2004

Asiatic Herpetological ResearchVol. 10, pp. 151-160

Studies on Pakistan Lizards: Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867)(Gekkonidae: Gekkoninae)
KURT AUFFENBERG1,*, KENNETH L. KRYSKO2, AND WALTER AUFFENBERG†
1Florida Museum of Natural History, Powell Hall,

P. O. Box 112710, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA*E-mail: kauffe@flmnh.ufl.edu
2Florida Museum of Natural History, Division of Herpetology,
P. O. Box 117800, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA†(1928-2004)
Abstract. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) is diagnosed based on the examination of 44 morphologicalcharacters in a series of 25 specimens collected near Skardu, Federally Administered Northern Areas (FANA),
Pakistan. Observations on geographic distribution, habitat, and reproduction are provided. The questionable taxonomic status of Gymnodactylus yarkandensis Anderson, 1872 is discussed. Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei
Szczerbak, 1991 is regarded as a junior synonym of C. stoliczkai.
Key words. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai, Cyrtopodion yarkandensis, Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei, gecko, lizard, taxonomy, Pakistan.

Introduction
The diverse gecko fauna of Pakistan is poorly understood. Particularly problematic are the angular-toed orthin-toed geckos variously assigned to Cyrtodactylus,
Cyrtopodion, and Tenuidactylus. Much of the taxonomic confusion stems from a general dearth of adequate
material. Large series of specimens from which to identify variation in important taxonomic characters arelacking in most cases. Examination of specimens collected during surveys by Walter Auffenberg and the
Zoological Survey Department of Pakistan in the 1980s1990s provide insights to many questions regardingsome of these poorly defined taxa. One such species,
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867), is discussed below. Future contributions will examine additional species.

Materials and Methods
Herpetological collections were made in the vicinity ofSkardu, Federally Administered Northern Areas(FANA), Pakistan in late August 1991. A series (n = 25)
of Cyrtopodion stoliczkai comprised of all size classes
ranging from newborns to adults was collected fromunder slabs of caliche broken off the edge of a dry creek
bed near the Skardu Airport, ca. 10 km west of Skardu.
These specimens were subsequently deposited in the
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of
Florida (UF 81327 - 81351).
This entire series was examined for 44 morphological characters (Tables 1 and 2). Although most of these© 2004 by Asiatic Herpetological Researchcounts and measurements are standard, clarification on
certain characters are provided. Only original (notregenerated) tails were measured. The left side is given
first for scale counts taken on both sides of the specimen. Character 6 was obtained by counting the scales
surrounding five randomly selected enlarged dorsal
tubercles. Character 12 lists color bands in the following
order: occipital region, nape, body (from forelimbs tosacrum), and original tail. Character 13 lists the left side
only for the number of scales between the eye and ear.
The numbers of longitudinal rows of enlarged dorsal
tubercles (Character 14) and transverse rows of ventral
scales (Character 15) were taken at mid-body.
Source acronyms follow Leviton et al. (1985):
BMNH (British Museum of Natural History, London);MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard
University); NMW (Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien);
UF (Florida Museum of Natural History, University of
Florida); ZFMK (Zoologischen Forschungsinstitutes
und Museums Alexander Koenig, Bonn); ZSI (IndianMuseum, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta); ZSMH
(Zoologische Staatssammlung München).

Results
Table 2 illustrates the variation of 44 morphologicalcharacters examined in 25 Cyrtopodion stoliczkai from
Skardu. We found that these characters overlap withthose available for Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei
Szczerbak, 1991. Therefore, we believe that A. boehmei
should be considered a junior synonym of C. stoliczkai(see Discussion).

Vol. 10, p. 152

Asiatic Herpetological Research

Figure 1. Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) dorsal and ventral views of adult (UF 81349) andsubadult specimen (UF 81334) similar in size to holotype of Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei (Szczerbak,
1991); both specimens collected near Skardu Airport,
ca. 10 km. west of Skardu, FANA, Pakistan.

Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867)[Fig. 1; Tables 1,2]
Diagnosis. - Medium-sized geckos (snout-vent length[SVL] of largest adult = 46.5 mm), tail slightly longer
than body (longest tail = 53.4 mm), SVL/tail length,mean = 0.854, Standard Deviation [SD] = 0.0455 (n =11); limbs moderate, hind limb extends to axilla, forelimb to near nostril; body and head somewhat dorsoventrally compressed. Head moderate (headlength/SVL, mean = 0.267, SD = 0.0267, headwidth/head length, mean = 0.696, SD = 0.0370, headheight/head width, mean = 0.593, SD = 0.0546), snout
equal to or slightly longer than distance between eye andear. Eye large (eye diameter/eye - nostril, mean = 0.704,
SD = 0.0665); ear rounded to ovate, small, ear diameter/eye diameter, mean = 0.148, SD = 0.0463. Nostril

2004

bordered by rostral, first supralabial, and normally 3
postnasals, occasionally fused to form 2 postnasals or
split into 4 scales, medial postnasal smaller than others;
1 - 2 medial scales between postnasals (lacking in one
specimen), when 2 present, one is often much larger thanthe other. Dorsal head scales generally homogeneous insize and shape, slightly larger on snout; 17 - 20 interorbital scales; loreals often with small projections on posterior half of eye; rostral partially cleft; 9-11 supralabials (12 on right side of one specimen), 7 - 9 infralabials.
Mental triangular, longer than broad. 3 pairs of postmentals (rarely 2), decreasing in size posteriorly, firstpair in contact, with a broad suture; second pair rarely
disproportionate in size; third pair often variable in size,
may be substantially enlarged on one side, often separated from infralabials by a series of small scales. Dorsumof body and limbs with small roundish, beaded to flat
scales intermixed with larger, roundish tubercles; tubercles surrounded by rosettes of 7 - 9 small scales, 2 - 3times larger than granular scales, smooth, flat to rounded, sometimes indistinctly keeled, slightly conical laterally; arranged in 8 - 10 (rarely 12) longitudinal rows, lateral rows indistinct. Lateral fold indistinct, often absent.
Venter with roundish, slightly imbricate scales, 25 - 31
across middle of belly; 113 - 135 from postmentals to
cloaca. Preanal and femoral pores absent. Femoral
spines absent. Cloacal spines present, 1 - 2 per side.
Digits moderate, subdigital lamellae well-developed,
nearly as broad as digit, 16 - 20 on fourth finger, 10 - 12
on first toe, 19 - 27 on fourth toe. Tail dorso-ventrallycompressed on anterior two-thirds, round on posterior
one-third; anterior half with dorsal medial groove; anterior half distinctly segmented, swollen and lobed laterally in adults, less so in subadults and juveniles, tapering
to point; 5 whorls on anterior one-third on tail; each segment on anterior half with one enlarged dorso-lateral
tubercle and 2 - 3 enlarged, bluntly conical lateral tubercles per side, medial tubercles largest; tubercles reducedin size and number (2) distally, indistinct or absent on
posterior one-third; 6 - 7 rows of scales per whorl, terminal row not enlarged, squared-off posteriorly, notacuminate or keeled; 2 series of small subcaudals,
cycloid, not greatly enlarged transversely, only about
twice as large as adjacent scales, separated by medial
groove on anterior half to two-thirds of tail; regenerated
tail without segments and lobes, uniformly covered insmall flattened scales.
Dorsal ground color light to medium gray with 7 10 irregular transverse darker gray bands, with evendarker posterior margins; 1 on occipital area, 1 on nape,and 5 - 8 on body; 10 - 15 on tail; limbs with short grayish bands; grayish-brown band from nostril through eye;
top of head irregularly mottled; labials with dark speckles; venter whitish.

2004

Asiatic Herpetological Research

Table 1. Morphological Characters examined for
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai from Pakistan. See text for character
descriptions.
1. Number of post-nasals
2. Number of medial scales between post-nasals
3. Number of supralabials
4. Number of infralabials
5. Number of interorbitals
6. Number of scales surrounding dorsal tubercle (randomly counted 5 tubercles)
7. Number of scales between postmentals and cloaca
8. Number subdigital lamellae on fourth toe
9. Number of pairs of postmentals
10. Number of whorls on anterior one-third of tail11. Number of large, lateral tubercles on each tail whorl
12. Number of color bands on head, nape, body, and tail13. Number of scales between eye and ear (left side only)
14. Number of longitudinal rows of tubercles
15. Number of transverse rows of ventral scales at midbody
16. Number of subdigital lamellae on first toe
17. Presence (+) and number of cloacal spines
18. Number of scale rows per tail whorl (max. 8 whorls
counted)19. Number of subdigital lamallae on fourth finger
20. First pair of postmentals in contact (+) or not in contact (-)
21. Scales on top of head homogeneous in size (+) or not
homogeneous in size (-)
22. Dorsal tubercles present (+) or absent (-)
23. Mental triangular (+) or not triangular (-)
24. Tail whorls distinct (+) or indistinct (-)
25. Preanal pores present (+) or absent (-)
26. Color pattern of dorsum banded (+) or not banded (-)
27. Color band from nostril through eye to nape present(+) or absent (-)
28. Femoral spines present (+) or absent (-)
29. Femoral pores present (+) or absent (-)
30. Enlarged tubercles on limbs present (+) or absent (-)
31. Roundish dorsal tubercles present (+) or absent (-)
32. Dorsal tubercle sculpture rounded (+) or not rounded(-)
33. Medial subcaudals in series (+) or not in series (-)
34. Distal scale row of tail whorl enlarged (+) or notenlarged (-)
35. Tail dorsoventrally compressed (+) or not compressed(-)
36. Snout-vent length (SVL)
37. Tail length
38. Head length
39. Head width
40. Head height
41. Nostril-eye distance
42. Eye-ear distance
43. Eye diameter
44. Ear diameter

