AERC TAC’s
TAXONOMIC RECOMMENDATIONSJuly 2010

Citation:
Crochet P.-A., Raty L., De Smet G., Anderson B., Barthel P.H., Collinson J.M., Dubois P.J., Helbig
A.J., Jiguet F., Jirle E., Knox A.G., Le Maréchal P., Parkin D.T., Pons, J.-M., Roselaar C.S.,
Svensson L., van Loon A.J., Yésou P. (2010) AERC TAC's Taxonomic Recommendations. July
2010. Available online at http://www.aerc.eu/tac.html.

Authorship:
The three chairmen of the TAC over the past several years are listed first as they were largely
responsible for the compilation of the report. Unless they refused, members of the nationaltaxonomic committees who were responsible for the decisions that fed into the report are then listed
in alphabetic order, in recognition of their essential input to this document. This should not beinterpreted as suggesting that they support every individual conclusion contained here. Authors
acknowledge here the contributions of A. B. van den Berg, R. Sluys, C. J. Hazevoet. G. Sangster
has contributed hugely to the progress of many decisions and his input has been instrumental to
finalize the present document.

Introduction
This document constitutes the official 2010 AERC TAC recommendations for species-levelsystematics of Western Palearctic birds. For full information on the TAC and its history, pleaserefer to the documents on the AERC web page www.aerc.eu, including the minutes of the AERC
meetings (http://www.aerc.eu/Minutes.htm) and the TAC pages (http://www.aerc.eu/aerc_tac.htm).
The TAC has five members: Taxonomy Sub-committee of the British Ornithologists’ Union
Records Committee (BOURC-TSC, UK), Commission de l’Avifaune Française (CAF, France),
Swedish Taxonomic Committee (STC, Sweden), Commissie Systematiek Nederlandse Avifauna(CSNA, Netherlands) and German Taxonomic Committee (German TC, Germany). As decided
long ago (see introduction to AERC TAC 2003), systematic changes are based on decisions
published by, or directly passed to the TAC chairman, by these taxonomic committees (TCs).
The format of this document was agreed at the Blankenberge (Belgium) meeting (27&28 November2009), where the following points were adopted:=> only systematic and nomenclatural changes affecting the list of species of the birds of theWestern Palearctic (WP) are considered; the starting point is the list of Holarctic birds
published by Voous (1973, 1977a, 1977b). To ease the publication process a shorter format ofrecommendations (compared to the 2003 document) has been adopted: for each case there is
now only a summary of the support among TCs and a list of relevant TCs publications.
=> English names follow the IOC world bird list (Gill & Donsker 2010).
The AERC list of the birds of the Western Palearctic, based on the principles detailed above, will
be made available on the AERC web page at the same time as these recommendations.
This document has been prepared by Laurent Raty (current TAC chairman) and Pierre-André
Crochet (appointed co-chairman at the Blankenberge meeting), with extensive use of the previous
AERC TAC (2003) recommendations prepared by Gunter de Smet (then chairman of the TAC). It
has been significantly improved by comments from its co-authors.
This document is made of three parts:
The “AERC TAC 2009 new recommendations” are changes adopted after the publication of the2003 TAC document and based on the voting process detailed below.
The “Cases previously adopted but decisions subsequently overturned” lists, as the nameimplies, two decisions that were published in AERC TAC 2003 recommendations but for
which there is no longer enough support from the TAC members to sustain a change from the
Voous list.
The “AERC TAC 2003 recommendations” are those recommendations posted on the AERC web
site in 2003. They have been modified to agree with the format adopted in Blankenberge (seeabove) but for consistency reasons they have all been retained as long as the support from theTCs has increased or remained identical. Relevant taxonomic committee publications havebeen updated. The only exception concerns some cases included in the 2003 document whichhave been deleted because they had already been adopted in Voous’s series of papers or were
not affecting the WP species list.
1) The voting system has been the subject of considerable debate among the TCs’ members. The
majority-rule system adopted following an email consultation of AERC members on the AERC
mailing list in early 2008 and confirmed during the Blankenberge meeting has been rejected bysome TCs. While the voting system will need to be further discussed among TCs’ members andbetween AERC and TC’s members in the future, the current document is based on unanimity ofvoting TCs.
More precisely: i) a change can only be accepted if it receives at least three positive votes: nochange can be accepted if less than three members vote; ii) a change cannot be accepted if it2

