate the net change of soil C stocks within the models. A variety of models designed to simulate soil carbon
dynamics exist (for example, see reviews by McGill et al., 1996; Smith et al., 1997).
Key criteria in selecting an appropriate model are that the model is capable of representing all of the
management practices that are represented and that model inputs (i.e. driving variables) are compatible with theavailability of country-wide input data. It is critical that the model be validated with independent observations
from country or region-specific field locations that are representatives of the variability of climate, soil andmanagement systems in the country. Examples of appropriate validation data sets include long-term grassland
experiments (e.g. Conant et al., 2001) or long-term measurements of ecosystem carbon flux for grassland
systems, using techniques such as eddy covariance (Baldocchi et al., 2001). Ideally, an inventory system ofpermanent, statistically representative grassland plots, that include major climatic regions, soil types, andmanagement systems and system changes, would be established where repeated measures of soil carbon stocks
could be made over time. Recommended re-sampling frequencies in most cases should not be less than 3 to 5
years (IPCC, 2000b). Where possible, measurements of soil carbon stocks should be made on an equivalent mass
basis (e.g. Ellert et al., 2001). Procedures should be implemented to minimize the influence of spatial variability
with repeated sampling over time (e.g. Conant and Paustian, 2002a). Such inventory measurements could be
integrated with a process model-based methodology.
Organic Soils
The methodology for estimating carbon stock change in organic soils used for managed grassland is to assign anannual loss rate of C due to the drainage and other management perturbations in adapting these soils to managed
grassland 2. Drainage and pasture management practices stimulate the oxidation of organic matter previously
built up under a largely anoxic environment (although emission rates are lower than under annual cropland use
where repeated tillage further stimulates decomposition). The area of grassland organic soils under each climate
type is multiplied by the emission factor to derive an estimate of annual C emissions, as shown in Equation
3.4.10 below:
EQUATION 3.4.10
CO2 EMISSIONS FROM CULTIVATED ORGANIC SOILS IN GRASSLAND REMAINING GRASSLAND∆CGGOrganic= ∑c (A ● EF) c
Where:∆CGGOrganic= CO2 emissions from cultivated organic soils in grassland remaining grassland, tonnes C yr-1
A = land area of organic soils in climate type c, ha
EF = emission factor for climate type c (see Table 3.4.6), tonnes C ha-1 yr-1
Tier 1: For Tier 1, default emission factors (Table 3.4.6) are used along with area estimates for organic soils
under grassland management within each climate region present in the country (Equation 3.4.10). Area estimates
can be developed using the guidance in Chapter 2.
Tier 2: The Tier 2 approach uses Equation 3.4.10 where emission factors are estimated from country-specificdata, stratified by climate region, as described in Section 3.4.1.2.1.2. Area estimates should be developed
following the guidance Chapter 2.
Tier 3: Tier 3 approaches for organic soils will include more detailed systems integrating dynamic models andmeasurement networks as described above for mineral soils.

Lim ing
The IPCC Guidelines include application of carbonate containing lime (e.g. calcic limestone (CaCO3) or
dolomite CaMg(CO3)2) to soils as a source of CO2 emissions. In humid regions, intensively managed pastures
may be periodically limed to reduce soil acidity. A simplified explanation of the process is that when carbonate
lime is dissolved in soil, the base cations (Ca++, Mg++) exchange with hydrogen ions (H+) on soil colloids(thereby reducing soil acidity) and the bicarbonate formed (2HCO3) can react further to evolve CO2 and water

2

Natural, ‘wetland’ grasslands that may be used for seasonal grazing but have not been artificially drained should not be
included in this category.

3.114

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland(H2O). Although the liming effect generally has a duration of a few years (after which lime is again added),depending on climate, soil and management practices, the IPCC Guidelines account for emission as CO2 of all
the added carbonate carbon in the year of application. Thus the basic methodology is simply the amount of lime
applied times an emission factor that varies slightly depending on the composition of the material added.
EQUATION 3.4.11
ANNUAL CARBON EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURAL LIME APPLICATION∆CGGLiming = MLimestone ● EFLimestone + MDolomite ● EFDolomite
Where:∆CGGLiming = annual C emissions from agricultural lime application, tonnes C yr-1
M = annual amount of calcic limestone (CaCO3) or dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2), tonnes yr-1
EF = emission factor, tonnes C (tonne limestone or dolomite)-1 (These are equivalent to carbonate carbon
contents of the materials (12% for CaCO3, 13% for CaMg(CO3)2 ))Tier 1: For Tier 1, the total amount of carbonate containing lime applied annually to grassland soil and an
overall emission factor of 0.12 can be used to estimate CO2 emissions, without differentiating between variable
compositions of lime material. Note that while carbonate limes are the dominant liming material used, oxides
and hydroxides of lime, which do not contain inorganic carbon, are used to a limited extent for agriculturalliming and should not be included here (CO2 is produced in their manufacture but not following soil application).
Tier 2: A Tier 2 approach could entail differentiation of different forms of lime and specific emission factors if
data are available, since different carbonate liming materials (limestone as well as other sources such as marl andshell deposits) can vary somewhat in their carbon content and overall purity.
Tier 3: A Tier 3 approach could entail a more detailed accounting of emissions stemming from lime
applications than is assumed under Tiers 1 and 2. Depending on climate and soil conditions, biocarbonate
derived from lime application may not all be released as CO2 in the soil or from drainage water – some can beleached and precipitated deeper in the soil profile or be transported to deep groundwater, lakes and oceans andsequestered. If sufficient data and understanding of inorganic carbon transformation for specific climate-soil
conditions are available, specific emission factors could be derived. However, such an analysis would likely
necessitate including carbon fluxes associated with primary and secondary carbonate minerals in soil and their
response to grassland management practices.

3.4.1.2.1.2 Choice of Emission/Removal Factors
Mineral soils
When using either the Tier 1 or Tier 2 method, the following emission/removal factors are needed for mineralsoils: reference carbon stock (SOCREF); stock change factor for land-use change (FLU); stock change factor for
management regime (FMG); and factor for input of organic matter (FI).
Reference carbon stocks (SOCREF)
Soils under native vegetation that have not been subject to significant land use and management impacts are used
as a baseline or reference to which management-induced changes in soil carbon can be related.
Tier 1: Under Tier 1, it is good practice to use the default reference carbon stocks (SOCREF) provided in Table
3.4.4. These are updated from those provided in the IPCC Guidelines with the following improvements: i)estimates are statistically-derived from recent compilations of soil profiles under native vegetation, ii) ‘Spodic’soils (defined as boreal and temperate zone podzols in WRB classification, Spodosols in USDA classification)
are included as a separate category, iii) soils within the boreal climate region have been included.
Tier 2: For Tier 2, reference soil C stocks can be determined from measurements of soils, for example, as part of acountry’s soil survey and mapping activities. Advantages include more representative values for an individual
country and the ability to better estimate probability distribution functions that can be used in a formal uncertainty
analysis. Accepted standards for sampling and analysis of soil organic carbon and bulk density should be used.
Stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI)
Tier 1: Under Tier 1, it is good practice to use default stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI) provided in Table
3.4.5.
These are updated from the IPCC Guidelines, based on statistical analysis of published research. Wheresufficient data exists, separate values were computed for temperate and tropical grassland. All grasslands

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.115

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance(excluding those on organic soils) are assigned a base or (land use) factor of 1. Four categories of grassland
management condition are defined (unimproved/non-degraded, moderately degraded, severely degraded andimproved – see definitions in Table 3.4.5). Improved grasslands are defined as sustainably (non-degraded)managed grassland that receive at least one type of external input (e.g. improved species, fertilization, or
irrigation) to increase productivity. For improved grasslands there are two levels for the input factor value,‘nominal’ (which denotes the base case (FI=1) where there is no additional management improvement, beyond
that required for classification as improved grassland) and ‘high’, in which at least one addition improvement has
been implemented (e.g. fertilization plus irrigation), representing highly intensive grassland management. Values
for the moderately degraded grassland category were based on studies reporting conditions or treatments
representative of overgrazing and/or degradation. However, in many cases, particularly in the tropics, pasturedegradation is associated with a loss of more palatable grass species and replacement by ‘weedy’ species (often
woody plants). Although this constitutes degradation from the standpoint of use for grazing, negative impacts on
soil C may be less severe (as indicated by the small reduction in FLU for moderately degraded grassland, relative
to the native condition). In the IPCC Guidelines there was only one category specified for degraded grasslandwith a much lower value for FMG (0.7), implying severe degradation and high soil C loss. There are insufficientstudies in the literature to re-estimate a factor value for this condition and thus the previous value has beenretained to represent this severely degraded condition.
Tier 2: For Tier 2 applications, stock change factor values can be estimated from long-term experiments orother field measurements (e.g., field chronosequences) for a particular country or region. Advantages include
more accurate and representative values for the country of interest and the ability to estimate probability
distribution functions for factor values that can be used in a scientific uncertainty analysis. There are few
replicated long-term experiments investigating the impacts of grassland management on soil C stocks, and thus
uncertainties of emission factors for grassland management are greater than those for permanent cropland. Many
studies evaluate stock differences in paired plots and it is important that the plots being compared have similar
land use/management histories prior to implementation of experimental management treatments. If sufficientsequestration rate and land management data are available, factor values may be calculated for specific grassland
management practices (e.g., fertilisation, sowing improved grass and legume species, grazing management, etc.).
Information compiled from published studies and other sources should include C stock (i.e., mass per unit area toa specified depth) or all information needed to calculate SOC stocks, i.e., percent organic matter together withbulk density. If the percent organic matter and not the percent organic carbon are reported, a conversion factor of
0.58 for the carbon content of soil organic matter can be used. Other information that must be included in theanalysis is the soil type (e.g., WRB or USDA Soil Taxonomy Reference), depth of measurement, and time frame
over which the management difference has been expressed. Stock change factors should encompass sufficientdepth to include the full influence of management changes on soil C stocks and correcting for possible changes
in bulk density (Ellert et al., 2001). It is good practice to include a minimum depth of at least 30 cm (i.e., thedepth used for Tier 1 calculations); stock changes over deeper depths may be desirable if a sufficient number ofstudies are available and if statistically significant differences in stocks due to land management aredemonstrated at those depths.

