沙漠研究 22-1, 83 -86 (2012 )"ICAL 1 / DT X"

Journal of Arid Land Studies－Refereed Paper－Plant Biodiversity in the Semi-arid Zone of Tunisia
Kiyokazu KAWADA*1), 2), Kohei SUZUKI2), Hideki SUGANUMA3), Abderrazak SMAOUI4) and Hiroko ISODA1), 2)
Abstract: Plant biodiversity which is a base for supporting ecosystems brings not only contribution to our life as resource materials,
but also various ecosystem services such as environmental adjustment functions. Plants in arid and semi-arid zones are very sensitiveto climate change. For example, if there is a slight decrease in the amount of rain, the landscape is changed like a desert. On theother hand, vegetation with high biodiversity has plasticity to climate change. Therefore, it is important to manage the biodiversity insemi-arid zones to prevent desertification. In Tunisia, arid and semi-arid zones are distributed in the central and southern parts of thecountry. Field survey was carried out in November 2008 and November 2009. Field survey was conducted in the semi-arid zone ofTunisia wherein 17 study sites were set in locations with diverse vegetation types. Plant species composition and coverage weremeasured in 5 × 5 m quadrat. Results showed that the number of species richness ranges from two to twenty-two. The lowest
species richness was found to be in steppe that is dominated by Stipa tenacissima or Halocnemum strobilaceum. The highest species
richness was measured at steppe dominated by Retama raetam. We use diversity indexes (Shannon’s H’ and Simpson’s 1 - D) to rate
the important factors for biodiversity conservation.
Key Words: Biodiversity, Semi-arid, Species composition, Tunisia, Vegetation

1. Introduction
North Africa is characterized by specific ecosystems from
Mediterranean Sea to Sahara desert. In particular, we are able
to observe dynamic climate changes from Mediterranean
climate to desert climate in Maghreb countries (Tunisia,Algeria and Morocco). This climate diversity produced
various vegetation types along the graduation of aridity. For
example, the cork forest distribution near the north part ofMaghreb countries advance southward with the dominant
species changing from cork tree to Pine tree. Further south,
forest zone changed to steppe zone, then it gradually became adesert. We can see this dynamic change in vegetation withina short distance.
A huge area of the arid and semi-arid region is faced withthe desertification crisis. Extensive land use was pointed out
as one of the major factors that contributed to desertification inprevious studies (Li et al., 2000; Zhao et al., 2005). North
African countries do not regard this as a problem because allthese countries include Sahara desert. The land use of arid
and semi-arid area in North Africa has been historically used
for arid tolerant crops including palm or olive, grazing, and useof natural bioresources. In fact, most flatland without salt
accumulation area has been cultivated. Some areas withnatural vegetation are being degraded by grazing and use of thenatural bioresources.
This means that high risk ofdesertification continues to grow in arid and semi-arid area.

In order to conserve the arid and semi-arid land ecosystems,
it is important to detect when the degradation or desertification
starts. The floristic composition has been believed to give thesign of any environmental changes (Vesk and Westoby, 2001).
We attempted to know the extent of the arid and semi-arid landdegradation by assessing the floristic composition, as anindicator of the condition of the ecosystems (Dyksterhuis,1949; Nakamura et al., 2000; Numata, 1975; Sternberg et al.,
2000; Vesk and Westoby, 2001). Bai et al., (2004) alsosuggested that plant communities with high species diversity
combat desertification process. However there is not enoughinformation about arid and semi-arid land ecosystem in North
Africa. It is necessary to measure the plant community
structure in detail to know the basis of the ecosystem in the aridand semi-arid zones. In community scale research, species
composition and biomass distribution of plant communities areessential data for ecological description. An accumulation ofthese fundamental data are important to describe ecologicalcharacteristics in community scale. However there are few
studies about description of plant community structure of thearid and semi-arid zones in North Africa.
We examined floristic composition on different land use
intensities, including the meteorological factor. We focusedon comparison of vegetation structure among research sites toassess the effects of degradation on the arid and semi-arid landecosystems. The objectives of this study were to compare
species composition, species richness and species diversity ofthe study sites and make ecological interpretations of the* Corresponding Author: kawada.arena@gmail.com
1-1-1, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan
1) Alliance for Research on North Africa, University of Tsukuba, Japan

