8㎜
Mem. Muroran Inst. Tech., 56 (2006) 25～32↑Font 9 pt.

25 ㎜※Abb. of journal title, vol.,page number(only 1st page)

Comparison of Community Annoyance from Railway Noise
Evaluated by Different Category Scales↑Font 18 pt.

Taroh MIZUMOTO*1, Jiroh TAKASAGO*2 and Hanako NAKAJIMA*290 ㎜(just a roughstandard)↑Font 11 pt.

※centeralignment(Received ○th October 2015, Accepted ○th January 2016)↑Font 11 pt.

Font 9 pt.
within 150 words(just a rough standard)

Abstract20 ㎜

The concept of Third Cinema was begun in Latin America in the 1960’s by two Argentine filmmakers,Felnando Solanas and Octavio Getino. According to Solanas and Getino, Third Cinema is concernedwith making political films. This is in contrast to both ‘First Cinema’, which describes the type of films
made by Hollywood with the aim of making a financial profit; and Second Cinema, which refers to socalled ‘Art Cinema’, where the aim is to depict the director’s vision of the world. Third Cinema is acollaborative process and its aim is to instigate political revolution. This paper explains the history ofThird Cinema and examines whether the concept still has relevancy in the present.

20 ㎜

Keywords: Lagrangian singularity, Lefschetz invariant, Congruences, Standard zeta values

10 ㎜
Text Font 10 pt.

20 ㎜○＝Blank line□＝Space↓Ruled line

10 ㎜

1 INTRODUCTION
Line spacing : about 15pt
Caption: Bold
○ Character spacing : about 10.95pt
Font 10 pt.
□Since the time that Schultz(1) proposed a synthesis curve to show a unified dose-response relationship for various
kinds of noise sources, a considerable number of reviews ###############. Furthermore there is a great need for a
unified annoyance scale acceptable to many researchers.
□We constructed four to seven-point category scales in Japanese for noise annoyance based on the meanin-gs of thedescriptors assigned to the categories and in-vestigated the effect of the different category scales on the annoyance
response in a psycho-acoustic experim-ent(2). ######## Because of the lack of social survey date on the community
response to ordinary railway n-oise in Japan, there is now a great need for data to rel-ate the two.
○2 METHODS○2.1 Social survey□A social survey on community response to railway noise was carried out by a distribute-collect method in urban andrural areas along railways in Kyushu, Japan, during the periods from May to June.
□##############################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################□*1 Library↑Ruled line□*2 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture↑Font 9 pt.
Line spacing 10 pt.

25 ㎜

Page number → －Font 12 pt.

25 －15 ㎜

20 ㎜

8㎜
Taroh MIZUMOTO, Jiroh TAKASAGO and Hanako NAKAJIMA↑Font 9 pt.

※Center alignment
Even page: Author name
Odd page: Article title#################################################################.
○
3 CONCLUTIONS○□The following main conclusions were reached in the present study.
1. Annoyance response such as % very annoyed and % rather annoyed are strongly affected by ########.
2. This suggests that ########################.
3. No systematic difference is found in dose-response relationships between railway and road traffic noises, obtained
from social surveys ##################### ###########################################.
□This finding is quite different from those of European studies.
○
ACKNOWLEDGMENT○□This study was partly funded by Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research by the Japanese Ministry of Educa-tion, Scienceand Culture. The authors appreciate the scientific support of Dr. Evy Christrom, University of Gothenburg, in planningthe framework of the．．．
○REFERENCES Font 9 pt.
○(1) Schultz, T. Z., Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(2), 1977, 377405.
(2) Mizumoto, T. , Takasago, J. and Washibetsu, S., An experimental study on an annoyance scale for noise assess- ment, Journal ofthe Acoustical Society of Japan (in Japanese), 50(3), 1987, 215-226.
(3) Mizumoto, T. , Takasago, J. and Washibetsu, S., Cross-cultural study on community response to traffic noise(1): Surveys inSongkhla, Thailand and Tomakomai, Japan, Proceedings of Internoise (in Japanese), 945, 1994, 1145-1148.

－ 32 －15 ㎜