Vol. 10, p. 153

Distribution. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai has been recorded from various localities (see references cited herein)in the upper Indus River valley ranging from Leh,
Kashmir to Skardu, Pakistan, a distance of almost 300
km by air (Fig. 2). This species was collected in the
Kargil vicinity in Kashmir along one of the many tributaries of the upper Indus River and may occur in otherassociated river valleys as well. The Shyok River, alarge tributary draining areas to the north of the Indus
River, remains virtually unexplored. The Indus River
enters a series of gorges west of Skardu, which may
impede dispersal in that direction.
Habitat. - Cyrtopodion stoliczkai occurs in the PamirKarakorum Highlands region of northern Pakistan andadjacent Kashmir at elevations from 2300 to 3700 m.
Vegetation is sparse in this region, being generally confined to human occupation sites, seeps, streams, andforested valleys. The intervening barren landscape ischaracterized by stark and steep mountainsides, rockand boulder fields, and large areas of clay, caliche, andsand. This species has not been collected from humanhabitations. Some individuals from the large series collected by Stoliczka during the Second Yarkand
Expedition were found under stones (Blanford, 1878).
Gruber (1981) collected most of his series in rocky
habitats, although one specimen was found in a small
hole in a willow tree. Our series was collected fromsmall cracks and fissures between slabs of caliche (seeabove).
Reproduction. - In the vicinity of Skardu, hatchingoccurs in mid to late August. In addition to several newborns, three full-term eggs (UF 81352) were collected ina cavity between slabs of caliche on 29 August 1991.
Although collected together, it is unknown if these represent a single clutch or communal oviposition site. Egg
measurements range from 9.7 - 11.1 mm in length and7.6 - 8.5 mm in width.

Discussion
The assignment of the species epithet "stoliczkai" to thegenus Cyrtopodion Fitzinger, 1843 is arbitrary. The
generic assignments of the angular-toed geckos ofSouth and Central Asia have undergone a great deal ofrevision over the last few decades (see Anderson, 1999
for a synopsis of the nomenclature history). In thispaper we follow the simplified arrangement presented
by Anderson (1999) on Iranian species of this group, as
we assign all Pakistan species of angular-toed geckos to
the genus Cyrtopodion. We also find it prudent, considering the current taxonomic confusion, not to allocate
subgenera. Cyrtopodion stoliczkai is presently not

1

3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
4/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
2/2
3/3
2/2
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3

Specimen

81327
81328
81329
81330
81331
81332
81333
81334
81335
81336
81337
81338
81339
81340
81341
81342
81343
81344
81345
81346
81347
81348
81349
81350
81351
38773*

3

10/9
10/10
10/10
11/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
9/9
11/11
10/10
11/10
10/10
10/10
11/11
10/11
10/11
10/10
10/10
11/10
10/10
9/9
10/10
10/10
11/12
9/9

2

1
1
0
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1

7/8
7/7
7/7
9/9
8/8
8/8
8/9
7/7
8/8
8/7
8/7
7/7
7/8
7/7
8/8
8/8
8/7
7/7
9/9
9/8
8/8
8/8
9/9
7/7
9/9
6/7

4
19
20
17
18
20
18
19
18
18
20
20
20
20
19
20
17
17
18
17
18
18
20
19
18
19
20

5
7-8
7-9
7-8
7-8
7-8
7-8
7-8
7-8
7-8
7-9
8
7-8
7-8
7-9
8
7-8
7-8
7-9
7-8
8-9
7-8
7-9
7-8
7-9
7-8
8

6
135
125
117
113
127
116
122
119
113
126
126
132
118
117
124
116
115
129
119
129
115
114
122
130
122
NA

7
23/22
22/23
23/23
22/23
23/23
26/26
23/21
22/23
22/21
22/22
23/22
23/24
20/20
19/19
22/20
22/23
23/22
23/22
24/26
25/27
-/24
23/23
25/24
26/24
22/23
NA

