The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 19 (2008)

From City of Culture to City of Consumption:
Boston in Henry James’s The Bostonians

Yuko NAKAGAWA*

Henry James’s The Bostonians (1886) distinguishes itself from his otherworks by its disturbing narrator1 and its all-American setting, which amounts
to a frank criticism of his home country. In fact some of the novel is so sarcastic that when first serialized in The Century, James had to defend himself
even to his brother in his letters.2 His intention can be seen in his Notebook
as follows:
The relation of the two girls should be a study of one of those friendships between
women which are so common in New England. The whole thing is as local, as
American, as possible, and full of Boston; an attempt to show that I can write an
American story. There must, indispensably, be a type of newspaper man—the man
whose ideal is energetic reporter. I should like to bafouer [French: ridicule] thevulgarity and hideousness of this—the impudent invasion of privacy—the extinction of all conception of privacy, etc. . . . I wished to write a very American tale, atale very characteristic of our social conditions, and I asked myself what was themost salient and peculiar point in our social life. The answer was: the situation of
women, the decline of the sentiment of sex, the agitation on their behalf.3

Apparently James’s intention was to write “a very American tale” and to him
it was about the friendship between women, journalism that invaded privacy,
and the women’s movement which seemed to him to diminish women’s
feminine nature. Then he picked Boston as the setting. Why would he choose
Copyright © 2008 Yuko Nakagawa. All rights reserved. This work may be used, withthis notice included, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be
distributed, electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission fromthe author.
*Professor, Ritsumeikan University

63

64

YUKO NAKAGAWA

Boston as a setting for his “very American tale?”
One possible answer to the question could be that, to James, what made “avery American tale” was a frenzied uproar over money in an American city.
Indeed after the Civil War, the whole nation was heading towards commercialization, and the culture of consumption was replacing the high culture
embodied by Boston. Boston itself went through modernization and also became a hub of commerce.
Another answer to the question could be that Boston did not seem to becapable of such excitement over money, for it was where the New England
mind with its Puritan heritage and Transcendentalist philosophy was supposed to be still intact. As Shaun O’Connell writes, “Boston holds a high,though precarious, place in the American mind” because it is the site of the
Massachusetts Bay Colony and because of that it came to represent “[theAmerican] head, the national citadel of culture and moral purpose,”4 though
it also embodied “a darker side of the American character—a puritan
streak. . . .”5 Because of its original position as the city of New England heritage, its transition to a city of capitalism appears even more drastic. Boston at
this time embodied both conflicting values, the New England mind and theculture of consumption. These could be the reasons why James chose Boston
as his setting, and depicted how the city of culture became a new city of culture of consumption. The change meant the decline of Boston which, in Oliver Wendell Holmes’ words, had been “the thinking centre of the continent,
and therefore of the planet.”6This paper will discuss how Bostonians, represented by Olive Chancellor,a Boston elite and a feminist, and Verena Tarrant, a talented young speaker,
face the transition of Boston from a city of culture to a city of capitalism.
Olive resists the change but eventually assimilates to it, or it could be said
that she is incorporated into the system, while Verena easily adjusts herself tothe new environment without hesitation. The transition is encoded everywhere: streetcars running in the city jingling their bells, the newspaper boys’
hawking cry, bright shop-fronts, hotels showing off their interiors at nightwith glass windows and electric lights, busy theatres with posters of actresses, new residential areas, and churches receding to the background in thelandscape. The change affected the city’s landscape as well as individuals
and their lifestyles.
The novel starts with the visit of Basil Ransom, a New York lawyer from
Mississippi, to his wealthy cousin, Olive Chancellor, a prestigious bourgeois,
at her house on Charles Street. He encounters Boston, and the novel ends
with him luring Verena away from her debut as a speaker for the women’s

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

65

movement at the Music Hall in Boston. Though many critics have discussed
the novel in terms of gender or feminism, I would like to focus on its representation of the changes taking place in the city and the individual characters’
reaction to those changes. In a sense it is the story of Basil’s experience ofBoston, yet James also presents Olive’s and Verena’s perspectives with episodes of their visits to New York and Marmion near Cape Cod. What the
decline of Boston as a city of culture means is crucial in discussing what
American society achieved and sacrificed in its transition into a culture of
consumption.
I.

URBANIZATION AND THE LANDSCAPE OF BOSTON

The story is set over two years in the late 1870s, probably 1877 through1879.7 The characteristics of Boston are first presented through the eyes ofBasil Ransom, an outsider to the city. His conversation with Olive’s elder
sister Mrs. Luna, provides the reader with the well-known characteristics ofBoston: she says, “[n]obody tells fibs in Boston. I don’t know what to makeof them all” (35), and calls Boston “this unprevaricating city” (35), while
Basil refers to Boston as “the city of reform” (38). Basil’s comment is right,
for in Boston reform movements, such as abolition before the Civil War andwomen’s suffrage movement after it, were active. Lucy Stone, Julia Ward
Howe and Henry Blackwell formed the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA) in Boston in November 1869. Suffrage was still a controversial
issue in the US at the time of the novel’s setting. Mrs. Luna, a New Yorker
and a woman of the fashionable world, has no interest in suffrage and dislikes
Boston, which is exclusive and does not offer many social occasions. Therefore most of her comments on Boston, closely related to Olive, are negativeand impress upon the reader that Boston is still a city of Puritans. Her statement that “[t]here were people who wanted one to spend the winter in Boston” (39), however, implies that Boston attracted people for its cultural eventsand remained active in winter in spite of its severe climate.
Basil Ransom, from the South, apparently has some prejudice against Boston on two strokes: as a city of reform and a city of culture. By reform Basilmeans temperance and women’s suffrage movement, which he dislikes because they intend to change his lifestyle. To him, the gathering at Miss Birdseye’s to hear Mrs. Farrinder, a celebrated speaker for the emancipation of
women, is “something very Bostonian” (49); his comment betrays his prejudice that reform movements exist only in Boston. The fact is not true, ofcourse; the National Woman Suffrage Association was active in New York.