Organic soils
When estimating emissions from organic soils that have been modified through artificial drainage and otherpractices for use as managed grassland, an emission factor (EF) is required for different climatic regimes.
Tier 1: For Tier 1, default emission factors, unchanged from the IPCC Guidelines, are provided in Table 3.4.6.
Natural, ‘wetland’ grasslands that may be used for seasonal grazing but have not been artificially drained are
excluded.
Tier 2: For Tier 2, there are limited literature data on emissions from organic soils used for managed grassland;
published studies usually make estimates based on subsidence, with a limited number of direct measurements of
CO2 fluxes from grassland organic soils (Ogle et al., 2003). Processes that contribute to subsidence include
erosion, compaction, burning, and decomposition, only the latter of which should be included in the emission
factor estimate. If using subsidence data, appropriate regional conversion factors to determine the proportion ofsubsidence attributable to oxidation should be used, based on studies measuring both subsidence and CO2 flux.
In the absence of such information, a default factor of 0.5 for oxidation-to-subsidence, on a gram-per-gram
equivalent basis, is recommended based on reviews by Armentano and Menges (1986). If available, direct
measurements of carbon fluxes are recommended as providing the best means of estimating emission rates fromorganic soils.

3.116

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

TABLE 3.4.4
DEFAULT REFERENCE (UNDER NATIVE VEGETATION) SOIL ORGANIC C STOCKS (SOCREF)(TONNES C PER HA FOR 0-30 CM DEPTH)
RegionHAC soils1

LAC soils2

Sandy soils3

Spodic soils4

Volcanic soils5

Wetlandsoils6

Boreal

68

NA

10#

117

20#

146

Cold temperate, dry

50

33

34

NA

20#

Cold temperate, moist

95

85

71

115

130

Warm temperate, dry
Warm temperate,
moist
Tropical, dry

38

24

19

NA

70#

88

63

34

NA

80

38

35

31

NA

50#

Tropical, moist

65

47

39

NA

70#

NA

#

Tropical, wet

44

60

66

130

87

88

86

Note: Data are derived from soil databases described by Jobbagy and Jackson (2000) and Bernoux et al. (2002). Mean stocks are shown.
A default error estimate of 95% (expressed as 2X standard deviations as percent of the mean) are assumed for soil-climate types. NA
denotes ‘not applicable’ because these soils do not normally occur in some climate zones.
# indicates where no data were available and default values from IPCC Guidelines were retained.
1

Soils with high activity clay (HAC) minerals are lightly to moderately weathered soils, which are dominated by 2:1 silicate clay
minerals (in the World Reference Base for Soil Resources (WRB) classification these include Leptosols, Vertisols, Kastanozems,
Chernozems, Phaeozems, Luvisols, Alisols, Albeluvisols, Solonetz, Calcisols, Gypsisols, Umbrisols, Cambisols, Regosols; in USDA
classification includes Mollisols, Vertisols, high-base status Alfisols, Aridisols, Inceptisols).

2

Soils with low activity clay (LAC) minerals are highly weathered soils, dominated by 1:1 clay minerals and amorphous iron andaluminium oxides (in WRB classification includes Acrisols, Lixisols, Nitisols, Ferralsols, Durisols; in USDA classification includes
Ultisols, Oxisols, acidic Alfisols).

3

Includes all soils (regardless of taxonomic classification) having > 70% sand and < 8% clay, based on standard textural analyses (inWRB classification includes Arenosols,; in USDA classification includes Psamments).

4

Soils exhibiting strong podzolization (in WRB classification includes Podzols; in USDA classification Spodosols)

5

Soils derived from volcanic ash with allophanic mineralogy (in WRB classification Andosols; in USDA classification Andisols)

6

Soils with restricted drainage leading to periodic flooding and anaerobic conditions (in WRB classification Gleysols; in USDA
classification Aquic suborders).

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.117

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

TABLE 3.4.5
RELATIVE STOCK CHANGE FACTORS FOR GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT[SEE SECTION 3.4.7 FOR METHODS USED TO ESTIMATE THE STOCK CHANGE FACTORS]
FactorLevel

Climateregime

IPCC
Guidelines
default

GPG
reviseddefault

Error 1,2

Land use
(FLU)

All

All

1.0

1.0

NA

Management(FMG)

Nominally
managed (non All–degraded)

1.0

1.0

NA

Management(FMG)

Moderately
degradedgrassland

Temperate/Boreal

NA

0.95

+ 12%

Tropical

NA

0.97

+ 10%

Management(FMG)

Severelydegraded

All

0.7

0.7

+ 50%

Temperate/Boreal

1.1

1.14

+ 10%

Tropical

1.1

1.17

+ 10%

All

NA

1.0

NA

Temperate/Boreal

NA

1.11

+ 8%

Tropical

NA

1.11

+ 8%

Management(FMG)

Improved
grassland

Input (applied
only to improved
grassland) (FI )NominalInput (applied
only to improved
grassland) (FI )High

Definition
All permanent grassland is assigned aland use factor of 1.
Represents, non-degraded andsustainably managed grassland, but
without significant management
improvements.
Represents overgrazed or moderately
degraded grassland, with somewhat
reduced productivity (relative to thenative or nominally managed grassland)
and receiving no management inputs.
Implies major long-term loss of
productivity and vegetation cover, due
to severe mechanical damage to thevegetation and/or severe soil erosion.
Represents grassland which issustainably managed with moderategrazing pressure and that receive atleast one improvement (e.g.
fertilization, species improvement,
irrigation).
Applies to improved grassland where
no additional management inputs havebeen used.
Applies to improved grassland where
one or more additional management
inputs/improvements have been used(beyond that required to be classified as
improved grassland).

1+ two standard deviations, expressed as a percent of the mean; where sufficient studies were not available for a statistical analysis adefault, based on expert judgement, of + 50% is used. NA denotes ‘Not Applicable’, for factor values that constitute reference values orwhere factor values were not previously estimated for the IPCC Guidelines.

2

This error range does not include potential systematic error due to small sample sizes that may not be representative of the true impact
for all regions of the world.

TABLE 3.4.6
ANNUAL EMISSION FACTORS (EF) FOR MANAGED GRASSLAND ORGANIC SOILS
Error #

Cold Temperate

IPCC Guidelines default(tonnes C ha-1 yr-1)
0.25

Warm Temperate

2.5

+ 90%

Tropical/sub-tropical

5.0

+ 90%

Climatic temperature regime

#

+ 90%

Represents a nominal estimate of error, equivalent to two times standard deviation, as a percentage of the mean

Lim ing
See discussion under Section 3.4.1.2.1.1.

3.4.1.2.1.3 Choice of Activity Data
Mineral Soils
The area of grassland under different management practices (A) is required for estimating mineral soil
emissions/removals.

3.118

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

For existing grassland, activity data should record changes or trends in management practices or utilization of thegrassland that affect soil carbon storage by impacting production. Two main types of activity data exist: (i)aggregate statistics compiled at a national level or for administrative areas within countries (e.g., provinces,counties, districts), or (ii) point-based land use and management inventories making up a statistically-based
sample of a country’s land area. The use of both sorts of activity data is described in Chapter 2, and the use of
the methods set out there with the three tiers described here will depend on the spatial and temporal resolution
required. For Tier 1 and Tier 2 inventories, activity data need to be stratified by major climatic differences andsoil types, since reference soil C stocks vary significantly according to these factors. For application of dynamic
models and/or a direct measurement-based inventory in Tier 3, similar or more detailed knowledge of the
combinations of climate, soil, topographic and management data are needed, but the exact requirements will bein part dependent on the model used.
Globally available land use statistics such as FAO’s databases (http://www.fao.org/waicent/portal/glossary_en.asp)
provide annual compilations of total land area by major land use types, without any additional details forgrassland management, climate, or soil. Thus FAO or similar country-total data would require additional incountry information to stratify areas by management, climate, and soil types. If such information has not alreadybeen compiled, an initial approach would be to overlay available land cover/land use maps (of national origin orfrom global datasets such as IGBP_DIS) with soil maps of national origin or global sources such as the FAO
Soils Map of the World. Where possible land areas associated with a characteristic grassland management
should be delineated and associated with the appropriate general (i.e., degraded, native, or improved) or specific(e.g., fertilization or grazing intensity) management factor values. Soil degradation maps may be a useful sourceof information for stratifying grassland according to management (e.g. Conant and Paustian, 2002b).
National land use and resource inventories, comprised of a collection of permanent sample points where data iscollected at regular intervals, have some advantages over aggregate pastoral and land use statistics. Inventory
points can more readily be associated with a particular grassland management system and the soil typeassociated with the particular location can be determined by sampling or by referencing the location to a suitablesoil map. Inventory points selected based on an appropriate statistical design also enable estimates of thevariability associated with activity data, which can be used as part of a formal uncertainty analysis. The
principles of sampling are described in Chapter 2 and an example of a point-based resource inventory is the
National Resource Inventory in the U.S. (Nusser and Goebel, 1997).

Organic Soils
The area of cultivated organic soils by climate regime (A) is required to estimate organic soil emissions. Similar
databases and approaches as those outlined above can be used for deriving area estimates. An overlay of soils
maps showing the spatial distribution of histosols (i.e. organic soils) with land cover maps showing grasslandarea can provide initial information on areas with organic soils under grassland. Country-specific data on
drainage projects combined with soil maps and surveys can be used to get a more refined estimate of relevant
areas of managed grassland on organic soils.