receives one (or more) negative votes and iii) "pending" now counts as a “no”. Of course in thiscase a vote "no" does not mean "We believe the change is wrong" but either "We believe the change
is wrong" or "The change might well be justified but we do not consider that there is enoughevidence at present, so we should wait and in the meantime retain the status quo". There are thus
only 3 possible votes: 'yes', 'no' or ‘no vote’.
In this document, the support for each case is given as yes / no / not addressed.
Note that several TAC members sent some of their votes directly to the TAC chairman, either
without publishing a decision on the case (when this did not affect their national list) or prior to the
publication of their own decisions in order not to delay the publication of the TAC
recommendations. There might thus be some discrepancy between the support indicated here
and the “relevant taxonomic committee publications” section; this is not necessarily a mistake.
2) The species sequence (the higher-level systematics i.e. the family and order names and the orderof the species in the species list) has generally not been addressed by the AERC TAC. This
document and the corresponding list of birds of the Western Palearctic thus still follow the sequence
in Voous (1973; 1977a; b) except for a single decision adopted by all TAC members. This speciessequence and the corresponding higher-level systematics are now totally outdated (they are now
known to grossly misrepresent avian species relationships in many cases) and updating them will
become a major task of future TAC work.
The single unanimous change to the sequence list concerns the position of the Anseriformes andGalliformes: numerous lines of evidence show that the most basal subdivision among modern birds
is between Palaeognathae (ratites and tinamous) and Neognathae (all other modern birds) and that,among the latter, Anseriformes and Galliformes are sister taxa and form together the sister group of
all the other neognath orders. In application of the convention that sister groups are best listed inorder of increasing species-richness (de Queiroz & Gauthier 1992), taxonomic lists of modern birds
should start with Palaeognathae, followed by Neognathae; among the latter, Galloanserae shouldcome first; and among them, Anseriformes should precede Galliformes.
3) In general, only the changes that affect the list of the species of the Western Palearctic are
considered here, so changes affecting name or validity of subspecies are not considered, except ina few cases of special interest.
4) Purely nomenclatural changes made mandatory by the rules of zoological nomenclature(ICZN 1999) have been automatically accepted without relying on the voting process.
5) For convenience, the limits of the Western Palearctic region follow those defined in the“Birds of the Western Palearctic” (BWP) (Cramp et al. 1977-1994). They are arbitrary (like anyother limit) and do not always follow the limits of the biogeographic WP region. For example, thetransition between the Sahel (Afrotropical) and the Sahara (Palearctic) often lies further south thanthe BWP limit, while in the Middle East, Palearctic faunal elements predominate in Western Iranand most of Arabia even if both regions are exluded from the BWP limits.
6) The default species-level systematics (the starting point of the list) is the series of papers
published by Voous (1973; 1977a; 1977b) in the journal Ibis. The AERC WP list thus follows
the Voous systematics for species names, except for the changes listed here. It should be noted that
there are a few differences between the original Ibis papers and the subsequent reprint of the Voouslist. For species not in Voous (a few introduced or accidental species), the default species-levelsystematics is that of the IOC world bird list.
7) English names follow the IOC world bird list except in a few cases where such names only
make sense in the light of taxonomic decisions that have not been adopted by the TAC. For
example, Western Great Egret (IOC name for Egretta alba) has been changed to Great Egret
because the AERC TAC does not split E. modesta (Eastern Great Egret) from E. alba.

38) This document is by essence incomplete. Recommendations can only be adopted after they
have been accepted and often published by at least three national taxonomic committees. Since eachtaxonomic committee deals with systematic issues in different order, many changes that are strongly
supported by published evidence have not yet reached enough support among TAC members, andare not included here.
This document is certainly not free from mistakes. One of the advantages of posting it on the web isthat mistakes can easily be corrected, so please send any comments, suggestions or corrections to
Pierre-André Crochet (pierre-andre.crochet at cefe.cnrs.fr).
Thanks to Aleix Comas, Richard Klim, Yann Kolbeinsson, Peter Kovalik, William Velmala forcorrecting a number of mistakes in previous versions of this document or the associated WP list.

