JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

JCM Verification Report Form
A. Summary of verification
A.1. General Information
Title of the project

A HIGH EFFICIENCY AND LOW LOSS
POWER

TRANSMISSIONAND

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN MONGOLIA
Reference number

MN005

Monitoring period

02/12/2017 – 31/12/2018

Date of completion of the monitoring report

14/02/2019

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited(LRQA)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Hitachi, Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

20/02/2019

A.2 Conclusion of verification and level of assurance
Overall verification opinion

Positive
Negative

Unqualified opinion

Based on the process and procedure conducted, Lloyd's
Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA) (TPE’s name)provides reasonable assurance that the emission reductions
for A HIGH EFFICIENCY AND LOW LOSS POWER
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN
MONGOLIA (project name)

Are free of material errors and are a fair representationof the GHG data and information, and

Are prepared in line with the related JCM rules,
procedure, guidelines, forms and other relevant

documents(If overall verification opinion is <State the reasons>negative, please check below and
Not applicablestate its reasons.)
Qualified Opinion
Adverse opinion
Disclaimer
A.3. Overview of the verification results

1

JCNIIい̲F̲ヽ竹f Repttvell12.1

Veri■ Catiё nreqliⅢ

Item

Ⅲ

NolCAR10r cL=tS

l rerllining・

The TPE determines tlle conforlniサ of tlle actual
ppieCt and■ s operation with the eligibiliサ criterla of:す 場竃講尋Tl高 置繊 the applied metllodology.
。f l 1111‐ ■ apl=ed‐‐
meth6dO16占 ‐■・‐‐
proJ.cOt■
The TPE assesses the status ofthe aclual pr●疇 0■ ￨￨ ￨Mζ

図ect and iお

operation with the registered/validated PDD or any::二 ￨ apprOved revised PE)D.

図

PDDI"￨■ y llp● v。 ￨ieviged PDDI ‐‐Ifmonitoring Option C is selected,tlle TPE detellllines

鮮犠 紺 宅、vhether the llleasuring equipmen

have been properly

1譜臨臨1計 measured values are properly corrccted, 3711ere

calibrated in line with the rnonitoring plan and、 vhetller

ncccssary,to calculate emisslo■

畔轟1椰
FeduCtions・ ￨￨￨‐ ■ ■図rcductions in linc withthc PE)1)and Monitoring(3uidelines.

The TPE assesses the data and calculations of GHG

emission reductions achicvcd"/reSulting from thepraect by the application of tlle selectcd approved

図

IIlethodologv.

AvOidな C,lol‐ 16ub
registratio■ ￨￨ ￨■The TPE detelnines whether the proieCt iS not￨registered under other illterllationJ climate lnitigaion

図mechanlsms.

‐￨‐ ■regis,at1011 TheTPEdeterlninesullethertllerearepostregistration■ changcs i■ olll the registered PE)D and/or rnethodology■■ ‐changeヽ ■ ‐

PO

￨‐

図

which Drevent the use ofthe aDDlied lllethodolo2v.

Aut■od lgll壼 01':

Last nalne:Chiba

ML tt

Ms.□

First nal■ e:Miclliaki

Titlei Climate Chttge Ⅳfanager‐ Asiàと Paciflc

Date:20/02/2019

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

B. Verification team and other experts

Mr.
Ms.

Name

Company

Function*

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Team
leaderSchemecompetence*

Mr.
Internal
Stewart Niu LRQA China
Ms.
reviewer
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*

Onsitevisit

Technical
competenceauthorised
N/A* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of verification, findings and conclusions based on reporting requirements
C.1. Compliance of the project implementation and operation with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology<Means of verification>
LRQA has determined during the verification process that the actual implementation andoperation of the project has been conducted in conformance with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology.
The project applied the approved methodology: JCM_MN_AM001_ver01.0 Installation ofenergy-saving transmission lines in the Mongolian Grid".
LRQA assessed by means of an on-site visit that the physical features of the project are in place
and that the PPs have operated the project as per the eligibility criteria of the applied
methodology. The steps taken to verify each eligibility criterion and the conclusions about
implementation of the project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The transmission line constitutes of a single or double circuit(s) directly connecting
a substation and another substation within the country with no branching in between, and does
not constitute a part of a loop.
Justification in the PDD: This project involves the placement of low-loss transmission lines in3