3.4.1.2.1.4 Uncertai nty Assessment
An assessment of uncertainty requires that uncertainty in per area emission/removal rates as well as uncertainty
in the activity data (i.e. the land areas involved in land-use and management changes), and their interaction be
estimated.
Where available, estimates of the standard deviation (and sample size) for the revised global default values
developed in this report are provided in the tables; these can be used with the appropriate estimates of variability
in activity data to estimate uncertainty, using the guidance provided in Chapter 5 of this report. Inventory
agencies should be aware that simple global defaults have a relatively high level of uncertainty associated withthem when applied to specific countries. In addition, because the field studies available to derive the global
defaults are not evenly distributed across climate regions, soil types and management systems, some areas –particularly in tropical regions – are underrepresented. For the Tier 2 methods, probability density functions (i.e.
providing mean and variance estimates) can be derived for stock change factors, organic soil emission factors
and reference C stocks as part of the process of deriving region- or country-specific data. Uncertainty in soil
emission and removal rates can be reduced by field studies of management influences on soil C stocks for major
grassland types and management regimes. Where chronosequence data are used, uncertainty in the carbon stockchanges estimates can be relatively high and thus it is desirable to use the mean of several ‘replicate’ studies toderive more representative values.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.119

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

3.4.1.3

N ON -CO 2 GREENH OUSE GAS EMISSIO NS

Coverage of Non-CO 2 gases in IPCC Guidelines
The IPCC Guidelines and GPG2000 (Chapter 4, Agriculture) already address the following emissions:•

N2O emissions from application of mineral and organic fertilisers, organic residues and biological nitrogen
fixation in managed grassland;•

N2O, NOx, CH4 and CO emissions from grassland (savanna) burning in the tropics; and•CH4 emissions from grazing livestock.

It is good practice to follow the existing IPCC Guidelines (Chapter 4, Agriculture) and GPG2000 to estimate
and report these fluxes in the Agriculture section.
Additional sources of emissions and removals, not included in IPCC Guidelines (Chapter 4, Agriculture) andGPG2000, include N2O emissions from organic nitrogen mineralization in drained, organic grassland soils3,
changes reduced uptake of CH4 in managed grassland soils and emissions from burning in temperate grassland.
Insufficient data on N2O emissions from enhanced mineralization of organic nitrogen on organic grassland soils
and management-induced reductions in CH4 sinks in grassland soils preclude recommending specificmethodologies at this time. In most circumstances they are likely to represent minor fluxes and as more researchis done and additional information becomes available, a fuller consideration of these sources may be possible.
For grassland burning occurring in grassland outside the tropics (and hence not included in IPCC Guidelines(Chapter 4, Agriculture) and GPG2000), methods to estimate N2O, NOx, CH4 and CO released from grassland
burning are described in Section 3.2.1.4. Default estimates for standing biomass, used to estimate the quantity offuel consumed, can be obtained from Table 3.4.2. Note that the amount of biomass that can serve as fuel canvary considerably according to the time of year and grazing regime and thus country-specific biomass estimatesthat correspond to when and where grassland burning occurs are recommended.

3.4.2

Land Converted to Grassland

The carbon implications of the conversion from other land uses (mostly forest land, cropland, and to lesser
degree wetlands and seldom settlements) to grassland is less clearcut than the case of conversion to cropland.
Literature on the main conversion type (from forest land to grassland in the tropics) provides evidence for net
gains as well as net losses in soil carbon, and the effect of management on the soil carbon changes of grassland
after conversion is critical (see for example Veldkamp, 2001). Conversion of land from other uses and fromnatural states to grassland can result in net emissions (or net uptake) of CO2 from both, biomass and soil.
Emissions from biomass are addressed in Section 3.4.2.1 and those from soil in Section 3.4.2.2. The calculationof carbon stock changes in biomass as a result of land use conversions to grassland is found in the IPCC
Guidelines in Section 5.2.3. (Forest and Grassland Conversion).
Methods described in this section are designed to account for changes in biomass and soils stocks associatedwith the land use conversion and the establishment of new grassland. Subsequent stock changes should be
estimated under Grassland Remaining Grassland.
The summary equation for carbon stock changes in Lands Converted to Grassland is shown below in Equation
3.4.12. Two sub-categories are estimated for the category of Lands Converted to Grasslands: living biomass andsoil organic matter. Table 3.4.7 summarises the tiers for each of the carbon subcategories.
EQUATION 3.4.12
TOTAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN LAND CONVERTED TO GRASSLAND∆CLG = ∆CLGLB + ∆CLGSoils
Where:∆CLG = total change in carbon stocks in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CLGLB = change in carbon stocks in living biomass in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1

3

Emissions from fertilization and manuring on these grasslands are included in IPCC Guidelines (Chapter 4, Agriculture)
and GPG2000.

3.120

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland∆CLGSoils = change in carbon stocks in soils in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1

3.4.2.1

C HANGE IN CARB ON STOCKS IN BIO MASS

3.4.2.1.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUESThis section provides good practice guidance for calculating CO2 emissions and removals in biomass due to theconversion of land from natural conditions and other uses to grassland, including deforestation and conversion ofcropland to pasture and grazing lands. The carbon emissions and removals in biomass in land use conversion to
grassland result from the removal of existing and replacement with different vegetation. This process may resultin increases or decreases in carbon stocks in biomass depending on the type of land use conversion. This isdifferent from the concepts underlying carbon stock changes in biomass of grassland remaining grassland wherechanges are tied to management practices.
Generically, the methods to quantify emissions and removals of carbon due to conversion of other land uses tograssland require estimates of the carbon stocks prior to and following conversion (depending on whether
previous land use was forest land, cropland, wetlands) and the estimates of the areas of land converted during theperiod over which conversion has an effect. As a result of conversion to grassland, it is assumed that thedominant vegetation is removed entirely, after which some type of grass is planted or otherwise established (e.g.
in establishment of pasture). Alternatively, grassland can result from the abandonment of the preceding land use
e.g. cropland, and the area is taken over by grassland. Vegetation that replaces that which was cleared during
conversion should be accounted for using this methodology in conjunction with the methods in Section 3.4.1.

3.4.2.1.1.1 Choice of Method
Tier 1: The Tier 1 method follows the approach in IPCC Guidelines Section 5.2.3. Forest and Grassland
Conversion where the amount of carbon removed is estimated by multiplying the area converted annually by thedifference between average carbon stocks in biomass prior to and following conversion, accounting for carbon inbiomass that replaces cleared vegetation. It is good practice to account completely for all land conversions tograssland. Thus, this section elaborates on the method such that it includes each initial land use, including but notlimited to forests. All countries should strive for improving inventory and reporting approaches by advancing to
the highest tier possible given national circumstances. It is good practice for countries to use a Tier 2 or Tier 3
approach if carbon emissions and removals in land converted to grassland is a key category and if the subcategory of living biomass is considered significant based on principles outlined in Chapter 5. Countries should
use the decision tree in Figure 3.1.2 to help with the choice of method.
Equation 3.4.13 summarises the major elements of a first order approximation of carbon stock changes from land
use conversion to grassland. Average carbon stock change on a per area basis is estimated for each type of
conversion. The average carbon stock change is equal to the carbon stock change due to the removal of biomass
from the initial land use (i.e., carbon in biomass immediately after conversion minus the carbon in biomass prior
to conversion), plus carbon stocks from biomass growth following conversion. As stated in the IPCC Guidelines,
it is necessary to account for any vegetation that replaces the vegetation that was cleared during land use
conversion. The IPCC Guidelines combine carbon in biomass after conversion and carbon in biomass that grows
on the land following conversion into a single term. In this method, they are separated into two terms, CAfter andCGrowth to increase transparency. At Tier 1, carbon stocks in biomass immediately after conversion (CAfter) are
assumed to be zero, i.e., the land is cleared of all vegetation before grass or woody vegetation is seeded, planted
or naturally regenerated. Average carbon stock change per area for a given land use conversion is multiplied by
the estimated area of lands undergoing such a conversion in a given year. In subsequent years, carbon stockchanges in living biomass of grassland, resulting from management changes, are counted following themethodology in Section 3.4.1.1 (Change in Biomass in: Grassland Remaining Grassland).

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.121

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

TABLE 3.4.7
TIER DESCRIPTIONS FOR SUBCATEGORIES UNDER LAND CONVERTED TO GRASSLAND
Tier
Subcategories

Tier 1

Tier 2Tier 3

Living biomass

Use default coefficients toestimate carbon stock change
in biomass resulting from land
use conversions and for carbon
in biomass that replaces
cleared vegetation.

Use at least some country-specific carbon
stock parameters to estimate carbon stockchanges from land use conversion to
grassland. Apportion carbon from biomass
removal to burning, decay, and othernationally important conversion processes.
Estimate non-CO2 trace gas emissions fromthe portion of biomass burned both on-siteand off-site. Use area estimates that are
disaggregated to nationally relevant climate
zones and other boundaries to match
country-specific carbon stock parameters.

Use country-specificapproach at finespatial scale (e.g.,modeling,
measurement).

Carbon stocks
in soil

For changes in soil carbon
from mineral soils use default
coefficients. The areas must be
stratified by climate and soil
type. For changes in soil
carbon from organic soils use
default coefficients and stratify
the areas by climatic region.
For emissions from liming, use
default emission factors.

For both mineral and organic soils use somecombination of default and/or countryspecific coefficients and area estimates ofincreasingly finer spatial resolution. For
emissions from liming, use emission factors
differentiated by forms of lime.

Use country-specificapproach at finespatial scale (e.g.,modeling,
measurement).

The basic steps in estimating carbon stock changes in biomass from land conversion to grassland are as follows:1.