8
3/3
3/3
3/3
2/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
2/2
3/3
3/3
3/3
2/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3

9
NA
5
NA
NA
NA
5
5
5
5
NA
5
NA
NA
5
5
NA
5
5
5
5
NA
NA
5
NA
5
NA

10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
NA
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
NA
2
2

11
1/1/5/10
1/1/5/12
1/1/5/10
1/1/5/NA
1/1/5/13
1/1/5/NA
1/1/6/15
1/1/6/11
1/1/6/NA
1/1/6/NA
1/1/6/15
1/1/6/NA
1/1/5/NA
1/1/6/14
1/1/5/NA
1/1/6/NA
1/1/5/13
1/1/6/NA
1/1/6/13
1/1/6/12
1/1/6/NA
1/1/5/NA
1/1/8/13
1/1/7/NA
1/1/6/NA
1/1/5/12

12
17
17
17
17
16
16
17
16
17
16
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
15
16
16
17
16
17
16
16
NA

13
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
8
12
10
8
10
8
10
8
8
10
10
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
NA

14
29
30
29
31
31
27
27
28
28
28
25
28
26
27
26
26
30
26
28
29
27
25
25
28
29
NA

15
10/10
11/11
10/11
10/10
11/11
12/12
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
11/11
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
11/10
10/10
11/11
10/11
11/11
NA/10
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
NA

16
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/1/1
+/2/2
+/1/1
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/1/1
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/2/2
+/1/1
+/2/2
NA

17
6-7
6
6-7
NA
6-7
6-7
6-7
6-7
6-7
6-7
6
6-7
6-7
6
6
NA
6-7
6-7
6-7
6
6-7
6
6-7
NA
6-7
NA

18
19/19
18/17
19/19
18/18
18/18
18/18
16/17
19/19
19/18
19/18
18/18
18/17
18/19
19/19
18/18
18/18
18/18
17/17
18/19
18/20
18/18
18/18
20/20
20/19
18/18
NA

19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

21

Table 2. Measurements and scale counts for Cyrtopodion stoliczkai from Pakistan. See text and Table 1 for character descriptions. Note that all specimens residein
the UF, except specimen with asterisk (= ZFMK).

Vol. 10, p. 154
Asiatic Herpetological Research
2004

22

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

Specimen

81327
81328
81329
81330
81331
81332
81333
81334
81335
81336
81337
81338
81339
81340
81341
81342
81343
81344
81345
81346
81347
81348
81349
81350
81351
38773*

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

23

Table 2. Continued.

+
NA
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA
+
-

24

-

25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

NA

27 28

26
NA

29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA

30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA

31
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA

32
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA

33
NA

34
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NA

35
23.7
45.1
20.1
43.6
34.0
36.7
41.9
33.4
41.1
44.0
38.7
37.9
22.0
36.3
45.0
34.1
41.5
46.5
43.4
43.5
37.2
43.9
45.1
40.0
34.0
34.6

36
25.0
52.5
17.5
NA
41.0
NA
47.5
41.5
NA
NA
46.6
NA
NA
46.3
NA
NA
48.8
NA
51.0
48.1
NA
NA
53.4
NA
NA
35.7

37
6.8
13.7
7.5
11.0
9.2
9.5
10.7
8.5
10.6
11.3
9.7
10.1
6.5
9.8
11.3
9.5
10.9
11.3
10.8
11.1
9.4
11.1
11.5
10.5
9.1
NA

38
4.6
8.3
4.4
7.9
6.1
6.9
7.6
6.0
7.6
8.1
7.0
6.9
4.3
6.6
8.0
7.0
7.6
8.2
7.8
8.1
6.3
7.8
8.3
7.3
6.5
7.2

39
2.6
5.1
2.7
4.8
3.6
4.2
4.2
3.3
4.5
4.8
4.0
3.8
2.7
5.2
4.8
4.0
5.4
4.6
4.3
4.6
3.8
4.2
4.6
4.1
3.7
4.4

40
1.9
3.4
1.6
3.3
2.7
3.0
3.4
2.5
3.3
3.4
2.6
3.1
1.5
2.9
3.6
2.9
3.6
3.5
3.2
3.5
2.8
3.5
3.7
3.0
2.8
NA

41
1.9
3.4
1.6
3.3
2.4
3.0
3.4
2.5
3.3
3.0
2.6
3.1
1.5
2.5
3.6
2.9
3.6
3.5
3.2
3.5
2.8
3.5
3.7
3.0
2.8
NA

42
1.4
2.4
1.3
2.2
1.8
2.1
2.4
1.7
2.2
2.5
2.0
2.2
1.4
2.0
2.6
1.9
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.0
2.2
2.5
2.3
1.7
1.5

