1Sample Chapter -- Prologue

Prologue:

By Kenneth D. Ackerman

On May 16, 1860, with Civil War looming and the country torn by sectional hatreds overslavery, states rights, and clashing visions of the American future, the recently-formed
Republican Party met in Chicago, Illinois, to choose its nominee for President. Looking back, itsselection of Abraham Lincoln, a principled man uniquely qualified to lead the nation through theturmoil of disunion, war, and emancipation, seemed pre-ordained. Could it have been any otherway? The country needed a special leader for a dangerous time, and one emerged. Thenomination assured Lincoln’s election. That November, Lincoln would face a crippled
Democratic Party and win the Presidency with thirty-nine percent of the popular vote. Today, hetops almost every poll of historians and non-historians alike as the nation’s single greatest andmost admired president.
But Lincoln’s nomination was no sure thing. In fact, almost until the minute it happened,
it seemed far-fetched. Lincoln was so obscure in May 1860 that, after his selection, major
newspapers misspelled his name -- Abram instead of Abraham – and struggled to learn hisbackground. The New-York Times, for one, described him as a “youngster who, with ragged
trousers, used barefoot to drive his father’s oxen and spend his days in splitting rails.”
Every president is shaped by the nominating convention that chooses him to run.

Lincoln’s in 1860 not only was one of the most important, but also the most exciting ever in
America up to that point. In a three day, three-ballot carnival of music, fireworks, and politics
drawing some 40,000 people, it saw Lincoln and his friends outwit the leading celebrities of theirparty, capturing the prize with nerve, ambition, and brass tacks. They played the kind of hardball
politics that usually made reformers cringe. Still, it gave us the best candidate anyone could have
hoped for to save the country.
How? By all appearances, the Republican presidential nomination in 1860 had been
locked up in advance by another candidate: William Seward, New York’s distinguished U.S.
Senator and former governor, backed by New York money, eastern abolitionists, and veteranpolitical fixer Thurlow Weed, publisher of the influential Albany Evening Journal. Seward hadlaunched a coordinated, well-funded national campaign. His managers in Chicago charmeddelegates with champagne and oysters as their army of noisy boosters and clackers – imported by
the trainload from New York’s rowdy neighborhoods -- paraded through Chicago behind brass
bands and colorful banners. Seward’s committed delegates on the convention floor outnumberedthose of every other candidate, though not quite an outright majority.
Should Seward stumble, a line of major figures stood ready to collect the prize: Ohio’s
Governor and former U.S. Senator Salmon P. Chase, Pennsylvania’s Senator Simon Cameron,
Missouri’s Edward Bates, among others. Each had his own block of delegates, a national
reputation, and plenty of friends.
Abraham Lincoln, by contrast, was a relative unknown. At 51 years old, he had held
national office only once, serving a single term in the U.S. Congress in the late 1840s. He’d left
his seat in 1848 after speaking out against the popular Mexican War. He’d twice failed to win anIllinois seat in the U.S. Senate. His 1858 debates with Democrat Stephen A. Douglas had won
him national attention and a majority of the popular votes, but the Democratic-controlled statelegislature that year still gave the seat to Douglas. (Prior to 1913, when the Seventeenth
Amendment to the Constitution was ratified, U.S. Senators were chosen by state legislatures
rather than by voters.) A self-educated lawyer, Lincoln had never managed a large company,
never run a government agency, and had few backers outside his home state. An engaging public
speaker, he suffered bouts of melancholy, stood awkwardly tall, and had a homely appearance.
“If I had two faces,” he once joked, “do you think this is the one I’d be wearing?”
In the end, “Honest Abe” and his operators captured the nomination by a host of tricks
that made peoples’ heads spin. Among other things, they pushed Republicans to hold theirconvention in Chicago, far from East Coast pressures, where they could use their local advantage
to manipulate convention arrangements and pack the hall with Lincoln men. They forced a “unitrule” on Illinois’s own twenty-two delegates, a tactic future Republican conventions would
outlaw as an undemocratic tool for Bosses. They recast Lincoln’s image from sharp railroad
lawyer to folksy “rail splitter,” though Lincoln hadn’t done physical labor in decades. They cut
deals for votes and launched whispering campaigns against rival candidates, calling themunelectable or worse.