Estimate the average area of land undergoing a transition from non-grassland to grassland during a year
(Aconversion), separately for each initial land use (i.e., forest land, cropland, etc.) and final grassland type.

2.

For each type of land use transition to grassland, use Equation 3.4.13 to estimate the resulting change incarbon stocks. Default data in Section 3.4.2.1.1.2 for CAfter, CBefore, and CGrowth can be used to estimate thetotal stock change on a per area basis for each type of land use transition. The estimate for stock change on a
per area basis can then be multiplied by the appropriate area estimates from step 1.

3.

Estimate the total carbon stock change from all land use conversions to grassland by summing the individual
estimates for each transition.

The default assumption for Tier 1 is that all carbon in biomass is lost to the atmosphere through decay processes
either on- or off-site. As such, Tier 1 calculations do not differentiate immediate emissions from burning andother conversion activities.
EQUATION 3.4.13
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN LIVING BIOMASS IN LAND CONVERTED TO GRASSLAND∆CLGLB = AConversion ● (LConversion + ∆CGrowth)
LConversion = CAfter – CBefore
Where:∆CLGLB = annual change in carbon stocks in living biomass in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1
AConversion = annual area of land converted to grassland from some initial use, ha yr-1
LConversion = carbon stock change per area for that type of conversion when land is converted to grassland,
tonnes C ha-1
∆CGrowth = carbon stocks from one year of growth of grassland vegetation after conversion, tonnes C ha-1
CAfter= carbon stocks in biomass immediately after conversion to grassland, tonnes C ha-1
CBefore= carbon stocks in biomass immediately before conversion to grassland, tonnes C ha-1

3.122

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

Biomass stocks in newly established grassland tend to level out within a few years following conversion (e.g. 1-2
years for above-ground herbaceous biomass, 3-5 years for below-ground biomass), varying depending on thetype of land conversion (for example, sown pastures can become quickly established whereas naturalregeneration on abandoned cropland may take several years), climate and management conditions. Since under
Tier 1 Grassland Remaining Grassland the default biomass stock change is zero, changes in biomass carbon
stocks for grassland established following land use conversion are accounted for in the year of the conversion.
Tier 2: The Tier 2 calculations are structurally similar to Tier 1, with these distinctions. First, Tier 2 relies on atleast some country-specific estimates of the carbon stocks in initial and final land uses rather than the defaults
provided in Section 3.4.2.1.1.2. Area estimates for land converted to grassland are disaggregated at finer spatial
scales to capture regional variations in country-specific carbon stocks values.
Second, Tier 2 may modify the assumption that carbon stocks immediately following conversion are zero. This
enables countries to take into account land use transitions where some, but not all, vegetation from the originalland use is removed. In addition, under Tier 2 it is possible to account for biomass accumulation following
grassland establishment over a several year period (rather than accounting all biomass stock change in the yearof conversion) if data are available to estimate the time to full biomass establishment and the annual stockchanges.
Third, under Tier 2, it is good practice to apportion carbon losses to burning and decay processes if applicable.
Emissions of carbon dioxide occur as a result of burning and decay in land-use conversions. In addition, nonCO2 trace gas emissions occur as a result of burning. By partitioning losses to burning and decay, countries cancalculate non-CO2 trace gas emissions from burning. The IPCC Guidelines Workbook provides step-by-step
instructions for estimating carbon removals from burning and decay of biomass on-site and off-site and for
estimating non-CO2 trace gas emissions from burning (pages 5.7-5.17). Below is guidance on estimating carbon
removals from burning and decay and Section 3.2.1.4 of this chapter provides further guidance on estimating
non-CO2 trace gas emissions from burning.
The basic equations for estimating the amount of carbon burned or left to decay are provided in Equations 3.4.15
and 3.4.16 below, respectively. This methodology addresses burning for the purposes of land clearing. Non-CO2
emissions from burning in Grassland Remaining Grassland are covered in Section 3.4.3 of this report. The
default assumption in Equations 3.4.15 and 3.4.16 is that only aboveground biomass is burned or decays.
Countries are encouraged to use additional information to assess this assumption, particularly for decaying
belowground biomass. The basic approach can be modified to address other conversion activities as well as tomeet the needs of national circumstances. Both equations use as an input the total amount of carbon in biomass
removed during land clearing (∆Cconversion) (Equation 3.4.14), which is equivalent to area of land converted(AConversion) multiplied by the carbon stock change per area for that type of conversion (LConversion) in Equation
3.4.13).
The portion of woody biomass removed is sometimes used as wood products. In the case of wood products,
countries may use the default assumption that carbon in wood products is oxidized in the year of removal.
Alternatively, countries may refer to Appendix 3a.1 for estimation techniques for carbon storage in harvested
wood products, which may be accounted provided carbon in the product pool is increasing.
EQUATION 3.4.14
CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS AS A RESULT OF BIOMASS CLEARING DURING LAND USE
CONVERSION∆Cconversion = Aconversion ● (Lconversion)
Where:∆Cconversion = change in carbon stocks as a result of a clearing biomass in a land use conversion, tonnes C
AConversion = area of land converted to grassland, ha
LConversion = carbon stock change per area for that type of conversion, tonnes C ha-1 (from Equation 3.4.13)

EQUATION 3.4.15
CARBON LOSSES FROM BIOMASS BURNING, ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE
Lburn onsite = ∆Cconversion ● ρburned on site ● ρoxid
Lburn offsite = ∆Cconversion ● ρburned off site ● ρoxid
Where:

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.123

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

Lburn = carbon losses from biomass burned, tonnes C∆Cconversion = change in carbon stocks as a result of a clearing biomass in a land use conversion, tonnes Cρburned on site = proportion of biomass that is burned on-site, dimensionlessρoxid = proportion of biomass that oxidizes when burned, dimensionlessρburned off site = proportion of biomass that is burned off-site, dimensionless
EQUATION 3.4.16
CARBON LOSSES FROM BIOMASS DECAY
Ldecay = ∆Cconversion ● ρdecay

ρdecay = 1 – (ρburned on site + ρburned off site )Where:
Ldecay = carbon losses from biomass decay, tonnes C∆Cconversion = change in carbon stocks as a result of a clearing biomass in a land use conversion, tonnes Cρdecay = proportion of biomass that is left on-site to decay, dimensionlessρburned on site = proportion of biomass that is burned on-site, dimensionlessρburned off site = proportion of biomass that is burned off-site, dimensionless
It is good practice for countries to use the terms Lburn on site and Lburn off site as inputs to estimate non-CO2 trace gas
emissions from burning following guidance provided in Section 3.2.1.4.
Tier 3: Tier 3 is similar to Tier 2, with the following distinctions: rather than relying on average annual rates of
conversion, countries use direct estimates of spatially disaggregated areas converted annually for each initial andfinal land use; carbon stock changes are based on locally specific information. In addition, countries may use
dynamic models, making it possible to spatially and temporally link biomass and soil carbon stock change
estimates.

3.4.2.1.1.2 Choice of Emission/Removal Factors
Tier 1: The first step in this methodology requires parameters for carbon stocks before conversion for each
initial land use (CBefore) and after conversion (CAfter). It is assumed that all biomass is cleared when preparing asite for grassland use, thus, the default for CAfter is 0 tonnes C ha-1. Table 3.4.8 provides users with directions on
where to find carbon stock values for CBefore in land uses prior to clearing. Table 3.4.9 provides default values forcarbon stocks in grassland after conversion (∆CGrowth). These values are based on the defaults abovegroundbiomass stocks (Table 3.4.2) and the root:shoot ratios (Table 3.4.3), provided in Section 3.4.1.1.1.2 under
Grassland Remaining Grassland, and apply to herbaceous (i.e. non-woody) biomass only.
TABLE 3.4.8
DEFAULT BIOMASS CARBON STOCKS REMOVED DUE TO LAND CONVERSION TO GRASSLAND
Land-use category
Forest land

Cropland:
Perennial Woody Crops
Cropland:Annual Crops
1

Carbon stock in biomass before conversion (CBefore)(tonnes C ha-1)
See Table 3A.1.2 for carbon stocks in a range of forest types by climate
regions. Stocks are in terms of dry matter of carbon. Multiply values by acarbon fraction (CF) 0.5 to convert dry matter to carbon.
See Table 3.3.2 for carbon stocks in a range of climate regions for genericperennial woody cropland. Use the term for aboveground biomass carbon
stocks at harvest. Values are in units of tonnes C ha-1.
Use IPCC Guidelines default of 5 tonnes carbon ha-1 (or 10 tonnes dry
matter ha-1)

Error
Range 1

+ 75%
+ 75%

Represents a nominal estimate of error, equivalent to two times standard deviation, as a percentage of the mean.

Tier 2: Tier 2 methods should include some country-specific estimates for biomass stocks and removals due toland conversion, and also include estimates of on- and off-site losses due to burning and decay following land
conversion to grassland. These improvements can take the form of systematic studies of carbon content andemissions and removals associated with land uses and land-use conversions within the country and a reexamination of default assumptions in light of country-specific conditions.