43
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.5

44

2004
Asiatic Herpetological ResearchVol. 10, p. 155

Vol. 10, p. 156

Asiatic Herpetological Research

2004

Figure 2. Map of reported localities of Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867).

assigned to a subgenus, but is regarded as a member ofthe "Tibeto-Himalayan" group. Our somewhat cursory
examination of other members of this group, including
C. baturensis (Khan, 1992), C. chitralensis (Smith,1935) (synonymized with C. walli (Ingoldby, 1922) by
Khan, [1992]), and C. mintoni (Golubev and Szczerbak,
1981), clearly shows that this group is highly artificial.
Khan and Rosler (1999) did not consider
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai as a member of the Pakistan
gecko fauna, confining it to the upper Indus River valleyin Kashmir. However, the morphological characters of
our series from Skardu closely match those of Szczerbak
and Golubev (1986, 1996) and Khan and Rosler (1999).
Therefore, C. stoliczkai does indeed occur in Pakistan.
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867) was
described from a single specimen collected by
Ferdinand Stoliczka in 1865 near Karoo, north of Dras,in northern Kashmir (Blanford, 1878). Some previous
authors have cited Steindachner (1869) as the originaldescription, but this actually refers to a reprint of the earlier work (K. Adler, pers. comm.). This single specimen
was subsequently transferred to the Naturhistorisches

Museum, Wien (Vienna, Austria), where Steindachnerdesignated it as the holotype (NMW 16756) in honor ofits collector. The holotype is well-illustrated by
Szczerbak and Golubev (1986, 1996:Fig. 92). During
the Second Yarkand Expedition (1873 - 1874), Stoliczka
collected an additional 46 specimens from the type
locality and a few localities eastward to Leh in the Indus
River valley of central Ladakh, Kashmir. These specimens were subsequently deposited in the IndianMuseum, Calcutta (Blanford, 1878). Annandale (1913)
enumerated only 31 specimens in the Indian Museum
collections in his treatment of Indian Gymnodactylus.
Zugmayer (1909) and Brongersma (1935) reported thisspecies from Lamayuru and Leh, respectively, both
localities being in central Ladakh. Gruber (1981) collected 14 specimens from a few localities in the samegeneral area as Stoliczka in 1865, which were depositedin the ZSM. Khan and Rosler (1999) presented adetailed redescription of C. stoliczkai based on this lastseries, but were unable to examine the holotype and theseries in the Indian Museum. Khan and Rosler (1999)
erroneously referred to a specimen of C. stoliczkai in the

2004

Asiatic Herpetological ResearchMuseum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ 7132) as botha syntype and paratype. This specimen cannot be considered either, as Steindachner mentioned only one specimen in the original description, and Constable (1949:84)
did not provide any type designation for this MCZ specimen. This specimen was received by the MCZ via
exchange with the Indian Museum, Calcutta, in June
1908 (Constable, 1949:61; J. Rosado, pers. comm.).
Stoliczka is given as the collector (Constable, 1949:61).
Stoliczka died in 1874 during the Second Yarkand
Expedition's return to India, indicating that his large
series from Ladakh in the Indian Museum was collectedin 1873 during the outbound portion of the expedition.
We must assume that the MCZ specimen originates fromthis large series, however, it is possible that Stoliczka
made additional collections in Ladakh between 1865
and 1873. Nevertheless, it is clear that Steindachner(1867) examined only one specimen at the time C.
stoliczkai was described and the MCZ specimen cannot
be a type. Additionally, Khan and Rosler (1999) referredto MCZ 7132 as a topotype. This may or may not be correct, as Stoliczka's journal from the Second Yarkand
Expedition indicated that only some of his specimens
were collected at the type locality (Blanford, 1878) andothers were collected elsewhere. However, since theonly locality information available for the MCZ specimen is "Ladakh", it cannot be ascertained that it is actually one of the specimens collected at the type locality.
Gymnodactylus walli Ingoldby, 1922 and G. yarkandensis Anderson, 1872 were regarded as synonyms ofCyrtopodion stoliczkai by Smith (1935), a view followed by virtually all subsequent authors. Minton(1966) referred to a single specimen from Udigram,Swat District, Northwest Frontier Province, Pakistan as
C. stoliczkai, which was later found to be a distinct
species (Mertens, 1969:26; Khan, 1980:14; described as
Gymnodactylus mintoni by Golubev and Szczerbak in1981). Khan (1992) produced a compelling argument toconsider Cyrtopodion walli distinct from C. stoliczkai
based on an examination of the type specimens in the
British Musuem. We are unable to resolve the synonymy
of C. yarkandensis (Anderson, 1872). Blanford (1878)
relegated C. yarkandensis to the synonymy of C.
stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867), and subsequent authors
followed this view (Annandale, 1913; Boulenger, 1890;
Kluge, 1991, 1993, 2001; Mertens, 1969; Minton, 1966;
Smith, 1935; Szczerbak and Golubev, 1986, 1996;
Wermuth, 1965; Zhao and Adler, 1993). Khan (1994)
resurrected C. yarkandensis based on an examination ofa single specimen housed in the British Museum(BMNH 72.3.22.4). A comparison of color transparencies taken during a study of the same specimen by W.
Auffenberg in the early 1990s, along with our series
from Skardu, indicate that this specimen is probably best