IssuesPassions over of slavery and states rights had reached a boiling point in early 1860. The
Missouri Compromise, which had papered over differences since 1820 by limiting slavery toSouthern states, had unraveled in 1854 with passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act that suddenly
permitted slavery into the free western territories. Then, in 1856, the Supreme Court upheld theFugitive Slave law in its Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, making slavery legal nationwide. The
issue erupted in open violence in “Bloody Kansas,” followed by John Brown’s 1859 raid on
Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. President James Buchanan sat helplessly in the White House, unableor unwilling to staunch the crisis.
Most white Northerners abhorred slavery, despite personal prejudices against AfricanAmericans. They saw Southerners as bold and arrogant, dominating the economy with their huge
plantations that inevitably threatened free farmers and factory workers up north. WilliamH. Seward in 1858, as a United States Senator, predicted an “irrepressible conflict” between
North and South. Lincoln too warned that the nation could not survive half slave, half free.
Northerners and Southerners alike saw 1860 as a watershed. The choice of a next president
would tip the balance, making the country unlivable for one side or the other.
By the time Republicans gathered in Chicago to pick a candidate, they had already seen
the Democratic Party disintegrate over the issue. Democrats had met in Charleston, SouthCarolina, in late April but had disbanded their convention after 57 ballots without a nominee.
Illinois U.S. Senator Stephen A. Douglas -- a champion of letting settlers decide for themselves
whether to allow slavery through what he called “popular sovereignty” -- far outpolled his moredogmatic rivals, but he failed to satisfy the Party’s rule requiring a two-thirds majority fornominees, a device designed to give slave states a veto. Delegates from seven southern states had
stormed out after failing to break the impasse. Later that summer, the Democratic Party would
split in two. Northerners, meeting in Baltimore, would nominate Douglas. Southerners would
meet in Richmond, Virginia, future capitol of the Confederacy, and chose Kentuckian John
Breckenridge, the country’s sitting Vice President and a pro-slavery Southerner.

This split among Democrats had already spawned the creation of yet another newpolitical force, the Constitutional Union Party. Shunning both Democrats and Republicans alikeas sectional zealots, it met in Baltimore on May 9 to choose its own separate candidate forpresident, Tennessee U.S. Senator John Bell. Bell, a former Speaker of the House who owned
166 slaves, saw himself as a unifying force who could bridge North and South and avoid Civil
War. To demonstrate his commitment to national harmony, he chose as his vice presidential
running mate the prominent Massachusetts orator and former U.S. Senator Edward Everett –who later would give the main speech before Lincoln’s own famous 1863 Gettysburg Address.

ChicagoAs a result, Republicans, their Party just five years old, suddenly found themselves in asurprising position. As they gathered in Chicago in May 1860, filled its hotels and enjoyed theexcitement, the delegates and politicos all recognized that whoever they chose as a candidate –unless they chose badly – could probably win the White House.
Following tradition, the candidates themselves stayed away -- Lincoln in Springfield and
Seward in upstate New York -- as their “friends” set up shop in hotels around the convention hallto plead their cases. Nine slave states decided to boycott the convention (Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, or the Carolinas).
All the delegates who came to Chicago were chosen by state and/or local party meetings - conventions and caucuses. Many were hand picked by local strongmen. Primary elections
giving voters a voice in party nominations would not exist until the Twentieth Century. Practicalpoliticians would make the choice, plying their craft on the loftiest stage of the era, their party’s
national convention.

Chicago itself in 1860 was a rugged frontier town of 100,000 on the banks of Lake
Michigan, the fastest growing city in America. Visitors saw it as a place of contrasts, glaring
wealth and poverty, luxury homes and mud streets, theaters and brothels. Growing rich fromrailroads and factories, the city sported forty large hotels, thousands of smokestacks, and a dozen
baseball teams.
For the Republican Convention, Chicago built what was then the largest indoor arena inAmerica. The “Wigwam,” named for the large tents often erected for religious camp meetings,
would hold twelve thousand people. It had space for 466 delegates on its wide stage, a standingarea (no chairs) for spectators, and an upstairs gallery for ladies with escorts. Its twenty-footdoors could open and allow thousands more to peer in from outside on nearby Lake and Marketstreets. The stage itself was lit by gas lamps and decked with evergreen wreaths and large oilpainted figures representing Agriculture, Justice, Liberty, Mechanics and the Arts. Busts ofprominent statesmen dotted the room along with coats of arms of the different States.
Some 40,000 strangers would invade Chicago for what would be the largest politicalgathering ever yet held in America. To greet them, the city lined its streets in red, white, and blue
bunting, posted flags and banners, and provided fire works, booming cannons, and marching
brass bands. Railroads provided special trains for delegates traveling from New York and othereast coast cities, with crowds and marching bands to greet them at stops along the way.
It would be a grand old time, no matter what.

The Newspapers
In this History Short, we tell the story of Lincoln’s nominating convention primarily
through the eyes of newspaper writers – giving it the immediacy and excitement of the moment.