3.124

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

Default parameters for emissions from burning and decay are provided, however countries are encouraged todevelop country-specific coefficients to improve the accuracy of estimates. The IPCC Guidelines use a general
default of 0.5 for the proportion of biomass burned on-site for forest conversions. Research studies suggests thatthe fraction is highly variable and could be as low as 0.2 (e.g. Fearnside, 2000; Barbosa and Fearnside, 1996; andFearnside, 1990). Updated default proportions of biomass burned on site are provided here. Table 3A.1.12
provides defaults for proportion of biomass consumed in on-site burning by a range of forest vegetation classes.
These defaults should be used for transitions from forest land to grassland. For non-forest initial land uses, thedefault proportion of biomass left on-site and burned is 0.35. This default takes into consideration research,which suggests the fraction should fall within the range 0.2 to 0.5 (Fearnside, 2000; Barbosa and Fearnside, 1996;
and Fearnside, 1990). It is good practice for countries to use 0.35, or another value within this range provided
the rationale for the choice is documented. There is no default value for the amount of biomass taken off-site andburned; countries will need to develop a proportion based on national data sources. In Equation 3.4.15., thedefault proportion of biomass oxidized as a result of burning is 0.9, as originally stated in the IPCC Guidelines.
The method for estimating emissions from decay assumes that all biomass decays over a period of 10 years. For
reporting purposes countries have two options: to report all emissions from decay in one year, recognizing that inreality they occur over a 10 year period, or report all emission from decay on an annual basis, estimating the rate
as one tenth of the totals in Equation 3.4.16. If countries choose the latter option, they should add a
multiplication factor of 0.10 to Equations 3.4.16.
Tier 3: Under Tier 3, all parameters should be country-defined using more accurate values rather than thedefaults.
TABLE 3.4.9
DEFAULT BIOMASS CARBON STOCKS PRESENT ON LAND CONVERTED TO GRASSLAND
IPCC Climate zone

Total (above- and belowground) nonwoody biomass(tonnes d.m. ha-1)

Error 1

Boreal - Dry & Wet 2

8.5

+ 75%

Cold Temperate - Dry

6.5

+ 75%

Cold Temperate -Wet

13.6

+ 75%

Warm Temperate – Dry

6.1

+ 75%

Warm Temperate –Wet

13.5

+ 75%

Tropical - Dry

8.7

+ 75%

Tropical - Moist & Wet

16.1

+ 75%

1

Represents a nominal estimate of error, equivalent to two times standard deviation, as a percentage of the mean.

2

Due to limited data, dry and moist zones for the boreal temperature regime and moist and wet zones for the tropicaltemperature regime were combined.

3.4.2.1.1.3 Choice of Activity Data
All tiers require estimates of land areas converted to grassland. The same area data should be used for biomass
calculations and the soil estimates described in Section 3.4.2.2. If necessary, area data used in the soils analysis
can be aggregated to match the spatial scale required for lower order estimates of biomass; however, at higher
tiers, stratification should take account of major soil types. Area data should be obtained using the methods
described in Chapter 2. Higher tiers require greater detail but the minimum requirement for inventories to beconsistent with the IPCC Guidelines is that the areas of forest conversion can be identified separately. This isbecause forest will usually have higher carbon density before conversion. This implies that at least partial
knowledge of the land-use change matrix and therefore, where Chapter 2 Approaches 1 and 2 are being used,supplementary surveys may be needed to identify how much of the land being converted to grassland came fromforest. As pointed out in Chapter 2, where surveys are being set up, it will often be more accurate to seek toestablish directly areas under conversion, than to estimate these from the differences in total land areas underparticular uses at different times.
Tier 1: At this level, one type of activity data is needed: estimates of areas converted to grassland from initialland uses (i.e., forest land, cropland, settlements, etc.) to final grassland type (Aconversion). The methodology
assumes that area estimates are based on a one-year time frame. If area estimates are assessed over longer timeframes, they should be converted to average annual areas to match the default carbon stock values provided. If
countries do not have these data, partial samples may be extrapolated to the entire land base or historic estimatesof conversions may be extrapolated over time based on the judgement of country experts. At a minimum,

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.125

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidancecountries can rely on information on average deforestation rates and land-use conversions to grassland frominternational sources, including the FAO. Tier 1 approaches may use average annual rates of conversion andestimated areas in place of direct estimates.
Tier 2: Countries should strive to use actual area estimates for all possible transitions from initial land use to
final grassland type. Complete reporting can be accomplished either through analysis of periodic remotelysensed images of land use and land cover patterns, and/or periodic ground-based sampling of land use patterns,
or hybrid inventory systems.
Tier 3: Activity data used in Tier 3 calculations should be a full accounting of all land use transitions tograssland and be disaggregate to account for different conditions within a country. Disaggregation can occur
along political (county, province, etc.), biome, climate, or on a combination of these parameters. In many cases
countries may have information on multi-year trends in land conversion (from periodic sample-based or
remotely sensed inventories of land use and land cover).

3.4.2.1.1.4 Uncertai nty Assessment
Tier 1: The sources of uncertainty in this method are from the use of global or national average rates of
conversion and course estimates of land areas converted to grassland. In addition, reliance on default parameters
for carbon stocks in initial and final conditions contributes to relatively high degrees of uncertainty. The default
values in this method have corresponding error ranges associated with them and the values are included in
default tables.
Tier 2: The use of actual area estimates rather than average rates of conversion will improve the accuracy of
estimates. In addition, the tracking of each land area for all possible land-use transitions will enable moretransparent accounting and allow experts to identify gaps and areas where land areas are accounted for multiple
times. Finally, a Tier 2 method uses at least some country-defined defaults, which will improve the accuracy of
estimates, provided they better represent conditions relevant to the country. Probability density functions (i.e.
providing mean and variance estimates) can be derived for all country-defined parameters. Such data can be usedin advanced uncertainty analyses such as Monte Carlo simulations. Refer to Chapter 5 (Section 5.2) of this reportfor guidance on developing estimates of sample-based uncertainties. At a minimum, Tier 2 methods should
provide error ranges in the form of percent standard deviations for each country-defined parameter.
Tier 3: Activity data from a land use and management inventory system should provide a basis to assign
estimates of uncertainty to areas associated with land-use changes by use of various methods, including Monte
Carlo simulations.

3.4.2.2

C HANGE IN CARB ON STOCKS IN SOILS

3.4.2.2.1 METHODOLOGICAL ISSUESLand conversion to grassland can occur from unmanaged land, including native, relatively undisturbed
ecosystems (e.g. forest land, wetlands) and from intensively managed cropland. With conversion from forest
land, disturbance associated with land clearing will usually result in losses of C in dead organic matter (surface
litter and coarse woody debris). Any litter and coarse woody debris pools (estimated using the methods describedin Section 3.2.2.2) should be assumed oxidized following land conversion and changes in soil organic matter C
stocks should be estimated as described below.
The total change in carbon stocks in soils on Lands Converted to Grassland is shown in Equation 3.4.17 below:
EQUATION 3.4.17
ANNUAL CHANGE IN CARBON STOCKS IN SOILS IN LAND CONVERTED TO GRASSLAND (LG)
∆CLGSoils = ∆CLGMineral – ∆CLGOrganic – ∆CLGLime
Where:∆CLGSoils = annual change in stocks in soils in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CLGMineral = change in carbon stocks in mineral soils in land converted to grassland, tonnes C yr-1
∆CLGOrganic = annual C emissions from organic soils converted to grassland (estimated as net annual flux),
tonnes C yr-1

3.126

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland∆CLGLime = annual C emissions from agricultural lime application on land converted to grassland, tonnes
C yr-1
Criteria for selecting the most suitable estimation method depend on the type of land conversion and thelongevity of the conversion, and availability of suitable country-specific information to estimate reference soil C
stocks and stock change and emission factors. All countries should strive for improving inventory and reporting
approaches by advancing to the highest tier possible given national circumstances. It is good practice forcountries to use a Tier 2 or Tier 3 approach if carbon emissions and removals in land converted to grassland is a
key category and if the sub-category of soil organic matter is considered significant based on principles outlined
in Chapter 5. Countries should use the decision tree in Figure 3.1.2 to help with the choice of method.

3.4.2.2.1.1 Choice of Method
Mineral Soils
Tier 1: The Tier 1 method is fundamentally similar as for Grasslands Remaining Grasslands (Equation 3.4.8 in
Section 3.4.1.2.1.1) except pre-conversion carbon stocks are dependent of parameters for other land use. Tier 1
methods rely on default values for reference C stocks and stock change factors and relatively aggregated data on
the location and rates of land-use conversion.
For Tier 1, the initial (pre-conversion) soil C stock (SOC(0-T)) is determined from the same reference soil C
stocks (SOCREF) used for all land uses (Table 3.4.4), together with stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI) appropriate
for the previous land use as well as for grassland use. For native unmanaged land, as well as for managed forest,
soil C stocks are assumed equal to the reference values (i.e. land use, management and input factors equal 1).
Current (SOC0) soil C stocks on land converted to grassland are estimated exactly as for permanent grassland,i.e., using the reference carbon stocks (Table 3.4.4) and stock change factors (Table 3.4.5). Thus, annual rates ofemissions (source) or removals (sink) are calculated as the difference in stocks (over time) divided by theinventory time period (default is 20 years).
The calculation steps for determining SOC0 and SOC(0-T) and net soil C stock change per ha of land area are as
follows:
Step 1: Select the reference carbon stock value (SOCREF), based on climate and soil type, for each area of land
being inventoried.
Step 2: Calculate the pre-conversion C stock (SOC(0-T)) of land being converted into grassland, based on thereference carbon stock and previous land use and management, which determine land use (FLU),
management (FMG) and input (FI ) factors. Note that where the land being converted is forest the preconversion stocks will be equal to the native soil carbon reference stocks.
Step 3: Calculate SOC0 by repeating step 2 using the same reference carbon stock (SOCREF)), but management
and input factors that represent conditions in the land converted to grassland.
Step 4: Calculate the average annual change in soil C stock for the area over the inventory period (∆CLGMineral ).
Example 1: For a forest on volcanic soil in a tropical moist environment: SOCREF = 70 tonnes C ha-1.
For all forest soils default values for stock change factors (FLU , FMG , FI) are all 1; thus SOC(0-T) is
70 tonnes C ha-1. If the land is converted into pasture that is moderately degraded/overgrazed then
SOC0 = 70 tonnes C ha-1 ● 1 ● 0.97 ● 1 = 67.9 tonnes C ha-1. Thus the average annual change insoil C stock for the area over the inventory period is calculated as (67.9 tonnes C ha-1 – 70 tonnes
C ha-1) / 20 yrs = -0.01 tonnes C ha-1 yr-1.
Example 2: For tropical moist, volcanic soil that has been under long-term annual cropland, withintensive tillage and where crop residues are removed from the field, carbon stocks at the
beginning of the inventory period SOC(0-T) are 70 tonnes C ha-1 ● 0.58 ● 1 ● 0.91 = 36.9 tonnes C
ha-1. Following conversion to improved (e.g. fertilised) pasture, carbon stocks (SOC0) are 70
tonnes C ha-1 ● 1● 1.17 ● 1 = 81.9 tonnes C ha-1. Thus the average annual change in soil C stock
for the area over the inventory period is calculated as (81.9 tonnes C ha-1 – 36.9 tonnes C ha-1) / 20
yrs =2.25 tonnes C ha-1 yr-1.
Tier 2: The Tier 2 method for mineral soils also uses Equation 3.4.8, but involves country or region-specificreference C stocks and/or stock change factors and more disaggregated land use activity data.