Vol. 10, p. 157

assigned to C. stoliczkai. However, important morphological characters cannot be ascertained from the transparencies or Khan's (1994) description. Szczerbak and
Golubev (1986, 1996) also assigned this specimen to C.
stoliczkai. Whether C. yarkandensis is a distinct taxon
or a synonym of C. stoliczkai can be determined onlywith a thorough examination of the types housed in the
Indian Museum, Calcutta. We provide the following
notes on C. yarkandensis at this point merely for a historical perspective.
Anderson (1872) mentioned two specimens in his
description of Cyrtodactylus yarkandensis. These were
supposedly collected in Yarkand (= Shache, Xinjiang,
China; Zhao and Adler, 1993) during the First Yarkand
Expedition in 1870 (Blanford, 1878). This locality was
doubted by Blanford (1878:12-13), maintaining that thetypes of C. yarkandensis were identical to the C.
stoliczkai specimens collected by Stoliczka during theSecond Yarkand Expedition in Ladakh, some of whichwere taken from the type locality of C. stoliczkai.
Blanford (1878:13) stated "The specimens described by
Dr. Anderson as Cyrtodactylus yarkandensis werebrought, with others, by a collector, who accompanied
Dr. Henderson on the mission which was sent to
Yárkand in 1870; this mission traversed precisely thesame route through Kashmir and Leh as the second in1873 - 74, and I do not think there can be any reasonable
doubt that the real locality whence Cyrtodactylus
yarkandensis was obtained must have been Ladák, andnot Yárkand." Annandale (1913:316) incorrectly attributed the collection of the types of C. yarkandensis to
Stoliczka during the Second Yarkand Expedition. That
mission embarked in 1873, about one year after
Anderson's (1872) description of C. yarkandensis. Khan
(1994) referred to this specimen (BMNH 72.3.22.4;"Yarkhand") as a syntype. The specimen catalogue at the
British Museum indicates that this specimen was"Presented by [the] Indian Museum Calcutta through Dr.
Anderson" and cataloged on March 22, 1872 (C.
McCarthy, pers. comm.), the same year the species was
described. Anderson (1872:381) mentioned only two
specimens in the original description and Annandale(1913:316) referred to two specimens (ZSI 3792 - 93) as
types of C. yarkandensis (as a synonym of
Gymnodactylus stoliczkai Steindachner) in the IndianMuseum, Calcutta. It can be assumed that these were thespecimens on which Anderson based his description,
thus the status of the British Museum specimen remains
nebulous.
Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei Szczerbak, 1991
was described from two specimens collected by G.
Osella from Skardu, Pakistan in July 1976. Although we
did not examine the holotype, we have no doubt that thedescription of this species is based on subadultVol. 10, p. 158

