United Nations
General Assembly

A/HRC/34/NGO/X
Distr.: GeneralXX February 2017
English only

Human Rights Council
Thirty-four session
Agenda item 3
Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and culturalrights, including the right to development
Written statement * submitted by Human Rights Now, a nongovernmental organization in special consultative status
The Secretary-General has received the following written statement which iscirculated in accordance with Economic and Social Council resolution
1996/31.
[13 February 2017]*GE.17-This written statement is issued, unedited, in the language(s) received from the submitting
non-governmental organization(s).

A/HRC/34/NGO/X

Serious Human Rights Situation of the People Affected by theFukushima Nuclear Disaster1. Background
Human Rights Now, a Tokyo-based international human rights NGO, is deeply concerned about thehuman rights situation of people affected by the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.
The March 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, administered by TEPCO,
led to mass evacuations of residents in Fukushima Prefecture, over 80,000 persons of which remain
officially evacuated as of December 2016.1
However, many citizens in Fukushima still live in areas where they could be exposed to higher
doses of radiation than the internationally recommended limit. This is due to the government’s
lifting of evacuation orders in areas up to a 20mSv per year exposure limit, which is in fact 20 times
greater than the limit for the public based on international standards recommended by theInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).2
There are broad areas with large populations that are not included in the evacuation zones inFukushima. Without sufficient financial support for evacuation from the government, many people
who cannot afford to relocate have no choice but to stay within the areas in which they could
receive doses greater than the ICRP recommended limit for the general public. Some families
outside the evacuation area, including pregnant women and children, decided to evacuate without
any financial support from the Japanese government.
The number of evacuees from outside government-designated evacuation zones, are reported as
32,000 o as of January 2, 2017.3 For those, TEPCO has not provided substantial support orcompensation, and the only support provided by the government is free housing. 4
Apparently, the series of measures taken by the Japanese government have been extremely
insufficient to ensure the economic, social, and cultural rights of affected people; however, thedecision made by the Japanese government will pose further risks to the fundamental human rightsof the affected people by depriving essential livelihood support from evacuees.

1

Fukushima Prefecture “Heisei 23 nen tohoku chiho taiheiyo oki jishin niyoru higai jokyo soku ho (dai 1679 ho)”, 30 Jan. 2017.
ICRP, 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , ICRP Publication 60 , Ann. ICRP 21(1 - 3) ; and ICRP, 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , ICRP Publication 103, Ann.
ICRP 37 (2 - 4).
3
Okada Hiroyuki, “‘jisyuhinan’ 3.2 mannin, jyūtaku shien uchikiri ni himei”, Toyo Keizai, 2 Jan. 2017,
http://toyokeizai.net/articles/-/151985.
4
Mainichi, 11 March 2016, , http://mainichi.jp/articles/20160311/ddm/010/040/006000c
22

A/HRC/34/NGO/X

2. The latest policy of the Japanese government
In 2012, the Japanese government organised the original evacuated areas into three categories
distinguished by the severity of the annual radiation doses at the time: (1) areas less than
20mSv/year; (2) areas between 20-50mSv/year and; (3) areas over 50mSv/year.5 Under thedefinitions, as of 2016 Areas 1 and 2 are supposed to be below 20mSv/year and Area 3 over
20mSv/year.6
The government has gradually been lifting evacuation orders in Areas 1 and 2, and it decided to lift
most of the remaining orders in these areas March 2017.7
TEPCO compensation payments, which cover evacuation expenses and pain and suffering ofevacuees, are set to end by March 2018.8 Once TEPCO ceases compensation payments, manyevacuees will face financial difficulty. These steps pressure evacuees to return to areas withexposures potentially up to 20mSv/year.
For the evacuees without government evacuation orders, the government plans to put an end to freehousing support in March 2017.9 These decisions have been made without sufficient consultation
with the evacuees, especially vulnerable populations. Although evacuees will have the option ofremaining in the homes through paying rent, many worry that they will be unable to afford it. 10
The situation has left many evacuees highly concerned about their future. According to a 2016
survey, 70% of evacuees without order have stated that they have been unable to decide where tolive once the housing scheme ends.11
Through ending housing support, the government is pushing vulnerable citizens to choose between
destitution and returning to an area where their health would be placed in serious risk. The
inevitable effect of these decisions will be the virtually forced relocation of citizens to these areas.
On top of these pressures, there have also been alarming reports from various regions of Japan thathighlight the severe bullying of evacuee children.
In Yokohama, a 13-year-old evacuee stopped attending school after he was repeatedly called“vermin” by his classmates (a commonly used insult deriving from the radiation in Fukushima).
12
In Niigata, a 13-year-old girl evacuee has told of similar incidents, and a 10-year-old boy wasreportedly called “vermin” by a teacher.13 A Junior-High School student in Tokyo was subjected to5