3) Faculty of Science and Technology, Seikei University

2) Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Japan4) Center of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria

semi-arid zone in Tunisia.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study sites
vTunisia is situated at latitude 30°13' - 38°20' N, and longitude
7°31' - 11°35' E. The country covers a total land area of
163,610 km2 and it has a population of 10,430,000 in 2009.
The Atlas Mountain ranges run from Southwest to Northeast
with the region being lower in the east. The highest point ofMts. Atlas in Tunisia is Mt Chambi (1,544 m), located at theKasserine province, situated in west side of Tunisia. Here wecan observe vegetation change, from the cork oak forest in thenorthern part to the Sahara desert in the southern part.
The seventeen study sites in the central area of Tunisia areshown in Figure 1. The sites were selected after preliminary
surveys of representative areas in the semi-arid zone of Tunisia.
The study sites were located at Gafsa and Kasserine province.
2.2. Field survey methods
Field survey was carried out in November 2008 andNovember 2009. We set nine quadrats in each study site.
Each quadrat size was 5 × 5 m. After recording all the namesof the species in the quadrat, we measured the coverage of thepopulation of each species. We measured vegetation
coverage using the Penfound-Howard method (Penfound andHoward 1940). The coverage class is divided into 6 classes:
4 for 75 - 100%, 3 for 50 - 75%, 2 for 25 - 50%, 1 for 5 - 25%,
1/ for 1 - 5%, + for less than 1%. Nomenclature follows
Flora de la Tunisie (Cuenod et al., 1954; Pottier-Alapetite 1979,1981).
2.3. Data analysis
To estimate relative dominance of species i (pi) of all
quadrats, we adopted the use of coverage class evaluated by
the Penfound-Howard criteria. In calculation, the coveragementioned above was converted as follows: 0.875 m2 for 4,0.625 m2 for 3, 0.375 m2 for 2, 0.15 m2 for 1, 0.03 m2 for 1/,
and 0.005 m2 for +.
We used Simpson’s diversity index (1 - D) and the
Shannon diversity index (H’) to assess multilateral species
diversity. Simpson’s diversity index is sensitive to thediversity of dominant species (Simpson, 1949):

1 − D = 1 − ∑ pi 2
The Shannon diversity index (H’) is sensitive to thediversity of common species (Weaver and Shannon, 1949):

H ' = −∑ Pi ln PiFig. 1. Location of study sites.

This unit is nat because we calculated H’ using logarithm
natural. To measure evenness, we used Pielou’s index (J):J = H ' / ln S
S denotes the total number of species (Pielou, 1969).
We used version 19 of SPSS for Windows (IBM, Armonk,NY, USA) for all statistical analyses. To test the relationshipbetween coverage and evenness, we used arcsin conversion tothese parameters. We then analyzed the correlation between
alien species richness and native species richness using
Spearman's rank correlation test.

3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Species composition
We recognized 152 species that included unidentified
species in the study sites. Most of the unidentified species
were in germination or seedling stage, and were, therefore, notdominant species. The dominant species in each study site
are shown in Table 1. Site K, L, M and N located at Pinus
halepensis forest, however our results did not include crowntree. Other sites were dominated by shrub or perennial
species. Some of the dominant species such as Arthrophytum
schmittianum (in site B and H), Salsola villosa, Salsora
vermiculate (in site F), Salsola tetrandra (in site R),
Arthrocnemum indicum (in site S) and Halocnemum
strobilaceum (in site T) are halophyte or salt-tolerant species.

Table 1. Dominant species of each study sites.
Site
Dominant species
B
Arthrophytum schmittianum
C
Moricandia arvensis
DAnabasis articulataE
Gymnocarpos decander, Helianthemum hirtum
F
Salsola villosa, Salsora vermiculateG
Thymelaea microphylla, Aristida plumosa
H
Arthrophytum schmittianum
I
Stipa tenacissima
JRetama raetam, Artemisia campestris
KStipa tenacissima
LRosmarinus officinalis
M
Rosmarinus officinalis, Quercus ilex
N
Stipa tenacissima, Rosmarinus officinalisO
Stipa tenacissima, Artemisia herba-alba
R
Salsola tetrandra
S
Arthrocnemum indicum
T
Halocnemum strobilaceum