Asiatic Herpetological Research

Cyrtopodion stoliczkai. This relationship was originallysuggested by Golubev (in Szczerbak and Golubev,
1996:200, footnote). Morphological characters for A.
boehmei provided by Szczerbak (1991) fall within therange of variation in those we recorded for C. stoliczkai(Table 1). The holotype (ZFMK 38773, see Fig. 3 inSzczerbak, 1991) matches the subadults in our complete
growth series collected in Skardu in 1991 (Table 2). The
whorls of the anterior third of the tail of C. stoliczkai do
not become swollen and lobed until maturity, but
Szczerbak (1991) lacked a sufficient series of specimens
to make this determination.
Golubev (in Szczerbak and Golubev, 1996:200,
footnote) also suggested that Tenuidactylus baturensis
Khan and Baig, 1992 may also be conspecific with
Cyrtopodion stoliczkai. Our examination of one specimen collected near the type locality of T. baturensis indicates that although it is similar in overall morphology,
this species appears to be distinct.
Khan (2001) divided the Tibeto - Himalayan groupof Cyrtopodion into three subgroups: Stoliczkai subgroup = C. baturensis (Khan and Baig, 1992), C.
stoliczkai (Steindachner, 1867), and C. yarkandensis(Anderson, 1872); Tibetinus subgroup = C. battalensis(Khan, 1993), C. dattanensis (Khan, 1980), C.
himalayanus (Duda and Sahi, 1978), C. mintoni(Golubev and Szczerbak, 1981), and C. tibetinus(Boulenger, 1905); and the Walli subgroup - C. walli(Ingoldby, 1922) (including C. chitralensis [Smith,1935] as a synonym) and C. kirmanense (Nikolsky,1900). Our preliminary examination of most of thesetaxa reveals that Khan's system has merit concerning
overall morphological and ecological data. Further
investigations into the Pakistan gecko fauna and that ofadjacent areas will undoubtedly lead to further discoveries of new species and more clearly define those alreadydescribed.

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Division of International
Conservation, United States Fish and Wildlife Service(Washington, D. C.), Deutscher Akademischer
Austauschdienst, Bonn, Germany, and the Office ofSponsored Research, University of Florida for the funding support awarded to W. Auffenberg that made possible the fieldwork and museum visits by him. We also
thank Kraig Adler (CU), Steve Anderson (University of
the Pacific), M. S. Khan (Secane, Pennsylvania), Arnold
Kluge (UMMZ), Colin McCarthy (BMNH), and Jose
Rosado (MCZ) for pertinent literature, insight, and theexamination of specimens under their care. We also recognize Max Nickerson and Wayne King (Florida
Museum of Natural History) for their encouragement

2004

and support. Tammy Johnson prepared Fig. 2. We thankthe dedicated staff of the Zoological Survey Departmentof Pakistan, particularly Mohammad Farooq Ahmed,
former Director, Hafizur Rehman, Shamim Fakhri, andAleem Khan, for their support and assistance throughout
the fieldwork portion of this project.

Literature Cited
Anderson, J. 1872. On some Persian, Himalayan, andother reptiles. Proceedings of the ZoologicalSociety of London 1872(2):371-404.
Anderson, S. C. 1999. The Lizards of Iran. Society for
the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, NY.
pp. 442.
Annandale, N. 1913. The Indian geckos of the genus
Gymnodactylus. Records of the Indian Museum
9:309-326, pls. 16-17.
Blanford, W. T. 1878. Scientific results of the Second
Yarkand Mission; based on the collections andnotes of the late Ferdinand Stoliczka, Ph.D. Reptilia
and Amphibia, Calcutta, 26 pp.
Boulenger, G. A. 1890. The Fauna of British India,
including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia andBatrachia. Taylor and Francis, London, xviii + 541
pp.
Boulenger, G. A. 1905. On some batrachians and reptiles
from Tibet. Annals and Magazine of Natural
History (7th series) 11:379-380.
Brongersma, L. D. 1935. Amphibien und Reptilien. Pp.
446-451. In Visser (ed.), Karakorum I. Wissenschaftliche
Ergebnisse
derNiederländischer
Expeditionen in den Karakorum und dieangrennzenden Gebiete 1922, 1925 und 1929/30.
Brockhaus, Leipzig.
Constable, J. D. 1949. Reptiles from the Indian peninsula in the Museum of Comparative Zoology.
Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology
103(2):59-160.
Duda, P. L. and D. N. Sahi. 1978. Cyrtodactylus
himalayanus: A new gekkonid species from Jammu,
India. Journal of Herpetology 12(3):351-354.
Fitzinger, L. J. 1843. Systema reptilium. Fasciculus
Primus: Amblyglossae (Conspectus Geographicus).
Braumüller und Seidel, Vienna, iv + 106 pp.

2004

Asiatic Herpetological ResearchVol. 10, p. 159(Reprint 1973 Society for the Study of Amphibians
and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York).

Kluge, A. G. 2001. Gekkotan Lizard Taxonomy.
Hamadryad, Special Publication 26(1):1-209.

Golubev, M. L. and N. N. Szczerbak. 1981. [A new
species of the genus Gymnodactylus Spix, 1823
(Reptilia, Sauria, Gekkonidae)]. Vestnik Zoologii
1981(3):40-45. (In Russian).