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

between the new Oyu Tolgoi substation and Tsagaan Suvarga substation. There are no branchlines or loops present within the interval. Therefore, the project fulfils this criterion.
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team assessed the project documentation, technicalspecification, and conducted physical on site assessment.
Conclusion: Based on the verification processes taken, the verification team confirmed that the
project transmission line is a single circuit line directly connecting new Oyu Tolgoi (NOT) andTsagaan Suvarga (TS) Substations in southern Mongolia. There is no branching between the 2
substations and it does not constitute a part of a loop. Therefore the criterion is met by the
project.
Criterion 2: The type of conductor is LL-ACSR/SA, which meets the following technicalcriteria.
Type ofEquivalent toEquivalent toEquivalent to

LL-ACSR/SA

LL-ACSR/SA

LL-ACSR/SA

279/20mm2

337/27mm2

445/36mm2mm≦ 21.6≦ 24.0≦ 27.5Ω/km≦ 0.1063≦ 0.0862≦ 0.0659

Tensile strengthN≧ 75,050≧ 90,574≧ 120,481

Weight

kg/km

≦ 921

≦ 1,132≦ 1,490

ACSR

ACSR

ACSR

240/32mm2

300/39mm2

400/51mm2

energy-saving

unit

conductors
Outer diameterof conductor
Direct current
resistance(@20degC)

Corresponding
conductors
currently in usethat forms thebasis ofcalculating thereferenceemissions

Justification in the PDD: The specifications of the transmission line to be placed in this project
are as follows, and meet those outlined in the eligibility criterion.
Specification of low-loss conductor;- External diameter：27.5 mm- Direct-current resistance：0.064 Ω/km
- Tensile strength ：120,600N
4

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1- Weight ： 1,490 kg/km
Steps taken for assessment: The verification team reviewed the technical specification, test
reports, and conducted physical on-site assessment.
Conclusion: Based on the verification processes taken, the verification team confirmed that the
project low loss transmission line of conductor equivalent to LL-ACSR/SA 445/36mm2
satisfies the specification. Therefore the criterion is met by the proposed project.
The verification team confirmed that the eligibility conditions are satisfied by the project byreviewing the supporting documents and the on site assessment.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of the section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project has been implemented in conformity with theeligibility criteria of the applied methodology.
C.2. Assessment of the project implementation against the registered PDD or any approved
revised PDD<Means of verification>
The project installed a high efficiency and low-loss power transmission line made in Japan that
reduces transmission loss compared to a conventional transmission line, and contributes toreducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The project transmission line is a single-circuit
transmission line spanning 159.4 km between NOT Substation in Omnogovi Province and TS
Substation in Dornogovi Province in southern region of Mongolia. The project is implemented
by NATIONAL POWER TRANSMISSION GRID State Owned Stock Company (NPTG)
from Mongolia and Hitachi, Ltd. from Japan. The project receives financial support for JCM
demonstration projects from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development
Organization (NEDO), Japan.
The verification team assessed the Monitoring Report (MR) consists of Monitoring Report
Sheet (MRS) parts of the Monitoring Spreadsheet and the supporting documents, conducted aphysical site visit to assess the status of the actual project and its operation in accordance withthe registered PDD.
The start date of project operation was changed from 01/10/2017 as indicated in the registered
PDD to 02/12/2017 to reflect the actual implementation of the project. The verification team5

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

confirmed the post registration change that do not affect applicability of the approved
methodology based on the revised PDD as mentioned below.
The verification team determined through the verification process that the implementation andoperation of the project has been in accordance with the description contained in the registered
PDD with the post registration change. The verification team, by means of a desk review andan on-site visit, assessed that:- all physical features of the JCM project described in the registered PDD are in place, and- the PPs have operated the JCM project as per the registered PDD with the post registration
change.
The MR follows the Monitoring Plan (MP) of the registered PDD that have been establishedbased on the approved methodology.
The parameters to be monitored ex-post are E_L,send,y Power sent from the point oforigin/supply to the transmission line L in year y (in MWh/y), E_L,receive,y Power received
at the point of receipt of the transmission line L in year y (in MWh/y), and EF_Grid,y CO2emission factor of the grid in year y (in tCO2/MWh). The electrical power meters measureelectricity transmission at the both ends of the project transmission line to determine theelectrical power loss. The most recent data of CO2 emission factor of the grid available at thetime of submission of the MR is applied.
The roles and responsibilities of the persons are described in the Monitoring Structure Sheet(MSS) in accordance with the requirements of the applied methodology. There was no change
in the organizational structure during the monitoring period.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Please refer to CAR 1 and its resolution as detailed in below Section C.4. on the change of thestart date of the project operation.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project was implemented and operated in accordancewith the registered PDD with the post registration change and a revision requested for the startdate of the project operation in accordance with the actual date.
C.3. Compliance of calibration frequency and correction of measured values with related
requirements<Means of verification>6