Newspapers dominated the American media in 1860 and they covered politics intensely. Cuttingedge technologies were changing the face of news at that point: the telegraph, which allowed
stories to flash across the country almost instantly from the touch of an operator’s key; huge
steam presses that could produce tens of thousands of copies in a few hours; and type-setting
machines that allowed quick assembly of multiple daily editions. Lincoln’s convention in 1860
would be the first with telegraph instruments wired to transmit news directly from the convention
floor. The Chicago Wigwam itself made room for at least sixty reporters to cover the story fromthe scene.
The New York Herald and New York Sun had the biggest circulations in 1860, selling
77,000 and 60,000 copies each day, respectively. But the closest to being a truly national
platform was the New York Tribune, still operating under its founding publisher and editor,
Horace Greeley. In additional to its 55,000 daily circulation in 1860, the Tribune also produced aweekly edition with over 100,000 copies mailed across the country and passed hand to hand or
shared by friends in small towns. Its actual readership was estimated at half a million. Frontier
Illinois alone received 10,000 copies each week, making Greeley perhaps the best-known“pundit” of the era.
Greeley would play a uniquely large role in shaping American journalism in the 1800s.
Eccentric, talkative, disheveled, with an unmistakable wispy beard, he would take credit fortraining an entire generation of editors, writers, and craftsman at the Tribune who would lead
American newspapers for the next thirty years: Charles Dana at the New York Sun, HenryRaymond and George Jones at The New-York Times, Whitelaw Reid at the Tribune, George W.
Curtis at Harper’s Weekly, among others.
Most newspapers in 1860 were owned, controlled by, or allied with political parties.

Independence was rare, and newsmen saw no conflict in openly taking sides. Both Greeley andHenry Raymond, publisher of The New-York Times, sat as delegates at Lincoln’s 1860
nominating convention. Greeley had been a member of Congress in the 1840s. Raymond had
been New York Lieutenant Governor and speaker of the state assembly, and would be elected toCongress in 1865. Thurlow Weed, the acknowledged leader of the Seward campaign, publishedthe Albany Evening Journal, and Lincoln backer Joseph Medill ran the Chicago Tribune.
Here, too, Greeley had been the trail-blazer, having helped conceive the “Tippicanoe andTyler Too” campaign for Whig nominee William Henry Harrison in 1840 and made his New
York Tribune a campaign headquarters for Republican John Fremont in 1856. In 1872, Greeley
would run for president himself, winning the nominations of both the Democratic and the Liberal
Republican parties, though losing in a landslide to the incumbent, Ulysses S. Grant.
In 1860, Greeley came to Chicago with the singular purpose of wanting to stop William
Seward from winning the nomination. Greeley had once been close friends with Seward, a fellow
New York progressive, but they had broken years earlier in argument over a patronage ob. Now,
ostracized by New York’s pro-Seward delegation, Greeley attended the Convention s a carpetbag
delegate from Oregon and campaign loudly for Missouri’s Edward Bates.
In this History Short, we use the daily reporting of Greeley’s New York Tribune as themain source for coverage of the convention’s daily proceedings – just as did the half million
daily and weekly readers of the Tribune at the time. By-lines were rare in 1860s newspapers, somany of the fine journalists behind the columns remain anonymous.
For commentary, we turn to one of the most flamboyant newsmen of the era, Joe HowardJr. of The New-York Times. Born in Brooklyn in 1833, graduate of the Troy Polytechnic Institute(today’s RPI), Howard gave up a career in civil engineering to join the Times in early 1860 tocover a shoemakers strike in Lynn, Massachusetts. His dogged reporting sometimes crossed theethical line even by Nineteenth Century standards. During the Civil War, he covered dozens ofbattles from Bull Run to Balls Bluff, but was also caught violating military orders by sneaking
into the funeral of General Philip Kearney – killed in action at the Second Battle ofManassas/Bull Run -- to snoop on celebrities.
Most notoriously, Howard was prosecuted in May 1864 and spent fourteen weeks in a
military prison for producing a fake story claiming that President Lincoln planned to draft some
400,000 additional soldiers to bolster General Grant’s army in Virginia. The episode came just afew months after the New York City draft riots and terrified many New Yorkers. Howard later
admitted that he had designed the story to aid certain Wall Street speculators placing bets on theNew York Gold Exchange.
Still, Howard’s reporting on the 1860 presidential race was first rate, earning him anational following and a rare by-line. After the war, Howard would become one of the best
known writers in America, long-time president of the New York Press Club, and author of a
syndicated column in addition to editing the Brooklyn Eagle and other local papers.
Finally, for context, we include a smattering of eye-witness accounts, letters, interviews
and memoir excerpts from key players. For ease of reading, we have made minor edits, added
annotations and background, and updated formatting. Otherwise, we have left the original text
alone. We hope you enjoy it, a good story told well by talented people who saw it with their owneyes.
We give special thanks for help in preparing this History Short to the staff at the Libraryof Congress in Washington, D.C., a true national treasure that gave us easy access to all originalmaterial. Unless otherwise noted, they are the source of everything you see here. Thanks also to
my friends and colleagues Steve Terman and David O. Stewart for feedback on the concept,
Linette Abraham Vann for help in preparing the manuscript, and Paula Reichwald of Igossi.Com
for designing the cover and converting the book into digital form.
The full official proceedings of the 1860 Republican Convention are available online at
the University of California Digital Library,
http://archive.org/details/proceedingsofrep00repuiala