Leviton, A. E., R. H. Gibbs, Jr., E. Heal, and C. E.
Dawson. 1985. Standards in herpetology andichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for
institutional resource collections in herpetology andichthyology. Copeia 1985:802-832.

Gruber, U. 1981. Notes on the herpetofauna of Kashmirand Ladakh. British Journal of Herpetology 6:145150.
Ingoldby, C. M. 1922. A new stone gecko from theHimalaya. Journal of the Bombay Natural History
Society 28:1051.
Khan, M. S. 1980. A new species of gecko from northern Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology
12(1):11-16.
Khan, M. S. 1992. Validity of the mountain gecko
Gymnodactylus
walli
Ingoldby,
1922.
Herpetological Journal 2:106-109.
Khan, M. S. 1993. A new angular-toed gecko from
Pakistan, with remarks on the taxonomy and a key
to the species belonging to genus Cyrtodactylus(Reptilia: Sauria: Geckkonidae). Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 25(1):67-73.
Khan, M. S. 1994. Validity and redescription ofTenuidactylus yarkandensis (J. Anderson, 1872).
Pakistan Journal of Zoology 26(2):139-143.
Khan, M. S. 2001. Taxonomic notes on angular-toed
Gekkota of Pakistan, with description of a new
species of genus Cyrtopodion. Pakistan Journal of
Zoology 33(1):13-24.
Khan, M. S. and K. J. Baig. 1992. A new Tenuidactylus
gecko from northeastern Gilgit Agency, North
Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 24(4):273277.
Khan, M. S. and H. Rosler. 1999. Redescription andgeneric redesignation of the Ladakhian gecko
Gymnodactylus stoliczkai Steindachner, 1969 [sic].
Asiatic Herpetological Research 8:60-68.
Kluge, A. G. 1991. Checklist of gekkonid lizards.
Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service
85:1-35.
Kluge, A. G. 1993. Gekkonoid Lizard Taxonomy.
International Gecko Society, San Diego, 245 pp.

Mertens, R. 1969. Die Amphibien und Reptilien WestPakistans. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde
197:1-96.
Minton, S. A., Jr. 1966. A contribution to the herpetology of West Pakistan. Bulletin of the American
Museum of Natural History 134(2):29-184.
Nikolsky, A. M. 1899 [1900]. Reptiles, amphibiens etpoissons, recueillis pendant la voyage de Mr. N. A.
Zarudny en 1898 dans la Perse. Annuaire du Musée
Zoologique de l'Académie Impériale des Sciencesde St. Pétersbourg, 4:375-417. (In Russian).
Smith, M. A. 1935. The Fauna of British India,
Including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia andAmphibia. vol. 2, Sauria. Taylor and Francis,
London, xiii + 440 pp.
Steindachner, F. 1867. Reptilia. In: F. Steindachner (ed.)
Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte Novara um die
Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den
Befehlen des Commodore B. von WüllerstorfUrbair, Zoology, vol. 1, part 3. KaiserlichKöniglichen Hof-Staatsdruckerei, Vienna, 98 pp..
Steindachner, F. 1869. Reptilia. In: F. Steindachner (ed.)
Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte Novara um die
Erde in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859 unter den
Befehlen des Commodore B. von WüllerstorfUrbair, Zoology, vol. 1, part 3. KaiserlichKöniglichen Hof-Staatsdruckerei, Vienna, 98 pp., 3
pls. (Reprint of 1867 Edition).
Szczerbak, N. N. 1991. Eine neue Gecko-Art aus
Pakistan: Alsophylax (Altiphylax) boehmei sp. nov.
Salamandra 27(1):53-57.
Szczerbak, N. N. and M. L. Golubev. 1986. [Gecko
Fauna of the USSR and Adjacent Regions]. Nauka
Dymka, Kiev, 232 pp. (In Russian).
Szczerbak, N. N. and M. L. Golubev. 1996. Gecko
Fauna of the USSR and Adjacent Regions. [English
edition translated from the Russian by M. L.
Golubev and S. A. Malinsky; A. E. Leviton and G.

Vol. 10, p. 160

Asiatic Herpetological Research

R. Zug, eds.]. Society for the Study of Amphibians
and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York, 232 pp.
Wermuth, H. 1965. Liste der rezenten Amphibien und
Reptilien: Gekkonidae, Pygopodidae, Xantusidae.
Das Tierreich 80:xxiv + 246 pp.
Zhao, E. and K. K. Adler. 1993. Herpetology of China.
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles,
Oxford, Ohio, 522 pp.
Zugmayer, E. 1909. Beiträge zur Herpetologie vonZentral-Asien.
Zoologischen
Jarhbüchern27(5):481-508.

2004