CENSORSHIP
Human Rights - the Right to uphold Opinions without interference and to seek, receive andimpart Information and Ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
WHEREAS, Article 19 of the UDHR states:"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes
freedoms to uphold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."; andWHEREAS, Article 19 of the UDHR is enshrined in Article 19 of the ICCPR, which states:"Article 19.
1.

Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions withoutinterference.";

WHEREAS, Article 19 of the UDHR is enshrined in the ECHR in Article 10. the "Right of Freedomof Expression":"Article 10.
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive
and impart information and ideas without interference by publicauthority and regardless of frontiers.
This includes the right to express opinions, verbally or in writing or by protesting or throughart or music or other such forms of expression without interference from teachers and theschool's employees and agents. This also includes the right to receive ALL the information
about the alleged benefits, efficacy, risks, harms and funding sources and conflicts of interests
surrounding the so-called COVID-19 pandemic measures, both domestically andinternationally without interference, censorship, reputational attacks, blocking of informationand other such measures. Any information provided by the teachers, the school and its'
employees and agents which does NOT provide both sides of the debate of the risk/benefit
analysis of such COVID-19 pandemic measures, will likely amount to an "interference" and will
be a prima facie breach of Article 19 of the UDHR and Article 10 of the ECHR;
WHEREAS, in the case of Kimber, the court held that all Australians, including those who holdor are suspected of holding "anti-vaccination sentiments" are entitled to the protection of therule of law, stating inter alia:"[184] Finally, all Australians, including those who hold or are suspected ofholding "anti-vaccination sentiments", are entitled to the protection of our laws...";

- Kimber v Sapphire Coast Community Aged Care Ltd (C2021/2676) Australian Fair Work
Commission, Sydney, 27th September 2021; andWHEREAS, the Rome Declaration contains allegations by Physicians that they are being
discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about
new and emerging diseases - endangering the essence of the medical profession and the livesof Patients. The Rome Declaration contains the following Declaration, inter alia:"WHEREAS, physicians are increasingly being discouraged from engaging in open
professional discourse and the exchange of ideas about new and emerging
diseases, not only endangering the essence of the medical profession, but more
importantly, more tragically, the lives of our patients." https://stateofthenation.co/?p=86476
Such censorship is a prima facie breach of Article 19 and Article 10 of the ECHR. The same
applies to a child/children, their parents/grandparents, teachers or staff or others who arebeing discouraged from engaging in open professional discourse and the exchange of ideas
and information.; andWHEREAS, in the case of Kimber, the court held that Australians should "vigorously oppose"the "ongoing censorship of any views that question the current policies regarding COVID-19",
stating, inter alia:["183] Australians should also vigorously oppose the ongoing
censorship of any
views that question the current policies regarding COVID. Science is no longer
science if a person is not allowed to question it."
- Kimber v Sapphire Coast Community Aged Care Ltd (C2021/2676) Australian Fair Work
Commission, Sydney, 27th September 2021;and
WHEREAS, Article 10 of the ECHR provides for a limited right to derogate from the right tofreedom of expression as follows:"The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities,
may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as areprescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests ofnational security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention ofdisorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of thereputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received inconfidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary."; and