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, March 30, 2012,
http://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/roadmap/pdf/20120330_01b.pdf.
6Id.
7Reconstruction Agency, http://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-1/160809_mitinoritomitoshi.pdf.
8Tepco Press Release, 26 Aug. 2016, http://www.tepco.co.jp/cc/press/2015/1258474_6818.html.
9Mainichi, 11 Mar. 2016, http://mainichi.jp/articles/20160311/ddm/010/040/006000c.
10Japan Times, 11 March 2016, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/03/11/national/nuclear-refugees-tell-distrust-pressurereturn-fukushima/#.WJFt_Pl9601.
11
Mainichi, “70% of voluntary Fukushima evacuees undecided where to live after free housing ends “, 26 Mar. 2016,
http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20160326/p2a/00m/0na/012000c.
12Asahi Shinbun, 16 Nov. 2016, http://www.asahi.com/articles/ASJCH5GJYJCHULOB02P.html.
13
Asahi Shinbun, 20 Nov. 2016.

3

A/HRC/34/NGO/X

sickening abuse, with students taunting that she “may die soon from Leukaemia”. 14 The government
has failed to provide any concrete measure to protect vulnerable children from such bullying.
3. Concerns the current situation in in Fukushima
A major concern with lifting the evacuation orders is the research indicating that areas of
Fukushima remain insufficiently decontaminated for long-term habitation.15
Despite this, the government has failed to establish free, periodic, and comprehensive health checks
for affected persons, except for biennial ultrasound examinations for children under the age of 18 at
the time of the accident who live or used to live in Fukushima prefecture.16
As of December 2016, 183 children in Fukushima prefecture were diagnosed with or believed tohave thyroid cancer, a worrying increase of 68 children from the second survey conducted in 2014
and 2015. 17 Despite the alarming nature of these findings, the prefectural government has failed toacknowledge the impact of radiation on children. It has also made no move to expand the scope of
its healthcare services, thereby leaving many potentially affected persons unable to seek medical
evaluation or treatment.
4. Failure to Implement UN Recommendations and RequestsThe Special Rapporteur on the right to health in 2013, Anand Grover, wrote a report for the 23 rd
Human Rights Council in May 2013 18 which included recommendations to the government of Japanthat the government has failed to implement to date. These include recommendations that evacuees
only recommended to return when radiation doses in areas had been reduced, as far as possible, tolevels below 1mSv/year, and that all persons living in areas with higher exposures be provided with
sufficient medical care. He also called on the government to implement a rights-centred approachand to continue financial support for evacuees so as to allow them to return at a time of theirchoosing.
The UN Human Rights Committee also recommended in 2014 that the government of Japan “liftthe designation of contaminated locations as evacuation areas only where the radiation level does
not place the residents at risk.”19
The Special Rapporteur on the hazardous Substances and Wastes, Mr. Baskut Tuncak, hasrequested a country visit to Japan in February 2015 which the government has failed to accept todate.20

14Mainichi, 12 Jan. 2017, http://mainichi.jp/articles/20170112/ddn/012/040/043000c.
Greenpeace, “Radiation Reloaded: Ecological Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident”, 4 March
2016, http://www.greenpeace.org/japan/ja/library/publication/20160304_report/.
16
Fukushima Health Management Survey, http://fmu-global.jp/fukushima-health-management-survey/
17
Friends of the Earth, “Fact Sheet: kodomo kodomo-tachi no kōjōsen gan no jōkyō”, 1 Feb. 2017,
http://www.foejapan.org/energy/fukushima/pdf/factsheet_thyroid_170201.pdf
18
A/HRC/23/41/Add.3
19
Human Rights Committee, “Concluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Japan”, 20 Aug. 2014, CCPR/C/JPN/CO/6.
20OHCHR, “View Country Visits of Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council Since 1998: Japan”
http://spinternet.ohchr.org/_Layouts/SpecialProceduresInternet/ViewCountryVisits.aspx?Lang=en&country=JPN.
154

A/HRC/34/NGO/X

4. Recommendations
Human Rights Now is deeply concerned about the human rights of Fukushima evacuees who willsoon lose TEPCO compensation and/or free housing without other means of support to pay forremaining evacuated, pressuring many to return to formerly-evacuated areas with potentially highradiation exposure levels, and the government of Japan’s continued failure to implement relevant
UN recommendations.
We call on the government of Japan to take the following actions.
Protect all evacuees as internally displaced persons(IDP) and provide necessary financial
and material support to enable them to remain evacuated without the burden of undue
financial pressure to relocate.
Revise the decision to cease housing support for evacuees from non-designated areas.
Implement the recommendations made by Mr. Anand Grover in his 2013 report, and the UN
Human Rights Committee’s 2014 concluding observations.
Accept and coordinate official visits of mandate holders to Japan to investigate the humanrights situation of people in Fukushima affected by the nuclear disaster.

We also call the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to housing, Special Rapporteur on thehazardous Substances and Wastes, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced
persons, and Special Rapporteur on the right to health, to

conduct official visit to Japan to investigate the human rights situation of affected by theFukushima nuclear disaster5