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

The parameters No. 1. E_L,send,y and No. 2. E_L,receive,y apply the monitoring Option C
and the monitoring of the parameters use electrical power meters as the measuring equipment.
The electrical power meters installed at the two substations of the both ends of the projecttransmission line were initially calibrated on 13/02/2017. The electrical power meters aresupposed to be recalibrated every year after start of the operation according to the registered
MP, though the calibration of the subject measuring equipment is not a requirement of thenational laws and regulations in the host country.
The first monitoring period covers the period from 02/12/2017 to 31/12/2018. Actual start dateof project operation was confirmed as 02/12/2017. The PPs conducted the second calibrationof the electrical power meters on 03/01/2019 after the end of the monitoring period. The
verification team reviewed the records of the delayed calibration and confirmed that the
instrumental errors identified in the delayed calibration test were less than 5% and no correction
was required to the measured values to calculate emission reductions in line with the JCM
Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR during the monitoring period.
Through the processes taken, CAR 2 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
Nature of the issue raised: The Measurement methods and procedures of the MRS did notinclude the information of the subsequent calibration of the measuring equipment conducted in
January 2019.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs added the information of the calibration
conducted in January 2019 in the revised MR.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team reviewed the revised MR and confirmedthat the information of the subsequent calibration of the electrical power meters conducted on
03/01/2019 has been incorporated.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the measuring equipment applied for the parameterssatisfied the requirements of the MP concerning the regular calibration with the delayedcalibration conducted and no correction was required to the measured values during themonitoring period.
C.4. Assessment of data and calculation of GHG emission reductions<Means of verification>7

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

The MR is developed using the MRS applied to the registered JCM project that is confirmed
fulfilment of the requirements of the MRS of the applied methodology.
LRQA has determined that:
1. a complete set of data for the specified monitoring period is available,
2. information provided in the MR has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log
books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analysis,
3. calculations of reference emissions (REs) and project emissions (PEs), as appropriate, havebeen carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the MP and theapplied methodology,
4. any assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified, and5. appropriate emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly
applied.
The project introduces a low loss transmission line and emission source is transmission loss of
the reference transmission line in the reference scenario and transmission loss of the projecttransmission line.
The REs and PEs are determined as a product of the transmission loss of the referencetransmission line and the project transmission line and the CO2 emission factor. Transmission
loss of the project transmission line is the difference of monitored power sent from the point oforigin/supply to the transmission line and power received at the point of receipt of thetransmission line. The transmission loss of the reference transmission line is calculated fromthe transmission loss of the project transmission line and the direct current resistance oftransmission line applied to the reference transmission line at 0.0718 Ω/km and the projecttransmission line at 0.0640 Ω/km as determined at the validation and fixed ex-ante. The CO2
emission factor uses the most recent data at the time of submission of the MR. The Standardized
Baseline ASB0039-2018 Grid emission factor for Mongolia’s national electricity grid Version
01.0 was approved by the CDM Executive Board and made publicly available on 17/07/2018.
The Combined margin CO2 emission factor for Mongolia’s national electricity grid applicable
to all project activities except wind and solar power generation for first crediting period as
0.859 tCO2/MWh is chosen and applied as appropriate.
The GHG emission reductions during the monitoring period are calculated as: ERp = REp PEp = REp =∑_L (LOSS_RF,L,y x EF_grid,y) - ∑_L (LOSS_PJ,L,y x EF_grid,y)Year 2017: (78.61-77.49) x 0.0718/0.0640 x 0.859 - (78.61-77.49) x 0.859 = 1.08 – 0.96 = 0.12
tCO2eYear 2018: (568.16-557.10) x 0.0718/0.0640 x 0.859 - (568.16-557.10) x 0.859 = 10.66 – 9.50
= 1.16 tCO2e
The verification team assessed the reported data with documented evidence and by means ofon site visit.
8