AERC TAC 2009 new recommendations
Canada Goose Branta canadensis (polytypic: canadensis, interior, maxima, fulva, moffitti,
occidentalis, parvipes)
Cackling Goose Branta hutchinsii (split from B. canadensis; polytypic: hutchinsii,
leucopareia, minima, taverneri)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2005, on
behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Anderson et al. (2007,
on behalf of the STC), Jiguet et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF).
Velvet Scoter Melanitta fusca
White-winged Scoter Melanitta deglandi (split from M. fusca; polytypic: deglandi,stejnegeri)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2005, on
behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005), Commission de l’Avifaune
Française (2006, CAF), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC). Detailed review: Collinson etal. (2006, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Common Scoter Melanitta nigra
Black Scoter Melanitta americana (split from M. nigra)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2005, on
behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Commission del’Avifaune Française (2006, on behalf of the CAF), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC).
Detailed review: Collinson et al. (2006, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Smew Mergellus albellus (was Mergus albellus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is supported by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Le Maréchal etal. (1999, on the behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (2005;
in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Cory’s Shearwater Calonectris diomedea (polytypic: diomedea, borealis)
Cape Verde Shearwater Calonectris edwardsii (split from C.diomedea)
4Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC did
not address this case yet.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig(in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Jiguet et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF).
Remark: The CSNA recommends treating the complex as three species, splitting also C. borealis
from C. diomedea.
Macaronesian Shearwater Puffinus baroli (split from extralimital P. assimilis; polytypic:
baroli and boydi)
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is favoured by four of the five TAC members, the CSNA did not
address it.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany),
Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Jiguet et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF).
Remark: This is clearly an incomplete case. The taxonomy of the two other taxa of the LittleAudubon’s Shearwater complex that are on the Western Palearctic list (persicus and bailloni, both
vagrants to Israel) should also be reviewed. Both are currently treated as subspecies of Audubon’s
Shearwater P. lherminieri but none of them is in fact related to lherminieri. The French and German
TC both recommend treating them as distinct species (P. persicus and P. bailloni), as also adopted
by the IOC World Bird List, but this proposal has not yet reached enough support among the TAC
members to get accepted here.
Bonelli’s Eagle Aquila fasciata (was Hieraaetus fasciatus)
Booted Eagle Aquila pennata (was Hieraaetus pennatus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Jiguet et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF), Anderson
et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Eurasian Dotterel Charadrius morinellus (was Eudromias morinellus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: This case has apparently never been formallyaddressed by any of the TCs but all five of them use Charadrius morinellus in their national lists.
Spur-winged Lapwing Vanellus spinosus (was Hoplopterus spinosus)
Black-headed Lapwing Vanellus tectus (was Hoplopterus tectus)
Red-wattled Lapwing Vanellus indicus (was Hoplopterus indicus)
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC did
not address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster
et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Little Gull Hydrocoloeus minutus (was Larus minutus)
Sabine’s Gull Xema sabini (was Larus sabini)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is supported by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany),
Sangster et al. (2007, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of theCSNA).
Remark: These two recommendations have reached enough support to be formally accepted here
but the generic classification of gulls still needs further changes in order to reflect species
relationships adequately.
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia (was Sterna caspia)
5

Little Tern Sternula albifrons (was Sterna albifrons)
Saunders’s Tern Sternula saundersi (was Sterna saundersi)
Aleutian Tern Onychoprion aleuticus (was Sterna aleutica)
Bridled Tern Onychoprion anaethetus (was Sterna anaethetus)
Sooty Tern Onychoprion fuscatus (was Sterna fuscata)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet
et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Black Tern Chlidonias niger (was Chlidonias nigra)
White-winged Tern Chlidonias leucopterus (was Chlidonias leucoptera)
Notice the correct spelling: Chlidonias is masculine (David & Gosselin 2002a). Chlidonias hybridaremains as such as the specific epithet hybrida is a masculine noun (David & Gosselin 2002b).
Black-billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus (was Coccyzus erythrophthalmus)
Notice the correct spelling: the spelling erythrophthalmus constitutes an unjustified emendation (seeKnox et al. 2008).
Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon (was Ceryle alcyon)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Sangster et al.
(2007, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Red-rumped Swallow Cecropis daurica (was Hirundo daurica)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet
et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
American Cliff Swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota (was Hirundo pyrrhonota)
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is favoured by four of the five TAC members, the CSNA did not
address it.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet et al.
(2007, on behalf of the CAF).
Hume's Wheatear Oenanthe albonigra (was Oenanthe alboniger)
Notice the correct spelling: Oenanthe is a Latin feminine noun, hence is feminine; the original
spelling of the specific epithet was alboniger, which is a compound Latin adjective and must agree
in gender with Oenanthe (David & Gosselin 2002b).
Naumann's Thrush Turdus naumanni
Dusky Thrush Turdus eunomus (split from T. naumanni).
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2008, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Red-throated Thrush Turdus ruficollis
Black-throated Thrush Turdus atrogularis (split from T. ruficollis).
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.

6Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2008, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Azure-winged Magpie Cyanopica cyanus (was Cyanopica cyana)
Notice the correct spelling: although Cyanopica is feminine, cyanus is a Latinised Greek noun withmodified ending, and not an adjective; its original spelling should therefore be retained (David &Gosselin 2002a).

Cases previously adopted but decisions subsequently
overturned
Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica (no change)
This species had been transferred to the genus Sterna in the previous AERC TAC recommendations(AERC TAC 2003). With the recognition of the genera Hydroprogne, Sternula and Onychoprion(see above), this move is no longer justified and all five TAC members now support the use of
Gelochelidon.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet
et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Greenish Warbler Phylloscopus trochiloides
Green Warbler Phylloscopus nitidus (no change)
Two-barred Warbler Phylloscopus plumbeitarsus (no change)
These three taxa were treated as distinct species in Voous (1977a). Green and Two-barred Warblers
were lumped with Greenish Warbler in the previous AERC TAC recommendations (AERC TAC
2003). There is however only limited support for this move: the CAF, CSNA and German TC
prefer to keep them as distinct species, and the BOURC-TSC has officially split Green Warbler
again. Only the STC officially prefers to treat these three forms as a single species. There is thus
now a 1/4/0 support for lumping Green Warbler and 2/3/0 for lumping Two-barred Warbler with
Greenish Warbler. None of these changes can thus be accepted and the three taxa are treated here as
specifically distinct following Voous (1977a).
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC, infavour of the lump of the three taxa), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Knox et al. (2008, on
behalf of the BOURC-TSC, where nitidus is split again).