Organic Soils
Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches for organic soils that are converted from other land uses to grassland within theinventory period are treated the same as long-term grassland on organic soils, i.e., they have a constant emission

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.127

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

factor applied to them, based on climate regime (see Equation 3.4.10 and Table 3.4.6). In Tier 2, emission factors
are derived from country or region-specific data.

Mineral and Organic soils
For both mineral and organic soils, Tier 3 methods will involve more detailed and country-specific models
and/or measurement-based approaches along with highly disaggregated land use and management data. Tier 3
approaches for estimating soil C changes from land-use conversions to grassland should employ models and data
sets that are capable of representing transitions over time between different land use and vegetation types,
including forest, savanna, grassland and cropland. The Tier 3 method needs to be integrated with estimates ofbiomass removal and the post-clearance treatment of plant residues (including woody debris and litter), as
variation in the removal and treatment of residues (e.g. burning, site preparation) will affect C inputs to soilorganic matter formation and C losses through decomposition and combustion. It is critical that models bevalidated with independent observations from country or region-specific field locations that are representative of
the interactions of climate, soil and vegetation type on post-conversion changes in soil C stocks.

Lim ing
If lime is applied to grassland converted from other land uses then the methods for estimating CO2 emissions
from liming are the same as described for Grassland Remaining Grassland, in Section 3.4.1.2.1.1.

3.4.2.2.1.2 Choice of Emission/Removal Factors
Mineral soils
The following variables are needed when using either the Tier 1 or Tier 2 method:
Reference carbon stocks (SOCREF)
Tier 1: Under Tier 1, it is good practice to use the default reference carbon stocks (SOCREF) provided in Table
3.4.4. These are updated from those provided in the IPCC Guidelines with the following improvements: i)estimates are statistically-derived from recent compilations of soil profiles under native vegetation, ii) ‘Spodic’soils (defined as boreal and temperate zone podzols in WRB classification, Spodosols in USDA classification)
are included as a separate category, iii) soils within the boreal climate region have been included.
Tier 2: For the Tier 2 method, reference soil C stocks can be determined from measurements of soils, forexample, as part of a country’s soil survey and mapping activities. It is important that reliable taxonomic
descriptions of measured soils be used to group soils into the classes defined in Table 3.4.4 or if a finer
subdivision of reference soil C stocks is used definitions of soil groupings need to be consistently and well
documented. Advantages to using country-specific data for estimating reference soil C stocks include moreaccurate and representative values for an individual country and the ability to better estimate probability
distribution functions that can be used in a formal uncertainty analysis.
Stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI)
Tier 1: Under Tier 1, it is good practice to use default stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI) as referred to in Table
3.4.10. These are updated from the IPCC Guidelines, based on a statistical analysis of published research.
Definitions guiding the selection of appropriate factor values are provided in the table. Stock change factors areused in estimating both post- (SOC0) and pre-conversion (SOC(0-T)) stocks; values will vary according to land
use and management conditions before and after the conversion. Note that where forest is converted to grasslanduse, the stock change factors all have the value of one, such that the pre-conversion soil carbon stocks are equal
to the native vegetation reference values (SOCREF).
TABLE 3.4.10
RELATIVE SOIL STOCK CHANGE FACTORS FOR LAND-USE CONVERSIONS TO GRASSLAND
Factor value typeLevel

GPG default

Land use, Management, & Input

Managed grassland

See default values in Table 3.4.5

Land use, Management, & Input

CroplandSee default values in Table 3.3.4

Land use, Management, & Input

Forest land

Default values for FLU, FMG, FI = 1

Tier 2: For the Tier 2 method, estimation of country-specific stock change factors for land-use conversion to
grassland will typically be based on paired-plot comparisons representing converted and unconverted lands,
where all factors other than land-use history are as similar as possible (e.g. Davidson and Ackermann, 1993).
Ideally several sample locations can be found that represent a given land use at different times since conversion– referred to as a chronosequence (e.g. Neill et al., 1997). There are few replicated long-term experiments of

3.128

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

land- use conversions and thus stock change factors and emission factors for land-use conversions will have arelatively high uncertainty. In evaluating existing studies or conducting new measurements it is critical that theplots being compared have similar pre-conversion histories and management as well as similar topographic
position, soil physical properties, and be located in close proximity. As for permanent grassland, required
information includes C stock (i.e. mass per unit area to a specified depth) for each land use (and time point if achronosequence). As previously described under Grassland Remaining Grassland, in the absence of specificinformation upon which to select an alternative depth interval, it is good practice to compare stock change
factors at a depth of at least 30 cm (i.e. the depth used for Tier 1 calculations). Stock changes over a deeper depth
may be desirable if a sufficient number of studies are available and if statistically significant differences instocks due to land management are demonstrated at deeper depths. However, it is critical that the reference soil
carbon stocks (SOCRef) and stock change factors (FLU, FMG, FI) be determined to a common depth.

Organic soils
Tier 1 and Tier 2 choice of C emission factors from organic soils recently converted to managed grassland
should observe the same procedures for deriving emission factors as described earlier under the Grassland
Remaining Grassland section.

3.4.2.2.1.3 Choice of Activity Data
All tiers require estimates of land areas converted to grassland. The same area estimates should be used for bothbiomass and soil calculations on land converted to grassland. Higher tiers require greater specificity of areas. To
be consistent with IPCC Guidelines, at a minimum, the area of land converted to grassland should be identified
separately for all tiers. This implies at least some knowledge of the land uses prior to conversion; this may
require expert judgment if Approach 1 in Chapter 2 is used for land area identification.
Tier 1: One type of activity data is needed for a Tier 1 approach: separate estimates of areas converted tograssland from initial land uses (i.e., forest land, cropland), by climate region. Distribution of land use
conversion by soil type (i.e. within a climate region) needs to be estimated, either by spatially explicit methods(e.g. overlays between maps of land use conversion and soils maps) or by knowledge of the distribution of major
soil types within areas subject to land use conversion by country experts. The determination of the area of land
converted to grassland needs to be consistent with the time period (T in Equation 3.4.8) used in the stock change
calculations. If countries do not have these data, partial samples may be extrapolated to the entire land base or
historic estimates of conversions may be extrapolated in time based on the judgement of country experts. Under
Tier 1 calculations, international statistics such as FAO databases, IPCC Guidelines, and other sources,
supplemented with sound assumptions by country experts, can be used to estimate the area of land converted tograssland from each initial land use. For higher tier calculations, country-specific data sources are used toestimate all transitions from initial land use to grassland.
Tier 2: Countries should strive to use actual area estimates for all possible transitions from initial land use to
grassland, stratified by management condition. Full coverage of land areas can be accomplished through analysis
of periodic remotely sensed images of land use and land cover patterns, through periodic ground-based samplingof land use patterns, or hybrid inventory systems. If such finer resolution country-specific data are partiallyavailable, countries are encouraged to use sound assumptions from best available knowledge to extrapolate to theentire land base. Historical estimates of conversions may be extrapolated in time based on the judgment ofcountry experts.
Tier 3: Activity data used in Tier 3 calculations should be a full accounting of all land use transitions tograssland and be disaggregated to account for different conditions within a country. Disaggregation can occur
along political (county, province, etc.), biome, climate, or on a combination of these parameters. In many cases
countries may have information on multi-year trends in land conversion (from periodic sample-based or
remotely sensed inventories of land use and land cover).

3.4.2.2.1.4 Uncertai nty Assessment
Tier 1: The sources of uncertainty in this method are from the use of global or national average rates of
conversion and course estimates of land areas converted to grassland. In addition, reliance on default parameters
for carbon stocks in initial and final conditions contributes to relatively high degrees of uncertainty. The default
values in this method have corresponding error ranges associated with them.
Tier 2: Actual area estimates for different land use transitions will enable more transparent accounting andallow experts to identify gaps and double counting of land areas. The Tier 2 method uses at least some countrydefined defaults, which will improve the accuracy of estimates, because they better represent conditions relevantto the country. Use of country-specific values should entail sufficient sample sizes and or use of expert judgment
to estimate uncertainties, which, together with uncertainty estimates on activity data derived using the advice in
Chapter 2 should be used in the approaches to uncertainty analysis described in Chapter 5 of this report.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.129

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

Tier 3: Activity data from a land use and management inventory system should provide a basis to assign
estimates of uncertainty to areas associated with land-use changes. Combining emission and activity data andtheir associated uncertainties can be done using Monte-Carlo procedures to estimate means and confidence
intervals for the overall inventory.