Table 2. Species richness and species diversity of each study sites.
Site Species richness Shannon(H') Simpson (1-D)
B
7.1 ± 0.4
0.8 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.1
C
14.6 ± 0.7
1.5 ± 0.1
0.7 ± 0.0D
7.0 ± 0.4
1.9 ± 0.1
0.9 ± 0.0E
4.7 ± 0.3
0.9 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.0
F10.6 ± 0.6
1.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.1
G
10.2 ± 0.6
1.2 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.0H
9.4 ± 0.8
0.3 ± 0.0
0.1 ± 0.0
I
15.0 ± 0.7
1.5 ± 0.0
0.7 ± 0.0J
14.9 ± 1.1
1.4 ± 0.0
0.7 ± 0.0K
3.4 ± 0.4
0.4 ± 0.1
0.2 ± 0.1L
6.6 ± 0.7
0.9 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.0M
7.1 ± 0.8
1.0 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.0N
6.1 ± 0.4
0.9 ± 0.0
0.5 ± 0.0O
6.7 ± 0.5
0.8 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.1
R3.3 ± 0.2
0.4 ± 0.1
0.2 ± 0.0
S
11.8 ± 1.0
1.2 ± 0.1
0.4 ± 0.0T
2.9 ± 0.3
0.4 ± 0.1
0.2 ± 0.1

Pielou (J)0.4 ± 0.1
0.6 ± 0.0
1.0 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.0
0.1 ± 0.0
0.6 ± 0.0
0.5 ± 0.0
0.3 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.0
0.5 ± 0.0
0.5 ± 0.0
0.4 ± 0.0
0.4 ± 0.1
0.5 ± 0.0
0.3 ± 0.1

1.2
Stipa tenacissima
Arthrophytum schmittianum
20.68

Retama raetam
Aristida plumosa
10.72
6.17

Halocnemum strobilaceum
Thymelaea microphylla
Quercus ilex

Evenness index

Rosmarinus officinalis

0.8
0.60.4r = −0.928
P < 0.010.2

Artemisia herba-albaPlantago albicans
Others●Normal site
▲Saline siter = −0.617
P < 0.05

1.0

0.0
020

40
Coverage (%)

6080

Fig.2. Ratio of total coverage in study sites.

Fig. 3. Relationship between evenness and coverage.

Figure 2 shows the ratio of total converted coverage of thisstudy. The species listed ranked in the top 10, and it
dominated about 65% of the total cover ratio. Stipa
tenacissima dominated the highest ratio of coverage.
However S. tenacissima appeared at site H, K, L, M, N and O.
The secondary dominant species Rosmarinus officinalis is also
distributed at site K, L, M and N.

negative correlation with evenness of distribution (Fig. 3). It
means that vegetation coverage is caused by the growth of asingle or a few specific species. A decrease of evenness isdirectly linked to decrease of species diversity from thisrelationship.

3.2. Species richness and species diversity
The range of species richness was from two to twenty-twospecies per 25 m2. The lowest species richness was measured
at steppe, in a zone dominated by Stipa tenacissima (in site K)
or Halocnemum strobilaceum (in site T). The highest species
richness was measured at steppe, in a zone dominated by
Retama raetam and Artemisia campestris (in site J).
The average species richness and species diversity in eachsite are shown in Table 2. The lowest species richness wasmeasured at site T, while the highest species richness was atsite I. Meanwhile, the lowest species diversity was measured atsite H and the highest species diversity was measured at site D.
In all saline sites, halophyte or salt tolerant species
dominate, while in a normal site, the vegetation coverage has

The species diversity in the semi-arid zone of Tunisia
seemed to be uncorrelated with latitude. The results of ourstudy showed that the species diversity varied enormously inthe semi-arid zone of Tunisia. It is affected by various local
environmental factors such as soil, water, microclimate,grazing, and so on. We considered that one limiting factor ofspecies diversity is salinity. We measured the lowest species
diversity in site H which is dominated by Arthrophytum
schmittianum. This species is well known for its highadaptation to saline conditions.
Other halophyte orsalt-tolerant species were dominated at sites B, R and T.
These plants can indicate land condition of salinity but eachspecies has different adaptation ability to salinity. For
example, Halocnemum strobilaceum is able to adapt to high