AERC TAC 2003 recommendations(updated for taxonomic committees support)

Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus muta (was Lagopus mutus)
Notice the correct spelling: Lagopus is a Latin feminine noun, hence must be regarded as feminine;muta is an adjective and must agree in gender with Lagopus (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Egyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiaca (was Alopochen aegyptiacus)

7

Notice the correct spelling: Alopochen ends in a transliterated Greek noun of common gender andwas established in combination with a feminine adjective, hence is to be treated as feminine;
aegyptiaca is an adjective and must agree in gender with Alopochen (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Eurasian Teal Anas crecca
Green-winged Teal Anas carolinensis (split from A. crecca)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), British
Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (2001), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of theSTC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Le Maréchal et al. (2001, on behalf of theCAF). Detailed review: Sangster et al. (2001, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Black-throated Loon Gavia arctica
Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica (split from G. arctica)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Jiguet &la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Knox et al. (2008, on
the behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Black-browed Albatross Thalassarche melanophris (was Diomedea melanophris)
Shy Albatross Thalassarche cauta (was Diomedea cauta)
Yellow-nosed Albatross Thalassarche chlororhynchos(was Diomedea chlororhynchos)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Dubois et al. (2003, on behalf of the CAF),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review: Sangster et al. (2002b, on behalf of
the BOURC-TSC).
Soft-plumaged Petrel Pterodrome mollis
Zino’s Petrel Pterodroma madeira (split from P. mollis)
Fea’s Petrel Pterodroma feae (split from P. mollis)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1992), Kjellén &Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (in Bauer et
al. 2005, Germany).
Black-capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata
Bermuda Petrel Pterodroma cahow (split from P. hasitata)Support: 3/1/1. This treatment is supported by three of the five TAC members, the BOURC-TSC
prefers to wait and the CSNA did not address it.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Helbig (inBauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Manx Shearwater Puffinus puffinus
Yelkouan Shearwater Puffinus yelkouan (split from P. puffinus)
Balearic Shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus (split from P. puffinus)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1991), Le Maréchal etal. (1999, on the behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), British
8Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (2001), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of theSTC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review: Sangster et al. (2002c, on
behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Northern Gannet Morus bassanus (was Sula bassana)Support: 4/1/0. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the German TC
prefers to keep this species in the genus Sula.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1991); Sangster et al.
(1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (2005;
in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Dwarf Bittern Ixobrychus sturmii (was Ardeirallus sturmii)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is supported by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén, N. & Olsson, U. (1995, on behalf of STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF).
Striated Heron Butorides striata (was Butorides striatus)
Notice the correct spelling: Butorides was originally established in combination with the feminine
adjective javanica and should thus be treated as feminine; striata is an adjective and must agree in
gender with Butorides (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Black Heron Egretta ardesiaca (was Hydranassa ardesiaca)
Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor (was Hydranassa tricolor)
Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea (was Hydranassa caerulea)
Support: 3/0/2. This treatment is supported by three of the five TAC members, the BOURC-TSC
and CSNA did not address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Jiguet etal. (2007, on behalf of the CAF).
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus (split from the extralimital P. ruber)Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Knox etal. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Dubois et al. (2003, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Tawny Eagle Aquila rapax (polytypic: belisarius, extralimital vindhiana and rapax)
Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis (split from A. rapax; polytypic: orientalis, extralimital
nipalensis)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publication: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster etal. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca
Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti (split from A. heliaca)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publication: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Allen’s Gallinule Porphyrio alleni (was Porphyrula alleni)
Purple Gallinule Porphyrio martinica (was Porphyrula martinica)9Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the CSNA did not
address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Jiguet
et al. (2007, on behalf of the CAF), Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC), Sangster et al.
(2007, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Note: Purple Gallinule is sometimes called P. martinicus (for ex. Gill & Donsker 2010). See AERC
TAC 2003 for a discussion on this issue.
Demoiselle Crane Grus virgo (was Anthropoides virgo).
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC did
not address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata (polytypic: undulata and fuertaventurae)
Macqueen’s Bustard Chlamydotis macqueenii (split from C. undulata)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Le Maréchal et al. (1999, on the behalf of the CAF),
Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Knox et al. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Detailed review: Sangster et al. (2004a, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Kurrichane Buttonquail Turnix sylvaticus (was Turnix sylvatica)
Notice the correct spelling: Turnix is the masculine French noun “turnix” and is thus masculine(David & Gosselin 2002a).
American Golden Plover Pluvialis dominica
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva (split from P. dominica)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1986), Kjellén &Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (in Bauer et
al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review: Knox (1987).
Sociable Lapwing Vanellus gregarius (was Chettusia gregaria)
White-tailed Lapwing Vanellus leucurus (was Chettusia leucura)Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), British
Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Le Maréchal et al. (1999, on the behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al.
(1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Stilt Sandpiper Calidris himantopus (was Micropalama himantopus)
Support: 4/1/0. This treatment is favoured by four TAC members, the German TC prefers to wait.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Sangster et al. (2004b, on behalf of the
BOURC-TSC), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005,
Germany).
Common Snipe Gallinago gallinago
Wilson’s Snipe Gallinago delicata (split from G. gallinago)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
10Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF),
Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Knox et al. (2008, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius
Notice the correct spelling: Actitis originates from a Greek word (ακτιτης) latinised with a modified
ending indicating no particular gender, and its gender was not indicated by its original author; it isthus to be treated as masculine (David & Gosselin 2002a).
European Herring Gull Larus argentatus (polytypic: argentatus, argenteus)
Caspian Gull Larus cachinnans (split from L. argentatus)
Yellow-legged Gull Larus michahellis (split from L. argentatus; polytypic: michahellis,
atlantis)Armenian Gull Larus armenicus (split from L. argentatus)
Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus (polytypic: fuscus, intermedius, graellsii, heuglini,
barabensis).
Support: 5/0/0. The species status of these five species is supported by all five TAC members.
American Herring Gull Larus smithsonianus (split from L. argentatus; polytypic:
smithsonianus, extralimital mongolicus, vegae)
Support: 4/1/0. A separate species status for L. smithsonianus is supported by four of the five TAC
members, the Swedish STC prefers to wait.
The CAF, CSNA and German TC further split L. vegae (with subspecies mongolicus) from L.
smithsonianus, but since this treatment is not supported yet by either the BOURC-TSC or Swedish
STC, it is not adopted here.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2003, on
behalf of the CSNA; 2007, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Le Maréchal et al. (2001, on the behalfof the CAF), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Dubois et al. (2003, on behalf of
the CAF), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the
BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review: Collinson et al.
(2008, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Long-billed Murrelet Brachyramphus perdix (split from extralimital B. marmoratus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Sangster et al. (2007, on behalf on the BOURC-TSC).
Parakeet Auklet Aethia psittacula (was Cyclorrhynchus psittacula)
Support: 3/0/2. This treatment is supported by three of the five TAC members, the BOURC-TSC
and CSNA did not address it.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC).
Snowy Owl Bubo scandiacus (was Nyctea scandiaca)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b,
on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la
CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Brown Fish Owl Bubo zeylonensis (was Ketupa zeylonensis)
Support: 3/1/1. This treatment is supported by three of the five TAC members; the Swedish STC
prefers to wait and the BOURC-TSC did not address it.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
11

Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus (split from the extralimital M. superciliosus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster
et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (in Bauer et al.
2005, Germany).
Chestnut-headed Sparrow-Lark Eremopterix signatus (not in Voous 1977a)
Notice the correct spelling: Eremopterix ends in a Greek noun (πτερυξ) latinised with a modified
ending indicating no particular gender, and its gender was not indicated by its original author; it isthus to be treated as masculine (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Bar-tailed Lark Ammomanes cinctura (was Ammomanes cincturus)
Notice the correct spelling: Ammomanes was first established in combination with the feminine
adjective pallida and is thus of feminine gender; in addition cinctura is a noun in apposition, hence
its original spelling must be conserved (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Common House Martin Delichon urbicum (was Delichon urbica)
Notice the correct spelling: Delichon is an anagram of Chelidon, its gender was not indicated by its
original author, but it ends in -on and as a consequence must be treated as neuter (David & Gosselin
2002a).
Richard’s Pipit Anthus richardi (split from the extralimital A. novaeseelandiae)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster
et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA; 2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Baueret al. 2005, Germany).
Water Pipit Anthus spinoletta
Eurasian Rock Pipit Anthus petrosus (split from A. spinoletta; polytypic: petrosus,
littoralis)
Buff-bellied Pipit Anthus rubescens (split from A. spinoletta; polytypic: rubescens,japonicus and extralimital alticola)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1986), Kjellén &Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (in Bauer et
al. 2005, Germany).
Güldenstädt’s Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogastrus (was Phoenicurus erythrogaster).
Notice the correct spelling: erythrogastra (this species nomen was originally coined as Motacillaerythrogastra) is a latinized Greek adjective and its masculine form is erythrogastrus (David &Gosselin 2002b).
Common Stonechat Saxicola torquatus (was Saxicola torquata)
Notice the correct spelling: Saxicola ends in a Latin component of common gender, and its gender
was not indicated by its original author; it is thus to be treated as masculine (David & Gosselin
2002a).
Pied Wheatear Oenanthe pleschanka
Cyprus Wheatear Oenanthe cypriaca (split from O. pleschanka)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
12Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), Sangster
et al. (2004b, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany),
Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Kurdistan Wheatear Oenanthe xanthoprymna
Red-tailed Wheatear Oenanthe chrysopygia (split from O. xanthoprymna)
Support: 3/1/1. This treatment is supported by three of the five TAC members; the CSNA prefers to
wait and the BOURC-TSC did not address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF),
Anderson et al. (2007, on behalf of the STC).
Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus
Basra Reed Warbler Acrocephalus griseldis (split from A. arundinaceus)
Oriental Reed Warbler Acrocephalus orientalis (split from A. arundinaceus)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Detailed review: Parkin et al. (2004, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Eastern Olivaceous Warbler Hippolais pallida
Western Olivaceous Warbler Hippolais opaca (split from H. pallida)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Knox et al. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Dubois et al. (2003, on behalf of the CAF),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review: Parkin et al. (2004, on behalf of the
BOURC-TSC).
Booted Warbler Hippolais caligata
Sykes’s Warbler Hippolais rama (split from H. caligata)Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Knox etal. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Detailed review: Parkin et al. (2004, on behalf of t he BOURC-TSC).
Marmora’s Warbler Sylvia sarda
Balearic Warbler Sylvia balearica (split from S. sarda)
Support: 4/1/0. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC
prefers to wait.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Asian Desert Warbler Sylvia nana
African Desert Warbler Sylvia deserti (split from S. nana)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b,
on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la
CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Western Orphean Warbler Sylvia hortensis
Eastern Orphean Warbler Sylvia crassirostris (split from S. hortensis; polytypic:
crassirostris, jerdoni)
13Support: 4/1/0. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC
prefers to wait.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF),
Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Yellow-browed Warbler Phylloscopus inornatus
Hume’s Leaf Warbler Phylloscopus humei (split from P. inornatus; polytypic: humei andextralimital mandellii)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Kjellén & Olsson (1995, on behalf of STC), British
Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Helbig (2005; inBauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Western Bonelli’s Warbler Phylloscopus bonelli
Eastern Bonelli’s Warbler Phylloscopus orientalis (split from P. bonelli)This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publication: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997); Sangster et al.
(1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Le Maréchal et al. (2001, on the behalf of the CAF), Anderson &Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Common Chiffchaff Phylloscopus collybita
Iberian Chiffchaff Phylloscopus ibericus (split from P. collybita)
Canary Islands Chiffchaff Phylloscopus canariensis (split from P. collybita; polytypic:
canariensis, exsul)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (1999, on behalf of the CSNA), British
Ornithologists’ Union Record Committee (1999), Le Maréchal & la CAF (1998, on behalf of theCAF), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005,
Germany).
Remark: The name used for the Iberian Chiffchaff in Sangster et al. (2002a) was P. brehmii(Homeyer, 1871), which is in fact a junior synonym of collybita. Relevant taxonomic committee
publications on this nomenclatural change: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA), Knox etal. (2002, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Dubois et al. (2003, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Common Firecrest Regulus ignicapilla (was Regulus ignicapillus)
Notice the correct spelling: ignicapilla is a noun in apposition and therefore is not affect by thegender of the genus nomen (David & Gosselin 2002b).
Madeira Firecrest Regulus madeirensis (split from R. ignicapilla)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Sangster et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURCTSC), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Asian Brown Flycatcher Muscicapa dauurica (was Muscicapa latirostris)
This is a purely nomenclatural change: the correct scientific name of this species has been discussed
by Banks & Browning (1995), the name dauurica Pallas, 1811 has priority over latirostris Raffles,
1822.
14