3.4.2.3

N ON -CO 2 GREENH OUSE GASES

As for all grasslands, sources of CH4 and N2O emissions associated with grassland that have recently undergonea change in land use are likely to be:•

Emissions from vegetation fires;•

N2O emissions from mineralisation of soil organic matter;•N2O from fertiliser use;•

Increase in N2O emissions and reduction in CH4 emissions from drainage of organic soils; and•Reduced CH4 sink in aerobic soils due to fertiliser use.

Emissions of methane from grazing livestock (enteric fermentation) and nitrous oxide from fertiliser use andanimal waste should be calculated and reported using the methods set out in Chapter 4 (the Agriculture chapter)of the IPCC Guidelines and the corresponding parts (Section 4.2 and 4.7) of GPG2000.
Fire related emissions should be calculated using the methods set out in Section 3.2.1.4, taking account, wheredata are available to do so, of the fact that the fuel load will often be higher during the transition period if theprevious land use was forest.
Land-use conversion may lead to mineralisation of soil organic matter nitrogen, which can increase N2O
emissions. However, depending on the previous land use, climate and soil type, land-use conversion to grassland
can also increase soil organic matter (Guo and Gifford, 2002).
Fertilization of grassland will tend to reduce the soil methane uptake, and, where wetland soils have been drained
nitrous oxide emissions may increase and countries reporting Agricultural emissions at Tier 3 may wish to takethese effects into account as described in Section 3.4.1.3. Additional effects of the transition to grassland that
may influence non-CO2 emissions, for example soil disturbance due to ploughing, or compaction where
mechanical equipment is used for clearance, but the effects are unlikely to be large, and no default methods exist
to account for them. Changes in the rate of removal CH4 from the atmosphere by aerated topsoil arising from theconversion is not addressed in this guidance, though a fuller consideration of various activities on methane
oxidation may be possible in future.

3.4.3

CompletenessA complete data series for land area estimates contains, at a minimum, the area of land within country
boundaries that is considered grassland during the time period covered by land use surveys or other data sources
and for which greenhouse gas emission and removals are estimated in the LULUCF sector. The total area
covered by the grassland inventory methodology is the sum of land remaining in grassland and land converted tograssland during the time period. This inventory methodology may not include some grassland areas where
greenhouse gas emissions and removals are believed to be insignificant or constant through time, such as native
grassland with moderate grazing and no significant management inputs. Therefore, it is possible for the total
grassland area for which estimates are prepared to be less than the total area of grassland within country
boundaries. In this case, it is good practice for countries to document and explain the difference in grassland areain the inventory and total grassland within their boundaries. Countries are encouraged to track through time thetotal area of land in grassland within country boundaries, keeping transparent records on which portions are used
to estimate carbon dioxide emissions and removals. As addressed in Chapter 2, all grassland areas, including
those not covered by the emissions inventory, should be part of the consistency checks to help avoid double
counting or omission. When summed with area estimates for other land uses, the grassland area data series will
enable a complete assessment of the land base included in a countries’ LULUCF sector inventory report.
Countries that use Tier 2 or 3 methods for grassland biomass and soil pools should include more detail in theirinventory on the grassland area data series. For example, countries may need to stratify the grassland area bymajor climate and soil types, including both the inventoried and non-inventoried grassland areas. When stratified
land areas are used in the inventory, it is good practice for countries to use the same area classifications for boththe biomass and soils pools. This will ensure consistency and transparency, allow for efficient use of land

3.130

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

surveys and other data collection tools, and enable the explicit linking between carbon dioxide emissions andremovals in biomass and soil pools.

3.4.4

Developing a Consistent Time Series

To maintain a consistent time series, it is good practice for countries to maintain records on the grassland areasused in inventory reports over time. These records should track the total grassland area included in the inventory,
subdivided by lands remaining in grassland and land converted to grassland. Countries are encouraged to include
an estimate of the total grassland area within country boundaries. To ensure that area estimates are treatedconsistently through time, land use definitions should be clearly defined and kept constant. If changes are madeto land use definitions, it is good practice to keep transparent records of how the definition changed. Consistentdefinitions should also be used for each of the grassland types and management systems included in theinventory. In addition, to facilitate the proper accounting of carbon emissions and removals over several periods,
information on historic land conversions can be utilized. Even if a country cannot rely on historic data for current
inventories, improvements to current inventory practices to provide the ability to track land conversions acrosstime will have benefits in future inventories.
Consistent estimation and reporting requires common definitions of activities, climate and soil types during theperiod of the inventory, which may require work to relate definitions used by national agencies involved in datacollection, as set out in Chapter 2.

3.4.5

Reporting and Documentation

The categories described in Section 3.4 can be reported using the reporting tables in Annex 3A.2. The estimates
under the grassland category can be compared with the reporting categories in the IPCC Guidelines as follows:•

Carbon dioxide emissions and removals in woody biomass in grassland remaining grassland to IPCC
Reporting Category 5A, Changes in woody biomass;•

Carbon dioxide emissions and removals in soils in grassland remaining grassland to IPCC Reporting
Category 5D, Changes in soil carbon; and•Carbon dioxide emissions and removals resulting from land-use conversions to grassland to IPCC Reporting
Category 5B for biomass, IPCC Reporting category 5D for soils, and IPCC Reporting Category 5E for nonCO2 gases.
It is good practice to maintain and archive all information used to produce national inventory estimates.
Metadata and data sources for information used to estimate country-specific factors should be documented andboth mean and variance estimates provided. Actual databases and procedures used to process the data (e.g.
statistical programs) to estimate country-specific factors should be archived. Activity data and definitions used tocategorize or aggregate the activity data must be documented and archived. Procedures used to categorize
activity data by climate and soil types (for Tier 1 and Tier 2) must be clearly documented. For Tier 3 approaches
that use modelling, the model version and identification must be documented. Use of dynamic models requiresthat copies of all model input files as well as copies of model source code and executable programs bepermanently archived.

3.4.6

Inventory Quality Assurance/Quality Control(QA/QC)

It is good practice to implement quality control checks and external expert review of inventory estimates anddata. Specific attention should be paid to country-specific estimates of stock change and emission factors toensure that they are based on high quality data and verifiable expert opinion.
Specific QA/QC checks across the grassland methodology include:
Grassland remaining grassland: Areas reporting of grassland biomass stock changes and grassland soil stockchanges should be the same. Grassland may include areas where soil stock changes are accounted for but
biomass changes are assumed to be zero (e.g. where non-woody biomass is largely absent), areas where bothbiomass and soil stocks are changing (e.g. areas with woody biomass encroachment), and areas where neither
biomass nor soil stocks are changing (e.g. extensively managed native grassland). To increase transparency andeliminate errors, the total grassland area where any stock changes are estimated should be reported, and where

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.131

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidancebiomass stock changes equal zero these should still be reported if soil carbon stock changes are reported for thesame area.
Lands converted to grassland: Aggregate area totals for land converted to grassland should be the same in thebiomass and soils estimations. While biomass and soil pools may be disaggregated to different levels of detail,the same general categories should be used to disaggregate the area data.
For all soil carbon stock change estimates using Tier 1 or Tier 2 methods, total areas for each climate-soil typecombination must be the same for the start (year(0-T)) and the end (year(0)) of the inventory period (see Equation
3.4.9).

3.4.7

Estimation of Revised GPG Tier 1 Defaults for
Grassland Management (see Table 3.4.5)

Grassland C stock change factors were calculated for three general types of grassland condition: degraded,nominally managed, and improved grassland. An additional input factor was included for application to
improved grassland. The management improvements considered here were limited to fertilization (organic or
inorganic), sowing legumes or more grass species, and irrigation. Overgrazed grassland and poorly managed (i.e.,
none of the management improvements were applied) tropical pastures were classified as degraded grassland.
Native or introduced grasslands that were unimproved were grouped into the nominal grassland classification.
Grasslands with any single type of management improvement were classified as improved grassland withmedium C input rates. For improved grassland in which multiple management improvements were implemented,
C input rates were considered high. The data were synthesized in linear mixed-effects models, accounting forboth fixed and random effects. Fixed effects included depth, number of years since the management change, andthe type of management change (e.g., reduced tillage vs. no-till). For depth, we did not aggregate data but
included C stocks measured for each depth increment (e.g., 0-5 cm, 5-10 cm, and 10-30 cm) as a separate pointin the dataset. Similarly, we did not aggregate data collected at different points in time from the same study.
Consequently, random effects were used to account for the interdependence in times series data and theinterdependence among data points representing different depths from the same study. We estimated factors forthe effect of the management practice at 20 years for the top 30 cm of the soil. Variance was calculated for eachof the factor values, and used to construct probability distribution functions with a normal density.