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

The level of achieved ERs during the first monitoring period is much less than the ex-anteestimation under the circumstances below:- Actual start of project operation was delayed from 01/10/2017 to 02/12/2017,- Electricity demand at the receiving end of the project transmission line has been limited withthe 2 nearby villages due to delay of the mining project, and- Data of electricity transmitted was not monitored at the receiving substation from 05/08/2018
to 21/11/2018 due to bypass connection work required for modification work in NOT
Substation and delay in installation of CTs on the bypass connection line that is assumed aszero for calculation of the ERs.
Achievement of the estimated ERs in the registered PDD depends on the progress of the mining
project and increase of the electricity demand at the receiving end of the project transmission
line in the subsequent monitoring period.
Through the processes taken, CAR 1 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.

Parameters

Monitored values

E_L,send,y2017:

78.61 Assessment was conducted based on records of meter

MWh/y
2018:

Method to check values in the monitoring report with sources

readings and on site assessment.
568.16

MWh/y
E_L,receive,y 2017:77.49 Assessment was conducted based on records of meter

MWh/y
2018:

readings and on site assessment.
557.10MWh/y
EF_Grid,y2017:

0.859 Assessment was conducted by confirming information

tCO2/MWh2018:

announced by the national authority of the host country and0.859 reviewing the published document by the CDM Executive

tCO2/MWh

Board<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: The monitoring period was indicated starting from 06/12/2017 in
the MR that was not from the start date of the project operation as indicated in the registered
PDD and it did not consider the actual start of operation of the project that the monitored data9

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

is available from 02/12/2017.
The end date of the monitoring period was indicated as 31/07/2018 in the MR but the data
monitored until 31/12/2018 had been considered for calculating the ERs.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs confirmed that the actual start date ofoperation is 02/12/2017 and submitted the revised PDD and MR for review by the verification
team.
Assessment of the responses: The verification team reviewed the revised PDD and MR. The
start date of the project operation is changed to 02/12/2017 to reflect the actual implementationof the project. The verification team confirmed the change as a post registration change that
does not affect applicability of the approved methodology. The verification team also
confirmed that the indication of the monitoring period has been amended in the revised MR.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating REs
and PEs have been followed. The verification team is of the opinion that all assumptions,emission factors and default values that were applied in calculations have been justified.
C.5. Assessment of avoidance of double registration<Means of verification>
The verification team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation from thePPs that the project is not registered under the other international climate mitigation
mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS) and found no identical project as the proposed JCM project interms of the name of entities, applied technology, scale and the location. The result ofresearches confirmed that the proposed project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG
emission reductions.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Fof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team confirmed that the project is not registered under other international10

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

climate mitigation programs.
C.6. Post registration changes<Means of verification>
The verification team assessed the post registration changes as below.
1) The start date of the project operation was changed from 01/10/2017 as indicated in theregistered PDD to 02/12/2017.
2) The parameter E_L,receive,y was not monitored in accordance with the registered MP from05/08/2018 to 21/11/2018 due to the bypass connection at the receiving end of the projecttransmission line requested for modification work in NOT Substation and delay in installationof CTs on the bypass connection line.
The verification team assessed the project documentation, conducted the on site visit andconfirmed that the post registration changes from the registered PDD and MP do not prevent
application of the approved methodology. The start date of the project operation changed in therevised PDD is in accordance with the available operational data collected by the measuring
equipment. For the period a part of data is not monitored from 05/08/2018 to 21/11/2018, thePPs assumed the data is zero for calculation of the ERs and the verification confirmed that thetreatment is conservative as the data is used for calculation of both REs and PEs.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Please refer to CAR 1 and its resolution as detailed in the above Section C.4. on the change ofthe start date of the project operation.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The verification team through the verification processes determined that there was no post
registration change from the registered PDD or approved methodology which prevent from useof the applied methodology.

D. Assessment of response to remaining issues
An assessment of response to the remaining issues including FARs from the validation and/or
previous verification period, if appropriate
No FAR was issued in the validation and this is the first verification of the project.