Red-breasted Flycatcher Ficedula parva
Taiga Flycatcher Ficedula albicilla (split from F. parva)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b,
on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la
CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany). Detailed review:
Svensson et al. (2005, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
European Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca
Atlas Pied Flycatcher Ficedula speculigera (split from F. hypoleuca)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Sangster et al. (2004b, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of theCAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Common Babbler Turdoides caudata (was Turdoides caudatus)
Fulvous Babbler Turdoides fulva (was Turdoides fulvus)
Notice the correct spelling: Turdoides is derived from Latin, ends in -oides, and was originallycombined with the feminine adjectival species name leucocephala. It is thus of feminine gender(David & Gosselin 2002a).
Eurasian Blue Tit Parus caeruleus
African Blue Tit Parus teneriffae (split from P. caeruleus; polytypic: P. c. palmensis,
teneriffae, ombriosus, degener, ultramarinus, cyrenaicae)
Support: 4/1/0. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC
prefers to wait.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Black-crowned Tchagra Tchagra senegalus (was Tchagra senegala)
Notice the correct spelling: Tchagra is the masculine French noun “tchagra” and is thus masculine;
senegalus is an adjective and must agree in gender with Tchagra (David & Gosselin 2002a).
Isabelline Shrike Lanius isabellinus (polytypic: L. i. phoenicuroides, isabellinus andarenarius). Note change of subspecies names:
Lanius isabellinus phoenicuroides remains as is;
Lanius isabellinus speculigerus becomes Lanius isabellinus isabellinus;
Lanius isabellinus isabellinus becomes Lanius isabellinus arenarius.
Support: 5/0/0. These changes have been accepted by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b,
on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (inBauer et al. 2005, Germany).
Great Grey Shrike Lanius excubitor
Southern Grey Shrike Lanius meridionalis (polytypic: meridionalis, koenigi, algeriensis,
elegans, aucheri, pallidirostris, and extralimital leucopygos, buryi, uncinatus and lahtora)
This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997); Sangster et al.
(1999, on behalf of the CSNA), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (inBauer et al. 2005, Germany).
15