66

YUKO NAKAGAWA

And yet, in the novel, Boston is marked as a city of reform, as people cameto Boston for opportunities such as Mrs. Farrinder’s lecture. Basil also had
heard that Boston is “a city of culture” (46). He finds it in Olive’s drawing
room with “so much organized privacy or . . . so many objects that spoke of
habits and tastes” (45) including German books, which he likes.
The view from Olive’s drawing room presents Boston in more detail. The
Back Bay view that Basil sees from there are of “wooden spires, the masts oflonely boats, the chimneys of dirty ‘works’” (45). Robert Martin calls thesethree items in the landscape “central elements of Boston,” for they are “thespires of the declining church, the masts of isolated self whose triumphantself-reliance has been transformed to isolation and loneliness, and the chimneys of the new industrial order.”8 The first two suggest that the old elementsof Boston, religion and Transcendentalism, are declining in their influence,
while the chimneys imply the advent of new industry. The invasion of the
new industry introduces ugliness and unpleasantness in the landscape, whichis emphasized in a different description. It is presented as Verena’s vision:
the long, low bridge that crawled, on its staggering posts, across the Charles; thecasual patches of ice and snow; the desolate suburban horizons, peeled and madebald by the rigour of the season; the general hard, cold void of the prospect; theextrusion, at Charlestown, at Cambridge, of a few chimneys and steeples, straight,
sordid tubes of factories and engine-shops, or spare, heavenward finger of the New
England meeting-house. There was something inexorable in the poverty of thescene, shameful in the meanness of its details, which gave a collective impressionof boards and tin and frozen earth, sheds and rotting piles, railway-lines striding
flat across a thoroughfare of puddles, and tracks of the humbler, the universal
horse-car, traversing obliquely this path of danger; loose fences, vacant lots,
mounds of refuse, yards bestrewn with iron pipes, telegraph poles, and barewooden backs of places. (185)The crudeness, ugliness, poverty and squalor of the landscape are emphasized, and we can see that factories and churches are all muddled together inthe same wintry view. This landscape of Charlestown and Cambridge contrasts with Beacon Hill, which is “a prestigious enclave” of Boston.9 These
suburban manufacturing and residential areas are set apart from the city of
Boston only by the Charles River, which is not a long distance, as James used
to walk over the bridge from his room in Beacon Hill to his father’s to join
him for dinner in Quincy St. in Cambridge during his stay in 188210.
Another geographical element of Boston appears in the first description of
the view of the unfilled part of the Back Bay: “A brackish expanse of anoma-

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

67

lous character, which is too big for a river and too small for a bay” (45). Mona
Domosh points out that the filling of the Back Bay was completed only in thelate 1870s,11 the time period of The Bostonians. It is natural then that the row
of houses Basil sees are “in their extreme modernness, which overlooked thesame lagoon from a long embankment on the left, constructed of stones
roughly piled” (45). Probably Basil finds “extreme modernness” in theirnewness and their Victorian brownstone facades. Commonwealth Avenue,
where the first houses were sold in the Back Bay area, was regarded as “thearchitectural showpiece for the city and a symbol of the refined lifestyle ofBoston’s elite classes.”12 The planning of the Back Bay tripled the size of
Boston’s original landmass by the 1880s,13 and expanded the city, but its use
was strictly controlled. It prohibited commercial land use, thereby allowing
the area “to remain exclusive and residential”14 and, at the same time, imposed limits on residential buildings. Consequently, no “shockers” like the
Vanderbilt mansion in New York were permitted in the Back Bay. Instead, theresult was a “homogeneous, discrete, and ornamental environment”15 for a
few elites. In Domosh’s words, the Back Bay was “a direct expression of thecity’s stable and conservative elite class,”16 an alternative to Beacon Hill andthe “old” South End, another elite enclave, which were “being encroachedupon by commercial interests, and invaded by lower-class housing”17 as aresult of economic growth and the increasing population of immigrants.
Many of the bourgeoisie fled to the Back Bay from Beacon Hill and the SouthEnd, though they encountered “some new neighbors—prosperous merchants
and self-made moguls newly rich from ventures in a burgeoning industrial
economy.”18 With the development of the Back Bay, these privileged few, thebourgeoisie, were able to secure their enclave in the changing city, affording
a glimpse of class conflict in the physical urban landscape of Boston.
It is not only the Back Bay but also Cambridge that James presents: thisnew residential area exhibits an unpleasant bareness and homogeneity. When
Basil visits Cambridge, James describes it as “a sightless, soundless, interspaced, embryonic region” (239). Its newness is emphasized, but not favorably: the silvered number on plates affixed on the door was what gave “thepersonal identity” to the otherwise similar houses (240). Unlike the ugly factories in Verena’s view above, the street is clean but vacant in the daytime.
Thus as William J. Lloyd suggests, the depiction “bore little resemblances tothe attractive cottages and abundant greenery of the much publicized suburban ideal.”19 The problems caused by urbanization and the transitional natureof Boston can be seen in the descriptions of the landscapes seen from Olive’s
drawing room and other new neighborhoods.

68

YUKO NAKAGAWA

James also provides a detailed description of Boston as an increasingly
modern city. Hoping to be interviewed, Verena’s father, Selah Tarrant, an
obscure but ambitious mesmeric healer, frequents the offices of newspapers
and the vestibules of hotels which he regards as “national nerve-centres”(123). The “high glass plates” (123) of the vestibules of hotels impress thereader as convenient devices introduced for efficiency at the sacrifice of privacy. The place bustles with “the piled-up luggage, the convenient spittoons,
the elbowing loungers, the disconsolate ‘guests,’ the truculent Irish porters,
the rows of shaggy-backed men in strange hats, writing letters at a table inlaid
with advertisements . . .” (123). Advertisements, which stimulate the desireof individuals, are indispensable features in a city that is in transition to theculture of consumption. Ian Bell points out that the view is distorted by Selah
Tarrant’s ambition,20 but the Irish porters imply the presence of the immigrants that the observer can no longer disregard, while the elbowing of theloungers connotes competition in the crowded city. The picture is no longer
that of a city of culture or of Transcendentalism.
Another description of a hotel is presented in Basil’s walk just before
Verena’s debut at the Music Hall. The place is more thriving, active and attractive:
The shop-fronts glowed through frosty panes, the passers bustled on the pavement, the bells of the street-cars jangled in the cold air, the newsboys hawked theevening-papers, the vestibules of the theatres, illuminated and flanked with coloured posters and the photographs of actresses, exhibited seductively their swinging doors of red leather or baize, spotted with little brass nails. Behind great platesof glass the interior of the hotels became visible, with marble-paved lobbies, whitewith electric lamps, and columns, and Westerners on divans stretching their legs,
while behind a counter, set apart and covered with an array of periodicals andnovels in paper covers, little boys, with the faces of old men, showing plans of theplay-houses and offering librettos, sold orchestra-chairs at a premium. (412−413)

The exterior of the hotel extends into the interior, for the hotel is transparent,
exposing people in the lobby. It has become a site for publicity, though lessso, according to Bell, than were department stores at the time of the writingof The Bostonians.21 It is in The American Scene (1907) that James overtly
criticizes the hotel as a site for publicity.
Advertising is another modern aspect of Boston. Posters and the photographs of the actresses that Basil sees here prove that Boston is in the Age ofAdvertising,22 and that it is also a place that provides pleasure. As he meditates, Boston is “big and full of nocturnal life” (413) with little or no trace ofFROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

69

Puritan heritage. This is now a city immersed in the culture of consumption,
for purchasing tickets is a transaction, an economic activity, a form of reproduction enabled by accumulation. James presents this scene almost at the endof the novel. This is where Basil arrives at the end of his encounter with Boston. Even to him, a New Yorker, Boston is a modern city of consumption.
James depicts another modern aspect of Boston: public transportation.
Streetcars carry the pleasure-seekers and are indispensable, though the efficiency and convenience demanded the sacrifice of the passengers’ individualism that New England virtue so valued. Unlike in a hackney-coach, riding ina streetcar meant sharing the same space with strangers, threatening one’s
individualism. William J. Lloyd writes that James was critical of the system,
for his characters “‘spent hours in jingling, aching, jostled journeys’ as they
moved throughout the expanded city in unending pursuit of their rather inconsequential goals.”23 Yet it gave convenience to those who could not afforda hackney-coach or other individual transportation. In fact, we learn that Olive, Verena and Miss Birdseye depend on streetcars for their mobility. Public
transportation is a democratic device that gives mobility to almost everyone.
Olive prefers to ride streetcars because the occasions allow her to mingle
with the “people.” Basil experiences riding a streetcar in Boston when he
joins Miss Birdseye to collect the address of Verena’s parents. On this trip,
traditional civility is disrupted by the interruption of their conversation andthe rudeness of the conductor to Miss Birdseye.24 Thus, James depicts boththe shortcomings and the attractiveness of urban life, which enable the activities of commerce and consumption. Boston is no longer a city of reform,
but a city dominated by the culture of consumption and commercialism. Even
Miss Birdseye, the surviving Transcendentalist, has to adjust to it and also
benefits from it.
II.

“THE OLDEST BOURGEOISIE” IN THE NEW URBAN BOSTON:
OLIVE CHANCELLOR’S ASSIMILATION

Olive represents Beacon Hill, that is, the old Boston elite. Even though her
position in the Boston hierarchy was not the highest, her family belonged to“the bourgeoisie—the oldest and best” (61), though James writes that shepurchased the house on Charles Street after her father’s death (161). Hercharacter is that of the New England Woman with the attributes of “a vestigial puritanism” 25 as her last name connotes: she has a strong sense of duty
and justice. Such a nature demands that she be useful to others and discourages her from seeking pleasure; Olive devotes herself to the emancipation of

70

YUKO NAKAGAWA

women, belonging to twenty associations and committees. Her simple dress
contrasts with her elder sister Mrs. Luna, who busies herself in conspicuous
consumption. From her sense of duty and romantic longings emerge an aspiration for martyrdom. Olive’s sense of duty once drives her to befriend someshop-girls, who are underpaid and belong to “the people.” Her attempt, however, ends as a failure because of their concern about a young man called
Charlie and Olive’s tendency to romanticize things: “she [Olive] took them[the shop girls] more tragically than they took themselves” (62).
Then how does Olive adjust to the urbanizing Boston turning into a city ofculture of consumption? She enjoys the Back Bay view with Verena in thesunset, which suggests that she also romanticizes the view. Martin writes that
Olive “shuts her curtains” to “a new urban reality”26, though not completely,
I would say. She is aware of some new urban aspects of the city, such as thedecline of Transcendentalism. She knows that “this frumpy little missionary[Miss Birdseye] was the last link in a tradition, and that when she could (sic)be called away the heroic age of New England life—the age of plain living
and high thinking, of pure ideals and earnest effort, of moral passion andnoble experiment—would effectually be closed” (189).27 It was the traditional spirit of New England that promoted social reformist tendencies suchas Miss Birdseye’s, but that spirit lost favor to the desire for money and pleasure. Olive’s desire is for heroic deeds; to be a martyr is to fulfill her romantic
longing. Olive adheres to the reformist cause, adding some romantic elements to it.
Olive’s attitude towards the transition of Boston is contradictory and complicated. She is very exclusive. She dislikes Verena’s parents in Cambridge
for their vulgarity, even though she has a liking for what she calls “the people,” that is the middle class and lower class. She is no different from the
Boston elite who protected their enclave by building the Back Bay and were
famous for their solidarity. Even though she cries, “I’m sick of the Back Bay”
(90), she does not leave her social position. She represents it. The narrator
sarcastically reveals her lifestyle: “as a typical Bostonian she could not fail tobelong in some degree to a ‘set’” (187) which consists of “select spirits” andwhat she calls “real people” (187), apparently intelligent and wealthy women
who are allowed—in other words, are able to afford—to borrow books fromAthenaeum, Boston’s great private library that James used to visit. She avails
herself of the city of culture where the opportunities for hearing good music
are numerous and excellent, made possible by the convenient location of theMusic Hall. Olive takes full advantage of the prosperity of the city and her
position in the Boston social hierarchy.

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

71

Such enjoyment of comfort, however, brings about a sense of guilt for a
New England mind with a puritan streak such as Olive’s. Her involvementwith some city missions, such as cleaning dirty children, could be seen as theatonement for the guilt she feels. Olive herself is aware of her contradiction.
The experience of the city mission and Miss Birdseye’s bare, vulgar room in
the South End stand in contrast to her own luxurious home with flowers, goodmusic, and a warm hearth with tea service. Olive is well aware that she cannot be another Miss Birdseye who has devoted herself to the weakest with noself-interest. Nor does she want to be like Matthias Pardon, a journalist, who
represents “the vulgarity and hideousness . . . —the impudent invasion ofprivacy—the extinction of all conception of privacy”28 that James deplored in
his Notebook. Pardon proposes to Verena to organize and publicize her lecture tour to make money, that is, to fulfill his personal desire for gain. Oliveis aware that her desire to possess Verena is not only for the cause but also forher personal affection, whether it be lesbian or not. The “union” she requests
is in reality not a voluntary one but one purchased by offering checks to
Verena’s parents. As such it is tainted with vulgarity.
Olive is also aware of her narrowness. As a Bostonian she has a sense ofantagonism against New Yorkers represented by the Burrages. Henry Burrage with his soft nature and musical talent is acceptable, but Mrs. Burrage,in spite of her intelligence and culture, is unacceptable to Olive, for Mrs. Burrage seems to say that she belongs to “a larger world than hers [Olive’s]”(164−65). Indeed Mrs. Burrage’s New York high society is larger than Boston’s. Her attitude is comparatively free from any class consciousness, inquite a democratic spirit, seeming to imply that “every one present had somedistinction and some talent, that they were all good company together” (165).
Such an impression highlights Olive’s sense of inferiority and insecurity.
This is the way she, as a reformer, should feel, but she herself knows that she
is actually exclusive rather than democratic.
Ironically, and of necessity, Olive, who controls Verena, becomes an entrepreneur in the marketing of Verena’s lecture. She ends up assisting Mr. Filerin the lecture business, who sells the pamphlets of the sketches of Verena’s
life to advertise her and to earn more profits from their sale in the Boston
Music Hall. It is analogous to selling Verena’s privacy and not much different
from Matthias Pardon’s attempt to acquire from Verena “any personal items”
to report in his newspaper. Though the novel does not tell how much Olive isgoing to share in the profits from the lecture, it is apparent that she assists inthe business that profits from the sale of posters and photographs of Verena
as well as price of admission. Even though Olive is not interested in making

72

YUKO NAKAGAWA

money and detests vulgarity, she succumbs to the capitalistic venture. She isa part of the system of reproduction to satisfy the audience of consumers in
Boston.
Irony is added by the fact that Mr. Filer controls Olive who controls Verena. Consequently, the cause is treated in the same class with the prima donnas
and natural curiosities that Mr. Filer has handled. Thus, Olive, who hates
vulgarity, is nonetheless completely submerged in the money-making systemof the culture of consumption. Olive’s strategy, however, is not new. Anna
Dickinson whom Sara DeSaussure Davis identifies as Verena’s model, contracted with agents, such as John G. North and T. B. Pugh in 1860s.29 These
agents took over the burdens from the star lecturers, such as “advertising,travel planning, and negotiation with local host.”30 Some reform movements
had already been turned into entertainment in the postwar lecturing boom.
Basil sees that Olive is “struggling and yielding, making sacrifice of taste forthe sake of the largest hearing and conforming herself to a great popular system” (415). He adds, however, that “there was a catch-penny effect about thewhole thing” (415). Thus, Olive degrades the women’s movement by reducing it to an entertainment.
And Olive, who used to have a strong sense of justice, has learned thegame of the money-making world and almost manipulates others for her own
benefit, which is to keep Verena. I say “almost” because she does not carryout her plan, which is to make use of the Burrages’ proposal: to let Henry
Burrage marry Verena and financially support the movement. Olive once,
though only for a moment, has a vision that she can use the Burrages to protect Verena from Basil and, later, to set aside the Burrages once the funds aresafely invested in their movement. Such egotism distinguishes Olive from theheroic and disinterested Miss Birdseye.
And yet, it is Olive’s sense of justice that brings her disaster: because ofher sense of justice, Olive does not prohibit Verena from seeing Basil both in
New York and Marmion, which allows Basil to persuade Verena to marryhim. Olive is just in refusing Verena’s pledge not to marry anyone. Later she
regrets her own refusal, but also reconfirms that such a pledge would have
spoiled their union. She tries not to blame Verena for giving up the cause;
Olive tries to “be rigidly just” (395). James depicts this sense of justice as apeculiar trait of New Englanders also exemplified in Mrs. Daintry in “A New
England Winter” (1884), who is particular about doing right.31 This is whatsaves Olive from the immoral aggressive world of commerce that Basil represents. After all, Olive fails to truly assimilate herself to the culture of consumption. When she climbs onto the platform after Verena’s flight from the

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

73

Music Hall, she is desperately clinging to her New England ideal. It mightseem suicidal, but it will be fulfilling her wish for martyrdom. Her decision
is to remain a Bostonian in the old sense. And whether it ends up as a disasteror her acquisition of a voice depends on the Bostonian audience: whether
they are supporters of the cause or the consumers of the spectacular in theMusic Hall, a mob who, in Basil’s words, “howl and thump” (430).
III.

ANOTHER BOSTONIAN, VERENA“The Bostonians” is the expression used by Basil to refer to Olive Chancellor and Verena Tarrant. Though Verena lives in Cambridge and her father
is from Baltimore, she is a Bostonian in the sense that her mother is thedaughter of a famous abolitionist and she herself had attended lectures since
she was an infant. Her background and character contrast with Olive’s. Her
family is not wealthy at all; her father is a mesmeric healer of immoral character, and her mother clings to her father’s fame while she longs for the fashionable world of Beacon Hill. Verena is noted for her red hair, but she also
has a gift in her ability to attract the audience with her voice. She possesses
what Olive lacks: Olive has bouts of shyness, for example, and cannot speakout in public, while Verena’s voice is her gift. Verena is definitely one of theAmerican Girls that James depicted so often in his works, such as Daisy
Miller (1878) and The Portrait of a Lady (1881).32 She is endowed with thecharacteristics of the American Girl, though lacking substantial self; that is,
she is simple, innocent, and good-natured, though not as intelligent as Olive.
“Natural” is the adjective often used to characterize her. Her good nature andlack of substantial self makes her easy prey to a stronger will. First Olive andlater Basil pressure her. Ian Bell analyses Basil’s use of theatrical vocabulary
as “a characteristic rhetoric in his appropriation of Verena” for example, hetells her that the successful speaker is not Verena herself but a “preposterous
puppet” (330) concealing her.33 What he means is that Verena does not atheart agree with the cause and that she is therefore unnatural on the platform.
Verena believes him, and her attitude towards Olive changes. Verena protests
against their leaving Marmion in order to escape from Basil, claiming thatescaping demonstrates a lack of dignity. Olive regards Verena’s attitude as“entirely unnatural and overdone” (370). Depending on the situation in thenovel, she could be either natural or theatrical. “Natural” is related to Transcendentalism, while “theatrical” is related to the culture of consumption.
Verena can belong to either world.
James depicted many American girls in his works, such as Daisy Miller in

74

YUKO NAKAGAWA

Daisy Miller that won his fame, Isabel Archer in The Portrait of a Lady,
Milly Theale in The Wings of the Dove (1902) and many more. He was not,however, the only writer who represented the American Girl or images ofyoung American women. The American Girl is an icon of the country, “thevisual and literary form to represent the values of the nation and codify thefears and desires of its citizens,”34 though we should be reminded that theseimages of American women were “created as ideas, not found as facts.”35 In
Verena, James presents an example of the American woman encountering theculture of consumption. Verena easily adjusts herself to the culture of consumption and is in contrast with Olive’s complicated situation, which is why
James needed to introduce her. Her lack of substantial self, which enables her
to enjoy the culture of consumption, is what matters here, as a contrast to
Olive who was in Basil’s opinion, “intensely, fearfully, a person” (114). Jennifer A. Wicke notes that Verena functions as a “free-floating currency as anadvertisable image”36 and writes that she becomes “an object to be produced,
a blank whose aesthetic surface” allows “nearly any representation to be imprinted upon it.”37 Indeed she is seen as an appropriate object to be imprinted
on: Mrs. Luna sarcastically compares her to “a walking advertisement” (261)
at the Burrages’ Wednesday Club. She is also interesting as a consumer who
is easily incorporated into the city’s culture of consumption.
It is in New York that Verena looks most flourishing. In contrast to Olive
who wears only simple dresses, Verena pays attention to what she wears,
though she chooses a style that does not match Olive’s taste, as exemplified
in a jacket with gilded buttons that she wears on her first visit to Charles
Street. In New York, she appears at the Burrages’ on the Fifth Avenue in awhite dress with flowers in her bosom. (If the flower were single, it would bein the typical style of a lecturer for the women’s movement, such as Victoria
Woodhull.) Wearing it, she attracts members of high society with her lecture
and impresses Basil as a success. Traveling about in a carriage, she enjoys
receiving “new expressions of curiosity and sympathy, assurances that one
was watched and followed” (291) with the consciousness of a celebrity. Thisis appropriate for an advertising girl. Then the narrator writes that “there wasenough of the epicurean in Verena’s composition to make it easy for her incertain conditions to live only for the hour” (291). Such a tendency is indispensable for a culture of consumption in order to promote more consumption. Dinner at Delmonico’s, and an evening at the German Opera or Museum
are all things that New York, the biggest city of the culture of consumption,offers as entertainment. To her New York is “the bright, amusing city, where
the elements seemed so numerous, the animation so immense, the shops so

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

75

brilliant, the women so strikingly dressed” (289) which quickens her curiosity even in the midst of her depressed conversation with Olive about a letterfrom Basil, which she had kept secret from Olive until that morning. She is aconsumer, easily adapting to the metropolis.
Verena’s advantage is that she can enjoy New York even without money.
While she enjoys fine food at a famous restaurant and opera with Henry Burrage, she can enjoy a walk in Central Park with Basil. She makes the most ofCentral Park with him, enjoying the “elevated,” the Zoological Garden, its
lake and the Maze. She is a perfect user of Central Park, for whose favor andpleasure Frederick Law Olmsted, who designed the park, aimed. Remaining
in a carriage, she unintentionally displays Henry Burrage’s status in the park,
which, as Domosh writes, actually functioned as “a display ground for thecity’s elite.”38 But with Basil, she enjoys walking in the park and his plan is
to share the noonday repast out of a French dish at a little table with napkins.
The plan is never carried out, but it was what Olmsted aimed for, as Richard
Godden explains: “Frederick Olmsted designed parks explicitly to offer, tothe rising proletariat, a horticultural version of the ‘softening and refining’‘tea table’ of the middle class.” 39
It is not only Verena’s adaptability to the metropolis but also her failure to
see ugliness that helps her as a consumer. She chooses to see the positive, as
exemplified earlier in her view of the Back Bay from Olive’s drawing room.
As Martin points out, Verena’s perspective is at the moment of sunset thattransforms the ugly picture into “a clear cold rosiness.”40 In spite of the presence of “something inexorable in the poverty of the scene” (185), owing to
the effect of the sunset, Verena thinks the picture lovely. She, like Basil, fails
to read the moral meaning of the landscape and is instead attracted to it. This
limited view, however, helps her to survive in the city and enjoy what it offers
her, even though it is somewhat like living in a fool’s paradise. And yet it also
symbolizes a failure to see humanity, the suffering and poverty beneath thepicture. James presents such insensitivity when Basil faces the landscapeviewed at the plaza in the south of Central Park and thinks that the day was
still “in its youth” (332), which reflects his optimistic view, though unrealistic:
The bowers and boscages stretched behind them, the artificial lakes and cockneyfied landscapes, making all the region bright with the sense of air and space, andraw natural tints, and vegetation too diminutive to overshadow. The chocolatecoloured houses, in tall, new rows, surveryed the expanse. . . . and the beer-saloons, with exposed shoulders and sides, which in New York do a good deal to-

76

YUKO NAKAGAWA
wards representing the picturesque, the “bit” appreciated by painters, announced
themselves in signs of large lettering to the sky. Groups of the unemployed, thechildren of disappointment from beyond the seas, propped themselves against low,sunny wall of the Park; and on the other side the commercial vista of the Sixth
Avenue stretched away with a remarkable absence of aerial perspective. (332)This passage reveals that the city is new and the park’s version of nature is
artificial. The business district is threatening, blocking the view. Immigrants,
who were becoming a big issue in New York, at that time, are depicted as apart of landscape rather than as part of its humanity that he can sympathize
with. Basil just observes the landscape, accepts it only with a feeling that the
day is still young. Yoko Funasaka points out the ironic tone of the narrator indescribing the beer-saloons as an indispensable element of the “picturesque”
landscape in New York.41 Thus is the New York landscape vulgar, though to
Basil, beer-saloons are indispensable. James seems to imply that one needs
insensitivity to live in this metropolis.
Verena’s perspective is not mentioned here. And yet it is clear that she isgreatly affected by her conversation with Basil as they walked in the park, forshe escapes from him by changing her plan and leaving New York. As she isfrequently associated with the word “natural,” it seems fitting that she enjoys
more of nature than culture. Even though she rejoices in the carriage ridewith Henry Burrage in the park, she prefers walking through the park instead.
And yet the park is artificial. As Martin points out, “Central Park is evoked as
an example of the creation of a false pastoral.”42 Verena, however, does notmind if the park is artificial. It is in Marmion in Cape Cod that she becomes
converted to Basil’s side, behaving more as she pleases. From a performer on
the platform is she changed to a woman in love coated with romantic illusions. In spite of Basil’s brutality, she finds him “the towering eminence inher mind” (375). And yet his cruelty is shown earlier in the story in their walkin Cambridge; though the walk was proposed by Verena’s kindness, Basilkeeps on referring to her betrayal of Olive in keeping the walk as a secret andhe enjoys her hesitation.
Marmion is pastoral as Basil imagines it, for its quiet and seclusion. There,
he can woo Verena with no disturbance by any that would disadvantage him
because of his lack of substantial fortune. The place, however, is full of images of decline, such as this description of “the apples in the little tough,dense orchards, which gave suggestion of sour fruition here and there” (339).
Martin connects the image of decline with the impossibility of imagining that
this final section of the novel will lead to fruitful union and David Howard

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

77

connects the waning of the ship-building industry at Marmion to the “superannuated reformer,” Miss Birdseye, who dies in this town.43 It is not only
Marmion that is declining, but also Provincetown that Basil visits for a few
days where “the impression of fallen greatness was still stronger than at
Marmion” (392). As Old Boston is declining, so is the whole of New England. Urbanization seems to be the only means to avoid such decline, though
the price is high.
Verena, though she is capable of being a model of spectacle and a consumer of urban Boston, shrinks from the role and ends up in becoming a malechauvinist’s wife. And yet, her optimism shows in the final scene, when shesays that “their [the Boston audience’s] nature is fine” (439). Her belief in
Boston’s sense of justice, her pride in it as a city of culture, may be the one
thing she can still cherish, in spite of the last sentence describing her exitfrom the Music Hall: “It is to be feared that with the union, so far from brilliant, into which she was about to enter, these [tears] were not the last she wasdestined to shed” (433). Ironically it is with “a long furred cloak” (430) that
Basil covers Verena to conceal her identity. She will probably not be able toafford such a cloak, but it imprints her identity as a consumer. The image
connotes her vulnerability in the culture of consumption. She has no brightprospect. Verena’s fate is not peculiar to Bostonians, though it is a typical fate
for a Henry James American Girl.
IV.

COSMOPOLITAN JAMESThe Bostonians begins with Basil’s encountering Boston and ends with his
winning Verena away from Olive. It is often discussed as a male chauvinist’s
triumph over a feminist, but it also symbolizes the defeat of Boston, that is,
the Old Boston of the New England intellectuals. Basil is not a New Yorker
in an exact sense, but he is endowed with cunning to exploit the weak, andvulgarity that is associated with the world of commerce, originating in New
York. He is a lawyer but his ambition is for a public life to promote his ideas“to be embodied in national conduct” (198). He is not much different from
Selah Tarrant in this sense. Olive’s defeat, then, symbolizes the failure of
Boston to keep its traditional ideology intact against modernization.
It seems that James chose Boston for the setting of “a very Americantale”44 because Boston with its New England mindset had turned into a cityof consumer culture, vulgar and immoral, where people seek profit and fulfillment of desire. The tale is tragic. James may seem to miss the traditional
Boston, but not exactly. Indeed his caricature of Olive’s puritan streak, which

78

YUKO NAKAGAWA

Basil describes as “morbid” (41), and of the traditional Miss Birdseye at the
beginning of the novel are softened into sympathetic depictions as the story
develops: Olive’s sense of justice is presented as superior to Basil’s brutality
and egotism and Miss Birdseye’s death is depicted sympathetically. And yet
the Old Boston is destined to be replaced by the culture of consumption, andNew York is depicted as more attractive than modern Boston.
New York in this novel is represented partially by Basil, and more so by
the Burrages. Their fashionable society indeed represents the top of the culture of consumption. They turn Verena’s lecture into highbrow entertainment.
They are more generous and cosmopolitan and less exclusive than the Bostonians in the novel. In the presence of Mrs. Burrage, Olive is concerned about
whether Mrs. Burrage regards her as “provincial.” Olive’s sense of inferiority
implies her recognition of New York’s superiority. James has declared Boston a provincial city.
James was not originally from Boston. He spent his childhood in New
York, Newport, and Europe. It was when he entered Harvard that he moved
to Greater Boston. Owing to his father’s reputation, James was introduced tomany of the literary figures in Boston, but he did not regard his home country
as providing good material for writing, as he writes in Hawthorne that it had
no cathedrals or abbeys or pictures or political society as can be found inEurope.45 Consequently, he sought his career in Europe rather than in Boston
or New York. With his experience abroad in childhood, James was a cosmopolitan, so Boston must have seemed “provincial” to him. After his visit to
Boston in 1882, he writes that “Boston is absolutely nothing to me—I don’teven dislike it. I like it, on the contrary; I only dislike to live there”.46 He wasapparently homesick for England as he writes in a later entry:
Here I sit scribbling in my bedroom at a Boston hotel—on a marble-topped table!—and conscious of a ferocious homesickness—a homesickness which makesme think of the day when I shall next see the white cliffs of old England loomthrough their native fog, as one of the happiest of my life!47

James’ father’s education never restricted him to any particular religion,
which was crucial in the shaping of an individual’s identity in nineteenthcentury America. He writes in his autobiography that “the moral of all ofwhich was that we need never fear not to be good enough if we were only
social enough.”48 By “social” he means “not provincial,” “not narrow,” cosmopolitan, in other words. Olive’s narrowness and exclusiveness is Back
Bay’s. And to cosmopolitan James, America was “provincial,” however urbanized it was.

FROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

V.

79

CONCLUSION

The Bostonians is James’ criticism of American society. He registers thetransition Boston undergoes from a city of culture with a New England mindset, which valued justice and human goodness, to a city of consumer culture,a provincial version of New York. The New England concern for social good
is replaced by a desire for publicity and money. The change affects individuals. In the change, Olive Chancellor clings to the women’s movement, which
is changed into an entertainment to generate profit. This is “a very Americantale” of a triumph of money over morals.
When James left his home country for England in 1883, he did not return
to it for about twenty years. What he observed on his return in 1904 is recorded in The American Scene (1906). What he depicts in it is, though inmore vague and elaborate images and words, not much different from what
he depicts in The Bostonians. He criticizes the lack of boundaries between
the public and the private, the homogeneousness of the society, the want ofmanners, ugliness and vulgarity everywhere, and more. James, by this timeover sixty years old, however, was overwhelmed with the changes in his
home country. In Boston, he visited Ashburton Place, where he had resided
for two years after the Civil War, and cherished “some echo of ghostly footsteps,”49 but in his next visit a month later, he found the houses leveled andcleared to the corner. What was left was “a gaping void, the brutal effacement, at a stroke, of every related object, of the whole precious past.”50 Jeremy Tambling states that “[a]bsence, like the ‘gaping void,’ is a trope throughout The American Scene: America is full of things not there, or not there
fully.”51 Such absence does not seem to exist in The Bostonians, for Jamesfeels absence after he was away from his country for about twenty years. And
yet the “effacement” forced by the transition of the city, or vice versa, is what
happens morally and not so overwhelmingly in The Bostonians. The New
England intellectual is fading, not leaving much trace in the American Girl,the heiress of the age.
NOTES
1

For the function of the narrator, see Alfred Habegger, Henry James and the “Woman Business” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 182−229.
2Henry James writes to his brother William James: “I am quite appalled by your note of the
2d, in which you assault me on the subject of my having painted a “portrait from life” of Miss
Peabody! I was in some measure prepared for it by Lowell’s (as I found the other day) taking
for granted that she had been my model, and an allusion to the same effect in a note from Aunt
Kate. Still, I didn’t expect the charge to come from you . . . . Miss Birdseye was evolved en-

80

YUKO NAKAGAWA

tirely from my moral consciousness, like every person I have ever drawn, and originated in mydesire to make a figure who should embody in a sympathetic, pathetic, picturesque, and at thesame time grotesque way, the humanitary and ci-devant transcendental tendencies which I
thought it highly probable I should be accused of treating in a contemptuous manner in so far
as they were otherwise represented in the tale.”
Henry James, “To William James,” 14 February 1885, Henry James: Letters, ed. Leon Edel,vol. 3 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), 68−69.
3Henry James, The Complete Notebooks of Henry James, ed. Leon Edel and Lyall H. Powers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), 19−20.
4Shaun O’Connell, Imagining Boston: A Literary Landscape (Boston: Beacon Press,
1990), 1.
5
Ibid., 1−2.
6
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Professor at the Breakfast-Table, The Writings of Oliver Wendell
Holmes, vol. 2 (Tokyo: Honnotomosha, 1990), 83.
7
In the novel James mentions only once the setting of the year as “the winter of 187-”
which is when Verena starts living with Olive in Charles Street. Henry James, The Bostonians(the 1886 English edition), ed. Charles Anderson (New York: Penguin Books, 1984), 170. All
further references to The Bostonians will appear within the text in parentheses with page number. See David Howard, “The Bostonians,” The Air of Reality: New Essays on Henry James,
ed. John Goode (London: Methuen, 1972), 78.
8
Robert K. Martin, “Picturesque Misperception in The Bostonians,” The Henry James Review 9 (Spring 1988): 78.
9
Mona Domosh, Invented Cities: The Creation of Landscape in Nineteenth-Century New
York & Boston (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 30.
10James, Notebooks, 232.
11
Domosh, Invented,104.
12
Ibid., 114.
13
Elizabeth McNulty, Boston: Then and Now (San Diego: Thunder Bay Press, 1999), 5.
14
Domosh, Invented, 120.
15
Ibid., 119.
16
Ibid., 119.
17
Ibid., 109−110.
18
Barbara W. Moore and Gail Weesner, Back Bay: A Living Portrait (Boston: Centry Hill
Press, 1995), 26.
19
William J. Lloyd, “Understanding Late Nineteenth-Century American Cities,” Geographical Review, 71 (1981): 466.
20
Ian F. A. Bell, Henry James & the Past (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991), 92−93.
21
Ibid., 94−95.
22Frank Presbrey, The History and Development of Advertising (New York: Doubleday,
Doran & Company, 1929), 265−266, writes: “Boston appears to have been good ground inwhich to grow advertising agents, for the more successful and longest-lived of the early agentscame from the New England metropolis, including S.M. Pettengill, J. Wesley Barber and –George P. Rowell, the man who did perhaps more than any other man to develop advertisingin the nineteenth century and bring it to the point from which the expansion of the last thirty
years has taken place.”
23
Lloyd, “Understanding,” 469. It is Verena who “spent hours in jingling, aching, jostledjourneys” between Charles Street and her house in Cambridge. (James, The Bostonians, 179)
24
James criticizes the speaking manner of the conductors in trains much later in his essay“The Speech of American Women,” Harper’s Bazar 41 (1907): 17−21.
25
Martha Banta, Imaging American Women: Idea and Ideals in Cultural History (NewFROM CITY OF CULTURE TO CITY OF CONSUMPTION

81

York: Columbia University Press, 1987), 52.
26
Martin, “Misperception,” 79.
27“[C]ould” in this quotation is changed to “should” by Richard Lansdown in his Penguin
Classics edition. See Richard Lansdown ed., The Bostonians (the 1886 English edition) by
Henry James (New York: Penguin Classics, 2000), 139.
28
James, Notebooks, 19.
29
Sara deSaussure Davis, “Feminist Sources in The Bostonians,” American Literature 50(1979): 570−87.
30
J. Matthew Gallman, America’s Joan of Arc: The Life of Anna Elizabeth Dicksinson (NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2006), 66.
31
See Henry James, “A New England Winter,” Henry James: Complete Stories 1884−1891(New York: Library of America, 1999), 65−122.
32
For Verena’s good-nature and vulnerability, see Yuko Nakagawa, “Henry James no
American Girl: The Bostonians no Verena no baai” [“Henry James’s American Girl: Verena in
The Bostonians”] Helicon (Gifu University, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Departmentof English) 3 (1994): 51−58.
33
Bell, Past, 79.
34
Banta, Imaging, 2.
35
Ibid., xxxi.
36
Jennifer A. Wicke, Advertising Fictions: Literature, Advertisement and Social Reading(New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), 98−99.
37
Ibid., 99.
38
Domosh, Invented, 34.
39
Richard Godden, Fictions of Capital: The American Novel from James to Mailer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 18.
40
Martin, “Misperception,” 185.
41
Yoko Funasaka, “Bosuton no hitobito ni okeru Bosuton to Nyu Yohku” [“Boston and New
York in The Bostonians,”] Eibeibungaku Ronsou [English Literature Review ] (The English
Literary Society Kyoto Women’s University) 43 (1999): 6.
42
Martin, “Misperception,” 81.
43
Ibid., 82; and Howard, “The Bostonians,” 61.
44
James, Notebooks, 20.
45
Henry James, Hawthorne, Henry James: Literary Criticism; Essays on Literature, American Writers, English Writers (New York: Library of America, 1984), 351−52.
46
James, Notebooks, 232.
47
Ibid., 216.
48
Henry James, A Small Boy and Others, Henry James: Autobiography, ed. Frederick W.
Dupee (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983), 124.
49
Henry James, The American Scene, ed. Leon Edel (Bloomington: Indiana University
Press, 1968), 22.
50James, Scene, 229.
51
Jeremy Tambling, Lost in the American City: Dickens, James, and Kafka (New York:
Palgrave, 2001), 107.