11

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

12

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

E. Verified amount of emission reductions achieved
Year

Verified
Reference Verified Project Emissions Verified
Emission
Emissions (tCO2e)(tCO2e)Reductions (tCO2e)

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017

1

1

0

2018

11

10

1

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Total (tCO2e)

1

F. List of interviewees and documents received
F.1. List of interviewees
National Power Transmission Grid State Owned Stock Company
D. Odkhuu, Shift engineer
N. Batnyam, Technician
Hitachi Ltd. Power Business Unit
Hiroshi Konno, Section Manager, Global T&D Engineering Group, System Engineering
Department, Power Production Management Division
Masanori Furuya, Engineer, Global T&D Engineering Dept. Business Management Div.,
Transmission & Distribution Systems Division13

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

Mongolyn Alt (MAK) Corporation
B. Munkhzaya, Electrical engineer
B. Byambosuren, Electrical engineer
J-Power Systems Corporation
Takayuki Nagai, Specialist, Design & Engineering Section, Overseas Project Department,
Overhead Transmission Line Division
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
Takahiro Yada, Information System Group Innovative Solution Department, Overhead
Transmission Line Division
Environmental Resource Management (ERM) Japan Ltd.
Tsuyoshi Nakao, Group Leader, Sustainability Management TeamF.2. List of documents received
Category A documents (documents prepared by the PP)- MR completed on 25/12/2018, 10, 15, 18/01/2019, 14/02/2019- Revised PDD Version 03.0 drafted on 23/01/2019- Sustainable Development Contribution Report completed on 17/01/2019- Power meter measurement accuracy check sheet for NOT dated 03/01/2019- Power meter measurement accuracy check sheet for TS dated 03/01/2019- Single line diagram and photographs for bypass transmission line
- Specification, drawing and photographs of CT- CT inspection report- Procedures for Processing Monitoring Data
- Procedures for Checking Accuracy of Power Meter- Flowchart of Monitoring- CVT Secondary Wiring Diagram in New OT Substation- CVT Secondary Wiring Diagram in TS Substation- Declaration of avoidance of double registration- Instruction Manual for measurement device (Ref. No. JTD52-14-256A)- Specification for data process equipment- System equipment structure drawing
14

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1- Measuring equipment system drawing- Photos of measuring equipment- Factory test report for Measurement Devices- Instrument Calibration Certificate for temperature meter, pyranometer, ultrasonic aerovane,and power meter- Mandatory Calibration, A Comprehensive List of Instruments, The regulations of calibrationinterval
Category B documents (other documents referenced)- JCM_MN_AM001_ver01.0 Installation of energy-saving transmission lines in the Mongolian
Grid- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_MN_PCP_ver06.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_MN_GL_VV_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_MN_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.1- JCM Guidelines for Developing Sustainable Development Contribution Plan and Report
JCM_MN_GL_SDCP_CR_ver01.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_MN_Glossary_ver01.0- JCM Verification Report Form JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1- Additional information to the Proposed Methodology MN_PM001 “Installation of energysaving transmission lines in the Mongolian Grid”- Approved CDM Standardized baseline ASB0039-2018 Grid emission factor for Mongolia’s
national electricity grid Version 01.0
- JCM Mongolia website http://www.jcm-mongolia.com/?lang=en- Approved CDM baseline and monitoring methodology AM0097 Installation of high voltage
direct current power transmission line Version 01.0.0- Approved Large-scale CDM methodology AM0118 Introduction of low resistivity powertransmission line Version 01.0
- Approved Small Scale CDM Methodology AMS II.A. Supply-side energy efficiency
improvements – transmission and distribution Version 10- PDD, Validation Report and Verification Report of the registered JCM projects MN001,
MN002, MN003 and MN004- Proposed and registered projects under CDM, VCS, Gold Standard, and the other international
schemes15

JCM_MN_F_Vrf_Rep_ver02.1

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s verification team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

16

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: A HIGH EFFICIENCY AND LOW LOSS POWER
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IN(Ref# MN005)
Verification for the first monitoring period: 02/12/2017 –
31/12/2018
We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the verification process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the verification of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba

Team Leader

Stewart Niu

Technical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific15/05/2018

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA), and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'Lloyd’s Register'. Lloyd’s Register assumes noresponsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in thisdocument or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the provision of thisinformation or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 0, 20 November 2014