Citril Finch Serinus citrinella
Corsican Finch Serinus corsicanus (split from S. citrinella)This treatment has already been recommended on behalf of the AERC TAC by Sangster et al.
(2002a), which see for details.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Le Maréchal et al. (2001, on the behalf of the CAF),
Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Helbig (in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany), Knox
et al. (2008, on behalf of the BOURC-TSC).
Crimson-winged Finch Rhodopechys sanguineus (was Rhodopechys sanguinea)
Notice the correct spelling: Rhodopechys ends in a transliterated Greek masculine noun, hence ismasculine; sanguineus is an adjective and must agree in gender with Rhodopechys (David &Gosselin 2002a).
Ovenbird Seiurus aurocapilla (was Seiurus aurocapillus)
Notice the correct spelling: although Seiurus is masculine, the specific epithet auricapilla ends in a
Latin noun with modified ending and is not an adjective; its original spelling must therefore be
retained (David & Gosselin 2002b).
Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis (was Ammodramus sandwichensis)
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the CSNA did not
address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Anderson &Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC).
Fox Sparrow Passerella iliaca (was Zonotrichia iliaca)
Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the CSNA did not
address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Anderson &Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC).
Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia (was Zonotrichia melodia)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is supported by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: British Ornithologists’ Union (1997), Anderson &Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Sangster et al. (2009, on behalf of the CSNA).
Striolated Bunting Emberiza striolata
House Bunting Emberiza sahari (split from E. striolata; polytypic: sahari, theresae,
sanghae)Support: 4/0/1. This treatment is supported by four of the five TAC members; the BOURC-TSC did
not address this case.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC),
Jiguet & la CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF).
Corn Bunting Emberiza calandra (was Miliaria calandra)
Support: 5/0/0. This treatment is favoured by all five TAC members.
Relevant taxonomic committee publications: Sangster et al. (2003, on behalf of the CSNA; 2004b,
on behalf of the BOURC-TSC), Anderson & Svensson (2003, on behalf of the STC), Jiguet & la
CAF (2004, on behalf of the CAF), Helbig (2005; in Bauer et al. 2005, Germany).

16

REFERENCES
AERC TAC (2003): AERC TAC's Taxonomic Recommendations. 1st December 2003. Available
online at http://www.aerc.eu/aerc_tac.htm [Accessed January 2010].
Anderson B., Svensson L. (2003): Holarktis fåglar. Ny forskning förändrar den officiella listan. VårFågelvärld 62: 6-12.
Anderson B., Jirle E., Svensson L. (2007): Förändringar i listan över Holarktis fåglar – Rapport nr 2från SOF:s Taxonomikommitté. Vår Fågelvärld 66: 14-21.
Banks R.C., Browning M.R. (1995): Comments on the status of revived old names for some North
American birds. The Auk 112: 633-648.
Bauer H.G., Bezzel E., Fiedler W. (eds) (2005): Das Kompendium der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Allesüber Biologie, Gefährdung und Schutz. 3 volumes. AULA-Verlag, Wiebelsheim.
British Ornithologists’ Union (1986): Records Committee: twelfth report (April 1986). Ibis 128:
601-603.
British Ornithologists’ Union (1991): Records Committee: fifteenth report (April 1991). Ibis 133:
438-441.
British Ornithologists’ Union (1992): Records Committee: seventeenth report (May 1992). Ibis 134:
380-381.
British Ornithologists’ Union (1997): Records Committee: twenty-third report (July 1996). Ibis
139: 197-201.
British Ornithologists’ Union Record Committee (1999): British Ornithologists’ Union Records
Committee: 25th report (October 1998). Ibis 141: 175-180.
British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee (2001): British Ornithologists’ Union Records
Committee: 27th report (October 2000). Ibis 143: 171-175.
Collinson M., Parkin D.T., Knox A.G, Sangster G., Helbig A.J. (2006): Species limits within thegenus Melanitta, the scoters. British Birds 99: 183-201.
Collinson M., Parkin D.T., Knox A.G., Sangster G., Svensson L. (2008): Species boundaries in the
Herring and Lesser Black-backed Gull complex. British Birds 101: 340-363.
Commission de l’Avifaune Française (2006): En direct de la CAF. Décisions prises par laCommission de l’avifaune française en 2004-2005. Ornithos 13: 244-257.
Cramp S., Simmons K.E.L., Perrins C.M. (eds) (1977-1994): Handbook of the birds of Europe, theMiddle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic. 9 volumes. Oxford University
Press, Oxford/London/New York.
David N., Gosselin M. (2002a): The grammatical gender of the avian genera. Bull. Brit. Ornithol.
Club 122: 257-275.
David N., Gosselin M. (2002b): Gender agreement of avian species names. Bull. Brit. Ornithol.
Club 122: 14-49.
Dubois P.J., Jiguet F., Le Maréchal P., CAF (2003): En direct de la CAF. Décisions récentes prises
par la Commission de l’Avifaune Française. Ornithos 10: 230-237.
Gill F.B., Wright M. (2006): Birds of the World. Recommended English Names. Princeton
University Press, Princeton and London.
Gill F., Donsker D. (eds) (2010): IOC World Bird Names (version 2.3). Available online at
http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [Accessed Jan 2010].

