実験報告書様式（一般利用課題・成果公開利用）（ ※本報告書は英語で記述してください。ただし、産業利用課題として採択されている方は日本語で記述していただいても結構です。 ）MLF Experimental Report
課題番号 Project No.

提出日 Date of Report
装置責任者 Name of responsible person
Toshiya Otomo

実験課題名 Title of experiment

装置名 Name of Instrument/（BL No.）

Structure of liquid SnI4

NOVA/BL21

実験責任者名 Name of principal investigator

実施日 Date of Experiment

Kazuhiro Fuchizaki

March 14-15

所属 Affiliation
Department of Physics, Ehime University
試料、実験方法、利用の結果得られた主なデータ、考察、結論等を、記述して下さい。（適宜、図表添付のこと）
Please report your samples, experimental method and results, discussion and conclusions. Please add figures andtables for better explanation.
1. 試料 Name of sample(s) and chemical formula, or compositions including physical form.
tin tetraiodide (SnI4)
a molecular crystalline solid with the space symmetry Pa3 composed of molecules with the point symmetry Td
at ambient conditions
NOTE Because SnI4 is a hazardous substance, a careful treatment is required upon sampling.

2. 実験方法及び結果 （実験がうまくいかなかった場合、その理由を記述してください。）
Experimental method and results. If you failed to conduct experiment as planned, please describe reasons.
Experimental Method
Sample preparation
A silica tube with dimensions of 5.5 mm outer diameter (4.5 mm inner diameter) and 65 mm length was loadedwith a powdered sample that has been grounded from polycrystalline samples. The sample actually loaded wasabout 30 mm in length. The end of the tube was sealed with care by glasswork. The sealing was confirmed by
no SnI4 gas leaked out even after the sample was boiled by heating the tube. This confirmation was madetwice. Another sample with almost equal quantity was prepared in exactly the same way as a reserve. These
two samples were registered prior to the experiment.
Measurement
One of the tubes containing the sample was held in an electric furnace fixed in a vessel. The vessel, including
the furnace, was then evacuated for about an hour to attain 10-3 Pa. The furnace was gradually heated, whilethe vessel was kept evacuated. It took about three hours to reach and be held at 160 degrees centigrade.
12. 実験方法及び結果（つづき） Experimental method and results (continued)
Although the fluctuations of temperature are rather large (146.3 degrees at minimum, and 178.1 degrees atmaximum), the first scan was started. The scan was, however, aborted due to some troubles occurred in theheater system. The network connection between the heater and the controller was also lost. After fixing theseproblems, the scan at 160 degrees (nominal temperature) was restarted. It took about 2 hours for this firstscan. Another three scans were done at temperatures, 200, 250, and 300 degrees. It took about four to five
hours for each scan.
After these sample measurements, a blank experiment, in which only a silica tube is measured, was originallyplanned. It is necessary to subtract the scattered intensity from the container to obtain the intensity from thesample itself. However, the blank experiment was not carried out because of the reason mentioned below.
Experimental Results
Because we have to go through many complicated procedures to obtain the structure factor, and it takes
several months to carry out the whole process, we looked into the raw intensity profile stored in a single
counter after all the sample measurements were done. Contrary to our expectations, there was noquantitative change in the profiles against the variation in temperature. Moreover, the profile seems toresemble the one obtainable from vitreous silica. At this moment, we all suspected that what we measured
were not a sample but only a container.
To confirm this unpleasant expectation, we had to break the vacuum to take the tube out from the furnace.
Quite unfortunately, no sample was retained. The sample completely leaked out, leaving many faint horizontal
stripes on the inner wall of the tube. The latter fact implied that the leakage of the sample took placeintermittently after it melted. The problem was when the leakage happened. If this happened during themeasurements, the leakage of the sample necessarily brought about a quite troublesome situation ofcontamination. Fortunately, radiation measurement showed no indication of contamination.
We tabulated chronologically all the events during the experiment by reviewing a log kept by each researcher,and noticed that there was a sudden drop in a degree of vacuum at early stage of the vacuum drawing processduring heating the sample beyond the melting point. Some of the researchers noticed this event at that time,
but they thought that this was caused by diffusion of boron nitride, a substance used as a lubricant upon fixing
the tube to the furnace. Perhaps, this deterioration in the degree of vacuum was brought about by diffusion of
the sample that leaked as a gas. The leakage was probably completed before the temperature reached 160
degrees at which the first scan began. If this was the case, then the sample was not irradiated at all. This may
be the reason why no contamination was detected.
Examination of the Failure to Prevent Recurrence
No microcracks were detected on close inspection of the tube surface using a microscope. However, thisfact did not deny a possibility of a presence of even smaller cracks associated with deterioration; the tube was
not a new one. Another cause of the leakage was due to incompleteness of the sealing. Considering rather ahigh saturated vapor pressure of the sample, sampling in vacuo should have been desired.

2