4. Discussion

concentration of saline soil, while the Salsola genus is not able
to adapt to the same concentration as H. strobilaceum. We
can therefore prospect that salinity is an effective factor onspecies diversity.
On the other hand, species richness and species diversity
were not related. It suggests that evenness is a major
contributor to species diversity. We also considered that thedistribution pattern of appearance species decide species
diversity. The landscape of steppe in North Africa is far
different from that of the Eurasian steppe. The distribution
pattern of vegetation in North Africa is like a patch (Cerdà,1997). However, in the Eurasian steppe it is carpet-like(Nakamura et al., 2000; Kawada et al., 2005).
In
consequence, Shannon’s species diversity index of S.
tenacissima -dominant sites varies from 0.30 to 1.90,
meanwhile the diversity indexes of steppe in other regions
were 2.98 in Ukraine, and 1.98 in Inner Mongolia (Kawada etal., 2005; Wuyunna et al., 1999). The species diversity ofsteppe in Tunisia is lower than that of the Eurasian steppe.

5. Conclusion
Plant biodiversity in the semi-arid zone of Tunisia varies
enormously but is generally lower compared to other semi-aridenvironment. It suggests that the ecosystem in North Africa
have low ability to adapt (flexibility) to environmental change.
It is important to manage the biodiversity in the semi-arid zone
to prevent desertification.
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted under the support of the Mitsui& Co., Ltd. Environment Fund and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (19880006) of the Japan Society for the Promotion ofScience.

References
Bai Y., Han X., Wu J., Chen Z., Li L. (2004): Ecosystemstability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia
grassland. Nature, 431: 181-184.
Cerdà A. (1997): The effect of patchy distribution of Stipa
tenacissima L. on runoff and erosion. Journal of Arid
Environments, 36: 37-51
Cuenod A., Pottier-Alapetite G., Labbe A. (1954) Flora deTunisie Gyptogames vasculaires, Gymnospermes et
Monocotyledones, Imprimerie S. E. F. A. N., Tunis.
Dyksterhuis E.J. (1949): Condition and Management of Range

Land Based on Quantitative Ecology. Journal of Range
Management, 2: 104-115.
Kawada K., Vovk A.G., Filatova O.V., Araki M., Nakamura T.,
Hayashi, I. (2005): Floristic composition and plant biomass
production of steppe communities in the vicinity of Kharkiv,Ukraine. Grassland Science, 51(3): 205-213.
Li S.G., Harazono Y., Oikawa T., Zhao H.L., He Z.Y., ChangX.L. (2000): Grassland desertification by grazing and theresulting micrometeorological changes in Inner Mongolia.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 102: 125-137.
Nakamura T., Go T., Wuyunna, Hayashi I. (2000): Effects ofgrazing on the floristic composition of grasslands inBaiyinxile, Xilingole, Inner Mongolia. Science, 45: 342-350.
Numata M. (1975): Methods of biological description ofvascular plants.
Penfound W.T., Howard J.A. (1940): A phytosociologicalstudy of an evergreen oak forest in the vicinity of New
Orleans, Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist, 1:
165-174.
Pielou, E.C. (1969): An introduction to mathematical ecology.
New York, Wiley-Interscience.
Pottier-Alapetite G. (1979) Flora de Tunisie Angiospermes dictyledones *Apetales - dialypetales, Ministere del’Enseignement Superieur et de la Researche Scientifique etle Ministere de I’Agriculture, Tunis.
Pottier-Alapetite G. (1981) Flora de Tunisie Angiospermes dictyledones *Gamopetales, Ministere de l’Enseignement
Superieur et de la Researche Scientifique et le Ministere deI’Agriculture, Tunis.
Simpson E.H. (1949): Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163:688.
Sternberg M., Gutman M., Perevolotsky A., Ungar E.D., Kigel
J. (2000): Vegetation response to grazing management in a
Mediterranean herbaceous community: A functional group
approach. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 37(2): 224-237.
Vesk P.A., Westoby M. (2001): Predicting plant species'
responses to grazing. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38(5):897-909.
Weaver W., Shannon, C.E. (1949): The Mathematical Theoryof Communication. University of Illinois Press, Illinois.
Wuyunna, Nakamura T., Hayashi I. (1999): Species Diversity
and Phytomass of the Grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China.
Grassland Science, 45: 140-148.
Zhao H.L., Zhao X.Y., Zhou R.L., Zhang T.H., Drake S.
(2005). Desertification processes due to heavy grazing insandy rangeland, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid
Environments, 62(2): 309-319