17

Helbig A.J. (2005): Anmerkungen zur Systematik und Taxonomie der Artenliste der Vögel
Deutschlands. Limicola 19: 112-128.
ICZN (1999): International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th ed. International Trust for
Zoological Nomenclature, London. Available online at http://www.iczn.org/iczn/ [Accessed Jan
2010].
Jiguet F., Crochet P.-A., Dubois P.J., Le Maréchal P., Pons J.-M., Yésou P. (2007): Décisions prises
par la Commission de l’Avifaune Française en 2006-2007. 11e rapport de la CAF. Ornithos 14:
108-115.
Kjellén N., Olsson U. (1995): Holarktis fåglar. Vår Fågelvärld suppl. no. 23. Sveriges
Ornitologiska Förening, Stockholm.
Knox A.G. (1987): Taxonomic status of 'Lesser Golden Plovers'. British Birds 80: 482-487.
Knox A. G., Helbig A.J., Parkin D.T., Sangster G. (2001): The taxonomic status of Lesser Redpoll.
British Birds 94: 260-267.
Knox A.G., Collinson J.M., Helbig A.J., Parkin D.T., Sangster G. (2002): Taxonomic
recommendations for British birds. Ibis 144: 707-710.
Knox A.G., Collinson J.M., Parkin D.T., Sangster G., Svensson L. (2008): Taxonomic
recommendations for British birds: Fifth report. Ibis 150: 833-835.
Le Maréchal P., CAF (1998): En direct de la CAF. Décisions récentes prises par la Commission del’Avifaune Française (CAF). Ornithos 5: 39-41.
Le Maréchal P., CAF (1999): En direct de la CAF. Décisions prises en 1998 et 1999 par laCommission de l’Avifaune Française (CAF). Ornithos 6: 189-192.
Le Maréchal P., Dubois P.J., CAF (2001): En direct de la CAF. Décisions prises le 24 Avril 2001
par la Commission de l’Avifaune Française. Ornithos 6: 216-219.
Parkin D.T., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Sangster G., Svensson L. (2004): Species limits
in Acrocephalus and Hippolais warblers from the Western Palearctic. British Birds 98: 276-299.
Queiroz K. de, Gauthier J. (1992): Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449 – 480.
Sangster G., Collinson J.M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T. (2002b): The generic status ofBlack-browed Albatross and other albatrosses. British Birds 95: 583-585.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T. (2002c): The specific status of
Balearic and Yelkouan Shearwater. British Birds 95: 636-639.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T. (2004a): The taxonomic status of
Macqueen's Bustard. British Birds 98: 60-67.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T. (2004b): Taxonomic
recommendations for British birds: second report. Ibis 146: 153-157.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T. (2005): Taxonomic
recommendations for British birds: third report. Ibis 147: 821-826.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Helbig A.J., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T., Prater T. (2001): The taxonomic
status of Green-winged Teal Anas carolinensis. British Birds. 94: 218-226.
Sangster G., Collinson M., Knox A.G., Parkin D.T., Svensson L (2007): Taxonomic
recommendations for British birds: fourth report. Ibis 149: 853-857.
Sangster G., Hazevoet C.J., van den Berg A.B., Roselaar C.S., Sluys, R. (1999): Dutch avifaunal
list: species concepts, taxonomic instability, and taxonomic changes in 1977-1998. Ardea 87: 139165.
Sangster G., Knox A.G., Helbig A.J., Parkin D.T. (2002a): Taxonomic recommendations for
European birds. Ibis 144: 153-159.
18

Sangster G., van den Berg A.B., van Loon A.J., Roselaar C.S. (2003): Dutch avifaunal list:
taxonomic changes in 1999-2003. Ardea 91: 279-286.
Sangster G., van den Berg A.B., van Loon A.J., Roselaar C.S. (2009): Dutch avifaunal list:
taxonomic changes in 2004-2008. Ardea 97: 373-381.
Voous K.H. (1973): List of recent holarctic bird species. Non-passerines. Ibis 115: 612-638.
Voous K.H. (1977a): List of recent holarctic bird species. Passerines. Ibis 119: 223-250.
Voous K.H. (1977b): List of recent holarctic bird species. Passerines (conclusion). Ibis 119: 376406.

19