3.132

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

Grassland

REFERENCES USED FOR ANALYSIS IN SECTION 3.4.7
Abril, A., and E. H. Bucher. (1999). The effects of overgrazing on soil microbial community and fertility in the
Chaco dry savannas of Argentina. Applied Soil Ecology 12:159-167.
Aina, P. O. (1979). Soil changes resulting from long-term management practices in Western Nigeria. Soil Science
Society of America Journal 43:173-177.
Arnold, P. W., F. Hunter, and P. Gonzalez Fernandez. (1976). Long-term grassland experiments at Cockle Park.
Annales Agronomiques 27:1027-1042.
Banerjee, M. R., D. L. Burton, W. P. McCaughey, and C. A. Grant. (2000). Influence of pasture management on soil
biological quality. Journal of Range Management 53:127-133.
Bardgett, R. D., C. Frankland Juliet, and J. B. Whittaker. (1993). The effects of agricultural practices on the soil
biota of some upland grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 45:25-45.
Barrow, N. J. (1969). The accumulation of soil organic matter under pasture and its effect on soil properties.
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 9:437-445.
Biondini, M. E., B. D. Patton, and P. E. Nyren. (1998). Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern
mixed-grass prairie, USA. Ecological Applications 8:469-479.
Cantarutti, R. B., J. M. Brage, R. M. Boddey, and S. d. P. Resende. (1995). Caracterizacao do status de nitrogenio
em solosob pastagm de Brachiaria humidicola pura e consorciada com Desmodium ovalifolium cv. Itabela.
Pages 733-735 in Proceedings of the XXV Congresso Brasileiro do Ciencia do Solo, Micosa, MG, Brazil.
Carr, S. C. M., and J. S. Turner. (1959). The ecology of the Bogong high plains II. Fencing experiments in grassland
C. Australian Journal of Botany 7:34-83.
Carter, M. R., D. A. Angers, and H. T. Kunelius. (1994). Soil structural for and stability, and organic matter undercool-season perennial grasses. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58:1194-1199.
Cerri, C. C., B. Volkoff, and F. Andreaux. (1991). Nature and behavior of organic matter in soils under naturalforest, and after deforestation, burning and cultivation, near Manaus. Forest Ecology and Management 38:247257.
Chone, T., F. Andreuz, J. C. Correa, B. Volkhoff, and C. C. Cerri. (1991). Changes in organic matter in an Oxisol
from the central Amazonian forest during eight years as pasture determined by 13C isotopic composition.
Pages 397-405 in J. Berthelin, editor. Diversity of Environmental Biogeochemistry. Elsiver, Amsterdam.
Chuluun, T., L. L. Tieszen, and D. Ojima. (1999). Land use impact on C4 plant cover of temperate east Asian
grasslands. Pages 103-109 in K. Otsubo, editor. NIES Workshop on Information Bases and Modeling for Landuse and Land-cover Changes Studies in East Asia. Center for Global Environmental Research.
Desjardins, T., F. Andreauz, B. Volkoff, and C. C. Cerri. (1994). Organic carbon and 13C content in soils and soil
size-fractions, and their changes due to deforestation and pasture installation in eastern Amazonia. Geoderma
61:103-118.
Eden, M. J., D. F. M. McGregor, and N. A. Q. Viera. (1990). Pasture development on cleared forest land in northern
Amazonia. The Geographical Journal 156:283-296.
Escobar, C. J., and J. L. Toriatti Dematte. (1991). Distribution of organic matter and natural carbon-13 in an Ultisolin the Amazon piedmont. Pasturas Tropicales 13:27-30.
Feigl, B. J., J. Melillo, and C. C. Cerri. (1995). Changes in the origin and quality of soil organic matter after pasture
introduction in Rondonia (Brazil). Plant and Soil 175:21-29.
Fisher, M. J., I. M. Tao, M. A. Ayarza, C. E. Lascano, J. I. Sanz, R. J. Thomas, and R. R. Vera. (1994). Carbon
storage by introduced deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas. Nature 371:236-238.
Frank, A. B., D. L. Tanaka, L. Hofmann, and R. F. Follett. (1995). Soil carbon and nitrogen of Northern Great
Plains grasslands as influenced by long-term grazing. Journal of Range Management 48:470-474.
Franzluebbers, A. J., N. Nazih, J. A. Stuedmann, J. J. Fuhrmann, H. H. Schomberg, and P. G. Hartel. (1999). Soil
carbon and nitrogen pools under low- and high-endophyte-infected tall fescue. Soil Science Society of America
Journal 63:1687-1694.
Franzluebbers, A. J., J. A. Stuedmann, H. H. Schomberg, and S. R. Wilkinson. (2000). Soil organic C and N pools
under long-term pasture management in the Southern Piedmont USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32:469-478.
Garcia-Oliva, F., I. Casar, P. Morales, and J. M. Maass. (1994). Forest-to-pasture conversion influences on soilorganic carbon dynamics in a tropical deciduous forest. Oecologia 99:392-396.
Goh, K. M., J. D. Stout, and T. A. Rafter. (1977). Radiocarbon enrichment of soil organic matter fractions in New
Zealand soils. Soil Science 123:385-391.
Jackman, R. H. (1964). Accumulation of organic matter in some New Zealand soils under permanent pasture I.
Patterns of change of organic carbon, nitrogen, sulphur, and phosphorous. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural
Research 7:445-471.
Kohn, G. D., G. J. Osborne, G. D. Batten, A. N. Smith, and W. J. Lill. (1977). The effect of topdresedsuperphosphate on changes in Nitrogen : Carbon : Sulphur : Phosphorous and pH on a red earth soil during along term grazing experiment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 15:147-158.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

3.133

Chapter 3: LUCF Sector Good Practice Guidance

REFERENCES USED FOR ANALYSIS IN SECTION 3.4.7 (CONTINUED)
Koutika, L. S., F. Bartoli, F. Andreux, C. C. Cerri, G. Burtin, T. Chone, and R. Philippy. (1997). Organic matter
dynamics and aggregation in soils under rain forest and pastures of increasing age in the eastern Amazon
Basin. Geoderma 76.
Loiseau, P., and C. Grignani. (1991). Status of organic nitrogen and fate of mineral nitrogen in mid-mountainpastures. Agronomie 11:143-150.
Lovell, R. D., S. C. Jarvis, and R. D. Bardgett. (1995). Soil microbial biomass and activity in long-term grassland:
effects of management changes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27:969-975.
Lytton Hitchins, J. A., A. J. Koppi, and A. B. McBratney. (1994). The soil condition of adjacent bio-dynamic andconventionally managed dairy pasture in Victoria, Australia. Soil Use and Management 10:79-87.
Malhi, S. S., J. T. Harapiak, M. Nyborg, K. S. Gill, and N. A. Flore. (2002). Autumn and spring applications ofammonium nitrate and urea to bromegrass influence total and light fraction organic C and N in a thin Black
Chernozem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82:211-217.
Malhi, S. S., M. Nyborg, J. T. Harapiak, K. Heier, and N. A. Flore. (1997). Increasing organic C and N in soil underbromegrass with long-term N fertilization. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 49:255-260.
Manley, J. T., G. E. Schuman, J. D. Reeder, and R. H. Hart. (1995). Rangeland soil carbon and nitrogen responses to
grazing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50:294-298.
Moulin, A. P., D. H. McCartney, S. Bittman, and W. F. Nuttall. Long-term effects of fertilizer on soil carbon in a
pasture soil.
Naeth, M. A., A. W. Bailey, D. J. Pluth, D. S. Chanasyk, and R. T. Hardin. (1991). Grazing impacts on litter and soilorganic matter in mixed prairie and fescue grassland ecosystems of Alberta. Journal of Range Management
44:7-12.
Neill, C., J. M. Melillo, P. A. Steudler, C. C. Cerri, J. F. L. d. Moraes, M. C. Piccolo, and M. Brito. (1997). Soil
carbon and nitrogen stocks following forest clearing for pasture in the Southwestern Brazilian Amazon.
Ecological Applications 7:1216-1225.
Nyborg, M., S. S. Malhi, E. D. Solberg, and R. C. Izaurralde. (1999). Carbon storage and light fraction C in a
grassland dark gray chernozem soil as influenced by N and S fertilization. Canadian Journal of Soil Science
79:317-320.
Oberson, A., D. K. Friesen, H. Tiessen, C. Morel, and W. Stahel. (1999). Phosphorus status and cycling in nativesavanna and improved pastures on an acid low-P Colombian oxisol. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
55:77-88.
Reiners, W. A., A. F. Bouwman, W. F. J. Parsons, and M. Keller. (1994). Tropical rain forest conversion to pasture:
Changes in vegetation and soil properties. Ecological Applications 4:363-377.
Ridley, A. M., W. J. Slattery, K. R. Halyar, and A. Cowling. (1990). The importance of the carbon cycle toacidification of grazed animal pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30:529-537.
Rixon, A. J. (1966). Soil fertility changes in a redbrown earth under irrigated pastures. Australian Journal of
Agricultural Research 17:303-316.
Russell, J. S. (1960). Soil fertility changes in the long term experimental plots at Kybybolite, South Australia. I.
Changes in pH, total nitrogen, organic carbon and bulk density. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
11:902-926.
Schuman, G. E., J. D. Reeder, J. T. Manley, R. H. Hart, and W. A. Manley. (1999). Impact of grazing managementon the carbon and nitrogen balance of a mixed-grass rangeland. Ecological Applications 9:65-71.
Shiel, R. S. (1986). Variation in amounts of carbon and nitrogen associated with particle size fractions of soils fromthe Palace Leas meadow hay plots. Journal of Soil Science 37:249-257.
Skjemstad, J. O., V. R. Catchpoole, R. P. l. Feuvre, and R. P. Le Feuvre. (1994). Carbon dynamics in Vertisols
under several crops as assessed by natural abundance 13C. Australian Journal of Soil Research 32:311-321.
Smoliak, S., J. F. Dormaar, and A. Johnston. (1972). Long-term grazing effects on Stipa-Bouteloua prairie soils.
Journal of Range Management 25:246-250.
Trumbore, S. E., E. A. Davidson, P. Barbosa De Camargo, D. C. Nepstad, and L. A. Martinelli. (1995).
Belowground cycling of carbon in forests and pastures of Eastern Amazonia. Global Biogeochemical Cycles
9:515-528.
Veldkamp, E. (1994). Organic carbon turnover in three tropical soils under pasture after deforestation. Soil Science
Society of America Journal 58:175-180.
Walker, T. W., B. K. Thapa, and A. F. R. Adams. (1959). Studies on soil organic matter. 3. Accumulation of carbon,
nitrogen, sulphur, organic and total phosphorous in improved grassland soils. Soil Science 87:135-140.
Wang, Y., and Z. Chen. (1998). Distribution of soil organic carbon in the major grasslands of Xilinguole, Inner
Mongolia, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 22:545-551.
Wood, K. M., and W. H. Blackburn. (1984). Vegetation and soil responses to cattle grazing systems in the Texas
rolling plains. Journal of Range Management

3.134

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF