The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 26 (2015)
Copyright © 2015 Rie Makino. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this noticeincluded, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be distributed,
electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission from the author.

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative:
Internment, Interethnicity, and Christianity
in Hisaye Yamamoto’s “The Eskimo Connection”

Rie Makino*

Introduction
Although very few remember, the occupation of Alcatraz Island in San
Francisco Bay (1969–71), known historically as part of the American Indian
Movement (AIM), inspired sympathy from Asian American activists,
especially Japanese Americans in the Bay Area. Claiming the island, aformer federal prison closed in 1963, as their land and protesting the US
government’s policy, the group of Native American activists stayed there
for nineteen months. Their purpose was to build a Native American culturaland educational center, and their protest eventually became an interethnicsite of memory that Japanese Americans, as “racial kinsmen,” could sharewith Native Americans.1 Japanese American writer Karen Tei Yamashita,
for instance, fictionalized the occupation of Alcatraz in I Hotel (2010),
which portrays three Japanese American characters bringing supplies to the
Native American activists. “Of course, depending, they [JapaneseAmericans] could have been mistaken for Indian,” writes Yamashita,
pointing out their physical resemblance to Native Americans. “It wouldn’t
be the first time someone recognized the features that claim the same genesthat crossed the Bering Strait or canoed across the Pacific.”2 With an*Associate Professor, Nihon University, College of Commerce

99

100

Rie Makino

emphasis on the anthropological theory that Native Americans are raciallyrelated to the Japanese (Ainu), the occupation of Alcatraz presents aninterethnic connection of these groups who fought for “self-determination”
in the 1970s.
Although the social protest at Alcatraz is called the “Indian occupation,”
the name is irrelevant when we focus on the process by which the Native
American activists eventually came to stay on the island. According to theTreaty of Fort Laramie (1868) between the US government and the Sioux,abandoned or out-of-use federal land was to be returned to Native Americans.
Since Alcatraz penitentiary had been closed since 1963 and the island was
declared surplus federal property in 1964, numerous Native American
activists thought the island qualified for reclamation. Troy R. Johnson
reports, “The federal government could not take anything away from them[the Native American activists] because they did not own anything.”3Japanese American activists’ sympathy for them stems from the government’s
using the term, “occupation” to describe what they considered criminal
activity by the Native Americans. In addition to the racial intimacy between
Japanese Americans and Native Americans, as a federal prison, Alcatraz
reminded Japanese Americans of their World War II internment. Several
Japanese American activists overlapped the image of their internment with
the Alcatraz occupation because, in both cases, the government was
unrelenting in confining ethnic groups.
Although Japanese American writer Hisaye Yamamoto never comments
directly on the occupation of Alcatraz, several descriptions in her short story“The Eskimo Connection” apparently refer to this incident. The setting ofher story is 1975, a few years after the Alcatraz occupation. A middle-aged
Japanese American housewife and writer, Emiko Toyama, who experienced
wartime internment during her youth, has begun mentoring bycorrespondence a Native American prisoner who wants to be a writer. She
feels an unusual intimacy with this inmate, Alden Ryan Walunga, who
eventually becomes a fanatic Christian. Like her best-known stories,“Seventeen Syllables” and “Yoneko’s Earthquake,” in which JapaneseAmerican female protagonists interact with other ethnic groups, this later
work in her “interethnic saga” comes close to the writer’s Japanese
ancestry—in this case, alongside Native Americans.4
Yamamoto’s choice of Native Americans as a central theme suggests her
journalistic interest in this ethnic group. Emiko’s act of supporting andmentoring Alden, for instance, is based on her viewing him as someone“young enough one of her children.”5 Such intimacy—that is, considering

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

101

another ethnic group as part of the family—was generally expressed in the
popular Asian American journal Gidra during the 1970s, which statedJapanese American activists’ intention of supporting Native Americans bycalling them “Indian brothers”: “They [the Native Americans] have a chanceto create for themselves a new life, a new society. We, as Asian Americans,should support our brothers as much as we can.”6 As for Yamamoto’s
characterization of Alden as an Alaskan Eskimo, one major figure in theactual Alcatraz incident was Joe Bill, a Hooper Bay Eskimo.7 In an interview,
Richard Oaks, a Mohawk student at San Francisco State College, asserted
that Alcatraz was just “the beginning of our fight for justice and selfdetermination” and that the Native American activists aimed to occupy partof Alaska next.8 In “The Eskimo Connection,” Alaska is both Alden’sbirthplace and his final place of imprisonment. These factors indicate that
Yamamoto, who once worked for the Los Angeles Tribune, a left-wing
African American newspaper, and lived in Los Angeles in the 1970s, would
have thus received detailed information about the Alcatraz incident.
“The Eskimo Connection” shows an interethnic resonance between
Native Americans and Japanese Americans, but simultaneously it predicts
the danger of falling into a simplified racial unity. After corresponding with
Alden, Emiko feels strong intimacy with him because he is her racial“kinsman.” She even expresses affinity with him by jokingly adding a letterto her name, turning “Emiko” to “Eskimo.”9 In addition, her intimacy with
Alden stems from her perspective that the prison and the internment camp
are similar political state apparatuses. She, therefore, views this young
Native American as “an Asian family member” who, like her, is spending
his youth in an enclosed sphere—a prison.10 Her perceived closeness,
however, soon fades into suspicion and criticism of Alden when she learnsof his fanatical Christian beliefs from reading his letters. Emiko becomes
intimidated by his dysfunctional psychological state, which is divided
between his Native American heritage and Christianity. In the story’s
climax, Emiko is astounded by the vignette Alden composes called “The
Coffin of 1974,” which is about the main character’s brutal rape and themurder of members of his family, implying Alden’s actual crime and secretidentity. Thus does Emiko’s goal of mentoring Alden end in failure becauseof her limited imagination and her romantic sympathy for him.
A simple reading of “The Eskimo Connection” indicates the psychological,
racial, and ethnic barrier that cannot be transcended between JapaneseAmericans and Native Americans. A closer reading, however, of Emiko’s
optimism expressed in the final scene suggests a more nuanced, complex

102

Rie Makino

dimension of interethnicity that denies the story’s central theme of failed
interethnic connection. Although disgusted with Alden’s horror story,
Emiko still misses him: “Emiko—holding fast to the Lord Jesus Christ andrefusing to consider any other alternatives—imagined [Alden] was probably
much too busy back there on his home ground [Alaska] to continue to be thepen pal of some old woman way down there in California.”11 At least Emikoknows “alternatives”—that is, life as a Native American but not like Alden’s.
Here I want to trace Yamamoto’s perspective on Native Americans by
exploring how she portrays the Japanese American subject in relation to theAmerican Indian Movement in the 1970s. Yamamoto bestows a uniqueresonance on this ethnic group, revealing a complex mechanism thattranscends the ethnocentric theme. She does not foreground the JapaneseAmerican internment experience.12 In fact, in very few of her works is thecentral theme the internment.13 Instead, in her major works written afterWorld War II, such as “Seventeen Syllables” and “Yoneko’s Earthquake,”she focuses on life on Japanese American farms in the 1930s.14 Her primary
theme is commonly acknowledged to be intraethnic family conflict between
first-generation Japanese mothers and second-generation Japanese American
daughters.15 In Yamamoto’s later works, however, such as “The Eskimo
Connection,” we see an interethnic theme not circumscribed by the categoryof ethnocentric literature.
I focus here on Yamamoto’s portrayal of the Japanese American subject
in the 1970s, to borrow Caroline Chung Simpson’s phrase, an “absent
presence,” whose history of internment has been represented as elusive in
the United States. While, in general, the term “absent presence” as appliedby critics in ethnic studies is associated with the tragedy of the “subaltern”
whose existence has been deleted from US history, I focus here more on
autonomy than on dysfunction. In other words, Yamamoto’s narrative about“absent presence” effectively illuminates the Japanese American subject byresisting adopting both the social protest point of view in the 1970s, whichemphasized the ethnic unity of Native Americans and Japanese Americans,
and Christianity as used in the US discourse of national ideology. Theinternment is represented as an absent presence not only because Americans
in general did not know (or did not want to know) the history but also
because Japanese Americans did not want to or could not talk about it.
Furthermore, in the 1970s, the Asian American movement was at its peak.
At the same time, Japan was achieving high economic growth, and thissuccess raised the status of Japanese Americans over that of other Asian
American groups. I argue that this peculiar position contributes to theAbsent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

103

formation of Yamamoto’s nonprotest narrative in relation to the internment
discourse. Her unique narrative approach avoids the US racial andmulticultural politics that categorizes each ethnic group. To analyze
Yamamoto’s interethnic resonance, I draw particular inspiration from theNative American writer and critic Gerald Vizenor, whose concepts of“absence” and “presence” in the representation of Native Americans
synchronize with Yamamoto’s perspective.16 Finally, grounded on theconcept of absent presence, I textually analyze Yamamoto’s use of
Christianity in “The Eskimo Connection.” To highlight both the presence
and absence of the Japanese American subject, Yamamoto uses Christian
discourse as a parameter of national ideology to visualize or (in-visualize)
American ethnicity.

Absent Presence: Yamamoto’s Internment Discourse
Regarding the US nation-state policy and its discourse in regard to
Japanese Americans during and after World War II, Caroline Chung Simpson
asserts that Japanese Americans were faced with the notion of “absent
presence,” which involved “the historical process of remembering byforgetting, of discursive inclusion that works to evade or dispute.”17
Simpson’s analysis explores the justice policy of the US nation-state in theCold War era of the 1950s, which did not completely suppress the internment
from its history but worked to visualize Japanese American existence only
in order to erase the shame and mistake of governmental policy. JapaneseAmericans, based on this American view of justice, are only “visible” when
they are presented as immigrants who are “successfully” assimilated into
the United States.
Pushing Simpson’s historical analysis further, I argue that the intraethnic
syndrome and the generational gap among Japanese Americans also
contribute to the formation of the “absent presence.” To elaborate the key
term—absent present narrative—in Yamamoto’s works, I focus on two
different eras: the 1940s (World War II and the internment) and the 1970s(the Japanese American redress movement and the American Indian
Movement) as the times for portraying the unique subject position ofJapanese Americans. Because of Japan’s high rate of economic growth in
the 1970s, Japanese Americans began to be classified as a model minority,
an Asian racial stereotype of quiet middle-class educated conformists. This
image separated Japanese Americans from other ethnic groups involved in“self-determining” ethnic movements of the time. I argue how the history of

104

Rie Makino

the internment contributes to Yamamoto’s nonprotest narrative, which
eventually becomes a counter narrative to the social protest of ethnic unity
in the 1970s.
For a Japanese American writer, in this case Yamamoto, who experienced
internment in the 1940s, spontaneously to engage in social protest against
the nation-state in the 1970s was very difficult. The expression that best
portrays the condition of Japanese Americans just after the World War II is“social amnesia”—“a group phenomenon marked by attempts to suppress
feelings and memories of particular moments or extended periods. It is nota psychological pathology but a conscious effort to screen memories . . . tosuppress unpleasant experiences.”18 The act of suppressing is not equivalent
to forgetting; rather, it is an intraethnic psychic syndrome among JapaneseAmericans who consciously or unconsciously conceal their emotionalanger, grief, and protest arising from this trauma. In the 1970s, this syndrome
created a difference in degree of enthusiasm for redress, depending on thegeneration. The redress movement in the 1970s and 1980s mainly consistedof Nisei who came of age inside the camps and their Sansei children. There
were, however, internal differences of perspective in these two groups, asacknowledged in a 1973 article by Minako Maykovich: “The Nisei is being
currently criticized by the Sansei for being quiet, docile, and self-effacing,and for not violently protesting real or imagined prejudices.”19 The JapaneseAmericans in the 1970s movement presumably separated into two groups:
third-generation children who were aggressively involved in the redress
movement and second-generation parents who experienced the internment
and passively engaged in the movement. The parent groups who experienced
internment did not want to talk about it. The children who were born andraised in the camps, however, did not remember the internment as a time ofpersecution. Instead, they eagerly desired to know the history of theinternment.
The 1970s is also a time when Japanese Americans invoked the memoryof the internment in US regulations, specifically the Emergency Detention
Act, Title II of the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, which was
dubbed the “concentration camp law.” The act permitted detaining any
individual suspected of being a threat to the nation. According to Masumi
Izumi, in the late 1960s African Americans and members of the radical New
Left were convinced that the government was building camps to incarceratethem.20 The rumor continued until 1971, when Congress repealed Title II,
because of the campaign by Nisei and Sansei activists between 1967 and1971. The repeal is considered a precursor to the national campaign for

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative105

redress with the warning that the government should not repeat the same
mistake that they did to the Japanese Americans during World War II. Izumi
points out the passivity of the Nisei in contrast to the Sansei activists on thismatter: “A handful of Nisei felt the necessity to take a stand on theconcentration camp issue, although the Nisei generation had generally
shown little interest in the rumor. Indeed some Nisei opposed taking any
action on this issue.”21
Yamamoto creates the Nisei character Emiko, who occupies an anomaly:
she performs as a conformist but also sympathizes with the 1970s activists.
She is portrayed as a relatively quiet, educated middle-class JapaneseAmerican widow, whose livelihood is secured by her husband’s life
insurance. Such characterization fits the model minority image. Emiko,
however, also has great sympathy for the dissenters or outlaws sanctionedby the government, as her support and mentorship of Alden indicate. In twophases, as a “prisoner” in the 1940s and as a member of the “model minority”
in the 1970s, Emiko adjusts to US society.
Based on her experiences as a second-generation Japanese American
who experienced internment when she was young, Yamamoto during WorldWar II created a unique nonprotest narrative by focusing on the child’s stateof mind. In 1942, she wrote her first piece, “Death Rides the Rails to
Poston,” a mystery, an enigmatic murder of a middle-aged JapaneseAmerican man, set among a group of Japanese Americans on the train to the
Poston internment camp in Arizona. At that time, Yamamoto was twentyone, but her story begins with the explanatory note that it was written as the“first attempt” at writing a story, when the narrator was “a ten-year-old
girl.”22 Considering the genre—mystery—and the historical background​—1942—the preadolescent narrative is impudently comical and somewhat
controversial, as if this putative writer were enjoying the dark incident
happening during the internment.23 This point of view, however, also reflects
the aspect of social realism: the narrator is too young to understand theimplications of the internment. Avoiding discussion of the persecution not
only reflects the Japanese Americans’ psychic syndrome in those days but
also Yamamoto’s experimental accomplishment of creating a nonprotest
narrative to reveal the narrator’s position as absent present—the young
narrator observes those involved in the internment not as a trauma but as an
onlooker.
Yamamoto uses a similar strategy in “The Eskimo Connection.” Only
one sentence—“As a young woman in camp, she [Emiko] had hung out
sometimes with people who wrote and painted”—indicates Emiko’s

106

Rie Makino

background as an internee, and this flashback invokes only her artistic
activity—not shared trauma or suffering—with the other internees.24 In
parallel with this narrative, which avoids describing the persecuted historyof the internment, through Emiko’s voice, Yamamoto invokes the danger of
speaking up. The story introduces “the horror of the year before”—that is,
the government’s use of cutting off infrastructure and the police by a groupof dissidents, “the mousetrapping and cooking alive of five young men andwomen who had gotten disillusioned with the establishment and taken
matters into their own hands.”25 Emiko criticizes the government’s
unrelenting purge of disloyal activism, but simultaneously she implies thedanger of militant protest against the nation-state that eventually terminates
the dissenters themselves. In thinking about the 1970s, Emiko sympathizes
with the protesters but opposes their articulation of the protest itself.
Absent presence as a discourse of the internment reveals the irrelevanceof protest as well as the survival skill of the generational, intraethnic
problem of Japanese Americans who do not or cannot give voice to memories
of persecution. Writing in a post internment era, when ethnic groups freely
articulated their identities in acts of “self-determination,” Yamamoto did
not conform to this social trend but used absent presence as an artistic
strategy to delineate the Japanese American subject.

The American Indian Movement as an Interethnic Site
Another reason that Yamamoto does not straightforwardly support a
protest narrative in the 1970s movement is that she seems to believe that theact of protest invokes a discourse of persecution that occasionally reiterates
and even romanticizes colonial history. In “The Eskimo Connection,” shecriticizes Emiko’s imagination for so easily associating the JapaneseAmerican internment with Alden’s prison life. Her association is based onher desire to seek a place where she can share a similar memory ofpersecution with a different ethnic group. This illusion is easily shattered,however, when she sends Alden an Asian American magazine and receives
notification from the prison office that no material of a political nature will
be accepted in the prison: “She felt something like a cold hand touch
her . . . that was what being in prison was, was it…?”26 Through Emiko’s
romantic sympathy for Alden, Yamamoto criticizes the social current of the
1970s in which Japanese Americans searched for a resemblance to theirinternment in other locations.
It was, in fact, a general and natural syndrome in those days that JapaneseAbsent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

107

American activists’ protest overlapped internment discourse on the Native
American occupation. On March 7, 1970, the San Mateo Times reported,“Tom Hisata, San Mateo Chapter President of the Japanese American
Citizens League, with 50 Japanese Americans” brought supplies to Alcatraz
and one of their declarations was to Repeal Title II: Concentration Camp
Law.27 Indeed, Alcatraz stood as another internment site for JapaneseAmerican activists. Based on the same logic, Japanese Americans wereinvolved at Wounded Knee, another major site of the American Indian
Movement. One Japanese American journalist asserted, “We cannot allow
the kind of isolation and lack of support experienced by the JapaneseAmericans when they were ‘relocated’ into concentration camps to happen
to us or to any other people again.”28 Several Japanese American associations,especially the Manzanar Committee and the Metropolitan Los Angeles
chapter of the Japanese American Citizens League, supported the Native
American activists at Wounded Knee. Needless to say, Manzanar is one of
the ten Japanese American internment camp locations. The JapaneseAmerican activists sympathized with the Native Americans by synchronizing
internment discourse with the discourse of Native American reservations.
Going against the current, Yamamoto warns Japanese American activists
who facilely emphasize interethnic union. The complex historical formationof the internment in relation to Native Americans segregates those JapaneseAmericans who cannot easily own their persecution. In her poem “Exile:
1942–45,” Yamamoto refers to the Poston internment camp in Arizona,which was built on a former site for Native American relocation.29 She
highlights racial segregation in the US policy toward Native Americans
while simultaneously illuminating the doubly erased Japanese Americaninternment history. In a 1987 interview, held a few years after the publicationof “The Eskimo Connection,” she talked about a friend of hers who returnedto the former camp with her family and reported on her state of mind:
A friend went to the Grand Canyon once and on the way back she andher husband and child visited Poston, where we were, and she said thatthe camp and grounds had all been taken back by the Indians, and they
were growing alfalfa on it, and they were living in the adobe schoolbuilding that we all built with our own hands, and cooking in them,and about all that remains of us was the little plaque that dedicated theschool, and told us how it had been built.30
The internment site and the collective were doubly erased by the “hand”

108

Rie Makinoof the Native Americans under US policy. She criticizes confrontation
created by the US nation-state, which visualizes Native American history at
the forefront and drives Japanese American internment into oblivion. As aformer internee, Yamamoto presents a realistic portrait of these groups’
interethnicity, which nevertheless cannot be summarized with the idealistic
notion of ethnic unity.
In addition to interethnic conflict around the internment site, the Japanese
attack on the Aleutian Islands in 1942 reveals another chasm between
Native Americans and Japanese Americans. Because of the Japaneseinvasion, the US government evacuated the Aleuts from their ancestral
homeland to southeastern Alaska. The government’s treatment, however,“denied their [the Aleuts’] freedom, placing them in camps unfit for humanhabitation.”31 Although both groups experienced relocation during WorldWar II, in contrast to the internment of the Japanese Americans, whom the
US government considered “an enemy,” the Aleut citizens were relocatedfor their own “protection.” In fact, “camp conditions were actually worseamong the Aleuts than among the Japanese-Americans.”32 This history
provides more evidence for Yamamoto’s emphasis on the difference between
Emiko, a former Japanese American internee, and Alden, an Alaskan
Eskimo, in “The Eskimo Connection.” The ethnic unity emphasized by theAmerican Indian Movement activists does not work for Emiko and Alden
because of their different and conflicting historical backgrounds.
From a perspective similar to that of Yamamoto, who criticized social
protests that invoked the history of colonization, the contemporary Native
American (Anishinaabe) novelist Gerald Vizenor has warned Native
Americans against protest through occupation of lands. Vizenor criticized
the occupation of Wounded Knee in South Dakota in 1973; this protest
began in Minneapolis with two Anishinaabe activists, both of whom wereheavily involved in the Alcatraz occupation, Dennis Banks and Russell
Means.33 As a journalist at the Minneapolis Tribune, Vizenor strongly
opposed their extreme political protest. He was not against the act of protest,
but he believed that theirs appealed easily to violence: “The militants speaka language of confrontation and urban politics. They were not elected to
speak for reservation tribal people.”34 Vizenor also insisted that the American
Indian Movement was not acting as a social movement but “a radical urbanorganization whose followers have dreamed of returning to the ideal
reservation as the new tribal warriors.” 35 He characterized the occupationof land, such as Alcatraz or Wounded Knee, as a dangerous return to colonial
discourse—that is, because of their pain at being colonized the occupiers try

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

109

to reclaim their land and make it into their own utopia. In the process, thehistory of colonization remains alive and influential in their minds. Vizenor
indicated the danger to the American Indian Movement of reviving andperpetuating the persecution discourse.
As for the ethnic subject positions controlled by colonial discourse of
persecution, Vizenor presents the concept of “indian” as a term circumscribedin the discourse of Manifest Destiny. By introducing the term “manifest
manners,” a Euro-American discourse applied to current life from thecolonial, imperial concept of Manifest Destiny in the mid-nineteenth
century, Vizenor discriminates “indian” from “native.” “Indian” is the term
created by manifest manners, while “native” is the subject position of absent
presence that cannot be circumscribed within this colonial discourse:
The indian is an imprinted picture, the pose of a continental fugitive.
The simulation of the other is the absence of the native; the indian is
an imprimatur of a theistic civilization. Native resistance was abstracted
as a fugitive pose in national histories; at the same time, the indian wasa cultural concoction of bourgeois nostalgia and social sciences
evidence.36“Indian” is a name acknowledged by manifest manners, a colonial
discourse. It is represented by the tragic history of persecution, romanticism,and wronged compassion. “Noble savage,” for instance, is one representationof “indian.” Likewise, the perspective that considers the Native Americans’occupation of lands “the idealization of the reservation” enacts “indian.”
On the contrary, “native” is free from this colonial discourse, positioning
itself outside the colonial matrix. “The indian is a simulation, the absenceof natives; the indian transposes the real, and the simulation of the real has
no referent, memories, or native stories,” says Vizenor.37 “Native,” thus,
represents the elusive sphere of what Lacan calls “the real,” which the US
colonial discourse cannot capture within national imagery. The history ofvictimization relates to the acts of protest, and self-visualization and is thus
considered a part of ethnicity as surveyed by the US nation-state.
If we read “The Eskimo Connection” as the story of Emiko, not Alden,
we can interpret it as a different “Eskimo,” one who can escape a disastrous
ending like Alden’s. In a way that articulates Vizenor’s concepts, Alden
performs as an “indian,” with whose actions Emiko cannot sympathize. In
contrast to the story’s title, nothing connects Emiko and Alden, and she has
noticed her difference from him from the beginning. She does have a critical

110

Rie Makino

viewpoint on Alden’s writing despite being strongly attracted to him as aperson. She judges his writing “confused,” mixing “a passionate cry against
the despoiling of his native land” with “a sermon repeating the Biblicalprophecy that such an evil was only part of the wholesale corruption toprecede the return of Christ.”38 At a glance, Alden is caught in the trap ofcolonial discourse; thus, he “didn’t know whether to laugh or cry,” when hearticulated his feeling toward nature, split as he was between his cultural
heritage and Christianity as the discourse of Manifest Destiny.39 Moreproblematically, in the prison, he thinks his uncontrollable native “cry” is“evil” and thus needs to be controlled. Considering the historical times
when many Native American youth were arrested, imprisoned, or killed asthey participated in the American Indian Movement, we can assume theprocess that Alden might have been going through: the awakening of his
ethnic heritage, with the erupting “uncontrollable passion,” causes him tobe observed and surveyed continuously by the power of the nation-state.
The problem lies in Alden’s protest as an “indian” being caught by thecolonial logic of manifest manners or, in the story, Christianity.
Alden is portrayed as performing what Vizenor calls “indian.” When
Alden is transferred to McNeal Island in Washington state, he is deeply
impressed and satisfied with the beauty of nature: “It’s beauty that I am after
in my writing. There is lots of beauty in McNeil. The air’s odor reminded
me of home quiescently and of my love.” The nostalgia and sorrow ofparting from his sweetheart at home, however, are soon replaced by his
Christian belief: “I had allowed my mind to stay away from Jesus Christ andthat attitude chain reacted to a sin that reinforced the negative feeling.” Healso emphasizes, “God was soothing me, telling me that I am His child andhe forgives,” as if his missing home and family is somehow not Christian.40
Every time he feels connection to his Native American heritage and his
unity with nature that “Native” connection is admonished and restrained by
his Christian belief. Christianity is not represented as a religion but stands
as a surveyor that censors him. Alden’s mind wavers in this hide-and-seekpolitics between his “native” culture and Christianity.

Christianity as the Surveillance
The Christian frame in Yamamoto’s works marks a national sphere inwhich ethnic groups can be supervised or disciplined by the nation-state.
After 1960, Yamamoto began to portray enclosed “Christian” spaces ofprison and hospital established by the nation-state as settings for her

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

111

interethnic theme, which reflect her position as an internee. “Epithalamion”(1960), for instance, portrays a Christian community and hospital in which
the protagonist Yuki Tsumagari, a caregiver and former internee, falls inlove with Marco Cimarusti, one of the patients and an Italian sailor. Similar
to “The Eskimo Connection,” Christianity works as “a remedy” or“salvation” for people in these state institutions: they undergo rehabilitation
through the act of believing Christ to be an “ordinary” American citizen andthereby are returned to their “normal” lives. The Japanese American
protagonists Yuki and Emiko also act as caregiver or mentor to ethnic
antagonists and as guides to support them; however, their failed attempts
make them realize that they themselves stand outside the national andreligious narratives, and this eventually invokes their subject positions asinternees.
In Yamamoto’s stories, Christianity encapsulates a discourse of
assimilation in the US nation-state. It is an ideology for visualizing ethnic
groups and simultaneously evokes the Japanese American protagonists as“absent presence” in this national-religious matrix. How Yamamoto adopts
this religious motif is associated with the conditions of the internment.
During and after World War II, some Protestant denominations, especially
Quakers, Congregationalists, and Methodists, were vigorously engaged insupporting the internees against the xenophobia being directed toward
Japanese and Japanese Americans.41 Protestantism in general, however,supports a national discourse of assimilation.42
In addition, Protestantism was compatible with the US capitalist
orientation toward the internees. In his research on the religion of JapaneseAmericans during and after World War II, David Yoo reports that at a time
when everything Japanese was considered a threat to the nation, the internees
began to see Protestantism as a tool for accessing American society.
Protestantism, at the same time, created ethnic solidarity for JapaneseAmericans; the internees “discovered Protestant missions that offered
English language classes, lodging, job information, and referrals.”43 The
white Protestant American patrons, however, still maintained theirdiscriminatory views; thus internee believers were positioned in Christianity“as a servant to master.”44 In this racial hierarchy, the internees recognized
their status as subcitizens: Japanese American Protestants were largely
refused “integration.”45 Being Protestant, therefore, did not mean becoming
American but, rather, acknowledging and establishing a “secondary”
qualification for belonging. Japanese Americans were visible only when
they were presented as a “secondary” ethnic group, “successfully”

112

Rie Makino

assimilated through the US discourse of Christianity. In contrast, JapaneseAmericans who were not circumscribed within this discourse remained
invisible, an absent presence. Declaring herself “an anarchist Christian,”
Yamamoto affirmed that her inclination toward Christianity was not basedon an intention to belong to a specific religion.46 She professed a Christianbelief while rejecting assimilation into this Euro-American discourse ofcapitalism.
In these historical conditions, the government was able to implement
internment. Yamamoto here inserts her criticism of the nation-state as
identical with Christianity. The Christian motif satisfies the matrix of
exclusion and inclusion in which the Japanese American protagonists
recognize their absent present selves who cannot be assimilated andclassified into the national discourse. In “The Eskimo Connection,” Emikointentionally stays outside this national sphere. Between Christianity (thepower of the nation-state) and the ethnocentric movements (the American
Indian Movement and the redress movement), Emiko presents a uniquesubject position that invokes internment discourse as a counternarrative inorder to criticize these two cultural poles.

“The Coffin of 1974”: Alden’s Story“The Coffin of 1974,” a vignette written by Alden in “The Eskimo
Connection,” best summarizes Yamamoto’s perspective on the historical
discrepancy between Native Americans and Japanese Americans and her
criticism of Christianity as a symbolic form of the nation-state. “The Coffin
of 1974” also reveals the autonomy of the Japanese American subject
position of absent presence during the 1970s. The vignette implies Alden’smurder of his family, and Emiko thinks he might have committed thishorrendous crime in 1974. As the vignette’s title indicates, the protagonist
experiences a symbolic death in 1974 and is later revived by “Christ, a newman, washed clean of his sins.”47 The theme of the story is obvious—theprotagonist’s crime and his salvation—but the story’s unbalanced structure,
which has a full-page description of nature but only two short paragraphs
about Alden’s murder and salvation needs to be discussed as the theme ofthe story.
Yamamoto invites us to a double reading of the vignette: the story,
indicating Alden’s state of mind, can be separated into two parts. The major
plot includes the Eskimo’s murder of his family and his sudden salvation by
Jesus Christ. A side plot is about “the snowbirds” that observe this incident.

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

113

A question remains as to why Alden uses so much space to talk about thisand why Emiko is so strongly attracted to this first half of the story, which,seemingly, has nothing to do with the protagonist’s committing murder as
the central theme. The answer might be apparent in Emiko’s response: she
is, in fact, impressed, “praising the poetry of the stark landscape with thesnowbirds.”48 This is because she sympathizes with what is portrayed in thevignette’s first half, which not only represents Alden’s Native American
culture but also her absent present position as “another Eskimo.”
The snowbirds’ presence invokes an anthropological theory to connect
the Eskimo to the Japanese immigrants. “Snowbirds ran through the air,rapidly singing the Bering Sea Spring song,” and they “[landed] upon themelting and softening snow, very wild, almost invisible as they blended
with the snow and exposed gravel of earth.”49 The description symbolizes
the Japanese tribe, both the Ainu crossing the Bering Sea and later Japaneseimmigrants adjusting to the new land in the United States. They stay quiet
and “invisible,” blending themselves into “the white snow,” their new
circumstances. The snowbird image serves as a double symbol of the ancientJapanese tribe and twentieth-century Japanese immigrants. It also shows theJapanese American subject position of the model minority: they blend into
the “white” society by concealing their ethnicity.
The snowbirds then are “confused” and “getting scared” of “the little
Eskimo boys with slingshots.”50 The boys represent the Native Americans’militant element, a great contrast to the snowbird’s absent presence. The
snowbirds’ anxiety about these militant Eskimos disappears soon after they
see the Eskimo’s coffin. They are thus released from the Eskimo’s threat,
while simultaneously showing respect for his valor by “lining up in a file as
if in response to a military and folk-hero who was honoring them a pass.”51
If we read this as a social satire of the 1970s, we can see the racial politics:“the snowbirds”—that is, the Japanese Americans—recognize Native
American militancy as threatening, but at the same time, the Native
Americans’ bravery is praiseworthy as social protest. The first half of “The
Coffin of 1974,” thus, indicates two ethnic groups: Native Americans andJapanese Americans whose strategies for survival and protest are
diametrically opposed.
In the politics of the colonizers and the colonized, “the snowbirds”
symbolically hide their identity and secure their positions. The Eskimo,
conversely, meets a disastrous and confusing end: instead of fighting thenation-state, he kills his family. His crimes are forgiven, and he is given newlife by Jesus Christ:

114

Rie Makino

The mother was grieving for her oldest son. He [the Eskimo] was
the one in the coffin. And if Emiko read the story correctly, it was theoldest son who, with a twenty-two Remington magnum rifle, had
killed both his uncle (his mother’s youngest brother) and a girl relative.
The girl relative had also been raped.
There was a lot of blood in the story, both walrus and human. But
there was, all of a sudden, a happy ending. The oldest son had not died,after all. He was reborn in Christ, a new man, washed out of his sins!
Alleluia!52
In this bizarre “happy ending,” the protagonist does not seem to repent of
his crime. Because he expresses no repentance, the vignette, nonetheless,follows one simple plot line: the protagonist cuts off his native heritage,
symbolized by the act of slaughtering his family, and is assimilated in the
United States through his conversion to Christianity. Alden’s fanatical
Christianity is, indeed, formulated within the state prison that filters
incoming literature for “religious material only”; thus, Alden’s vignette
reflects his own life of leaving his ethnic heritage and being assimilated into
the United States.53 Christian salvation does not actually save him; instead,
it justifies his brutal murders as the severing of his cultural roots.
Emiko observes Alden’s insanity and confusion calmly and even withsome humor, acknowledging that she herself is more invisible than he is.
She relates her position as that of “a snowbird” that stands outside thisnational and religious matrix to criticize the dichotomy between the ethnic
heritage and Christianity. Emiko, as the translation of her Japanese name“laughter” indicates, can even “smile at” the ironic consequence that prisonis the only place where Alden can survive. At the end of the story, Emikopassively suggests her position of “Eskimo” as one of the “other alternatives”
for Alden; however, he cannot see this option.

Conclusion
When we look into Yamamoto’s major stories, “Seventeen Syllables” and“Yoneko’s Earthquake,” that marked her career as a Japanese American
writer just after World War II and compare them with her minor piece, “TheEskimo Connection,” whose setting is the 1970s, we can see Yamamoto’s
strategy of positioning Japanese American subjects in relation to otherethnic groups. After the 1960s, Yamamoto saw the pitfalls of US

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative115

multiculturalism as delineated in Christianity as an ideological apparatus
for categorizing ethnic groups. In “The Eskimo Connection,” to challenge
this apparatus, she uses internment discourse to criticize the protest that led
to reiteration of colonial history. The uniqueness of “The Eskimo
Connection” is thus Yamamoto’s portrayal of how internment discourse isused to criticize both the Christian discourse and the social current of ethnic
unity as manifested in the American Indian Movement. Her portrayal of
Emiko, who neither assimilates into the Christian national discourse nor
returns easily to her “indian” ethnic heritage, exemplifies the absent
presence that challenges the colonial matrix of the United States.
Yamamoto was in a unique position as a writer to reveal the complex
context of Japanese Americans of her time. In the 1940s, she created anonprotest narrative in “Death Rides the Rails to Poston,” which observes
the internees and their involvement in a murder mystery. As a strategy, her
nonprotest narrative has been consistent, and in “The Eskimo Connection,”
it is revealed as interest in Native Americans. Through Emiko’s perspectiveon the Eskimo Alden as a racial kinsman and her association of her own
internment and his prison life, Yamamoto warns against intersection with
the Native American discourse of relocation as articulated by the American
Indian movement activists. Yamamoto, however, does not portray Emiko asa figure of complete naiveté: rather, through her interactions with this young
Eskimo, she acknowledges her “alternative” position, which remains
uninvolved in the persecution discourse that reiterates colonial history.
Yamamoto’s strategy is now correlated with the contemporary stream of
Asian American literature, which is moving away from ethnocentric
perspectives in the United States. As mentioned in the introduction, Karen
Tei Yamashita in I Hotel portrays Japanese American characters influenced
by the Native Americans’ occupation of Alcatraz. These characters wereborn and spent their early childhood in the Tule Lake internment campduring World War II. They do not exactly know what the camp means eventhough it was their birthplace; thus, they search for a similar location thatinvokes their “buried” collective memory. Yamamoto in “The Eskimo
Connection” criticizes such a tendency for Japanese Americans to searchfor sites similar to internment sites through their easy identification withanother ethnic group, while suggesting that the search simultaneously leads
to the discovery that their place is in a totally different location. Emiko infact discovers the locus of her identity in the process of tracing the Eskimo
Alden.
In a 1987 interview with Charles Crow, Yamamoto refers to Yamashita,

116

Rie Makino

whose works treat Japanese immigrants in South America. She comments
about Yamashita’s work: “It’s interesting, because . . . it gives you alternatives. . . other things that could have happened. Possibilities.”54 Yamamoto
observes that Yamashita portrays Japanese immigrants in Brazil as
manifesting a different articulation of Japanese “American” identity fromthat of North Americans, whose articulation stems from the discourse of
persecution. As Yamamoto sees it, the possibilities and “alternatives” forJapanese Americans who deviate from this discourse are surely handed
down in Yamashita’s writings. Yamamoto, in “The Eskimo Connection,”
therefore foresees the “alternatives” of the Japanese American subject who
is not circumscribed by images of repression.

Notes
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Kakenhi#26370334 and Research Aid of Nihon University (overseas researcher B).
1 The major historical figures involved in this movement are Greg Yung Morozumi
and his family, Joseph and Steve, his friend Ko Ijichi, and Leroy Sanders. On February
14, 1970, they brought food and supplies to the island. Fung, “‘This isn’t your battle or
our land’: The Native American Occupation of Alcatraz in the Asian American Political
Imagination,” College Literature 41, no. 1 (2014): 149.
2 Yamashita, Karen Tei, I Hotel (Minneapolis: Coffee House Press, 2010), 374.
3 Johnson, Troy R., The Occupation of Alcatraz Island (Urbana: University of Illinois
Press, 1996), 49.
4 Although Yamamoto never mentioned her married life with Andrew Desoto, a
Spanish sailor, the varied and recurrent interethnic themes within the Christian framework
in her literary work—a Mexican American boy, Jesus Carrasco, in “Seventeen Syllables”;
a Filipino contract worker, Marpo, in “Yoneko’s Earthquake”; an Italian American
alcoholic patient, Marco Cimarusti, in “Epithalamion”; and a Native American prisoner,
Alden Ryan Walunga, in “The Eskimo Connection”—reflects her personal interactions
with people of other races. The recurrent interethnic theme compensates for Yamamoto’s
silence about her life.
5 Yamamoto, Hisaye, and King-Kok Cheung, Seventeen Syllables (New Brunswick,
NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994), 96.
6 Kudaka, Geraldine, “Indian Brothers,” Gidra 2 (1970): 22.
7 Johnson, Troy R., Occupation of Alcatraz Island, 52.
8 Hatanaka, Carol, “Indians Claim Rock.” Gidra 1 (1969): 3.
9 Seventeen Syllables, 98.

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

117

Yamamoto calls herself and the people incarcerated “prisoner(s).” The statement isin Hisaye Yamamoto Sakuhinshu-Jyuunana Moji hoka Jyuuhappenn. [Seventeen
Syllables and Other Stories], trans. Iwao Yamamoto and Mie Hihara. (Tokyo: Nan’undo
Phoenix), 403.
11 Seventeen Syllables, 104.
12 Several critics have pointed out Yamamoto’s “passive” way of articulating her ethnic
identity. See Ward Moore, “A Letter from Southern California,” San Francisco Chronicle,
January 15, 1950, 5; Grace Kyongwan Hong, “Something Forgotten Which Should Have
Been Remembered: Private Property and Cross-Racial Solidarity in the Works of Hisaye
Yamamoto,” American Literature 71 (1999): 294; and James Kyung-Jin Lee, Urban
Triage: Race and Fictions in Multiculturalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 2004), 47.
13 In 1942, she wrote “Death Rides to the Rail of Poston,” which is her first work
dealing with the issue of the internment. In 1950, she wrote “The Legend of Miss
Sasagawara” between the time when she was writing “Seventeen Syllables” (1949) and“Yoneko’s Earthquake” (1951). She explores the issue of the internment through the lifeof the female protagonist, Mari Sasagawara, who was interned in Poston, Arizona. “Las
Vegas Charley” partially refers to the internment as well.
14 Based on the dichotomy between extravagance and necessity, Sau-Ling Wongargues that the Japanese American family is caught between reclaiming “extravagance”
as situated in Japan, whereas America is perceived as the land of “necessity” (174).
Wong, Reading Asian American Literature: From Necessity to Extravagance (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1993).
15 Traise Yamamoto explores the American daughter’s inability to perceive her
Japanese mother’s subjectivity, which is associated with the absence of mother figures in
Hisaye Yamamoto’s works. T. Yamamoto, Masking Selves, Making Subjects: JapaneseAmerican Women, Identity, and the Body (Los Angeles: University of California Press,
1999). King-kok Cheung calls the nonverbal and indirect communications of JapaneseAmerican families portrayed by Yamamoto “rhetorical silence” to emphasize that
continuities between ancestral and ethnic cultures exist and are important fordifferentiating Japanese and Japanese Americans. Cheung, Articulate Silences: Hisaye
Yamamoto, Maxine Hong Kingston, Joy Kogawa (Ithaca: Cornell University Press,
1993), 31. Pushing Cheung’s approach to women’s silences further, Naoko Sugiyama
specifically focuses on the meanings of silences in Japanese American mother-daughter
relationships. Sugiyama, “Issei Mothers’ Silence, Nisei Daughters’ Stories: The Short
Fiction of Hisaye Yamamoto,” Comparative Literature Studies 33, no. 1 (1996): 1–14.
16 Vizenor uses lowercase and italics “indian” to resist the official representation ofindigenous people of the United States as Native Americans or the colonial misapplicationof Indian.
10

118

Rie Makino

Caroline Chung Simpson, An Absent Presence: Japanese Americans in Postwar
American Culture, 1945–1960 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001), 3.
18 Kashima, Tetsuden, Judgment without Trial: Japanese American Imprisonment
during World War II (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2003), 219.
19 Maykovich, Minako K., “Political Activation of Japanese American Youth,” Journalof Social Issues 29, no. 2 (1973): 167–85.
20 Izumi, Masumi, “Prohibiting ‘American Concentration Camps’: Repeal of theEmergency Detention Act and the Public Historical Memory of the Japanese American
Internment,” Pacific Historical Review 74, no. 2 (May 2005): 170.
21 Ibid., 173.
22 Seventeen Syllables, 131.
23 The comical atmosphere is apparent throughout the story: The protagonist, Shu
Shingu, assumes the role of a detective to solve this case; however, his amateur
investigation only stimulates his irresponsible curiosity about the murder and cannot
prevent the suicide of a pregnant woman who eventually turns out to be the murderer.
24 Seventeen Syllables, 96.
25 Ibid., 99.
26 Ibid., 98.
27 “Japanese Group to Alcatraz,” San Mateo Times. Saturday, March 7, 1970.
28 Hamano, Merilynne, “From Manzanar to Wounded Knee,” Gidra 5 (1973): 9.
29 This is Yamamoto’s minor poem, published in the journal Rafu Shimpo. “Exile
1942–45,” Rafu Shimpo, December 19, 1981, 20.
30 Crow, Charles L., and Hisaye Yamamoto, “A MELUS Interview: Hisaye Yamamoto,”
MELUS 14, no. 1 (Spring 1987): 75.
31 Approximately eight hundred Aleut citizens were relocated from their village tosoutheastern Alaska. Madden, Ryan, “The Forgotten People: The Relocation andInternment of Aleuts during World War II,” American Indian Culture and Research
Journal 16, no. 4 (1992): 55.
32 Ibid., 58.
33 Vizenor, Gerald Robert, Fugitive Poses: Native American Indian Scenes of Absence
and Presence (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998), 152–53.
34 Vizenor, Gerald, and Robert A. Lee, Postindian Conversations (Lincoln: Universityof Nebraska Press, 2003), 45.
35 Ibid., 183.
36 Vizenor, Fugitive Poses, 145.
37 Ibid., 15.
38 Seventeen Syllables, 96.
39 Ibid., 96.
40 All quotes, Ibid., 100.
17

Absent Presence as a Nonprotest Narrative

119

Taylor, Sandra C, “‘Fellow-Feelers with the Afflicted’: The Christian Churches andthe Relocation of the Japanese during World War II,” in Japanese Americans: From
Relocation to Redress, ed. Roger Daniels, Sandra C. Taylor, and Harry H. L. Kitano.
(Seattle: University of Washington, 1991), 125.
42 There is, for instance, an interesting contrast between the Protestant denominations
and Buddhism, the other major religious group in the internment camps coming fromoutside. The Protestants inside the camp “continue to be significantly more negative intheir recollection of the camp than Buddhists,” who did not consider their major concern
to be the assimilation of the Japanese American internees to the American Way. Fujita,
Stephen S., and Marilyn Fernandez, “Religion and Japanese American’s Views of their
World War II Incarceration,” Journal of Asian American Studies 5, no. 2 (2002): 130.
43 Yoo, David. Growing Up Nisei: Race, Generation, and Culture among JapaneseAmericans in California, 1924–49. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2000), 130.
44 Ibid., 131.
45 Ibid., 135.
46 Seventeen Syllables, 85. Yamamoto joined a Catholic lay community, the Catholic
Worker movement, soon after she was released from the camp, although she did notconvert to Catholicism. Rather, she seemed to use her interest in Catholicism to shelter
herself from Protestant Christianity, the dominant religious grouping in the UnitedStates. As for Yamamoto’s adoption of a Catholic motif in “The High-Heeled Shoes” and“Epithalamion,” see my article, “Hisaye Yamamoto no sakuhin ni okeru katorikku teki
furemu to torauma no jikkenn teki katari” [The Catholic frame and experimental narrativein Hisaye Yamamoto’s stories: The reconsideration of ‘High-Heeled Shoes’] in Hyoui
Suru Kako: Trauma, Memory and Regeneration in Asian American Literature [Thehaunting past: Trauma, memory, and regeneration in Asian American literature], ed.
Fukuko Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Ishihara, Taeko Inagi, Eriko Hara, Takashi Aso, Kotaro
Nakagaki(Tokyo: Kinsei-do, 2014), 232–48.
47 Seventeen Syllables, 103.
48 Ibid., 103.
49 Ibid., 102.
50 Ibid., 102–03.
51 Ibid., 103.
52 Ibid., 103.
53 Ibid., 98.
54 Crow and Yamamoto, “MELUS Interview: Hisaye Yamamoto,” 83.
41